1 Short title
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
note: Citation of Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Apr 2005
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
note: Amendment of Sch 4 by Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-10-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-10
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

1 July 2007 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
note: Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-11
schema version: 2

1 Nov 2008 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
note: Legislation history
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-12
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2010
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-13
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
note: Item 31 of Schedule 5
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-14
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
note: Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-15-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-15
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies legislative provisions into a deontic model
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPartOf

1 Nov 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
note: Commencement provision for Sch 2 (item 42)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-16
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision is in effect during the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2010
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2010
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: January 1, 2011

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision is in effect during the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2010
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: During January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2010
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: January 1, 2011

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision begins on January 1, 2011
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commences on January 1, 2011
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
premise text: Sch 2 (item 42)

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision is in effect during the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2010
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: During January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2010
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: January 1, 2011

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision is in effect during the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2010
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2010
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: January 1, 2011

1 May 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
note: Amended by Statute Law Revision Act 2012
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-17-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-17
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amended by Statute Law Revision Act 2012
modality: Deontic
operator: amendment

1 July 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
note: July 2011 (s 2(1))
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-18
schema version: 2

1 Jan 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
note: Amendment by Acts and Instruments (Framework Reform) (Consequential Provisions) Act 2015
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-19
schema version: 2

1 Dec 1982 (s 2 and gaz
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
note: Transitioning Act 1983
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
note: Amendment by Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-20
schema version: 2

1 July 2019 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-21
schema version: 2

1 Feb 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-22
schema version: 2

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
note: Archives and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2021
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-23
schema version: 2

1 Apr 2022
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
note: Amendment (Enhancing Engagement) Act 2023
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-24
schema version: 2

1 June 1983
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
note: Amendment Act 1983
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 Jan 1984 (s 2 and gaz
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
note: Public Service Reform Act 1984, section 46
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 July 1984 (s 2(4) and
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
note: Transitioning provisions and consequential amendments
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-5
schema version: 2

1 Sept 1999 (s 2(2) and
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
note: Statute Stocktake Act, 1999
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-6
schema version: 2

1 Oct 2001
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
note: Conditional commencement of Act 2002
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-7
schema version: 2

1 July 2003 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
note: Inspector-General of Taxation Act 2003
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-8
schema version: 2

1 Apr 2005
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-9
schema version: 2

10 Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.49
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10(1) Unpublished operational information
has part: 10(2) Unpublished operational information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-10
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
note: Financial Sector Reform (Hayne Royal Commission Response—Better Advice) Act 2021
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-11
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
note: Legislation history for Freedom of Information Act 1982
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-12
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.254
note: Conditional commencement of the Administrative Review Tribunal (Miscellaneous Measures) Act 2025
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-13-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-13
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified

10 Nov
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.254
note: Commencement and application provisions for the 50, 2006 regulation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-14
schema version: 2

10 Mar 1993 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
note: Qantas Sale Amendment Act 1994
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-3
schema version: 2

10 Dec 1999 (s 2(2))
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
note: Dec 1999 (s 2(2))
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-4
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
note: Commencement dates for certain items in Schedule 1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-5
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
note: Consequential Provisions Act 2015
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-6
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
note: Legislation history for Freedom of Information Act 1982
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-7
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2015
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-8
schema version: 2

10 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
note: Consequential and transitional provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-9
schema version: 2

10(1) Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.49
note: Agency must publish operational information if it has existed for more than 12 months.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Unpublished operational information

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must publish operational information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(1) Unpublished operational information

10(2) Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.49
note: Avoid prejudice from unpublished information
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Unpublished operational information

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits subjecting person to prejudice
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The person must not...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(2) Unpublished operational information

10A Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.49
note: Agency principal officer may perform functions on behalf of the agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May perform function
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10A Who performs functions etc. given to agencies

10B Transitional—Norfolk Island authorities
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.50
note: No application during a 2-year period
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10b
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No application during that time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on application
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: During the specified period, this Part does not apply.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10B Transitional—Norfolk Island authorities

11 Right of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(1) Right of access
has part: 11(2) Right of access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Apr
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-10
schema version: 2

11 Apr
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
note: National Security Legislation Amendment (Comprehensive Review and Other Measures No. 2) Act 2023
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-11
schema version: 2

11 Aug
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
note: Sch 1 (items 20–24, 33–35)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-12
schema version: 2

11 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
note: Endnotes
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-2
schema version: 2

11 Nov
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

11 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
note: Conditional commencement of Transport Safety Investigation (Consequential Amendments) Act 2003
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-4
schema version: 2

11 Apr
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-5
schema version: 2

11 June 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
note: Legislation Amendment Act 2011
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-6
schema version: 2

11 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-7
schema version: 2

11 Nov
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-8
schema version: 2

11 Feb
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
note: Conditional commencement of Trade Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-9-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-9
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified

11(1) Right of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51
note: Right of access to documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Right of access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right exists
modality: Deontic
operator: =

11(2) Right of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51
note: Right of access is not affected by reasons given for seeking access.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Right of access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a person’s right of access is not affected by: (a) any reasons the person gives for seeking access; or (b) the agency’s or Minister’s belief as to what are his or her reasons for seeking access.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right is not affected by reasons given for seeking access.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) Subject to this Act, a person’s right of access...

11A Access to documents on request
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11A(1) Access to documents on request
has part: 11A(2) Access to documents on request
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11a
schema version: 2

11A(1) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51
note: Request for access to documents must be made in accordance with subsection 15(2)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11A Access to documents on request

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide access to documents upon request
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11A(1) Access to documents on request

11A(2) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51
note: Access to documents on request is subject to this Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11A Access to documents on request

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide access to documents on request.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11A(2) Access to documents on request

11B Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11B(1) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(2) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11b
schema version: 2

11B(1) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.53
note: Public interest exemptions—factors
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors

11B(2) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.53
note: Factors favoring access are not limited by this section.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors

11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.53
note: Factors favouring access to the document in the public interest
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) allow a person to access his or her own personal information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between factors favouring access to the document
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) promote effective oversight of public expenditure;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) inform debate on a matter of public importance;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application to factors favouring access to the document
modality: CogAI
operator: through
premise text: (a) promote the objects of this Act (including all the matters set out in sections 3 and 3A);

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: include whether access to the document would do any of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of factors favouring access to the document
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (3) Factors favouring access to the document in the public interest

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) inform debate on a matter of public importance;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of factors favouring access to the document
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (a) promote the objects of this Act (including all the matters set out in sections 3 and 3A);

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) allow a person to access his or her own personal information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between factors favouring access to the document
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (c) promote effective oversight of public expenditure;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors

11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.53
note: Factors that must not be taken into account when deciding access to a document would be contrary to the public interest.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusions from consideration of access to a document
modality: Deontic
operator: excluded
premise text: (4) The following factors must not be taken into account...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors

11C Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11C(1) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(2) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(3) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(4) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(5) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(6) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(7) Publication of information in accessed documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c
schema version: 2

11C(1) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
note: Publication of information is required if an agency or Minister gives a person access to a document under section 11A.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publication is required
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11C(1) Publication of information in accessed documents

11C(2) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
note: The Information Commissioner may make a determination for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c).
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents

11C(3) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
note: Agency must publish information on website
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Within a specific time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) The agency, or the Minister, must publish the information to members of the public generally on a website by:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Information must be published on website
modality: CogAI
operator: must be published
premise text: (a) making the information available for downloading from the website; or (b) publishing on the website a link to another website, from which the information can be downloaded; or (c) publishing on the website other details of how the information may be obtained.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information must be accessible to the public
modality: Diffusion
operator: must be accessible
premise text: (a) making the information available for downloading from the website; or (b) publishing on the website a link to another website, from which the information can be downloaded; or (c) publishing on the website other details of how the information may be obtained.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Within a specific time frame
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) The agency, or the Minister, must publish the information to members of the public generally on a website by:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11C(3) Publication of information in accessed documents

11C(4) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
note: Agency may impose charge for accessing information
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has permission to impose charge
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11C(4) Publication of information in accessed documents

11C(5) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
description: Details of the charge
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
note: Agency or Minister must publish details of charge for accessing information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must publish details of charge.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11C(5) Publication of information in accessed documents

11C(6) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
note: Agency must comply with section within 10 working days after access to document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for compliance.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Compliance implies agency action.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLICATION

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must comply with section.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to comply.
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATION

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Compliance within 10 working days is required.
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN

11C(7) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
note: Definition of working day
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11C(7) Publication of information in accessed documents

12 Part not to apply to certain documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.55
note: Exemptions from access under Part 1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2007
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

12 Apr
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-3
schema version: 2

12 Apr 2007 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
note: Legislation Amendment (Content Services) Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-4
schema version: 2

12 Apr
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-5-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-5
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Indicates a temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >

12 Apr
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-6
schema version: 2

12 Apr 2013 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
note: Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Act 2012
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-7
schema version: 2

12 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
note: Conditional commencement of certain provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-8
schema version: 2

12 Nov
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
note: Commences on 1 Jan 2016
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-9
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a document, or a copy of a document
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within the open access period within the meaning of that Act
premise text: unless the document contains personal information (including personal information about a deceased person); or

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to a document, or a copy of a document
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of access
modality: Deontic
operator: not entitled to
premise text: (1) A person is not entitled to obtain access under this Part

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to a document, or a copy of a document
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of access
modality: Deontic
operator: not entitled to obtain access under this Part
premise text: (1) A person is not entitled to obtain access under this Part

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Part not to apply to certain documents

13 Documents in certain institutions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 13(1) Documents in certain institutions
has part: 13(2) Documents in certain institutions
has part: 13(3) Documents in certain institutions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
schema version: 2

13 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
note: Conditional commencement on 1 July 2014
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-2
schema version: 2

13 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
note: Consequential and transitional provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-3
schema version: 2

13 Apr
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
note: Amendment of Sch 7 by Acts and Instruments (Framework Reform) Act 126, 2015
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-4
schema version: 2

13 Oct
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
note: Consequential and transitional provisions for the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-5
schema version: 2

13 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
note: Sch 2: 14 Sept 2019 (s2(1) item 1)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-6
schema version: 2

13(1) Documents in certain institutions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.56
note: Documents in certain institutions are not considered documents of an agency for the purposes of this Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Documents in certain institutions

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits documents in certain institutions from being considered agency documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

13(2) Documents in certain institutions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.56
note: Document possession obligation for agencies
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Documents in certain institutions

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency is deemed to have possession
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has possession of document
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPossession
premise text: Document transferred to National Archives

13(3) Documents in certain institutions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.56
note: Records of certain commissions are taken to be documents of an agency and in the possession of a department.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Documents in certain institutions

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state to treat records as documents of an agency.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13(3) Documents in certain institutions

14 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
note: Conditional commencement on gaz 1988, No S399
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
schema version: 2

14 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
note: Amendment Act 1988
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-2
schema version: 2

14 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
note: Conversion into Public Company Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-3
schema version: 2

14 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
note: Conversion into Public Company Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-4
schema version: 2

14 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
note: Conversion into Public Company Act 1989
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-5
schema version: 2

14 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-6
schema version: 2

14 Sept 2006 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
note: Prohibition on Inspector of Transport Security (Consequential Provisions) Act 2006
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-7
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Inspector of Transport Security (Consequential Provisions) Act 2006
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

14 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
note: Amendment Act 2013
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-8
schema version: 2

15 Requests for access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15(1) Requests for access
has part: 15(2) Requests for access
has part: 15(2A) Requests for access
has part: 15(3) Requests for access
has part: 15(4) Requests for access
has part: 15(5) Requests for access
has part: 15(5A) Requests for access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
schema version: 2

15 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
note: Conditional commencement of Transport and Communications Legislation Amendment Act 1994
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

15 Apr
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
note: Commencement of Freedom of Information Act 1982
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Starts on April 16, 2003
modality: Deontic
operator: begins

15 July
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 2 on July 16, 2003
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-4
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: July 16, 2003, is a temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: July 16, 2003, is a temporal interval

15 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-5
schema version: 2

15 Mar 2007 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
note: Classification of Publications, Films and Computer Games
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-6
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classify publications, films and computer games
modality: Deontic
operator: classify

15 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-7
schema version: 2

15 Feb 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2012
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-8
schema version: 2

15(1) Requests for access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
note: Request for access to a document of an agency or official document of a Minister.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Requests for access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(1) Requests for access

15(2) Requests for access
type: Concept
description: yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
note: Request must be in writing and provide necessary information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Requests for access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(2) Requests for access

15(2A) Requests for access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
note: Request must be sent to agency or Minister in specified ways.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Requests for access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The request must be sent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request must be sent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The request is required

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(2A) Requests for access

15(3) Requests for access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
note: Agency must assist person to make compliant request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Requests for access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Assistance required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has a duty to assist.
modality: Deontic
operator: Duty
premise text: Request not compliant with section.

15(4) Requests for access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
note: Duty to assist with request redirection
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Requests for access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has a duty to assist
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

15(5) Requests for access
type: Concept
description: Notification of request receipt and decision
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
note: Agency must notify applicant of request receipt and decision within 30 days.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Requests for access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must take action within a specified timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Agency must inform applicant of request receipt and decision.
modality: Epistemic
operator: NOTICE

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Decision must be made within a specified timeframe.
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(5) Requests for access

15(5A) Requests for access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
note: Agency or Minister must have regard to guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-5a
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Requests for access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(5A) Requests for access

15A Request for access to personnel records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.63
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15A(1) Request for access to personnel records
has part: 15A(2) Request for access to personnel records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15a
schema version: 2

15A(1) Request for access to personnel records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.63
note: Definition of personnel records
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15A Request for access to personnel records

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15A(1) Request for access to personnel records

15A(2) Request for access to personnel records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.63
note: No access to personnel records unless request is made through established procedures.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15A Request for access to personnel records

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (i) is not satisfied with the outcome of the request; or (ii) has not been notified of the outcome within 30 days after the request was made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal interval for notification of request outcome.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (d) either:...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must not apply under section 15 for access to such records unless the person:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Infers that established procedures are in place for requesting personnel records.
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: (2) Where:...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must not apply under section 15 for access to such records unless the person:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to personnel records unless request is made through established procedures.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Where:...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must not apply under section 15 for access to such records unless the person:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about established procedures for requesting personnel records.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) Where:...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (i) is not satisfied with the outcome of the request; or (ii) has not been notified of the outcome within 30 days after the request was made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace for requests and outcomes.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (d) either:...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15A(2) Request for access to personnel records

15AA Extension of time with agreement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.60
note: Extension of time with agreement for dealing with a request
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15aa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15aa
schema version: 2

15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.61
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15AB(1) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
has part: 15AB(2) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
has part: 15AB(3) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15ab
schema version: 2

15AB(1) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.61
note: Agency or Minister may apply for extension of time to deal with a request
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests

15AB(2) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
references: sch-4-sec-33(3)
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.61
note: Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend time
modality: Deontic
operator: may

15AB(3) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.61
note: Inform specified persons of extension period
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.61
note: Agency must make decision on request within time.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ac-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ac-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15ac
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision not received
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request made within time period

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ac-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal

16 Transfer of requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16(1) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(2) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(3) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(3A) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(4) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(5) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(6) Transfer of requests
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
note: References amendments and updates to schedules
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-10
schema version: 2

16 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 3 on July 1, 2015
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-11
schema version: 2

16 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
note: Commencement of Act 2015
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-12
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between Act 2015 and commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: 31 Dec 2015 (s 2(1) item 1)

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as a prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: No explicit duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create right

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires ordered trace of temporal intervals
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: 31 Dec 2015 (s 2(1) item 1)

16 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
note: Never commenced
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-13
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: never

16 May
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
note: May
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-14
schema version: 2

16 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1986
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

16 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
note: Electoral and Referendum Amendment Act 1992, s 2(1)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-3
schema version: 2

16 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
note: Endnotes and legislation history for Freedom of Information Act 1982
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-4
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Date range specified (19 July 1996)

16 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-5
schema version: 2

16 Dec 1995 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1996
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-6
schema version: 2

16 May 2005 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-7
schema version: 2

16 Oct
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-8
schema version: 2

16 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
note: Conditional commencement of Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Act 2010
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-9-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-9
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

16(1) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
note: Agency may transfer request to another agency with agreement.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Transfer of requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(1) Transfer of requests

16(2) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
note: Request transfer to corresponding department if connected with specified body or person's functions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Transfer of requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the request and the corresponding department.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (c) to the Department corresponding to the Department of State administered by the Minister who administers the enactment by or under which the body or person is established, continued in existence or appointed;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes the implication of transferring the request.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (c) to the Department corresponding to the Department of State administered by the Minister who administers the enactment by or under which the body or person is established, continued in existence or appointed;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the agency to transfer the request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to transfer the request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) Where a request is made to an agency for access to a document that: (a) originated with, or has been received from, a body which, or person who, is specified in Part I of Schedule 2; and (b) is more closely connected with the functions of that body or person than with those of the agency to which the request is made;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the request and the corresponding department.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (d) if the request relates to a document that originated with, or has been received from, a part of the Department of Defence specified in Division 2 of Part I of Schedule 2—to that Department;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(2) Transfer of requests

16(3) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
note: Agency must transfer request to another agency if it is more closely connected with the other agency's functions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Transfer of requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must transfer request
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(3) Transfer of requests

16(3A) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
note: Agency must provide access to documents subject to subsections (1), (2) or (3)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Transfer of requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(3A) Transfer of requests

16(4) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
note: Agency must inform person making request and send document to other agency if necessary.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Transfer of requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a duty or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(4) Transfer of requests

16(5) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
note: Request is taken to be a request made to the agency for access to the document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Transfer of requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request is taken to be a request made to the agency.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(5) Transfer of requests

16(6) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
note: Agency includes a Minister.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Transfer of requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency includes a Minister.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency definition
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(6) Transfer of requests

16A Requests transferred from the ACT
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.65
note: Request becomes a request under this Act upon receipt by agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request under this Act at time of receipt.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Request is received at specific time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: at
premise text: Request becomes a request under this Act upon receipt by agency.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request under this Act at time of receipt.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request becomes a request under this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
premise text: Request under FOI Act 1989 transferred to agency.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16A Requests transferred from the ACT

17 Requests involving use of computers etc.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 17(1) Requests involving use of computers etc.
has part: 17(2) Requests involving use of computers etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
schema version: 2

17 May 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
note: Legislation history for Freedom of Information Act 1982
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-10
schema version: 2

17 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
note: Conditional commencement of Intelligence Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Cyber Security) Act 2024
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-11-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-11-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-11-logic-ltl-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-11
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-11-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as 14 Oct 2024 (s 2(1) item 3)

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-11-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as a single event

17 Mar 2006
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.254
note: Amendment history
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-12-logic-n3logic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-12
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-12-logic-n3logic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Endnote 4—Amendment history
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Identifies provision as part of amendment history
modality: N3Logic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Provision affected

17 Oct
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
note: Freedom of Information Laws Amendment Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-2
schema version: 2

17 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-3
schema version: 2

17 June 2004 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2003
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-4
schema version: 2

17 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
note: Conditional commencement on June 17, 2004
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-5
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional commencement on June 17, 2004
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

17 Oct 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
note: Human Services Legislation Amendment Act 2005
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-6
schema version: 2

17 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
note: Transfer of Assets Act 2011
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-7
schema version: 2

17 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-8
schema version: 2

17 June 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-9
schema version: 2

17(1) Requests involving use of computers etc.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
note: Agency must deal with request as if it were a request for access to written document containing information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Requests involving use of computers etc.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must deal with the request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(1) Requests involving use of computers etc.

17(2) Requests involving use of computers etc.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
note: Agency not required to comply with subsection (1) if compliance would substantially and unreasonably divert resources.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Requests involving use of computers etc.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(2) Requests involving use of computers etc.

19 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
note: Commencement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
schema version: 2

19 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
note: Conditional commencement of Taxation Laws Amendment Act (No. 4)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement on January 1, 1995

19 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-3
schema version: 2

19 Dec 1994 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
note: Sale Act 1995
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-4
schema version: 2

19 May
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
note: Enhancing Online Safety for Children Amendment Act 2017
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-5
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 May

19 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
note: References Sch 1 (item 3) and Sch 2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-6
schema version: 2

19 Mar 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
note: Amendment (Sport Integrity Australia) Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-7
schema version: 2

19 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
note: Conditional commencement of Treasury Laws Amendment (Housing Measures No. 1) Act 2023
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-8-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-8
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
note: Commencement date fixed by proclamation
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Oct 2014
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
note: Abolition of Albury-Wodonga Development Corporation Act 2014
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Dec 2015
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2016
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Undertaking

20 Forms of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(1) Forms of access
has part: 20(2) Forms of access
has part: 20(3) Forms of access
has part: 20(4) Forms of access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 July
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

20 Jan 2008 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
note: Quarantine Amendment (Commission of Inquiry) Act 2007
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-3
schema version: 2

20 Oct
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2017
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-4
schema version: 2

20 Nov
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-5
schema version: 2

20 Feb
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.254
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-6
schema version: 2

20(1) Forms of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
note: Agency or Minister may provide access to a document in various forms.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Forms of access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister may provide access to a document.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

20(2) Forms of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
note: Applicant must be given access in the requested form.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Forms of access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(2) Forms of access

20(3) Forms of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
note: Access refused if it would interfere with agency operations or infringe copyright.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Forms of access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: access in that form may be refused and access given in another form.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access if it would interfere with agency operations or infringe copyright.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) would interfere unreasonably with the operations of the agency, or the performance by the Minister of his or her functions, as the case may be;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies reasons for refusing access.
modality: Deontic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) would interfere unreasonably with the operations of the agency, or the performance by the Minister of his or her functions, as the case may be;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies reasons for refusing access.
modality: Deontic
operator: Classify
premise text: (b) would be detrimental to the preservation of the document or, having regard to the physical nature of the document, would not be appropriate;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies reasons for refusing access.
modality: Deontic
operator: Classify
premise text: (c) would, but for this Act, involve an infringement of copyright (other than copyright owned by the Commonwealth, an agency or a State) subsisting in matter contained in the document, being matter that does not relate to the affairs of an agency or of a Department of State;

20(4) Forms of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
note: Applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Forms of access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between request and refusal of access.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection 17(1), where a person requests access to a document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of refusal on payment of charge.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection 17(1), where a person requests access to a document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay a charge not greater than what would have been paid in the requested form.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection 17(1), where a person requests access to a document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval between request and refusal of access.
modality: Diffusion
operator: between
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection 17(1), where a person requests access to a document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between request and refusal of access.
modality: LTL
operator: between
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection 17(1), where a person requests access to a document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(4) Forms of access

21 Deferment of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(1) Deferment of access
has part: 21(2) Deferment of access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
schema version: 2

21 Oct
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
note: Commencement of Special Broadcasting Service Act 1991
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-2
schema version: 2

21 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
note: Amendment of schedule
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-3
schema version: 2

21 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2000
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-4
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: 1 Feb 2001 (s 2(2)) —

21 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
note: Conditional commencement on a specific date
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-5
schema version: 2

21 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-6
schema version: 2

21 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-7
schema version: 2

21(1) Deferment of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
note: Deferment of access to a document may be deferred under certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Deferment of access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to defer access under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

21(2) Deferment of access
type: Concept
description: Reasons and period for deferment
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
note: Agency must inform applicant of reasons and period for deferment.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Deferment of access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must inform applicant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(2) Deferment of access

22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(1) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
has part: 22(2) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
has part: 22(3) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
has part: 22(4) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Sept 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
note: Freedom of Information Amendment (Parliamentary Budget Office) Act 2012
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-10
schema version: 2

22 Feb
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
note: Consequential Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-11
schema version: 2

22 Feb
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
note: Consequential and transitional provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-12
schema version: 2

22 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 1 (items 48–51)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-13
schema version: 2

22 May 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-14
schema version: 2

22 May
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
note: Conditional commencement of the Administrative Review Tribunal (Consequential and Transitional Provisions No. 1) Act 2024
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-15-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-15-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-15
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-15-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: May 2024 (s 2(1) item 7)

22 Oct
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
note: Commencement of Freedom of Information Act 1982
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Freedom of Information Act 1982 has effect from 22 October 1990 to an unspecified end date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During the specified period, the Act is in force
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The Freedom of Information Act 1982 has effect during the period commencing on the day after the day on which this Act receives Royal Assent.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Freedom of Information Act 1982 commences on 22 October 1990.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commences on the specified date
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
premise text: The Act commences on the day after the day on which this Act receives Royal Assent.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Freedom of Information Act 1982 has effect from 22 October 1990 to an unspecified end date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During the specified period, the Act is in force
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The Freedom of Information Act 1982 has effect during the period commencing on the day after the day on which this Act receives Royal Assent.

22 Oct
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
note: Commonwealth Banks Restructuring Act 1990
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-3
schema version: 2

22 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-4
schema version: 2

22 Sept 1999 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-5
schema version: 2

22 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
note: Commencement of Freedom of Information Act 1982
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-6
schema version: 2

22 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-7
schema version: 2

22 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
note: Tax Laws Amendment (Confidentiality of Taxpayer Information) Act 2010
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-8-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-8
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

22 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-9
schema version: 2

22(1) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
note: Agency or Minister may prepare edited copy of document for access under section 11A.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to prepare edited copy.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(1) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted

22(2) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
note: Agency or Minister must provide edited copy to applicant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide edited copy.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(2) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted

22(3) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
note: Agency must provide written notice to applicant regarding edited copy and grounds for deletions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(3) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted

22(4) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
note: Exempt from section 26 decision unless applicant requests
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
modality: Deontic
operator: allows

23 Decisions to be made by authorised persons
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23(1) Decisions to be made by authorised persons
has part: 23(2) Decisions to be made by authorised persons
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
schema version: 2

23 July
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
note: Conditional commencement of Royal Commissions Amendment (Protection of Information) Act 2021
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-10
schema version: 2

23 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-2
schema version: 2

23 June 1994 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
note: List of employment services subject to consequential amendments
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-3
schema version: 2

23 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
note: Conditional commencement of the Ministers of State and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2000
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-4
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

23 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
note: Commencement of Intelligence Services Legislation Amendment Act 2005
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-5
schema version: 2

23 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
note: Tribunals Amalgamation Act 2015
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-6
schema version: 2

23 Aug
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
note: Conditional commencement of Judiciary Amendment Act 2015
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-7
schema version: 2

23 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
note: May 2016 (s 2(1) item 3)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-8
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

23 July
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (International Production Orders) Act 2021
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-9
schema version: 2

23(1) Decisions to be made by authorised persons
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70
note: Authorized persons can make decisions on behalf of the agency
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Decisions to be made by authorised persons

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision-making is within the authorized person's scope of authority
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Decision-making is within the authorized person's scope of authority
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: Authorized persons are acting within the scope of authority exercisable by them

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes the agency's permission for decision-making
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognizes the agency's permission for decision-making
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Authorized persons are acting within the scope of authority exercisable by them

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency permits the decision-making
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency permits authorized persons to make decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Authorized persons are acting within the scope of authority exercisable by them

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision-making diffuses to authorized persons
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Decision-making diffuses to authorized persons
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Authorized persons are acting within the scope of authority exercisable by them

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision-making is a recurring trace for authorized persons
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Decision-making is a recurring trace for authorized persons
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Authorized persons are acting within the scope of authority exercisable by them

23(2) Decisions to be made by authorised persons
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70
note: Authorized persons can make decisions on behalf of specified courts, tribunals, authorities, or bodies.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Decisions to be made by authorised persons

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to act on behalf of others.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(2) Decisions to be made by authorised persons

24 Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24(1) Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
has part: 24(2) Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 May
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
note: Commencement of Defence Legislation Amendment Act 1990
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies temporal interval for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

24 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
note: Prime Minister and Cabinet (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1994
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Dec

24 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-4
schema version: 2

24 Sept 2007 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-5
schema version: 2

24 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-6
schema version: 2

24(1) Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70
note: Agency or Minister may refuse to give access to document after consultation process.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by agency or Minister.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

24(2) Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70
note: Agency or Minister may treat 2 or more requests as a single request if satisfied that the requests relate to the same document or documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(2) Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.

24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
has part: 24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24a
schema version: 2

24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
note: Refusal of document access request
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and agency's possession
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (i) is in the agency’s or Minister’s possession but cannot be found;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister may refuse request
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) An agency or Minister may refuse a request for access to a document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not

24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
note: Agency may refuse request if document cannot be found or received through contractual measures.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the agency has taken all reasonable steps to receive the document in accordance with those contractual measures.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and receipt.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (b) the agency has not received the document;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the agency has taken all reasonable steps to receive the document in accordance with those contractual measures.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Agency's refusal is implied by lack of receipt.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (b) the agency has not received the document;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the agency has not received the document;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has a duty to refuse request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) An agency may refuse a request for access to a document if...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the agency has taken all reasonable steps to receive the document in accordance with those contractual measures.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Document receipt is propagated through contractual measures.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (a) in order to comply with section 6C, the agency has taken contractual measures to ensure that it receives the document;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the agency has taken all reasonable steps to receive the document in accordance with those contractual measures.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Agency's efforts to receive document are recurring.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (b) the agency has not received the document;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not

24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.71
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
has part: 24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
has part: 24AA(3) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24aa
schema version: 2

24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.71
note: Request for document processing must not substantially divert agency resources or interfere with Minister's functions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on diversion of agency resources
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (i) in the case of an agency—would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency from its other operations;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on interference with Minister's functions
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (ii) in the case of a Minister—would substantially and unreasonably interfere with the performance of the Minister’s functions;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?

24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.71
note: Agency or Minister must consider resources for identifying, locating, or collating documents within a filing system.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consideration of resources is related to the use of time for identifying, locating, or collating documents.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: Resources that would have to be used for identifying, locating, or collating documents within a filing system.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Consideration of resources is related to the processing or analysis of information.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: Resources that would have to be used for making a copy, or an edited copy, of a document.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider resources.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Resources for identifying, locating, or collating documents within a filing system.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consideration of resources is related to the spread or dissemination of information.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: Resources that would have to be used for consulting with any person or body in relation to the request.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Consideration of resources is related to the use of time for examining documents.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: Resources that would have to be used for examining a document.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?

24AA(3) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.71
note: Must not have regard to certain factors when deciding on a practical refusal reason.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Allen interval application for prohibition on considering factors
modality: AllenInterval
operator: DoesNotOverlapWith
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI logic application for prohibition on considering factors
modality: CogAI
operator: DoesNotInfluence
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on considering certain factors
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotHaveRegardTo
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion logic application for prohibition on considering factors
modality: Diffusion
operator: DoesNotSpreadTo
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Linear logic application for prohibition on considering factors
modality: LinearLogic
operator: MustNotConsider
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:

24AB What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(3) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(5) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(6) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(7) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(8) What is a request consultation process?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab
schema version: 2

24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
note: Requirement to notify
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?

24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
description: yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
note: Agency must provide written notice with details of refusal reason and contact person.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?

24AB(3) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
note: Agency must assist applicant to revise request if contact made during consultation period.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency must take reasonable steps to assist applicant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has a duty to assist applicant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Applicant contacts contact person during consultation period.

24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
note: Provide reasonable opportunity to consult with contact person and assist applicant in revising request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide reasonable opportunity for consultation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of provision as a duty
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?

24AB(5) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
note: Applicant may agree to extend consultation period
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend consultation period
modality: Deontic
operator: May

24AB(6) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
note: Must provide written notice to agency or Minister before end of consultation period.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AB(6) What is a request consultation process?

24AB(7) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
note: Failure to consult during the consultation period results in withdrawal of request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation period overlaps with the processing period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consultation period disregarded in calculating processing period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The consultation period is disregarded in calculating the processing period.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The request is recognized as withdrawn due to a lack of consultation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Request is recognized as withdrawn due to lack of consultation.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The request is taken to have been withdrawn under subsection (6) at the end of the consultation period if...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to do so results in withdrawal of request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult during the consultation period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The applicant must consult with the contact person during the consultation period.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The request is withdrawn due to a lack of consultation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Request is withdrawn due to lack of consultation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The request is taken to have been withdrawn under subsection (6) at the end of the consultation period if...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conditions must be met for the consultation period to end.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Consultation period ends when conditions are met.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: The consultation period ends at the end of the specified time period.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AB(7) What is a request consultation process?

24AB(8) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
note: Agency or Minister must notify applicant of decision within 30 days after request is made.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The period starting on the day an applicant is given a notice under subsection (2) and ending on the day the applicant does one of the things mentioned in paragraph (6)(b) or (c)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The period starting on the day an applicant is given a notice under subsection (2) and ending on the day the applicant does one of the things mentioned in paragraph (6)(b) or (c)
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must notify applicant of decision within 30 days after request is made.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The period starting on the day an applicant is given a notice under subsection (2) and ending on the day the applicant does one of the things mentioned in paragraph (6)(b) or (c)
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The period starting on the day an applicant is given a notice under subsection (2) and ending on the day the applicant does one of the things mentioned in paragraph (6)(b) or (c)
modality: LTL
operator: >=

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AB(8) What is a request consultation process?

25 Information as to existence of certain documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 25(1) Information as to existence of certain documents
has part: 25(2) Information as to existence of certain documents
has part: 25(3) Information as to existence of certain documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
schema version: 2

25 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
note: Reference to s 151(9) and Sch 4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-2
schema version: 2

25 Oct 1991
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
note: Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-3
schema version: 2

25 Nov
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
note: Sales Tax Amendment (Transitional) Act 1992
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-4
schema version: 2

25 Oct
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-5
schema version: 2

25 Oct 1996 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-6
schema version: 2

25 May
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-7
schema version: 2

25(1) Information as to existence of certain documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
note: No agency or Minister must provide information about the existence of a document if disclosure would exempt it.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 25 Information as to existence of certain documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

25(2) Information as to existence of certain documents
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
note: Agency or Minister must provide notice if a document exists but is exempt from disclosure.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 25 Information as to existence of certain documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25(2) Information as to existence of certain documents

25(3) Information as to existence of certain documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
note: Refusing access to document if it existed
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 25 Information as to existence of certain documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access refused
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Refuse access to document
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
premise text: Document would be exempt

26 Reasons and other particulars of decisions to be given
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.75
note: Notice of decision on document access request
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 May
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

26 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
note: Conditional commencement on July 1, 2006
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-3
schema version: 2

26 May
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
note: Schedule of commencement dates for certain items in Schedules 1 and 2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-4
schema version: 2

26 May
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
note: May be cited
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-5
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision-maker must provide notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26 Reasons and other particulars of decisions to be given

26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
has part: 26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
has part: 26A(3) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26a
schema version: 2

26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.76
note: Request for access to document must be made with consultation under section 26A
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access request must be made within a reasonable timeframe
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Request for access must be made within a reasonable timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (ii) access to the document would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest for the purposes of subsection 11A(5)

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access request must be made with consultation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for access must be made with consultation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: State may reasonably wish to contend that access would be contrary to public interest

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency or Minister must consider consultation before granting access
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider consultation before granting access to document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: State may reasonably wish to contend that access would be contrary to public interest

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency or Minister must consider public interest before granting access
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider public interest before granting access to document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (ii) access to the document would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest for the purposes of subsection 11A(5)

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State

26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.76
note: Consultation required before granting access to document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of decision without consultation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Decision to give access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State

26A(3) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.76
note: Agency/Minister must give written notice to State and Applicant after consultation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency/Minister must give written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

27 Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 27(1) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(2) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(3) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(4) Consultation—business documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
schema version: 2

27 Nov
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
note: Federal Airports Corporation Amendment Act 1990
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

27 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
note: Conditional commencement of Freedom of Information Amendment Act 1991
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-3
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

27 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-4
schema version: 2

27 Nov
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
note: Defence Legislation Amendment Act 2003
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-5
schema version: 2

27 May 2004 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
note: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Amendment Act 2005
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-6
schema version: 2

27 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-7
schema version: 2

27 Dec 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
note: Items 3 and 12
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-8
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes items 3 and 12
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

27(1) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.78
note: Access to documents is prohibited unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of access to documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(1) Consultation—business documents

27(2) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.78
note: Information about business or professional affairs must be provided.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(2) Consultation—business documents

27(3) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.78
note: Agency must consider certain matters when determining exemption contention.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to consider certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(3) Consultation—business documents

27(4) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.78
note: No access to document without reasonable submissions from person or organisation concerned.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of access to document without submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(4) Consultation—business documents

27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.81
curation status: Proposed
has part: 27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
has part: 27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27a
schema version: 2

27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.81
note: Agency must consult with the person concerned before granting access to a document containing personal information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation is required before granting access.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consultation must occur before granting access to the document.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Granting access to a document containing personal information.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consultation is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must consult with the person concerned.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request for access to a document containing personal information.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy

27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.81
note: Agency must consider personal information when determining exemption contention.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency considers the personal information between the time the person concerned was associated with the matters dealt with in the information and the present time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of personal information.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The agency must consider the personal information within a reasonable time frame.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency considers the personal information between the time the person concerned was associated with the matters dealt with in the information and the present time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of personal information.
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The agency must consider the personal information within a reasonable time frame.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must consider the personal information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consider personal information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Agency has a duty to consider personal information.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency considers the personal information between the time the person concerned was associated with the matters dealt with in the information and the present time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of personal information.
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The agency must consider the personal information within a reasonable time frame.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency considers the personal information between the time the person concerned was associated with the matters dealt with in the information and the present time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of personal information.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The agency must consider the personal information within a reasonable time frame.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy

28 Dec
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
note: Transitioning Act 1991
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Apr
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
note: Consequential Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

28 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
note: Sch 1 (items 1A, 37)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-3
schema version: 2

28 Oct
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2022
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-4
schema version: 2

28 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
note: Commencement of Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-5
schema version: 2

28 Nov
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
note: Conditional commencement on 1 Jan 2024
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-6
schema version: 2

28 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
note: Legislation history for Freedom of Information Act 1982
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-7
schema version: 2

29 Charges
type: Concept
description: written notice stating the applicant is liable to pay a charge, preliminary assessment of the amount of the charge, and basis for the assessment
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.83
note: Agency or Minister must give written notice to applicant stating they are liable to pay a charge.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
schema version: 2

29 Feb
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
note: Broadcasting Services Amendment (Digital Television and Datacasting) Act 2000
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

29 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
note: References Sch 1 (item 2) and Sch 2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-3
schema version: 2

29 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
note: Conditional commencement of Aged Care (Single Quality Framework) Reform Act 2018
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-4
schema version: 2

29 Nov
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-5
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must give written notice to applicant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 Charges

3 Objects—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3(1) Objects—general
has part: 3(2) Objects—general
has part: 3(3) Objects—general
has part: 3(4) Objects—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Nov 1983
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

3 Nov 1993
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-3
schema version: 2

3 Aug 2000
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
note: Repeals Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Act 2000
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-4
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Act 2000
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

3 May 2006
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
note: National Health and Medical Research Council Amendment Act 50, 2006
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-5
schema version: 2

3(1) Objects—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
note: Require agencies to publish information and provide a right of access to documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Objects—general

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: require

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entailment of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: entails
premise text: (b) providing for a right of access to documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(1) Objects—general

3(2) Objects—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
note: Promote public participation in Government processes and scrutiny of activities.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Objects—general

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Promote public participation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The Parliament intends...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(2) Objects—general

3(3) Objects—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
note: Increase recognition of information held by the Government for public purposes.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Objects—general

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(3) Objects—general

3(4) Objects—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
note: Functions and powers given by this Act are to be performed and exercised as far as possible.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Objects—general

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(4) Objects—general

30 Sept
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
note: Citation using 'may be cited'
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
schema version: 2

30 May
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1994
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1994
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

30 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
note: Consequential Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-3
schema version: 2

30 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
note: Conditional commencement of Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measures No. 1) Act 2007
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-4
schema version: 2

30 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
note: Conditional commencement of Archives Amendment Act 2008
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-5
schema version: 2

30 June
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
note: Amendment of Public Governance and Resources Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2015
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-6
schema version: 2

30 June 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-7
schema version: 2

31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
has part: 31(2) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
schema version: 2

31 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-2
schema version: 2

31 Oct
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-3
schema version: 2

31 May
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
note: Sch 1, Sch 3 (items 7–14, 16–34, 39), Sch 4 (items 1–57, 65), Sch 6 (items 1–41) and Sch 7: s 2(1) items 2, 4, 6, 7
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-4
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 May

31 Mar
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 2 and 3: 1 Apr 2022 (s 2(1) item 1)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-5
schema version: 2

31 May
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-6
schema version: 2

31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.86
note: Applicant must pay charge within processing period
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Pay charge
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide payment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request received before processing period end

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing

31(2) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.86
note: Disregard certain days when calculating processing period for charge imposition
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: processing period length
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Calculate processing period during specified days
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: charge notice day to applicant payment day

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Disregard certain days when calculating processing period for charge imposition
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(2) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing

31A Access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.88
note: Access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents is not required.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

31B Exempt documents for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.89
note: A document is exempt if it meets certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31b
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from access
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Division 2 and Division 3 exemptions

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31B Exempt documents for the purposes of this Part

32 Interpretation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.89
note: Interpretation of exempt documents provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-32
schema version: 2

33 Documents affecting national security, defence or international
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.91
note: Disclosure of certain documents under this Act is prohibited.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-33-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-33
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

34 Cabinet documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.91
note: A document is exempt if it was submitted to the Cabinet for consideration or proposed by a Minister to be so.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-34
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Documents created with this purpose are exempt
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines when a document is considered exempt due to its creation purpose
modality: AllenInterval
operator: was brought into existence for the dominant purpose of submission for consideration by the Cabinet
premise text: The Cabinet has the power to submit documents for consideration

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Submitted documents are exempt from certain rules
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines when a document is considered exempt due to its submission
modality: CogAI
operator: has been submitted to the Cabinet for its consideration
premise text: The Cabinet has the power to consider documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Documents submitted or proposed for submission are exempt
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts documents from certain rules
modality: Deontic
operator: is exempt from
premise text: The Cabinet has the power to submit documents for consideration

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Documents created with this purpose are exempt
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines when a document is considered exempt due to its creation purpose
modality: Diffusion
operator: was brought into existence for the dominant purpose of briefing a Minister on a document
premise text: Ministers have the power to brief each other on documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proposed documents are exempt from certain rules
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines when a document is considered exempt due to its proposal
modality: LTL
operator: is or was proposed by a Minister to be submitted
premise text: Ministers have the power to propose documents for submission

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Cabinet documents

37 Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.92
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37(1) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
has part: 37(2) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
has part: 37(2A) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
has part: 37(3) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-37
schema version: 2

37(1) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.92
note: Disclosure of certain documents is prohibited.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-37-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) disclose, or enable a person to ascertain, the existence or identity of a confidential source of information

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of sensitive information
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (c) endanger the life or physical safety of any person

37(2) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.92
note: Disclosure of certain documents is prohibited to prevent prejudice in fair trial or adjudication.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-37-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disclosure of lawful methods or procedures for preventing...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Discloses temporal overlap between exemptions and law enforcement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disclosure of lawful methods or procedures for preventing...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes exemptions in law enforcement.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A document is an exempt document if...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disclosure of lawful methods or procedures for preventing...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses exemptions in law enforcement.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...disclosure of lawful methods or procedures for preventing...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Discloses recurring exemptions in law enforcement.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (2) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(2) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public

37(2A) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.92
note: Person receiving protection under a program is considered confidential source of information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person receiving protection during the period is considered confidential source of information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between protection and confidentiality
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Protection under a program is given.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person receiving protection is considered confidential source of information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Protection under a program is given.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(2A) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public

37(3) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.92
note: Definition of law for the purpose of enforcement and protection.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-37-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term for legal purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Establishes a class hierarchy for law.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

38 Documents to which secrecy provisions of enactments apply
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.93
note: Definition of exempt document
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-38
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Documents to which secrecy provisions of enactments apply

3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3A(1) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
has part: 3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3a
schema version: 2

3A(1) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.14
note: Publication and access powers not limited by this Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has power to publish or give access to information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.14
note: The Parliament does not intend to limit or prevent the exercise of its power.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This limits the Parliament's power.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Parliament's intention is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Parliament does not intend to limit or prevent the exercise of its power.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This permits the exercise of the Parliament's power.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Parliament does not intend to prevent or discourage the exercise of its power.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The Parliament does not intend to limit or prevent the exercise of its power:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This allows access to information or documents.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Parliament intends to allow access to information or documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Whether or not access to the information or document has been requested under section 15.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This allows publication of information or documents.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Parliament intends to allow publication of information or documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Despite any restriction on the publication of the information or document under this Act.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This allows access to information or documents regardless of request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Parliament intends to allow access to information or documents regardless of request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Whether or not access to the information or document has been requested under section 15.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible

4 Interpretation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.14
note: Definitions for key terms in the Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Nov 1986
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
note: Conversion to Public Company Act 1988
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-2
schema version: 2

4 Nov 2005
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
note: Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Serious Drug Offences and Other Measures) Act 129, 2005
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-3
schema version: 2

4 Dec 2011
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-4
schema version: 2

4 Dec 2012
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-5
schema version: 2

4 Dec 2012 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
note: Amendment of Judicial Complaints Act 2012
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-6
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definitions for key terms in the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: section 3
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subsection 3(2) to (7)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Ombudsman Act 1976

42 Documents subject to legal professional privilege
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42(1) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
has part: 42(2) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
has part: 42(3) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-42
schema version: 2

42(1) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
note: Documents subject to legal professional privilege are exempt from production in legal proceedings.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-42-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Documents subject to legal professional privilege

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on parties to produce exempt documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

42(2) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
note: Waiver of legal professional privilege claim
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-42-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Documents subject to legal professional privilege

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) A document is not an exempt document...

42(3) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
note: Document containing operational information is not exempt under subsection (1) solely because of its operational nature.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-42-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Documents subject to legal professional privilege

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document is not exempt solely because of its operational nature.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Document is exempt under subsection (1)

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(3) Documents subject to legal professional privilege

45 Documents containing material obtained in confidence
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45(1) Documents containing material obtained in confidence
has part: 45(2) Documents containing material obtained in confidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45
schema version: 2

45(1) Documents containing material obtained in confidence
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
note: A document is exempt if disclosure would found an action for breach of confidence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Documents containing material obtained in confidence

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure must occur within a specific temporal interval
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: contains
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would found an action, by a person (other than an agency or the Commonwealth), for breach of confidence.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AI recognizes and maintains confidentiality
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes confidentiality
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would found an action, by a person (other than an agency or the Commonwealth), for breach of confidence.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document is exempt if disclosure would found an action for breach of confidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep confidential
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Disclosure would found an action for breach of confidence.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Confidentiality is maintained through diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of confidential information
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would found an action, by a person (other than an agency or the Commonwealth), for breach of confidence.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Confidentiality validation ensures compliance
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of confidential documents
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would found an action, by a person (other than an agency or the Commonwealth), for breach of confidence.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(1) Documents containing material obtained in confidence

45(2) Documents containing material obtained in confidence
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
note: Disclosure of certain documents is not a breach of confidence owed to a person or body other than specified individuals or agencies.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Documents containing material obtained in confidence

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure of the document is permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose certain documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to a document to which subsection 47C(1) applies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose certain documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The disclosure of the document would not constitute a breach of confidence owed to a person or body other than specified individuals or agencies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose certain documents in specific contexts
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The document is prepared by a prescribed authority or Norfolk Island authority in the performance of its functions

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose certain documents in specific contexts
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The document relates to the affairs of an agency or a Department of State

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure of certain documents in specific contexts
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The disclosure of the document would constitute a breach of confidence owed to a person or body other than specified individuals or agencies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(2) Documents containing material obtained in confidence

45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45A(1) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(2) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(3) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(4) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(5) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(6) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(7) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(8) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a
schema version: 2

45A(1) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
note: Definition of exempt document
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents

45A(2) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
note: Defines exempt documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents

45A(3) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
note: Disclosure of confidential request information is restricted.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure of request information is restricted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts disclosure of confidential information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
premise text: Confidential request made to Parliamentary Budget Officer.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(3) Parliamentary Budget Office documents

45A(4) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
note: Documents attached to exempt documents are not automatically exempt.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits automatic exemption of attached documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(4) Parliamentary Budget Office documents

45A(5) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
note: Information made publicly available by the Parliamentary Budget Officer is exempt from this section.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or in a statement made under subsection 64V(4) of that Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Information made publicly available during a specific time period is exempt from this section.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: under section 64U of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or in a statement made under subsection 64V(4) of that Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes exemptions to information made publicly available by the Parliamentary Budget Officer.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: under section 64U of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is exempt matter because of this section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts information made publicly available by the Parliamentary Budget Officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Information has been made publicly available by the Parliamentary Budget Officer:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or in a statement made under subsection 64V(4) of that Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about exemptions to the public.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: under section 64U of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or in a statement made under subsection 64V(4) of that Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates exemptions to information made publicly available by the Parliamentary Budget Officer.
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
premise text: under section 64U of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999:

45A(6) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
note: Information made publicly available by Senator or MP is exempt from confidentiality request
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Senator/MP obligation to provide public information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

45A(7) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
note: Disclosure of factual information is not exempt if it reveals a confidential request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure of factual information is not exempt.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose factual information
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (7) Information in a document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(7) Parliamentary Budget Office documents

45A(8) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
note: Definition of confidential request
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45A(8) Parliamentary Budget Office documents

46 Documents disclosure of which would be contempt of Parliament
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.97
note: Public disclosure of certain documents would be contempt of Parliament or court.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-46-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-46
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits public disclosure of certain documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
has part: 47(2) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
has part: 47(3) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47
schema version: 2

47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.98
note: Disclosures of trade secrets or commercially valuable information are exempt.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to keep trade secrets or commercially valuable information confidential.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable

47(2) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.98
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) for certain types of requests
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable

47(3) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.98
note: Defines what constitutes an undertaking for the purpose of section 47(3)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an undertaking that is carried on by the Commonwealth or a State; or an authority of the Commonwealth or of a State; or a Norfolk Island authority; or a local government authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies a class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (c) a Norfolk Island authority; or (d) a local government authority.

47A Electoral rolls and related documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.99
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47A(1) Electoral rolls and related documents
has part: 47A(2) Electoral rolls and related documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47a
schema version: 2

47A(1) Electoral rolls and related documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.99
note: Defines electoral roll and related documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47A Electoral rolls and related documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
premise text: (1) In this section:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines electoral roll and related documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: electoral roll means: (a) a Roll of the electors of: (i) a State or Territory; or (ii) a Division (within the meaning of the Electoral Act); or (iii) a Subdivision (within the meaning of the Electoral Act); prepared under the Electoral Act;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Electoral Act means the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: electoral roll means: (b) any part of a Roll referred to in paragraph (a).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (b) any part of a Roll referred to in paragraph (a).

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47A(1) Electoral rolls and related documents

47A(2) Electoral rolls and related documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.99
note: Defines what constitutes an exempt document under this section.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47A Electoral rolls and related documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or any other document that meets these criteria
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between documents
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: a document that was used to prepare an electoral roll; or a document that is a copy of a document referred to in paragraph (e)

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or any other document that meets these criteria
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Lists specific examples of exempt documents
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: The document is an electoral roll; or a print, or a copy of a print, of an electoral roll; or...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or any other document that meets these criteria
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Lists additional examples of exempt documents
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (i) is a copy of a document referred to in paragraph (e); or (ii) contains only copies of documents referred to in paragraph (e)

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or any other document that meets these criteria
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the conditions under which documents are exempt
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: (i) sets out particulars of only one elector; and (ii) was used to prepare an electoral roll

47B Public interest conditional exemptions—Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.101
note: Conditional exemptions for public interest
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47b
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exemption granted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Public interest exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Disclosure would cause damage to relations between the Commonwealth and a State

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47B Public interest conditional exemptions—Commonwealth-State

47C Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.101
note: Conditional exemptions for deliberative processes
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47c
schema version: 2

47D Public interest conditional exemptions—financial or property
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.102
note: Conditional exemptions for documents with substantial adverse effect on Commonwealth or agency interests.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47d-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47d
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on State to consider public interest when disclosing documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47D Public interest conditional exemptions—financial or property

47E Public interest conditional exemptions—certain operations of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.103
note: Conditional exemptions for certain documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47e
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditional exemptions apply to documents that overlap with agency operations
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to, do any of the following:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State obligation to provide access to conditionally exempt documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State prohibition on disclosing certain documents without public interest justification
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State obligation to provide access to documents that do not prejudice agency operations
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to, do any of the following:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditional exemptions repeat across agency operations
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: The document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to, do any of the following:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47E Public interest conditional exemptions—certain operations of

47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.103
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47f
schema version: 2

47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.103
note: Disclosure of personal information without consent is prohibited.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of personal information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Discloses personal information may be uncertain.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Uncertainty

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditionally exempt from disclosure.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.103
note: Agency must consider personal information when deciding whether to disclose a document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The agency must consider the temporal relationship between the document and the person's association with the matters dealt with.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) whether the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The agency must recognize the importance of personal privacy in its decision-making.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to consider personal information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the availability of the information from publicly accessible sources;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The agency must consider how the disclosure of the document would affect the person's privacy.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: (a) the extent to which the information is well known;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The agency must consider whether the person's association with the matters dealt with has changed over time.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (b) whether the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy

47G Public interest conditional exemptions—business
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.105
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47G(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
has part: 47G(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
has part: 47G(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47g
schema version: 2

47G(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.105
note: Conditional exemptions for business information disclosure
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47g-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47G Public interest conditional exemptions—business

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for conditional exemptions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >

47G(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.105
note: Exempts trade secrets and other information from subsection (1)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47g-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47G Public interest conditional exemptions—business

47G(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.105
note: Conditional exemption from subsection (1)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47g-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47G Public interest conditional exemptions—business

47H Public interest conditional exemptions—research
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.106
note: Conditional exemptions for research documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47h-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47h
schema version: 2

47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.107
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47J(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
has part: 47J(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
has part: 47J(2A) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
has part: 47J(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47j
schema version: 2

47J(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.107
note: Conditional exemptions for documents that could have a substantial adverse effect on the economy.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for conditional exemptions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy by: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Influences decision-making about conditional exemptions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Influence Decision-Making
premise text: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of documents that could have a substantial adverse effect on the economy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies documents as conditionally exempt based on their potential economic impact.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about conditional exemptions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring traces for conditional exemptions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.

47J(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.107
note: A substantial adverse effect on Australia's economy includes a substantial adverse effect on a particular sector of the economy or the economy of a particular region of Australia.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A substantial adverse effect on Australia's economy includes a substantial adverse effect on a particular sector of the economy or the economy of a particular region of Australia.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a particular sector of the economy; or (b) the economy of a particular region of Australia.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substantial adverse effect
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substantial adverse effect
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1),

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47J(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy

47J(2A) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.107
note: Norfolk Island is taken to be a region of Australia for the purposes of paragraph (2)(b).
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a duty to treat Norfolk Island as a region of Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47J(2A) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy

47J(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.107
note: List of documents subject to conditional exemptions for the economy
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy

48 Application for amendment or annotation of personal records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.109
note: Request for amendment or annotation of personal records
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-48
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to request amendment or annotation of personal records
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: None

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation to process request for amendment or annotation of personal records
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligationTo
premise text: State hasRightTo amendOrAnnotatePersonalRecords

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has permission to process request for amendment or annotation of personal records
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo
premise text: State hasRightTo amendOrAnnotatePersonalRecords

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 48 Application for amendment or annotation of personal records

49 Requirements of an application for amendment
type: Concept
description: yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.109
note: Application for amendment must be in writing and specify certain information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-49-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-49
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for amendment must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49 Requirements of an application for amendment

4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 4A(1) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
has part: 4A(2) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
has part: 4A(3) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
has part: 4A(4) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
has part: 4A(5) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a
schema version: 2

4A(1) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
note: ACT enactments are not enactments.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) ACT enactments are not enactments.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
modality: Deontic
operator: not

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4A(1) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to

4A(2) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
note: Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to be enacted.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The legislation is not enacted during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between enactments
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 and the Canberra Water Supply (Googong Dam) Act 1974 are not enactments.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The legislation is not enacted during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relation between enactments
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 and the Canberra Water Supply (Googong Dam) Act 1974 are not enactments.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The legislation is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of enactments
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 and the Canberra Water Supply (Googong Dam) Act 1974 are not enactments.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The legislation is not enacted during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relation between enactments
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 and the Canberra Water Supply (Googong Dam) Act 1974 are not enactments.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The legislation is not enacted during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between enactments
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 and the Canberra Water Supply (Googong Dam) Act 1974 are not enactments.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4A(2) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to

4A(3) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
note: Part IV, sections 29 and 30, subsection 63(2), section 66 and Division 5 of Part X are not enactments.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain legislation from being enacted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4A(3) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to

4A(4) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
note: Legislation under an Act or Ordinance is not considered an enactment.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for legislation under an Act or Ordinance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) Where the whole of an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment, an instrument made under it is not an enactment.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive artificial intelligence logic for legislation under an Act or Ordinance
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (4) Where the whole of an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment, an instrument made under it is not an enactment.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of legislation under an Act or Ordinance
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (4) Where the whole of an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment, an instrument made under it is not an enactment.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion logic for legislation under an Act or Ordinance
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (4) Where the whole of an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment, an instrument made under it is not an enactment.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Linear temporal logic for legislation under an Act or Ordinance
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (4) Where the whole of an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment, an instrument made under it is not an enactment.

4A(5) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
note: Instrument made under an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment unless for the purposes of another part.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This instrument is enacted during that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The other part of the Act or Ordinance is enacted during this period.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Unless for the purposes of another part, it is an enactment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: unless
premise text: Instrument made under an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4A(5) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to

5 Act to apply to courts in respect of administrative matters
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
note: A court other than a court of Norfolk Island shall be deemed a prescribed authority.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
schema version: 2

5 June 1997
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
note: Sale Act 1997
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-5-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-2
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: DEEMED

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Act to apply to courts in respect of administrative matters

50 Amendment of records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.110
curation status: Proposed
has part: 50(1) Amendment of records
has part: 50(2) Amendment of records
has part: 50(3) Amendment of records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-50
schema version: 2

50(1) Amendment of records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.110
note: Agency or Minister may amend record of information if certain conditions met.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-50-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Amendment of records

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the information has been used, is being used or is available for use by the agency or Minister for an administrative purpose.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Information has been used by the agency or Minister for administrative purpose.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Used for
premise text: (c) the information has been used, is being used or is available for use by the agency or Minister for an administrative purpose;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister may amend the record of information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister has obligation to amend record if conditions met.
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: the agency or Minister to whom such an application is made is satisfied that...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister may amend the record of information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister may amend record if conditions met.
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: (1) Subject to section 51C, where the agency or Minister to whom such an application is made is satisfied that...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister is satisfied that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must satisfy conditions before amending record.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (a) the record of personal information to which the request relates is contained in a document of the agency or an official document of the Minister, as the case may be;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the information is incomplete, incorrect, out of date or misleading.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Information is incomplete, incorrect, out of date or misleading.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (b) the information is incomplete, incorrect, out of date or misleading;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(1) Amendment of records

50(2) Amendment of records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.110
note: Agency or Minister may make amendment to records.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-50-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Amendment of records

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50(2) Amendment of records

50(3) Amendment of records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.110
note: Ensure amendment of records does not obliterate prior text.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-50-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Amendment of records

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must ensure amendment does not obliterate prior text.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

51 Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.111
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51(1) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
has part: 51(2) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
has part: 51(3) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51
schema version: 2

51(1) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.111
note: Agency must annotate document with statement provided by applicant
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide annotation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

51(2) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.111
note: Agency or Minister may consider statement irrelevant, defamatory or voluminous.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(2) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications

51(3) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.111
note: Conditional application provision
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 51 Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications

51A Requirements of an application for annotation
type: Concept
description: Statement by applicant specifying incomplete, incorrect, out of date or misleading information.
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.111
note: Application for annotation must be in writing and specify document containing personal information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51A Requirements of an application for annotation

51B Annotation of records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51B(1) Annotation of records
has part: 51B(2) Annotation of records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51b
schema version: 2

51B(1) Annotation of records
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
note: Agency must annotate document with statement provided by applicant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51B Annotation of records

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide annotation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

51B(2) Annotation of records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
note: Agency or Minister may exempt records from annotation requirements.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51B Annotation of records

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to exempt records.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51B(2) Annotation of records

51C Transfer of requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51C(1) Transfer of requests
has part: 51C(2) Transfer of requests
has part: 51C(3) Transfer of requests
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51c
schema version: 2

51C(1) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
note: Transfer of requests to another agency or Minister with agreement.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51C Transfer of requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Transfer of requests to another agency or Minister with agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51C(1) Transfer of requests

51C(2) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
note: Agency or Minister must transfer application to corresponding Department if it relates to a specified body or person.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51C Transfer of requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application must be transferred before the corresponding Department.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (c) to the Department corresponding to the Department of State administered by the Minister...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must transfer application.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Where an application is made under section 48 to an agency or Minister...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51C(2) Transfer of requests

51C(3) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
note: Agency or Minister must transfer application to other agency if conditions are met.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 51C Transfer of requests

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister to whom the application is made must transfer the application to the other agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application must be transferred if it originated in another agency with overlapping functions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: (b) is more closely connected with the functions of the other agency...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister to whom the application is made must transfer the application to the other agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Application must be transferred if it originated in another agency with overlapping functions.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
premise text: (b) is more closely connected with the functions of the other agency...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister to whom the application is made must transfer the application to the other agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must transfer application.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) Where an application is made under section 48 to an agency or a Minister...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister to whom the application is made must transfer the application to the other agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Application must be transferred if it originated in another agency with overlapping functions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information flow
premise text: (b) is more closely connected with the functions of the other agency...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister to whom the application is made must transfer the application to the other agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application must be transferred if it originated in another agency with overlapping functions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (b) is more closely connected with the functions of the other agency...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51C(3) Transfer of requests

51D Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.115
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51D(1) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
has part: 51D(2) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
has part: 51D(3) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51d
schema version: 2

51D(1) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
type: Concept
description: Notification of decision
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.115
note: Agency must notify applicant of decision within 30 days
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51D Notification etc. of a decision under this Part

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

51D(2) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.115
note: Notification of a decision under this Part
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51D Notification etc. of a decision under this Part

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification must occur within a specified time frame
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) Section 23 applies in relation to a decision on an application made under section 48.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification is justified by the need to inform
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rationale for notification
modality: Argumentation
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) Section 23 applies in relation to a decision on an application made under section 48.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification can be automated using AI
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence assistance for notification
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) Section 23 applies in relation to a decision on an application made under section 48.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 23 must be applied
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Section 23 applies in relation to a decision on an application made under section 48.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification must be communicated to relevant parties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of notification
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) Section 23 applies in relation to a decision on an application made under section 48.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51D(2) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part

51D(3) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.115
note: Notification of a decision under this Part
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 51D Notification etc. of a decision under this Part

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51D(3) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part

51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.115
note: Agency must make decision on application within 30 days.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51da-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51da-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51da-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision made on application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has a duty to make a decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Application received within 30 days.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51da-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation

51E Comments on annotations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.117
note: Agency or Minister may add comments to annotations.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51e
schema version: 2

52 Internal review of decisions—guide
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.118
note: Agencies must complete internal reviews within 30 days.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-52-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-52
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: within 30 days
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Agencies must complete internal reviews.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-52-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52 Internal review of decisions—guide

53 Interpretation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.118
note: Deems a claim that a document is exempt under section 33 or 34 as an obligation to acknowledge the existence of the document if it exists.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-53
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to acknowledge the existence of a document if it exists.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53 Interpretation

53A What is an access refusal decision?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.118
note: Definition of access refusal decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-53a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of access refusal decision
modality: Deontic
operator: =

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53A What is an access refusal decision?

53B What is an access grant decision?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.119
note: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-53b
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: MUST
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide access
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53B What is an access grant decision?

53C Internal review—who is an affected third party?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.121
note: Defines who is an affected third party for a document request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-53c
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53C Internal review—who is an affected third party?

54 Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision
has part: 54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54
schema version: 2

54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
note: Agency must provide access to document if refusal decision is made by someone other than the principal officer or responsible Minister.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Internal review—access refusal decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide access to document.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision

54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
note: Applicant may apply for internal review of access refusal decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Internal review—access refusal decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply for internal review.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision

54A Internal review—access grant decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54A(1) Internal review—access grant decision
has part: 54A(2) Internal review—access grant decision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54a
schema version: 2

54A(1) Internal review—access grant decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
note: Agency must grant access to documents upon request
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54A Internal review—access grant decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency is required to make a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54A(1) Internal review—access grant decision

54A(2) Internal review—access grant decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
note: Third party may apply for review of access grant decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54A Internal review—access grant decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to apply for review
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54A(2) Internal review—access grant decision

54B Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54B(1) Internal review—application for review
has part: 54B(2) Internal review—application for review
has part: 54B(3) Internal review—application for review
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b
schema version: 2

54B(1) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
note: Application for internal review must be made within a specified time period.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for internal review must be made within a specified time period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54B(1) Internal review—application for review

54B(2) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
note: Agency may extend application deadline
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits agency action
modality: Deontic
operator: May

54B(3) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
note: Exercise of agency power to allow further application period
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between agency power and responsible Minister approval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (b) acting in accordance with arrangements approved by the responsible Minister or principal officer of the agency

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has the authority to grant an extension
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
premise text: (a) acting within the scope of authority exercisable by him or her

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has the authority to grant an extension
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: (b) acting in accordance with arrangements approved by the responsible Minister or principal officer of the agency

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of agency power to grant extension through responsible Minister approval
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (b) acting in accordance with arrangements approved by the responsible Minister or principal officer of the agency

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of agency power to grant extension
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (a) acting within the scope of authority exercisable by him or her

54C Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.123
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review
has part: 54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c
schema version: 2

54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.123
note: Decision on internal review
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review

54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.123
note: Agency must arrange for internal review of decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has a duty to arrange for internal review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review

54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(2) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(4) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(5) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(6) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(7) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(8) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d
schema version: 2

54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
note: Internal review deemed affirmation of original decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Internal review obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

54D(2) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
note: Agency must affirm original decision and notify applicant
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency's action overlaps with review period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between agency's action and review period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) Subject to this section: (a) the principal officer of the agency is taken to have made a decision personally affirming the original decision on the last day of the initial decision period;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency's action implicates applicant's rights
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of agency's action on applicant's rights
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
premise text: (b) notice of the decision is taken to have been given under section 26 to the internal review applicant on the same day.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency must affirm original decision and notify applicant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affirmation obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) Subject to this section:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency's action diffuses to applicant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of agency's action to applicant
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (b) notice of the decision is taken to have been given under section 26 to the internal review applicant on the same day.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agency's actions and reviews form a recurring trace
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of agency's actions and reviews
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (2) Subject to this section: (a) the principal officer of the agency is taken to have made a decision personally affirming the original decision on the last day of the initial decision period;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54D(2) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
note: Agency may apply for further time to deal with application.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits agency to request extension.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

54D(4) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
note: Allow further time for agency to deal with application
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: allow

54D(5) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
note: Imposing conditions on further time allowed for internal review
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Any condition imposed by the Information Commissioner is obligatory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to impose conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: impose
premise text: Information Commissioner may impose any condition

54D(6) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
note: Agency must comply with conditions imposed under subsection (5) within the further time allowed.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Agency's compliance is within the further time allowed.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must comply with conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54D(6) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

54D(7) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
note: No further time allowed after agency fails to comply with conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No further time allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency's failure to comply is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) does not make a decision on the request within the further time allowed;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54D(7) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

54D(8) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
note: Prevents Information Commissioner from allowing further time under this section in relation to a decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Action is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: No further time can be allowed

54E Internal review—decisions to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.125
note: Exemptions from internal review
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54e
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from internal review
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54E Internal review—decisions to which this Part does not apply

54F Review by the Information Commissioner—guide
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.126
note: Application for review of a decision by the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54f
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide an application for review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54F Review by the Information Commissioner—guide

54G Key concepts—what is an IC review?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.128
note: Defines IC review and its meaning.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54g-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54g
schema version: 2

54H Key concepts—what is an IC review application?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.128
note: Definition of IC review application
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54h-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54h
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54H Key concepts—what is an IC review application?

54J Key concepts—who is an IC review applicant?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.128
note: Defines who is an IC review applicant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54j-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54j
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54J Key concepts—who is an IC review applicant?

54K Key concepts—what is an IC reviewable decision?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.128
note: Defines IC reviewable decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54k-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54k
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54k-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54K Key concepts—what is an IC reviewable decision?

54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
has part: 54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
has part: 54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l
schema version: 2

54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
note: Application for review of access refusal decisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
note: Access refusal decisions are subject to internal review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide access refusal decision subject to internal review.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
note: Application for IC review may be made by or on behalf of the person who made the request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make application
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions

54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
has part: 54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m
schema version: 2

54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
note: Application for review of access grant decisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to apply for review
modality: Deontic
operator: apply

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Possibility of review
modality: Epistemic
operator: possibility

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions

54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
note: Decision to affirm original access grant decision if no internal review decision within 30 days
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Affirmation obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions

54N IC review applications—application
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.131
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54N(1) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(2) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(3) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(4) IC review applications—application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n
schema version: 2

54N(1) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
description: Details on notice delivery, copy of relevant notice
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.131
note: Application must provide details on notice delivery and copy of relevant notice.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54N IC review applications—application

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must provide details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54N(2) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.131
note: Must provide particulars of basis for dispute
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54N IC review applications—application

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54N(3) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.131
note: Office must provide assistance to prepare IC review application.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54N IC review applications—application

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54N(3) IC review applications—application

54N(4) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.131
note: Must send IC review application to Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54N IC review applications—application

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to send application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54N(4) IC review applications—application

54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p
schema version: 2

54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
note: Notify affected third parties of non-access to documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
note: Notify affected third party upon document of application.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify affected third party.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
note: Notify Information Commissioner of notice
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third

54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 54Q(3) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q
schema version: 2

54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
note: Not giving IC review applications under certain circumstances.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: This section applies when IC review applications are related to documents with consultation requirements
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: This section applies when IC review applications are related to documents with consultation requirements
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to give IC review applications
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: This section applies when IC review applications are related to documents with consultation requirements
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: This section applies when IC review applications are related to documents with consultation requirements
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving

54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
note: Agency or Minister not required to notify affected third party under certain circumstances.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No notification required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from notification
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Agency or Minister applies for order

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving

54Q(3) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
note: Notifying an affected third party would prejudice certain activities.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notifying would prejudice...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prejudice investigation or enforcement
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) prejudice the conduct of an investigation...

54R IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.133
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54R(1) IC review applications—withdrawal
has part: 54R(2) IC review applications—withdrawal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r
schema version: 2

54R(1) IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.133
note: Withdrawal of IC review application
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54R IC review applications—withdrawal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits withdrawal
modality: Deontic
operator: May

54R(2) IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.133
note: Withdrawal of IC review application is taken never to have been made.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54R IC review applications—withdrawal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of IC review application withdrawal
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

54S IC review applications—time limits
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.133
note: IC review application must be made within a certain time limit
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54s-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54s-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54s
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be made within a certain time limit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54s-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54S IC review applications—time limits

54T IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54T(1) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(2) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(4) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(6) IC review applications—extension of time
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t
schema version: 2

54T(1) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
note: Application for extension of time for IC review application
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

54T(2) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
note: Extension of time for IC review applications may be granted.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting extension of time is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
note: Extension of time for making IC review application
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allowance of extension
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time

54T(4) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
note: Must give notice of application to affected persons
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...give notice of the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notice must be given before review determination
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (4) Before determining an application under subsection (1),...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...give notice of the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Information Commissioner may require...

54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
description: Reasonable opportunity to be heard
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
note: Must notify the Information Commissioner within a time limit
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a reasonable opportunity to be heard
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time

54T(6) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
note: Must give IC review applicant and person to whom notice has been given a reasonable opportunity to present their cases before determining the application.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The time period between giving notice and determining the application is a temporal interval that must be considered.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must give IC review applicant and person to whom notice has been given a reasonable opportunity to present their cases before determining the application.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54U Decision to review—interpretation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.136
note: Applies to a part of an IC review application
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54u-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54u
schema version: 2

54V Decision to review—preliminary inquiries
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.136
note: Inquiries for IC review determination
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54v-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54v-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54v
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Duty to determine IC review
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inquire
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Information Commissioner may make inquiries

54W Decision to review—discretion not to review
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.136
note: Decision not to review IC review application under certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54w
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on frivolous IC review applications
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Information Commissioner may decide not to continue IC review under certain conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Information Commissioner must contact IC review applicant after making reasonable attempts
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.137
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54X(1) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(2) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(4) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x
schema version: 2

54X(1) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.137
note: Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to undertake an IC review
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to

54X(2) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
description: Decision notice
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.137
note: Notify review parties of decision in writing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must notify...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.137
note: Notice must state reasons for Information Commissioner's decision and application details.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state reasons for Information Commissioner's decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to

54X(4) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.137
note: Exempt matter and certain document information cannot be included in the notice.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempt matter and certain document information cannot be included in the notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

54Y Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.138
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54Y(1) Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
has part: 54Y(2) Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54y
schema version: 2

54Y(1) Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.138
note: Agency or Minister must review actual decision after IC review has been made.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54Y Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) a person makes an IC review application for review of the deemed decision;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between IC review application and Information Commissioner's decision.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) a person makes an IC review application for review of the deemed decision;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must review actual decision after IC review has been made.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) the Information Commissioner has not made a decision under section 54W (decision not to review) or 55K (decision on review) in relation to the deemed decision;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must review actual decision after IC review has been made.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) the Information Commissioner has not made a decision under section 54W (decision not to review) or 55K (decision on review) in relation to the deemed decision;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) subsection 15AC(7), 51DA(6) or 54D(6) applies in relation to a decision (the actual decision) made by the agency or Minister.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between actual decision and Information Commissioner's decision.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (d) subsection 15AC(7), 51DA(6) or 54D(6) applies in relation to a decision (the actual decision) made by the agency or Minister.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54Y(1) Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has

54Y(2) Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.138
note: Must deal with IC review application as if it were an IC review application
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54y-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54Y Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must deal with IC review application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

54Z Procedure in IC review—general notice requirement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.139
note: Information Commissioner must inform person, agency or Minister who made the decision before undertaking IC review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54z-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54z-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54z
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54z-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55 Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.139
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55(1) Procedure in IC review—general
has part: 55(2) Procedure in IC review—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55
schema version: 2

55(1) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.139
note: The Information Commissioner may review an IC reviewable decision without holding a hearing under certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

55(2) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.139
note: The Information Commissioner may conduct an IC review in whatever way he or she considers appropriate.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may conduct an IC review.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The IC review is a part of the procedure in IC review—general.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(2) Procedure in IC review—general

55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55A(1) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
has part: 55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
has part: 55A(3) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a
schema version: 2

55A(1) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
note: List of parties to an IC review proceeding
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55A(1) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding

55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
note: Person whose interests are affected by IC reviewable decision may apply to be a review party.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding

55A(3) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
note: The Information Commissioner may make a person an IC review party by notice in writing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55A(3) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding

55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55B(1) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
has part: 55B(2) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b
schema version: 2

55B(1) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
note: Request for hearing during IC review
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request for hearing is permitted
modality: Deontic
operator: may

55B(2) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
note: Notify other review parties of application
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55C Procedure in IC review—representation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.142
note: May appear in person or be represented by another person
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55c
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to appear in person or be represented
modality: Deontic
operator: may

55D Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.142
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus
has part: 55D(2) Procedure in IC review—onus
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d
schema version: 2

55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.142
note: Agency has the onus of establishing that a decision is justified.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55D Procedure in IC review—onus

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has the onus of establishing that a decision is justified.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus

55D(2) Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.142
note: Affected third party bears the onus of establishing justification for a decision refusing a request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55D Procedure in IC review—onus

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The IC review overlaps with the access grant decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between IC review and access grant decisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: IC review is made under section 54M

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision refusing the request is justified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to establish justification
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Request was made under section 54M

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner should give a decision adverse to the person who made the request
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to establish justification for adverse decision
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Information Commissioner should give a decision adverse to the person who made the request

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision refusing the request is justified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to establish justification for adverse decision in IC review
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Decision refusing the request is justified

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The affected third party is involved in recurring traces of IC reviews
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of affected third party in IC reviews
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
premise text: Affected third party is involved in multiple IC reviews

55DA Decision-maker must assist Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.142
note: Agency or Minister must assist Information Commissioner in IC review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55da-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55da-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55da
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55da-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55da-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55DA Decision-maker must assist Information Commissioner

55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.143
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55E(1) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
has part: 55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
has part: 55E(3) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e
schema version: 2

55E(1) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
description: Statement of reasons
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.143
note: Agency or Minister must provide statement of reasons for decision if requested.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must provide statement of reasons for decision if requested.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.143
note: Agency or Minister must provide adequate statement of reasons upon request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision

55E(3) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.143
note: Provide adequate statement of reasons within specified period or 28 days.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide statement of reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55F Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.143
note: Review parties must agree on terms of a decision in IC review
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55f
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory agreement on terms of a decision in IC review
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the review parties reach agreement as to the terms of a decision on an IC review

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55F Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement

55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.144
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
has part: 55G(2) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g
schema version: 2

55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.144
note: Agency or Minister may vary access refusal decision during IC review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to vary access refusal decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access

55G(2) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.144
note: Agency or Minister must notify Information Commissioner of variation or substitution in access refusal decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must perform action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55H(1) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(2) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(5) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h
schema version: 2

55H(1) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145
note: The Information Commissioner may refer a question of law to the Federal Court of Australia.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer questions of law
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55H(1) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

55H(2) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145
note: The Information Commissioner may refer questions of law to.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer questions of law.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145
note: Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has authority
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAuthority
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Has jurisdiction
modality: LinearLogic
operator: hasJurisdiction
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has authority.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Has authority
modality: LinearLogic
operator: hasAuthority
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145
note: Jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia may be exercised by a single judge.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exercise jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

55H(5) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145
note: Must not give a decision before Federal Court of Australia makes a decision on the question.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between decision-making and IC review.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or make a decision, that is inconsistent with the opinion of the Federal Court of Australia on the question;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: IC review procedure contradiction.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Contradiction
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on giving decisions before Federal Court of Australia makes a decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner must not...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or make a decision, that is inconsistent with the opinion of the Federal Court of Australia on the question;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on proceeding in a manner inconsistent with Federal Court of Australia's opinion.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner must not...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not, for the purposes of the IC review:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: IC review procedure propagation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner...

55J Procedure in IC review—sending of documents to, and
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.146
note: Must send documents to Federal Court of Australia upon request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55j-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55j
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55K(1) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(2) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(6) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k
schema version: 2

55K(1) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
note: Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of undertaking an IC review
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) After undertaking an IC review, the Information Commissioner MUST make a decision in writing:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) After undertaking an IC review, the Information Commissioner MUST make a decision in writing:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must make a decision in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must vary the IC reviewable decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) varying the IC reviewable decision;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must set aside the IC reviewable decision and make a decision in substitution for that decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) setting aside the IC reviewable decision and making a decision in substitution for that decision.

55K(2) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
note: Information Commissioner may exercise powers of the person who made IC reviewable decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exercise power
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55K(2) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
note: Decision of the Information Commissioner has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Content of the decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Content of the decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Content of the decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Content of the decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Recurring trace: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Content of the decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
description: Statement of reasons, Statement of rights
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
note: Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner must include statement of reasons and rights to apply for Tribunal review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must include statement of reasons and rights to apply for Tribunal review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
note: Exempt matter cannot be included in a decision on IC review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of information inclusion
modality: Deontic
operator: not include

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

55K(6) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
note: Information Commissioner must provide a copy of decision to each review party.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of decision to each review party.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55K(6) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner

55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55L(1) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
has part: 55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l
schema version: 2

55L(1) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148
note: No power to give access to exempt documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving access to exempt documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55L(1) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt

55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148
note: No power to give access to exempt matter
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits giving access to exempt matter
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt

55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
has part: 55M(2) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m
schema version: 2

55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148
note: The Information Commissioner must decide to amend records under certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision must occur during these conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The decision must occur during certain conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The opinion was based on a mistake of fact or the author of the opinion was biased, unqualified to form the opinion or acted improperly in conducting the factual inquiries that led to the formation of the opinion.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must decide to amend records.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has a duty to make decisions under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: The decision requires an amendment to be made to the record.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision is conditional on these conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The decision is conditional on certain conditions being met.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The decision requires an amendment to be made to the record.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records

55M(2) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148
note: Cannot amend records in certain circumstances
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot amend records
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner must not...

55N Decision on IC review—obligation to comply with decision
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149
note: Must comply with decision on IC review
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55n-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55n-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55n
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p
schema version: 2

55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149
note: Agency must comply with section 55N
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149
note: Application for IC review may be made by the Information Commissioner or the IC review applicant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application may be made
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149
note: Court may make orders to secure compliance by principal officer or Minister.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149
note: Application under subsection (1) may not be made before the end of the time.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot make application
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency

55Q Decision on IC review—correction of errors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55Q(1) Decision on IC review—correction of errors
has part: 55Q(2) Decision on IC review—correction of errors
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55q
schema version: 2

55Q(1) Decision on IC review—correction of errors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.150
note: The Information Commissioner may correct obvious errors in decisions under section 55K of the Information Commissioner on an IC review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55Q Decision on IC review—correction of errors

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has a duty to correct obvious errors.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55Q(1) Decision on IC review—correction of errors

55Q(2) Decision on IC review—correction of errors
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.150
note: Correction of errors by Information Commissioner on application or initiative.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55Q Decision on IC review—correction of errors

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to correct errors
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r
schema version: 2

55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151
note: The Information Commissioner may compel a person to produce information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Compelling a person to provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of

55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
description: Documents
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151
note: Notice to produce documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for document production
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to produce
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of

55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to provide information or produce a document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner requires the person to provide information or produce a document.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of

55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
description: Information gathering powers—obliging production of
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151
note: Notice requirements for production of information
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notice requirements for production of information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of

55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
description: Information
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151
note: Committing an offence if a person fails to provide information
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of

55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55S(1) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
has part: 55S(2) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
has part: 55S(3) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s
schema version: 2

55S(1) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.152
note: Must permit access by those entitled to documents produced in accordance with a notice under subsection 55R(3).
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

55S(2) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.152
note: Must permit inspection of documents held by the Information Commissioner for IC review purposes.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to permit inspection
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55S(3) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.152
note: Permit inspection of documents at reasonable times.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: permit

55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55T(1) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(2) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(3) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(4) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(5) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t
schema version: 2

55T(1) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153
note: Principal officer of an agency or Minister claims a document is exempt.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is claimed to be exempt.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Claiming a document is exempt.
modality: Deontic
operator: claims
premise text: Section 55U does not apply to the document.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document is claimed not to be exempt.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Claiming a document is not exempt.
modality: Deontic
operator: claims
premise text: (b) section 55U does not apply to the document.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The document has no exemption status.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Claiming a document has no exemption status.
modality: Deontic
operator: claims
premise text: (b) section 55U does not apply to the document.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55T(1) Information gathering powers—production of exempt

55T(2) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153
note: The Information Commissioner may require a document to be produced for deciding whether it is an exempt document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has the power to require a document to be produced.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

55T(3) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153
note: Must return exempt document to person who produced it
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to return exempt document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55T(4) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153
note: The Information Commissioner may require the production of an exempt document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to produce information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

55T(5) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153
note: Access to document is restricted to the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts access to document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict

55U Information gathering powers—production of national
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national
has part: 55U(2) Information gathering powers—production of national
has part: 55U(3) Information gathering powers—production of national
has part: 55U(4) Information gathering powers—production of national
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u
schema version: 2

55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.154
note: IC review of a decision in relation to an exempt document under section 33, 34 or 45A.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national

55U(2) Information gathering powers—production of national
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.154
note: The Information Commissioner may only require the production of a document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to produce information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

55U(3) Information gathering powers—production of national
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.154
note: Require document production for inspection if exempt claim is disputed
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Information Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: require

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Requires evidence to be satisfied before requiring document production
modality: Epistemic
operator: satisfy

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Involves an ordered trace of document inspection
modality: LTL
operator: ordered

55U(4) Information gathering powers—production of national
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.154
note: Restricts access to exempt documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to exempt documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55V(1) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
has part: 55V(2) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v
schema version: 2

55V(1) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
note: Refusal of access to a document under section 24A
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies documents as accessible or not under section 24A using AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to a document under section 24A
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55V(1) Information gathering powers—further searches for a

55V(2) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
note: Agency or Minister must conduct further searches for a document upon request.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct further searches.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
has part: 55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
has part: 55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w
schema version: 2

55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to appear before the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: require

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
note: Notice must be in writing, specify time and place for compliance.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
note: Failure to comply with a notice requirement is an offence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (1); and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation: before the notice requirement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (1); and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: No CogAI logic applies.
modality: CogAI
operator: none
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (1); and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a notice requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (1); and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: No diffusion logic applies.
modality: Diffusion
operator: none
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person engages in conduct; and
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation: before the conduct.
modality: LTL
operator: before
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear

55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
has part: 55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
has part: 55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x
schema version: 2

55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.156
note: The Information Commissioner may administer an oath or affirmation to a person.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must administer an oath or affirmation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.156
note: The oath or affirmation must be true.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Oath or affirmation must be true.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.156
note: Failure to comply with oath or affirmation requirement is an offence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to comply is an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or

55Y Information gathering powers—no loss of legal professional
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.156
note: No loss of legal professional privilege when information is given, produced or referred to for the purposes of this Part.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55y-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55y
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55y-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55Y Information gathering powers—no loss of legal professional

55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.157
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
has part: 55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
has part: 55Z(3) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z
schema version: 2

55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.157
note: Protection from liability for good faith information gathering
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide information in good faith
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability

55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.157
note: Protection from liability for information gathering powers
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Civil proceedings do not lie against a person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the section applies, then...
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: This section applies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability

55Z(3) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.157
note: Protection from liability for information gathering powers
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the person to comply with this section
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

55ZA Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.158
note: Scope of Division
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55za-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55za
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55za-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55ZA Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.158
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55ZB(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZB(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZB(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb
schema version: 2

55ZB(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.158
note: Request for personal appearance and evidence from Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security before determining a document is exempt.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST request the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security to appear personally...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to request evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Information Commissioner must request the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security to appear personally...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security MUST give evidence on...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ...the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security to give evidence on...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST consider the damage that would, or could reasonably be expected to, be caused to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider damage to Commonwealth security, defence, or international relations
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ...the damage that would, or could reasonably be expected to, be caused to...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST consider whether giving access to the document in accordance with the request would divulge any information or matter communicated in confidence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider divulgence of confidential information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ...whether giving access to the document in accordance with the request would divulge any information or matter communicated in confidence...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST provide reasons for the determination that the document is not an exempt document under section 33.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide reasons for exemption determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ...the damage that would, or could reasonably be expected to, be caused to...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST consider the international relations of the Commonwealth.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider Commonwealth interests
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ...the international relations of the Commonwealth;

55ZB(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.158
note: Request for Inspector-General to appear and give evidence on potential damage or divulgence of confidential information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Inspector-General must appear and give evidence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Information Commissioner must request the Inspector-General...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Inspector-General must give evidence on the requested matters
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to appear and give evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Inspector-General must appear personally...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55ZB(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

55ZB(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.158
note: Agency must provide evidence before hearing Inspector-General's evidence
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55ZC Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
note: Must comply with request unless not qualified to give evidence
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zc-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zc
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55ZD(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(4) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(5) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(6) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(7) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(8) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd
schema version: 2

55ZD(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
note: Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must comply with a request under section 55ZB.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation: At
modality: AllenInterval
operator: AT

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a request
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55ZD(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

55ZD(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
note: The Information Commissioner must allow the Inspector-General to take possession of documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allowance of action
modality: Deontic
operator: allow

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55ZD(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

55ZD(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
note: Production of documents required by Inspector-General
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory production of documents
modality: Deontic
operator: require

55ZD(4) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
note: The Inspector-General may make copies or take extracts from documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make copies or take extracts.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

55ZD(5) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
note: Return original documents to the Information Commissioner or agency/minister after a reasonable period.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to return documents
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGATE

55ZD(6) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
note: Permits inspection of documents held by the Inspector-General.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: permit

55ZD(7) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
note: Permit to inspect document at reasonable times
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: permit

55ZD(8) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
note: The Information Commissioner must allow the Inspector-General a reasonable time to consider documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a reasonable time to consider documents.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
premise text: The Information Commissioner must...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55ZD(8) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—

56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56(1) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(2) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(3) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(4) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(5) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(6) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56
schema version: 2

56(1) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
note: Right to appeal on questions of law from Information Commissioner's decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information Commissioner's decision is subject to review
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: has right
premise text: Review party may appeal

56(2) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
note: Appeal must be instituted within a specified time frame.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be instituted
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) An appeal under this section...

56(3) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
note: Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The jurisdiction applies during appeals instituted under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Jurisdiction applies during appeals instituted under this section
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to hear appeals.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to hear appeals
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to process appeals.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to process appeals
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court has jurisdiction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear appeals
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to diffuse decisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to diffuse decisions
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(3) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

56(4) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
note: Jurisdiction to make findings of fact under section 56A
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Jurisdiction includes
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (3)

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subsubsection (3) included in subsection (4)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subsubsection
premise text: (3)

56(5) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
note: Must hear and determine the appeal.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to hear and determine the appeal.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

56(6) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
note: The Federal Court of Australia may not make certain decisions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

56A Appeals—Federal Court of Australia may make findings of fact
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.163
note: The Federal Court of Australia may make findings of fact in certain circumstances.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Court may make findings of fact.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The provision has a descriptive clause.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

57 Review by the Tribunal—guide
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.165
note: Application for review by the Administrative Review Tribunal
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-57
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 4 deals with the procedure to be followed in a review by the Tribunal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Division 3 sets out the powers of the Tribunal in a review.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 4 deals with the procedure to be followed in a review by the Tribunal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Divisional structure
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
premise text: Division 3 sets out the powers of the Tribunal in a review.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 6 deals with the circumstances in which the Tribunal may make recommendations as to costs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Divisional structure
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
premise text: Division 5 deals with ensuring that exempt matter that comes before the Tribunal is protected from disclosure.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Division 4 deals with the procedure to be followed in a review by the Tribunal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Division 3 sets out the powers of the Tribunal in a review.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57 Review by the Tribunal—guide

57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.166
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
has part: 57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
has part: 57A(3) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a
schema version: 2

57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.166
note: Application for review of decisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application may be made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply for review
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Person whose interests are affected

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are

57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.166
note: Application for review of IC reviewable decision must be made within a specified period.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make application within a specified period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are

57A(3) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.166
note: Part 5 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 does not apply in relation to certain decisions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the application of Part 5.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

58 Powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58(1) Powers of Tribunal
has part: 58(2) Powers of Tribunal
has part: 58(6) Powers of Tribunal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58
schema version: 2

58(1) Powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
note: Tribunal has power to review and decide on agency/minister decisions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Powers of Tribunal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Tribunal has the power to review and decide.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal has power to review and decide.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
premise text: Tribunal is a decision-making body.

58(2) Powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
note: Tribunal cannot decide access to exempt document containing exempt matter.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Powers of Tribunal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access to exempt matter is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal cannot decide access to exempt document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Exempt matter exists in the document.

58(6) Powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
note: Tribunal has power to determine charges payable under Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Powers of Tribunal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal has power to determine charges payable under Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(6) Powers of Tribunal

58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
has part: 58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a
schema version: 2

58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
note: Access to document is refused under section 24A.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches

58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
note: Tribunal may require further searches for document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches

58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58AA(1) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
has part: 58AA(2) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa
schema version: 2

58AA(1) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
note: The Tribunal may require an amendment to a record of an opinion if certain conditions are met.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendment must be made during the factual inquiries.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The amendment must be made during the factual inquiries.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The Tribunal's decision requires an amendment.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An amendment must be made if certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Tribunal has a duty to require an amendment.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: The Tribunal may make a decision that requires an amendment.

58AA(2) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
note: Tribunal cannot amend records under certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot amend records
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Multiple conditions apply
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
premise text: (a) and (b)

58E Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.170
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58E(1) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
has part: 58E(2) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
has part: 58E(3) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
has part: 58E(4) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58e
schema version: 2

58E(1) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.170
note: Production of exempt documents in Tribunal proceedings
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58E Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal requires production of exempt documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Require

58E(2) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.170
note: Produce exempt documents for inspection if not satisfied
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58E Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

58E(3) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.170
note: Tribunal must not permit access to exempt documents unless specified conditions are met.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58E Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on access to exempt documents
modality: Deontic
operator: must-not-permit

58E(4) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.170
note: Document must be produced to the Tribunal if satisfied
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58E Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Document production is between subsection (3) and section 60
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

6 Act to apply to certain tribunals in respect of administrative
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.32
note: Tribunals, authorities, and bodies specified in Schedule 1 are deemed prescribed authorities.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Dec 1988
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
note: Privacy Act 1988 commencement
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

6 Sept 2005
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
note: Sch 2 (items 90, 91, 729)
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-3
schema version: 2

6 Oct 2009
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
note: Amendment of offshore petroleum and greenhouse gas storage legislation
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-4
schema version: 2

6 Nov 2017
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
note: Establishment of the Australian Signals Directorate
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-5
schema version: 2

6 Mar 2020
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
note: Never commenced
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-6-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-6
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Never commenced
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-6-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LinearLogic
operator: !

6 Nov 2023
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-7
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of staff in the tribunal's prescribed authority
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: a registry or other office of or under the charge of a tribunal, authority or body so specified and the staff of such a registry or other office when acting in a capacity as members of that staff

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of certain offices from being prescribed authorities
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: the holder of an office pertaining to a tribunal, authority or body specified in Schedule 1, being an office established by the legislation establishing the tribunal, authority or body so specified in his or her capacity as the holder of that office

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of certain offices from being prescribed authorities
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: being an office established by the legislation establishing the tribunal, authority or body so specified in his or her capacity as the holder of that office

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Act to apply to certain tribunals in respect of administrative

60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
has part: 60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
has part: 60(3) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60
schema version: 2

60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
note: Applicability of section to proceedings under this Part.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to specified proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties

60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
note: Agency's decisions are binding on its representatives.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision is binding.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency's decisions are binding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A decision given by a person on behalf of an agency is taken to have been given by the agency.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The representative has permission to make a decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency's representatives can make decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) A decision given by a person on behalf of an agency is taken to have been given by the agency.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The representative has a right.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency's representatives have rights.
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: (2) A decision given by a person on behalf of an agency is taken to have been given by the agency.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency's decisions are part of its authority.
modality: Deontic
operator: Undertaking
premise text: (2) A decision given by a person on behalf of an agency is taken to have been given by the agency.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The representative is obligated to follow the decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency's representatives are obligated to follow decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A decision given by a person on behalf of an agency is taken to have been given by the agency.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties

60(3) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
note: List of parties to a proceeding before the Tribunal for a review of a decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The parties are as follows:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Parties to a proceeding are listed.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: The Tribunal must list the parties.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60(3) Procedure in Tribunal—parties

60A Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.173
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60A(1) Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
has part: 60A(2) Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60a
schema version: 2

60A(1) Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.173
note: Exempt document under section 33 must be disclosed in a proceeding before the Tribunal.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60A Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inspection agency has an obligation to disclose documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

60A(2) Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.173
note: Request for personal appearance and evidence from Inspector-General
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60A Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inspector-General must appear personally
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must appear personally
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request for personal appearance

60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa
schema version: 2

60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
note: Requirement to notify affected third party
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third

60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
note: Agency must notify affected third party upon request for document access.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must notify affected third party.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third

60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.172
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 60AB(3) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab
schema version: 2

60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.172
note: Not giving a document in relation to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A is an obligation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving

60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.172
note: No notification required under certain circumstances.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of notification
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving

60AB(3) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.172
note: Notifying an affected third party under certain circumstances may prejudice investigation, enforcement, or administration of the law.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Notifying an affected third party under certain circumstances may prejudice investigation, enforcement, or administration of the law.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Preclusion of notification due to potential impact on investigation
modality: LTL
operator: Preclude
premise text: Notifying an affected third party under certain circumstances may prejudice investigation, enforcement, or administration of the law.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60AB(3) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving

61 Onus
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.176
curation status: Proposed
has part: 61(1) Onus
has part: 61(2) Onus
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-61
schema version: 2

61(1) Onus
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.176
note: Agency or Minister has the onus of establishing that the decision is not justified.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-61-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Onus

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency or Minister has onus of establishing that the decision is not justified.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Agency or Minister must establish that the decision is not justified.
modality: Epistemic
operator: establishing

61(2) Onus
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.176
note: Affected third party bears the onus of establishing that a decision refusing to give access is justified or that the Tribunal should give an adverse decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-61-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Onus

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal overlap between proceedings and decision-making process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between proceedings and decision-making process.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Proceedings under this Part relate to decisions made under section 26A, 27 or 27A.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Onus of establishing justification or adverse decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to establish justification or adverse decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Affected third party is a party to the proceeding.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No obligation to provide justification or adverse decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No prohibition on establishing justification or adverse decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Affected third party is a party to the proceeding.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Diffusion of onus from Tribunal to affected third party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of onus from Tribunal to affected third party.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Tribunal has the onus of establishing justification or adverse decision.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Recurring trace of affected third party's involvement in proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of affected third party's involvement in proceedings.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: Affected third party is a party to the proceeding.

61A Modification of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.176
note: The Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 applies to proceedings under this Part as if a reference to the decision-maker in certain provisions of that Act were a reference to the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision imposes an obligation on the agency or Minister to make decisions in accordance with the specified provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The provision classifies the decision-maker as a party to be notified of application.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61A Modification of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024

62 Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.178
curation status: Proposed
has part: 62(1) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
has part: 62(2) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-62
schema version: 2

62(1) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.178
note: Exemption from Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-62-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the agent
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(1) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act

62(2) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
type: Concept
description: additional notices containing further and better particulars
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.178
note: Tribunal may make declaration if notice lacks adequate particulars.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-62-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal may make declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(2) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act

63 Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63(1) Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
has part: 63(2) Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-63
schema version: 2

63(1) Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
note: Tribunal must consider non-disclosure of certain matters when making orders.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-63-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Tribunal must consider non-disclosure during determination.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during determination
premise text: (1) In determining whether the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to make an order or orders under subsection 69(3) or 70(1) or (2) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, the Tribunal must have regard to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal has an obligation to consider non-disclosure of certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal has an obligation to consider non-disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) In determining whether the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to make an order or orders under subsection 69(3) or 70(1) or (2) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, the Tribunal must have regard to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Tribunal's consideration of non-disclosure is a trace during determination.
modality: LTL
operator: during determination
premise text: (1) In determining whether the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to make an order or orders under subsection 69(3) or 70(1) or (2) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, the Tribunal must have regard to:

63(2) Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
note: Tribunal cannot include certain matters in its decision or reasons.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-63-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Matter or information of a kind referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure of certain matters
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Tribunal's decision or reasons

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Absence of applicant or representative
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal may receive evidence or hear argument without applicant or representative present
modality: Deontic
operator: may receive evidence or hear argument
premise text: In order to prevent disclosure of certain matters

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Matter or information of a kind referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal cannot include matter or information of a kind referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b)
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot include matter or information
premise text: Decision or reasons

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Absence of applicant or representative
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Tribunal may receive evidence or hear argument without applicant or representative present
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
premise text: In order to prevent disclosure of certain matters

64 Production of exempt documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
curation status: Proposed
has part: 64(1) Production of exempt documents
has part: 64(1A) Production of exempt documents
has part: 64(2) Production of exempt documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-64
schema version: 2

64(1) Production of exempt documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
note: Tribunal must return exempt document to person who produced it, unless certain conditions apply.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-64-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Production of exempt documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal must not disclose or permit access to exempt document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

64(1A) Production of exempt documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
note: Inspection of exempt documents by Tribunal members or staff under certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-64-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Production of exempt documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to inspect documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

64(2) Production of exempt documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
note: Tribunal may not disclose exempt document contents to unauthorized persons.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-64-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Production of exempt documents

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

66 Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.184
curation status: Proposed
has part: 66(1) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
has part: 66(2) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
has part: 66(3) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-66
schema version: 2

66(1) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.184
note: Tribunal may recommend costs be paid by Commonwealth to applicant who is successful in review application.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-66-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal may make recommendation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66(1) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in

66(2) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.184
note: Tribunal must consider financial hardship, public benefit, commercial benefit, and decision reasonableness when making a recommendation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-66-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Tribunal considers time period for decision reasonableness.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (d) the reasonableness of the decision reviewed by the Tribunal.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal must consider certain factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66(2) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in

66(3) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.184
note: Minister may authorize payment of costs to an applicant
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-66-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66(3) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in

67 Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.185
curation status: Proposed
has part: 67(1) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
has part: 67(2) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
has part: 67(3) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
has part: 67(4) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-67
schema version: 2

67(1) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.185
note: Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-67-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67(1) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal

67(2) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.185
note: Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal from the time an appeal is instituted.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-67-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty to suspend the operation of a decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: stay

67(3) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.185
note: Stay continues until earlier of Federal Court decision or other determination.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-67-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal

67(4) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.185
note: Continuation of automatic stay on appeal
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-67-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal

68 Investigations and complaints—guide
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.187
note: The Information Commissioner may investigate an action taken by an agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-68-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-68
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Investigations and complaints—guide

69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
has part: 69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-69
schema version: 2

69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
note: The Information Commissioner must investigate a complaint.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-69-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to investigate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate

69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
note: Power to investigate agency actions under this Act
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-69-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency can be investigated
modality: Deontic
operator: can

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate

6A Official Secretary to the Governor-General
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6A(1) Official Secretary to the Governor-General
has part: 6A(2) Official Secretary to the Governor-General
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6a
schema version: 2

6A(1) Official Secretary to the Governor-General
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.32
note: Official Secretary to the Governor-General is exempt from this Act for administrative matters.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Official Secretary to the Governor-General

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This exemption applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: The Official Secretary to the Governor-General is exempt from this Act for administrative matters.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A(1) Official Secretary to the Governor-General

6A(2) Official Secretary to the Governor-General
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.32
note: Official Secretary to the Governor-General has possession of documents in certain circumstances.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Official Secretary to the Governor-General

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document was possessed during employment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Document was possessed during employment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Employed under section 13 of the Governor-General Act 1974

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document in Official Secretary's possession
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official Secretary has possession
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPossession
premise text: Employed under section 13 of the Governor-General Act 1974

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A(2) Official Secretary to the Governor-General

6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
has part: 6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c
schema version: 2

6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
note: Agency must provide service under Commonwealth contract
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide service
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts

6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
note: Agency must take measures to ensure receipt of document from contracted service provider or subcontractor.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Document received
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must take measures
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Contractual measure required

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts

7 Exemption of certain persons and bodies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7(1) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
has part: 7(1A) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
has part: 7(2) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
schema version: 2

7 Dec 1992
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-2
schema version: 2

7 July 1997
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
note: Conditional commencement of Judiciary Amendment Act 1999
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-3
schema version: 2

7 Dec 2006
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
note: Endnote 3—Legislation history
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-4
schema version: 2

7(1) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
note: Exempts certain persons and bodies from being prescribed authorities.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Exemption of certain persons and bodies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption occurs during the period when these entities would otherwise be prescribed authorities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between exemption and prescribed authority.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The bodies specified in Division 1 of Part I of Schedule 2, and a person holding and performing the duties of an office specified in that Division, are to be deemed not to be prescribed authorities for the purposes of this Act.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These entities are classified as exempt using AI.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies entities as exempt using AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
premise text: (1) The bodies specified in Division 1 of Part I of Schedule 2, and a person holding and performing the duties of an office specified in that Division, are to be deemed not to be prescribed authorities for the purposes of this Act.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These entities are exempt from being prescribed authorities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts entities from a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (1) The bodies specified in Division 1 of Part I of Schedule 2, and a person holding and performing the duties of an office specified in that Division, are to be deemed not to be prescribed authorities for the purposes of this Act.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption spreads through these entities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how the exemption is propagated.
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (1) The bodies specified in Division 1 of Part I of Schedule 2, and a person holding and performing the duties of an office specified in that Division, are to be deemed not to be prescribed authorities for the purposes of this Act.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption ends when these entities would otherwise be prescribed authorities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between exemption and prescribed authority.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (1) The bodies specified in Division 1 of Part I of Schedule 2, and a person holding and performing the duties of an office specified in that Division, are to be deemed not to be prescribed authorities for the purposes of this Act.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(1) Exemption of certain persons and bodies

7(1A) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
note: Exemption from the definition of agency for certain parts of the Department of Defence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Exemption of certain persons and bodies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts from definition of agency
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(1A) Exemption of certain persons and bodies

7(2) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
note: Exempts specified persons and bodies from the operation of the Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Exemption of certain persons and bodies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable during the period specified in Part II of Schedule 2.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the exemption applies.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The persons, bodies and Departments specified in Part II of Schedule 2 are exempt...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable during the period specified in Part II of Schedule 2.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the exemption applies.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) The persons, bodies and Departments specified in Part II of Schedule 2 are exempt...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Act does not apply to the documents referred to in that Schedule in relation to them.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts entities from an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (2) The persons, bodies and Departments specified in Part II of Schedule 2 are exempt...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable during the period specified in Part II of Schedule 2.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the exemption applies.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) The persons, bodies and Departments specified in Part II of Schedule 2 are exempt...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable during the period specified in Part II of Schedule 2.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the exemption applies.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) The persons, bodies and Departments specified in Part II of Schedule 2 are exempt...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(2) Exemption of certain persons and bodies

70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
curation status: Proposed
has part: 70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
has part: 70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
has part: 70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-70
schema version: 2

70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
note: Complainant may complain to the Information Commissioner about an action taken by an agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Indicates the relationship between actions or statements.
modality: Argumentation
operator: to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Indicates the subject of knowledge or inquiry.
modality: Epistemic
operator: about

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Expresses a temporal relation between actions.
modality: LTL
operator: complain

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
note: Complaint must be in writing and identify the agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
note: Office must provide assistance to formulate complaint
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints

71 Information Commissioner investigations—interpretation
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.190
note: Interpretation of Subdivision application to part of a complaint
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-71-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-71
schema version: 2

72 Information Commissioner investigations—preliminary inquiries
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.190
note: The Information Commissioner may make inquiries of the respondent agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-72-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-72
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72 Information Commissioner investigations—preliminary inquiries

73 Information Commissioner investigations—discretion not to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.190
note: Discretion not to investigate a complaint under section 70
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-73
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision to investigate overlaps with the action taken by an agency.
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the decision to investigate and the action taken by an agency
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The Information Commissioner may decide not to investigate...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action is taken by an agency in the performance of its functions or exercise of its powers.
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to investigate a complaint under section 70
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Information Commissioner may decide not to investigate...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission for the Information Commissioner to decide not to investigate a complaint under section 70
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The Information Commissioner may decide not to investigate...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It would be reasonable for the complainant to have exercised the right.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation for the complainant to exercise their right to review the action
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The complainant has not exercised...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The decision to investigate is until the complainant exercises their right.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the decision to investigate and the complainant's exercise of their right
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: The Information Commissioner may decide not to investigate...

74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.191
note: Transfer of investigations to Ombudsman
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-74
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Investigations can be transferred during the satisfaction of the Information Commissioner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Investigations can be transferred during the satisfaction of the Information Commissioner
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The Information Commissioner is satisfied that a complaint could be more effectively dealt with.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Ombudsman has jurisdiction over complaints
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Transfer of investigations implies that the Ombudsman has jurisdiction over complaints
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: The complaint could be more effectively dealt with by the Ombudsman.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The transfer of investigations and the jurisdiction over complaints are related concepts
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Transfer of investigations and jurisdiction over complaints are related concepts
modality: CogAI
operator: and
premise text: The Ombudsman has jurisdiction over complaints.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to transfer investigations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to transfer investigations
modality: Deontic
operator: should
premise text: The Information Commissioner is satisfied that a complaint could be more effectively dealt with by the Ombudsman.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The transfer of investigations and the satisfaction of the Information Commissioner are related conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Transfer of investigations and satisfaction of the Information Commissioner are related conditions
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
premise text: The Information Commissioner is satisfied that a complaint could be more effectively dealt with.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to

75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
curation status: Proposed
has part: 75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75
schema version: 2

75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
note: Information Commissioner must notify respondent agency in writing before beginning an investigation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
note: The Information Commissioner must provide notice if they decide not to investigate a complaint.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

75(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
description: Decision notice
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
note: Notify complainant and respondent agency of decision in writing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST notify...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

75(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
description: Reasons for decision
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
note: Notice must state reasons for decision.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reasons for decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state reason
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements

76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
has part: 76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76
schema version: 2

76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
note: Investigations must be conducted in private and as the Information Commissioner thinks fit.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to conduct investigations in private
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) An investigation must be conducted...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of

76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
note: The Information Commissioner may obtain information from any officer of an agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to obtain information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of

77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77
schema version: 2

77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
note: Authorized person may enter and remain at a place with consent.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
note: Authorized person may enter a place occupied by an agency or contracted service provider.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorized person has the power to enter a place.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
note: Authorized person may enter a place with consent from the principal officer or contracted service provider.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to enter a place
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
note: Must leave premises upon request
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorised person must leave the premises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must leave premises
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
note: General power to investigate
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
note: Authorized persons are defined.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or a higher position.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between positions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: An APS employee is performing the duties of an Executive Level 2, or equivalent, position...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an information officer or APS employee...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of authorized person
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: An authorized person is defined as...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the purposes of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Authorization by Information Commissioner
modality: Diffusion
operator: for
premise text: An APS employee is authorized by the Information Commissioner for the purposes of this section.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or a higher position.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between positions
modality: LTL
operator: within
premise text: An APS employee is performing the duties of an Executive Level 2, or equivalent, position...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to

78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.195
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(1) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
has part: 78(2) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-78
schema version: 2

78(1) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.195
note: Places where investigations are prohibited
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(1) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which

78(2) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.195
note: Prohibition on investigation without approval
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: authorised person must not enter or carry on investigation

79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196
curation status: Proposed
has part: 79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79
schema version: 2

79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196
note: Person must provide information to Information Commissioner during investigation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196
note: Notice to produce information during investigations.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to provide information or produce a document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has the power to require information or production.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196
note: The notice must be in writing and specify a place for compliance within 14 days.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The notice must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Compliance within 14 days is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: WITHIN

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196
note: Failure to comply with a notice requirement is an offence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a notice requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on failing to comply with a notice requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No permission granted for failing to comply with a notice requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No right granted for failing to comply with a notice requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: right
premise text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Undertaking to comply with a notice requirement is not explicitly stated.
modality: Deontic
operator: undertaking
premise text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production

7A Information publication scheme—guide
type: Concept
description: Information about the agency's operations, including operational information.
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.40
note: An agency must publish a plan and range of information on its website.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must publish information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7A Information publication scheme—guide

8 Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(1) Information to be published—what information?
has part: 8(2) Information to be published—what information?
has part: 8(3) Information to be published—what information?
has part: 8(4) Information to be published—what information?
has part: 8(5) Information to be published—what information?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Nov 1988
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
note: Consequential Provisions
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

8 Nov 2005
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
note: Amendment Act 2006
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-3
schema version: 2

8 Oct 2009
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-4
schema version: 2

8(1) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
description: Information that must be published
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42
note: Agency must prepare a plan showing information to be published.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must prepare a plan
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(1) Information to be published—what information?

8(2) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42
note: Agency must publish certain information
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for publication of information
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) The agency must publish...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide specified information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of agency's organisation and functions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
premise text: (a) the plan prepared under subsection (1);

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(2) Information to be published—what information?

8(3) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42
note: The Information Commissioner may make a determination by legislative instrument.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?

8(4) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42
note: Agency must publish other information held by the agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(4) Information to be published—what information?

8(5) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
description: True
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42
note: Agency must publish information about its functions and powers.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(5) Information to be published—what information?

80 Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.197
note: Information Commissioner may take possession, make copies, extracts, or hold documents for investigation purposes.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-80-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-80
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take action
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80 Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with

81 Information Commissioner investigations—exempt documents
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.198
note: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-81
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal application of sections 55T and 55U to investigations under this Part.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Application
premise text: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal application of sections 55T and 55U to investigations under this Part.
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Application
premise text: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of sections 55T and 55U to investigations under this Part.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal diffusion of sections 55T and 55U to investigations under this Part.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Application
premise text: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal application of sections 55T and 55U to investigations under this Part.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Application
premise text: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81 Information Commissioner investigations—exempt documents

82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.198
curation status: Proposed
has part: 82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
has part: 82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
has part: 82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-82
schema version: 2

82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.198
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to appear before the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may require a person to appear.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing, specifying time and place of compliance
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.198
note: Notice requirements for compliance with investigation
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.198
note: Failure to comply with a notice requirement is an offence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a notice requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if the person's conduct breaches the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage in conduct that breaches a notice requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: The person engages in conduct; and

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's conduct must not breach the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on engaging in conduct that breaches a notice requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's conduct must not breach the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to be free from unreasonable requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: right
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (1); and

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person's conduct must not breach the requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Undertaking to comply with a notice requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: undertaking
premise text: A person commits an offence if:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to

83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.199
curation status: Proposed
has part: 83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
has part: 83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
has part: 83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-83
schema version: 2

83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.199
note: Information Commissioner may administer oath or affirmation to a person.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May administer oath or affirmation
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
description: True answers
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.199
note: The oath or affirmation must be true.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Is within the interval of true statements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Oath or affirmation is a temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The statement must be made by the person taking the oath or affirmation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must provide true answers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Oath or affirmation implies truth-telling
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: The person taking the oath or affirmation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must provide true answers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory truth-telling
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person taking the oath or affirmation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.199
note: Failure to comply with oath or affirmation requirement is an offence.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between the requirement and the breach.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation; (b) the person engages in conduct; (c) the person’s conduct breaches that requirement.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches that requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty for a contravention of this subsection: 6 months imprisonment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conduct that breaches the oath or affirmation requirement is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The person's conduct breaches that requirement.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of the offence.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation; (b) the person engages in conduct; (c) the person’s conduct breaches that requirement.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of

84 Information Commissioner investigations—no loss of legal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
note: No loss of legal professional privilege
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-84-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-84
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal professional privilege obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-84-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 84 Information Commissioner investigations—no loss of legal

85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
has part: 85(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
has part: 85(3) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-85
schema version: 2

85(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
note: Protection from investigations for good faith provision of information, documents, or answers.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-85-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to protect individuals from investigations for good faith provision of information, documents, or answers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from

85(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
note: Protection from civil proceedings and liability for penalties.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-85-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Civil proceedings do not lie against a person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the section applies, then...
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Section applies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person is not liable for a penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the section applies, then...
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Section applies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from

85(3) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
note: Protection from investigation outcomes
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-85-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) This section applies...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(3) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from

86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(5) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86
schema version: 2

86(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
note: Notify respondent agency upon investigation completion
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between investigation and notification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must notify.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
description: Investigation results, investigation recommendations, and reasons for the investigation results.
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
note: Notice on completion of investigation results and recommendations.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state investigation results and recommendations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
note: Agency may provide comments on notice to Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide comments
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
note: The Information Commissioner must give a copy of the notice to the complainant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the notice to the complainant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

86(5) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
note: Information Commissioner must prepare a copy of the report to give to the complainant that excludes certain matters.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must prepare a copy of the report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(5) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion

87 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
type: Concept
description: True
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.201
note: Investigation results must be provided by the respondent agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-87-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-87
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide investigation results.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the

88 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.202
note: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-88
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recommendations are made during the investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Recommendations are made during the investigation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The investigation recommendations, in relation to the investigation...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner believes that the respondent agency ought to implement the investigation recommendations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to implement investigation recommendations.
modality: Deontic
operator: ought
premise text: The respondent agency ought to implement the investigation recommendations.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the

89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.202
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
has part: 89(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
has part: 89(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89
schema version: 2

89(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.202
note: Agency must take adequate action to implement investigation recommendations.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits agency from failing to take adequate action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the Information Commissioner completes an investigation;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits agency from failing to take adequate action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the Information Commissioner gives an agency a notice under section 86;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must implement investigation recommendations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits agency from failing to implement investigation recommendations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the Information Commissioner completes an investigation;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits agency from failing to take adequate action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) the Information Commissioner is not satisfied that the agency has taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must implement investigation recommendations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits agency from failing to implement investigation recommendations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the Information Commissioner gives an agency a notice under section 86;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement

89(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.202
note: Respondent agency must provide particulars of proposed action to implement investigation recommendations.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide particulars of proposed action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement

89(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.202
note: Respondent agency must comply with implementation notice.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement

89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(5) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a
schema version: 2

89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203
note: Failure to respond to implementation notice within specified time or inadequate action must be taken.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must respond or take action within the specified time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time constraint for response or action.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (i) the agency has not responded to the implementation notice within the time specified in the notice; or (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate and appropriate action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of failure to respond or inadequate action on agency's obligations.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) the Information Commissioner gives an implementation notice to a respondent agency; and (b) the Information Commissioner is satisfied that...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate and appropriate action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to respond or inadequate action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the Information Commissioner gives an implementation notice to a respondent agency; and (b) the Information Commissioner is satisfied that...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate and appropriate action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of responsibility from Information Commissioner to agency.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Must
premise text: (a) the Information Commissioner gives an implementation notice to a respondent agency; and (b) the Information Commissioner is satisfied that...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency must respond or take action until the specified time expires.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal constraint for response or action.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (i) the agency has not responded to the implementation notice within the time specified in the notice; or (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203
note: The Information Commissioner must give a written report to the responsible Minister.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

89A(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203
note: Minister must receive report from Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report to Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89A(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203
note: Information Commissioner must prepare a copy of the report to give to the FOI Minister that excludes certain matters.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a copy of the report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

89A(5) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203
note: The FOI Minister must cause the report to be laid before each House of Parliament.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89A(5) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take

89B Information Commissioner investigations—requirements for
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.204
note: Agency must provide report with details of response to implementation notice and proposed action.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89b
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89B Information Commissioner investigations—requirements for

89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.204
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
has part: 89C(2) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c
schema version: 2

89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.204
note: Obligation to ensure documents are reported
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure reporting of documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring

89C(2) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.204
note: Exempt matter and certain information types cannot be included in a document.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of including exempt matter and certain information types.
modality: Deontic
operator: not

89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.205
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
has part: 89D(2) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
has part: 89D(3) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d
schema version: 2

89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.205
note: Restrictions on amendments to certain documents
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits amendments
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on

89D(2) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.205
note: Limitation on Information Commissioner investigations
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Information Commissioner investigations
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner may...

89D(3) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.205
note: Limitation on recommending amendment to a record
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...recommend that an amendment be made to a record
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot recommend amendment
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (3) The Information Commissioner must not...

89E Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.205
note: Protection from civil action for loss suffered by another person
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89e
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits civil action against loss suffered by another person
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: None

89F Complaints to Ombudsman—powers not affected
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.207
note: Ombudsman's powers not affected by this Part
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89f
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision in this Part occurs during the exercise of the Ombudsman's powers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between provisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: This Part does not prevent the Ombudsman from exercising powers or performing functions under the Ombudsman Act 1976.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Ombudsman's powers are excluded by this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of Ombudsman's powers
modality: Deontic
operator: excludedBy
premise text: This Part does not prevent the Ombudsman from exercising powers or performing functions under the Ombudsman Act 1976.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision in this Part occurs during the exercise of the Ombudsman's powers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between provisions
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: This Part does not prevent the Ombudsman from exercising powers or performing functions under the Ombudsman Act 1976.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89F Complaints to Ombudsman—powers not affected

89G Complaints to Ombudsman—report must not contain certain
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.207
note: Report must not include certain information
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89g
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exempt matter overlaps with reports during a specific time period
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Reports must not include exempt matter during a specific time period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exempt matter is classified as such in reports
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Reports must not include exempt matter that is classified as such
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Report must not include exempt matter or information about certain documents
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reporting of exempt matter and certain documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exempt matter infects other reports
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Reports must not include exempt matter that infects other reports
modality: Diffusion
operator: Infects
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Exempt matter is recurring in reports to the Ombudsman
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Reports must not include exempt matter in recurring reports to the Ombudsman
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89G Complaints to Ombudsman—report must not contain certain

89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.207
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
has part: 89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h
schema version: 2

89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.207
note: Ombudsman must investigate certain decisions not to grant access to documents.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by

89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.207
note: Right to seek reasons for decision not to give access to exempt document
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) seek from any person the reasons for a decision made under this Act not to give access to an exempt document
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to seek reasons for decision not to give access to exempt document
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: (2) The certificate does not affect the Ombudsman’s right to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) require any person to give any information or to answer any questions concerning the decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to require information or answer questions concerning decision
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: (2) The certificate does not affect the Ombudsman’s right to:

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by

89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.208
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
has part: 89J(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j
schema version: 2

89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.208
note: Limitation on amending records in a report under section 15 of the Ombudsman Act 1976.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...recommend that an amendment be made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for amendment consideration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The Ombudsman may, in a report under section 15 of the Ombudsman Act 1976...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...recommend that an amendment be made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to limit amending records
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: The Ombudsman may...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Mistake of fact implies amendment
modality: LinearLogic
operator: if and only if
premise text: (a) the opinion was based on a mistake of fact;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Bias or improper conduct implies amendment
modality: LinearLogic
operator: if and only if
premise text: (b) the author of the opinion was biased, unqualified to form the opinion or acted improperly in conducting the factual inquiries that led to the formation of the opinion.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in

89J(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.208
note: Limitation on amending records in reports under section 15 of the Ombudsman Act 1976
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...recommend that an amendment be made...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to not amend records
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: The Ombudsman must not...

89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(3) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k
schema version: 2

89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209
note: The Information Commissioner may declare a person to be a vexatious applicant.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of a vexatious applicant
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration

89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209
note: The Information Commissioner may make a declaration on the application of an agency or Minister.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration

89K(3) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209
note: Agency or Minister must establish declaration
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish the declaration within a certain timeframe.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration if they apply for it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of onus
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: If an agency or Minister applies for a declaration, they have the onus of establishing that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must provide evidence to support their application for a declaration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requiring evidence
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The onus of establishing a declaration spreads to other agencies or Ministers who may also apply for a declaration.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of onus
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO

89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209
note: The Information Commissioner must give written notice to the person in relation to whom the vexatious applicant declaration is made.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration

89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209
note: The Information Commissioner may make a declaration if the person has repeatedly engaged in access actions and abuses the process.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The person has repeatedly engaged in access actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (i) the person has repeatedly engaged in access actions;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The repeated engagement involves an abuse of the process for the access action.
modality: Deontic
operator: abuses
premise text: (ii) the repeated engagement involves an abuse of the process for the access action;

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration

89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.210
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
has part: 89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
has part: 89M(3) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m
schema version: 2

89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.210
note: A vexatious applicant declaration has effect in accordance with the terms and conditions stated.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Declaration has effect during declaration period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Declaration has effect during declaration period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Declaration made

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Declaration has effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration has effect
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
premise text: Declaration made

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration

89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.210
note: Refusal to consider certain requests or applications without written permission.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if made by the person without the written permission of the Information Commissioner.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for refusal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...without written permission.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of refusal on request or application
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...without written permission.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Agency or Minister may refuse to consider...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration

89M(3) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.210
note: Notify vexatious applicant of decision
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

89N Vexatious applicants—review by Tribunal
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.211
note: Application for review of a decision under section 89K
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89n-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89n
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for review
modality: Deontic
operator: may

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89n-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89N Vexatious applicants—review by Tribunal

89P Staff to hold appropriate security clearance
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.212
note: Staff must be given security clearance
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89p-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89p-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-89p
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide security clearance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89p-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89P Staff to hold appropriate security clearance

8A Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?
has part: 8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8a
schema version: 2

8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
note: Agency must provide operational information to the public.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8A Information to be published—what is operational information?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide operational information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Operational information is held by the agency.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasValue

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?

8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
note: Agency must publish operational information
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8A Information to be published—what is operational information?

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Operational information must be published during the agency's operational period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Operational information must be published and made accessible to the public using AI-powered tools
modality: CogAI
operator: must be published
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide operational information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Operational information must be published and made accessible to the public
modality: Diffusion
operator: must be published
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Operational information must be published during the agency's operational period
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?

8B Information to be published—accuracy etc.
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
note: Agency must ensure information accuracy, completeness, and timeliness.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8b
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must ensure information accuracy.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8B Information to be published—accuracy etc.

8C Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions
has part: 8C(2) Information to be published—restrictions
has part: 8C(3) Information to be published—restrictions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8c
schema version: 2

8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
note: Publication of exempt matter is prohibited.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8C Information to be published—restrictions

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits publication of exempt matter.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions

8C(2) Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
note: Restrictions on publication of information
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8C Information to be published—restrictions

8C(3) Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
note: Restrictions on information publication
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8C Information to be published—restrictions

8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8D(1) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d
schema version: 2

8D(1) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
description: true
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45
note: Agency must publish required or permitted information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8D(1) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45
note: Agency must publish information to the public and particular classes of persons or entities.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must publish information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
description: Information
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45
note: Agency must publish information on a website.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45
note: Agency may impose charge for accessing information
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has the power to impose a charge
modality: Deontic
operator: May

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45
note: Agency must publish details of charge for accessing information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide details of charge
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is

8E Information to be published—Information Commissioner to
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.46
note: The Information Commissioner must assist agencies in identifying and preparing required information.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8e
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8E Information to be published—Information Commissioner to

8F Review of scheme—Information Commissioner functions
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.47
note: The Information Commissioner has functions to review and monitor the operation of the information publication scheme.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8f
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8F Review of scheme—Information Commissioner functions

9 Review of scheme—by agencies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9(1) Review of scheme—by agencies
has part: 9(2) Review of scheme—by agencies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
schema version: 2

9 Mar 1982
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-2
schema version: 2

9 Mar 1988
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
note: Endnotes
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-3
schema version: 2

9 June 2006
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
note: Fuel Tax (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2006 commencement
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-4
schema version: 2

9 Oct 2009 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2010
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-5
schema version: 2

9 July 2024
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
note: Conditional commencement of the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service Amendment (Independent Parliamentary Standards Commission) Act 2024
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-6
schema version: 2

9(1) Review of scheme—by agencies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.47
note: Agency must review information publication scheme annually or within 5 years after last review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Review of scheme—by agencies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must perform review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(1) Review of scheme—by agencies

9(2) Review of scheme—by agencies
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.47
note: The first review under subsection (1) must be completed within 5 years after the day this section commences.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Review of scheme—by agencies

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be completed within 5 years
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

90 Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.212
curation status: Proposed
has part: 90(1) Protection against civil liability—general
has part: 90(2) Protection against civil liability—general
has part: 90(3) Protection against civil liability—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-90
schema version: 2

90(1) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.212
note: No action for defamation, breach of confidence or infringement of copyright lies against the Commonwealth, a Minister, an agency or an officer of an agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No action for defamation, breach of confidence or infringement of copyright.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90(1) Protection against civil liability—general

90(2) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.212
note: No action for defamation or breach of confidence against a person supplying a document to a Minister or agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect against defamation and breach of confidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90(2) Protection against civil liability—general

90(3) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.212
note: Publication of a document is covered by this subsection if it meets certain conditions.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publication of a document is covered by this subsection.
modality: Deontic
operator: covers

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90(3) Protection against civil liability—general

91 Protection against civil liability—particular situations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.213
curation status: Proposed
has part: 91(1A) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
has part: 91(1B) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
has part: 91(1C) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
has part: 91(2) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-91
schema version: 2

91(1A) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.213
note: Section 90 applies in relation to the giving of access to a document even if there has been a failure to comply with section 26A, 27 or 27A.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-91-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 91 Protection against civil liability—particular situations

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91(1A) Protection against civil liability—particular situations

91(1B) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.213
note: No action lies against the Commonwealth, an agency, a Minister or an officer for failure to comply with certain sections.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-91-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 91 Protection against civil liability—particular situations

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No action lies against the Commonwealth, an agency, a Minister or an officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91(1B) Protection against civil liability—particular situations

91(1C) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.213
note: Protection against civil liability for showing a document to certain individuals or organisations.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-91-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 91 Protection against civil liability—particular situations

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No action for defamation, breach of confidence or infringement of copyright lies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect against civil liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Showing a document to certain individuals or organisations.

91(2) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.213
note: Giving access to a document does not constitute an authorization or approval.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-91-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 91 Protection against civil liability—particular situations

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) The giving of access to a document (including an exempt document) in consequence of a request shall not be taken to constitute an authorization or approval:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of authorization
modality: Deontic
operator: not

92 Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.215
curation status: Proposed
has part: 92(1) Protection against criminal liability
has part: 92(2) Protection against criminal liability
has part: 92(3) Protection against criminal liability
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-92
schema version: 2

92(1) Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.215
note: Minister or officer not committing a criminal offence due to good faith actions under Part II or section 11C.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Protection against criminal liability

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minister's good faith actions overlap with the definition of a criminal offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Part II or section 11C

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Minister's good faith actions imply no criminal offence committed
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Good faith actions under Part II or section 11C

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's obligation to not commit a criminal offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Good faith actions under Part II or section 11C

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Minister's good faith actions diffuse the definition of a criminal offence
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Part II or section 11C

92(2) Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.215
note: Protection against criminal liability for showing documents to State or organisation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Protection against criminal liability

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed during this period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between showing documents and criminal liability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Showing documents to State or organisation for specified purposes.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect against criminal liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Showing documents to State or organisation for specified purposes.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92(2) Protection against criminal liability

92(3) Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.215
note: State has the same meaning as in section 26A.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 92 Protection against criminal liability

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State = section 26A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of State
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: State has the same meaning as in section 26A.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92(3) Protection against criminal liability

93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.215
note: Agencies must provide information to Information Commissioner
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner

93A Guidelines
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93A(1) Guidelines
has part: 93A(2) Guidelines
has part: 93A(3) Guidelines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a
schema version: 2

93A(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
note: The Information Commissioner may issue guidelines by instrument in writing.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Guidelines

93A(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
note: Regard must be had to guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Guidelines

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Guidelines apply between these provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Guidelines apply to specific provisions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Provisions include paragraph 9A(b), subsection 11B(5), and subsection 15(5A).

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Function/exercise of power is guided by guidelines.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Guidelines are related to the performance of a function or exercise of power.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of power under this Act.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to consider guidelines.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regard must be had to guidelines.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of power under this Act.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Function/exercise of power contains guidelines.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Guidelines are part of the performance of a function or exercise of power.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of power under this Act.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Function/exercise of power is validated by guidelines.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Guidelines validate the performance of a function or exercise of power.
modality: SHACL
operator: VALIDATES
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of power under this Act.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93A(2) Guidelines

93A(3) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
note: Guidelines are not legislative instruments.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 93A Guidelines

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) Guidelines are not legislative instruments.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
modality: Deontic
operator: not

93B Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93B(1) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(2) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(3) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(4) Review of operation of Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b
schema version: 2

93B(1) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
note: Minister must undertake review of Act's operation.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to undertake review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93B(1) Review of operation of Act

93B(2) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
note: Review of operation of Act must start within 6 months after commencement.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act

93B(3) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
note: The Minister must prepare a written report about the review.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a written report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

93B(4) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
note: Minister must lay report before Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

94 Regulations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.217
curation status: Proposed
has part: 94(1) Regulations
has part: 94(2) Regulations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-94
schema version: 2

94(1) Regulations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.217
note: Governor-General may make regulations not inconsistent with the Act.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-94-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Regulations

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94(1) Regulations

94(2) Regulations
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.217
note: Regulations cannot vary charge amounts based on agency or class of agency.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-94-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Regulations

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on variation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

9A Functions and powers under this Part
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.48
note: Must consider objects of the Act and guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9a
schema version: 2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the objects of this Act (including all the matters set out in sections 3 and 3A);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: Agency's consideration of Act objects.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part,

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the objects of this Act (including all the matters set out in sections 3 and 3A);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider objects of the Act and guidelines.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The agency must have regard to...

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner for the purposes of this paragraph under section 93A;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ...and guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner for the purposes of this paragraph under section 93A.

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the objects of this Act (including all the matters set out in sections 3 and 3A);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval: Agency's consideration of Act objects.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part,

1 January 2026
type: Concept
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

Freedom of Information Act 1982
type: Document
date: 1 January 2026
identifier: No. 3 of 1982
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU