1 Short title
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 May 1982 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act (No. 2) 1982
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 July 1989 (s 2(2) and
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
note: Australian Federal Police Amendment Act 147, 1989
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 Oct 2001
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
note: Legislation history note
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 July 2008
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
note: Legislation history for Australian Federal Police Act 1979
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-5
schema version: 2

1 July 2009 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
note: Conditional commencement of National Security Legislation Amendment Act 2010
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

1 July 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
note: July 2011 (s 2(1))
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-7
schema version: 2

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
note: Sch 2 (items 356–396) item 5
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-8
schema version: 2

1 July 2023 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
note: Conditional commencement of Criminal Code Amendment (State Sponsors of Terrorism) Act 2025
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-9-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-9-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-9
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified

10 Appointment of members to other Police Forces
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.35
note: Allowing members to be appointed in other police forces or agencies.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Apr
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-2
schema version: 2

10 Dec 2008 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
note: Item 5 of Schedule 2, item 10
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-3
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
note: Consequential Provisions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-4
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
note: Conditional commencement of legislation amendment act
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to members.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

11 State and Territory writs and warrants
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.35
note: Execution of Commonwealth or Territory writs and warrants by State or Territory members
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Sch 1: 8 Jan 1993 (s2(1))
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2
schema version: 2

11 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
note: Ends on 1 Feb 1998
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-3
schema version: 2

11 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1998
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-4
schema version: 2

11 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
note: Duty to amend legislation
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

11 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-6
schema version: 2

11 Feb
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
note: Legislation history note
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-7
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal overlap: State or Territory member and Commonwealth writ overlap
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap of execution authority
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: State or Territory member executes Commonwealth writ at some point in time

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CogAI recognition: State or Territory member recognized as authorized
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of execution authority by CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: CogAI recognizes State or Territory member as authorized to execute Commonwealth writs and warrants

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Writ may be executed by State or Territory member
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to execute Commonwealth writs and warrants
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: State or Territory member may execute Commonwealth writ

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authority diffusion: State or Territory member and Commonwealth writ diffuse authority
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of execution authority
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: State or Territory member diffuses execution authority to Commonwealth writ

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Execution authority conditional on certain conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditional execution authority
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: State or Territory member executes Commonwealth writ until certain conditions are met

12 Immunities from certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36
note: Exemptions from obtaining licenses or registering vehicles
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Apr
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
note: Legislation history note
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-2
schema version: 2

12 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-3
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from laws
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

12A Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12A(1) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
has part: 12A(2) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
has part: 12A(3) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
has part: 12A(4) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12a
schema version: 2

12A(1) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36
note: Definition of terms for immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12A Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12A(1) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry

12A(2) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36
note: Right to be accompanied by an AFP dog under the control of the AFP dog handler.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12A Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval of entering premises with an AFP dog overlaps with the temporal interval of the AFP dog handler's duties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with the temporal interval of entering premises with an AFP dog.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (2) Where an AFP dog handler is entitled to enter, or to be on or in, particular premises or a particular place in the performance of the AFP dog handler’s duties as a member or a protective service officer

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The AFP dog has the capability to be accompanied by an AFP dog under the control of the AFP dog handler.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Has the capability to be accompanied by an AFP dog under the control of the AFP dog handler.
modality: CogAI
operator: hasCapability
premise text: (2) Where an AFP dog handler is entitled to enter, or to be on or in, particular premises or a particular place in the performance of the AFP dog handler’s duties as a member or a protective service officer

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The AFP dog handler has a right to be accompanied by an AFP dog.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has a right to be accompanied by an AFP dog.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: (2) Where an AFP dog handler is entitled to enter, or to be on or in, particular premises or a particular place in the performance of the AFP dog handler’s duties as a member or a protective service officer

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information that the AFP dog handler has a right to be accompanied by an AFP dog is diffused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the information that the AFP dog handler has a right to be accompanied by an AFP dog.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) Where an AFP dog handler is entitled to enter, or to be on or in, particular premises or a particular place in the performance of the AFP dog handler’s duties as a member or a protective service officer

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The AFP dog handler holds for all temporal intervals of entering premises with an AFP dog.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Holds for all temporal intervals of entering premises with an AFP dog.
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
premise text: (2) Where an AFP dog handler is entitled to enter, or to be on or in, particular premises or a particular place in the performance of the AFP dog handler’s duties as a member or a protective service officer

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 12A(2) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry

12A(3) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36
note: The Commonwealth is not subject to penalty, liability or forfeiture for an AFP dog entering premises if under control of handler performing duties.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12A Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commonwealth is not subject to penalty, liability or forfeiture.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to not impose penalty, liability or forfeiture.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) The Commonwealth...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commonwealth is not subject to penalty, liability or forfeiture if under control of handler performing duties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission for Commonwealth to enter premises without penalty, liability or forfeiture.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (3) The Commonwealth...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The handler must perform duties as member or protective service officer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Handler's duty to perform duties as member or protective service officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) the AFP dog handler is performing the AFP dog handler’s duties...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The handler must enter premises without penalty, liability or forfeiture.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Handler's duty to enter premises without penalty, liability or forfeiture.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (c) the AFP dog handler is entitled to enter...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The handler must be on or in premises without penalty, liability or forfeiture.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Handler's duty to be on or in premises without penalty, liability or forfeiture.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (c) the AFP dog handler is entitled to be...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12A(3) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry

12A(4) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36
note: Certificate as prima facie evidence of AFP dog handler status
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12A Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the fact or facts certified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) In any proceeding, a certificate in writing signed by the Commissioner...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12A(4) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry

13 Apr
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
note: Amendment of Schedule 7 by Acts and Instruments (Framework Reform) Act 2015
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
note: Mandatory commencement of Australian Federal Police Legislation Amendment Act 1989
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

14 Feb
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as 1 July 2013 (s 2(1) item 2)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: No explicit duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ordered trace required
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as 1 July 2013 (s 2(1) item 2)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide commencement date
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

141 Section 141
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.23
note: Definition of terms related to AFP employees and their misconduct.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-141
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a framework for understanding AFP employee roles and misconduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines key terms for the Act.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 141 Section 141

14A Powers of arrest
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.38
note: Protective service officer may arrest without warrant under certain conditions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14a
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval of the arrest is within the commission of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of the arrest within the commission of the offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: the person has just committed, or is committing, the offence;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The use of artificial intelligence is with the arrest process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Use of artificial intelligence in the arrest process.
modality: CogAI
operator: With
premise text: the protective service officer may, without warrant, arrest a person...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to arrest under certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to arrest under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: The protective service officer may, without warrant, arrest a person...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of information about the arrest is through the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about the arrest through the person.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
premise text: the arrest of the person is necessary for the purpose of ensuring the appearance of the person before a court of competent jurisdiction for the offence;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval of the prevention of further offences is until the commission of the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval of the prevention of further offences.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: the arrest of the person is necessary for the purpose of preventing the continuation of, or a repetition of, the offence;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14A Powers of arrest

14B Use of force in making arrest etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14B(1) Use of force in making arrest etc.
has part: 14B(2) Use of force in making arrest etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14b
schema version: 2

14B(1) Use of force in making arrest etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.38
note: Use of force in making arrest etc.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14B Use of force in making arrest etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on excessive force
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14B(1) Use of force in making arrest etc.

14B(2) Use of force in making arrest etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.38
note: Protective service officers must not use force likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm unless necessary.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14B Use of force in making arrest etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 14B(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using force likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Subsection (1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14B(2) Use of force in making arrest etc.

14C Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14C(1) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
has part: 14C(2) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
has part: 14C(3) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
has part: 14C(4) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14c
schema version: 2

14C(1) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39
note: Arrested person must be informed of grounds of arrest.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14C Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform the person at the time of the arrest.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14C(1) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest

14C(2) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
description: Information about the substance of the offence
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39
note: Informing an arrested person of the substance of the offence is sufficient compliance.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14C Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Informing an arrested person is a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14C(2) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest

14C(3) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39
note: Exemption from informing of grounds of arrest for certain protective service officers
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14C Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exempt from duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not apply...

14C(4) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
description: Explanation of the substance of the offence that the person is able to understand
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39
note: Protective service officer must inform arrested person of grounds for arrest if they are unable to understand due to language or disability.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 14C Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justification for not providing explanation if person understands
modality: Argumentation
operator: JUSTIFICATION

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Reasonable grounds for believing the person is unable to understand
modality: Epistemic
operator: REASONABLE GROUNDS

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Continuous provision of explanation until the person understands
modality: LTL
operator: CONTINUOUSLY

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14C(4) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest

14D Search of arrested person
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39
note: Lawful arrest allows for search of person and property.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14d-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14d
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conduct ordinary or frisk search.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to conduct search upon lawful arrest.
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Lawful arrest

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14D Search of arrested person

14E How arrested person to be dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.41
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14E(1) How arrested person to be dealt with
has part: 14E(2) How arrested person to be dealt with
has part: 14E(3) How arrested person to be dealt with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14e
schema version: 2

14E(1) How arrested person to be dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.41
note: Arrested person must be delivered to a police officer for dealing with according to law.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14E How arrested person to be dealt with

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is delivered into the custody of a police officer as soon as practicable to be dealt with according to law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Delivery must occur before dealing with according to law
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (1) A protective service officer who arrests a person for an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is delivered into the custody of a police officer as soon as practicable to be dealt with according to law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Delivery must occur before dealing with according to law in all cases, and it must be done so in a way that is consistent with the law, using AI-powered tools if available
modality: CogAI
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (1) A protective service officer who arrests a person for an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must ensure that the person is delivered into the custody of a police officer as soon as practicable to be dealt with according to law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to deliver arrested person to police officer
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) A protective service officer who arrests a person for an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is delivered into the custody of a police officer as soon as practicable to be dealt with according to law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Delivery must occur before dealing with according to law in all cases, and it must be done so in a way that is consistent with the law
modality: Diffusion
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (1) A protective service officer who arrests a person for an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is delivered into the custody of a police officer as soon as practicable to be dealt with according to law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Delivery must occur before dealing with according to law in all cases
modality: LTL
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (1) A protective service officer who arrests a person for an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14E(1) How arrested person to be dealt with

14E(2) How arrested person to be dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.41
note: Deliver seized weapon to police officer
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14E How arrested person to be dealt with

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must deliver
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14E(2) How arrested person to be dealt with

14E(3) How arrested person to be dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.41
note: Definition of police officer
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14E How arrested person to be dealt with

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: police officer
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a class of entities (police officers)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (a) a member or special member; or (b) a member, however described, of a police force of a State or Territory; or (c) a member, however described, of a police force of a foreign country.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: member
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a subclass relationship between entities (police officers)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (a) a member or special member; or (b) a member, however described, of a police force of a State or Territory; or (c) a member, however described, of a police force of a foreign country.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: special member
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines another subclass relationship between entities (police officers)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (a) a member or special member; or (b) a member, however described, of a police force of a State or Territory; or (c) a member, however described, of a police force of a foreign country.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: foreign country
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines another subclass relationship between entities (police officers)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (a) a member or special member; or (b) a member, however described, of a police force of a State or Territory; or (c) a member, however described, of a police force of a foreign country.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14E(3) How arrested person to be dealt with

14F Release of arrested person
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.41
note: Conditions for release of arrested person
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14f
schema version: 2

14G Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14G(1) Relationship of Division to other laws
has part: 14G(2) Relationship of Division to other laws
has part: 14G(3) Relationship of Division to other laws
has part: 14G(4) Relationship of Division to other laws
has part: 14G(5) Relationship of Division to other laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14g
schema version: 2

14G(1) Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42
note: Power of arrest is in addition to other laws
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14G Relationship of Division to other laws

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds power of arrest
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14G(1) Relationship of Division to other laws

14G(2) Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42
note: Applicable laws supersede other laws in relation to arrests.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14G Relationship of Division to other laws

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicable law
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable laws supersede other laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: Supersedes
premise text: Other law

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14G(2) Relationship of Division to other laws

14G(3) Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42
note: Section 252 and 253 of the Migration Act 1958 apply to subsection (2)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14G Relationship of Division to other laws

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sections 252 and 253
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Subsection (2)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14G(3) Relationship of Division to other laws

14G(4) Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42
note: Powers and duties of protective service officers are not exclusive to this Division.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14g-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 14G Relationship of Division to other laws

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Division does not exclude these powers or duties.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of powers and duties from other laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
premise text: Other laws confer powers or duties on protective service officers.

14G(5) Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42
note: This Division is in addition to and not in derogation of any rights and freedoms of the individual.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14g-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 14G Relationship of Division to other laws

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is in addition to, and not in derogation of, any rights and freedoms of the individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Allows concurrent operation within temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: concurrent
premise text: This Division, in so far as it protects the individual...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and not in derogation of any rights and freedoms of the individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Adds to existing CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: addition
premise text: This Division is in addition to...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and not in derogation of any rights and freedoms of the individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds to existing rights and freedoms
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
premise text: This Division is in addition to...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is in addition to, and not in derogation of, any rights and freedoms of the individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Adds to existing diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: addition
premise text: This Division, in so far as it protects the individual...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and not in derogation of any rights and freedoms of the individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Allows concurrent operation within temporal intervals
modality: LTL
operator: concurrent
premise text: This Division is in addition to...

14H Definitions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.44
note: Definitions for designated person, police officer, and vehicle.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14h-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14h
schema version: 2

14I Requirement to provide name etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14I(1) Requirement to provide name etc.
has part: 14I(2) Requirement to provide name etc.
has part: 14I(3) Requirement to provide name etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14i
schema version: 2

14I(1) Requirement to provide name etc.
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.44
note: Request to provide name, address and reason for presence
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14i-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14I Requirement to provide name etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14I(1) Requirement to provide name etc.

14I(2) Requirement to provide name etc.
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.44
note: Suspect must comply with request from designated person.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14i-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14I Requirement to provide name etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The suspect must not fail to comply with the request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide name and address
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If a designated person...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14I(2) Requirement to provide name etc.

14I(3) Requirement to provide name etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.44
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14i-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14I Requirement to provide name etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Reasonable excuse is a belief.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14I(3) Requirement to provide name etc.

14J Stopping and searching
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.45
note: Designated person has obligation to suspect reasonable grounds for stopping and searching.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14j-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14j-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14j
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Designated person has obligation to suspect reasonable grounds for stopping and searching.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14J Stopping and searching

14K Seizure of things found
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14K(1) Seizure of things found
has part: 14K(2) Seizure of things found
has part: 14K(3) Seizure of things found
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14k
schema version: 2

14K(1) Seizure of things found
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.48
note: Seizure of things found
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14K Seizure of things found

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14K(1) Seizure of things found

14K(2) Seizure of things found
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.48
note: Seizure of weapons or things suspected to be used for harm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14K Seizure of things found

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the designated person may seize the weapon or thing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for seizure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) If, as a result of conducting a search...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the designated person may seize the weapon or thing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Provides justification for seizure
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (2) If, as a result of conducting a search...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the designated person may seize the weapon or thing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits seizure of certain items
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If, as a result of conducting a search...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the designated person may seize the weapon or thing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about seizure
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) If, as a result of conducting a search...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the designated person may seize the weapon or thing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for seizure
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) If, as a result of conducting a search...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14K(2) Seizure of things found

14K(3) Seizure of things found
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.48
note: Ensure delivery of thing into police custody as soon as practicable.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14K Seizure of things found

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure delivery of thing into police custody.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14K(3) Seizure of things found

14L How seized things must be dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.49
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14L(1) How seized things must be dealt with
has part: 14L(2) How seized things must be dealt with
has part: 14L(3) How seized things must be dealt with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14l
schema version: 2

14L(1) How seized things must be dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.49
note: Police officer must serve seizure notice within 7 days after seizure day.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14L How seized things must be dealt with

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to serve notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14L(1) How seized things must be dealt with

14L(2) How seized things must be dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.49
note: Exemptions from seizure
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14L How seized things must be dealt with

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14L(2) How seized things must be dealt with

14L(3) How seized things must be dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.49
note: Seizure notice must identify thing, state date seized, and ground for seizure.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14L How seized things must be dealt with

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide required information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14L(3) How seized things must be dealt with

14M Application to magistrate
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.52
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14M(1) Application to magistrate
has part: 14M(2) Application to magistrate
has part: 14M(3) Application to magistrate
has part: 14M(4) Application to magistrate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14m
schema version: 2

14M(1) Application to magistrate
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.52
note: Police officer may apply to a magistrate for an order.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14M Application to magistrate

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the police officer may apply to a magistrate for an order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: (1) If subsection 14L(7) applies...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14M(1) Application to magistrate

14M(2) Application to magistrate
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.52
note: Magistrate must allow owner to appear and be heard in application determination.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14M Application to magistrate

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must allow owner to appear and be heard.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14M(2) Application to magistrate

14M(3) Application to magistrate
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.52
note: Magistrate may make orders regarding seized items under certain conditions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14M Application to magistrate

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the magistrate may make any of the following orders:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Magistrate specifies a period for retaining seized items.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (c) that the thing be retained by the police officer for the period specified in the order,

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the magistrate may make any of the following orders:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Magistrate justifies orders regarding seized items.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (3) If the magistrate is satisfied that...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the magistrate may make any of the following orders:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Magistrate represents knowledge about seized items.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (3) If the magistrate is satisfied that...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the magistrate may make any of the following orders:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may prohibit the return of seized items.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) If the magistrate is satisfied that...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the magistrate may make any of the following orders:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Magistrate propagates conditions for seizing items.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (a) in the case of a thing seized under subsection 14K(1)—there are reasonable grounds to suspect...

14M(4) Application to magistrate
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.52
note: Magistrate must order return of thing to owner if not satisfied.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14m-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 14M Application to magistrate

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must order return.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14M(4) Application to magistrate

14N Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.53
note: No other laws can limit or exclude this Division's powers and duties.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14n-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14n-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14n
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No other laws can limit or exclude this Division's powers and duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14n-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14N Relationship of Division to other laws

15 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police (Consequential Amendments) Act 1979
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-logic-ltl-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

15 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
note: Sch 1 (items 1–3): 15 Dec 2004 (s 2)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: June 15, 1979
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditionally commenced on June 15, 1979

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: June 15, 1979
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditionally commenced on June 15, 1979

16 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
note: Witness Protection Act 1994
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 17(1) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
has part: 17(2) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
has part: 17(3) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
has part: 17(3A) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
has part: 17(4) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
has part: 17(4A) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17
schema version: 2

17 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Commencement of amendments
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-2
schema version: 2

17 Jan 1990
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Conditional commencement of section 4 and 5
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-3
schema version: 2

17 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
note: Sch 6 (items 15, 16)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-4
schema version: 2

17 June 1999 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
note: Amendment Act 1999
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-5
schema version: 2

17 Aug
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-6
schema version: 2

17 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
note: Conditional commencement of the Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act 2021
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-7
schema version: 2

17 Mar 2006
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
note: Amendment of section
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-8
schema version: 2

17(1) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
note: Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners must be appointed by the Governor-General.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide appointment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(1) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners

17(2) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
note: Term of office for Commissioner
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Term of office is limited to 7 years for Commissioner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Commissioner's term of office is limited to 7 years
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Term of office not exceeding 7 years

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Excerpt is relevant to Commissioner's duties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Excerpt may be cited as authority
modality: Argumentation
operator: may be cited
premise text: (2) Subject to this Part, the Commissioner holds office

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Excerpt is relevant to Commissioner's duties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excerpt may be used in AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: may be cited
premise text: (2) Subject to this Part, the Commissioner holds office

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner has a duty to hold office
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner holds office
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (2) Commissioner holds office

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Excerpt is relevant to Commissioner's duties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excerpt may be used as evidence
modality: Diffusion
operator: may be cited
premise text: (2) Subject to this Part, the Commissioner holds office

17(3) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
note: Deputy Commissioner's term of office and eligibility for re-appointment
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners

17(3A) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
note: Service continuity for re-appointed persons
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person’s service is to be taken to be continuous.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Service continuity implies overlap with previous term
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3A) Where a person is re-appointed...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person’s service is to be taken to be continuous.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Service continuity implies knowledge representation of previous term
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (3A) Where a person is re-appointed...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person’s service is to be taken to be continuous.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to treat service as continuous
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity Obligation
premise text: (3A) Where a person is re-appointed...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person’s service is to be taken to be continuous.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Service continuity implies diffusion of previous term
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (3A) Where a person is re-appointed...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person’s service is to be taken to be continuous.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Service continuity implies recurrent trace of previous term
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent Trace
premise text: (3A) Where a person is re-appointed...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(3A) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners

17(4) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
note: Commissioner's terms and conditions determined by Governor-General.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner holds office
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(4) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners

17(4A) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
note: Terms and conditions for Deputy Commissioner's office
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-4a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners

18 Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(1) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
has part: 18(2) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-2
schema version: 2

18 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
note: Duty to report certain information
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-3
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

18 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police Amendment Act 121, 1985
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-4
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal intervals required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

18 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
note: Conditional commencement of section 29
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-5-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Classification
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval required

18 Aug 2007 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
note: Conditional commencement of Amendment (Transition to Forward with Fairness) Act 2008
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-6
schema version: 2

18 June 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
note: Amendment of Schedule 2 by Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-7
schema version: 2

18(1) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
note: Minister may appoint person to act as Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner during vacancy.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appoint person
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(1) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy

18(2) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
note: Duties of Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exercise powers as Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: has power

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(2) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy

19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19(1) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
has part: 19(1A) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
has part: 19(1B) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
has part: 19(1C) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
has part: 19(2) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19
schema version: 2

19 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
note: Sch: 16 Jan 1995 (s 2(4))
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-2
schema version: 2

19 Feb
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
note: Conditional commencement of Non-Proliferation Legislation Amendment Act 2007
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-3
schema version: 2

19(1) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55
note: Delegate powers in case of absence or unavailability
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Delegate power to next senior member
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(1) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner

19(1A) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55
note: Minister may determine remuneration and allowances of a person exercising Commissioner's powers and functions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

19(1B) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55
note: Commissioner may determine remuneration and allowances of a Deputy Commissioner
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has the power to determine remuneration and allowances
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(1B) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner

19(1C) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55
note: No remuneration or allowances for less than one week
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1c-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits payment for less than one week
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1c-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(1C) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner

19(2) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 July 2000 (s 2(1) and
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
note: Amendment machinery for Criminal Code
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 2011
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-3
schema version: 2

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
note: Conditional commencement of the Legislation Amendment (Identity Crimes and Other Measures) Act 2011.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-4
schema version: 2

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-5
schema version: 2

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
note: Commencement of certain sections and divisions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
note: Conditional commencement of remaining provisions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

20 Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(1) Remuneration and allowances
has part: 20(2) Remuneration and allowances
has part: 20(2A) Remuneration and allowances
has part: 20(3) Remuneration and allowances
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20
schema version: 2

20 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
note: Repeal of Australian Federal Police Act 1979 amendment
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-2
schema version: 2

20 Mar
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
note: Conditional commencement of Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Board and Other Measures) Act 2008
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-3
schema version: 2

20(1) Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
note: Commissioner's remuneration
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Remuneration and allowances

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has obligation to receive remuneration
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(1) Remuneration and allowances

20(2) Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
note: The Commissioner must be paid allowances as prescribed.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Remuneration and allowances

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(2) Remuneration and allowances

20(2A) Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
description: remuneration and allowances
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
note: Deputy Commissioner must be paid remuneration and allowances determined by the Commissioner.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Remuneration and allowances

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to pay remuneration and allowances
modality: Deontic
operator: >

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(2A) Remuneration and allowances

20(3) Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
note: Remuneration and allowances subject to the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Remuneration and allowances

21 Leave of absence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(1) Leave of absence
has part: 21(1A) Leave of absence
has part: 21(2) Leave of absence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

21 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
note: References sections 4–6, 8–14 and 16–18.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-2
schema version: 2

21 Dec
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
note: Amendment of schedule
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-3
schema version: 2

21(1) Leave of absence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
note: Recreation leave entitlements determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Leave of absence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements exist.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(1) Leave of absence

21(1A) Leave of absence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
note: Grant leave of absence on terms and conditions determined by the Minister.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Leave of absence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: grant

21(2) Leave of absence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
note: Grant of leave of absence on terms and conditions determined by the Commissioner.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Leave of absence

22 Termination of appointment
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.57
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(1) Termination of appointment
has part: 22(2) Termination of appointment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Sept
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 1)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-2
schema version: 2

22 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
note: Repeal of Australian Federal Police Act 1979
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-3
schema version: 2

22 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
note: Commencement of Act 2004
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-4
schema version: 2

22 Feb
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
note: Requires s. 4 and Sch 1 (items 89,90,496) to be in force on 22 Feb 2005
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires

22 Mar
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
note: Conditional commencement of amendments to Defence Legislation
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-6
schema version: 2

22 May
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-7
schema version: 2

22(1) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.57
note: Governor-General may terminate appointment of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Termination of appointment

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to terminate appointment
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(1) Termination of appointment

22(2) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.57
note: Termination of appointment for certain reasons
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Termination of appointment

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (c) becomes bankrupt or applies to take the benefit of any law for the relief of bankrupt or insolvent debtors;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for absence from duty
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (b) is absent from duty, except on leave of absence under section 21, for 14 consecutive days, or for 28 days in any 12 months;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Governor-General shall terminate his or her appointment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on certain actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If the Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner engages in paid employment outside the duties of his or her office without the approval of the Minister;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (b) is absent from duty, except on leave of absence under section 21, for 14 consecutive days, or for 28 days in any 12 months;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on certain actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) engages in paid employment outside the duties of his or her office without the approval of the Minister;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Governor-General shall terminate his or her appointment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on certain actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) becomes bankrupt or applies to take the benefit of any law for the relief of bankrupt or insolvent debtors, compounds with his or her creditors or makes an assignment of his or her remuneration for their benefit;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (d) compounds with his or her creditors or makes an assignment of his or her remuneration for their benefit;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for bankruptcy
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (c) becomes bankrupt or applies to take the benefit of any law for the relief of bankrupt or insolvent debtors;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(2) Termination of appointment

23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
has part: 23(2) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

23 Aug
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Scope
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: s 4: 23 Aug 1991 (s 2(1))

23 Mar
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
note: Law Enforcement (AFP Professional Standards and Related Measures) Act 2006
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-3
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23 Mar

23 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
note: Schedule 1 (items 23–28)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-4
schema version: 2

23 June 2008 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
note: Prohibition on certain conduct
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

23 Mar
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers, Offences and Other Measures) Act 2015
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-6
schema version: 2

23 July 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
note: Sch 8 (items 20, 21)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-7
schema version: 2

23 May 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
note: Prohibition on espionage and foreign interference
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-8-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-8
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits espionage and foreign interference
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
note: The Commissioner has all the rights, duties and powers of an employer in respect of AFP employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner has the right to exercise powers as an employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner

23(2) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
note: Rights and duties of Commissioner in respect of AFP employees
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rights and duties apply during employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Rights and duties apply during employment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rights and duties are recognized by AI systems.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Rights and duties are recognized by AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: in
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner has rights and duties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has rights and duties
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rights and duties diffuse to employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Rights and duties diffuse to employees
modality: Diffusion
operator: in
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rights and duties are traceable during employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Rights and duties are traceable during employment
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...

24 Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24(1) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(2) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(3) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(4) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(5) Engagement of AFP employees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24
schema version: 2

24 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-2
schema version: 2

24 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Act 2001
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-3
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and Act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement on May 24, 2001

24 May 2001 (s 2(1(a))
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
note: Measures to Combat Serious and Organised Crime Act 2001
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-4
schema version: 2

24 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-5
schema version: 2

24 Aug
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
note: Amendment machinery for Crimes Legislation Amendment (Police Powers at Airports) Act 2019
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-6
schema version: 2

24(1) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
note: The Commissioner may engage persons as employees subject to conditions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage persons
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(1) Engagement of AFP employees

24(2) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
note: Conditions for engaging AFP employees
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(2) Engagement of AFP employees

24(3) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
note: Conditions for engagement of AFP employees may be applied
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(3) Engagement of AFP employees

24(4) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
note: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens as AFP employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must not engage...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(4) Engagement of AFP employees

24(5) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
references: sec-69A
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
note: Exemption from engagement under section 24(5)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No obligation to engage persons overseas during certain periods
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section 24(5) does not apply to overseas engagement during certain periods
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: Section 69A deals with the engagement of such persons

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No obligation to engage persons overseas during certain periods
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Section 24(5) does not apply to overseas engagement during certain periods
modality: CogAI
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: Section 69A deals with the engagement of such persons

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No obligation to engage persons overseas
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section does not apply to overseas engagement
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: Section 24(5)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No obligation to engage persons overseas during certain periods
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section 24(5) does not apply to overseas engagement during certain periods
modality: Diffusion
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: Section 69A deals with the engagement of such persons

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No obligation to engage persons overseas during certain periods
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Section 24(5) does not apply to overseas engagement during certain periods
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalExclusion
premise text: Section 69A deals with the engagement of such persons

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(5) Engagement of AFP employees

25 Senior executive AFP employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.59
note: The Commissioner may declare an AFP employee a senior executive AFP employee.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

25 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-2
schema version: 2

25 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
note: Conditional commencement of Workplace Relations and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1996
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-3
schema version: 2

25 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
note: Obligation to comply with certain legislation
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-4
schema version: 2

25 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-5
schema version: 2

25 Nov 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
note: Duty to report aviation crimes
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-6
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to report
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The person must report the aviation crime

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of senior executive status is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

26 Continuous employment
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.59
note: Employment is taken to be continuous if engaged under section 24 for a period and re-engaged immediately after the end of that period.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26
schema version: 2

26 May
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
note: May
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-2
schema version: 2

26 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2016
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-3
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employment continuity is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26 Continuous employment

27 Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.59
note: Commissioner may determine remuneration and terms of employment
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27
schema version: 2

27 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
note: Remainder of section 21
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 21 holds
modality: Deontic
operator: holds

27 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Amendment of s 31(2) and Sch: 10 Dec 1991
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-3
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amends s 31(2)
modality: Deontic
operator: amendment

27 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-4
schema version: 2

27 Dec 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27 Dec 2011 (s 2(1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27 Remuneration and other conditions

28 Termination of employment by Commissioner
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61
note: The Commissioner may terminate employment by notice in writing.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
note: Legislation history for Australian Federal Police Act 1979
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-10
schema version: 2

28 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
note: Sch: 19 Oct 1979 (s2(1))
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-2
schema version: 2

28 May
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-3
schema version: 2

28 May 1980 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
note: Australian Federal Police Amendment Act 22, 1981
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-4
schema version: 2

28 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police Amendment Act 117, 1984
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-5-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: 28 Oct 1985 is a specific date

28 Oct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
note: Conditional commencement of s 4–20 on 28 Oct 1985 (s 2)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-6
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: 28 Oct 1985 (s 2)

28 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-7
schema version: 2

28 Nov
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-8
schema version: 2

28 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-9
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

29 May 1988 (s 2(3) and
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
note: May 1988 (s 2(3) and gaz 1988, No S149)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29
schema version: 2

29 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
note: Repealed before commencing
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-2
schema version: 2

29 Nov 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
note: Public Service Amendment Act 2013, item 14
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-3
schema version: 2

29 June 2013 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
note: Consequential and transitional provisions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-4
schema version: 2

29 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-5
schema version: 2

29 Dec 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-6
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

3 Repeal
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
note: Repeal of Commonwealth Police Act 1957
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 June 1988
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
note: Prohibition on certain conduct
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids the specified conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

3 Nov 1993
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
note: Qantas Sale Amendment Act 1994
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-3
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2004
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-4
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditionally commenced on 18 Apr 1995 (s 2(1) item 5)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: No explicit duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditionally commenced on 18 Apr 1995 (s 2(1) item 5)

3 Mar 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act 2011
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-5-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

3 Sept
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-6
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on the Commonwealth Police Act 1957
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

30 Resignation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30(1) Resignation
has part: 30(2) Resignation
has part: 30(3) Resignation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

30 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Conditional commencement of Sch: 1 July 1990 (s 2(2))
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-2
schema version: 2

30 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
note: Sch 1, Sch 3 (items 3, 6–24), Sch 4 and Sch 5: 30 Dec 2006 (s 2(1) items 2, 5)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-3
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

30 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
note: Marking of Plastic Explosives Act 2007
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-4
schema version: 2

30 June
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
note: Sch 6 (items 16, 17), Sch 7 (items 232–234) and Sch 14: 1 July 2014 (s 2(1) items 6, 14)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

30 June 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
note: Sch 2 (items 13, 14)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-6
schema version: 2

30(1) Resignation
type: Concept
description: Written notice of resignation and effective date
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61
note: Employee must give written notice of resignation and specify the effective date.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Resignation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must give written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(1) Resignation

30(2) Resignation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61
note: Notice period for resignation must be within a certain range.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Resignation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(2) Resignation

30(3) Resignation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61
note: Section 30A obligation
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Resignation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(3) Resignation

30A Resignation in anticipation of termination of employment
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61
note: Employee must provide written notice of resignation before termination.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30a
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30A Resignation in anticipation of termination of employment

31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
has part: 31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31
schema version: 2

31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
note: Employee entitled to retire upon reaching minimum age
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has right to retire
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age

31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
note: Minimum retiring age is 55 years, or as prescribed by regulations.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the obligation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the minimum retiring age is 55 years, or such higher or lower age as is prescribed by the regulations.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between the obligation and its fulfillment.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the minimum retiring age is 55 years, or such higher or lower age as is prescribed by the regulations.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Provides a basis for AI-driven analysis.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the minimum retiring age is 55 years, or such higher or lower age as is prescribed by the regulations.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to a broader context.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the minimum retiring age is 55 years, or such higher or lower age as is prescribed by the regulations.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age

32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(2) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(4) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32
schema version: 2

32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
note: Commissioner may retire employee by notice if employee consents.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to retire
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds

32(2) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
note: Employee may consent to retirement under subsection (1)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds

32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
description: Commissioner's certification
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
note: Certification of incapacity is required for retirement on invalidity grounds.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Certification must be made during the initial period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) If: a person is engaged as an AFP employee under section 24 for a period; and the person completes that period of engagement (the initial period);

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certification is required for retirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Commissioner certifies in writing that the person's physical or mental incapacity was the only reason why the person was not re-engaged.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Re-engagement is required after the end of the initial period.
modality: Deontic
operator: must be re-engaged
premise text: (c) the person is not re-engaged under that section for a further period starting immediately after the end of the initial period;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Failure to certify incapacity results in non-retirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: is not certified
premise text: (d) the Commissioner certifies in writing that the person’s physical or mental incapacity was the only reason why the person was not so re-engaged;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Certification must be made until the end of the initial period.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (3) If: a person is engaged as an AFP employee under section 24 for a period; and the person completes that period of engagement (the initial period);

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds

32(4) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
note: AFP employee must provide CSC certificate for retirement on invalidity grounds
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: CSC's discretion to deny retirement on invalidity grounds
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
note: AFP employee must be a member of the superannuation scheme established by the Superannuation Act 1990.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Between the time of employment and retirement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (5) In spite of this section, an AFP employee who:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be a member of the superannuation scheme established by the Superannuation Act 1990.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST BE
premise text: (5) In spite of this section, an AFP employee who:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds

33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(3) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(4) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(5) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33
schema version: 2

33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66
note: Retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect on the specified day after notice is given to the employee.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice must be given between the day of retirement and the specified day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notice must be given before the specified day
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (1) If an AFP employee has consented to being retired under subsection 32(1), the employee’s retirement takes effect on the day specified in the notice under that subsection.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee's retirement takes effect on the specified day after notice is given to the employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation takes effect
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
premise text: (1) If an AFP employee has consented to being retired under subsection 32(1), the employee’s retirement takes effect on the day specified in the notice under that subsection.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice must not be given before the specified day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notice must not be given before the specified day
modality: Deontic
operator: must not
premise text: (1) If an AFP employee has consented to being retired under subsection 32(1), the employee’s retirement takes effect on the day specified in the notice under that subsection.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice must be given to the employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notice must be given to the employee
modality: Deontic
operator: must be
premise text: (1) If an AFP employee has consented to being retired under subsection 32(1), the employee’s retirement takes effect on the day specified in the notice under that subsection.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice must be given until the specified day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Notice must be given until the specified day
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (1) If an AFP employee has consented to being retired under subsection 32(1), the employee’s retirement takes effect on the day specified in the notice under that subsection.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66
note: Employee must be informed of right to review retirement decision.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the notice given to the employee under that subsection must inform the employee that the employee is entitled to apply, within the period, and in the manner, prescribed by the regulations
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Retirement takes effect after review period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) If an AFP employee who is retired under subsection 32(1) has not consented to being retired under that subsection:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the notice given to the employee under that subsection must inform the employee that the employee is entitled to apply, within the period, and in the manner, prescribed by the regulations
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform employee of right to review retirement decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If an AFP employee who is retired under subsection 32(1) has not consented to being retired under that subsection:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subject to the outcome of any such review, the employee’s retirement takes effect on a day specified in the notice
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee's retirement takes effect on a day specified in the notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If an AFP employee who is retired under subsection 32(1) has not consented to being retired under that subsection:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subject to the outcome of any such review, the employee’s retirement takes effect on a day specified in the notice
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employee's retirement may take effect on a specified day.
modality: LTL
operator: OR
premise text: (2) If an AFP employee who is retired under subsection 32(1) has not consented to being retired under that subsection:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

33(3) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66
note: Must not be before end of period mentioned in paragraph (2)(a).
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (3) The day specified in the notice must not be before the end of the period mentioned in paragraph (2)(a).

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (3) The day specified in the notice must not be before the end of the period mentioned in paragraph (2)(a).

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (3) The day specified in the notice must not be before the end of the period mentioned in paragraph (2)(a).

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (3) The day specified in the notice must not be before the end of the period mentioned in paragraph (2)(a).

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(3) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

33(4) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66
note: Regulations must provide for review of decisions to retire AFP employees under subsection 32(1) without consent.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations must provide for review of decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(4) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

33(5) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
description: yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66
note: Regulations must provide written reasons for decisions and a copy of those reasons to the AFP employee concerned.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations must provide written reasons for decisions and a copy of those reasons to the AFP employee concerned.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(5) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect

34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.67
note: Resignation under certain conditions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act

35 Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.69
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35(1) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
has part: 35(2) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
has part: 35(3) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35
schema version: 2

35(1) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.69
note: Commissioner may engage consultants or independent contractors.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Commissioner may engage consultants or independent

35(2) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.69
note: Commissioner may determine a consultant or independent contractor to be an AFP appointee.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Commissioner may engage consultants or independent

35(3) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.69
note: Determination under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Commissioner may engage consultants or independent

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(3) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent

35A Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35A(1) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(2) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(3) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(4) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(5) Payments in special circumstances
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a
schema version: 2

35A(1) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70
note: Commissioner may authorise payments to a person under special circumstances.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner may authorise payments.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35A(1) Payments in special circumstances

35A(2) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70
note: Authorization for payments in special circumstances
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has the authority to make payments
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize

35A(3) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70
note: Payments may be authorised under this section even though the payments would not otherwise be authorised by law or required to meet a legal liability.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

35A(4) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70
note: No authorisation can be made under this section if it would involve a total amount of more than $100,000.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No authorisation can be made under this section if it would involve a total amount of more than $100,000.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

35A(5) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70
note: Payment recovery upon breach of conditions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment may be recovered
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Payment recovery upon breach of conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Condition is breached

36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.71
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(1) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36
schema version: 2

36(1) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.71
note: Oath or affirmation required for appointment as Commissioner
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to take oath or affirmation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.71
note: Deputy Commissioner must enter into an undertaking and take oath or affirmation upon appointment.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.71
note: Enter into an undertaking and make oath or affirmation after declaration as a member.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to enter into undertaking and make oath or affirmation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.71
note: Must provide information immediately after appointment.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Information provided during appointment period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) A person appointed under section 40E to assist in the performance of the functions of the Australian Federal Police must, immediately after his or her appointment:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Must provide information as a condition of appointment
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
premise text: (4) A person appointed under section 40E to assist in the performance of the functions of the Australian Federal Police must, immediately after his or her appointment:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence system must process information
modality: CogAI
operator: must
premise text: (4) A person appointed under section 40E to assist in the performance of the functions of the Australian Federal Police must, immediately after his or her appointment:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information diffusion as a result of obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
premise text: (4) A person appointed under section 40E to assist in the performance of the functions of the Australian Federal Police must, immediately after his or her appointment:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations

37 General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37(1) General administration and control
has part: 37(2) General administration and control
has part: 37(3) General administration and control
has part: 37(4) General administration and control
has part: 37(5) General administration and control
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37
schema version: 2

37(1) General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73
note: Commissioner has general administration and control of Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has authority
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(1) General administration and control

37(2) General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73
note: The Minister has an obligation to give written directions to the Commissioner regarding general policy.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister has an obligation to give written directions.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(2) General administration and control

37(3) General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73
note: Commissioner must comply with written directions from Minister.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner must comply with direction
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Direction from Minister is within the Commissioner's power to give directions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Minister has power to give directions under subsection (2)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner must comply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Minister's direction implies a requirement for Commissioner
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Minister gives written directions

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner must comply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Minister gives written directions

37(4) General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73
note: The Commissioner must comply with all directions given under this section.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner must comply with all directions given under this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(4) General administration and control

37(5) General administration and control
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73
note: The Minister may make an arrangement with a State for the provision or development of common services.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 37 General administration and control

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make an arrangement
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(5) General administration and control

38 Commissioner’s Orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.74
note: The Commissioner may issue orders with respect to the general administration and control of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-38-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

39 Compliance with Commissioner’s Orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.74
note: Must comply with Commissioner’s Orders
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-39-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39 Compliance with Commissioner’s Orders

3A Overview of Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3A(1) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(2) Overview of Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3a
schema version: 2

3A(1) Overview of Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
note: Defines the composition of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Overview of Act

3A(2) Overview of Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
note: Commissioners appointed by Governor-General
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Overview of Act

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Governor-General appoints Commissioners
modality: Deontic
operator: Appoints
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners are appointed by the Governor-General.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(2) Overview of Act

4 Interpretation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.15
note: Definition of adjustment payment and AFP appointee.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Mar 1991
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1989
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2
schema version: 2

4 Mar 1991
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
note: Conditional commencement of Industrial Relations Legislation Amendment Act 1991
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-3
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

4 June 2006
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
note: Conditional commencement of Sch1 (item 3)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-4
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of terms
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Interpretation

40 Compliance with specific directions, instructions or orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.74
note: Disobeying or failing to carry out lawful directions is prohibited.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disobeying is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disobedience
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Lawful direction given by the Commissioner or AFP appointee

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Compliance with specific directions, instructions or orders

40A Self-incrimination
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.75
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40A(1) Self-incrimination
has part: 40A(2) Self-incrimination
has part: 40A(3) Self-incrimination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40a
schema version: 2

40A(1) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.75
note: AFP appointee must provide information despite potential self-incrimination
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40A Self-incrimination

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40A(1) Self-incrimination

40A(2) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.75
note: No admissible evidence against AFP appointee in proceedings.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40A Self-incrimination

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits admissible evidence against AFP appointee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) However, any information or answer so given or any document so produced is not admissible in evidence against the AFP appointee in any proceedings.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40A(2) Self-incrimination

40A(3) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.75
note: No self-incrimination for testing purposes
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40A Self-incrimination

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits self-incrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40A(3) Self-incrimination

40B AFP employees who are members of the Australian Federal
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
note: Declare AFP employee a member of Australian Federal Police
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40b
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declare an individual as a member
modality: Deontic
operator: declare

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorize an individual as a member of Australian Federal Police
modality: Deontic
operator: authorize

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40B AFP employees who are members of the Australian Federal

40C Determination of competency or qualification requirements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
note: Commissioner may specify competency and qualification requirements by written determination.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40c
schema version: 2

40D Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40D(1) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(2) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(3) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(4) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(5) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(6) Commissioned police officers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40d
schema version: 2

40D(1) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
note: The Governor-General may declare a member to be a commissioned police officer.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of commission is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40D(1) Commissioned police officers

40D(2) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
note: The Minister must receive a recommendation from the Commissioner before declaring a member a commissioned police officer.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recommendation precedes the declaration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The recommendation must be received before declaration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The Governor-General makes a declaration under subsection (1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister has received a recommendation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must receive a recommendation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Governor-General makes a declaration under subsection (1)

40D(3) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
note: The Commissioner must recommend a member for commission only if satisfied they are qualified.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Member is qualified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner must make a recommendation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Commissioner has command powers.

40D(4) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
note: Commissioner may declare a member commissioned police officer upon authorization.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner may declare.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Governor-General authorizes the Commissioner.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40D(4) Commissioned police officers

40D(5) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
note: Declaration required for competent police officer
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration is required
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

40D(6) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
note: The Governor-General's power is not limited by the giving of an authorisation.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40d-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits the Governor-General's power
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
premise text: (4)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40D(6) Commissioned police officers

40E Special members
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40E(1) Special members
has part: 40E(2) Special members
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40e
schema version: 2

40E(1) Special members
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.78
note: The Commissioner may appoint a special member of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40E Special members

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner may appoint a special member.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

40E(2) Special members
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.78
note: Special members have powers and duties during appointment
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40E Special members

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has any powers and duties that are expressly conferred or imposed on special members
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Possession of powers and duties
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (2) A person appointed under subsection (1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40E(2) Special members

40EA AFP employees who are protective service officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.79
note: Commissioner may declare AFP employee a protective service officer if they meet requirements.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ea-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ea-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ea
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ea-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ea-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40EA AFP employees who are protective service officers

40EB Determination of competency or qualification requirements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.79
note: Commissioner may specify competency and qualification requirements by written determination.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40eb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40eb
schema version: 2

40EC Special protective service officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.80
note: Commissioner may appoint special protective service officers.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ec
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: appoint a person as a special protective service officer of the Australian Federal Police.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has permission to appoint special protective service officers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The Commissioner may, on such terms and conditions...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: authorise special payments to special protective service officers.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has authority to authorise special payments.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Note: The Commissioner may, under section 35A...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: appoint a person as a special protective service officer of the Australian Federal Police.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has authority to appoint special protective service officers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Commissioner may, on such terms and conditions...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: determines in writing the terms and conditions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has authority to determine terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The Commissioner may, on such terms and conditions...

40ED Powers and duties of special protective service officers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.80
note: Special protective service officers have powers and duties expressly conferred or imposed under this Act.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ed-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ed-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ed
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ed-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressly conferred powers and duties
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ed-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40ED Powers and duties of special protective service officers

40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40F(1) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(2) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(3) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(5) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40f
schema version: 2

40F(1) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81
note: The Commissioner may arrange for an AFP employee to be seconded.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The duration of the secondment is not specified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Secondment duration is not specified.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: A secondment has a start and end date.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An AFP employee may be seconded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: The Commissioner has the power to arrange secondments.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40F(1) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

40F(2) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81
note: Commissioner must consult with authorities before terminating a secondment.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Commissioner must consult with authorities before terminating a secondment.

40F(3) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81
note: Guidelines for secondment of AFP employees to foreign countries or other bodies/organisations.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81
note: Minister must consult Commissioner about guidelines before giving them.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation about guidelines happens before the guidelines are given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consultation before giving guidelines
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: The Minister gives guidelines to the Commissioner

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must consult Commissioner about guidelines before giving them.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Minister must give guidelines to Commissioner

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

40F(5) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81
note: Cannot arrange for AFP employee to be seconded outside Australia without guidelines.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40f-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Secondment timing
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (5) If the Minister gives guidelines to the Commissioner, the Commissioner must not arrange for an AFP employee to be seconded to the Police Force of a foreign country, or to any other body or organisation outside Australia, except in accordance with the guidelines.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Secondment timing
modality: CogAI
operator: Not Cognizable
premise text: (5) If the Minister gives guidelines to the Commissioner, the Commissioner must not arrange for an AFP employee to be seconded to the Police Force of a foreign country, or to any other body or organisation outside Australia, except in accordance with the guidelines.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Secondment timing
modality: Diffusion
operator: Not Diffused
premise text: (5) If the Minister gives guidelines to the Commissioner, the Commissioner must not arrange for an AFP employee to be seconded to the Police Force of a foreign country, or to any other body or organisation outside Australia, except in accordance with the guidelines.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Secondment timing
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (5) If the Minister gives guidelines to the Commissioner, the Commissioner must not arrange for an AFP employee to be seconded to the Police Force of a foreign country, or to any other body or organisation outside Australia, except in accordance with the guidelines.

40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
has part: 40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
has part: 40G(3) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40g
schema version: 2

40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.82
note: AFP employee status not affected by secondment
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period of the secondment.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between secondment and AFP employment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) The secondment under section 40F of a person who is an AFP employee does not affect...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person’s status as an AFP employee; and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Status unaffected
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
premise text: (1) The secondment under section 40F of a person who is an AFP employee does not affect...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the application of any provision of this Act in relation to the person during the period of the secondment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provisions of Act do not apply during secondment
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (1) The secondment under section 40F of a person who is an AFP employee does not affect...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...AFP professional standards obligations etc. continue
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligations unaffected by secondment
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
premise text: (1) The secondment under section 40F of a person who is an AFP employee does not affect...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person’s status as an AFP employee; and...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Secondment repeats AFP employment
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (1) The secondment under section 40F of a person who is an AFP employee does not affect...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.

40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.82
note: Remains subject to obligations and liabilities as AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues existing obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.

40G(3) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.82
note: Rights and immunities of AFP employees on secondment
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An AFP employee on secondment holds their rights and immunities
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds rights and immunities
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (3) Nothing in this section affects: (a) any rights, powers or immunities that an AFP employee who is seconded under section 40F has by virtue of holding the office or position to which the employee has been seconded;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An AFP employee on secondment holds their obligations and liabilities
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds obligations and liabilities
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (3) Nothing in this section affects: (b) the extent to which the employee is subject to obligations or liabilities in relation to discipline by virtue of holding the office or position to which the employee has been seconded.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An AFP employee on secondment holds their office or position
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds office or position
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (3) Nothing in this section affects: (a) any rights, powers or immunities that an AFP employee who is seconded under section 40F has by virtue of holding the office or position to which the employee has been seconded;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 40G(3) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.

40H Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40H(1) Assignment of duties etc.
has part: 40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.
has part: 40H(3) Assignment of duties etc.
has part: 40H(4) Assignment of duties etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40h
schema version: 2

40H(1) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83
note: Determination of duties and places for AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.

40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83
note: Duties to meet special operational needs
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for special operational needs includes those who are performing duties...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for special operational needs
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may from time to time determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee while the employee is performing duties outside Australia.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CogAI's role in managing special operational needs includes those who are performing duties...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI's role in managing special operational needs
modality: CogAI
operator: Through
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may from time to time determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee while the employee is performing duties outside Australia.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to meet special operational needs
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may from time to time determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee while the employee is performing duties outside Australia.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of information about special operational needs includes those who are performing duties...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about special operational needs
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may from time to time determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee while the employee is performing duties outside Australia.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recurring trace of employees subject to special operational needs includes those who are performing duties...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of employees subject to special operational needs
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may from time to time determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee while the employee is performing duties outside Australia.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.

40H(3) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83
note: Commissioner may determine accommodation arrangements for employee performing special duties.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40H(3) Assignment of duties etc.

40H(4) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83
note: Commissioner may revoke determination in writing
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40h-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.

40J Suspension from duties etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83
note: Regulations may suspend duties of AFP employees with or without remuneration.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40j-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40j-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40j
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may suspend duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40J Suspension from duties etc.

40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
has part: 40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
has part: 40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40k
schema version: 2

40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.86
note: Commissioner must make written declaration if employee's conduct amounts to serious misconduct.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Declaration must be made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Commissioner has authority to terminate employment

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct

40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
description: Copy of declaration to AFP employee
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.86
note: Declaration must be made within 24 hours of Commissioner's decision.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration must be made within 24 hours.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct

40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.86
note: Definition of serious misconduct for termination of employment
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: serious misconduct
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of serious misconduct
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) corruption, a serious abuse of power, or a serious dereliction of duty

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: serious misconduct
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: AFP employee

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct

40L Financial statements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40L(1) Financial statements
has part: 40L(2) Financial statements
has part: 40L(3) Financial statements
has part: 40L(4) Financial statements
has part: 40L(5) Financial statements
has part: 40L(6) Financial statements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40l
schema version: 2

40L(1) Financial statements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
note: The Commissioner may give a written direction requiring an AFP employee or special member to provide a statement.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner must give a written direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(1) Financial statements

40L(2) Financial statements
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
note: Financial statements must be made in a specified form and manner, contain required information, and be accompanied by documents.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide financial statements
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(2) Financial statements

40L(3) Financial statements
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
note: Must provide financial statement within 2 months after the end of the period to which it relates.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide financial statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(3) Financial statements

40L(4) Financial statements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
note: Commissioner may grant extension of time for giving statement in special circumstances.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40l-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner may grant extension of time
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(4) Financial statements

40L(5) Financial statements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
note: Must provide financial statement despite potential incrimination or penalty
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40l-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must provide the statement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide financial statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The person is required to give the statement

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(5) Financial statements

40L(6) Financial statements
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
note: No admissible in evidence against the person in any proceedings.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40l-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 40L Financial statements

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40L(6) Financial statements

40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40LA(1) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40LA(2) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40LA(3) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40LA(4) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40LA(5) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40la
schema version: 2

40LA(1) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88
note: Authorized manager requires screening test subject to undergo alcohol screening test if reasonably suspected to be under influence.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40la-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Screening test subject
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires action
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Authorized manager

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40LA(1) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo

40LA(2) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
description: Test results
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88
note: Must comply with requirement given under subsection (1)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40la-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40LA(2) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo

40LA(3) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88
note: Must return to duties immediately if alcohol not detected
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40la-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The screening test subject may return to his or her duties immediately.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between 'return to duties' and 'alcohol not detected'
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS_AT
premise text: (3) If the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is not present in the screening test subject’s breath...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The screening test subject may return to his or her duties immediately.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Relationship between 'return to duties' and 'alcohol not detected'
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_COGNITIVE_OF
premise text: (3) If the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is not present in the screening test subject’s breath...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The screening test subject may return to his or her duties immediately.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to return to duties immediately
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) If the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is not present in the screening test subject’s breath...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The screening test subject may return to his or her duties immediately.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Relationship between 'return to duties' and 'alcohol not detected'
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_DIFFUSED_BY
premise text: (3) If the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is not present in the screening test subject’s breath...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The screening test subject may return to his or her duties immediately.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditional relationship between 'return to duties' and 'alcohol not detected'
modality: LTL
operator: BUT_IF
premise text: (3) If the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is not present in the screening test subject’s breath...

40LA(4) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88
note: Must undergo breath test if alcohol detected or refuses screening
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40la-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The screening test subject may be given a written direction under section 40M to undergo a breath test.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits AFP appointees from refusing breath test
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is present in the screening test subject’s breath; or (b) the screening test subject refuses to undergo the alcohol screening test;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The screening test subject may be given a written direction under section 40M to undergo a breath test.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on AFP appointees to undergo breath test if alcohol detected or refuses screening
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) If: (a) the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is present in the screening test subject’s breath; or (b) the screening test subject refuses to undergo the alcohol screening test;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The screening test subject may be given a written direction under section 40M to undergo a breath test.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace of AFP appointees who must undergo breath test if alcohol detected or refuses screening
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (4) If: (a) the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is present in the screening test subject’s breath; or (b) the screening test subject refuses to undergo the alcohol screening test;

40LA(5) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88
note: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40la-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Drug testing occurs during the term of the appointment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Drug testing must occur during the term of the appointment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFP appointees are trustworthy.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The requirement for drug testing implies that AFP appointees must be trustworthy.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
premise text: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AI-powered monitoring is incorporated into the drug testing process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The requirement for drug testing incorporates AI-powered monitoring.
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
premise text: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFP appointees must undergo drug testing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
premise text: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: All AFP appointees must undergo drug testing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The requirement for drug testing spreads to all AFP appointees.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40LA(5) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo

40M Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.89
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40M(1) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40M(2) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40M(3) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40m
schema version: 2

40M(1) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.89
note: AFP appointees on duty must undergo alcohol screening and breath tests.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40M Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits AFP appointees on duty from not undergoing alcohol screening and breath tests.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40M(1) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo

40M(2) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.89
note: Provide a blood sample if breath test indicates alcohol presence
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40M Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a blood sample
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40M(3) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.89
note: Must comply with direction given under this section
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40M Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40N Alcohol screening tests, alcohol breath tests and prohibited
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.89
note: Drug tests after certain incidents
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40n
schema version: 2

40N Section 40N
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.92
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40N(2) Section 40N
has part: 40N(3) Section 40N
has part: 40N(4) Section 40N
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40n-2
schema version: 2

40N(2) Section 40N
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.92
note: Allows regulations to incorporate standards from Standards Australia or New Zealand.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40n-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40N Section 40N

40N(3) Section 40N
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.92
note: Ensure text of applied standard is readily available and free of charge to AFP appointees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40n-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40N Section 40N

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure availability of standard text
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40N(3) Section 40N

40N(4) Section 40N
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.92
note: Copyright exemption for making text available
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40n-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40N Section 40N

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies excerpt as a permission
modality: Deontic
operator: =

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide drug tests
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40N Alcohol screening tests, alcohol breath tests and prohibited

40P Regulations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.91
note: Regulations for authorisation and provision of services under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40p
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap of provisions for calibration, inspection and testing of devices used in conducting breath tests, blood tests or prohibited drug tests under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of devices used in conducting breath tests, blood tests or prohibited drug tests under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation of persons to give directions under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of provisions for calibration, inspection and testing of devices used in conducting breath tests, blood tests or prohibited drug tests under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring provision for calibration, inspection and testing of devices used in conducting breath tests, blood tests or prohibited drug tests under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent

40PA Managers who may require alcohol screening tests
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.93
note: Commissioner may issue orders authorizing AFP appointees to act as managers.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40pa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40pa
schema version: 2

40Q Admissibility of test results etc. in legal proceedings
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.93
note: Exclusion of certain test results from admissibility in proceedings against AFP appointees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40q-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40q-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40q
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits admissibility of certain test results in proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

40R Approval of screening devices
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.93
note: Approval of screening devices
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40r-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40r-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40r
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to approve devices
modality: Deontic
operator: may

40RA Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.95
note: Establishes procedures for AFP conduct and practices issues
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ra-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ra
schema version: 2

40RB Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.95
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RB(1) Simplified outline of this Part
has part: 40RB(2) Simplified outline of this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rb
schema version: 2

40RB(1) Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.95
note: Deals with handling of AFP conduct issues and AFP practices issues.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rb-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RB Simplified outline of this Part

40RB(2) Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.95
note: List of issues that may be dealt with under this Part
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rb-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RB Simplified outline of this Part

40RC Commissioner may determine professional standards
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RC(1) Commissioner may determine professional standards
has part: 40RC(2) Commissioner may determine professional standards
has part: 40RC(3) Commissioner may determine professional standards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rc
schema version: 2

40RC(1) Commissioner may determine professional standards
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
note: Commissioner may determine professional standards
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RC Commissioner may determine professional standards

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to comply with professional standards
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RC(1) Commissioner may determine professional standards

40RC(2) Commissioner may determine professional standards
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
note: Commissioner may determine professional standards
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RC Commissioner may determine professional standards

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for determining professional standards
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner may determine a professional standard by reference to the requirements specified in...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to determine professional standards
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Commissioner's power to determine professional standards
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: The Commissioner may determine a professional standard by reference to the requirements specified in...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RC(2) Commissioner may determine professional standards

40RC(3) Commissioner may determine professional standards
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
note: Commissioner may determine professional standards
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40RC Commissioner may determine professional standards

40RD Unit to be constituted
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RD(1) Unit to be constituted
has part: 40RD(2) Unit to be constituted
has part: 40RD(3) Unit to be constituted
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rd
schema version: 2

40RD(1) Unit to be constituted
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
note: Establishment of a unit within the Australian Federal Police
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RD Unit to be constituted

40RD(2) Unit to be constituted
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
note: The Commissioner may determine the name of the unit.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RD Unit to be constituted

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to determine a name
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RD(2) Unit to be constituted

40RD(3) Unit to be constituted
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
note: The Commissioner determines the establishment of the unit from time to time.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40RD Unit to be constituted

40RE Head of unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RE(1) Head of unit
has part: 40RE(2) Head of unit
has part: 40RE(3) Head of unit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40re
schema version: 2

40RE(1) Head of unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: Commissioner may appoint head of unit
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40re-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RE Head of unit

40RE(2) Head of unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: The head of the unit is responsible for performing its functions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40re-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RE Head of unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Head of unit has responsibility to perform functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Responsibility

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RE(2) Head of unit

40RE(3) Head of unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: Direct responsibility to Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40re-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40RE Head of unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direct responsibility
modality: Deontic
operator: is responsible under
premise text: (2)

40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RF(1) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(2) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(3) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(4) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(5) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(6) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(7) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rf
schema version: 2

40RF(1) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: Commissioner may assign a member or special member to the unit under section 40RD.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit

40RF(2) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
description: writing, period of service
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: Assignment must be in writing and specify the period of service.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Assignment must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Assignment must specify the period of service.
modality: Deontic
operator: FOR

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RF(2) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit

40RF(3) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: Maximum duration for assignment of members and special members to a unit
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period specified under paragraph (2)(b) must not exceed 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duration constraint
modality: Deontic
operator: >=

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RF(3) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit

40RF(4) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: Commissioner may vary assignment of members to unit under special reasons.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

40RF(5) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: The period substituted under subsection (4) may exceed 2 years.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit

40RF(6) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: Member or special member must cease serving in the unit after specified period.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must arrange for the member, or special member, to cease serving in the unit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval starts after specified period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after the member, or special member, has served in the unit for the period specified in the assignment...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must arrange for the member, or special member, to cease serving in the unit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Obligation implies action by relevant parties
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after the member, or special member, has served in the unit for the period specified in the assignment...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must arrange for the member, or special member, to cease serving in the unit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to cease serving
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after the member, or special member, has served in the unit for the period specified in the assignment...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must arrange for the member, or special member, to cease serving in the unit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Obligation spreads to all relevant parties
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-SPREADS-TO
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after the member, or special member, has served in the unit for the period specified in the assignment...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner must arrange for the member, or special member, to cease serving in the unit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval is independent of other intervals
modality: LTL
operator: BUT
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after the member, or special member, has served in the unit for the period specified in the assignment...

40RF(7) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
note: Reassignment of members to unit after cessation of service
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the period of 12 months from the time when the member, or special member, ceased to serve in the unit ends;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for reassignment of members
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) the member, or special member, ceases to serve in the unit;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the member, or special member, may again be assigned to the unit.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference for reassignment of members
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (a) a member, or special member, of the Australian Federal Police is assigned to the unit constituted under section 40RD;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the member, or special member, may again be assigned to the unit.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of reassignment obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (c) the period of 12 months from the time when the member, or special member, ceased to serve in the unit ends;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the member, or special member, may again be assigned to the unit.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to reassign member
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (a) a member, or special member, of the Australian Federal Police is assigned to the unit constituted under section 40RD;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the period of 12 months from the time when the member, or special member, ceased to serve in the unit ends;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of reassignment obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (b) the member, or special member, ceases to serve in the unit;

40RG Member or special member in unit may be directed to
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.99
note: Commissioner may direct member or special member to perform duties not related to unit's functions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rg-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rg-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rg
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner may direct
modality: Deontic
operator: may

40RH AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.99
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RH(1) AFP conduct issues
has part: 40RH(2) AFP conduct issues
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rh
schema version: 2

40RH(1) AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.99
note: Definition of AFP conduct issue
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rh-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RH AFP conduct issues

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RH(1) AFP conduct issues

40RH(2) AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.99
note: Continues to apply despite exceptions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rh-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RH AFP conduct issues

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RH(2) AFP conduct issues

40RI AFP practices issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.100
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RI(1) AFP practices issues
has part: 40RI(2) AFP practices issues
has part: 40RI(3) AFP practices issues
has part: 40RI(4) AFP practices issues
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ri
schema version: 2

40RI(1) AFP practices issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.100
note: Defines AFP practices issue for purposes of the Act.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ri-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RI AFP practices issues

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition applies to issues during the period of the Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue is an issue...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition implies that issues are about AFP practices.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of the definition
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue is an issue...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition applies to AI applications.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: is
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue is an issue...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An AFP practices issue is defined.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a term
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue is an issue...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition spreads to other issues.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of the definition
modality: Diffusion
operator: is
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue is an issue...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RI(1) AFP practices issues

40RI(2) AFP practices issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.100
note: An AFP practices issue includes an issue of whether a practice or procedure is contrary to law, unreasonable, unjust, oppressive, discriminatory, inadequate, or otherwise wrong or inappropriate.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ri-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RI AFP practices issues

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is contrary to law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The practice is contrary to law.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is unreasonable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The practice is unreasonable.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is unjust.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The practice is unjust.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is oppressive.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The practice is oppressive.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is discriminatory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The practice is discriminatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is inadequate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The practice is inadequate.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...

40RI(3) AFP practices issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.100
note: Defines practices and procedures of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ri-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40RI AFP practices issues

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RI(3) AFP practices issues

40RI(4) AFP practices issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.100
note: Section has effect subject to section 40RJ.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ri-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40RI AFP practices issues

40RJ Exclusion of certain employment action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.101
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RJ(1) Exclusion of certain employment action
has part: 40RJ(2) Exclusion of certain employment action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rj
schema version: 2

40RJ(1) Exclusion of certain employment action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.101
note: Exclusion of certain employment action
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RJ Exclusion of certain employment action

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates to conduct of a person that is conduct that: (a) consists of action taken in relation to an AFP appointee’s employment; and (b) involves neither: (i) a contravention by the person of the AFP professional standards; nor (ii) corrupt conduct by the person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to employment action
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP conduct issue does not include...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates to conduct of a person that is conduct that: (a) consists of action taken in relation to an AFP appointee’s employment; and (b) involves neither: (i) a contravention by the person of the AFP professional standards; nor (ii) corrupt conduct by the person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relation to employment action
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP conduct issue does not include...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates to conduct of a person that is conduct that: (a) consists of action taken in relation to an AFP appointee’s employment; and (b) involves neither: (i) a contravention by the person of the AFP professional standards; nor (ii) corrupt conduct by the person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluded conduct issues
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP conduct issue does not include...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates to conduct of a person that is conduct that: (a) consists of action taken in relation to an AFP appointee’s employment; and (b) involves neither: (i) a contravention by the person of the AFP professional standards; nor (ii) corrupt conduct by the person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relation to employment action
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP conduct issue does not include...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates to conduct of a person that is conduct that: (a) consists of action taken in relation to an AFP appointee’s employment; and (b) involves neither: (i) a contravention by the person of the AFP professional standards; nor (ii) corrupt conduct by the person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation to employment action
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP conduct issue does not include...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RJ(1) Exclusion of certain employment action

40RJ(2) Exclusion of certain employment action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.101
note: Exclusion of certain employment action
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RJ Exclusion of certain employment action

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates a practice or procedure of the Australian Federal Police...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclude certain employment actions
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue does not include...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RJ(2) Exclusion of certain employment action

40RK Categories of conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RK(1) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(2) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(3) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(4) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(5) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(6) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(7) Categories of conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rk
schema version: 2

40RK(1) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
note: There are 4 categories of conduct.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There exist 4 categories of conduct.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Existence of categories
modality: Deontic
operator: Existence
premise text: (1) There are 4 categories of conduct for the purposes of this Act.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The categories are: (i) category 1, (ii) category 2, (iii) category 3, and (iv) category 4.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classification into categories
modality: Deontic
operator: Classification
premise text: (1) There are 4 categories of conduct for the purposes of this Act.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RK(1) Categories of conduct

40RK(2) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
note: Category 1 is the lowest and least serious category of conduct.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Category 1 is the lowest category.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Category classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: The categories of conduct are defined.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RK(2) Categories of conduct

40RK(3) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
note: Next highest category of conduct
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Category 2 is the next highest category of conduct
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines order of categories
modality: Deontic
operator: next
premise text: (3) The next highest, and next most serious, is category 2.

40RK(4) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
note: Next highest category
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: category 3
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines order of categories
modality: Deontic
operator: next
premise text: (4)

40RK(5) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
note: Conduct giving rise to a corruption issue is the most serious type.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: X is an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies conduct as an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RK(5) Categories of conduct

40RK(6) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
note: Prioritization of conduct categories
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal prioritization based on categorization
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Prioritizes temporal intervals based on categorization
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Prioritization
premise text: (6) If conduct would otherwise belong to more than one category, it is taken to belong to the higher or highest of those categories.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Knowledge prioritization based on conduct categorization
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Prioritizes knowledge based on conduct categorization
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Prioritization
premise text: (6) If conduct would otherwise belong to more than one category, it is taken to belong to the higher or highest of those categories.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to prioritize higher category
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prioritizes higher category over others
modality: Deontic
operator: Prioritization
premise text: (6) If conduct would otherwise belong to more than one category, it is taken to belong to the higher or highest of those categories.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information prioritization based on conduct categorization
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prioritizes information based on conduct categorization
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Prioritization
premise text: (6) If conduct would otherwise belong to more than one category, it is taken to belong to the higher or highest of those categories.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal prioritization based on categorization
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prioritizes temporal intervals based on categorization
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Prioritization
premise text: (6) If conduct would otherwise belong to more than one category, it is taken to belong to the higher or highest of those categories.

40RK(7) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
note: The category to which conduct belongs may change as more information is obtained.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RK(7) Categories of conduct

40RL Categories of AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RL(1) Categories of AFP conduct issues
has part: 40RL(2) Categories of AFP conduct issues
has part: 40RL(3) Categories of AFP conduct issues
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rl
schema version: 2

40RL(1) Categories of AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
note: Definition of category 1 conduct issue
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RL Categories of AFP conduct issues

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a key concept
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RL(1) Categories of AFP conduct issues

40RL(2) Categories of AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
note: Duty to report category 2 conduct issues
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RL Categories of AFP conduct issues

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must report category 2 conduct issues
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RL(2) Categories of AFP conduct issues

40RL(3) Categories of AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
note: Duty to report category 3 conduct issues
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rl-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40RL Categories of AFP conduct issues

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must report category 3 conduct issues
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RL(3) Categories of AFP conduct issues

40RM AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RM(1) AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
has part: 40RM(2) AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rm
schema version: 2

40RM(1) AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
note: Commissioner and Ombudsman may jointly determine kinds of conduct
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rm-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RM AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds

40RM(2) AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
note: Conduct not determined is considered category 3 conduct.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rm-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RM AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: :

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RM(2) AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds

40RN Category 1 conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
note: Determination of category 1 conduct
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rn-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rn
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rn-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RN Category 1 conduct

40RO Category 2 conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RO(1) Category 2 conduct
has part: 40RO(2) Category 2 conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ro
schema version: 2

40RO(1) Category 2 conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104
note: Determine category 2 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ro-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RO Category 2 conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines category 2 conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: determines

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RO(1) Category 2 conduct

40RO(2) Category 2 conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104
note: Ensure category 3 conduct is not treated as such.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ro-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RO Category 2 conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the conduct does not warrant being treated as category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establish temporal relation between events.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman must also be satisfied that...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the conduct does not warrant being treated as category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classify conduct using AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman must also be satisfied that...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the conduct does not warrant being treated as category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman must also be satisfied that...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the conduct does not warrant being treated as category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuse information about conduct.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman must also be satisfied that...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the conduct does not warrant being treated as category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establish temporal relation between events.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman must also be satisfied that...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RO(2) Category 2 conduct

40RP Category 3 conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40RP(1) Category 3 conduct
has part: 40RP(2) Category 3 conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rp
schema version: 2

40RP(1) Category 3 conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104
note: Determine category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40RP Category 3 conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: conduct of a particular kind is to be category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act only if they are satisfied that
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines category 3 conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
premise text: (1) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman may determine under subsection 40RM(1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Does not raise a corruption issue.
modality: Deontic
operator: does not raise
premise text: (b) conduct of that kind does not raise a corruption issue.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RP(1) Category 3 conduct

40RP(2) Category 3 conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104
note: No limitation on Category 3 conduct
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40RP Category 3 conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40RP(2) Category 3 conduct

40RQ Managers for particular categories of AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.105
note: Commissioner may issue orders authorizing AFP appointees to act as managers for specific conduct issues.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rq-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40rq
schema version: 2

40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40SA(1) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40SA(2) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40SA(3) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40SA(4) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40SA(5) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sa
schema version: 2

40SA(1) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106
note: Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices to the Commissioner or an AFP appointee.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40SA(1) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices

40SA(2) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106
note: Giving information anonymously is permitted.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give information anonymously.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40SA(2) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices

40SA(3) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106
note: Must provide information that implies a desire to be kept informed of action taken.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to provide information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed intention to be kept informed.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Person gives information that implies a desire to be kept informed.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to provide information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed intention to be kept informed.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Person indicates a desire to be kept informed.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40SA(3) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices

40SA(4) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106
note: The AFP appointee may require the person giving information to reduce it to writing.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The AFP appointee has the power to require reduction of information to writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40SA(4) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices

40SA(5) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106
note: Must provide information about AFP conduct or practices
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sa-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information about AFP conduct or practices
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40SA(5) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices

40SB Arrangements for person in custody to give information
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.107
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40SB(1) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
has part: 40SB(2) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
has part: 40SB(3) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sb
schema version: 2

40SB(1) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.107
note: A person in custody must provide information.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40SB Arrangements for person in custody to give information

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40SB(1) Arrangements for person in custody to give information

40SB(2) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.107
note: A custodian is defined as the person in custody or another person performing duties in connection with the detainee's detention.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40SB Arrangements for person in custody to give information

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of custodian
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40SB(2) Arrangements for person in custody to give information

40SB(3) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.107
note: Request for facilities to provide information
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40SB Arrangements for person in custody to give information

40SC Recording and dealing with information given under
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.109
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40SC(1) Recording and dealing with information given under
has part: 40SC(2) Recording and dealing with information given under
has part: 40SC(3) Recording and dealing with information given under
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sc
schema version: 2

40SC(1) Recording and dealing with information given under
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.109
note: Recipient must record and deal with information in accordance with Commissioner's orders.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40SC Recording and dealing with information given under

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner's orders
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Recipient must perform action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 40SA

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40SC(1) Recording and dealing with information given under

40SC(2) Recording and dealing with information given under
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.109
note: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period if issue is appropriate for informal resolution.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40SC Recording and dealing with information given under

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Recipient satisfied that explanation can be given within a reasonable period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Recipient satisfied that giving an explanation to the person giving the information is likely to resolve the issue.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period.
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide explanation or take action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Recipient satisfied that issue is appropriate for informal resolution.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Recipient must arrange for action to be taken.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Recipient satisfied that taking other action is likely to resolve the issue.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Recipient able to give person giving information explanation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Recipient satisfied that the recipient is able to give the person giving the information that explanation, or arrange for that action to be taken, within a reasonable period.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Recipient satisfied that issue is appropriate for informal resolution.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Recipient satisfied that the issue: (i) arises as a result of a misunderstanding of the facts, the law or the practices or procedures of the Australian Federal Police; or (ii) is otherwise appropriate for informal resolution.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40SC(2) Recording and dealing with information given under

40SC(3) Recording and dealing with information given under
type: Concept
description: details of the information
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.109
note: Record details of information if issue is not resolved within a reasonable period.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40SC Recording and dealing with information given under

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to record details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40SD Commissioner may decide that AFP conduct issue should be
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.110
note: Commissioner may decide that AFP conduct issue should be dealt with under this Part
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sd-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40sd
schema version: 2

40SE Recording and dealing with information referred under
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.110
note: The Commissioner must record and deal with an AFP conduct issue in accordance with orders.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40se-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40se-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40se
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40se-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner must perform the action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40se-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40SE Recording and dealing with information referred under

40TA Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.111
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TA(1) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40TA(2) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40TA(3) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ta
schema version: 2

40TA(1) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.111
note: Commissioner may issue orders about AFP conduct or practices.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ta-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TA Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner has the power to issue orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TA(1) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices

40TA(2) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.111
note: Ensure complainant is kept informed of progress in dealing with AFP conduct issue.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ta-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TA Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure complainant is kept informed.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TA(2) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices

40TA(3) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.111
note: Ensure complainant is kept informed of progress in dealing with AFP practices issue.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ta-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40TA Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure complainant is kept informed.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TA(3) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices

40TB Dealing with related AFP conduct issues that have different
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: Dealing with related AFP conduct issues that have different categories may be dealt with together as if they all belong to the higher or highest of those categories.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tb
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TB Dealing with related AFP conduct issues that have different

40TC Training and development action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TC(1) Training and development action
has part: 40TC(2) Training and development action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tc
schema version: 2

40TC(1) Training and development action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: Training and development action is a duty to improve AFP appointee's performance.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TC Training and development action

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TC(1) Training and development action

40TC(2) Training and development action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: Training and development action for AFP appointee
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TC Training and development action

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide training and development action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TC(2) Training and development action

40TD Remedial action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TD(1) Remedial action
has part: 40TD(2) Remedial action
has part: 40TD(3) Remedial action
has part: 40TD(4) Remedial action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40td
schema version: 2

40TD(1) Remedial action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: Remedial action definition
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40td-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TD Remedial action

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of remedial action as an obligation to remedy unsatisfactory performance
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TD(1) Remedial action

40TD(2) Remedial action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: Remedial action for AFP appointee may include improving behavior, structured changes to employment, or recording adverse findings.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40td-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TD Remedial action

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State has obligation to provide remedial action for AFP appointee.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TD(2) Remedial action

40TD(3) Remedial action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: Remedial action may include counselling, reprimanding, or giving a formal warning to the AFP appointee.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40td-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40TD Remedial action

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May provide remedial action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TD(3) Remedial action

40TD(4) Remedial action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
note: Remedial action may take one or more of the following forms: changing shifts, restricting duties, reassigning duties, or transferring to another part.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40td-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40TD Remedial action

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Remedial action can occur at any time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) Without limiting paragraph (2)(b), remedial action in relation to the AFP appointee may take one or more of the following forms:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Remedial action can occur at any time
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (4) Without limiting paragraph (2)(b), remedial action in relation to the AFP appointee may take one or more of the following forms:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide remedial action
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Remedial action can occur at any time
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (4) Without limiting paragraph (2)(b), remedial action in relation to the AFP appointee may take one or more of the following forms:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Remedial action can occur at any time
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (4) Without limiting paragraph (2)(b), remedial action in relation to the AFP appointee may take one or more of the following forms:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TD(4) Remedial action

40TE Termination action
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.113
note: Defines termination action for AFP appointees
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40te-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40te
schema version: 2

40TF Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.115
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TF(1) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
has part: 40TF(2) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tf
schema version: 2

40TF(1) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.115
note: Duty to investigate AFP conduct issues
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TF Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information under section 40SA
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) a person gives information under section 40SA that raises: (i) an AFP conduct issue in relation to conduct engaged in by an AFP appointee; or (ii) an AFP practices issue in relation to a practice or procedure of the AFP;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must decide under section 40SD that an AFP conduct issue is to be dealt with under this Part
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) the Commissioner decides under section 40SD that an AFP conduct issue in relation to an AFP appointee is to be dealt with under this Part.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TF(1) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct

40TF(2) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.115
note: Commissioner may determine no further action is to be taken under this Part in relation to AFP conduct if certain conditions are met.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TF Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner may determine no further action is to be taken.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner may determine no further action is to be taken if appropriate action has already been taken.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (b) appropriate action has already been taken:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner may determine no further action is to be taken if the person gave information under section 40SA more than 12 months after becoming aware of the conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (a) the person became aware of the conduct, or the practice or procedure, more than 12 months before the person gave the information under section 40SA;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TF(2) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct

40TG When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.117
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TG(1) When Subdivision applies
has part: 40TG(2) When Subdivision applies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tg
schema version: 2

40TG(1) When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.117
note: Subdivision applies under certain conditions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TG When Subdivision applies

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TG(1) When Subdivision applies

40TG(2) When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.117
note: Subdivision applies under certain conditions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TG When Subdivision applies

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subdivision applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (2) This Subdivision also applies if...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TG(2) When Subdivision applies

40TH How issue is dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.117
note: Ensure adequate opportunity for AFP appointee and complainant to be heard in relation to the issue.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40th
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure adequate opportunity for AFP appointee and complainant to be heard.
modality: Deontic
operator: Ensure
premise text: (1) In dealing with the AFP conduct issue, the manager must:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determine action to be taken under section 40TI or 40TJ.
modality: Deontic
operator: Determine
premise text: (1) In dealing with the AFP conduct issue, the manager must:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider whether information raises an AFP practices issue.
modality: Deontic
operator: Consider
premise text: (1) In dealing with the AFP conduct issue, the manager must:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TH How issue is dealt with

40TI Action that may be taken in relation to category 1 conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.118
note: Manager must take training and development action if satisfied category 1 conduct has occurred.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ti-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ti-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ti
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ti-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Manager must take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ti-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TI Action that may be taken in relation to category 1 conduct

40TJ Action that may be taken in relation to category 2 conduct
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.118
note: Action that may be taken in relation to category 2 conduct
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tj-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tj-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tj
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to take action
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tj-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TJ Action that may be taken in relation to category 2 conduct

40TK AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TK(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
has part: 40TK(2) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
has part: 40TK(3) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tk
schema version: 2

40TK(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
note: Manager must be satisfied that information raises an AFP practices issue.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TK AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: that the information raises an AFP practices issue.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Manager's satisfaction must occur before section application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (1) This section applies if the manager is satisfied

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: that the information raises an AFP practices issue.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Manager's satisfaction implies section application
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (1) This section applies if the manager is satisfied

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: that the information raises an AFP practices issue.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Manager recognizes satisfaction as a condition for section application
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
premise text: (1) This section applies if the manager is satisfied

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: that the information raises an AFP practices issue.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Manager must be satisfied
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies if the manager is satisfied

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: that the information raises an AFP practices issue.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section application spreads to related information
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (1) This section applies if the manager is satisfied

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TK(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP

40TK(2) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
note: Manager must inform AFP appointee of identified issue.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TK AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TK(2) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP

40TK(3) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
note: Manager must address AFP practices issue
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tk-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40TK AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to address issue
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TK(3) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP

40TL When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TL(1) When Subdivision applies
has part: 40TL(2) When Subdivision applies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tl
schema version: 2

40TL(1) When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
note: Subdivision applies under certain conditions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tl-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TL When Subdivision applies

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TL(1) When Subdivision applies

40TL(2) When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
note: Subdivision applies under certain conditions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tl-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TL When Subdivision applies

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TL(2) When Subdivision applies

40TM Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TM(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
has part: 40TM(2) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tm
schema version: 2

40TM(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
note: The head of the unit must notify the Ombudsman about category 3 conduct issues.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TM Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The head of the unit must notify the Ombudsman.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TM(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify

40TM(2) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
note: Exemption from subsection (1) when dealt with jointly by Ombudsman and Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TM Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption applies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TM(2) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify

40TN Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TN(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
has part: 40TN(2) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
has part: 40TN(3) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tn
schema version: 2

40TN(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
note: Allocate issue to law enforcement officers for investigation.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TN Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must allocate issue
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TN(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally

40TN(2) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
note: Head of unit may allocate issue to himself/herself.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TN Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to allocate issue
modality: Deontic
operator: May

40TN(3) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
note: Allocation of issue to person outside unit requires Commissioner's agreement.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tn-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40TN Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The allocation is permitted.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the unit
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The head of the unit may allocate...

40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TO(1) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(2) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(3) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(4) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(5) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(6) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(7) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40to
schema version: 2

40TO(1) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
note: Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40to-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for allocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) This section applies if:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide allocation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies if:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TO(1) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

40TO(2) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
note: The Commissioner must allocate the issue to a person for investigation.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40to-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner must allocate the issue.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40TO(3) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
note: The person allocated must not be a member of the unit.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40to-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person allocated must not be a member of the unit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotBe
premise text: The person to whom the issue is allocated must not be a member of the unit.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TO(3) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

40TO(4) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
note: Corruption issue cannot be allocated to the Ombudsman
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40to-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issue cannot be allocated to the Ombudsman
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Issue must be allocated to someone outside the unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Corruption issue must not be allocated to the Ombudsman
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Positive prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Ombudsman is not allowed to allocate issue

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issue cannot be allocated to the Ombudsman
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Negation of allocation
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ¬
premise text: Issue must be allocated to someone outside the unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TO(4) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

40TO(5) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
note: Commissioner must allocate issue to the Ombudsman if category 3 conduct issue.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40to-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must allocate issue to the Ombudsman.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TO(5) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

40TO(6) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
note: Consultation with Ombudsman required when allocating issue to someone outside unit
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40to-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to consult
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Commissioner must consult with Ombudsman

40TO(7) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
note: Commissioner must consult with National Anti-Corruption Commissioner about the choice of person to whom issue is allocated.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40to-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Issue is a corruption issue and has been allocated for at least one day.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (7) If the issue is a corruption issue, the Commissioner must consult with the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner about the choice of the person to whom the issue is to be allocated.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide consultation with National Anti-Corruption Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (7) If the issue is a corruption issue, the Commissioner must consult with the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner about the choice of the person to whom the issue is to be allocated.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Issue has been allocated for at least one day.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (7) If the issue is a corruption issue, the Commissioner must consult with the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner about the choice of the person to whom the issue is to be allocated.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TO(7) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit

40TP Persons eligible to have category 3 conduct issue or corruption
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
note: Person must have qualifications or experience for issue allocation
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tp-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tp-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tp
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issue allocation allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Qualifications/experience required
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Person has appropriate qualifications or experience

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tp-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TP Persons eligible to have category 3 conduct issue or corruption

40TQ How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TQ(1) How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
has part: 40TQ(2) How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tq
schema version: 2

40TQ(1) How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
note: Section applies if issue is allocated to a person under section 40TN or 40TO.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tq-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TQ How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with

40TQ(2) How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
note: Ensure complainant has adequate opportunity to be heard in relation to the issue.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tq-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TQ How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure complainant has adequate opportunity to be heard.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TQ(2) How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with

40TR Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TR(1) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
has part: 40TR(2) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tr
schema version: 2

40TR(1) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
note: The investigator may recommend one or more actions to be taken in relation to the AFP appointee.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TR Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The recommendation may be made at any stage of the investigation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The investigator may take one or more actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner can take one or more actions in relation to the AFP appointee.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The investigator must recommend one or more actions if satisfied on reasonable grounds.
modality: Deontic
operator: must

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: One or more of the following actions may be taken.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TR(1) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3

40TR(2) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
note: The Commissioner may take termination action in relation to an AFP employee.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TR Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TR(2) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3

40TS Investigative powers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.123
note: Investigator has powers in relation to investigation of issue.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ts-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ts-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ts
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ts-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Investigator has power
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ts-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TS Investigative powers

40TU Report of investigation
type: Concept
description: written report
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.123
note: Investigator must prepare and give written report after investigation completion.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tu-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tu-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tu
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare and give written report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tu-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TU Report of investigation

40TV Taking action on report
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.124
note: Ensure recommendations are fully considered and appropriate action is taken.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tv-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tv-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tv
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tv-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure actions are taken
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40TW AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TW(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
has part: 40TW(2) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tw
schema version: 2

40TW(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.124
note: Section applies if information raises an AFP practices issue and a report is prepared under section 40TU.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tw-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TW AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Report prepared during investigation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between investigation and report preparation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Investigator prepares a report under section 40TU in relation to the investigation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Information raises an AFP practices issue

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section applies if report is prepared under section 40TU
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation to prepare report under section 40TU
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Investigator prepares a report under section 40TU in relation to the investigation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigator must investigate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation to investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Information raises an AFP practices issue

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Conjunction of two obligations
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
premise text: Section applies if information raises an AFP practices issue and a report is prepared under section 40TU

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TW(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP

40TW(2) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.124
note: Must identify AFP practices issue in report.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tw-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TW AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to identify AFP practices issue.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40TX Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.125
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40TX(1) Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
has part: 40TX(2) Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tx
schema version: 2

40TX(1) Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.125
note: Ensure action is taken in response to AFP practices issue
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40TX Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must ensure action is taken
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person gives information under section 40SA that raises an AFP practices issue; or (b) an AFP practices issue is: (i) brought, under section 40TK, to the attention of an AFP appointee; or (ii) identified, under section 40TW, in a report prepared under section 40TU; as a result of an AFP conduct issue being dealt with under this Part.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40TX(1) Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in

40TX(2) Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.125
note: Ensure appropriate action is taken to deal with the issue.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40tx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40TX Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure action is taken
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40UA Minister may arrange special inquiries
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40UA(1) Minister may arrange special inquiries
has part: 40UA(2) Minister may arrange special inquiries
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ua
schema version: 2

40UA(1) Minister may arrange special inquiries
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126
note: The Minister may arrange for an inquiry to be held.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ua-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ua-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ua-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40UA Minister may arrange special inquiries

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ua-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

40UA(2) Minister may arrange special inquiries
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126
note: Subsection (1) applies even if certain conduct or matters are being dealt with under other provisions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ua-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ua-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40UA Minister may arrange special inquiries

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ua-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40UA(2) Minister may arrange special inquiries

40UB Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40UB(1) Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
has part: 40UB(2) Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ub
schema version: 2

40UB(1) Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126
note: Minister must inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ub-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40UB Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40UB(2) Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
type: Concept
description: (a) the fact that the inquiry will be held; (b) the conduct or matter into which the inquiry is to be held; (c) the person or persons who are to conduct the inquiry; (d) the manner in which the inquiry will be held.
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126
note: Inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry details
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ub-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40UB Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the manner in which the inquiry will be held.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of information provision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) The Minister must inform...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the manner in which the inquiry will be held.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The Minister must inform...

40UC Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40UC(1) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
has part: 40UC(2) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
has part: 40UC(3) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
has part: 40UC(4) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40uc
schema version: 2

40UC(1) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
note: Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40uc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40UC Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40UC(1) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome

40UC(2) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
note: Commissioner may suspend further action pending inquiry completion.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40uc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40UC Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40UC(2) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome

40UC(3) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
note: Commissioner may terminate investigation under Division 3.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40uc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40UC Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to terminate investigation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

40UC(4) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
note: Consultation with Ombudsman required before taking action under subsection (2) or (3)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40uc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40UC Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation with Ombudsman MUST MEET within a certain temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation with Ombudsman
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: (4) If the conduct or matter is being dealt with under Division 3 jointly by the Ombudsman and the Australian Federal Police...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner MUST consult the Ombudsman before taking action under subsection (2) or (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult Ombudsman
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) If the conduct or matter is being dealt with under Division 3 jointly by the Ombudsman and the Australian Federal Police...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner MUST inform the Ombudsman of any action taken under subsection (2) or (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform Ombudsman of action taken
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) If the conduct or matter is being dealt with under Division 3 jointly by the Ombudsman and the Australian Federal Police...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action under subsection (2) or (3) MUST MEET within a certain temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for action under subsection (2) or (3)
modality: LTL
operator: MEETS
premise text: (4) If the conduct or matter is being dealt with under Division 3 jointly by the Ombudsman and the Australian Federal Police...

40UD Reports of special inquiries
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40UD(1) Reports of special inquiries
has part: 40UD(2) Reports of special inquiries
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ud
schema version: 2

40UD(1) Reports of special inquiries
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
note: Must report results of inquiry to Minister and make recommendations if any.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ud-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ud-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ud-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40UD Reports of special inquiries

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ud-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must report results of inquiry to Minister and make recommendations if any.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ud-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40UD(1) Reports of special inquiries

40UD(2) Reports of special inquiries
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
note: Reports of special inquiries
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ud-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ud-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40UD Reports of special inquiries

40VA Application of Division
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40VA(1) Application of Division
has part: 40VA(2) Application of Division
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40va
schema version: 2

40VA(1) Application of Division
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
note: This Division applies if a person (the investigator) is investigating a category 3 conduct issue or a corruption issue under Division 3.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40va-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40VA Application of Division

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Division applies during...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (investigator is conducting an inquiry under Division 4)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Division applies
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (investigator is investigating a category 3 conduct issue or a corruption issue under Division 3)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VA(1) Application of Division

40VA(2) Application of Division
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
note: Powers provided in this Division are in addition to any other powers the investigator may have.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40va-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40VA Application of Division

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VA(2) Application of Division

40VB Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40VB(1) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
has part: 40VB(2) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
has part: 40VB(3) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vb
schema version: 2

40VB(1) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
note: The investigator has discretion over the manner of conducting the investigation or inquiry.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40VB Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry

40VB(2) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
note: Investigator must investigate jointly with Ombudsman and in accordance with arrangement.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40VB Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigator must investigate jointly with the Ombudsman; and investigate the issue in accordance with the arrangement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Investigation is between investigation by investigator and investigation by Ombudsman.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) If the Ombudsman makes an arrangement...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigator must investigate jointly with the Ombudsman; and investigate the issue in accordance with the arrangement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must investigate jointly with Ombudsman and in accordance with arrangement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If the Ombudsman makes an arrangement...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The investigator must investigate jointly with the Ombudsman; and investigate the issue in accordance with the arrangement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Investigation is between investigation by investigator and investigation by Ombudsman.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) If the Ombudsman makes an arrangement...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VB(2) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry

40VB(3) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
note: Head of unit may give investigator directions on investigation manner.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40VB Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigator must comply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with head's directions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Head of unit gave directions.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VB(3) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry

40VC Obtaining information and making inquiries
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40VC(1) Obtaining information and making inquiries
has part: 40VC(2) Obtaining information and making inquiries
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vc
schema version: 2

40VC(1) Obtaining information and making inquiries
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130
note: Investigator may obtain information and make inquiries as they think fit.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vc-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40VC Obtaining information and making inquiries

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to obtain information
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vc-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VC(1) Obtaining information and making inquiries

40VC(2) Obtaining information and making inquiries
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130
note: Divisional effect on subsection (1)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vc-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40VC Obtaining information and making inquiries

40VD Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40VD(1) Relationship with other laws
has part: 40VD(2) Relationship with other laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vd
schema version: 2

40VD(1) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130
note: AFP appointee must comply with laws that would apply without the sections.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40VD Relationship with other laws

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VD(1) Relationship with other laws

40VD(2) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130
note: Nothing in subsection (1) affects the operation of any other provision of this Division.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40VD Relationship with other laws

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VD(2) Relationship with other laws

40VE Directions to AFP appointee
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.131
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40VE(1) Directions to AFP appointee
has part: 40VE(2) Directions to AFP appointee
has part: 40VE(3) Directions to AFP appointee
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ve
schema version: 2

40VE(1) Directions to AFP appointee
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.131
note: Investigator may direct AFP appointee to provide information or produce documents.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ve-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40VE Directions to AFP appointee

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The direction begins at a certain point in time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Direction specifies when information must be provided.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
premise text: Information is to be provided at some point in time.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to comply implies an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Failure to comply implies an offence.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Compliance is necessary for the investigation.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance is obligatory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Failure to comply is an offence.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VE(1) Directions to AFP appointee

40VE(2) Directions to AFP appointee
type: Concept
description: []
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.131
note: Investigator must state direction, specify investigation subject matter, and provide written copy to AFP appointee.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ve-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40VE Directions to AFP appointee

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40VE(3) Directions to AFP appointee
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.131
note: Must comply with direction despite potential public interest concerns
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ve-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40VE Directions to AFP appointee

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40VF Entering and searching AFP premises
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.133
note: Investigator may enter and search AFP premises for investigation or inquiry purposes.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vf-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vf
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vf-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VF Entering and searching AFP premises

40VG Special powers if investigator conducting inquiry under
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.134
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vg-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vg
schema version: 2

40VH Offences
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.137
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40VH(1) Offences
has part: 40VH(2) Offences
has part: 40VH(3) Offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vh
schema version: 2

40VH(1) Offences
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.137
note: Refusal to comply with direction or be sworn/affirmed is an offence.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40VH Offences

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An AFP appointee commits an offence if the AFP appointee: (a) refuses or fails to comply with a direction given under subsection 40VE(1) or 40VG(2);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to comply with direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) refuses or fails to comply with a direction given under subsection 40VE(1) or 40VG(2);

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An AFP appointee commits an offence if the AFP appointee: (b) refuses or fails to be sworn or make an affirmation, when required to do so under subsection 40VG(2);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to be sworn/affirmed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (b) refuses or fails to be sworn or make an affirmation, when required to do so under subsection 40VG(2);

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An AFP appointee commits an offence if the AFP appointee: (c) gives information or makes a statement to the investigator knowing that it is false or misleading in a material particular.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of giving false information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (c) gives information or makes a statement to the investigator knowing that it is false or misleading in a material particular.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VH(1) Offences

40VH(2) Offences
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.137
note: Defendant bears evidential burden for reasonable excuse.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40VH Offences

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant bears burden of proof for excuse
modality: Epistemic
operator: Burden of Proof

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VH(2) Offences

40VH(3) Offences
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.137
note: Prosecution must prove investigator compliance with certain directions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40vh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40VH Offences

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigator compliance is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Prosecution bears the onus of proving...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigator must comply with directions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with directions
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Subsection (3) requires prosecution to prove compliance with certain directions.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigator has an obligation to comply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on investigator
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Prosecution bears the onus of proving...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40VH(3) Offences

40WA Record keeping
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40WA(1) Record keeping
has part: 40WA(2) Record keeping
has part: 40WA(3) Record keeping
has part: 40WA(4) Record keeping
has part: 40WA(5) Record keeping
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40wa
schema version: 2

40WA(1) Record keeping
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138
note: The Commissioner must keep adequate records.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40wa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40WA Record keeping

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40WA(1) Record keeping

40WA(2) Record keeping
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138
note: The Commissioner must keep records of certain information and actions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40wa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40WA Record keeping

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner must keep records.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40WA(2) Record keeping

40WA(3) Record keeping
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138
note: Exemption from record keeping for certain conduct issues
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40wa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40WA Record keeping

40WA(4) Record keeping
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138
note: Access to records for performing functions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40wa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40WA Record keeping

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to access records
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo

40WA(5) Record keeping
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138
note: Access to records for Ombudsman's functions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40wa-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40WA Record keeping

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to records is a temporal aspect of Ombudsman's functions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Access to records occurs during Ombudsman's functions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Ombudsman performs functions that require access to records

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State must provide access to records for Ombudsman's functions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: State implies provision of access to records for Ombudsman's functions
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Ombudsman requires access to records for functions

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State recognizes Ombudsman's right to access records
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognizes State's obligation to provide access to records
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: Ombudsman requires access to records for functions

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State must provide access to records
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ombudsman has right to access records
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: Ombudsman's functions require access to records

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State diffuses access to records for Ombudsman's functions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Access to records diffuses to Ombudsman's functions
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Ombudsman's functions require access to records

40WB Records about corruption issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.139
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40WB(1) Records about corruption issues
has part: 40WB(2) Records about corruption issues
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40wb
schema version: 2

40WB(1) Records about corruption issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.139
note: Directs the Commissioner to restrict access to information about a corruption issue.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40wb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40WB Records about corruption issues

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs the Commissioner to restrict access.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

40WB(2) Records about corruption issues
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.139
note: The Commissioner must comply with direction.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40wb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40WB Records about corruption issues

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner MUST comply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The Commissioner must...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40WB(2) Records about corruption issues

40XA Annual reviews by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40XA(1) Annual reviews by Ombudsman
has part: 40XA(2) Annual reviews by Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40xa
schema version: 2

40XA(1) Annual reviews by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: Defines review periods for Ombudsman annual reviews
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xa-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40xa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40XA Annual reviews by Ombudsman

40XA(2) Annual reviews by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: Annual review of AFP conduct issues and practices by Ombudsman
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xa-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40xa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40XA Annual reviews by Ombudsman

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40XA(2) Annual reviews by Ombudsman

40XB Ad hoc reviews by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: The Ombudsman may inspect records for review purposes.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xb-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xb-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40xb
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40XB Ad hoc reviews by Ombudsman

40XC Commissioner to provide information and access to
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: The Commissioner must provide information and access to documents upon request.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xc-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40xc
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner must provide information and access to documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

40XD Annual reports by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40XD(1) Annual reports by Ombudsman
has part: 40XD(2) Annual reports by Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40xd
schema version: 2

40XD(1) Annual reports by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: Annual reports by Ombudsman must be prepared and presented to the Senate and House of Representatives.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40xd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40XD Annual reports by Ombudsman

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare annual reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40XD(1) Annual reports by Ombudsman

40XD(2) Annual reports by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
note: Annual reports by Ombudsman must include comments on comprehensiveness and adequacy of administration.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40xd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40XD Annual reports by Ombudsman

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40XD(2) Annual reports by Ombudsman

40YA Victimisation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.142
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40YA(1) Victimisation
has part: 40YA(2) Victimisation
has part: 40YA(3) Victimisation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ya
schema version: 2

40YA(1) Victimisation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.142
note: Causing or threatening detriment to another person on grounds of providing information under this Part.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ya-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40YA Victimisation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 6 months.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits causing or threatening detriment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 6 months.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies the provision is a prohibition.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40YA(1) Victimisation

40YA(2) Victimisation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.142
note: A threat may be express or implied.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ya-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40YA Victimisation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed threats are obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40YA(2) Victimisation

40YA(3) Victimisation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.142
note: No fear of threat's execution is necessary to prove in prosecution.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ya-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40YA Victimisation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No fear of threat's execution is necessary to prove in prosecution.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity

40YB Providing false information about AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.142
note: Providing false information about AFP conduct or practices is prohibited.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yb-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yb-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40yb
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits providing false information about AFP conduct or practices.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The person knows that the information is false in a material partical.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yb-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40YB Providing false information about AFP conduct or practices

40YC AFP appointees to provide name, etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.143
note: Refusing or failing to comply with a request for personal information without reasonable excuse is prohibited.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yc-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40yc
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal or failure to comply is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing or failing to comply with a request without reasonable excuse.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Request for personal information

40ZA Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40ZA(1) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(2) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(3) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(4) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(5) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(6) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(6A) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(7) Secrecy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40za
schema version: 2

40ZA(1) Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
note: Confidentiality requirement for certain investigations and inquiries.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40za-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40ZA Secrecy

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain confidentiality.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40ZA(1) Secrecy

40ZA(2) Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
note: Making or divulging records of investigation information is prohibited.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40za-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40ZA Secrecy

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Penalty: 30 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person who is, or has been, a person to whom this section applies commits an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40ZA(2) Secrecy

40ZA(3) Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
note: Conditional effect of subsection (2)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40za-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40ZA Secrecy

40ZA(4) Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
note: Allow person to divulge information for investigation or inquiry purposes
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40za-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40ZA Secrecy

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to divulge information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

40ZA(5) Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
note: Consent required for divulging or communicating information.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40za-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 40ZA Secrecy

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: None

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40ZA(5) Secrecy

40ZA(6) Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
note: Exemption from subsection (2) prohibition on producing records or giving information in evidence before a court.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40za-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 40ZA Secrecy

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to produce records or give information in evidence before a court.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

40ZA(6A) Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
note: Allowance to disclose information for IGIS purposes
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40za-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 40ZA Secrecy

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: None

40ZA(7) Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
note: Defines the appropriate person for purposes of this section.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40za-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 40ZA Secrecy

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40ZA(7) Secrecy

41 Definitions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.146
note: Definitions for Part VA of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the day on which Schedule 1 to the Australian Federal Police Legislation Amendment Act 1999 commences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval definition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Schedule 1 to the Australian Federal Police Legislation Amendment Act 1999 commences.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a body corporate, whether incorporated before, on or after the commencing day...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Commonwealth organisation means...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an unincorporated authority or body...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relationship definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (i) that is a subsidiary of another body corporate mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b); and

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the day on which this Part commences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval definition
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: This Part commences.

41A Old law members or staff members
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.150
note: Definition of old law member or staff member
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41a
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41A Old law members or staff members

42 Related offences
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.150
note: Offences are related if they share physical elements.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42
schema version: 2

42A Abscond
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.150
note: Absconding in connection with an offence is prohibited.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42a
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits absconding in connection with an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42A Abscond

42B Charge with offence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.151
note: A person must be charged with an offence if a summons or warrant is issued.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42b
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The charge with offence occurs after the summons is issued
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The charge must occur after the issuance of a summons or warrant
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: A summons has been issued requiring the attendance of the person to answer the information

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must be charged with the offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be charged with an offence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: A summons or warrant is issued

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must ensure the charge with offence occurs
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The state must ensure that a person is charged with an offence if a summons or warrant is issued
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: A summons or warrant is issued

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must be charged with the offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The person must be charged with an offence if a summons or warrant is issued
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: A summons has been issued requiring the attendance of the person to answer the information

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The current charge is part of the trace of charges
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The trace of charges must include the current charge
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: A warrant for the arrest of the person has been issued

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42B Charge with offence

42C Conviction and quashing of conviction
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.151
note: A person is taken to be convicted of an offence if they are convicted or abscond in connection with the offence.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42c-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42c
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42C Conviction and quashing of conviction

42D Property of a person
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42D(1) Property of a person
has part: 42D(2) Property of a person
has part: 42D(3) Property of a person
has part: 42D(4) Property of a person
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42d
schema version: 2

42D(1) Property of a person
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.152
note: Property of a person is to be taken into account when making a restraining order.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42D Property of a person

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Property of a person overlaps with property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (1) For the purpose of making a restraining order against the property of a person, that property is to be taken to include property in which the person has a beneficial interest.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Property of a person has a beneficial interest in it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Has beneficial interest in property of a person.
modality: CogAI
operator: hasBeneficialInterestIn
premise text: (1) For the purpose of making a restraining order against the property of a person, that property is to be taken to include property in which the person has a beneficial interest.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Property of a person includes property in which the person has a beneficial interest.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes property in which the person has a beneficial interest.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (1) For the purpose of making a restraining order against the property of a person, that property is to be taken to include property in which the person has a beneficial interest.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Property of a person diffuses into property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses into property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
premise text: (1) For the purpose of making a restraining order against the property of a person, that property is to be taken to include property in which the person has a beneficial interest.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Property of a person occurs before property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Occurs before property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
premise text: (1) For the purpose of making a restraining order against the property of a person, that property is to be taken to include property in which the person has a beneficial interest.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42D(1) Property of a person

42D(2) Property of a person
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.152
note: Property of a person is to be taken into account when making a restraining order against the property of a defendant.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42D Property of a person

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to take property into account
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Property is taken into account
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: Restraining order against property of a person

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42D(2) Property of a person

42D(3) Property of a person
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.152
note: Property available for recovery order satisfaction
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 42D Property of a person

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is available to satisfy a recovery order made against the person, whether or not a restraining order has been made against the property
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) Property that is to be taken to be property of a person under subsection (1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is available to satisfy a recovery order made against the person, whether or not a restraining order has been made against the property
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
premise text: (3) Property that is to be taken to be property of a person under subsection (1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is available to satisfy a recovery order made against the person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Property is property of a person
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (3) Property that is to be taken to be property of a person under subsection (1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is available to satisfy a recovery order made against the person, whether or not a restraining order has been made against the property
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Property diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) Property that is to be taken to be property of a person under subsection (1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is available to satisfy a recovery order made against the person, whether or not a restraining order has been made against the property
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (3) Property that is to be taken to be property of a person under subsection (1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42D(3) Property of a person

42D(4) Property of a person
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.152
note: Property must be available to satisfy a recovery order if a restraining order is in place.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 42D Property of a person

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42D(4) Property of a person

42E Dealing with property
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.153
note: Dealing with property includes incurring further liability or increasing debt.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42e
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to deal with property
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42E Dealing with property

42F Effective control of property
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42F(1) Effective control of property
has part: 42F(2) Effective control of property
has part: 42F(3) Effective control of property
has part: 42F(4) Effective control of property
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42f
schema version: 2

42F(1) Effective control of property
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.154
note: Property may be subject to effective control of a person.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42F Effective control of property

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42F(1) Effective control of property

42F(2) Effective control of property
type: Concept
description: Reasonable grounds to believe property is subject to effective control
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.154
note: Determine whether property is subject to effective control of a person
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42F Effective control of property

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to determine
modality: Deontic
operator: Determine

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42F(2) Effective control of property

42F(3) Effective control of property
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.154
note: Defines family relationships for the purpose of paragraph (2)(e)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 42F Effective control of property

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of family relationships
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42F(3) Effective control of property

42F(4) Effective control of property
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.154
note: Defines who is considered a child for the purposes of the Act.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 42F Effective control of property

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42F(4) Effective control of property

42G Sufficient consideration
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
note: A consideration sufficient for transferring or acquiring property is one that reflects its value.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42g-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42g
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Value reflection
modality: Deontic
operator: >

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42g-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42G Sufficient consideration

42H Application of Part to convictions and offences
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42H(1) Application of Part to convictions and offences
has part: 42H(2) Application of Part to convictions and offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42h
schema version: 2

42H(1) Application of Part to convictions and offences
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
note: This Part does not apply to a person’s conviction of an offence if the conviction happened before the commencing day.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42H Application of Part to convictions and offences

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The condition is met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The commencing day overlaps with the past.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The commencing day has passed.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part does not apply.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a condition is true, then the obligation is not met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The commencing day has passed.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42H(1) Application of Part to convictions and offences

42H(2) Application of Part to convictions and offences
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
note: This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42H Application of Part to convictions and offences

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part applies during the commencing day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision applies during the commencing day.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part applies during the commencing day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The provision applies during the commencing day.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (2) This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part applies during the commencing day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision applies during the commencing day.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part applies during the commencing day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision applies during the commencing day.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42H(2) Application of Part to convictions and offences

42J Crown bound
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42J(1) Crown bound
has part: 42J(2) Crown bound
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42j
schema version: 2

42J(1) Crown bound
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
note: The Crown is bound by this Part.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42J Crown bound

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap with other parts
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Crown is bound.
modality: Deontic
operator: Binding

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42J(1) Crown bound

42J(2) Crown bound
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
note: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence under this Part.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42J Crown bound

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: This provision applies to a specific temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Nothing in this Part renders the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: This provision is a statement of fact.
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: Nothing in this Part renders the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Nothing in this Part renders the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: This provision is a statement of fact.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Nothing in this Part renders the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: This provision applies to a specific context.
modality: N3Logic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Nothing in this Part renders the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.

43 Notice of charge etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 43(1) Notice of charge etc.
has part: 43(2) Notice of charge etc.
has part: 43(3) Notice of charge etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43
schema version: 2

43(1) Notice of charge etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.156
note: Commissioner must notify Minister of charge.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 43 Notice of charge etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43(1) Notice of charge etc.

43(2) Notice of charge etc.
type: Concept
description: particulars of the charge, reasons why the Commissioner considers that the offence is or may be a corruption offence
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.156
note: Notice must contain particulars of charge and reasons for considering it a corruption offence.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 43 Notice of charge etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice with particulars of charge and reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43(2) Notice of charge etc.

43(3) Notice of charge etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.156
note: Notification of Minister upon charge outcome
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 43 Notice of charge etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

44 Authority to apply for superannuation order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.156
note: Authority to apply for superannuation order
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, during this time, the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person.
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During which time the offence is a corruption offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The Minister administering the Crimes (Superannuation Benefits) Act 1989 is of the opinion that the offence is a corruption offence.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person.
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies that the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: The Minister administering the Crimes (Superannuation Benefits) Act 1989 is of the opinion that the offence is a corruption offence.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation to apply for superannuation order
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: The Minister administering the Crimes (Superannuation Benefits) Act 1989 is of the opinion that the offence is a corruption offence.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person.
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has permission to apply for superannuation order
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
premise text: The Minister administering the Crimes (Superannuation Benefits) Act 1989 is of the opinion that the offence is a corruption offence.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, everywhere that the offence is a corruption offence, the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Everywhere that the offence is a corruption offence
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: The provision applies when the Minister administering the Crimes (Superannuation Benefits) Act 1989 is of the opinion that the offence is a corruption offence.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44 Authority to apply for superannuation order

45 Application for superannuation order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.157
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45(1) Application for superannuation order
has part: 45(1A) Application for superannuation order
has part: 45(2) Application for superannuation order
has part: 45(3) Application for superannuation order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45
schema version: 2

45(1) Application for superannuation order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.157
note: DPP must make application to court for superannuation order
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Application for superannuation order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

45(1A) Application for superannuation order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.157
note: DPP must make application to court if certain conditions met
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Application for superannuation order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(1A) Application for superannuation order

45(2) Application for superannuation order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.157
note: Application for superannuation order must be made under this section.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Application for superannuation order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The DPP must not make an application for a superannuation order unless under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making an application for a superannuation order outside this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The DPP must not make an application for a superannuation order otherwise than under this section.

45(3) Application for superannuation order
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.157
note: Must give written notice of application
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Application for superannuation order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: DPP must give written notice of application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

45A Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45A(1) Application for superannuation order: evidence
has part: 45A(2) Application for superannuation order: evidence
has part: 45A(3) Application for superannuation order: evidence
has part: 45A(4) Application for superannuation order: evidence
has part: 45A(5) Application for superannuation order: evidence
has part: 45A(6) Application for superannuation order: evidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a
schema version: 2

45A(1) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
note: Court may consider transcript of proceedings and evidence given in those proceedings when determining an application for a superannuation order.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may consider transcript of proceedings and evidence given in those proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(1) Application for superannuation order: evidence

45A(2) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
note: Prima facie evidence of fact in proceedings
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Documents under seal overlap with court finding
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Documents under seal overlap with court finding
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Court finding appears on documents under seal

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State must provide documents under seal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide prima facie evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Court finding is prima facie evidence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(2) Application for superannuation order: evidence

45A(3) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
description: Certificate signed or sealed by the person's superannuation authority
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
note: Prima facie evidence of employer contributions or benefits
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the matters stated in the certificate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer contributions or benefits are held in a specified fund
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (a) stating that employer contributions or benefits made or payable by the Commonwealth...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the matters stated in the certificate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer contributions or benefits are equal to the sum of those contributions or benefits as at the specified day plus the amount of interest accrued under the scheme
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (b) stating the amount that equals the sum of those contributions or benefits...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(3) Application for superannuation order: evidence

45A(4) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
description: The certificate must state that benefits have been paid to the person under the relevant superannuation scheme, and the amount of those benefits as at the specified day.
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
note: A certificate signed or sealed by the person’s superannuation authority is required as evidence for an application for a superannuation order.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The certificate is required as evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(4) Application for superannuation order: evidence

45A(5) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
note: Document purporting to be sealed with court seal is taken as lawfully sealed unless proven otherwise.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(5) Application for superannuation order: evidence

45A(6) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
note: Document purporting to be signed or sealed by superannuation authority is taken as authentic unless proven otherwise.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on superannuation authority to authenticate documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

46 Superannuation orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.159
curation status: Proposed
has part: 46(1) Superannuation orders
has part: 46(2) Superannuation orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46
schema version: 2

46(1) Superannuation orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.159
note: Court must declare person convicted of corruption offence and apply Part to their rights under superannuation scheme.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 46 Superannuation orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must declare person convicted of corruption offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46(1) Superannuation orders

46(2) Superannuation orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.159
note: Court must not make superannuation order unless person has absconded and committed for trial or jury could find guilty.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 46 Superannuation orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must not make superannuation order unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Absconding is within a temporal interval that requires court consideration.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WithinTemporalInterval
premise text: (2) Where a person is, because of paragraph 42C(1)(b), to be taken to have been convicted of an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must not make superannuation order unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (2) Where a person is, because of paragraph 42C(1)(b), to be taken to have been convicted of an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must not make superannuation order unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Positive obligation for court to consider absconding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (2) Where a person is, because of paragraph 42C(1)(b), to be taken to have been convicted of an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must not make superannuation order unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Absconding is within a temporal interval that requires court consideration.
modality: LTL
operator: WithinTemporalInterval
premise text: (2) Where a person is, because of paragraph 42C(1)(b), to be taken to have been convicted of an offence...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46(2) Superannuation orders

46A When does a superannuation order take effect?
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.161
note: A superannuation order takes effect on the day it is made.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (A implies obligation)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takesEffect
premise text: (A takes effect)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46A When does a superannuation order take effect?

47 Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47(1) Effect of superannuation order
has part: 47(1A) Effect of superannuation order
has part: 47(1B) Effect of superannuation order
has part: 47(2) Effect of superannuation order
has part: 47(3) Effect of superannuation order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47
schema version: 2

47(1) Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Ceases rights and benefits payable to or in respect of the person on the day the order takes effect.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Effect of superannuation order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an adjustment payment is not payable to the person on or after that day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with the day the order takes effect.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (aa) any entitlement of the person to an adjustment payment ceases on that day...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...all rights of, and benefits payable to or in respect of, the person cease...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implicates cessation of rights and benefits.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a superannuation order...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...all rights of, and benefits payable to or in respect of, the person cease...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits rights and benefits payable to or in respect of the person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a superannuation order...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation is not liable to pay any employer contribution or benefit under the scheme in respect of the person on or after that day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits liability for employer contributions and benefits.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation is not liable to pay any employer contribution or benefit under the scheme in respect of the person on or after that day...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation is not liable to pay any employer contribution or benefit under the scheme in respect of the person on or after that day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace with the day the order takes effect.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (b) any amount of the kind mentioned in subsection 46(3) that is vested in the person ceases to be so vested on that day...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(1) Effect of superannuation order

47(1A) Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Debt due to Commonwealth or organisation
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-cogai-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Effect of superannuation order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key refers to a specific provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (1A) An amount payable by a person to the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation under a superannuation order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth organisation, as the case may be.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key refers to a specific provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Identifies an assertion about a natural person
modality: CogAI
operator: assertion
premise text: (1A) An amount payable by a person to the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation under a superannuation order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth organisation, as the case may be.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key refers to a specific provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: due
premise text: (1A) An amount payable by a person to the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation under a superannuation order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth organisation, as the case may be.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key refers to a specific provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Identifies an ordered trace
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
premise text: (1A) An amount payable by a person to the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation under a superannuation order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth organisation, as the case may be.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The key refers to a specific provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Identifies an assertion about a legal person
modality: SHACL
operator: assertion
premise text: (1A) An amount payable by a person to the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation under a superannuation order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth organisation, as the case may be.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(1A) Effect of superannuation order

47(1B) Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Enforcement of superannuation order as a civil proceeding
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Effect of superannuation order

47(2) Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Entitlement to payment upon cessation of employment
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Effect of superannuation order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on the day on which he or she ceases to be a member of the relevant superannuation scheme.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for payment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Despite the Superannuation Act, or any other Act or any agreement...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person is entitled to payment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of cessation of employment
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (2) Despite the Superannuation Act, or any other Act or any agreement...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person is entitled to payment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of entitlement
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (2) Despite the Superannuation Act, or any other Act or any agreement...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to payment
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person is entitled to payment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of entitlement
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) Despite the Superannuation Act, or any other Act or any agreement...

47(3) Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162
note: Entitlement to payment of benefits upon cessation of membership
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Effect of superannuation order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) who would, but for that subsection, have been entitled to payment of benefits under the relevant superannuation scheme on or after the day on which the superannuation order takes effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The entitlement occurs during the period of membership
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) who: (i) was an AFP employee at the time the relevant corruption offence was committed but was not such an employee when charged with that offence; or (ii) was an old law member or staff member at the time the relevant corruption offence was committed but was not such a member or an AFP employee when charged with that offence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is entitled, on the day on which he or she ceases to be a member of the scheme, to payment of an amount worked out using the formula
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The entitlement is governed by a rule
modality: CogAI
operator: hasRule
premise text: (1) applies to a person

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is entitled, on the day on which he or she ceases to be a member of the scheme, to payment of an amount worked out using the formula
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entails an obligation to provide payment upon cessation of membership
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (1) applies to a person

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) who would, but for that subsection, have been entitled to payment of benefits under the relevant superannuation scheme on or after the day on which the superannuation order takes effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The entitlement is conditional upon meeting certain conditions
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
premise text: (a) who: (i) was an AFP employee at the time the relevant corruption offence was committed but was not such an employee when charged with that offence; or (ii) was an old law member or staff member at the time the relevant corruption offence was committed but was not such a member or an AFP employee when charged with that offence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is entitled, on the day on which he or she ceases to be a member of the scheme, to payment of an amount worked out using the formula
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The entitlement ends upon cessation of membership
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (b) who would, but for that subsection, have been entitled to payment of benefits under the relevant superannuation scheme on or after the day on which the superannuation order takes effect

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(3) Effect of superannuation order

47A Superannuation orders: variation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47A(1) Superannuation orders: variation
has part: 47A(2) Superannuation orders: variation
has part: 47A(3) Superannuation orders: variation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47a
schema version: 2

47A(1) Superannuation orders: variation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
note: Variation of superannuation order by DPP after its effect
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47A Superannuation orders: variation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...apply to the court that made the order...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Variation occurs after effect of original order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) If a superannuation order...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...having regard to any amount of employer contributions...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: DPP's variation is based on employer contributions
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) If a superannuation order...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...apply to the court that made the order...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to vary superannuation order
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) If a superannuation order...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as soon as practicable after the order takes effect...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty of DPP to vary order after its effect
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) If a superannuation order...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...vary the order by substituting for the specified amount...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Variation affects all related orders
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) If a superannuation order...

47A(2) Superannuation orders: variation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
note: Court must vary superannuation order upon application.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47A Superannuation orders: variation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Varying order required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to vary superannuation order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Application made

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47A(2) Superannuation orders: variation

47A(3) Superannuation orders: variation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
note: Defines prescribed period for superannuation order variation
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47A Superannuation orders: variation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ending on the day on which...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for prescribed period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: starting on the day on which...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the variation is made.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies 'prescribed period'
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedBy
premise text: prescribed period means the period starting on the day on which...

47B Superannuation orders: revocation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47B(1) Superannuation orders: revocation
has part: 47B(2) Superannuation orders: revocation
has part: 47B(3) Superannuation orders: revocation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47b
schema version: 2

47B(1) Superannuation orders: revocation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
note: A superannuation order made in relation to a person is revoked if certain conditions are met.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47B Superannuation orders: revocation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making of an application for a superannuation order under subsection 45(1A); or
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Revocation of superannuation order
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: (1) A superannuation order made in relation to a person is to be taken...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making of an application for a superannuation order under subsection 45(1A); or
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to revoke superannuation order
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) the person’s sentence is so reduced or otherwise changed that...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making of an application for a superannuation order under subsection 45(1A); or
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to revoke superannuation order
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (c) where the person is taken to be convicted because of...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making of an application for a superannuation order under subsection 45(1A); or
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to revoke superannuation order
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: ...the person is brought before a court in respect of the offence concerned and, having been convicted...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the making of an application for a superannuation order under subsection 45(1A); or
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for revocation
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) the person’s conviction is quashed; or

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47B(1) Superannuation orders: revocation

47B(2) Superannuation orders: revocation
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
note: Written notice must be given to the person in respect of whom the order was made and their superannuation authority.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47B Superannuation orders: revocation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

47B(3) Superannuation orders: revocation
type: Concept
description: Amount determined by the Finance Minister
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
note: Payable amount for revocation of superannuation order
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47B Superannuation orders: revocation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal interval between two events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (3) Where: (a) a superannuation order is made in relation to a person who is taken to be convicted because of paragraph 42C(1)(b); and (b) the superannuation order is to be taken to have been revoked;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Excerpt implies a relationship between two events or conditions
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (3) Where: (a) a superannuation order is made in relation to a person who is taken to be convicted because of paragraph 42C(1)(b); and (b) the superannuation order is to be taken to have been revoked;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Payable amount for revocation of superannuation order
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excerpt describes a diffusion of information or obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) Where: (a) a superannuation order is made in relation to a person who is taken to be convicted because of paragraph 42C(1)(b); and (b) the superannuation order is to be taken to have been revoked;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal relationship between two events
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) Where: (a) a superannuation order is made in relation to a person who is taken to be convicted because of paragraph 42C(1)(b); and (b) the superannuation order is to be taken to have been revoked;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47B(3) Superannuation orders: revocation

49A Application for restraining order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49A(1) Application for restraining order
has part: 49A(2) Application for restraining order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49a
schema version: 2

49A(1) Application for restraining order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
note: Application for restraining order against specified property
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49A Application for restraining order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the DPP may apply to the appropriate court for a restraining order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between charging and application for restraining order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) has been, or is about to be, charged with an offence;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the DPP may apply to the appropriate court for a restraining order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on DPP to apply for restraining order
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (1) Where a person (in this Division called the defendant):

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the DPP may apply to the appropriate court for a restraining order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on defendant to prevent application for restraining order
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (a) has been convicted of an offence; or (b) has been, or is about to be, charged with an offence;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the DPP may apply to the appropriate court for a restraining order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between charging and application for restraining order
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (b) has been, or is about to be, charged with an offence;

49A(2) Application for restraining order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
note: The DPP may give undertakings regarding payment of damages or costs.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49A Application for restraining order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to give undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: may

49B Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49B(1) Making of restraining orders
has part: 49B(2) Making of restraining orders
has part: 49B(3) Making of restraining orders
has part: 49B(4) Making of restraining orders
has part: 49B(5) Making of restraining orders
has part: 49B(6) Making of restraining orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49b
schema version: 2

49B(1) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
note: Restraining order on property
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may, by order, direct that the property...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disposal of property
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) Subject to this Division, where an application is made for a restraining order...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49B(1) Making of restraining orders

49B(2) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
note: Restraining order cannot exceed amount necessary for recovery of losses.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Restraining order must not exceed amount necessary for recovery of losses.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

49B(3) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
note: Court can make restraining order against property with value more than payable by defendant under recovery order.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court permits making restraining order against property
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not prevent the court from making a...

49B(4) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
note: A court may make a restraining order against property.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has the power to make a restraining order.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49B(4) Making of restraining orders

49B(5) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
note: Court must not make restraining order unless defendant will be charged within 48 hours.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defendant will be charged within 48 hours.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must not make restraining order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Application made in reliance on proposed charging.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49B(5) Making of restraining orders

49B(6) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
note: Court refusal to make restraining order based on Commonwealth's undertakings
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court refusal to make restraining order
modality: Deontic
operator: refusal

49C Restraining order may be subject to conditions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.167
note: Restraining order conditions for a person's property
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49c-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49c
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes obligations for a restraining order
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49C Restraining order may be subject to conditions

49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49D(1) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
has part: 49D(2) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
has part: 49D(3) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
has part: 49D(4) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
has part: 49D(5) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49d
schema version: 2

49D(1) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
description: Affidavit of police officer stating belief in defendant's guilt
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168
note: Court must have affidavit from police officer to make restraining order
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must have affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49D(1) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases

49D(2) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
description: Affidavit of police officer stating belief in defendant's control
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168
note: Court must have affidavit from police officer to make restraining order against property
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must have affidavit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49D(2) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases

49D(3) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
description: Grounds on which the officer holds that belief
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168
note: Police officer must state grounds for belief in affidavit.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Grounds on which the officer holds that belief
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide grounds for belief
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49D(3) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases

49D(4) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168
note: Court may direct DPP to give or publish notice of application.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may direct DPP.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Direct the DPP to give or publish notice.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: direct

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49D(4) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases

49D(5) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168
note: Police officer must be a member of the Australian Federal Police or a State/Territory police force.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Police officer must be a member of the Australian Federal Police or a State/Territory police force.
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBe

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Police officer is a member of the Australian Federal Police or a State/Territory police force.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isA

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49D(5) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases

49E Notice of application for restraining order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49E(1) Notice of application for restraining order
has part: 49E(2) Notice of application for restraining order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49e
schema version: 2

49E(1) Notice of application for restraining order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
note: Notice of application for restraining order to property owners and interested persons
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49E Notice of application for restraining order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

49E(2) Notice of application for restraining order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
note: Court must consider application if DPP asks, but restraining order ceases after 14 days.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49E Notice of application for restraining order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Restraining order ceases after 14 days
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49E(2) Notice of application for restraining order

49EA Extension of certain restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49EA(1) Extension of certain restraining orders
has part: 49EA(2) Extension of certain restraining orders
has part: 49EA(3) Extension of certain restraining orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49ea
schema version: 2

49EA(1) Extension of certain restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
note: Court may extend restraining order on application by DPP
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49ea-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49EA Extension of certain restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

49EA(2) Extension of certain restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
note: Applying certain subsections to the extension of a restraining order
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49ea-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49EA Extension of certain restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applying certain subsections to the extension of a restraining order
modality: Deontic
operator: apply

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49EA(2) Extension of certain restraining orders

49EA(3) Extension of certain restraining orders
type: Concept
description: Notice to owner and any person with interest in property
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
note: Must give written notice of application for extension of restraining order
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49ea-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 49EA Extension of certain restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

49F Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49F(1) Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
has part: 49F(2) Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49f
schema version: 2

49F(1) Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
note: Any person with an interest may provide evidence at a hearing.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49F Persons who may appear and adduce evidence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provide evidence at a hearing
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: Claiming an interest in the property

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Adduce evidence at the hearing
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Can adduce evidence
modality: Epistemic
operator: CAN
premise text: Notice of application given under subsection 49E(1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provide evidence at a hearing
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of providing evidence
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: Any person who claims an interest in the property may appear and adduce evidence

49F(2) Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
note: Any person with an interest may appear and adduce evidence
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49F Persons who may appear and adduce evidence

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May appear and adduce evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

49G Witnesses not required to answer questions etc. in certain cases
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
note: Witnesses are not required to answer questions or produce documents if it may prejudice an investigation or prosecution.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49g-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49g
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Witnesses are not required to answer questions or produce documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49g-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49G Witnesses not required to answer questions etc. in certain cases

49H Notice of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49H(1) Notice of restraining orders
has part: 49H(2) Notice of restraining orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49h
schema version: 2

49H(1) Notice of restraining orders
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
note: Must provide written notice of restraining order to person's property
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49H Notice of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice of restraining order to person's property
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

49H(2) Notice of restraining orders
type: Concept
description: Notice of restraining order
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
note: DPP must give notice of restraining order as soon as practicable after end of specified period.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49H Notice of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The DPP must give the person notice of the restraining order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49H(2) Notice of restraining orders

49J Ancillary orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.171
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49J(1) Ancillary orders
has part: 49J(2) Ancillary orders
has part: 49J(3) Ancillary orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49j
schema version: 2

49J(1) Ancillary orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.171
note: Court may make ancillary orders with a restraining order.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49J Ancillary orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May impose obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49J(1) Ancillary orders

49J(2) Ancillary orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.171
note: Application for ancillary order
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49J Ancillary orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49J(2) Ancillary orders

49J(3) Ancillary orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.171
note: Restraining order against property in reliance on conviction, charging or proposed charging.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 49J Ancillary orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal overlap between a conviction and a restraining order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) an appropriate court makes a restraining order against property in reliance on the conviction, charging or proposed charging;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes the implication between a conviction and a restraining order.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) a defendant has been convicted of, or has been charged or is about to be charged with, an offence;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inferentially relates a conviction to a restraining order.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (a) a defendant has been convicted of, or has been charged or is about to be charged with, an offence;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to make a restraining order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) Where...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagates the effect of a conviction to a restraining order.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (b) an appropriate court makes a restraining order against property in reliance on the conviction, charging or proposed charging;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49J(3) Ancillary orders

49K Charge on property subject to restraining order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.172
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49K(1) Charge on property subject to restraining order
has part: 49K(2) Charge on property subject to restraining order
has part: 49K(3) Charge on property subject to restraining order
has part: 49K(4) Charge on property subject to restraining order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49k
schema version: 2

49K(1) Charge on property subject to restraining order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.172
note: Charge on property subject to restraining order
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49K Charge on property subject to restraining order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...upon the making of the later of the orders, there is created...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the charge and the recovery order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: ...the making of the later of the orders, there is created...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...there is created, by force of this section, a charge on the property to secure the payment of the amount specified in the recovery order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes the relationship between the charge and the payment
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) a recovery order is made against a defendant;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...property of another person in relation to which an order is, or has been, made under subsection 53A(1);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes how the system recognizes entities (property) subject to the charge
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity recognition
premise text: (i) property of the defendant; or

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a charge on the property to secure the payment of the amount specified in the recovery order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Commonwealth or relevant organisation to secure payment
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Where...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a charge on the property to secure the payment of the amount specified in the recovery order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how the charge spreads to other entities
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: ...the making of the later of the orders, there is created...

49K(2) Charge on property subject to restraining order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.172
note: Charge on property ceases to have effect under specified conditions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49K Charge on property subject to restraining order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Charge ceases during specified events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A charge on property of a person ceases to have effect: (a) if the relevant recovery order ceases to have effect;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Charge ceases during specified events
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) A charge on property of a person ceases to have effect: (a) if the relevant recovery order ceases to have effect;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation ceases
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (2) A charge on property of a person ceases to have effect:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Charge spreads during specified events
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) A charge on property of a person ceases to have effect: (a) if the relevant recovery order ceases to have effect;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Charge ceases during specified events
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) A charge on property of a person ceases to have effect: (a) if the relevant recovery order ceases to have effect;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49K(2) Charge on property subject to restraining order

49K(3) Charge on property subject to restraining order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.172
note: A charge on property has priority over all other encumbrances.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 49K Charge on property subject to restraining order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Charge on property overlaps with other encumbrances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Charge on property overlaps with other encumbrances
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Charge on property has priority over all other encumbrances.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes the charge on property.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognizes the charge on property as a valid encumbrance
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Charge on property is subject to every encumbrance...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Charge has priority over all other encumbrances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Priority of charge on property
modality: Deontic
operator: Priority
premise text: Charge on property is subject to every encumbrance...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Change of ownership diffuses the effect on the charge.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Change of ownership does not affect the charge on property
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Charge on property is subject to every encumbrance...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Charge on property is recurrently present in the property's history.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Charge on property is recurrently present in the property's history
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: Charge on property has priority over all other encumbrances.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49K(3) Charge on property subject to restraining order

49K(4) Charge on property subject to restraining order
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.172
note: Charge created on property of a particular kind
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49k-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 49K Charge on property subject to restraining order

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Creation of charge
modality: Deontic
operator: CREATE
premise text: (4) Where: (a) a charge is created on property of a particular kind;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49K(4) Charge on property subject to restraining order

49L Registration of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49L(1) Registration of restraining orders
has part: 49L(2) Registration of restraining orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49l
schema version: 2

49L(1) Registration of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
note: Authority responsible for administering provisions may record particulars of restraining order on register.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49L Registration of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority has obligation to record particulars.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49L(1) Registration of restraining orders

49L(2) Registration of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
note: A person who deals with property must have notice of a restraining order if it has been recorded.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49L Registration of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to provide notice of restraining orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49L(2) Registration of restraining orders

49M Contravention of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49M(1) Contravention of restraining orders
has part: 49M(2) Contravention of restraining orders
has part: 49M(3) Contravention of restraining orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49m
schema version: 2

49M(1) Contravention of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
note: Restraining order contravention is an offence punishable by imprisonment.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49M Contravention of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restraining order contravention is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49M(1) Contravention of restraining orders

49M(2) Contravention of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
note: Disposing of property in contravention of a restraining order
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49M Contravention of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the disposition or dealing was either not for sufficient consideration or not in favour of a person who acted in good faith;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between property disposal and restraining order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) a restraining order is made against property; (b) the property is disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in contravention of the restraining order;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the disposition or dealing was either not for sufficient consideration or not in favour of a person who acted in good faith;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implying property disposal and restraining order
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
premise text: (a) a restraining order is made against property; (b) the property is disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in contravention of the restraining order;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the disposition or dealing was either not for sufficient consideration or not in favour of a person who acted in good faith;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricting property disposal
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a restraining order is made against property; (b) the property is disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in contravention of the restraining order;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the disposition or dealing was either not for sufficient consideration or not in favour of a person who acted in good faith;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusing property disposal and restraining order
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) a restraining order is made against property; (b) the property is disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in contravention of the restraining order;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the disposition or dealing was either not for sufficient consideration or not in favour of a person who acted in good faith;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of property disposal and restraining order
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (a) a restraining order is made against property; (b) the property is disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in contravention of the restraining order;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49M(2) Contravention of restraining orders

49M(3) Contravention of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
note: Court may set aside disposition or dealing as from a specific day.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 49M Contravention of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may make an order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Court's power is between the disposition or dealing and the specific day.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (3) Where the DPP makes an application...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may make an order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Court implies that disposition or dealing is prohibited after a specific day.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) Where the DPP makes an application...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may make an order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Court recognizes the need to set aside disposition or dealing.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (3) Where the DPP makes an application...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may make an order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court prohibits the disposition or dealing.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) Where the DPP makes an application...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court may make an order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Court's power spreads to disposition or dealing after a specific day.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (3) Where the DPP makes an application...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49M(3) Contravention of restraining orders

49N Restraining orders: revocation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.175
note: Revocation of restraining orders under certain conditions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49n-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49n-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49n
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to revoke a restraining order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The court may revoke the order if...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49n-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49N Restraining orders: revocation

49P When do restraining orders cease to have effect?
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.175
note: Restraining orders cease effect upon acquittal or withdrawal of charge without conviction.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49p-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49p-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49p
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restraining orders cease effect.
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (1) A restraining order ceases to have effect if...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49p-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49P When do restraining orders cease to have effect?

49Q Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.176
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49Q(1) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
has part: 49Q(2) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
has part: 49Q(3) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49q
schema version: 2

49Q(1) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.176
note: Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49Q Extension of period of effect of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to extend the period of effect of restraining orders
modality: Deontic
operator: may

49Q(2) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.176
note: Court may extend period of effect of restraining order under certain conditions.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49Q Extension of period of effect of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: May still be made recovery order or order under subsection 53A(1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: may still be
premise text: (b) where the property concerned is the property of another...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Thinks appropriate in relation to operation of restraining order
modality: Argumentation
operator: thinks appropriate
premise text: the court may: (c) by order, extend the period of effect...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May extend period of effect
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (2) Where, on an application for an extension...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Extend period of effect of restraining order
modality: Diffusion
operator: extend
premise text: (2) Where, on an application for an extension...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49Q(2) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders

49Q(3) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
type: Concept
description: written notice
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.176
note: Notice must be given to a person in relation to a restraining order
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49q-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 49Q Extension of period of effect of restraining orders

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: DPP must give a person written notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

49R Notice of applications
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.177
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49R(1) Notice of applications
has part: 49R(2) Notice of applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49r
schema version: 2

49R(1) Notice of applications
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.177
note: Notice of application to other persons entitled under subsection 49J(2)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49R Notice of applications

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice to other persons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49R(1) Notice of applications

49R(2) Notice of applications
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.177
note: Notice of application for revocation of restraining order must be given to DPP.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49R Notice of applications

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person applying must give written notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

4A Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.27
note: Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4a
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify prohibited drug
modality: Deontic
operator: specify

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4A Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs

4AA State offences that have a federal aspect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 4AA(1A) State offences that have a federal aspect
has part: 4AA(1) State offences that have a federal aspect
has part: 4AA(2) State offences that have a federal aspect
has part: 4AA(3) State offences that have a federal aspect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4aa
schema version: 2

4AA(1) State offences that have a federal aspect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.24
note: A State offence has a federal aspect if certain conditions are met.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 4AA State offences that have a federal aspect

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would be, incidental to the investigation mentioned in subsection (i).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: States that the investigation is during the investigation mentioned in subsection (i).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (d) both: (i) the Australian Federal Police is investigating an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or a Territory; and (ii) if the Australian Federal Police is investigating, or were to investigate, the State offence—that investigation is, or would be, incidental to the investigation mentioned in

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A State offence has a federal aspect if, and only if:...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States the condition for a State offence to have a federal aspect.
modality: Deontic
operator: if-and-only-if
premise text: (a) both: (i) the State offence is not an ancillary offence; and (ii) assuming that the provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...both conditions must be met for a State offence to have a federal aspect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: States that both conditions must be met for a State offence to have a federal aspect.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
premise text: (a) and (b)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4AA(1) State offences that have a federal aspect

4AA(1A) State offences that have a federal aspect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.24
note: Identify State offences with a federal aspect
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4aa-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 4AA State offences that have a federal aspect

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Australian Federal Police investigation occurs during Commonwealth investigation)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Investigation by Australian Federal Police during Commonwealth investigation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) the Australian Federal Police investigating them is incidental to the Australian Federal Police investigating an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or a Territory.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (State offence has a federal aspect)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State offence has a federal aspect
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1A) The object of this section is to identify State offences that have a federal aspect because: (a) they potentially fall within Commonwealth legislative power because of the elements of the State offence; or (b) they potentially fall within Commonwealth legislative power because of the circumstances in which the State offence was committed (whether or not those circumstances are expressed to be acts or omissions involved in committing the offence); or (c) the Australian Federal Police investigating them is incidental to the Australian Federal Police investigating an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or a Territory.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (State offence has a federal aspect)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Multiple conditions for federal aspect
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
premise text: (a) they potentially fall within Commonwealth legislative power because of the elements of the State offence; or (b) they potentially fall within Commonwealth legislative power because of the circumstances in which the State offence was committed (whether or not those circumstances are expressed to be acts or omissions involved in committing the offence); or (c) the Australian Federal Police investigating them is incidental to the Australian Federal Police investigating an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or a Territory.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4AA(1A) State offences that have a federal aspect

4AA(2) State offences that have a federal aspect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.24
note: Determines the specificity of acts or omissions in State offences
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 4AA State offences that have a federal aspect

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines the specificity of acts or omissions in State offences
modality: Deontic
operator: determines

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4AA(2) State offences that have a federal aspect

4AA(3) State offences that have a federal aspect
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.24
note: A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c) if the conduct constituting the State offence affects the interests of the Commonwealth;
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 4AA State offences that have a federal aspect

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) affects the interests of: (i) the Commonwealth;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: States that a conduct constituting a State offence occurs during the period when it affects the interests of the Commonwealth.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) affects the interests of: (i) the Commonwealth;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: States that a conduct constituting a State offence is processed or executed during the period when it affects the interests of the Commonwealth.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (3) A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) affects the interests of: (i) the Commonwealth;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States that a conduct constitutes a covered offence if it affects the interests of the Commonwealth.
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
premise text: (3) A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) affects the interests of: (i) the Commonwealth;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: States that a conduct constituting a State offence spreads or is transmitted during the period when it affects the interests of the Commonwealth.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (3) A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) affects the interests of: (i) the Commonwealth;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: States that a conduct constituting a State offence occurs during the period when it affects the interests of the Commonwealth.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4AA(3) State offences that have a federal aspect

5 References in other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5(1) References in other laws
has part: 5(1A) References in other laws
has part: 5(2) References in other laws
has part: 5(3) References in other laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

5 Aug 1996
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1996
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-2
schema version: 2

5 Dec 2011
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 2 (items 1, 2)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-3
schema version: 2

5(1) References in other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.28
note: References in other laws
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5 References in other laws

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition is valid during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between definitions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) a reference to the Police Force of that Territory shall be read as a reference to the Australian Federal Police;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The reference is substituted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference substitution
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
premise text: (a) a reference to a Commonwealth Police Officer shall be read as a reference to a member of the Australian Federal Police;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition is updated.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference substitution in definitions
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
premise text: (e) a reference to the Commissioner of Police of that Territory, however described, shall be read as a reference to the Commissioner;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition is updated.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference substitution in definitions
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
premise text: (a) a reference to a Commonwealth Police Officer shall be read as a reference to a member of the Australian Federal Police;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition is valid during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between definitions
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (d) a reference to an officer of police of that Territory shall be read as a reference to a member of the Australian Federal Police;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(1) References in other laws

5(1A) References in other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.28
note: Reference to Australian Capital Territory is taken to include it.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 5 References in other laws

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...includes, that Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation: includes
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (1A) Where a reference in a law...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Taken for the purposes of subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1A) Where a reference in a law...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy: law -> Australian Capital Territory
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: That reference shall, for the purposes of subsection (1), be taken to be a reference to that Territory.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(1A) References in other laws

5(2) References in other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.28
note: If a provision of a law refers to an Australian Federal Police member holding a particular rank, it must be read as referring to the member to whom a declaration applies.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5 References in other laws

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Then the provision must be read as referring to the member to whom the declaration applies during its duration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between declarations and provisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: A declaration is in force under subsection (3) that a member is of that rank for the purposes of this paragraph.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Then the provision must be read as referring to that member.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: If a provision refers to an Australian Federal Police member holding a particular rank.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Then the provision must be read as referring to the member to whom the declaration applies during its duration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between declarations and provisions (LTL)
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: A declaration is in force under subsection (3) that a member is of that rank for the purposes of this paragraph.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(2) References in other laws

5(3) References in other laws
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.28
note: The Commissioner may declare a member's rank for the purposes of paragraph (2)(b)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 5 References in other laws

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of rank is an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51(1) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 51(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 51(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 51(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 51(5) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51
schema version: 2

51(1) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178
note: Suspension of superannuation rights upon charging with corruption offence.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...then, if the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that the offence is a corruption offence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between charging and suspension.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (b) the person ceases, for any reason, to be an AFP employee on or after the day on which the person is charged;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that the offence is a corruption offence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of persons and their rights.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: (1) Where:...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner shall notify the person’s superannuation authority in writing...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Suspension of superannuation rights upon charging with corruption offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Where:...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner shall notify the person’s superannuation authority in writing...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of persons charged with corruption offences.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (a) a person is charged with an offence;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner shall notify the person’s superannuation authority in writing...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of superannuation scheme suspension.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
premise text: (b) the person ceases, for any reason, to be an AFP employee on or after the day on which the person is charged;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(1) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

51(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178
note: The Commissioner must give a copy of a notice to the person concerned.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner must give a copy of a notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

51(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178
note: Person entitled to receive payment upon ceasing employment if certain conditions met.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ceasing employment overlaps with receiving payment.
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between ceasing employment and receiving payment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Payment received on day of ceasing employment.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person entitled to receive payment.
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to receive payment upon ceasing employment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Commissioner notifies superannuation authority of suspension.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

51(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178
note: Commissioner must notify relevant superannuation authority
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

51(5) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178
note: Re-engagement after initial period
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with

53A Court may lift corporate veil etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.179
curation status: Proposed
has part: 53A(1) Court may lift corporate veil etc.
has part: 53A(2) Court may lift corporate veil etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53a
schema version: 2

53A(1) Court may lift corporate veil etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.179
note: Court may lift corporate veil to declare property available for recovery order.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 53A Court may lift corporate veil etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has an obligation to lift corporate veil.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53A(1) Court may lift corporate veil etc.

53A(2) Court may lift corporate veil etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.179
note: Court may enforce recovery order against property
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 53A Court may lift corporate veil etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53A(2) Court may lift corporate veil etc.

54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54(1) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
has part: 54(2) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
has part: 54(3) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
has part: 54(4) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
has part: 54(5) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
has part: 54(6) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54
schema version: 2

54(1) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
note: Person responsible for administration of fund must pay amount out of the fund.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay amount out of the fund.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(1) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51

54(2) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
note: Finance Minister must make arrangements for payment of amount out of Consolidated Revenue Fund.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Finance Minister has an obligation to make arrangements.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

54(3) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
note: Commonwealth pays amount under subsections 47(2) or (3) and 51(3)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the Commonwealth
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(3) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51

54(4) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
note: Payment of amount from Commonwealth fund
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Payment obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

54(5) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
note: Amount payable by Commonwealth out of Consolidated Revenue Fund
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the Commonwealth
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

54(6) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
note: The Consolidated Revenue Fund is appropriated to pay amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(6) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51

54A Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.181
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54A(1) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
has part: 54A(2) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
has part: 54A(3) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54a
schema version: 2

54A(1) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.181
note: Prevents payment of another amount under certain subsections.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54A Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits payment of another amount.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54A(1) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions

54A(2) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.181
note: Payment of another amount under subsection 47(2) is not entitled.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54A Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Payment of another amount under subsection 47(2) is not permitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54A(2) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions

54A(3) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.181
note: Definition of Superannuation Benefits Act Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54A Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines the scope of the term
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54A(3) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions

55 Possible superannuation order not to be taken into account in
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.181
note: Court cannot punish with imprisonment for life or longer than 12 years in sentencing.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-55-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on punishment with imprisonment for life or longer than 12 years.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-55-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55 Possible superannuation order not to be taken into account in

56 Constitution of appropriate courts
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.182
note: Court may deal with application for superannuation order or restraining order made by a person convicted of corruption offence.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-56-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may deal with application
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56 Constitution of appropriate courts

5A Application and extension of Act and regulations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5A(1) Application and extension of Act and regulations
has part: 5A(2) Application and extension of Act and regulations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5a
schema version: 2

5A(1) Application and extension of Act and regulations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.29
note: Applicability of Act and regulations
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5A Application and extension of Act and regulations

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: Act applies from commencement to present
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (1) This Act and the regulations apply throughout the whole of Australia and also outside Australia.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Act applies to Australia and outside Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) This Act and the regulations apply throughout the whole of Australia and also outside Australia.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5A(1) Application and extension of Act and regulations

5A(2) Application and extension of Act and regulations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.29
note: Act and regulations extend to external Territories.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5A Application and extension of Act and regulations

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension of Act and regulations
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
premise text: (2) This Act and the regulations extend to the external Territories.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5A(2) Application and extension of Act and regulations

5B Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.29
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5b
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5B Application of the Criminal Code

6 Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(1) Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
has part: 6(2) Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Dec 1989
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
note: Prohibition on amending s 8(1)(a), 8(1A), (1B)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2
schema version: 2

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
note: Reference to section 4(1), (2) and Schedule 2.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-3
schema version: 2

6 Nov 2025
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
note: Commencement and application provisions for Schedule 3, item 6
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-4
schema version: 2

6(1) Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.30
note: Defines the composition of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Constitution of the Australian Federal Police

6(2) Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.30
note: The Australian Federal Police is a listed entity.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Constitution of the Australian Federal Police

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Australian Federal Police is a listed entity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner of Police is the accountable authority of the Australian Federal Police.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The persons referred to in subsection (1) are officials of the Australian Federal Police.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official classification
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2) Constitution of the Australian Federal Police

60A Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.183
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60A(1) Secrecy
has part: 60A(2) Secrecy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60a
schema version: 2

60A(1) Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.183
note: List of individuals subject to secrecy
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60A Secrecy

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies to a person who is, or was at any time...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The list includes individuals who were in office during the relevant period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (e) a person engaged under section 35; or (f) a person performing functions under an agreement under section 69D.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies to a person who is, or was at any time...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Membership in the list implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
premise text: (a) the Commissioner; or (b) a Deputy Commissioner; or...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies to a person who is, or was at any time...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Membership in the list implies obligation for all individuals listed
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
premise text: (e) a person engaged under section 35; or (f) a person performing functions under an agreement under section 69D.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies to a person who is, or was at any time...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The list includes individuals whose functions were performed during the relevant period
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (f) a person performing functions under an agreement under section 69D.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60A(1) Secrecy

60A(2) Secrecy
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.183
note: Prohibited from making or divulging prescribed information except for specific purposes.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60A Secrecy

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...except for the purposes of this Act or the regulations; or...the purposes of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022 or regulations under that Act; or...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for the prohibition.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A person to whom this section applies must not...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...except for the purposes of this Act or the regulations; or...the purposes of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022 or regulations under that Act; or...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Mechanism for the prohibition.
modality: CogAI
operator: by
premise text: (2) A person to whom this section applies must not...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not make a record of any prescribed information; or...must not divulge or communicate any prescribed information...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making or divulging prescribed information.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) A person to whom this section applies must not...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...except for the purposes of this Act or the regulations; or...the purposes of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022 or regulations under that Act; or...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Mechanism for the prohibition.
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (2) A person to whom this section applies must not...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...except for the purposes of this Act or the regulations; or...the purposes of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022 or regulations under that Act; or...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for the prohibition.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) A person to whom this section applies must not...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60A(2) Secrecy

61 Awards for bravery etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
curation status: Proposed
has part: 61(1) Awards for bravery etc.
has part: 61(1A) Awards for bravery etc.
has part: 61(2) Awards for bravery etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61
schema version: 2

61(1) Awards for bravery etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
note: Commissioner must confer award on AFP appointee who merits it.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Awards for bravery etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The award CAN BE CONFERRED BETWEEN the date of merit and the current date.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Award can be conferred within a specific timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) Where an AFP appointee has, by his or her bravery or other conspicuous conduct...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conferment of the award IMPLIES that the Commissioner took a positive action.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Award conferment implies a positive action
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (1) Where an AFP appointee has, by his or her bravery or other conspicuous conduct...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The award RECOGNIZED BY AI SYSTEMS who process the Commissioner's decision.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Award recognition can be recognized by AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
premise text: (1) Where an AFP appointee has, by his or her bravery or other conspicuous conduct...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner MUST confer the award on that person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to confer award
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Where an AFP appointee has, by his or her bravery or other conspicuous conduct...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The award REACHES OTHERS who are aware of the recipient's merit.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Award recognition can spread to others
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (1) Where an AFP appointee has, by his or her bravery or other conspicuous conduct...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61(1) Awards for bravery etc.

61(1A) Awards for bravery etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
note: Commissioner may confer award on a person who has shown bravery or conspicuous conduct.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Awards for bravery etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61(1A) Awards for bravery etc.

61(2) Awards for bravery etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
note: Award criteria must be prescribed.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Awards for bravery etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prescribed criteria are obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61(2) Awards for bravery etc.

62 Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
curation status: Proposed
has part: 62(1) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
has part: 62(2) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
has part: 62(3) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62
schema version: 2

62(1) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
note: Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards is prohibited.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if the person dishonestly represents that a police award has been conferred on the person.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards is prohibited.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Prohibition of dishonest representation
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if the person dishonestly represents that a police award has been conferred on the person.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(1) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards

62(2) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
note: Dishonesty in representing conferral of police awards is prohibited.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Dishonesty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, a police award is an award,...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(2) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards

62(3) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
note: Definition of dishonest
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines dishonest
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(3) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards

63 Personation etc. of member or special member
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63(1) Personation etc. of member or special member
has part: 63(2) Personation etc. of member or special member
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63
schema version: 2

63(1) Personation etc. of member or special member
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186
note: Wearing or displaying a uniform or badge of a member or special member, or having certain articles in possession is prohibited.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Personation etc. of member or special member

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...shall not: (b) wear or display any uniform or badge...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person, not being a member or special member...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...shall not: (c) have in his or her possession any arms or ammunition...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person, not being a member or special member...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...shall not: (c) have in his or her possession any article of clothing, accoutrements or equipment...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person, not being a member or special member...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(1) Personation etc. of member or special member

63(2) Personation etc. of member or special member
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Personation etc. of member or special member

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Reasonable excuse is a belief.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(2) Personation etc. of member or special member

63A Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63A(1) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
has part: 63A(2) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a
schema version: 2

63A(1) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186
note: Wearing or displaying a uniform or badge of a protective service officer or special protective service officer, or possessing certain articles, is prohibited.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63A Personation etc. of protective service officer or special

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not: (a) wear or display any uniform or badge...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibited actions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) A person, not being a protective service officer or a special protective service officer...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not: (a) wear or display any uniform or badge...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of prohibited actions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) A person, not being a protective service officer or a special protective service officer...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not: (a) wear or display any uniform or badge...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of prohibited actions.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (1) A person, not being a protective service officer or a special protective service officer...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not: (a) wear or display any uniform or badge...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of impersonation and possession of certain articles.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person, not being a protective service officer or a special protective service officer...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not: (a) wear or display any uniform or badge...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibited actions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (1) A person, not being a protective service officer or a special protective service officer...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63A(1) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special

63A(2) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63A Personation etc. of protective service officer or special

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant must believe in reasonable excuse.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63A(2) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special

63B Possession of documents etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.187
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63B(1) Possession of documents etc.
has part: 63B(2) Possession of documents etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63b
schema version: 2

63B(1) Possession of documents etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.187
note: Possession of certain documents is prohibited for non-AFP members.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63B Possession of documents etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of possession
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63B(1) Possession of documents etc.

63B(2) Possession of documents etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.187
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to a reasonable excuse.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63B Possession of documents etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant must believe in a reasonable excuse.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63B(2) Possession of documents etc.

64 Assault etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.187
note: Offender must pay compensation for damage to uniform or accoutrements.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64 Assault etc.

64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188
curation status: Proposed
has part: 64A(1) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
has part: 64A(1A) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
has part: 64A(2) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
has part: 64A(3) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
has part: 64A(4) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64a
schema version: 2

64A(1) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188
note: Members in uniform must wear identification numbers. Wearing identification numbers is mandatory for protective service officers.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to wear ID number
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64A(1) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers

64A(1A) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188
note: Members in uniform must wear identification numbers.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64a-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64A(1A) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers

64A(2) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188
note: Defence for prosecution failure due to lack of identification number visibility Wearing identification numbers is an offence of strict liability.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defence to prosecution
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Identification number not clearly visible on uniform

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64A(2) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers

64A(3) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188
note: Defence against prosecution for offence under subsection (1) The Commissioner must take steps to enable members to comply with subsection (1).
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subsection (3)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defence against prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: defence
premise text: subsection (1)

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner has a duty to take steps.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64A(3) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers

64A(4) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188
note: The Commissioner must take steps to enable protective service officers to comply with subsection (1).
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner has a duty to take steps.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64A(4) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers

64AA Suspended AFP employees who are members
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.189
note: Member of AFP cannot exercise power while suspended.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64aa-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64aa
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on exercising power
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64aa-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64AA Suspended AFP employees who are members

64B Liability for wrongful acts of members
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.189
note: Liability for wrongful acts of members
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64b
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State is liable for torts committed by employees
modality: Deontic
operator: liability

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64B Liability for wrongful acts of members

66 Protection of persons in respect of work reports
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.191
curation status: Proposed
has part: 66(1) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
has part: 66(2) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
has part: 66(3) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66
schema version: 2

66(1) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.191
note: Protection from civil or criminal action for reports made in good faith
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Protection of persons in respect of work reports

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No action lies against the person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection from civil or criminal action
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Good faith report

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66(1) Protection of persons in respect of work reports

66(2) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.191
note: Good faith report requirement
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Protection of persons in respect of work reports

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make good faith reports
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66(2) Protection of persons in respect of work reports

66(3) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.191
note: Exemption from subsection (1) under certain conditions
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Protection of persons in respect of work reports

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not apply unless...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66(3) Protection of persons in respect of work reports

67 Annual reports
type: Concept
description: true
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192
note: Annual report must include particulars of AFP conduct issues and action taken.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-67-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67 Annual reports

68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192
curation status: Proposed
has part: 68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(2) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(3) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(4) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68
schema version: 2

68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
description: Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192
note: Certification of appointment and status of member
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

68(2) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192
note: Certification of member's status and declaration under section 40B
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

68(3) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
description: (a), (b), (c)
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192
note: Certification of special member appointment and status
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Special member appointment and status are during the period of certification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) that, on a specified date, he or she made and subscribed the oath or affirmation mentioned in the certificate before the Commissioner...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner holds obligation to certify special member appointment and status
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (3) The Commissioner may, by writing signed by the Commissioner...

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner holds obligation to provide certification of special member appointment and status
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (c) that he or she is, on the date on which the certificate is signed, a special member and has been such a special member continuously since he or she was so appointed.

68(4) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192
note: Certification of membership status
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.

68A Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.195
curation status: Proposed
has part: 68A(1) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
has part: 68A(2) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
has part: 68A(3) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68a
schema version: 2

68A(1) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.195
note: This section applies in relation to a person who is a transferred PSO, instead of subsection 68(4A).
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 68A Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to transferred PSOs
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68A(1) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs

68A(2) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.195
note: The Commissioner must certify a person as a transferred PSO.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 68A Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide certification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68A(2) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs

68A(3) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.195
note: The Commissioner must certify certain information about a person.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 68A Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner must provide the certification.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68A(3) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs

69 Prohibition of patronage and favouritism
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.196
note: The Commissioner must exercise powers without patronage or favouritism.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of patronage and favouritism
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69 Prohibition of patronage and favouritism

69A Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.196
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees
has part: 69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees
has part: 69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69a
schema version: 2

69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.196
note: The Commissioner may engage persons overseas as employees.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage persons overseas
modality: Deontic
operator: May

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees

69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.196
note: The Commissioner has all the rights, duties and powers of an employer.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner has the right to all rights, duties and powers of an employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees

69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.196
note: Commissioner's power to engage persons overseas is not limited by this section.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commissioner can engage persons overseas
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner's power is not limited
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section does not limit other powers

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees

69B Limited operation of Fair Work Act
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.197
note: Limited operation of Fair Work Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69b
schema version: 2

69C Delegation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.197
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69C(1) Delegation
has part: 69C(2) Delegation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69c
schema version: 2

69C(1) Delegation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.197
note: Delegation of powers to Deputy Commissioner or AFP employee/special member
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69c-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69C Delegation

69C(2) Delegation
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.197
note: Delegation of power to senior executive AFP employee
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69C Delegation

69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.198
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69D(1) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
has part: 69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69d
schema version: 2

69D(1) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.198
note: The Commissioner may arrange for a person to assist the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The arrangement must occur during the performance of functions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: performing the functions specified in the agreement.

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner may arrange for a person to assist the Australian Federal Police.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.198
note: Terms and conditions for persons assisting the Australian Federal Police must be specified in an agreement.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Commissioner to specify terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police

69E Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.199
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69E(1) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
has part: 69E(2) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
has part: 69E(3) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69e
schema version: 2

69E(1) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.199
note: Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69E Commissioner may charge for certain protective services

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69E(1) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services

69E(2) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.199
note: Commissioner must charge a reasonable amount for protective services.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69E Commissioner may charge for certain protective services

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to charge a reasonable amount
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69E(2) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services

69E(3) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.199
note: Definition of Commonwealth authority
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 69E Commissioner may charge for certain protective services

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of Commonwealth authority
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69E(3) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services

7 Apr 1997
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

7 Mar 2000
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-7-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Act begins on April 7, 1997.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Starts on specified date
modality: Deontic
operator: begins

70 Regulations
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.199
note: The Governor-General may make regulations for securing discipline and good government of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-70-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70 Regulations

71 Interpretation of Part VII
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.202
note: Interpretation of Part VII
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-71-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71
schema version: 2

75 Recognition of previous service for certain purposes
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.202
note: Deems service of AFP member as existing Police Force member for certain purposes.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Deemed to include service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: Service of AFP member as existing Police Force member

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Deems service of AFP member as existing Police Force member for certain purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75 Recognition of previous service for certain purposes

77 Accrued leave
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.202
note: Retains accrued leave rights
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Retains accrued leave rights during existing membership
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Accrued during existing membership
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Commencing date

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Retains accrued leave rights
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right retention
modality: Deontic
operator: retain
premise text: Section 72 of the Act

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 77 Accrued leave

8 November 2025
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Functions
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.30
note: Provision of police services in relation to various matters
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-2
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During certain periods
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (ii) property of the Commonwealth (including Commonwealth places) and property of authorities of the Commonwealth;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of provision of services
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (b) the provision of police services in relation to:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has function
modality: Deontic
operator: hasFunction
premise text: (1) The functions of the Australian Federal Police are:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation to perform functions
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (be) to perform such protective and custodial functions as the Minister directs by notice in writing in the Gazette;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation to assist or cooperate with international organisations
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (bg) the provision of police services and police support services in relation to establishing, developing and monitoring peace, stability and security in foreign countries;

8 Nov 1988
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
note: Prohibition of certain sections
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-3
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids specific sections
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

8 July 1996
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-4
schema version: 2

8 Nov 2005
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2006
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-5
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This compilation shows the text of the law as amended and in force on 8 November 2025.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text is classified as a compilation.

80 Powers and duties in relation to Commonwealth places
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.203
note: Exercise and perform powers and duties equivalent to those under the Commonwealth Police Act 1957.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-80-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-80-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exercise and perform powers and duties equivalent to those under the Commonwealth Police Act 1957.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-80-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Relates to a class/type/subclass hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class/Type/Subclass Hierarchy

8A Minister may direct which functions are protective service
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.33
note: Minister may direct certain functions as protective service.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8a
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs functions as protective service.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

9 Laws conferring powers on members
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.33
note: Member has certain powers and duties conferred or imposed by laws.
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

9 Apr 1981
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-2
schema version: 2

9 Dec 2008
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-3
schema version: 2

9 May 2018
type: Concept
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 2 (items 42–49,284)
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-4
schema version: 2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Member's functions in the Australian Capital Territory are governed by laws.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: when performing functions in the Australian Capital Territory—the powers and duties conferred or imposed on a constable or on an officer of police by or under any law (including the common law) of the Territory;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Member has certain powers and duties.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (1) In addition to any other powers and duties, a member has:

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Member's functions in the Jervis Bay Territory are governed by laws.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: when performing functions in the Jervis Bay Territory—the powers and duties conferred or imposed on a constable or an officer of police by or under any law (including the common law) of the Territory;

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Member's functions in an External Territory are governed by laws.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: when performing functions in an External Territory—the powers and duties conferred or imposed on a constable or an officer of police by or under any law (including the common law) of the Territory;

Australian Federal Police Act 1979
type: Document
date: 8 November 2025
identifier: No. 58 of 1979
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU