International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 18 of 1995
date: 28 March 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

28 March 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-logic-descriptionlogic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995.
premise text: The text is classified as a compilation.
conclusion text: International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
has part: 2(3) Commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commencement of sections 1 and 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-1-norm

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commencement of remaining provisions subject to subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Subsection (3) is mentioned but not defined
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(3) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-3
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Conditional commencement provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 The objects of this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Enable cooperation with Tribunal in investigation and prosecution of persons accused of committing Tribunal offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.9
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 The objects of this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: enable
logic summary: Enable cooperation with Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Definitions for the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.10
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-4-norm

827 S/RES/827 (1993); and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-827
note: References annexed documents and resolutions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.17
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-827-norm

1966 S/RES/1966 (2010).
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1966
note: Defines strip search and stored communication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.17
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-ltl-6
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-diffusion-7

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Defines strip search and stored communication.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies a specific definition
premise text: The term 'stored communication' is defined.
conclusion text: It refers to the same as in the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies a specific definition
premise text: The term 'statutory form' is defined.
conclusion text: It refers to the form of a warrant or notice as set out in the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies a specific definition
premise text: The term 'strip search' is defined.
conclusion text: It includes requiring a person to remove all of their garments and an examination of the person's body (but not of the person's body cavities) and those garments.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for strip search
premise text: The strip search may include requiring a person to remove all of their garments.
conclusion text: It includes the time period during which the examination is conducted.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-ltl-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for strip search
premise text: The strip search may include requiring a person to remove all of their garments.
conclusion text: It includes the time period during which the examination is conducted.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1966-logic-diffusion-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for strip search
premise text: The strip search may include requiring a person to remove all of their garments.
conclusion text: It includes the time period during which the examination is conducted.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Some Territories to be regarded as States
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory are regarded as States.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.18
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Some Territories to be regarded as States
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: regarded-as
logic summary: Obligation to regard certain territories as states.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 External Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: This Act extends to each external Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.18
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends to external Territories
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.19
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6a-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6a-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A Application of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Tribunal may request assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
has part: 7(1) Tribunal may request assistance
has part: 7(2) Tribunal may request assistance
has part: 7(3) Tribunal may request assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20

7(1) Tribunal may request assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-ss-1
part of: 7 Tribunal may request assistance
note: Request for assistance must be made to the Attorney-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to request assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(2) Tribunal may request assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-ss-2
part of: 7 Tribunal may request assistance
note: Tribunal may request assistance of various types.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-2-norm

7(3) Tribunal may request assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-ss-3
part of: 7 Tribunal may request assistance
note: Tribunal's request for assistance is taken to have been made to the Attorney-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(3) Tribunal may request assistance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Request is treated as having been made
premise text: Tribunal requests assistance
conclusion text: Attorney-General is notified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Form of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
has part: 8(1) Form of requests
has part: 8(2) Form of requests
has part: 8(3) Form of requests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20

8(1) Form of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
part of: 8 Form of requests
note: Request must be in writing and specify certain details.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(1) Form of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide request in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(2) Form of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 Form of requests
note: Request for investigation or prosecution must specify certain details.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(2) Form of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires specification of certain details.
premise text: (2) The request must also indicate...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(3) Form of requests
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
part of: 8 Form of requests
note: Failure to comply does not invalidate a request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.20
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(3) Form of requests
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Request validity is unaffected by non-compliance
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Notice by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
has part: 9(1) Notice by Attorney-General
has part: 9(2) Notice by Attorney-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22

9(1) Notice by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-1
part of: 9 Notice by Attorney-General
note: The Attorney-General must provide notice to a magistrate upon receiving a request for surrender from a Tribunal.
description: Notice in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(1) Notice by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
premise text: Request received from Tribunal
conclusion text: Notice provided to magistrate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relationship: Request received before notice provided
premise text: Request received from Tribunal
conclusion text: Notice provided to magistrate after request received
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(2) Notice by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-2
part of: 9 Notice by Attorney-General
note: A copy of the arrest warrant must be attached to the notice.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(2) Notice by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the arrest warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Issue of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
has part: 10(1) Issue of warrants
has part: 10(2) Issue of warrants
has part: 10(3) Issue of warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22

10(1) Issue of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-1
part of: 10 Issue of warrants
note: Magistrate must issue a warrant upon application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(1) Issue of warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(2) Issue of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-2
part of: 10 Issue of warrants
note: Issue warrant for arrest under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must issue warrant
premise text: (2) A magistrate must issue a warrant...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(3) Issue of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-3
part of: 10 Issue of warrants
note: Magistrate must report to Attorney-General
description: report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.22
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: Magistrate must report to Attorney-General
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Cancellation of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: The Attorney-General must cancel a warrant if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.23
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Cancellation of warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must cancel a warrant.
premise text: The person has not been arrested under the warrant.
conclusion text: Cancel the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The cancellation must occur after the person has not been arrested.
premise text: The person has not been arrested under the warrant.
conclusion text: Cancel the warrant after the person has not been arrested.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: The cancellation must occur before a certain time.
premise text: A request from a Tribunal would oblige the Attorney-General to issue a notice under section 9.
conclusion text: Cancel the warrant if no such request is received within a certain time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
logic summary: The cancellation must be related to both conditions.
premise text: The person has not been arrested under the warrant and A request from a Tribunal would oblige the Attorney-General to issue a notice under section 9.
conclusion text: Cancel the warrant if both conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The cancellation is related to a request from a Tribunal.
premise text: A request from a Tribunal would oblige the Attorney-General to issue a notice under section 9.
conclusion text: The warrant should be cancelled if no such request is received.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Remand
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
has part: 12(1) Remand
has part: 12(2) Remand
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.23

12(1) Remand
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-1
part of: 12 Remand
note: A person arrested under a warrant must be given written notice and brought before a magistrate.
description: (a) written notice that specifies the Tribunal offence and describes the conduct alleged to constitute that offence; (b) bring before a magistrate in the State or Territory where the person is arrested
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.23
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(1) Remand
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice and be brought before a magistrate
premise text: (a) written notice that specifies the Tribunal offence and describes the conduct alleged to constitute that offence; (b) bring before a magistrate in the State or Territory where the person is arrested
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Must be brought before a magistrate before being arrested
premise text: (b) be brought before a magistrate in the State or Territory in which the person is arrested.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must bring before a magistrate in the State or Territory where the person is arrested
premise text: (b) be brought before a magistrate in the State or Territory in which the person is arrested.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice that specifies the Tribunal offence and describes the conduct alleged to constitute that offence
premise text: (a) be given a written notice that: (i) specifies the Tribunal offence in respect of which the warrant was issued; and (ii) describes the conduct that is alleged to constitute that offence;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(2) Remand
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-2
part of: 12 Remand
note: Magistrate must remand person in custody or on bail for necessary period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.23
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(2) Remand
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must remand person.
premise text: (2) If a magistrate is satisfied...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Release from remand on the Attorney-General’s direction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
note: The Attorney-General must direct a magistrate to release a person from custody or discharge recognisances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Release from remand on the Attorney-General’s direction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General has a duty to direct a magistrate.
premise text: The Attorney-General is required to take action.
conclusion text: A magistrate must order the release of a person from custody.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal relationship between actions.
premise text: The Attorney-General's direction must occur before the release of a person from custody.
conclusion text: The release occurs after the direction is given.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal relationship between actions.
premise text: The release of a person from custody must occur before the Attorney-General's next action.
conclusion text: The direction is an instance of the obligation to direct a magistrate in relation to the release.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The provision defines a specific class of diffusion.
premise text: The Attorney-General's direction is a type of action that affects others.
conclusion text: The direction is an instance of the diffusion of obligation to direct a magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-13-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The provision defines a specific class of cognitive action.
premise text: The Attorney-General's direction is a type of action that requires reasoning.
conclusion text: The direction is an instance of the cognitive action of directing a magistrate.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Release from remand after certain periods
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
has part: 14(1) Release from remand after certain periods
has part: 14(2) Release from remand after certain periods
has part: 14(3) Release from remand after certain periods
has part: 14(4) Release from remand after certain periods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24

14(1) Release from remand after certain periods
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
part of: 14 Release from remand after certain periods
note: Must bring person before magistrate after 14 days on remand
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(1) Release from remand after certain periods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must bring person before magistrate
premise text: (a) the person was arrested under a warrant issued under subsection 10(2); and (b) the person is, under this Division, on remand 14 days after the day on which the person was arrested; and (c) a notice has not been given under section 9 in relation to the person.
conclusion text: (1) A person must be brought before a magistrate if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must bring person before magistrate after 14 days on remand
premise text: (b) the person is, under this Division, on remand 14 days after the day on which the person was arrested; and (c) a notice has not been given under section 9 in relation to the person.
conclusion text: (1) A person must be brought before a magistrate if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must bring person before magistrate after 14 days on remand
premise text: (c) a notice has not been given under section 9 in relation to the person.
conclusion text: (1) A person must be brought before a magistrate if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must bring person before magistrate after 14 days on remand
conclusion text: (1) A person must be brought before a magistrate if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(2) Release from remand after certain periods
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
part of: 14 Release from remand after certain periods
note: Magistrate must order release or discharge under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Discharge of recognisances
premise text: (b) order the discharge of the recognisances on which bail was granted to the person; as the case requires.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: OR
logic summary: Release and discharge alternatives
premise text: (a) order the release of the person from custody; or (b) order the discharge of the recognisances on which bail was granted to the person; as the case requires.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Time period for notice
premise text: that is reasonable in all the circumstances
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(3) Release from remand after certain periods
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-3
part of: 14 Release from remand after certain periods
note: Must be brought before a magistrate if notice is not given within a particular period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(3) Release from remand after certain periods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be brought before a magistrate.
premise text: (3) If: (a) a magistrate was satisfied under subsection (2) that such a notice was likely to be given in relation to the person within a particular period; and (b) the notice is not given within the period;
conclusion text: the person must be brought before a magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: Notice must be given within a particular period.
premise text: (3) If: (a) a magistrate was satisfied under subsection (2) that such a notice was likely to be given in relation to the person within a particular period; and (b) the notice is not given within the period;
conclusion text: the person must be brought before a magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURRING
logic summary: Recurring trace of notice non-giving.
premise text: (3) If: (a) a magistrate was satisfied under subsection (2) that such a notice was likely to be given in relation to the person within a particular period; and (b) the notice is not given within the period;
conclusion text: the person must be brought before a magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(4) Release from remand after certain periods
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-4
part of: 14 Release from remand after certain periods
note: Magistrate must order release or discharge of recognisances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.24
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must order release or discharge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Application for search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
has part: 15(1) Application for search warrants
has part: 15(2) Application for search warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.25

15(1) Application for search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-1
part of: 15 Application for search warrants
note: Police officer may apply for search warrant to search premises for evidential material.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.25
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by police officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within applicable period
logic summary: Search warrant application must be made within applicable period.
premise text: (3) of this section will be, at any premises;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(2) Application for search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-2
part of: 15 Application for search warrants
note: If a person is arrested under a warrant issued under section 10, then the application for search warrants must be made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.25
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(2) Application for search warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: arrested under a warrant issued under section 10
conclusion text: application for search warrants must be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Surrender determination by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
has part: 16(1) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
has part: 16(2) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
has part: 16(3) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
has part: 16(4) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27

16(1) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-1
part of: 16 Surrender determination by Attorney-General
note: Attorney-General must determine surrender of a person remanded under Division 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(1) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General has a duty to determine surrender.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(2) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-2
part of: 16 Surrender determination by Attorney-General
note: Attorney-General must determine surrender to Tribunal under special circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(2) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General must determine surrender to Tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(3) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-3
part of: 16 Surrender determination by Attorney-General
note: Attorney-General must consider documents provided by person when determining special circumstances.
description: documents intended to show that there are special circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(3) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General must consider documents provided by person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATION
logic summary: Attorney-General has an obligation to consider documents provided by person.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Documents provided by person are part of the condition for Attorney-General's decision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY
logic summary: Attorney-General must provide a reasonable opportunity to person to provide documents.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(4) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-4
part of: 16 Surrender determination by Attorney-General
note: Determination must be made as soon as reasonably practicable after remand.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(4) Surrender determination by Attorney-General
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-16-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Release from remand on refusal to surrender the person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
note: Release from remand on refusal to surrender the person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.27
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-ltl-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide release from remand
premise text: Attorney-General has determined not to surrender the person
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must, by notice in writing...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must direct a magistrate to order release or discharge
premise text: If the Attorney-General has determined not to surrender the person
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must, by notice in writing...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for release from remand
premise text: If the Attorney-General has determined not to surrender the person
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General must, by notice in writing...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-17-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for discharge of recognisances
premise text: (b) the discharge of the recognisances on which bail was granted to the person;
conclusion text: ...the recognisances on which bail was granted...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Surrender warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
has part: 18(1) Surrender warrants
has part: 18(2) Surrender warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28

18(1) Surrender warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
part of: 18 Surrender warrants
note: Must issue warrant for surrender of person to Tribunal if Attorney-General determines surrender is warranted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must issue warrant
premise text: Attorney-General determines surrender is warranted
conclusion text: Issue warrant for surrender of person to Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Surrender warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Surrender warrants
note: The surrender warrant must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(2) Surrender warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written surrender warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Persons imprisoned under Australian law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
has part: 19(1) Persons imprisoned under Australian law
has part: 19(2) Persons imprisoned under Australian law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28

19(1) Persons imprisoned under Australian law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 Persons imprisoned under Australian law
note: The Attorney-General must not issue a surrender warrant under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) Persons imprisoned under Australian law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing a surrender warrant
premise text: (1) The Attorney-General must not issue a surrender warrant...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Persons imprisoned under Australian law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
part of: 19 Persons imprisoned under Australian law
note: Exempts persons released on parole or licence from serving a sentence of imprisonment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(2) Persons imprisoned under Australian law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts persons released on parole or licence from serving a sentence of imprisonment.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the person is not taken to be serving a sentence of imprisonment...
conclusion text: ...or has been otherwise conditionally released...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal relationship between parole/release and imprisonment.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the person is not taken to be serving a sentence of imprisonment...
conclusion text: ...for the remainder of the sentence or period of detention.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines the temporal relationship between parole/release and imprisonment.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the person is not taken to be serving a sentence of imprisonment...
conclusion text: ...for the remainder of the sentence or period of detention.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines the scope of persons exempt from serving a sentence of imprisonment.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the person is not taken to be serving a sentence of imprisonment...
conclusion text: ...or has been otherwise conditionally released...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-19-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Defines the scope of persons exempt from serving a sentence of imprisonment.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the person is not taken to be serving a sentence of imprisonment...
conclusion text: ...or has been otherwise conditionally released...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Detention following surrender warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
has part: 20(1) Detention following surrender warrants
has part: 20(2) Detention following surrender warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28

20(1) Detention following surrender warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
part of: 20 Detention following surrender warrants
note: Must bring person before magistrate within a certain timeframe after surrender warrant is issued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(1) Detention following surrender warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to bring person before magistrate
premise text: The Attorney-General issues the surrender warrant.
conclusion text: The person must be brought before a magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2) Detention following surrender warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
part of: 20 Detention following surrender warrants
note: Magistrate must remand person in custody for necessary period to execute warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.28
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must remand person in custody.
premise text: (2) A magistrate...
conclusion text: must remand the person in custody.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Content of surrender warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
has part: 21(1) Content of surrender warrants
has part: 21(2) Content of surrender warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.29

21(1) Content of surrender warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-1
part of: 21 Content of surrender warrants
note: Police officer must transport and detain eligible person in custody for surrender.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.29
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(1) Content of surrender warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Police officer must transport and detain eligible person in custody.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2) Content of surrender warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-2
part of: 21 Content of surrender warrants
note: A place referred to in paragraph (1)(b) or (c) may be a place in or outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.29
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-2-norm

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(2) Content of surrender warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

22 Execution of surrender warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
note: Must be executed according to its tenor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.29
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Execution of surrender warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to execute surrender warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Release from remand
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
note: If surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person, then certain actions must be taken.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.29
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (a) a surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person;
conclusion text: then certain actions must be taken.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (1) If: (a) a surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person;
conclusion text: then certain actions must be taken.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication
premise text: (1) If: (a) a surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person;
conclusion text: then certain actions must be taken.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of information
premise text: (1) If: (a) a surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person;
conclusion text: then certain actions must be taken.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: inference
logic summary: Inference engine
premise text: (1) If: (a) a surrender warrant has been issued in relation to a person;
conclusion text: then certain actions must be taken.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

24 Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
has part: 24(1) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
has part: 24(2) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
has part: 24(3) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.30

24(1) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-ss-1
part of: 24 Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
note: Time spent in custody for surrender warrant and Tribunal offence is counted towards sentence or period of detention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.30
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(1) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(2) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-ss-2
part of: 24 Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
note: Time spent in custody for Tribunal offence is not counted towards sentence of imprisonment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.30
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(2) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion from counting time spent in custody
premise text: (2) If the person is convicted of the Tribunal offence, time spent by the person in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed by ...
conclusion text: ...is not to be counted as time towards the sentence of imprisonment or period of detention referred to in subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjoint
logic summary: Temporal disjointness
premise text: (2) If the person is convicted of the Tribunal offence, time spent by the person in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed by ...
conclusion text: ...is not to be counted as time towards the sentence of imprisonment or period of detention referred to in subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal until
premise text: (2) If the person is convicted of the Tribunal offence, time spent by the person in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed by ...
conclusion text: ...is not to be counted as time towards the sentence of imprisonment or period of detention referred to in subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Temporal diffusion
premise text: (2) If the person is convicted of the Tribunal offence, time spent by the person in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed by ...
conclusion text: ...is not to be counted as time towards the sentence of imprisonment or period of detention referred to in subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: Temporal assertion
premise text: (2) If the person is convicted of the Tribunal offence, time spent by the person in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed by ...
conclusion text: ...is not to be counted as time towards the sentence of imprisonment or period of detention referred to in subsection (1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

24(3) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-ss-3
part of: 24 Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
note: Inclusion of time spent outside Australia in custody reference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.30
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(3) Effect of surrender to Tribunal on person’s terms of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes time spent outside Australia
premise text: (3) A reference in this section to time spent in custody includes a reference to time spent in custody outside Australia.
conclusion text: Time spent outside Australia is included in custody reference
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Expiry of Australian sentences while under Tribunal detention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Notify Tribunal of sentence expiry
description: Information about sentence expiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.31
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Expiry of Australian sentences while under Tribunal detention
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notification obligation
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must inform the Tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25A Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25a
has part: 25A(1) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
has part: 25A(2) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
has part: 25A(3) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.32

25A(1) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25a-ss-1
part of: 25A Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
note: Authorisation of material provision to a Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.32
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 25A(1) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (1) The Attorney-General may authorise, in writing...
conclusion text: ...the provision of material to a Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25A(2) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25a-ss-2
part of: 25A Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
note: Authorisation of material use by Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.32
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 25A(2) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to use material
premise text: (2) The authorisation may:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25A(3) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25a-ss-3
part of: 25A Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
note: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.32
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25A(3) Authorising provision of material obtained by law enforcement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25a-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Material lawfully obtained in Australia includes material obtained from individuals or entities by consent and material obtained by warrant, or the exercise of a coercive power by a court, in Australia for the purposes of a domestic investigation or prosecution.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
has part: 26(1) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
has part: 26(2) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
has part: 26(3) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33

26(1) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-ss-1
part of: 26 Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
note: Attorney-General must authorise taking of evidence etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(1) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Tribunal makes a request to the Attorney-General...
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must authorise taking of evidence etc.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Contains temporal interval
premise text: (1) This section applies if a Tribunal makes a request to the Attorney-General...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(2) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-ss-2
part of: 26 Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
note: Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(2) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (3)
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may comply with the request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(3) Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-ss-3
part of: 26 Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence etc.
note: Attorney-General must not comply with request under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of complying with the request.
premise text: (3) The Attorney-General must not comply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Taking of evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
has part: 27(1) Taking of evidence
has part: 27(2) Taking of evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33

27(1) Taking of evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-ss-1
part of: 27 Taking of evidence
note: Magistrate may take evidence on oath from witnesses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(1) Taking of evidence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to take evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(2) Taking of evidence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-ss-2
part of: 27 Taking of evidence
note: Magistrate must put evidence in writing and certify it.
description: Evidence to be sent to Attorney-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.33
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Producing documents or other articles
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-2
has part: 28(1) Producing documents or other articles
has part: 28(2) Producing documents or other articles
has part: 28(3) Producing documents or other articles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34

28(1) Producing documents or other articles
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-2-ss-1
part of: 28 Producing documents or other articles
note: Magistrate may require production of documents or articles upon authorization by Attorney-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Magistrate has obligation to require production upon authorization.
premise text: Attorney-General authorizes production.
conclusion text: Magistrate requires production.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(2) Producing documents or other articles
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-2-ss-2
part of: 28 Producing documents or other articles
note: Must send documents to Attorney-General with a written statement.
description: Written statement certifying production to the magistrate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must send documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(3) Producing documents or other articles
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-2-ss-3
part of: 28 Producing documents or other articles
note: Magistrate must send certified copies of documents to Attorney-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate has a duty to send certified copies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Legal representation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29
has part: 29(1) Legal representation
has part: 29(2) Legal representation
has part: 29(3) Legal representation
has part: 29(4) Legal representation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34

29(1) Legal representation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-1
part of: 29 Legal representation
note: Witness must provide legal representative if present
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(1) Legal representation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide legal representation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(2) Legal representation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-2
part of: 29 Legal representation
note: Permit legal representation for specified persons and entities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMIT
logic summary: Grant permission to have legal representation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(3) Legal representation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-3
part of: 29 Legal representation
note: Allow examination or cross-examination via video link.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-3-norm

29(4) Legal representation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-4
part of: 29 Legal representation
note: Definition of video link
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.34
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(4) Legal representation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: video link
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Form of certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
note: Must state presence of certain persons
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.35
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-30-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 Form of certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Compellability of persons to attend etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
note: Compelling persons to attend and give evidence for a charge against a person for an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.35
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-31-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Compellability of persons to attend etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compel persons to attend and give evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Tribunal immunity certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32
has part: 32(1) Tribunal immunity certificates
has part: 32(2) Tribunal immunity certificates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.36

32(1) Tribunal immunity certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-1
part of: 32 Tribunal immunity certificates
note: Authenticated Tribunal immunity certificates are admissible as prima facie evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.36
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(1) Tribunal immunity certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Admissibility
logic summary: Certificate admissibility is an obligation.
premise text: (1) An authenticated Tribunal immunity certificate...
conclusion text: The certificate is admissible as prima facie evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
logic summary: Certificate validity is a temporal interval.
premise text: (1) An authenticated Tribunal immunity certificate...
conclusion text: The certificate's validity is an interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) Tribunal immunity certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-2
part of: 32 Tribunal immunity certificates
note: Certificate or declaration specifying requirements for answering questions or producing documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.36
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires persons to answer questions or produce documents
premise text: (a) is given or made by a Tribunal under the Statute of the Tribunal or under the rules adopted under the Statute of the Tribunal;
conclusion text: persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: specifies
logic summary: Specifies requirements for answering questions or producing documents
premise text: (b) specifies or declares that, under the Statute of the Tribunal or under the rules adopted under the Statute of the Tribunal,
conclusion text: the Statute of the Tribunal or under the rules adopted under the Statute of the Tribunal, persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Requires persons to answer questions or produce documents during specified circumstances
premise text: (ii) either generally or in specified circumstances;
conclusion text: persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document during specified circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Requires persons to answer questions or produce documents during specified circumstances
premise text: (ii) either generally or in specified circumstances;
conclusion text: persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document during specified circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Requires persons to answer questions or produce documents during specified circumstances
premise text: (ii) either generally or in specified circumstances;
conclusion text: persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document during specified circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Requires persons to answer questions or produce documents during specified circumstances
premise text: (ii) either generally or in specified circumstances;
conclusion text: persons generally or a specified person could or could not be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document during specified circumstances.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32A Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32a
has part: 32A(1) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
has part: 32A(2) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.37

32A(1) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32a-ss-1
part of: 32A Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
note: The Attorney-General must authorise an eligible law enforcement officer to apply for a surveillance device warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.37
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32A(1) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The Attorney-General must authorise an eligible law enforcement officer to apply for a surveillance device warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32A(2) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32a-ss-2
part of: 32A Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
note: Authorises eligible law enforcement officers to apply for surveillance device warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.37
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32A(2) Authorising applications for surveillance device warrants
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the obligation.
conclusion text: eligible law enforcement officer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Identifies the duty.
conclusion text: apply for surveillance device warrants
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the time period during which the duty applies.
conclusion text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32AA Authorising applications for computer access warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32aa
has part: 32AA(1) Authorising applications for computer access warrants
has part: 32AA(2) Authorising applications for computer access warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.38

32AA(1) Authorising applications for computer access warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32aa-ss-1
part of: 32AA Authorising applications for computer access warrants
note: The Attorney-General may authorise an eligible law enforcement officer to apply for a computer access warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.38
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32AA(1) Authorising applications for computer access warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Authorization is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32AA(2) Authorising applications for computer access warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32aa-ss-2
part of: 32AA Authorising applications for computer access warrants
note: Authorising applications for computer access warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.38
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32AA(2) Authorising applications for computer access warrants
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Defines terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32aa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: same meaning as
logic summary: Defines computer and data terms
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32B Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32b
has part: 32B(1) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
has part: 32B(2) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
has part: 32B(3) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.40

32B(1) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32b-ss-1
part of: 32B Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
note: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order for the carrying out of a forensic procedure on a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.40
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32B(1) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Authorisation is required.
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order.
conclusion text: An authorisation is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGiven
logic summary: The person must be given an opportunity to consent to the forensic procedure and has not consented to it.
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order if the person has not consented to the forensic procedure.
conclusion text: Consent is required from the person before the authorisation can be granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGiven
logic summary: The Tribunal must give appropriate undertakings about the retention, use and destruction of forensic material or information obtained from analysing that material.
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order if the Tribunal has given appropriate undertakings.
conclusion text: Undertakings are required from the Tribunal before the authorisation can be granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGiven
logic summary: The person must be believed to be in Australia.
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order if the person is believed to be in Australia.
conclusion text: Belief is required about the person's location before the authorisation can be granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGiven
logic summary: The Tribunal must give undertakings that the Attorney-General considers necessary.
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise a constable to apply for an order if the Tribunal has given undertakings that the Attorney-General considers necessary.
conclusion text: Undertakings are required from the Tribunal before the authorisation can be granted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32B(2) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32b-ss-2
part of: 32B Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
note: Authorisation required for forensic procedures in cases where consent cannot be obtained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.40
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32B(2) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
logic summary: Authorisation is required.
premise text: (2) If the person is a child or an incapable person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32B(3) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32b-ss-3
part of: 32B Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
note: Defines terms for forensic procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.40
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-3-norm

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32B(3) Authorising application for carrying out of forensic procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

32C Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32c
has part: 32C(1) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
has part: 32C(2) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.41

32C(1) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32c-ss-1
part of: 32C Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
note: The Attorney-General must direct a constable on how to provide forensic evidence.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.41
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32C(1) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General has a duty to direct the constable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32C(2) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32c-ss-2
part of: 32C Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
note: A direction under subsection (1) must not be a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.41
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-2-norm

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-32c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32C(2) Providing forensic evidence to the Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

33 Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33
has part: 33(1) Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
has part: 33(2) Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42

33(1) Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-1
part of: 33 Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
note: Authorises police officer to apply for search warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Attorney-General authorizes police officer.
premise text: Tribunal requests search warrant.
conclusion text: Police officer applies for search warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(2) Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-2
part of: 33 Attorney-General may authorise applications for search
note: Attorney-General must not comply with request under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of compliance
premise text: (2) The Attorney-General must not comply with the request if...
conclusion text: ...there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of compliance due to sovereignty, security or national interest concerns
premise text: (2) The Attorney-General must not comply with the request if...
conclusion text: ...complying with the request would prejudice Australia’s sovereignty, security or national interest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of compliance due to multiple reasons
premise text: (2) The Attorney-General must not comply with the request if...
conclusion text: ...complying with the request would prejudice Australia’s sovereignty, security or national interest; and there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of compliance due to multiple reasons
premise text: (2) The Attorney-General must not comply with the request if...
conclusion text: ...there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance; and complying with the request would prejudice Australia’s sovereignty, security or national interest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of compliance due to multiple reasons
premise text: (2) The Attorney-General must not comply with the request if...
conclusion text: ...there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance; and there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Applications for search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34
has part: 34(1) Applications for search warrants
has part: 34(2) Applications for search warrants
has part: 34(3) Applications for search warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42

34(1) Applications for search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-1
part of: 34 Applications for search warrants
note: Police officer may apply for search warrant with reasonable grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for search warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(2) Applications for search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-2
part of: 34 Applications for search warrants
note: Police officer may apply for search warrant with reasonable grounds for suspicion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for search warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(3) Applications for search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-3
part of: 34 Applications for search warrants
note: Applicable period for search warrant applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.42
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-3-norm

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(3) Applications for search warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

34A Authorising application for a stored communications warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34a
note: Authorisation for application of stored communications warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.44
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34a-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34a-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Granting authority
premise text: The Attorney-General may authorise...
conclusion text: ...the Australian Federal Police or the police force...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34B Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34b
has part: 34B(1) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
has part: 34B(2) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.45

34B(1) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34b-ss-1
part of: 34B Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
note: The Attorney-General may authorise disclosure of information or documents under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.45
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-ltl-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 34B(1) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or documents.
premise text: (a) a Tribunal has requested the Attorney-General to arrange for the disclosure of the information or documents;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: The Attorney-General is permitted to authorise disclosure under certain conditions.
premise text: (c) the Attorney-General is satisfied that: (i) a proceeding is before, or an investigation is being conducted by, the Tribunal;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: The Attorney-General is permitted to authorise disclosure under certain conditions.
premise text: (ii) the information or documents relate to the fact of a communication passing over a telecommunications system during a period specified in the Tribunal’s request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: The disclosure is permitted only if it occurs within a specified time period.
premise text: (b) the information or documents come into existence during a period specified by the Tribunal, and which started on or after the day the request was made;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The disclosure is permitted until a certain time has passed.
premise text: (b) the information or documents come into existence during a period specified by the Tribunal, and which started on or after the day the request was made;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34B(2) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34b-ss-2
part of: 34B Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
note: Avoids doubt about communication contents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.45
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-2-norm

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-34b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34B(2) Authorising an authorisation for the disclosure of prospective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

35 Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35
has part: 35(1) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
has part: 35(2) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.46

35(1) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
part of: 35 Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
note: The Attorney-General may make arrangements for the travel of a person to a foreign country if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.46
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(1) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to travel
premise text: The Attorney-General may make arrangements...
conclusion text: The person must be allowed to travel.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(2) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
part of: 35 Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
note: Attorney-General must not comply with request if it would prejudice Australia's sovereignty, security or national interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.46
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(2) Persons giving evidence or assisting (other than prisoners)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot comply with request
premise text: Attorney-General must not comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36
has part: 36(1) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
has part: 36(2) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.47

36(1) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-1
part of: 36 Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
note: Prisoners must provide evidence or assistance in a foreign country if requested by the Attorney-General and meet certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.47
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(1) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Prisoners must provide evidence or assistance in a foreign country.
premise text: The Attorney-General requests the prisoner's attendance.
conclusion text: The prisoner must attend.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: There are reasonable grounds to believe that the prisoner can give evidence relevant to the proceeding or assist the investigation.
premise text: there are reasonable grounds to believe that the prisoner can give evidence relevant to the proceeding or assist the investigation;
conclusion text: The time of the request is before the time of the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must provide adequate undertakings in respect of the matters referred to in section 37.
premise text: the Attorney-General is satisfied that the prisoner has consented to giving evidence or assisting in the foreign country;
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must provide adequate undertakings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Tribunal must give evidence relevant to the proceeding or assist the investigation if requested by the Attorney-General.
premise text: the Attorney-General is satisfied that the prisoner has consented to giving evidence or assisting in the foreign country;
conclusion text: The Tribunal must give evidence relevant to the proceeding or assist the investigation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must be satisfied that the prisoner has consented to giving evidence or assisting in the foreign country.
premise text: the Attorney-General is satisfied that the Tribunal has given, to the extent (if any) required by the Attorney-General, adequate undertakings in respect of the matters referred to in section 37.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General must be satisfied that the prisoner has consented.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(2) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36-ss-2
part of: 36 Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
note: Release of prisoner for travel to give evidence or assist investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.47
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(2) Prisoners giving evidence or assisting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted by the State.
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (4), if the prisoner is being held in custody,
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may: ... direct that the prisoner be released...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between prisoner's custody and travel.
premise text: (b) if the prisoner is a federal prisoner and also a State prisoner-direct
conclusion text: ... that the prisoner be released from prison for the purpose of such travel...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Conditional release until necessary directions or approvals are given.
premise text: (c) in any case-subject to the making or giving of any necessary directions or approvals relevant to release of the prisoner
conclusion text: ... make arrangements for such travel in the custody of a police
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No prohibition on releasing prisoner.
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (4), if the prisoner is being held in custody
conclusion text: ... the Attorney-General may: ... direct that the prisoner be released...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-36-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Release of prisoner implies travel for evidence or investigation.
premise text: (2) Subject to subsection (4), if the prisoner is being held in custody
conclusion text: ... the Attorney-General may: ... direct that the prisoner be released...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Undertakings relating to prisoners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37
has part: 37(1) Undertakings relating to prisoners
has part: 37(2) Undertakings relating to prisoners
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.49

37(1) Undertakings relating to prisoners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
part of: 37 Undertakings relating to prisoners
note: The Tribunal must give an undertaking to return a prisoner to Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.49
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(1) Undertakings relating to prisoners
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to return the prisoner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) Undertakings relating to prisoners
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
part of: 37 Undertakings relating to prisoners
note: Tribunal undertakings for prisoner custody arrangements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.49
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2) Undertakings relating to prisoners
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to make arrangements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Effect of removal to foreign country on prisoners’ terms of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38
note: Continuation of imprisonment sentence while in custody outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.49
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Effect of removal to foreign country on prisoners’ terms of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continues to serve sentence of imprisonment
premise text: Person is serving a sentence of imprisonment
conclusion text: Person continues to serve that sentence of imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval during which person is in custody outside Australia
premise text: Person is in custody in connection with the request
conclusion text: Temporal interval during which person is in custody outside Australia >= temporal interval during which person is serving sentence of imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval during which person is released from prison pursuant to a request by a Tribunal
premise text: Person is released from a prison pursuant to a request by a Tribunal under section 36
conclusion text: Temporal interval during which person is released from prison pursuant to a request by a Tribunal >= temporal interval during which person is serving sentence of imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: AND
logic summary: Combination of conditions for continuation of imprisonment sentence
premise text: Person is in custody in connection with the request AND person is released from a prison pursuant to a request by a Tribunal under section 36
conclusion text: Person continues to serve that sentence of imprisonment AND person is subject to detention under Commonwealth law
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-38-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: AND
logic summary: Combination of conditions for continuation of imprisonment sentence
premise text: Person is in custody in connection with the request AND person is released from a prison pursuant to a request by a Tribunal under section 36
conclusion text: Person continues to serve that sentence of imprisonment AND person is subject to detention under Commonwealth law
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Transit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39
has part: 39(1) Transit
has part: 39(2) Transit
has part: 39(3) Transit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.50

39(1) Transit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-1
part of: 39 Transit
note: Transportation of person in custody through Australia for specific purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.50
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(1) Transit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows transportation of person in custody through Australia.
premise text: (1) If a person is to be transported...
conclusion text: ...the person may be transported...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Specifies the temporal overlap between transportation and purposes.
premise text: (1) If a person is to be transported in custody from a foreign country...
conclusion text: ...the person may be transported through Australia in the custody of another person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies that transportation is only allowed for specified purposes.
premise text: (1) If a person is to be transported...
conclusion text: ...the person may be transported through Australia in the custody of another person.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagates the condition that transportation is only allowed for specified purposes.
premise text: (1) If a person is to be transported...
conclusion text: ...the person may be transported through Australia in the custody of another person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classifies the type of transportation permit.
premise text: (1) If a person is to be transported...
conclusion text: ...the person may be transported through Australia in the custody of another person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

39(2) Transit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-2
part of: 39 Transit
note: Must be kept in custody until transportation is continued
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.50
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(2) Transit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep person in custody
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(3) Transit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39-ss-3
part of: 39 Transit
note: Transportation of a person in custody not continued within a reasonable time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.50
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(3) Transit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-39-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of transportation
premise text: (a) a person is being held in custody pursuant to a direction under subsection (2); and (b) the person’s transportation is not, in the Attorney-General’s opinion, continued within a reasonable time;
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may direct that the person be transported in custody to the foreign country from which the person was first transported.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40 Service of process
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40
has part: 40(1) Service of process
has part: 40(2) Service of process
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.51

40(1) Service of process
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-1
part of: 40 Service of process
note: Attorney-General may arrange for service of process.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.51
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to arrange for service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(2) Service of process
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-2
part of: 40 Service of process
note: Attorney-General must not comply with request under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.51
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot comply with request
premise text: (a) complying with the request would prejudice Australia’s sovereignty, security or national interest;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot comply with request due to special circumstances
premise text: (b) there are special circumstances justifying non-compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AA Application of Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40aa
note: Request for Attorney-General's identification and tracing of proceeds of Tribunal offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.52
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aa-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aa-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AA Application of Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires Attorney-General's satisfaction
premise text: Attorney-General is satisfied
conclusion text: Request made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AB Authorising applications under the Proceeds of Crime Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ab
note: The Attorney-General may authorise an officer to make applications under the Proceeds of Crime Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.52
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ab-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ab-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ab-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AB Authorising applications under the Proceeds of Crime Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ab-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Attorney-General may authorise an officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AC Applying for and making restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ac
has part: 40AC(1) Applying for and making restraining orders
has part: 40AC(2) Applying for and making restraining orders
has part: 40AC(3) Applying for and making restraining orders
has part: 40AC(4) Applying for and making restraining orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53

40AC(1) Applying for and making restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ac-ss-1
part of: 40AC Applying for and making restraining orders
note: The Attorney-General may authorise a proceeds of crime authority to apply for a restraining order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Authorization is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: The authorization is within the Attorney-General's power.
premise text: (1) If the proceeds request involves the making of a restraining order,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AC(2) Applying for and making restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ac-ss-2
part of: 40AC Applying for and making restraining orders
note: Authority to apply for restraining order against property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Authority applies for restraining order
premise text: (2) If so authorised, a proceeds of crime authority may apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AC(3) Applying for and making restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ac-ss-3
part of: 40AC Applying for and making restraining orders
note: Applying Part 2-1 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to applications and restraining orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AC(3) Applying for and making restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Applying a rule or regulation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AC(4) Applying for and making restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ac-ss-4
part of: 40AC Applying for and making restraining orders
note: Applying Part as if certain references are to Tribunal offence or criminal proceeding in respect of it
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval for criminal proceeding in respect of Tribunal offence
premise text: It being reasonably suspected that criminal proceedings are about to commence against the person in the Tribunal in respect of a Tribunal offence
conclusion text: ...reasonably suspected that criminal proceedings are about to commence...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: References to indictable offence are references to Tribunal offence
premise text: That Part applies as if references in that Part to an indictable offence were references to the Tribunal offence that is the subject of the proceeds request
conclusion text: ...references to the Tribunal offence that is the subject of the proceeds request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: References to person charged with indictable offence are references to person against whom criminal proceeding in respect of Tribunal offence has commenced
premise text: That Part applies as if references in that Part to a person charged with an indictable offence were references to a person against whom a criminal proceeding in respect of a Tribunal offence has commenced in the Tribunal
conclusion text: ...a person against whom a criminal proceeding in respect of a Tribunal offence has commenced in the Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: References to it being proposed to charge person with indictable offence are references to it being reasonably suspected that criminal proceedings are about to commence against the person in the Tribunal in respect of a Tribunal offence
premise text: That Part applies as if references in that Part to it being proposed to charge a person with an indictable offence were references to it being reasonably suspected that criminal proceedings are about to commence against the person in the Tribunal in respect of a Tribunal offence
conclusion text: ...it being reasonably suspected that criminal proceedings are about to commence against the person in the Tribunal in respect of a Tribunal offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Paragraphs omitted from Part
premise text: That Part applies as if paragraphs 17(1)(e) and (f), subsections 17(3) and (4) and sections 18 to 20A, 29, 29A and 44 to 45A of that Act were omitted
conclusion text: ...paragraphs 17(1)(e) and (f), subsections 17(3) and (4) and sections 18 to 20A, 29, 29A and 44 to 45A of that Act were omitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AD Excluding property from restraining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ad
note: Court must make restraining order under Part 2-1 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 against property in respect of the Tribunal offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.53
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ad-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ad-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ad-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AD Excluding property from restraining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must make restraining order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AE When restraining order ceases to be in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ae
has part: 40AE(1) When restraining order ceases to be in force
has part: 40AE(2) When restraining order ceases to be in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.54

40AE(1) When restraining order ceases to be in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ae-ss-1
part of: 40AE When restraining order ceases to be in force
note: Cease of restraining order after one month
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.54
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Cease of action
premise text: (1) If, at the end of the period of 1 month...
conclusion text: ...the order ceases to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which restraining order is in force
premise text: (1) If, at the end of the period of 1 month...
conclusion text: ...the order ceases to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which restraining order is in force
premise text: (1) If, at the end of the period of 1 month...
conclusion text: ...the order ceases to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which restraining order is in force
premise text: (1) If, at the end of the period of 1 month...
conclusion text: ...the order ceases to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which restraining order is in force
premise text: (1) If, at the end of the period of 1 month...
conclusion text: ...the order ceases to be in force.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AE(2) When restraining order ceases to be in force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ae-ss-2
part of: 40AE When restraining order ceases to be in force
note: Restraining order ceases to be in force under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.54
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Restraining order ceases to be in force
premise text: (2) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AF Applying for and making production orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40af
has part: 40AF(1) Applying for and making production orders
has part: 40AF(2) Applying for and making production orders
has part: 40AF(3) Applying for and making production orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.55

40AF(1) Applying for and making production orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40af-ss-1
part of: 40AF Applying for and making production orders
note: Authorized officer may apply for production order under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.55
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AF(1) Applying for and making production orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Authorized officer may apply for production order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AF(2) Applying for and making production orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40af-ss-2
part of: 40AF Applying for and making production orders
note: Applying Part 3-2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to production orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.55
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AF(2) Applying for and making production orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Part applies to the application and production order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AF(3) Applying for and making production orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40af-ss-3
part of: 40AF Applying for and making production orders
note: Applying Part 40AF(3) as if certain references were to the Tribunal offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.55
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AF(3) Applying for and making production orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40af-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: as if
logic summary: Conditional application of Part 40AF(3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AG Retaining produced documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ag
note: An authorised officer must provide a written direction to the Attorney-General on how to deal with retained documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.55
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ag-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ag-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ag-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AG Retaining produced documents
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ag-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The authorized officer must provide a written direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AH Giving notices to financial institutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ah
has part: 40AH(1) Giving notices to financial institutions
has part: 40AH(2) Giving notices to financial institutions
has part: 40AH(3) Giving notices to financial institutions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.56

40AH(1) Giving notices to financial institutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ah-ss-1
part of: 40AH Giving notices to financial institutions
note: A senior police officer may give a written notice to a financial institution requiring the institution to provide certain information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.56
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AH(1) Giving notices to financial institutions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The police officer must give a written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The notice requires information over a specified period of up to 6 months.
premise text: (d) details of transactions on such an account over a specified period of up to 6 months;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The notice requires information from a transaction conducted by the financial institution.
premise text: (f) a transaction conducted by the financial institution on behalf of a specified person.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The notice requires information about related accounts.
premise text: (e) details of any related accounts (including names of those who hold those accounts);
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AH(2) Giving notices to financial institutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ah-ss-2
part of: 40AH Giving notices to financial institutions
note: Senior police officer must not issue notice unless reasonably believed required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.56
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AH(2) Giving notices to financial institutions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Senior police officer must not issue notice.
conclusion text: unless reasonably believed required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AH(3) Giving notices to financial institutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ah-ss-3
part of: 40AH Giving notices to financial institutions
note: Defines a senior police officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.56
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AH(3) Giving notices to financial institutions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a duty
premise text: (3) A senior police officer is a person covered by paragraph 213(3)(a), (b) or (c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
conclusion text: There is a duty to identify, trace, and freeze or seize proceeds of Tribunal offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval
premise text: (3) A senior police officer is a person covered by paragraph 213(3)(a), (b) or (c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
conclusion text: The duty to identify, trace, and freeze or seize proceeds of Tribunal offences applies at all times
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a right
premise text: (3) A senior police officer is a person covered by paragraph 213(3)(a), (b) or (c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
conclusion text: There is a right to identify, trace, and freeze or seize proceeds of Tribunal offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ah-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines an obligation
premise text: (3) A senior police officer is a person covered by paragraph 213(3)(a), (b) or (c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to identify, trace, and freeze or seize proceeds of Tribunal offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40AI Contents of notices to financial institutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ai
note: Financial institution must provide information within 14 days after receiving notice.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.57
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-logic-descriptionlogic-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AI Contents of notices to financial institutions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Financial institution must provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ai-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Information or documents required to be provided.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AJ Protection from suits etc. for those complying with notices
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40aj
note: No action against financial institution or its employees for actions taken under notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.57
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aj-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aj-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aj-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AJ Protection from suits etc. for those complying with notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Protection from obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AK Making false statements in applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ak
note: Making false statements in applications is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.58
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ak-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ak-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ak-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AK Making false statements in applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ak-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements in applications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AL Disclosing existence or nature of notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40al
note: Disclosing existence or nature of notice is prohibited after receiving a notice under section 40AH.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.58
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40al-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40al-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40al-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of notice existence or nature.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AM Failing to comply with a notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40am
note: Failing to comply with a notice is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.58
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AM Failing to comply with a notice
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits failing to comply with a notice.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to comply with the notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Identifies the temporal overlap between failing to comply and the notice.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to comply with the notice.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Identifies the recurring nature of failing to comply with a notice.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to comply with the notice.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses the obligation to comply with a notice.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to comply with the notice.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40am-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the cognitive aspect of failing to comply with a notice.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to comply with the notice.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40AN Applying for and making monitoring orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40an
has part: 40AN(1) Applying for and making monitoring orders
has part: 40AN(2) Applying for and making monitoring orders
has part: 40AN(3) Applying for and making monitoring orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.59

40AN(1) Applying for and making monitoring orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40an-ss-1
part of: 40AN Applying for and making monitoring orders
note: Authorized officer may apply for a monitoring order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.59
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AN(1) Applying for and making monitoring orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Authorized officer may apply for a monitoring order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AN(2) Applying for and making monitoring orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40an-ss-2
part of: 40AN Applying for and making monitoring orders
note: Applying Part 3-4 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to monitoring orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.59
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AN(2) Applying for and making monitoring orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Part applies to the application and monitoring order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AN(3) Applying for and making monitoring orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40an-ss-3
part of: 40AN Applying for and making monitoring orders
note: Applying Part as if references to serious offence are references to Tribunal offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.59
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-3-norm

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40an-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AN(3) Applying for and making monitoring orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40AO Passing on information given under monitoring orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ao
note: Must pass information on to Attorney-General or APS employee
description: Information under monitoring order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.60
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ao-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ao-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ao-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pass information on
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AP Applying for and issuing search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ap
has part: 40AP(1) Applying for and issuing search warrants
has part: 40AP(2) Applying for and issuing search warrants
has part: 40AP(3) Applying for and issuing search warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.60

40AP(1) Applying for and issuing search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ap-ss-1
part of: 40AP Applying for and issuing search warrants
note: Authorized officer must apply for search warrant under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.60
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must apply
premise text: Authorized officer
conclusion text: Search warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AP(2) Applying for and issuing search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ap-ss-2
part of: 40AP Applying for and issuing search warrants
note: Part 3-5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 applies to the application and POCA search warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.60
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AP(2) Applying for and issuing search warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Part 3-5 applies to the application and POCA search warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AP(3) Applying for and issuing search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ap-ss-3
part of: 40AP Applying for and issuing search warrants
note: Applying Part as if certain references are to specific definitions or sections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.60
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AP(3) Applying for and issuing search warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Applying Part as if certain references are to specific definitions or sections.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ap-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AQ Contents of POCA search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40aq
note: POCA search warrant must state that seizure of property is necessary to prevent concealment, loss or destruction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.61
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aq-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aq-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aq-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AQ Contents of POCA search warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40aq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: POCA search warrant imposes an obligation on the state to seize property if necessary.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40AR Seizure of certain property or things found in the course of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40ar
note: Seizure of property or things found during a search warrant is prohibited unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.62
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ar-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ar-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ar-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AR Seizure of certain property or things found in the course of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40ar-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AS Return of seized property to third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40as
has part: 40AS(1) Return of seized property to third parties
has part: 40AS(2) Return of seized property to third parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.62

40AS(1) Return of seized property to third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40as-ss-1
part of: 40AS Return of seized property to third parties
note: Duty to return seized property to third parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.62
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AS(1) Return of seized property to third parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation to return seized property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AS(2) Return of seized property to third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40as-ss-2
part of: 40AS Return of seized property to third parties
note: Court must be a court of the State or Territory with proceeds jurisdiction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.62
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AS(2) Return of seized property to third parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40as-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must be a court of the State or Territory with proceeds jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AT Dealing with certain seized property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40at
has part: 40AT(1) Dealing with certain seized property
has part: 40AT(2) Dealing with certain seized property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.63

40AT(1) Dealing with certain seized property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40at-ss-1
part of: 40AT Dealing with certain seized property
note: Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section if seized under a POCA search warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.63
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AT(1) Dealing with certain seized property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Property must be dealt with within 30 days.
premise text: (1) Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section if: (a) it has been seized under a POCA search warrant in relation to a Tribunal offence; and (b) it is not: (i) evidential material; or (ii) property of a kind referred to in subparagraph 40AR(a)(iv) or (v.).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Property must be dealt with within 30 days.
premise text: (1) Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section if: (a) it has been seized under a POCA search warrant in relation to a Tribunal offence; and (b) it is not: (i) evidential material; or (ii) property of a kind referred to in subparagraph 40AR(a)(iv) or (v.).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section.
premise text: (1) Property must be dealt with in accordance with this section if: (a) it has been seized under a POCA search warrant in relation to a Tribunal offence; and (b) it is not: (i) evidential material; or (ii) property of a kind referred to in subparagraph 40AR(a)(iv) or (v.).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AT(2) Dealing with certain seized property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40at-ss-2
part of: 40AT Dealing with certain seized property
note: Forfeiture order not registered within 30 days after seizure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.63
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AT(2) Dealing with certain seized property
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of forfeiture order not registered within 30 days.
premise text: (2) a forfeiture order in relation to the property has not been registered in a court under Part 6;
conclusion text: a restraining order has not been made as described in Subdivision B in respect of the property in relation to the Tribunal offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Forfeiture order registration within 30 days after seizure.
premise text: (2) If, at the end of the period of 30 days after the day the property was seized:
conclusion text: a forfeiture order in relation to the property has not been registered in a court under Part 6;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of forfeiture order registration.
premise text: (2) If, at the end of the period of 30 days after the day the property was seized:
conclusion text: a restraining order has not been made as described in Subdivision B in respect of the property in relation to the Tribunal offence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of information about forfeiture order registration.
premise text: (2) If, at the end of the period of 30 days after the day the property was seized:
conclusion text: a restraining order has not been made as described in Subdivision B in respect of the property in relation to the Tribunal offence
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40at-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of forfeiture order registration by AI.
premise text: (2) If, at the end of the period of 30 days after the day the property was seized:
conclusion text: a restraining order has not been made as described in Subdivision B in respect of the property in relation to the Tribunal offence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AU Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40au
has part: 40AU(1) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
has part: 40AU(2) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
has part: 40AU(3) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.65

40AU(1) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40au-ss-1
part of: 40AU Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
note: Seizure of property or thing under POCA search warrant in relation to Tribunal offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.65
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AU(1) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation
premise text: (seized item is evidential material or property of a kind)
conclusion text: (seizing officer has obligation to deal with seized item)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation
premise text: (seized item is property or thing under POCA search warrant in relation to Tribunal offence)
conclusion text: (seizing officer has obligation to deal with seized item)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Has temporal interval greater than or equal to
premise text: (seizure occurs under POCA search warrant in relation to Tribunal offence)
conclusion text: (seizure has temporal interval greater than or equal to seizure of property or thing under POCA search warrant in relation to Tribunal offence)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has obligation
premise text: (seizing officer is authorised officer or person assisting in relation to warrant)
conclusion text: (seizing officer has obligation to deal with seized item)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AU(2) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40au-ss-2
part of: 40AU Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
note: Retention of seized item pending written direction from Attorney-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.65
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for retention period
premise text: Retention period exceeds 1 month
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40AU(3) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40au-ss-3
part of: 40AU Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
note: The Attorney-General may direct the seizing officer to send the seized item to the Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.65
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40AU(3) Dealing with evidential material and certain property or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-40au-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Directive obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Tribunal sittings in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41
has part: 41(1) Tribunal sittings in Australia
has part: 41(2) Tribunal sittings in Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66

41(1) Tribunal sittings in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-1
part of: 41 Tribunal sittings in Australia
note: A Tribunal may sit in Australia for the purpose of performing its functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to perform functions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(2) Tribunal sittings in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-2
part of: 41 Tribunal sittings in Australia
note: Tribunal may sit in Australia for taking evidence, conducting or continuing a proceeding, or giving judgment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(2) Tribunal sittings in Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May sit in Australia
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-41-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relation between Tribunal sitting and taking evidence
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42
has part: 42(1) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
has part: 42(2) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
has part: 42(3) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66

42(1) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-1
part of: 42 Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
note: Tribunal may exercise prescribed powers while sitting in Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to exercise powers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(2) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-2
part of: 42 Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
note: Regulations must implement agreements between Commonwealth and Tribunal about powers exercised while sitting in Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(2) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulations must implement agreements
premise text: Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Regulations made for the purposes of subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(3) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-3
part of: 42 Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
note: Tribunal's powers while sitting in Australia may apply, adopt or incorporate rules of procedure and evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.66
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(3) Tribunal’s powers while sitting in Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Tribunal's powers may apply, adopt or incorporate rules of procedure and evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

43 Contravention of Tribunal orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43
note: Prohibition on intentionally contravening Tribunal orders or hindering their functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.67
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-diffusion-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Contravention of Tribunal orders etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening Tribunal orders.
premise text: A person must not intentionally contravene an order that a Tribunal makes while sitting in Australia.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on hindering Tribunal functions.
premise text: A person must not otherwise intentionally hinder a Tribunal in performing its functions while sitting in Australia.
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between contravention and imprisonment.
premise text: A person must not intentionally contravene an order that a Tribunal makes while sitting in Australia; or A person must not otherwise intentionally hinder a Tribunal in performing its functions while sitting in Australia.
conclusion text: Imprisonment occurs during the period of contravention or hindering.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication between contravention and imprisonment.
premise text: A person must not intentionally contravene an order that a Tribunal makes while sitting in Australia; or A person must not otherwise intentionally hinder a Tribunal in performing its functions while sitting in Australia.
conclusion text: Imprisonment implies contravention or hindering.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-43-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition to related concepts.
premise text: A person must not intentionally contravene an order that a Tribunal makes while sitting in Australia; or A person must not otherwise intentionally hinder a Tribunal in performing its functions while sitting in Australia.
conclusion text: Contravention and hindering diffuse to related concepts.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44
has part: 44(1) Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
has part: 44(3) Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68

44(1) Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-1
part of: 44 Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
note: Attorney-General may authorise proceeds of crime authority to apply for registration of forfeiture order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(1) Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by the Attorney-General.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), if...
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise a proceeds of crime authority...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for the enforcement of forfeiture orders.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), if...
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise a proceeds of crime authority...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for the enforcement of forfeiture orders.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), if...
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise a proceeds of crime authority...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of the Attorney-General's decision.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), if...
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise a proceeds of crime authority...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Decision Support
logic summary: Decision support for the Attorney-General.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (3), if...
conclusion text: the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise a proceeds of crime authority...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

44(3) Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44-ss-3
part of: 44 Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders
note: Attorney-General must not comply with requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Attorney-General cannot comply with requests.
premise text: Request for enforcement of forfeiture orders
conclusion text: Non-compliance is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Opinion
logic summary: Attorney-General's opinion is a condition for non-compliance.
premise text: Special circumstances justifying non-compliance
conclusion text: Non-compliance is justified if special circumstances exist.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Non-compliance may recur under certain conditions.
premise text: Request for enforcement of forfeiture orders
conclusion text: Non-compliance may be recurring.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-44-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Non-compliance may diffuse to other entities.
premise text: Request for enforcement of forfeiture orders
conclusion text: Non-compliance may diffuse.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Registration of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45
has part: 45(1) Registration of order
has part: 45(1A) Registration of order
has part: 45(1B) Registration of order
has part: 45(2) Registration of order
has part: 45(3) Registration of order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68

45(1) Registration of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-1
part of: 45 Registration of order
note: Court must register order unless it would be contrary to the interests of justice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must register order
premise text: Proceeds of crime authority applies to court with proceeds jurisdiction
conclusion text: Court must register order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(1A) Registration of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-1a
part of: 45 Registration of order
note: Notice must be given to specified persons and court-directed persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1a-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(1B) Registration of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-1b
part of: 45 Registration of order
note: Court may consider application without notice if requested by proceeds of crime authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1b-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45(1B) Registration of order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to consider application without notice.
premise text: Proceeds of crime authority requests court to do so.
conclusion text: Court may consider application without notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

45(2) Registration of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-2
part of: 45 Registration of order
note: Order must be registered in a court by the registration of a copy of the appropriate order sealed by the Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be registered
premise text: Order must be registered in a court by the registration of a copy of the appropriate order sealed by the Tribunal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Registration is within the scope of the Tribunal's authority
premise text: The registration must be done under the rules of the court, which are part of the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Registration implies that the order is valid
premise text: If an order must be registered in a court, then it is valid.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45(3) Registration of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45-ss-3
part of: 45 Registration of order
note: Permits electronic transmission of sealed copies for purposes of subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.68
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: same-as
logic summary: Identifies same document
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means
conclusion text: it is taken for the purposes of subsection (2) of this section to be the same as the sealed copy.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies time frame for transmission
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means
conclusion text: it is taken for the purposes of subsection (2) of this section during the specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies time frame for transmission
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means
conclusion text: it is taken for the purposes of subsection (2) of this section during the specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permitted
logic summary: Specifies permitted action
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means
conclusion text: it is permitted for the purposes of subsection (2) of this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies time frame for transmission
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means
conclusion text: it is taken during the specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-45-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies time frame for transmission
premise text: (3) Subject to subsection 46(2), if a copy of a sealed copy of an order is faxed, emailed or sent by other electronic means
conclusion text: it is taken during the specified time frame.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Effect of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46
has part: 46(1) Effect of order
has part: 46(1A) Effect of order
has part: 46(2) Effect of order
has part: 46(3) Effect of order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.69

46(1) Effect of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46-ss-1
part of: 46 Effect of order
note: Forfeiture order has effect as if made by court under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.69
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(1) Effect of order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Implies obligation to enforce
premise text: (1) A forfeiture order registered in a court has effect...
conclusion text: ...may be enforced, as if it were a forfeiture order made by the court...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between events
premise text: (1) A forfeiture order registered in a court has effect...
conclusion text: ...as if it were a forfeiture order made by the court under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 at the time of registration.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between events
premise text: (1) A forfeiture order registered in a court has effect...
conclusion text: ...as if it were a forfeiture order made by the court under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 at the time of registration.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Spreads information or obligation
premise text: (1) A forfeiture order registered in a court has effect...
conclusion text: ...as if it were a forfeiture order made by the court under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 at the time of registration.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: Expresses knowledge or belief
premise text: (1) A forfeiture order registered in a court has effect...
conclusion text: ...as if it were a forfeiture order made by the court under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 at the time of registration.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46(1A) Effect of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46-ss-1a
part of: 46 Effect of order
note: Repeal of subparagraph 68(1)(b)(ii) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.69
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-1a-norm

46(2) Effect of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46-ss-2
part of: 46 Effect of order
note: Registration ceases to have effect after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.69
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits registration after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
premise text: (2) A registration effected by a court registering a copy of a sealed copy ceases to have effect...
conclusion text: ...unless the sealed copy has been filed by then in that court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Registration is an interval that ends after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
premise text: (2) A registration effected by a court registering a copy of a sealed copy ceases to have effect...
conclusion text: ...unless the sealed copy has been filed by then in that court.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Registration is an interval that ends after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
premise text: (2) A registration effected by a court registering a copy of a sealed copy ceases to have effect...
conclusion text: ...unless the sealed copy has been filed by then in that court.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Registration is diffused into a new entity that ceases to exist after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
premise text: (2) A registration effected by a court registering a copy of a sealed copy ceases to have effect...
conclusion text: ...unless the sealed copy has been filed by then in that court.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Registration is inferred to cease after 45 days unless sealed copy is filed.
premise text: (2) A registration effected by a court registering a copy of a sealed copy ceases to have effect...
conclusion text: ...unless the sealed copy has been filed by then in that court.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46(3) Effect of order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46-ss-3
part of: 46 Effect of order
note: Permits disposal of property subject to an order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.69
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(3) Effect of order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission
premise text: (3) Subject to section 46A, property that is subject to an order registered under this Part may be disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in accordance with any direction of the Attorney-General or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between property and order
premise text: (3) Subject to section 46A, property that is subject to an order registered under this Part may be disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in accordance with any direction of the Attorney-General or
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between property and order
premise text: (3) Subject to section 46A, property that is subject to an order registered under this Part may be disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in accordance with any direction of the Attorney-General or
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between property and order
premise text: (3) Subject to section 46A, property that is subject to an order registered under this Part may be disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in accordance with any direction of the Attorney-General or
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between property and order
premise text: (3) Subject to section 46A, property that is subject to an order registered under this Part may be disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in accordance with any direction of the Attorney-General or
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a
has part: 46A(1) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(2) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(3) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(4) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(5) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(6) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
has part: 46A(7) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70

46A(1) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a-ss-1
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
note: Person with interest in property may apply for order under subsection (2) if not convicted of related offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46A(1) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to provide order under subsection (2)
premise text: (1) If a court registers...
conclusion text: ...may apply to the court for an order under subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval of application
premise text: (1) If a court registers...
conclusion text: ...may apply to the court for an order under subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46A(2) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a-ss-2
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
note: Court must declare nature, extent and value of applicant's interest in property if not involved in offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46A(2) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must declare nature, extent and value of applicant's interest in property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46A(3) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a-ss-3
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
note: Court must give leave for person to apply under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46A(3) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court must give leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

46A(4) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a-ss-4
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
note: Court may give leave if satisfied there are special grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to grant leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46A(5) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a-ss-5
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
note: Grant leave to a person under certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-logic-deontic-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 46A(5) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission
premise text: (a) the person, for a good reason, did not attend the hearing
conclusion text: Leave granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Allow leave application
premise text: (a) the person, for a good reason, did not attend the hearing
conclusion text: Leave granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

46A(6) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a-ss-6
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
note: Application must be made within 6 weeks of forfeiture order registration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits making an application after a certain period.
premise text: (6) Unless the court gives leave, an application under subsection (1) is to be made before the end of 6 weeks beginning on the day when the forfeiture order is registered in the court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines an overlapping interval for the application deadline.
premise text: (6) Unless the court gives leave, an application under subsection (1) is to be made before the end of 6 weeks beginning on the day when the forfeiture order is registered in the court.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines an overlapping trace for the application deadline.
premise text: (6) Unless the court gives leave, an application under subsection (1) is to be made before the end of 6 weeks beginning on the day when the forfeiture order is registered in the court.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines an overlapping diffusion for the application deadline.
premise text: (6) Unless the court gives leave, an application under subsection (1) is to be made before the end of 6 weeks beginning on the day when the forfeiture order is registered in the court.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines an overlapping CogAI for the application deadline.
premise text: (6) Unless the court gives leave, an application under subsection (1) is to be made before the end of 6 weeks beginning on the day when the forfeiture order is registered in the court.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46A(7) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a-ss-7
part of: 46A Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
note: Court may give leave to apply outside the period if not due to neglect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.70
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-7-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46A(7) Effect on third parties of registration of forfeiture orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-46a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting leave is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 When search warrants can be issued
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47
has part: 47(1) When search warrants can be issued
has part: 47(2) When search warrants can be issued
has part: 47(3) When search warrants can be issued
has part: 47(4) When search warrants can be issued
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.73

47(1) When search warrants can be issued
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 When search warrants can be issued
note: Magistrate may issue warrant to search premises under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.73
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1) When search warrants can be issued
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Magistrate obligation to issue warrant
premise text: Application made under subsection 15(1) or 34(1)
conclusion text: Warrant issued if reasonable grounds exist
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal interval of applicability
premise text: Applicable period referred to in subsection (3) of this section
conclusion text: Evidential material will exist within applicable period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional warrant issuance
premise text: Application made under subsection 15(1) or 34(1)
conclusion text: Warrant issued if reasonable grounds exist
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(2) When search warrants can be issued
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 When search warrants can be issued
note: Magistrate may issue warrant for search or frisk if application is made and reasonable grounds are suspected.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.73
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(2) When search warrants can be issued
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Magistrate may issue warrant
premise text: Application made
conclusion text: Warrant issued
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(3) When search warrants can be issued
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-3
part of: 47 When search warrants can be issued
note: Search warrant application period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.73
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(3) When search warrants can be issued
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPeriod
logic summary: Defines search warrant application period
premise text: Section 52—48
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines applicable period for search warrant application
premise text: Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Defines time interval for search warrant application
premise text: Section 52—48
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: between
logic summary: Defines time interval for search warrant application
premise text: Section 52—48
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Spreads information about search warrant application period
premise text: Section 52—48
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines search warrant application period using artificial intelligence
premise text: Section 52—48
conclusion text: 72 hours or 48 hours if made by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(4) When search warrants can be issued
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-4
part of: 47 When search warrants can be issued
note: Grounds for suspicion must be stated in the information.
description: Grounds for suspicion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.73
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(4) When search warrants can be issued
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state grounds for suspicion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Content of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48
has part: 48(1) Content of warrants
has part: 48(2) Content of warrants
has part: 48(3) Content of warrants
has part: 48(4) Content of warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.74

48(1) Content of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-1
part of: 48 Content of warrants
note: Magistrate must state purpose, premises, and evidential material in search warrant.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.74
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(1) Content of warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must state purpose, premises, and evidential material.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS A
logic summary: Purpose is a description of the Tribunal offence.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(2) Content of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-2
part of: 48 Content of warrants
note: Allows for successive warrants in relation to the same premises or person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.74
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-2-norm

48(3) Content of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-3
part of: 48 Content of warrants
note: Seizure of evidential material or seizable items without warrant is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.74
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of seizure without warrant.
premise text: (3) The magistrate is also to state, in a warrant...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(4) Content of warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-4
part of: 48 Content of warrants
note: Magistrate must state warrant details
description: Details of warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.74
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(4) Content of warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49
has part: 49(1) The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
has part: 49(2) The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.76

49(1) The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-1
part of: 49 The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
note: Restrictions on search and seizure of premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.76
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of certain actions
premise text: (1) A warrant in force...
conclusion text: The executing officer or an officer assisting may not perform these actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(2) The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-2
part of: 49 The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to premises
note: Restriction on execution hours of a search warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.76
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) If the warrant states that it may be executed only during particular hours, it must not be executed outside those hours.
conclusion text: It is forbidden to execute the warrant outside the specified hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal restriction
premise text: (2) If the warrant states that it may be executed only during particular hours, it must not be executed outside those hours.
conclusion text: The execution is restricted to the specified hours.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal restriction
premise text: (2) If the warrant states that it may be executed only during particular hours, it must not be executed outside those hours.
conclusion text: The execution is restricted until the specified hours.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: only-if
logic summary: Conditional restriction
premise text: (2) If the warrant states that it may be executed only during particular hours, it must not be executed outside those hours.
conclusion text: The execution is only possible if the specified hours are met.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-49-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: Artificial agent perspective
premise text: (2) If the warrant states that it may be executed only during particular hours, it must not be executed outside those hours.
conclusion text: The artificial agent asserts that the execution is restricted to the specified hours.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 The things authorised by a search warrant in relation to a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50
note: Seizure of things is prohibited unless on reasonable grounds believed necessary to prevent concealment, loss or destruction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.77
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-50-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of seizure unless on reasonable grounds.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Restrictions on personal searches
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51
note: Restrictions on personal searches
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-51-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-51-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits strip search or body cavity search
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52
has part: 52(1) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
has part: 52(2) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
has part: 52(3) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
has part: 52(4) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78

52(1) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-1
part of: 52 Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
note: Police officers may apply for warrants by telephone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(1) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for a warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: HasPart
logic summary: Excerpt is part of section 52(1)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(2) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-2
part of: 52 Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
note: Magistrate must require communication by voice to the extent practicable in circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must require communication by voice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Magistrate may require communication by voice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(3) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-3
part of: 52 Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
note: Application for warrant must include required information.
description: All necessary information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(3) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide required information
conclusion text: All necessary information must be provided
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(4) Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-4
part of: 52 Warrants may be issued by telephone etc.
note: Magistrate may issue warrant urgently or due to delay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.78
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-52-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to issue warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53
has part: 53(1) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
has part: 53(2) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
has part: 53(3) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
has part: 53(4) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
has part: 53(5) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79

53(1) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-1
part of: 53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
note: Inform applicant of warrant terms and signing time
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(1) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Magistrate must inform applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Informing is a formality
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(2) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-2
part of: 53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
note: Applicant must complete a form of warrant
description: Form of warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(2) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide form of warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(3) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-3
part of: 53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
note: Provide completed warrant form and sworn information within a specified timeframe.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(3) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(4) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-4
part of: 53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
note: The magistrate must complete a form of warrant.
description: Form of warrant completed by the magistrate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The magistrate must complete a form of warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(5) Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-5
part of: 53 Formalities relating to warrants issued by telephone etc.
note: Court assumes exercise of power under warrant was not duly authorised unless proved otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.79
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits exercise of power under warrant unless duly authorised.
premise text: (5) If: (a) it is material, in any proceedings, for a court to be satisfied that the exercise of a power under a warrant issued under section 52 was duly authorised; and (b) the form of warrant signed by the magistrate is not produced in evidence; the court is to assume, unless the contrary is proved, that the exercise of the power was not duly authorised.
conclusion text: (5) If: (a) it is material, in any proceedings, for a court to be satisfied that the exercise of a power under a warrant issued under section 52 was not duly authorised; and (b) the form of warrant signed by the magistrate is not produced in evidence; the court is to assume that the exercise of the power was not duly authorised.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Availability of assistance and use of force in executing a warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54
note: Executing officer may obtain assistance and use force in executing a warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-54-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-54-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Availability of assistance and use of force in executing a warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to use force
premise text: Executing officer may obtain assistance and use force
conclusion text: State permits use of force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
has part: 55(1) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
has part: 55(2) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
has part: 55(3) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
has part: 55(4) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
has part: 55(5) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80

55(1) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-1
part of: 55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
note: Must provide a copy of warrant to occupier or representative
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(1) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide a copy of warrant to occupier or representative
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(2) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-2
part of: 55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
note: Must provide a copy of the warrant to the occupier.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(2) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(3) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-3
part of: 55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
note: Must show a copy of the warrant to the occupier.
description: Copy of warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(3) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must show a copy of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(4) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-4
part of: 55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
note: Must identify self to occupier or person being searched.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(4) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(5) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-5
part of: 55 Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
note: No signature or seal is required on a copy of the warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.80
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-5-norm

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-55-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(5) Copy of warrant to be shown to occupier etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

56 Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56
has part: 56(1) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
has part: 56(2) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
has part: 56(3) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81

56(1) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-1
part of: 56 Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
note: Officer may take photographs with occupier's consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(1) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permitted action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(2) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-2
part of: 56 Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
note: Police officers may complete warrant execution after temporarily ceasing it with occupier's consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(2) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to complete warrant execution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(3) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-3
part of: 56 Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
note: Completion of warrant execution despite court order revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(3) Specific powers available to officers executing warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Warrant execution can proceed despite court order revocation
premise text: (a) the execution of a search warrant is stopped by an order of a court; and (b) the order is later revoked or reversed on appeal; and (c) the warrant is still in force;
conclusion text: the execution of the warrant may be completed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Warrant execution completion occurs during warrant revocation
premise text: (a) the execution of a search warrant is stopped by an order of a court; and (b) the order is later revoked or reversed on appeal; and (c) the warrant is still in force;
conclusion text: the execution of the warrant may be completed.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Warrant revocation ends warrant execution completion
premise text: (a) the execution of a search warrant is stopped by an order of a court; and (b) the order is later revoked or reversed on appeal; and (c) the warrant is still in force;
conclusion text: the execution of the warrant may be completed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Warrant revocation requires warrant execution completion
premise text: (a) the execution of a search warrant is stopped by an order of a court; and (b) the order is later revoked or reversed on appeal; and (c) the warrant is still in force;
conclusion text: the execution of the warrant may be completed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Use of equipment to examine or process things
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57
has part: 57(1) Use of equipment to examine or process things
has part: 57(2) Use of equipment to examine or process things
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81

57(1) Use of equipment to examine or process things
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-1
part of: 57 Use of equipment to examine or process things
note: Executing officer may bring necessary equipment to premises for examination or processing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(1) Use of equipment to examine or process things
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Executing officer has the power to bring necessary equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57(2) Use of equipment to examine or process things
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-2
part of: 57 Use of equipment to examine or process things
note: Consent of occupier required for examination or processing at premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.81
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted by occupier
premise text: (a) it is not practicable to examine or process the things at the warrant premises; or (b) the occupier of the premises consents in writing;
conclusion text: The use of equipment to examine or process things is permitted if the occupier consents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between consent and examination
premise text: (b) the occupier of the premises consents in writing;
conclusion text: The temporal interval of 'consent' overlaps with the examination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-57-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consent and examination
premise text: (b) the occupier of the premises consents in writing;
conclusion text: The examination occurs until the consent expires.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58
has part: 58(1) Use of electronic equipment at premises
has part: 58(2) Use of electronic equipment at premises
has part: 58(3) Use of electronic equipment at premises
has part: 58(4) Use of electronic equipment at premises
has part: 58(5) Use of electronic equipment at premises
has part: 58(6) Use of electronic equipment at premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82

58(1) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-1
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises
note: Executing officer may operate electronic equipment at premises under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(1) Use of electronic equipment at premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits action under specified conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believes
logic summary: Requires reasonable grounds for belief.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Ordered
logic summary: Requires sequence of events.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Spreads information about electronic equipment.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

58(2) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-2
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises
note: Seize equipment and associated devices if evidential material is accessible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(2) Use of electronic equipment at premises
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of seizing equipment without permission.
premise text: Executing officer may seize equipment if evidential material is accessible.
conclusion text: Seizure of equipment is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Seizure occurs within a specific time frame.
premise text: Executing officer may seize equipment after operating it.
conclusion text: Seizure occurs within a specific time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Permission is implied if the occupier agrees to use facilities for a purpose.
premise text: Occupier agrees to use facilities for a purpose.
conclusion text: Permission is implied.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Seizure spreads to other devices if they are accessible.
premise text: Executing officer may seize equipment and associated devices.
conclusion text: Seizure spreads to other devices.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Equipment is recognized as a potential threat if it can be accessed by operating it.
premise text: Executing officer recognizes equipment as a potential threat.
conclusion text: Equipment is recognized as a potential threat.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(3) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-3
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises
note: Equipment seizure under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(3) Use of electronic equipment at premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits equipment seizure without practicable documentary form or copying
premise text: (3) Equipment may be seized...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(4) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-4
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises
note: Executing officer may take necessary actions to secure electronic equipment at premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-ltl-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(4) Use of electronic equipment at premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to perform action.
premise text: (a) evidential material may be accessible by operating electronic equipment at the warrant premises;
conclusion text: he or she may do whatever is necessary to secure the equipment,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Duty to perform action.
premise text: (c) if he or she does not take action under this subsection, the material may be destroyed, altered or otherwise interfered with;
conclusion text: he or she may do whatever is necessary to secure the equipment,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permitted action.
premise text: (b) expert assistance is required to operate the equipment;
conclusion text: he or she may do whatever is necessary to secure the equipment,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation application.
premise text: (a) evidential material may be accessible by operating electronic equipment at the warrant premises;
conclusion text: he or she may do whatever is necessary to secure the equipment,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-4-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relation application.
premise text: (c) if he or she does not take action under this subsection, the material may be destroyed, altered or otherwise interfered with;
conclusion text: he or she may do whatever is necessary to secure the equipment,
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(5) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-5
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises
note: Notice must be given to premises occupier before securing equipment.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(5) Use of electronic equipment at premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(6) Use of electronic equipment at premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-6
part of: 58 Use of electronic equipment at premises
note: Equipment must be secured.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.82
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-6-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(6) Use of electronic equipment at premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-58-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide obligation
premise text: (6) The equipment may be secured:
conclusion text: The equipment must be secured.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59
has part: 59(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
has part: 59(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
has part: 59(3) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.84

59(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59-ss-1
part of: 59 Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
note: Compensation for damage to electronic equipment if caused by insufficient care.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.84
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59(1) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate for damage.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...compensation for the damage is payable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59-ss-2
part of: 59 Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
note: Compensation is payable out of money appropriated by the Parliament for the purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.84
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59(2) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Compensation is payable out of money appropriated by the Parliament for the purpose.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59(3) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59-ss-3
part of: 59 Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
note: Occupier must provide warning or guidance about equipment operation.
description: warning or guidance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.84
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59(3) Compensation for damage to electronic equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-59-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIG
logic summary: Mandatory duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Copies of seized things to be provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60
has part: 60(1) Copies of seized things to be provided
has part: 60(2) Copies of seized things to be provided
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85

60(1) Copies of seized things to be provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60-ss-1
part of: 60 Copies of seized things to be provided
note: Must provide a copy of seized documents or information to the occupier upon request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-60-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-60-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(1) Copies of seized things to be provided
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(2) Copies of seized things to be provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60-ss-2
part of: 60 Copies of seized things to be provided
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain seizures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-60-ss-2-norm

61 Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61
has part: 61(1) Occupier entitled to be present during search
has part: 61(2) Occupier entitled to be present during search
has part: 61(3) Occupier entitled to be present during search
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85

61(1) Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-1
part of: 61 Occupier entitled to be present during search
note: Occupier entitled to be present during search
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Occupier has right
premise text: (1) If a warrant in relation to premises is being executed and the occupier of the premises or another person who apparently represents the occupier is present at the premises, the person is entitled to observe the search being conducted.
conclusion text: The occupier has the right to be present during the search
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Search occurs during the presence of the occupier
premise text: (1) If a warrant in relation to premises is being executed and the occupier of the premises or another person who apparently represents the occupier is present at the premises, the person is entitled to observe the search being conducted.
conclusion text: The search occurs during the presence of the occupier
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Search is recurring or ordered
premise text: (1) If a warrant in relation to premises is being executed and the occupier of the premises or another person who apparently represents the occupier is present at the premises, the person is entitled to observe the search being conducted.
conclusion text: The search is recurring or ordered during the presence of the occupier
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Occupier has right to be present during search
premise text: (1) If a warrant in relation to premises is being executed and the occupier of the premises or another person who apparently represents the occupier is present at the premises, the person is entitled to observe the search being conducted.
conclusion text: The occupier has the right to be present during the search
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: entitlement
logic summary: Occupier's entitlement to be present during search
premise text: (1) If a warrant in relation to premises is being executed and the occupier of the premises or another person who apparently represents the occupier is present at the premises, the person is entitled to observe the search being conducted.
conclusion text: The occupier's entitlement to be present during the search is established
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(2) Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-2
part of: 61 Occupier entitled to be present during search
note: Right to observe search ceases if impedes search.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cease
logic summary: Obligation to observe ceases
premise text: Right to observe search
conclusion text: Impedance of search
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(3) Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-3
part of: 61 Occupier entitled to be present during search
note: Occupier entitled to be present during search
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Right of occupier to presence during search
premise text: (3) This section does not prevent 2 or more areas of the premises being searched at the same time.
conclusion text: Occupier entitled to be present during search
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between sections
premise text: (3) This section does not prevent 2 or more areas of the premises being searched at the same time.
conclusion text: Section 61(3) overlaps with other sections
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace between sections
premise text: (3) This section does not prevent 2 or more areas of the premises being searched at the same time.
conclusion text: Section 61(3) has a recurring trace with other sections
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of right to presence during search
premise text: (3) This section does not prevent 2 or more areas of the premises being searched at the same time.
conclusion text: Right to presence during search diffuses to other sections
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-61-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of right to presence during search
premise text: (3) This section does not prevent 2 or more areas of the premises being searched at the same time.
conclusion text: Section 61(3) recognizes right to presence during search
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Receipts for things seized under warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62
note: Must provide receipt for seized thing
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.85
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-62-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-62-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Receipts for things seized under warrant
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide receipt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Searches without warrant in emergency situations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63
has part: 63(1) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
has part: 63(2) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
has part: 63(3) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
has part: 63(4) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87

63(1) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-1
part of: 63 Searches without warrant in emergency situations
note: Police officers can conduct warrantless searches in emergency situations under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(1) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits warrantless searches without emergency justification.
premise text: (a) evidential material is in or on a conveyance; and (b) it is necessary to exercise a power under subsection (2) in order to prevent the material from being concealed, lost or destroyed;
conclusion text: No warrantless search allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes the temporal overlap between emergency situations and warrantless searches.
premise text: (c) it is necessary to exercise the power without the authority of a search warrant because the circumstances are serious and urgent.
conclusion text: Emergency situations overlap with warrantless searches.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Describes the recurring nature of emergency situations that justify warrantless searches.
premise text: (a) evidential material is in or on a conveyance; and (b) it is necessary to exercise a power under subsection (2) in order to prevent the material from being concealed, lost or destroyed;
conclusion text: Emergency situations recur.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on police officers to exercise power under subsection (2) in emergency situations.
premise text: (c) it is necessary to exercise the power without the authority of a search warrant because the circumstances are serious and urgent.
conclusion text: Police officers have an obligation to act in emergencies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Grants permission for police officers to exercise power under subsection (2) without a warrant in emergency situations.
premise text: (a) evidential material is in or on a conveyance; and (b) it is necessary to exercise a power under subsection (2) in order to prevent the material from being concealed, lost or destroyed;
conclusion text: Police officers have permission to act without warrants.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

63(2) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-2
part of: 63 Searches without warrant in emergency situations
note: Police officer may not search without warrant in emergency situations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits searching without warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(3) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-3
part of: 63 Searches without warrant in emergency situations
note: Seize material or thing if suspected to be relevant to an offence against an Australian law under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to seize material or thing under certain circumstances.
premise text: Police Officer suspects on reasonable grounds that it is necessary to seize the material or thing.
conclusion text: Seize the material or thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe
logic summary: Police Officer must believe on reasonable grounds that seizing the material or thing is necessary.
premise text: Police Officer suspects that it is necessary to seize the material or thing.
conclusion text: Seize the material or thing.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Seizure of material or thing is allowed until circumstances change.
premise text: Police Officer seizes the material or thing.
conclusion text: Circumstances may change, and seizure must be lifted.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Seizure of material or thing implies that it is necessary to prevent its concealment, loss, or destruction.
premise text: Police Officer seizes the material or thing.
conclusion text: Concealment, loss, or destruction must be prevented.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Seizure of material or thing occurs during emergency situation.
premise text: Police Officer searches for material in emergency situation.
conclusion text: Emergency situation ends, and seizure must be lifted.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

63(4) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-4
part of: 63 Searches without warrant in emergency situations
note: Police officer must exercise powers subject to section 64.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(4) Searches without warrant in emergency situations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: Police officer must exercise powers.
conclusion text: Subject to section 64.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The police officer's powers overlap with section 64.
premise text: Section 64 defines a specific set of circumstances under which the police officer may exercise their powers.
conclusion text: The police officer must exercise powers within these circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Exercising powers without section 64 is implied to be prohibited.
premise text: Section 64 defines the limits of the police officer's powers.
conclusion text: Without these limits, exercising powers would be unjustified.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The police officer's powers are diffused by section 64.
premise text: Section 64 defines the scope of the police officer's authority.
conclusion text: Without this definition, the police officer's powers would be unclear.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-63-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Enforces
logic summary: Section 64 enforces the police officer's powers.
premise text: The police officer must exercise their powers within these limits.
conclusion text: This ensures that the police officer acts in accordance with the law.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 How a police officer exercises a power under section 63
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64
note: Police officer must exercise power under section 63 in relation to conveyance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.87
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-64-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64 How a police officer exercises a power under section 63
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must exercise power under section 63
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Power to enter premises to arrest person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65
has part: 65(1) Power to enter premises to arrest person
has part: 65(2) Power to enter premises to arrest person
has part: 65(3) Power to enter premises to arrest person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.89

65(1) Power to enter premises to arrest person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-1
part of: 65 Power to enter premises to arrest person
note: Police officer may not enter premises without power to arrest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.89
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(1) Power to enter premises to arrest person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of entering premises without power.
premise text: (a) a police officer has, under this Act or pursuant to a warrant issued under this Act, power to arrest a person;
conclusion text: the police officer may not enter the premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between entering and searching.
premise text: the police officer may enter the premises, using such force as is necessary and reasonable in the circumstances;
conclusion text: there is a temporal overlap between entering and searching.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of police officer's actions.
premise text: the police officer may enter the premises, using such force as is necessary and reasonable in the circumstances;
conclusion text: there is a recurring trace of the police officer's actions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about premises.
premise text: (a) a police officer has, under this Act or pursuant to a warrant issued under this Act, power to arrest a person;
conclusion text: information about the premises is diffused through the police officer's actions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of premises and persons.
premise text: (b) the police officer believes on reasonable grounds that the person is on any premises;
conclusion text: the premises and persons are represented in knowledge.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(2) Power to enter premises to arrest person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-2
part of: 65 Power to enter premises to arrest person
note: Police officer cannot enter dwelling house during certain hours without reasonable grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.89
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(2) Power to enter premises to arrest person
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of entering dwelling house during certain hours
premise text: Police officer must not enter dwelling house under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Prohibition on entering dwelling house during certain hours
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Restriction applies during specific time interval
premise text: (2) A police officer must not enter a dwelling house under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The restriction on entering dwelling house applies during the period commencing at 9 p.m. and ending at 6 a.m.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Restriction is temporal
premise text: (2) A police officer must not enter a dwelling house under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The restriction on entering dwelling house is during the period commencing at 9 p.m. and ending at 6 a.m.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Police officer must have reasonable grounds to enter dwelling house
premise text: (2) A police officer must not enter a dwelling house under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The police officer must have reasonable grounds to enter the dwelling house during the restricted period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Police officer must believe on reasonable grounds to enter dwelling house
premise text: (2) A police officer must not enter a dwelling house under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The police officer must believe on reasonable grounds to enter the dwelling house during the restricted period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(3) Power to enter premises to arrest person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-3
part of: 65 Power to enter premises to arrest person
note: Defines dwelling house for purposes of arrest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.89
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(3) Power to enter premises to arrest person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: dwelling house includes a conveyance, and a room in a hotel...
conclusion text: Conveyance or room is dwelling house
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: dwelling house includes a conveyance, and a room in a hotel...
conclusion text: Conveyance or room is subclass of dwelling house
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: people ordinarily retire for the night
conclusion text: Retirement during night
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

66 Use of force in making arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66
note: Use of force in making arrest must be reasonable and necessary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.89
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-66-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Use of force in making arrest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation to use force in making arrest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67
has part: 67(1) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
has part: 67(2) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
has part: 67(3) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.90

67(1) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-1
part of: 67 Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
note: Informing grounds of arrest upon arrest.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.90
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67(1) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform the other person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67(2) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-2
part of: 67 Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
note: Inform other person of grounds of arrest
description: Reason for arrest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.90
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67(2) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67(3) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-3
part of: 67 Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
note: Inform other person of substance of Tribunal offence in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.90
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67(3) Persons to be informed of grounds of arrest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to inform other person
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...he or she should know the substance of the Tribunal offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between arrest and information provision
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not apply to the arrest of...
conclusion text: ...he or she should know the substance of the Tribunal offence...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of knowledge on duty to inform
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the arrest of...
conclusion text: ...he or she should know the substance of the Tribunal offence...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of knowledge through actions
premise text: the other person’s actions make it impracticable for the person making the arrest...
conclusion text: ...he or she is being arrested.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-67-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Representation of knowledge in the context of arrest
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not apply to the arrest of...
conclusion text: ...he or she should know the substance of the Tribunal offence...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

68 Power to conduct a frisk search of an arrested person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68
note: Police officer may conduct frisk search of arrested person if reasonable grounds exist.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.91
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-68-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-68-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Power to conduct a frisk search of an arrested person
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to conduct frisk search
premise text: Police officer has authority to arrest
conclusion text: Police officer may conduct frisk search
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Power to conduct an ordinary search of an arrested person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69
note: Police officer may conduct ordinary search of arrested person if suspecting they carry evidential material or seizable item.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.91
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69 Power to conduct an ordinary search of an arrested person
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to conduct search
premise text: Police officer has authority to conduct search
conclusion text: Search may be conducted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: at or soon after
logic summary: Search may be conducted at time of arrest or shortly thereafter
premise text: Time of arrest is relevant for search
conclusion text: Search may be conducted at or soon after the time of arrest
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if
logic summary: Conducting search is justified if suspecting evidential material or seizable item
premise text: Suspecting evidential material or seizable item justifies search
conclusion text: Search may be conducted if suspecting evidential material or seizable item
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: of
logic summary: Search is related to diffusion of information about arrested person's activities
premise text: Arrested person's activities are relevant for search
conclusion text: Search is related to diffusion of information about arrested person's activities
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-69-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: of
logic summary: Search is related to cognitive processing of arrested person's activities
premise text: Arrested person's activities are relevant for search
conclusion text: Search is related to cognitive processing of arrested person's activities
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Power to conduct search of arrested person’s premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70
note: Police officer may not seize things in plain view at premises without reasonable grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.91
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-70-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-70-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-70-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 70 Power to conduct search of arrested person’s premises
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of seizure without reasonable grounds.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71
has part: 71(1) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(2) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(3) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(4) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(5) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(6) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(7) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
has part: 71(8) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92

71(1) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-1
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
note: Police officer may conduct an ordinary search or strip search on a person arrested under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(1) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Police officer must conduct an ordinary search or strip search.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(2) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-2
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
note: Police officers are prohibited from conducting strip searches without approval from a superintendent or higher.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of strip searches without approval
premise text: Police officers must have approval from a superintendent or higher to conduct a strip search.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(3) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-3
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
note: Consent in writing required for strip search
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: The person consents in writing.
conclusion text: A strip search may be conducted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(4) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-4
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
note: A strip search may be conducted in the presence of a medical practitioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(4) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May conduct strip search in presence of medical practitioner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(5) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-5
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
note: Approval may be obtained by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-5-norm

71(6) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-6
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
note: Police officer must make a record of decision and reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-6-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(6) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(7) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-7
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
note: Use of force necessary and reasonable in circumstances for strip search
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-7-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(7) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: use
logic summary: Obligation to use force necessary and reasonable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(8) Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-8
part of: 71 Power to conduct an ordinary search or strip search
note: Seizure of certain items during strip search
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.92
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-8-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-71-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits seizure of certain items
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Rules for conduct of strip search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72
note: Strip search must be conducted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.93
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-72-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-72-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-72-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 72 Rules for conduct of strip search
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits strip search in certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73
has part: 73(1) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
has part: 73(2) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95

73(1) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-1
part of: 73 Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
note: Must conduct search by person of same sex as the person being searched.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(1) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct search by same sex
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(2) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-2
part of: 73 Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
note: Officer assisting who is not a police officer must not take part in ordinary search or frisk search of a person under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(2) Conduct of ordinary searches and frisk searches
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Announcement before entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74
has part: 74(1) Announcement before entry
has part: 74(2) Announcement before entry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95

74(1) Announcement before entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-1
part of: 74 Announcement before entry
note: Police officer must announce before entering premises under warrant or to arrest person.
description: Announcement and opportunity for entry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(1) Announcement before entry
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must announce before entering premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(2) Announcement before entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-2
part of: 74 Announcement before entry
note: Police officer not required to comply with subsection (1) under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(2) Announcement before entry
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excusal
logic summary: Excusal of duty
premise text: (2) A police officer is not required to comply with subsection (1)
conclusion text: if he or she believes on reasonable grounds...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to deviate from duty
premise text: (2) A police officer is not required to comply with subsection (1)
conclusion text: ...if he or she believes on reasonable grounds...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between conditions
premise text: (a) the safety of a person (including the police officer); or
conclusion text: ...or that the effective execution of the warrant or the arrest is not frustrated.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between conditions
premise text: (a) the safety of a person (including the police officer); or
conclusion text: ...or that the effective execution of the warrant or the arrest is not frustrated.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-74-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of conditions to other agents
premise text: (a) the safety of a person (including the police officer); or
conclusion text: ...or that the effective execution of the warrant or the arrest is not frustrated.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

75 Offence for making false statements in warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75
note: Making false statements in warrant applications is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.95
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-75-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-75-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-75-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 75 Offence for making false statements in warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements in warrant applications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Offences relating to telephone warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76
note: Prohibits certain actions related to telephone warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-76-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-76-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-76-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 76 Offences relating to telephone warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Retention of things seized
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77
has part: 77(1) Retention of things seized
has part: 77(2) Retention of things seized
has part: 77(3) Retention of things seized
has part: 77(4) Retention of things seized
has part: 77(5) Retention of things seized
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96

77(1) Retention of things seized
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-1
part of: 77 Retention of things seized
note: Police officer must deliver seized thing to Commissioner of Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(1) Retention of things seized
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: Police officer seizes a thing
conclusion text: Must deliver to Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(2) Retention of things seized
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-2
part of: 77 Retention of things seized
note: The Commissioner must inform and retain a thing pending the Attorney-General's direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(2) Retention of things seized
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner must perform an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(3) Retention of things seized
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-3
part of: 77 Retention of things seized
note: The Attorney-General may give the Commissioner a direction on how to deal with a thing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-3-norm

77(4) Retention of things seized
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-4
part of: 77 Retention of things seized
note: The Commissioner must send a thing to a Tribunal upon direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner must send the thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(5) Retention of things seized
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77-ss-5
part of: 77 Retention of things seized
note: Return seized thing if reason for seizure no longer exists or thing is not needed in evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.96
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77(5) Retention of things seized
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must return seized thing
premise text: Reason for seizure no longer exists or thing is not needed in evidence.
conclusion text: Return the thing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Return seized thing if reason for seizure no longer exists or thing is not needed in evidence
premise text: The Attorney-General must direct the Commissioner to return the thing
conclusion text: If the time period of the reason for seizure has passed, the thing must be returned
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Return seized thing if reason for seizure no longer exists or thing is not needed in evidence
premise text: The Attorney-General must direct the Commissioner to return the thing
conclusion text: If the condition is met, the thing must be returned until it's no longer needed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Thing can be forfeited or forfeitable if reason for seizure still exists
premise text: Unless the thing is forfeited or forfeitable to the Commonwealth or is the subject of a dispute as to ownership.
conclusion text: The thing can be forfeited or forfeitable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-77-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Thing must not be used in evidence by a Tribunal or in respect of criminal proceedings in Australia if reason for seizure no longer exists
premise text: It is decided that the thing is not to be used in evidence by a Tribunal or in respect of criminal proceedings in Australia.
conclusion text: The thing must not be used in evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Arrest of persons escaping from custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78
has part: 78(1) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
has part: 78(2) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
has part: 78(3) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98

78(1) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Arrest of persons escaping from custody
note: Police officer may arrest person without warrant if reasonable grounds to believe escaped from custody.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(1) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by police officer
premise text: Police officer has reasonable grounds to believe person escaped from custody.
conclusion text: Person may be arrested without warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: reasonable grounds
logic summary: Belief of police officer is sufficient for arrest
premise text: Police officer believes person escaped from custody.
conclusion text: Arrest is justified by belief.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: without warrant
logic summary: Arrest without warrant is a traceable event
premise text: Police officer arrests person without warrant.
conclusion text: Arrest without warrant is a traceable event.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if
logic summary: Arrest is conditional on reasonable grounds
premise text: Police officer has reasonable grounds to believe person escaped from custody.
conclusion text: Arrest is justified if reasonable grounds exist.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: escaped from custody
logic summary: Temporal interval of escape from custody relevant to arrest
premise text: Person escaped from custody.
conclusion text: Arrest is timed by escape from custody.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(2) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Arrest of persons escaping from custody
note: Police officer must take person before magistrate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(2) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: Police officer must take person before magistrate.
conclusion text: The police officer has a duty to take the person before a magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Temporal relationship
premise text: The police officer must take the person before a magistrate as soon as practicable.
conclusion text: The taking of the person before a magistrate occurs before the person is taken into custody.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Inference
premise text: If the police officer takes the person before a magistrate, then the person will be brought to justice.
conclusion text: The police officer taking the person before a magistrate implies that the person will be brought to justice.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Inference
premise text: If the police officer takes the person before a magistrate, then the news of the arrest spreads to others.
conclusion text: The taking of the person before a magistrate spreads to other authorities and officials.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Expertise
premise text: The police officer must take the person before a magistrate because it requires expertise in law enforcement.
conclusion text: The taking of the person before a magistrate requires expertise in law enforcement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(3) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-3
part of: 78 Arrest of persons escaping from custody
note: Magistrate may issue warrant for police officer to return escaped person to custody.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(3) Arrest of persons escaping from custody
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by magistrate.
premise text: Magistrate satisfied person has escaped custody.
conclusion text: Warrant issued for police officer to return person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Arrest of person released on bail
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79
has part: 79(1) Arrest of person released on bail
has part: 79(2) Arrest of person released on bail
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98

79(1) Arrest of person released on bail
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79-ss-1
part of: 79 Arrest of person released on bail
note: Police officer may arrest person released on bail if reasonable grounds exist.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(1) Arrest of person released on bail
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(2) Arrest of person released on bail
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79-ss-2
part of: 79 Arrest of person released on bail
note: Must bring arrested person before court as soon as practicable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(2) Arrest of person released on bail
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to bring arrested person before court
premise text: (2) A person arrested under subsection (1)
conclusion text: must, as soon as practicable, be brought before the court by which the person was admitted to bail.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and bringing arrested person before court
premise text: (2) A person arrested under subsection (1)
conclusion text: must, as soon as practicable, be brought before the court by which the person was admitted to bail.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval between arrest and bringing arrested person before court is a necessary condition for obligation
premise text: (2) A person arrested under subsection (1)
conclusion text: must, as soon as practicable, be brought before the court by which the person was admitted to bail.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Arrested person's obligation to be brought before court is a necessary condition for diffusion of responsibility
premise text: (2) A person arrested under subsection (1)
conclusion text: must, as soon as practicable, be brought before the court by which the person was admitted to bail.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-79-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Arrested person's obligation to be brought before court is a necessary condition for CogAI's decision-making process
premise text: (2) A person arrested under subsection (1)
conclusion text: must, as soon as practicable, be brought before the court by which the person was admitted to bail.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Aiding persons to escape etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80
note: Prohibits arrest and custody under Commonwealth law for crimes committed outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.98
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-80-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Legal assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81
has part: 81(1) Legal assistance
has part: 81(2) Legal assistance
has part: 81(3) Legal assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99

81(1) Legal assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-1
part of: 81 Legal assistance
note: A person may apply for assistance from the Attorney-General in a proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(1) Legal assistance
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between a person's actions.
premise text: (a) has instituted, or proposes to institute, a proceeding before a magistrate or a court under this Act...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Claim
logic summary: Asserts the applicability of the provision.
premise text: (a) has instituted, or proposes to institute, a proceeding before a magistrate or a court under this Act...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
logic summary: Describes the impact of the provision on others.
premise text: (a) has instituted, or proposes to institute, a proceeding before a magistrate or a court under this Act...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Identifies the provision's relevance.
premise text: (a) has instituted, or proposes to institute, a proceeding before a magistrate or a court under this Act...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(2) Legal assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-2
part of: 81 Legal assistance
note: Authority for Attorney-General to grant legal or financial assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(2) Legal assistance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (2) If the Attorney-General is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General may authorise provision by the Commonwealth...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(3) Legal assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-3
part of: 81 Legal assistance
note: Conditions for granting legal assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-3-norm

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-81-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(3) Legal assistance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

82 Arrangements with States
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82
has part: 82(1) Arrangements with States
has part: 82(2) Arrangements with States
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99

82(1) Arrangements with States
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-1
part of: 82 Arrangements with States
note: Governor-General may make arrangements with Governor of a State regarding administration of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-82-ss-1-norm

82(2) Arrangements with States
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-2
part of: 82 Arrangements with States
note: Governor-General may arrange with Governor of a State for variation or revocation of arrangement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.99
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-82-ss-2-norm

83 Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83
note: Attorney-General may delegate powers under this Act to an officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.100
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-ltl-3
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-cogai-5

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83 Delegation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: delegate
logic summary: Attorney-General delegates power
premise text: The Attorney-General may delegate to an officer of the Attorney-General’s Department all or any of his or her powers under this Act.
conclusion text: An officer is authorized to act on behalf of the Attorney-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for delegation
premise text: The Attorney-General may delegate to an officer of the Attorney-General’s Department all or any of his or her powers under this Act, other than:
conclusion text: Delegation occurs during the Attorney-General's term.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval for delegation
premise text: The Attorney-General may delegate to an officer of the Attorney-General’s Department all or any of his or her powers under this Act, other than:
conclusion text: Delegation ends when the Attorney-General's term ends.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Delegation diffusion
premise text: The Attorney-General may delegate to an officer of the Attorney-General’s Department all or any of his or her powers under this Act, other than:
conclusion text: Delegation is diffused through the Attorney-General's department.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-83-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
logic summary: Delegation classification
premise text: The Attorney-General may delegate to an officer of the Attorney-General’s Department all or any of his or her powers under this Act, other than:
conclusion text: Delegation is a cognitive process.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Act not to limit other provision of assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84
note: Provision of assistance under other laws is allowed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.100
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-84-norm

85 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85
note: Governor-General may make regulations not inconsistent with this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.101
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-85-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-85-logic-descriptionlogic-2

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Governor-General has the power to make regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-85-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: HasPart
logic summary: Regulations are part of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-2
note: Conditional commencement and amendment provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-2-norm

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2
note: References s 4(1), (2) and sch 33.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-6-2-norm

24 May 2001 (s 2(1)(a))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-2
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-24-2-norm

11 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2
note: Conditional commencement of sch 2 (items 1-5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-11-2-norm

3 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: Conditional commencement of statute law revision act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-3-2-norm

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-2
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-2-norm

2 Mar 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Legislation history note for International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.105
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-2-2-norm

25 July
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-2
note: List of items in Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-2-norm

25 July 2011 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-3
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-25-3-norm

5 Dec 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-2-norm

1 Jan 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Amendment by Statute Law Revision Act 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1-2-norm

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-2
note: Conditional commencement of statute law revision act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-2-norm

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-3
note: Mandatory date for commencement of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-3-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-3-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Equality operator
premise text: The date is specified as mandatory
conclusion text: A duty to comply with the Act on this date exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-3
note: Classifies items 7-15 of Schedule 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-3-norm

29 June 2013 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-3
note: Amendment by Crimes Legislation Amendment (International Crime Cooperation and Other Measures) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-29-3-norm

22 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-4
note: Granting permission for items 5 and 6 in Schedule 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-4-norm

23 May 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-3
note: Legislation history for International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.106
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-3-norm

27 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-2
note: Conditional commencement of legislation amendment act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-27-2-norm

26 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-2
note: May
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-26-2-norm

1 July 2016 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
note: Part of chapter 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-1-3-norm

18 June 2015 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-2
note: Amendment of Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-18-2-norm

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-4
note: Prohibition on Acts and Instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits acts and instruments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2
note: Conditional commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Northern Territory Local Court) Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-10-2-norm

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-5
note: May 2016 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-5-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-5-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-23-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-5-norm

22 Nov 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-6
note: Reference to International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.107
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-22-6-norm

8 Dec 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-2
note: Mandatory commencement of Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (New South Wales Local Court) Act 2026
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.108
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Mar 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.108
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-5-3-norm

28 Mar 2026 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-4
note: Amendment history for International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995
references: sec-28-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995.pdf, p.108
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-4-norm
asserts: international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-4-logic-deontic-1

international-war-crimes-tribunals-act-1995-sec-28-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes amendment history
premise text: Amendment history
conclusion text: Provision classified as Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed