Australian Federal Police Act 1979
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 58 of 1979
date: 8 November 2025
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

8 November 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
premise text: The text is classified as a compilation.
conclusion text: This compilation shows the text of the law as amended and in force on 8 November 2025.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commencement of certain sections and divisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-ss-1-norm

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Conditional commencement of remaining provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Repeal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Repeal of Commonwealth Police Act 1957
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on the Commonwealth Police Act 1957
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A Overview of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3a
has part: 3A(1) Overview of Act
has part: 3A(2) Overview of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13

3A(1) Overview of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3a-ss-1
part of: 3A Overview of Act
note: Defines the composition of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3a-ss-1-norm

3A(2) Overview of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3a-ss-2
part of: 3A Overview of Act
note: Commissioners appointed by Governor-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.13
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(2) Overview of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Appoints
logic summary: Governor-General appoints Commissioners
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners are appointed by the Governor-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Definition of adjustment payment and AFP appointee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.15
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Interpretation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Definition of terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141 Section 141
type: Concept
realized by: sec-141
note: Definition of terms related to AFP employees and their misconduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.23
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 141 Section 141
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms for the Act.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-141-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Establishes a framework for understanding AFP employee roles and misconduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

4AA State offences that have a federal aspect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4aa
has part: 4AA(1A) State offences that have a federal aspect
has part: 4AA(1) State offences that have a federal aspect
has part: 4AA(2) State offences that have a federal aspect
has part: 4AA(3) State offences that have a federal aspect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.24

4AA(1A) State offences that have a federal aspect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4aa-ss-1a
part of: 4AA State offences that have a federal aspect
note: Identify State offences with a federal aspect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.24
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4AA(1A) State offences that have a federal aspect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: State offence has a federal aspect
premise text: (1A) The object of this section is to identify State offences that have a federal aspect because: (a) they potentially fall within Commonwealth legislative power because of the elements of the State offence; or (b) they potentially fall within Commonwealth legislative power because of the circumstances in which the State offence was committed (whether or not those circumstances are expressed to be acts or omissions involved in committing the offence); or (c) the Australian Federal Police investigating them is incidental to the Australian Federal Police investigating an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or a Territory.
conclusion text: (State offence has a federal aspect)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
logic summary: Multiple conditions for federal aspect
premise text: (a) they potentially fall within Commonwealth legislative power because of the elements of the State offence; or (b) they potentially fall within Commonwealth legislative power because of the circumstances in which the State offence was committed (whether or not those circumstances are expressed to be acts or omissions involved in committing the offence); or (c) the Australian Federal Police investigating them is incidental to the Australian Federal Police investigating an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or a Territory.
conclusion text: (State offence has a federal aspect)
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Investigation by Australian Federal Police during Commonwealth investigation
premise text: (c) the Australian Federal Police investigating them is incidental to the Australian Federal Police investigating an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or a Territory.
conclusion text: (Australian Federal Police investigation occurs during Commonwealth investigation)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4AA(1) State offences that have a federal aspect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4aa-ss-1
part of: 4AA State offences that have a federal aspect
note: A State offence has a federal aspect if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.24
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4AA(1) State offences that have a federal aspect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-and-only-if
logic summary: States the condition for a State offence to have a federal aspect.
premise text: (a) both: (i) the State offence is not an ancillary offence; and (ii) assuming that the provision creating the State offence had been enacted by the Parliament of the Commonwealth instead of by the Parliament of the
conclusion text: A State offence has a federal aspect if, and only if:...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
logic summary: States that both conditions must be met for a State offence to have a federal aspect.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: ...both conditions must be met for a State offence to have a federal aspect.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: States that the investigation is during the investigation mentioned in subsection (i).
premise text: (d) both: (i) the Australian Federal Police is investigating an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or a Territory; and (ii) if the Australian Federal Police is investigating, or were to investigate, the State offence—that investigation is, or would be, incidental to the investigation mentioned in
conclusion text: ...would be, incidental to the investigation mentioned in subsection (i).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4AA(2) State offences that have a federal aspect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4aa-ss-2
part of: 4AA State offences that have a federal aspect
note: Determines the specificity of acts or omissions in State offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.24
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4AA(2) State offences that have a federal aspect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determines the specificity of acts or omissions in State offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

4AA(3) State offences that have a federal aspect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4aa-ss-3
part of: 4AA State offences that have a federal aspect
note: A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c) if the conduct constituting the State offence affects the interests of the Commonwealth;
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.24
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4AA(3) State offences that have a federal aspect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
logic summary: States that a conduct constitutes a covered offence if it affects the interests of the Commonwealth.
premise text: (3) A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c)
conclusion text: (a) affects the interests of: (i) the Commonwealth;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: States that a conduct constituting a State offence occurs during the period when it affects the interests of the Commonwealth.
premise text: (3) A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c)
conclusion text: (a) affects the interests of: (i) the Commonwealth;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: States that a conduct constituting a State offence occurs during the period when it affects the interests of the Commonwealth.
premise text: (3) A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c)
conclusion text: (a) affects the interests of: (i) the Commonwealth;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: States that a conduct constituting a State offence spreads or is transmitted during the period when it affects the interests of the Commonwealth.
premise text: (3) A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c)
conclusion text: (a) affects the interests of: (i) the Commonwealth;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: States that a conduct constituting a State offence is processed or executed during the period when it affects the interests of the Commonwealth.
premise text: (3) A State offence is taken to be covered by paragraph (1)(c)
conclusion text: (a) affects the interests of: (i) the Commonwealth;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

4A Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4a
note: Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.27
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 4A Commissioner may specify prohibited drugs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specify
logic summary: Specify prohibited drug
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 References in other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
has part: 5(1) References in other laws
has part: 5(1A) References in other laws
has part: 5(2) References in other laws
has part: 5(3) References in other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.28

5(1) References in other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-ss-1
part of: 5 References in other laws
note: References in other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(1) References in other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Reference substitution
premise text: (a) a reference to a Commonwealth Police Officer shall be read as a reference to a member of the Australian Federal Police;
conclusion text: The reference is substituted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between definitions
premise text: (c) a reference to the Police Force of that Territory shall be read as a reference to the Australian Federal Police;
conclusion text: The definition is valid during this period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between definitions
premise text: (d) a reference to an officer of police of that Territory shall be read as a reference to a member of the Australian Federal Police;
conclusion text: The definition is valid during this period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Reference substitution in definitions
premise text: (e) a reference to the Commissioner of Police of that Territory, however described, shall be read as a reference to the Commissioner;
conclusion text: The definition is updated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Reference substitution in definitions
premise text: (a) a reference to a Commonwealth Police Officer shall be read as a reference to a member of the Australian Federal Police;
conclusion text: The definition is updated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5(1A) References in other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-ss-1a
part of: 5 References in other laws
note: Reference to Australian Capital Territory is taken to include it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(1A) References in other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Taken for the purposes of subsection (1)
premise text: (1A) Where a reference in a law...
conclusion text: ...that Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy: law -> Australian Capital Territory
premise text: That reference shall, for the purposes of subsection (1), be taken to be a reference to that Territory.
conclusion text: ...that Territory.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation: includes
premise text: (1A) Where a reference in a law...
conclusion text: ...includes, that Territory.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5(2) References in other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-ss-2
part of: 5 References in other laws
note: If a provision of a law refers to an Australian Federal Police member holding a particular rank, it must be read as referring to the member to whom a declaration applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(2) References in other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: If a provision refers to an Australian Federal Police member holding a particular rank.
conclusion text: Then the provision must be read as referring to that member.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between declarations and provisions
premise text: A declaration is in force under subsection (3) that a member is of that rank for the purposes of this paragraph.
conclusion text: Then the provision must be read as referring to the member to whom the declaration applies during its duration.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between declarations and provisions (LTL)
premise text: A declaration is in force under subsection (3) that a member is of that rank for the purposes of this paragraph.
conclusion text: Then the provision must be read as referring to the member to whom the declaration applies during its duration.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5(3) References in other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-ss-3
part of: 5 References in other laws
note: The Commissioner may declare a member's rank for the purposes of paragraph (2)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.28
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of rank is an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5A Application and extension of Act and regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5a
has part: 5A(1) Application and extension of Act and regulations
has part: 5A(2) Application and extension of Act and regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.29

5A(1) Application and extension of Act and regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5a-ss-1
part of: 5A Application and extension of Act and regulations
note: Applicability of Act and regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.29
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5A(1) Application and extension of Act and regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Act applies to Australia and outside Australia
premise text: (1) This Act and the regulations apply throughout the whole of Australia and also outside Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval: Act applies from commencement to present
premise text: (1) This Act and the regulations apply throughout the whole of Australia and also outside Australia.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5A(2) Application and extension of Act and regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5a-ss-2
part of: 5A Application and extension of Act and regulations
note: Act and regulations extend to external Territories.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.29
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5A(2) Application and extension of Act and regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extension of Act and regulations
premise text: (2) This Act and the regulations extend to the external Territories.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5B Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5b
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.29
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5b-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5B Application of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
has part: 6(1) Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
has part: 6(2) Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.30

6(1) Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
note: Defines the composition of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-1-norm

6(2) Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
note: The Australian Federal Police is a listed entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Constitution of the Australian Federal Police
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Entity classification
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):
conclusion text: The Australian Federal Police is a listed entity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Authority classification
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):
conclusion text: The Commissioner of Police is the accountable authority of the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Official classification
premise text: (2) For the purposes of the finance law (within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013):
conclusion text: The persons referred to in subsection (1) are officials of the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Functions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-2
note: Provision of police services in relation to various matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.30
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasFunction
logic summary: Has function
premise text: (1) The functions of the Australian Federal Police are:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During certain periods
premise text: (ii) property of the Commonwealth (including Commonwealth places) and property of authorities of the Commonwealth;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of provision of services
premise text: (b) the provision of police services in relation to:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation to perform functions
premise text: (be) to perform such protective and custodial functions as the Minister directs by notice in writing in the Gazette;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation to assist or cooperate with international organisations
premise text: (bg) the provision of police services and police support services in relation to establishing, developing and monitoring peace, stability and security in foreign countries;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A Minister may direct which functions are protective service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8a
note: Minister may direct certain functions as protective service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Directs functions as protective service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Laws conferring powers on members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Member has certain powers and duties conferred or imposed by laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.33
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-ltl-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Member has certain powers and duties.
premise text: (1) In addition to any other powers and duties, a member has:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Member's functions in the Australian Capital Territory are governed by laws.
premise text: when performing functions in the Australian Capital Territory—the powers and duties conferred or imposed on a constable or on an officer of police by or under any law (including the common law) of the Territory;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Member's functions in the Jervis Bay Territory are governed by laws.
premise text: when performing functions in the Jervis Bay Territory—the powers and duties conferred or imposed on a constable or an officer of police by or under any law (including the common law) of the Territory;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Member's functions in an External Territory are governed by laws.
premise text: when performing functions in an External Territory—the powers and duties conferred or imposed on a constable or an officer of police by or under any law (including the common law) of the Territory;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Appointment of members to other Police Forces
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Allowing members to be appointed in other police forces or agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.35
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to members.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 State and Territory writs and warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Execution of Commonwealth or Territory writs and warrants by State or Territory members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.35
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to execute Commonwealth writs and warrants
premise text: State or Territory member may execute Commonwealth writ
conclusion text: Writ may be executed by State or Territory member
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap of execution authority
premise text: State or Territory member executes Commonwealth writ at some point in time
conclusion text: Temporal overlap: State or Territory member and Commonwealth writ overlap
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Conditional execution authority
premise text: State or Territory member executes Commonwealth writ until certain conditions are met
conclusion text: Execution authority conditional on certain conditions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of execution authority
premise text: State or Territory member diffuses execution authority to Commonwealth writ
conclusion text: Authority diffusion: State or Territory member and Commonwealth writ diffuse authority
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of execution authority by CogAI
premise text: CogAI recognizes State or Territory member as authorized to execute Commonwealth writs and warrants
conclusion text: CogAI recognition: State or Territory member recognized as authorized
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Immunities from certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Exemptions from obtaining licenses or registering vehicles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12A Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12a
has part: 12A(1) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
has part: 12A(2) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
has part: 12A(3) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
has part: 12A(4) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36

12A(1) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12a-ss-1
part of: 12A Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
note: Definition of terms for immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-1-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12A(1) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12A(2) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12a-ss-2
part of: 12A Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
note: Right to be accompanied by an AFP dog under the control of the AFP dog handler.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 12A(2) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has a right to be accompanied by an AFP dog.
premise text: (2) Where an AFP dog handler is entitled to enter, or to be on or in, particular premises or a particular place in the performance of the AFP dog handler’s duties as a member or a protective service officer
conclusion text: The AFP dog handler has a right to be accompanied by an AFP dog.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Overlaps with the temporal interval of entering premises with an AFP dog.
premise text: (2) Where an AFP dog handler is entitled to enter, or to be on or in, particular premises or a particular place in the performance of the AFP dog handler’s duties as a member or a protective service officer
conclusion text: The temporal interval of entering premises with an AFP dog overlaps with the temporal interval of the AFP dog handler's duties.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
logic summary: Holds for all temporal intervals of entering premises with an AFP dog.
premise text: (2) Where an AFP dog handler is entitled to enter, or to be on or in, particular premises or a particular place in the performance of the AFP dog handler’s duties as a member or a protective service officer
conclusion text: The AFP dog handler holds for all temporal intervals of entering premises with an AFP dog.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses the information that the AFP dog handler has a right to be accompanied by an AFP dog.
premise text: (2) Where an AFP dog handler is entitled to enter, or to be on or in, particular premises or a particular place in the performance of the AFP dog handler’s duties as a member or a protective service officer
conclusion text: The information that the AFP dog handler has a right to be accompanied by an AFP dog is diffused.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasCapability
logic summary: Has the capability to be accompanied by an AFP dog under the control of the AFP dog handler.
premise text: (2) Where an AFP dog handler is entitled to enter, or to be on or in, particular premises or a particular place in the performance of the AFP dog handler’s duties as a member or a protective service officer
conclusion text: The AFP dog has the capability to be accompanied by an AFP dog under the control of the AFP dog handler.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12A(3) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12a-ss-3
part of: 12A Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
note: The Commonwealth is not subject to penalty, liability or forfeiture for an AFP dog entering premises if under control of handler performing duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12A(3) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not impose penalty, liability or forfeiture.
premise text: (3) The Commonwealth...
conclusion text: The Commonwealth is not subject to penalty, liability or forfeiture.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission for Commonwealth to enter premises without penalty, liability or forfeiture.
premise text: (3) The Commonwealth...
conclusion text: The Commonwealth is not subject to penalty, liability or forfeiture if under control of handler performing duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Handler's duty to perform duties as member or protective service officer.
premise text: (b) the AFP dog handler is performing the AFP dog handler’s duties...
conclusion text: The handler must perform duties as member or protective service officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Handler's duty to enter premises without penalty, liability or forfeiture.
premise text: (c) the AFP dog handler is entitled to enter...
conclusion text: The handler must enter premises without penalty, liability or forfeiture.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Handler's duty to be on or in premises without penalty, liability or forfeiture.
premise text: (c) the AFP dog handler is entitled to be...
conclusion text: The handler must be on or in premises without penalty, liability or forfeiture.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12A(4) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12a-ss-4
part of: 12A Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
note: Certificate as prima facie evidence of AFP dog handler status
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.36
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12A(4) Immunity from State and Territory laws in relation to entry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide certificate
premise text: (4) In any proceeding, a certificate in writing signed by the Commissioner...
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the fact or facts certified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14A Powers of arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14a
note: Protective service officer may arrest without warrant under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.38
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14A Powers of arrest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to arrest under certain conditions.
premise text: The protective service officer may, without warrant, arrest a person...
conclusion text: There is an obligation to arrest under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval of the arrest within the commission of the offence.
premise text: the person has just committed, or is committing, the offence;
conclusion text: The temporal interval of the arrest is within the commission of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal interval of the prevention of further offences.
premise text: the arrest of the person is necessary for the purpose of preventing the continuation of, or a repetition of, the offence;
conclusion text: The temporal interval of the prevention of further offences is until the commission of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
logic summary: Diffusion of information about the arrest through the person.
premise text: the arrest of the person is necessary for the purpose of ensuring the appearance of the person before a court of competent jurisdiction for the offence;
conclusion text: The diffusion of information about the arrest is through the person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: With
logic summary: Use of artificial intelligence in the arrest process.
premise text: the protective service officer may, without warrant, arrest a person...
conclusion text: The use of artificial intelligence is with the arrest process.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14B Use of force in making arrest etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14b
has part: 14B(1) Use of force in making arrest etc.
has part: 14B(2) Use of force in making arrest etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.38

14B(1) Use of force in making arrest etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14b-ss-1
part of: 14B Use of force in making arrest etc.
note: Use of force in making arrest etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.38
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 14B(1) Use of force in making arrest etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on excessive force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14B(2) Use of force in making arrest etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14b-ss-2
part of: 14B Use of force in making arrest etc.
note: Protective service officers must not use force likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm unless necessary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.38
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 14B(2) Use of force in making arrest etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of using force likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm.
premise text: Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Section 14B(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14C Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14c
has part: 14C(1) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
has part: 14C(2) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
has part: 14C(3) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
has part: 14C(4) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39

14C(1) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14c-ss-1
part of: 14C Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
note: Arrested person must be informed of grounds of arrest.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14C(1) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform the person at the time of the arrest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14C(2) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14c-ss-2
part of: 14C Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
note: Informing an arrested person of the substance of the offence is sufficient compliance.
description: Information about the substance of the offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14C(2) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Informing an arrested person is a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14C(3) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14c-ss-3
part of: 14C Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
note: Exemption from informing of grounds of arrest for certain protective service officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to exempt from duty
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14C(4) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14c-ss-4
part of: 14C Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
note: Protective service officer must inform arrested person of grounds for arrest if they are unable to understand due to language or disability.
description: Explanation of the substance of the offence that the person is able to understand
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14C(4) Arrested person to be informed of grounds of arrest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: REASONABLE GROUNDS
logic summary: Reasonable grounds for believing the person is unable to understand
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTINUOUSLY
logic summary: Continuous provision of explanation until the person understands
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: JUSTIFICATION
logic summary: Justification for not providing explanation if person understands
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14D Search of arrested person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14d
note: Lawful arrest allows for search of person and property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.39
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14d-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14d-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14D Search of arrested person
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Right to conduct search upon lawful arrest.
premise text: Lawful arrest
conclusion text: Conduct ordinary or frisk search.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14E How arrested person to be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14e
has part: 14E(1) How arrested person to be dealt with
has part: 14E(2) How arrested person to be dealt with
has part: 14E(3) How arrested person to be dealt with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.41

14E(1) How arrested person to be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14e-ss-1
part of: 14E How arrested person to be dealt with
note: Arrested person must be delivered to a police officer for dealing with according to law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14E(1) How arrested person to be dealt with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to deliver arrested person to police officer
premise text: (1) A protective service officer who arrests a person for an offence...
conclusion text: must ensure that the person is delivered into the custody of a police officer as soon as practicable to be dealt with according to law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Delivery must occur before dealing with according to law
premise text: (1) A protective service officer who arrests a person for an offence...
conclusion text: the person is delivered into the custody of a police officer as soon as practicable to be dealt with according to law.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Delivery must occur before dealing with according to law in all cases
premise text: (1) A protective service officer who arrests a person for an offence...
conclusion text: the person is delivered into the custody of a police officer as soon as practicable to be dealt with according to law.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Delivery must occur before dealing with according to law in all cases, and it must be done so in a way that is consistent with the law
premise text: (1) A protective service officer who arrests a person for an offence...
conclusion text: the person is delivered into the custody of a police officer as soon as practicable to be dealt with according to law.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Delivery must occur before dealing with according to law in all cases, and it must be done so in a way that is consistent with the law, using AI-powered tools if available
premise text: (1) A protective service officer who arrests a person for an offence...
conclusion text: the person is delivered into the custody of a police officer as soon as practicable to be dealt with according to law.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14E(2) How arrested person to be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14e-ss-2
part of: 14E How arrested person to be dealt with
note: Deliver seized weapon to police officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14E(2) How arrested person to be dealt with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must deliver
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14E(3) How arrested person to be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14e-ss-3
part of: 14E How arrested person to be dealt with
note: Definition of police officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14E(3) How arrested person to be dealt with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines a class of entities (police officers)
premise text: (a) a member or special member; or (b) a member, however described, of a police force of a State or Territory; or (c) a member, however described, of a police force of a foreign country.
conclusion text: police officer
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines a subclass relationship between entities (police officers)
premise text: (a) a member or special member; or (b) a member, however described, of a police force of a State or Territory; or (c) a member, however described, of a police force of a foreign country.
conclusion text: member
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines another subclass relationship between entities (police officers)
premise text: (a) a member or special member; or (b) a member, however described, of a police force of a State or Territory; or (c) a member, however described, of a police force of a foreign country.
conclusion text: special member
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Defines another subclass relationship between entities (police officers)
premise text: (a) a member or special member; or (b) a member, however described, of a police force of a State or Territory; or (c) a member, however described, of a police force of a foreign country.
conclusion text: foreign country
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

14F Release of arrested person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14f
note: Conditions for release of arrested person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.41
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14f-norm

14G Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14g
has part: 14G(1) Relationship of Division to other laws
has part: 14G(2) Relationship of Division to other laws
has part: 14G(3) Relationship of Division to other laws
has part: 14G(4) Relationship of Division to other laws
has part: 14G(5) Relationship of Division to other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42

14G(1) Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14g-ss-1
part of: 14G Relationship of Division to other laws
note: Power of arrest is in addition to other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14G(1) Relationship of Division to other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adds power of arrest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14G(2) Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14g-ss-2
part of: 14G Relationship of Division to other laws
note: Applicable laws supersede other laws in relation to arrests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14G(2) Relationship of Division to other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Supersedes
logic summary: Applicable laws supersede other laws.
premise text: Other law
conclusion text: Applicable law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14G(3) Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14g-ss-3
part of: 14G Relationship of Division to other laws
note: Section 252 and 253 of the Migration Act 1958 apply to subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14G(3) Relationship of Division to other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Section applies
premise text: Subsection (2)
conclusion text: Sections 252 and 253
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14G(4) Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14g-ss-4
part of: 14G Relationship of Division to other laws
note: Powers and duties of protective service officers are not exclusive to this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: Inclusion of powers and duties from other laws.
premise text: Other laws confer powers or duties on protective service officers.
conclusion text: This Division does not exclude these powers or duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

14G(5) Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14g-ss-5
part of: 14G Relationship of Division to other laws
note: This Division is in addition to and not in derogation of any rights and freedoms of the individual.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.42
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adds to existing rights and freedoms
premise text: This Division is in addition to...
conclusion text: ...and not in derogation of any rights and freedoms of the individual.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: concurrent
logic summary: Allows concurrent operation within temporal intervals
premise text: This Division, in so far as it protects the individual...
conclusion text: ...is in addition to, and not in derogation of, any rights and freedoms of the individual.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: concurrent
logic summary: Allows concurrent operation within temporal intervals
premise text: This Division is in addition to...
conclusion text: ...and not in derogation of any rights and freedoms of the individual.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: addition
logic summary: Adds to existing diffusion
premise text: This Division, in so far as it protects the individual...
conclusion text: ...is in addition to, and not in derogation of, any rights and freedoms of the individual.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14g-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: addition
logic summary: Adds to existing CogAI
premise text: This Division is in addition to...
conclusion text: ...and not in derogation of any rights and freedoms of the individual.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14H Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14h
note: Definitions for designated person, police officer, and vehicle.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14h-norm

14I Requirement to provide name etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14i
has part: 14I(1) Requirement to provide name etc.
has part: 14I(2) Requirement to provide name etc.
has part: 14I(3) Requirement to provide name etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.44

14I(1) Requirement to provide name etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14i-ss-1
part of: 14I Requirement to provide name etc.
note: Request to provide name, address and reason for presence
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14I(1) Requirement to provide name etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14I(2) Requirement to provide name etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14i-ss-2
part of: 14I Requirement to provide name etc.
note: Suspect must comply with request from designated person.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14I(2) Requirement to provide name etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide name and address
premise text: (2) If a designated person...
conclusion text: The suspect must not fail to comply with the request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14I(3) Requirement to provide name etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14i-ss-3
part of: 14I Requirement to provide name etc.
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.44
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14I(3) Requirement to provide name etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14i-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Reasonable excuse is a belief.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14J Stopping and searching
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14j
note: Designated person has obligation to suspect reasonable grounds for stopping and searching.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.45
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14j-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14j-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14J Stopping and searching
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Designated person has obligation to suspect reasonable grounds for stopping and searching.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14K Seizure of things found
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14k
has part: 14K(1) Seizure of things found
has part: 14K(2) Seizure of things found
has part: 14K(3) Seizure of things found
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.48

14K(1) Seizure of things found
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14k-ss-1
part of: 14K Seizure of things found
note: Seizure of things found
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.48
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-1-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 14K(1) Seizure of things found
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

14K(2) Seizure of things found
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14k-ss-2
part of: 14K Seizure of things found
note: Seizure of weapons or things suspected to be used for harm
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.48
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 14K(2) Seizure of things found
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits seizure of certain items
premise text: (2) If, as a result of conducting a search...
conclusion text: the designated person may seize the weapon or thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for seizure
premise text: (2) If, as a result of conducting a search...
conclusion text: the designated person may seize the weapon or thing.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for seizure
premise text: (2) If, as a result of conducting a search...
conclusion text: the designated person may seize the weapon or thing.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information about seizure
premise text: (2) If, as a result of conducting a search...
conclusion text: the designated person may seize the weapon or thing.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Provides justification for seizure
premise text: (2) If, as a result of conducting a search...
conclusion text: the designated person may seize the weapon or thing.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14K(3) Seizure of things found
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14k-ss-3
part of: 14K Seizure of things found
note: Ensure delivery of thing into police custody as soon as practicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.48
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14K(3) Seizure of things found
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure delivery of thing into police custody.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14L How seized things must be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14l
has part: 14L(1) How seized things must be dealt with
has part: 14L(2) How seized things must be dealt with
has part: 14L(3) How seized things must be dealt with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.49

14L(1) How seized things must be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14l-ss-1
part of: 14L How seized things must be dealt with
note: Police officer must serve seizure notice within 7 days after seizure day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14L(1) How seized things must be dealt with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to serve notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14L(2) How seized things must be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14l-ss-2
part of: 14L How seized things must be dealt with
note: Exemptions from seizure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-2-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14L(2) How seized things must be dealt with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

14L(3) How seized things must be dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14l-ss-3
part of: 14L How seized things must be dealt with
note: Seizure notice must identify thing, state date seized, and ground for seizure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.49
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14L(3) How seized things must be dealt with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide required information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14M Application to magistrate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14m
has part: 14M(1) Application to magistrate
has part: 14M(2) Application to magistrate
has part: 14M(3) Application to magistrate
has part: 14M(4) Application to magistrate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.52

14M(1) Application to magistrate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14m-ss-1
part of: 14M Application to magistrate
note: Police officer may apply to a magistrate for an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.52
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14M(1) Application to magistrate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: (1) If subsection 14L(7) applies...
conclusion text: ...the police officer may apply to a magistrate for an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14M(2) Application to magistrate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14m-ss-2
part of: 14M Application to magistrate
note: Magistrate must allow owner to appear and be heard in application determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.52
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14M(2) Application to magistrate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Magistrate must allow owner to appear and be heard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14M(3) Application to magistrate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14m-ss-3
part of: 14M Application to magistrate
note: Magistrate may make orders regarding seized items under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.52
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Magistrate may prohibit the return of seized items.
premise text: (3) If the magistrate is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the magistrate may make any of the following orders:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Magistrate specifies a period for retaining seized items.
premise text: (c) that the thing be retained by the police officer for the period specified in the order,
conclusion text: ...the magistrate may make any of the following orders:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Magistrate justifies orders regarding seized items.
premise text: (3) If the magistrate is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the magistrate may make any of the following orders:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Magistrate propagates conditions for seizing items.
premise text: (a) in the case of a thing seized under subsection 14K(1)—there are reasonable grounds to suspect...
conclusion text: ...the magistrate may make any of the following orders:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Magistrate represents knowledge about seized items.
premise text: (3) If the magistrate is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the magistrate may make any of the following orders:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14M(4) Application to magistrate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14m-ss-4
part of: 14M Application to magistrate
note: Magistrate must order return of thing to owner if not satisfied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.52
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14M(4) Application to magistrate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must order return.
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14N Relationship of Division to other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14n
note: No other laws can limit or exclude this Division's powers and duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.53
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14n-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14n-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14n-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14N Relationship of Division to other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No other laws can limit or exclude this Division's powers and duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
has part: 17(1) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
has part: 17(2) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
has part: 17(3) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
has part: 17(3A) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
has part: 17(4) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
has part: 17(4A) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54

17(1) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-1
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
note: Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners must be appointed by the Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(1) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(2) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-2
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
note: Term of office for Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Commissioner holds office
premise text: (2) Commissioner holds office
conclusion text: Commissioner has a duty to hold office
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Commissioner's term of office is limited to 7 years
premise text: (2) Term of office not exceeding 7 years
conclusion text: Term of office is limited to 7 years for Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: may be cited
logic summary: Excerpt may be cited as authority
premise text: (2) Subject to this Part, the Commissioner holds office
conclusion text: Excerpt is relevant to Commissioner's duties
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: may be cited
logic summary: Excerpt may be used as evidence
premise text: (2) Subject to this Part, the Commissioner holds office
conclusion text: Excerpt is relevant to Commissioner's duties
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: may be cited
logic summary: Excerpt may be used in AI systems
premise text: (2) Subject to this Part, the Commissioner holds office
conclusion text: Excerpt is relevant to Commissioner's duties
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(3) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-3
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
note: Deputy Commissioner's term of office and eligibility for re-appointment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3-norm

17(3A) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-3a
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
note: Service continuity for re-appointed persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(3A) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to treat service as continuous
premise text: (3A) Where a person is re-appointed...
conclusion text: ...the person’s service is to be taken to be continuous.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Service continuity implies overlap with previous term
premise text: (3A) Where a person is re-appointed...
conclusion text: ...the person’s service is to be taken to be continuous.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent Trace
logic summary: Service continuity implies recurrent trace of previous term
premise text: (3A) Where a person is re-appointed...
conclusion text: ...the person’s service is to be taken to be continuous.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Service continuity implies diffusion of previous term
premise text: (3A) Where a person is re-appointed...
conclusion text: ...the person’s service is to be taken to be continuous.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Service continuity implies knowledge representation of previous term
premise text: (3A) Where a person is re-appointed...
conclusion text: ...the person’s service is to be taken to be continuous.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(4) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-4
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
note: Commissioner's terms and conditions determined by Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(4) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Commissioner holds office
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(4A) Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-4a
part of: 17 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioners
note: Terms and conditions for Deputy Commissioner's office
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-ss-4a-norm

18 Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
has part: 18(1) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
has part: 18(2) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54

18(1) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
part of: 18 Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
note: Minister may appoint person to act as Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner during vacancy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(1) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to appoint person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
note: Duties of Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.54
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(2) Acting Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner during vacancy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has power
logic summary: Exercise powers as Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
has part: 19(1) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
has part: 19(1A) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
has part: 19(1B) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
has part: 19(1C) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
has part: 19(2) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55

19(1) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
note: Delegate powers in case of absence or unavailability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate
logic summary: Delegate power to next senior member
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(1A) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-1a
part of: 19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
note: Minister may determine remuneration and allowances of a person exercising Commissioner's powers and functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(1B) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-1b
part of: 19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
note: Commissioner may determine remuneration and allowances of a Deputy Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1B) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commissioner has the power to determine remuneration and allowances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(1C) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-1c
part of: 19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
note: No remuneration or allowances for less than one week
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1c-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1C) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits payment for less than one week
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
part of: 19 Absence etc. of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.55
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-ss-2-norm

20 Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
has part: 20(1) Remuneration and allowances
has part: 20(2) Remuneration and allowances
has part: 20(2A) Remuneration and allowances
has part: 20(3) Remuneration and allowances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56

20(1) Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
part of: 20 Remuneration and allowances
note: Commissioner's remuneration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(1) Remuneration and allowances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Commissioner has obligation to receive remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2) Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
part of: 20 Remuneration and allowances
note: The Commissioner must be paid allowances as prescribed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2) Remuneration and allowances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2A) Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-2a
part of: 20 Remuneration and allowances
note: Deputy Commissioner must be paid remuneration and allowances determined by the Commissioner.
description: remuneration and allowances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2A) Remuneration and allowances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Duty to pay remuneration and allowances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(3) Remuneration and allowances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-3
part of: 20 Remuneration and allowances
note: Remuneration and allowances subject to the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-ss-3-norm

21 Leave of absence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
has part: 21(1) Leave of absence
has part: 21(1A) Leave of absence
has part: 21(2) Leave of absence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56

21(1) Leave of absence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-1
part of: 21 Leave of absence
note: Recreation leave entitlements determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(1) Leave of absence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Recreation leave entitlements exist.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(1A) Leave of absence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-1a
part of: 21 Leave of absence
note: Grant leave of absence on terms and conditions determined by the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2) Leave of absence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-2
part of: 21 Leave of absence
note: Grant of leave of absence on terms and conditions determined by the Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.56
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-ss-2-norm

22 Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
has part: 22(1) Termination of appointment
has part: 22(2) Termination of appointment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.57

22(1) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-1
part of: 22 Termination of appointment
note: Governor-General may terminate appointment of Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.57
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(1) Termination of appointment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to terminate appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(2) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-2
part of: 22 Termination of appointment
note: Termination of appointment for certain reasons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.57
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(2) Termination of appointment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on certain actions
premise text: (2) If the Commissioner or a Deputy Commissioner engages in paid employment outside the duties of his or her office without the approval of the Minister;
conclusion text: the Governor-General shall terminate his or her appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval for absence from duty
premise text: (b) is absent from duty, except on leave of absence under section 21, for 14 consecutive days, or for 28 days in any 12 months;
conclusion text: or (c) becomes bankrupt or applies to take the benefit of any law for the relief of bankrupt or insolvent debtors;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace for bankruptcy
premise text: (c) becomes bankrupt or applies to take the benefit of any law for the relief of bankrupt or insolvent debtors;
conclusion text: or (d) compounds with his or her creditors or makes an assignment of his or her remuneration for their benefit;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on certain actions
premise text: (a) engages in paid employment outside the duties of his or her office without the approval of the Minister;
conclusion text: or (b) is absent from duty, except on leave of absence under section 21, for 14 consecutive days, or for 28 days in any 12 months;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on certain actions
premise text: (c) becomes bankrupt or applies to take the benefit of any law for the relief of bankrupt or insolvent debtors, compounds with his or her creditors or makes an assignment of his or her remuneration for their benefit;
conclusion text: the Governor-General shall terminate his or her appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
has part: 23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
has part: 23(2) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58

23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-ss-1
part of: 23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
note: The Commissioner has all the rights, duties and powers of an employer in respect of AFP employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(1) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Commissioner has the right to exercise powers as an employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2) Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-ss-2
part of: 23 Employer powers etc. of Commissioner
note: Rights and duties of Commissioner in respect of AFP employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Commissioner has rights and duties
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...
conclusion text: The Commissioner has rights and duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Rights and duties apply during employment
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...
conclusion text: The rights and duties apply during employment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Rights and duties are traceable during employment
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...
conclusion text: The rights and duties are traceable during employment.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: in
logic summary: Rights and duties diffuse to employees
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...
conclusion text: The rights and duties diffuse to employees.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: in
logic summary: Rights and duties are recognized by AI systems
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner has, in respect of AFP employees...
conclusion text: The rights and duties are recognized by AI systems.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

24 Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
has part: 24(1) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(2) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(3) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(4) Engagement of AFP employees
has part: 24(5) Engagement of AFP employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58

24(1) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-ss-1
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees
note: The Commissioner may engage persons as employees subject to conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(1) Engagement of AFP employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to engage persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(2) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-ss-2
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees
note: Conditions for engaging AFP employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(2) Engagement of AFP employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(3) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-ss-3
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees
note: Conditions for engagement of AFP employees may be applied
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(3) Engagement of AFP employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May apply conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(4) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-ss-4
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees
note: Commissioner must not engage non-Australian citizens as AFP employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(4) Engagement of AFP employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: The Commissioner must not engage...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(5) Engagement of AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-ss-5
part of: 24 Engagement of AFP employees
note: Exemption from engagement under section 24(5)
references: sec-69A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.58
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(5) Engagement of AFP employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Section does not apply to overseas engagement
premise text: Section 24(5)
conclusion text: No obligation to engage persons overseas
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalExclusion
logic summary: Section 24(5) does not apply to overseas engagement during certain periods
premise text: Section 69A deals with the engagement of such persons
conclusion text: No obligation to engage persons overseas during certain periods
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalExclusion
logic summary: Section 24(5) does not apply to overseas engagement during certain periods
premise text: Section 69A deals with the engagement of such persons
conclusion text: No obligation to engage persons overseas during certain periods
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: TemporalExclusion
logic summary: Section 24(5) does not apply to overseas engagement during certain periods
premise text: Section 69A deals with the engagement of such persons
conclusion text: No obligation to engage persons overseas during certain periods
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: TemporalExclusion
logic summary: Section 24(5) does not apply to overseas engagement during certain periods
premise text: Section 69A deals with the engagement of such persons
conclusion text: No obligation to engage persons overseas during certain periods
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Senior executive AFP employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: The Commissioner may declare an AFP employee a senior executive AFP employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.59
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Declaration of senior executive status is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Continuous employment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
note: Employment is taken to be continuous if engaged under section 24 for a period and re-engaged immediately after the end of that period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.59
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Continuous employment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Employment continuity is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Remuneration and other conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
note: Commissioner may determine remuneration and terms of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.59
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27 Remuneration and other conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Duty to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Termination of employment by Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
note: The Commissioner may terminate employment by notice in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
has part: 30(1) Resignation
has part: 30(2) Resignation
has part: 30(3) Resignation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61

30(1) Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-1
part of: 30 Resignation
note: Employee must give written notice of resignation and specify the effective date.
description: Written notice of resignation and effective date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(1) Resignation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employee must give written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(2) Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-2
part of: 30 Resignation
note: Notice period for resignation must be within a certain range.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(2) Resignation
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(3) Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-ss-3
part of: 30 Resignation
note: Section 30A obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-3-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(3) Resignation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30A Resignation in anticipation of termination of employment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30a
note: Employee must provide written notice of resignation before termination.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.61
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30A Resignation in anticipation of termination of employment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
has part: 31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
has part: 31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64

31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-1
part of: 31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
note: Employee entitled to retire upon reaching minimum age
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(1) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has right to retire
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-2
part of: 31 Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
note: Minimum retiring age is 55 years, or as prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(2) Retirement upon reaching minimum retiring age
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the obligation.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the minimum retiring age is 55 years, or such higher or lower age as is prescribed by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between the obligation and its fulfillment.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the minimum retiring age is 55 years, or such higher or lower age as is prescribed by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Applies to a broader context.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the minimum retiring age is 55 years, or such higher or lower age as is prescribed by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Provides a basis for AI-driven analysis.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the minimum retiring age is 55 years, or such higher or lower age as is prescribed by the regulations.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32
has part: 32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(2) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(4) Retirement on invalidity grounds
has part: 32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64

32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-1
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
note: Commissioner may retire employee by notice if employee consents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(1) Retirement on invalidity grounds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to retire
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-2
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
note: Employee may consent to retirement under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-2-norm

32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-3
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
note: Certification of incapacity is required for retirement on invalidity grounds.
description: Commissioner's certification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(3) Retirement on invalidity grounds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Certification is required for retirement.
premise text: Commissioner certifies in writing that the person's physical or mental incapacity was the only reason why the person was not re-engaged.
conclusion text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Certification must be made during the initial period.
premise text: (3) If: a person is engaged as an AFP employee under section 24 for a period; and the person completes that period of engagement (the initial period);
conclusion text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Certification must be made until the end of the initial period.
premise text: (3) If: a person is engaged as an AFP employee under section 24 for a period; and the person completes that period of engagement (the initial period);
conclusion text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must be re-engaged
logic summary: Re-engagement is required after the end of the initial period.
premise text: (c) the person is not re-engaged under that section for a further period starting immediately after the end of the initial period;
conclusion text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is not certified
logic summary: Failure to certify incapacity results in non-retirement.
premise text: (d) the Commissioner certifies in writing that the person’s physical or mental incapacity was the only reason why the person was not so re-engaged;
conclusion text: The person is taken to have been retired under this section on the day on which the initial period ended.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32(4) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-4
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
note: AFP employee must provide CSC certificate for retirement on invalidity grounds
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to provide certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: CSC's discretion to deny retirement on invalidity grounds
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-5
part of: 32 Retirement on invalidity grounds
note: AFP employee must be a member of the superannuation scheme established by the Superannuation Act 1990.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.64
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(5) Retirement on invalidity grounds
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST BE
logic summary: Must be a member of the superannuation scheme established by the Superannuation Act 1990.
premise text: (5) In spite of this section, an AFP employee who:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-32-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Between the time of employment and retirement.
premise text: (5) In spite of this section, an AFP employee who:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33
has part: 33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(3) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(4) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
has part: 33(5) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66

33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-1
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
note: Retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect on the specified day after notice is given to the employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(1) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
logic summary: Obligation takes effect
premise text: (1) If an AFP employee has consented to being retired under subsection 32(1), the employee’s retirement takes effect on the day specified in the notice under that subsection.
conclusion text: The employee's retirement takes effect on the specified day after notice is given to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Notice must be given before the specified day
premise text: (1) If an AFP employee has consented to being retired under subsection 32(1), the employee’s retirement takes effect on the day specified in the notice under that subsection.
conclusion text: The notice must be given between the day of retirement and the specified day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Notice must be given until the specified day
premise text: (1) If an AFP employee has consented to being retired under subsection 32(1), the employee’s retirement takes effect on the day specified in the notice under that subsection.
conclusion text: The notice must be given until the specified day.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must not
logic summary: Notice must not be given before the specified day
premise text: (1) If an AFP employee has consented to being retired under subsection 32(1), the employee’s retirement takes effect on the day specified in the notice under that subsection.
conclusion text: The notice must not be given before the specified day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must be
logic summary: Notice must be given to the employee
premise text: (1) If an AFP employee has consented to being retired under subsection 32(1), the employee’s retirement takes effect on the day specified in the notice under that subsection.
conclusion text: The notice must be given to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-2
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
note: Employee must be informed of right to review retirement decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(2) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform employee of right to review retirement decision.
premise text: (2) If an AFP employee who is retired under subsection 32(1) has not consented to being retired under that subsection:
conclusion text: the notice given to the employee under that subsection must inform the employee that the employee is entitled to apply, within the period, and in the manner, prescribed by the regulations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employee's retirement takes effect on a day specified in the notice.
premise text: (2) If an AFP employee who is retired under subsection 32(1) has not consented to being retired under that subsection:
conclusion text: subject to the outcome of any such review, the employee’s retirement takes effect on a day specified in the notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Retirement takes effect after review period.
premise text: (2) If an AFP employee who is retired under subsection 32(1) has not consented to being retired under that subsection:
conclusion text: the notice given to the employee under that subsection must inform the employee that the employee is entitled to apply, within the period, and in the manner, prescribed by the regulations
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: OR
logic summary: Employee's retirement may take effect on a specified day.
premise text: (2) If an AFP employee who is retired under subsection 32(1) has not consented to being retired under that subsection:
conclusion text: subject to the outcome of any such review, the employee’s retirement takes effect on a day specified in the notice
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

33(3) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-3
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
note: Must not be before end of period mentioned in paragraph (2)(a).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(3) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Negative obligation.
premise text: (3) The day specified in the notice must not be before the end of the period mentioned in paragraph (2)(a).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval.
premise text: (3) The day specified in the notice must not be before the end of the period mentioned in paragraph (2)(a).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Inference.
premise text: (3) The day specified in the notice must not be before the end of the period mentioned in paragraph (2)(a).
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Spread.
premise text: (3) The day specified in the notice must not be before the end of the period mentioned in paragraph (2)(a).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(4) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-4
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
note: Regulations must provide for review of decisions to retire AFP employees under subsection 32(1) without consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(4) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulations must provide for review of decisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(5) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-5
part of: 33 Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
note: Regulations must provide written reasons for decisions and a copy of those reasons to the AFP employee concerned.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.66
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(5) Time when retirement on invalidity grounds takes effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-33-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulations must provide written reasons for decisions and a copy of those reasons to the AFP employee concerned.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34
note: Resignation under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.67
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-34-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Voluntary retirement for the purposes of the Superannuation Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

35 Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35
has part: 35(1) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
has part: 35(2) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
has part: 35(3) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.69

35(1) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
part of: 35 Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
note: Commissioner may engage consultants or independent contractors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.69
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35-ss-1-norm

35(2) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
part of: 35 Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
note: Commissioner may determine a consultant or independent contractor to be an AFP appointee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.69
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35-ss-2-norm

35(3) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-3
part of: 35 Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
note: Determination under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.69
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35-ss-3-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(3) Commissioner may engage consultants or independent
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

35A Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a
has part: 35A(1) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(2) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(3) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(4) Payments in special circumstances
has part: 35A(5) Payments in special circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70

35A(1) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-1
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances
note: Commissioner may authorise payments to a person under special circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35A(1) Payments in special circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Commissioner may authorise payments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A(2) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-2
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances
note: Authorization for payments in special circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Commissioner has the authority to make payments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A(3) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-3
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances
note: Payments may be authorised under this section even though the payments would not otherwise be authorised by law or required to meet a legal liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A(4) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-4
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances
note: No authorisation can be made under this section if it would involve a total amount of more than $100,000.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No authorisation can be made under this section if it would involve a total amount of more than $100,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A(5) Payments in special circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-5
part of: 35A Payments in special circumstances
note: Payment recovery upon breach of conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.70
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-35a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Payment recovery upon breach of conditions
premise text: Condition is breached
conclusion text: Payment may be recovered
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36
has part: 36(1) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
has part: 36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.71

36(1) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-1
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
note: Oath or affirmation required for appointment as Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.71
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to take oath or affirmation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-2
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
note: Deputy Commissioner must enter into an undertaking and take oath or affirmation upon appointment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.71
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(2) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-3
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
note: Enter into an undertaking and make oath or affirmation after declaration as a member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.71
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(3) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to enter into undertaking and make oath or affirmation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-4
part of: 36 Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
note: Must provide information immediately after appointment.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.71
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(4) Undertakings and oaths or affirmations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Information provided during appointment period
premise text: (4) A person appointed under section 40E to assist in the performance of the functions of the Australian Federal Police must, immediately after his or her appointment:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: Must provide information as a condition of appointment
premise text: (4) A person appointed under section 40E to assist in the performance of the functions of the Australian Federal Police must, immediately after his or her appointment:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
logic summary: Information diffusion as a result of obligation
premise text: (4) A person appointed under section 40E to assist in the performance of the functions of the Australian Federal Police must, immediately after his or her appointment:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-36-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must
logic summary: Artificial intelligence system must process information
premise text: (4) A person appointed under section 40E to assist in the performance of the functions of the Australian Federal Police must, immediately after his or her appointment:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37
has part: 37(1) General administration and control
has part: 37(2) General administration and control
has part: 37(3) General administration and control
has part: 37(4) General administration and control
has part: 37(5) General administration and control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73

37(1) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: Commissioner has general administration and control of Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(1) General administration and control
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Commissioner has authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: The Minister has an obligation to give written directions to the Commissioner regarding general policy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2) General administration and control
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: The Minister has an obligation to give written directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(3) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-3
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: Commissioner must comply with written directions from Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: Minister gives written directions
conclusion text: Commissioner must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Direction from Minister is within the Commissioner's power to give directions
premise text: Minister has power to give directions under subsection (2)
conclusion text: Commissioner must comply with direction
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Minister's direction implies a requirement for Commissioner
premise text: Minister gives written directions
conclusion text: Commissioner must comply
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(4) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-4
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: The Commissioner must comply with all directions given under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(4) General administration and control
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner must comply with all directions given under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(5) General administration and control
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-5
part of: 37 General administration and control
note: The Minister may make an arrangement with a State for the provision or development of common services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.73
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(5) General administration and control
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-37-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make an arrangement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Commissioner’s Orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38
note: The Commissioner may issue orders with respect to the general administration and control of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.74
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-38-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Compliance with Commissioner’s Orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39
note: Must comply with Commissioner’s Orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.74
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-39-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 Compliance with Commissioner’s Orders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Compliance with specific directions, instructions or orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40
note: Disobeying or failing to carry out lawful directions is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.74
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40 Compliance with specific directions, instructions or orders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disobedience
premise text: Lawful direction given by the Commissioner or AFP appointee
conclusion text: Disobeying is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40A Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40a
has part: 40A(1) Self-incrimination
has part: 40A(2) Self-incrimination
has part: 40A(3) Self-incrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.75

40A(1) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40a-ss-1
part of: 40A Self-incrimination
note: AFP appointee must provide information despite potential self-incrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.75
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40A(1) Self-incrimination
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40A(2) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40a-ss-2
part of: 40A Self-incrimination
note: No admissible evidence against AFP appointee in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.75
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40A(2) Self-incrimination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits admissible evidence against AFP appointee.
premise text: (2) However, any information or answer so given or any document so produced is not admissible in evidence against the AFP appointee in any proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40A(3) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40a-ss-3
part of: 40A Self-incrimination
note: No self-incrimination for testing purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.75
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40A(3) Self-incrimination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits self-incrimination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40B AFP employees who are members of the Australian Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40b
note: Declare AFP employee a member of Australian Federal Police
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40B AFP employees who are members of the Australian Federal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: declare
logic summary: Declare an individual as a member
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorize
logic summary: Authorize an individual as a member of Australian Federal Police
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40C Determination of competency or qualification requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40c
note: Commissioner may specify competency and qualification requirements by written determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40c-norm

40D Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40d
has part: 40D(1) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(2) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(3) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(4) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(5) Commissioned police officers
has part: 40D(6) Commissioned police officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76

40D(1) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40d-ss-1
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: The Governor-General may declare a member to be a commissioned police officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40D(1) Commissioned police officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of commission is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40D(2) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40d-ss-2
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: The Minister must receive a recommendation from the Commissioner before declaring a member a commissioned police officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must receive a recommendation
premise text: The Governor-General makes a declaration under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The Minister has received a recommendation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The recommendation must be received before declaration
premise text: The Governor-General makes a declaration under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The recommendation precedes the declaration
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40D(3) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40d-ss-3
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: The Commissioner must recommend a member for commission only if satisfied they are qualified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner must make a recommendation.
premise text: Commissioner has command powers.
conclusion text: Member is qualified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40D(4) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40d-ss-4
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: Commissioner may declare a member commissioned police officer upon authorization.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40D(4) Commissioned police officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authorization is required.
premise text: Governor-General authorizes the Commissioner.
conclusion text: Commissioner may declare.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40D(5) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40d-ss-5
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: Declaration required for competent police officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Declaration is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40D(6) Commissioned police officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40d-ss-6
part of: 40D Commissioned police officers
note: The Governor-General's power is not limited by the giving of an authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.76
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40D(6) Commissioned police officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits the Governor-General's power
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40E Special members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40e
has part: 40E(1) Special members
has part: 40E(2) Special members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.78

40E(1) Special members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40e-ss-1
part of: 40E Special members
note: The Commissioner may appoint a special member of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.78
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Commissioner may appoint a special member.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40E(2) Special members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40e-ss-2
part of: 40E Special members
note: Special members have powers and duties during appointment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.78
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40E(2) Special members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Possession of powers and duties
premise text: (2) A person appointed under subsection (1)
conclusion text: has any powers and duties that are expressly conferred or imposed on special members
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40EA AFP employees who are protective service officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ea
note: Commissioner may declare AFP employee a protective service officer if they meet requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.79
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ea-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ea-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ea-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40EA AFP employees who are protective service officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ea-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40EB Determination of competency or qualification requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40eb
note: Commissioner may specify competency and qualification requirements by written determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.79
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40eb-norm

40EC Special protective service officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ec
note: Commissioner may appoint special protective service officers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.80
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Commissioner has permission to appoint special protective service officers.
premise text: The Commissioner may, on such terms and conditions...
conclusion text: appoint a person as a special protective service officer of the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Commissioner has authority to authorise special payments.
premise text: Note: The Commissioner may, under section 35A...
conclusion text: authorise special payments to special protective service officers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Commissioner has authority to appoint special protective service officers.
premise text: The Commissioner may, on such terms and conditions...
conclusion text: appoint a person as a special protective service officer of the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ec-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Commissioner has authority to determine terms and conditions.
premise text: The Commissioner may, on such terms and conditions...
conclusion text: determines in writing the terms and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40ED Powers and duties of special protective service officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ed
note: Special protective service officers have powers and duties expressly conferred or imposed under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.80
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ed-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ed-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ed-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40ED Powers and duties of special protective service officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ed-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Expressly conferred powers and duties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40f
has part: 40F(1) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(2) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(3) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
has part: 40F(5) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81

40F(1) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40f-ss-1
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
note: The Commissioner may arrange for an AFP employee to be seconded.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40F(1) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the Commissioner.
premise text: The Commissioner has the power to arrange secondments.
conclusion text: An AFP employee may be seconded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Secondment duration is not specified.
premise text: A secondment has a start and end date.
conclusion text: The duration of the secondment is not specified.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40F(2) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40f-ss-2
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
note: Commissioner must consult with authorities before terminating a secondment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: Commissioner must consult with authorities before terminating a secondment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40F(3) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40f-ss-3
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
note: Guidelines for secondment of AFP employees to foreign countries or other bodies/organisations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-3-norm

40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40f-ss-4
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
note: Minister must consult Commissioner about guidelines before giving them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40F(4) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult Commissioner
premise text: Minister must give guidelines to Commissioner
conclusion text: Minister must consult Commissioner about guidelines before giving them.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Consultation before giving guidelines
premise text: The Minister gives guidelines to the Commissioner
conclusion text: The consultation about guidelines happens before the guidelines are given.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40F(5) Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40f-ss-5
part of: 40F Secondment of AFP employees to other police forces etc.
note: Cannot arrange for AFP employee to be seconded outside Australia without guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.81
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Secondment timing
premise text: (5) If the Minister gives guidelines to the Commissioner, the Commissioner must not arrange for an AFP employee to be seconded to the Police Force of a foreign country, or to any other body or organisation outside Australia, except in accordance with the guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Secondment timing
premise text: (5) If the Minister gives guidelines to the Commissioner, the Commissioner must not arrange for an AFP employee to be seconded to the Police Force of a foreign country, or to any other body or organisation outside Australia, except in accordance with the guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Not Diffused
logic summary: Secondment timing
premise text: (5) If the Minister gives guidelines to the Commissioner, the Commissioner must not arrange for an AFP employee to be seconded to the Police Force of a foreign country, or to any other body or organisation outside Australia, except in accordance with the guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40f-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Not Cognizable
logic summary: Secondment timing
premise text: (5) If the Minister gives guidelines to the Commissioner, the Commissioner must not arrange for an AFP employee to be seconded to the Police Force of a foreign country, or to any other body or organisation outside Australia, except in accordance with the guidelines.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40g
has part: 40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
has part: 40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
has part: 40G(3) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.82

40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40g-ss-1
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
note: AFP employee status not affected by secondment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.82
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-ltl-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40G(1) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Status unaffected
premise text: (1) The secondment under section 40F of a person who is an AFP employee does not affect...
conclusion text: ...the person’s status as an AFP employee; and...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Provisions of Act do not apply during secondment
premise text: (1) The secondment under section 40F of a person who is an AFP employee does not affect...
conclusion text: ...the application of any provision of this Act in relation to the person during the period of the secondment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Obligations unaffected by secondment
premise text: (1) The secondment under section 40F of a person who is an AFP employee does not affect...
conclusion text: ...AFP professional standards obligations etc. continue
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between secondment and AFP employment
premise text: (1) The secondment under section 40F of a person who is an AFP employee does not affect...
conclusion text: ...the period of the secondment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Secondment repeats AFP employment
premise text: (1) The secondment under section 40F of a person who is an AFP employee does not affect...
conclusion text: ...the person’s status as an AFP employee; and...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40g-ss-2
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
note: Remains subject to obligations and liabilities as AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.82
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40G(2) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues existing obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40G(3) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40g-ss-3
part of: 40G Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
note: Rights and immunities of AFP employees on secondment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.82
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 40G(3) Effect of secondment on status as AFP employee etc.
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds rights and immunities
premise text: (3) Nothing in this section affects: (a) any rights, powers or immunities that an AFP employee who is seconded under section 40F has by virtue of holding the office or position to which the employee has been seconded;
conclusion text: An AFP employee on secondment holds their rights and immunities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds obligations and liabilities
premise text: (3) Nothing in this section affects: (b) the extent to which the employee is subject to obligations or liabilities in relation to discipline by virtue of holding the office or position to which the employee has been seconded.
conclusion text: An AFP employee on secondment holds their obligations and liabilities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds office or position
premise text: (3) Nothing in this section affects: (a) any rights, powers or immunities that an AFP employee who is seconded under section 40F has by virtue of holding the office or position to which the employee has been seconded;
conclusion text: An AFP employee on secondment holds their office or position
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40H Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40h
has part: 40H(1) Assignment of duties etc.
has part: 40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.
has part: 40H(3) Assignment of duties etc.
has part: 40H(4) Assignment of duties etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83

40H(1) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40h-ss-1
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.
note: Determination of duties and places for AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-1-norm

40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40h-ss-2
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.
note: Duties to meet special operational needs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40H(2) Assignment of duties etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to meet special operational needs
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may from time to time determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee while the employee is performing duties outside Australia.
conclusion text: The Commissioner must determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal interval for special operational needs
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may from time to time determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee while the employee is performing duties outside Australia.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for special operational needs includes those who are performing duties...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of employees subject to special operational needs
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may from time to time determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee while the employee is performing duties outside Australia.
conclusion text: The recurring trace of employees subject to special operational needs includes those who are performing duties...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
logic summary: Diffusion of information about special operational needs
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may from time to time determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee while the employee is performing duties outside Australia.
conclusion text: The diffusion of information about special operational needs includes those who are performing duties...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Through
logic summary: CogAI's role in managing special operational needs
premise text: (2) The Commissioner may from time to time determine in writing the terms and conditions applying to an AFP employee while the employee is performing duties outside Australia.
conclusion text: CogAI's role in managing special operational needs includes those who are performing duties...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40H(3) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40h-ss-3
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.
note: Commissioner may determine accommodation arrangements for employee performing special duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40H(3) Assignment of duties etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40H(4) Assignment of duties etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40h-ss-4
part of: 40H Assignment of duties etc.
note: Commissioner may revoke determination in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40h-ss-4-norm

40J Suspension from duties etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40j
note: Regulations may suspend duties of AFP employees with or without remuneration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.83
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40j-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40j-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40J Suspension from duties etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulations may suspend duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40k
has part: 40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
has part: 40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
has part: 40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.86

40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40k-ss-1
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct
note: Commissioner must make written declaration if employee's conduct amounts to serious misconduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.86
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40K(1) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to make declaration
premise text: Commissioner has authority to terminate employment
conclusion text: Declaration must be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40k-ss-2
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct
note: Declaration must be made within 24 hours of Commissioner's decision.
description: Copy of declaration to AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.86
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40K(2) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Declaration must be made within 24 hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40k-ss-3
part of: 40K Termination of employment for serious misconduct
note: Definition of serious misconduct for termination of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.86
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40K(3) Termination of employment for serious misconduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: AFP employee
conclusion text: serious misconduct
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40k-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Definition of serious misconduct
premise text: (a) corruption, a serious abuse of power, or a serious dereliction of duty
conclusion text: serious misconduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40l
has part: 40L(1) Financial statements
has part: 40L(2) Financial statements
has part: 40L(3) Financial statements
has part: 40L(4) Financial statements
has part: 40L(5) Financial statements
has part: 40L(6) Financial statements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87

40L(1) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40l-ss-1
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: The Commissioner may give a written direction requiring an AFP employee or special member to provide a statement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(1) Financial statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner must give a written direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L(2) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40l-ss-2
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: Financial statements must be made in a specified form and manner, contain required information, and be accompanied by documents.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(2) Financial statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide financial statements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L(3) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40l-ss-3
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: Must provide financial statement within 2 months after the end of the period to which it relates.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(3) Financial statements
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide financial statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L(4) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40l-ss-4
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: Commissioner may grant extension of time for giving statement in special circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(4) Financial statements
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Commissioner may grant extension of time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L(5) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40l-ss-5
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: Must provide financial statement despite potential incrimination or penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(5) Financial statements
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide financial statement
premise text: The person is required to give the statement
conclusion text: The person must provide the statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40L(6) Financial statements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40l-ss-6
part of: 40L Financial statements
note: No admissible in evidence against the person in any proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.87
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-6-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40l-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40L(6) Financial statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40la
has part: 40LA(1) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40LA(2) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40LA(3) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40LA(4) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40LA(5) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88

40LA(1) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40la-ss-1
part of: 40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
note: Authorized manager requires screening test subject to undergo alcohol screening test if reasonably suspected to be under influence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40LA(1) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires action
premise text: Authorized manager
conclusion text: Screening test subject
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40LA(2) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40la-ss-2
part of: 40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
note: Must comply with requirement given under subsection (1)
description: Test results
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40LA(2) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40LA(3) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40la-ss-3
part of: 40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
note: Must return to duties immediately if alcohol not detected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return to duties immediately
premise text: (3) If the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is not present in the screening test subject’s breath...
conclusion text: The screening test subject may return to his or her duties immediately.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS_AT
logic summary: Temporal relationship between 'return to duties' and 'alcohol not detected'
premise text: (3) If the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is not present in the screening test subject’s breath...
conclusion text: The screening test subject may return to his or her duties immediately.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BUT_IF
logic summary: Conditional relationship between 'return to duties' and 'alcohol not detected'
premise text: (3) If the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is not present in the screening test subject’s breath...
conclusion text: The screening test subject may return to his or her duties immediately.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_DIFFUSED_BY
logic summary: Relationship between 'return to duties' and 'alcohol not detected'
premise text: (3) If the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is not present in the screening test subject’s breath...
conclusion text: The screening test subject may return to his or her duties immediately.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_COGNITIVE_OF
logic summary: Relationship between 'return to duties' and 'alcohol not detected'
premise text: (3) If the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is not present in the screening test subject’s breath...
conclusion text: The screening test subject may return to his or her duties immediately.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40LA(4) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40la-ss-4
part of: 40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
note: Must undergo breath test if alcohol detected or refuses screening
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits AFP appointees from refusing breath test
premise text: (a) the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is present in the screening test subject’s breath; or (b) the screening test subject refuses to undergo the alcohol screening test;
conclusion text: The screening test subject may be given a written direction under section 40M to undergo a breath test.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace of AFP appointees who must undergo breath test if alcohol detected or refuses screening
premise text: (4) If: (a) the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is present in the screening test subject’s breath; or (b) the screening test subject refuses to undergo the alcohol screening test;
conclusion text: The screening test subject may be given a written direction under section 40M to undergo a breath test.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on AFP appointees to undergo breath test if alcohol detected or refuses screening
premise text: (4) If: (a) the result of the alcohol screening test shows that alcohol is present in the screening test subject’s breath; or (b) the screening test subject refuses to undergo the alcohol screening test;
conclusion text: The screening test subject may be given a written direction under section 40M to undergo a breath test.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40LA(5) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40la-ss-5
part of: 40LA Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
note: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.88
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40LA(5) Authorised managers may require AFP appointees to undergo
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
logic summary: Requires AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.
premise text: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.
conclusion text: AFP appointees must undergo drug testing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Drug testing must occur during the term of the appointment.
premise text: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.
conclusion text: Drug testing occurs during the term of the appointment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
logic summary: The requirement for drug testing implies that AFP appointees must be trustworthy.
premise text: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.
conclusion text: AFP appointees are trustworthy.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: The requirement for drug testing spreads to all AFP appointees.
premise text: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.
conclusion text: All AFP appointees must undergo drug testing.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40la-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
logic summary: The requirement for drug testing incorporates AI-powered monitoring.
premise text: Authorized managers may require AFP appointees to undergo drug testing.
conclusion text: AI-powered monitoring is incorporated into the drug testing process.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40M Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40m
has part: 40M(1) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40M(2) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
has part: 40M(3) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.89

40M(1) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40m-ss-1
part of: 40M Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
note: AFP appointees on duty must undergo alcohol screening and breath tests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.89
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40M(1) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits AFP appointees on duty from not undergoing alcohol screening and breath tests.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40M(2) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40m-ss-2
part of: 40M Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
note: Provide a blood sample if breath test indicates alcohol presence
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.89
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a blood sample
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40M(3) Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40m-ss-3
part of: 40M Prescribed persons may require AFP appointees to undergo
note: Must comply with direction given under this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.89
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40N Alcohol screening tests, alcohol breath tests and prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40n
note: Drug tests after certain incidents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.89
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40N Alcohol screening tests, alcohol breath tests and prohibited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide drug tests
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40P Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40p
note: Regulations for authorisation and provision of services under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.91
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation of persons to give directions under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap of provisions for calibration, inspection and testing of devices used in conducting breath tests, blood tests or prohibited drug tests under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring provision for calibration, inspection and testing of devices used in conducting breath tests, blood tests or prohibited drug tests under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of provisions for calibration, inspection and testing of devices used in conducting breath tests, blood tests or prohibited drug tests under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40p-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise
logic summary: Recognition of devices used in conducting breath tests, blood tests or prohibited drug tests under sections 40LA, 40M and 40N.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40N Section 40N
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40n-2
has part: 40N(2) Section 40N
has part: 40N(3) Section 40N
has part: 40N(4) Section 40N
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.92

40N(2) Section 40N
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40n-2-ss-2
part of: 40N Section 40N
note: Allows regulations to incorporate standards from Standards Australia or New Zealand.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.92
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-2-norm

40N(3) Section 40N
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40n-2-ss-3
part of: 40N Section 40N
note: Ensure text of applied standard is readily available and free of charge to AFP appointees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.92
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40N(3) Section 40N
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure availability of standard text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40N(4) Section 40N
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40n-2-ss-4
part of: 40N Section 40N
note: Copyright exemption for making text available
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.92
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40n-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies excerpt as a permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40PA Managers who may require alcohol screening tests
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40pa
note: Commissioner may issue orders authorizing AFP appointees to act as managers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.93
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40pa-norm

40Q Admissibility of test results etc. in legal proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40q
note: Exclusion of certain test results from admissibility in proceedings against AFP appointees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.93
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40q-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40q-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits admissibility of certain test results in proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40R Approval of screening devices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40r
note: Approval of screening devices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.93
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40r-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40r-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to approve devices
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RA Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ra
note: Establishes procedures for AFP conduct and practices issues
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.95
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ra-norm

40RB Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rb
has part: 40RB(1) Simplified outline of this Part
has part: 40RB(2) Simplified outline of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.95

40RB(1) Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rb-ss-1
part of: 40RB Simplified outline of this Part
note: Deals with handling of AFP conduct issues and AFP practices issues.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.95
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rb-ss-1-norm

40RB(2) Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rb-ss-2
part of: 40RB Simplified outline of this Part
note: List of issues that may be dealt with under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.95
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rb-ss-2-norm

40RC Commissioner may determine professional standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rc
has part: 40RC(1) Commissioner may determine professional standards
has part: 40RC(2) Commissioner may determine professional standards
has part: 40RC(3) Commissioner may determine professional standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97

40RC(1) Commissioner may determine professional standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rc-ss-1
part of: 40RC Commissioner may determine professional standards
note: Commissioner may determine professional standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RC(1) Commissioner may determine professional standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Duty to comply with professional standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RC(2) Commissioner may determine professional standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rc-ss-2
part of: 40RC Commissioner may determine professional standards
note: Commissioner may determine professional standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RC(2) Commissioner may determine professional standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Duty to determine professional standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Commissioner's power to determine professional standards
premise text: The Commissioner may determine a professional standard by reference to the requirements specified in...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for determining professional standards
premise text: Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner may determine a professional standard by reference to the requirements specified in...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RC(3) Commissioner may determine professional standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rc-ss-3
part of: 40RC Commissioner may determine professional standards
note: Commissioner may determine professional standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rc-ss-3-norm

40RD Unit to be constituted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rd
has part: 40RD(1) Unit to be constituted
has part: 40RD(2) Unit to be constituted
has part: 40RD(3) Unit to be constituted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97

40RD(1) Unit to be constituted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rd-ss-1
part of: 40RD Unit to be constituted
note: Establishment of a unit within the Australian Federal Police
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-1-norm

40RD(2) Unit to be constituted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rd-ss-2
part of: 40RD Unit to be constituted
note: The Commissioner may determine the name of the unit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RD(2) Unit to be constituted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Duty to determine a name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40RD(3) Unit to be constituted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rd-ss-3
part of: 40RD Unit to be constituted
note: The Commissioner determines the establishment of the unit from time to time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.97
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rd-ss-3-norm

40RE Head of unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40re
has part: 40RE(1) Head of unit
has part: 40RE(2) Head of unit
has part: 40RE(3) Head of unit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98

40RE(1) Head of unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40re-ss-1
part of: 40RE Head of unit
note: Commissioner may appoint head of unit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-1-norm

40RE(2) Head of unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40re-ss-2
part of: 40RE Head of unit
note: The head of the unit is responsible for performing its functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RE(2) Head of unit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Responsibility
logic summary: Head of unit has responsibility to perform functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RE(3) Head of unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40re-ss-3
part of: 40RE Head of unit
note: Direct responsibility to Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40re-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is responsible under
logic summary: Direct responsibility
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rf
has part: 40RF(1) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(2) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(3) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(4) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(5) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(6) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
has part: 40RF(7) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98

40RF(1) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-1
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
note: Commissioner may assign a member or special member to the unit under section 40RD.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-1-norm

40RF(2) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-2
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
note: Assignment must be in writing and specify the period of service.
description: writing, period of service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RF(2) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Assignment must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: FOR
logic summary: Assignment must specify the period of service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RF(3) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-3
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
note: Maximum duration for assignment of members and special members to a unit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RF(3) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Duration constraint
conclusion text: The period specified under paragraph (2)(b) must not exceed 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RF(4) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-4
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
note: Commissioner may vary assignment of members to unit under special reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RF(5) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-5
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
note: The period substituted under subsection (4) may exceed 2 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-5-norm

40RF(6) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-6
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
note: Member or special member must cease serving in the unit after specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to cease serving
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after the member, or special member, has served in the unit for the period specified in the assignment...
conclusion text: The Commissioner must arrange for the member, or special member, to cease serving in the unit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Temporal interval starts after specified period
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after the member, or special member, has served in the unit for the period specified in the assignment...
conclusion text: The Commissioner must arrange for the member, or special member, to cease serving in the unit.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BUT
logic summary: Temporal interval is independent of other intervals
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after the member, or special member, has served in the unit for the period specified in the assignment...
conclusion text: The Commissioner must arrange for the member, or special member, to cease serving in the unit.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-SPREADS-TO
logic summary: Obligation spreads to all relevant parties
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after the member, or special member, has served in the unit for the period specified in the assignment...
conclusion text: The Commissioner must arrange for the member, or special member, to cease serving in the unit.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Obligation implies action by relevant parties
premise text: (6) As soon as practicable after the member, or special member, has served in the unit for the period specified in the assignment...
conclusion text: The Commissioner must arrange for the member, or special member, to cease serving in the unit.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RF(7) Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rf-ss-7
part of: 40RF Assignment of members, and special members, to unit
note: Reassignment of members to unit after cessation of service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.98
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to reassign member
premise text: (a) a member, or special member, of the Australian Federal Police is assigned to the unit constituted under section 40RD;
conclusion text: the member, or special member, may again be assigned to the unit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for reassignment of members
premise text: (b) the member, or special member, ceases to serve in the unit;
conclusion text: the period of 12 months from the time when the member, or special member, ceased to serve in the unit ends;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Inference for reassignment of members
premise text: (a) a member, or special member, of the Australian Federal Police is assigned to the unit constituted under section 40RD;
conclusion text: the member, or special member, may again be assigned to the unit.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Spread of reassignment obligation
premise text: (b) the member, or special member, ceases to serve in the unit;
conclusion text: the period of 12 months from the time when the member, or special member, ceased to serve in the unit ends;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rf-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of reassignment obligation
premise text: (c) the period of 12 months from the time when the member, or special member, ceased to serve in the unit ends;
conclusion text: the member, or special member, may again be assigned to the unit.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40RG Member or special member in unit may be directed to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rg
note: Commissioner may direct member or special member to perform duties not related to unit's functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.99
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rg-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rg-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commissioner may direct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RH AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rh
has part: 40RH(1) AFP conduct issues
has part: 40RH(2) AFP conduct issues
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.99

40RH(1) AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rh-ss-1
part of: 40RH AFP conduct issues
note: Definition of AFP conduct issue
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.99
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rh-ss-1-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RH(1) AFP conduct issues
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40RH(2) AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rh-ss-2
part of: 40RH AFP conduct issues
note: Continues to apply despite exceptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.99
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rh-ss-2-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RH(2) AFP conduct issues
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40RI AFP practices issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ri
has part: 40RI(1) AFP practices issues
has part: 40RI(2) AFP practices issues
has part: 40RI(3) AFP practices issues
has part: 40RI(4) AFP practices issues
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.100

40RI(1) AFP practices issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ri-ss-1
part of: 40RI AFP practices issues
note: Defines AFP practices issue for purposes of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.100
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RI(1) AFP practices issues
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of a term
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue is an issue...
conclusion text: An AFP practices issue is defined.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue is an issue...
conclusion text: The definition applies to issues during the period of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of the definition
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue is an issue...
conclusion text: The definition implies that issues are about AFP practices.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: is
logic summary: Spread of the definition
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue is an issue...
conclusion text: The definition spreads to other issues.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue is an issue...
conclusion text: The definition applies to AI applications.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40RI(2) AFP practices issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ri-ss-2
part of: 40RI AFP practices issues
note: An AFP practices issue includes an issue of whether a practice or procedure is contrary to law, unreasonable, unjust, oppressive, discriminatory, inadequate, or otherwise wrong or inappropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.100
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-6

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The practice is contrary to law.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is contrary to law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The practice is unreasonable.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is unreasonable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The practice is unjust.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is unjust.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The practice is oppressive.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is oppressive.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The practice is discriminatory.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is discriminatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The practice is inadequate.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), an AFP practices issue includes...
conclusion text: An issue of whether a practice or procedure is inadequate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RI(3) AFP practices issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ri-ss-3
part of: 40RI AFP practices issues
note: Defines practices and procedures of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.100
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-3-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RI(3) AFP practices issues
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40RI(4) AFP practices issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ri-ss-4
part of: 40RI AFP practices issues
note: Section has effect subject to section 40RJ.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.100
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ri-ss-4-norm

40RJ Exclusion of certain employment action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rj
has part: 40RJ(1) Exclusion of certain employment action
has part: 40RJ(2) Exclusion of certain employment action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.101

40RJ(1) Exclusion of certain employment action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rj-ss-1
part of: 40RJ Exclusion of certain employment action
note: Exclusion of certain employment action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.101
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RJ(1) Exclusion of certain employment action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Excluded conduct issues
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP conduct issue does not include...
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates to conduct of a person that is conduct that: (a) consists of action taken in relation to an AFP appointee’s employment; and (b) involves neither: (i) a contravention by the person of the AFP professional standards; nor (ii) corrupt conduct by the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to employment action
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP conduct issue does not include...
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates to conduct of a person that is conduct that: (a) consists of action taken in relation to an AFP appointee’s employment; and (b) involves neither: (i) a contravention by the person of the AFP professional standards; nor (ii) corrupt conduct by the person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to employment action
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP conduct issue does not include...
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates to conduct of a person that is conduct that: (a) consists of action taken in relation to an AFP appointee’s employment; and (b) involves neither: (i) a contravention by the person of the AFP professional standards; nor (ii) corrupt conduct by the person.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to employment action
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP conduct issue does not include...
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates to conduct of a person that is conduct that: (a) consists of action taken in relation to an AFP appointee’s employment; and (b) involves neither: (i) a contravention by the person of the AFP professional standards; nor (ii) corrupt conduct by the person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to employment action
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP conduct issue does not include...
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates to conduct of a person that is conduct that: (a) consists of action taken in relation to an AFP appointee’s employment; and (b) involves neither: (i) a contravention by the person of the AFP professional standards; nor (ii) corrupt conduct by the person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40RJ(2) Exclusion of certain employment action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rj-ss-2
part of: 40RJ Exclusion of certain employment action
note: Exclusion of certain employment action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.101
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RJ(2) Exclusion of certain employment action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclude certain employment actions
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Act, an AFP practices issue does not include...
conclusion text: ...an issue that relates a practice or procedure of the Australian Federal Police...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40RK Categories of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rk
has part: 40RK(1) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(2) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(3) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(4) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(5) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(6) Categories of conduct
has part: 40RK(7) Categories of conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102

40RK(1) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-1
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct
note: There are 4 categories of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RK(1) Categories of conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Existence
logic summary: Existence of categories
premise text: (1) There are 4 categories of conduct for the purposes of this Act.
conclusion text: There exist 4 categories of conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification into categories
premise text: (1) There are 4 categories of conduct for the purposes of this Act.
conclusion text: The categories are: (i) category 1, (ii) category 2, (iii) category 3, and (iv) category 4.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40RK(2) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-2
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct
note: Category 1 is the lowest and least serious category of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RK(2) Categories of conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Category classification
premise text: The categories of conduct are defined.
conclusion text: Category 1 is the lowest category.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40RK(3) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-3
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct
note: Next highest category of conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: next
logic summary: Determines order of categories
premise text: (3) The next highest, and next most serious, is category 2.
conclusion text: Category 2 is the next highest category of conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40RK(4) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-4
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct
note: Next highest category
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: next
logic summary: Determines order of categories
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: category 3
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RK(5) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-5
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct
note: Conduct giving rise to a corruption issue is the most serious type.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RK(5) Categories of conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies conduct as an obligation.
conclusion text: X is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RK(6) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-6
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct
note: Prioritization of conduct categories
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prioritization
logic summary: Prioritizes higher category over others
premise text: (6) If conduct would otherwise belong to more than one category, it is taken to belong to the higher or highest of those categories.
conclusion text: Obligation to prioritize higher category
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Prioritization
logic summary: Prioritizes temporal intervals based on categorization
premise text: (6) If conduct would otherwise belong to more than one category, it is taken to belong to the higher or highest of those categories.
conclusion text: Temporal prioritization based on categorization
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Prioritization
logic summary: Prioritizes temporal intervals based on categorization
premise text: (6) If conduct would otherwise belong to more than one category, it is taken to belong to the higher or highest of those categories.
conclusion text: Temporal prioritization based on categorization
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Prioritization
logic summary: Prioritizes information based on conduct categorization
premise text: (6) If conduct would otherwise belong to more than one category, it is taken to belong to the higher or highest of those categories.
conclusion text: Information prioritization based on conduct categorization
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Prioritization
logic summary: Prioritizes knowledge based on conduct categorization
premise text: (6) If conduct would otherwise belong to more than one category, it is taken to belong to the higher or highest of those categories.
conclusion text: Knowledge prioritization based on conduct categorization
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RK(7) Categories of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rk-ss-7
part of: 40RK Categories of conduct
note: The category to which conduct belongs may change as more information is obtained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.102
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-7-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rk-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RK(7) Categories of conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40RL Categories of AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rl
has part: 40RL(1) Categories of AFP conduct issues
has part: 40RL(2) Categories of AFP conduct issues
has part: 40RL(3) Categories of AFP conduct issues
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103

40RL(1) Categories of AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rl-ss-1
part of: 40RL Categories of AFP conduct issues
note: Definition of category 1 conduct issue
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RL(1) Categories of AFP conduct issues
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a key concept
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RL(2) Categories of AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rl-ss-2
part of: 40RL Categories of AFP conduct issues
note: Duty to report category 2 conduct issues
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RL(2) Categories of AFP conduct issues
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must report category 2 conduct issues
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RL(3) Categories of AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rl-ss-3
part of: 40RL Categories of AFP conduct issues
note: Duty to report category 3 conduct issues
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RL(3) Categories of AFP conduct issues
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rl-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must report category 3 conduct issues
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RM AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rm
has part: 40RM(1) AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
has part: 40RM(2) AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103

40RM(1) AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rm-ss-1
part of: 40RM AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
note: Commissioner and Ombudsman may jointly determine kinds of conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rm-ss-1-norm

40RM(2) AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rm-ss-2
part of: 40RM AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
note: Conduct not determined is considered category 3 conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rm-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RM(2) AFP Commissioner and Ombudsman to determine the kinds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: :
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RN Category 1 conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rn
note: Determination of category 1 conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.103
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rn-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rn-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RN Category 1 conduct
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40RO Category 2 conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ro
has part: 40RO(1) Category 2 conduct
has part: 40RO(2) Category 2 conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104

40RO(1) Category 2 conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ro-ss-1
part of: 40RO Category 2 conduct
note: Determine category 2 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RO(1) Category 2 conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determines category 2 conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RO(2) Category 2 conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ro-ss-2
part of: 40RO Category 2 conduct
note: Ensure category 3 conduct is not treated as such.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RO(2) Category 2 conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Ensure obligation.
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman must also be satisfied that...
conclusion text: the conduct does not warrant being treated as category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establish temporal relation between events.
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman must also be satisfied that...
conclusion text: the conduct does not warrant being treated as category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establish temporal relation between events.
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman must also be satisfied that...
conclusion text: the conduct does not warrant being treated as category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuse information about conduct.
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman must also be satisfied that...
conclusion text: the conduct does not warrant being treated as category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ro-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classify conduct using AI.
premise text: (2) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman must also be satisfied that...
conclusion text: the conduct does not warrant being treated as category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40RP Category 3 conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rp
has part: 40RP(1) Category 3 conduct
has part: 40RP(2) Category 3 conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104

40RP(1) Category 3 conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rp-ss-1
part of: 40RP Category 3 conduct
note: Determine category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RP(1) Category 3 conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determines category 3 conduct.
premise text: (1) The Commissioner and the Ombudsman may determine under subsection 40RM(1)
conclusion text: conduct of a particular kind is to be category 3 conduct for the purposes of this Act only if they are satisfied that
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not raise
logic summary: Does not raise a corruption issue.
premise text: (b) conduct of that kind does not raise a corruption issue.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40RP(2) Category 3 conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rp-ss-2
part of: 40RP Category 3 conduct
note: No limitation on Category 3 conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.104
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-2-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40RP(2) Category 3 conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40RQ Managers for particular categories of AFP conduct issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40rq
note: Commissioner may issue orders authorizing AFP appointees to act as managers for specific conduct issues.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.105
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40rq-norm

40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sa
has part: 40SA(1) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40SA(2) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40SA(3) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40SA(4) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40SA(5) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106

40SA(1) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sa-ss-1
part of: 40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
note: Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices to the Commissioner or an AFP appointee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-1-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 40SA(1) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40SA(2) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sa-ss-2
part of: 40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
note: Giving information anonymously is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 40SA(2) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to give information anonymously.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40SA(3) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sa-ss-3
part of: 40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
note: Must provide information that implies a desire to be kept informed of action taken.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40SA(3) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expressed intention to be kept informed.
premise text: Person gives information that implies a desire to be kept informed.
conclusion text: Obligation to provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expressed intention to be kept informed.
premise text: Person indicates a desire to be kept informed.
conclusion text: Obligation to provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40SA(4) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sa-ss-4
part of: 40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
note: The AFP appointee may require the person giving information to reduce it to writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40SA(4) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The AFP appointee has the power to require reduction of information to writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40SA(5) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sa-ss-5
part of: 40SA Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
note: Must provide information about AFP conduct or practices
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.106
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40SA(5) Giving information that raises an AFP conduct or practices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide information about AFP conduct or practices
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40SB Arrangements for person in custody to give information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sb
has part: 40SB(1) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
has part: 40SB(2) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
has part: 40SB(3) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.107

40SB(1) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sb-ss-1
part of: 40SB Arrangements for person in custody to give information
note: A person in custody must provide information.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.107
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40SB(1) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40SB(2) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sb-ss-2
part of: 40SB Arrangements for person in custody to give information
note: A custodian is defined as the person in custody or another person performing duties in connection with the detainee's detention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.107
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40SB(2) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Definition of custodian
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40SB(3) Arrangements for person in custody to give information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sb-ss-3
part of: 40SB Arrangements for person in custody to give information
note: Request for facilities to provide information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.107
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sb-ss-3-norm

40SC Recording and dealing with information given under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sc
has part: 40SC(1) Recording and dealing with information given under
has part: 40SC(2) Recording and dealing with information given under
has part: 40SC(3) Recording and dealing with information given under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.109

40SC(1) Recording and dealing with information given under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sc-ss-1
part of: 40SC Recording and dealing with information given under
note: Recipient must record and deal with information in accordance with Commissioner's orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.109
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40SC(1) Recording and dealing with information given under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Recipient must perform action.
premise text: Section 40SA
conclusion text: Commissioner's orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40SC(2) Recording and dealing with information given under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sc-ss-2
part of: 40SC Recording and dealing with information given under
note: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period if issue is appropriate for informal resolution.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.109
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40SC(2) Recording and dealing with information given under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide explanation or take action.
premise text: Recipient satisfied that issue is appropriate for informal resolution.
conclusion text: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Recipient satisfied that explanation can be given within a reasonable period.
premise text: Recipient satisfied that giving an explanation to the person giving the information is likely to resolve the issue.
conclusion text: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Recipient must arrange for action to be taken.
premise text: Recipient satisfied that taking other action is likely to resolve the issue.
conclusion text: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Recipient able to give person giving information explanation.
premise text: Recipient satisfied that the recipient is able to give the person giving the information that explanation, or arrange for that action to be taken, within a reasonable period.
conclusion text: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Recipient satisfied that issue is appropriate for informal resolution.
premise text: Recipient satisfied that the issue: (i) arises as a result of a misunderstanding of the facts, the law or the practices or procedures of the Australian Federal Police; or (ii) is otherwise appropriate for informal resolution.
conclusion text: Recipient must provide explanation or take action within a reasonable period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

40SC(3) Recording and dealing with information given under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sc-ss-3
part of: 40SC Recording and dealing with information given under
note: Record details of information if issue is not resolved within a reasonable period.
description: details of the information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.109
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to record details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40SD Commissioner may decide that AFP conduct issue should be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40sd
note: Commissioner may decide that AFP conduct issue should be dealt with under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.110
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40sd-norm

40SE Recording and dealing with information referred under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40se
note: The Commissioner must record and deal with an AFP conduct issue in accordance with orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.110
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40se-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40se-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40se-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40SE Recording and dealing with information referred under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40se-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner must perform the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TA Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ta
has part: 40TA(1) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40TA(2) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
has part: 40TA(3) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.111

40TA(1) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ta-ss-1
part of: 40TA Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
note: Commissioner may issue orders about AFP conduct or practices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.111
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TA(1) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commissioner has the power to issue orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TA(2) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ta-ss-2
part of: 40TA Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
note: Ensure complainant is kept informed of progress in dealing with AFP conduct issue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.111
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TA(2) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure complainant is kept informed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TA(3) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ta-ss-3
part of: 40TA Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
note: Ensure complainant is kept informed of progress in dealing with AFP practices issue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.111
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TA(3) Commissioner’s orders about how AFP conduct or practices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ta-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure complainant is kept informed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TB Dealing with related AFP conduct issues that have different
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tb
note: Dealing with related AFP conduct issues that have different categories may be dealt with together as if they all belong to the higher or highest of those categories.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tb-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TB Dealing with related AFP conduct issues that have different
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40TC Training and development action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tc
has part: 40TC(1) Training and development action
has part: 40TC(2) Training and development action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112

40TC(1) Training and development action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tc-ss-1
part of: 40TC Training and development action
note: Training and development action is a duty to improve AFP appointee's performance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TC(1) Training and development action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TC(2) Training and development action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tc-ss-2
part of: 40TC Training and development action
note: Training and development action for AFP appointee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TC(2) Training and development action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide training and development action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TD Remedial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40td
has part: 40TD(1) Remedial action
has part: 40TD(2) Remedial action
has part: 40TD(3) Remedial action
has part: 40TD(4) Remedial action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112

40TD(1) Remedial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40td-ss-1
part of: 40TD Remedial action
note: Remedial action definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TD(1) Remedial action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Definition of remedial action as an obligation to remedy unsatisfactory performance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TD(2) Remedial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40td-ss-2
part of: 40TD Remedial action
note: Remedial action for AFP appointee may include improving behavior, structured changes to employment, or recording adverse findings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TD(2) Remedial action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: State has obligation to provide remedial action for AFP appointee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TD(3) Remedial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40td-ss-3
part of: 40TD Remedial action
note: Remedial action may include counselling, reprimanding, or giving a formal warning to the AFP appointee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TD(3) Remedial action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May provide remedial action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TD(4) Remedial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40td-ss-4
part of: 40TD Remedial action
note: Remedial action may take one or more of the following forms: changing shifts, restricting duties, reassigning duties, or transferring to another part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.112
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TD(4) Remedial action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to provide remedial action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Remedial action can occur at any time
premise text: (4) Without limiting paragraph (2)(b), remedial action in relation to the AFP appointee may take one or more of the following forms:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Remedial action can occur at any time
premise text: (4) Without limiting paragraph (2)(b), remedial action in relation to the AFP appointee may take one or more of the following forms:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Remedial action can occur at any time
premise text: (4) Without limiting paragraph (2)(b), remedial action in relation to the AFP appointee may take one or more of the following forms:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40td-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Remedial action can occur at any time
premise text: (4) Without limiting paragraph (2)(b), remedial action in relation to the AFP appointee may take one or more of the following forms:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TE Termination action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40te
note: Defines termination action for AFP appointees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.113
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40te-norm

40TF Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tf
has part: 40TF(1) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
has part: 40TF(2) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.115

40TF(1) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tf-ss-1
part of: 40TF Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
note: Duty to investigate AFP conduct issues
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.115
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TF(1) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information under section 40SA
premise text: (a) a person gives information under section 40SA that raises: (i) an AFP conduct issue in relation to conduct engaged in by an AFP appointee; or (ii) an AFP practices issue in relation to a practice or procedure of the AFP;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must decide under section 40SD that an AFP conduct issue is to be dealt with under this Part
premise text: (b) the Commissioner decides under section 40SD that an AFP conduct issue in relation to an AFP appointee is to be dealt with under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TF(2) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tf-ss-2
part of: 40TF Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
note: Commissioner may determine no further action is to be taken under this Part in relation to AFP conduct if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.115
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TF(2) Discretion to take no further action in relation to AFP conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commissioner may determine no further action is to be taken.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commissioner may determine no further action is to be taken if appropriate action has already been taken.
premise text: (b) appropriate action has already been taken:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tf-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commissioner may determine no further action is to be taken if the person gave information under section 40SA more than 12 months after becoming aware of the conduct.
premise text: (a) the person became aware of the conduct, or the practice or procedure, more than 12 months before the person gave the information under section 40SA;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TG When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tg
has part: 40TG(1) When Subdivision applies
has part: 40TG(2) When Subdivision applies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.117

40TG(1) When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tg-ss-1
part of: 40TG When Subdivision applies
note: Subdivision applies under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.117
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-1-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TG(1) When Subdivision applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40TG(2) When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tg-ss-2
part of: 40TG When Subdivision applies
note: Subdivision applies under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.117
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TG(2) When Subdivision applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Subdivision applies
premise text: (2) This Subdivision also applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TH How issue is dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40th
note: Ensure adequate opportunity for AFP appointee and complainant to be heard in relation to the issue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.117
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TH How issue is dealt with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Ensure
logic summary: Ensure adequate opportunity for AFP appointee and complainant to be heard.
premise text: (1) In dealing with the AFP conduct issue, the manager must:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Determine
logic summary: Determine action to be taken under section 40TI or 40TJ.
premise text: (1) In dealing with the AFP conduct issue, the manager must:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40th-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Consider
logic summary: Consider whether information raises an AFP practices issue.
premise text: (1) In dealing with the AFP conduct issue, the manager must:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TI Action that may be taken in relation to category 1 conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ti
note: Manager must take training and development action if satisfied category 1 conduct has occurred.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.118
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ti-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ti-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ti-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TI Action that may be taken in relation to category 1 conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ti-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Manager must take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TJ Action that may be taken in relation to category 2 conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tj
note: Action that may be taken in relation to category 2 conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.118
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tj-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tj-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tj-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TJ Action that may be taken in relation to category 2 conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TK AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tk
has part: 40TK(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
has part: 40TK(2) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
has part: 40TK(3) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119

40TK(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tk-ss-1
part of: 40TK AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
note: Manager must be satisfied that information raises an AFP practices issue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TK(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Manager must be satisfied
premise text: (1) This section applies if the manager is satisfied
conclusion text: that the information raises an AFP practices issue.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Manager's satisfaction must occur before section application
premise text: (1) This section applies if the manager is satisfied
conclusion text: that the information raises an AFP practices issue.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Manager's satisfaction implies section application
premise text: (1) This section applies if the manager is satisfied
conclusion text: that the information raises an AFP practices issue.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Section application spreads to related information
premise text: (1) This section applies if the manager is satisfied
conclusion text: that the information raises an AFP practices issue.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
logic summary: Manager recognizes satisfaction as a condition for section application
premise text: (1) This section applies if the manager is satisfied
conclusion text: that the information raises an AFP practices issue.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TK(2) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tk-ss-2
part of: 40TK AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
note: Manager must inform AFP appointee of identified issue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TK(2) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TK(3) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tk-ss-3
part of: 40TK AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
note: Manager must address AFP practices issue
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TK(3) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to address issue
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TL When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tl
has part: 40TL(1) When Subdivision applies
has part: 40TL(2) When Subdivision applies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119

40TL(1) When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tl-ss-1
part of: 40TL When Subdivision applies
note: Subdivision applies under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tl-ss-1-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TL(1) When Subdivision applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40TL(2) When Subdivision applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tl-ss-2
part of: 40TL When Subdivision applies
note: Subdivision applies under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.119
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tl-ss-2-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tl-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TL(2) When Subdivision applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40TM Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tm
has part: 40TM(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
has part: 40TM(2) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120

40TM(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tm-ss-1
part of: 40TM Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
note: The head of the unit must notify the Ombudsman about category 3 conduct issues.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TM(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The head of the unit must notify the Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TM(2) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tm-ss-2
part of: 40TM Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
note: Exemption from subsection (1) when dealt with jointly by Ombudsman and Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TM(2) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD to notify
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exemption from subsection (1)
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply
conclusion text: Exemption applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40TN Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tn
has part: 40TN(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
has part: 40TN(2) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
has part: 40TN(3) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120

40TN(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tn-ss-1
part of: 40TN Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
note: Allocate issue to law enforcement officers for investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TN(1) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must allocate issue
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TN(2) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tn-ss-2
part of: 40TN Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
note: Head of unit may allocate issue to himself/herself.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to allocate issue
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TN(3) Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tn-ss-3
part of: 40TN Head of unit constituted under section 40RD generally
note: Allocation of issue to person outside unit requires Commissioner's agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.120
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tn-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted by the unit
premise text: The head of the unit may allocate...
conclusion text: The allocation is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40to
has part: 40TO(1) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(2) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(3) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(4) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(5) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(6) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
has part: 40TO(7) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121

40TO(1) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40to-ss-1
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
note: Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TO(1) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide allocation
premise text: (1) This section applies if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for allocation
premise text: (1) This section applies if:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TO(2) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40to-ss-2
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
note: The Commissioner must allocate the issue to a person for investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner must allocate the issue.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TO(3) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40to-ss-3
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
note: The person allocated must not be a member of the unit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TO(3) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotBe
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: The person to whom the issue is allocated must not be a member of the unit.
conclusion text: The person allocated must not be a member of the unit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TO(4) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40to-ss-4
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
note: Corruption issue cannot be allocated to the Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TO(4) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Issue must be allocated to someone outside the unit
conclusion text: Issue cannot be allocated to the Ombudsman
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Positive prohibition
premise text: Ombudsman is not allowed to allocate issue
conclusion text: Corruption issue must not be allocated to the Ombudsman
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negation of allocation
premise text: Issue must be allocated to someone outside the unit
conclusion text: Issue cannot be allocated to the Ombudsman
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TO(5) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40to-ss-5
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
note: Commissioner must allocate issue to the Ombudsman if category 3 conduct issue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TO(5) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must allocate issue to the Ombudsman.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TO(6) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40to-ss-6
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
note: Consultation with Ombudsman required when allocating issue to someone outside unit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Commissioner must consult with Ombudsman
conclusion text: Obligation to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TO(7) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40to-ss-7
part of: 40TO Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
note: Commissioner must consult with National Anti-Corruption Commissioner about the choice of person to whom issue is allocated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.121
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-ltl-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TO(7) Commissioner must allocate issue to someone outside unit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide consultation with National Anti-Corruption Commissioner.
premise text: (7) If the issue is a corruption issue, the Commissioner must consult with the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner about the choice of the person to whom the issue is to be allocated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Issue is a corruption issue and has been allocated for at least one day.
premise text: (7) If the issue is a corruption issue, the Commissioner must consult with the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner about the choice of the person to whom the issue is to be allocated.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40to-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Issue has been allocated for at least one day.
premise text: (7) If the issue is a corruption issue, the Commissioner must consult with the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner about the choice of the person to whom the issue is to be allocated.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TP Persons eligible to have category 3 conduct issue or corruption
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tp
note: Person must have qualifications or experience for issue allocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tp-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tp-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tp-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TP Persons eligible to have category 3 conduct issue or corruption
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Qualifications/experience required
premise text: Person has appropriate qualifications or experience
conclusion text: Issue allocation allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TQ How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tq
has part: 40TQ(1) How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
has part: 40TQ(2) How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122

40TQ(1) How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tq-ss-1
part of: 40TQ How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
note: Section applies if issue is allocated to a person under section 40TN or 40TO.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tq-ss-1-norm

40TQ(2) How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tq-ss-2
part of: 40TQ How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
note: Ensure complainant has adequate opportunity to be heard in relation to the issue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tq-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TQ(2) How category 3 conduct issue or corruption issue is dealt with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Ensure complainant has adequate opportunity to be heard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TR Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tr
has part: 40TR(1) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
has part: 40TR(2) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122

40TR(1) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tr-ss-1
part of: 40TR Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
note: The investigator may recommend one or more actions to be taken in relation to the AFP appointee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TR(1) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The investigator may take one or more actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: The Commissioner can take one or more actions in relation to the AFP appointee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
logic summary: One or more of the following actions may be taken.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: The investigator must recommend one or more actions if satisfied on reasonable grounds.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The recommendation may be made at any stage of the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TR(2) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tr-ss-2
part of: 40TR Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
note: The Commissioner may take termination action in relation to an AFP employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.122
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TR(2) Recommendations that may be made in relation to category 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TS Investigative powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ts
note: Investigator has powers in relation to investigation of issue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.123
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ts-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ts-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ts-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TS Investigative powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ts-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Investigator has power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TU Report of investigation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tu
note: Investigator must prepare and give written report after investigation completion.
description: written report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.123
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tu-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tu-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tu-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TU Report of investigation
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare and give written report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TV Taking action on report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tv
note: Ensure recommendations are fully considered and appropriate action is taken.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.124
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tv-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tv-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tv-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure actions are taken
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TW AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tw
has part: 40TW(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
has part: 40TW(2) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.124

40TW(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tw-ss-1
part of: 40TW AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
note: Section applies if information raises an AFP practices issue and a report is prepared under section 40TU.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.124
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TW(1) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Information raises an AFP practices issue
conclusion text: Section applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation to prepare report under section 40TU
premise text: Investigator prepares a report under section 40TU in relation to the investigation
conclusion text: Section applies if report is prepared under section 40TU
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
logic summary: Conjunction of two obligations
premise text: Section applies if information raises an AFP practices issue and a report is prepared under section 40TU
conclusion text: Section applies
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between investigation and report preparation
premise text: Investigator prepares a report under section 40TU in relation to the investigation
conclusion text: Report prepared during investigation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation to investigate
premise text: Information raises an AFP practices issue
conclusion text: Investigator must investigate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TW(2) AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tw-ss-2
part of: 40TW AFP practices issue identified in course of dealing with AFP
note: Must identify AFP practices issue in report.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.124
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to identify AFP practices issue.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TX Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tx
has part: 40TX(1) Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
has part: 40TX(2) Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.125

40TX(1) Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tx-ss-1
part of: 40TX Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
note: Ensure action is taken in response to AFP practices issue
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.125
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40TX(1) Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must ensure action is taken
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a person gives information under section 40SA that raises an AFP practices issue; or (b) an AFP practices issue is: (i) brought, under section 40TK, to the attention of an AFP appointee; or (ii) identified, under section 40TW, in a report prepared under section 40TU; as a result of an AFP conduct issue being dealt with under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40TX(2) Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40tx-ss-2
part of: 40TX Commissioner to ensure that appropriate action is taken in
note: Ensure appropriate action is taken to deal with the issue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.125
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40tx-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure action is taken
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40UA Minister may arrange special inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ua
has part: 40UA(1) Minister may arrange special inquiries
has part: 40UA(2) Minister may arrange special inquiries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126

40UA(1) Minister may arrange special inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ua-ss-1
part of: 40UA Minister may arrange special inquiries
note: The Minister may arrange for an inquiry to be held.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ua-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ua-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ua-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40UA(2) Minister may arrange special inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ua-ss-2
part of: 40UA Minister may arrange special inquiries
note: Subsection (1) applies even if certain conduct or matters are being dealt with under other provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ua-ss-2-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ua-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40UA(2) Minister may arrange special inquiries
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40UB Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ub
has part: 40UB(1) Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
has part: 40UB(2) Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126

40UB(1) Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ub-ss-1
part of: 40UB Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
note: Minister must inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40UB(2) Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ub-ss-2
part of: 40UB Minister to inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry
note: Inform certain persons and bodies of inquiry details
description: (a) the fact that the inquiry will be held; (b) the conduct or matter into which the inquiry is to be held; (c) the person or persons who are to conduct the inquiry; (d) the manner in which the inquiry will be held.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.126
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
premise text: (2) The Minister must inform...
conclusion text: ...the manner in which the inquiry will be held.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ub-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of information provision
premise text: (2) The Minister must inform...
conclusion text: ...the manner in which the inquiry will be held.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40UC Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40uc
has part: 40UC(1) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
has part: 40UC(2) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
has part: 40UC(3) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
has part: 40UC(4) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127

40UC(1) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40uc-ss-1
part of: 40UC Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
note: Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-1-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40UC(1) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40UC(2) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40uc-ss-2
part of: 40UC Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
note: Commissioner may suspend further action pending inquiry completion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-2-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40UC(2) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40UC(3) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40uc-ss-3
part of: 40UC Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
note: Commissioner may terminate investigation under Division 3.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to terminate investigation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40UC(4) Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40uc-ss-4
part of: 40UC Division 3 investigation may be suspended pending outcome
note: Consultation with Ombudsman required before taking action under subsection (2) or (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult Ombudsman
premise text: (4) If the conduct or matter is being dealt with under Division 3 jointly by the Ombudsman and the Australian Federal Police...
conclusion text: The Commissioner MUST consult the Ombudsman before taking action under subsection (2) or (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation with Ombudsman
premise text: (4) If the conduct or matter is being dealt with under Division 3 jointly by the Ombudsman and the Australian Federal Police...
conclusion text: The consultation with Ombudsman MUST MEET within a certain temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal interval for action under subsection (2) or (3)
premise text: (4) If the conduct or matter is being dealt with under Division 3 jointly by the Ombudsman and the Australian Federal Police...
conclusion text: The action under subsection (2) or (3) MUST MEET within a certain temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40uc-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform Ombudsman of action taken
premise text: (4) If the conduct or matter is being dealt with under Division 3 jointly by the Ombudsman and the Australian Federal Police...
conclusion text: The Commissioner MUST inform the Ombudsman of any action taken under subsection (2) or (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40UD Reports of special inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ud
has part: 40UD(1) Reports of special inquiries
has part: 40UD(2) Reports of special inquiries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127

40UD(1) Reports of special inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ud-ss-1
part of: 40UD Reports of special inquiries
note: Must report results of inquiry to Minister and make recommendations if any.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ud-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ud-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ud-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40UD(1) Reports of special inquiries
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ud-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must report results of inquiry to Minister and make recommendations if any.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40UD(2) Reports of special inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ud-ss-2
part of: 40UD Reports of special inquiries
note: Reports of special inquiries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.127
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ud-ss-2-norm

40VA Application of Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40va
has part: 40VA(1) Application of Division
has part: 40VA(2) Application of Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129

40VA(1) Application of Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40va-ss-1
part of: 40VA Application of Division
note: This Division applies if a person (the investigator) is investigating a category 3 conduct issue or a corruption issue under Division 3.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VA(1) Application of Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (investigator is investigating a category 3 conduct issue or a corruption issue under Division 3)
conclusion text: This Division applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (investigator is conducting an inquiry under Division 4)
conclusion text: This Division applies during...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40VA(2) Application of Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40va-ss-2
part of: 40VA Application of Division
note: Powers provided in this Division are in addition to any other powers the investigator may have.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-2-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40va-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VA(2) Application of Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40VB Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vb
has part: 40VB(1) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
has part: 40VB(2) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
has part: 40VB(3) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129

40VB(1) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vb-ss-1
part of: 40VB Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
note: The investigator has discretion over the manner of conducting the investigation or inquiry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-1-norm

40VB(2) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vb-ss-2
part of: 40VB Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
note: Investigator must investigate jointly with Ombudsman and in accordance with arrangement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VB(2) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must investigate jointly with Ombudsman and in accordance with arrangement.
premise text: (2) If the Ombudsman makes an arrangement...
conclusion text: The investigator must investigate jointly with the Ombudsman; and investigate the issue in accordance with the arrangement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Investigation is between investigation by investigator and investigation by Ombudsman.
premise text: (2) If the Ombudsman makes an arrangement...
conclusion text: The investigator must investigate jointly with the Ombudsman; and investigate the issue in accordance with the arrangement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Investigation is between investigation by investigator and investigation by Ombudsman.
premise text: (2) If the Ombudsman makes an arrangement...
conclusion text: The investigator must investigate jointly with the Ombudsman; and investigate the issue in accordance with the arrangement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40VB(3) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vb-ss-3
part of: 40VB Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
note: Head of unit may give investigator directions on investigation manner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.129
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VB(3) Manner of conducting investigation or inquiry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with head's directions.
premise text: Head of unit gave directions.
conclusion text: Investigator must comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40VC Obtaining information and making inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vc
has part: 40VC(1) Obtaining information and making inquiries
has part: 40VC(2) Obtaining information and making inquiries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130

40VC(1) Obtaining information and making inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vc-ss-1
part of: 40VC Obtaining information and making inquiries
note: Investigator may obtain information and make inquiries as they think fit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vc-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vc-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VC(1) Obtaining information and making inquiries
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to obtain information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40VC(2) Obtaining information and making inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vc-ss-2
part of: 40VC Obtaining information and making inquiries
note: Divisional effect on subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vc-ss-2-norm

40VD Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vd
has part: 40VD(1) Relationship with other laws
has part: 40VD(2) Relationship with other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130

40VD(1) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vd-ss-1
part of: 40VD Relationship with other laws
note: AFP appointee must comply with laws that would apply without the sections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VD(1) Relationship with other laws
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40VD(2) Relationship with other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vd-ss-2
part of: 40VD Relationship with other laws
note: Nothing in subsection (1) affects the operation of any other provision of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.130
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-2-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VD(2) Relationship with other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40VE Directions to AFP appointee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ve
has part: 40VE(1) Directions to AFP appointee
has part: 40VE(2) Directions to AFP appointee
has part: 40VE(3) Directions to AFP appointee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.131

40VE(1) Directions to AFP appointee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ve-ss-1
part of: 40VE Directions to AFP appointee
note: Investigator may direct AFP appointee to provide information or produce documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.131
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VE(1) Directions to AFP appointee
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with direction.
premise text: Failure to comply is an offence.
conclusion text: Compliance is obligatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Direction specifies when information must be provided.
premise text: Information is to be provided at some point in time.
conclusion text: The direction begins at a certain point in time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Failure to comply implies an offence.
premise text: Compliance is necessary for the investigation.
conclusion text: Failure to comply implies an offence.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40VE(2) Directions to AFP appointee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ve-ss-2
part of: 40VE Directions to AFP appointee
note: Investigator must state direction, specify investigation subject matter, and provide written copy to AFP appointee.
description: []
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.131
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state direction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40VE(3) Directions to AFP appointee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ve-ss-3
part of: 40VE Directions to AFP appointee
note: Must comply with direction despite potential public interest concerns
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.131
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ve-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with direction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40VF Entering and searching AFP premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vf
note: Investigator may enter and search AFP premises for investigation or inquiry purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.133
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vf-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vf-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VF Entering and searching AFP premises
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40VG Special powers if investigator conducting inquiry under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vg
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.134
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vg-norm

40VH Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vh
has part: 40VH(1) Offences
has part: 40VH(2) Offences
has part: 40VH(3) Offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.137

40VH(1) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vh-ss-1
part of: 40VH Offences
note: Refusal to comply with direction or be sworn/affirmed is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.137
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VH(1) Offences
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to comply with direction.
premise text: (a) refuses or fails to comply with a direction given under subsection 40VE(1) or 40VG(2);
conclusion text: An AFP appointee commits an offence if the AFP appointee: (a) refuses or fails to comply with a direction given under subsection 40VE(1) or 40VG(2);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to be sworn/affirmed.
premise text: (b) refuses or fails to be sworn or make an affirmation, when required to do so under subsection 40VG(2);
conclusion text: An AFP appointee commits an offence if the AFP appointee: (b) refuses or fails to be sworn or make an affirmation, when required to do so under subsection 40VG(2);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of giving false information.
premise text: (c) gives information or makes a statement to the investigator knowing that it is false or misleading in a material particular.
conclusion text: An AFP appointee commits an offence if the AFP appointee: (c) gives information or makes a statement to the investigator knowing that it is false or misleading in a material particular.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40VH(2) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vh-ss-2
part of: 40VH Offences
note: Defendant bears evidential burden for reasonable excuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.137
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VH(2) Offences
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Burden of Proof
logic summary: Defendant bears burden of proof for excuse
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40VH(3) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40vh-ss-3
part of: 40VH Offences
note: Prosecution must prove investigator compliance with certain directions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.137
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40VH(3) Offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: Prosecution bears the onus of proving...
conclusion text: Investigator compliance is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Obligation to comply with directions
premise text: Subsection (3) requires prosecution to prove compliance with certain directions.
conclusion text: Investigator must comply with directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40vh-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Obligation on investigator
premise text: Prosecution bears the onus of proving...
conclusion text: Investigator has an obligation to comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40WA Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40wa
has part: 40WA(1) Record keeping
has part: 40WA(2) Record keeping
has part: 40WA(3) Record keeping
has part: 40WA(4) Record keeping
has part: 40WA(5) Record keeping
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138

40WA(1) Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40wa-ss-1
part of: 40WA Record keeping
note: The Commissioner must keep adequate records.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40WA(1) Record keeping
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40WA(2) Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40wa-ss-2
part of: 40WA Record keeping
note: The Commissioner must keep records of certain information and actions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40WA(2) Record keeping
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner must keep records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40WA(3) Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40wa-ss-3
part of: 40WA Record keeping
note: Exemption from record keeping for certain conduct issues
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-3-norm

40WA(4) Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40wa-ss-4
part of: 40WA Record keeping
note: Access to records for performing functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Right to access records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40WA(5) Record keeping
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40wa-ss-5
part of: 40WA Record keeping
note: Access to records for Ombudsman's functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.138
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Ombudsman has right to access records
premise text: Ombudsman's functions require access to records
conclusion text: State must provide access to records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Access to records occurs during Ombudsman's functions
premise text: Ombudsman performs functions that require access to records
conclusion text: Access to records is a temporal aspect of Ombudsman's functions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: State implies provision of access to records for Ombudsman's functions
premise text: Ombudsman requires access to records for functions
conclusion text: State must provide access to records for Ombudsman's functions
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Access to records diffuses to Ombudsman's functions
premise text: Ombudsman's functions require access to records
conclusion text: State diffuses access to records for Ombudsman's functions
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wa-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes State's obligation to provide access to records
premise text: Ombudsman requires access to records for functions
conclusion text: State recognizes Ombudsman's right to access records
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40WB Records about corruption issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40wb
has part: 40WB(1) Records about corruption issues
has part: 40WB(2) Records about corruption issues
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.139

40WB(1) Records about corruption issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40wb-ss-1
part of: 40WB Records about corruption issues
note: Directs the Commissioner to restrict access to information about a corruption issue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.139
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Directs the Commissioner to restrict access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40WB(2) Records about corruption issues
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40wb-ss-2
part of: 40WB Records about corruption issues
note: The Commissioner must comply with direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.139
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40WB(2) Records about corruption issues
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40wb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: (2) The Commissioner must...
conclusion text: The Commissioner MUST comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40XA Annual reviews by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40xa
has part: 40XA(1) Annual reviews by Ombudsman
has part: 40XA(2) Annual reviews by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140

40XA(1) Annual reviews by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40xa-ss-1
part of: 40XA Annual reviews by Ombudsman
note: Defines review periods for Ombudsman annual reviews
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xa-ss-1-norm

40XA(2) Annual reviews by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40xa-ss-2
part of: 40XA Annual reviews by Ombudsman
note: Annual review of AFP conduct issues and practices by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xa-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40XA(2) Annual reviews by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40XB Ad hoc reviews by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40xb
note: The Ombudsman may inspect records for review purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xb-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xb-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40XB Ad hoc reviews by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40XC Commissioner to provide information and access to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40xc
note: The Commissioner must provide information and access to documents upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xc-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xc-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: The Commissioner must provide information and access to documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40XD Annual reports by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40xd
has part: 40XD(1) Annual reports by Ombudsman
has part: 40XD(2) Annual reports by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140

40XD(1) Annual reports by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40xd-ss-1
part of: 40XD Annual reports by Ombudsman
note: Annual reports by Ombudsman must be prepared and presented to the Senate and House of Representatives.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40XD(1) Annual reports by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare annual reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40XD(2) Annual reports by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40xd-ss-2
part of: 40XD Annual reports by Ombudsman
note: Annual reports by Ombudsman must include comments on comprehensiveness and adequacy of administration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.140
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40XD(2) Annual reports by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40xd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40YA Victimisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ya
has part: 40YA(1) Victimisation
has part: 40YA(2) Victimisation
has part: 40YA(3) Victimisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.142

40YA(1) Victimisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ya-ss-1
part of: 40YA Victimisation
note: Causing or threatening detriment to another person on grounds of providing information under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.142
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40YA(1) Victimisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits causing or threatening detriment.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 6 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies the provision is a prohibition.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: Imprisonment for 6 months.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40YA(2) Victimisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ya-ss-2
part of: 40YA Victimisation
note: A threat may be express or implied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.142
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40YA(2) Victimisation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expressed threats are obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40YA(3) Victimisation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ya-ss-3
part of: 40YA Victimisation
note: No fear of threat's execution is necessary to prove in prosecution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.142
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40ya-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: No fear of threat's execution is necessary to prove in prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40YB Providing false information about AFP conduct or practices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40yb
note: Providing false information about AFP conduct or practices is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.142
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yb-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yb-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yb-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40YB Providing false information about AFP conduct or practices
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits providing false information about AFP conduct or practices.
premise text: The person knows that the information is false in a material partical.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40YC AFP appointees to provide name, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40yc
note: Refusing or failing to comply with a request for personal information without reasonable excuse is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.143
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yc-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yc-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40yc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing or failing to comply with a request without reasonable excuse.
premise text: Request for personal information
conclusion text: Refusal or failure to comply is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40ZA Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40za
has part: 40ZA(1) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(2) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(3) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(4) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(5) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(6) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(6A) Secrecy
has part: 40ZA(7) Secrecy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144

40ZA(1) Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40za-ss-1
part of: 40ZA Secrecy
note: Confidentiality requirement for certain investigations and inquiries.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40ZA(1) Secrecy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to maintain confidentiality.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40ZA(2) Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40za-ss-2
part of: 40ZA Secrecy
note: Making or divulging records of investigation information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40ZA(2) Secrecy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A person who is, or has been, a person to whom this section applies commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...Penalty: 30 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40ZA(3) Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40za-ss-3
part of: 40ZA Secrecy
note: Conditional effect of subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-3-norm

40ZA(4) Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40za-ss-4
part of: 40ZA Secrecy
note: Allow person to divulge information for investigation or inquiry purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to divulge information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40ZA(5) Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40za-ss-5
part of: 40ZA Secrecy
note: Consent required for divulging or communicating information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 40ZA(5) Secrecy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40ZA(6) Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40za-ss-6
part of: 40ZA Secrecy
note: Exemption from subsection (2) prohibition on producing records or giving information in evidence before a court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to produce records or give information in evidence before a court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40ZA(6A) Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40za-ss-6a
part of: 40ZA Secrecy
note: Allowance to disclose information for IGIS purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40ZA(7) Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40za-ss-7
part of: 40ZA Secrecy
note: Defines the appropriate person for purposes of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.144
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-7-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-40za-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40ZA(7) Secrecy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

41 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41
note: Definitions for Part VA of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.146
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-ltl-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: Commonwealth organisation means...
conclusion text: ...a body corporate, whether incorporated before, on or after the commencing day...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Subclass relationship definition
premise text: (i) that is a subsidiary of another body corporate mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b); and
conclusion text: ...an unincorporated authority or body...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval definition
premise text: Schedule 1 to the Australian Federal Police Legislation Amendment Act 1999 commences.
conclusion text: ...the day on which Schedule 1 to the Australian Federal Police Legislation Amendment Act 1999 commences.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal interval definition
premise text: This Part commences.
conclusion text: ...the day on which this Part commences.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41A Old law members or staff members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41a
note: Definition of old law member or staff member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.150
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41a-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-41a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41A Old law members or staff members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

42 Related offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42
note: Offences are related if they share physical elements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.150
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42-norm

42A Abscond
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42a
note: Absconding in connection with an offence is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.150
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 42A Abscond
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits absconding in connection with an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42B Charge with offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42b
note: A person must be charged with an offence if a summons or warrant is issued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.151
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42B Charge with offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be charged with an offence
premise text: A summons or warrant is issued
conclusion text: The person must be charged with the offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The charge must occur after the issuance of a summons or warrant
premise text: A summons has been issued requiring the attendance of the person to answer the information
conclusion text: The charge with offence occurs after the summons is issued
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: The trace of charges must include the current charge
premise text: A warrant for the arrest of the person has been issued
conclusion text: The current charge is part of the trace of charges
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The state must ensure that a person is charged with an offence if a summons or warrant is issued
premise text: A summons or warrant is issued
conclusion text: The state must ensure the charge with offence occurs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42b-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The person must be charged with an offence if a summons or warrant is issued
premise text: A summons has been issued requiring the attendance of the person to answer the information
conclusion text: The person must be charged with the offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42C Conviction and quashing of conviction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42c
note: A person is taken to be convicted of an offence if they are convicted or abscond in connection with the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.151
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42c-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42c-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42C Conviction and quashing of conviction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42D Property of a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42d
has part: 42D(1) Property of a person
has part: 42D(2) Property of a person
has part: 42D(3) Property of a person
has part: 42D(4) Property of a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.152

42D(1) Property of a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42d-ss-1
part of: 42D Property of a person
note: Property of a person is to be taken into account when making a restraining order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.152
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42D(1) Property of a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes property in which the person has a beneficial interest.
premise text: (1) For the purpose of making a restraining order against the property of a person, that property is to be taken to include property in which the person has a beneficial interest.
conclusion text: Property of a person includes property in which the person has a beneficial interest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Overlaps with property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
premise text: (1) For the purpose of making a restraining order against the property of a person, that property is to be taken to include property in which the person has a beneficial interest.
conclusion text: Property of a person overlaps with property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
logic summary: Occurs before property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
premise text: (1) For the purpose of making a restraining order against the property of a person, that property is to be taken to include property in which the person has a beneficial interest.
conclusion text: Property of a person occurs before property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
logic summary: Diffuses into property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
premise text: (1) For the purpose of making a restraining order against the property of a person, that property is to be taken to include property in which the person has a beneficial interest.
conclusion text: Property of a person diffuses into property that includes property with a beneficial interest.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasBeneficialInterestIn
logic summary: Has beneficial interest in property of a person.
premise text: (1) For the purpose of making a restraining order against the property of a person, that property is to be taken to include property in which the person has a beneficial interest.
conclusion text: Property of a person has a beneficial interest in it.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42D(2) Property of a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42d-ss-2
part of: 42D Property of a person
note: Property of a person is to be taken into account when making a restraining order against the property of a defendant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.152
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42D(2) Property of a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Property is taken into account
premise text: Restraining order against property of a person
conclusion text: Obligation to take property into account
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42D(3) Property of a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42d-ss-3
part of: 42D Property of a person
note: Property available for recovery order satisfaction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.152
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42D(3) Property of a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Property is property of a person
premise text: (3) Property that is to be taken to be property of a person under subsection (1)
conclusion text: is available to satisfy a recovery order made against the person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (3) Property that is to be taken to be property of a person under subsection (1)
conclusion text: is available to satisfy a recovery order made against the person, whether or not a restraining order has been made against the property
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (3) Property that is to be taken to be property of a person under subsection (1)
conclusion text: is available to satisfy a recovery order made against the person, whether or not a restraining order has been made against the property
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Property diffusion
premise text: (3) Property that is to be taken to be property of a person under subsection (1)
conclusion text: is available to satisfy a recovery order made against the person, whether or not a restraining order has been made against the property
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
logic summary: Knowledge representation
premise text: (3) Property that is to be taken to be property of a person under subsection (1)
conclusion text: is available to satisfy a recovery order made against the person, whether or not a restraining order has been made against the property
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42D(4) Property of a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42d-ss-4
part of: 42D Property of a person
note: Property must be available to satisfy a recovery order if a restraining order is in place.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.152
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42D(4) Property of a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42E Dealing with property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42e
note: Dealing with property includes incurring further liability or increasing debt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.153
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42E Dealing with property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Class hierarchy application
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42e-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to deal with property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

42F Effective control of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42f
has part: 42F(1) Effective control of property
has part: 42F(2) Effective control of property
has part: 42F(3) Effective control of property
has part: 42F(4) Effective control of property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.154

42F(1) Effective control of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42f-ss-1
part of: 42F Effective control of property
note: Property may be subject to effective control of a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.154
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42F(1) Effective control of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42F(2) Effective control of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42f-ss-2
part of: 42F Effective control of property
note: Determine whether property is subject to effective control of a person
description: Reasonable grounds to believe property is subject to effective control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.154
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42F(2) Effective control of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Determine
logic summary: Obligation to determine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42F(3) Effective control of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42f-ss-3
part of: 42F Effective control of property
note: Defines family relationships for the purpose of paragraph (2)(e)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.154
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42F(3) Effective control of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: List of family relationships
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42F(4) Effective control of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42f-ss-4
part of: 42F Effective control of property
note: Defines who is considered a child for the purposes of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.154
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-4-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42F(4) Effective control of property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

42G Sufficient consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42g
note: A consideration sufficient for transferring or acquiring property is one that reflects its value.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42g-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42g-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42G Sufficient consideration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Value reflection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42H Application of Part to convictions and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42h
has part: 42H(1) Application of Part to convictions and offences
has part: 42H(2) Application of Part to convictions and offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155

42H(1) Application of Part to convictions and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42h-ss-1
part of: 42H Application of Part to convictions and offences
note: This Part does not apply to a person’s conviction of an offence if the conviction happened before the commencing day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42H(1) Application of Part to convictions and offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If a condition is true, then the obligation is not met.
premise text: The commencing day has passed.
conclusion text: This Part does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The commencing day overlaps with the past.
premise text: The commencing day has passed.
conclusion text: The condition is met.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

42H(2) Application of Part to convictions and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42h-ss-2
part of: 42H Application of Part to convictions and offences
note: This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42H(2) Application of Part to convictions and offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time.
premise text: (2) This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.
conclusion text: This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies during the commencing day.
premise text: (2) This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.
conclusion text: This Part applies during the commencing day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies during the commencing day.
premise text: (2) This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.
conclusion text: This Part applies during the commencing day.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies during the commencing day.
premise text: (2) This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.
conclusion text: This Part applies during the commencing day.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42h-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies during the commencing day.
premise text: (2) This Part applies to an offence committed, or believed to have been committed, at any time, whether before, on or after the commencing day.
conclusion text: This Part applies during the commencing day.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42J Crown bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42j
has part: 42J(1) Crown bound
has part: 42J(2) Crown bound
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155

42J(1) Crown bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42j-ss-1
part of: 42J Crown bound
note: The Crown is bound by this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42J(1) Crown bound
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Binding
logic summary: The Crown is bound.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with other parts
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

42J(2) Crown bound
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42j-ss-2
part of: 42J Crown bound
note: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.155
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
premise text: Nothing in this Part renders the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: This provision is a statement of fact.
premise text: Nothing in this Part renders the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: This provision applies to a specific temporal interval.
premise text: Nothing in this Part renders the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: This provision is a statement of fact.
premise text: Nothing in this Part renders the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-42j-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: This provision applies to a specific context.
premise text: Nothing in this Part renders the Crown liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
conclusion text: The Crown is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Notice of charge etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43
has part: 43(1) Notice of charge etc.
has part: 43(2) Notice of charge etc.
has part: 43(3) Notice of charge etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.156

43(1) Notice of charge etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43-ss-1
part of: 43 Notice of charge etc.
note: Commissioner must notify Minister of charge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.156
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43(1) Notice of charge etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43(2) Notice of charge etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43-ss-2
part of: 43 Notice of charge etc.
note: Notice must contain particulars of charge and reasons for considering it a corruption offence.
description: particulars of the charge, reasons why the Commissioner considers that the offence is or may be a corruption offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.156
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43(2) Notice of charge etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice with particulars of charge and reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43(3) Notice of charge etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43-ss-3
part of: 43 Notice of charge etc.
note: Notification of Minister upon charge outcome
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.156
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-43-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Authority to apply for superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44
note: Authority to apply for superannuation order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.156
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-argumentation-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44 Authority to apply for superannuation order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation to apply for superannuation order
premise text: The Minister administering the Crimes (Superannuation Benefits) Act 1989 is of the opinion that the offence is a corruption offence.
conclusion text: Therefore, the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During which time the offence is a corruption offence
premise text: The Minister administering the Crimes (Superannuation Benefits) Act 1989 is of the opinion that the offence is a corruption offence.
conclusion text: Therefore, during this time, the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Everywhere that the offence is a corruption offence
premise text: The provision applies when the Minister administering the Crimes (Superannuation Benefits) Act 1989 is of the opinion that the offence is a corruption offence.
conclusion text: Therefore, everywhere that the offence is a corruption offence, the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Has permission to apply for superannuation order
premise text: The Minister administering the Crimes (Superannuation Benefits) Act 1989 is of the opinion that the offence is a corruption offence.
conclusion text: Therefore, the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-44-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies that the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person
premise text: The Minister administering the Crimes (Superannuation Benefits) Act 1989 is of the opinion that the offence is a corruption offence.
conclusion text: Therefore, the DPP shall authorise the appropriate court to apply for a superannuation order in respect of the person.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed

45 Application for superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45
has part: 45(1) Application for superannuation order
has part: 45(1A) Application for superannuation order
has part: 45(2) Application for superannuation order
has part: 45(3) Application for superannuation order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.157

45(1) Application for superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-1
part of: 45 Application for superannuation order
note: DPP must make application to court for superannuation order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.157
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(1A) Application for superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-1a
part of: 45 Application for superannuation order
note: DPP must make application to court if certain conditions met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.157
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(1A) Application for superannuation order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to make application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(2) Application for superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-2
part of: 45 Application for superannuation order
note: Application for superannuation order must be made under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.157
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of making an application for a superannuation order outside this section.
premise text: (2) The DPP must not make an application for a superannuation order otherwise than under this section.
conclusion text: The DPP must not make an application for a superannuation order unless under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(3) Application for superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-3
part of: 45 Application for superannuation order
note: Must give written notice of application
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.157
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
conclusion text: DPP must give written notice of application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a
has part: 45A(1) Application for superannuation order: evidence
has part: 45A(2) Application for superannuation order: evidence
has part: 45A(3) Application for superannuation order: evidence
has part: 45A(4) Application for superannuation order: evidence
has part: 45A(5) Application for superannuation order: evidence
has part: 45A(6) Application for superannuation order: evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158

45A(1) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a-ss-1
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence
note: Court may consider transcript of proceedings and evidence given in those proceedings when determining an application for a superannuation order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(1) Application for superannuation order: evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may consider transcript of proceedings and evidence given in those proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(2) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a-ss-2
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence
note: Prima facie evidence of fact in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(2) Application for superannuation order: evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide prima facie evidence
premise text: Court finding is prima facie evidence
conclusion text: State must provide documents under seal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Documents under seal overlap with court finding
premise text: Court finding appears on documents under seal
conclusion text: Documents under seal overlap with court finding
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(3) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a-ss-3
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence
note: Prima facie evidence of employer contributions or benefits
description: Certificate signed or sealed by the person's superannuation authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(3) Application for superannuation order: evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Employer contributions or benefits are held in a specified fund
premise text: (a) stating that employer contributions or benefits made or payable by the Commonwealth...
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the matters stated in the certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Employer contributions or benefits are equal to the sum of those contributions or benefits as at the specified day plus the amount of interest accrued under the scheme
premise text: (b) stating the amount that equals the sum of those contributions or benefits...
conclusion text: is prima facie evidence of the matters stated in the certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(4) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a-ss-4
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence
note: A certificate signed or sealed by the person’s superannuation authority is required as evidence for an application for a superannuation order.
description: The certificate must state that benefits have been paid to the person under the relevant superannuation scheme, and the amount of those benefits as at the specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(4) Application for superannuation order: evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: The certificate is required as evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(5) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a-ss-5
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence
note: Document purporting to be sealed with court seal is taken as lawfully sealed unless proven otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(5) Application for superannuation order: evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(6) Application for superannuation order: evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45a-ss-6
part of: 45A Application for superannuation order: evidence
note: Document purporting to be signed or sealed by superannuation authority is taken as authentic unless proven otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.158
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-45a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on superannuation authority to authenticate documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Superannuation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46
has part: 46(1) Superannuation orders
has part: 46(2) Superannuation orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.159

46(1) Superannuation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46-ss-1
part of: 46 Superannuation orders
note: Court must declare person convicted of corruption offence and apply Part to their rights under superannuation scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.159
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(1) Superannuation orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must declare person convicted of corruption offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46(2) Superannuation orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46-ss-2
part of: 46 Superannuation orders
note: Court must not make superannuation order unless person has absconded and committed for trial or jury could find guilty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.159
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(2) Superannuation orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (2) Where a person is, because of paragraph 42C(1)(b), to be taken to have been convicted of an offence...
conclusion text: Court must not make superannuation order unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WithinTemporalInterval
logic summary: Absconding is within a temporal interval that requires court consideration.
premise text: (2) Where a person is, because of paragraph 42C(1)(b), to be taken to have been convicted of an offence...
conclusion text: Court must not make superannuation order unless...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: WithinTemporalInterval
logic summary: Absconding is within a temporal interval that requires court consideration.
premise text: (2) Where a person is, because of paragraph 42C(1)(b), to be taken to have been convicted of an offence...
conclusion text: Court must not make superannuation order unless...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Positive obligation for court to consider absconding.
premise text: (2) Where a person is, because of paragraph 42C(1)(b), to be taken to have been convicted of an offence...
conclusion text: Court must not make superannuation order unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46A When does a superannuation order take effect?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a
note: A superannuation order takes effect on the day it is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.161
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46A When does a superannuation order take effect?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-46a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takesEffect
logic summary: Implies obligation
premise text: (A takes effect)
conclusion text: (A implies obligation)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47
has part: 47(1) Effect of superannuation order
has part: 47(1A) Effect of superannuation order
has part: 47(1B) Effect of superannuation order
has part: 47(2) Effect of superannuation order
has part: 47(3) Effect of superannuation order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162

47(1) Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 Effect of superannuation order
note: Ceases rights and benefits payable to or in respect of the person on the day the order takes effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1) Effect of superannuation order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits rights and benefits payable to or in respect of the person.
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a superannuation order...
conclusion text: ...all rights of, and benefits payable to or in respect of, the person cease...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with the day the order takes effect.
premise text: (aa) any entitlement of the person to an adjustment payment ceases on that day...
conclusion text: ...an adjustment payment is not payable to the person on or after that day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace with the day the order takes effect.
premise text: (b) any amount of the kind mentioned in subsection 46(3) that is vested in the person ceases to be so vested on that day...
conclusion text: ...the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation is not liable to pay any employer contribution or benefit under the scheme in respect of the person on or after that day.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits liability for employer contributions and benefits.
premise text: (c) the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation is not liable to pay any employer contribution or benefit under the scheme in respect of the person on or after that day...
conclusion text: ...the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation is not liable to pay any employer contribution or benefit under the scheme in respect of the person on or after that day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implicates cessation of rights and benefits.
premise text: (1) Where a court makes a superannuation order...
conclusion text: ...all rights of, and benefits payable to or in respect of, the person cease...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

47(1A) Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-1a
part of: 47 Effect of superannuation order
note: Debt due to Commonwealth or organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-cogai-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-shacl-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1A) Effect of superannuation order
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Identifies temporal intervals
premise text: (1A) An amount payable by a person to the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation under a superannuation order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth organisation, as the case may be.
conclusion text: The key refers to a specific provision
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: due
logic summary: Identifies a duty
premise text: (1A) An amount payable by a person to the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation under a superannuation order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth organisation, as the case may be.
conclusion text: The key refers to a specific provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
logic summary: Identifies an ordered trace
premise text: (1A) An amount payable by a person to the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation under a superannuation order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth organisation, as the case may be.
conclusion text: The key refers to a specific provision
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: assertion
logic summary: Identifies an assertion about a natural person
premise text: (1A) An amount payable by a person to the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation under a superannuation order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth organisation, as the case may be.
conclusion text: The key refers to a specific provision
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1a-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: assertion
logic summary: Identifies an assertion about a legal person
premise text: (1A) An amount payable by a person to the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth organisation under a superannuation order is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth organisation, as the case may be.
conclusion text: The key refers to a specific provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(1B) Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-1b
part of: 47 Effect of superannuation order
note: Enforcement of superannuation order as a civil proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-1b-norm

47(2) Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 Effect of superannuation order
note: Entitlement to payment upon cessation of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Right to payment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for payment
premise text: (2) Despite the Superannuation Act, or any other Act or any agreement...
conclusion text: ...on the day on which he or she ceases to be a member of the relevant superannuation scheme.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of cessation of employment
premise text: (2) Despite the Superannuation Act, or any other Act or any agreement...
conclusion text: ...the person is entitled to payment.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of entitlement
premise text: (2) Despite the Superannuation Act, or any other Act or any agreement...
conclusion text: ...the person is entitled to payment.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of entitlement
premise text: (2) Despite the Superannuation Act, or any other Act or any agreement...
conclusion text: ...the person is entitled to payment.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(3) Effect of superannuation order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-3
part of: 47 Effect of superannuation order
note: Entitlement to payment of benefits upon cessation of membership
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.162
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(3) Effect of superannuation order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Entails an obligation to provide payment upon cessation of membership
premise text: (1) applies to a person
conclusion text: the person is entitled, on the day on which he or she ceases to be a member of the scheme, to payment of an amount worked out using the formula
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The entitlement occurs during the period of membership
premise text: (a) who: (i) was an AFP employee at the time the relevant corruption offence was committed but was not such an employee when charged with that offence; or (ii) was an old law member or staff member at the time the relevant corruption offence was committed but was not such a member or an AFP employee when charged with that offence
conclusion text: (b) who would, but for that subsection, have been entitled to payment of benefits under the relevant superannuation scheme on or after the day on which the superannuation order takes effect
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: The entitlement ends upon cessation of membership
premise text: (b) who would, but for that subsection, have been entitled to payment of benefits under the relevant superannuation scheme on or after the day on which the superannuation order takes effect
conclusion text: the person is entitled, on the day on which he or she ceases to be a member of the scheme, to payment of an amount worked out using the formula
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
logic summary: The entitlement is conditional upon meeting certain conditions
premise text: (a) who: (i) was an AFP employee at the time the relevant corruption offence was committed but was not such an employee when charged with that offence; or (ii) was an old law member or staff member at the time the relevant corruption offence was committed but was not such a member or an AFP employee when charged with that offence
conclusion text: (b) who would, but for that subsection, have been entitled to payment of benefits under the relevant superannuation scheme on or after the day on which the superannuation order takes effect
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasRule
logic summary: The entitlement is governed by a rule
premise text: (1) applies to a person
conclusion text: the person is entitled, on the day on which he or she ceases to be a member of the scheme, to payment of an amount worked out using the formula
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47A Superannuation orders: variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47a
has part: 47A(1) Superannuation orders: variation
has part: 47A(2) Superannuation orders: variation
has part: 47A(3) Superannuation orders: variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164

47A(1) Superannuation orders: variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47a-ss-1
part of: 47A Superannuation orders: variation
note: Variation of superannuation order by DPP after its effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to vary superannuation order
premise text: (1) If a superannuation order...
conclusion text: ...apply to the court that made the order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty of DPP to vary order after its effect
premise text: (1) If a superannuation order...
conclusion text: ...as soon as practicable after the order takes effect...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Variation occurs after effect of original order
premise text: (1) If a superannuation order...
conclusion text: ...apply to the court that made the order...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: DPP's variation is based on employer contributions
premise text: (1) If a superannuation order...
conclusion text: ...having regard to any amount of employer contributions...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Variation affects all related orders
premise text: (1) If a superannuation order...
conclusion text: ...vary the order by substituting for the specified amount...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

47A(2) Superannuation orders: variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47a-ss-2
part of: 47A Superannuation orders: variation
note: Court must vary superannuation order upon application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47A(2) Superannuation orders: variation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to vary superannuation order
premise text: Application made
conclusion text: Varying order required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47A(3) Superannuation orders: variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47a-ss-3
part of: 47A Superannuation orders: variation
note: Defines prescribed period for superannuation order variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definedBy
logic summary: Classifies 'prescribed period'
premise text: prescribed period means the period starting on the day on which...
conclusion text: the variation is made.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for prescribed period
premise text: starting on the day on which...
conclusion text: ending on the day on which...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

47B Superannuation orders: revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47b
has part: 47B(1) Superannuation orders: revocation
has part: 47B(2) Superannuation orders: revocation
has part: 47B(3) Superannuation orders: revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164

47B(1) Superannuation orders: revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47b-ss-1
part of: 47B Superannuation orders: revocation
note: A superannuation order made in relation to a person is revoked if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47B(1) Superannuation orders: revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Revocation of superannuation order
premise text: (1) A superannuation order made in relation to a person is to be taken...
conclusion text: ...the making of an application for a superannuation order under subsection 45(1A); or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for revocation
premise text: (a) the person’s conviction is quashed; or
conclusion text: ...the making of an application for a superannuation order under subsection 45(1A); or
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to revoke superannuation order
premise text: (b) the person’s sentence is so reduced or otherwise changed that...
conclusion text: ...the making of an application for a superannuation order under subsection 45(1A); or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to revoke superannuation order
premise text: (c) where the person is taken to be convicted because of...
conclusion text: ...the making of an application for a superannuation order under subsection 45(1A); or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to revoke superannuation order
premise text: ...the person is brought before a court in respect of the offence concerned and, having been convicted...
conclusion text: ...the making of an application for a superannuation order under subsection 45(1A); or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

47B(2) Superannuation orders: revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47b-ss-2
part of: 47B Superannuation orders: revocation
note: Written notice must be given to the person in respect of whom the order was made and their superannuation authority.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47B(3) Superannuation orders: revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47b-ss-3
part of: 47B Superannuation orders: revocation
note: Payable amount for revocation of superannuation order
description: Amount determined by the Finance Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.164
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47B(3) Superannuation orders: revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Payable amount for revocation of superannuation order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal interval between two events
premise text: (3) Where: (a) a superannuation order is made in relation to a person who is taken to be convicted because of paragraph 42C(1)(b); and (b) the superannuation order is to be taken to have been revoked;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal relationship between two events
premise text: (3) Where: (a) a superannuation order is made in relation to a person who is taken to be convicted because of paragraph 42C(1)(b); and (b) the superannuation order is to be taken to have been revoked;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Excerpt describes a diffusion of information or obligation
premise text: (3) Where: (a) a superannuation order is made in relation to a person who is taken to be convicted because of paragraph 42C(1)(b); and (b) the superannuation order is to be taken to have been revoked;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Excerpt implies a relationship between two events or conditions
premise text: (3) Where: (a) a superannuation order is made in relation to a person who is taken to be convicted because of paragraph 42C(1)(b); and (b) the superannuation order is to be taken to have been revoked;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49A Application for restraining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49a
has part: 49A(1) Application for restraining order
has part: 49A(2) Application for restraining order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166

49A(1) Application for restraining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49a-ss-1
part of: 49A Application for restraining order
note: Application for restraining order against specified property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation on DPP to apply for restraining order
premise text: (1) Where a person (in this Division called the defendant):
conclusion text: the DPP may apply to the appropriate court for a restraining order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between charging and application for restraining order
premise text: (b) has been, or is about to be, charged with an offence;
conclusion text: the DPP may apply to the appropriate court for a restraining order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between charging and application for restraining order
premise text: (b) has been, or is about to be, charged with an offence;
conclusion text: the DPP may apply to the appropriate court for a restraining order
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation on defendant to prevent application for restraining order
premise text: (a) has been convicted of an offence; or (b) has been, or is about to be, charged with an offence;
conclusion text: the DPP may apply to the appropriate court for a restraining order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49A(2) Application for restraining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49a-ss-2
part of: 49A Application for restraining order
note: The DPP may give undertakings regarding payment of damages or costs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to give undertakings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49B Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49b
has part: 49B(1) Making of restraining orders
has part: 49B(2) Making of restraining orders
has part: 49B(3) Making of restraining orders
has part: 49B(4) Making of restraining orders
has part: 49B(5) Making of restraining orders
has part: 49B(6) Making of restraining orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166

49B(1) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49b-ss-1
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders
note: Restraining order on property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49B(1) Making of restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disposal of property
premise text: (1) Subject to this Division, where an application is made for a restraining order...
conclusion text: ...the court may, by order, direct that the property...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

49B(2) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49b-ss-2
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders
note: Restraining order cannot exceed amount necessary for recovery of losses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Restraining order must not exceed amount necessary for recovery of losses.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49B(3) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49b-ss-3
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders
note: Court can make restraining order against property with value more than payable by defendant under recovery order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permits making restraining order against property
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not prevent the court from making a...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49B(4) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49b-ss-4
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders
note: A court may make a restraining order against property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49B(4) Making of restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court has the power to make a restraining order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49B(5) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49b-ss-5
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders
note: Court must not make restraining order unless defendant will be charged within 48 hours.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49B(5) Making of restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Court must not make restraining order.
premise text: Application made in reliance on proposed charging.
conclusion text: Defendant will be charged within 48 hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49B(6) Making of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49b-ss-6
part of: 49B Making of restraining orders
note: Court refusal to make restraining order based on Commonwealth's undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.166
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refusal
logic summary: Court refusal to make restraining order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49C Restraining order may be subject to conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49c
note: Restraining order conditions for a person's property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.167
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49c-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49c-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49C Restraining order may be subject to conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes obligations for a restraining order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49d
has part: 49D(1) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
has part: 49D(2) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
has part: 49D(3) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
has part: 49D(4) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
has part: 49D(5) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168

49D(1) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49d-ss-1
part of: 49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
note: Court must have affidavit from police officer to make restraining order
description: Affidavit of police officer stating belief in defendant's guilt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49D(1) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must have affidavit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49D(2) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49d-ss-2
part of: 49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
note: Court must have affidavit from police officer to make restraining order against property
description: Affidavit of police officer stating belief in defendant's control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49D(2) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must have affidavit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49D(3) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49d-ss-3
part of: 49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
note: Police officer must state grounds for belief in affidavit.
description: Grounds on which the officer holds that belief
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49D(3) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide grounds for belief
conclusion text: Grounds on which the officer holds that belief
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49D(4) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49d-ss-4
part of: 49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
note: Court may direct DPP to give or publish notice of application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49D(4) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may direct DPP.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: direct
logic summary: Direct the DPP to give or publish notice.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49D(5) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49d-ss-5
part of: 49D Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
note: Police officer must be a member of the Australian Federal Police or a State/Territory police force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.168
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49D(5) Affidavit of police officer needed in certain cases
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBe
logic summary: Police officer must be a member of the Australian Federal Police or a State/Territory police force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49d-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isA
logic summary: Police officer is a member of the Australian Federal Police or a State/Territory police force.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49E Notice of application for restraining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49e
has part: 49E(1) Notice of application for restraining order
has part: 49E(2) Notice of application for restraining order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169

49E(1) Notice of application for restraining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49e-ss-1
part of: 49E Notice of application for restraining order
note: Notice of application for restraining order to property owners and interested persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49E(2) Notice of application for restraining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49e-ss-2
part of: 49E Notice of application for restraining order
note: Court must consider application if DPP asks, but restraining order ceases after 14 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49E(2) Notice of application for restraining order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49e-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Restraining order ceases after 14 days
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49EA Extension of certain restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49ea
has part: 49EA(1) Extension of certain restraining orders
has part: 49EA(2) Extension of certain restraining orders
has part: 49EA(3) Extension of certain restraining orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169

49EA(1) Extension of certain restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49ea-ss-1
part of: 49EA Extension of certain restraining orders
note: Court may extend restraining order on application by DPP
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49EA(2) Extension of certain restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49ea-ss-2
part of: 49EA Extension of certain restraining orders
note: Applying certain subsections to the extension of a restraining order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49EA(2) Extension of certain restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applying certain subsections to the extension of a restraining order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49EA(3) Extension of certain restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49ea-ss-3
part of: 49EA Extension of certain restraining orders
note: Must give written notice of application for extension of restraining order
description: Notice to owner and any person with interest in property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.169
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49ea-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49F Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49f
has part: 49F(1) Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
has part: 49F(2) Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170

49F(1) Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49f-ss-1
part of: 49F Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
note: Any person with an interest may provide evidence at a hearing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May provide evidence
premise text: Claiming an interest in the property
conclusion text: Provide evidence at a hearing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: CAN
logic summary: Can adduce evidence
premise text: Notice of application given under subsection 49E(1)
conclusion text: Adduce evidence at the hearing
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Recurring trace of providing evidence
premise text: Any person who claims an interest in the property may appear and adduce evidence
conclusion text: Provide evidence at a hearing
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49F(2) Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49f-ss-2
part of: 49F Persons who may appear and adduce evidence
note: Any person with an interest may appear and adduce evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May appear and adduce evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49G Witnesses not required to answer questions etc. in certain cases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49g
note: Witnesses are not required to answer questions or produce documents if it may prejudice an investigation or prosecution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49g-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49g-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49G Witnesses not required to answer questions etc. in certain cases
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Witnesses are not required to answer questions or produce documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49H Notice of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49h
has part: 49H(1) Notice of restraining orders
has part: 49H(2) Notice of restraining orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170

49H(1) Notice of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49h-ss-1
part of: 49H Notice of restraining orders
note: Must provide written notice of restraining order to person's property
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide written notice of restraining order to person's property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49H(2) Notice of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49h-ss-2
part of: 49H Notice of restraining orders
note: DPP must give notice of restraining order as soon as practicable after end of specified period.
description: Notice of restraining order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.170
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49H(2) Notice of restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
conclusion text: The DPP must give the person notice of the restraining order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49J Ancillary orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49j
has part: 49J(1) Ancillary orders
has part: 49J(2) Ancillary orders
has part: 49J(3) Ancillary orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.171

49J(1) Ancillary orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49j-ss-1
part of: 49J Ancillary orders
note: Court may make ancillary orders with a restraining order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.171
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49J(1) Ancillary orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May impose obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49J(2) Ancillary orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49j-ss-2
part of: 49J Ancillary orders
note: Application for ancillary order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.171
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-2-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 49J(2) Ancillary orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

49J(3) Ancillary orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49j-ss-3
part of: 49J Ancillary orders
note: Restraining order against property in reliance on conviction, charging or proposed charging.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.171
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49J(3) Ancillary orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to make a restraining order.
premise text: (3) Where...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal overlap between a conviction and a restraining order.
premise text: (b) an appropriate court makes a restraining order against property in reliance on the conviction, charging or proposed charging;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes the implication between a conviction and a restraining order.
premise text: (a) a defendant has been convicted of, or has been charged or is about to be charged with, an offence;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagates the effect of a conviction to a restraining order.
premise text: (b) an appropriate court makes a restraining order against property in reliance on the conviction, charging or proposed charging;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49j-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inferentially relates a conviction to a restraining order.
premise text: (a) a defendant has been convicted of, or has been charged or is about to be charged with, an offence;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49K Charge on property subject to restraining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49k
has part: 49K(1) Charge on property subject to restraining order
has part: 49K(2) Charge on property subject to restraining order
has part: 49K(3) Charge on property subject to restraining order
has part: 49K(4) Charge on property subject to restraining order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.172

49K(1) Charge on property subject to restraining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49k-ss-1
part of: 49K Charge on property subject to restraining order
note: Charge on property subject to restraining order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.172
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Commonwealth or relevant organisation to secure payment
premise text: (1) Where...
conclusion text: ...a charge on the property to secure the payment of the amount specified in the recovery order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the charge and the recovery order
premise text: ...the making of the later of the orders, there is created...
conclusion text: ...upon the making of the later of the orders, there is created...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Describes the relationship between the charge and the payment
premise text: (a) a recovery order is made against a defendant;
conclusion text: ...there is created, by force of this section, a charge on the property to secure the payment of the amount specified in the recovery order
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Describes how the charge spreads to other entities
premise text: ...the making of the later of the orders, there is created...
conclusion text: ...a charge on the property to secure the payment of the amount specified in the recovery order
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity recognition
logic summary: Describes how the system recognizes entities (property) subject to the charge
premise text: (i) property of the defendant; or
conclusion text: ...property of another person in relation to which an order is, or has been, made under subsection 53A(1);
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49K(2) Charge on property subject to restraining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49k-ss-2
part of: 49K Charge on property subject to restraining order
note: Charge on property ceases to have effect under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.172
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49K(2) Charge on property subject to restraining order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Obligation ceases
premise text: (2) A charge on property of a person ceases to have effect:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Charge ceases during specified events
premise text: (2) A charge on property of a person ceases to have effect: (a) if the relevant recovery order ceases to have effect;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Charge ceases during specified events
premise text: (2) A charge on property of a person ceases to have effect: (a) if the relevant recovery order ceases to have effect;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Charge spreads during specified events
premise text: (2) A charge on property of a person ceases to have effect: (a) if the relevant recovery order ceases to have effect;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Charge ceases during specified events
premise text: (2) A charge on property of a person ceases to have effect: (a) if the relevant recovery order ceases to have effect;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49K(3) Charge on property subject to restraining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49k-ss-3
part of: 49K Charge on property subject to restraining order
note: A charge on property has priority over all other encumbrances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.172
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49K(3) Charge on property subject to restraining order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Priority
logic summary: Priority of charge on property
premise text: Charge on property is subject to every encumbrance...
conclusion text: Charge has priority over all other encumbrances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Charge on property overlaps with other encumbrances
premise text: Charge on property has priority over all other encumbrances.
conclusion text: Charge on property overlaps with other encumbrances.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Charge on property is recurrently present in the property's history
premise text: Charge on property has priority over all other encumbrances.
conclusion text: Charge on property is recurrently present in the property's history.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Change of ownership does not affect the charge on property
premise text: Charge on property is subject to every encumbrance...
conclusion text: Change of ownership diffuses the effect on the charge.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes the charge on property as a valid encumbrance
premise text: Charge on property is subject to every encumbrance...
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes the charge on property.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49K(4) Charge on property subject to restraining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49k-ss-4
part of: 49K Charge on property subject to restraining order
note: Charge created on property of a particular kind
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.172
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49K(4) Charge on property subject to restraining order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CREATE
logic summary: Creation of charge
premise text: (4) Where: (a) a charge is created on property of a particular kind;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49L Registration of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49l
has part: 49L(1) Registration of restraining orders
has part: 49L(2) Registration of restraining orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174

49L(1) Registration of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49l-ss-1
part of: 49L Registration of restraining orders
note: Authority responsible for administering provisions may record particulars of restraining order on register.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49L(1) Registration of restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Authority has obligation to record particulars.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49L(2) Registration of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49l-ss-2
part of: 49L Registration of restraining orders
note: A person who deals with property must have notice of a restraining order if it has been recorded.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49L(2) Registration of restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to provide notice of restraining orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49M Contravention of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49m
has part: 49M(1) Contravention of restraining orders
has part: 49M(2) Contravention of restraining orders
has part: 49M(3) Contravention of restraining orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174

49M(1) Contravention of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49m-ss-1
part of: 49M Contravention of restraining orders
note: Restraining order contravention is an offence punishable by imprisonment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49M(1) Contravention of restraining orders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Restraining order contravention is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49M(2) Contravention of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49m-ss-2
part of: 49M Contravention of restraining orders
note: Disposing of property in contravention of a restraining order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49M(2) Contravention of restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Restricting property disposal
premise text: (a) a restraining order is made against property; (b) the property is disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in contravention of the restraining order;
conclusion text: the disposition or dealing was either not for sufficient consideration or not in favour of a person who acted in good faith;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between property disposal and restraining order
premise text: (a) a restraining order is made against property; (b) the property is disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in contravention of the restraining order;
conclusion text: the disposition or dealing was either not for sufficient consideration or not in favour of a person who acted in good faith;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of property disposal and restraining order
premise text: (a) a restraining order is made against property; (b) the property is disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in contravention of the restraining order;
conclusion text: the disposition or dealing was either not for sufficient consideration or not in favour of a person who acted in good faith;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusing property disposal and restraining order
premise text: (a) a restraining order is made against property; (b) the property is disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in contravention of the restraining order;
conclusion text: the disposition or dealing was either not for sufficient consideration or not in favour of a person who acted in good faith;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implying property disposal and restraining order
premise text: (a) a restraining order is made against property; (b) the property is disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in contravention of the restraining order;
conclusion text: the disposition or dealing was either not for sufficient consideration or not in favour of a person who acted in good faith;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49M(3) Contravention of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49m-ss-3
part of: 49M Contravention of restraining orders
note: Court may set aside disposition or dealing as from a specific day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.174
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49M(3) Contravention of restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court prohibits the disposition or dealing.
premise text: (3) Where the DPP makes an application...
conclusion text: ...the court may make an order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Court's power is between the disposition or dealing and the specific day.
premise text: (3) Where the DPP makes an application...
conclusion text: ...the court may make an order...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Court implies that disposition or dealing is prohibited after a specific day.
premise text: (3) Where the DPP makes an application...
conclusion text: ...the court may make an order...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Court's power spreads to disposition or dealing after a specific day.
premise text: (3) Where the DPP makes an application...
conclusion text: ...the court may make an order...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49m-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Court recognizes the need to set aside disposition or dealing.
premise text: (3) Where the DPP makes an application...
conclusion text: ...the court may make an order...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49N Restraining orders: revocation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49n
note: Revocation of restraining orders under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.175
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49n-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49n-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49n-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 49N Restraining orders: revocation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to revoke a restraining order.
premise text: The court may revoke the order if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

49P When do restraining orders cease to have effect?
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49p
note: Restraining orders cease effect upon acquittal or withdrawal of charge without conviction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.175
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49p-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49p-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49p-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49P When do restraining orders cease to have effect?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Restraining orders cease effect.
premise text: (1) A restraining order ceases to have effect if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49Q Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49q
has part: 49Q(1) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
has part: 49Q(2) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
has part: 49Q(3) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.176

49Q(1) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49q-ss-1
part of: 49Q Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
note: Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.176
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting permission to extend the period of effect of restraining orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49Q(2) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49q-ss-2
part of: 49Q Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
note: Court may extend period of effect of restraining order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.176
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49Q(2) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May extend period of effect
premise text: (2) Where, on an application for an extension...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: may still be
logic summary: May still be made recovery order or order under subsection 53A(1)
premise text: (b) where the property concerned is the property of another...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: thinks appropriate
logic summary: Thinks appropriate in relation to operation of restraining order
premise text: the court may: (c) by order, extend the period of effect...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: extend
logic summary: Extend period of effect of restraining order
premise text: (2) Where, on an application for an extension...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

49Q(3) Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49q-ss-3
part of: 49Q Extension of period of effect of restraining orders
note: Notice must be given to a person in relation to a restraining order
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.176
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: DPP must give a person written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49R Notice of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49r
has part: 49R(1) Notice of applications
has part: 49R(2) Notice of applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.177

49R(1) Notice of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49r-ss-1
part of: 49R Notice of applications
note: Notice of application to other persons entitled under subsection 49J(2)
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.177
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49R(1) Notice of applications
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice to other persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49R(2) Notice of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49r-ss-2
part of: 49R Notice of applications
note: Notice of application for revocation of restraining order must be given to DPP.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.177
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-49r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to notify
conclusion text: The person applying must give written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51
has part: 51(1) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 51(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 51(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 51(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
has part: 51(5) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178

51(1) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
note: Suspension of superannuation rights upon charging with corruption offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(1) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Suspension of superannuation rights upon charging with corruption offence.
premise text: (1) Where:...
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner shall notify the person’s superannuation authority in writing...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between charging and suspension.
premise text: (b) the person ceases, for any reason, to be an AFP employee on or after the day on which the person is charged;
conclusion text: ...then, if the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that the offence is a corruption offence...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of persons charged with corruption offences.
premise text: (a) a person is charged with an offence;
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner shall notify the person’s superannuation authority in writing...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of persons and their rights.
premise text: (1) Where:...
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner believes on reasonable grounds that the offence is a corruption offence...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of superannuation scheme suspension.
premise text: (b) the person ceases, for any reason, to be an AFP employee on or after the day on which the person is charged;
conclusion text: ...the Commissioner shall notify the person’s superannuation authority in writing...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
note: The Commissioner must give a copy of a notice to the person concerned.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(2) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner must give a copy of a notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-3
part of: 51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
note: Person entitled to receive payment upon ceasing employment if certain conditions met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(3) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to receive payment upon ceasing employment.
premise text: Commissioner notifies superannuation authority of suspension.
conclusion text: Person entitled to receive payment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between ceasing employment and receiving payment.
premise text: Payment received on day of ceasing employment.
conclusion text: Ceasing employment overlaps with receiving payment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.7000
curation status: Proposed

51(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-4
part of: 51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
note: Commissioner must notify relevant superannuation authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(4) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(5) Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-5
part of: 51 Person ceases to be an AFP employee: persons charged with
note: Re-engagement after initial period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.178
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-51-ss-5-norm

53A Court may lift corporate veil etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53a
has part: 53A(1) Court may lift corporate veil etc.
has part: 53A(2) Court may lift corporate veil etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.179

53A(1) Court may lift corporate veil etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53a-ss-1
part of: 53A Court may lift corporate veil etc.
note: Court may lift corporate veil to declare property available for recovery order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.179
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53A(1) Court may lift corporate veil etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to lift corporate veil.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53A(2) Court may lift corporate veil etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53a-ss-2
part of: 53A Court may lift corporate veil etc.
note: Court may enforce recovery order against property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.179
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53A(2) Court may lift corporate veil etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-53a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54
has part: 54(1) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
has part: 54(2) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
has part: 54(3) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
has part: 54(4) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
has part: 54(5) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
has part: 54(6) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180

54(1) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-1
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
note: Person responsible for administration of fund must pay amount out of the fund.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(1) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay amount out of the fund.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(2) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-2
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
note: Finance Minister must make arrangements for payment of amount out of Consolidated Revenue Fund.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Finance Minister has an obligation to make arrangements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(3) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-3
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
note: Commonwealth pays amount under subsections 47(2) or (3) and 51(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(3) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(4) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-4
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
note: Payment of amount from Commonwealth fund
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Payment obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(5) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-5
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
note: Amount payable by Commonwealth out of Consolidated Revenue Fund
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(6) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-6
part of: 54 Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
note: The Consolidated Revenue Fund is appropriated to pay amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.180
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(6) Amounts payable under section 46, 47, 47B or 51
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54A Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54a
has part: 54A(1) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
has part: 54A(2) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
has part: 54A(3) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.181

54A(1) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54a-ss-1
part of: 54A Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
note: Prevents payment of another amount under certain subsections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.181
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 54A(1) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits payment of another amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54A(2) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54a-ss-2
part of: 54A Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
note: Payment of another amount under subsection 47(2) is not entitled.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.181
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 54A(2) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Payment of another amount under subsection 47(2) is not permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54A(3) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54a-ss-3
part of: 54A Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
note: Definition of Superannuation Benefits Act Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.181
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54A(3) Multiple payments in respect of same employee contributions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-54a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines the scope of the term
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Possible superannuation order not to be taken into account in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
note: Court cannot punish with imprisonment for life or longer than 12 years in sentencing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.181
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-55-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-55-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-55-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55 Possible superannuation order not to be taken into account in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on punishment with imprisonment for life or longer than 12 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Constitution of appropriate courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56
note: Court may deal with application for superannuation order or restraining order made by a person convicted of corruption offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.182
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-56-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-56-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56 Constitution of appropriate courts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may deal with application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60A Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60a
has part: 60A(1) Secrecy
has part: 60A(2) Secrecy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.183

60A(1) Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60a-ss-1
part of: 60A Secrecy
note: List of individuals subject to secrecy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.183
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60A(1) Secrecy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: Membership in the list implies obligation
premise text: (a) the Commissioner; or (b) a Deputy Commissioner; or...
conclusion text: This section applies to a person who is, or was at any time...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The list includes individuals who were in office during the relevant period
premise text: (e) a person engaged under section 35; or (f) a person performing functions under an agreement under section 69D.
conclusion text: This section applies to a person who is, or was at any time...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The list includes individuals whose functions were performed during the relevant period
premise text: (f) a person performing functions under an agreement under section 69D.
conclusion text: This section applies to a person who is, or was at any time...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: Membership in the list implies obligation for all individuals listed
premise text: (e) a person engaged under section 35; or (f) a person performing functions under an agreement under section 69D.
conclusion text: This section applies to a person who is, or was at any time...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60A(2) Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60a-ss-2
part of: 60A Secrecy
note: Prohibited from making or divulging prescribed information except for specific purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.183
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60A(2) Secrecy
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of making or divulging prescribed information.
premise text: (2) A person to whom this section applies must not...
conclusion text: ...must not make a record of any prescribed information; or...must not divulge or communicate any prescribed information...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for the prohibition.
premise text: (2) A person to whom this section applies must not...
conclusion text: ...except for the purposes of this Act or the regulations; or...the purposes of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022 or regulations under that Act; or...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval for the prohibition.
premise text: (2) A person to whom this section applies must not...
conclusion text: ...except for the purposes of this Act or the regulations; or...the purposes of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022 or regulations under that Act; or...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Mechanism for the prohibition.
premise text: (2) A person to whom this section applies must not...
conclusion text: ...except for the purposes of this Act or the regulations; or...the purposes of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022 or regulations under that Act; or...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: by
logic summary: Mechanism for the prohibition.
premise text: (2) A person to whom this section applies must not...
conclusion text: ...except for the purposes of this Act or the regulations; or...the purposes of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022 or regulations under that Act; or...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Awards for bravery etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61
has part: 61(1) Awards for bravery etc.
has part: 61(1A) Awards for bravery etc.
has part: 61(2) Awards for bravery etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185

61(1) Awards for bravery etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-1
part of: 61 Awards for bravery etc.
note: Commissioner must confer award on AFP appointee who merits it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(1) Awards for bravery etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to confer award
premise text: (1) Where an AFP appointee has, by his or her bravery or other conspicuous conduct...
conclusion text: The Commissioner MUST confer the award on that person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Award can be conferred within a specific timeframe
premise text: (1) Where an AFP appointee has, by his or her bravery or other conspicuous conduct...
conclusion text: The award CAN BE CONFERRED BETWEEN the date of merit and the current date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Award conferment implies a positive action
premise text: (1) Where an AFP appointee has, by his or her bravery or other conspicuous conduct...
conclusion text: The conferment of the award IMPLIES that the Commissioner took a positive action.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Award recognition can spread to others
premise text: (1) Where an AFP appointee has, by his or her bravery or other conspicuous conduct...
conclusion text: The award REACHES OTHERS who are aware of the recipient's merit.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
logic summary: Award recognition can be recognized by AI systems
premise text: (1) Where an AFP appointee has, by his or her bravery or other conspicuous conduct...
conclusion text: The award RECOGNIZED BY AI SYSTEMS who process the Commissioner's decision.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

61(1A) Awards for bravery etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-1a
part of: 61 Awards for bravery etc.
note: Commissioner may confer award on a person who has shown bravery or conspicuous conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(1A) Awards for bravery etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(2) Awards for bravery etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-2
part of: 61 Awards for bravery etc.
note: Award criteria must be prescribed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(2) Awards for bravery etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Prescribed criteria are obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62
has part: 62(1) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
has part: 62(2) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
has part: 62(3) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185

62(1) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62-ss-1
part of: 62 Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
note: Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(1) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if the person dishonestly represents that a police award has been conferred on the person.
conclusion text: Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of dishonest representation
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if the person dishonestly represents that a police award has been conferred on the person.
conclusion text: Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

62(2) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62-ss-2
part of: 62 Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
note: Dishonesty in representing conferral of police awards is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(2) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, a police award is an award,...
conclusion text: Dishonesty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(3) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62-ss-3
part of: 62 Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
note: Definition of dishonest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.185
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(3) Dishonestly representing conferral of police awards
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines dishonest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Personation etc. of member or special member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63
has part: 63(1) Personation etc. of member or special member
has part: 63(2) Personation etc. of member or special member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186

63(1) Personation etc. of member or special member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-1
part of: 63 Personation etc. of member or special member
note: Wearing or displaying a uniform or badge of a member or special member, or having certain articles in possession is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(1) Personation etc. of member or special member
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
premise text: (1) A person, not being a member or special member...
conclusion text: ...shall not: (b) wear or display any uniform or badge...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
premise text: (1) A person, not being a member or special member...
conclusion text: ...shall not: (c) have in his or her possession any arms or ammunition...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
premise text: (1) A person, not being a member or special member...
conclusion text: ...shall not: (c) have in his or her possession any article of clothing, accoutrements or equipment...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(2) Personation etc. of member or special member
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-2
part of: 63 Personation etc. of member or special member
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(2) Personation etc. of member or special member
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Reasonable excuse is a belief.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63A Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a
has part: 63A(1) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
has part: 63A(2) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186

63A(1) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a-ss-1
part of: 63A Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
note: Wearing or displaying a uniform or badge of a protective service officer or special protective service officer, or possessing certain articles, is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 63A(1) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of impersonation and possession of certain articles.
premise text: (1) A person, not being a protective service officer or a special protective service officer...
conclusion text: ...must not: (a) wear or display any uniform or badge...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibited actions.
premise text: (1) A person, not being a protective service officer or a special protective service officer...
conclusion text: ...must not: (a) wear or display any uniform or badge...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of prohibited actions.
premise text: (1) A person, not being a protective service officer or a special protective service officer...
conclusion text: ...must not: (a) wear or display any uniform or badge...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibited actions.
premise text: (1) A person, not being a protective service officer or a special protective service officer...
conclusion text: ...must not: (a) wear or display any uniform or badge...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of prohibited actions.
premise text: (1) A person, not being a protective service officer or a special protective service officer...
conclusion text: ...must not: (a) wear or display any uniform or badge...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

63A(2) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63a-ss-2
part of: 63A Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.186
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63A(2) Personation etc. of protective service officer or special
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Defendant must believe in reasonable excuse.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63B Possession of documents etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63b
has part: 63B(1) Possession of documents etc.
has part: 63B(2) Possession of documents etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.187

63B(1) Possession of documents etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63b-ss-1
part of: 63B Possession of documents etc.
note: Possession of certain documents is prohibited for non-AFP members.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.187
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 63B(1) Possession of documents etc.
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of possession
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63B(2) Possession of documents etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63b-ss-2
part of: 63B Possession of documents etc.
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to a reasonable excuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.187
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63B(2) Possession of documents etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-63b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Defendant must believe in a reasonable excuse.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Assault etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64
note: Offender must pay compensation for damage to uniform or accoutrements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.187
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64 Assault etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64a
has part: 64A(1) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
has part: 64A(1A) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
has part: 64A(2) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
has part: 64A(3) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
has part: 64A(4) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188

64A(1) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64a-ss-1
part of: 64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
note: Members in uniform must wear identification numbers. Wearing identification numbers is mandatory for protective service officers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(1) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to wear ID number
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64A(1A) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64a-ss-1a
part of: 64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
note: Members in uniform must wear identification numbers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1a-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(1A) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64A(2) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64a-ss-2
part of: 64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
note: Defence for prosecution failure due to lack of identification number visibility Wearing identification numbers is an offence of strict liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(2) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from prosecution
premise text: Identification number not clearly visible on uniform
conclusion text: Defence to prosecution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64A(3) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64a-ss-3
part of: 64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
note: Defence against prosecution for offence under subsection (1) The Commissioner must take steps to enable members to comply with subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(3) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defence
logic summary: Defence against prosecution
premise text: subsection (1)
conclusion text: subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner has a duty to take steps.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

64A(4) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64a-ss-4
part of: 64A Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
note: The Commissioner must take steps to enable protective service officers to comply with subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.188
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(4) Members in uniform to wear identification numbers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner has a duty to take steps.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64AA Suspended AFP employees who are members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64aa
note: Member of AFP cannot exercise power while suspended.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.189
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64aa-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64aa-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64aa-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 64AA Suspended AFP employees who are members
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on exercising power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64B Liability for wrongful acts of members
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64b
note: Liability for wrongful acts of members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.189
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64b-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64b-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64B Liability for wrongful acts of members
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-64b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: liability
logic summary: State is liable for torts committed by employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Protection of persons in respect of work reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66
has part: 66(1) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
has part: 66(2) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
has part: 66(3) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.191

66(1) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66-ss-1
part of: 66 Protection of persons in respect of work reports
note: Protection from civil or criminal action for reports made in good faith
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.191
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(1) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Protection from civil or criminal action
premise text: Good faith report
conclusion text: No action lies against the person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66(2) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66-ss-2
part of: 66 Protection of persons in respect of work reports
note: Good faith report requirement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.191
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(2) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Obligation to make good faith reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66(3) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66-ss-3
part of: 66 Protection of persons in respect of work reports
note: Exemption from subsection (1) under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.191
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(3) Protection of persons in respect of work reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-66-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not apply unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

67 Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67
note: Annual report must include particulars of AFP conduct issues and action taken.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-67-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-67-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67 Annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68
has part: 68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(2) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(3) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
has part: 68(4) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192

68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68-ss-1
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
note: Certification of appointment and status of member
description: Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68(1) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Certification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68(2) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68-ss-2
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
note: Certification of member's status and declaration under section 40B
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-2-norm

68(3) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68-ss-3
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
note: Certification of special member appointment and status
description: (a), (b), (c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Commissioner holds obligation to certify special member appointment and status
premise text: (3) The Commissioner may, by writing signed by the Commissioner...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Special member appointment and status are during the period of certification
premise text: (b) that, on a specified date, he or she made and subscribed the oath or affirmation mentioned in the certificate before the Commissioner...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Commissioner holds obligation to provide certification of special member appointment and status
premise text: (c) that he or she is, on the date on which the certificate is signed, a special member and has been such a special member continuously since he or she was so appointed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68(4) Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68-ss-4
part of: 68 Proof of appointment, status of member etc.
note: Certification of membership status
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.192
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68-ss-4-norm

68A Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68a
has part: 68A(1) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
has part: 68A(2) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
has part: 68A(3) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.195

68A(1) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68a-ss-1
part of: 68A Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
note: This section applies in relation to a person who is a transferred PSO, instead of subsection 68(4A).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.195
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68A(1) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Section applies to transferred PSOs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68A(2) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68a-ss-2
part of: 68A Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
note: The Commissioner must certify a person as a transferred PSO.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.195
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68A(2) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide certification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68A(3) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68a-ss-3
part of: 68A Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
note: The Commissioner must certify certain information about a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.195
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68A(3) Certificates in relation to transferred PSOs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-68a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner must provide the certification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Prohibition of patronage and favouritism
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69
note: The Commissioner must exercise powers without patronage or favouritism.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.196
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 69 Prohibition of patronage and favouritism
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of patronage and favouritism
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69A Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69a
has part: 69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees
has part: 69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees
has part: 69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.196

69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69a-ss-1
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees
note: The Commissioner may engage persons overseas as employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.196
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 69A(1) Persons engaged overseas as employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to engage persons overseas
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69a-ss-2
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees
note: The Commissioner has all the rights, duties and powers of an employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.196
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69A(2) Persons engaged overseas as employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Commissioner has the right to all rights, duties and powers of an employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69a-ss-3
part of: 69A Persons engaged overseas as employees
note: Commissioner's power to engage persons overseas is not limited by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.196
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69A(3) Persons engaged overseas as employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commissioner's power is not limited
premise text: Section does not limit other powers
conclusion text: Commissioner can engage persons overseas
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69B Limited operation of Fair Work Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69b
note: Limited operation of Fair Work Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.197
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69b-norm

69C Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69c
has part: 69C(1) Delegation
has part: 69C(2) Delegation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.197

69C(1) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69c-ss-1
part of: 69C Delegation
note: Delegation of powers to Deputy Commissioner or AFP employee/special member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.197
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69c-ss-1-norm

69C(2) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69c-ss-2
part of: 69C Delegation
note: Delegation of power to senior executive AFP employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.197
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69c-ss-2-norm

69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69d
has part: 69D(1) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
has part: 69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.198

69D(1) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69d-ss-1
part of: 69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
note: The Commissioner may arrange for a person to assist the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.198
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Commissioner may arrange for a person to assist the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: The arrangement must occur during the performance of functions.
premise text: performing the functions specified in the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69d-ss-2
part of: 69D Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
note: Terms and conditions for persons assisting the Australian Federal Police must be specified in an agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.198
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69D(2) Secondment of persons to assist the Australian Federal Police
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Commissioner to specify terms and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69E Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69e
has part: 69E(1) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
has part: 69E(2) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
has part: 69E(3) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.199

69E(1) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69e-ss-1
part of: 69E Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
note: Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.199
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-1-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69E(1) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69E(2) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69e-ss-2
part of: 69E Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
note: Commissioner must charge a reasonable amount for protective services.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.199
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69E(2) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to charge a reasonable amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69E(3) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69e-ss-3
part of: 69E Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
note: Definition of Commonwealth authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.199
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69E(3) Commissioner may charge for certain protective services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of Commonwealth authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-69e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70
note: The Governor-General may make regulations for securing discipline and good government of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.199
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-70-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-70-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70 Regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Interpretation of Part VII
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71
note: Interpretation of Part VII
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.202
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-71-norm

75 Recognition of previous service for certain purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75
note: Deems service of AFP member as existing Police Force member for certain purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.202
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75 Recognition of previous service for certain purposes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Deems service of AFP member as existing Police Force member for certain purposes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-75-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: Service of AFP member as existing Police Force member
conclusion text: Deemed to include service
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Accrued leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77
note: Retains accrued leave rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.202
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-logic-alleninterval-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 77 Accrued leave
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: retain
logic summary: Right retention
premise text: Section 72 of the Act
conclusion text: Retains accrued leave rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-77-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Accrued during existing membership
premise text: Commencing date
conclusion text: Retains accrued leave rights during existing membership
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Powers and duties in relation to Commonwealth places
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80
note: Exercise and perform powers and duties equivalent to those under the Commonwealth Police Act 1957.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.203
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-80-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-80-logic-descriptionlogic-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Exercise and perform powers and duties equivalent to those under the Commonwealth Police Act 1957.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-80-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class/Type/Subclass Hierarchy
logic summary: Relates to a class/type/subclass hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police (Consequential Amendments) Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-logic-ltl-2

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditionally commenced on June 15, 1979
conclusion text: June 15, 1979
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditionally commenced on June 15, 1979
conclusion text: June 15, 1979
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-2
note: Sch: 19 Oct 1979 (s2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-2-norm

28 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-3-norm

28 May 1980 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-4
note: Australian Federal Police Amendment Act 22, 1981
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-4-norm

9 Apr 1981
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-2-norm

1 May 1982 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act (No. 2) 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-2-norm

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-2
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-2-norm

20 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-2
note: Repeal of Australian Federal Police Act 1979 amendment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-2-norm

18 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-2
note: Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.207
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-2-norm

22 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-3
note: Repeal of Australian Federal Police Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-3-norm

18 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-3
note: Duty to report certain information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-5
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police Amendment Act 117, 1984
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-5-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: 28 Oct 1985 is a specific date
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-4
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police Amendment Act 121, 1985
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-4-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal intervals required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-6
note: Conditional commencement of s 4–20 on 28 Oct 1985 (s 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-6-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: 28 Oct 1985 (s 2)
conclusion text: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-2
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-2-norm

29 May 1988 (s 2(3) and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29
note: May 1988 (s 2(3) and gaz 1988, No S149)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.208
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 June 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: Prohibition on certain conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids the specified conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Nov 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-3
note: Prohibition of certain sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids specific sections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Dec 1989
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2
note: Prohibition on amending s 8(1)(a), 8(1A), (1B)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-2-norm

14 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
note: Mandatory commencement of Australian Federal Police Legislation Amendment Act 1989
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide commencement date
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-2
note: References sections 4–6, 8–14 and 16–18.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-2-norm

1 July 1989 (s 2(2) and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
note: Australian Federal Police Amendment Act 147, 1989
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-3-norm

27 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-2
note: Remainder of section 21
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.209
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Section 21 holds
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-2
note: Commencement of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-2-norm

4 Mar 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1989
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-2-norm

17 Jan 1990
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-3
note: Conditional commencement of section 4 and 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-3-norm

4 Mar 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-3
note: Conditional commencement of Industrial Relations Legislation Amendment Act 1991
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-3-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-3
note: Amendment of s 31(2) and Sch: 10 Dec 1991
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: amendment
logic summary: Amends s 31(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-2
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-2-norm

23 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-2
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-2-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the scope of the Act
premise text: s 4: 23 Aug 1991 (s 2(1))
conclusion text: Scope
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-2
note: Conditional commencement of Sch: 1 July 1990 (s 2(2))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-2-norm

11 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2
note: Sch 1: 8 Jan 1993 (s2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.210
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-2-norm

21 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-3
note: Amendment of schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-21-3-norm

3 Nov 1993
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-3
note: Qantas Sale Amendment Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-3-norm

16 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
note: Witness Protection Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-16-norm

18 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-5
note: Conditional commencement of section 29
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-5-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal interval required
conclusion text: Classification
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-2
note: Sch: 16 Jan 1995 (s 2(4))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-2-norm

8 July 1996
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-4-norm

5 Aug 1996
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1996
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-2-norm

25 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-3
note: Conditional commencement of Workplace Relations and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1996
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-3-norm

25 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-4
note: Obligation to comply with certain legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-4-norm

7 Apr 1997
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-7-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Starts on specified date
conclusion text: The Act begins on April 7, 1997.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-3
note: Ends on 1 Feb 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.211
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-3-norm

11 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-4
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-4-norm

29 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-2
note: Repealed before commencing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-2-norm

17 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-4
note: Sch 6 (items 15, 16)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-4-norm

17 June 1999 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-5
note: Amendment Act 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-5-norm

11 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-5
note: Duty to amend legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Mar 2000
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-7-2-norm

2 July 2000 (s 2(1) and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Amendment machinery for Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-2-norm

24 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-3
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-3-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and Act
premise text: Conditional commencement on May 24, 2001
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-3
note: Reference to section 4(1), (2) and Schedule 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-3-norm

24 May 2001 (s 2(1(a))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-4
note: Measures to Combat Serious and Organised Crime Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-4-norm

1 Oct 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-4
note: Legislation history note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.212
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-4-norm

11 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-6
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-6-norm

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-4
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2004
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditionally commenced on 18 Apr 1995 (s 2(1) item 5)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditionally commenced on 18 Apr 1995 (s 2(1) item 5)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
premise text: No explicit duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-4
note: Commencement of Act 2004
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-4-norm

15 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-2
note: Sch 1 (items 1–3): 15 Dec 2004 (s 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-15-2-norm

22 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-5
note: Requires s. 4 and Sch 1 (items 89,90,496) to be in force on 22 Feb 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
logic summary: Expresses a requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Nov 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-5
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-8-5-norm

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-3
note: Law Enforcement (AFP Professional Standards and Related Measures) Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 Mar
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-3
note: Sch 1, Sch 3 (items 3, 6–24), Sch 4 and Sch 5: 30 Dec 2006 (s 2(1) items 2, 5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.213
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-3-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-4
note: Marking of Plastic Explosives Act 2007
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-4-norm

19 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-3
note: Conditional commencement of Non-Proliferation Legislation Amendment Act 2007
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-19-3-norm

10 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-2-norm

17 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-6-norm

18 Aug 2007 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-6
note: Conditional commencement of Amendment (Transition to Forward with Fairness) Act 2008
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-6-norm

20 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-3
note: Conditional commencement of Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Board and Other Measures) Act 2008
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-20-3-norm

23 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-4
note: Schedule 1 (items 23–28)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-4-norm

23 June 2008 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-5
note: Prohibition on certain conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 July 2008
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-5
note: Legislation history for Australian Federal Police Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.214
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-5-norm

9 Dec 2008
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-3-norm

10 Dec 2008 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-3
note: Item 5 of Schedule 2, item 10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-3-norm

25 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-5-norm

1 July 2009 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6
note: Conditional commencement of National Security Legislation Amendment Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-6-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-5-norm

25 Nov 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-6
note: Duty to report aviation crimes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-6-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-6-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-25-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
premise text: The person must report the aviation crime
conclusion text: There is an obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-3
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-3-norm

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-4
note: Conditional commencement of the Legislation Amendment (Identity Crimes and Other Measures) Act 2011.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-4-norm

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-2-5-norm

3 Mar 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-5
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-5-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-6
note: Conditional commencement of amendments to Defence Legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-6-norm

12 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-2
note: Legislation history note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.215
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12-2-norm

27 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-4-norm

27 Dec 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-5
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-5-norm

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-27-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27 Dec 2011 (s 2(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

28 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-7-norm

1 July 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-7
note: July 2011 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-7-norm

5 Dec 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-3
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 2 (items 1, 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-5-3-norm

28 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-8-norm

29 Nov 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-3
note: Public Service Amendment Act 2013, item 14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-3-norm

14 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-2
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-3

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as 1 July 2013 (s 2(1) item 2)
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as 1 July 2013 (s 2(1) item 2)
conclusion text: Ordered trace required
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-14-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
premise text: No explicit duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create a right
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-9-norm

29 June 2013 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-4
note: Consequential and transitional provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-4-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-5
note: Sch 6 (items 16, 17), Sch 7 (items 232–234) and Sch 14: 1 July 2014 (s 2(1) items 6, 14)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.216
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-5-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-5-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
note: Amendment of Schedule 7 by Acts and Instruments (Framework Reform) Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-13-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-4
note: Consequential Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-4-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-5
note: Conditional commencement of legislation amendment act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-10-5-norm

26 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-2
note: May
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-2-norm

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-8
note: Sch 2 (items 356–396) item 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-8-norm

18 June 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-7
note: Amendment of Schedule 2 by Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-18-7-norm

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-6
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers, Offences and Other Measures) Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-6-norm

26 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-3
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-3-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-3-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-26-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-7
note: Legislation history note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.217
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-11-7-norm

9 May 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-4
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 2 (items 42–49,284)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-9-4-norm

22 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-22-7-norm

23 July 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-7
note: Sch 8 (items 20, 21)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-7-norm

23 May 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-8
note: Prohibition on espionage and foreign interference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-8-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-8-logic-deontic-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-23-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits espionage and foreign interference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-5-norm

30 June 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-6
note: Sch 2 (items 13, 14)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-30-6-norm

29 Dec 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-6
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-29-6-norm

24 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-6
note: Amendment machinery for Crimes Legislation Amendment (Police Powers at Airports) Act 2019
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-24-6-norm

28 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-10
note: Legislation history for Australian Federal Police Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.218
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-28-10-norm

17 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-7
note: Conditional commencement of the Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-7-norm

3 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-6
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-3-6-norm

12 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-12-3-norm

1 July 2023 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-9
note: Conditional commencement of Criminal Code Amendment (State Sponsors of Terrorism) Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-9-norm
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-9-logic-alleninterval-1

australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-1-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal relation required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Nov 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-4
note: Commencement and application provisions for Schedule 3, item 6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-6-4-norm

17 Mar 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-8
note: Amendment of section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-17-8-norm

4 June 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-4
note: Conditional commencement of Sch1 (item 3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: australian-federal-police-act-1979.pdf, p.219
asserts: australian-federal-police-act-1979-sec-4-4-norm