Freedom of Information Act 1982
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 3 of 1982
date: 1 January 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 January 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sec-1-norm

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Citation of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Commencement date fixed by proclamation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Undertaking
logic summary: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Objects—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
has part: 3(1) Objects—general
has part: 3(2) Objects—general
has part: 3(3) Objects—general
has part: 3(4) Objects—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13

3(1) Objects—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-ss-1
part of: 3 Objects—general
note: Require agencies to publish information and provide a right of access to documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(1) Objects—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: entails
logic summary: Entailment of obligation
premise text: (b) providing for a right of access to documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(2) Objects—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-ss-2
part of: 3 Objects—general
note: Promote public participation in Government processes and scrutiny of activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(2) Objects—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Promote public participation
premise text: (2) The Parliament intends...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(3) Objects—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-ss-3
part of: 3 Objects—general
note: Increase recognition of information held by the Government for public purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-3-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(3) Objects—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3(4) Objects—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-ss-4
part of: 3 Objects—general
note: Functions and powers given by this Act are to be performed and exercised as far as possible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.13
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(4) Objects—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3a
has part: 3A(1) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
has part: 3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.14

3A(1) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3a-ss-1
part of: 3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
note: Publication and access powers not limited by this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.14
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has power to publish or give access to information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2
part of: 3A Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
note: The Parliament does not intend to limit or prevent the exercise of its power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.14
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(2) Objects—information or documents otherwise accessible
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Parliament's intention is an obligation.
premise text: The Parliament does not intend to limit or prevent the exercise of its power.
conclusion text: This limits the Parliament's power.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: The Parliament does not intend to prevent or discourage the exercise of its power.
premise text: The Parliament does not intend to limit or prevent the exercise of its power:
conclusion text: This permits the exercise of the Parliament's power.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Parliament intends to allow access to information or documents.
premise text: Whether or not access to the information or document has been requested under section 15.
conclusion text: This allows access to information or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Parliament intends to allow publication of information or documents.
premise text: Despite any restriction on the publication of the information or document under this Act.
conclusion text: This allows publication of information or documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Parliament intends to allow access to information or documents regardless of request.
premise text: Whether or not access to the information or document has been requested under section 15.
conclusion text: This allows access to information or documents regardless of request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
note: Definitions for key terms in the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.14
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definitions for key terms in the Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988
conclusion text: section 3
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: Ombudsman Act 1976
conclusion text: subsection 3(2) to (7)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a
has part: 4A(1) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
has part: 4A(2) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
has part: 4A(3) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
has part: 4A(4) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
has part: 4A(5) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29

4A(1) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a-ss-1
part of: 4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
note: ACT enactments are not enactments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 4A(1) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
conclusion text: (1) ACT enactments are not enactments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4A(2) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2
part of: 4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
note: Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to be enacted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 4A(2) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of enactments
premise text: (2) The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 and the Canberra Water Supply (Googong Dam) Act 1974 are not enactments.
conclusion text: The legislation is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between enactments
premise text: (2) The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 and the Canberra Water Supply (Googong Dam) Act 1974 are not enactments.
conclusion text: The legislation is not enacted during this period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between enactments
premise text: (2) The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 and the Canberra Water Supply (Googong Dam) Act 1974 are not enactments.
conclusion text: The legislation is not enacted during this period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between enactments
premise text: (2) The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 and the Canberra Water Supply (Googong Dam) Act 1974 are not enactments.
conclusion text: The legislation is not enacted during this period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between enactments
premise text: (2) The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 and the Canberra Water Supply (Googong Dam) Act 1974 are not enactments.
conclusion text: The legislation is not enacted during this period.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4A(3) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a-ss-3
part of: 4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
note: Part IV, sections 29 and 30, subsection 63(2), section 66 and Division 5 of Part X are not enactments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 4A(3) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain legislation from being enacted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4A(4) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4
part of: 4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
note: Legislation under an Act or Ordinance is not considered an enactment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of legislation under an Act or Ordinance
premise text: (4) Where the whole of an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment, an instrument made under it is not an enactment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for legislation under an Act or Ordinance
premise text: (4) Where the whole of an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment, an instrument made under it is not an enactment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Linear temporal logic for legislation under an Act or Ordinance
premise text: (4) Where the whole of an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment, an instrument made under it is not an enactment.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Diffusion logic for legislation under an Act or Ordinance
premise text: (4) Where the whole of an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment, an instrument made under it is not an enactment.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Cognitive artificial intelligence logic for legislation under an Act or Ordinance
premise text: (4) Where the whole of an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment, an instrument made under it is not an enactment.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4A(5) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5
part of: 4A Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
note: Instrument made under an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment unless for the purposes of another part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4A(5) Certain legislation relating to Australian Capital Territory not to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: unless
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Instrument made under an Act or Ordinance is not an enactment.
conclusion text: Unless for the purposes of another part, it is an enactment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which
premise text: The other part of the Act or Ordinance is enacted during this period.
conclusion text: This instrument is enacted during that period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Act to apply to courts in respect of administrative matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
note: A court other than a court of Norfolk Island shall be deemed a prescribed authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.29
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Act to apply to courts in respect of administrative matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: DEEMED
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Act to apply to certain tribunals in respect of administrative
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
note: Tribunals, authorities, and bodies specified in Schedule 1 are deemed prescribed authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.32
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Act to apply to certain tribunals in respect of administrative
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of staff in the tribunal's prescribed authority
premise text: a registry or other office of or under the charge of a tribunal, authority or body so specified and the staff of such a registry or other office when acting in a capacity as members of that staff
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Exclusion of certain offices from being prescribed authorities
premise text: the holder of an office pertaining to a tribunal, authority or body specified in Schedule 1, being an office established by the legislation establishing the tribunal, authority or body so specified in his or her capacity as the holder of that office
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Exclusion of certain offices from being prescribed authorities
premise text: being an office established by the legislation establishing the tribunal, authority or body so specified in his or her capacity as the holder of that office
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6A Official Secretary to the Governor-General
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6a
has part: 6A(1) Official Secretary to the Governor-General
has part: 6A(2) Official Secretary to the Governor-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.32

6A(1) Official Secretary to the Governor-General
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6a-ss-1
part of: 6A Official Secretary to the Governor-General
note: Official Secretary to the Governor-General is exempt from this Act for administrative matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.32
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(1) Official Secretary to the Governor-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from the Act
premise text: The Official Secretary to the Governor-General is exempt from this Act for administrative matters.
conclusion text: This exemption applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A(2) Official Secretary to the Governor-General
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2
part of: 6A Official Secretary to the Governor-General
note: Official Secretary to the Governor-General has possession of documents in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.32
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(2) Official Secretary to the Governor-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPossession
logic summary: Official Secretary has possession
premise text: Employed under section 13 of the Governor-General Act 1974
conclusion text: Document in Official Secretary's possession
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Document was possessed during employment
premise text: Employed under section 13 of the Governor-General Act 1974
conclusion text: Document was possessed during employment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c
has part: 6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
has part: 6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33

6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1
part of: 6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
note: Agency must provide service under Commonwealth contract
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6C(1) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2
part of: 6C Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
note: Agency must take measures to ensure receipt of document from contracted service provider or subcontractor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6C(2) Requirement for Commonwealth contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must take measures
premise text: Contractual measure required
conclusion text: Document received
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Exemption of certain persons and bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
has part: 7(1) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
has part: 7(1A) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
has part: 7(2) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33

7(1) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-ss-1
part of: 7 Exemption of certain persons and bodies
note: Exempts certain persons and bodies from being prescribed authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts entities from a duty.
premise text: (1) The bodies specified in Division 1 of Part I of Schedule 2, and a person holding and performing the duties of an office specified in that Division, are to be deemed not to be prescribed authorities for the purposes of this Act.
conclusion text: These entities are exempt from being prescribed authorities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between exemption and prescribed authority.
premise text: (1) The bodies specified in Division 1 of Part I of Schedule 2, and a person holding and performing the duties of an office specified in that Division, are to be deemed not to be prescribed authorities for the purposes of this Act.
conclusion text: The exemption occurs during the period when these entities would otherwise be prescribed authorities.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between exemption and prescribed authority.
premise text: (1) The bodies specified in Division 1 of Part I of Schedule 2, and a person holding and performing the duties of an office specified in that Division, are to be deemed not to be prescribed authorities for the purposes of this Act.
conclusion text: The exemption ends when these entities would otherwise be prescribed authorities.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Describes how the exemption is propagated.
premise text: (1) The bodies specified in Division 1 of Part I of Schedule 2, and a person holding and performing the duties of an office specified in that Division, are to be deemed not to be prescribed authorities for the purposes of this Act.
conclusion text: The exemption spreads through these entities.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
logic summary: Classifies entities as exempt using AI.
premise text: (1) The bodies specified in Division 1 of Part I of Schedule 2, and a person holding and performing the duties of an office specified in that Division, are to be deemed not to be prescribed authorities for the purposes of this Act.
conclusion text: These entities are classified as exempt using AI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(1A) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-ss-1a
part of: 7 Exemption of certain persons and bodies
note: Exemption from the definition of agency for certain parts of the Department of Defence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1A) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts from definition of agency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(2) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-ss-2
part of: 7 Exemption of certain persons and bodies
note: Exempts specified persons and bodies from the operation of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.33
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(2) Exemption of certain persons and bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts entities from an obligation.
premise text: (2) The persons, bodies and Departments specified in Part II of Schedule 2 are exempt...
conclusion text: The Act does not apply to the documents referred to in that Schedule in relation to them.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the exemption applies.
premise text: (2) The persons, bodies and Departments specified in Part II of Schedule 2 are exempt...
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable during the period specified in Part II of Schedule 2.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the exemption applies.
premise text: (2) The persons, bodies and Departments specified in Part II of Schedule 2 are exempt...
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable during the period specified in Part II of Schedule 2.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the exemption applies.
premise text: (2) The persons, bodies and Departments specified in Part II of Schedule 2 are exempt...
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable during the period specified in Part II of Schedule 2.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval during which the exemption applies.
premise text: (2) The persons, bodies and Departments specified in Part II of Schedule 2 are exempt...
conclusion text: The exemption is applicable during the period specified in Part II of Schedule 2.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7A Information publication scheme—guide
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7a
note: An agency must publish a plan and range of information on its website.
description: Information about the agency's operations, including operational information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.40
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7A Information publication scheme—guide
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must publish information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
has part: 8(1) Information to be published—what information?
has part: 8(2) Information to be published—what information?
has part: 8(3) Information to be published—what information?
has part: 8(4) Information to be published—what information?
has part: 8(5) Information to be published—what information?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42

8(1) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-ss-1
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?
note: Agency must prepare a plan showing information to be published.
description: Information that must be published
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(1) Information to be published—what information?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must prepare a plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(2) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?
note: Agency must publish certain information
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(2) Information to be published—what information?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide specified information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of agency's organisation and functions
premise text: (a) the plan prepared under subsection (1);
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for publication of information
premise text: (2) The agency must publish...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(3) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-ss-3
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?
note: The Information Commissioner may make a determination by legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-3-norm

8(4) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-ss-4
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?
note: Agency must publish other information held by the agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(4) Information to be published—what information?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(5) Information to be published—what information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-ss-5
part of: 8 Information to be published—what information?
note: Agency must publish information about its functions and powers.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.42
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(5) Information to be published—what information?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8a
has part: 8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?
has part: 8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44

8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1
part of: 8A Information to be published—what is operational information?
note: Agency must provide operational information to the public.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A(1) Information to be published—what is operational information?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide operational information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasValue
logic summary: Operational information is held by the agency.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2
part of: 8A Information to be published—what is operational information?
note: Agency must publish operational information
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8A(2) Information to be published—what is operational information?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide operational information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Operational information must be published during the agency's operational period
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Operational information must be published during the agency's operational period
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must be published
logic summary: Operational information must be published and made accessible to the public
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must be published
logic summary: Operational information must be published and made accessible to the public using AI-powered tools
premise text: (2) An agency’s operational information does not include information that is available to members of the public otherwise than by being published by (or on behalf of) the agency.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8B Information to be published—accuracy etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8b
note: Agency must ensure information accuracy, completeness, and timeliness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8B Information to be published—accuracy etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must ensure information accuracy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8C Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8c
has part: 8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions
has part: 8C(2) Information to be published—restrictions
has part: 8C(3) Information to be published—restrictions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44

8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8c-ss-1
part of: 8C Information to be published—restrictions
note: Publication of exempt matter is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 8C(1) Information to be published—restrictions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits publication of exempt matter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8C(2) Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8c-ss-2
part of: 8C Information to be published—restrictions
note: Restrictions on publication of information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-2-norm

8C(3) Information to be published—restrictions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8c-ss-3
part of: 8C Information to be published—restrictions
note: Restrictions on information publication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.44
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8c-ss-3-norm

8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d
has part: 8D(1) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
has part: 8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45

8D(1) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d-ss-1
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
note: Agency must publish required or permitted information.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8D(1) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d-ss-2
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
note: Agency must publish information to the public and particular classes of persons or entities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8D(2) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must publish information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d-ss-3
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
note: Agency must publish information on a website.
description: Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8D(3) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d-ss-4
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
note: Agency may impose charge for accessing information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 8D(4) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Agency has the power to impose a charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8d-ss-5
part of: 8D Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
note: Agency must publish details of charge for accessing information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.45
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8D(5) Information to be published—how (and to whom) information is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide details of charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8E Information to be published—Information Commissioner to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8e
note: The Information Commissioner must assist agencies in identifying and preparing required information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.46
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8e-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8E Information to be published—Information Commissioner to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8F Review of scheme—Information Commissioner functions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8f
note: The Information Commissioner has functions to review and monitor the operation of the information publication scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.47
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8f-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8F Review of scheme—Information Commissioner functions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Review of scheme—by agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
has part: 9(1) Review of scheme—by agencies
has part: 9(2) Review of scheme—by agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.47

9(1) Review of scheme—by agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-ss-1
part of: 9 Review of scheme—by agencies
note: Agency must review information publication scheme annually or within 5 years after last review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.47
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(1) Review of scheme—by agencies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must perform review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(2) Review of scheme—by agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-ss-2
part of: 9 Review of scheme—by agencies
note: The first review under subsection (1) must be completed within 5 years after the day this section commences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.47
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be completed within 5 years
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A Functions and powers under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9a
note: Must consider objects of the Act and guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.48
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider objects of the Act and guidelines.
premise text: The agency must have regard to...
conclusion text: ...the objects of this Act (including all the matters set out in sections 3 and 3A);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval: Agency's consideration of Act objects.
premise text: In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part,
conclusion text: ...the objects of this Act (including all the matters set out in sections 3 and 3A);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval: Agency's consideration of Act objects.
premise text: In performing a function, or exercising a power, under this Part,
conclusion text: ...the objects of this Act (including all the matters set out in sections 3 and 3A);
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
premise text: ...and guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner for the purposes of this paragraph under section 93A.
conclusion text: ...guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner for the purposes of this paragraph under section 93A;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
has part: 10(1) Unpublished operational information
has part: 10(2) Unpublished operational information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.49

10(1) Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-ss-1
part of: 10 Unpublished operational information
note: Agency must publish operational information if it has existed for more than 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.49
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(1) Unpublished operational information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must publish operational information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(2) Unpublished operational information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-ss-2
part of: 10 Unpublished operational information
note: Avoid prejudice from unpublished information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.49
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(2) Unpublished operational information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits subjecting person to prejudice
premise text: (2) The person must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10A Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10a
note: Agency principal officer may perform functions on behalf of the agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.49
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10A Who performs functions etc. given to agencies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May perform function
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10B Transitional—Norfolk Island authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10b
note: No application during a 2-year period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.50
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 10B Transitional—Norfolk Island authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on application
premise text: During the specified period, this Part does not apply.
conclusion text: No application during that time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Right of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
has part: 11(1) Right of access
has part: 11(2) Right of access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51

11(1) Right of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-ss-1
part of: 11 Right of access
note: Right of access to documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Right exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(2) Right of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-ss-2
part of: 11 Right of access
note: Right of access is not affected by reasons given for seeking access.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Right is not affected by reasons given for seeking access.
premise text: (2) Subject to this Act, a person’s right of access...
conclusion text: a person’s right of access is not affected by: (a) any reasons the person gives for seeking access; or (b) the agency’s or Minister’s belief as to what are his or her reasons for seeking access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11A Access to documents on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11a
has part: 11A(1) Access to documents on request
has part: 11A(2) Access to documents on request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51

11A(1) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11a-ss-1
part of: 11A Access to documents on request
note: Request for access to documents must be made in accordance with subsection 15(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11A(1) Access to documents on request
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide access to documents upon request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11A(2) Access to documents on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11a-ss-2
part of: 11A Access to documents on request
note: Access to documents on request is subject to this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.51
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11A(2) Access to documents on request
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide access to documents on request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11B Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11b
has part: 11B(1) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(2) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors
has part: 11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.53

11B(1) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11b-ss-1
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors
note: Public interest exemptions—factors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.53
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-1-norm

11B(2) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11b-ss-2
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors
note: Factors favoring access are not limited by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.53
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-2-norm

11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors
note: Factors favouring access to the document in the public interest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.53
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11B(3) Public interest exemptions—factors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: List of factors favouring access to the document
premise text: (3) Factors favouring access to the document in the public interest
conclusion text: include whether access to the document would do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between factors favouring access to the document
premise text: (c) promote effective oversight of public expenditure;
conclusion text: (d) allow a person to access his or her own personal information.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between factors favouring access to the document
premise text: (c) promote effective oversight of public expenditure;
conclusion text: (d) allow a person to access his or her own personal information.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Spread of factors favouring access to the document
premise text: (a) promote the objects of this Act (including all the matters set out in sections 3 and 3A);
conclusion text: (b) inform debate on a matter of public importance;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: through
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application to factors favouring access to the document
premise text: (a) promote the objects of this Act (including all the matters set out in sections 3 and 3A);
conclusion text: (b) inform debate on a matter of public importance;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11b-ss-4
part of: 11B Public interest exemptions—factors
note: Factors that must not be taken into account when deciding access to a document would be contrary to the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.53
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11B(4) Public interest exemptions—factors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excluded
logic summary: Exclusions from consideration of access to a document
premise text: (4) The following factors must not be taken into account...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11C Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c
has part: 11C(1) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(2) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(3) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(4) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(5) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(6) Publication of information in accessed documents
has part: 11C(7) Publication of information in accessed documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54

11C(1) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-1
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents
note: Publication of information is required if an agency or Minister gives a person access to a document under section 11A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11C(1) Publication of information in accessed documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publication is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11C(2) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-2
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents
note: The Information Commissioner may make a determination for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-2-norm

11C(3) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents
note: Agency must publish information on website
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11C(3) Publication of information in accessed documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Within a specific time frame
premise text: (3) The agency, or the Minister, must publish the information to members of the public generally on a website by:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Within a specific time frame
premise text: (3) The agency, or the Minister, must publish the information to members of the public generally on a website by:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must be accessible
logic summary: Information must be accessible to the public
premise text: (a) making the information available for downloading from the website; or (b) publishing on the website a link to another website, from which the information can be downloaded; or (c) publishing on the website other details of how the information may be obtained.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must be published
logic summary: Information must be published on website
premise text: (a) making the information available for downloading from the website; or (b) publishing on the website a link to another website, from which the information can be downloaded; or (c) publishing on the website other details of how the information may be obtained.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11C(4) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-4
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents
note: Agency may impose charge for accessing information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 11C(4) Publication of information in accessed documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Agency has permission to impose charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11C(5) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-5
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents
note: Agency or Minister must publish details of charge for accessing information.
description: Details of the charge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11C(5) Publication of information in accessed documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must publish details of charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11C(6) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents
note: Agency must comply with section within 10 working days after access to document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must comply with section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATION
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to comply.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Compliance within 10 working days is required.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLICATION
logic summary: Compliance implies agency action.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for compliance.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11C(7) Publication of information in accessed documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11c-ss-7
part of: 11C Publication of information in accessed documents
note: Definition of working day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.54
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-7-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11c-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11C(7) Publication of information in accessed documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12 Part not to apply to certain documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
note: Exemptions from access under Part 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.55
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Part not to apply to certain documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not entitled to
logic summary: Prohibition of access
premise text: (1) A person is not entitled to obtain access under this Part
conclusion text: to a document, or a copy of a document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within the open access period within the meaning of that Act
logic summary: Temporal interval for exemption
premise text: unless the document contains personal information (including personal information about a deceased person); or
conclusion text: a document, or a copy of a document
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not entitled to obtain access under this Part
logic summary: Prohibition of access
premise text: (1) A person is not entitled to obtain access under this Part
conclusion text: to a document, or a copy of a document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

13 Documents in certain institutions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
has part: 13(1) Documents in certain institutions
has part: 13(2) Documents in certain institutions
has part: 13(3) Documents in certain institutions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.56

13(1) Documents in certain institutions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-ss-1
part of: 13 Documents in certain institutions
note: Documents in certain institutions are not considered documents of an agency for the purposes of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits documents in certain institutions from being considered agency documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(2) Documents in certain institutions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-ss-2
part of: 13 Documents in certain institutions
note: Document possession obligation for agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPossession
logic summary: Agency has possession of document
premise text: Document transferred to National Archives
conclusion text: Agency is deemed to have possession
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(3) Documents in certain institutions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-ss-3
part of: 13 Documents in certain institutions
note: Records of certain commissions are taken to be documents of an agency and in the possession of a department.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.56
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(3) Documents in certain institutions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state to treat records as documents of an agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Requests for access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
has part: 15(1) Requests for access
has part: 15(2) Requests for access
has part: 15(2A) Requests for access
has part: 15(3) Requests for access
has part: 15(4) Requests for access
has part: 15(5) Requests for access
has part: 15(5A) Requests for access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58

15(1) Requests for access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-1
part of: 15 Requests for access
note: Request for access to a document of an agency or official document of a Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-1-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(1) Requests for access
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15(2) Requests for access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-2
part of: 15 Requests for access
note: Request must be in writing and provide necessary information.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(2) Requests for access
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(2A) Requests for access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-2a
part of: 15 Requests for access
note: Request must be sent to agency or Minister in specified ways.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(2A) Requests for access
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Request must be sent
premise text: The request is required
conclusion text: The request must be sent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(3) Requests for access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-3
part of: 15 Requests for access
note: Agency must assist person to make compliant request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Duty
logic summary: Agency has a duty to assist.
premise text: Request not compliant with section.
conclusion text: Assistance required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(4) Requests for access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-4
part of: 15 Requests for access
note: Duty to assist with request redirection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Agency has a duty to assist
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(5) Requests for access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-5
part of: 15 Requests for access
note: Agency must notify applicant of request receipt and decision within 30 days.
description: Notification of request receipt and decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(5) Requests for access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must take action within a specified timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: NOTICE
logic summary: Agency must inform applicant of request receipt and decision.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Decision must be made within a specified timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(5A) Requests for access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-ss-5a
part of: 15 Requests for access
note: Agency or Minister must have regard to guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.58
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(5A) Requests for access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider guidelines
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AA Extension of time with agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15aa
note: Extension of time with agreement for dealing with a request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.60
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15aa-norm

15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15ab
has part: 15AB(1) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
has part: 15AB(2) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
has part: 15AB(3) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.61

15AB(1) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-1
part of: 15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
note: Agency or Minister may apply for extension of time to deal with a request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.61
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-1-norm

15AB(2) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-2
part of: 15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
note: Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
references: sch-4-sec-33(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.61
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to extend time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AB(3) Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-3
part of: 15AB Extension of time for complex or voluminous requests
note: Inform specified persons of extension period
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.61
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15ac
note: Agency must make decision on request within time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.61
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ac-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ac-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ac-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AC Decision not made on request within time—deemed refusal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a decision
premise text: Request made within time period
conclusion text: Decision not received
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15A Request for access to personnel records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15a
has part: 15A(1) Request for access to personnel records
has part: 15A(2) Request for access to personnel records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.63

15A(1) Request for access to personnel records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15a-ss-1
part of: 15A Request for access to personnel records
note: Definition of personnel records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.63
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-1-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15A(1) Request for access to personnel records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15A(2) Request for access to personnel records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2
part of: 15A Request for access to personnel records
note: No access to personnel records unless request is made through established procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.63
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15A(2) Request for access to personnel records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to personnel records unless request is made through established procedures.
premise text: (2) Where:...
conclusion text: the person must not apply under section 15 for access to such records unless the person:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Establishes a temporal interval for notification of request outcome.
premise text: (d) either:...
conclusion text: (i) is not satisfied with the outcome of the request; or (ii) has not been notified of the outcome within 30 days after the request was made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace for requests and outcomes.
premise text: (d) either:...
conclusion text: (i) is not satisfied with the outcome of the request; or (ii) has not been notified of the outcome within 30 days after the request was made.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information about established procedures for requesting personnel records.
premise text: (2) Where:...
conclusion text: the person must not apply under section 15 for access to such records unless the person:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Infers that established procedures are in place for requesting personnel records.
premise text: (2) Where:...
conclusion text: the person must not apply under section 15 for access to such records unless the person:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
has part: 16(1) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(2) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(3) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(3A) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(4) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(5) Transfer of requests
has part: 16(6) Transfer of requests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64

16(1) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-1
part of: 16 Transfer of requests
note: Agency may transfer request to another agency with agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-1-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(1) Transfer of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16(2) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-2
part of: 16 Transfer of requests
note: Request transfer to corresponding department if connected with specified body or person's functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(2) Transfer of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the agency to transfer the request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the request and the corresponding department.
premise text: (c) to the Department corresponding to the Department of State administered by the Minister who administers the enactment by or under which the body or person is established, continued in existence or appointed;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the request and the corresponding department.
premise text: (d) if the request relates to a document that originated with, or has been received from, a part of the Department of Defence specified in Division 2 of Part I of Schedule 2—to that Department;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Grants permission to transfer the request.
premise text: (2) Where a request is made to an agency for access to a document that: (a) originated with, or has been received from, a body which, or person who, is specified in Part I of Schedule 2; and (b) is more closely connected with the functions of that body or person than with those of the agency to which the request is made;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Describes the implication of transferring the request.
premise text: (c) to the Department corresponding to the Department of State administered by the Minister who administers the enactment by or under which the body or person is established, continued in existence or appointed;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(3) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-3
part of: 16 Transfer of requests
note: Agency must transfer request to another agency if it is more closely connected with the other agency's functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(3) Transfer of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must transfer request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(3A) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-3a
part of: 16 Transfer of requests
note: Agency must provide access to documents subject to subsections (1), (2) or (3)
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(3A) Transfer of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(4) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-4
part of: 16 Transfer of requests
note: Agency must inform person making request and send document to other agency if necessary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(4) Transfer of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies a duty or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(5) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-5
part of: 16 Transfer of requests
note: Request is taken to be a request made to the agency for access to the document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(5) Transfer of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Request is taken to be a request made to the agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(6) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-ss-6
part of: 16 Transfer of requests
note: Agency includes a Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.64
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(6) Transfer of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Agency definition
conclusion text: Agency includes a Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16A Requests transferred from the ACT
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16a
note: Request becomes a request under this Act upon receipt by agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.65
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16A Requests transferred from the ACT
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
logic summary: Request becomes a request under this Act.
premise text: Request under FOI Act 1989 transferred to agency.
conclusion text: Request under this Act at time of receipt.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: at
logic summary: Request is received at specific time.
premise text: Request becomes a request under this Act upon receipt by agency.
conclusion text: Request under this Act at time of receipt.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Requests involving use of computers etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
has part: 17(1) Requests involving use of computers etc.
has part: 17(2) Requests involving use of computers etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66

17(1) Requests involving use of computers etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-ss-1
part of: 17 Requests involving use of computers etc.
note: Agency must deal with request as if it were a request for access to written document containing information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(1) Requests involving use of computers etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must deal with the request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(2) Requests involving use of computers etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-ss-2
part of: 17 Requests involving use of computers etc.
note: Agency not required to comply with subsection (1) if compliance would substantially and unreasonably divert resources.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-2-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(2) Requests involving use of computers etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20 Forms of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
has part: 20(1) Forms of access
has part: 20(2) Forms of access
has part: 20(3) Forms of access
has part: 20(4) Forms of access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66

20(1) Forms of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-ss-1
part of: 20 Forms of access
note: Agency or Minister may provide access to a document in various forms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Agency or Minister may provide access to a document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2) Forms of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-ss-2
part of: 20 Forms of access
note: Applicant must be given access in the requested form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2) Forms of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(3) Forms of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-ss-3
part of: 20 Forms of access
note: Access refused if it would interfere with agency operations or infringe copyright.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access if it would interfere with agency operations or infringe copyright.
premise text: (a) would interfere unreasonably with the operations of the agency, or the performance by the Minister of his or her functions, as the case may be;
conclusion text: access in that form may be refused and access given in another form.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies reasons for refusing access.
premise text: (a) would interfere unreasonably with the operations of the agency, or the performance by the Minister of his or her functions, as the case may be;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies reasons for refusing access.
premise text: (b) would be detrimental to the preservation of the document or, having regard to the physical nature of the document, would not be appropriate;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies reasons for refusing access.
premise text: (c) would, but for this Act, involve an infringement of copyright (other than copyright owned by the Commonwealth, an agency or a State) subsisting in matter contained in the document, being matter that does not relate to the affairs of an agency or of a Department of State;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(4) Forms of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-ss-4
part of: 20 Forms of access
note: Applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.66
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(4) Forms of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay a charge not greater than what would have been paid in the requested form.
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection 17(1), where a person requests access to a document...
conclusion text: The applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between request and refusal of access.
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection 17(1), where a person requests access to a document...
conclusion text: The applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between request and refusal of access.
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection 17(1), where a person requests access to a document...
conclusion text: The applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between request and refusal of access.
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection 17(1), where a person requests access to a document...
conclusion text: The applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of refusal on payment of charge.
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection 17(1), where a person requests access to a document...
conclusion text: The applicant shall not be required to pay a charge greater than what they would have paid if access was given in the requested form.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Deferment of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
has part: 21(1) Deferment of access
has part: 21(2) Deferment of access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68

21(1) Deferment of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-ss-1
part of: 21 Deferment of access
note: Deferment of access to a document may be deferred under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to defer access under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2) Deferment of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-ss-2
part of: 21 Deferment of access
note: Agency must inform applicant of reasons and period for deferment.
description: Reasons and period for deferment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(2) Deferment of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must inform applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
has part: 22(1) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
has part: 22(2) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
has part: 22(3) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
has part: 22(4) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68

22(1) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-ss-1
part of: 22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
note: Agency or Minister may prepare edited copy of document for access under section 11A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(1) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to prepare edited copy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(2) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-ss-2
part of: 22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
note: Agency or Minister must provide edited copy to applicant.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(2) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide edited copy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(3) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-ss-3
part of: 22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
note: Agency must provide written notice to applicant regarding edited copy and grounds for deletions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(3) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(4) Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-ss-4
part of: 22 Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
note: Exempt from section 26 decision unless applicant requests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.68
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Decisions to be made by authorised persons
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
has part: 23(1) Decisions to be made by authorised persons
has part: 23(2) Decisions to be made by authorised persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70

23(1) Decisions to be made by authorised persons
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-ss-1
part of: 23 Decisions to be made by authorised persons
note: Authorized persons can make decisions on behalf of the agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Agency permits authorized persons to make decisions
premise text: Authorized persons are acting within the scope of authority exercisable by them
conclusion text: The agency permits the decision-making
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Decision-making is within the authorized person's scope of authority
premise text: Authorized persons are acting within the scope of authority exercisable by them
conclusion text: The decision-making is within the authorized person's scope of authority
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Decision-making is a recurring trace for authorized persons
premise text: Authorized persons are acting within the scope of authority exercisable by them
conclusion text: The decision-making is a recurring trace for authorized persons
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Decision-making diffuses to authorized persons
premise text: Authorized persons are acting within the scope of authority exercisable by them
conclusion text: The decision-making diffuses to authorized persons
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes the agency's permission for decision-making
premise text: Authorized persons are acting within the scope of authority exercisable by them
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes the agency's permission for decision-making
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2) Decisions to be made by authorised persons
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-ss-2
part of: 23 Decisions to be made by authorised persons
note: Authorized persons can make decisions on behalf of specified courts, tribunals, authorities, or bodies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(2) Decisions to be made by authorised persons
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to act on behalf of others.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
has part: 24(1) Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
has part: 24(2) Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70

24(1) Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-ss-1
part of: 24 Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
note: Agency or Minister may refuse to give access to document after consultation process.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by agency or Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(2) Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-ss-2
part of: 24 Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
note: Agency or Minister may treat 2 or more requests as a single request if satisfied that the requests relate to the same document or documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.70
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-ss-2-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(2) Power to refuse request—diversion of resources etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24aa
has part: 24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
has part: 24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
has part: 24AA(3) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.71

24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?
note: Request for document processing must not substantially divert agency resources or interfere with Minister's functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.71
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AA(1) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition on diversion of agency resources
premise text: (i) in the case of an agency—would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency from its other operations;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition on interference with Minister's functions
premise text: (ii) in the case of a Minister—would substantially and unreasonably interfere with the performance of the Minister’s functions;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?
note: Agency or Minister must consider resources for identifying, locating, or collating documents within a filing system.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.71
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AA(2) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider resources.
premise text: Resources for identifying, locating, or collating documents within a filing system.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Consideration of resources is related to the use of time for identifying, locating, or collating documents.
premise text: Resources that would have to be used for identifying, locating, or collating documents within a filing system.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Consideration of resources is related to the use of time for examining documents.
premise text: Resources that would have to be used for examining a document.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Consideration of resources is related to the spread or dissemination of information.
premise text: Resources that would have to be used for consulting with any person or body in relation to the request.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Consideration of resources is related to the processing or analysis of information.
premise text: Resources that would have to be used for making a copy, or an edited copy, of a document.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(3) When does a practical refusal reason exist?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3
part of: 24AA When does a practical refusal reason exist?
note: Must not have regard to certain factors when deciding on a practical refusal reason.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.71
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotHaveRegardTo
logic summary: Prohibition on considering certain factors
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: MustNotConsider
logic summary: Linear logic application for prohibition on considering factors
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: DoesNotOverlapWith
logic summary: Allen interval application for prohibition on considering factors
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DoesNotSpreadTo
logic summary: Diffusion logic application for prohibition on considering factors
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: DoesNotInfluence
logic summary: CogAI logic application for prohibition on considering factors
premise text: (3) In deciding whether a practical refusal reason exists, an agency or Minister must not have regard to:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab
has part: 24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(3) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(5) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(6) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(7) What is a request consultation process?
has part: 24AB(8) What is a request consultation process?
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72

24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-1
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Requirement to notify
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AB(1) What is a request consultation process?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-2
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Agency must provide written notice with details of refusal reason and contact person.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AB(2) What is a request consultation process?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(3) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-3
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Agency must assist applicant to revise request if contact made during consultation period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency has a duty to assist applicant.
premise text: Applicant contacts contact person during consultation period.
conclusion text: Agency must take reasonable steps to assist applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Provide reasonable opportunity to consult with contact person and assist applicant in revising request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AB(4) What is a request consultation process?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to provide reasonable opportunity for consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Classification of provision as a duty
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(5) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-5
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Applicant may agree to extend consultation period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend consultation period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(6) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-6
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Must provide written notice to agency or Minister before end of consultation period.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AB(6) What is a request consultation process?
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(7) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Failure to consult during the consultation period results in withdrawal of request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AB(7) What is a request consultation process?
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consult during the consultation period.
premise text: The applicant must consult with the contact person during the consultation period.
conclusion text: Failure to do so results in withdrawal of request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Consultation period disregarded in calculating processing period.
premise text: The consultation period is disregarded in calculating the processing period.
conclusion text: The consultation period overlaps with the processing period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Consultation period ends when conditions are met.
premise text: The consultation period ends at the end of the specified time period.
conclusion text: Conditions must be met for the consultation period to end.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Request is withdrawn due to lack of consultation.
premise text: The request is taken to have been withdrawn under subsection (6) at the end of the consultation period if...
conclusion text: The request is withdrawn due to a lack of consultation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Request is recognized as withdrawn due to lack of consultation.
premise text: The request is taken to have been withdrawn under subsection (6) at the end of the consultation period if...
conclusion text: The request is recognized as withdrawn due to a lack of consultation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(8) What is a request consultation process?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8
part of: 24AB What is a request consultation process?
note: Agency or Minister must notify applicant of decision within 30 days after request is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.72
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AB(8) What is a request consultation process?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must notify applicant of decision within 30 days after request is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The period starting on the day an applicant is given a notice under subsection (2) and ending on the day the applicant does one of the things mentioned in paragraph (6)(b) or (c)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: The period starting on the day an applicant is given a notice under subsection (2) and ending on the day the applicant does one of the things mentioned in paragraph (6)(b) or (c)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The period starting on the day an applicant is given a notice under subsection (2) and ending on the day the applicant does one of the things mentioned in paragraph (6)(b) or (c)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24ab-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The period starting on the day an applicant is given a notice under subsection (2) and ending on the day the applicant does one of the things mentioned in paragraph (6)(b) or (c)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24a
has part: 24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
has part: 24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74

24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1
part of: 24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
note: Refusal of document access request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 24A(1) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Agency or Minister may refuse request
premise text: (1) An agency or Minister may refuse a request for access to a document...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and agency's possession
premise text: (i) is in the agency’s or Minister’s possession but cannot be found;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2
part of: 24A Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
note: Agency may refuse request if document cannot be found or received through contractual measures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 24A(2) Requests may be refused if documents cannot be found, do not
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Agency has a duty to refuse request.
premise text: (2) An agency may refuse a request for access to a document if...
conclusion text: ...the agency has not received the document;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and receipt.
premise text: (b) the agency has not received the document;
conclusion text: ...and (c) the agency has taken all reasonable steps to receive the document in accordance with those contractual measures.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Agency's efforts to receive document are recurring.
premise text: (b) the agency has not received the document;
conclusion text: ...and (c) the agency has taken all reasonable steps to receive the document in accordance with those contractual measures.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Document receipt is propagated through contractual measures.
premise text: (a) in order to comply with section 6C, the agency has taken contractual measures to ensure that it receives the document;
conclusion text: ...and (c) the agency has taken all reasonable steps to receive the document in accordance with those contractual measures.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Agency's refusal is implied by lack of receipt.
premise text: (b) the agency has not received the document;
conclusion text: ...and (c) the agency has taken all reasonable steps to receive the document in accordance with those contractual measures.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Information as to existence of certain documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
has part: 25(1) Information as to existence of certain documents
has part: 25(2) Information as to existence of certain documents
has part: 25(3) Information as to existence of certain documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74

25(1) Information as to existence of certain documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-ss-1
part of: 25 Information as to existence of certain documents
note: No agency or Minister must provide information about the existence of a document if disclosure would exempt it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25(2) Information as to existence of certain documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-ss-2
part of: 25 Information as to existence of certain documents
note: Agency or Minister must provide notice if a document exists but is exempt from disclosure.
description: Notice in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25(2) Information as to existence of certain documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25(3) Information as to existence of certain documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-ss-3
part of: 25 Information as to existence of certain documents
note: Refusing access to document if it existed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.74
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
logic summary: Refuse access to document
premise text: Document would be exempt
conclusion text: Access refused
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Reasons and other particulars of decisions to be given
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
note: Notice of decision on document access request
description: Notice in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.75
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Reasons and other particulars of decisions to be given
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Mandatory action
conclusion text: Decision-maker must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26a
has part: 26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
has part: 26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
has part: 26A(3) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.76

26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
note: Request for access to document must be made with consultation under section 26A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.76
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26A(1) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Request for access must be made with consultation
premise text: State may reasonably wish to contend that access would be contrary to public interest
conclusion text: Access request must be made with consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Request for access must be made within a reasonable timeframe
premise text: (ii) access to the document would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest for the purposes of subsection 11A(5)
conclusion text: Access request must be made within a reasonable timeframe
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider consultation before granting access to document
premise text: State may reasonably wish to contend that access would be contrary to public interest
conclusion text: Agency or Minister must consider consultation before granting access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must consider public interest before granting access to document
premise text: (ii) access to the document would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest for the purposes of subsection 11A(5)
conclusion text: Agency or Minister must consider public interest before granting access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26a-ss-2
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
note: Consultation required before granting access to document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.76
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 26A(2) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of decision without consultation.
premise text: Decision to give access
conclusion text: Consultation required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26A(3) Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26a-ss-3
part of: 26A Consultation—documents affecting Commonwealth-State
note: Agency/Minister must give written notice to State and Applicant after consultation.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.76
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency/Minister must give written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
has part: 27(1) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(2) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(3) Consultation—business documents
has part: 27(4) Consultation—business documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.78

27(1) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-ss-1
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents
note: Access to documents is prohibited unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.78
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(1) Consultation—business documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of access to documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(2) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-ss-2
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents
note: Information about business or professional affairs must be provided.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.78
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(2) Consultation—business documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(3) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-ss-3
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents
note: Agency must consider certain matters when determining exemption contention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.78
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(3) Consultation—business documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to consider certain matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(4) Consultation—business documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-ss-4
part of: 27 Consultation—business documents
note: No access to document without reasonable submissions from person or organisation concerned.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.78
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(4) Consultation—business documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of access to document without submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27a
has part: 27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
has part: 27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.81

27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1
part of: 27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
note: Agency must consult with the person concerned before granting access to a document containing personal information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.81
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27A(1) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must consult with the person concerned.
premise text: Request for access to a document containing personal information.
conclusion text: Consultation is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Consultation must occur before granting access to the document.
premise text: Granting access to a document containing personal information.
conclusion text: Consultation is required before granting access.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2
part of: 27A Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
note: Agency must consider personal information when determining exemption contention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.81
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27A(2) Consultation—documents affecting personal privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consider personal information.
premise text: Agency has a duty to consider personal information.
conclusion text: The agency must consider the personal information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of personal information.
premise text: The agency must consider the personal information within a reasonable time frame.
conclusion text: The agency considers the personal information between the time the person concerned was associated with the matters dealt with in the information and the present time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of personal information.
premise text: The agency must consider the personal information within a reasonable time frame.
conclusion text: The agency considers the personal information between the time the person concerned was associated with the matters dealt with in the information and the present time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of personal information.
premise text: The agency must consider the personal information within a reasonable time frame.
conclusion text: The agency considers the personal information between the time the person concerned was associated with the matters dealt with in the information and the present time.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of personal information.
premise text: The agency must consider the personal information within a reasonable time frame.
conclusion text: The agency considers the personal information between the time the person concerned was associated with the matters dealt with in the information and the present time.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Charges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
note: Agency or Minister must give written notice to applicant stating they are liable to pay a charge.
description: written notice stating the applicant is liable to pay a charge, preliminary assessment of the amount of the charge, and basis for the assessment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.83
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Charges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must give written notice to applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
has part: 31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
has part: 31(2) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.86

31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-ss-1
part of: 31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
note: Applicant must pay charge within processing period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.86
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(1) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide payment
premise text: Request received before processing period end
conclusion text: Pay charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(2) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-ss-2
part of: 31 Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
note: Disregard certain days when calculating processing period for charge imposition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.86
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(2) Decision to impose charge—extended period for processing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Disregard certain days when calculating processing period for charge imposition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Calculate processing period during specified days
premise text: charge notice day to applicant payment day
conclusion text: processing period length
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31A Access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31a
note: Access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents is not required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.88
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits access to exempt and conditionally exempt documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31B Exempt documents for the purposes of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31b
note: A document is exempt if it meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.89
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31B Exempt documents for the purposes of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from access
premise text: Division 2 and Division 3 exemptions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-32
note: Interpretation of exempt documents provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.89
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-32-norm

33 Documents affecting national security, defence or international
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-33
note: Disclosure of certain documents under this Act is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.91
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-33-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Cabinet documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-34
note: A document is exempt if it was submitted to the Cabinet for consideration or proposed by a Minister to be so.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.91
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Cabinet documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is exempt from
logic summary: Exempts documents from certain rules
premise text: The Cabinet has the power to submit documents for consideration
conclusion text: Documents submitted or proposed for submission are exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: was brought into existence for the dominant purpose of submission for consideration by the Cabinet
logic summary: Defines when a document is considered exempt due to its creation purpose
premise text: The Cabinet has the power to submit documents for consideration
conclusion text: Documents created with this purpose are exempt
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: is or was proposed by a Minister to be submitted
logic summary: Defines when a document is considered exempt due to its proposal
premise text: Ministers have the power to propose documents for submission
conclusion text: Proposed documents are exempt from certain rules
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: was brought into existence for the dominant purpose of briefing a Minister on a document
logic summary: Defines when a document is considered exempt due to its creation purpose
premise text: Ministers have the power to brief each other on documents
conclusion text: Documents created with this purpose are exempt
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-34-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: has been submitted to the Cabinet for its consideration
logic summary: Defines when a document is considered exempt due to its submission
premise text: The Cabinet has the power to consider documents
conclusion text: Submitted documents are exempt from certain rules
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-37
has part: 37(1) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
has part: 37(2) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
has part: 37(2A) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
has part: 37(3) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.92

37(1) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-37-ss-1
part of: 37 Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
note: Disclosure of certain documents is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.92
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure
premise text: (b) disclose, or enable a person to ascertain, the existence or identity of a confidential source of information
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of sensitive information
premise text: (c) endanger the life or physical safety of any person
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-37-ss-2
part of: 37 Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
note: Disclosure of certain documents is prohibited to prevent prejudice in fair trial or adjudication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.92
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain documents.
premise text: (2) A document is an exempt document if...
conclusion text: ...disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Discloses temporal overlap between exemptions and law enforcement.
premise text: (2) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to:
conclusion text: ...disclosure of lawful methods or procedures for preventing...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Discloses recurring exemptions in law enforcement.
premise text: (2) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to:
conclusion text: ...disclosure of lawful methods or procedures for preventing...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses exemptions in law enforcement.
premise text: (2) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to:
conclusion text: ...disclosure of lawful methods or procedures for preventing...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes exemptions in law enforcement.
premise text: (2) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to:
conclusion text: ...disclosure of lawful methods or procedures for preventing...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2A) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a
part of: 37 Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
note: Person receiving protection under a program is considered confidential source of information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.92
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2A) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of obligation
premise text: Protection under a program is given.
conclusion text: Person receiving protection is considered confidential source of information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between protection and confidentiality
premise text: Protection under a program is given.
conclusion text: Person receiving protection during the period is considered confidential source of information.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(3) Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-37-ss-3
part of: 37 Documents affecting enforcement of law and protection of public
note: Definition of law for the purpose of enforcement and protection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.92
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term for legal purposes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-37-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Establishes a class hierarchy for law.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Documents to which secrecy provisions of enactments apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-38
note: Definition of exempt document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.93
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-38-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Documents to which secrecy provisions of enactments apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

42 Documents subject to legal professional privilege
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-42
has part: 42(1) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
has part: 42(2) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
has part: 42(3) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95

42(1) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-42-ss-1
part of: 42 Documents subject to legal professional privilege
note: Documents subject to legal professional privilege are exempt from production in legal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on parties to produce exempt documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(2) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-42-ss-2
part of: 42 Documents subject to legal professional privilege
note: Waiver of legal professional privilege claim
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (2) A document is not an exempt document...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(3) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-42-ss-3
part of: 42 Documents subject to legal professional privilege
note: Document containing operational information is not exempt under subsection (1) solely because of its operational nature.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(3) Documents subject to legal professional privilege
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Document is exempt under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Document is not exempt solely because of its operational nature.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45 Documents containing material obtained in confidence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45
has part: 45(1) Documents containing material obtained in confidence
has part: 45(2) Documents containing material obtained in confidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95

45(1) Documents containing material obtained in confidence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45-ss-1
part of: 45 Documents containing material obtained in confidence
note: A document is exempt if disclosure would found an action for breach of confidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(1) Documents containing material obtained in confidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to keep confidential
premise text: Disclosure would found an action for breach of confidence.
conclusion text: Document is exempt if disclosure would found an action for breach of confidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: contains
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would found an action, by a person (other than an agency or the Commonwealth), for breach of confidence.
conclusion text: Disclosure must occur within a specific temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of confidential information
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would found an action, by a person (other than an agency or the Commonwealth), for breach of confidence.
conclusion text: Confidentiality is maintained through diffusion
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes confidentiality
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would found an action, by a person (other than an agency or the Commonwealth), for breach of confidence.
conclusion text: AI recognizes and maintains confidentiality
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
logic summary: Validation of confidential documents
premise text: (1) A document is an exempt document if its disclosure under this Act would found an action, by a person (other than an agency or the Commonwealth), for breach of confidence.
conclusion text: Confidentiality validation ensures compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45(2) Documents containing material obtained in confidence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45-ss-2
part of: 45 Documents containing material obtained in confidence
note: Disclosure of certain documents is not a breach of confidence owed to a person or body other than specified individuals or agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.95
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(2) Documents containing material obtained in confidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose certain documents
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to a document to which subsection 47C(1) applies
conclusion text: Disclosure of the document is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to disclose certain documents
premise text: The disclosure of the document would not constitute a breach of confidence owed to a person or body other than specified individuals or agencies
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose certain documents in specific contexts
premise text: The document is prepared by a prescribed authority or Norfolk Island authority in the performance of its functions
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose certain documents in specific contexts
premise text: The document relates to the affairs of an agency or a Department of State
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure of certain documents in specific contexts
premise text: The disclosure of the document would constitute a breach of confidence owed to a person or body other than specified individuals or agencies
conclusion text: Disclosure is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a
has part: 45A(1) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(2) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(3) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(4) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(5) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(6) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(7) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
has part: 45A(8) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96

45A(1) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-1
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents
note: Definition of exempt document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-1-norm

45A(2) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-2
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents
note: Defines exempt documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-2-norm

45A(3) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-3
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents
note: Disclosure of confidential request information is restricted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(3) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts disclosure of confidential information.
premise text: Confidential request made to Parliamentary Budget Officer.
conclusion text: Disclosure of request information is restricted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(4) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-4
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents
note: Documents attached to exempt documents are not automatically exempt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(4) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits automatic exemption of attached documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(5) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents
note: Information made publicly available by the Parliamentary Budget Officer is exempt from this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-shacl-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts information made publicly available by the Parliamentary Budget Officer.
premise text: Information has been made publicly available by the Parliamentary Budget Officer:
conclusion text: is exempt matter because of this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Information made publicly available during a specific time period is exempt from this section.
premise text: under section 64U of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999:
conclusion text: or in a statement made under subsection 64V(4) of that Act
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses information about exemptions to the public.
premise text: under section 64U of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999:
conclusion text: or in a statement made under subsection 64V(4) of that Act
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes exemptions to information made publicly available by the Parliamentary Budget Officer.
premise text: under section 64U of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999:
conclusion text: or in a statement made under subsection 64V(4) of that Act
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-5-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
logic summary: Validates exemptions to information made publicly available by the Parliamentary Budget Officer.
premise text: under section 64U of the Parliamentary Service Act 1999:
conclusion text: or in a statement made under subsection 64V(4) of that Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(6) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-6
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents
note: Information made publicly available by Senator or MP is exempt from confidentiality request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Senator/MP obligation to provide public information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(7) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-7
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents
note: Disclosure of factual information is not exempt if it reveals a confidential request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(7) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose factual information
premise text: (7) Information in a document...
conclusion text: Disclosure of factual information is not exempt.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45A(8) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8
part of: 45A Parliamentary Budget Office documents
note: Definition of confidential request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.96
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45A(8) Parliamentary Budget Office documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-45a-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Documents disclosure of which would be contempt of Parliament
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-46
note: Public disclosure of certain documents would be contempt of Parliament or court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.97
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-46-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits public disclosure of certain documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47
has part: 47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
has part: 47(2) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
has part: 47(3) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.98

47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
note: Disclosures of trade secrets or commercially valuable information are exempt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.98
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to keep trade secrets or commercially valuable information confidential.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(2) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) for certain types of requests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.98
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-2-norm

47(3) Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47-ss-3
part of: 47 Documents disclosing trade secrets or commercially valuable
note: Defines what constitutes an undertaking for the purpose of section 47(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.98
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Identifies a class hierarchy
premise text: (c) a Norfolk Island authority; or (d) a local government authority.
conclusion text: an undertaking that is carried on by the Commonwealth or a State; or an authority of the Commonwealth or of a State; or a Norfolk Island authority; or a local government authority.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47A Electoral rolls and related documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47a
has part: 47A(1) Electoral rolls and related documents
has part: 47A(2) Electoral rolls and related documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.99

47A(1) Electoral rolls and related documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1
part of: 47A Electoral rolls and related documents
note: Defines electoral roll and related documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.99
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47A(1) Electoral rolls and related documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines electoral roll and related documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Electoral Act means the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.
conclusion text: electoral roll means: (a) a Roll of the electors of: (i) a State or Territory; or (ii) a Division (within the meaning of the Electoral Act); or (iii) a Subdivision (within the meaning of the Electoral Act); prepared under the Electoral Act;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: (b) any part of a Roll referred to in paragraph (a).
conclusion text: electoral roll means: (b) any part of a Roll referred to in paragraph (a).
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) In this section:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47A(2) Electoral rolls and related documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2
part of: 47A Electoral rolls and related documents
note: Defines what constitutes an exempt document under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.99
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Lists specific examples of exempt documents
premise text: The document is an electoral roll; or a print, or a copy of a print, of an electoral roll; or...
conclusion text: or any other document that meets these criteria
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between documents
premise text: a document that was used to prepare an electoral roll; or a document that is a copy of a document referred to in paragraph (e)
conclusion text: or any other document that meets these criteria
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Describes the conditions under which documents are exempt
premise text: (i) sets out particulars of only one elector; and (ii) was used to prepare an electoral roll
conclusion text: or any other document that meets these criteria
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Lists additional examples of exempt documents
premise text: (i) is a copy of a document referred to in paragraph (e); or (ii) contains only copies of documents referred to in paragraph (e)
conclusion text: or any other document that meets these criteria
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47B Public interest conditional exemptions—Commonwealth-State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47b
note: Conditional exemptions for public interest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.101
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47B Public interest conditional exemptions—Commonwealth-State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Public interest exemption
premise text: Disclosure would cause damage to relations between the Commonwealth and a State
conclusion text: Exemption granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47C Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47c
note: Conditional exemptions for deliberative processes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.101
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47c-norm

47D Public interest conditional exemptions—financial or property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47d
note: Conditional exemptions for documents with substantial adverse effect on Commonwealth or agency interests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.102
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47d-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47d-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47D Public interest conditional exemptions—financial or property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on State to consider public interest when disclosing documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47E Public interest conditional exemptions—certain operations of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47e
note: Conditional exemptions for certain documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.103
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47E Public interest conditional exemptions—certain operations of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State obligation to provide access to conditionally exempt documents
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Conditional exemptions apply to documents that overlap with agency operations
premise text: The document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to, do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Conditional exemptions repeat across agency operations
premise text: The document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to, do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: State prohibition on disclosing certain documents without public interest justification
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47e-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State obligation to provide access to documents that do not prejudice agency operations
premise text: The document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to, do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47f
has part: 47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
has part: 47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.103

47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
note: Disclosure of personal information without consent is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.103
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47F(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of personal information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Uncertainty
logic summary: Discloses personal information may be uncertain.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Conditionally exempt from disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2
part of: 47F Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
note: Agency must consider personal information when deciding whether to disclose a document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.103
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47F(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—personal privacy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to consider personal information.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...
conclusion text: ...the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The agency must consider the temporal relationship between the document and the person's association with the matters dealt with.
premise text: (b) whether the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
conclusion text: ...the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The agency must consider whether the person's association with the matters dealt with has changed over time.
premise text: (b) whether the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
conclusion text: ...the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: The agency must consider how the disclosure of the document would affect the person's privacy.
premise text: (a) the extent to which the information is well known;
conclusion text: ...the availability of the information from publicly accessible sources;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47f-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The agency must recognize the importance of personal privacy in its decision-making.
premise text: (2) In determining whether the disclosure of the document would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information, an agency or Minister must have regard to...
conclusion text: ...the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47G Public interest conditional exemptions—business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47g
has part: 47G(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
has part: 47G(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
has part: 47G(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.105

47G(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47g-ss-1
part of: 47G Public interest conditional exemptions—business
note: Conditional exemptions for business information disclosure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.105
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47g-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for conditional exemptions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47G(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47g-ss-2
part of: 47G Public interest conditional exemptions—business
note: Exempts trade secrets and other information from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.105
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47g-ss-2-norm

47G(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47g-ss-3
part of: 47G Public interest conditional exemptions—business
note: Conditional exemption from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.105
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47g-ss-3-norm

47H Public interest conditional exemptions—research
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47h
note: Conditional exemptions for research documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.106
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47h-norm

47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47j
has part: 47J(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
has part: 47J(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
has part: 47J(2A) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
has part: 47J(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.107

47J(1) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
note: Conditional exemptions for documents that could have a substantial adverse effect on the economy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.107
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of documents that could have a substantial adverse effect on the economy.
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies documents as conditionally exempt based on their potential economic impact.
premise text: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for conditional exemptions.
premise text: (1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could be reasonably expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on Australia’s economy by: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring traces for conditional exemptions.
premise text: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information about conditional exemptions.
premise text: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Influence Decision-Making
logic summary: Influences decision-making about conditional exemptions.
premise text: (a) influencing a decision or action of a person or entity; or (b) giving a person (or class of persons) an undue benefit or detriment, in relation to business carried on by the person (or class), by providing premature knowledge of proposed or possible action or inaction of a person or entity.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47J(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
note: A substantial adverse effect on Australia's economy includes a substantial adverse effect on a particular sector of the economy or the economy of a particular region of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.107
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47J(2) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes
premise text: (a) a particular sector of the economy; or (b) the economy of a particular region of Australia.
conclusion text: A substantial adverse effect on Australia's economy includes a substantial adverse effect on a particular sector of the economy or the economy of a particular region of Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substantial adverse effect
logic summary: Substantial adverse effect
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1),
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47J(2A) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2a
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
note: Norfolk Island is taken to be a region of Australia for the purposes of paragraph (2)(b).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.107
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47J(2A) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Implies a duty to treat Norfolk Island as a region of Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47J(3) Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47j-ss-3
part of: 47J Public interest conditional exemptions—the economy
note: List of documents subject to conditional exemptions for the economy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.107
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-47j-ss-3-norm

48 Application for amendment or annotation of personal records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-48
note: Request for amendment or annotation of personal records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.109
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Application for amendment or annotation of personal records
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Has right to request amendment or annotation of personal records
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligationTo
logic summary: Has obligation to process request for amendment or annotation of personal records
premise text: State hasRightTo amendOrAnnotatePersonalRecords
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo
logic summary: Has permission to process request for amendment or annotation of personal records
premise text: State hasRightTo amendOrAnnotatePersonalRecords
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Requirements of an application for amendment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-49
note: Application for amendment must be in writing and specify certain information.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.109
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-49-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 Requirements of an application for amendment
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application for amendment must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Amendment of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-50
has part: 50(1) Amendment of records
has part: 50(2) Amendment of records
has part: 50(3) Amendment of records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.110

50(1) Amendment of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-50-ss-1
part of: 50 Amendment of records
note: Agency or Minister may amend record of information if certain conditions met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.110
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(1) Amendment of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Agency or Minister has obligation to amend record if conditions met.
premise text: the agency or Minister to whom such an application is made is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister may amend the record of information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Used for
logic summary: Information has been used by the agency or Minister for administrative purpose.
premise text: (c) the information has been used, is being used or is available for use by the agency or Minister for an administrative purpose;
conclusion text: ...the information has been used, is being used or is available for use by the agency or Minister for an administrative purpose.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Information is incomplete, incorrect, out of date or misleading.
premise text: (b) the information is incomplete, incorrect, out of date or misleading;
conclusion text: ...the information is incomplete, incorrect, out of date or misleading.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Agency or Minister may amend record if conditions met.
premise text: (1) Subject to section 51C, where the agency or Minister to whom such an application is made is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister may amend the record of information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Agency or Minister must satisfy conditions before amending record.
premise text: (a) the record of personal information to which the request relates is contained in a document of the agency or an official document of the Minister, as the case may be;
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister is satisfied that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(2) Amendment of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-50-ss-2
part of: 50 Amendment of records
note: Agency or Minister may make amendment to records.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.110
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-2-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(2) Amendment of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

50(3) Amendment of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-50-ss-3
part of: 50 Amendment of records
note: Ensure amendment of records does not obliterate prior text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.110
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Agency or Minister must ensure amendment does not obliterate prior text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51
has part: 51(1) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
has part: 51(2) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
has part: 51(3) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.111

51(1) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
note: Agency must annotate document with statement provided by applicant
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.111
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide annotation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
note: Agency or Minister may consider statement irrelevant, defamatory or voluminous.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.111
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-2-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(2) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

51(3) Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51-ss-3
part of: 51 Annotations of records etc. following unsuccessful applications
note: Conditional application provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.111
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51-ss-3-norm

51A Requirements of an application for annotation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51a
note: Application for annotation must be in writing and specify document containing personal information.
description: Statement by applicant specifying incomplete, incorrect, out of date or misleading information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.111
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51A Requirements of an application for annotation
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51B Annotation of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51b
has part: 51B(1) Annotation of records
has part: 51B(2) Annotation of records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112

51B(1) Annotation of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51b-ss-1
part of: 51B Annotation of records
note: Agency must annotate document with statement provided by applicant.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide annotation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51B(2) Annotation of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51b-ss-2
part of: 51B Annotation of records
note: Agency or Minister may exempt records from annotation requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 51B(2) Annotation of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to exempt records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

51C Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51c
has part: 51C(1) Transfer of requests
has part: 51C(2) Transfer of requests
has part: 51C(3) Transfer of requests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112

51C(1) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1
part of: 51C Transfer of requests
note: Transfer of requests to another agency or Minister with agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 51C(1) Transfer of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Transfer of requests to another agency or Minister with agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51C(2) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2
part of: 51C Transfer of requests
note: Agency or Minister must transfer application to corresponding Department if it relates to a specified body or person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51C(2) Transfer of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must transfer application.
premise text: (2) Where an application is made under section 48 to an agency or Minister...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Application must be transferred before the corresponding Department.
premise text: (c) to the Department corresponding to the Department of State administered by the Minister...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51C(3) Transfer of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3
part of: 51C Transfer of requests
note: Agency or Minister must transfer application to other agency if conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.112
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 51C(3) Transfer of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Agency or Minister must transfer application.
premise text: (3) Where an application is made under section 48 to an agency or a Minister...
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister to whom the application is made must transfer the application to the other agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Application must be transferred if it originated in another agency with overlapping functions.
premise text: (b) is more closely connected with the functions of the other agency...
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister to whom the application is made must transfer the application to the other agency.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Application must be transferred if it originated in another agency with overlapping functions.
premise text: (b) is more closely connected with the functions of the other agency...
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister to whom the application is made must transfer the application to the other agency.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information flow
logic summary: Application must be transferred if it originated in another agency with overlapping functions.
premise text: (b) is more closely connected with the functions of the other agency...
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister to whom the application is made must transfer the application to the other agency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
logic summary: Application must be transferred if it originated in another agency with overlapping functions.
premise text: (b) is more closely connected with the functions of the other agency...
conclusion text: ...the agency or Minister to whom the application is made must transfer the application to the other agency.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51D Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51d
has part: 51D(1) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
has part: 51D(2) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
has part: 51D(3) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.115

51D(1) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51d-ss-1
part of: 51D Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
note: Agency must notify applicant of decision within 30 days
description: Notification of decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.115
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51D(2) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2
part of: 51D Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
note: Notification of a decision under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.115
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51D(2) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify
premise text: (2) Section 23 applies in relation to a decision on an application made under section 48.
conclusion text: Section 23 must be applied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval for notification
premise text: (2) Section 23 applies in relation to a decision on an application made under section 48.
conclusion text: Notification must occur within a specified time frame
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Rationale for notification
premise text: (2) Section 23 applies in relation to a decision on an application made under section 48.
conclusion text: Notification is justified by the need to inform
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Spread of notification
premise text: (2) Section 23 applies in relation to a decision on an application made under section 48.
conclusion text: Notification must be communicated to relevant parties
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Artificial intelligence assistance for notification
premise text: (2) Section 23 applies in relation to a decision on an application made under section 48.
conclusion text: Notification can be automated using AI
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51D(3) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51d-ss-3
part of: 51D Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
note: Notification of a decision under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.115
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51D(3) Notification etc. of a decision under this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51da
note: Agency must make decision on application within 30 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.115
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51da-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51da-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51da-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51DA Decision not made on request for amendment or annotation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51da-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency has a duty to make a decision.
premise text: Application received within 30 days.
conclusion text: Decision made on application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51E Comments on annotations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51e
note: Agency or Minister may add comments to annotations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.117
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-51e-norm

52 Internal review of decisions—guide
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-52
note: Agencies must complete internal reviews within 30 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-52-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-52-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-52-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52 Internal review of decisions—guide
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency obligation
premise text: Agencies must complete internal reviews.
conclusion text: within 30 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-53
note: Deems a claim that a document is exempt under section 33 or 34 as an obligation to acknowledge the existence of the document if it exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 Interpretation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to acknowledge the existence of a document if it exists.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53A What is an access refusal decision?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-53a
note: Definition of access refusal decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.118
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53A What is an access refusal decision?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of access refusal decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53B What is an access grant decision?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-53b
note: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.119
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53B What is an access grant decision?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide access
premise text: Access must generally be given to a conditionally exempt document unless it would be contrary to the public interest.
conclusion text: MUST
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53C Internal review—who is an affected third party?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-53c
note: Defines who is an affected third party for a document request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.121
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53c-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-53c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53C Internal review—who is an affected third party?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54 Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54
has part: 54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision
has part: 54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122

54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-ss-1
part of: 54 Internal review—access refusal decision
note: Agency must provide access to document if refusal decision is made by someone other than the principal officer or responsible Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(1) Internal review—access refusal decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide access to document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54-ss-2
part of: 54 Internal review—access refusal decision
note: Applicant may apply for internal review of access refusal decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(2) Internal review—access refusal decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to apply for internal review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54A Internal review—access grant decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54a
has part: 54A(1) Internal review—access grant decision
has part: 54A(2) Internal review—access grant decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122

54A(1) Internal review—access grant decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54a-ss-1
part of: 54A Internal review—access grant decision
note: Agency must grant access to documents upon request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54A(1) Internal review—access grant decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency is required to make a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54A(2) Internal review—access grant decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54a-ss-2
part of: 54A Internal review—access grant decision
note: Third party may apply for review of access grant decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54A(2) Internal review—access grant decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Right to apply for review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54B Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b
has part: 54B(1) Internal review—application for review
has part: 54B(2) Internal review—application for review
has part: 54B(3) Internal review—application for review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122

54B(1) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review
note: Application for internal review must be made within a specified time period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54B(1) Internal review—application for review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application for internal review must be made within a specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54B(2) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review
note: Agency may extend application deadline
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits agency action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54B(3) Internal review—application for review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3
part of: 54B Internal review—application for review
note: Exercise of agency power to allow further application period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.122
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Agency has the authority to grant an extension
premise text: (a) acting within the scope of authority exercisable by him or her
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Agency has the authority to grant an extension
premise text: (b) acting in accordance with arrangements approved by the responsible Minister or principal officer of the agency
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between agency power and responsible Minister approval
premise text: (b) acting in accordance with arrangements approved by the responsible Minister or principal officer of the agency
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace of agency power to grant extension
premise text: (a) acting within the scope of authority exercisable by him or her
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of agency power to grant extension through responsible Minister approval
premise text: (b) acting in accordance with arrangements approved by the responsible Minister or principal officer of the agency
conclusion text: (3) The agency’s power...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54C Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c
has part: 54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review
has part: 54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.123

54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review
note: Decision on internal review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.123
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54C(1) Internal review—decision on internal review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2
part of: 54C Internal review—decision on internal review
note: Agency must arrange for internal review of decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.123
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54C(2) Internal review—decision on internal review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency has a duty to arrange for internal review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d
has part: 54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(2) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(4) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(5) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(6) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(7) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
has part: 54D(8) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124

54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: Internal review deemed affirmation of original decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54D(1) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Internal review obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D(2) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: Agency must affirm original decision and notify applicant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54D(2) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Affirmation obligation
premise text: (2) Subject to this section:
conclusion text: Agency must affirm original decision and notify applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between agency's action and review period
premise text: (2) Subject to this section: (a) the principal officer of the agency is taken to have made a decision personally affirming the original decision on the last day of the initial decision period;
conclusion text: Agency's action overlaps with review period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Recurring trace of agency's actions and reviews
premise text: (2) Subject to this section: (a) the principal officer of the agency is taken to have made a decision personally affirming the original decision on the last day of the initial decision period;
conclusion text: Agency's actions and reviews form a recurring trace
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of agency's action to applicant
premise text: (b) notice of the decision is taken to have been given under section 26 to the internal review applicant on the same day.
conclusion text: Agency's action diffuses to applicant
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
logic summary: Implication of agency's action on applicant's rights
premise text: (b) notice of the decision is taken to have been given under section 26 to the internal review applicant on the same day.
conclusion text: Agency's action implicates applicant's rights
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: Agency may apply for further time to deal with application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 54D(3) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits agency to request extension.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D(4) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: Allow further time for agency to deal with application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D(5) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-5
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: Imposing conditions on further time allowed for internal review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: impose
logic summary: Obligation to impose conditions
premise text: Information Commissioner may impose any condition
conclusion text: Any condition imposed by the Information Commissioner is obligatory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D(6) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: Agency must comply with conditions imposed under subsection (5) within the further time allowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54D(6) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Agency must comply with conditions.
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Agency's compliance is within the further time allowed.
premise text: (a) makes a decision on the application within the further time allowed; and (b) complies with any condition imposed under subsection (5).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D(7) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-7
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: No further time allowed after agency fails to comply with conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 54D(7) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Agency's failure to comply is prohibited.
premise text: (a) does not make a decision on the request within the further time allowed;
conclusion text: No further time allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54D(8) Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54d-ss-8
part of: 54D Internal review—deemed affirmation of original decision
note: Prevents Information Commissioner from allowing further time under this section in relation to a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.124
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54d-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents action
premise text: No further time can be allowed
conclusion text: Action is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54E Internal review—decisions to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54e
note: Exemptions from internal review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.125
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54e-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54E Internal review—decisions to which this Part does not apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from internal review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54F Review by the Information Commissioner—guide
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54f
note: Application for review of a decision by the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.126
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54f-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54F Review by the Information Commissioner—guide
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide an application for review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54G Key concepts—what is an IC review?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54g
note: Defines IC review and its meaning.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.128
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54g-norm

54H Key concepts—what is an IC review application?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54h
note: Definition of IC review application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.128
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54h-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54H Key concepts—what is an IC review application?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54J Key concepts—who is an IC review applicant?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54j
note: Defines who is an IC review applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.128
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54j-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54J Key concepts—who is an IC review applicant?
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54K Key concepts—what is an IC reviewable decision?
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54k
note: Defines IC reviewable decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.128
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54k-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54k-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54K Key concepts—what is an IC reviewable decision?
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l
has part: 54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
has part: 54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
has part: 54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129

54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
note: Application for review of access refusal decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54L(1) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
note: Access refusal decisions are subject to internal review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54L(2) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency must provide access refusal decision subject to internal review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3
part of: 54L IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
note: Application for IC review may be made by or on behalf of the person who made the request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54L(3) IC reviewable decisions—access refusal decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to make application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m
has part: 54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
has part: 54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129

54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1
part of: 54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
note: Application for review of access grant decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54M(1) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Duty to apply for review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: possibility
logic summary: Possibility of review
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2
part of: 54M IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
note: Decision to affirm original access grant decision if no internal review decision within 30 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.129
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54M(2) IC reviewable decisions—access grant decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Affirmation obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54N IC review applications—application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n
has part: 54N(1) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(2) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(3) IC review applications—application
has part: 54N(4) IC review applications—application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.131

54N(1) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1
part of: 54N IC review applications—application
note: Application must provide details on notice delivery and copy of relevant notice.
description: Details on notice delivery, copy of relevant notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.131
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must provide details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54N(2) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2
part of: 54N IC review applications—application
note: Must provide particulars of basis for dispute
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.131
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54N(3) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3
part of: 54N IC review applications—application
note: Office must provide assistance to prepare IC review application.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.131
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54N(3) IC review applications—application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide assistance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54N(4) IC review applications—application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4
part of: 54N IC review applications—application
note: Must send IC review application to Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.131
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54N(4) IC review applications—application
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to send application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p
has part: 54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132

54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
note: Notify affected third parties of non-access to documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54P(1) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
note: Notify affected third party upon document of application.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54P(2) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify affected third party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3
part of: 54P IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
note: Notify Information Commissioner of notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54P(3) IC review applications—requirement to notify affected third
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q
has part: 54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 54Q(3) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132

54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1
part of: 54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
note: Not giving IC review applications under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54Q(1) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to give IC review applications
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This section applies when IC review applications are related to documents with consultation requirements
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This section applies when IC review applications are related to documents with consultation requirements
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This section applies when IC review applications are related to documents with consultation requirements
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This section applies when IC review applications are related to documents with consultation requirements
premise text: (1) This section applies in relation to a document to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2
part of: 54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
note: Agency or Minister not required to notify affected third party under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54Q(2) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from notification
premise text: Agency or Minister applies for order
conclusion text: No notification required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54Q(3) IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54q-ss-3
part of: 54Q IC review applications—circumstances in which not giving
note: Notifying an affected third party would prejudice certain activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.132
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54q-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prejudice investigation or enforcement
premise text: (a) prejudice the conduct of an investigation...
conclusion text: Notifying would prejudice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54R IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r
has part: 54R(1) IC review applications—withdrawal
has part: 54R(2) IC review applications—withdrawal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.133

54R(1) IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1
part of: 54R IC review applications—withdrawal
note: Withdrawal of IC review application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.133
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits withdrawal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54R(2) IC review applications—withdrawal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2
part of: 54R IC review applications—withdrawal
note: Withdrawal of IC review application is taken never to have been made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.133
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of IC review application withdrawal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54S IC review applications—time limits
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54s
note: IC review application must be made within a certain time limit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.133
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54s-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54s-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54s-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54S IC review applications—time limits
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be made within a certain time limit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54T IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t
has part: 54T(1) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(2) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(4) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time
has part: 54T(6) IC review applications—extension of time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134

54T(1) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-1
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Application for extension of time for IC review application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-1-norm

54T(2) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Extension of time for IC review applications may be granted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Granting extension of time is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Extension of time for making IC review application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54T(3) IC review applications—extension of time
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Allowance of extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54T(4) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Must give notice of application to affected persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
premise text: The Information Commissioner may require...
conclusion text: ...give notice of the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Notice must be given before review determination
premise text: (4) Before determining an application under subsection (1),...
conclusion text: ...give notice of the application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Must notify the Information Commissioner within a time limit
description: Reasonable opportunity to be heard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54T(5) IC review applications—extension of time
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a reasonable opportunity to be heard
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54T(6) IC review applications—extension of time
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6
part of: 54T IC review applications—extension of time
note: Must give IC review applicant and person to whom notice has been given a reasonable opportunity to present their cases before determining the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.134
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must give IC review applicant and person to whom notice has been given a reasonable opportunity to present their cases before determining the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54t-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The time period between giving notice and determining the application is a temporal interval that must be considered.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54U Decision to review—interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54u
note: Applies to a part of an IC review application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54u-norm

54V Decision to review—preliminary inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54v
note: Inquiries for IC review determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54v-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54v-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to inquire
premise text: Information Commissioner may make inquiries
conclusion text: Duty to determine IC review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54W Decision to review—discretion not to review
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54w
note: Decision not to review IC review application under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.136
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on frivolous IC review applications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Information Commissioner may decide not to continue IC review under certain conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54w-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Information Commissioner must contact IC review applicant after making reasonable attempts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x
has part: 54X(1) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(2) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
has part: 54X(4) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.137

54X(1) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-1
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
note: Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to undertake an IC review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-1-norm

54X(2) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
note: Notify review parties of decision in writing.
description: Decision notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must notify...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
note: Notice must state reasons for Information Commissioner's decision and application details.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54X(3) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state reasons for Information Commissioner's decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54X(4) Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4
part of: 54X Decision to review—notice requirement if discretion not to
note: Exempt matter and certain document information cannot be included in the notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.137
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54x-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Exempt matter and certain document information cannot be included in the notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54Y Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54y
has part: 54Y(1) Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
has part: 54Y(2) Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.138

54Y(1) Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1
part of: 54Y Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
note: Agency or Minister must review actual decision after IC review has been made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.138
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54Y(1) Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must review actual decision after IC review has been made.
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between IC review application and Information Commissioner's decision.
premise text: (b) a person makes an IC review application for review of the deemed decision;
conclusion text: (b) a person makes an IC review application for review of the deemed decision;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between actual decision and Information Commissioner's decision.
premise text: (d) subsection 15AC(7), 51DA(6) or 54D(6) applies in relation to a decision (the actual decision) made by the agency or Minister.
conclusion text: (d) subsection 15AC(7), 51DA(6) or 54D(6) applies in relation to a decision (the actual decision) made by the agency or Minister.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must review actual decision after IC review has been made.
premise text: (c) the Information Commissioner has not made a decision under section 54W (decision not to review) or 55K (decision on review) in relation to the deemed decision;
conclusion text: (c) the Information Commissioner has not made a decision under section 54W (decision not to review) or 55K (decision on review) in relation to the deemed decision;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54Y(2) Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54y-ss-2
part of: 54Y Decision to review—actual decisions made after IC review has
note: Must deal with IC review application as if it were an IC review application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.138
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must deal with IC review application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54Z Procedure in IC review—general notice requirement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54z
note: Information Commissioner must inform person, agency or Minister who made the decision before undertaking IC review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.139
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54z-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54z-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-54z-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55
has part: 55(1) Procedure in IC review—general
has part: 55(2) Procedure in IC review—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.139

55(1) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-1
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general
note: The Information Commissioner may review an IC reviewable decision without holding a hearing under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.139
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(2) Procedure in IC review—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55-ss-2
part of: 55 Procedure in IC review—general
note: The Information Commissioner may conduct an IC review in whatever way he or she considers appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.139
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(2) Procedure in IC review—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may conduct an IC review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: The IC review is a part of the procedure in IC review—general.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a
has part: 55A(1) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
has part: 55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
has part: 55A(3) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141

55A(1) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-1
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
note: List of parties to an IC review proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-1-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55A(1) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
note: Person whose interests are affected by IC reviewable decision may apply to be a review party.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55A(2) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55A(3) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3
part of: 55A Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
note: The Information Commissioner may make a person an IC review party by notice in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55A(3) Procedure in IC review—parties to proceeding
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b
has part: 55B(1) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
has part: 55B(2) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141

55B(1) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1
part of: 55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
note: Request for hearing during IC review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Request for hearing is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55B(2) Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2
part of: 55B Procedure in IC review—application for hearing
note: Notify other review parties of application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.141
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55C Procedure in IC review—representation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55c
note: May appear in person or be represented by another person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.142
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55c-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to appear in person or be represented
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55D Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d
has part: 55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus
has part: 55D(2) Procedure in IC review—onus
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.142

55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1
part of: 55D Procedure in IC review—onus
note: Agency has the onus of establishing that a decision is justified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.142
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55D(1) Procedure in IC review—onus
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
logic summary: Agency has the onus of establishing that a decision is justified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55D(2) Procedure in IC review—onus
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2
part of: 55D Procedure in IC review—onus
note: Affected third party bears the onus of establishing justification for a decision refusing a request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.142
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to establish justification
premise text: Request was made under section 54M
conclusion text: Decision refusing the request is justified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to establish justification for adverse decision
premise text: Information Commissioner should give a decision adverse to the person who made the request
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner should give a decision adverse to the person who made the request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between IC review and access grant decisions
premise text: IC review is made under section 54M
conclusion text: The IC review overlaps with the access grant decision
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: Recurring trace of affected third party in IC reviews
premise text: Affected third party is involved in multiple IC reviews
conclusion text: The affected third party is involved in recurring traces of IC reviews
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55d-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to establish justification for adverse decision in IC review
premise text: Decision refusing the request is justified
conclusion text: The decision refusing the request is justified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55DA Decision-maker must assist Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55da
note: Agency or Minister must assist Information Commissioner in IC review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.142
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55da-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55da-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55da-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55DA Decision-maker must assist Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55da-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e
has part: 55E(1) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
has part: 55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
has part: 55E(3) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.143

55E(1) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
note: Agency or Minister must provide statement of reasons for decision if requested.
description: Statement of reasons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.143
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must provide statement of reasons for decision if requested.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
note: Agency or Minister must provide adequate statement of reasons upon request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.143
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55E(2) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55E(3) Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3
part of: 55E Procedure in IC review—inadequate reasons from decision
note: Provide adequate statement of reasons within specified period or 28 days.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.143
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide statement of reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55F Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55f
note: Review parties must agree on terms of a decision in IC review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.143
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55f-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55F Procedure in IC review—review parties reach agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory agreement on terms of a decision in IC review
premise text: (a) the review parties reach agreement as to the terms of a decision on an IC review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g
has part: 55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
has part: 55G(2) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.144

55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1
part of: 55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
note: Agency or Minister may vary access refusal decision during IC review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.144
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 55G(1) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to vary access refusal decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55G(2) Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2
part of: 55G Procedure in IC review—revocation or variation of access
note: Agency or Minister must notify Information Commissioner of variation or substitution in access refusal decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.144
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency or Minister must perform action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h
has part: 55H(1) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(2) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
has part: 55H(5) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145

55H(1) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
note: The Information Commissioner may refer a question of law to the Federal Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55H(1) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to refer questions of law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55H(2) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
note: The Information Commissioner may refer questions of law to.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Obligation to refer questions of law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
note: Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55H(3) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Has jurisdiction
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it.
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Has jurisdiction
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it.
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAuthority
logic summary: Has authority
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it.
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has authority.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: hasAuthority
logic summary: Has authority
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it.
conclusion text: The Federal Court of Australia has authority.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
note: Jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia may be exercised by a single judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55H(4) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Exercise jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55H(5) Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5
part of: 55H Procedure in IC review—reference of questions of law to
note: Must not give a decision before Federal Court of Australia makes a decision on the question.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.145
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on giving decisions before Federal Court of Australia makes a decision.
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner must not...
conclusion text: ...give a decision to which the question is relevant before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on proceeding in a manner inconsistent with Federal Court of Australia's opinion.
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner must not...
conclusion text: ...or make a decision, that is inconsistent with the opinion of the Federal Court of Australia on the question;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between decision-making and IC review.
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner...
conclusion text: ...before the Federal Court of Australia makes a decision in relation to the reference;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Contradiction
logic summary: IC review procedure contradiction.
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner...
conclusion text: ...or make a decision, that is inconsistent with the opinion of the Federal Court of Australia on the question;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55h-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: IC review procedure propagation.
premise text: (5) If a question of law is referred, the Information Commissioner...
conclusion text: ...must not, for the purposes of the IC review:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55J Procedure in IC review—sending of documents to, and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55j
note: Must send documents to Federal Court of Australia upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.146
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55j-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to disclose documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k
has part: 55K(1) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(2) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
has part: 55K(6) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147

55K(1) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
note: Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must make a decision in writing
conclusion text: (1) After undertaking an IC review, the Information Commissioner MUST make a decision in writing:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must vary the IC reviewable decision
premise text: (b) varying the IC reviewable decision;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must set aside the IC reviewable decision and make a decision in substitution for that decision
premise text: (c) setting aside the IC reviewable decision and making a decision in substitution for that decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval of undertaking an IC review
premise text: (1) After undertaking an IC review, the Information Commissioner MUST make a decision in writing:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55K(2) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
note: Information Commissioner may exercise powers of the person who made IC reviewable decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55K(2) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Exercise power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
note: Decision of the Information Commissioner has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55K(3) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
conclusion text: Content of the decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
conclusion text: Content of the decision
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Ordered trace: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
conclusion text: Content of the decision
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Recurring trace: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
conclusion text: Content of the decision
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Knowledge representation: Same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister
premise text: (3) A decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review has the same effect as a decision of the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
conclusion text: Content of the decision
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
note: Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner must include statement of reasons and rights to apply for Tribunal review.
description: Statement of reasons, Statement of rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55K(4) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must include statement of reasons and rights to apply for Tribunal review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
note: Exempt matter cannot be included in a decision on IC review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55K(5) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not include
logic summary: Prohibition of information inclusion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55K(6) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55k-ss-6
part of: 55K Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
note: Information Commissioner must provide a copy of decision to each review party.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.147
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55K(6) Decision on IC review—decision of Information Commissioner
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55k-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide a copy of decision to each review party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l
has part: 55L(1) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
has part: 55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148

55L(1) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1
part of: 55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
note: No power to give access to exempt documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55L(1) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving access to exempt documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2
part of: 55L Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
note: No power to give access to exempt matter
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55L(2) Decision on IC review—no power to give access to exempt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits giving access to exempt matter
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m
has part: 55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
has part: 55M(2) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148

55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1
part of: 55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
note: The Information Commissioner must decide to amend records under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55M(1) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has a duty to make decisions under certain conditions.
premise text: The decision requires an amendment to be made to the record.
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must decide to amend records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The decision must occur during certain conditions.
premise text: The opinion was based on a mistake of fact or the author of the opinion was biased, unqualified to form the opinion or acted improperly in conducting the factual inquiries that led to the formation of the opinion.
conclusion text: The decision must occur during these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: The decision is conditional on certain conditions being met.
premise text: The decision requires an amendment to be made to the record.
conclusion text: The decision is conditional on these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55M(2) Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2
part of: 55M Decision on IC review—limitation on amending records
note: Cannot amend records in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.148
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot amend records
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55N Decision on IC review—obligation to comply with decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55n
note: Must comply with decision on IC review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55n-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55n-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p
has part: 55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
has part: 55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149

55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
note: Agency must comply with section 55N
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55P(1) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Agency must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
note: Application for IC review may be made by the Information Commissioner or the IC review applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55P(2) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Application may be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
note: Court may make orders to secure compliance by principal officer or Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55P(3) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4
part of: 55P Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
note: Application under subsection (1) may not be made before the end of the time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.149
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55P(4) Decision on IC review—enforcement of decision against agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Cannot make application
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
conclusion text: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55p-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Application under subsection (1) may only be made if...
premise text: Time has ended for making an application to the Tribunal
conclusion text: ...the end of the time.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55Q Decision on IC review—correction of errors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55q
has part: 55Q(1) Decision on IC review—correction of errors
has part: 55Q(2) Decision on IC review—correction of errors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.150

55Q(1) Decision on IC review—correction of errors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55q-ss-1
part of: 55Q Decision on IC review—correction of errors
note: The Information Commissioner may correct obvious errors in decisions under section 55K of the Information Commissioner on an IC review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.150
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55Q(1) Decision on IC review—correction of errors
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has a duty to correct obvious errors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55Q(2) Decision on IC review—correction of errors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55q-ss-2
part of: 55Q Decision on IC review—correction of errors
note: Correction of errors by Information Commissioner on application or initiative.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.150
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Obligation to correct errors
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r
has part: 55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
has part: 55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151

55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
note: The Information Commissioner may compel a person to produce information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55R(1) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Compelling a person to provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
note: Notice to produce documents
description: Documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55R(2) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to produce
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval for document production
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to provide information or produce a document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55R(3) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: The Information Commissioner requires the person to provide information or produce a document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
note: Notice requirements for production of information
description: Information gathering powers—obliging production of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55R(4) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notice requirements for production of information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5
part of: 55R Information gathering powers—obliging production of
note: Committing an offence if a person fails to provide information
description: Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.151
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55R(5) Information gathering powers—obliging production of
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55r-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
conclusion text: A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s
has part: 55S(1) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
has part: 55S(2) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
has part: 55S(3) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.152

55S(1) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
note: Must permit access by those entitled to documents produced in accordance with a notice under subsection 55R(3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.152
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55S(2) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
note: Must permit inspection of documents held by the Information Commissioner for IC review purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.152
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to permit inspection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55S(3) Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3
part of: 55S Information gathering powers—dealings with documents
note: Permit inspection of documents at reasonable times.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.152
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t
has part: 55T(1) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(2) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(3) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(4) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
has part: 55T(5) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153

55T(1) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
note: Principal officer of an agency or Minister claims a document is exempt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55T(1) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: claims
logic summary: Claiming a document is exempt.
premise text: Section 55U does not apply to the document.
conclusion text: The document is claimed to be exempt.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: claims
logic summary: Claiming a document is not exempt.
premise text: (b) section 55U does not apply to the document.
conclusion text: The document is claimed not to be exempt.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: claims
logic summary: Claiming a document has no exemption status.
premise text: (b) section 55U does not apply to the document.
conclusion text: The document has no exemption status.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55T(2) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
note: The Information Commissioner may require a document to be produced for deciding whether it is an exempt document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has the power to require a document to be produced.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55T(3) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
note: Must return exempt document to person who produced it
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return exempt document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55T(4) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
note: The Information Commissioner may require the production of an exempt document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to produce information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55T(5) Information gathering powers—production of exempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5
part of: 55T Information gathering powers—production of exempt
note: Access to document is restricted to the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.153
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts access to document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55U Information gathering powers—production of national
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u
has part: 55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national
has part: 55U(2) Information gathering powers—production of national
has part: 55U(3) Information gathering powers—production of national
has part: 55U(4) Information gathering powers—production of national
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.154

55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national
note: IC review of a decision in relation to an exempt document under section 33, 34 or 45A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.154
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55U(1) Information gathering powers—production of national
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55U(2) Information gathering powers—production of national
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national
note: The Information Commissioner may only require the production of a document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.154
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to produce information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55U(3) Information gathering powers—production of national
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national
note: Require document production for inspection if exempt claim is disputed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.154
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Information Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: satisfy
logic summary: Requires evidence to be satisfied before requiring document production
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
logic summary: Involves an ordered trace of document inspection
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55U(4) Information gathering powers—production of national
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4
part of: 55U Information gathering powers—production of national
note: Restricts access to exempt documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.154
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits access to exempt documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v
has part: 55V(1) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
has part: 55V(2) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155

55V(1) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1
part of: 55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a
note: Refusal of access to a document under section 24A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55V(1) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to a document under section 24A
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information about when access to a document can be refused under section 24A
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies documents as accessible or not under section 24A using AI
premise text: (a) access to the document is refused under section 24A (document cannot be found etc.); or (b) access is purportedly given to the document...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55V(2) Information gathering powers—further searches for a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2
part of: 55V Information gathering powers—further searches for a
note: Agency or Minister must conduct further searches for a document upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55v-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct further searches.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w
has part: 55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
has part: 55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
has part: 55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155

55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to appear before the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55W(1) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
note: Notice must be in writing, specify time and place for compliance.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55W(2) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3
part of: 55W Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
note: Failure to comply with a notice requirement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.155
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55W(3) Information gathering powers—obliging persons to appear
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a notice requirement.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: if the person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (1); and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Temporal relation: before the notice requirement.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: if the person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (1); and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: before
logic summary: Temporal relation: before the conduct.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: if the person engages in conduct; and
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: none
logic summary: No diffusion logic applies.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: if the person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (1); and
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55w-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: none
logic summary: No CogAI logic applies.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: if the person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (1); and
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x
has part: 55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
has part: 55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
has part: 55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.156

55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
note: The Information Commissioner may administer an oath or affirmation to a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.156
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55X(1) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must administer an oath or affirmation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
note: The oath or affirmation must be true.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.156
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55X(2) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Oath or affirmation must be true.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3
part of: 55X Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
note: Failure to comply with oath or affirmation requirement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.156
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55X(3) Information gathering powers—administration of oath or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
premise text: Person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation.
conclusion text: Failure to comply is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55Y Information gathering powers—no loss of legal professional
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55y
note: No loss of legal professional privilege when information is given, produced or referred to for the purposes of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.156
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55y-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55y-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55Y Information gathering powers—no loss of legal professional
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z
has part: 55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
has part: 55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
has part: 55Z(3) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.157

55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability
note: Protection from liability for good faith information gathering
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.157
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55Z(1) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to provide information in good faith
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability
note: Protection from liability for information gathering powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.157
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55Z(2) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the section applies, then...
premise text: This section applies
conclusion text: Civil proceedings do not lie against a person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55Z(3) Information gathering powers—protection from liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3
part of: 55Z Information gathering powers—protection from liability
note: Protection from liability for information gathering powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.157
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55z-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the person to comply with this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZA Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55za
note: Scope of Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.158
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55za-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55za-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55ZA Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb
has part: 55ZB(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZB(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZB(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.158

55ZB(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Request for personal appearance and evidence from Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security before determining a document is exempt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.158
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to request evidence
premise text: The Information Commissioner must request the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security to appear personally...
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST request the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security to appear personally...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
premise text: ...the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security to give evidence on...
conclusion text: The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security MUST give evidence on...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider damage to Commonwealth security, defence, or international relations
premise text: ...the damage that would, or could reasonably be expected to, be caused to...
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST consider the damage that would, or could reasonably be expected to, be caused to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider divulgence of confidential information
premise text: ...whether giving access to the document in accordance with the request would divulge any information or matter communicated in confidence...
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST consider whether giving access to the document in accordance with the request would divulge any information or matter communicated in confidence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide reasons for exemption determination
premise text: ...the damage that would, or could reasonably be expected to, be caused to...
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST provide reasons for the determination that the document is not an exempt document under section 33.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider Commonwealth interests
premise text: ...the international relations of the Commonwealth;
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST consider the international relations of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZB(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Request for Inspector-General to appear and give evidence on potential damage or divulgence of confidential information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.158
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55ZB(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide evidence
premise text: The Information Commissioner must request the Inspector-General...
conclusion text: The Inspector-General must appear and give evidence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to appear and give evidence
premise text: The Inspector-General must appear personally...
conclusion text: The Inspector-General must give evidence on the requested matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZB(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3
part of: 55ZB Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Agency must provide evidence before hearing Inspector-General's evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.158
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZC Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zc
note: Must comply with request unless not qualified to give evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zc-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd
has part: 55ZD(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(4) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(5) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(6) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(7) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
has part: 55ZD(8) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160

55ZD(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must comply with a request under section 55ZB.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55ZD(1) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: AT
logic summary: Temporal relation: At
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZD(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: The Information Commissioner must allow the Inspector-General to take possession of documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55ZD(2) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Allowance of action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZD(3) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-3
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Production of documents required by Inspector-General
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Mandatory production of documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZD(4) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-4
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: The Inspector-General may make copies or take extracts from documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make copies or take extracts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZD(5) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-5
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Return original documents to the Information Commissioner or agency/minister after a reasonable period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGATE
logic summary: Duty to return documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZD(6) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-6
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Permits inspection of documents held by the Inspector-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permit
logic summary: Grants permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZD(7) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-7
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: Permit to inspect document at reasonable times
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55ZD(8) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-8
part of: 55ZD Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
note: The Information Commissioner must allow the Inspector-General a reasonable time to consider documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.160
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55ZD(8) Evidence by Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-55zd-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allow
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: The Information Commissioner must...
conclusion text: ...a reasonable time to consider documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56
has part: 56(1) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(2) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(3) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(4) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(5) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
has part: 56(6) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162

56(1) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-1
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: Right to appeal on questions of law from Information Commissioner's decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has right
logic summary: Right to appeal
premise text: Review party may appeal
conclusion text: Information Commissioner's decision is subject to review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(2) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-2
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: Appeal must be instituted within a specified time frame.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be instituted
premise text: (2) An appeal under this section...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(3) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-3
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(3) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear appeals
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction...
conclusion text: The Federal Court has jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Jurisdiction applies during appeals instituted under this section
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction...
conclusion text: The jurisdiction applies during appeals instituted under this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to hear appeals
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction...
conclusion text: The Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to hear appeals.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to diffuse decisions
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction...
conclusion text: The Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to diffuse decisions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to process appeals
premise text: (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction...
conclusion text: The Federal Court's jurisdiction implies the ability to process appeals.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(4) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-4
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: Jurisdiction to make findings of fact under section 56A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Jurisdiction includes
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subsubsection
logic summary: Subsubsection (3) included in subsection (4)
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: (4)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(5) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-5
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: Must hear and determine the appeal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to hear and determine the appeal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(6) Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56-ss-6
part of: 56 Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of
note: The Federal Court of Australia may not make certain decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.162
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56A Appeals—Federal Court of Australia may make findings of fact
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56a
note: The Federal Court of Australia may make findings of fact in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.163
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Court may make findings of fact.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-56a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: The provision has a descriptive clause.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Review by the Tribunal—guide
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-57
note: Application for review by the Administrative Review Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.165
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Review by the Tribunal—guide
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Divisional structure
premise text: Division 3 sets out the powers of the Tribunal in a review.
conclusion text: Division 4 deals with the procedure to be followed in a review by the Tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Division 3 sets out the powers of the Tribunal in a review.
conclusion text: Division 4 deals with the procedure to be followed in a review by the Tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Division 3 sets out the powers of the Tribunal in a review.
conclusion text: Division 4 deals with the procedure to be followed in a review by the Tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Divisional structure
premise text: Division 5 deals with ensuring that exempt matter that comes before the Tribunal is protected from disclosure.
conclusion text: Division 6 deals with the circumstances in which the Tribunal may make recommendations as to costs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a
has part: 57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
has part: 57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
has part: 57A(3) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.166

57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1
part of: 57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
note: Application for review of decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.166
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(1) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May apply for review
premise text: Person whose interests are affected
conclusion text: Application may be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2
part of: 57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
note: Application for review of IC reviewable decision must be made within a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.166
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(2) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make application within a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(3) Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-57a-ss-3
part of: 57A Tribunal reviewable decisions—which decisions are
note: Part 5 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 does not apply in relation to certain decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.166
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the application of Part 5.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58
has part: 58(1) Powers of Tribunal
has part: 58(2) Powers of Tribunal
has part: 58(6) Powers of Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168

58(1) Powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-1
part of: 58 Powers of Tribunal
note: Tribunal has power to review and decide on agency/minister decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Tribunal has power to review and decide.
premise text: Tribunal is a decision-making body.
conclusion text: Tribunal has the power to review and decide.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(2) Powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-2
part of: 58 Powers of Tribunal
note: Tribunal cannot decide access to exempt document containing exempt matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Tribunal cannot decide access to exempt document.
premise text: Exempt matter exists in the document.
conclusion text: Access to exempt matter is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(6) Powers of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58-ss-6
part of: 58 Powers of Tribunal
note: Tribunal has power to determine charges payable under Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(6) Powers of Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Tribunal has power to determine charges payable under Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a
has part: 58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
has part: 58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168

58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1
part of: 58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
note: Access to document is refused under section 24A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 58A(1) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access to document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2
part of: 58A Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
note: Tribunal may require further searches for document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58A(2) Powers of Tribunal—requiring further searches
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa
has part: 58AA(1) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
has part: 58AA(2) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168

58AA(1) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1
part of: 58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
note: The Tribunal may require an amendment to a record of an opinion if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: The Tribunal has a duty to require an amendment.
premise text: The Tribunal may make a decision that requires an amendment.
conclusion text: An amendment must be made if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The amendment must be made during the factual inquiries.
premise text: The Tribunal's decision requires an amendment.
conclusion text: The amendment must be made during the factual inquiries.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58AA(2) Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2
part of: 58AA Powers of Tribunal—limitation on amending records
note: Tribunal cannot amend records under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.168
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot amend records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58aa-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
logic summary: Multiple conditions apply
premise text: (a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58E Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58e
has part: 58E(1) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
has part: 58E(2) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
has part: 58E(3) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
has part: 58E(4) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.170

58E(1) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58e-ss-1
part of: 58E Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
note: Production of exempt documents in Tribunal proceedings
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.170
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Require
logic summary: Tribunal requires production of exempt documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58E(2) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58e-ss-2
part of: 58E Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
note: Produce exempt documents for inspection if not satisfied
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.170
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58E(3) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58e-ss-3
part of: 58E Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
note: Tribunal must not permit access to exempt documents unless specified conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.170
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must-not-permit
logic summary: Prohibition on access to exempt documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58E(4) Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4
part of: 58E Production to the Tribunal of certain exempt documents
note: Document must be produced to the Tribunal if satisfied
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.170
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-58e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Document production is between subsection (3) and section 60
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60
has part: 60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
has part: 60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
has part: 60(3) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171

60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-ss-1
part of: 60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties
note: Applicability of section to proceedings under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(1) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to specified proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-ss-2
part of: 60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties
note: Agency's decisions are binding on its representatives.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(2) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency's decisions are binding.
premise text: (2) A decision given by a person on behalf of an agency is taken to have been given by the agency.
conclusion text: The decision is binding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Agency's representatives can make decisions.
premise text: (2) A decision given by a person on behalf of an agency is taken to have been given by the agency.
conclusion text: The representative has permission to make a decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Agency's representatives have rights.
premise text: (2) A decision given by a person on behalf of an agency is taken to have been given by the agency.
conclusion text: The representative has a right.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Undertaking
logic summary: Agency's decisions are part of its authority.
premise text: (2) A decision given by a person on behalf of an agency is taken to have been given by the agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Agency's representatives are obligated to follow decisions.
premise text: (2) A decision given by a person on behalf of an agency is taken to have been given by the agency.
conclusion text: The representative is obligated to follow the decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(3) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60-ss-3
part of: 60 Procedure in Tribunal—parties
note: List of parties to a proceeding before the Tribunal for a review of a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(3) Procedure in Tribunal—parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Parties to a proceeding are listed.
premise text: The Tribunal must list the parties.
conclusion text: The parties are as follows:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa
has part: 60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
has part: 60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171

60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1
part of: 60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
note: Requirement to notify affected third party
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60AA(1) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2
part of: 60AA Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
note: Agency must notify affected third party upon request for document access.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.171
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60AA(2) Procedure in Tribunal—requirement to notify affected third
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must notify affected third party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab
has part: 60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
has part: 60AB(3) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.172

60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
note: Not giving a document in relation to which a consultation requirement applies under section 27 or 27A is an obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.172
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60AB(1) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
note: No notification required under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.172
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60AB(2) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60AB(3) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3
part of: 60AB Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
note: Notifying an affected third party under certain circumstances may prejudice investigation, enforcement, or administration of the law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.172
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-ltl-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60AB(3) Procedure in Tribunal—circumstances in which not giving
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Notifying an affected third party under certain circumstances may prejudice investigation, enforcement, or administration of the law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60ab-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Preclude
logic summary: Preclusion of notification due to potential impact on investigation
premise text: Notifying an affected third party under certain circumstances may prejudice investigation, enforcement, or administration of the law.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60A Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60a
has part: 60A(1) Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
has part: 60A(2) Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.173

60A(1) Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60a-ss-1
part of: 60A Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
note: Exempt document under section 33 must be disclosed in a proceeding before the Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.173
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Inspection agency has an obligation to disclose documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60A(2) Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-60a-ss-2
part of: 60A Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security must be
note: Request for personal appearance and evidence from Inspector-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.173
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-60a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must appear personally
premise text: Request for personal appearance
conclusion text: Inspector-General must appear personally
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Onus
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-61
has part: 61(1) Onus
has part: 61(2) Onus
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.176

61(1) Onus
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-61-ss-1
part of: 61 Onus
note: Agency or Minister has the onus of establishing that the decision is not justified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.176
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasOnus
logic summary: Agency or Minister has onus of establishing that the decision is not justified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: establishing
logic summary: Agency or Minister must establish that the decision is not justified.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(2) Onus
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-61-ss-2
part of: 61 Onus
note: Affected third party bears the onus of establishing that a decision refusing to give access is justified or that the Tribunal should give an adverse decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.176
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to establish justification or adverse decision.
premise text: Affected third party is a party to the proceeding.
conclusion text: Onus of establishing justification or adverse decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No prohibition on establishing justification or adverse decision.
premise text: Affected third party is a party to the proceeding.
conclusion text: No obligation to provide justification or adverse decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between proceedings and decision-making process.
premise text: Proceedings under this Part relate to decisions made under section 26A, 27 or 27A.
conclusion text: Temporal overlap between proceedings and decision-making process.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace of affected third party's involvement in proceedings.
premise text: Affected third party is a party to the proceeding.
conclusion text: Recurring trace of affected third party's involvement in proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of onus from Tribunal to affected third party.
premise text: Tribunal has the onus of establishing justification or adverse decision.
conclusion text: Diffusion of onus from Tribunal to affected third party.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61A Modification of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-61a
note: The Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 applies to proceedings under this Part as if a reference to the decision-maker in certain provisions of that Act were a reference to the agency or Minister who made the IC reviewable decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.176
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61A Modification of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The provision imposes an obligation on the agency or Minister to make decisions in accordance with the specified provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-61a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: The provision classifies the decision-maker as a party to be notified of application.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-62
has part: 62(1) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
has part: 62(2) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.178

62(1) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-62-ss-1
part of: 62 Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
note: Exemption from Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.178
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(1) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the agent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(2) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-62-ss-2
part of: 62 Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
note: Tribunal may make declaration if notice lacks adequate particulars.
description: additional notices containing further and better particulars
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.178
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(2) Application of section 268 of Administrative Review Tribunal Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Tribunal may make declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-63
has part: 63(1) Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
has part: 63(2) Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180

63(1) Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-63-ss-1
part of: 63 Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
note: Tribunal must consider non-disclosure of certain matters when making orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Tribunal has an obligation to consider non-disclosure of certain matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during determination
logic summary: Tribunal must consider non-disclosure during determination.
premise text: (1) In determining whether the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to make an order or orders under subsection 69(3) or 70(1) or (2) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, the Tribunal must have regard to:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during determination
logic summary: Tribunal's consideration of non-disclosure is a trace during determination.
premise text: (1) In determining whether the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to make an order or orders under subsection 69(3) or 70(1) or (2) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, the Tribunal must have regard to:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Tribunal has an obligation to consider non-disclosure.
premise text: (1) In determining whether the Tribunal is satisfied that it is desirable to make an order or orders under subsection 69(3) or 70(1) or (2) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, the Tribunal must have regard to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

63(2) Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-63-ss-2
part of: 63 Tribunal to ensure non-disclosure of certain matters
note: Tribunal cannot include certain matters in its decision or reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure of certain matters
premise text: Tribunal's decision or reasons
conclusion text: Matter or information of a kind referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may receive evidence or hear argument
logic summary: Tribunal may receive evidence or hear argument without applicant or representative present
premise text: In order to prevent disclosure of certain matters
conclusion text: Absence of applicant or representative
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
logic summary: Tribunal may receive evidence or hear argument without applicant or representative present
premise text: In order to prevent disclosure of certain matters
conclusion text: Absence of applicant or representative
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot include matter or information
logic summary: Tribunal cannot include matter or information of a kind referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b)
premise text: Decision or reasons
conclusion text: Matter or information of a kind referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Production of exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-64
has part: 64(1) Production of exempt documents
has part: 64(1A) Production of exempt documents
has part: 64(2) Production of exempt documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180

64(1) Production of exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-64-ss-1
part of: 64 Production of exempt documents
note: Tribunal must return exempt document to person who produced it, unless certain conditions apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Tribunal must not disclose or permit access to exempt document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(1A) Production of exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-64-ss-1a
part of: 64 Production of exempt documents
note: Inspection of exempt documents by Tribunal members or staff under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1a-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to inspect documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(2) Production of exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-64-ss-2
part of: 64 Production of exempt documents
note: Tribunal may not disclose exempt document contents to unauthorized persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.180
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-66
has part: 66(1) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
has part: 66(2) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
has part: 66(3) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.184

66(1) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-66-ss-1
part of: 66 Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
note: Tribunal may recommend costs be paid by Commonwealth to applicant who is successful in review application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.184
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(1) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Tribunal may make recommendation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66(2) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-66-ss-2
part of: 66 Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
note: Tribunal must consider financial hardship, public benefit, commercial benefit, and decision reasonableness when making a recommendation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.184
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(2) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Tribunal must consider certain factors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Tribunal considers time period for decision reasonableness.
premise text: (d) the reasonableness of the decision reviewed by the Tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66(3) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-66-ss-3
part of: 66 Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
note: Minister may authorize payment of costs to an applicant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.184
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(3) Tribunal may make recommendation that costs be available in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-66-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-67
has part: 67(1) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
has part: 67(2) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
has part: 67(3) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
has part: 67(4) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.185

67(1) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-67-ss-1
part of: 67 Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
note: Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.185
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-1-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67(1) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

67(2) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-67-ss-2
part of: 67 Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
note: Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal from the time an appeal is instituted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.185
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: stay
logic summary: Imposes a duty to suspend the operation of a decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67(3) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-67-ss-3
part of: 67 Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
note: Stay continues until earlier of Federal Court decision or other determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.185
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-3-norm

67(4) Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-67-ss-4
part of: 67 Automatic stay of certain decisions on appeal
note: Continuation of automatic stay on appeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.185
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-67-ss-4-norm

68 Investigations and complaints—guide
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-68
note: The Information Commissioner may investigate an action taken by an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.187
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-68-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Investigations and complaints—guide
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to investigate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-69
has part: 69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
has part: 69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189

69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-69-ss-1
part of: 69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
note: The Information Commissioner must investigate a complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(1) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to investigate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-69-ss-2
part of: 69 Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
note: Power to investigate agency actions under this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(2) Information Commissioner investigations—power to investigate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Agency can be investigated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-70
has part: 70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
has part: 70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
has part: 70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189

70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-ss-1
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
note: Complainant may complain to the Information Commissioner about an action taken by an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(1) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: about
logic summary: Indicates the subject of knowledge or inquiry.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: complain
logic summary: Expresses a temporal relation between actions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: to
logic summary: Indicates the relationship between actions or statements.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-ss-2
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
note: Complaint must be in writing and identify the agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(2) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-70-ss-3
part of: 70 Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
note: Office must provide assistance to formulate complaint
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.189
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(3) Information Commissioner investigations—making complaints
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-70-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Information Commissioner investigations—interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-71
note: Interpretation of Subdivision application to part of a complaint
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.190
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-71-norm

72 Information Commissioner investigations—preliminary inquiries
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-72
note: The Information Commissioner may make inquiries of the respondent agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.190
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-72-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-72-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72 Information Commissioner investigations—preliminary inquiries
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Information Commissioner investigations—discretion not to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-73
note: Discretion not to investigate a complaint under section 70
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.190
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to investigate a complaint under section 70
premise text: The Information Commissioner may decide not to investigate...
conclusion text: The action is taken by an agency in the performance of its functions or exercise of its powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.9000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission for the Information Commissioner to decide not to investigate a complaint under section 70
premise text: The Information Commissioner may decide not to investigate...
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the decision to investigate and the action taken by an agency
premise text: The Information Commissioner may decide not to investigate...
conclusion text: The decision to investigate overlaps with the action taken by an agency.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the decision to investigate and the complainant's exercise of their right
premise text: The Information Commissioner may decide not to investigate...
conclusion text: The decision to investigate is until the complainant exercises their right.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-73-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation for the complainant to exercise their right to review the action
premise text: The complainant has not exercised...
conclusion text: It would be reasonable for the complainant to have exercised the right.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-74
note: Transfer of investigations to Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.191
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74 Information Commissioner investigations—transfer to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: should
logic summary: Obligation to transfer investigations
premise text: The Information Commissioner is satisfied that a complaint could be more effectively dealt with by the Ombudsman.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to transfer investigations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Investigations can be transferred during the satisfaction of the Information Commissioner
premise text: The Information Commissioner is satisfied that a complaint could be more effectively dealt with.
conclusion text: Investigations can be transferred during the satisfaction of the Information Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Transfer of investigations implies that the Ombudsman has jurisdiction over complaints
premise text: The complaint could be more effectively dealt with by the Ombudsman.
conclusion text: The Ombudsman has jurisdiction over complaints
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
logic summary: Transfer of investigations and satisfaction of the Information Commissioner are related conditions
premise text: The Information Commissioner is satisfied that a complaint could be more effectively dealt with.
conclusion text: The transfer of investigations and the satisfaction of the Information Commissioner are related conditions
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-74-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: and
logic summary: Transfer of investigations and jurisdiction over complaints are related concepts
premise text: The Ombudsman has jurisdiction over complaints.
conclusion text: The transfer of investigations and the jurisdiction over complaints are related concepts
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75
has part: 75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
has part: 75(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193

75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-1
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
note: Information Commissioner must notify respondent agency in writing before beginning an investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-2
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
note: The Information Commissioner must provide notice if they decide not to investigate a complaint.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Information Commissioner must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-3
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
note: Notify complainant and respondent agency of decision in writing.
description: Decision notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner MUST notify...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-4
part of: 75 Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
note: Notice must state reasons for decision.
description: Reasons for decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state reason
conclusion text: Reasons for decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76
has part: 76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
has part: 76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193

76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-1
part of: 76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
note: Investigations must be conducted in private and as the Information Commissioner thinks fit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(1) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to conduct investigations in private
premise text: (1) An investigation must be conducted...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-2
part of: 76 Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
note: The Information Commissioner may obtain information from any officer of an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.193
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(2) Information Commissioner investigations—conduct of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to obtain information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77
has part: 77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
has part: 77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194

77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-1
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: Authorized person may enter and remain at a place with consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(1) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-2
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: Authorized person may enter a place occupied by an agency or contracted service provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(2) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authorized person has the power to enter a place.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-3
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: Authorized person may enter a place with consent from the principal officer or contracted service provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(3) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to enter a place
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-4
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: Must leave premises upon request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(4) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must leave premises
conclusion text: The authorised person must leave the premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-5
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: General power to investigate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(5) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77-ss-6
part of: 77 Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
note: Authorized persons are defined.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.194
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(6) Information Commissioner investigations—general power to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of authorized person
premise text: An authorized person is defined as...
conclusion text: ...an information officer or APS employee...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal relation between positions
premise text: An APS employee is performing the duties of an Executive Level 2, or equivalent, position...
conclusion text: ...or a higher position.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal relation between positions
premise text: An APS employee is performing the duties of an Executive Level 2, or equivalent, position...
conclusion text: ...or a higher position.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-77-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: for
logic summary: Authorization by Information Commissioner
premise text: An APS employee is authorized by the Information Commissioner for the purposes of this section.
conclusion text: ...the purposes of this section.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-78
has part: 78(1) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
has part: 78(2) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.195

78(1) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
note: Places where investigations are prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.195
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(1) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

78(2) Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Information Commissioner investigations—places for which
note: Prohibition on investigation without approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.195
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: authorised person must not enter or carry on investigation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79
has part: 79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
has part: 79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196

79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-1
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
note: Person must provide information to Information Commissioner during investigation.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-2
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
note: Notice to produce information during investigations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-3
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to provide information or produce a document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: The Information Commissioner has the power to require information or production.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-4
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
note: The notice must be in writing and specify a place for compliance within 14 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(4) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The notice must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Compliance within 14 days is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-79-ss-5
part of: 79 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
note: Failure to comply with a notice requirement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.196
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(5) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging production
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a notice requirement.
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on failing to comply with a notice requirement.
premise text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: No permission granted for failing to comply with a notice requirement.
premise text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: right
logic summary: No right granted for failing to comply with a notice requirement.
premise text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-79-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: undertaking
logic summary: Undertaking to comply with a notice requirement is not explicitly stated.
premise text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-80
note: Information Commissioner may take possession, make copies, extracts, or hold documents for investigation purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.197
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-80-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-80-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80 Information Commissioner investigations—dealings with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Information Commissioner investigations—exempt documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-81
note: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.198
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81 Information Commissioner investigations—exempt documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Application of sections 55T and 55U to investigations under this Part.
premise text: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if...
conclusion text: ...as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Application
logic summary: Temporal application of sections 55T and 55U to investigations under this Part.
premise text: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if...
conclusion text: ...as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Application
logic summary: Temporal application of sections 55T and 55U to investigations under this Part.
premise text: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if...
conclusion text: ...as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Application
logic summary: Temporal diffusion of sections 55T and 55U to investigations under this Part.
premise text: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if...
conclusion text: ...as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-81-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Application
logic summary: Temporal application of sections 55T and 55U to investigations under this Part.
premise text: Sections 55T and 55U apply to an investigation under this Part as if...
conclusion text: ...as if a reference in those sections to an IC review of a decision were a reference to an investigation of a complaint made under section 70.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-82
has part: 82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
has part: 82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
has part: 82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.198

82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-ss-1
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
note: The Information Commissioner may require a person to appear before the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.198
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(1) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The Information Commissioner may require a person to appear.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-ss-2
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
note: Notice requirements for compliance with investigation
description: Notice in writing, specifying time and place of compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.198
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(2) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-82-ss-3
part of: 82 Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
note: Failure to comply with a notice requirement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.198
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(3) Information Commissioner investigations—obliging persons to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a notice requirement.
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission to engage in conduct that breaches a notice requirement.
premise text: The person engages in conduct; and
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if the person's conduct breaches the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on engaging in conduct that breaches a notice requirement.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: The person's conduct must not breach the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: right
logic summary: Right to be free from unreasonable requirements.
premise text: The person is subject to a requirement specified in a notice under subsection (1); and
conclusion text: The person's conduct must not breach the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: undertaking
logic summary: Undertaking to comply with a notice requirement.
premise text: A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: The person's conduct must not breach the requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-83
has part: 83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
has part: 83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
has part: 83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.199

83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-1
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
note: Information Commissioner may administer oath or affirmation to a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.199
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(1) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May administer oath or affirmation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-2
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
note: The oath or affirmation must be true.
description: True answers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.199
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(2) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory truth-telling
premise text: The person taking the oath or affirmation
conclusion text: Must provide true answers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Oath or affirmation is a temporal interval
premise text: The statement must be made by the person taking the oath or affirmation
conclusion text: Is within the interval of true statements
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Oath or affirmation implies truth-telling
premise text: The person taking the oath or affirmation
conclusion text: Must provide true answers
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-83-ss-3
part of: 83 Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
note: Failure to comply with oath or affirmation requirement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.199
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(3) Information Commissioner investigations—administration of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
premise text: The person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that breaches that requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Conduct that breaches the oath or affirmation requirement is prohibited.
premise text: The person's conduct breaches that requirement.
conclusion text: Penalty for a contravention of this subsection: 6 months imprisonment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between the requirement and the breach.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation; (b) the person engages in conduct; (c) the person’s conduct breaches that requirement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of the offence.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation; (b) the person engages in conduct; (c) the person’s conduct breaches that requirement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with oath or affirmation requirement.
premise text: The person is required under this section to be examined on oath or affirmation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Information Commissioner investigations—no loss of legal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-84
note: No loss of legal professional privilege
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-84-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-84-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-84-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 84 Information Commissioner investigations—no loss of legal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Legal professional privilege obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-85
has part: 85(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
has part: 85(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
has part: 85(3) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200

85(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-85-ss-1
part of: 85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
note: Protection from investigations for good faith provision of information, documents, or answers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(1) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to protect individuals from investigations for good faith provision of information, documents, or answers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-85-ss-2
part of: 85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
note: Protection from civil proceedings and liability for penalties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(2) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the section applies, then...
premise text: Section applies
conclusion text: Civil proceedings do not lie against a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the section applies, then...
premise text: Section applies
conclusion text: Person is not liable for a penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(3) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-85-ss-3
part of: 85 Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
note: Protection from investigation outcomes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(3) Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-85-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect
premise text: (3) This section applies...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86
has part: 86(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
has part: 86(5) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200

86(1) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-1
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
note: Notify respondent agency upon investigation completion
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner must notify.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between investigation and notification
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-2
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
note: Notice on completion of investigation results and recommendations.
description: Investigation results, investigation recommendations, and reasons for the investigation results.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(2) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state investigation results and recommendations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-3
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
note: Agency may provide comments on notice to Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(3) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to provide comments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-4
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
note: The Information Commissioner must give a copy of the notice to the complainant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(4) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the notice to the complainant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(5) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-86-ss-5
part of: 86 Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
note: Information Commissioner must prepare a copy of the report to give to the complainant that excludes certain matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.200
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(5) Information Commissioner investigations—notice on completion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-86-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must prepare a copy of the report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-87
note: Investigation results must be provided by the respondent agency.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.201
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-87-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-87-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide investigation results.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-88
note: Investigation recommendations are formal recommendations to the respondent agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.202
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88 Information Commissioner investigations—what are the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ought
logic summary: Duty to implement investigation recommendations.
premise text: The respondent agency ought to implement the investigation recommendations.
conclusion text: The Information Commissioner believes that the respondent agency ought to implement the investigation recommendations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-88-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Recommendations are made during the investigation.
premise text: The investigation recommendations, in relation to the investigation...
conclusion text: The recommendations are made during the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89
has part: 89(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
has part: 89(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
has part: 89(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.202

89(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89-ss-1
part of: 89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
note: Agency must take adequate action to implement investigation recommendations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.202
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits agency from failing to take adequate action.
premise text: (a) the Information Commissioner completes an investigation;
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits agency from failing to take adequate action.
premise text: (b) the Information Commissioner gives an agency a notice under section 86;
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits agency from failing to implement investigation recommendations.
premise text: (a) the Information Commissioner completes an investigation;
conclusion text: The agency must implement investigation recommendations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits agency from failing to take adequate action.
premise text: (c) the Information Commissioner is not satisfied that the agency has taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits agency from failing to implement investigation recommendations.
premise text: (b) the Information Commissioner gives an agency a notice under section 86;
conclusion text: The agency must implement investigation recommendations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89-ss-2
part of: 89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
note: Respondent agency must provide particulars of proposed action to implement investigation recommendations.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.202
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide particulars of proposed action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89-ss-3
part of: 89 Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
note: Respondent agency must comply with implementation notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.202
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to implement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a
has part: 89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
has part: 89A(5) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203

89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
note: Failure to respond to implementation notice within specified time or inadequate action must be taken.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(1) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to respond or inadequate action.
premise text: (a) the Information Commissioner gives an implementation notice to a respondent agency; and (b) the Information Commissioner is satisfied that...
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate and appropriate action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Time constraint for response or action.
premise text: (i) the agency has not responded to the implementation notice within the time specified in the notice; or (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.
conclusion text: The agency must respond or take action within the specified time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal constraint for response or action.
premise text: (i) the agency has not responded to the implementation notice within the time specified in the notice; or (ii) the agency has not taken action that is adequate and appropriate in the circumstances to implement the investigation recommendations for the investigation.
conclusion text: The agency must respond or take action until the specified time expires.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Must
logic summary: Diffusion of responsibility from Information Commissioner to agency.
premise text: (a) the Information Commissioner gives an implementation notice to a respondent agency; and (b) the Information Commissioner is satisfied that...
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate and appropriate action.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of failure to respond or inadequate action on agency's obligations.
premise text: (a) the Information Commissioner gives an implementation notice to a respondent agency; and (b) the Information Commissioner is satisfied that...
conclusion text: The agency must take adequate and appropriate action.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
note: The Information Commissioner must give a written report to the responsible Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(2) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
note: Minister must receive report from Information Commissioner
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(3) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report to Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
note: Information Commissioner must prepare a copy of the report to give to the FOI Minister that excludes certain matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(4) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a copy of the report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(5) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5
part of: 89A Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
note: The FOI Minister must cause the report to be laid before each House of Parliament.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.203
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(5) Information Commissioner investigations—failure to take
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89B Information Commissioner investigations—requirements for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89b
note: Agency must provide report with details of response to implementation notice and proposed action.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.204
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89B Information Commissioner investigations—requirements for
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c
has part: 89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
has part: 89C(2) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.204

89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1
part of: 89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
note: Obligation to ensure documents are reported
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.204
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89C(1) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure reporting of documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89C(2) Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2
part of: 89C Information Commissioner investigations—ensuring
note: Exempt matter and certain information types cannot be included in a document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.204
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of including exempt matter and certain information types.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d
has part: 89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
has part: 89D(2) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
has part: 89D(3) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.205

89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
note: Restrictions on amendments to certain documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.205
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89D(1) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89D(2) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
note: Limitation on Information Commissioner investigations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.205
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits Information Commissioner investigations
premise text: (2) The Information Commissioner may...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89D(3) Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3
part of: 89D Information Commissioner investigations—limitation on
note: Limitation on recommending amendment to a record
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.205
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot recommend amendment
premise text: (3) The Information Commissioner must not...
conclusion text: ...recommend that an amendment be made to a record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89E Information Commissioner investigations—protection from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89e
note: Protection from civil action for loss suffered by another person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.205
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89e-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89e-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits civil action against loss suffered by another person
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89F Complaints to Ombudsman—powers not affected
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89f
note: Ombudsman's powers not affected by this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.207
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89F Complaints to Ombudsman—powers not affected
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludedBy
logic summary: Exclusion of Ombudsman's powers
premise text: This Part does not prevent the Ombudsman from exercising powers or performing functions under the Ombudsman Act 1976.
conclusion text: The Ombudsman's powers are excluded by this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between provisions
premise text: This Part does not prevent the Ombudsman from exercising powers or performing functions under the Ombudsman Act 1976.
conclusion text: The provision in this Part occurs during the exercise of the Ombudsman's powers.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89f-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between provisions
premise text: This Part does not prevent the Ombudsman from exercising powers or performing functions under the Ombudsman Act 1976.
conclusion text: The provision in this Part occurs during the exercise of the Ombudsman's powers.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89G Complaints to Ombudsman—report must not contain certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89g
note: Report must not include certain information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.207
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89G Complaints to Ombudsman—report must not contain certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reporting of exempt matter and certain documents
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.
conclusion text: Report must not include exempt matter or information about certain documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Reports must not include exempt matter during a specific time period
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.
conclusion text: Exempt matter overlaps with reports during a specific time period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Reports must not include exempt matter in recurring reports to the Ombudsman
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.
conclusion text: Exempt matter is recurring in reports to the Ombudsman
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Infects
logic summary: Reports must not include exempt matter that infects other reports
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.
conclusion text: Exempt matter infects other reports
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89g-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Reports must not include exempt matter that is classified as such
premise text: Subsection 25(1) deals with information about the existence or otherwise of certain documents.
conclusion text: Exempt matter is classified as such in reports
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h
has part: 89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
has part: 89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.207

89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1
part of: 89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
note: Ombudsman must investigate certain decisions not to grant access to documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.207
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89H(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2
part of: 89H Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
note: Right to seek reasons for decision not to give access to exempt document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.207
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 89H(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—certain rights not affected by
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Has right to seek reasons for decision not to give access to exempt document
premise text: (2) The certificate does not affect the Ombudsman’s right to:
conclusion text: (a) seek from any person the reasons for a decision made under this Act not to give access to an exempt document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89h-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Has right to require information or answer questions concerning decision
premise text: (2) The certificate does not affect the Ombudsman’s right to:
conclusion text: (b) require any person to give any information or to answer any questions concerning the decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j
has part: 89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
has part: 89J(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.208

89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1
part of: 89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
note: Limitation on amending records in a report under section 15 of the Ombudsman Act 1976.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.208
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89J(1) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to limit amending records
premise text: The Ombudsman may...
conclusion text: ...recommend that an amendment be made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: if and only if
logic summary: Mistake of fact implies amendment
premise text: (a) the opinion was based on a mistake of fact;
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: if and only if
logic summary: Bias or improper conduct implies amendment
premise text: (b) the author of the opinion was biased, unqualified to form the opinion or acted improperly in conducting the factual inquiries that led to the formation of the opinion.
conclusion text: ...he or she is satisfied...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for amendment consideration
premise text: The Ombudsman may, in a report under section 15 of the Ombudsman Act 1976...
conclusion text: ...recommend that an amendment be made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89J(2) Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2
part of: 89J Complaints to Ombudsman—limitation on amending records in
note: Limitation on amending records in reports under section 15 of the Ombudsman Act 1976
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.208
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Obligation to not amend records
premise text: The Ombudsman must not...
conclusion text: ...recommend that an amendment be made...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k
has part: 89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(3) Vexatious applicants—declaration
has part: 89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209

89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
note: The Information Commissioner may declare a person to be a vexatious applicant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89K(1) Vexatious applicants—declaration
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of a vexatious applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
note: The Information Commissioner may make a declaration on the application of an agency or Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89K(2) Vexatious applicants—declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89K(3) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
note: Agency or Minister must establish declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish the declaration within a certain timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Implication of onus
premise text: If an agency or Minister applies for a declaration, they have the onus of establishing that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration.
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must establish that the Information Commissioner should make the declaration if they apply for it.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Spread of onus
conclusion text: The onus of establishing a declaration spreads to other agencies or Ministers who may also apply for a declaration.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Requiring evidence
conclusion text: The agency or Minister must provide evidence to support their application for a declaration.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4
part of: 89K Vexatious applicants—declaration
note: The Information Commissioner must give written notice to the person in relation to whom the vexatious applicant declaration is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89K(4) Vexatious applicants—declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89l
note: The Information Commissioner may make a declaration if the person has repeatedly engaged in access actions and abuses the process.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.209
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89L Vexatious applicants—grounds for declaration
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The person has repeatedly engaged in access actions.
premise text: (i) the person has repeatedly engaged in access actions;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89l-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: abuses
logic summary: The repeated engagement involves an abuse of the process for the access action.
premise text: (ii) the repeated engagement involves an abuse of the process for the access action;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m
has part: 89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
has part: 89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
has part: 89M(3) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.210

89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
note: A vexatious applicant declaration has effect in accordance with the terms and conditions stated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.210
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89M(1) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Declaration has effect
premise text: Declaration made
conclusion text: Declaration has effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Declaration has effect during declaration period
premise text: Declaration made
conclusion text: Declaration has effect during declaration period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
note: Refusal to consider certain requests or applications without written permission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.210
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89M(2) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
premise text: Agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
conclusion text: ...without written permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for refusal
premise text: (a) an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
conclusion text: ...if made by the person without the written permission of the Information Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of refusal on request or application
premise text: (a) an agency or Minister may refuse to consider...
conclusion text: ...without written permission.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89M(3) Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3
part of: 89M Vexatious applicants—effect of declaration
note: Notify vexatious applicant of decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.210
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89N Vexatious applicants—review by Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89n
note: Application for review of a decision under section 89K
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.211
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89n-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89n-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89N Vexatious applicants—review by Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to apply for review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89P Staff to hold appropriate security clearance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-89p
note: Staff must be given security clearance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.212
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89p-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89p-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89p-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89P Staff to hold appropriate security clearance
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-89p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide security clearance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-90
has part: 90(1) Protection against civil liability—general
has part: 90(2) Protection against civil liability—general
has part: 90(3) Protection against civil liability—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.212

90(1) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-ss-1
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general
note: No action for defamation, breach of confidence or infringement of copyright lies against the Commonwealth, a Minister, an agency or an officer of an agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.212
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(1) Protection against civil liability—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No action for defamation, breach of confidence or infringement of copyright.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(2) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-ss-2
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general
note: No action for defamation or breach of confidence against a person supplying a document to a Minister or agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.212
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(2) Protection against civil liability—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect against defamation and breach of confidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(3) Protection against civil liability—general
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-90-ss-3
part of: 90 Protection against civil liability—general
note: Publication of a document is covered by this subsection if it meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.212
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(3) Protection against civil liability—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-90-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
logic summary: Publication of a document is covered by this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Protection against civil liability—particular situations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-91
has part: 91(1A) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
has part: 91(1B) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
has part: 91(1C) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
has part: 91(2) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.213

91(1A) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-91-ss-1a
part of: 91 Protection against civil liability—particular situations
note: Section 90 applies in relation to the giving of access to a document even if there has been a failure to comply with section 26A, 27 or 27A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.213
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1a-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91(1A) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

91(1B) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-91-ss-1b
part of: 91 Protection against civil liability—particular situations
note: No action lies against the Commonwealth, an agency, a Minister or an officer for failure to comply with certain sections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.213
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1b-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 91(1B) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No action lies against the Commonwealth, an agency, a Minister or an officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91(1C) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-91-ss-1c
part of: 91 Protection against civil liability—particular situations
note: Protection against civil liability for showing a document to certain individuals or organisations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.213
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1c-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect against civil liability
premise text: Showing a document to certain individuals or organisations.
conclusion text: No action for defamation, breach of confidence or infringement of copyright lies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91(2) Protection against civil liability—particular situations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-91-ss-2
part of: 91 Protection against civil liability—particular situations
note: Giving access to a document does not constitute an authorization or approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.213
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of authorization
conclusion text: (2) The giving of access to a document (including an exempt document) in consequence of a request shall not be taken to constitute an authorization or approval:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-92
has part: 92(1) Protection against criminal liability
has part: 92(2) Protection against criminal liability
has part: 92(3) Protection against criminal liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.215

92(1) Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-ss-1
part of: 92 Protection against criminal liability
note: Minister or officer not committing a criminal offence due to good faith actions under Part II or section 11C.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.215
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister's obligation to not commit a criminal offence
premise text: Good faith actions under Part II or section 11C
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Minister's good faith actions overlap with the definition of a criminal offence
premise text: Part II or section 11C
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Minister's good faith actions imply no criminal offence committed
premise text: Good faith actions under Part II or section 11C
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Minister's good faith actions diffuse the definition of a criminal offence
premise text: Part II or section 11C
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92(2) Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-ss-2
part of: 92 Protection against criminal liability
note: Protection against criminal liability for showing documents to State or organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.215
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92(2) Protection against criminal liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect against criminal liability
premise text: Showing documents to State or organisation for specified purposes.
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between showing documents and criminal liability
premise text: Showing documents to State or organisation for specified purposes.
conclusion text: No criminal offence committed during this period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92(3) Protection against criminal liability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-92-ss-3
part of: 92 Protection against criminal liability
note: State has the same meaning as in section 26A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.215
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92(3) Protection against criminal liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-92-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of State
premise text: State has the same meaning as in section 26A.
conclusion text: State = section 26A
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93
note: Agencies must provide information to Information Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.215
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93 Agencies to provide information to Information Commissioner
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93A Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a
has part: 93A(1) Guidelines
has part: 93A(2) Guidelines
has part: 93A(3) Guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216

93A(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-1
part of: 93A Guidelines
note: The Information Commissioner may issue guidelines by instrument in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-1-norm

93A(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2
part of: 93A Guidelines
note: Regard must be had to guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93A(2) Guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regard must be had to guidelines.
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of power under this Act.
conclusion text: Obligation to consider guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Guidelines apply to specific provisions.
premise text: Provisions include paragraph 9A(b), subsection 11B(5), and subsection 15(5A).
conclusion text: Guidelines apply between these provisions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Guidelines are part of the performance of a function or exercise of power.
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of power under this Act.
conclusion text: Function/exercise of power contains guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Guidelines are related to the performance of a function or exercise of power.
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of power under this Act.
conclusion text: Function/exercise of power is guided by guidelines.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: VALIDATES
logic summary: Guidelines validate the performance of a function or exercise of power.
premise text: Performance of a function or exercise of power under this Act.
conclusion text: Function/exercise of power is validated by guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93A(3) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3
part of: 93A Guidelines
note: Guidelines are not legislative instruments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
conclusion text: (3) Guidelines are not legislative instruments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93B Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b
has part: 93B(1) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(2) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(3) Review of operation of Act
has part: 93B(4) Review of operation of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216

93B(1) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act
note: Minister must undertake review of Act's operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93B(1) Review of operation of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to undertake review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93B(2) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act
note: Review of operation of Act must start within 6 months after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-2-norm

93B(3) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act
note: The Minister must prepare a written report about the review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a written report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93B(4) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4
part of: 93B Review of operation of Act
note: Minister must lay report before Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.216
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-93b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-94
has part: 94(1) Regulations
has part: 94(2) Regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.217

94(1) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-94-ss-1
part of: 94 Regulations
note: Governor-General may make regulations not inconsistent with the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.217
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-1-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94(1) Regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

94(2) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-94-ss-2
part of: 94 Regulations
note: Regulations cannot vary charge amounts based on agency or class of agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.217
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-94-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibition on variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Mar 1982
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-2-norm

1 Dec 1982 (s 2 and gaz
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-2
note: Transitioning Act 1983
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-2-norm

1 June 1983
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-3
note: Amendment Act 1983
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-3-norm

3 Nov 1983
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-2-norm

1 Jan 1984 (s 2 and gaz
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-4
note: Public Service Reform Act 1984, section 46
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-4-norm

25 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-2
note: Reference to s 151(9) and Sch 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-2-norm

1 July 1984 (s 2(4) and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-5
note: Transitioning provisions and consequential amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-5-norm

16 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-2
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1986
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-2-norm

17 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-2
note: Freedom of Information Laws Amendment Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-2-norm

4 Nov 1986
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-2
note: Conversion to Public Company Act 1988
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-2-norm

9 Mar 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-3
note: Endnotes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.233
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-3-norm

8 Nov 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-2
note: Consequential Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-2-norm

6 Dec 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-2
note: Privacy Act 1988 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-2-norm

14 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
note: Conditional commencement on gaz 1988, No S399
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-norm

14 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-2
note: Amendment Act 1988
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-2-norm

14 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-3
note: Conversion into Public Company Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-3-norm

14 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-4
note: Conversion into Public Company Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-4-norm

14 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-5
note: Conversion into Public Company Act 1989
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-5-norm

19 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
note: Commencement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-norm

27 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-2
note: Federal Airports Corporation Amendment Act 1990
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-2-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-2
note: Commencement of Defence Legislation Amendment Act 1990
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-2-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identifies temporal interval for commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-2
note: Commencement of Freedom of Information Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.234
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Commences on the specified date
premise text: The Act commences on the day after the day on which this Act receives Royal Assent.
conclusion text: Freedom of Information Act 1982 commences on 22 October 1990.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During the specified period, the Act is in force
premise text: The Freedom of Information Act 1982 has effect during the period commencing on the day after the day on which this Act receives Royal Assent.
conclusion text: The Freedom of Information Act 1982 has effect from 22 October 1990 to an unspecified end date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During the specified period, the Act is in force
premise text: The Freedom of Information Act 1982 has effect during the period commencing on the day after the day on which this Act receives Royal Assent.
conclusion text: The Freedom of Information Act 1982 has effect from 22 October 1990 to an unspecified end date.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-3
note: Commonwealth Banks Restructuring Act 1990
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-3-norm

28 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
note: Transitioning Act 1991
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-norm

27 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-3
note: Conditional commencement of Freedom of Information Amendment Act 1991
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-3-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-4-norm

25 Oct 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-3
note: Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-3-norm

21 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-2
note: Commencement of Special Broadcasting Service Act 1991
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-2-norm

25 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-4
note: Sales Tax Amendment (Transitional) Act 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-4-norm

30 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
note: Citation using 'may be cited'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-norm

7 Dec 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-2-norm

11 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-2
note: Endnotes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.235
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-2-norm

21 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-3
note: Amendment of schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-3-norm

3 Nov 1993
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-3-norm

10 Mar 1993 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-2
note: Qantas Sale Amendment Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-2-norm

16 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-3
note: Electoral and Referendum Amendment Act 1992, s 2(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-3-norm

24 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-3
note: Prime Minister and Cabinet (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-3-norm

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Dec
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-2
note: Conditional commencement of Transport and Communications Legislation Amendment Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-2-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-2
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-2-logic-alleninterval-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 1994
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-2-norm

23 June 1994 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-3
note: List of employment services subject to consequential amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-3-norm

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-2
note: Conditional commencement of Taxation Laws Amendment Act (No. 4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-2-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement on January 1, 1995
conclusion text: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-3-norm

19 Dec 1994 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-4
note: Sale Act 1995
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-4-norm

16 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-4
note: Endnotes and legislation history for Freedom of Information Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.236
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-4-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Date range specified (19 July 1996)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-5-norm

16 Dec 1995 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-6
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1996
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-6-norm

25 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-5-norm

25 Oct 1996 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-6-norm

5 June 1997
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5-2
note: Sale Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-5-2-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-3
note: Consequential Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-3-norm

7 July 1997
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-3
note: Conditional commencement of Judiciary Amendment Act 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-3-norm

31 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-2-norm

1 Sept 1999 (s 2(2) and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-6
note: Statute Stocktake Act, 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-6-norm

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-4-norm

22 Sept 1999 (s 2(1))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-5-norm

11 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-3
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-3-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-3-norm

10 Dec 1999 (s 2(2))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-4
note: Dec 1999 (s 2(2))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-4-norm

22 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-6
note: Commencement of Freedom of Information Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.237
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-6-norm

23 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-4
note: Conditional commencement of the Ministers of State and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-4-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-2
note: Broadcasting Services Amendment (Digital Television and Datacasting) Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-2-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-2-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Aug 2000
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-4
note: Repeals Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Act 2000
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-4
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-4-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: 1 Feb 2001 (s 2(2)) —
conclusion text: temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-5
note: Conditional commencement on a specific date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-5-norm

28 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-2
note: Consequential Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-2-norm

1 Oct 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-7
note: Conditional commencement of Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-7-norm

11 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-4
note: Conditional commencement of Transport Safety Investigation (Consequential Amendments) Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-4-norm

11 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-5-norm

1 July 2003 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-8
note: Inspector-General of Taxation Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-8-norm

15 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-3
note: Commencement of Freedom of Information Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.238
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-3-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-3-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Starts on April 16, 2003
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-4
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 2 on July 16, 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-4-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval application
premise text: July 16, 2003, is a temporal interval
conclusion text: July 16, 2003, is a temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-5
note: Defence Legislation Amendment Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-5-norm

17 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-3-norm

17 June 2004 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-4
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-4-norm

17 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-5
note: Conditional commencement on June 17, 2004
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Conditional commencement on June 17, 2004
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-2-norm

27 May 2004 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-6
note: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Amendment Act 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-6-norm

1 Apr 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-9-norm

16 May 2005 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-7
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-7-norm

1 Apr 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-10
note: Amendment of Sch 4 by Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-10-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-10-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-8-norm

17 Oct 2014 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-6
note: Human Services Legislation Amendment Act 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-6-norm

6 Sept 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-3
note: Sch 2 (items 90, 91, 729)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.239
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-3-norm

23 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-5
note: Commencement of Intelligence Services Legislation Amendment Act 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-5-norm

4 Nov 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-3
note: Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Serious Drug Offences and Other Measures) Act 129, 2005
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-3-norm

8 Nov 2005
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-3
note: Amendment Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-3-norm

3 May 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3-5
note: National Health and Medical Research Council Amendment Act 50, 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-3-5-norm

9 June 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-4
note: Fuel Tax (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2006 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-4-norm

26 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-3
note: Conditional commencement on July 1, 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-3-norm

14 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-6-norm

14 Sept 2006 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-7
note: Prohibition on Inspector of Transport Security (Consequential Provisions) Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-7-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-7-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits Inspector of Transport Security (Consequential Provisions) Act 2006
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Dec 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7-4
note: Endnote 3—Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.240
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-7-4-norm

12 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-2
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2007
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-2-norm

15 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-5-norm

15 Mar 2007 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-6
note: Classification of Publications, Films and Computer Games
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: classify
logic summary: Classify publications, films and computer games
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-7-norm

1 July 2007 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-11
note: Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-11-norm

30 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-4
note: Conditional commencement of Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measures No. 1) Act 2007
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-4-norm

12 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-3-norm

12 Apr 2007 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-4
note: Legislation Amendment (Content Services) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-4-norm

20 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-2-norm

20 Jan 2008 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-3
note: Quarantine Amendment (Commission of Inquiry) Act 2007
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-3-norm

24 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-4-norm

24 Sept 2007 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-5-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-5
note: Conditional commencement of Archives Amendment Act 2008
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-5-norm

31 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-3-norm

1 Nov 2008 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-12
note: Legislation history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.241
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-12-norm

6 Oct 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-4
note: Amendment of offshore petroleum and greenhouse gas storage legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-4-norm

8 Oct 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-8-4-norm

9 Oct 2009 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-5
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-5-norm

1 Mar 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-13-norm

1 Mar 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-14
note: Item 31 of Schedule 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-14-norm

1 Mar 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-15
note: Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-15-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-15-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPartOf
logic summary: Classifies legislative provisions into a deontic model
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-4
note: Sch 1, Sch 3 (items 7–14, 16–34, 39), Sch 4 (items 1–57, 65), Sch 6 (items 1–41) and Sch 7: s 2(1) items 2, 4, 6, 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-4-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-4-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 May
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-7-norm

1 Nov 2010 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-16
note: Commencement provision for Sch 2 (item 42)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.242
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-ltl-3
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-cogai-5

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Commences on January 1, 2011
premise text: Sch 2 (item 42)
conclusion text: The provision begins on January 1, 2011
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2010
premise text: January 1, 2011
conclusion text: The provision is in effect during the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2010
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2010
premise text: January 1, 2011
conclusion text: The provision is in effect during the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2010
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: During January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2010
premise text: January 1, 2011
conclusion text: The provision is in effect during the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2010
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-16-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: During January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2010
premise text: January 1, 2011
conclusion text: The provision is in effect during the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2010
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-5
note: Commencement dates for certain items in Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-5-norm

1 May 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-17
note: Amended by Statute Law Revision Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-17-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-17-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: amendment
logic summary: Amended by Statute Law Revision Act 2012
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-8
note: Tax Laws Amendment (Confidentiality of Taxpayer Information) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-8-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-9
note: Conditional commencement of Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-9-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-7
note: Transfer of Assets Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-7-norm

12 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-5
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-5-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Indicates a temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-6-norm

11 June 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-6
note: Legislation Amendment Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-6-norm

25 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-25-7-norm

1 July 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-18
note: July 2011 (s 2(1))
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.243
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-18-norm

27 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-7-norm

27 Dec 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27-8
note: Items 3 and 12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-27-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes items 3 and 12
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Dec 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-4-norm

15 Feb 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15-8
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-15-8-norm

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-9-norm

22 Sept 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-10
note: Freedom of Information Amendment (Parliamentary Budget Office) Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-10-norm

4 Dec 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-5-norm

4 Dec 2012 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4-6
note: Amendment of Judicial Complaints Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-4-6-norm

11 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-7-norm

12 Apr 2013 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-7
note: Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-7-norm

12 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-8
note: Conditional commencement of certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-8-norm

14 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14-8
note: Amendment Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-14-8-norm

28 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-3
note: Sch 1 (items 1A, 37)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.244
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-3-norm

13 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-2
note: Conditional commencement on 1 July 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-2-norm

13 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-3
note: Consequential and transitional provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-3-norm

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-6
note: Amendment of Public Governance and Resources Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-6-norm

13 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-4
note: Amendment of Sch 7 by Acts and Instruments (Framework Reform) Act 126, 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-4-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-6
note: Consequential Provisions Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-6-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-7
note: Legislation history for Freedom of Information Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.245
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-7-norm

2 Oct 2014
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-2
note: Abolition of Albury-Wodonga Development Corporation Act 2014
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-2-2-norm

11 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-8-norm

1 Jan 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-19
note: Amendment by Acts and Instruments (Framework Reform) (Consequential Provisions) Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-19-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-8
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-8-norm

24 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-24-6-norm

26 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-4
note: Schedule of commencement dates for certain items in Schedules 1 and 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-4-norm

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-20
note: Amendment by Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-20-norm

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-6
note: Tribunals Amalgamation Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-6-norm

26 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26-5
note: May be cited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.246
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-26-5-norm

16 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-10
note: References amendments and updates to schedules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-10-norm

23 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-7
note: Conditional commencement of Judiciary Amendment Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-7-norm

16 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-11
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 3 on July 1, 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-11-norm

16 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-12
note: Commencement of Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-deontic-2
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-ltl-3

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between Act 2015 and commencement
premise text: 31 Dec 2015 (s 2(1) item 1)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as a prohibition
premise text: No explicit duty, ban conduct, grant permission, or create right
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-12-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires ordered trace of temporal intervals
premise text: 31 Dec 2015 (s 2(1) item 1)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

13 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-5
note: Consequential and transitional provisions for the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-5-norm

12 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12-9
note: Commences on 1 Jan 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-12-9-norm

2 Dec 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2-3
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-2-3-norm

11 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-9
note: Conditional commencement of Trade Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-9-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-9-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-8
note: May 2016 (s 2(1) item 3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.247
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-8-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-4
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2017
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-4-norm

22 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-11
note: Consequential Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-11-norm

22 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-12
note: Consequential and transitional provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-12-norm

19 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-5
note: Enhancing Online Safety for Children Amendment Act 2017
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-5-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-5-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 May
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-13
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 1 (items 48–51)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-13-norm

6 Nov 2017
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-5
note: Establishment of the Australian Signals Directorate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-5-norm

11 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.248
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-10-norm

21 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-6
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-6-norm

29 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-3
note: References Sch 1 (item 2) and Sch 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-3-norm

30 June 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-30-7-norm

29 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-4
note: Conditional commencement of Aged Care (Single Quality Framework) Reform Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-4-norm

21 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-21-7-norm

1 July 2019 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-21
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-21-norm

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-9
note: Consequential and transitional provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-9-norm

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-10-norm

13 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13-6
note: Sch 2: 14 Sept 2019 (s2(1) item 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.249
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-13-6-norm

19 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-6
note: References Sch 1 (item 3) and Sch 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-6-norm

19 Mar 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-7
note: Amendment (Sport Integrity Australia) Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-7-norm

6 Mar 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-6
note: Never commenced
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-6-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-6-logic-linearlogic-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Never commenced
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-6-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: !
logic summary: Recurring trace
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-13
note: Never commenced
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-13-logic-deontic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: never
logic summary: Prohibition of commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-5-norm

1 Feb 2020 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-22
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-22-norm

17 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-8-norm

17 June 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-9
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-9-norm

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-23
note: Archives and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-23-norm

16 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16-14
note: May
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-16-14-norm

17 May 2021 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-10
note: Legislation history for Freedom of Information Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.250
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-10-norm

23 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-9
note: Conditional commencement of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (International Production Orders) Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-9-norm

23 July
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23-10
note: Conditional commencement of Royal Commissions Amendment (Protection of Information) Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-23-10-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-11
note: Financial Sector Reform (Hayne Royal Commission Response—Better Advice) Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-11-norm

28 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-4
note: Consequential Amendments Act 2022
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-4-norm

31 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-5
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 2 and 3: 1 Apr 2022 (s 2(1) item 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-5-norm

1 Apr 2022
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1-24
note: Amendment (Enhancing Engagement) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-1-24-norm

11 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-11
note: National Security Legislation Amendment (Comprehensive Review and Other Measures No. 2) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-11-norm

11 Aug
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11-12
note: Sch 1 (items 20–24, 33–35)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.251
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-11-12-norm

19 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19-8
note: Conditional commencement of Treasury Laws Amendment (Housing Measures No. 1) Act 2023
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-8-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-8-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-19-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-5
note: Commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-5-norm

6 Nov 2023
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-6-7-norm

22 May 2024 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-14
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-14-norm

28 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-6
note: Conditional commencement on 1 Jan 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-6-norm

28 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28-7
note: Legislation history for Freedom of Information Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.252
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-28-7-norm

22 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22-15
note: Conditional commencement of the Administrative Review Tribunal (Consequential and Transitional Provisions No. 1) Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-15-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-15-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-22-15-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: May 2024 (s 2(1) item 7)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31-6
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-31-6-norm

9 July 2024
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9-6
note: Conditional commencement of the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service Amendment (Independent Parliamentary Standards Commission) Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-9-6-norm

17 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-11
note: Conditional commencement of Intelligence Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Cyber Security) Act 2024
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-11-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-11-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-11-logic-ltl-2

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-11-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as 14 Oct 2024 (s 2(1) item 3)
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-11-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as a single event
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29-5
note: Consequential and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-29-5-norm

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-12
note: Legislation history for Freedom of Information Act 1982
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.253
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-12-norm

10 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-13
note: Conditional commencement of the Administrative Review Tribunal (Miscellaneous Measures) Act 2025
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.254
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-13-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-13-logic-alleninterval-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20-6
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.254
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-20-6-norm

10 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10-14
note: Commencement and application provisions for the 50, 2006 regulation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.254
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-10-14-norm

17 Mar 2006
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17-12
note: Amendment history
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: freedom-of-information-act-1982.pdf, p.254
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-12-norm
asserts: freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-12-logic-n3logic-1

freedom-of-information-act-1982-sch-4-sec-17-12-logic-n3logic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identifies provision as part of amendment history
premise text: Provision affected
conclusion text: Endnote 4—Amendment history
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed