1 Short title
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Jan 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
note: Amendment by Statute Law Revision Act 2012
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
note: Part of chapter 2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

10 Issue of warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10(1) Issue of warrants
has part: 10(2) Issue of warrants
has part: 10(3) Issue of warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Sept
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Northern Territory Local Court) Act 2016
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-2
schema version: 2

10(1) Issue of warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
note: Magistrate must issue a warrant upon application.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Issue of warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10(1) Issue of warrants

10(2) Issue of warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
note: Issue warrant for arrest under specified conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Issue of warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must issue warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A magistrate must issue a warrant...

10(3) Issue of warrants
type: Concept
description: report
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
note: Magistrate must report to Attorney-General
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Issue of warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Magistrate must report to Attorney-General
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

11 Cancellation of warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.23
note: The Attorney-General must cancel a warrant if certain conditions are met.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Oct
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
note: Conditional commencement of sch 2 (items 1-5)
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cancel the warrant after the person has not been arrested.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The cancellation must occur after the person has not been arrested.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The person has not been arrested under the warrant.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The warrant should be cancelled if no such request is received.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The cancellation is related to a request from a Tribunal.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: A request from a Tribunal would oblige the Attorney-General to issue a notice under section 9.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cancel the warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must cancel a warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The person has not been arrested under the warrant.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cancel the warrant if both conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The cancellation must be related to both conditions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
premise text: The person has not been arrested under the warrant and A request from a Tribunal would oblige the Attorney-General to issue a notice under section 9.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cancel the warrant if no such request is received within a certain time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The cancellation must occur before a certain time.
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: A request from a Tribunal would oblige the Attorney-General to issue a notice under section 9.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Cancellation of warrants

12 Remand
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12(1) Remand
has part: 12(2) Remand
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

12(1) Remand
type: Concept
description: (a) written notice that specifies the Tribunal offence and describes the conduct alleged to constitute that offence; (b) bring before a magistrate in the State or Territory where the person is arrested
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.23
note: A person arrested under a warrant must be given written notice and brought before a magistrate.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Remand

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Must be brought before a magistrate before being arrested
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: (b) be brought before a magistrate in the State or Territory in which the person is arrested.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice and be brought before a magistrate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) written notice that specifies the Tribunal offence and describes the conduct alleged to constitute that offence; (b) bring before a magistrate in the State or Territory where the person is arrested

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must bring before a magistrate in the State or Territory where the person is arrested
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) be brought before a magistrate in the State or Territory in which the person is arrested.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice that specifies the Tribunal offence and describes the conduct alleged to constitute that offence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) be given a written notice that: (i) specifies the Tribunal offence in respect of which the warrant was issued; and (ii) describes the conduct that is alleged to constitute that offence;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(1) Remand

12(2) Remand
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.23
note: Magistrate must remand person in custody or on bail for necessary period.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Remand

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must remand person.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If a magistrate is satisfied...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(2) Remand

13 Release from remand on the Attorney-General’s direction
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24
note: The Attorney-General must direct a magistrate to release a person from custody or discharge recognisances.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The release occurs after the direction is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal relationship between actions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The Attorney-General's direction must occur before the release of a person from custody.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The direction is an instance of the cognitive action of directing a magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The provision defines a specific class of cognitive action.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: The Attorney-General's direction is a type of action that requires reasoning.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A magistrate must order the release of a person from custody.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General has a duty to direct a magistrate.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Attorney-General is required to take action.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The direction is an instance of the diffusion of obligation to direct a magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision defines a specific class of diffusion.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: The Attorney-General's direction is a type of action that affects others.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The direction is an instance of the obligation to direct a magistrate in relation to the release.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal relationship between actions.
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: The release of a person from custody must occur before the Attorney-General's next action.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 Release from remand on the Attorney-General’s direction

14 Release from remand after certain periods
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(1) Release from remand after certain periods
has part: 14(2) Release from remand after certain periods
has part: 14(3) Release from remand after certain periods
has part: 14(4) Release from remand after certain periods
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

14(1) Release from remand after certain periods
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24
note: Must bring person before magistrate after 14 days on remand
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Release from remand after certain periods

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person must be brought before a magistrate if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must bring person before magistrate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) the person was arrested under a warrant issued under subsection 10(2); and (b) the person is, under this Division, on remand 14 days after the day on which the person was arrested; and (c) a notice has not been given under section 9 in relation to the person.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person must be brought before a magistrate if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must bring person before magistrate after 14 days on remand
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) the person is, under this Division, on remand 14 days after the day on which the person was arrested; and (c) a notice has not been given under section 9 in relation to the person.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person must be brought before a magistrate if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must bring person before magistrate after 14 days on remand
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) a notice has not been given under section 9 in relation to the person.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person must be brought before a magistrate if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must bring person before magistrate after 14 days on remand
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(1) Release from remand after certain periods

14(2) Release from remand after certain periods
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24
note: Magistrate must order release or discharge under certain conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Release from remand after certain periods

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time period for notice
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
premise text: that is reasonable in all the circumstances

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Discharge of recognisances
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) order the discharge of the recognisances on which bail was granted to the person; as the case requires.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Release and discharge alternatives
modality: LinearLogic
operator: OR
premise text: (a) order the release of the person from custody; or (b) order the discharge of the recognisances on which bail was granted to the person; as the case requires.

14(3) Release from remand after certain periods
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24
note: Must be brought before a magistrate if notice is not given within a particular period.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Release from remand after certain periods

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must be brought before a magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notice must be given within a particular period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
premise text: (3) If: (a) a magistrate was satisfied under subsection (2) that such a notice was likely to be given in relation to the person within a particular period; and (b) the notice is not given within the period;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must be brought before a magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be brought before a magistrate.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) If: (a) a magistrate was satisfied under subsection (2) that such a notice was likely to be given in relation to the person within a particular period; and (b) the notice is not given within the period;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must be brought before a magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of notice non-giving.
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
premise text: (3) If: (a) a magistrate was satisfied under subsection (2) that such a notice was likely to be given in relation to the person within a particular period; and (b) the notice is not given within the period;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(3) Release from remand after certain periods

14(4) Release from remand after certain periods
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24
note: Magistrate must order release or discharge of recognisances.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Release from remand after certain periods

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must order release or discharge.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

15 Application for search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15(1) Application for search warrants
has part: 15(2) Application for search warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

15(1) Application for search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.25
note: Police officer may apply for search warrant to search premises for evidential material.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Application for search warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Search warrant application must be made within applicable period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within applicable period
premise text: (3) of this section will be, at any premises;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by police officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

15(2) Application for search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.25
note: If a person is arrested under a warrant issued under section 10, then the application for search warrants must be made.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Application for search warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: application for search warrants must be made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: arrested under a warrant issued under section 10

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(2) Application for search warrants

16 Surrender determination by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16(1) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
has part: 16(2) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
has part: 16(3) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
has part: 16(4) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

16(1) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27
note: Attorney-General must determine surrender of a person remanded under Division 1.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Surrender determination by Attorney-General

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General has a duty to determine surrender.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(1) Surrender determination by Attorney-General

16(2) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27
note: Attorney-General must determine surrender to Tribunal under special circumstances.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Surrender determination by Attorney-General

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General must determine surrender to Tribunal.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(2) Surrender determination by Attorney-General

16(3) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
type: Concept
description: documents intended to show that there are special circumstances
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27
note: Attorney-General must consider documents provided by person when determining special circumstances.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Surrender determination by Attorney-General

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Attorney-General must provide a reasonable opportunity to person to provide documents.
modality: Argumentation
operator: REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General must consider documents provided by person.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to consider documents provided by person.
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATION

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Documents provided by person are part of the condition for Attorney-General's decision.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(3) Surrender determination by Attorney-General

16(4) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27
note: Determination must be made as soon as reasonably practicable after remand.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Surrender determination by Attorney-General

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(4) Surrender determination by Attorney-General

17 Release from remand on refusal to surrender the person
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27
note: Release from remand on refusal to surrender the person
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must, by notice in writing...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for release from remand
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: If the Attorney-General has determined not to surrender the person

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must, by notice in writing...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide release from remand
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Attorney-General has determined not to surrender the person

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must, by notice in writing...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must direct a magistrate to order release or discharge
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: If the Attorney-General has determined not to surrender the person

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the recognisances on which bail was granted...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for discharge of recognisances
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (b) the discharge of the recognisances on which bail was granted to the person;

18 Surrender warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(1) Surrender warrants
has part: 18(2) Surrender warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

18 June 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
note: Amendment of Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-2
schema version: 2

18(1) Surrender warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
note: Must issue warrant for surrender of person to Tribunal if Attorney-General determines surrender is warranted.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Surrender warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issue warrant for surrender of person to Tribunal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must issue warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Attorney-General determines surrender is warranted

18(2) Surrender warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
note: The surrender warrant must be in writing.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Surrender warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written surrender warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(2) Surrender warrants

19 Persons imprisoned under Australian law
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19(1) Persons imprisoned under Australian law
has part: 19(2) Persons imprisoned under Australian law
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19
schema version: 2

19(1) Persons imprisoned under Australian law
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
note: The Attorney-General must not issue a surrender warrant under certain conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Persons imprisoned under Australian law

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing a surrender warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: (1) The Attorney-General must not issue a surrender warrant...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(1) Persons imprisoned under Australian law

19(2) Persons imprisoned under Australian law
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
note: Exempts persons released on parole or licence from serving a sentence of imprisonment.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Persons imprisoned under Australian law

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the remainder of the sentence or period of detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal relationship between parole/release and imprisonment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the person is not taken to be serving a sentence of imprisonment...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or has been otherwise conditionally released...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines the scope of persons exempt from serving a sentence of imprisonment.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the person is not taken to be serving a sentence of imprisonment...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or has been otherwise conditionally released...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts persons released on parole or licence from serving a sentence of imprisonment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the person is not taken to be serving a sentence of imprisonment...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or has been otherwise conditionally released...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines the scope of persons exempt from serving a sentence of imprisonment.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the person is not taken to be serving a sentence of imprisonment...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the remainder of the sentence or period of detention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal relationship between parole/release and imprisonment.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the person is not taken to be serving a sentence of imprisonment...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(2) Persons imprisoned under Australian law

1966 S/RES/1966 (2010).
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.17
note: Defines strip search and stored communication.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-ltl-6
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-diffusion-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1966
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It includes the time period during which the examination is conducted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for strip search
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: The strip search may include requiring a person to remove all of their garments.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines strip search and stored communication.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It refers to the same as in the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies a specific definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The term 'stored communication' is defined.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It refers to the form of a warrant or notice as set out in the regulations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies a specific definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The term 'statutory form' is defined.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It includes requiring a person to remove all of their garments and an examination of the person's body (but not of the person's body cavities) and those garments.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies a specific definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The term 'strip search' is defined.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-diffusion-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It includes the time period during which the examination is conducted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for strip search
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: The strip search may include requiring a person to remove all of their garments.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-ltl-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It includes the time period during which the examination is conducted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for strip search
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: The strip search may include requiring a person to remove all of their garments.

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
has part: 2(3) Commencement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
note: Legislation history note for International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9
note: Commencement of sections 1 and 2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9
note: Commencement of remaining provisions subject to subsection (3)
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Subsection (3) is mentioned but not defined

2(3) Commencement
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9
note: Conditional commencement provision
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

20 Detention following surrender warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(1) Detention following surrender warrants
has part: 20(2) Detention following surrender warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20
schema version: 2

20(1) Detention following surrender warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
note: Must bring person before magistrate within a certain timeframe after surrender warrant is issued.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Detention following surrender warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must be brought before a magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to bring person before magistrate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Attorney-General issues the surrender warrant.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(1) Detention following surrender warrants

20(2) Detention following surrender warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
note: Magistrate must remand person in custody for necessary period to execute warrant.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Detention following surrender warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must remand the person in custody.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must remand person in custody.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A magistrate...

21 Content of surrender warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(1) Content of surrender warrants
has part: 21(2) Content of surrender warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

21(1) Content of surrender warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.29
note: Police officer must transport and detain eligible person in custody for surrender.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Content of surrender warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Police officer must transport and detain eligible person in custody.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(1) Content of surrender warrants

21(2) Content of surrender warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.29
note: A place referred to in paragraph (1)(b) or (c) may be a place in or outside Australia.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Content of surrender warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(2) Content of surrender warrants

22 Execution of surrender warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.29
note: Must be executed according to its tenor.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Sept
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
note: Conditional commencement of statute law revision act
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-2
schema version: 2

22 Sept
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
note: Mandatory date for commencement of Act
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-3
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A duty to comply with the Act on this date exists
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Equality operator
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The date is specified as mandatory

22 May
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
note: Granting permission for items 5 and 6 in Schedule 5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-4
schema version: 2

22 May
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-5
schema version: 2

22 Nov 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
note: Reference to International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-6
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to execute surrender warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Execution of surrender warrants

23 Release from remand
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.29
note: If surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person, then certain actions must be taken.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

23 Mar
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-2
schema version: 2

23 May 2018
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
note: Legislation history for International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-3
schema version: 2

23 Mar
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
note: Prohibition on Acts and Instruments
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-4
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits acts and instruments
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

23 Mar
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
note: May 2016 commencement
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-5
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then certain actions must be taken.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) If: (a) a surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then certain actions must be taken.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: (1) If: (a) a surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then certain actions must be taken.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inference engine
modality: CogAI
operator: inference
premise text: (1) If: (a) a surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then certain actions must be taken.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (a) a surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then certain actions must be taken.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) If: (a) a surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person;

24 Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24(1) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
has part: 24(2) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
has part: 24(3) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24
schema version: 2

24 May 2001 (s 2(1)(a))
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-2
schema version: 2

24(1) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.30
note: Time spent in custody for surrender warrant and Tribunal offence is counted towards sentence or period of detention.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(1) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of

24(2) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.30
note: Time spent in custody for Tribunal offence is not counted towards sentence of imprisonment.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is not to be counted as time towards the sentence of imprisonment or period of detention referred to in subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal disjointness
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjoint
premise text: (2) If the person is convicted of the Tribunal offence, time spent by the person in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed by ...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is not to be counted as time towards the sentence of imprisonment or period of detention referred to in subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal assertion
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
premise text: (2) If the person is convicted of the Tribunal offence, time spent by the person in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed by ...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is not to be counted as time towards the sentence of imprisonment or period of detention referred to in subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion from counting time spent in custody
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: (2) If the person is convicted of the Tribunal offence, time spent by the person in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed by ...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is not to be counted as time towards the sentence of imprisonment or period of detention referred to in subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) If the person is convicted of the Tribunal offence, time spent by the person in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed by ...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is not to be counted as time towards the sentence of imprisonment or period of detention referred to in subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal until
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) If the person is convicted of the Tribunal offence, time spent by the person in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed by ...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(2) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of

24(3) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.30
note: Inclusion of time spent outside Australia in custody reference
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24(3) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of

25 Expiry of Australian sentences while under Tribunal detention
type: Concept
description: Information about sentence expiry
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.31
note: Notify Tribunal of sentence expiry
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

25 July
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
note: List of items in Schedule 1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-2
schema version: 2

25 July 2011 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 2011
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-3
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must inform the Tribunal.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 Expiry of Australian sentences while under Tribunal detention

25A Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 25A(1) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
has part: 25A(2) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
has part: 25A(3) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25a
schema version: 2

25A(1) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.32
note: Authorisation of material provision to a Tribunal
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 25A Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the provision of material to a Tribunal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
premise text: (1) The Attorney-General may authorise, in writing...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25A(1) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement

25A(2) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.32
note: Authorisation of material use by Tribunal
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 25A Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to use material
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The authorisation may:

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25A(2) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement

25A(3) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.32
note: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 25A Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
modality: CogAI
operator: includes

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
modality: LTL
operator: includes

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25A(3) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement

26 Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26(1) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
has part: 26(2) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
has part: 26(3) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26
schema version: 2

26 May
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
note: May
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-2
schema version: 2

26(1) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
note: Attorney-General must authorise taking of evidence etc.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Contains temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Tribunal makes a request to the Attorney-General...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must authorise taking of evidence etc.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Tribunal makes a request to the Attorney-General...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(1) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.

26(2) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
note: Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may comply with the request
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (3)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26(2) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.

26(3) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
note: Attorney-General must not comply with request under certain circumstances.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of complying with the request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (3) The Attorney-General must not comply...

27 Taking of evidence
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 27(1) Taking of evidence
has part: 27(2) Taking of evidence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27
schema version: 2

27 May
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
note: Conditional commencement of legislation amendment act
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-2
schema version: 2

27(1) Taking of evidence
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
note: Magistrate may take evidence on oath from witnesses.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Taking of evidence

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to take evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: may

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(1) Taking of evidence

27(2) Taking of evidence
type: Concept
description: Evidence to be sent to Attorney-General
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
note: Magistrate must put evidence in writing and certify it.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 27 Taking of evidence

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

28 March 2026
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Producing documents or other articles
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28(1) Producing documents or other articles
has part: 28(2) Producing documents or other articles
has part: 28(3) Producing documents or other articles
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-2
schema version: 2

28(1) Producing documents or other articles
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
note: Magistrate may require production of documents or articles upon authorization by Attorney-General.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Producing documents or other articles

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Magistrate requires production.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate has obligation to require production upon authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: require
premise text: Attorney-General authorizes production.

28(2) Producing documents or other articles
type: Concept
description: Written statement certifying production to the magistrate
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
note: Must send documents to Attorney-General with a written statement.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Producing documents or other articles

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must send documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

28(3) Producing documents or other articles
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
note: Magistrate must send certified copies of documents to Attorney-General.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Producing documents or other articles

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate has a duty to send certified copies.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

28 June
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
note: Classifies items 7-15 of Schedule 5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-3
schema version: 2

28 Mar 2026 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
references: sec-28-4
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.108
note: Amendment history for International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-4
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provision classified as Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes amendment history
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Amendment history

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text is classified as a compilation.

29 Legal representation
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 29(1) Legal representation
has part: 29(2) Legal representation
has part: 29(3) Legal representation
has part: 29(4) Legal representation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29
schema version: 2

29 Mar
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
note: Conditional commencement and amendment provision
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-2
schema version: 2

29 June 2013 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
note: Amendment by Crimes Legislation Amendment (International Crime Cooperation and Other Measures) Act 2018
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-3
schema version: 2

29(1) Legal representation
type: Concept
description: yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
note: Witness must provide legal representative if present
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Legal representation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide legal representation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29(1) Legal representation

29(2) Legal representation
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
note: Permit legal representation for specified persons and entities.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Legal representation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to have legal representation.
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT

29(3) Legal representation
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
note: Allow examination or cross-examination via video link.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Legal representation

29(4) Legal representation
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
note: Definition of video link
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Legal representation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: video link
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29(4) Legal representation

3 The objects of this Act
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9
note: Enable cooperation with Tribunal in investigation and prosecution of persons accused of committing Tribunal offences.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 June
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
note: Conditional commencement of statute law revision act
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enable cooperation with Tribunal
modality: Deontic
operator: enable

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 The objects of this Act

30 Form of certificates
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.35
note: Must state presence of certain persons
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-30-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 Form of certificates

31 Compellability of persons to attend etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.35
note: Compelling persons to attend and give evidence for a charge against a person for an offence.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-31-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to compel persons to attend and give evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Compellability of persons to attend etc.

32 Tribunal immunity certificates
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(1) Tribunal immunity certificates
has part: 32(2) Tribunal immunity certificates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32
schema version: 2

32(1) Tribunal immunity certificates
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.36
note: Authenticated Tribunal immunity certificates are admissible as prima facie evidence.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Tribunal immunity certificates

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The certificate's validity is an interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Certificate validity is a temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
premise text: (1) An authenticated Tribunal immunity certificate...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The certificate is admissible as prima facie evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certificate admissibility is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Admissibility
premise text: (1) An authenticated Tribunal immunity certificate...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(1) Tribunal immunity certificates

32(2) Tribunal immunity certificates
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.36
note: Certificate or declaration specifying requirements for answering questions or producing documents
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Tribunal immunity certificates

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document during specified circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires persons to answer questions or produce documents during specified circumstances
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (ii) either generally or in specified circumstances;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document during specified circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requires persons to answer questions or produce documents during specified circumstances
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (ii) either generally or in specified circumstances;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires persons to answer questions or produce documents
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) is given or made by a Tribunal under the Statute of the Tribunal or under the rules adopted under the Statute of the Tribunal;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Statute of the Tribunal or under the rules adopted under the Statute of the Tribunal, persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Specifies requirements for answering questions or producing documents
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: specifies
premise text: (b) specifies or declares that, under the Statute of the Tribunal or under the rules adopted under the Statute of the Tribunal,

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document during specified circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Requires persons to answer questions or produce documents during specified circumstances
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (ii) either generally or in specified circumstances;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document during specified circumstances.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires persons to answer questions or produce documents during specified circumstances
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (ii) either generally or in specified circumstances;

32A Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.37
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32A(1) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
has part: 32A(2) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32a
schema version: 2

32A(1) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.37
note: The Attorney-General must authorise an eligible law enforcement officer to apply for a surveillance device warrant.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32A Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must authorise an eligible law enforcement officer to apply for a surveillance device warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32A(1) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants

32A(2) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.37
note: Authorises eligible law enforcement officers to apply for surveillance device warrants.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32A Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the time period during which the duty applies.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: eligible law enforcement officer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: apply for surveillance device warrants
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32A(2) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants

32AA Authorising applications for computer access warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32AA(1) Authorising applications for computer access warrants
has part: 32AA(2) Authorising applications for computer access warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32aa
schema version: 2

32AA(1) Authorising applications for computer access warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.38
note: The Attorney-General may authorise an eligible law enforcement officer to apply for a computer access warrant.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32AA Authorising applications for computer access warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization is permitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32AA(1) Authorising applications for computer access warrants

32AA(2) Authorising applications for computer access warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.38
note: Authorising applications for computer access warrants
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32AA Authorising applications for computer access warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines terms
modality: Deontic
operator: has

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines computer and data terms
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: same meaning as

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32AA(2) Authorising applications for computer access warrants

32B Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32B(1) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
has part: 32B(2) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
has part: 32B(3) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32b
schema version: 2

32B(1) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.40
note: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order for the carrying out of a forensic procedure on a person.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32B Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An authorisation is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consent is required from the person before the authorisation can be granted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The person must be given an opportunity to consent to the forensic procedure and has not consented to it.
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGiven
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order if the person has not consented to the forensic procedure.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertakings are required from the Tribunal before the authorisation can be granted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Tribunal must give appropriate undertakings about the retention, use and destruction of forensic material or information obtained from analysing that material.
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGiven
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order if the Tribunal has given appropriate undertakings.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Belief is required about the person's location before the authorisation can be granted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The person must be believed to be in Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGiven
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order if the person is believed to be in Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertakings are required from the Tribunal before the authorisation can be granted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Tribunal must give undertakings that the Attorney-General considers necessary.
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGiven
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order if the Tribunal has given undertakings that the Attorney-General considers necessary.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32B(1) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures

32B(2) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.40
note: Authorisation required for forensic procedures in cases where consent cannot be obtained.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32B Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
premise text: (2) If the person is a child or an incapable person...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32B(2) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures

32B(3) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.40
note: Defines terms for forensic procedures
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 32B Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32B(3) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures

32C Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.41
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32C(1) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
has part: 32C(2) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32c
schema version: 2

32C(1) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.41
note: The Attorney-General must direct a constable on how to provide forensic evidence.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32C Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General has a duty to direct the constable.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32C(1) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal

32C(2) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.41
note: A direction under subsection (1) must not be a legislative instrument.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32C Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32C(2) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal

33 Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 33(1) Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
has part: 33(2) Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33
schema version: 2

33(1) Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
note: Authorises police officer to apply for search warrant.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Attorney-General may authorise applications for search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Police officer applies for search warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General authorizes police officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: Tribunal requests search warrant.

33(2) Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
note: Attorney-General must not comply with request under certain circumstances.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Attorney-General may authorise applications for search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) The Attorney-General must not comply with the request if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...complying with the request would prejudice Australia’s sovereignty, security or national interest.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of compliance due to sovereignty, security or national interest concerns
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) The Attorney-General must not comply with the request if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...complying with the request would prejudice Australia’s sovereignty, security or national interest; and there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of compliance due to multiple reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) The Attorney-General must not comply with the request if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance; and complying with the request would prejudice Australia’s sovereignty, security or national interest.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of compliance due to multiple reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) The Attorney-General must not comply with the request if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance; and there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of compliance due to multiple reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) The Attorney-General must not comply with the request if...

34 Applications for search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34(1) Applications for search warrants
has part: 34(2) Applications for search warrants
has part: 34(3) Applications for search warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34
schema version: 2

34(1) Applications for search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
note: Police officer may apply for search warrant with reasonable grounds.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Applications for search warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for search warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: May

34(2) Applications for search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
note: Police officer may apply for search warrant with reasonable grounds for suspicion.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Applications for search warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for search warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: May

34(3) Applications for search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
note: Applicable period for search warrant applications
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Applications for search warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(3) Applications for search warrants

34A Authorising application for a stored communications warrant
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.44
note: Authorisation for application of stored communications warrant
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34a-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34a
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Australian Federal Police or the police force...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting authority
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise...

34B Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34B(1) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
has part: 34B(2) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34b
schema version: 2

34B(1) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.45
note: The Attorney-General may authorise disclosure of information or documents under certain conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34B Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The disclosure is permitted only if it occurs within a specified time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (b) the information or documents come into existence during a period specified by the Tribunal, and which started on or after the day the request was made;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) a Tribunal has requested the Attorney-General to arrange for the disclosure of the information or documents;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General is permitted to authorise disclosure under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: (c) the Attorney-General is satisfied that: (i) a proceeding is before, or an investigation is being conducted by, the Tribunal;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General is permitted to authorise disclosure under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: (ii) the information or documents relate to the fact of a communication passing over a telecommunications system during a period specified in the Tribunal’s request.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The disclosure is permitted until a certain time has passed.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) the information or documents come into existence during a period specified by the Tribunal, and which started on or after the day the request was made;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34B(1) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective

34B(2) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.45
note: Avoids doubt about communication contents
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34B Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34B(2) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective

35 Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35(1) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
has part: 35(2) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35
schema version: 2

35(1) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.46
note: The Attorney-General may make arrangements for the travel of a person to a foreign country if certain conditions are met.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must be allowed to travel.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to travel
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: The Attorney-General may make arrangements...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(1) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)

35(2) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.46
note: Attorney-General must not comply with request if it would prejudice Australia's sovereignty, security or national interest.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot comply with request
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Attorney-General must not comply

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(2) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)

36 Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(1) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
has part: 36(2) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36
schema version: 2

36(1) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.47
note: Prisoners must provide evidence or assistance in a foreign country if requested by the Attorney-General and meet certain conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Prisoners giving evidence or assisting

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The time of the request is before the time of the investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: There are reasonable grounds to believe that the prisoner can give evidence relevant to the proceeding or assist the investigation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: there are reasonable grounds to believe that the prisoner can give evidence relevant to the proceeding or assist the investigation;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The prisoner must attend.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prisoners must provide evidence or assistance in a foreign country.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Attorney-General requests the prisoner's attendance.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must provide adequate undertakings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must provide adequate undertakings in respect of the matters referred to in section 37.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: the Attorney-General is satisfied that the prisoner has consented to giving evidence or assisting in the foreign country;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Tribunal must give evidence relevant to the proceeding or assist the investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Tribunal must give evidence relevant to the proceeding or assist the investigation if requested by the Attorney-General.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: the Attorney-General is satisfied that the prisoner has consented to giving evidence or assisting in the foreign country;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must be satisfied that the prisoner has consented.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must be satisfied that the prisoner has consented to giving evidence or assisting in the foreign country.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: the Attorney-General is satisfied that the Tribunal has given, to the extent (if any) required by the Attorney-General, adequate undertakings in respect of the matters referred to in section 37.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(1) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting

36(2) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.47
note: Release of prisoner for travel to give evidence or assist investigation.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Prisoners giving evidence or assisting

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... that the prisoner be released from prison for the purpose of such travel...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between prisoner's custody and travel.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (b) if the prisoner is a federal prisoner and also a State prisoner-direct

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... the Attorney-General may: ... direct that the prisoner be released...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Release of prisoner implies travel for evidence or investigation.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (4), if the prisoner is being held in custody

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may: ... direct that the prisoner be released...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (4), if the prisoner is being held in custody,

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... the Attorney-General may: ... direct that the prisoner be released...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No prohibition on releasing prisoner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (4), if the prisoner is being held in custody

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... make arrangements for such travel in the custody of a police
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditional release until necessary directions or approvals are given.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (c) in any case-subject to the making or giving of any necessary directions or approvals relevant to release of the prisoner

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36(2) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting

37 Undertakings relating to prisoners
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.49
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37(1) Undertakings relating to prisoners
has part: 37(2) Undertakings relating to prisoners
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37
schema version: 2

37(1) Undertakings relating to prisoners
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.49
note: The Tribunal must give an undertaking to return a prisoner to Australia.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Undertakings relating to prisoners

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to return the prisoner.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(1) Undertakings relating to prisoners

37(2) Undertakings relating to prisoners
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.49
note: Tribunal undertakings for prisoner custody arrangements
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Undertakings relating to prisoners

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make arrangements
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(2) Undertakings relating to prisoners

38 Effect of removal to foreign country on prisoners’ terms of
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.49
note: Continuation of imprisonment sentence while in custody outside Australia
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval during which person is in custody outside Australia >= temporal interval during which person is serving sentence of imprisonment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which person is in custody outside Australia
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Person is in custody in connection with the request

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person continues to serve that sentence of imprisonment AND person is subject to detention under Commonwealth law
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Combination of conditions for continuation of imprisonment sentence
modality: CogAI
operator: AND
premise text: Person is in custody in connection with the request AND person is released from a prison pursuant to a request by a Tribunal under section 36

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person continues to serve that sentence of imprisonment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues to serve sentence of imprisonment
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
premise text: Person is serving a sentence of imprisonment

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person continues to serve that sentence of imprisonment AND person is subject to detention under Commonwealth law
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Combination of conditions for continuation of imprisonment sentence
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
premise text: Person is in custody in connection with the request AND person is released from a prison pursuant to a request by a Tribunal under section 36

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval during which person is released from prison pursuant to a request by a Tribunal >= temporal interval during which person is serving sentence of imprisonment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval during which person is released from prison pursuant to a request by a Tribunal
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: Person is released from a prison pursuant to a request by a Tribunal under section 36

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Effect of removal to foreign country on prisoners’ terms of

39 Transit
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 39(1) Transit
has part: 39(2) Transit
has part: 39(3) Transit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39
schema version: 2

39(1) Transit
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.50
note: Transportation of person in custody through Australia for specific purposes.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Transit

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person may be transported through Australia in the custody of another person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal overlap between transportation and purposes.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) If a person is to be transported in custody from a foreign country...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person may be transported through Australia in the custody of another person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies that transportation is only allowed for specified purposes.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) If a person is to be transported...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person may be transported through Australia in the custody of another person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies the type of transportation permit.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (1) If a person is to be transported...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person may be transported...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows transportation of person in custody through Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1) If a person is to be transported...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person may be transported through Australia in the custody of another person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagates the condition that transportation is only allowed for specified purposes.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) If a person is to be transported...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39(1) Transit

39(2) Transit
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.50
note: Must be kept in custody until transportation is continued
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Transit

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep person in custody
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39(2) Transit

39(3) Transit
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.50
note: Transportation of a person in custody not continued within a reasonable time.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 39 Transit

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may direct that the person be transported in custody to the foreign country from which the person was first transported.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of transportation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a person is being held in custody pursuant to a direction under subsection (2); and (b) the person’s transportation is not, in the Attorney-General’s opinion, continued within a reasonable time;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39(3) Transit

4 Definitions
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.10
note: Definitions for the Act
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

40 Service of process
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.51
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40(1) Service of process
has part: 40(2) Service of process
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40
schema version: 2

40(1) Service of process
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.51
note: Attorney-General may arrange for service of process.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Service of process

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to arrange for service.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

40(2) Service of process
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.51
note: Attorney-General must not comply with request under certain circumstances.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Service of process

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot comply with request
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (a) complying with the request would prejudice Australia’s sovereignty, security or national interest;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot comply with request due to special circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (b) there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance.

40AA Application of Division
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.52
note: Request for Attorney-General's identification and tracing of proceeds of Tribunal offence.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aa-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40aa
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires Attorney-General's satisfaction
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Attorney-General is satisfied

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AA Application of Division

40AB Authorising applications under the Proceeds of Crime Act
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.52
note: The Attorney-General may authorise an officer to make applications under the Proceeds of Crime Act.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ab-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ab-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ab
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General may authorise an officer.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ab-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AB Authorising applications under the Proceeds of Crime Act

40AC Applying for and making restraining orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40AC(1) Applying for and making restraining orders
has part: 40AC(2) Applying for and making restraining orders
has part: 40AC(3) Applying for and making restraining orders
has part: 40AC(4) Applying for and making restraining orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ac
schema version: 2

40AC(1) Applying for and making restraining orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53
note: The Attorney-General may authorise a proceeds of crime authority to apply for a restraining order.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40AC Applying for and making restraining orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The authorization is within the Attorney-General's power.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (1) If the proceeds request involves the making of a restraining order,

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization is permitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

40AC(2) Applying for and making restraining orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53
note: Authority to apply for restraining order against property
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40AC Applying for and making restraining orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority applies for restraining order
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: (2) If so authorised, a proceeds of crime authority may apply...

40AC(3) Applying for and making restraining orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53
note: Applying Part 2-1 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to applications and restraining orders.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ac-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40AC Applying for and making restraining orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applying a rule or regulation.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AC(3) Applying for and making restraining orders

40AC(4) Applying for and making restraining orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53
note: Applying Part as if certain references are to Tribunal offence or criminal proceeding in respect of it
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ac-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40AC Applying for and making restraining orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...reasonably suspected that criminal proceedings are about to commence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for criminal proceeding in respect of Tribunal offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
premise text: It being reasonably suspected that criminal proceedings are about to commence against the person in the Tribunal in respect of a Tribunal offence

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...references to the Tribunal offence that is the subject of the proceeds request
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: References to indictable offence are references to Tribunal offence
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: That Part applies as if references in that Part to an indictable offence were references to the Tribunal offence that is the subject of the proceeds request

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a person against whom a criminal proceeding in respect of a Tribunal offence has commenced in the Tribunal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: References to person charged with indictable offence are references to person against whom criminal proceeding in respect of Tribunal offence has commenced
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: That Part applies as if references in that Part to a person charged with an indictable offence were references to a person against whom a criminal proceeding in respect of a Tribunal offence has commenced in the Tribunal

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...it being reasonably suspected that criminal proceedings are about to commence against the person in the Tribunal in respect of a Tribunal offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: References to it being proposed to charge person with indictable offence are references to it being reasonably suspected that criminal proceedings are about to commence against the person in the Tribunal in respect of a Tribunal offence
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: That Part applies as if references in that Part to it being proposed to charge a person with an indictable offence were references to it being reasonably suspected that criminal proceedings are about to commence against the person in the Tribunal in respect of a Tribunal offence

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...paragraphs 17(1)(e) and (f), subsections 17(3) and (4) and sections 18 to 20A, 29, 29A and 44 to 45A of that Act were omitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Paragraphs omitted from Part
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: That Part applies as if paragraphs 17(1)(e) and (f), subsections 17(3) and (4) and sections 18 to 20A, 29, 29A and 44 to 45A of that Act were omitted

40AD Excluding property from restraining orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53
note: Court must make restraining order under Part 2-1 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 against property in respect of the Tribunal offence.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ad-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ad-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ad
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must make restraining order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ad-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AD Excluding property from restraining orders

40AE When restraining order ceases to be in force
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40AE(1) When restraining order ceases to be in force
has part: 40AE(2) When restraining order ceases to be in force
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ae
schema version: 2

40AE(1) When restraining order ceases to be in force
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.54
note: Cease of restraining order after one month
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ae-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40AE When restraining order ceases to be in force

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the order ceases to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which restraining order is in force
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) If, at the end of the period of 1 month...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the order ceases to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval during which restraining order is in force
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (1) If, at the end of the period of 1 month...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the order ceases to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cease of action
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (1) If, at the end of the period of 1 month...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the order ceases to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval during which restraining order is in force
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (1) If, at the end of the period of 1 month...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the order ceases to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval during which restraining order is in force
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) If, at the end of the period of 1 month...

40AE(2) When restraining order ceases to be in force
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.54
note: Restraining order ceases to be in force under certain conditions
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ae-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40AE When restraining order ceases to be in force

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restraining order ceases to be in force
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (2) If...

40AF Applying for and making production orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.55
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40AF(1) Applying for and making production orders
has part: 40AF(2) Applying for and making production orders
has part: 40AF(3) Applying for and making production orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40af
schema version: 2

40AF(1) Applying for and making production orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.55
note: Authorized officer may apply for production order under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40af-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40AF Applying for and making production orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorized officer may apply for production order.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AF(1) Applying for and making production orders

40AF(2) Applying for and making production orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.55
note: Applying Part 3-2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to production orders
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40af-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40AF Applying for and making production orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part applies to the application and production order
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AF(2) Applying for and making production orders

40AF(3) Applying for and making production orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.55
note: Applying Part 40AF(3) as if certain references were to the Tribunal offence
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40af-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40AF Applying for and making production orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional application of Part 40AF(3)
modality: Deontic
operator: as if

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AF(3) Applying for and making production orders

40AG Retaining produced documents
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.55
note: An authorised officer must provide a written direction to the Attorney-General on how to deal with retained documents.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ag-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ag-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ag
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ag-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The authorized officer must provide a written direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ag-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AG Retaining produced documents

40AH Giving notices to financial institutions
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40AH(1) Giving notices to financial institutions
has part: 40AH(2) Giving notices to financial institutions
has part: 40AH(3) Giving notices to financial institutions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ah
schema version: 2

40AH(1) Giving notices to financial institutions
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.56
note: A senior police officer may give a written notice to a financial institution requiring the institution to provide certain information.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ah-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40AH Giving notices to financial institutions

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The notice requires information over a specified period of up to 6 months.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (d) details of transactions on such an account over a specified period of up to 6 months;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The police officer must give a written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The notice requires information about related accounts.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (e) details of any related accounts (including names of those who hold those accounts);

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The notice requires information from a transaction conducted by the financial institution.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (f) a transaction conducted by the financial institution on behalf of a specified person.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AH(1) Giving notices to financial institutions

40AH(2) Giving notices to financial institutions
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.56
note: Senior police officer must not issue notice unless reasonably believed required.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ah-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40AH Giving notices to financial institutions

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless reasonably believed required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Senior police officer must not issue notice.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AH(2) Giving notices to financial institutions

40AH(3) Giving notices to financial institutions
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.56
note: Defines a senior police officer
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ah-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40AH Giving notices to financial institutions

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a duty to identify, trace, and freeze or seize proceeds of Tribunal offences
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (3) A senior police officer is a person covered by paragraph 213(3)(a), (b) or (c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a right to identify, trace, and freeze or seize proceeds of Tribunal offences
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a right
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (3) A senior police officer is a person covered by paragraph 213(3)(a), (b) or (c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to identify, trace, and freeze or seize proceeds of Tribunal offences
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (3) A senior police officer is a person covered by paragraph 213(3)(a), (b) or (c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The duty to identify, trace, and freeze or seize proceeds of Tribunal offences applies at all times
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (3) A senior police officer is a person covered by paragraph 213(3)(a), (b) or (c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AH(3) Giving notices to financial institutions

40AI Contents of notices to financial institutions
type: Concept
description: true
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.57
note: Financial institution must provide information within 14 days after receiving notice.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ai
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Financial institution must provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Information or documents required to be provided.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AI Contents of notices to financial institutions

40AJ Protection from suits etc. for those complying with notices
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.57
note: No action against financial institution or its employees for actions taken under notice.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aj-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aj-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40aj
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection from obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aj-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AJ Protection from suits etc. for those complying with notices

40AK Making false statements in applications
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.58
note: Making false statements in applications is prohibited.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ak-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ak-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ak
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ak-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements in applications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ak-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AK Making false statements in applications

40AL Disclosing existence or nature of notice
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.58
note: Disclosing existence or nature of notice is prohibited after receiving a notice under section 40AH.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40al-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40al-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40al
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40al-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of notice existence or nature.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

40AM Failing to comply with a notice
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.58
note: Failing to comply with a notice is an offence.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40am
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person fails to comply with the notice.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies the temporal overlap between failing to comply and the notice.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person fails to comply with the notice.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the cognitive aspect of failing to comply with a notice.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person fails to comply with the notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failing to comply with a notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person fails to comply with the notice.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the obligation to comply with a notice.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person fails to comply with the notice.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Identifies the recurring nature of failing to comply with a notice.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AM Failing to comply with a notice

40AN Applying for and making monitoring orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.59
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40AN(1) Applying for and making monitoring orders
has part: 40AN(2) Applying for and making monitoring orders
has part: 40AN(3) Applying for and making monitoring orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40an
schema version: 2

40AN(1) Applying for and making monitoring orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.59
note: Authorized officer may apply for a monitoring order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40an-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40AN Applying for and making monitoring orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorized officer may apply for a monitoring order.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AN(1) Applying for and making monitoring orders

40AN(2) Applying for and making monitoring orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.59
note: Applying Part 3-4 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to monitoring orders
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40an-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40AN Applying for and making monitoring orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part applies to the application and monitoring order
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AN(2) Applying for and making monitoring orders

40AN(3) Applying for and making monitoring orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.59
note: Applying Part as if references to serious offence are references to Tribunal offence
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40an-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40AN Applying for and making monitoring orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AN(3) Applying for and making monitoring orders

40AO Passing on information given under monitoring orders
type: Concept
description: Information under monitoring order
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.60
note: Must pass information on to Attorney-General or APS employee
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ao-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ao-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ao
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ao-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pass information on
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40AP Applying for and issuing search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.60
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40AP(1) Applying for and issuing search warrants
has part: 40AP(2) Applying for and issuing search warrants
has part: 40AP(3) Applying for and issuing search warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ap
schema version: 2

40AP(1) Applying for and issuing search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.60
note: Authorized officer must apply for search warrant under specified conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ap-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40AP Applying for and issuing search warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Search warrant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Authorized officer

40AP(2) Applying for and issuing search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.60
note: Part 3-5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 applies to the application and POCA search warrant.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ap-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40AP Applying for and issuing search warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part 3-5 applies to the application and POCA search warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AP(2) Applying for and issuing search warrants

40AP(3) Applying for and issuing search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.60
note: Applying Part as if certain references are to specific definitions or sections.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ap-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40AP Applying for and issuing search warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applying Part as if certain references are to specific definitions or sections.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AP(3) Applying for and issuing search warrants

40AQ Contents of POCA search warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.61
note: POCA search warrant must state that seizure of property is necessary to prevent concealment, loss or destruction.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aq-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aq-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40aq
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: POCA search warrant imposes an obligation on the state to seize property if necessary.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aq-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AQ Contents of POCA search warrants

40AR Seizure of certain property or things found in the course of
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.62
note: Seizure of property or things found during a search warrant is prohibited unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ar-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ar-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40ar
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ar-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ar-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AR Seizure of certain property or things found in the course of

40AS Return of seized property to third parties
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40AS(1) Return of seized property to third parties
has part: 40AS(2) Return of seized property to third parties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40as
schema version: 2

40AS(1) Return of seized property to third parties
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.62
note: Duty to return seized property to third parties
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40as-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40AS Return of seized property to third parties

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation to return seized property
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AS(1) Return of seized property to third parties

40AS(2) Return of seized property to third parties
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.62
note: Court must be a court of the State or Territory with proceeds jurisdiction.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40as-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40AS Return of seized property to third parties

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must be a court of the State or Territory with proceeds jurisdiction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AS(2) Return of seized property to third parties

40AT Dealing with certain seized property
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.63
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40AT(1) Dealing with certain seized property
has part: 40AT(2) Dealing with certain seized property
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40at
schema version: 2

40AT(1) Dealing with certain seized property
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.63
note: Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section if seized under a POCA search warrant.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40at-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40AT Dealing with certain seized property

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Property must be dealt with within 30 days.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section if: (a) it has been seized under a POCA search warrant in relation to a Tribunal offence; and (b) it is not: (i) evidential material; or (ii) property of a kind referred to in subparagraph 40AR(a)(iv) or (v.).

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section if: (a) it has been seized under a POCA search warrant in relation to a Tribunal offence; and (b) it is not: (i) evidential material; or (ii) property of a kind referred to in subparagraph 40AR(a)(iv) or (v.).

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Property must be dealt with within 30 days.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section if: (a) it has been seized under a POCA search warrant in relation to a Tribunal offence; and (b) it is not: (i) evidential material; or (ii) property of a kind referred to in subparagraph 40AR(a)(iv) or (v.).

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AT(1) Dealing with certain seized property

40AT(2) Dealing with certain seized property
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.63
note: Forfeiture order not registered within 30 days after seizure.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40at-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40AT Dealing with certain seized property

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a forfeiture order in relation to the property has not been registered in a court under Part 6;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Forfeiture order registration within 30 days after seizure.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2) If, at the end of the period of 30 days after the day the property was seized:

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a restraining order has not been made as described in Subdivision B in respect of the property in relation to the Tribunal offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of forfeiture order registration by AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (2) If, at the end of the period of 30 days after the day the property was seized:

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a restraining order has not been made as described in Subdivision B in respect of the property in relation to the Tribunal offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of forfeiture order not registered within 30 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) a forfeiture order in relation to the property has not been registered in a court under Part 6;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a restraining order has not been made as described in Subdivision B in respect of the property in relation to the Tribunal offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about forfeiture order registration.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) If, at the end of the period of 30 days after the day the property was seized:

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a restraining order has not been made as described in Subdivision B in respect of the property in relation to the Tribunal offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of forfeiture order registration.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) If, at the end of the period of 30 days after the day the property was seized:

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AT(2) Dealing with certain seized property

40AU Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.65
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40AU(1) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
has part: 40AU(2) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
has part: 40AU(3) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40au
schema version: 2

40AU(1) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.65
note: Seizure of property or thing under POCA search warrant in relation to Tribunal offence.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40au-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40AU Dealing with evidential material and certain property or

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (seizure has temporal interval greater than or equal to seizure of property or thing under POCA search warrant in relation to Tribunal offence)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Has temporal interval greater than or equal to
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (seizure occurs under POCA search warrant in relation to Tribunal offence)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (seizing officer has obligation to deal with seized item)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (seized item is evidential material or property of a kind)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (seizing officer has obligation to deal with seized item)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (seized item is property or thing under POCA search warrant in relation to Tribunal offence)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (seizing officer has obligation to deal with seized item)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (seizing officer is authorised officer or person assisting in relation to warrant)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AU(1) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or

40AU(2) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.65
note: Retention of seized item pending written direction from Attorney-General
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40au-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40AU Dealing with evidential material and certain property or

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for retention period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Retention period exceeds 1 month

40AU(3) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.65
note: The Attorney-General may direct the seizing officer to send the seized item to the Tribunal.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40au-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40AU Dealing with evidential material and certain property or

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directive obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40AU(3) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or

41 Tribunal sittings in Australia
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 41(1) Tribunal sittings in Australia
has part: 41(2) Tribunal sittings in Australia
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41
schema version: 2

41(1) Tribunal sittings in Australia
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
note: A Tribunal may sit in Australia for the purpose of performing its functions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Tribunal sittings in Australia

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to perform functions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

41(2) Tribunal sittings in Australia
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
note: Tribunal may sit in Australia for taking evidence, conducting or continuing a proceeding, or giving judgment.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 41 Tribunal sittings in Australia

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between Tribunal sitting and taking evidence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May sit in Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41(2) Tribunal sittings in Australia

42 Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 42(1) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
has part: 42(2) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
has part: 42(3) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42
schema version: 2

42(1) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
note: Tribunal may exercise prescribed powers while sitting in Australia
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exercise powers
modality: Deontic
operator: may

42(2) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
note: Regulations must implement agreements between Commonwealth and Tribunal about powers exercised while sitting in Australia.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulations made for the purposes of subsection (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations must implement agreements
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(2) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia

42(3) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
note: Tribunal's powers while sitting in Australia may apply, adopt or incorporate rules of procedure and evidence.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 42 Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Tribunal's powers may apply, adopt or incorporate rules of procedure and evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42(3) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia

43 Contravention of Tribunal orders etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.67
note: Prohibition on intentionally contravening Tribunal orders or hindering their functions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment occurs during the period of contravention or hindering.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between contravention and imprisonment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: A person must not intentionally contravene an order that a Tribunal makes while sitting in Australia; or A person must not otherwise intentionally hinder a Tribunal in performing its functions while sitting in Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment implies contravention or hindering.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication between contravention and imprisonment.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: A person must not intentionally contravene an order that a Tribunal makes while sitting in Australia; or A person must not otherwise intentionally hinder a Tribunal in performing its functions while sitting in Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening Tribunal orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: A person must not intentionally contravene an order that a Tribunal makes while sitting in Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on hindering Tribunal functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: A person must not otherwise intentionally hinder a Tribunal in performing its functions while sitting in Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contravention and hindering diffuse to related concepts.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition to related concepts.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: A person must not intentionally contravene an order that a Tribunal makes while sitting in Australia; or A person must not otherwise intentionally hinder a Tribunal in performing its functions while sitting in Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Contravention of Tribunal orders etc.

44 Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44(1) Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
has part: 44(3) Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44
schema version: 2

44(1) Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
note: Attorney-General may authorise proceeds of crime authority to apply for registration of forfeiture order.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise a proceeds of crime authority...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for the enforcement of forfeiture orders.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise a proceeds of crime authority...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Decision support for the Attorney-General.
modality: CogAI
operator: Decision Support
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise a proceeds of crime authority...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the Attorney-General.
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise a proceeds of crime authority...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of the Attorney-General's decision.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise a proceeds of crime authority...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for the enforcement of forfeiture orders.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), if...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(1) Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders

44(3) Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
note: Attorney-General must not comply with requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders under certain circumstances.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-compliance is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General cannot comply with requests.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Request for enforcement of forfeiture orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-compliance may diffuse.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Non-compliance may diffuse to other entities.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: Request for enforcement of forfeiture orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-compliance is justified if special circumstances exist.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Attorney-General's opinion is a condition for non-compliance.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Opinion
premise text: Special circumstances justifying non-compliance

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-compliance may be recurring.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Non-compliance may recur under certain conditions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Request for enforcement of forfeiture orders

45 Registration of order
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 45(1) Registration of order
has part: 45(1A) Registration of order
has part: 45(1B) Registration of order
has part: 45(2) Registration of order
has part: 45(3) Registration of order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45
schema version: 2

45(1) Registration of order
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
note: Court must register order unless it would be contrary to the interests of justice.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Registration of order

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court must register order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must register order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Proceeds of crime authority applies to court with proceeds jurisdiction

45(1A) Registration of order
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
note: Notice must be given to specified persons and court-directed persons
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1a-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Registration of order

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

45(1B) Registration of order
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
note: Court may consider application without notice if requested by proceeds of crime authority.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1b-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Registration of order

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court may consider application without notice.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to consider application without notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Proceeds of crime authority requests court to do so.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45(1B) Registration of order

45(2) Registration of order
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
note: Order must be registered in a court by the registration of a copy of the appropriate order sealed by the Tribunal.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Registration of order

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Registration is within the scope of the Tribunal's authority
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The registration must be done under the rules of the court, which are part of the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Registration implies that the order is valid
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: If an order must be registered in a court, then it is valid.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be registered
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Order must be registered in a court by the registration of a copy of the appropriate order sealed by the Tribunal.

45(3) Registration of order
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
note: Permits electronic transmission of sealed copies for purposes of subsection (2)
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 45 Registration of order

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it is taken for the purposes of subsection (2) of this section during the specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies time frame for transmission
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it is taken during the specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Specifies time frame for transmission
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it is permitted for the purposes of subsection (2) of this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies permitted action
modality: Deontic
operator: permitted
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it is taken for the purposes of subsection (2) of this section to be the same as the sealed copy.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies same document
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: same-as
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it is taken during the specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Specifies time frame for transmission
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it is taken for the purposes of subsection (2) of this section during the specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies time frame for transmission
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means

46 Effect of order
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.69
curation status: Proposed
has part: 46(1) Effect of order
has part: 46(1A) Effect of order
has part: 46(2) Effect of order
has part: 46(3) Effect of order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46
schema version: 2

46(1) Effect of order
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.69
note: Forfeiture order has effect as if made by court under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 46 Effect of order

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if it were a forfeiture order made by the court under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 at the time of registration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A forfeiture order registered in a court has effect...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if it were a forfeiture order made by the court under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 at the time of registration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Expresses knowledge or belief
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
premise text: (1) A forfeiture order registered in a court has effect...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may be enforced, as if it were a forfeiture order made by the court...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation to enforce
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
premise text: (1) A forfeiture order registered in a court has effect...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if it were a forfeiture order made by the court under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 at the time of registration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads information or obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) A forfeiture order registered in a court has effect...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if it were a forfeiture order made by the court under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 at the time of registration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between events
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) A forfeiture order registered in a court has effect...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46(1) Effect of order

46(1A) Effect of order
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.69
note: Repeal of subparagraph 68(1)(b)(ii) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 46 Effect of order

46(2) Effect of order
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.69
note: Registration ceases to have effect after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 46 Effect of order

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the sealed copy has been filed by then in that court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Registration is an interval that ends after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A registration effected by a court registering a copy of a sealed copy ceases to have effect...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the sealed copy has been filed by then in that court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Registration is inferred to cease after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: (2) A registration effected by a court registering a copy of a sealed copy ceases to have effect...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the sealed copy has been filed by then in that court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits registration after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A registration effected by a court registering a copy of a sealed copy ceases to have effect...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the sealed copy has been filed by then in that court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Registration is diffused into a new entity that ceases to exist after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) A registration effected by a court registering a copy of a sealed copy ceases to have effect...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the sealed copy has been filed by then in that court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Registration is an interval that ends after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) A registration effected by a court registering a copy of a sealed copy ceases to have effect...

46(3) Effect of order
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.69
note: Permits disposal of property subject to an order under certain conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 46 Effect of order

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between property and order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) Subject to section 46A, property that is subject to an order registered under this Part may be disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in accordance with any direction of the Attorney-General or

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between property and order
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (3) Subject to section 46A, property that is subject to an order registered under this Part may be disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in accordance with any direction of the Attorney-General or

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
premise text: (3) Subject to section 46A, property that is subject to an order registered under this Part may be disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in accordance with any direction of the Attorney-General or

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between property and order
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (3) Subject to section 46A, property that is subject to an order registered under this Part may be disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in accordance with any direction of the Attorney-General or

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between property and order
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) Subject to section 46A, property that is subject to an order registered under this Part may be disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in accordance with any direction of the Attorney-General or

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46(3) Effect of order

46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 46A(1) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(2) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(3) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(4) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(5) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(6) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(7) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a
schema version: 2

46A(1) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
note: Person with interest in property may apply for order under subsection (2) if not convicted of related offence.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may apply to the court for an order under subsection (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (1) If a court registers...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may apply to the court for an order under subsection (2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide order under subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: (1) If a court registers...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46A(1) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

46A(2) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
note: Court must declare nature, extent and value of applicant's interest in property if not involved in offence.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must declare nature, extent and value of applicant's interest in property.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46A(2) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

46A(3) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
note: Court must give leave for person to apply under subsection (1)
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must give leave
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46A(3) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

46A(4) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
note: Court may give leave if satisfied there are special grounds.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to grant leave
modality: Deontic
operator: May

46A(5) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
note: Grant leave to a person under certain circumstances
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Leave granted
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) the person, for a good reason, did not attend the hearing

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Leave granted
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow leave application
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
premise text: (a) the person, for a good reason, did not attend the hearing

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46A(5) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

46A(6) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
note: Application must be made within 6 weeks of forfeiture order registration.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines an overlapping interval for the application deadline.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (6) Unless the court gives leave, an application under subsection (1) is to be made before the end of 6 weeks beginning on the day when the forfeiture order is registered in the court.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines an overlapping CogAI for the application deadline.
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (6) Unless the court gives leave, an application under subsection (1) is to be made before the end of 6 weeks beginning on the day when the forfeiture order is registered in the court.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making an application after a certain period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (6) Unless the court gives leave, an application under subsection (1) is to be made before the end of 6 weeks beginning on the day when the forfeiture order is registered in the court.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines an overlapping diffusion for the application deadline.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (6) Unless the court gives leave, an application under subsection (1) is to be made before the end of 6 weeks beginning on the day when the forfeiture order is registered in the court.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines an overlapping trace for the application deadline.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (6) Unless the court gives leave, an application under subsection (1) is to be made before the end of 6 weeks beginning on the day when the forfeiture order is registered in the court.

46A(7) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
note: Court may give leave to apply outside the period if not due to neglect.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-7-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting leave is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46A(7) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders

47 When search warrants can be issued
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.73
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47(1) When search warrants can be issued
has part: 47(2) When search warrants can be issued
has part: 47(3) When search warrants can be issued
has part: 47(4) When search warrants can be issued
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47
schema version: 2

47(1) When search warrants can be issued
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.73
note: Magistrate may issue warrant to search premises under certain conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47 When search warrants can be issued

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidential material will exist within applicable period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of applicability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: Applicable period referred to in subsection (3) of this section

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant issued if reasonable grounds exist
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate obligation to issue warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Application made under subsection 15(1) or 34(1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant issued if reasonable grounds exist
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conditional warrant issuance
modality: LTL
operator: if
premise text: Application made under subsection 15(1) or 34(1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(1) When search warrants can be issued

47(2) When search warrants can be issued
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.73
note: Magistrate may issue warrant for search or frisk if application is made and reasonable grounds are suspected.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47 When search warrants can be issued

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant issued
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may issue warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Application made

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(2) When search warrants can be issued

47(3) When search warrants can be issued
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.73
note: Search warrant application period
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47 When search warrants can be issued

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines time interval for search warrant application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: Section 52—48

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines search warrant application period using artificial intelligence
modality: CogAI
operator: defines
premise text: Section 52—48

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines search warrant application period
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPeriod
premise text: Section 52—48

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines applicable period for search warrant application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: defines
premise text: Subsections (1) and (2)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads information about search warrant application period
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Section 52—48

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines time interval for search warrant application
modality: LTL
operator: between
premise text: Section 52—48

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(3) When search warrants can be issued

47(4) When search warrants can be issued
type: Concept
description: Grounds for suspicion
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.73
note: Grounds for suspicion must be stated in the information.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 47 When search warrants can be issued

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must state grounds for suspicion
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(4) When search warrants can be issued

48 Content of warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 48(1) Content of warrants
has part: 48(2) Content of warrants
has part: 48(3) Content of warrants
has part: 48(4) Content of warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48
schema version: 2

48(1) Content of warrants
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.74
note: Magistrate must state purpose, premises, and evidential material in search warrant.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Content of warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must state purpose, premises, and evidential material.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Purpose is a description of the Tribunal offence.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS A

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(1) Content of warrants

48(2) Content of warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.74
note: Allows for successive warrants in relation to the same premises or person.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Content of warrants

48(3) Content of warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.74
note: Seizure of evidential material or seizable items without warrant is prohibited.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Content of warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of seizure without warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) The magistrate is also to state, in a warrant...

48(4) Content of warrants
type: Concept
description: Details of warrant
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.74
note: Magistrate must state warrant details
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 48 Content of warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(4) Content of warrants

49 The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49(1) The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
has part: 49(2) The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49
schema version: 2

49(1) The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.76
note: Restrictions on search and seizure of premises
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49 The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The executing officer or an officer assisting may not perform these actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of certain actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A warrant in force...

49(2) The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.76
note: Restriction on execution hours of a search warrant
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49 The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The execution is restricted to the specified hours.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal restriction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) If the warrant states that it may be executed only during particular hours, it must not be executed outside those hours.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The artificial agent asserts that the execution is restricted to the specified hours.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial agent perspective
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
premise text: (2) If the warrant states that it may be executed only during particular hours, it must not be executed outside those hours.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is forbidden to execute the warrant outside the specified hours.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) If the warrant states that it may be executed only during particular hours, it must not be executed outside those hours.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The execution is only possible if the specified hours are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional restriction
modality: Diffusion
operator: only-if
premise text: (2) If the warrant states that it may be executed only during particular hours, it must not be executed outside those hours.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The execution is restricted until the specified hours.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal restriction
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) If the warrant states that it may be executed only during particular hours, it must not be executed outside those hours.

5 Some Territories to be regarded as States
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.18
note: Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory are regarded as States.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

5 Dec 2011
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-2
schema version: 2

5 Mar 2026
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.108
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-3
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to regard certain territories as states.
modality: Deontic
operator: regarded-as

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Some Territories to be regarded as States

50 The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to a person
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.77
note: Seizure of things is prohibited unless on reasonable grounds believed necessary to prevent concealment, loss or destruction.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-50-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of seizure unless on reasonable grounds.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

51 Restrictions on personal searches
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78
note: Restrictions on personal searches
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-51-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits strip search or body cavity search
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

52 Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 52(1) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
has part: 52(2) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
has part: 52(3) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
has part: 52(4) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52
schema version: 2

52(1) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78
note: Police officers may apply for warrants by telephone.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for a warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: May

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Excerpt is part of section 52(1)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: HasPart

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(1) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.

52(2) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78
note: Magistrate must require communication by voice to the extent practicable in circumstances.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must require communication by voice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate may require communication by voice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

52(3) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
description: All necessary information
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78
note: Application for warrant must include required information.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: All necessary information must be provided
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide required information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(3) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.

52(4) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78
note: Magistrate may issue warrant urgently or due to delay
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to issue warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: May

53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79
curation status: Proposed
has part: 53(1) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
has part: 53(2) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
has part: 53(3) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
has part: 53(4) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
has part: 53(5) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53
schema version: 2

53(1) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79
note: Inform applicant of warrant terms and signing time
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must inform applicant
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Informing is a formality
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(1) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.

53(2) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
description: Form of warrant
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79
note: Applicant must complete a form of warrant
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide form of warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(2) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.

53(3) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
description: true
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79
note: Provide completed warrant form and sworn information within a specified timeframe.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(3) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.

53(4) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
description: Form of warrant completed by the magistrate
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79
note: The magistrate must complete a form of warrant.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The magistrate must complete a form of warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

53(5) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79
note: Court assumes exercise of power under warrant was not duly authorised unless proved otherwise.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5) If: (a) it is material, in any proceedings, for a court to be satisfied that the exercise of a power under a warrant issued under section 52 was not duly authorised; and (b) the form of warrant signed by the magistrate is not produced in evidence; the court is to assume that the exercise of the power was not duly authorised.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exercise of power under warrant unless duly authorised.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (5) If: (a) it is material, in any proceedings, for a court to be satisfied that the exercise of a power under a warrant issued under section 52 was duly authorised; and (b) the form of warrant signed by the magistrate is not produced in evidence; the court is to assume, unless the contrary is proved, that the exercise of the power was not duly authorised.

54 Availability of assistance and use of force in executing a warrant
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
note: Executing officer may obtain assistance and use force in executing a warrant.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-54-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State permits use of force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to use force
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: Executing officer may obtain assistance and use force

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-54-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Availability of assistance and use of force in executing a warrant

55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55(1) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
has part: 55(2) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
has part: 55(3) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
has part: 55(4) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
has part: 55(5) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55
schema version: 2

55(1) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
note: Must provide a copy of warrant to occupier or representative
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of warrant to occupier or representative
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(1) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.

55(2) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
note: Must provide a copy of the warrant to the occupier.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(2) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.

55(3) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
description: Copy of warrant
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
note: Must show a copy of the warrant to the occupier.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must show a copy of the warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(3) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.

55(4) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
note: Must identify self to occupier or person being searched.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(4) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.

55(5) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
note: No signature or seal is required on a copy of the warrant.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(5) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.

56 Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56(1) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
has part: 56(2) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
has part: 56(3) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56
schema version: 2

56(1) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
note: Officer may take photographs with occupier's consent.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Specific powers available to officers executing warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permitted action
modality: Deontic
operator: can

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(1) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants

56(2) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
note: Police officers may complete warrant execution after temporarily ceasing it with occupier's consent.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Specific powers available to officers executing warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to complete warrant execution
modality: Deontic
operator: may

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(2) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants

56(3) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
note: Completion of warrant execution despite court order revocation
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Specific powers available to officers executing warrants

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the execution of the warrant may be completed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Warrant execution completion occurs during warrant revocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) the execution of a search warrant is stopped by an order of a court; and (b) the order is later revoked or reversed on appeal; and (c) the warrant is still in force;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the execution of the warrant may be completed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Warrant execution can proceed despite court order revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: (a) the execution of a search warrant is stopped by an order of a court; and (b) the order is later revoked or reversed on appeal; and (c) the warrant is still in force;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the execution of the warrant may be completed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Warrant revocation requires warrant execution completion
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (a) the execution of a search warrant is stopped by an order of a court; and (b) the order is later revoked or reversed on appeal; and (c) the warrant is still in force;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the execution of the warrant may be completed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Warrant revocation ends warrant execution completion
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (a) the execution of a search warrant is stopped by an order of a court; and (b) the order is later revoked or reversed on appeal; and (c) the warrant is still in force;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(3) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants

57 Use of equipment to examine or process things
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57(1) Use of equipment to examine or process things
has part: 57(2) Use of equipment to examine or process things
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57
schema version: 2

57(1) Use of equipment to examine or process things
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
note: Executing officer may bring necessary equipment to premises for examination or processing.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Use of equipment to examine or process things

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Executing officer has the power to bring necessary equipment.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57(1) Use of equipment to examine or process things

57(2) Use of equipment to examine or process things
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
note: Consent of occupier required for examination or processing at premises
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Use of equipment to examine or process things

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval of 'consent' overlaps with the examination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between consent and examination
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the occupier of the premises consents in writing;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The use of equipment to examine or process things is permitted if the occupier consents.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by occupier
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) it is not practicable to examine or process the things at the warrant premises; or (b) the occupier of the premises consents in writing;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The examination occurs until the consent expires.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consent and examination
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) the occupier of the premises consents in writing;

58 Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58(1) Use of electronic equipment at premises
has part: 58(2) Use of electronic equipment at premises
has part: 58(3) Use of electronic equipment at premises
has part: 58(4) Use of electronic equipment at premises
has part: 58(5) Use of electronic equipment at premises
has part: 58(6) Use of electronic equipment at premises
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58
schema version: 2

58(1) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
note: Executing officer may operate electronic equipment at premises under certain conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action under specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads information about electronic equipment.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Requires reasonable grounds for belief.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believes

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires sequence of events.
modality: LTL
operator: Ordered

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(1) Use of electronic equipment at premises

58(2) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
note: Seize equipment and associated devices if evidential material is accessible.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Seizure occurs within a specific time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Seizure occurs within a specific time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: Executing officer may seize equipment after operating it.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Permission is implied.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Permission is implied if the occupier agrees to use facilities for a purpose.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
premise text: Occupier agrees to use facilities for a purpose.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Equipment is recognized as a potential threat.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Equipment is recognized as a potential threat if it can be accessed by operating it.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: Executing officer recognizes equipment as a potential threat.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Seizure of equipment is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of seizing equipment without permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Executing officer may seize equipment if evidential material is accessible.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Seizure spreads to other devices.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Seizure spreads to other devices if they are accessible.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: Executing officer may seize equipment and associated devices.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(2) Use of electronic equipment at premises

58(3) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
note: Equipment seizure under certain conditions
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits equipment seizure without practicable documentary form or copying
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) Equipment may be seized...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(3) Use of electronic equipment at premises

58(4) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
note: Executing officer may take necessary actions to secure electronic equipment at premises.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she may do whatever is necessary to secure the equipment,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation application.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) evidential material may be accessible by operating electronic equipment at the warrant premises;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she may do whatever is necessary to secure the equipment,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ability to perform action.
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: (a) evidential material may be accessible by operating electronic equipment at the warrant premises;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she may do whatever is necessary to secure the equipment,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to perform action.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (c) if he or she does not take action under this subsection, the material may be destroyed, altered or otherwise interfered with;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she may do whatever is necessary to secure the equipment,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permitted action.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: (b) expert assistance is required to operate the equipment;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: he or she may do whatever is necessary to secure the equipment,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation application.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (c) if he or she does not take action under this subsection, the material may be destroyed, altered or otherwise interfered with;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(4) Use of electronic equipment at premises

58(5) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
note: Notice must be given to premises occupier before securing equipment.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(5) Use of electronic equipment at premises

58(6) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
note: Equipment must be secured.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-6-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The equipment must be secured.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (6) The equipment may be secured:

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(6) Use of electronic equipment at premises

59 Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.84
curation status: Proposed
has part: 59(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
has part: 59(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
has part: 59(3) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59
schema version: 2

59(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.84
note: Compensation for damage to electronic equipment if caused by insufficient care.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Compensation for damage to electronic equipment

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...compensation for the damage is payable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to compensate for damage.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (1) If...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment

59(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.84
note: Compensation is payable out of money appropriated by the Parliament for the purpose.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Compensation for damage to electronic equipment

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Compensation is payable out of money appropriated by the Parliament for the purpose.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment

59(3) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
description: warning or guidance
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.84
note: Occupier must provide warning or guidance about equipment operation.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 59 Compensation for damage to electronic equipment

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIG

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59(3) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment

6 External Territories
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.18
note: This Act extends to each external Territory.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
note: References s 4(1), (2) and sch 33.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extends to external Territories
modality: Deontic
operator: extends

60 Copies of seized things to be provided
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
curation status: Proposed
has part: 60(1) Copies of seized things to be provided
has part: 60(2) Copies of seized things to be provided
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60
schema version: 2

60(1) Copies of seized things to be provided
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
note: Must provide a copy of seized documents or information to the occupier upon request.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-60-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Copies of seized things to be provided

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-60-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60(1) Copies of seized things to be provided

60(2) Copies of seized things to be provided
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain seizures
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-60-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 60 Copies of seized things to be provided

61 Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
curation status: Proposed
has part: 61(1) Occupier entitled to be present during search
has part: 61(2) Occupier entitled to be present during search
has part: 61(3) Occupier entitled to be present during search
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61
schema version: 2

61(1) Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
note: Occupier entitled to be present during search
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Occupier entitled to be present during search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The search occurs during the presence of the occupier
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Search occurs during the presence of the occupier
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) If a warrant in relation to premises is being executed and the occupier of the premises or another person who apparently represents the occupier is present at the premises, the person is entitled to observe the search being conducted.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The occupier's entitlement to be present during the search is established
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Occupier's entitlement to be present during search
modality: Argumentation
operator: entitlement
premise text: (1) If a warrant in relation to premises is being executed and the occupier of the premises or another person who apparently represents the occupier is present at the premises, the person is entitled to observe the search being conducted.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The occupier has the right to be present during the search
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Occupier has right
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: (1) If a warrant in relation to premises is being executed and the occupier of the premises or another person who apparently represents the occupier is present at the premises, the person is entitled to observe the search being conducted.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The occupier has the right to be present during the search
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Occupier has right to be present during search
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: (1) If a warrant in relation to premises is being executed and the occupier of the premises or another person who apparently represents the occupier is present at the premises, the person is entitled to observe the search being conducted.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The search is recurring or ordered during the presence of the occupier
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Search is recurring or ordered
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) If a warrant in relation to premises is being executed and the occupier of the premises or another person who apparently represents the occupier is present at the premises, the person is entitled to observe the search being conducted.

61(2) Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
note: Right to observe search ceases if impedes search.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Occupier entitled to be present during search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Impedance of search
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to observe ceases
modality: Deontic
operator: Cease
premise text: Right to observe search

61(3) Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
note: Occupier entitled to be present during search
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 61 Occupier entitled to be present during search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 61(3) overlaps with other sections
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) This section does not prevent 2 or more areas of the premises being searched at the same time.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 61(3) recognizes right to presence during search
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of right to presence during search
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (3) This section does not prevent 2 or more areas of the premises being searched at the same time.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Occupier entitled to be present during search
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right of occupier to presence during search
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) This section does not prevent 2 or more areas of the premises being searched at the same time.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Right to presence during search diffuses to other sections
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of right to presence during search
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) This section does not prevent 2 or more areas of the premises being searched at the same time.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 61(3) has a recurring trace with other sections
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between sections
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (3) This section does not prevent 2 or more areas of the premises being searched at the same time.

62 Receipts for things seized under warrant
type: Concept
description: true
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
note: Must provide receipt for seized thing
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-62-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide receipt
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62 Receipts for things seized under warrant

63 Searches without warrant in emergency situations
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63(1) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
has part: 63(2) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
has part: 63(3) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
has part: 63(4) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63
schema version: 2

63(1) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87
note: Police officers can conduct warrantless searches in emergency situations under certain conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Searches without warrant in emergency situations

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Emergency situations overlap with warrantless searches.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal overlap between emergency situations and warrantless searches.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (c) it is necessary to exercise the power without the authority of a search warrant because the circumstances are serious and urgent.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No warrantless search allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits warrantless searches without emergency justification.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) evidential material is in or on a conveyance; and (b) it is necessary to exercise a power under subsection (2) in order to prevent the material from being concealed, lost or destroyed;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Police officers have an obligation to act in emergencies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on police officers to exercise power under subsection (2) in emergency situations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (c) it is necessary to exercise the power without the authority of a search warrant because the circumstances are serious and urgent.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Police officers have permission to act without warrants.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission for police officers to exercise power under subsection (2) without a warrant in emergency situations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (a) evidential material is in or on a conveyance; and (b) it is necessary to exercise a power under subsection (2) in order to prevent the material from being concealed, lost or destroyed;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Emergency situations recur.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the recurring nature of emergency situations that justify warrantless searches.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (a) evidential material is in or on a conveyance; and (b) it is necessary to exercise a power under subsection (2) in order to prevent the material from being concealed, lost or destroyed;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(1) Searches without warrant in emergency situations

63(2) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87
note: Police officer may not search without warrant in emergency situations.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Searches without warrant in emergency situations

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits searching without warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

63(3) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87
note: Seize material or thing if suspected to be relevant to an offence against an Australian law under certain circumstances.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Searches without warrant in emergency situations

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Emergency situation ends, and seizure must be lifted.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Seizure of material or thing occurs during emergency situation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: Police Officer searches for material in emergency situation.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Concealment, loss, or destruction must be prevented.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Seizure of material or thing implies that it is necessary to prevent its concealment, loss, or destruction.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
premise text: Police Officer seizes the material or thing.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Seize the material or thing.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to seize material or thing under certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Police Officer suspects on reasonable grounds that it is necessary to seize the material or thing.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Seize the material or thing.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Police Officer must believe on reasonable grounds that seizing the material or thing is necessary.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe
premise text: Police Officer suspects that it is necessary to seize the material or thing.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Circumstances may change, and seizure must be lifted.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Seizure of material or thing is allowed until circumstances change.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Police Officer seizes the material or thing.

63(4) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87
note: Police officer must exercise powers subject to section 64.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Searches without warrant in emergency situations

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The police officer must exercise powers within these circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The police officer's powers overlap with section 64.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Section 64 defines a specific set of circumstances under which the police officer may exercise their powers.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Without these limits, exercising powers would be unjustified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Exercising powers without section 64 is implied to be prohibited.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Section 64 defines the limits of the police officer's powers.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This ensures that the police officer acts in accordance with the law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Section 64 enforces the police officer's powers.
modality: CogAI
operator: Enforces
premise text: The police officer must exercise their powers within these limits.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subject to section 64.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Police officer must exercise powers.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Without this definition, the police officer's powers would be unclear.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The police officer's powers are diffused by section 64.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Section 64 defines the scope of the police officer's authority.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(4) Searches without warrant in emergency situations

64 How a police officer exercises a power under section 63
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87
note: Police officer must exercise power under section 63 in relation to conveyance.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-64-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must exercise power under section 63
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64 How a police officer exercises a power under section 63

65 Power to enter premises to arrest person
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.89
curation status: Proposed
has part: 65(1) Power to enter premises to arrest person
has part: 65(2) Power to enter premises to arrest person
has part: 65(3) Power to enter premises to arrest person
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65
schema version: 2

65(1) Power to enter premises to arrest person
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.89
note: Police officer may not enter premises without power to arrest.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Power to enter premises to arrest person

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: there is a temporal overlap between entering and searching.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between entering and searching.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: the police officer may enter the premises, using such force as is necessary and reasonable in the circumstances;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the premises and persons are represented in knowledge.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of premises and persons.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: (b) the police officer believes on reasonable grounds that the person is on any premises;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the police officer may not enter the premises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of entering premises without power.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a police officer has, under this Act or pursuant to a warrant issued under this Act, power to arrest a person;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: information about the premises is diffused through the police officer's actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about premises.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (a) a police officer has, under this Act or pursuant to a warrant issued under this Act, power to arrest a person;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: there is a recurring trace of the police officer's actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of police officer's actions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: the police officer may enter the premises, using such force as is necessary and reasonable in the circumstances;

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(1) Power to enter premises to arrest person

65(2) Power to enter premises to arrest person
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.89
note: Police officer cannot enter dwelling house during certain hours without reasonable grounds.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Power to enter premises to arrest person

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The restriction on entering dwelling house applies during the period commencing at 9 p.m. and ending at 6 a.m.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restriction applies during specific time interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A police officer must not enter a dwelling house under subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition on entering dwelling house during certain hours
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of entering dwelling house during certain hours
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Police officer must not enter dwelling house under subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The police officer must have reasonable grounds to enter the dwelling house during the restricted period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Police officer must have reasonable grounds to enter dwelling house
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (2) A police officer must not enter a dwelling house under subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The police officer must believe on reasonable grounds to enter the dwelling house during the restricted period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Police officer must believe on reasonable grounds to enter dwelling house
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (2) A police officer must not enter a dwelling house under subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The restriction on entering dwelling house is during the period commencing at 9 p.m. and ending at 6 a.m.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Restriction is temporal
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) A police officer must not enter a dwelling house under subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(2) Power to enter premises to arrest person

65(3) Power to enter premises to arrest person
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.89
note: Defines dwelling house for purposes of arrest
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Power to enter premises to arrest person

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Retirement during night
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: people ordinarily retire for the night

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conveyance or room is dwelling house
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: dwelling house includes a conveyance, and a room in a hotel...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conveyance or room is subclass of dwelling house
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
premise text: dwelling house includes a conveyance, and a room in a hotel...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(3) Power to enter premises to arrest person

66 Use of force in making arrest
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.89
note: Use of force in making arrest must be reasonable and necessary.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-66-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to use force in making arrest
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 Use of force in making arrest

67 Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 67(1) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
has part: 67(2) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
has part: 67(3) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67
schema version: 2

67(1) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.90
note: Informing grounds of arrest upon arrest.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform the other person.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67(1) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest

67(2) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
description: Reason for arrest
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.90
note: Inform other person of grounds of arrest
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67(2) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest

67(3) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.90
note: Inform other person of substance of Tribunal offence in certain circumstances.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 67 Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she should know the substance of the Tribunal offence...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between arrest and information provision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not apply to the arrest of...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she should know the substance of the Tribunal offence...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of knowledge on duty to inform
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the arrest of...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she should know the substance of the Tribunal offence...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Representation of knowledge in the context of arrest
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not apply to the arrest of...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she should know the substance of the Tribunal offence...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to inform other person
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...he or she is being arrested.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of knowledge through actions
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: the other person’s actions make it impracticable for the person making the arrest...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67(3) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest

68 Power to conduct a frisk search of an arrested person
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.91
note: Police officer may conduct frisk search of arrested person if reasonable grounds exist.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-68-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Police officer may conduct frisk search
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to conduct frisk search
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Police officer has authority to arrest

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Power to conduct a frisk search of an arrested person

69 Power to conduct an ordinary search of an arrested person
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.91
note: Police officer may conduct ordinary search of arrested person if suspecting they carry evidential material or seizable item.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Search may be conducted at or soon after the time of arrest
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Search may be conducted at time of arrest or shortly thereafter
modality: AllenInterval
operator: at or soon after
premise text: Time of arrest is relevant for search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Search may be conducted if suspecting evidential material or seizable item
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Conducting search is justified if suspecting evidential material or seizable item
modality: Argumentation
operator: if
premise text: Suspecting evidential material or seizable item justifies search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Search is related to cognitive processing of arrested person's activities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Search is related to cognitive processing of arrested person's activities
modality: CogAI
operator: of
premise text: Arrested person's activities are relevant for search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Search may be conducted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to conduct search
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Police officer has authority to conduct search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Search is related to diffusion of information about arrested person's activities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Search is related to diffusion of information about arrested person's activities
modality: Diffusion
operator: of
premise text: Arrested person's activities are relevant for search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69 Power to conduct an ordinary search of an arrested person

6A Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.19
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6a-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A Application of the Criminal Code

7 Tribunal may request assistance
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7(1) Tribunal may request assistance
has part: 7(2) Tribunal may request assistance
has part: 7(3) Tribunal may request assistance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

7(1) Tribunal may request assistance
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
note: Request for assistance must be made to the Attorney-General
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Tribunal may request assistance

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to request assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

7(2) Tribunal may request assistance
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
note: Tribunal may request assistance of various types.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Tribunal may request assistance

7(3) Tribunal may request assistance
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
note: Tribunal's request for assistance is taken to have been made to the Attorney-General.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Tribunal may request assistance

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Attorney-General is notified
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request is treated as having been made
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: Tribunal requests assistance

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(3) Tribunal may request assistance

70 Power to conduct search of arrested person’s premises
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.91
note: Police officer may not seize things in plain view at premises without reasonable grounds.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-70-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of seizure without reasonable grounds.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-70-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70 Power to conduct search of arrested person’s premises

71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
curation status: Proposed
has part: 71(1) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(2) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(3) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(4) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(5) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(6) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(7) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(8) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71
schema version: 2

71(1) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
note: Police officer may conduct an ordinary search or strip search on a person arrested under this Act.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Police officer must conduct an ordinary search or strip search.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(1) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

71(2) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
note: Police officers are prohibited from conducting strip searches without approval from a superintendent or higher.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of strip searches without approval
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Police officers must have approval from a superintendent or higher to conduct a strip search.

71(3) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
note: Consent in writing required for strip search
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A strip search may be conducted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: The person consents in writing.

71(4) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
note: A strip search may be conducted in the presence of a medical practitioner.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May conduct strip search in presence of medical practitioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(4) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

71(5) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
note: Approval may be obtained by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

71(6) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
note: Police officer must make a record of decision and reasons.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-6-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(6) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

71(7) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
note: Use of force necessary and reasonable in circumstances for strip search
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-7-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to use force necessary and reasonable
modality: Deontic
operator: use

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(7) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

71(8) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
note: Seizure of certain items during strip search
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-8-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits seizure of certain items
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

72 Rules for conduct of strip search
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.93
note: Strip search must be conducted under certain conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-72-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits strip search in certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-72-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72 Rules for conduct of strip search

73 Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
curation status: Proposed
has part: 73(1) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
has part: 73(2) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73
schema version: 2

73(1) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
note: Must conduct search by person of same sex as the person being searched.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct search by same sex
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(1) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches

73(2) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
note: Officer assisting who is not a police officer must not take part in ordinary search or frisk search of a person under this Part.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(2) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches

74 Announcement before entry
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
curation status: Proposed
has part: 74(1) Announcement before entry
has part: 74(2) Announcement before entry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74
schema version: 2

74(1) Announcement before entry
type: Concept
description: Announcement and opportunity for entry
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
note: Police officer must announce before entering premises under warrant or to arrest person.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Announcement before entry

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must announce before entering premises
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(1) Announcement before entry

74(2) Announcement before entry
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
note: Police officer not required to comply with subsection (1) under certain conditions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Announcement before entry

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or that the effective execution of the warrant or the arrest is not frustrated.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) the safety of a person (including the police officer); or

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if he or she believes on reasonable grounds...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excusal of duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Excusal
premise text: (2) A police officer is not required to comply with subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if he or she believes on reasonable grounds...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to deviate from duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) A police officer is not required to comply with subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or that the effective execution of the warrant or the arrest is not frustrated.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of conditions to other agents
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) the safety of a person (including the police officer); or

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or that the effective execution of the warrant or the arrest is not frustrated.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between conditions
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) the safety of a person (including the police officer); or

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(2) Announcement before entry

75 Offence for making false statements in warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
note: Making false statements in warrant applications is prohibited.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-75-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements in warrant applications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-75-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75 Offence for making false statements in warrants

76 Offences relating to telephone warrants
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
note: Prohibits certain actions related to telephone warrants.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-76-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-76-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76 Offences relating to telephone warrants

77 Retention of things seized
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77(1) Retention of things seized
has part: 77(2) Retention of things seized
has part: 77(3) Retention of things seized
has part: 77(4) Retention of things seized
has part: 77(5) Retention of things seized
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77
schema version: 2

77(1) Retention of things seized
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
note: Police officer must deliver seized thing to Commissioner of Australian Federal Police.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Retention of things seized

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must deliver to Commissioner
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Police officer seizes a thing

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(1) Retention of things seized

77(2) Retention of things seized
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
note: The Commissioner must inform and retain a thing pending the Attorney-General's direction.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Retention of things seized

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner must perform an action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(2) Retention of things seized

77(3) Retention of things seized
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
note: The Attorney-General may give the Commissioner a direction on how to deal with a thing.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Retention of things seized

77(4) Retention of things seized
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
note: The Commissioner must send a thing to a Tribunal upon direction.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Retention of things seized

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commissioner must send the thing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

77(5) Retention of things seized
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
note: Return seized thing if reason for seizure no longer exists or thing is not needed in evidence.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Retention of things seized

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the time period of the reason for seizure has passed, the thing must be returned
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Return seized thing if reason for seizure no longer exists or thing is not needed in evidence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The Attorney-General must direct the Commissioner to return the thing

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Return the thing
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must return seized thing
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Reason for seizure no longer exists or thing is not needed in evidence.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The thing can be forfeited or forfeitable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Thing can be forfeited or forfeitable if reason for seizure still exists
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Unless the thing is forfeited or forfeitable to the Commonwealth or is the subject of a dispute as to ownership.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The thing must not be used in evidence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Thing must not be used in evidence by a Tribunal or in respect of criminal proceedings in Australia if reason for seizure no longer exists
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: It is decided that the thing is not to be used in evidence by a Tribunal or in respect of criminal proceedings in Australia.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the condition is met, the thing must be returned until it's no longer needed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Return seized thing if reason for seizure no longer exists or thing is not needed in evidence
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: The Attorney-General must direct the Commissioner to return the thing

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77(5) Retention of things seized

78 Arrest of persons escaping from custody
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(1) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
has part: 78(2) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
has part: 78(3) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78
schema version: 2

78(1) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
note: Police officer may arrest person without warrant if reasonable grounds to believe escaped from custody.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Arrest of persons escaping from custody

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arrest is timed by escape from custody.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of escape from custody relevant to arrest
modality: AllenInterval
operator: escaped from custody
premise text: Person escaped from custody.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arrest is justified if reasonable grounds exist.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Arrest is conditional on reasonable grounds
modality: Argumentation
operator: if
premise text: Police officer has reasonable grounds to believe person escaped from custody.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person may be arrested without warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by police officer
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Police officer has reasonable grounds to believe person escaped from custody.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arrest is justified by belief.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Belief of police officer is sufficient for arrest
modality: Epistemic
operator: reasonable grounds
premise text: Police officer believes person escaped from custody.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Arrest without warrant is a traceable event.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Arrest without warrant is a traceable event
modality: LTL
operator: without warrant
premise text: Police officer arrests person without warrant.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(1) Arrest of persons escaping from custody

78(2) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
note: Police officer must take person before magistrate.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Arrest of persons escaping from custody

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The taking of the person before a magistrate occurs before the person is taken into custody.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: The police officer must take the person before a magistrate as soon as practicable.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The police officer taking the person before a magistrate implies that the person will be brought to justice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: If the police officer takes the person before a magistrate, then the person will be brought to justice.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The taking of the person before a magistrate requires expertise in law enforcement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Expertise
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
premise text: The police officer must take the person before a magistrate because it requires expertise in law enforcement.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The police officer has a duty to take the person before a magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Police officer must take person before magistrate.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The taking of the person before a magistrate spreads to other authorities and officials.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Inference
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
premise text: If the police officer takes the person before a magistrate, then the news of the arrest spreads to others.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(2) Arrest of persons escaping from custody

78(3) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
note: Magistrate may issue warrant for police officer to return escaped person to custody.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Arrest of persons escaping from custody

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant issued for police officer to return person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by magistrate.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Magistrate satisfied person has escaped custody.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(3) Arrest of persons escaping from custody

79 Arrest of person released on bail
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 79(1) Arrest of person released on bail
has part: 79(2) Arrest of person released on bail
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79
schema version: 2

79(1) Arrest of person released on bail
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
note: Police officer may arrest person released on bail if reasonable grounds exist.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Arrest of person released on bail

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(1) Arrest of person released on bail

79(2) Arrest of person released on bail
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
note: Must bring arrested person before court as soon as practicable
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Arrest of person released on bail

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must, as soon as practicable, be brought before the court by which the person was admitted to bail.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and bringing arrested person before court
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) A person arrested under subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must, as soon as practicable, be brought before the court by which the person was admitted to bail.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Arrested person's obligation to be brought before court is a necessary condition for CogAI's decision-making process
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) A person arrested under subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must, as soon as practicable, be brought before the court by which the person was admitted to bail.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to bring arrested person before court
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A person arrested under subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must, as soon as practicable, be brought before the court by which the person was admitted to bail.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Arrested person's obligation to be brought before court is a necessary condition for diffusion of responsibility
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) A person arrested under subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must, as soon as practicable, be brought before the court by which the person was admitted to bail.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and bringing arrested person before court is a necessary condition for obligation
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) A person arrested under subsection (1)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(2) Arrest of person released on bail

8 Form of requests
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(1) Form of requests
has part: 8(2) Form of requests
has part: 8(3) Form of requests
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Dec 2018
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.108
note: Mandatory commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (New South Wales Local Court) Act 2026
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-2
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

8(1) Form of requests
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
note: Request must be in writing and specify certain details.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Form of requests

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide request in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(1) Form of requests

8(2) Form of requests
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
note: Request for investigation or prosecution must specify certain details.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Form of requests

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires specification of certain details.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (2) The request must also indicate...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(2) Form of requests

8(3) Form of requests
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
note: Failure to comply does not invalidate a request.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Form of requests

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request validity is unaffected by non-compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (2)

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(3) Form of requests

80 Aiding persons to escape etc.
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
note: Prohibits arrest and custody under Commonwealth law for crimes committed outside Australia.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-80-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits actions
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

81 Legal assistance
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81(1) Legal assistance
has part: 81(2) Legal assistance
has part: 81(3) Legal assistance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81
schema version: 2

81(1) Legal assistance
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
note: A person may apply for assistance from the Attorney-General in a proceeding.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Legal assistance

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between a person's actions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) has instituted, or proposes to institute, a proceeding before a magistrate or a court under this Act...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Asserts the applicability of the provision.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Claim
premise text: (a) has instituted, or proposes to institute, a proceeding before a magistrate or a court under this Act...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Identifies the provision's relevance.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (a) has instituted, or proposes to institute, a proceeding before a magistrate or a court under this Act...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the impact of the provision on others.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
premise text: (a) has instituted, or proposes to institute, a proceeding before a magistrate or a court under this Act...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(1) Legal assistance

81(2) Legal assistance
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
note: Authority for Attorney-General to grant legal or financial assistance
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Legal assistance

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General may authorise provision by the Commonwealth...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
premise text: (2) If the Attorney-General is satisfied...

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(2) Legal assistance

81(3) Legal assistance
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
note: Conditions for granting legal assistance
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Legal assistance

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(3) Legal assistance

82 Arrangements with States
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
curation status: Proposed
has part: 82(1) Arrangements with States
has part: 82(2) Arrangements with States
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82
schema version: 2

82(1) Arrangements with States
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
note: Governor-General may make arrangements with Governor of a State regarding administration of the Act.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-82-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Arrangements with States

82(2) Arrangements with States
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
note: Governor-General may arrange with Governor of a State for variation or revocation of arrangement.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-82-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Arrangements with States

827 S/RES/827 (1993); and
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.17
note: References annexed documents and resolutions.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-827-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-827
schema version: 2

83 Delegation
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.100
note: Attorney-General may delegate powers under this Act to an officer.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation occurs during the Attorney-General's term.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for delegation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The Attorney-General may delegate to an officer of the Attorney-General’s Department all or any of his or her powers under this Act, other than:

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation is a cognitive process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Delegation classification
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
premise text: The Attorney-General may delegate to an officer of the Attorney-General’s Department all or any of his or her powers under this Act, other than:

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An officer is authorized to act on behalf of the Attorney-General.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General delegates power
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate
premise text: The Attorney-General may delegate to an officer of the Attorney-General’s Department all or any of his or her powers under this Act.

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation is diffused through the Attorney-General's department.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Delegation diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: The Attorney-General may delegate to an officer of the Attorney-General’s Department all or any of his or her powers under this Act, other than:

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegation ends when the Attorney-General's term ends.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for delegation
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The Attorney-General may delegate to an officer of the Attorney-General’s Department all or any of his or her powers under this Act, other than:

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83 Delegation

84 Act not to limit other provision of assistance
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.100
note: Provision of assistance under other laws is allowed
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-84-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84
schema version: 2

85 Regulations
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.101
note: Governor-General may make regulations not inconsistent with this Act.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-85-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-85-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85
schema version: 2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Governor-General has the power to make regulations.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-85-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Regulations are part of this Act.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: HasPart

9 Notice by Attorney-General
type: Concept
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9(1) Notice by Attorney-General
has part: 9(2) Notice by Attorney-General
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

9(1) Notice by Attorney-General
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
note: The Attorney-General must provide notice to a magistrate upon receiving a request for surrender from a Tribunal.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Notice by Attorney-General

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice provided to magistrate after request received
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship: Request received before notice provided
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Request received from Tribunal

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice provided to magistrate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request received from Tribunal

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(1) Notice by Attorney-General

9(2) Notice by Attorney-General
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
note: A copy of the arrest warrant must be attached to the notice.
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Notice by Attorney-General

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the arrest warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(2) Notice by Attorney-General

International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995
type: Document
date: 28 March 2026
identifier: No. 18 of 1995
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU