1 Short title
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
note: Table of sections
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 January 2010
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
note: References F2009L02563
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 July 2009 (see
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 January 2010
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.143
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-5
schema version: 2

1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1(2) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
has part: 1(3) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
has part: 1(4) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
has part: 1(5) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
has part: 1(6) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
has part: 1(7) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6
schema version: 2

1(2) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: A State is a referring State even if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the State's referral law provides that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval for the referral law
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
premise text: July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A State is a referring State even if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the relationship between the referral law and the Parliament of the Commonwealth
modality: Deontic
operator: <=>
premise text: the State's referral law provides that particular matters, or all matters, relating to State public sector employees, or State public sector employers, of the State are not included in any or all of the matters covered by subsections (3), (4) and (5)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A State is a referring State even if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the relationship between the referral law and the Parliament of the Commonwealth
modality: LTL
operator: <=>
premise text: the State's referral law provides that the reference to the Parliament of the Commonwealth of any or all of the matters covered by subsections (3), (4) and (5) is to terminate in particular circumstances

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(2) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters

1(3) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: Amending this Act to include referred provisions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters

1(4) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: Express amendments of this Act to cover referred subject matters
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters

1(5) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: Transition from Workplace Relations Act 1996 and State laws to this Act
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters

1(6) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: A State ceases to be a referring State under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the termination of a State's initial, amendment, or transition references.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Termination
premise text: (b) the State’s amendment reference terminates, and neither of subsections (7) and (8) apply to the termination;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits a State from being a referring State under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (6) Despite anything to the contrary in a referral law of a State, a State ceases to be a referring State if any or all of the following occurs:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the termination of a State's transition reference.
modality: LTL
operator: Termination
premise text: (c) the State’s transition reference terminates.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(6) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters

1(7) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: A State does not cease to be a referring State under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(7) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters

10 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

100 Paid personal/carer’s leave must not be cashed out except in
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
note: Paid personal/carer’s leave cannot be cashed out except in accordance with permitted terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-100-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-100-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-100
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-100-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cashing out paid personal/carer’s leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-100-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100 Paid personal/carer’s leave must not be cashed out except in

101 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
curation status: Proposed
has part: 101(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
has part: 101(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101
schema version: 2

101(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
note: Employer may include terms for cashing out paid personal/carer’s leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 101 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer obligation to include terms
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 101(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms

101(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
description: Separate written agreement between employer and employee for each cashing out of paid personal/carer’s leave
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
note: Paid personal/carer’s leave terms must be included in modern awards and enterprise agreements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-101-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 101 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include paid personal/carer’s leave terms in modern awards and enterprise agreements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 101(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms

102 Entitlement to unpaid carer’s leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
note: Entitlement to unpaid carer’s leave for family members or household members requiring care due to illness, injury, or emergency.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-102-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-102
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to take unpaid carer’s leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

103 Taking unpaid carer’s leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
curation status: Proposed
has part: 103(1) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
has part: 103(2) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
has part: 103(3) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103
schema version: 2

103(1) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
note: An employee may take unpaid carer’s leave for a particular permissible occasion.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 103 Taking unpaid carer’s leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to take unpaid carer’s leave
modality: Deontic
operator: May

103(2) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
note: Employee may take unpaid carer’s leave for a particular occasion.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 103 Taking unpaid carer’s leave

103(3) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
note: Cannot take unpaid carer’s leave during a particular period if paid personal/carer’s leave is available.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-103-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 103 Taking unpaid carer’s leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot take unpaid carer’s leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of taking unpaid carer’s leave
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Employee can take paid personal/carer’s leave

104 Entitlement to compassionate leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
note: Entitlement to compassionate leave for specified family and personal circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-104-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-104
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to take compassionate leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

105 Taking compassionate leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
curation status: Proposed
has part: 105(1) Taking compassionate leave
has part: 105(2) Taking compassionate leave
has part: 105(3) Taking compassionate leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105
schema version: 2

105(1) Taking compassionate leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
note: Employee may take compassionate leave for a particular occasion.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Taking compassionate leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to take compassionate leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

105(2) Taking compassionate leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
note: Employee may take compassionate leave for a particular occasion.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Taking compassionate leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105(2) Taking compassionate leave

105(3) Taking compassionate leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
note: Employee may take compassionate leave at any time while illness or injury persists.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-105-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 105 Taking compassionate leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

106 Payment for compassionate leave (other than for casual
type: Concept
description: Payment
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
note: Employer must pay employee at base rate for compassionate leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide payment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106 Payment for compassionate leave (other than for casual

106A Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
curation status: Proposed
has part: 106A(1) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106A(2) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106A(3) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106A(4) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106a
schema version: 2

106A(1) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
note: Employee entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 106A Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...10 days of paid family and domestic violence leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: An employee is entitled to...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 106A(1) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave

106A(2) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
note: Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 106A Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has right to paid family and domestic violence leave
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 106A(2) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave

106A(3) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
note: Employee's employment start date with a particular employer is determined.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 106A Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employment start date determination
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106A(3) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave

106A(4) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
note: Employee entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 106A Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

106B Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
curation status: Proposed
has part: 106B(1) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106B(2) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106B(3) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106b
schema version: 2

106B(1) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
note: Employee has an obligation to take paid family and domestic violence leave under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 106B Taking paid family and domestic violence leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee's leave must occur during their work hours.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employee must take leave during work hours.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: It is impractical for the employee to do that thing outside the employee’s work hours.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee must take paid family and domestic violence leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: The employee needs to do something to deal with the impact of family and domestic violence.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer must comply with the notice and evidence requirements of section 107.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply with notice and evidence requirements of section 107.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: The notice and evidence requirements of section 107 must be complied with.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer must provide a safe work environment for the employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide a safe work environment.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Examples of actions, by an employee who is experiencing family and domestic violence, that could be covered by paragraph (b) include...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee must take paid family and domestic violence leave every time they need to deal with family and domestic violence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employee must take leave every time they need to deal with family and domestic violence.
modality: LTL
operator: every
premise text: The employee needs to do something to deal with the impact of family and domestic violence.

106B(2) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
note: Family and domestic violence is defined as violent, threatening or abusive behavior by a close relative, household member, or intimate partner.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 106B Taking paid family and domestic violence leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a violent, threatening or abusive behavior.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of family and domestic violence is a deontic obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Family and domestic violence is defined as...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106B(2) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave

106B(3) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
note: Defines a close relative for paid family and domestic violence leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 106B Taking paid family and domestic violence leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106B(3) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave

106BA Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
curation status: Proposed
has part: 106BA(1) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106BA(2) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106BA(3) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106ba
schema version: 2

106BA(1) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
note: Employer must pay employee at full rate of pay during paid family and domestic violence leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106ba-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 106BA Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must pay employee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

106BA(2) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
note: An employee is taken to have been rostered to work hours if they accept an offer by the employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106ba-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 106BA Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is rostered
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's obligation to roster employee
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Employee accepts offer

106BA(3) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
note: Employer not required to pay employee for unpaid hours during paid family and domestic violence leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106ba-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 106BA Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents employer from paying employee for unpaid hours.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106BA(3) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave

106C Confidentiality
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
curation status: Proposed
has part: 106C(1) Confidentiality
has part: 106C(2) Confidentiality
has part: 106C(3) Confidentiality
has part: 106C(4) Confidentiality
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106c
schema version: 2

106C(1) Confidentiality
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
note: Employers must take steps to ensure employee confidentiality.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 106C Confidentiality

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers have a duty to maintain confidentiality.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

106C(2) Confidentiality
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
note: Employer must not use employee information for purposes other than leave entitlement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 106C Confidentiality

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An employer must not use such information for a purpose other than satisfying itself in relation to the employee’s entitlement to leave under this Subdivision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using employee information for unauthorized purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Employer must not use such information for a purpose other than satisfying itself in relation to the employee’s entitlement to leave under this Subdivision.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An employer must not use such information to take adverse action against an employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of taking adverse action against an employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: In particular, an employer must not use such information to take adverse action against an employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An employer must not use such information for a purpose other than satisfying itself in relation to the employee’s entitlement to leave under this Subdivision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using confidential information for purposes other than leave entitlement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) An employer must not, other than with the consent of the employee, use such information for a purpose other than satisfying itself in relation to the employee’s entitlement to leave under this Subdivision.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106C(2) Confidentiality

106C(3) Confidentiality
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
note: Conditional effect of subsection (2)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 106C Confidentiality

106C(4) Confidentiality
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
note: Employer may deal with employee information if required
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 106C Confidentiality

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer may deal with employee information if required
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to deal with employee information
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Nothing prevents an employer from doing so

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106C(4) Confidentiality

106D Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
curation status: Proposed
has part: 106D(1) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
has part: 106D(2) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
has part: 106D(3) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106d
schema version: 2

106D(1) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: Leave for victims of crime is not excluded by this Subdivision.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 106D Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106D(1) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and

106D(2) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: If an employee is entitled to leave under another law, that law applies in addition.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 106D Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106D(2) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and

106D(3) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: A national system employee is entitled to leave under this Subdivision only to the extent that the leave would not constitute leave for victims of crime.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 106D Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A person has an entitlement to leave under this Subdivision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Entitlement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106D(3) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and

106E Entitlement to days of leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: Defines what constitutes a day of leave for purposes of the Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-106e
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 106E Entitlement to days of leave

107 Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
curation status: Proposed
has part: 107(1) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 107(2) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 107(3) Notice and evidence requirements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107
schema version: 2

107(1) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
note: Employee must give notice of leave taking under this Division.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 107 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 107(1) Notice and evidence requirements

107(2) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
description: Notice and evidence
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
note: Notice must be given to employer within a specified period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 107 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

107(3) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
note: Provide evidence of leave reason upon request
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-107-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 107 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Leave reason falls within a specific time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) if it is paid personal/carer’s leave—the leave is taken for a reason specified in section 97; or (b) if it is unpaid carer’s leave—the leave is taken for a permissible occasion in circumstances specified in subsection 103(1); or (c) if it is compassionate leave—the leave is taken for a permissible occasion in circumstances specified in subsection 105(1); or (d) if it is paid family and domestic violence leave, and the employee has met the requirement specified in paragraph 106B(1)(a)—the leave is taken for the purpose specified in paragraph 106B(1)(b), and the requirement specified in paragraph 106B(1)(c) is met.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence upon request
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) An employee who has given his or her employer notice of the taking of leave under this Division must, if required by the employer, give the employer evidence that would satisfy a reasonable person...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Leave reason has a specific temporal relationship
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) if it is paid personal/carer’s leave—the leave is taken for a reason specified in section 97; or (b) if it is unpaid carer’s leave—the leave is taken for a permissible occasion in circumstances specified in subsection 103(1); or (c) if it is compassionate leave—the leave is taken for a permissible occasion in circumstances specified in subsection 105(1); or (d) if it is paid family and domestic violence leave, and the employee has met the requirement specified in paragraph 106B(1)(a)—the leave is taken for the purpose specified in paragraph 106B(1)(b), and the requirement specified in paragraph 106B(1)(c) is met.

108 Entitlement to be absent from employment for engaging in
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: Eligible community service activity entitlement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-108-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-108
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to be absent from employment for eligible community service activity
modality: Deontic
operator: has

109 Meaning of eligible community service activity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
curation status: Proposed
has part: 109(1) Meaning of eligible community service activity
has part: 109(2) Meaning of eligible community service activity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109
schema version: 2

109(1) Meaning of eligible community service activity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: Eligible community service activities
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 109 Meaning of eligible community service activity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 109(1) Meaning of eligible community service activity

109(2) Meaning of eligible community service activity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: Employee must engage in voluntary emergency management activity
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-109-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 109 Meaning of eligible community service activity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide voluntary emergency management activity
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 109(2) Meaning of eligible community service activity

11 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-11-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

110 Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
curation status: Proposed
has part: 110(1) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 110(2) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 110(3) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 110(4) Notice and evidence requirements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110
schema version: 2

110(1) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
note: Employee must provide notice of absence before it is covered by the Division.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(1) Notice and evidence requirements

110(2) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
note: Notice must be given to employer as soon as practicable and advise of absence period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

110(3) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
note: Employee must provide evidence of community service activity upon request.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between absence and community service activity
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(3) Notice and evidence requirements

110(4) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
note: Employee must comply with section for absence to be covered by the Division.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-110-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 110 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with section for absence to be covered by the Division.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110(4) Notice and evidence requirements

111 Payment to employees (other than casuals) on jury service
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
note: Payment to employees on jury service is mandatory.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-111-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-111-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-111
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-111-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory payment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-111-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 111 Payment to employees (other than casuals) on jury service

112 State and Territory laws that are not excluded
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
note: Exclusion of State and Territory laws not applying to employee entitlements
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-112-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-112
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the exclusion of laws
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of laws
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: This Act is not intended to apply

113 Entitlement to long service leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
curation status: Proposed
has part: 113(1) Entitlement to long service leave
has part: 113(2) Entitlement to long service leave
has part: 113(3) Entitlement to long service leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113
schema version: 2

113(1) Entitlement to long service leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: Entitlement to long service leave based on applicable award-derived terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Entitlement to long service leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is entitled to long service leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has entitlement to long service leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Applicable award-derived terms exist.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(1) Entitlement to long service leave

113(2) Entitlement to long service leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain agreements or instruments that deal with long service leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Entitlement to long service leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates that subsection (1) does not apply to the employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: !

113(3) Entitlement to long service leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: Applicable award-derived long service leave terms for an employee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 113 Entitlement to long service leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable award-derived long service leave terms
modality: Deontic
operator: applicable

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113(3) Entitlement to long service leave

113A Enterprise agreements may contain terms discounting service
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
note: Enterprise agreements may contain terms discounting service under prior agreements in certain circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-113a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Certain instruments that came into effect before this Part's commencement overlap with its commencement.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The commencement of this Part overlaps with the operation of certain instruments that came into effect before its commencement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: This Part commences after a certain date.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Terms discounting service may be contained in enterprise agreements.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an enterprise agreement applies, then it may contain terms discounting service.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Enterprise agreements apply.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Workplace agreements also operate.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The operation of enterprise agreements overlaps with the operation of workplace agreements.
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps
premise text: Enterprise agreements operate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 113A Enterprise agreements may contain terms discounting service

114 Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
curation status: Proposed
has part: 114(1) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
has part: 114(2) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
has part: 114(3) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
has part: 114(4) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-114
schema version: 2

114(1) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: Employee entitlement to be absent on public holiday
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-114-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 114 Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has right to absence
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 114(1) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday

114(2) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: An employer may request an employee to work on a public holiday if the request is reasonable.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-114-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 114 Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee may work
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to work on a public holiday
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Employer requests

114(3) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: Employee may refuse request to work on public holiday if unreasonable.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-114-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 114 Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to refuse
modality: Deontic
operator: May

114(4) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: Employer must consider employee's personal circumstances when determining reasonableness of request to work on public holiday.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-114-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 114 Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employer's request for work on public holiday may overlap with employee's family responsibilities.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the employee’s personal circumstances, including family responsibilities...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to consider employee's personal circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) In determining whether a request, or a refusal of a request, to work on a public holiday is reasonable...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer may request work on public holiday if employee is not entitled to overtime payments.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (c) whether the employee could reasonably expect that the employer might request work on the public holiday...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to consider type of employment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (e) the type of employment of the employee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Employer's workplace or enterprise and employee's personal circumstances are relevant factors.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (a) the nature of the employer’s workplace or enterprise...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employer may request work on public holiday if employee is entitled to overtime payments.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (d) whether the employee is entitled to receive overtime payments...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 114(4) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday

115 Meaning of public holiday
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
curation status: Proposed
has part: 115(1) Meaning of public holiday
has part: 115(2) Meaning of public holiday
has part: 115(3) Meaning of public holiday
has part: 115(4) Meaning of public holiday
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115
schema version: 2

115(1) Meaning of public holiday
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: List of public holidays
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Meaning of public holiday

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes specific days and types of days as public holidays
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) each of these days:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes specific types of days excluded from counting as public holidays
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: other than a day or part-day, or a kind of day or part-day, that is excluded by the regulations from counting as a public holiday

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes substituted public holidays under State or Territory laws
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Substituted public holidays under State or Territory laws

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclasses other days or part-days declared by law as public holidays
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: (b) any other day, or part-day, declared or prescribed by or under a law of a State or Territory to be observed generally within the State or Territory, or a region of the State or Territory, as a public holiday

115(2) Meaning of public holiday
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: Substituted day or part-day is the public holiday.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Meaning of public holiday

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 115(2) Meaning of public holiday

115(3) Meaning of public holiday
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: Allowing substitution of public holidays for award/agreement free employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Meaning of public holiday

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of substituted public holidays for award/agreement free employees
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

115(4) Meaning of public holiday
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: Employer and employee may agree on substitution of a day or part-day for a public holiday.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-115-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 115 Meaning of public holiday

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 115(4) Meaning of public holiday

116 Payment for absence on public holiday
type: Concept
description: Payment
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.273
note: Employer must pay employee at base rate for ordinary hours worked on public holiday.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must pay employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

116A Division does not apply to certain employees or employers in
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274
note: Division does not apply to certain employees or employers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116A Division does not apply to certain employees or employers in

116B Employer’s obligation to make superannuation contributions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274
note: Employer must make superannuation contributions for employee's benefit.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116b
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to make superannuation contributions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116B Employer’s obligation to make superannuation contributions

116C Reduction of employer’s liability to the extent of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274
note: Reduction of employer's liability for superannuation charge payments
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116c
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reduction of employer's liability
modality: Deontic
operator: !

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116C Reduction of employer’s liability to the extent of

116D Preventing multiple actions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
curation status: Proposed
has part: 116D(1) Preventing multiple actions
has part: 116D(2) Preventing multiple actions
has part: 116D(3) Preventing multiple actions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116d
schema version: 2

116D(1) Preventing multiple actions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
note: No application for orders in certain circumstances
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 116D Preventing multiple actions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restricts time frame for applications
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
premise text: (b) the contravention, or alleged contravention, relates wholly or partly to an employee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents applications
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) This section applies if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads restrictions across related situations
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: No application for orders in certain circumstances

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a recurring pattern of restrictions
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (c) the employee or another person referred to in an item in column 2 of the table...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116D(1) Preventing multiple actions

116D(2) Preventing multiple actions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
note: Preventing multiple actions: cannot make application if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 116D Preventing multiple actions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Proceedings have not been finally disposed of and Commissioner has not discontinued them.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Proceedings have not been finally disposed of and Commissioner has not discontinued the proceedings.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot make application if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Commissioner of Taxation has commenced proceedings against the employer to recover an amount of superannuation guarantee charge

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Employer's superannuation guarantee shortfall includes individual superannuation guarantee shortfall for the employee.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: The employer’s superannuation guarantee shortfall in respect of which the charge is imposed includes an individual superannuation guarantee shortfall for the employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Commissioner has obtained an order for recovery of the charge.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: The Commissioner has obtained an order for recovery of the charge.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116D(2) Preventing multiple actions

116D(3) Preventing multiple actions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
note: Terms defined in another Act have the same meaning here.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 116D Preventing multiple actions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Terms defined in another Act have the same meaning here.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

116E Orders for compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.276
curation status: Proposed
has part: 116E(1) Orders for compensation
has part: 116E(2) Orders for compensation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116e
schema version: 2

116E(1) Orders for compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.276
note: Court order for compensation if a civil remedy provision is contravened
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 116E Orders for compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 at some point in time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: This section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 awarding compensation to an employee for a contravention of a civil remedy provision that relates to a contravention of this Division.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 at some point in time
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: This section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 awarding compensation to an employee for a contravention of a civil remedy provision that relates to a contravention of this Division.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court order for compensation if a civil remedy provision is contravened
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 at some point in time
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: This section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 awarding compensation to an employee for a contravention of a civil remedy provision that relates to a contravention of this Division.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 at some point in time
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: This section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 awarding compensation to an employee for a contravention of a civil remedy provision that relates to a contravention of this Division.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116E(1) Orders for compensation

116E(2) Orders for compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.276
note: Court must consider paying compensation to a superannuation fund for the benefit of the employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-116e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 116E Orders for compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must consider paying compensation to a superannuation fund for the benefit of the employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116E(2) Orders for compensation

117 Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
curation status: Proposed
has part: 117(1) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
has part: 117(2) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
has part: 117(3) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-117
schema version: 2

117(1) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
type: Concept
description: Written notice of termination day
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: Employer must not terminate employee's employment without written notice.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-117-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 117 Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on terminating employment without written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117(1) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu

117(2) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
type: Concept
description: True
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: Employer must provide notice of termination or payment in lieu.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-117-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 117 Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117(2) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu

117(3) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: Minimum period of notice for termination or payment in lieu
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-117-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 117 Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires minimum period of notice
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117(3) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu

118 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Employees must give notice of termination before leaving employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-118-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-118
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-118-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for

119 Redundancy pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
curation status: Proposed
has part: 119(1) Redundancy pay
has part: 119(2) Redundancy pay
has part: 119(3) Redundancy pay
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119
schema version: 2

119(1) Redundancy pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Entitlement to redundancy pay upon termination of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Redundancy pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Redundancy pay entitlement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to provide redundancy pay
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Section 119(1)

119(2) Redundancy pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Redundancy pay calculation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Redundancy pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 11 weeks
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Greater than
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
premise text: At least 1 year but less than 2 years 4 weeks

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the total amount payable to the employee for...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Equals
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The amount of the redundancy pay equals...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119(2) Redundancy pay

119(3) Redundancy pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Employment as a casual employee is excluded from continuous service.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-119-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 119 Redundancy pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employment as a casual employee is not included in this definition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval exclusion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: not includes
premise text: The section defines continuous service with the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employment as a casual employee is excluded from continuous service.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 119(3) Redundancy pay

12 The Dictionary
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.41
note: Defines terms for affected employees and employers in enterprise agreements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 The Dictionary

120 Variation of redundancy pay for other employment or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
note: Variation of redundancy pay for other employment or incapacity to pay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-120-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-120
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-120-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 120 Variation of redundancy pay for other employment or

121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
curation status: Proposed
has part: 121(1) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
has part: 121(2) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
has part: 121(3) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
has part: 121(4) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
has part: 121(5) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
has part: 121(6) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121
schema version: 2

121(1) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Exemptions from redundancy pay obligation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121(1) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay

121(2) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay

121(3) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121(3) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay

121(4) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Entitlement to redundancy pay under certain conditions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entitlement to redundancy pay
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has a right to redundancy pay
modality: Deontic
operator: Entails
premise text: Employment termination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121(4) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay

121(5) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Exemptions from paying redundancy pay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts members' voluntary winding up from paying redundancy pay
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121(5) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay

121(6) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Exemptions from paying redundancy pay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-121-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 121(6) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay

122 Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
curation status: Proposed
has part: 122(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
has part: 122(2) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
has part: 122(3) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
has part: 122(4) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122
schema version: 2

122(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
note: Employee is not entitled to redundancy pay if service with first employer counts as service with second employer
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to redundancy pay)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with transfer of employment between non-associated entities
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) Subsection 22(5) does not apply (for the purpose of this Subdivision) to a transfer of employment between non-associated entities in relation to an employee if the second employer decides not to recognise the employee’s service with the first employer (for the purpose of this Subdivision).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to redundancy pay)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognises transfer of employment between non-associated entities as affecting the obligation to redundancy pay
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise
premise text: (1) Subsection 22(5) does not apply (for the purpose of this Subdivision) to a transfer of employment between non-associated entities in relation to an employee if the second employer decides not to recognise the employee’s service with the first employer (for the purpose of this Subdivision).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Employee is not entitled to redundancy pay if service with first employer counts as service with second employer)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits redundancy pay for employees whose service is counted with the second employer
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) Subsection 22(5) does not apply (for the purpose of this Subdivision) to a transfer of employment between non-associated entities in relation to an employee if the second employer decides not to recognise the employee’s service with the first employer (for the purpose of this Subdivision).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Employee is not entitled to redundancy pay if service with first employer counts as service with second employer)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses prohibition on redundancy pay for employees whose service is counted with the second employer
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (1) Subsection 22(5) does not apply (for the purpose of this Subdivision) to a transfer of employment between non-associated entities in relation to an employee if the second employer decides not to recognise the employee’s service with the first employer (for the purpose of this Subdivision).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to redundancy pay)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for transfer of employment between non-associated entities
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (1) Subsection 22(5) does not apply (for the purpose of this Subdivision) to a transfer of employment between non-associated entities in relation to an employee if the second employer decides not to recognise the employee’s service with the first employer (for the purpose of this Subdivision).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to

122(2) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
note: Employee not entitled to redundancy pay if refuses employment in certain circumstances
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to redundancy pay
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employee from receiving redundancy pay
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Subsection 22(5) applies to transfer of employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee must accept employment offer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employee from refusing employment in certain circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Subsection 22(5) applies to transfer of employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to redundancy pay
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of transfer of employment
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: Subsection 22(5) provides that service with the first employer counts as service with the second employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(2) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to

122(3) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
note: Employee not entitled to redundancy pay if they reject a better offer from another employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee's employment period overlaps with the redundancy pay period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with the employee's employment period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Employee's employment with the first employer ends on a specific date.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee's service is recognized.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the employee's service with the first employer.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: Employer recognizes the employee's service.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No redundancy pay is due.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits redundancy pay for employees who reject a better offer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employee rejects an offer of employment from another employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information is diffused to all relevant parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the information about the employee's situation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: Employer notifies the employee of their redundancy pay entitlement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee's employment history is a recurring trace.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of the employee's employment history.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Employee has worked for multiple employers.

122(4) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
note: First employer must pay employee a specified amount of redundancy pay.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-122-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay redundancy pay
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(4) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to

123 Limits on scope of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
note: Employees not covered by this Division
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-123-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-123
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-123-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 123 Limits on scope of this Division

124 Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
curation status: Proposed
has part: 124(1) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
has part: 124(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
has part: 124(3) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
has part: 124(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-124
schema version: 2

124(1) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: Fair Work Ombudsman must prepare and publish Fair Work Information Statement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-124-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 124(1) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work

124(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: Must contain specific information about employment standards and regulations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-124-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 124(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work

124(3) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must prepare and publish the Fair Work Information Statement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-124-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 124(3) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work

124(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: Employers must provide employees with a certain form of the Statement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-124-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing the Statement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) The regulations may prescribe other matters relating to the content or form of the Statement, or the manner in which employers may give the Statement to employees.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence involved in providing the Statement.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) The regulations may prescribe other matters relating to the content or form of the Statement, or the manner in which employers may give the Statement to employees.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must provide employees with a certain form of the Statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about the Statement.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) The regulations may prescribe other matters relating to the content or form of the Statement, or the manner in which employers may give the Statement to employees.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing the Statement.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) The regulations may prescribe other matters relating to the content or form of the Statement, or the manner in which employers may give the Statement to employees.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 124(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work

125 Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
curation status: Proposed
has part: 125(1) Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
has part: 125(2) Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125
schema version: 2

125(1) Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: Employer must provide Fair Work Information Statement to employee before or after employment starts.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 125 Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide Fair Work Information Statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125(2) Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: No requirement to provide Fair Work Information Statement more than once in 12 months.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 125 Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement

125A Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287
curation status: Proposed
has part: 125A(1) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
has part: 125A(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
has part: 125A(3) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
has part: 125A(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125a
schema version: 2

125A(1) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287
note: Prepare and publish Casual Employment Information Statement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 125A Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must prepare and publish statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125A(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287
note: Employer must provide information about casual employment to the Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 125A Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 125A(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual

125A(3) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287
note: The Casual Employment Information Statement must be prepared and published.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 125A Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare and publish the Casual Employment Information Statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125A(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287
note: Employers must provide employees with a Statement in the prescribed form.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 125A Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must provide employees with a Statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 125A(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual

125B Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
curation status: Proposed
has part: 125B(1) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
has part: 125B(2) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
has part: 125B(3) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125b
schema version: 2

125B(1) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
note: Employer must provide Casual Employment Information Statement to casual employee at specified times.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 125B Giving employees the Casual Employment Information

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide Casual Employment Information Statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125B(2) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
note: Employer must provide casual employment information to employees under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 125B Giving employees the Casual Employment Information

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to provide casual employment information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 125B(2) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information

125B(3) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
note: Employer does not need to provide the Statement more than once in a 12-month period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-125b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 125B Giving employees the Casual Employment Information

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation to provide the Statement more than once in a 12-month period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 125B(3) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information

126 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
note: School-based apprentices and trainees must be paid loadings in lieu of certain leave types.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-126-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-126
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be paid loadings in lieu of certain leave types.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-126-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for

127 Regulations about what modern awards and enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
note: Permits modern awards or enterprise agreements to include terms contrary to this Part.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-127-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-127-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-127
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-127-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows modern awards or enterprise agreements to include terms contrary to this Part.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-127-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 127 Regulations about what modern awards and enterprise

128 Relationship between National Employment Standards and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Permits agreements between employer and award/agreement free employee that is expressly permitted by regulations made for the purpose of section 129.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-128
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (b) an agreement between an employer and an award/agreement free employee that is expressly permitted by regulations made for the purpose of section 129.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The National Employment Standards have effect subject to: (a) an agreement between an employer and an award/agreement free employee or a requirement made by an employer of an award/agreement free employee, that is expressly permitted by a provision of this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is expressly permitted by a provision of this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies agreements between employer and award/agreement free employee as permissible
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: agreements etc. permitted by this Part for award/agreement free employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is expressly permitted by regulations made for the purpose of section 129.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies agreements between employer and award/agreement free employee as permissible
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: agreements etc. permitted by this Part for award/agreement free employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (b) an agreement between an employer and an award/agreement free employee that is expressly permitted by regulations made for the purpose of section 129.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Traces agreements between employer and award/agreement free employee
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: The National Employment Standards have effect subject to: (a) an agreement between an employer and an award/agreement free employee or a requirement made by an employer of an award/agreement free employee, that is expressly permitted by a provision of this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128 Relationship between National Employment Standards and

129 Regulations about what can be agreed to etc. in relation to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Allow employers and award/agreement free employees to agree on matters contrary to this Part.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-129-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-129
schema version: 2

13 Meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
note: Defines national system employee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-13-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a type of employment relationship
modality: Deontic
operator: is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13 Meaning of national system employee

130 Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
curation status: Proposed
has part: 130(1) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
has part: 130(2) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
has part: 130(3) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-130
schema version: 2

130(1) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Employee cannot take leave or accrue absence during compensation period due to personal illness or injury.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-130-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compensation period overlaps with employee's absence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between employee's absence and compensation period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Employee absent due to personal illness/injury receiving compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AI system recognizes employee's absence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of employee's absence during compensation period by AI system
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: Employee absent due to personal illness/injury receiving compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No leave/absence allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of taking leave or accrual during compensation period
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employee absent due to personal illness/injury receiving compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information diffused about employee's absence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about employee's absence during compensation period
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: Employee absent due to personal illness/injury receiving compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Recurring trace of employee's absence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of employee's absence during compensation period
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Employee absent due to personal illness/injury receiving compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 130(1) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while

130(2) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Employee may take leave during compensation period if permitted by law.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-130-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Leave overlaps with compensation period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent an employee from taking or accruing leave...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits taking leave during compensation period
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent an employee from taking or accruing leave...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 130(2) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while

130(3) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Allowance of unpaid parental leave during a compensation period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-130-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not prevent an employee from taking unpaid parental leave during a compensation period.

131 Relationship with other Commonwealth laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
note: Supplements entitlements under other Commonwealth laws
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-131-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-131
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 131 Relationship with other Commonwealth laws

132 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
note: Modern awards may set minimum terms and conditions for national system employees in particular industries or occupations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-132
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Default fund terms of modern awards are reviewed every 4 years
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The FWC must conduct 4 yearly reviews of default fund terms of modern awards
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Section 132(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Comply with modern awards
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with modern awards
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 45 of the Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Modern awards can have ancillary or supplementary terms
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Modern awards can have terms that are ancillary or supplementary to the National Employment Standards
modality: Deontic
operator: CAN
premise text: Section 132 of the Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Modern awards and National Employment Standards provide a fair and relevant minimum safety net
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must ensure that modern awards, together with the National Employment Standards, provide a fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 132(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Modern award powers can be exercised in certain circumstances
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC can exercise modern award powers in certain circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: CAN
premise text: Section 132(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132 Guide to this Part

133 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.293
note: Defines employee and employer terms
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-133-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-133-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-133
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-133-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-133-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 133 Meanings of employee and employer

134 The modern awards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
curation status: Proposed
has part: 134(1) The modern awards objective
has part: 134(2) The modern awards objective
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-134
schema version: 2

134(1) The modern awards objective
type: Concept
description: fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
note: Ensure modern awards provide a fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-134-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 134 The modern awards objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure modern awards provide a fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134(1) The modern awards objective

134(2) The modern awards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
note: The modern awards objective applies to the performance or exercise of FWC's modern award powers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-134-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 134 The modern awards objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The modern awards objective applies to the performance or exercise of FWC's modern award powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134(2) The modern awards objective

135 Special provisions relating to modern award minimum wages
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.295
note: Cannot vary modern award minimum wages except under specified conditions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation of modern award minimum wages requires FWC approval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation of modern award minimum wages
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
premise text: (a) modern award minimum wages can be varied if the FWC is satisfied that the variation is justified by work value reasons

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation of modern award minimum wages requires justification by FWC
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justification for varying modern award minimum wages
modality: Argumentation
operator: =>
premise text: (a) modern award minimum wages can be varied if the FWC is satisfied that the variation is justified by work value reasons

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Modern award minimum wages are defined in section 284 for AI systems
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Definition of modern award minimum wages in AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: For the meanings of modern award minimum wages, and setting and varying such wages, see section 284

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Modern award minimum wages can only be varied under specified conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of varying modern award minimum wages
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
premise text: (1) Modern award minimum wages cannot be varied under this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation of modern award minimum wages requires FWC approval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Relationship between FWC and variation of modern award minimum wages
modality: Diffusion
operator: <=>
premise text: (a) modern award minimum wages can be varied if the FWC is satisfied that the variation is justified by work value reasons

135A Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
curation status: Proposed
has part: 135A(1) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
has part: 135A(2) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
has part: 135A(3) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135a
schema version: 2

135A(1) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
note: Ensure that penalty rates and overtime rates are not reduced.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 135A Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensures the rate of a penalty rate or an overtime rate is not reduced.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 135A(1) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates

135A(2) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
note: Does not limit operation of other sections
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 135A Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) before section 160
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
premise text: (1) before section 144

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) does not limit the operation of section 160
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits the operation of other sections
modality: Deontic
operator: does not imply
premise text: (1) does not limit the operation of section 144

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 135A(2) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates

135A(3) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
note: No duty requires FWC to exercise powers under this Part regarding modern awards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-135a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 135A Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No duty requires FWC to exercise powers under this Part regarding modern awards.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: Nothing in subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 135A(3) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates

136 What can be included in modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
note: Terms that must be included in modern awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-136-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-136
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include terms
modality: Deontic
operator: must be included

fair-work-act-2009-sec-136-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136 What can be included in modern awards

137 Terms that contravene section 136 have no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298
note: Terms of modern awards that contravene section 136 have no effect.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-137
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a term of a modern award has effect, then it overlaps with section 136 within the same temporal interval.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section 137 implies that terms of modern awards with effect must comply with section 136 within the same temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: Terms of a modern award have no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 136.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a term of a modern award has effect, then it implies that AI systems process terms of modern awards in accordance with section 136.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Section 137 implies that terms of modern awards with effect must be processed by AI systems in accordance with section 136.
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: Terms of a modern award have no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 136.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a term of a modern award has effect, then it complies with section 136.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 137 implies that terms of modern awards with effect must comply with section 136.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Terms of a modern award have no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 136.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a term of a modern award has effect, then it diffuses to all agents affected by the term.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section 137 implies that terms of modern awards with effect must diffuse to all agents affected by the term.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Terms of a modern award have no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 136.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a term of a modern award has effect, then it holds for all possible traces that it complies with section 136.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Section 137 implies that terms of modern awards with effect must comply with section 136 for all possible traces.
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
premise text: Terms of a modern award have no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 136.

138 Achieving the modern awards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298
note: Terms that may be included in modern awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-138-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-138
schema version: 2

139 Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298
curation status: Proposed
has part: 139(1) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
has part: 139(2) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139
schema version: 2

139(1) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298
note: Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Terms that may be included in modern awards—general

fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(1) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general

139(2) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298
note: Allowances in modern awards must be clearly identified.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-139-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 139 Terms that may be included in modern awards—general

fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be clearly identified
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(2) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general

14 Meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
note: Defines what constitutes a national system employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition implies a focus on employment periods.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals are not explicitly defined, but the context suggests a focus on employment periods.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a constitutional corporation, so far as it employs, or usually employs, an individual;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition establishes a clear scope for national system employers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of national system employers.
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) A national system employer is: (a) a constitutional corporation, so far as it employs, or usually employs, an individual;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition establishes a clear scope for national system employers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of national system employers.
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (b) the Commonwealth, so far as it employs, or usually employs, an individual;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition implies a focus on employment periods.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal intervals are not explicitly defined, but the context suggests a focus on employment periods.
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a constitutional corporation, so far as it employs, or usually employs, an individual;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Meaning of national system employer

140 Outworker terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
curation status: Proposed
has part: 140(1) Outworker terms
has part: 140(2) Outworker terms
has part: 140(3) Outworker terms
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-140
schema version: 2

140(1) Outworker terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
note: Employer must comply with outworker terms
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-140-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 140 Outworker terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 140(1) Outworker terms

140(2) Outworker terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
note: Outworker terms must include pay or conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-140-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 140 Outworker terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide outworker terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 140(2) Outworker terms

140(3) Outworker terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
note: Defines outworker terms within a modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-140-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 140 Outworker terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Outworker terms are specified by the legislation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 140(3) Outworker terms

141 Industry-specific redundancy schemes
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
curation status: Proposed
has part: 141(1) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
has part: 141(2) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
has part: 141(3) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-141
schema version: 2

141(1) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
note: An industry-specific redundancy scheme may be included in a modern award if it was included in the award modernisation process or in accordance with subsection (2).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-141-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 141 Industry-specific redundancy schemes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 141(1) Industry-specific redundancy schemes

141(2) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
note: The FWC may include an industry-specific redundancy scheme in another modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-141-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 141 Industry-specific redundancy schemes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may include the scheme.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The scheme is included in another modern award.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 141(2) Industry-specific redundancy schemes

141(3) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
note: The FWC may only vary an industry-specific redundancy scheme in a modern award under Division 5.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-141-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 141 Industry-specific redundancy schemes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary the scheme
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 141(3) Industry-specific redundancy schemes

141A Terms permitting fixed term contracts
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
curation status: Proposed
has part: 141A(1) Terms permitting fixed term contracts
has part: 141A(2) Terms permitting fixed term contracts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-141a
schema version: 2

141A(1) Terms permitting fixed term contracts
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
note: Employee can be employed under a contract with a fixed term
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-141a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 141A Terms permitting fixed term contracts

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee can be employed under a contract with a fixed term
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

141A(2) Terms permitting fixed term contracts
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
note: Allowance of certain circumstances in modern awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-141a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 141A Terms permitting fixed term contracts

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of terms in modern awards
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Terms permitting fixed term contracts

142 Incidental and machinery terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
note: Definition of incidental terms in modern awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-142-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-142
schema version: 2

143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
curation status: Proposed
has part: 143(1) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(2) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(3) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(4) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(5) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(6) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(7) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(8) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(9) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143
schema version: 2

143(1) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
description: Coverage terms
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Must include coverage terms setting out covered parties
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: must include

143(2) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Must cover specified employers and employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed coverage terms
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST COVER
premise text: (2) A modern award must be expressed to cover:

143(3) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Specify organisations covered by a modern award
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

143(4) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Specify outworker entities for modern award coverage
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify outworker entities for modern award coverage
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

143(5) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Employers and employees must be specified by inclusion in a class or classes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers and employees must be specified.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143(5) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

143(6) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Employees not traditionally covered by awards may be described by reference to a particular industry or part of an industry, or particular kinds of work.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

143(7) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Cannot cover classes of employees with traditionally not been covered by awards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (7) A modern award must not be expressed to cover classes of employees:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (7) A modern award must not be expressed to cover classes of employees:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143(7) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

143(8) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Must not cover employees covered by a modern enterprise award or an enterprise instrument.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-8-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

143(9) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Exemption from application for modern enterprise awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-9-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts modern enterprise awards from application
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143(9) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern

143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
curation status: Proposed
has part: 143A(1) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(2) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(3) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(4) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(5) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(6) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(7) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(8) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a
schema version: 2

143A(1) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
description: Enterprise or enterprises to which the modern enterprise award relates; Employers, employees and organisations that are covered by the modern enterprise award.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: Defines coverage terms for modern enterprise awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires the inclusion of specific information in modern enterprise awards
modality: Deontic
operator: mustInclude

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143A(1) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

143A(2) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: Modern enterprise award must relate to a single enterprise or one or more enterprises under specific conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to one or more enterprises, but only if the employers all carry on similar business activities under the same franchise and are:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlapsWith
premise text: (2) A modern enterprise award must be expressed to relate...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a single enterprise (or a part of a single enterprise) only; or...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation relation
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeExpressedTo
premise text: (2) A modern enterprise award must be expressed to relate...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the employers all carry on similar business activities under the same franchise and are:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal occurrence relation
modality: LTL
operator: occursDuring
premise text: (2) A modern enterprise award must be expressed to relate...

143A(3) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: Must cover specified employer and employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses obligation to cover employers and employees
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST COVER

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143A(3) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

143A(4) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: Specify organisations covered by modern enterprise award
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143A(4) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

143A(5) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: Cannot cover outworker entities
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal disjointness
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjointWith

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot cover outworker entities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143A(5) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

143A(6) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: Enterprise must be specified by name or franchise name
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enterprise must be specified by name or franchise name
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143A(6) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

143A(7) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: Employer and employee specifications for modern enterprise awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) employees must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between employer and employee specifications
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
premise text: (a) an employer or employers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an employer or employers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer and employee specification
modality: Deontic
operator: specification
premise text: (7) For the purposes of subsections (3) and (4):

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Organisation specification
modality: Deontic
operator: specification
premise text: (c) organisations must be specified by name.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) employees must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace of employer and employee specifications
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
premise text: (a) an employer or employers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143A(7) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

143A(8) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: Cannot cover classes of employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-8-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143a-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-8-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143A(8) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards

143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
curation status: Proposed
has part: 143B(1) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
has part: 143B(2) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
has part: 143B(3) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
has part: 143B(4) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
has part: 143B(5) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143b
schema version: 2

143B(1) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
note: Must include coverage terms setting out covered parties
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include coverage terms
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

143B(2) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
note: Only specified State reference public sector employers and employees are covered by the modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional coverage
modality: Deontic
operator: only if
premise text: (2) The coverage terms must be such that:

143B(3) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
note: Specify organisations covered by a State reference public sector modern award
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern

143B(4) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
note: Cannot cover outworker entities
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot cover outworker entities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143B(4) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern

143B(5) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
note: Employers and employees must be specified by name or inclusion in a class.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-143b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer and employee specification is obligatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: specification
premise text: (5) For the purposes of this section:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Organisation specification is obligatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: specification
premise text: (c) organisations must be specified by name.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 143B(5) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern

144 Flexibility terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
curation status: Proposed
has part: 144(1) Flexibility terms
has part: 144(2) Flexibility terms
has part: 144(3) Flexibility terms
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144
schema version: 2

144(1) Flexibility terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
note: Employee and employer must agree on individual flexibility arrangements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Flexibility terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide individual flexibility arrangements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 144(1) Flexibility terms

144(2) Flexibility terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
note: Employee and employer must agree to individual flexibility arrangement under a flexibility term in a modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Flexibility terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee and employer must agree to individual flexibility arrangement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 144(2) Flexibility terms

144(3) Flexibility terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
note: Does not change effect of modern award on employer and other employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-144-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Flexibility terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies no change to modern award effect
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 144(3) Flexibility terms

145 Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
curation status: Proposed
has part: 145(1) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
has part: 145(2) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
has part: 145(3) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
has part: 145(4) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145
schema version: 2

145(1) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: Arrangement that does not meet a requirement may be a contravention of a provision.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 145 Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The arrangement is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the arrangement that does not meet a requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: A failure to meet such a requirement may be a contravention of a provision.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 145(1) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet

145(2) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: Employer contravenes flexibility term in specified circumstances
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 145 Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer contravenes flexibility term in specified circumstances
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening flexibility term
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) The arrangement has effect as if it were an individual flexibility arrangement.

145(3) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: Employer must ensure flexibility arrangement meets requirement or face contravention.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 145 Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Requirement overlaps with flexibility arrangement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between flexibility arrangement and requirement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Subsection 144(4) requires employer to ensure arrangement meets requirement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer contravenes flexibility term if arrangement does not meet requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance with flexibility arrangement requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Subsection 144(4) requires employer to ensure arrangement meets requirement.

145(4) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
type: Concept
description: Written notice of termination
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: Employee and employer can terminate individual flexibility arrangement with written notice.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 145 Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee and employer can terminate arrangement
modality: Deontic
operator: can

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Termination requires written notice
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 145(4) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet

145A Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
curation status: Proposed
has part: 145A(1) Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
has part: 145A(2) Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145a
schema version: 2

145A(1) Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
note: Employer must consult employees about changes to roster or hours of work.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 145A Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must consult employees.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 145A(1) Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work

145A(2) Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
note: Employer must provide information to employees about changes to rosters or hours of work.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-145a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 145A Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

146 Terms about settling disputes
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
note: A modern award must include a procedure for settling disputes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-146-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-146
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a procedure for settling disputes
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-146-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 146 Terms about settling disputes

147 Ordinary hours of work
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
note: Ordinary hours of work must be specified for each classification and type of employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-147
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to specify ordinary hours of work
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification-based specification of ordinary hours of work
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 147 Ordinary hours of work

148 Base and full rates of pay for pieceworkers
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
note: Award must specify base and full rates of pay for pieceworkers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-148-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-148-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-148
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-148-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Award must specify base and full rates of pay.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-148-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148 Base and full rates of pay for pieceworkers

149 Automatic variation of allowances
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
note: Automatic variation of allowances when wage rates in the award are varied.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include terms providing for automatic variation of allowances.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Allowances are a kind that should be varied when wage rates in the award are varied.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149 Automatic variation of allowances

149B Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
curation status: Proposed
has part: 149B(1) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
has part: 149B(2) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149b
schema version: 2

149B(1) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
note: Employer must make superannuation contributions to avoid liability.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 149B Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must make superannuation contributions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149B(1) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation

149B(2) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
note: Employer's obligation to make contributions for employee's benefit under a term does not apply in certain circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 149B Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The charge payment overlaps with the employee's benefit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employer's charge payment overlaps with employee's benefit under Part 8 of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (a) the employer has made a charge payment...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption is recognized.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Employer's exemption from obligation to make contributions for employee's benefit under a term recognizes the exemption.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (2) The obligation of an employer...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation does not apply in certain circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's exemption from obligation to make contributions for employee's benefit under a term.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (2) The obligation of an employer...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The liability is diffused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Employer's exemption from obligation to make contributions for employee's benefit under a term diffuses the liability to pay superannuation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) The obligation of an employer...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation repeats in certain circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employer's obligation to make contributions for employee's benefit under a term repeats in certain circumstances.
modality: LTL
operator: repeats
premise text: (2) The obligation of an employer...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149B(2) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation

149C Default fund terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
curation status: Proposed
has part: 149C(1) Default fund terms
has part: 149C(2) Default fund terms
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149c
schema version: 2

149C(1) Default fund terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
note: A modern award must include a default fund term that complies with section 149D.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 149C Default fund terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149C(1) Default fund terms

149C(2) Default fund terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
note: Employer must make terms and conditions of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 149C Default fund terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires an employer to make terms and conditions of employment
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149C(2) Default fund terms

149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
curation status: Proposed
has part: 149D(1) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
has part: 149D(1A) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
has part: 149D(2) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
has part: 149D(3) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
has part: 149D(4) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149d
schema version: 2

149D(1) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: Employer must make contributions to a superannuation fund for the benefit of an employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a moral obligation to make contributions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

149D(1A) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: Employer must make contributions to a superannuation fund for default fund employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149d-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Review occurs every 4 years.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during a 4 yearly review
premise text: Note: The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products is made during a 4 yearly review...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must make contributions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Contribution must be part of an ordered sequence.
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149D(1A) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made

149D(2) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: Employer must make contributions to a superannuation fund for default fund employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must make contributions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

149D(3) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: Employer must make contributions to a default fund employee's superannuation fund.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must make contributions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

149D(4) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: Employer must make contributions to a superannuation fund for default fund employee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must make contributions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149D(4) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made

149E Workplace delegates’ rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
note: Delegates' rights term must be included in modern awards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149e-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149e
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Delegates' rights term obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Award must include delegates' rights term.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Award requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149E Workplace delegates’ rights

149F Right to disconnect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
note: Right to disconnect term in modern awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149f-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-149f
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right exists
modality: Deontic
operator: has right

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149f-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 149F Right to disconnect

14A Transitional matters relating to employers etc. becoming, or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.89
note: Transitional provisions for employers and employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14a
schema version: 2

15 Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15(1) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 15(2) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

15(1) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
note: Defines employee and employer for the purpose of this Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Ordinary meanings of employee and employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes a person who is usually an employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) includes a reference to a person who is usually such an employee;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Does not include a person on a vocational placement.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (b) does not include a person on a vocational placement;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(1) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer

15(2) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
note: Defines employer with ordinary meaning including a person usually acting as such.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Ordinary meanings of employee and employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a person who is usually such an employer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extends the meaning of employer
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Note: Subsections 30E(2) and 30P(2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a referring State
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a referring State
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Note: Subsections 30E(2) and 30P(2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: employer with ordinary meaning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies employee and employer
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Subsections 30E(2) and 30P(2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(2) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer

150 Objectionable terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
note: No objectionable terms allowed in modern awards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-150-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-150-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-150
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-150-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of objectionable terms
modality: Deontic
operator: not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-150-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 150 Objectionable terms

151 Terms about payments and deductions for benefit of employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
note: No term with no effect due to subsections 326(1), (3), or (4) can be included in a modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-151-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-151
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain terms in modern awards.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-151-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151 Terms about payments and deductions for benefit of employer

152 Terms about right of entry
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
note: No official of an organisation can enter premises for certain purposes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-152-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-152
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No entry is allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: A modern award must not include terms that require or authorise an official of an organisation to enter premises.

153 Terms that are discriminatory
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
curation status: Proposed
has part: 153(1) Terms that are discriminatory
has part: 153(2) Terms that are discriminatory
has part: 153(3) Terms that are discriminatory
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-153
schema version: 2

153(1) Terms that are discriminatory
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
note: Terms that discriminate against employees on certain grounds are prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-153-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 153 Terms that are discriminatory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...discriminatory terms.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits discriminatory terms in modern awards.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Modern award must not include...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 153(1) Terms that are discriminatory

153(2) Terms that are discriminatory
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
note: No discrimination against employees based on inherent position requirements or religious susceptibilities.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-153-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 153 Terms that are discriminatory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals for discrimination based on inherent position requirements overlap with employee's term
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A term of a modern award does not discriminate against an employee:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No discrimination allowed
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A term of a modern award does not discriminate against an employee:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Good faith and avoiding injury to religious susceptibilities are permitted reasons for discrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (i) in good faith; and (ii) to avoid injury to the religious susceptibilities of adherents of that religion or creed.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal intervals for discrimination based on religious susceptibilities repeat with each employment as staff member
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (b) merely because it discriminates, in relation to employment of the employee as a member of the staff of an institution that is conducted in accordance with the doctrines, tenets, beliefs or teachings of a particular religion or creed:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 153(2) Terms that are discriminatory

153(3) Terms that are discriminatory
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
note: Minimum wages for junior employees do not discriminate against an employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-153-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 153 Terms that are discriminatory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minimum wages for junior employees overlap with minimum wages for all employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minimum wages for junior employees overlap with minimum wages for all employees.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps with
premise text: (a) all junior employees, or a class of junior employees;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minimum wages for junior employees are applicable to CogAI.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Minimum wages for junior employees are applicable to CogAI.
modality: CogAI
operator: is applicable to
premise text: (a) all junior employees, or a class of junior employees;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minimum wages for junior employees do not discriminate against an employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No discrimination in minimum wages for junior employees.
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award does not discriminate against an employee merely because it provides for minimum wages...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Junior employees are a class of employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Junior employees are a class of employees.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is a subclass of
premise text: (a) all junior employees, or a class of junior employees;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minimum wages for junior employees relate to diffusion in employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Minimum wages for junior employees relate to diffusion in employment.
modality: Diffusion
operator: is related to
premise text: (a) all junior employees, or a class of junior employees;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minimum wages for junior employees are part of the modern award terms.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Minimum wages for junior employees are part of the modern award terms.
modality: LTL
operator: is part of
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award does not discriminate against an employee merely because it provides for minimum wages...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 153(3) Terms that are discriminatory

154 Terms that contain State-based differences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
curation status: Proposed
has part: 154(1) Terms that contain State-based differences
has part: 154(2) Terms that contain State-based differences
has part: 154(3) Terms that contain State-based differences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-154
schema version: 2

154(1) Terms that contain State-based differences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
note: Terms and conditions of employment cannot be State-based difference terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-154-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 154 Terms that contain State-based differences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: are expressed to operate in one or more, but not every, State and Territory.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between State-based difference terms
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (a) are determined by reference to State or Territory boundaries;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not include terms and conditions of employment (State-based difference terms)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (a) are determined by reference to State or Territory boundaries;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not include terms and conditions of employment (State-based difference terms)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (b) are expressed to operate in one or more, but not every, State and Territory.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: are expressed to operate in one or more, but not every, State and Territory.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between State-based difference terms
modality: LTL
operator: between
premise text: (a) are determined by reference to State or Territory boundaries;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 154(1) Terms that contain State-based differences

154(2) Terms that contain State-based differences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
note: Limitation on inclusion of State-based difference terms in modern awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-154-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 154 Terms that contain State-based differences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...starting on the day...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the starting point of the limitation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAt
premise text: ...starting on the day on which the first modern award that included those terms came into operation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...but only for up to 5 years...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits the scope of State-based difference terms
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
premise text: (2) However, a modern award may include...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...starting on the day...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies the starting point of the limitation
modality: LTL
operator: StartsAt
premise text: ...starting on the day on which the first modern award that included those terms came into operation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 154(2) Terms that contain State-based differences

154(3) Terms that contain State-based differences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
note: The FWC may include State-based difference terms in another modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-154-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 154 Terms that contain State-based differences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between FWC's actions and modern award terms
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) a modern award includes State-based difference terms as permitted under subsection (2); and (b) the FWC is making or varying another modern award so that it (rather than the modern award referred to in paragraph (a)) will cover some or all of the classes of employees who are covered by those terms;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to include terms
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on extending coverage of terms
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: However, the FWC must not extend the coverage of those terms to classes of employees that they did not previously cover.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Terms and conditions of employment
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Chapter 2 Modern awards Part 2-3 Terms of modern awards Division 3 Section 155

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Repeating pattern of FWC's actions and modern award terms
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (a) a modern award includes State-based difference terms as permitted under subsection (2); and (b) the FWC is making or varying another modern award so that it (rather than the modern award referred to in paragraph (a)) will cover some or all of the classes of employees who are covered by those terms;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 154(3) Terms that contain State-based differences

155 Terms dealing with long service leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
note: No modern award may include terms dealing with long service leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-155-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-155
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

156B Making the Default Superannuation List
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156B(1) Making the Default Superannuation List
has part: 156B(2) Making the Default Superannuation List
has part: 156B(3) Making the Default Superannuation List
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156b
schema version: 2

156B(1) Making the Default Superannuation List
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: The FWC must make and publish the Default Superannuation List.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156B Making the Default Superannuation List

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make and publish the Default Superannuation List.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156B(1) Making the Default Superannuation List

156B(2) Making the Default Superannuation List
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: Specify each standard MySuper product determined by FWC
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156B Making the Default Superannuation List

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156B(2) Making the Default Superannuation List

156B(3) Making the Default Superannuation List
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: Cannot specify other products
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 156B Making the Default Superannuation List

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Default Superannuation List must exist before specifying other products
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The Default Superannuation List must not specify other products during its existence

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot specify other products
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI logic
modality: CogAI
operator: mustNotSpecify
premise text: The Default Superannuation List must not specify other products using CogAI rules

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot specify other products
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Default Superannuation List must not specify other products

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot specify other products
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion logic
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustNotSpecify
premise text: The Default Superannuation List must not specify other products in all possible worlds

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Default Superannuation List must end before specifying other products
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The Default Superannuation List must not specify other products until its existence ends

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156B(3) Making the Default Superannuation List

156C Applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156C(1) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
has part: 156C(2) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
has part: 156C(3) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
has part: 156C(4) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156c
schema version: 2

156C(1) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: Superannuation funds must apply to have a standard MySuper product included on the list.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156C Applications to list a standard MySuper product

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156C(1) Applications to list a standard MySuper product

156C(2) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: Specify period for application
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156C Applications to list a standard MySuper product

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156C(2) Applications to list a standard MySuper product

156C(3) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: Application for standard MySuper product inclusion on the list
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 156C Applications to list a standard MySuper product

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application can be made during this time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timing of application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The notice is published after the interval starts

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for standard MySuper product inclusion on the list
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

156C(4) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
description: Terms and conditions of employment
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: Application must meet certain terms and conditions of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 156C Applications to list a standard MySuper product

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must meet certain terms and conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156C(4) Applications to list a standard MySuper product

156D Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156D(1) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
has part: 156D(2) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
has part: 156D(3) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156d
schema version: 2

156D(1) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
note: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156D Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156D(1) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper

156D(2) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
note: Disclosure of interest in relation to a superannuation fund
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156D Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must disclose interest
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156D(2) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper

156D(3) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
note: The FWC must publish any submission that is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 156D Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156D(3) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper

156E Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156E(1) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
has part: 156E(2) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156e
schema version: 2

156E(1) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
note: FWC must make a determination about including a standard MySuper product on the list.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156E Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make a determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156E(1) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product

156E(2) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
note: FWC must not determine product inclusion unless in best interests of default fund employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156E Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: within a specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: the first stage criteria;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless in best interests of default fund employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: FWC must not determine product inclusion.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC is satisfied that including the product on the list would be in the best interests of default fund employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification criteria
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: taking into account the information provided in the application; and the first stage criteria; and any submissions that were made in relation to the application;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156E(2) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product

156F First stage criteria
type: Concept
description: The superannuation fund must deliver on the long term investment return target.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
note: Criteria for MySuper product approval
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156f-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156f
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The superannuation fund must deliver on the long term investment return target.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156F First stage criteria

156G Review of the default fund term of modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156G(1) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
has part: 156G(2) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
has part: 156G(3) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
has part: 156G(4) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156g
schema version: 2

156G(1) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
note: The FWC must review the default fund term of each modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156G Review of the default fund term of modern awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review default fund term
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156G(1) Review of the default fund term of modern awards

156G(2) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
note: Employers and organisations must provide employees with a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions regarding the default fund term of modern awards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156G Review of the default fund term of modern awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The FWC must ensure that the following persons have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions at least as early as the commencement date.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers and organisations must provide employees with a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must ensure that the following persons have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY BE CITED

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the default fund term of modern awards
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The FWC must ensure that the following persons have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
premise text: FWC

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The FWC must ensure that the following persons have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions for all time periods within the default fund term.
modality: LTL
operator: FOR ALL

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156G(2) Review of the default fund term of modern awards

156G(3) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
type: Concept
description: Interest in relation to the superannuation fund mentioned in the submission.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
note: Must disclose interest in superannuation fund if making a written submission.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 156G Review of the default fund term of modern awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must disclose interest.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156G(3) Review of the default fund term of modern awards

156G(4) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
note: The FWC must publish any submission that is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156g-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 156G Review of the default fund term of modern awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156G(4) Review of the default fund term of modern awards

156H Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156H(1) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
has part: 156H(2) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
has part: 156H(3) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156h
schema version: 2

156H(1) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
note: FWC must vary default fund term to specify certain superannuation funds
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156H Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to vary default fund term
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156H(1) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds

156H(2) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
note: Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156H Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The FWC considers relevant any submissions that were made in relation to the default fund term of the award and any other matter
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: taking into account:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must satisfy the second stage test
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC is satisfied that specifying a superannuation fund in relation to the product in the default fund term of the modern award would be in the best interests of the default fund employees to whom the modern award applies
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) the FWC is satisfied that specifying a superannuation fund in relation to the product in the default fund term of the modern award would be in the best interests of the default fund employees to whom the modern award applies, taking into account:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The FWC considers relevant any submissions that were made in relation to the default fund term of the award and any other matter
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: taking into account:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156H(2) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds

156H(3) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
note: Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 156H Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156H(3) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds

156J Variation to comply with section 149D
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: FWC must vary modern award term if it does not comply with section 149D
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156j-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156j-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156j
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to vary term
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156J Variation to comply with section 149D

156K Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156K(1) Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
has part: 156K(2) Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156k
schema version: 2

156K(1) Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156k-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156K Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds

156K(2) Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Transitional authorisation comes into operation on the day it is made and ceases to be in operation on the day specified in the authorisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156k-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156K Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds

156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156L(1) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
has part: 156L(2) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
has part: 156L(3) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
has part: 156L(4) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
has part: 156L(5) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156l
schema version: 2

156L(1) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
description: Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Employer must make and publish Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must make and publish Schedule.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156L(1) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products

156L(2) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Specify employer MySuper product to be included on the schedule.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify employer MySuper product to be included on the schedule.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156L(2) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products

156L(3) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Must amend schedule after determination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to amend
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156L(3) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products

156L(4) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Publish schedule as amended upon amendment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156l-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products

156L(5) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Cannot specify other product
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156l-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specifying other products
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156L(5) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products

156M FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156M(1) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
has part: 156M(2) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156m
schema version: 2

156M(1) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
note: FWC must invite applications to include employer MySuper product on schedule.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156M FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to invite applications
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156M(1) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper

156M(2) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
note: Specify period for application submission
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156M FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify period for application submission
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156M(2) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper

156N Making applications to include employer MySuper products
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156N(1) Making applications to include employer MySuper products
has part: 156N(2) Making applications to include employer MySuper products
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156n
schema version: 2

156N(1) Making applications to include employer MySuper products
type: Concept
description: (a) a superannuation fund that offers the product; (b) an employer to which the product relates
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
note: Employer must apply to include MySuper product on schedule
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156N Making applications to include employer MySuper products

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156N(1) Making applications to include employer MySuper products

156N(2) Making applications to include employer MySuper products
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
note: Application must be made within specified periods
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156N Making applications to include employer MySuper products

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within specified periods
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156N(2) Making applications to include employer MySuper products

156P FWC to determine applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156P(1) FWC to determine applications
has part: 156P(2) FWC to determine applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156p
schema version: 2

156P(1) FWC to determine applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
note: FWC must determine whether to include MySuper product on the schedule.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156P FWC to determine applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make a determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156P(1) FWC to determine applications

156P(2) FWC to determine applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
note: FWC must not determine product inclusion unless tests are met
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156P FWC to determine applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of FWC determination
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156P(2) FWC to determine applications

156Q The first stage test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
note: Employer MySuper product must satisfy first stage test in best interests of default fund employees or a particular class thereof.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156q
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must satisfy first stage test
modality: Deontic
operator: Satisfies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as MySuper product
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156Q The first stage test

156R Submissions about the first stage test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156R(1) Submissions about the first stage test
has part: 156R(2) Submissions about the first stage test
has part: 156R(3) Submissions about the first stage test
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156r
schema version: 2

156R(1) Submissions about the first stage test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
note: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156R Submissions about the first stage test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156R(1) Submissions about the first stage test

156R(2) Submissions about the first stage test
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
note: Disclose interest in relation to a superannuation fund when making a written submission.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156R Submissions about the first stage test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose interest
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156R(2) Submissions about the first stage test

156R(3) Submissions about the first stage test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
note: The FWC must publish any submission that is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156r-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 156R Submissions about the first stage test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156R(3) Submissions about the first stage test

156S The second stage test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: Employer must satisfy FWC that including product on Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products is in best interests of default fund employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156s
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must satisfy FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Product on Schedule is in best interests of default fund employees
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156S The second stage test

156T Submissions about the second stage test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
curation status: Proposed
has part: 156T(1) Submissions about the second stage test
has part: 156T(2) Submissions about the second stage test
has part: 156T(3) Submissions about the second stage test
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156t
schema version: 2

156T(1) Submissions about the second stage test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: Employers and their representatives must make written submissions to the FWC about MySuper products.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 156T Submissions about the second stage test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must make submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156T(1) Submissions about the second stage test

156T(2) Submissions about the second stage test
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: Disclose interest in relation to superannuation fund if applicable.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 156T Submissions about the second stage test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must disclose interest
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156T(2) Submissions about the second stage test

156T(3) Submissions about the second stage test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: The FWC must publish any submission that is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156t-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 156T Submissions about the second stage test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 156T(3) Submissions about the second stage test

156U Publishing documents under this Division
type: Concept
description: document on its website or by any other means
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
note: Publishing documents under this Division
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156u-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156u-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156u-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-156u
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publishing obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156u-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies documents as part of this Division
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF

157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
curation status: Proposed
has part: 157(1) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
has part: 157(2) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
has part: 157(2A) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
has part: 157(2B) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
has part: 157(3) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-157
schema version: 2

157(1) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
note: The FWC may vary modern awards if necessary to achieve the objective.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-157-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve

157(2) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
note: FWC may vary modern award minimum wages if justified by work value reasons and necessary to achieve the modern awards objective.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-157-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May vary modern award minimum wages
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Necessary to achieve the modern awards objective
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary to achieve the modern awards objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 157(2) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve

157(2A) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
note: Work value reasons justifying employee pay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-157-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 157(2A) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve

157(2B) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
note: FWC must consider work value reasons without gender assumptions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-157-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider work value reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 157(2B) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve

157(3) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
note: FWC may make a determination or modern award under this section.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-157-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make a determination or modern award.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 157(3) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve

158 Applications to vary, revoke or make modern award
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.331
note: Who may make an application for varying or revoking a modern award
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-158
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Who may make an application for varying or revoking a modern award
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Item Column 1 This kind of application …
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the entities that can make an application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
premise text: The table sets out who may apply for...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an application to vary, omit or include terms...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the entities that can make an application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
premise text: Item Column 2 may be made by …

fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (b) an organisation that is entitled to represent...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the entities that can make an application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
premise text: (a) an employer, employee or organisation that is covered by the modern award;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or (b) an organisation that is entitled to represent...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the entities that can make an application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
premise text: the industrial interests of one or more employers or employees that are covered by the modern award.

159 Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
curation status: Proposed
has part: 159(1) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
has part: 159(2) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-159
schema version: 2

159(1) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: The FWC may make a determination varying a modern award to update or omit the name of an employer, organisation or outworker entity.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-159-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 159 Variation of modern award to update or omit name of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make a determination varying a modern award.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 159(1) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of

159(2) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: The FWC may make a determination under this section on its own initiative or on application by the employer, organisation, or outworker entity.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-159-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 159 Variation of modern award to update or omit name of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make a determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 159(2) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of

159A Variation of default fund term of modern award
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
curation status: Proposed
has part: 159A(1) Variation of default fund term of modern award
has part: 159A(2) Variation of default fund term of modern award
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-159a
schema version: 2

159A(1) Variation of default fund term of modern award
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: The FWC may vary the default fund term of a modern award in relation to a superannuation fund.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-159a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 159A Variation of default fund term of modern award

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may vary the default fund term.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

159A(2) Variation of default fund term of modern award
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: FWC may make a determination on its own initiative or on application by an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-159a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 159A Variation of default fund term of modern award

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may make a determination
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 159A(2) Variation of default fund term of modern award

15A Meaning of casual employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15A(1) Meaning of casual employee
has part: 15A(2) Meaning of casual employee
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15a
schema version: 2

15A(1) Meaning of casual employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
note: An employee is a casual employee of an employer only if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15A Meaning of casual employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employment relationship lasts for at least...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the duration of employment as a casual employee
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: An employee who commences employment as a casual employee remains a casual employee until the occurrence of a specified event (see subsection (5));

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conditions are:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the conditions for an employee to be considered a casual employee
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (a) the employment relationship is characterised by an absence of a firm advance commitment to continuing and indefinite work; and (b) the employee would be entitled to a casual loading or a specific rate of pay for casual employees under the terms of a fair work instrument if the employee were a casual employee, or the employee is entitled to such a loading or rate of pay under the contract of employment.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to a casual loading or specific rate of pay if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the entitlement to a casual loading or specific rate of pay for casual employees
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (b) the employee would be entitled to a casual loading or a specific rate of pay for casual employees under the terms of a fair work instrument if the employee were a casual employee, or the employee is entitled to such a loading or rate of pay under the contract of employment.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15A(1) Meaning of casual employee

15A(2) Meaning of casual employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
note: Employment relationship characterized by absence of firm advance commitment to continuing and indefinite work is to be assessed based on real substance, practical reality, and true nature.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15A Meaning of casual employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employer's ability to offer or not offer work may indicate presence of firm advance commitment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (i) whether there is an inability of the employer to elect to offer, or not offer, work or an inability of the employee to elect to accept or reject work (and whether this occurs in practice);

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has obligation to provide continuing work
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has obligation to accept or reject work
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) on the basis that a firm advance commitment can be in the form of the contract of employment or, in addition to the terms of that contract, in the form of a mutual understanding or expectation between the employer and employee not rising to the level of a term of that contract (or to a variation of any such term);

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of employment relationship based on real substance, practical reality, and true nature
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(a), whether the employment relationship is characterised by an absence of a firm advance commitment to continuing and indefinite work is to be assessed:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of mutual understanding or expectation between employer and employee
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (b) on the basis that a firm advance commitment can be in the form of the contract of employment or, in addition to the terms of that contract, in the form of a mutual understanding or expectation between the employer and employee not rising to the level of a term of that contract (or to a variation of any such term);

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Future availability of continuing work may indicate presence of firm advance commitment
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (ii) whether, having regard to the nature of the employer’s enterprise, it is reasonably likely that there will be future availability of continuing work in that enterprise of the kind usually performed by the employee;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15A(2) Meaning of casual employee

15AA Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15AA(1) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 15AA(2) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 15AA(3) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15aa
schema version: 2

15AA(1) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
note: Determines the ordinary meaning of employee and employer
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15AA Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Individual is employee or employer if relationship meets ordinary meaning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines relationship between individual and person
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Relationship between individual and person

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AA(1) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer

15AA(2) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
note: Consider totality of relationship between individual and person for determining real substance, practical reality, and true nature of the relationship.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15AA Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to consider the totality of the relationship.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AA(2) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer

15AA(3) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
note: Exemptions from subsections (1) and (2)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15AA Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AA(3) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer

15AB Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15AB(1) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
has part: 15AB(2) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ab
schema version: 2

15AB(1) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
type: Concept
description: Opt out notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91
note: Notification of opt-out before section 15AA commencement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15AB Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AB(1) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply

15AB(2) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91
note: Individual may give opt out notice before section 15AA commencement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15AB Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Individual has an obligation to provide opt out notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AB(2) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply

15AC Effect of an opt out notice
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.93
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15AC(1) Effect of an opt out notice
has part: 15AC(2) Effect of an opt out notice
has part: 15AC(3) Effect of an opt out notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ac
schema version: 2

15AC(1) Effect of an opt out notice
type: Concept
description: Opt out notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.93
note: Individual must provide opt out notice before commencement of section 15AA.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Effect of an opt out notice

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide opt out notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AC(1) Effect of an opt out notice

15AC(2) Effect of an opt out notice
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.93
note: Section 15AA does not apply to the relationship after commencement unless opt out notice is revoked.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Effect of an opt out notice

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15AA does not apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 15AA prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

15AC(3) Effect of an opt out notice
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.93
note: Section 15AA ceases to apply on the day of opt out notice.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ac-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15AC Effect of an opt out notice

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 15AA is prohibited from applying.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

15AD Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15AD(1) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
has part: 15AD(2) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
has part: 15AD(3) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
has part: 15AD(4) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ad
schema version: 2

15AD(1) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
note: An individual can revoke an opt out notice at any time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ad-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15AD Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...at any time after giving the opt out notice, revoke the opt out notice by giving written notice (a revocation notice)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between opt out notice and revocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) An individual who has given an opt out notice to a person...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...revocation notice to the person that the individual elects that section 15AA is to apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Revoke opt out notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: (1) An individual who has given an opt out notice to a person may...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...revocation notice (a revocation notice) to the person that the individual elects that section 15AA is to apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to revoke opt out notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (1) An individual who has given an opt out notice to a person...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...revocation notice (a revocation notice) to the person that the individual elects that section 15AA is to apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide revocation notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) An individual who has given an opt out notice to a person...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...at any time after giving the opt out notice, revoke the opt out notice by giving written notice (a revocation notice)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of individual's actions
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (1) An individual who has given an opt out notice to a person...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AD(1) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual

15AD(2) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
note: An individual can revoke an opt out notice before the commencement of section 15AA.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ad-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15AD Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to relationship on or after commencement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between revocation notice and section 15AA commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Revocation notice given before section 15AA commencement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to relationship
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of revocation notice on section 15AA application
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Individual gives revocation notice before section 15AA commencement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to relationship on or after commencement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of revocation notice and section 15AA application
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: Individual gives revocation notice before section 15AA commencement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Revoke opt out notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: Individual gives revocation notice

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to all affected relationships
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of section 15AA application through relationships
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Relationship between person and individual on or after commencement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AD(2) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual

15AD(3) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
note: An individual can revoke an opt out notice.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ad-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15AD Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to the relationship from the day of revocation notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between revocation notice and commencement of section 15AA
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Revocation notice given on or after commencement of section 15AA

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to the relationship
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of revocation notice on section 15AA application
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Given an individual gives a revocation notice

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to the relationship from the day of revocation notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of relationships affected by section 15AA
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: Given an individual gives a revocation notice on or after commencement of section 15AA

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Revoke opt out notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: Given an individual gives a revocation notice

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to the relationship from the day of revocation notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of section 15AA through relationships affected by revocation notice
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Given an individual gives a revocation notice on or after commencement of section 15AA

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15AD(3) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual

15AD(4) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
note: An individual may give only one revocation notice in respect of a particular relationship.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ad-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15AD Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual

15B Meaning of collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
note: Defines collective agreement types
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15b
schema version: 2

15C Meaning of contractor high income threshold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15C(1) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
has part: 15C(2) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
has part: 15C(3) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15c
schema version: 2

15C(1) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
note: Prescribes the contractor high income threshold amount.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15C Meaning of contractor high income threshold

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15C(1) Meaning of contractor high income threshold

15C(2) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
note: Regulations cannot reduce the contractor high income threshold.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15C Meaning of contractor high income threshold

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on reducing the threshold.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

15C(3) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
note: Contractor high income threshold is the amount that it would be if a change had not occurred.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15C Meaning of contractor high income threshold

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contractor high income threshold is the amount that it would be if a change had not occurred.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between changes and contractor high income threshold
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
premise text: None

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contractor high income threshold is the amount that it would be if a change had not occurred.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applies to changes in contractor high income threshold
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: None

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contractor high income threshold is the amount that it would be if a change had not occurred.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between changes and contractor high income threshold
modality: LTL
operator: <>
premise text: None

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15C(3) Meaning of contractor high income threshold

15D Meaning of minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
note: Defines minimum standards guidelines
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15d-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15d
schema version: 2

15E Meaning of minimum standards order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
note: Defines minimum standards order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15e
schema version: 2

15F Meaning of regulated business
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
note: Defines regulated business as digital labour platform operator or road transport business.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15f
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15F Meaning of regulated business

15G Meaning of regulated worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
note: Defines regulated worker based on employee-like worker or regulated road transport contractor.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15g-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15g
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated worker
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a specific category of workers
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Section 15P and section 15Q

15H Meaning of services contract
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
note: Defines services contract as a contract for individual work with constitutional connection.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15h-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15h
schema version: 2

15J Prospective regulated workers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101
note: A reference to a regulated worker includes a person who may become one.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15j
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This person is included in the definition of a regulated worker.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusive relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: A reference to a regulated worker is an inclusive relation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A reference to a regulated worker includes this person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: A regulated worker is a person who may become one.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15J Prospective regulated workers

15K Effect of Chapter in determining whether a person is an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101
note: Disregard minimum standards orders, guidelines, or collective agreements when determining employee/employer relationships.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15k-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15k-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15k
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation exclusion
modality: Deontic
operator: excludedBy

15KA Specific provision about the effect of certain provisions in
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101
note: Defines relationship between individual and digital labour platform operator for ascertaining real substance of the relationship.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ka-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ka
schema version: 2

15L Meaning of digital labour platform
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15L(1) Meaning of digital labour platform
has part: 15L(2) Meaning of digital labour platform
has part: 15L(3) Meaning of digital labour platform
has part: 15L(4) Meaning of digital labour platform
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15l
schema version: 2

15L(1) Meaning of digital labour platform
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
note: Defines digital labour platform
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15L Meaning of digital labour platform

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a digital labour platform
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Digital labour platform is an online enabled application, website or system

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15L(1) Meaning of digital labour platform

15L(2) Meaning of digital labour platform
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
note: Definition of digital labour platform
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15L Meaning of digital labour platform

15L(3) Meaning of digital labour platform
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
note: Digital labour platform definition excludes online applications, websites or systems prescribed by regulations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15L Meaning of digital labour platform

15L(4) Meaning of digital labour platform
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
note: Specifies forms of digital platform work for which an online application, website or system may be specified.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15l-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15L Meaning of digital labour platform

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: online application, website or system
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: digital platform work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies forms of digital platform work for which an online application, website or system may be specified.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15L(4) Meaning of digital labour platform

15M Meaning of digital labour platform operator
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.103
note: Defines digital labour platform operator
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15m-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15m
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15m-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15M Meaning of digital labour platform operator

15N Meaning of digital platform work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.103
note: Definition of digital platform work
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15n-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15n
schema version: 2

15P Meaning of employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15P(1) Meaning of employee-like worker
has part: 15P(2) Meaning of employee-like worker
has part: 15P(3) Meaning of employee-like worker
has part: 15P(4) Meaning of employee-like worker
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15p
schema version: 2

15P(1) Meaning of employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
note: A person is an employee-like worker if they meet specific conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15P Meaning of employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employees-like workers must perform work within a specific timeframe.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between employment and work
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: The Act requires employees-like workers to perform work under a services contract.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employers must comply with the definition of employee-like worker.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligations on employers and workers
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: The Act requires employers to ensure their employees-like workers meet specific conditions.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Digital platforms must comply with the definition of employee-like worker.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between the worker and the platform
modality: Deontic
operator: <
premise text: The Act requires digital platforms to ensure their employees-like workers meet specific conditions.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Digital platforms must comply with the definition of employee-like worker.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between the worker and the platform
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: The Act requires digital platforms to ensure their employees-like workers meet specific conditions.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15P(1) Meaning of employee-like worker

15P(2) Meaning of employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
note: Defines employee-like worker for independent contractor reference
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15P Meaning of employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15P(2) Meaning of employee-like worker

15P(3) Meaning of employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
note: Regulations may specify characteristics for a person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15P Meaning of employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15P(3) Meaning of employee-like worker

15P(4) Meaning of employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
note: Disregard minimum standards orders, guidelines, or collective agreements when determining employee-like worker criteria.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15p-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15P Meaning of employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ignoring minimum standards orders, guidelines, or collective agreements is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore

15Q Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15Q(1) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
has part: 15Q(2) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15q
schema version: 2

15Q(1) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
note: A person is a regulated road transport contractor if they meet specific conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15Q Meaning of regulated road transport contractor

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for regulation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must regulate road transport contractors who meet specific conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Supports an argument that the state has a duty to regulate road transport contractors
modality: Argumentation
operator: >
premise text: The state has the power to regulate road transport contractors

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must regulate road transport contractors who meet specific conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to regulate road transport contractors
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: The state has the power to regulate road transport contractors

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Limits the scope of regulation to those who meet specific conditions
modality: Diffusion
operator: <=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15Q(1) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor

15Q(2) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
note: Defines regulated road transport contractor for the purpose of this Part.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15Q Meaning of regulated road transport contractor

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part refers to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor during this Part
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation definition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: A reference to an independent contractor includes a reference to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part refers to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference from definition
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: A reference to an independent contractor includes a reference to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part refers to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor including other definitions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inclusive definition
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: A reference to an independent contractor includes a reference to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part refers to an independent contractor including an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusive definition
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Independent contractor is defined as a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part refers to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: A reference to an independent contractor includes a reference to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part refers to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor including other definitions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Inclusive definition
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: A reference to an independent contractor includes a reference to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15Q(2) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor

15R Meaning of road transport business
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15R(1) Meaning of road transport business
has part: 15R(2) Meaning of road transport business
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15r
schema version: 2

15R(1) Meaning of road transport business
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
note: Defines road transport business
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15r-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15R Meaning of road transport business

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15R(1) Meaning of road transport business

15R(2) Meaning of road transport business
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
note: Business or undertaking may be specified by name or class.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15r-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15R Meaning of road transport business

15RA Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15RA(1) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
has part: 15RA(2) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ra
schema version: 2

15RA(1) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
note: Defines road transport contractual chain
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ra-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ra-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15RA Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ra-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15RA(1) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road

15RA(2) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
note: Defines a person in a road transport contractual chain.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ra-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15ra-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15RA Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ra-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15RA(2) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road

15RB Meaning of a road transport employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
note: Defines road transport employee-like worker
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15rb-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15rb-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15rb
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15rb-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Road transport employee-like worker
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: Employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15rb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15RB Meaning of a road transport employee-like worker

15S Meaning of road transport industry
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
note: Defines road transport industry
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15s-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15s-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15s
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: road transport industry means...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of the term
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15s-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15S Meaning of road transport industry

16 Meaning of base rate of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16(1) Meaning of base rate of pay
has part: 16(2) Meaning of base rate of pay
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

16(1) Meaning of base rate of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
note: Defines base rate of pay for national system employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Meaning of base rate of pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(1) Meaning of base rate of pay

16(2) Meaning of base rate of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
note: Employee's base rate of pay for National Employment Standards entitlements is specified by a modern award, enterprise agreement, or regulations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Meaning of base rate of pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies entitlements
modality: Deontic
operator: >

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(2) Meaning of base rate of pay

160 Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.335
curation status: Proposed
has part: 160(1) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
has part: 160(2) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-160
schema version: 2

160(1) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.335
note: The FWC may make a determination varying a modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-160-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 160 Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty

fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC has the power to make a determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 160(1) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty

160(2) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.335
note: The FWC may make a determination to remove ambiguity or uncertainty from modern awards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-160-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 160 Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty

fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC has the power to make a determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 160(2) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty

161 Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
curation status: Proposed
has part: 161(1) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
has part: 161(2) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
has part: 161(3) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-161
schema version: 2

161(1) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: The FWC must review a modern award if it is referred to it under section 46PW of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-161-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 161 Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human

fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must review a modern award.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 161(1) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human

161(2) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: Entitlement to make submissions for consideration in the review
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-161-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 161 Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human

fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement to make submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: entitledTo

161(3) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: FWC must vary modern award if it requires unlawful act
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-161-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 161 Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human

fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must vary modern award
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits doing an act that would be unlawful
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Act would be unlawful under any of the Acts referred to in subsection (2)

162 General
type: Concept
references: sec-582
references: sec-590
references: sec-596
references: sec-601
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.337
note: References other provisions in Part 5-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-162-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-162
schema version: 2

163 Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.337
curation status: Proposed
has part: 163(1) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
has part: 163(2) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-163
schema version: 2

163(1) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.337
note: Employers must not vary modern awards without proper justification.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-163-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 163 Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits varying modern awards without justification.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 163(1) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards

163(2) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.337
note: FWC must consider varying an existing modern award before making a new one.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-163-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 163 Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider varying an existing modern award.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 163(2) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards

164 Special criteria for revoking modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
note: FWC must not revoke modern awards without specific criteria
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-164-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-164-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-164
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-164-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-164-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 164 Special criteria for revoking modern awards

165 When variation determinations come into operation, other than
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
curation status: Proposed
has part: 165(1) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
has part: 165(2) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
has part: 165(3) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-165
schema version: 2

165(1) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
note: Determination under this Part that varies a modern award comes into operation on the specified day.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-165-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 165 When variation determinations come into operation, other than

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determination under this Part that varies a modern award comes into operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: comes-into-operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(1) When variation determinations come into operation, other than

165(2) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
note: Determination must not be earlier than the specified day unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-165-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 165 When variation determinations come into operation, other than

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Determination must be made on or after the specified day.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAt
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determination must be made on or after the specified day.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determination may be made earlier if exceptional circumstances justify it.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determination must be made on or after the specified day.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Determinations take effect from first full pay period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Determination takes effect from first full pay period.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(2) When variation determinations come into operation, other than

165(3) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
note: Determination takes effect on first full pay period after operation day
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-165-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 165 When variation determinations come into operation, other than

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates to temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relates to temporal intervals
premise text: (3) The determination does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the determination comes into operation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes variation determinations
modality: CogAI
operator: analyzes variation determinations
premise text: (3) The determination does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the determination comes into operation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determination takes effect on first full pay period after operation day
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
premise text: (3) The determination does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the determination comes into operation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses variation determinations
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses variation determinations
premise text: (3) The determination does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the determination comes into operation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applies to trace of variation determinations
modality: LTL
operator: applies to trace of variation determinations
premise text: (3) The determination does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the determination comes into operation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 165(3) When variation determinations come into operation, other than

166 When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
curation status: Proposed
has part: 166(1) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
has part: 166(2) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
has part: 166(3) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-166
schema version: 2

166(1) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
note: Commencement of modern award minimum wages determinations
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-166-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 166 When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking

166(2) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
note: The FWC must not specify another day unless it is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-166-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 166 When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking

fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The specified day meets the condition for operation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MeetsCondition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must not specify another day.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(2) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking

166(3) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
note: Must not be earlier than the day of determination unless certain conditions apply.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-166-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 166 When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking

fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not be earlier than the day of determination unless certain conditions apply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 166(3) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking

167 Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
curation status: Proposed
has part: 167(1) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
has part: 167(2) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
has part: 167(3) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-167
schema version: 2

167(1) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: Section applies under certain conditions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-167-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 167 Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: section applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: day before the day on which the determination is made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: section applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional application
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: subsection 165(2) or 166(3)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 167(1) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards

167(2) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: Validity of approval unaffected by retrospective effect
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-167-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 167 Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 167(2) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards

167(3) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: No pecuniary penalty for conduct before determination if it wouldn't have contravened a term of the modern award or enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-167-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 167 Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No exemption applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 167(3) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards

168 Varied modern award must be published
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341
curation status: Proposed
has part: 168(1) Varied modern award must be published
has part: 168(2) Varied modern award must be published
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168
schema version: 2

168(1) Varied modern award must be published
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341
note: FWC must publish varied modern award as soon as practicable.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 168 Varied modern award must be published

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish varied modern award.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168(1) Varied modern award must be published

168(2) Varied modern award must be published
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341
note: Publication of modern award must be done by the FWC.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 168 Varied modern award must be published

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish modern award.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Publication is a requirement for the FWC.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168(2) Varied modern award must be published

168A Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
curation status: Proposed
has part: 168A(1) Modern enterprise awards
has part: 168A(2) Modern enterprise awards
has part: 168A(3) Modern enterprise awards
has part: 168A(4) Modern enterprise awards
has part: 168A(5) Modern enterprise awards
has part: 168A(6) Modern enterprise awards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168a
schema version: 2

168A(1) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: Provisions in this Division have effect despite anything else in this Part.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards

168A(2) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: Defines a modern enterprise award
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the employers all carry on similar business activities under the same franchise...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal relationship between enterprises
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (ii) related bodies corporate of the same franchisor

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...A modern enterprise award is a modern award that is expressed to relate to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on employers to relate to a single enterprise or multiple enterprises
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (a) a single enterprise (or a part of a single enterprise) only; or (b) one or more enterprises...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...A modern enterprise award is a modern award that is expressed to relate to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the scope of a modern enterprise award
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (a) or (b)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the employers all carry on similar business activities under the same franchise...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Describes the relationship between employers and franchisors using linear logic
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =
premise text: (i) franchisees of the same franchisor; or (ii) related bodies corporate of the same franchisor

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168A(2) Modern enterprise awards

168A(3) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: Definition of a single enterprise
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...carried on by an employer; or...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
premise text: (3) A single enterprise is...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the activities carried on by...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: ¬∃
premise text: (3) A single enterprise is...

168A(4) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: Joint venture employers are considered one employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a duty to consider joint ventures as one employer
modality: Deontic
operator: implication

168A(5) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: Single enterprise considered one employer and single enterprise considered one single enterprise.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Single enterprise is considered one single enterprise.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
premise text: 2 or more related bodies corporate carry on a single enterprise.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Single enterprise considered one employer and single enterprise considered one single enterprise.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168A(5) Modern enterprise awards

168A(6) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: Defines part of a single enterprise
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A part of a single enterprise includes...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies part of an enterprise
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a geographically distinct part of the single enterprise; or (b) a distinct operational or organisational unit within the single enterprise.

168B The modern enterprise awards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
curation status: Proposed
has part: 168B(1) The modern enterprise awards objective
has part: 168B(2) The modern enterprise awards objective
has part: 168B(3) The modern enterprise awards objective
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168b
schema version: 2

168B(1) The modern enterprise awards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
note: The FWC must recognise that modern enterprise awards may provide terms and conditions tailored to reflect employment arrangements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 168B The modern enterprise awards objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must recognise that modern enterprise awards may provide terms and conditions tailored to reflect employment arrangements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168B(1) The modern enterprise awards objective

168B(2) The modern enterprise awards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
note: The modern enterprise awards objective applies to the performance of FWC's functions or powers under this Act, so far as they relate to modern enterprise awards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 168B The modern enterprise awards objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to the performance of FWC's functions or powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168B(2) The modern enterprise awards objective

168B(3) The modern enterprise awards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
note: Reference to modern enterprise awards objective is taken to include a reference to the modern enterprise awards objective.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 168B The modern enterprise awards objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reference to modern enterprise awards objective
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference is taken
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Modern enterprise awards objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168B(3) The modern enterprise awards objective

168C Rules about making and revoking modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
note: FWC cannot make or vary modern enterprise awards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168c
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making modern enterprise awards.
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168c-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168C Rules about making and revoking modern enterprise awards

168D Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
curation status: Proposed
has part: 168D(1) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
has part: 168D(2) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168d
schema version: 2

168D(1) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
note: FWC must not vary modern enterprise award to extend its coverage.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 168D Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not vary modern enterprise award.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168D(1) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards

168D(2) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
note: Considerations for varying modern enterprise award coverage
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 168D Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Contains temporal interval for decision-making process
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) In deciding whether to make a determination varying the coverage of a modern enterprise award...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider certain factors when varying coverage
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) In deciding whether to make a determination varying the coverage of a modern enterprise award...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168D(2) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards

168E State reference public sector modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
curation status: Proposed
has part: 168E(1) State reference public sector modern awards
has part: 168E(2) State reference public sector modern awards
has part: 168E(3) State reference public sector modern awards
has part: 168E(4) State reference public sector modern awards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168e
schema version: 2

168E(1) State reference public sector modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: Provisions in this Division have effect despite anything else in this Part.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 168E State reference public sector modern awards

168E(2) State reference public sector modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: Employers and employees must be specified in the modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 168E State reference public sector modern awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers and employees must be specified in the modern award.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168E(2) State reference public sector modern awards

168E(3) State reference public sector modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: Defines a State reference public sector employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 168E State reference public sector modern awards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a State reference public sector employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: =

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168E(3) State reference public sector modern awards

168E(4) State reference public sector modern awards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: Definition of State reference public sector employer
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 168E State reference public sector modern awards

168F The State reference public sector modern awards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
curation status: Proposed
has part: 168F(1) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
has part: 168F(2) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
has part: 168F(3) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168f
schema version: 2

168F(1) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: The State must recognise the need to facilitate arrangements for State reference public sector employers and employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 168F The State reference public sector modern awards objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The State has an obligation to recognise...
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168F(1) The State reference public sector modern awards objective

168F(2) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: The State reference public sector modern awards objective applies to the performance of the FWC’s functions or powers under this Act, so far as they relate to State reference public sector modern awards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 168F The State reference public sector modern awards objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to the performance of FWC’s functions or powers under this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168F(2) The State reference public sector modern awards objective

168F(3) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
note: Reference to modern awards objective includes State reference public sector modern awards objective.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 168F The State reference public sector modern awards objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference to modern awards objective includes State reference public sector modern awards objective.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168F(3) The State reference public sector modern awards objective

168G Making State reference public sector modern awards on
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
curation status: Proposed
has part: 168G(1) Making State reference public sector modern awards on
has part: 168G(2) Making State reference public sector modern awards on
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168g
schema version: 2

168G(1) Making State reference public sector modern awards on
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
note: FWC must make State reference public sector modern award on application
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 168G Making State reference public sector modern awards on

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must make award
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make State reference public sector modern award
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 158

168G(2) Making State reference public sector modern awards on
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
note: Specify employers, employees and organisations to be covered by the proposed award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 168G Making State reference public sector modern awards on

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify employers, employees and organisations to be covered by the proposed award.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168G(2) Making State reference public sector modern awards on

168H State reference public sector modern awards may contain
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
note: Section 154 does not apply in relation to State reference public sector modern awards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168h-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168h-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168h
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State reference public sector modern awards
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 154 does not apply
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply
premise text: Section 154

168J When State reference public sector modern awards come into
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
note: Defines commencement of State reference public sector modern awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168j-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168j
schema version: 2

168K Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
curation status: Proposed
has part: 168K(1) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
has part: 168K(2) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
has part: 168K(3) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168k
schema version: 2

168K(1) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
note: Determination to revoke State reference public sector modern award
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 168K Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to revoke
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

168K(2) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
note: No revocation of State reference public sector modern award without certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 168K Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless the FWC is satisfied that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No revocation without certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: FWC must not make a determination revoking a State reference public sector modern award.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168K(2) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern

168K(3) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
note: Considerations for revoking a State reference public sector modern award
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 168K Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must consider the circumstances leading to the award making
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consideration of circumstances leading to award making
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (a) the circumstances that led to the making of the modern award;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must take into account the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State must consider certain factors when revoking an award
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to revoke a State reference public sector modern award...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must provide additional information in regulations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State must provide certain information in regulations
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (f) any other matter prescribed by the regulations.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must consider the views of the persons covered by the modern award
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Consideration of views of persons covered by the modern award
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (e) the views of the persons covered by the modern award;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168K(3) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern

168L Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
curation status: Proposed
has part: 168L(1) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
has part: 168L(2) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
has part: 168L(3) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168l
schema version: 2

168L(1) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
note: Determination of varying coverage of State reference public sector modern award
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 168L Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector

168L(2) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
note: FWC must not vary coverage of State reference public sector modern award
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 168L Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The FWC must not make a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award so that it ceases to be a State reference public sector modern award.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive AI application
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (2) The FWC must not make a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award so that it ceases to be a State reference public sector modern award.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) The FWC must not make a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award so that it ceases to be a State reference public sector modern award.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The FWC must not make a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award so that it ceases to be a State reference public sector modern award.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168L(2) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector

168L(3) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
note: Consider circumstances, terms and conditions of employment, impact on persons covered, views of persons covered, and other prescribed matters when deciding whether to make a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-168l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 168L Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The FWC must consider the impact on persons covered, or proposed to be covered, by the modern award of a decision to make, or not make, the variation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: A decision to make, or not make, the variation must be based on consideration of certain factors.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain factors when making a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168L(3) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector

169 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.351
note: Defines enterprise agreements and their terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-169-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-169-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-169
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-169-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the types of matters that can be included in an enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-169-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 169 Guide to this Part

17 Meaning of child of a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 17(1) Meaning of child of a person
has part: 17(2) Meaning of child of a person
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17
schema version: 2

17(1) Meaning of child of a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
note: Defines child of a person for family law purposes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Meaning of child of a person

fair-work-act-2009-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(1) Meaning of child of a person

17(2) Meaning of child of a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
note: Determine family relationships based on child being a child of another person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Meaning of child of a person

fair-work-act-2009-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(2) Meaning of child of a person

170 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-170
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a definition.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 170 Meanings of employee and employer

171 Objects of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352
note: Objects of this Part are to provide a simple, flexible and fair framework for collective bargaining in good faith.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-171-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-171
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-171-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 171 Objects of this Part

172 Making an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
curation status: Proposed
has part: 172(1) Making an enterprise agreement
has part: 172(2) Making an enterprise agreement
has part: 172(3) Making an enterprise agreement
has part: 172(3A) Making an enterprise agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-172
schema version: 2

172(1) Making an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
note: Enterprise agreement matters
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-172-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 172 Making an enterprise agreement

172(2) Making an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
note: Employers may make an enterprise agreement with employees or relevant employee organisations
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-172-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 172 Making an enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make an enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: Employers may make an enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of employers and employees
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
premise text: Employer or employers are related employers

172(3) Making an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
note: Multi-enterprise agreements can be made with employees or employee organisations under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-172-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 172 Making an enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a temporal interval for approval
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for approval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
premise text: The FWC must not approve a multi-enterprise agreement that is not a greenfields agreement within a certain time frame

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There are conditions for approval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies the conditions for approval
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: The FWC must not approve a multi-enterprise agreement that is not a greenfields agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agreement is of a certain type
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies the type of agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The entities are classified as employees or employee organisations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the entities involved in the agreement
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The agreement is made with employees or employee organisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The entities are classified as employees or employee organisations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the entities involved in the agreement
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: >
premise text: The agreement is made with employees or employee organisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a trace of events for approval
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies the trace of events for approval
modality: LTL
operator: >
premise text: The FWC must not approve a multi-enterprise agreement that is not a greenfields agreement if certain conditions are not met

172(3A) Making an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
note: Two or more related employers may make a multi-enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-172-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 172 Making an enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers have the obligation to make a multi-enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

172A Special measures to achieve equality
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.357
note: Special measures to achieve equality are permitted.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-172a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to achieve equality through special measures.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits special measures to achieve equality.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Section 172(1)(a)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 172A Special measures to achieve equality

173 Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
curation status: Proposed
has part: 173(1) Notice of employee representational rights
has part: 173(2) Notice of employee representational rights
has part: 173(2A) Notice of employee representational rights
has part: 173(3) Notice of employee representational rights
has part: 173(4) Notice of employee representational rights
has part: 173(5) Notice of employee representational rights
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-173
schema version: 2

173(1) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: Employer must give notice of employee representational rights
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-173-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must give notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 173(1) Notice of employee representational rights

173(2) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
description: Notice of employee representational rights
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: Employer must notify employees of proposed enterprise agreement within specified timeframe.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-173-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to notify employees.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 173(2) Notice of employee representational rights

173(2A) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
description: Notice in writing
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: Employer must provide notice to bargaining representative when proposing single-enterprise agreement that replaces earlier agreement and meets certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-173-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 173(2A) Notice of employee representational rights

173(3) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: Employer must give notice within 14 days after agreement notification time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-173-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must give notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 173(3) Notice of employee representational rights

173(4) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: No notice required if previous notice given within reasonable period
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-173-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from notice requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

173(5) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: Regulations may prescribe how notices under subsection (1) may be given.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-173-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations prescribe how notices may be given.
modality: Deontic
operator: mayPrescribe

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 173(5) Notice of employee representational rights

174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
curation status: Proposed
has part: 174(1) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
has part: 174(1A) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
has part: 174(1B) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
has part: 174(2) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
has part: 174(3) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
has part: 174(5) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-174
schema version: 2

174(1) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
description: Notice requirements
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
note: Employer must give notice to employee under subsection 173(1)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-174-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must give notice to employee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 174(1) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

174(1A) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
note: Notice must contain prescribed content and be in prescribed form.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-174-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice with prescribed content and form.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 174(1A) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

174(1B) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
description: Notice of employee representational rights
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
note: Employer must ensure notice complies with this section.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-174-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must ensure notice complies with this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 174(1B) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

174(2) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
description: Notice of employee representational rights
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
note: Employee must appoint a bargaining representative
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-174-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The notice contains information about the employee's right to appoint a bargaining representative
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must appoint a bargaining representative
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 174(2) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

174(3) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
note: Employee must provide notice of representation rights
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-174-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 174(3) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

174(5) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
note: Employee must receive notice explaining effect of paragraph 178(2)(a)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-174-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 174(5) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

176 Bargaining representatives for proposed enterprise agreements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.361
note: Employer and employee organisations are bargaining representatives for proposed enterprise agreements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-176-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-176-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-176
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-176-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer and employee organisations have a duty to be bargaining representatives.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-176-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176 Bargaining representatives for proposed enterprise agreements

177 Bargaining representatives for proposed enterprise agreements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363
note: Employer and employee organization must bargain for a proposed single-enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-177-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-177-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-177
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-177-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer and employee organization must bargain for a proposed single-enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-177-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 177 Bargaining representatives for proposed enterprise agreements

177A Restrictions on removed persons being bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363
note: Definition of removed persons
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-177a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-177a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-177a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 177A Restrictions on removed persons being bargaining

178 Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
curation status: Proposed
has part: 178(1) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
has part: 178(2) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
has part: 178(3) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178
schema version: 2

178(1) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
note: Appointment of bargaining representative comes into force on specified day.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 178 Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Appointment takes effect
modality: Deontic
operator: comes-into-force

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 178(1) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters

178(2) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
note: Employers and employees must provide certain information upon appointment of bargaining representatives.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 178 Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers and employees must provide certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

178(3) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
note: Prescribes matters relating to qualifications or appointment of bargaining representatives.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 178 Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribe

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 178(3) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters

178A Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
curation status: Proposed
has part: 178A(1) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
has part: 178A(2) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178a
schema version: 2

178A(1) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
note: Appointment of bargaining representative may be revoked by written instrument.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 178A Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation and appointment have overlapping temporal intervals
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between revocation and appointment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: (1) The appointment of a bargaining representative for an enterprise agreement may be revoked by written instrument.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation implies appointment cancellation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication from revocation to appointment cancellation
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) The appointment of a bargaining representative for an enterprise agreement may be revoked by written instrument.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation can be inferred from appointment cancellation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inferred revocation from appointment cancellation
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (1) The appointment of a bargaining representative for an enterprise agreement may be revoked by written instrument.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The appointment can be revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Appointment revocation obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: (1) The appointment of a bargaining representative for an enterprise agreement may be revoked by written instrument.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation propagates to related entities
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagated revocation to related entities
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) The appointment of a bargaining representative for an enterprise agreement may be revoked by written instrument.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 178A(1) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.

178A(2) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
note: Duty to revoke appointment of bargaining representatives
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 178A Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to revoke appointment of bargaining representatives
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 178A(2) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.

178B Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
curation status: Proposed
has part: 178B(1) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
has part: 178B(2) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
has part: 178B(3) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178b
schema version: 2

178B(1) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
type: Concept
description: Notice to employee organisations
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
note: Employer must give written notice to employee organisations within a specified period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 178B Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 178B(1) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise

178B(2) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
note: Employer must provide notice to employee organisations within a specified period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 178B Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 178B(2) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise

178B(3) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
note: Notice has no effect unless agreed upon by other employer or employers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-178b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 178B Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agreement is required for notice to be effective.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negation of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: Notice has no effect unless agreed upon.

179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
curation status: Proposed
has part: 179(1) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
has part: 179(2) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
has part: 179(3) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
has part: 179(4) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
has part: 179(5) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
has part: 179(6) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179
schema version: 2

179(1) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
note: Organisations must provide disclosure documents to employers covered by an enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide disclosure documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179(1) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives

179(2) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
note: List of persons required for disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Discloses persons during certain periods
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires disclosure of certain persons
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179(2) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives

179(3) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
note: Organisations must disclose documents to employers before a certain time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

179(4) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
note: Organisations must disclose beneficial terms and conditions of employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179(4) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives

179(5) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
note: Organisations must not make false or misleading representations when providing documents.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making false or misleading representations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

179(6) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
note: Definition of a section 179 disclosable benefit
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classification of benefits
modality: Deontic
operator: hasType

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 179(6) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives

179A Disclosure by employers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
note: Employers must prepare a document if they will receive or obtain a section 179A disclosable benefit.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-179a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must prepare a document.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

17A Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 17A(1) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
has part: 17A(2) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
has part: 17A(3) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17a
schema version: 2

17A(1) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
note: Defines chain of arrangements for supply or production of goods produced by TCF work performed by a person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 17A Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)

17A(2) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
note: Exemptions from direct or indirect performance of TCF work
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 17A Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17A(2) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)

17A(3) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
note: Exemption from application of section for Division 2A or 2B
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 17A Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the purposes of Division 2A or 2B
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section does not apply for specified divisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
premise text: (3) This section does not apply...

18 Meaning of full rate of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(1) Meaning of full rate of pay
has part: 18(2) Meaning of full rate of pay
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

18(1) Meaning of full rate of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
note: Defines full rate of pay for national system employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Meaning of full rate of pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(1) Meaning of full rate of pay

18(2) Meaning of full rate of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
note: Employee's full rate of pay is adjusted based on applicable paragraphs.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Meaning of full rate of pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(2) Meaning of full rate of pay

180 Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180(1) Certain pre-approval requirements
has part: 180(4A) Certain pre-approval requirements
has part: 180(4B) Certain pre-approval requirements
has part: 180(4C) Certain pre-approval requirements
has part: 180(5) Certain pre-approval requirements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180
schema version: 2

180(1) Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
description: Copy of disclosure documents
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
note: Employer must comply with requirements before requesting employee approval for enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Certain pre-approval requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to comply with requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180(4A) Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
description: Copy of the document
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
note: Employer must take reasonable steps to provide employees with a copy of the document before the voting process starts.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Certain pre-approval requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide employees with a copy of the document.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180(4B) Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
note: Employer must provide employees with a copy of the document before voting process starts.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180-ss-4b
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Certain pre-approval requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide employees with a copy of the document.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180(4B) Certain pre-approval requirements

180(4C) Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
note: False or misleading representation of employee access to documents
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180-ss-4c
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Certain pre-approval requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No access to documents
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on false or misleading representation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employer must not make a false or misleading representation

180(5) Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
description: Explanation of terms and effect
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
note: Ensure explanation of terms and effect to employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Certain pre-approval requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180A Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180A(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
has part: 180A(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180a
schema version: 2

180A(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: This section applies to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a multi-enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180A Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to proposed enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180A(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee

180A(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
description: Written agreement from bargaining representatives
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: Employer cannot request employee approval for enterprise agreement without written agreement from bargaining representatives.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180A Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of requesting employee approval without written agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180A(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee

180B Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180B(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
has part: 180B(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180b
schema version: 2

180B(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: This section applies to a proposed single-enterprise agreement if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180B Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies during the nominal expiry date of the old agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section applies during the nominal expiry date of the old agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) the old agreement has not passed its nominal expiry date;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section implies that the new agreement will cease to apply to the employee in relation to that employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Section implies that the new agreement will cease to apply to the employee in relation to that employment.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (c) when the new agreement comes into operation, the old agreement will cease to apply to the employee in relation to that employment;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section implies that the new agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Section implies that the new agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: (a) a single interest employer agreement or a supported bargaining agreement (each of which is an old agreement)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies to a proposed single-enterprise agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies if conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (a) a single interest employer agreement or a supported bargaining agreement (each of which is an old agreement)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section implies that the old agreement is no longer applicable to the employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section implies that the old agreement is no longer applicable to the employee.
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: (c) when the new agreement comes into operation, the old agreement will cease to apply to the employee in relation to that employment;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180B(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee

180B(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
description: Written agreement from each employee organisation to which the old agreement applies.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: Employer cannot request employee approval for new agreement without written agreement from employee organisations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-180b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180B Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of requesting employee approval without written agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180B(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee

181 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.375
curation status: Proposed
has part: 181(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
has part: 181(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
has part: 181(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181
schema version: 2

181(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.375
note: Employers must request employee approval for proposed enterprise agreements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 181 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer obligation to request employee approval.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 181(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

181(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.375
note: Request for employee approval must wait 21 days after last notice under subsection 173(1)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 181 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

181(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.375
note: Employees may vote by ballot or electronic method
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-181-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 181 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 181(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

182 When an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
curation status: Proposed
has part: 182(1) When an enterprise agreement is made
has part: 182(2) When an enterprise agreement is made
has part: 182(3) When an enterprise agreement is made
has part: 182(4) When an enterprise agreement is made
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182
schema version: 2

182(1) When an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
note: Approval by majority of employees for a proposed single-enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 182 When an enterprise agreement is made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agreement commences after approval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between approval and agreement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Approval must occur before the agreement takes effect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Approval is required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve the agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Employees must approve the agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182(1) When an enterprise agreement is made

182(2) When an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
note: Enterprise agreement approval process
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 182 When an enterprise agreement is made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the agreement is made immediately after the end of the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between enterprise agreement approval and commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If: (a) a proposed enterprise agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement; and (b) the employees of each of the employers that will be covered by the agreement have been asked to approve the agreement under subsection 181(1); and (c) those employees have voted on whether or not to approve the agreement; and (d) a majority of the employees of at least one of those employers who cast a valid vote have approved the agreement;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the agreement is made immediately after the end of the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enterprise agreement approval by majority vote
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) a proposed enterprise agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement; and (b) the employees of each of the employers that will be covered by the agreement have been asked to approve the agreement under subsection 181(1); and (c) those employees have voted on whether or not to approve the agreement; and (d) a majority of the employees of at least one of those employers who cast a valid vote have approved the agreement;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the agreement is made immediately after the end of the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State's obligation to make enterprise agreements immediately after approval
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) If: (a) a proposed enterprise agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement; and (b) the employees of each of the employers that will be covered by the agreement have been asked to approve the agreement under subsection 181(1); and (c) those employees have voted on whether or not to approve the agreement; and (d) a majority of the employees of at least one of those employers who cast a valid vote have approved the agreement;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the agreement is made immediately after the end of the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring approval process for enterprise agreements
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (2) If: (a) a proposed enterprise agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement; and (b) the employees of each of the employers that will be covered by the agreement have been asked to approve the agreement under subsection 181(1); and (c) those employees have voted on whether or not to approve the agreement; and (d) a majority of the employees of at least one of those employers who cast a valid vote have approved the agreement;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182(2) When an enterprise agreement is made

182(3) When an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
note: Employers and employee organisations must sign a greenfields agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 182 When an enterprise agreement is made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers and employee organisations must sign a greenfields agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182(3) When an enterprise agreement is made

182(4) When an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
note: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement before applying for FWC approval.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-182-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 182 When an enterprise agreement is made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The employer's obligation is to give each of the employee organisations that were bargaining representatives for the agreement a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement at least one day before applying for FWC approval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement before applying for FWC approval.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The employer's obligation is to give each of the employee organisations that were bargaining representatives for the agreement a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement, and then apply for FWC approval, in an inclusive manner.
modality: Diffusion
operator: INCLUSIVE
premise text: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement before applying for FWC approval.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: The employer's obligation is to give each of the employee organisations that were bargaining representatives for the agreement a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement, and then apply for FWC approval.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
premise text: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement before applying for FWC approval.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The employer's obligation is to give each of the employee organisations that were bargaining representatives for the agreement a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement, and then apply for FWC approval, in a recursive manner.
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement before applying for FWC approval.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182(4) When an enterprise agreement is made

183 Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.377
curation status: Proposed
has part: 183(1) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
has part: 183(2) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-183
schema version: 2

183(1) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.377
note: Employee organisation can give notice to FWC for enterprise agreement coverage.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-183-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 183 Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee organisation has an obligation to give notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 183(1) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise

183(2) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.377
note: Notice must be given to FWC and employers before approval.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-183-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 183 Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice is temporally related to the approval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between notice and approval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The notice must be given before the FWC approves the agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The approval implies that the notice was provided.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Approval implies notice
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: If the FWC approves the agreement, then the employer must provide notice.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer must provide notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The notice must be given to the FWC, and a copy given to each employer covered by the enterprise agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 183(2) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise

184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378
curation status: Proposed
has part: 184(1) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
has part: 184(2) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
has part: 184(3) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
has part: 184(4) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
has part: 184(5) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184
schema version: 2

184(1) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378
note: Variation of multi-enterprise agreement not approved by all employees is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation of agreement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between employee approval and multi-enterprise agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) a multi-enterprise agreement is made; and (b) the agreement was not approved by the employees of all of the employers that made a request under subsection 181(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation of agreement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of multi-enterprise agreements based on employee approval.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) a multi-enterprise agreement is made; and (b) the agreement was not approved by the employees of all of the employers that made a request under subsection 181(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation of agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of variation without employee approval.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a multi-enterprise agreement is made; and (b) the agreement was not approved by the employees of all of the employers that made a request under subsection 181(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation of agreement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of employee approval and multi-enterprise agreements.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) a multi-enterprise agreement is made; and (b) the agreement was not approved by the employees of all of the employers that made a request under subsection 181(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation of agreement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of employee approval and multi-enterprise agreements.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (a) a multi-enterprise agreement is made; and (b) the agreement was not approved by the employees of all of the employers that made a request under subsection 181(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 184(1) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees

184(2) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378
note: Variation of agreement to cover specific employers and employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation must be expressed to cover only the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: Before a bargaining representative applies under section 185 for approval of the agreement...
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Before a bargaining representative applies under section 185 for approval of the agreement...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agreement must be varied so that it covers only the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Before a bargaining representative applies under section 185 for approval of the agreement...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation must be expressed to cover only the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed obligation: The bargaining representative must vary the agreement...
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Before a bargaining representative applies under section 185 for approval of the agreement...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation must cover only the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace: The variation must cover only the following:
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) each employer whose employees approved the agreement;

184(3) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378
note: Notice must be given to other bargaining representatives
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: written notice must be given
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 184(3) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees

184(4) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
description: Notice specifying employers and employees
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378
note: Employers must specify employees in a varied agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must specify employees
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 184(4) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees

184(5) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378
note: No notice required for unknown bargaining representatives.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-184-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 184(5) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees

185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
curation status: Proposed
has part: 185(1) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
has part: 185(1A) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
has part: 185(2) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
has part: 185(3) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
has part: 185(4) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
has part: 185(5) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185
schema version: 2

185(1) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
note: Must apply to FWC for approval of enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

185(1A) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
description: Material to accompany the application
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
note: Application for FWC approval must be made by employer or employee organisation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185(1A) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval

185(2) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
description: Signed copy of the agreement and required declarations
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
note: Application must be accompanied by a signed copy of the agreement and required declarations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

185(3) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
note: Application for FWC approval must be made within 14 days or a further period as allowed by the FWC.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified time frame.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

185(4) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
note: Application for FWC approval must be made within 14 days after agreement is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within 14 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

185(5) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
note: Must apply for FWC's approval
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185(5) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval

185A Material that must accompany an application under
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
note: Application must be accompanied by agreement and declarations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-185a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by agreement and declarations.
modality: Deontic
operator: must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185A Material that must accompany an application under

186 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 186(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 186(2A) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 186(2B) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186
schema version: 2

186(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
note: The FWC must approve an enterprise agreement if requirements are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve an enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

186(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
note: The FWC must approve an enterprise agreement if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must approve an enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

186(2A) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
note: The FWC must approve a cooperative workplace agreement if some employees were represented by an employee organisation during bargaining.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 186 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC's approval is conditional on the representation of some employees during bargaining.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The FWC's approval is conditional on the representation of some employees during bargaining.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The FWC's approval is dependent on certain conditions being met.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agreement must be approved by the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must approve the agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC has a duty to approve cooperative workplace agreements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agreement cannot cover employees in relation to general building and construction work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The agreement must not cover employees in relation to general building and construction work.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_NOT
premise text: Multi-enterprise agreements must not cover employees in relation to general building and construction work.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must approve cooperative workplace agreements that are not greenfields agreements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC has a duty to approve cooperative workplace agreements that are not greenfields agreements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC has a responsibility to approve cooperative workplace agreements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agreement must be approved by the FWC if some employees were represented by an employee organisation during bargaining.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The agreement must be approved by the FWC if some employees were represented by an employee organisation during bargaining.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: The agreement's approval is dependent on certain conditions being met.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186(2A) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

186(2B) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
note: FWC must approve multi-enterprise agreement not covering general building and construction work
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-186-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 186 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186(2B) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

187 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.383
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 187(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 187(3) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 187(4) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-187
schema version: 2

187(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.383
note: Requirement that approval not be inconsistent with good faith bargaining etc.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-187-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requirement to approve enterprise agreements in good faith
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

187(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.383
note: FWC must approve enterprise agreement if it would undermine good faith bargaining.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-187-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must approve the agreement within a certain timeframe if it would undermine good faith bargaining.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: FWC must approve enterprise agreement within a certain timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) The FWC must be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining by one or more bargaining representatives for a proposed enterprise agreement, or an enterprise agreement, in relation to which a scope order is in operation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC MUST approve enterprise agreement if it would undermine good faith bargaining.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC MUST be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining by one or more bargaining representatives for a proposed enterprise agreement, or an enterprise agreement, in relation to which a scope order is in operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The FWC must be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining by one or more bargaining representatives for a proposed enterprise agreement, or an enterprise agreement, in relation to which a scope order is in operation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must approve the agreement recursively if it would undermine good faith bargaining.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: FWC must approve enterprise agreement recursively
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: (2) The FWC must be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining by one or more bargaining representatives for a proposed enterprise agreement, or an enterprise agreement, in relation to which a scope order is in operation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

187(3) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.383
note: FWC must approve enterprise agreement variation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-187-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187(3) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

187(4) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.383
note: FWC must be satisfied with certain provisions of Subdivision E of this Division.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-187-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 187 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to be satisfied
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187(4) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—

188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
curation status: Proposed
has part: 188(1) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
has part: 188(2) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
has part: 188(2A) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
has part: 188(3) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
has part: 188(4) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-188
schema version: 2

188(1) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
note: FWC must consider statement of principles when determining genuine agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-188-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider statement of principles
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 188(1) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been

188(2) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
note: Employees must request approval of an enterprise agreement by voting for it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-188-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employees must request approval of an enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 188(2) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been

188(2A) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
note: Employer must comply with section 180A or 180B for an enterprise agreement to be considered genuinely agreed upon.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-188-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 188(2A) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been

188(3) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
note: Employer must take reasonable steps to give notice in relation to an enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-188-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must take reasonable steps.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 188(3) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been

188(4) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
note: Employer must comply with notice provisions for genuine agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-188-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 188(4) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been

188A Disclosure documents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
note: Failure to comply with disclosure requirements
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-188a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits non-compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

188B Statement of principles on genuine agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
curation status: Proposed
has part: 188B(1) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
has part: 188B(2) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
has part: 188B(3) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-188b
schema version: 2

188B(1) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
type: Concept
description: Statement of principles for employers
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
note: Employers must make a statement of principles on genuine agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-188b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 188B Statement of principles on genuine agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Statement of principles for employers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must make a statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 188B(1) Statement of principles on genuine agreement

188B(2) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
note: Publish statement on website and other means
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-188b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 188B Statement of principles on genuine agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Publish the statement on the FWC’s website and by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The FWC must...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 188B(2) Statement of principles on genuine agreement

188B(3) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
type: Concept
description: Informing employees of bargaining, right to representation, reasonable opportunity to consider and vote on the agreement
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
note: Employees must be informed about certain matters before a proposed enterprise agreement is put to a vote.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-188b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 188B Statement of principles on genuine agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employees must be informed about certain matters before a proposed enterprise agreement is put to a vote.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 188B(3) Statement of principles on genuine agreement

189 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
curation status: Proposed
has part: 189(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
has part: 189(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
has part: 189(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
has part: 189(4) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-189
schema version: 2

189(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: FWC must approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass the better off overall test.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-189-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 189 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass

fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve an enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 189(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass

189(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement under certain circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-189-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 189 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass

fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Approval is contingent on exceptional circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 189(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass

189(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-189-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 189 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass

fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 189(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass

189(4) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: Nominal expiry date of an enterprise agreement approved by FWC
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-189-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 189 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass

19 Meaning of industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19(1) Meaning of industrial action
has part: 19(2) Meaning of industrial action
has part: 19(3) Meaning of industrial action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19
schema version: 2

19(1) Meaning of industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
note: Restricts certain actions by employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Meaning of industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the acceptance of or offering for work by an employee;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restricts actions during work hours
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) a ban, limitation or restriction on...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the adoption of a practice...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) Industrial action means...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by the employer of the employees.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits lockout of employees
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (d) the lockout of employees from their employment...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the result of which is a restriction or limitation on, or a delay in, the performance of the work;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines industrial action as a subclass of work-related actions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
premise text: (a) the performance of work by an employee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the performance of any work at all by employees who attend for work;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Limits actions until work is performed
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (c) a failure or refusal by employees to attend...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(1) Meaning of industrial action

19(2) Meaning of industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
note: Definition of industrial action, excluding certain actions authorized or agreed upon by the employer or employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Meaning of industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap between employee actions and employer directions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: (ii) the employee did not unreasonably fail to comply with a direction of his or her employer to perform other available work, whether at the same or another workplace, that was safe and appropriate for the employee to perform.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes certain actions from industrial action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (2) However, industrial action does not include the following:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(2) Meaning of industrial action

19(3) Meaning of industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
note: Prevents employees from performing work under their contracts of employment without terminating those contracts.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Meaning of industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employees from performing work without terminating their contracts.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) An employer locks out employees...

190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
curation status: Proposed
has part: 190(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
has part: 190(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
has part: 190(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
has part: 190(4) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
has part: 190(5) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-190
schema version: 2

190(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
note: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-190-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Permission
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the type of obligation or prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text describes an action that the FWC may take (approve an agreement with undertakings)

190(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
note: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-190-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as a permission or right
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Undertaking for titles, commencement, definitions, descriptive clauses, and amendment machinery

190(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
note: FWC must seek views of bargaining representatives before accepting a written undertaking from one or more employers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-190-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to seek views of bargaining representatives
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 190(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings

190(4) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
note: FWC must seek views of bargaining representatives before accepting an undertaking.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-190-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC has sought the views of each person who the FWC knows is a bargaining representative for the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for seeking views of bargaining representatives.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (4) The FWC must not accept an undertaking unless...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC has sought the views of each person who the FWC knows is a bargaining representative for the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to seek views of bargaining representatives.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must not accept an undertaking unless...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC has sought the views of each person who the FWC knows is a bargaining representative for the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide signature requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) The FWC must not accept an undertaking unless...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC has sought the views of each person who the FWC knows is a bargaining representative for the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for accepting undertakings.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (4) The FWC must not accept an undertaking unless...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 190(4) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings

190(5) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
note: The undertaking must meet any requirements relating to the signing of undertakings that are prescribed by the regulations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-190-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking must meet...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

191 Effect of undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
note: Defines terms and conditions of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-191
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligations for employers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes obligations for employers
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Employment terms

191A FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
curation status: Proposed
has part: 191A(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
has part: 191A(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
has part: 191A(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-191a
schema version: 2

191A(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
note: FWC must approve enterprise agreement with amendments if it does not meet better off overall test
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-191a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 191A FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 191A(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments

191A(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
note: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-191a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 191A FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

191A(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
note: Seek views of employer, award employees, and bargaining representative before specifying an amendment under subsection (2)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-191a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 191A FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to seek views of employer, award employees, and bargaining representative
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

191B Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
curation status: Proposed
has part: 191B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
has part: 191B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-191b
schema version: 2

191B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
note: The amendment is taken to be applied as the agreement applies to the employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-191b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 191B Effect of amendment specified by FWC

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between the amendment and the agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) If: (a) the FWC specifies an amendment in approving an enterprise agreement under subsection 191A(2); and (b) the agreement covers a single employer;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes the relationship between the amendment and its application.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) If: (a) the FWC specifies an amendment in approving an enterprise agreement under subsection 191A(2); and (b) the agreement covers a single employer;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Establishes the relationship between the amendment and its application.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (1) If: (a) the FWC specifies an amendment in approving an enterprise agreement under subsection 191A(2); and (b) the agreement covers a single employer;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to apply the amendment as specified.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Specifies how the amendment is applied.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) If: (a) the FWC specifies an amendment in approving an enterprise agreement under subsection 191A(2); and (b) the agreement covers a single employer;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 191B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC

191B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
note: Agreement is taken to be amended by the amendment as it applies to each employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-191b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 191B Effect of amendment specified by FWC

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as the agreement applies to each employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the amendment and the application of the agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If:...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the agreement is taken to be amended by the amendment, as the agreement applies to each employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to amend the agreement as it applies to each employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) If:...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as the agreement applies to each employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the amendment and the application of the agreement.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) If:...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 191B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC

192 When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
curation status: Proposed
has part: 192(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
has part: 192(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
has part: 192(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-192
schema version: 2

192(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
note: FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement if it considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-192-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 192 When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve the agreement overlap with the conditions under which a person commits an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or is liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Indicates that the conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement overlap with the conditions under which a person commits an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or is liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The CogAI system recognizes the conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Indicates that the CogAI system recognizes the conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC shall not approve the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the FWC from approving an enterprise agreement under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement if it considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve the agreement diffuse into other areas of law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Indicates that the conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement diffuse into other areas of law.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve the agreement repeat in certain circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Indicates that the conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement repeat in certain circumstances.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 192(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement

192(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
note: The FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-192-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 192 When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

192(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
note: FWC may refer agreement to any person or body
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-192-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 192 When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agreement may be referred to person or body
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: FWC considers appropriate person or body

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 192(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement

193 Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
curation status: Proposed
has part: 193(1) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(1A) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(2) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(2A) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(3) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(4) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(5) Passing the better off overall test
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193
schema version: 2

193(1) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: Enterprise agreement must pass better off overall test for covered employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enterprise agreement must pass better off overall test.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 193(1) Passing the better off overall test

193(1A) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: FWC must undertake assessment against paragraph (1)(b) for employees with dual status.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test

193(2) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: FWC must disregard individual flexibility arrangement for the purposes of determining whether the agreement passes the better off overall test.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must disregard individual flexibility arrangements.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 193(2) Passing the better off overall test

193(2A) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: Disregard individual flexibility arrangement for better off overall test purposes
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 193(2A) Passing the better off overall test

193(3) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: Ensure greenfields agreement passes better off overall test for all reasonably foreseeable employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The greenfields agreement passes the better off overall test under this section during the relevant modern award period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Ensure overlap between test time and agreement application.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
premise text: The FWC must be satisfied as at the test time that each reasonably foreseeable employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to the employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The greenfields agreement passes the better off overall test under this section for all employees who receive knowledge updates about the relevant modern award.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Ensure AI system updates knowledge about the better off overall test.
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeUpdate
premise text: The FWC must be satisfied as at the test time that each reasonably foreseeable employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to the employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The greenfields agreement passes the better off overall test under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure compliance with obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The FWC must be satisfied that each reasonably foreseeable employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to the employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The greenfields agreement passes the better off overall test under this section for all employees who receive information about the relevant modern award.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Ensure information about the better off overall test is disseminated.
modality: Diffusion
operator: InformationSpread
premise text: The FWC must be satisfied as at the test time that each reasonably foreseeable employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to the employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The greenfields agreement passes the better off overall test under this section for all employees during the relevant modern award period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ensure recurring compliance with obligation.
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRecurring
premise text: The FWC must be satisfied as at the test time that each reasonably foreseeable employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to the employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 193(3) Passing the better off overall test

193(4) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: Employee must meet certain conditions to be covered by a modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employee must be during the relevant modern award to be covered.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (ii) is in operation; and (iii) covers his or her employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must meet conditions to be covered by a modern award.
modality: Deontic
operator: mustMeetConditions
premise text: (4) An award covered employee for an enterprise agreement is an employee who:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 193(4) Passing the better off overall test

193(5) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: A reasonably foreseeable employee for an enterprise agreement is a person who would be covered by the agreement and a modern award.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...at the test time of an employer covered by the agreement:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope of the definition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (5) A reasonably foreseeable employee for an enterprise agreement is...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would be covered by the agreement and a modern award.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of the definition
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (5) A reasonably foreseeable employee for an enterprise agreement is...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a person who would be covered by the agreement and a modern award.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a reasonably foreseeable employee
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (5) A reasonably foreseeable employee for an enterprise agreement is...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a person who would be covered by the agreement and a modern award.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Combination of conditions
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: (5) A reasonably foreseeable employee for an enterprise agreement is...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 193(5) Passing the better off overall test

193A Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
curation status: Proposed
has part: 193A(1) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(2) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(3) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(4) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(5) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(6) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(6A) Applying the better off overall test
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193a
schema version: 2

193A(1) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Applying the better off overall test
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applies to determining whether an enterprise agreement passes the better off overall test
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) This section applies for the purposes of determining...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 193A(1) Applying the better off overall test

193A(2) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Undertake a global assessment of whether each employee concerned would be better off having regard to certain terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test

193A(3) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Consider views from employer, employees, and bargaining representative on whether agreement passes better off overall test.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sec-193a-ss-3 overlaps with other sections in Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The key overlaps with other sections in the Fair Work Act 2009.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: sec-193a-ss-3 overlaps with sec-193a-ss-2 and sec-193a-ss-4.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sec-193a-ss-3 recognizes the existence of a bargaining representative.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The key recognizes the existence of a bargaining representative for the agreement.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The FWC must give consideration to any views from a bargaining representative.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must consider these views.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consider views from employer, employees, and bargaining representative.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: FWC must give consideration to any views relating to whether the agreement passes the better off overall test.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sec-193a-ss-3 contains information about an enterprise agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The key contains information about an enterprise agreement.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Contains
premise text: sec-193a-ss-3 is part of a section that deals with enterprise agreements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sec-193a-ss-3 repeats a section number from Part 1 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The key repeats a section number from another part of the Fair Work Act 2009.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: sec-193a-ss-3 is numbered similarly to sec-193a-ss-2 and sec-193a-ss-4.

193A(4) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Primary consideration must be given to a common view on whether the agreement passes the better off overall test.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Primary consideration must be given.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 193A(4) Applying the better off overall test

193A(5) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Does not apply if agreement is a greenfields agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 193A(5) Applying the better off overall test

193A(6) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: The FWC must only consider reasonably foreseeable patterns or kinds of work when applying the better off overall test.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must only consider reasonably foreseeable patterns or kinds of work.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 193A(6) Applying the better off overall test

193A(6A) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
note: Employer must determine foreseeability of work type or employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-193a-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must determine foreseeability
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Determining foreseeability is a task
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 193A(6A) Applying the better off overall test

194 Meaning of unlawful term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.396
note: Terms that meet certain criteria are prohibited in enterprise agreements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-194-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-194-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-194
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-194-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits terms that meet certain criteria.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

195 Meaning of discriminatory term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.397
note: Discriminatory term is defined as a term that discriminates against an employee based on certain characteristics.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-195
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Term is discriminatory if it discriminates against an employee during the term of the agreement.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Term is discriminatory if it discriminates against an employee during the term of the agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer is obligated to ensure equal treatment for employees.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If a term is discriminatory, then it implies that the employer is obligated to ensure equal treatment for employees.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Discriminatory term (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must ensure equal treatment for employees.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The employer must ensure that all employees are treated equally regardless of their characteristics.
modality: CogAI
operator: must
premise text: Discriminatory term (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Term is discriminatory if it discriminates against an employee.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Term is discriminatory if it discriminates against an employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Discriminatory term (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must comply with non-discriminatory terms of the agreement.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: If an employee is covered by the agreement, then the employer must comply with the non-discriminatory terms of the agreement.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
premise text: Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 195 Meaning of discriminatory term

195A Meaning of objectionable emergency management term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.399
note: Restricting or limiting emergency management body's ability to engage volunteers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-195a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricting or limiting emergency management body's ability.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The term has, or is likely to have, the effect of restricting or limiting the body’s ability.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 195A Meaning of objectionable emergency management term

196 Shiftworkers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
curation status: Proposed
has part: 196(1) Shiftworkers
has part: 196(2) Shiftworkers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-196
schema version: 2

196(1) Shiftworkers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
note: Defines shiftworker for National Employment Standards purposes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-196-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 196 Shiftworkers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 196(1) Shiftworkers

196(2) Shiftworkers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
note: The FWC must be satisfied that the agreement defines or describes an employee as a shiftworker.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-196-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 196 Shiftworkers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied for at least the duration of the shiftwork
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The FWC must be satisfied for at least the duration of the shiftwork
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The agreement defines or describes an employee as a shiftworker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must be satisfied
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The agreement defines or describes an employee as a shiftworker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The enterprise agreement must define or describe the employee as a shiftworker
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The enterprise agreement must define or describe the employee as a shiftworker
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The agreement defines or describes an employee as a shiftworker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied that the employee is a shiftworker for the purposes of the National Employment Standards
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must be satisfied that the employee is a shiftworker for the purposes of the National Employment Standards
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The agreement defines or describes an employee as a shiftworker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 196(2) Shiftworkers

197 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
curation status: Proposed
has part: 197(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
has part: 197(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-197
schema version: 2

197(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
note: Enterprise agreement must include pieceworker term if modern award does not.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-197-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 197 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between enterprise agreement and modern award.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee includes a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No detriment test
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide pieceworker term in enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee includes a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not omit pieceworker term in modern award.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: (b) a modern award that is in operation and covers the employee does not include such a term.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide pieceworker term if modern award does not.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) a modern award that is in operation and covers the employee does not include such a term.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide pieceworker term in modern award.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee includes a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Enterprise agreement must include specified term.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: INCLUDES
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee includes a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 197(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term

197(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
note: FWC must be satisfied that including a term in the agreement does not harm employee entitlements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-197-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 197 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied that including such a term does not harm employee entitlements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The effect of including the term overlaps with employee entitlements.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Including a term in the agreement may affect employee entitlements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied that including such a term does not harm employee entitlements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The FWC can infer that including the term will not harm employee entitlements.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Including a term in the agreement may affect employee entitlements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must be satisfied that including such a term does not harm employee entitlements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure employee entitlements are not harmed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Including a term in the agreement may harm employee entitlements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied that including such a term does not harm employee entitlements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The effect of including the term diffuses to employee entitlements.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Including a term in the agreement may affect employee entitlements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied that including such a term does not harm employee entitlements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The effect of including the term is recurrently related to employee entitlements.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: Including a term in the agreement may affect employee entitlements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 197(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term

198 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
curation status: Proposed
has part: 198(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
has part: 198(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-198
schema version: 2

198(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
note: No detriment test if enterprise agreement does not include a term defining the employee as a pieceworker and a modern award includes such a term.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-198-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 198 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commencement overlap
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The commencement of this section overlaps with the commencement of the modern award.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee does not include a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No detriment test
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an enterprise agreement does not include a term defining the employee as a pieceworker, then no detriment test applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee does not include a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No detriment test
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a modern award includes a term defining the employee as a pieceworker, then no detriment test applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (b) a modern award that is in operation and covers the employee includes such a term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Modern award includes term
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The modern award is classified as including a term defining the employee as a pieceworker.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
premise text: (b) a modern award that is in operation and covers the employee includes such a term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No detriment test repetition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The no detriment test repeats for each employee covered by the modern award.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (b) a modern award that is in operation and covers the employee includes such a term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 198(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a

198(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
note: FWC must be satisfied that not including a term in the agreement is not detrimental to employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-198-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 198 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 198(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a

199 School-based apprentices and school-based trainees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
note: Employee loadings in lieu of certain leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-199-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-199-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-199
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-199-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay loadings
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-199-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 199 School-based apprentices and school-based trainees

19A Meaning of industrial action: regulated workers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.115
note: Regulated workers and businesses must comply with minimum standards order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Regulated worker and business
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19A Meaning of industrial action: regulated workers

2 April 2026
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, saving, transitional provisions, editorial changes, presentational changes, modifications, and self-repealing provisions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
note: Commencement rules for provisions in the Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
note: Commencement of provisions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-3
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for the compilation date.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Fair Work Act 2009.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable

20 Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.117
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(1) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
has part: 20(2) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20
schema version: 2

20(1) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.117
note: Defines ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free

fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(1) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free

20(2) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.117
note: Defines ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free

fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 38 hours
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a specific obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) If there is no agreement...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(2) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free

200 Outworkers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
curation status: Proposed
has part: 200(1) Outworkers
has part: 200(2) Outworkers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-200
schema version: 2

200(1) Outworkers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
note: Enterprise agreement must include outworker terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-200-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 200 Outworkers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide outworker terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Outworker terms are a subclass of enterprise agreement terms.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 200(1) Outworkers

200(2) Outworkers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
note: FWC must be satisfied that agreement terms are not detrimental to employee compared to outworker terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-200-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 200 Outworkers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 200(2) Outworkers

201 Approval decision to note certain matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
curation status: Proposed
has part: 201(1) Approval decision to note certain matters
has part: 201(1A) Approval decision to note certain matters
has part: 201(2) Approval decision to note certain matters
has part: 201(2A) Approval decision to note certain matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-201
schema version: 2

201(1) Approval decision to note certain matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
note: FWC must note certain terms in its decision to approve an enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-201-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 201 Approval decision to note certain matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Note those terms in its decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to note terms
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC approves an enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 201(1) Approval decision to note certain matters

201(1A) Approval decision to note certain matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
note: FWC must note certain matters in its decision to approve an enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-201-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 201 Approval decision to note certain matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to note certain matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 201(1A) Approval decision to note certain matters

201(2) Approval decision to note certain matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
note: The FWC must note in its decision to approve the agreement that the agreement covers the organisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-201-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 201 Approval decision to note certain matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must note in its decision to approve the agreement that the agreement covers the organisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 201(2) Approval decision to note certain matters

201(2A) Approval decision to note certain matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
note: Approval decision required for certain agreements
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-201-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 201 Approval decision to note certain matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the approval decision must occur during the agreement-making process
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Approval decision timing not specified
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2A) If an agreement is made under subsection 182(4)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC approval implies the employment terms
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Approval decision implies employment terms
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (2A) If an agreement is made under subsection 182(4)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC approval is recognized by the AI system
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Approval decision recognized by AI system
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (2A) If an agreement is made under subsection 182(4)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC must approve the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires FWC approval
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (2A) If an agreement is made under subsection 182(4)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC approval diffuses to the employment terms
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Approval decision spreads to employment terms
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2A) If an agreement is made under subsection 182(4)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 201(2A) Approval decision to note certain matters

202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
curation status: Proposed
has part: 202(1) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
has part: 202(2) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
has part: 202(3) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
has part: 202(4) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
has part: 202(5) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
has part: 202(6) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-202
schema version: 2

202(1) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
note: Enterprise agreement must include a flexibility term
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-202-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a flexibility term
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 202(1) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

202(2) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
note: Employee and employer must agree to individual flexibility arrangement under a flexibility term in an enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-202-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must agree to individual flexibility arrangement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 202(2) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

202(3) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
note: Does not change effect of agreement on employer and other employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-202-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 202(3) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

202(4) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
note: If an enterprise agreement does not include a flexibility term, the model flexibility term is taken to be a term of the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-202-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 202(4) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

202(5) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
note: The FWC must determine the model flexibility term for enterprise agreements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-202-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to determine the model flexibility term.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 202(5) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

202(6) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
note: Duty to include flexibility term in enterprise agreements
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-202-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include flexibility term
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 202(6) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.

203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
curation status: Proposed
has part: 203(1) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(2) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(2A) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(3) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(4) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(5) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(6) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-203
schema version: 2

203(1) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: A flexibility term in an enterprise agreement must meet the requirements set out in this section.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-203-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must meet requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 203(1) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term

203(2) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Employer must ensure individual flexibility arrangements comply with enterprise agreement terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-203-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must ensure compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 203(2) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term

203(2A) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Must not allow effect of outworker terms to be varied
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-203-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits variation of outworker terms
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Requires inclusion in modern award
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 203(2A) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term

203(3) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Employer and employee must agree on individual flexibility arrangement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-203-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires genuine agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 203(3) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term

203(4) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Employee must be better off overall than without individual flexibility arrangement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-203-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must ensure employee is better off overall
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

203(5) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Employer must ensure individual flexibility arrangement is not approved or consented to by another person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-203-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

203(6) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
note: Employee must be able to terminate individual flexibility arrangement with written notice of not more than 28 days.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-203-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee can terminate arrangement with written notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must ensure employee can terminate arrangement
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Flexibility term requires termination notice

204 Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.410
curation status: Proposed
has part: 204(1) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
has part: 204(2) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
has part: 204(3) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
has part: 204(4) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-204
schema version: 2

204(1) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.410
note: Arrangements not meeting requirements may be a contravention of general protections.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-204-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 204 Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on non-compliant arrangements
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Failure to meet requirements may be a contravention of general protections.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 204(1) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of

204(2) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.410
note: Employer contravenes flexibility term in specified circumstances
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-204-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 204 Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer contravenes flexibility term
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening flexibility term
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employer must comply with flexibility terms

204(3) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.410
note: Employer must ensure arrangement meets requirements to avoid contravening flexibility term.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-204-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 204 Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Flexibility term overlaps with employer's action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between employer's action and flexibility term
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Employer must ensure arrangement meets requirements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contravening flexibility term is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employer must ensure arrangement meets requirements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 204(3) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of

204(4) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.410
note: Arrangement must be able to be terminated by either party with written notice.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-204-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 204 Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ability to terminate arrangement
modality: Deontic
operator: can

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 204(4) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of

205 Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
curation status: Proposed
has part: 205(1) Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
has part: 205(1A) Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-205
schema version: 2

205(1) Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
note: Consultation term for major workplace changes or roster changes
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-205-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 205 Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must consult employees
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

205(1A) Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
note: Employer must provide information to employees about changes to the regular roster or ordinary hours of work.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-205-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 205 Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

205A Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
curation status: Proposed
has part: 205A(1) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
has part: 205A(2) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
has part: 205A(3) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-205a
schema version: 2

205A(1) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
note: Enterprise agreement must include a delegates' rights term.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-205a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 205A Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a delegates' rights term.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 205A(1) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.

205A(2) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
note: Delegates' rights term in enterprise agreement must be at least as favourable as modern awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-205a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 205A Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 205A(2) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.

205A(3) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
note: Term does not change if modern award changes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-205a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 205A Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 205A(3) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.

206 Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
curation status: Proposed
has part: 206(1) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
has part: 206(2) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
has part: 206(3) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
has part: 206(4) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-206
schema version: 2

206(1) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
note: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less than the award rate if a modern award applies to the employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-206-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 206 Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on lower base rate of pay
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 206(1) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less

206(2) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
note: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less than the award rate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-206-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 206 Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits lower base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 206(2) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less

206(3) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
note: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less than the employee's order rate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-206-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 206 Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement is between the employee's order rate and the national minimum wage.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (3) If: ...; the base rate of pay payable to the employee under the enterprise agreement (the agreement rate) must not be less than the employee’s order rate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If an enterprise agreement applies to an employee, then the base rate of pay under the agreement must not be less than the employee's order rate.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) If: ...; the base rate of pay payable to the employee under the enterprise agreement (the agreement rate) must not be less than the employee’s order rate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits lower base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) If: ...; the base rate of pay payable to the employee under the enterprise agreement (the agreement rate) must not be less than the employee’s order rate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement is diffuse to all employees covered by the agreement.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (3) If: ...; the base rate of pay payable to the employee under the enterprise agreement (the agreement rate) must not be less than the employee’s order rate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement is recurring at least every pay period.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (3) If: ...; the base rate of pay payable to the employee under the enterprise agreement (the agreement rate) must not be less than the employee’s order rate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 206(3) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less

206(4) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
note: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less than the employee's order rate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-206-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 206 Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits lower base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 206(4) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less

207 Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
curation status: Proposed
has part: 207(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
has part: 207(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
has part: 207(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
has part: 207(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-207
schema version: 2

207(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
note: Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by the employer and employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-207-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 207 Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make a variation of an enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 207(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by

207(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
note: Employees must be affected for variation approval.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-207-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 207 Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employees must be affected for variation approval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Variation has no effect unless approved by the FWC

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 207(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by

207(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
note: Approval by FWC is required for variation of an enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-207-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 207 Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval by FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 207(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by

207(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
note: Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by one or more persons who will be necessary for the normal conduct of the enterprise concerned and are covered by the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-207-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 207 Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make variation of enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 207(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by

207A Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
curation status: Proposed
has part: 207A(1) Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
has part: 207A(2) Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-207a
schema version: 2

207A(1) Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
note: This section applies to a proposed variation of a multi-enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-207a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 207A Agreement of employee organisations covered by the

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to proposed variation of multi-enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 207A(1) Agreement of employee organisations covered by the

207A(2) Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
type: Concept
description: Written agreement from each organisation or a voting request order
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
note: Employer cannot request employee approval for variation without written agreement from each organisation or a voting request order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-207a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 207A Agreement of employee organisations covered by the

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of requesting employee approval without written agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

208 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
curation status: Proposed
has part: 208(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
has part: 208(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-208
schema version: 2

208(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
note: Employers must request employee approval for proposed variation of the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-208-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 208 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must request employee approval.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 208(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

208(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
note: Request for employee approval of proposed changes to terms and conditions of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-208-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 208 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request for employee approval can overlap with employment
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Request for employee approval can occur at any time during employment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Employment can start at any time

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Approval by employees implies acceptance of proposed changes
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Approval by employees implies acceptance of proposed changes to terms and conditions of employment
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Employees approve or reject proposed changes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request for employee approval incorporates AI-driven decision-making processes
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Request for employee approval incorporates AI-driven decision-making processes
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
premise text: Employer uses AI to facilitate request for employee approval

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employees may approve or reject proposed changes
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by employer
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: Employer requests approval from employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request for employee approval can diffuse to other employees
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Request for employee approval can diffuse to other employees through communication channels
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Employees communicate with each other about proposed changes

209 When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
curation status: Proposed
has part: 209(1) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
has part: 209(2) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-209
schema version: 2

209(1) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: Majority approval required for variation of enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-209-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 209 When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is approved between the start and end of the voting period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation approval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The variation is approved when the majority votes within a certain timeframe

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The process is defined as an AI application for variation approval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for variation approval
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: The process may involve artificial intelligence applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is made when a majority approves
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: A majority of affected employees must approve the variation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The process is defined as the diffusion of information to affected employees
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of variation approval process
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: The process involves the diffusion of information to affected employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is approved between the start and end of the voting period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation approval
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The variation is approved when the majority votes within a certain timeframe

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 209(1) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made

209(2) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: Majority approval required for variation of enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-209-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 209 When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 209(2) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made

21 Meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(1) Meaning of pieceworker
has part: 21(2) Meaning of pieceworker
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

21(1) Meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
note: Definition of a pieceworker
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Meaning of pieceworker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: pieceworker
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Award/agreement free employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: pieceworker
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: National system employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(1) Meaning of pieceworker

21(2) Meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
note: Definition of pieceworker class
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-ltl-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Meaning of pieceworker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (2) Without limiting the way in which a class may be described for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: (2) Without limiting the way in which a class may be described for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following: (a) a particular industry or part of an industry;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit subclass hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: (a) a particular industry or part of an industry;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following: (b) a particular kind of work;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit subclass hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: (b) a particular kind of work;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following: (c) a particular type of employment.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit subclass hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: (c) a particular type of employment.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-ltl-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) Without limiting the way in which a class may be described for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(2) Meaning of pieceworker

210 Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
curation status: Proposed
has part: 210(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
has part: 210(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
has part: 210(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
has part: 210(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-210
schema version: 2

210(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
type: Concept
description: Material accompanying the application
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: Application for FWC approval of variation to enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-210-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 210 Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to apply for approval
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 210(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an

210(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
type: Concept
description: signed copy of the variation, agreement as proposed to be varied, and required declarations
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: Application requirements for FWC approval of variation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-210-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 210 Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by specific documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 210(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an

210(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: Application must be made within a specified time period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-210-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 210 Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 210(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an

210(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
note: Requirements for signing variations of enterprise agreements
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-210-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 210 Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Requirements must be prescribed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires regulations to prescribe requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Regulations may prescribe requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 210(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an

211 When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
curation status: Proposed
has part: 211(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
has part: 211(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-211
schema version: 2

211(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
note: FWC must approve variation of enterprise agreement under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-211-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 211 When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for approval is between 0 and 4 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for approval of variation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The FWC must approve the variation within 4 years after its initial approval.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The approval of the variation implies that the FWC has fulfilled its obligations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of FWC's obligation to approve variation
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: If the conditions are met, the FWC must approve the variation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The classification implies that it is a cogent AI requirement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of FWC's obligation as a cogent AI requirement
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: The FWC's obligation to approve the variation is a requirement for all relevant parties.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the conditions are met, the FWC must approve the variation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC must approve the variation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of the obligation implies that it applies to all relevant parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to approve variation
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: The FWC's obligation to approve the variation is a requirement for all relevant parties.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 211(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise

211(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
note: FWC must not approve variation if employees not covered by agreement and employer specified in supported bargaining authorisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-211-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 211 When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not approve variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of FWC approval
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: FWC must approve variation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 211(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise

212 FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
curation status: Proposed
has part: 212(1) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
has part: 212(2) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
has part: 212(3) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
has part: 212(4) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-212
schema version: 2

212(1) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
note: FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with undertakings if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-212-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 212 FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with

fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation of enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 212(1) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with

212(2) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
note: FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-212-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 212 FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with

212(3) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
note: FWC may only accept a written undertaking from one or more employers covered by the agreement under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-212-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 212 FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with

fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 212(3) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with

212(4) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
note: Regulations prescribe requirements for signing undertakings.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-212-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 212 FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with

213 Effect of undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
note: Approval of variation of enterprise agreement after accepting undertaking under subsection 212(3)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-213
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to approve variation after accepting undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes duty

213A FWC may approve variation with amendments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
curation status: Proposed
has part: 213A(1) FWC may approve variation with amendments
has part: 213A(2) FWC may approve variation with amendments
has part: 213A(3) FWC may approve variation with amendments
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-213a
schema version: 2

213A(1) FWC may approve variation with amendments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
note: FWC must approve variation with amendments if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-213a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 213A FWC may approve variation with amendments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for approval of variation with amendments.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (1) This section applies if:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation with amendments.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 213A(1) FWC may approve variation with amendments

213A(2) FWC may approve variation with amendments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
note: FWC may approve variation with amendments
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-213a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 213A FWC may approve variation with amendments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

213A(3) FWC may approve variation with amendments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
note: Seek views of employers and employee organisations before specifying an amendment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-213a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 213A FWC may approve variation with amendments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for seeking views is before specifying an amendment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for seeking views
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The FWC must seek the views of employers and employee organisations before specifying an amendment.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An amendment can only be specified if the views are sought.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to seek views
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC must seek the views of employers and employee organisations.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An amendment can only be specified if the views are informed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC must inform employers and employee organisations of its intention to specify an amendment.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Seeking views is a permissive action for the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permissive provision
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: The FWC may seek the views of employers and employee organisations.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for informing is before specifying an amendment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for informing
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The FWC must inform employers and employee organisations of its intention to specify an amendment.

213B Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
curation status: Proposed
has part: 213B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
has part: 213B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-213b
schema version: 2

213B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
note: The variation is taken to be amended by the amendment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-213b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 213B Effect of amendment specified by FWC

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the variation is taken to be amended by the amendment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes to be
premise text: (1) If...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 213B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC

213B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
note: Variation in enterprise agreement is amended by the amendment as it applies to each employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-213b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 213B Effect of amendment specified by FWC

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the variation is taken to be amended...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Variation is amended by the amendment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (2) If...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 213B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC

214 When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.425
curation status: Proposed
has part: 214(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
has part: 214(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
has part: 214(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-214
schema version: 2

214(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.425
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an enterprise agreement if it may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-214-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 214 When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC may refuse to approve the variation if it overlaps with potential legal consequences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between the proposed variation and potential legal consequences.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC may refuse to approve the variation if it may result in a crime or penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of approving the variation if it may result in a crime or penalty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC may refuse to approve the variation if it may result in a liability for a pecuniary penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of approving the variation if it may result in a liability for a pecuniary penalty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of the prohibition from the FWC to the applicant is that they may refuse to approve the variation if it may result in a crime or penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of the prohibition from the FWC to the applicant.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC may refuse to approve the variation if it repeats the condition that it may result in a crime or penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Repetition of the condition that the FWC may refuse to approve the variation if it may result in a crime or penalty.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 214(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an

214(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.425
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-214-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 214 When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC obligation to approve variations
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 214(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an

214(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.425
note: FWC may refer an agreement to any person or body the FWC considers appropriate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-214-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 214 When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May refer an agreement to any person or body the FWC considers appropriate.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 214(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an

215 Approval decision to note undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.425
note: FWC must note undertaking as term of agreement upon approval
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-215-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-215-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-215
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-215-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to note undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-215-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 215 Approval decision to note undertakings

215A Approval decision to note amendments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: FWC must note amendment in approval decision.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-215a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-215a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-215a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-215a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to note amendment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-215a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 215A Approval decision to note amendments

216 When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Variation of enterprise agreement approved under section 211 operates from the day specified in the decision to approve.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216
schema version: 2

216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216A(1) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
has part: 216A(2) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
has part: 216A(3) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
has part: 216A(4) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
has part: 216A(5) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216a
schema version: 2

216A(1) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
description: Explanation of proposed variation terms and their effect
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Employer and employees may jointly add employer to supported bargaining agreement. Employer must explain proposed variation terms to employees before seeking approval.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer takes reasonable steps to ensure explanation is provided
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216A(1) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer

216A(2) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Consider employees from diverse backgrounds, young employees, and those without a representative when complying with the paragraph. Employer may request approval from affected employees for proposed variation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider employees from diverse backgrounds, young employees, and those without a representative when complying with the paragraph.
modality: Deontic
operator: consider

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216A(2) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer

216A(3) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Employer may request voting method
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to request voting method
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216A(3) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer

216A(4) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Majority of affected employees must approve variation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216A(4) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer

216A(5) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
description: Explanation to employees
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Employer must approve variation of supported bargaining agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to approve
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216A(5) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer

216AA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216AA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
has part: 216AA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216aa
schema version: 2

216AA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
description: Material to accompany the application
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427
note: Employer must apply for FWC approval of variation to a supported bargaining agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216AA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to apply for FWC approval.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216AA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a

216AA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
description: signed copy of the variation, copy of the agreement
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427
note: Application must be accompanied by a signed copy of the variation and a copy of the agreement as proposed to be varied.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216AA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be provided
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216AA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a

216AB When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216AB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
has part: 216AB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
has part: 216AB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ab
schema version: 2

216AB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
note: The FWC must approve a variation of a supported bargaining agreement if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216AB When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must approve the variation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216AB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported

216AB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
note: FWC must not approve variation if it covers general building and construction work.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216AB When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation cannot be approved if FWC has not approved it
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC approval and variation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: FWC must approve variation before it is approved

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation cannot be approved if FWC has not approved it
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Conditional relationship between FWC approval and variation
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
premise text: FWC must approve variation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation cannot be approved if FWC has not approved it
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Matching between FWC approval and variation
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: FWC must approve variation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not approve variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: FWC must approve variation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation cannot be approved if FWC has not approved it
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Absence of diffusion from FWC approval to variation
modality: Diffusion
operator: not
premise text: FWC approval does not imply variation approval

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216AB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported

216AB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
note: FWC must not approve variation if employer is specified in single interest employer authorisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216AB When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216AB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported

216AC Determining whether the FWC would have been required to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
note: Procedure for determining whether FWC would have been required to make a supported bargaining authorisation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ac-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ac
schema version: 2

216AD Determining whether a variation of a supported bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
note: Determine whether a variation of a supported bargaining agreement has been genuinely agreed to by affected employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ad-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ad-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ad
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determine whether a variation of a supported bargaining agreement has been genuinely agreed to by affected employees.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAgreedTo

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ad-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216AD Determining whether a variation of a supported bargaining

216AE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216AE(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
has part: 216AE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
has part: 216AE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ae
schema version: 2

216AE(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: FWC may refuse to approve variation of bargaining agreement if it violates Commonwealth law.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ae-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216AE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: FWC may refuse to approve variation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Variation is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: FWC considers that compliance with terms may result in a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216AE(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

216AE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a supported bargaining agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ae-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216AE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC obligation to approve variations of supported bargaining agreements
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216AE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

216AE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: FWC may refer agreement to any person or body the FWC considers appropriate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ae-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216AE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216AE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

216AF When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
note: Variation of supported bargaining agreement operates from the day specified in the decision to approve.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216af-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216af
schema version: 2

216B Application for the FWC to vary a supported bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
note: Application for variation of a supported bargaining agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216b
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216B Application for the FWC to vary a supported bargaining

216BA When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.432
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216BA(1) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
has part: 216BA(2) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
has part: 216BA(3) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
has part: 216BA(4) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ba
schema version: 2

216BA(1) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.432
note: The FWC must make a variation of a supported bargaining agreement if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ba-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216BA When the FWC must make a variation of a supported

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employees want to be covered by the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC has a duty to make a variation of the bargaining agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC is required to vary the agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216BA(1) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported

216BA(2) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.432
note: The FWC must consider the views of employee organisations and employers when determining whether it is appropriate for employees to be covered by an agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ba-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216BA When the FWC must make a variation of a supported

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must consider the views of employee organisations and employers at least once.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The FWC must consider the views of employee organisations and employers at least once.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The FWC has a duty to make a variation of a supported agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must consider the views of employee organisations and employers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must consider the views of employee organisations and employers.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC is required to make a variation of a supported agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC may have regard to matters referred to in section 243.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may have regard to matters referred to in section 243.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: The FWC has a duty to make a variation of a supported agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC's consideration of views is a recurring trace.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The FWC's consideration of views is a recurring trace.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: The FWC has a duty to make a variation of a supported agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216BA(2) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported

216BA(3) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.432
note: FWC must not make variation under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ba-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216BA When the FWC must make a variation of a supported

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of FWC making variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (3) Despite subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216BA(3) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported

216BA(4) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.432
note: FWC must not make variation if single interest employer authorisation applies
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ba-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 216BA When the FWC must make a variation of a supported

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not make variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Employer specified in single interest employer authorisation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216BA(4) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported

216BB When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216BB(1) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
has part: 216BB(2) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
has part: 216BB(3) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216bb
schema version: 2

216BB(1) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
note: FWC may refuse to make a variation of a supported bargaining agreement if it may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216bb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216BB When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if it may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of variation
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
premise text: FWC may refuse to make a variation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216BB(1) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a

216BB(2) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
note: Refusal of variation without consent is allowed despite other provisions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216bb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216BB When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Refusal of variation without consent is allowed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216BB(2) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a

216BB(3) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
note: FWC may refer agreement to any person or body
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216bb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216BB When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may refer agreement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: FWC has authority to make variations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216BB(3) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a

216BC When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
note: Variation of cooperative workplace agreement takes effect on specified day.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bc-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216bc
schema version: 2

216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216C(1) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
has part: 216C(2) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
has part: 216C(3) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
has part: 216C(4) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
has part: 216C(5) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216c
schema version: 2

216C(1) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
description: Explanation of terms and effect
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
note: Employer and employees may jointly make a variation to the cooperative workplace agreement. Employer must explain terms of proposed variation to affected employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make a variation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must take reasonable steps to ensure explanation is provided.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216C(1) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add

216C(2) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
note: Employer may request affected employees to approve proposed variation. Consider employees from diverse backgrounds, young employees, and those without a representative when complying with the paragraph.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval consideration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider employees from diverse backgrounds, young employees, and those without a representative when complying with the paragraph.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216C(2) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add

216C(3) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
note: Employer may request voting method
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216C(3) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add

216C(4) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
note: Majority of affected employees must approve variation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for approval starts when the majority of affected employees cast their votes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for approval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The variation is made when a majority of the affected employees who cast a valid vote approve the variation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An artificial intelligence system can be applied to facilitate the approval process.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for approval
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The variation is made when a majority of the affected employees who cast a valid vote approve the variation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is approved if a majority of affected employees approve it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: A majority of affected employees must approve the variation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of approval starts from the moment the majority of affected employees cast their votes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of approval
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The variation is made when a majority of the affected employees who cast a valid vote approve the variation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a temporal trace from the moment the majority of affected employees cast their votes until the variation is approved.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace for approval
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The variation is made when a majority of the affected employees who cast a valid vote approve the variation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216C(4) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add

216C(5) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
note: Approval by FWC is required for variation to take effect.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216c-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval by FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216C(5) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add

216CA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216CA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
has part: 216CA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
has part: 216CA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ca
schema version: 2

216CA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
description: Material accompanying the application
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
note: Employer must apply for FWC approval of variation to cooperative workplace agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ca-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216CA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to apply for FWC approval
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

216CA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
description: signed copy, agreement copy, declarations
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
note: Application requirements for FWC approval of variation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ca-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216CA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216CA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a

216CA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
note: Application must be made
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ca-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216CA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216CA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a

216CB When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216CB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
has part: 216CB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
has part: 216CB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216cb
schema version: 2

216CB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
note: FWC must approve variation of cooperative workplace agreement if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216cb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216CB When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 216CB(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216CB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative

216CB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
note: FWC must not approve variation if it covers general building and construction work
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216cb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216CB When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not approve variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: FWC must approve variation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216CB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative

216CB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
note: FWC must not approve variation if employer has supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216cb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216CB When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216CB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative

216CC Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.437
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216CC(1) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
has part: 216CC(2) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216cc
schema version: 2

216CC(1) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.437
note: The FWC must determine whether a variation of a cooperative workplace has been genuinely agreed to by the affected employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216cc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216CC Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must determine...
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216CC(1) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace

216CC(2) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.437
note: FWC may disregard certain matters when determining a variation of a cooperative workplace agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216cc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216CC Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 188B(3)(e)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Matters mentioned in paragraph 188B(3)(e) are taken to be matters relating to the variation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Section 216CC(2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 216CC(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may disregard certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: mayDisregard
premise text: Section 188B(3)(a) and (b)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 188B
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must take into account the statement of principles made under section 188B.
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeTakenIntoAccount
premise text: Section 216CC(2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Paragraphs 188B(3)(a) and (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may disregard matters mentioned in paragraphs 188B(3)(a) and (b).
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeDisregarded
premise text: Section 216CC(2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Paragraphs 188B(3)(c) and (d)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Matters mentioned in paragraphs 188B(3)(c) and (d) are taken to be matters relating to the variation.
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeRelatingTo
premise text: Section 216CC(2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216CC(2) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace

216CD When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.438
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216CD(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
has part: 216CD(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
has part: 216CD(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216cd
schema version: 2

216CD(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.438
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a cooperative workplace agreement if it may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216cd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216CD When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty during the period of variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty during the period of variation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may not approve the variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of approving the variation
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
premise text: compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty if certain conditions are met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty if certain conditions are met
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty during the period of variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty during the period of variation
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216CD(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

216CD(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.438
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a cooperative workplace agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216cd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216CD When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC obligation to approve variations
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216CD(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

216CD(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.438
note: FWC may refer agreement to any person or body the FWC considers appropriate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216cd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216CD When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216CD(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a

216CE When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.438
note: Variation of single interest employer agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ce-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ce
schema version: 2

216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216D(1) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
has part: 216D(2) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
has part: 216D(3) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
has part: 216D(4) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
has part: 216D(5) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216d
schema version: 2

216D(1) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
note: Employer must take reasonable steps to ensure affected employees approve proposed variation. Employers and employees must jointly approve a variation of the single interest employer agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must take reasonable steps.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers and employees must jointly approve a variation of the single interest employer agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216D(1) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add

216D(2) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
note: Approval by employee vote required for variation to take effect
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval by employee vote
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216D(2) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add

216D(3) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
note: Employees must approve proposed variation of single interest employer agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216D(3) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add

216D(4) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
note: Employees may vote by ballot or electronic method
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vote
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216D(4) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add

216D(5) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
note: Employees must approve variation of single interest employer agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216D(5) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add

216DA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216DA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
has part: 216DA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
has part: 216DA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
has part: 216DA(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216da
schema version: 2

216DA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
description: Material to accompany the application
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
note: Employer must apply for FWC approval of variation to single interest employer agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216da-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216DA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to apply for FWC approval.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

216DA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
description: signed copy, agreement copy, declarations
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
note: Application requirements for FWC approval of variation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216da-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216DA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide required documents
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

216DA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
note: Application must be made within a specified time period after variation is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216da-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216DA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified time period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

216DA(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
note: Requirements for signing variations of single interest employer agreements
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216da-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 216DA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Requirements must be prescribed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires regulations to prescribe requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Regulations may prescribe requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DA(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

216DB Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216DB(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
has part: 216DB(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216db
schema version: 2

216DB(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
note: Employee organisation may apply for approval of a variation to an interest employer agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216db-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216DB Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for approval
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DB(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

216DB(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
description: signed copy of the variation, agreement as proposed to be varied, and required declarations
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
note: Application requirements for FWC approval of a variation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216db-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216DB Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must provide required documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DB(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single

216DC When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216DC(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
has part: 216DC(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
has part: 216DC(1B) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
has part: 216DC(1C) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216dc
schema version: 2

216DC(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: FWC must approve a variation of a single interest employer agreement under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216dc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216DC When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must approve the variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DC(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest

216DC(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: Employer must approve variation of single interest if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216dc-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 216DC When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must approve variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Employer employed at least 20 employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DC(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest

216DC(1B) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: FWC may work out whether a majority of affected employees want to be covered by the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216dc-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 216DC When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1b-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DC(1B) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest

216DC(1C) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: Employer must approve variation of single interest under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216dc-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 216DC When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must approve variation of single interest.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DC(1C) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest

216DD Determining whether a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216DD(1) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
has part: 216DD(2) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
has part: 216DD(3) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216dd
schema version: 2

216DD(1) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446
note: Determine whether a variation of a single interest has been genuinely agreed to by affected employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216dd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216DD Determining whether a variation of a single interest

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to determine
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DD(1) Determining whether a variation of a single interest

216DD(2) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446
note: The FWC may disregard certain matters when taking into account the statement of principles made under section 188B.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216dd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216DD Determining whether a variation of a single interest

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may disregard certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DD(2) Determining whether a variation of a single interest

216DD(3) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446
note: Regulations may provide modifications to specified provisions of this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216dd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216DD Determining whether a variation of a single interest

216DE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216DE(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
has part: 216DE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
has part: 216DE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216de
schema version: 2

216DE(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an interest employer agreement if it may result in a person committing an offence or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216de-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216DE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between variation approval and offences/penalties
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence or pecuniary penalty

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if it may result in an offence or pecuniary penalty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of variation approval
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: FWC may refuse to approve a variation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC refusal to approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence or pecuniary penalty

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Variation approval diffuses to offences/penalties
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence or pecuniary penalty

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Variation approval contains offences/penalties
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence or pecuniary penalty

216DE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single interest employer agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216de-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216DE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May refuse to approve
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single

216DE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
note: FWC may refer agreement to any person or body
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216de-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216DE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agreement may be referred to another person or body
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: FWC has authority to approve variations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216DE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single

216DF When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Variation of multi-enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216df-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216df
schema version: 2

216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216E(1) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(2) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(3) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(4) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(5) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(6) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(7) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216e
schema version: 2

216E(1) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Employer and employees may jointly make a variation of a multi-enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer and employees may jointly make a variation of a multi-enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216E(1) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer

216E(2) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Approval by FWC required for variation of multi-enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval by FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216E(2) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer

216E(3) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Approval by employee vote required for variation to take effect
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval by employee vote
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the employer to obtain approval
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216E(3) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer

216E(4) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Request for employee approval of proposed variation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer

216E(5) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
description: Notification of vote time and place, voting method
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Employer must notify employees before making a request to vary an enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216e-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notification occurs before vote
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

216E(6) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Employees may vote by ballot or electronic method
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216e-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer

216E(7) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Approval by majority of affected employees required for variation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216e-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for approval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The variation must be approved within a specific temporal interval.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is made when a majority of the affected employees cast a valid vote approve the variation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: A majority of affected employees must approve the variation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216E(7) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer

216EA Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
curation status: Proposed
has part: 216EA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
has part: 216EA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
has part: 216EA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ea
schema version: 2

216EA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
type: Concept
description: Material to accompany the application
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
note: Must apply for FWC approval of variation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ea-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 216EA Application for the FWC’s approval of variation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216EA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation

216EA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
note: Application must be accompanied by required declarations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ea-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 216EA Application for the FWC’s approval of variation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide required declarations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216EA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation

216EA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
note: Application must be made within 14 days after variation is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ea-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 216EA Application for the FWC’s approval of variation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within 14 days after variation is made.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216EA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation

216EB When the FWC must approve variation of multi-enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
note: FWC must approve variation of multi-enterprise agreement if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216eb-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216eb-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216eb
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216eb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216eb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 216EB When the FWC must approve variation of multi-enterprise

216EC When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
note: Variation operates from the day specified in the decision to approve.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ec-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ec
schema version: 2

216ED Effect of variation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: A multi-enterprise agreement remains unchanged despite variation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ed-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-216ed
schema version: 2

217 Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
curation status: Proposed
has part: 217(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
has part: 217(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-217
schema version: 2

217(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty on application.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-217-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 217 Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation must occur during the application period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Variation can be applied on application by any of the following:
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement at any time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is applicable to employers, employees, and employee organisations covered by the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Variation can be applied on application by any of the following:
modality: CogAI
operator: has
premise text: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement at any time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employers, employees, and employee organisations covered by the agreement may apply for variation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by the FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: The FWC has the power to vary an enterprise agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation must occur during the application period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Variation can be applied on application by any of the following:
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement at any time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is applicable to employers, employees, and employee organisations covered by the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Variation can be applied on application by any of the following:
modality: SHACL
operator: has
premise text: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement at any time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 217(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or

217(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-217-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 217 Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or

217A FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
curation status: Proposed
has part: 217A(1) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
has part: 217A(2) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
has part: 217A(3) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-217a
schema version: 2

217A(1) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: This section applies if a variation of an enterprise agreement is proposed.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-217a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 217A FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (applicable)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (proposed)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 217A(1) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations

217A(2) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: Employer or employee organisation can apply to FWC for dispute resolution.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-217a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 217A FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Possibility of action
modality: Deontic
operator: can

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 217A(2) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations

217A(3) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: FWC must not arbitrate certain disputes
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-217a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 217A FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of arbitration
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (3) The FWC must not arbitrate (however described) the dispute.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 217A(3) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations

218 Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
curation status: Proposed
has part: 218(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
has part: 218(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
has part: 218(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
has part: 218(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-218
schema version: 2

218(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
note: FWC must review enterprise agreement on referral by Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-218-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 218 Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 218(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian

218(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
note: List of entities entitled to make submissions for consideration in the review
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-218-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 218 Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authority to make submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: canMakeSubmission

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 218(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian

218(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
note: FWC must vary agreement if it requires unlawful act
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-218-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 218 Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Agreement no longer requires unlawful act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory variation of agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: FWC must vary agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 218(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian

218(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
note: Variation of enterprise agreement operates from the day specified in the decision to vary the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-218-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 218 Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to operate variation from specified day.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 218(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian

218A Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
curation status: Proposed
has part: 218A(1) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
has part: 218A(2) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
has part: 218A(3) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-218a
schema version: 2

218A(1) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
note: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement to correct or amend errors.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-218a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 218A Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 218A(1) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,

218A(2) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
note: Application for variation of enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-218a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 218A Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to vary enterprise agreements
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 218A(2) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,

218A(3) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
note: Variation of enterprise agreements operates from the day specified in the decision to vary.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-218a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 218A Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Variation operates from a specified day.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 218A(3) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,

219 Employers and employees may agree to terminate an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
note: Employers and employees may agree to terminate an enterprise
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-219-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-219-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-219
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-219-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to terminate an enterprise
modality: Deontic
operator: May

22 Meanings of service and continuous service
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.119
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(1) Meanings of service and continuous service
has part: 22(2) Meanings of service and continuous service
has part: 22(3) Meanings of service and continuous service
has part: 22(3A) Meanings of service and continuous service
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22
schema version: 2

22(1) Meanings of service and continuous service
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.119
note: Defines service period for national system employee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Meanings of service and continuous service

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Includes excluded periods in total service count
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (1) A period of service by a national system employee with his or her national system employer is a period during which the employee is employed by the employer, but does not include any period (an excluded period) that does not count as service because of subsection (2).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Includes excluded periods in total service count
modality: Argumentation
operator: includes
premise text: (1) A period of service by a national system employee with his or her national system employer is a period during which the employee is employed by the employer, but does not include any period (an excluded period) that does not count as service because of subsection (2).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes excluded periods in total service count
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (1) A period of service by a national system employee with his or her national system employer is a period during which the employee is employed by the employer, but does not include any period (an excluded period) that does not count as service because of subsection (2).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Includes excluded periods in total service count
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: (1) A period of service by a national system employee with his or her national system employer is a period during which the employee is employed by the employer, but does not include any period (an excluded period) that does not count as service because of subsection (2).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Includes excluded periods in total service count
modality: LTL
operator: includes
premise text: (1) A period of service by a national system employee with his or her national system employer is a period during which the employee is employed by the employer, but does not include any period (an excluded period) that does not count as service because of subsection (2).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(1) Meanings of service and continuous service

22(2) Meanings of service and continuous service
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.119
note: Exemptions from service calculation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Meanings of service and continuous service

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Unauthorised absence is not counted as service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (a) any period of unauthorised absence;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from service calculation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(2) Meanings of service and continuous service

22(3) Meanings of service and continuous service
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.119
note: Does not break continuous service
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Meanings of service and continuous service

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...but does not count towards the length of...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
premise text: (3) An excluded period does not break...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(3) Meanings of service and continuous service

22(3A) Meanings of service and continuous service
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.119
note: Prescribes different kinds of periods for the purposes of different provisions of this Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Meanings of service and continuous service

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(3A) Meanings of service and continuous service

220 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
curation status: Proposed
has part: 220(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
has part: 220(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
has part: 220(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-220
schema version: 2

220(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
note: Employers must request employee approval for proposed termination of an enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-220-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 220 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must request employee approval.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 220(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

220(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
description: Reasonable steps to notify employees and a reasonable opportunity to decide.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
note: Employers must notify employees before requesting approval for a proposed termination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-220-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 220 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must take certain actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 220(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

220(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
note: Employees may be requested to approve a proposed change by ballot or electronic method.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-220-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 220 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted to employees.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 220(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed

221 When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
curation status: Proposed
has part: 221(1) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
has part: 221(2) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-221
schema version: 2

221(1) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
note: Majority vote required for termination of enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-221-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 221 When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employees must approve termination
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 221(1) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to

221(2) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
note: Majority approval required for termination of enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-221-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 221 When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Termination agreed upon if majority approves
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to obtain majority approval for termination
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Employees must approve proposed termination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 221(2) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to

222 Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
curation status: Proposed
has part: 222(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
has part: 222(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
has part: 222(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-222
schema version: 2

222(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
type: Concept
description: Material to accompany the application
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
note: Application for FWC approval of termination of enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-222-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 222 Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to apply for approval
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 222(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an

222(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
note: Application must be accompanied by required declarations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-222-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 222 Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide required declarations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 222(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an

222(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
note: Application deadline for FWC approval of termination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-222-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 222 Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be made within a specified time frame
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 222(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an

223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
note: FWC must approve termination of enterprise if employers comply with subsection 220(2)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-223-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-223-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-223
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-223-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must approve if employers comply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve termination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC has authority to approve terminations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-223-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise

224 When termination comes into operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
note: Termination operates from day specified in decision approval
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-224-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-224
schema version: 2

225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
note: Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-225-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-225
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-225-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its

226 Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
curation status: Proposed
has part: 226(1) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
has part: 226(1A) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
has part: 226(2) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-226
schema version: 2

226(1) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: FWC must terminate enterprise agreement if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-226-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 226 Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory termination
modality: Deontic
operator: must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 226(1) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry

226(1A) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: FWC must terminate enterprise agreement under subsection (1) only if satisfied it is appropriate in all circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-226-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 226 Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if satisfied it is appropriate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to terminate enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must terminate...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 226(1A) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry

226(2) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: Termination of employment due to employer's initiative or insolvency/bankruptcy
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-226-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 226 Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of termination without just cause
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) This subsection covers a termination...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 226(2) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry

226A Guarantee of termination entitlements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
curation status: Proposed
has part: 226A(1) Guarantee of termination entitlements
has part: 226A(2) Guarantee of termination entitlements
has part: 226A(3) Guarantee of termination entitlements
has part: 226A(4) Guarantee of termination entitlements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-226a
schema version: 2

226A(1) Guarantee of termination entitlements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: Guarantee of termination entitlements undertaking by employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-226a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 226A Guarantee of termination entitlements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Termination can occur at any time after signing of undertaking.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: if the agreement is terminated under section 226 and the employer terminates the employment of a protected employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the agreement is terminated under section 226 and the employer terminates the employment of a protected employee
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's obligation to comply with subsection (3) if agreement is terminated.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) is an undertaking that the employer will comply with subsection (3)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: by anyone, except where this is due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's permission for termination due to ordinary and customary turnover of labour.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (i) at the employer’s initiative because the employer no longer requires the job done by the employee to be done

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's prohibition from terminating employment due to insolvency or bankruptcy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (ii) because of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employer's obligation to comply with subsection (3) repeats indefinitely.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (a) is an undertaking that the employer will comply with subsection (3)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 226A(1) Guarantee of termination entitlements

226A(2) Guarantee of termination entitlements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: Employee must be covered by the agreement before termination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-226a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 226A Guarantee of termination entitlements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is covered during the term of the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship: Employee must be covered during the term of the agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Employee must be covered by the agreement before termination.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is protected if they would be covered.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If employee would be covered, then they are protected.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Employee must be covered by the agreement before termination.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to cover employee
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Employee must be covered by the agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee being protected iff they would be covered.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Employee being protected implies they would be covered.
modality: Diffusion
operator: iff
premise text: Employee is protected if they would be covered.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 226A(2) Guarantee of termination entitlements

226A(3) Guarantee of termination entitlements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: Employer must comply with enterprise agreement terms for termination entitlements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-226a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 226A Guarantee of termination entitlements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply with enterprise agreement terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 226A(3) Guarantee of termination entitlements

226A(4) Guarantee of termination entitlements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: Guarantee of termination entitlements comes into force on the day of agreement termination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-226a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 226A Guarantee of termination entitlements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 226A(4) Guarantee of termination entitlements

227 When termination comes into operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461
note: Termination operates from specified day
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227
schema version: 2

227A Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.462
curation status: Proposed
has part: 227A(1) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
has part: 227A(2) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
has part: 227A(4) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227a
schema version: 2

227A(1) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.462
note: Permits reconsideration of enterprise agreement by employers, employees, or employee organisations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 227A Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits action
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 227A(1) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise

227A(2) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.462
note: FWC must have regard to patterns of work when approving an agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 227A Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the condition in this subsection is satisfied.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: FWC had regard before approving the agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (a) before approving the agreement the FWC had regard, under subsection 193A(6), to patterns or kinds of work...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the condition in this subsection is satisfied.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regard to patterns of work is a requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
premise text: (a) before approving the agreement the FWC had regard, under subsection 193A(6), to patterns or kinds of work...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC did not have regard, under subsection 193A(6), to this pattern of work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must not have regard to certain patterns of work.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT HAVE REGARD TO
premise text: (b) at the test time or a later time, one or more employees covered by subsection (4) or (5) engaged in other patterns or kinds of work...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC did not have regard, under subsection 193A(6), to this pattern of work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Work on Saturdays and Sundays is a class of employees.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS A CLASS OF EMPLOYEES
premise text: (i) the award covered employees for the agreement; and (ii) if the agreement is a single-enterprise agreement that covers one or more employees to whom a supported bargaining agreement or a single interest employer agreement applies—those employees...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC did not have regard, under subsection 193A(6), to this pattern of work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Work on Sundays is a class of employees.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS A CLASS OF EMPLOYEES
premise text: (ii) if the agreement is a single-enterprise agreement that covers one or more employees to whom a supported bargaining agreement or a single interest employer agreement applies—those employees...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC did not have regard, under subsection 193A(6), to this pattern of work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: FWC did not have regard at the test time.
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: (b) at the test time or a later time, one or more employees covered by subsection (4) or (5) engaged in other patterns or kinds of work...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 227A(2) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise

227A(4) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.462
note: Employee covered by subsection if meets test time assumption
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 227A Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 227A(4) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise

227B Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
curation status: Proposed
has part: 227B(1) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
has part: 227B(2) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227b
schema version: 2

227B(1) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
note: FWC must reconsider whether an enterprise agreement passes the better off overall test under section 193.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 227B Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to reconsider
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 227B(1) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes

227B(2) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
note: Reconsideration of enterprise agreement passes
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 227B Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reconsideration obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 227B(2) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes

227C Effect of undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
curation status: Proposed
has part: 227C(1) Effect of undertakings
has part: 227C(2) Effect of undertakings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227c
schema version: 2

227C(1) Effect of undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
note: The undertaking is taken to be a term of the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 227C Effect of undertakings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 227C(1) Effect of undertakings

227C(2) Effect of undertakings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
note: The undertaking is taken to be a term of the agreement as it applies to each employer that gave the undertaking.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 227C Effect of undertakings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for the provision to apply
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (2) If: (a) the FWC accepts an undertaking under paragraph 227B(3)(a) in relation to an enterprise agreement; and (b) the agreement covers 2 or more employers;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the undertaking is taken to be a term of the agreement, as the agreement applies to each employer that gave the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the provision as an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) If: (a) the FWC accepts an undertaking under paragraph 227B(3)(a) in relation to an enterprise agreement; and (b) the agreement covers 2 or more employers;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the provision as a right for the employers that gave the undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) If: (a) the FWC accepts an undertaking under paragraph 227B(3)(a) in relation to an enterprise agreement; and (b) the agreement covers 2 or more employers;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace for the provision to apply
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (2) If: (a) the FWC accepts an undertaking under paragraph 227B(3)(a) in relation to an enterprise agreement; and (b) the agreement covers 2 or more employers;

227D Effect of amendment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
curation status: Proposed
has part: 227D(1) Effect of amendment
has part: 227D(2) Effect of amendment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227d
schema version: 2

227D(1) Effect of amendment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
note: The amendment takes effect as if it were part of the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 227D Effect of amendment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendment takes effect during the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the amendment and the agreement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendment takes effect as if it were part of the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation for the state to take effect the amendment as part of the agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: >

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 227D(1) Effect of amendment

227D(2) Effect of amendment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
note: Effect of amendment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 227D Effect of amendment

227E No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.466
curation status: Proposed
has part: 227E(1) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
has part: 227E(2) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227e
schema version: 2

227E(1) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.466
note: No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past conduct
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 227E No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No creation of liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 227E(1) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past

227E(2) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.466
note: No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past conduct that would not have contravened an enterprise agreement term.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-227e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 227E No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No pecuniary penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If conduct would not have contravened an enterprise agreement term, no pecuniary penalty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Conduct would not have contravened an enterprise agreement term.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No pecuniary penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The conduct must have occurred before the amendment was made.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Conduct occurred before amendment.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 227E(2) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past

228 Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.467
curation status: Proposed
has part: 228(1) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
has part: 228(2) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-228
schema version: 2

228(1) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.467
note: Bargaining representatives must meet good faith bargaining requirements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-228-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 228 Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining

fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide good faith bargaining requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 228(1) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining

228(2) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.467
note: No requirement for a bargaining representative to make concessions during bargaining.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-228-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 228 Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining

fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No requirement for a bargaining representative to make concessions during bargaining.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: Good faith bargaining requirements do not require...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 228(2) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining

229 Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468
curation status: Proposed
has part: 229(1) Applications for bargaining orders
has part: 229(2) Applications for bargaining orders
has part: 229(3) Applications for bargaining orders
has part: 229(4) Applications for bargaining orders
has part: 229(5) Applications for bargaining orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-229
schema version: 2

229(1) Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468
note: Application for bargaining order under section 230
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-229-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 229 Applications for bargaining orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Bargaining representative has obligation to apply for bargaining order
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 229(1) Applications for bargaining orders

229(2) Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468
note: No application for bargaining order can be made in relation to a proposed multi-enterprise agreement unless a supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-229-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 229 Applications for bargaining orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application timing overlaps with required authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application timing must overlap with supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application timing overlaps with required authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Application timing must overlap with supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application cannot be made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No application can be made
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is required

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application timing overlaps with required authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Application timing must overlap with supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application timing overlaps with required authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application timing must overlap with supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation

229(3) Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468
note: Application for bargaining orders can be made at any time, except under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-229-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 229 Applications for bargaining orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make an application
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 229(3) Applications for bargaining orders

229(4) Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468
note: Bargaining representative must apply for bargaining order under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-229-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 229 Applications for bargaining orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (d) considers that the relevant bargaining representatives have not responded appropriately to those concerns.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide written notice to relevant bargaining representatives.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) has given a written notice setting out those concerns...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (d) considers that the relevant bargaining representatives have not responded appropriately to those concerns.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must respond to written notice within a reasonable time.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) has given the relevant bargaining representatives a reasonable time...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (d) considers that the relevant bargaining representatives have not responded appropriately to those concerns.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must meet good faith bargaining requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) has concerns that one or more of the bargaining representatives for the agreement have not met, or are not meeting, the good faith bargaining requirements...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (d) considers that the relevant bargaining representatives have not responded appropriately to those concerns.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must proceed with bargaining process fairly and efficiently.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) has concerns that the bargaining process is not proceeding efficiently or fairly because there are multiple bargaining representatives for the agreement...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Non-compliance with notice requirements may be permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with notice requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) The bargaining representative may only apply for the bargaining order if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (4) The bargaining representative may only apply for the bargaining order if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not have concerns that are not addressed.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (d) considers that the relevant bargaining representatives have not responded appropriately to those concerns.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 229(4) Applications for bargaining orders

229(5) Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468
note: FWC may consider application despite non-compliance with certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-229-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 229 Applications for bargaining orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may consider application despite non-compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 229(5) Applications for bargaining orders

23 Meaning of small business employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23(1) Meaning of small business employer
has part: 23(2) Meaning of small business employer
has part: 23(3) Meaning of small business employer
has part: 23(4) Meaning of small business employer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

23(1) Meaning of small business employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122
note: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees at a particular time to be considered a small business employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Meaning of small business employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer has fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A national system employer is a small business employer at a particular time if the employer employs fewer than 15 employees at that time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer has fewer than 15 employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees.
modality: CogAI
operator: has
premise text: (1) A national system employer is a small business employer at a particular time if the employer employs fewer than 15 employees at that time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer has fewer than 15 employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (1) A national system employer is a small business employer at a particular time if the employer employs fewer than 15 employees at that time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer has fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (1) A national system employer is a small business employer at a particular time if the employer employs fewer than 15 employees at that time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer has fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) A national system employer is a small business employer at a particular time if the employer employs fewer than 15 employees at that time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(1) Meaning of small business employer

23(2) Meaning of small business employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122
note: Count all employees employed by the employer at a particular time, except for casual employees not regularly employed.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Meaning of small business employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: All employees must be counted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to count all employees
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The employer must count all employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(2) Meaning of small business employer

23(3) Meaning of small business employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122
note: Associated entities are taken to be one entity for calculating the number of employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Meaning of small business employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: One entity for calculation purposes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity classification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: Associated entities are taken to be one entity.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(3) Meaning of small business employer

23(4) Meaning of small business employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122
note: Employees to be counted in determining small business employer status
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 23 Meaning of small business employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Small business employer status determination at that time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between employee dismissal/termination and small business employer status
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: Employee dismissal/termination occurs at a particular time

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Small business employer status determination is possible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference of small business employer status from employee dismissal/termination
modality: Argumentation
operator: entails
premise text: Employee dismissal/termination occurs at a particular time

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Small business employer status determination is possible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to count employees in determining small business employer status
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Employees are to be counted

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Small business employer status determination is possible
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to count employees in determining small business employer status
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Employees are to be counted

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Small business employer status determination is possible for all employees
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Universal quantification of employees to be counted in determining small business employer status
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
premise text: Employees are to be counted

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23(4) Meaning of small business employer

230 When the FWC may make a bargaining order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.469
note: The FWC may make a bargaining order under this section in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-230-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-230-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-230
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-230-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC can make a bargaining order.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

fair-work-act-2009-sec-230-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 230 When the FWC may make a bargaining order

231 What a bargaining order must specify
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.471
curation status: Proposed
has part: 231(1) What a bargaining order must specify
has part: 231(2) What a bargaining order must specify
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-231
schema version: 2

231(1) What a bargaining order must specify
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.471
note: Bargaining order must specify certain actions and requirements for bargaining representatives.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-231-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 231 What a bargaining order must specify

fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide specified actions and requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 231(1) What a bargaining order must specify

231(2) What a bargaining order must specify
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.471
note: Specify kinds of bargaining orders that the FWC may make.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-231-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 231 What a bargaining order must specify

fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires certain actions from the FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 231(2) What a bargaining order must specify

232 Operation of a bargaining order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.472
note: Bargaining order operation and cessation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-232-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-232
schema version: 2

233 Contravening a bargaining order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.472
note: Prohibition on contravening a bargaining order term.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-233-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-233-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-233
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-233-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-233-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 233 Contravening a bargaining order

234 Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473
curation status: Proposed
has part: 234(1) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
has part: 234(2) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-234
schema version: 2

234(1) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473
note: Application for intractable bargaining declaration
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-234-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 234 Applications for intractable bargaining declarations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Bargaining representative has obligation to apply for intractable bargaining declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 234(1) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations

234(2) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473
note: No application for intractable bargaining declaration can be made unless a supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-234-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 234 Applications for intractable bargaining declarations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application overlaps with existing authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Application must overlap with existing authorisation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application overlaps with existing authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Application must overlap with existing authorisation
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application cannot be made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No application can be made
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is required

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application overlaps with existing authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Application must overlap with existing authorisation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application overlaps with existing authorisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application must overlap with existing authorisation
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 234(2) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations

235 When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473
curation status: Proposed
has part: 235(1) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
has part: 235(2) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-235
schema version: 2

235(1) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473
note: FWC may make intractable bargaining declaration under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-235-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 235 When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Declaration made if conditions met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC obligation to make intractable bargaining declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Application for declaration made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 235(1) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining

235(2) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473
note: FWC must be satisfied with dispute handling and applicant participation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-235-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 235 When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must be satisfied with dispute handling and applicant participation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 235(2) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining

235A Post-declaration negotiating period
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.475
curation status: Proposed
has part: 235A(1) Post-declaration negotiating period
has part: 235A(2) Post-declaration negotiating period
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-235a
schema version: 2

235A(1) Post-declaration negotiating period
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.475
note: The FWC may specify a post-declaration negotiating period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-235a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 235A Post-declaration negotiating period

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May specify a post-declaration negotiating period.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 235A(1) Post-declaration negotiating period

235A(2) Post-declaration negotiating period
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.475
note: FWC may extend negotiating period under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-235a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 235A Post-declaration negotiating period

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May extend negotiating period
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 235A(2) Post-declaration negotiating period

236 Majority support determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
curation status: Proposed
has part: 236(1) Majority support determinations
has part: 236(1A) Majority support determinations
has part: 236(1B) Majority support determinations
has part: 236(2) Majority support determinations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-236
schema version: 2

236(1) Majority support determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
note: A bargaining representative may apply for a determination that a majority of employees want to bargain with the employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-236-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 236 Majority support determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply for a determination
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 236(1) Majority support determinations

236(1A) Majority support determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
note: Bargaining representative cannot apply for determination if a supported bargaining authorisation specifies the employee is in operation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-236-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 236 Majority support determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Describes a relationship between authorisation and employee
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 236(1A) Majority support determinations

236(1B) Majority support determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
note: Employee cannot apply for FWC determination under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-236-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 236 Majority support determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for expiry dates
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) the agreement has not passed its nominal expiry date.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1B) Despite subsection (1), a bargaining representative of an employee may not apply to the FWC for a determination if:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits application for FWC determination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a single interest employer agreement or a supported bargaining agreement applies to the employee; and (b) the agreement has not passed its nominal expiry date.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 236(1B) Majority support determinations

236(2) Majority support determinations
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
note: Employer and employee information must be specified in the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-236-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 236 Majority support determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer and employee information must be specified.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 236(2) Majority support determinations

237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
curation status: Proposed
has part: 237(1) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
has part: 237(2) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
has part: 237(3) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
has part: 237(3A) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
has part: 237(4) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-237
schema version: 2

237(1) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
note: FWC must make a majority support determination for proposed single-enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-237-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a majority support determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 237(1) When the FWC must make a majority support determination

237(2) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
note: The FWC must make a majority support determination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-237-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a majority support determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 237(2) When the FWC must make a majority support determination

237(3) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
note: FWC may work out whether a majority of employees want to bargain using any method the FWC considers appropriate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-237-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 237(3) When the FWC must make a majority support determination

237(3A) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
note: FWC must consider group of employees when making majority support determination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-237-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must take into account whether the group is geographically, operationally or organisationally distinct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider group of employees
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must make a majority support determination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 237(3A) When the FWC must make a majority support determination

237(4) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
note: FWC must make a majority support determination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-237-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 237(4) When the FWC must make a majority support determination

238 Scope orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
curation status: Proposed
has part: 238(1) Scope orders
has part: 238(2) Scope orders
has part: 238(3) Scope orders
has part: 238(4) Scope orders
has part: 238(4A) Scope orders
has part: 238(5) Scope orders
has part: 238(6) Scope orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-238
schema version: 2

238(1) Scope orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
note: A bargaining representative may apply for a scope order if they have concerns about the agreement covering appropriate employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-238-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 238 Scope orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The bargaining representative has a duty to apply for an order if they have concerns.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 238(1) Scope orders

238(2) Scope orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
note: No scope order for proposed single-enterprise agreement if certain conditions apply
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-238-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 238 Scope orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditions must apply before scope order application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), a bargaining representative may not apply to the FWC for a scope order in relation to a proposed single-enterprise agreement if:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of scope order
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), a bargaining representative may not apply to the FWC for a scope order in relation to a proposed single-enterprise agreement if:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Scope order application conditional on certain conditions
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), a bargaining representative may not apply to the FWC for a scope order in relation to a proposed single-enterprise agreement if:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Two conditions must be met simultaneously
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
premise text: (a) a single interest employer agreement or a supported bargaining agreement applies to one or more employees who will be covered by the proposed single-enterprise agreement; and (b) the single interest employer agreement or supported bargaining agreement has not passed its nominal expiry date.

238(3) Scope orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
note: The bargaining representative must apply for a scope order if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-238-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 238 Scope orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The bargaining representative must apply for a scope order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 238(3) Scope orders

238(4) Scope orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
note: FWC may make scope order under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-238-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 238 Scope orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: making the order promotes fair and efficient conduct of bargaining during this period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Scope order applies during good faith bargaining period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: good faith bargaining requirements met or being met

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: making the order promotes fair and efficient conduct of bargaining
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC can make scope order under conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: good faith bargaining requirements met or being met

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: making the order promotes fair and efficient conduct of bargaining
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must make scope order if conditions are met
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: good faith bargaining requirements met or being met

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: making the order promotes fair and efficient conduct of bargaining
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may make scope order if reasonable in all circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: reasonable in all circumstances

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: making the order promotes fair and efficient conduct of bargaining everywhere in the workplace
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Scope order applies everywhere in the workplace
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: group of employees fairly chosen

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 238(4) Scope orders

238(4A) Scope orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
note: Employer must specify employer and employees to be covered in scope order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-238-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 238 Scope orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must specify employer and employees to be covered.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 238(4A) Scope orders

238(5) Scope orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
note: Specify employer and employees covered by a single-enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-238-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 238 Scope orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify employer and employees
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_SPECIFY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 238(5) Scope orders

238(6) Scope orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
note: Scope order must be in accordance with this section
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-238-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 238 Scope orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with the scope order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (6) The scope order: (a) must be in accordance with this section;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 238(6) Scope orders

239 Operation of a scope order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480
note: Scope order operation and termination conditions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-239
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Scope order operation and termination conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 239 Operation of a scope order

23A Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23A(1) Terms relating to superannuation
has part: 23A(1A) Terms relating to superannuation
has part: 23A(1B) Terms relating to superannuation
has part: 23A(2) Terms relating to superannuation
has part: 23A(3) Terms relating to superannuation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23a
schema version: 2

23A(1) Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: Defines MySuper product meaning
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23A Terms relating to superannuation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of term
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: MySuper product has the meaning given by...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23A(1) Terms relating to superannuation

23A(1A) Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: A standard MySuper product must not be an employer MySuper product.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23a-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 23A Terms relating to superannuation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It must not be the case that a standard MySuper product is an employer MySuper product.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on standard MySuper products being employer MySuper products.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (1A) A standard MySuper product is a MySuper product that is not an employer MySuper product.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23A(1A) Terms relating to superannuation

23A(1B) Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: Employer must provide a tailored or corporate MySuper product.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23a-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 23A Terms relating to superannuation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide a tailored or corporate MySuper product.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23A(1B) Terms relating to superannuation

23A(2) Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: A tailored MySuper product must satisfy section 29TB of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23A Terms relating to superannuation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must satisfy
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23A(2) Terms relating to superannuation

23A(3) Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: Definition of a corporate MySuper product
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 23A Terms relating to superannuation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: within the meaning of that Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: has one standard employer-sponsor

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23A(3) Terms relating to superannuation

23B Meaning of general building and construction work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23B(1) Meaning of general building and construction work
has part: 23B(2) Meaning of general building and construction work
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23b
schema version: 2

23B(1) Meaning of general building and construction work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
note: Defines general building and construction work
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23B Meaning of general building and construction work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (ii) civil construction within the meaning of paragraph 4.3(b) of the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020 as in force at the applicable time;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (i) general building and construction within the meaning of paragraph 4.3(a) of the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020 as in force at the applicable time;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (b) the work is not any of the following...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (a) the work is done onsite by an employee in the industry of:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (vii) work in the black coal mining industry within the meaning of clause 4.2 of the Black Coal Mining Industry Award 2020 as in force at the applicable time;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (b) the work is not any of the following:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or (xiv) work, in that part of the industry of civil construction described in subparagraph 4.3(b)(i) of the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020 as in force at the applicable time, that is the construction, repair, maintenance or demolition of power houses or other structures...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: (xiii) work in the asphalt industry within the meaning of clause 4.2 of the Asphalt Industry Award 2020 as in force at the applicable time;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23B(1) Meaning of general building and construction work

23B(2) Meaning of general building and construction work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
note: Defines applicable time as start of day before section commences.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23B Meaning of general building and construction work

24 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-24
schema version: 2

240 Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480
curation status: Proposed
has part: 240(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
has part: 240(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
has part: 240(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
has part: 240(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-240
schema version: 2

240(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480
note: A bargaining representative may apply to the FWC for the FWC to deal with a dispute about an enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-240-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 240 Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 240(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute

240(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480
note: Application for FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-240-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 240 Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 240(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute

240(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480
note: Bargaining representatives must agree to make an application.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-240-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 240 Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application must be made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: Bargaining representatives must agree.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 240(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute

240(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480
note: FWC may arbitrate dispute if bargaining representatives agree.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-240-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 240 Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may arbitrate dispute within a certain time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for FWC's arbitration.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (4) If the bargaining representatives have agreed...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may arbitrate dispute if bargaining representatives agree.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Bargaining representatives' agreement implies FWC's arbitration.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (4) If the bargaining representatives have agreed...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may arbitrate dispute and provide a cogent decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: FWD's arbitration as a cogent AI process.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (4) If the bargaining representatives have agreed...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may do so.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May do so.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: (4) If the bargaining representatives have agreed...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may arbitrate dispute and diffuse its decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of FWC's arbitration decision.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: (4) If the bargaining representatives have agreed...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 240(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute

240A Application to FWC for voting request order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.481
curation status: Proposed
has part: 240A(1) Application to FWC for voting request order
has part: 240A(2) Application to FWC for voting request order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-240a
schema version: 2

240A(1) Application to FWC for voting request order
type: Concept
description: Written agreement from employee organisations
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.481
note: Employer may request employee approval for enterprise agreement voting
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-240a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 240A Application to FWC for voting request order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer obligation to request written agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 240A(1) Application to FWC for voting request order

240A(2) Application to FWC for voting request order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.481
note: Permits an employer to make voting requests.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-240a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 240A Application to FWC for voting request order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits an employer to make voting requests.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 240A(2) Application to FWC for voting request order

240B FWC must make voting request order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.483
note: FWC must make voting request order if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-240b
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make voting request order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 240B FWC must make voting request order

241 Objects of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.484
note: Objects of this Division are specified.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-241-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-241
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-241-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 241 Objects of this Division

242 Supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.484
curation status: Proposed
has part: 242(1) Supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 242(2) Supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 242(3) Supported bargaining authorisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-242
schema version: 2

242(1) Supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.484
note: Employers subject to certain rules in relation to the agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-242-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 242 Supported bargaining authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 242(1) Supported bargaining authorisations

242(2) Supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.484
note: Employers and employees must be specified in the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-242-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 242 Supported bargaining authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers and employees must be specified.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 242(2) Supported bargaining authorisations

242(3) Supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.484
note: No application can be made in relation to a proposed greenfields agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-242-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 242 Supported bargaining authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot be made in relation to a proposed greenfields agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Application under this section

243 When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.485
curation status: Proposed
has part: 243(1) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
has part: 243(2) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-243
schema version: 2

243(1) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.485
note: The FWC must make a supported bargaining authorisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-243-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 243 When the FWC must make a supported bargaining

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must make a supported bargaining authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 243(1) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining

243(2) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.485
note: Examples of common interests that employers may have
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-243-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 243 When the FWC must make a supported bargaining

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 243(2) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining

243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486
curation status: Proposed
has part: 243A(1A) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 243A(1) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 243A(2) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 243A(3) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 243A(4) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-243a
schema version: 2

243A(1) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486
note: FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-243a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision overlaps with the concept of a supported bargaining authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the provision and the concept of a supported bargaining authorisation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) The FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC will not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inference from the provision to a conclusion about the FWC's actions.
modality: CogAI
operator: InferableFrom
premise text: (1) The FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC cannot make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making a supported bargaining authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (1) The FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision implies the diffusion of supported bargaining authorisations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Implication of the provision on the diffusion of supported bargaining authorisations.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implicates
premise text: (1) The FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision contains the concept of a single-enterprise agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal containment between the provision and the concept of a single-enterprise agreement.
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: (1) The FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 243A(1) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations

243A(1A) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486
note: Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-243a-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 243A(1A) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations

243A(2) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486
note: No effect if covered by a single-enterprise agreement past its nominal expiry date
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-243a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (supported bargaining authorisation has no effect)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Nominal expiry date overlaps with supported bargaining authorisation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (single-enterprise agreement nominal expiry date)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (supported bargaining authorisation has no effect)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits effect if condition met
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (single-enterprise agreement past nominal expiry date)

243A(3) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486
note: Employer's main intention must not be to avoid being specified in a supported bargaining authorisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-243a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the employer's main intention was not to avoid being specified, then they must be specified at some point in time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The employer's intention overlaps with the concept of avoiding specification.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The FWC has the power to specify supported bargaining authorisations.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the employer's main intention was not to avoid being specified, then they must be specified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's intention is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The FWC has the power to specify supported bargaining authorisations.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC can specify supported bargaining authorisations if the employer's main intention was not to avoid being specified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC has the power to specify supported bargaining authorisations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: If the employer's main intention was not to avoid being specified, then they must be specified.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the employer's main intention was not to avoid being specified, then they must be specified at some point in time and remain specified thereafter.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The employer's intention is an obligation until it is no longer true.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: The FWC has the power to specify supported bargaining authorisations.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 243A(3) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations

243A(4) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486
note: FWC cannot make a supported bargaining authorisation for general building and construction work.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-243a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 243A(4) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations

244 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.487
curation status: Proposed
has part: 244(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
has part: 244(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-244
schema version: 2

244(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.487
note: Employer may apply for variation of supported bargaining authorisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-244-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 244 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general

fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has the right to apply for variation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 244(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general

244(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.487
note: FWC must vary authorisation if circumstances change
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-244-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 244 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general

fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to vary authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 244(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general

245 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
curation status: Proposed
has part: 245(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
has part: 245(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-245
schema version: 2

245(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
note: Employer's name can be removed from supported bargaining authorization when covered by an enterprise agreement or workplace determination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-245-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 245 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the FWC to vary the supported bargaining authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 245(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise

245(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
note: Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-245-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 245 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to remove an employee when the employee is covered by an enterprise agreement, or a workplace determination, that is in operation.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between variation and removal of employees
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (2) The FWC is taken to have varied a supported bargaining authorisation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to remove an employee when the employee is covered by an enterprise agreement, or a workplace determination, that is in operation.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Mechanism of variation and removal of employees
modality: CogAI
operator: By
premise text: (2) The FWC is taken to have varied a supported bargaining authorisation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to remove an employee when the employee is covered by an enterprise agreement, or a workplace determination, that is in operation.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to vary supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The FWC is taken to have varied a supported bargaining authorisation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to remove an employee when the employee is covered by an enterprise agreement, or a workplace determination, that is in operation.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Mechanism of variation and removal of employees
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
premise text: (2) The FWC is taken to have varied a supported bargaining authorisation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to remove an employee when the employee is covered by an enterprise agreement, or a workplace determination, that is in operation.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between variation and removal of employees
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) The FWC is taken to have varied a supported bargaining authorisation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 245(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise

246 FWC’s assistance
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
curation status: Proposed
has part: 246(1) FWC’s assistance
has part: 246(2) FWC’s assistance
has part: 246(3) FWC’s assistance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-246
schema version: 2

246(1) FWC’s assistance
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
note: FWC’s assistance applies if a supported bargaining authorisation is in operation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-246-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 246 FWC’s assistance

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC's assistance applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship: FWC's assistance applies during supported bargaining authorisation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC’s assistance applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 246(1) FWC’s assistance

246(2) FWC’s assistance
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
note: FWC may provide assistance to bargaining representatives.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-246-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 246 FWC’s assistance

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to assist.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 246(2) FWC’s assistance

246(3) FWC’s assistance
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
note: FWC may direct a person to attend a conference.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-246-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 246 FWC’s assistance

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to direct
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 246(3) FWC’s assistance

248 Single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.491
curation status: Proposed
has part: 248(1) Single interest employer authorisations
has part: 248(2) Single interest employer authorisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-248
schema version: 2

248(1) Single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.491
note: Authorisation for a single interest employer
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-248-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 248 Single interest employer authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable to the FWC for an authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: apply

fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 248(1) Single interest employer authorisations

248(2) Single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.491
note: Employers and employees must specify details for the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-248-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 248 Single interest employer authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers and employees must specify details.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 248(2) Single interest employer authorisations

249 When the FWC must make a single interest employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.491
note: The FWC must make a single interest employer authorisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-249-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-249-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-249
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-249-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must make a single interest employer authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-249-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 249 When the FWC must make a single interest employer

249A Restriction on making single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.495
note: FWC cannot make single interest employer authorisation for certain enterprise agreements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-249a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-249a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-249a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-249a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for certain enterprise agreements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of single interest employer authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: FWC must not make...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-249a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 249A Restriction on making single interest employer authorisations

25 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
note: Defines employee and employer terms for this Part.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines terms for legal interpretation.
modality: Deontic
operator: has meaning

fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 Meanings of employee and employer

250 What a single interest employer authorisation must specify
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.495
note: Employers must specify covered employers, employees, and nominated person in a single interest employer authorisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-250-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-250-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-250
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-250-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must provide specified information in a single interest employer authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-250-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 250 What a single interest employer authorisation must specify

251 Variation of single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.496
curation status: Proposed
has part: 251(1) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
has part: 251(2) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
has part: 251(2A) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
has part: 251(2B) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-251
schema version: 2

251(1) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.496
note: Variation of single interest employer authorisations
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-251-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 251 Variation of single interest employer authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow variation of single interest employer authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 251(1) Variation of single interest employer authorisations

251(2) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.496
note: The FWC must vary the authorisation to remove the employer’s name if certain requirements are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-251-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 251 Variation of single interest employer authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must vary the authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 251(2) Variation of single interest employer authorisations

251(2A) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.496
note: Employers and employees must express views on single interest employer authorisations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-251-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 251 Variation of single interest employer authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No longer appropriate for the employer to be specified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Change in employer's circumstances occurs between two points in time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: Change in employer's circumstances.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No longer appropriate for the employer to be specified.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers and employees must express views.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Change in employer's circumstances.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 251(2A) Variation of single interest employer authorisations

251(2B) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.496
note: Application must be made by a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-251-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 251 Variation of single interest employer authorisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made by a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 251(2B) Variation of single interest employer authorisations

251A Restriction on variation of single interest employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.501
note: FWC must not vary single interest employer authorisation under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-251a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...authorisation under certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of varying single interest employer authorisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: FWC must not vary...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 251A Restriction on variation of single interest employer

252 Variation to extend period single interest employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.502
curation status: Proposed
has part: 252(1) Variation to extend period single interest employer
has part: 252(2) Variation to extend period single interest employer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-252
schema version: 2

252(1) Variation to extend period single interest employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.502
note: Variation of single interest employer authorization
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-252-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 252 Variation to extend period single interest employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 252(1) Variation to extend period single interest employer

252(2) Variation to extend period single interest employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.502
note: FWC may vary authorisation to extend period if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-252-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 252 Variation to extend period single interest employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the agreement will be made during the extended period
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for varying authorisation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: the authorisation is in operation for a longer period

fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may vary authorisation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: FWC has authority to extend period

fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 252(2) Variation to extend period single interest employer

253 Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503
curation status: Proposed
has part: 253(1) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
has part: 253(2) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-253
schema version: 2

253(1) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503
note: Terms of an enterprise agreement that are not about permitted matters, unlawful terms, or designated outworker terms have no effect.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-253-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 253 Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 55.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Terms with no effect are those that occur during the commencement of the enterprise agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Note 1: A term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 55 (see section 56).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that: (a) it is not a term about a permitted matter; or (b) it is an unlawful term; or (c) it is a designated outworker term.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Invalidates a term if it is not about permitted matters, unlawful terms, or designated outworker terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: invalidates
premise text: (a) it is not a term about a permitted matter; (b) it is an unlawful term; (c) it is a designated outworker term.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 55.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Terms with no effect are those that occur during the commencement of the enterprise agreement.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Note 1: A term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 55 (see section 56).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 253(1) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect

253(2) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503
note: Inclusion of a term with no effect does not prevent an enterprise agreement from being valid.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-253-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 253 Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include a term with no effect in an enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Term is included in the enterprise agreement.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 253(2) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect

254 Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503
curation status: Proposed
has part: 254(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
has part: 254(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-254
schema version: 2

254(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503
note: Applications by bargaining representatives
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-254-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 254 Applications by bargaining representatives

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 254(1) Applications by bargaining representatives

254(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503
note: Application for enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-254-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 254 Applications by bargaining representatives

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 254(2) Applications by bargaining representatives

254A Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
curation status: Proposed
has part: 254A(1) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
has part: 254A(2) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
has part: 254A(3) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-254a
schema version: 2

254A(1) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
note: Entitlement to make submissions for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-254a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 254A Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement is a right.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 254A(1) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions

254A(2) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
note: Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-254a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 254A Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 254A(2) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions

254A(3) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
note: Applicability of subsection (1) regardless of hearing
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-254a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 254A Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) applies regardless of hearing
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applicability overlaps with hearing
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) applies regardless of hearing

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) applies regardless of hearing
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability is necessary
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (1) applies regardless of hearing

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 254A(3) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions

255 Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
curation status: Proposed
has part: 255(1) Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
has part: 255(2) Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-255
schema version: 2

255(1) Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
note: Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-255-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 255 Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain actions
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) This Part does not empower the FWC to make an order that requires, or has the effect of requiring:

255(2) Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
note: FWC may make an order regarding proposed enterprise agreement content during arbitration under section 240.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-255-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 255 Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 255(2) Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders

255A Limitations relating to greenfields agreements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.505
note: Prohibits application of certain provisions after notified negotiation period ends
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-255a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following provisions do not apply in relation to the agreement at any time after the end of the notified negotiation period:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Provisions apply during notified negotiation period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) the notified negotiation period has ended;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following provisions do not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits application of provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (1) If...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following provisions do not apply in relation to the agreement at any time after the end of the notified negotiation period:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts certain provisions from application
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
premise text: (d) the following provisions do not apply in relation to the agreement at any time after the end of the notified negotiation period:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a bargaining order that relates to the agreement ceases to have effect at the end of the notified negotiation period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Bargaining order relates to greenfields agreements
modality: Deontic
operator: relates to
premise text: (i) section 228 (which deals with good faith bargaining requirements);

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a bargaining order that relates to the agreement ceases to have effect at the end of the notified negotiation period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Bargaining order ceases to have effect until end of negotiation period
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (e) a bargaining order that relates to the agreement ceases to have effect at the end of the notified negotiation period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 255A Limitations relating to greenfields agreements

256 Prospective employers and employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
note: Reference to employer or employee includes person who may become one
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-256
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 256 Prospective employers and employees

256A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
curation status: Proposed
has part: 256A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 256A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 256A(3) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 256A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-256a
schema version: 2

256A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
note: Employers, employees, and employee organisations must specify covered parties in an enterprise agreement or other instrument.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-256a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 256A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires specification of covered parties
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 256A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

256A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
note: Employees may be specified by class or by name.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-256a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 256A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 256A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

256A(3) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
description: Name
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
note: Must specify by name
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-256a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 256A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify by name
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

256A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
note: Employees, employers and employee organisations must describe a class by reference to one or more of the following.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-256a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 256A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must describe a class by reference to one or more of the following.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class description must be based on classification, job level or grade.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 256A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

257 Enterprise agreements may incorporate material in force from
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
note: Enterprise agreements may incorporate material in force from time to time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-257-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-257
schema version: 2

26 May 2009
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
note: Chapter 1 Introduction
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26
schema version: 2

26 May 2009
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-2
schema version: 2

26 May 2009
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-3
schema version: 2

26 Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
curation status: Proposed
has part: 26(1) Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
has part: 26(2) Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-4
schema version: 2

26(1) Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
note: Exclusion of State or Territory industrial laws
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-4-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (This Act)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of laws
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: (State or Territory industrial laws)

26(2) Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
note: Defines what constitutes a State or Territory industrial law.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26-4-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 26 Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a general State industrial law; or an Act of a State or Territory that applies to employment...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A State or Territory industrial law is:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a general State industrial law; or an Act of a State or Territory that applies to employment...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Combines the alternatives.
modality: CogAI
operator: or
premise text: (2) A State or Territory industrial law is:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a general State industrial law; or an Act of a State or Territory that applies to employment...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the type of law.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (2) A State or Territory industrial law is:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a general State industrial law; or an Act of a State or Territory that applies to employment...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Combines the conditions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
premise text: (2) A State or Territory industrial law is:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a general State industrial law; or an Act of a State or Territory that applies to employment...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the termination condition.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) A State or Territory industrial law is:

27 State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.129
curation status: Proposed
has part: 27(1A) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
has part: 27(1) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
has part: 27(2) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27
schema version: 2

27(1) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.129
note: Section 26 does not apply to certain State and Territory laws.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 27 State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26

fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law is prescribed by the regulations as a law to which section 26 does not apply.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion from section 26
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
premise text: Section 26 does not apply to a law of a State or Territory

27(1A) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.129
note: Exemptions from section 26
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 27 State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26

fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the listed laws.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State and Territory laws exempted
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Section 26 does not apply to...

27(2) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.129
note: List of non-excluded matters
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-27-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 27 State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26

fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enumerates non-excluded matters
modality: Deontic
operator: list

fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27(2) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26

28 Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28(1) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
has part: 28(2) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
has part: 28(3) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28
schema version: 2

28(1) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
note: Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(1) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws

28(2) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
note: The Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes prescribed State and Territory laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(2) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws

28(3) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
note: Section 27 is not applicable to the law.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 27 does not apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If section 26 applies, then section 27 does not apply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Section 26 applies.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not limit itself.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection (1) does not limit subsection (1).
modality: Deontic
operator: Does not limit
premise text: Subsection (1) has effect.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the law is covered by section 27, then subsection (1) does not apply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The law is covered by section 27.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 26 does not apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 26 does not apply to the law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Does not limit
premise text: The law is covered by section 27.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law is covered by section 27.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If subsection (1) has effect, then the law is covered by section 27.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Subsection (1) has effect.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(3) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws

29 Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
curation status: Proposed
has part: 29(1) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
has part: 29(2) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
has part: 29(3) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29
schema version: 2

29(1) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
note: Modern awards and enterprise agreements take precedence over state laws in case of inconsistency.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State laws are overridden by modern awards and enterprise agreements in case of inconsistency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Precedence obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: Modern awards and enterprise agreements take precedence over state laws.

29(2) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
note: Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with state laws
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: law of a State or Territory
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Law applies to enterprise agreement so far as it is covered by paragraph 27(1)(b), (c) or (d)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: so far as
premise text: paragraph 27(1A)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: term of a modern award or enterprise agreement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Term applies subject to certain laws
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: term of an enterprise agreement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Term requires designated emergency management body to act in accordance with state law
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: paragraph 194(baa)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: term of an enterprise agreement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Term permits designated emergency management body to act other than in accordance with state law
modality: Deontic
operator: permits
premise text: paragraph 253(1)(b)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29(2) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with

29(3) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
note: Term of modern award or enterprise agreement not subject to State law
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-29-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 29 Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion from State law
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29(3) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
note: A Proclamation must not specify a day that occurs before the day on which the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Object of this Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.30
note: Promotes national economic prosperity and social inclusion for all Australians.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a duty to promote national economic prosperity and social inclusion.
modality: Deontic
operator: >

fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Object of this Act

fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Commencement on the first day after the end of a 12-month period beginning on the day the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 receives Royal Assent.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of specifying a day before the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 receives Royal Assent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Provisions that do not commence within the specified period will start on the first day after the end of that period.
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually

30 Act may exclude State and Territory laws etc. in other cases
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
note: Act may exclude State and Territory laws etc.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

30A Meaning of terms used in this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
note: Defines terms used in Division 2A of the Fair Work Act 2009.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30a
schema version: 2

30B Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30B(1) Meaning of referring State
has part: 30B(4) Meaning of referring State
has part: 30B(2) Meaning of referring State
has part: 30B(3) Meaning of referring State
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30b
schema version: 2

30B(1) Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: A State is a referring State if the Parliament of the State has referred matters before 1 July 2009.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30B Meaning of referring State

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Parliament of the State has referred matters covered by subsections (3),
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Matters were referred before 1 July 2009
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
premise text: (1) A State is a referring State if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Parliament of the State has referred matters before 1 July 2009,
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Referred matters imply State is referring
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (1) A State is a referring State if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Parliament of the State has referred matters before 1 July 2009,
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: State asserts referring matter
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
premise text: (1) A State is a referring State if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Parliament of the State has referred the matters covered by subsections (3),
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State has referred matters
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (1) A State is a referring State if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Parliament of the State has referred matters covered by subsections (3),
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: State diffuses referring matter
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) A State is a referring State if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30B(1) Meaning of referring State

30B(2) Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: A State is a referring State even if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30B Meaning of referring State

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the State is a referring State
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditions for being a referring State
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (a) the State’s referral law provides that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30B(2) Meaning of referring State

30B(3) Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: Defines scope of referred provisions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 30B Meaning of referring State

30B(4) Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: States legislative powers in relation to the Parliament of the Commonwealth
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 30B Meaning of referring State

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: States temporal interval for Commonwealth reference
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (4) and (5) in relation to the State to the Parliament of the Commonwealth for the purposes of paragraph 51(xxxvii) of the Constitution:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States matters not included in Commonwealth legislative powers
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (b) if and to the extent that the matters are included in the legislative powers of the Parliament of the State.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States matters not otherwise included in Commonwealth legislative powers
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) if and to the extent that the matters are not otherwise included in the legislative powers of the Parliament of the Commonwealth (otherwise than by a reference under paragraph 51(xxxvii) of the Constitution);

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States matters included in State legislative powers
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (b) if and to the extent that the matters are included in the legislative powers of the Parliament of the State.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: States matters in relation to Commonwealth legislative powers
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (a) if and to the extent that the matters are not otherwise included in the legislative powers of the Parliament of the Commonwealth (otherwise than by a reference under paragraph 51(xxxvii) of the Constitution);

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30B(4) Meaning of referring State

30C Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30C(1) Extended meaning of national system employee
has part: 30C(2) Extended meaning of national system employee
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30c
schema version: 2

30C(1) Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
note: Defines a national system employee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30c-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30C Extended meaning of national system employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30C(1) Extended meaning of national system employee

30C(2) Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
note: Section does not limit operation of section 13.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30C Extended meaning of national system employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30C(2) Extended meaning of national system employee

30D Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30D(1) Extended meaning of national system employer
has part: 30D(2) Extended meaning of national system employer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30d
schema version: 2

30D(1) Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
note: Defines national system employer
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30d-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30D Extended meaning of national system employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30D(1) Extended meaning of national system employer

30D(2) Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
note: Section 14 is not limited by this section.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30d-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30D Extended meaning of national system employer

30E Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30E(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 30E(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 30E(3) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30e
schema version: 2

30E(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
note: A reference to an employee includes a law enforcement officer of a State that is a referring State.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30E Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30E(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer

30E(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
note: A reference to an employer includes a holder of an office in a referring State.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30E Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30E(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer

30E(3) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
note: Section does not limit operation of section 15.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 30E Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 15 is not limited by this section.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies the operation of section 15 is not limited.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Section 30E(3)

30F Extended meaning of outworker entity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
note: Defines outworker entity
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30f
schema version: 2

30G General protections
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30G(1) General protections
has part: 30G(2) General protections
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30g
schema version: 2

30G(1) General protections
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
note: Part 3-1 applies to action taken in a State that is a referring State because of this Division.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30G General protections

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Part 3-1 applies to action taken in a State that is a referring State because of this Division.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30G(1) General protections

30G(2) General protections
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
note: Section 30G(2) applies despite section 337 and does not limit the operation of sections 338 and 339.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30G General protections

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies despite other provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30G(2) General protections

30H Division only has effect if supported by reference
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
note: Division has effect only if supported by reference to Parliament of the Commonwealth
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30h-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30h-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30h
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division has effect only if supported by reference to Parliament of the Commonwealth
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30H Division only has effect if supported by reference

30K Meaning of terms used in this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.143
note: Definition of excluded subject matter
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30k
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of excluded subject matter
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: excluded subject matter
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: terms used in this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30K Meaning of terms used in this Division

30L Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: Definition of referring State
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30l-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30l
schema version: 2

30M Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30M(1) Extended meaning of national system employee
has part: 30M(2) Extended meaning of national system employee
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30m
schema version: 2

30M(1) Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
note: Defines a national system employee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30m-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30M Extended meaning of national system employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30M(1) Extended meaning of national system employee

30M(2) Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
note: Section does not limit operation of section 13.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30m-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30M Extended meaning of national system employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30M(2) Extended meaning of national system employee

30N Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30N(1) Extended meaning of national system employer
has part: 30N(2) Extended meaning of national system employer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30n
schema version: 2

30N(1) Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
note: Defines national system employer
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30N Extended meaning of national system employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office to whom subsection 30P(2) applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employment duration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) any person in a State that is a referring State because of this Division so far as the person employs, or usually employs, an individual;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office to whom subsection 30P(2) applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Includes persons and holders of offices
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
premise text: (1) A national system employer includes: (a) any person in a State that is a referring State because of this Division so far as the person employs, or usually employs, an individual;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes persons and holders of offices
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) any person in a State...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office to whom subsection 30P(2) applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of referring States and holders of offices
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: (1) A national system employer includes: (a) any person in a State...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office to whom subsection 30P(2) applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Includes persons and holders of offices
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
premise text: (1) A national system employer includes: (a) any person in a State that is a referring State because of this Division so far as the person employs, or usually employs, an individual;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office to whom subsection 30P(2) applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employment duration
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (a) any person in a State that is a referring State because of this Division so far as the person employs, or usually employs, an individual;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30N(1) Extended meaning of national system employer

30N(2) Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
note: Does not limit operation of section 14
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30N Extended meaning of national system employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 14
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits operation of section 14
modality: Deontic
operator: does not imply
premise text: Section 30N(2)

30P Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30P(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 30P(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 30P(3) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30p
schema version: 2

30P(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
note: A law enforcement officer of a referring State is included in the definition of employee if the State's referral law so provides.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30P Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion in a definition is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The law enforcement officer is a subclass of employee.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30P(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer

30P(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
note: A reference to an employer includes a holder of an office of the State.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30P Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Type equality
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: type equality

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30P(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer

30P(3) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
note: Section does not limit operation of section 15.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 30P Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer

30Q Extended meaning of outworker entity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30Q(1) Extended meaning of outworker entity
has part: 30Q(2) Extended meaning of outworker entity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30q
schema version: 2

30Q(1) Extended meaning of outworker entity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
note: An outworker entity includes a person who arranges for work to be performed in a State that is a referring State because of this Division.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30Q Extended meaning of outworker entity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of an outworker entity
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies outworker entity based on arrangement and work type
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30Q(1) Extended meaning of outworker entity

30Q(2) Extended meaning of outworker entity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
note: Does not limit the operation of the definition of outworker entity in section 12.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30Q Extended meaning of outworker entity

30R General protections
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30R(1) General protections
has part: 30R(2) General protections
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30r
schema version: 2

30R(1) General protections
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
note: Applicability of general protections to referring States
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30R General protections

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 3-1 applies to action taken in a State that is a referring State because of this Division.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: General protections apply to referring States
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) Part 3-1 applies to action taken in a State that is a referring State because of this Division.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30R(1) General protections

30R(2) General protections
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
note: Section 30R(2) applies despite section 337 and does not limit the operation of sections 338 and 339.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30R General protections

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies despite other provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30R(2) General protections

30S Division only has effect if supported by reference
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
note: Division has effect only if supported by reference to Parliament of the Commonwealth
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30s-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30s-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30s
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division has effect only if supported by reference to Parliament of the Commonwealth
modality: Deontic
operator: if-and-only-if

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30s-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30S Division only has effect if supported by reference

31 Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 31(1) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
has part: 31(2) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31
schema version: 2

31(1) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
note: A provision of this Act does not apply to a person or entity in Australia prescribed by the regulations as a person to whom, or an entity to which, the provision does not apply.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(1) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia

31(2) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
note: Minister must be satisfied that provision should not apply to person or entity in Australia due to insufficient connection.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-31-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 31 Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision should not apply to the person or entity in Australia.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The temporal interval of the provision's application overlaps with the temporal interval of the person or entity's connection to Australia.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: There is not a sufficient connection between the person or entity and Australia.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision should not apply to the person or entity in Australia.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The CogAI system can infer that the provision does not apply to the person or entity in Australia due to insufficient connection.
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: There is not a sufficient connection between the person or entity and Australia.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a sufficient connection between the person or entity and Australia.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to ensure provision does not apply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Minister must be satisfied that the provision should not apply.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision should not apply to the person or entity in Australia.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The diffusion of information about the provision's application is affected by the temporal interval of the person or entity's connection to Australia.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: There is not a sufficient connection between the person or entity and Australia.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision should not apply to the person or entity in Australia.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision's application continues until the temporal interval of the person or entity's connection to Australia ends.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: There is not a sufficient connection between the person or entity and Australia.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31(2) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia

32 Regulations may modify application of this Act in certain parts of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
note: Regulations may modify application of this Act in certain parts of Australia.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may modify application of this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32 Regulations may modify application of this Act in certain parts of

32A Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32A(1) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
has part: 32A(2) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
has part: 32A(3) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32a
schema version: 2

32A(1) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
note: The Minister may make rules modifying the Act's application in Norfolk Island.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32A Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister may make rules
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32A(1) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island

32A(2) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
note: Rules cannot create an offence or civil penalty, provide powers of arrest or detention, entry, search or seizure, impose a tax, set an amount to be appropriated from the Consolidated Revenue Fund, or directly amend the text of this Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32A Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Rules cannot create an offence or civil penalty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32A(2) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island

32A(3) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
note: This Act has effect as modified in relation to Norfolk Island.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-32a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 32A Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: This Act has effect as modified in relation to Norfolk Island.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffectAs

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32A(3) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island

33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 33(1) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
has part: 33(2) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
has part: 33(3) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
has part: 33(4) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
has part: 33(5) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
has part: 33(6) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33
schema version: 2

33(1) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
note: This Act extends to or in relation to certain ships and platforms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to ships and platforms
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (i) supplies, services or otherwise operates in connection with a fixed platform in the exclusive economic zone or in the waters above the continental shelf; (ii) operates to and from an Australian port;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of ship operation on base usage
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (i) is operated or chartered by an Australian employer; (ii) uses Australia as a base;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of ship operation on base usage
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (i) is operated or chartered by an Australian employer; (ii) uses Australia as a base;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension of the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: extends

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of ship operation to platform usage
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (i) supplies, services or otherwise operates in connection with a fixed platform in the exclusive economic zone or in the waters above the continental shelf; (ii) operates to and from an Australian port;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(1) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the

33(2) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
note: References to Australian employer and employee are included in provisions of the Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of Australian employer and employee references.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(2) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the

33(3) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
note: Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the waters above the continental shelf.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(3) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the

33(4) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
note: Modifications of this Act for its operation in the exclusive economic zone or continental shelf.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the

33(5) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
note: Prescribes modifications in relation to different parts of the exclusive economic zone or continental shelf.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the

33(6) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
note: Extension of this Act has effect in relation to acts, omissions, matters and things directly or indirectly connected with the exploration of, or exploitation of the natural resources of, the continental shelf in the Greater Sunrise special regime area.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-33-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The extension of this Act has effect.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33(6) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the

34 Extension of this Act beyond the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.157
note: Extension of this Act beyond the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-34-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-34
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval

35 Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35(1) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
has part: 35(2) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35
schema version: 2

35(1) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
note: Definition of Australian employer
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(1) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee

35(2) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
note: Defines Australian-based employee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35 Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An Australian-based employee is an employee who...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
premise text: (2) An Australian-based employee is an employee:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35(2) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee

35A Regulations excluding application of Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
curation status: Proposed
has part: 35A(1) Regulations excluding application of Act
has part: 35A(2) Regulations excluding application of Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a
schema version: 2

35A(1) Regulations excluding application of Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
note: Regulations may exclude application of Act in certain areas.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 35A Regulations excluding application of Act

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may exclude application
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35A(1) Regulations excluding application of Act

35A(2) Regulations excluding application of Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
note: Regulations excluding application of Act
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-35a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 35A Regulations excluding application of Act

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclude application in specified area or part
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35A(2) Regulations excluding application of Act

36 Geographical application of offences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
note: Geographical application of offences
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-36
schema version: 2

37 Act binds Crown
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
curation status: Proposed
has part: 37(1) Act binds Crown
has part: 37(2) Act binds Crown
has part: 37(3) Act binds Crown
has part: 37(4) Act binds Crown
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37
schema version: 2

37(1) Act binds Crown
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
note: The Act binds the Crown in all its capacities.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Act binds Crown

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Crown.
modality: Deontic
operator: binds

37(2) Act binds Crown
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
note: The Crown is not liable to prosecution for an offence, except as provided by subsection (3).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Act binds Crown

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prosecution is not allowed.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the Crown is not liable, then prosecution is not allowed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to be prosecuted.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There are exceptions to this rule.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision excludes certain cases where the Crown may be liable to prosecution.
modality: Deontic
operator: Excludes
premise text: This Act does not make the Crown liable to be prosecuted, except as provided for by subsection (3).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prosecution may be allowed in that case.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If there is an exception, then prosecution may be allowed in that case.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The Crown is not liable to prosecution for an offence, except as provided for by subsection (3).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This provision applies to all such cases.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: This provision applies to all cases where the Crown is not liable to prosecution.
modality: Deontic
operator: ForAll
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to be prosecuted, except as provided for by subsection (3).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There may be such cases.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: There may be cases where the Crown is not liable to prosecution.
modality: Deontic
operator: ForSome
premise text: The Crown is not liable to prosecution for an offence, except as provided for by subsection (3).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(2) Act binds Crown

37(3) Act binds Crown
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
note: The Crown is liable to prosecution for certain offences.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Act binds Crown

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines overlapping temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) The Crown in right of the Commonwealth is liable to be prosecuted for an offence against any of the following provisions:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes a logical implication.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (3) The Crown in right of the Commonwealth is liable to be prosecuted for an offence against any of the following provisions:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the Crown's liability.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (3) The Crown in right of the Commonwealth is liable to be prosecuted for an offence against any of the following provisions:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the Crown from committing certain acts.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) The Crown in right of the Commonwealth is liable to be prosecuted for an offence against any of the following provisions:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about related offences.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) subsection 327A(1); (b) a related offence provision, to the extent that the related offence provision relates to an offence against subsection 327A(1).

37(4) Act binds Crown
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
note: The Crown is liable for contravention of civil remedy provisions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-37-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 37 Act binds Crown

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Crown is liable for contravention of civil remedy provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37(4) Act binds Crown

38 Act not to apply so as to exceed Commonwealth power
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
note: Act not to apply so as to exceed Commonwealth power
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-38
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Act not to apply so as to exceed Commonwealth power

39 Acquisition of property
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
note: Acquisition of property from a person not on just terms is excluded.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-39-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-39
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of acquisition of property on just terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Guide to this Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 4(1) Guide to this Act
has part: 4(2) Guide to this Act
has part: 4(3) Guide to this Act
has part: 4(4) Guide to this Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2
schema version: 2

4(1) Guide to this Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
note: Provides for compliance with and enforcement of the Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Guide to this Act

fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4(1) Guide to this Act

4(2) Guide to this Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
note: Guide to this Act
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Guide to this Act

4(3) Guide to this Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
note: Guide to this Act
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Guide to this Act

4(4) Guide to this Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
note: Contains application, saving and transitional provisions relating to amendments of this Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Guide to this Act

40 Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40(1) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
has part: 40(2) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
has part: 40(3) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
has part: 40(4) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40
schema version: 2

40(1) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
note: Public sector employment law prevails over fair work instruments on inconsistency.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to the extent of any inconsistency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Precedence of public sector employment law over fair work instruments.
modality: Deontic
operator: >!
premise text: (1) A public sector employment law prevails...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(1) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector

40(2) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
note: Public sector employment law prevails over fair work instruments to the extent of any inconsistency if the instrument or term is prescribed by regulations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prioritize public sector employment law.
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails over

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Fair work instruments are included in a class of instruments prescribed by regulations.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(2) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector

40(3) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
note: Fair work instruments do not prevail over public sector employment laws
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Laws that fair work instruments never prevail over
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Fair work instruments do not overlap with public sector employment laws
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) A public sector employment law is a law of the Commonwealth...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Laws that fair work instruments never prevail over
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Fair work instruments contradict public sector employment laws
modality: Argumentation
operator: Contradicts
premise text: (3) A public sector employment law is a law of the Commonwealth...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Laws that fair work instruments never prevail over
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Fair work instruments do not apply to public sector employment laws
modality: CogAI
operator: DoesNotApply
premise text: (3) A public sector employment law is a law of the Commonwealth...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Laws that fair work instruments never prevail over
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of fair work instruments over public sector employment laws
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
premise text: (3) A public sector employment law is a law of the Commonwealth...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Laws that fair work instruments never prevail over
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Fair work instruments do not diffuse to public sector employment laws
modality: Diffusion
operator: DoesNotDiffuse
premise text: (3) A public sector employment law is a law of the Commonwealth...

40(4) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
note: Exempts certain public sector employment laws from subsection (2)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws during their commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws: (a) the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988; (b) the Superannuation Act 1976; (c) the Superannuation Act 1990; (d) the Superannuation Act 2005; (e) the Superannuation (Productivity Benefit) Act 1988;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws during their commencement
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (4) Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws: (a) the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988; (b) the Superannuation Act 1976; (c) the Superannuation Act 1990; (d) the Superannuation Act 2005; (e) the Superannuation (Productivity Benefit) Act 1988;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts certain public sector employment laws from subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws during their commencement
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (4) Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws: (a) the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988; (b) the Superannuation Act 1976; (c) the Superannuation Act 1990; (d) the Superannuation Act 2005; (e) the Superannuation (Productivity Benefit) Act 1988;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws during their commencement
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (4) Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws: (a) the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988; (b) the Superannuation Act 1976; (c) the Superannuation Act 1990; (d) the Superannuation Act 2005; (e) the Superannuation (Productivity Benefit) Act 1988;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(4) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector

40A Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.164
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40A(1) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
has part: 40A(2) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40a
schema version: 2

40A(1) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.164
note: Applicability of Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to this Act
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40A Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40A(1) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901

40A(2) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.164
note: Amendments to Acts Interpretation Act 1901 do not apply to this Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40A Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40A(2) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901

40B Effect of the Migration Act 1958
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.164
note: Disregard effect of Migration Act 1958 on contract validity
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40b
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40B Effect of the Migration Act 1958

40C Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.165
note: Must regard the road transport objective when performing functions and exercising powers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40c
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to regard the road transport objective.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Expert Panel's responsibility to consider the road transport objective.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has regard to

40D The road transport objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.166
note: Must consider minimum standards for regulated road transport workers and employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40d-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40d
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider minimum standards
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

40E Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40E(1) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
has part: 40E(2) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
has part: 40E(3) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
has part: 40E(4) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40e
schema version: 2

40E(1) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
note: Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40E Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Creates an obligation to establish a group
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40E(1) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group

40E(2) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
note: The Road Transport Advisory Group must advise the FWC on matters related to the road transport industry.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40E Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40E(2) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group

40E(3) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
note: Consultation requirement before advising FWC on a matter.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40E Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...any relevant subcommittee established under section 40G.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation requirement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (3) Before advising the FWC in relation to a matter, the Road Transport Advisory Group must consult...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...before advising FWC on a matter.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consultation requirement implies advising FWC on a matter
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: The Road Transport Advisory Group must consult any relevant subcommittee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...established under section 40G.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Consultation requirement requires expertise in road transport advisory group
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
premise text: The Road Transport Advisory Group must consult any relevant subcommittee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...before advising FWC on a matter.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Road Transport Advisory Group must consult...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...established under section 40G.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consultation requirement spreads to other advisory groups
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
premise text: The Road Transport Advisory Group must consult any relevant subcommittee...

40E(4) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
note: The President must consult with the Road Transport Advisory Group.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 40E Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40E(4) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group

40F Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40F(1) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
has part: 40F(2) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40f
schema version: 2

40F(1) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
note: The Minister must appoint members to the Road Transport Advisory Group.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40F(1) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group

40F(2) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
note: Ensure membership of Road Transport Advisory Group consists of specified persons.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40F Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Membership consists of specified persons.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure membership
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister must appoint members.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40F(2) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group

40G Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40G(1) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
has part: 40G(2) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
has part: 40G(3) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40g
schema version: 2

40G(1) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
note: Establish subcommittees to advise the Road Transport Advisory Group.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 40G Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: establish

40G(2) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
note: A subcommittee must be chaired by a member.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 40G Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There exists a time interval where the chairperson is a member of the Road Transport Advisory Group
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Chairing a subcommittee implies being part of the Road Transport Advisory Group at some point
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) A subcommittee may include persons who are not members of the Road Transport Advisory Group, but a subcommittee must be chaired by a member.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A subcommittee must be chaired by a member.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must chair a subcommittee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A subcommittee may include persons who are not members of the Road Transport Advisory Group, but a subcommittee must be chaired by a member.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A subcommittee must have a chairperson
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A subcommittee must have a chairperson
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A subcommittee may include persons who are not members of the Road Transport Advisory Group, but a subcommittee must be chaired by a member.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a subcommittee is chaired by a member, then that member is a member of the Road Transport Advisory Group
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Chairing a subcommittee implies membership in the Road Transport Advisory Group
modality: LinearLogic
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (2) A subcommittee may include persons who are not members of the Road Transport Advisory Group, but a subcommittee must be chaired by a member.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40G(2) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees

40G(3) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
note: Establish a subcommittee with majority owner drivers or representatives
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-40g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 40G Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establish a subcommittee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST ESTABLISH

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40G(3) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees

41 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.170
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-41-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-41
schema version: 2

42 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.171
note: Defines employee and employer terms
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-42-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-42
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42 Meanings of employee and employer

43 Terms and conditions of employment provided under this Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Main terms and conditions of employment provided under this Act
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-43-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-43
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employment terms are obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Terms and conditions of employment provided under this Act

44 Contravening the National Employment Standards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: Employer must not contravene National Employment Standards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-44-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-44
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening the National Employment Standards.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-44-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44 Contravening the National Employment Standards

45 Contravening a modern award
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: Prohibition on contravening a modern award term
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-45-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-45
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids contravention of a modern award term
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-45-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45 Contravening a modern award

46 The significance of a modern award applying to a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
curation status: Proposed
has part: 46(1) The significance of a modern award applying to a person
has part: 46(2) The significance of a modern award applying to a person
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46
schema version: 2

46(1) The significance of a modern award applying to a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: A modern award imposes obligations on a person unless the award applies to the person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 46 The significance of a modern award applying to a person

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Applicability of A ⊆ Obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The applicability of a modern award to a person overlaps with the obligation imposed by the award.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (A) Modern award does not impose obligations on a person, and (B) Person does not contravene a term of a modern award.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (A or B) and (not A or not B)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A, then B.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (A) Modern award does not impose obligations on a person, and (B) Person does not contravene a term of a modern award.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (not A or B)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A modern award may not impose obligations on a person unless the award applies to the person.
modality: Deontic
operator: NotImplying
premise text: (A) Modern award does not impose obligations on a person, and (B) Person does not contravene a term of a modern award.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (not A or B)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the applicability of a modern award to a person overlaps with the obligation imposed by the award, then the award imposes obligations on the person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (A) Modern award does not impose obligations on a person, and (B) Person does not contravene a term of a modern award.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation ⊆ Until(A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The obligation imposed by a modern award is until the applicability of the award to the person.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (A) Modern award does not impose obligations on a person, and (B) Person does not contravene a term of a modern award.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46(1) The significance of a modern award applying to a person

46(2) The significance of a modern award applying to a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: Award must apply to a person for entitlement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-46-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 46 The significance of a modern award applying to a person

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the award applies, then the person has an entitlement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Award application is necessary for entitlement
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (2) A modern award does not give a person an entitlement unless the award applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The award allows the person to have an entitlement if it applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Award application is permissive for entitlement
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) A modern award does not give a person an entitlement unless the award applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The award does not allow the person to have an entitlement if it does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Award application is prohibited for entitlement
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A modern award does not give a person an entitlement unless the award applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The award gives the person a right to have an entitlement if it applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Award application is a right for entitlement
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: (2) A modern award does not give a person an entitlement unless the award applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The award undertakes to give the person an entitlement if it applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Award application is an undertaking for entitlement
modality: Deontic
operator: Undertaking
premise text: (2) A modern award does not give a person an entitlement unless the award applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46(2) The significance of a modern award applying to a person

47 When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 47(1) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
has part: 47(2) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
has part: 47(3) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47
schema version: 2

47(1) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: A modern award applies to an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 47 When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Combines conditions for applicability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: and
premise text: (a) and (b) and (c)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States conditions for applicability
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (a) the modern award covers the employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity; and (b) the modern award is in operation; and (c) no other provision of this Act provides, or has the effect, that the modern award does not apply to the employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(1) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,

47(2) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: Modern awards do not apply to high income employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 47 When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Modern award does not apply to employee at a time when the employee is a high income employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits modern awards from applying to high income employees.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Modern award applies to employees in relation to particular employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(2) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,

47(3) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: A reference to a modern award applying to an employee is a reference to the award applying to the employee in relation to particular employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-47-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 47 When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference to a modern award
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47(3) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,

48 When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
curation status: Proposed
has part: 48(1) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
has part: 48(2) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
has part: 48(3) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
has part: 48(4) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48
schema version: 2

48(1) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
note: A modern award covers an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if the award is expressed to cover the employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 48 When a modern award covers an employer, employee,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional coverage
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (award is expressed to cover the employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(1) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,

48(2) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
note: A modern award covers an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 48 When a modern award covers an employer, employee,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if temporal interval of provision is met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of provision of Act or Registered Organisations Act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
premise text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if provision of Act is met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provision of Act or Registered Organisations Act
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if FWC order is met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC order under Act
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if court order is met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court order
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if ordered trace of FWC order is met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace of FWC order under Act
modality: LTL
operator: >
premise text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(2) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,

48(3) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
note: Exemptions from modern awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 48 When a modern award covers an employer, employee,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from modern awards
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(3) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,

48(4) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
note: A modern award that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-48-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 48 When a modern award covers an employer, employee,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A modern award that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48(4) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,

49 When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
curation status: Proposed
has part: 49(1) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(2) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(3) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(4) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(5) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(6) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(7) When a modern award is in operation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49
schema version: 2

49(1) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: Modern award commences on a specific date
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation

49(2) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: The FWC must specify a day for the modern award to come into operation unless it is satisfied that another day is appropriate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must specify a day.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(2) When a modern award is in operation

49(3) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: Cannot be earlier than the day of modern award making
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on early commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(3) When a modern award is in operation

49(4) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: Determination revoking a modern award comes into operation on the specified day.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation

49(5) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: Must not be earlier than the day of determination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on early commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(5) When a modern award is in operation

49(6) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: Modern award takes effect on first full pay period after operation day
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the award or determination comes into operation.)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Modern award takes effect during first full pay period after operation day
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (6) A modern award, or a determination revoking a modern award, does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Core provisions for this Chapter Division 2 Section 50 Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the award or determination comes into operation.)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Modern award takes effect during first full pay period after operation day
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (6) A modern award, or a determination revoking a modern award, does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Core provisions for this Chapter Division 2 Section 50 Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the award or determination comes into operation.)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Modern award takes effect on first full pay period after operation day
modality: Deontic
operator: takesEffect
premise text: (6) A modern award, or a determination revoking a modern award, does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Core provisions for this Chapter Division 2 Section 50 Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the award or determination comes into operation.)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Modern award takes effect during first full pay period after operation day
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (6) A modern award, or a determination revoking a modern award, does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Core provisions for this Chapter Division 2 Section 50 Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the award or determination comes into operation.)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Modern award takes effect during first full pay period after operation day
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (6) A modern award, or a determination revoking a modern award, does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Core provisions for this Chapter Division 2 Section 50 Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(6) When a modern award is in operation

49(7) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: Modern award continues in operation until revoked.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-49-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The modern award operates during the period before revocation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between modern award and revocation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (7) A modern award continues in operation until it is revoked.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The continued operation of the modern award implies certain employment terms.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of modern award continuation on employment terms
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (7) A modern award continues in operation until it is revoked.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AI systems recognize the continued operation of the modern award as a certain employment term.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of modern award continuation by AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (7) A modern award continues in operation until it is revoked.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The modern award must continue in operation until revoked.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain modern award in operation
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: (7) A modern award continues in operation until it is revoked.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The continued operation of the modern award diffuses certain employment terms.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuse implications of modern award continuation on employment terms
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (7) A modern award continues in operation until it is revoked.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49(7) When a modern award is in operation

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
note: Cannot specify a day before the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 receives Royal Assent.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5(1) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
has part: 5(2) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
has part: 5(3) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
has part: 5(4) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
has part: 5(5) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-2
schema version: 2

5(1) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
note: Employment terms and conditions for national system employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(1) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)

5(2) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
note: Main terms and conditions of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Workplace determinations
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with main terms and conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Section 279

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(2) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)

5(3) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
note: Minimum terms and conditions for national system employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: National Employment Standards apply to all national system employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(3) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)

5(4) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
note: Modern awards provide additional minimum terms and conditions for national system employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A modern award can have terms that are ancillary or supplementary to the National Employment Standards.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Modern awards apply during the term of employment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (4) Part 2-3 is about modern awards.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A modern award provides additional minimum terms and conditions for those national system employees to whom it applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Modern awards define minimum terms and conditions for national system employees.
modality: CogAI
operator: isDefinedBy
premise text: (4) Part 2-3 is about modern awards.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A modern award is made for a particular industry or occupation and provides additional minimum terms and conditions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a modern award as part of the National Employment Standards.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
premise text: (4) Part 2-3 is about modern awards.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A modern award provides additional minimum terms and conditions for those national system employees to whom it applies.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Modern awards imply additional minimum terms and conditions for national system employees.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (4) Part 2-3 is about modern awards.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A modern award can have terms that are ancillary or supplementary to the National Employment Standards.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Modern awards assert the existence of additional minimum terms and conditions.
modality: SHACL
operator: asserts
premise text: (4) Part 2-3 is about modern awards.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(4) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)

5(5) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
note: Enterprise agreement terms and conditions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(5) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on specifying a day before the Act receives Royal Assent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

50 Contravening an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: Prohibition on contravening an enterprise agreement term
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-50-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-50
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids contravention of enterprise agreement terms
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-50-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 50 Contravening an enterprise agreement

51 The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51(1) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
has part: 51(2) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51
schema version: 2

51(1) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: An enterprise agreement does not impose obligations on a person unless the agreement applies to the person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 51 The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation imposed by an enterprise agreement commences when the agreement applies to a person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of obligation commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
premise text: An enterprise agreement commences when it applies to a person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is not obligated by an enterprise agreement unless the agreement applies to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negation of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: An enterprise agreement does not impose obligations on a person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is obligated by an enterprise agreement if and only if the agreement applies to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Equivalence of obligation and applicability
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: An enterprise agreement does not impose obligations on a person unless the agreement applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person is not obligated by an enterprise agreement if and only if the agreement does not apply to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negation of obligation applicability
modality: Deontic
operator: ~
premise text: An enterprise agreement does not apply to a person unless the agreement imposes obligations on the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If an enterprise agreement does not impose obligations on a person, then the agreement does not apply to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of obligation and applicability
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
premise text: An enterprise agreement does not impose obligations on a person unless the agreement applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(1) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person

51(2) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: An enterprise agreement does not give a person an entitlement unless the agreement applies to the person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-51-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51 The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(2) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person

52 When an enterprise agreement applies to an employer, employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: Enterprise agreement applies to employee, employer or organisation if it is in operation and covers the relevant party.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-52
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then it applies to the relevant party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal conjunction of conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: and
premise text: (a) the agreement is in operation; (b) the agreement covers the employee, employer or organisation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then it applies to the relevant party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (a) the agreement is in operation; (b) the agreement covers the employee, employer or organisation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then it applies to the relevant party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identity of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The enterprise agreement is in operation and covers the employee, employer or organisation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then it applies to the relevant party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Conjunction of conditions
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
premise text: (a) the agreement is in operation; (b) the agreement covers the employee, employer or organisation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52 When an enterprise agreement applies to an employer, employee

53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
curation status: Proposed
has part: 53(1) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
has part: 53(2) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
has part: 53(3) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
has part: 53(4) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
has part: 53(5) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
has part: 53(6) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53
schema version: 2

53(1) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (1) An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee organisations are covered by the enterprise agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (1) An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Enterprise agreement obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(1) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

53(2) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: Enterprise agreement covers an employee organisation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enterprise agreement covers an employee organisation
modality: Deontic
operator: covers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(2) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

53(3) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: An enterprise agreement also covers an employee, employer or organisation if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the agreement covers the employee, employer or organisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(3) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

53(4) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: Enterprise agreements do not cover employees, employers, or organisations if another provision of this Act, an FWC order under another provision of this Act, or a court order applies.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enterprise agreements do not cover employees, employers, or organisations if another provision of this Act, an FWC order under another provision of this Act, or a court order applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(4) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

53(5) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: Enterprise agreements cease to cover employees after operation ends.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The operation cessation of an enterprise agreement overlaps with its termination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Enterprise agreements terminate at the time of operation cessation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (5) Despite subsections (1), (2) and (3), an enterprise agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer or employee organisation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CogAI recognises the termination of an enterprise agreement at the time of its operation cessation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognises the termination of enterprise agreements upon operation end.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
premise text: (5) Despite subsections (1), (2) and (3), an enterprise agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer or employee organisation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An enterprise agreement ceases to cover employees after it has ceased to operate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits enterprise agreements from covering employees after operation ends.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) Despite subsections (1), (2) and (3), an enterprise agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer or employee organisation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of an enterprise agreement's coverage ends at the time of its operation cessation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Enterprise agreements diffuse their coverage to employees upon operation end.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (5) Despite subsections (1), (2) and (3), an enterprise agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer or employee organisation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The termination of an enterprise agreement is recurring at the time of operation cessation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Enterprise agreements terminate at the time of operation cessation in a recurring manner.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (5) Despite subsections (1), (2) and (3), an enterprise agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer or employee organisation.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(5) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

53(6) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: A reference to an enterprise agreement covering an employee is a reference to the agreement covering the employee in relation to particular employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-53-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A reference to an enterprise agreement covering an employee is a reference to the agreement covering the employee in relation to particular employment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53(6) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or

54 When an enterprise agreement is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54(1) When an enterprise agreement is in operation
has part: 54(2) When an enterprise agreement is in operation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54
schema version: 2

54(1) When an enterprise agreement is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
note: Enterprise agreement commencement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-54-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 54 When an enterprise agreement is in operation

54(2) When an enterprise agreement is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
note: Enterprise agreement ceases operation on specified days
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-54-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 54 When an enterprise agreement is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits termination of enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) An enterprise agreement ceases to operate...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-54-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(2) When an enterprise agreement is in operation

55 Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
curation status: Proposed
has part: 55(1) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
has part: 55(2) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
has part: 55(3) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55
schema version: 2

55(1) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: Cannot exclude National Employment Standards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(1) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a

55(2) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include certain terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a

55(3) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: Terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement override National Employment Standards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-55-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 55 Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Terms of the modern award or enterprise agreement override National Employment Standards.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for compliance with terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
premise text: National Employment Standards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Terms of the modern award or enterprise agreement override National Employment Standards.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: >
premise text: National Employment Standards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Terms of the modern award or enterprise agreement override National Employment Standards.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on overriding terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: <
premise text: National Employment Standards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55(3) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a

56 Terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement contravening
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.183
note: Terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement that contravene section 55 have no effect.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-56-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-56
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement that contravene section 55.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

57 Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57(1) Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
has part: 57(2) Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57
schema version: 2

57(1) Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
note: A modern award does not apply to an employee in relation to particular employment at a time when an enterprise agreement applies.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A modern award does not apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an enterprise agreement applies, then a modern award does not apply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: An enterprise agreement applies.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57(1) Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements

57(2) Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
note: Award does not apply to employer or employee organisation if modern award does not apply to employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57 Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (modern award does not apply to employee) -> (award does not apply to employer or employee organisation)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A, then B.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (modern award does not apply to employee) -> (award does not apply to employer or employee organisation)

57A Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
curation status: Proposed
has part: 57A(1) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
has part: 57A(2) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
has part: 57A(3) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57a
schema version: 2

57A(1) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
note: Enterprise agreement and modern award conditions apply.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement applies to an employer; and (b) a modern award covers the employer...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Modern award includes designated outworker terms
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (c) the modern award includes one or more designated outworker terms.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57A(1) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to

57A(2) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
note: Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to apply.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The term applies during the specified time period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Term applies during specified time period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (2) Despite section 57, the designated outworker terms of the modern award apply at that time to the following:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The term implies continued application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Term implies continued application
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) Despite section 57, the designated outworker terms of the modern award apply at that time to the following:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The designated outworker terms continue to apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Term continues in effect
modality: Deontic
operator: Continues
premise text: (2) Despite section 57, the designated outworker terms of the modern award apply at that time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The term propagates to the employees and employer organizations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Term propagates to employees and employer organizations
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (a) the employer;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57A(2) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to

57A(3) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
note: Designated outworker terms of a modern award can apply to an employer under subsection (2) even if none of the employees of the employer is an outworker.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-57a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 57A Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The text describes a temporal interval: the extent to which designated outworker terms of a modern award apply to an employer.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
premise text: (a) and (b)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The text describes a cognitive process: the interpretation of the designated outworker terms.
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
premise text: (a) and (b)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The designated outworker terms of a modern award apply to the employer, employee or organisation.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (a) and (b)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The text describes a diffusion of obligations: the employer, employee or organisation must comply with the designated outworker terms.
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies
premise text: (a) and (b)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The text describes an ordered or recurring trace: the interaction between one or more enterprise agreements.
modality: LTL
operator: applies
premise text: Subdivision C—Interaction between one or more enterprise agreements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57A(3) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to

58 Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58(1) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
has part: 58(2) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58
schema version: 2

58(1) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
note: Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee at a particular time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(1) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee

58(2) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
note: Cannot apply later agreement until earlier one expires
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-58-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Later agreement cannot apply until earlier one expires
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for earlier agreement's expiry date
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: Earlier agreement has not passed its nominal expiry date

fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot apply later agreement until earlier one expires
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(2) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee

59 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
note: Employers must comply with National Employment Standards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-59-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-59
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59 Guide to this Part

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(1) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(2) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(3) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(4) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(5) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(6) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(6A) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(7) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(8) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2
schema version: 2

6(1) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Rights and responsibilities of national system employees, employers, organisations
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to rights and responsibilities
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

6(2) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Protects workplace rights, freedom of association and involvement in lawful industrial activities, and other protections.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 3-1 overlaps with other provisions that provide general workplace protections.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision overlaps with other provisions that provide general workplace protections.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) Part 3-1 provides general workplace protections.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 3-1 protects workplace rights.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision holds a right.
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
premise text: (2) Part 3-1 provides general workplace protections.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 3-1 protects freedom of association and involvement in lawful industrial activities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision holds a right to freedom of association and involvement in lawful industrial activities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
premise text: (2) Part 3-1 provides general workplace protections.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 3-1 provides other protections.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision holds a right to other protections.
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
premise text: (2) Part 3-1 provides general workplace protections.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 3-1 protects from discrimination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision holds a right to protection from discrimination.
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
premise text: (2) Part 3-1 provides general workplace protections.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 6(2) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

6(3) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Grants remedies for unfair dismissal of national system employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a right
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

6(4) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: No action lies under any law in force in a State or Territory in relation to protected industrial action except in certain circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

6(5) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Comply with requirements set out in Part 3-4 when exercising rights
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

6(6) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Employer can stand down employee without pay in certain circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(6) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

6(6A) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Part 3-5A prohibits sexual harassment of workers and others.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-6a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sexual harassment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

6(7) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Employees have a right to termination pay and payslips.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employees have a right to termination pay and payslips.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-7-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: LegalPerson
part of: 6(7) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

6(8) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Part 3-7 deals with offences in relation to corrupting benefits.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-8-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 6(8) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations

60 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-60
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines terms
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies employee and employer
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 Meanings of employee and employer

61 The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
curation status: Proposed
has part: 61(1) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
has part: 61(2) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
has part: 61(3) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61
schema version: 2

61(1) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: Sets minimum standards for employment that cannot be displaced
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 61 The National Employment Standards are minimum standards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires setting of minimum standards
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to employment of employees
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: appliesTo

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61(1) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards

61(2) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: List of matters covered by the National Employment Standards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 61 The National Employment Standards are minimum standards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61(2) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards

61(3) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: Divisions 3 to 12 constitute the National Employment Standards.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-61-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 61 The National Employment Standards are minimum standards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division constitutes the National Employment Standards.
modality: Deontic
operator: =

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61(3) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards

62 Maximum weekly hours
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
curation status: Proposed
has part: 62(1) Maximum weekly hours
has part: 62(2) Maximum weekly hours
has part: 62(3) Maximum weekly hours
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62
schema version: 2

62(1) Maximum weekly hours
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
note: Maximum weekly hours
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Maximum weekly hours

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between work hours and maximum weekly hours
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (a) for a full-time employee—38 hours; or (b) for an employee who is not a full-time employee—the lesser of:...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Employee's refusal to work unreasonable additional hours implies prohibition of excessive work hours
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Employee may refuse to work unreasonable additional hours

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of excessive work hours
modality: Deontic
operator: not

62(2) Maximum weekly hours
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
note: Employee may refuse additional hours beyond reasonable limits.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Maximum weekly hours

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to refuse additional hours
modality: Deontic
operator: May

62(3) Maximum weekly hours
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
note: Employee health and safety, personal circumstances, workplace needs, and compensation must be considered when determining reasonable additional hours.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-62-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Maximum weekly hours

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval consideration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee health and safety, personal circumstances, workplace needs, and compensation must be considered when determining reasonable additional hours.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62(3) Maximum weekly hours

63 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
curation status: Proposed
has part: 63(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
has part: 63(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63
schema version: 2

63(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
note: Maximum weekly hours for full-time and non-full-time employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for

fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exceeding maximum weekly hours is prohibited
modality: Deontic
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for

63(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
note: Allowing for average weekly hours exceeding the standard if reasonable
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-63-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 63 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for

fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits exceeding standard hours under certain conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: allows

64 Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
curation status: Proposed
has part: 64(1) Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
has part: 64(2) Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64
schema version: 2

64(1) Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
note: Employer and employee may agree on averaging arrangement for award/agreement free employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-64-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-64-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(1) Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees

64(2) Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
note: Allowing for average weekly hours exceeding the standard hours if reasonable
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-64-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permitting averaging arrangements with excess hours
modality: Deontic
operator: allows

65 Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
curation status: Proposed
has part: 65(1) Requests for flexible working arrangements
has part: 65(1A) Requests for flexible working arrangements
has part: 65(1B) Requests for flexible working arrangements
has part: 65(2) Requests for flexible working arrangements
has part: 65(2A) Requests for flexible working arrangements
has part: 65(3) Requests for flexible working arrangements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65
schema version: 2

65(1) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: Employees may request flexible working arrangements under certain circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request for change in working arrangements overlaps with circumstances
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Request must overlap with circumstances
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Circumstances apply to employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must consider request
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to change working arrangements
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: Employee requests flexible working arrangement

65(1A) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: Flexible working arrangements for specified circumstances
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between circumstances and flexible working arrangements
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (aa) the employee is pregnant; (a) the employee is the parent, or has responsibility for the care, of a child who is of school age or younger;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must provide flexible working arrangements for specified circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of flexible working arrangements to employees with disabilities
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (c) the employee has a disability;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring flexible working arrangements for employees experiencing family and domestic violence
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (e) the employee provides care or support to a member of the employee’s immediate family, or a member of the employee’s household, who requires care or support because the member is experiencing family and domestic violence;

65(1B) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: Request for part-time work to care for a child
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...without limiting subsection (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1B) To avoid doubt...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An employee may request to work part-time...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (1B) To avoid doubt, and without limiting subsection (1)

65(2) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: Request for flexible working arrangements requires minimum service period or regular casual employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This condition applies to the request for flexible working arrangements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of continuous service or be employed on a regular casual basis during a period of at least 12 months
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Employee has completed at least 12 months of continuous service or is employed on a regular casual basis during a period of at least 12 months

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request for flexible working arrangements is only allowed under these conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires employee to meet certain conditions before making a request
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of continuous service or be a regular casual employee with a reasonable expectation of continuing employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must not allow requests for flexible working arrangements unless employee meets these conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must not allow requests for flexible working arrangements unless employee meets these conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Employee has completed at least 12 months of continuous service or is a regular casual employee with a reasonable expectation of continuing employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This condition applies to the request for flexible working arrangements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employee must meet both conditions before making a request for flexible working arrangements
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: Employee has completed at least 12 months of continuous service or is a regular casual employee with a reasonable expectation of continuing employment

65(2A) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: Employee's regular casual employment period is taken as continuous service.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: takes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(2A) Requests for flexible working arrangements

65(3) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
description: Details of the change sought and reasons for the change
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
note: Request for flexible working arrangements must be in writing and set out details of the change sought.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide details in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(3) Requests for flexible working arrangements

65A Responding to requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
description: Written response
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
note: Employer must respond to employee's request for flexible working arrangements within 21 days.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

65B Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
curation status: Proposed
has part: 65B(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 65B(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 65B(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 65B(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 65B(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65b
schema version: 2

65B(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
description: Written response
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
note: Employer must respond to employee's request for change in working arrangements within 21 days.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 65B Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond to employee's request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65B(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division

65B(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
note: Parties must attempt to resolve disputes at the workplace level.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 65B Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must attempt to resolve disputes
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65B(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division

65B(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
note: Refer dispute to FWC if discussions at workplace level do not resolve it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 65B Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refer dispute to FWC
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer dispute to FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Discussion at workplace level does not resolve dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65B(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division

65B(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
note: FWC must deal with dispute by means other than arbitration unless exceptional circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 65B Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to deal with dispute by means other than arbitration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: FWC is an agent that must deal with disputes.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65B(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division

65B(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
note: Permission for FWC to permit representation by lawyer or paid agent in a matter before the FWC.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 65B Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

65C Arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
note: FWC may deal with dispute by arbitration if employer has not responded to employee's request.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-65c
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 65C(1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must respond to employee's request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 65A(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65C Arbitration

66 State and Territory laws that are not excluded
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.201
note: Exclusion of State and Territory laws on employee entitlements
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to the exclusion of laws of a State or Territory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of State and Territory laws
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: This Act is not intended to apply

66A Division applies to casual employees etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
curation status: Proposed
has part: 66A(1) Division applies to casual employees etc.
has part: 66A(2) Division applies to casual employees etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66a
schema version: 2

66A(1) Division applies to casual employees etc.
type: Concept
description: Written response with specified information
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: Employer must respond to employee notification within 21 days. Division applies in relation to casual employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 66A Division applies to casual employees etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66A(1) Division applies to casual employees etc.

66A(2) Division applies to casual employees etc.
type: Concept
description: Response including statement of acceptance or rejection
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: Employer must respond in writing to notification Employee must notify employer of change in employment status within 6 months.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 66A Division applies to casual employees etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must respond in writing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66A(2) Division applies to casual employees etc.

66K Effect of change
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
note: Employee is taken for purposes of Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66k-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66k
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66k-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66K Effect of change

66L Other rights and obligations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
curation status: Proposed
has part: 66L(1) Other rights and obligations
has part: 66L(2) Other rights and obligations
has part: 66L(3) Other rights and obligations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66l
schema version: 2

66L(1) Other rights and obligations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
note: Employer cannot reduce or vary employee's hours of work, change pattern of work, or terminate employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 66L Other rights and obligations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...reduce or vary an employee’s hours of work;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of employer's actions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (1) An employer must not do any of the following...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66L(1) Other rights and obligations

66L(2) Other rights and obligations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
note: No requirement or permission to change employment status.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 66L Other rights and obligations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal inclusion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Division:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Division:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative permission
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: (b) permits an employer to require an employee to change to full-time employment or part-time employment under this Division;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66L(2) Other rights and obligations

66L(3) Other rights and obligations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
note: Notification and response requirements for workplace rights
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 66L Other rights and obligations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires notification and response from employer
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, each of the following is a workplace right within the meaning of Part 3-1:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires response from employer in accordance with section 66AAC
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (b) receiving a response from an employer in accordance with section 66AAC;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires being taken to be full-time or part-time employee under section 66AAD
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (c) being taken to be a full-time employee or part-time employee under section 66AAD;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires receiving offer or notice in accordance with sections 66B and 66C
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (d) receiving an offer or notice in accordance with sections 66B and 66C;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires accepting offer and receiving notice under section 66E
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (e) accepting an offer and receiving a notice under section 66E;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66L(3) Other rights and obligations

66M Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
curation status: Proposed
has part: 66M(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 66M(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 66M(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 66M(6) Disputes about the operation of this Division
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66m
schema version: 2

66M(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
note: Applicable to disputes between employer and employee about operation of Subdivision B.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 66M Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Resolving disputes
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable to disputes
modality: Deontic
operator: applicableTo
premise text: (1) This section applies...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66M(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division

66M(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
note: Parties must attempt to resolve disputes at the workplace level through discussions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66m-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 66M Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to resolve disputes
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Term has no effect if it contravenes section 55
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: A term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent it contravenes section 55

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may deal with disputes
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY BE DEALT WITH
premise text: The FWC may deal with disputes that cannot be resolved at the workplace level

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66M(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division

66M(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
note: Party must refer dispute to FWC if discussions at workplace level do not resolve it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66m-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 66M Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for when the obligation applies is after discussions at workplace level have failed to resolve the dispute
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for when the obligation applies
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The obligation applies when discussions at workplace level do not resolve the dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition of 'party' supports the obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Definition of 'party' used in obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: Party is defined as an entity that can be a party to the dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must refer dispute to FWC
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer dispute to FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Party is a party to the dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition of 'dispute' supports the obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Definition of 'dispute' used in obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: Dispute is defined as a disagreement between parties

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal logic for when the obligation applies is that it must apply after discussions at workplace level have failed to resolve the dispute
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal logic for when the obligation applies
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: The obligation applies when discussions at workplace level do not resolve the dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66M(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division

66M(6) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
note: FWC must deal with dispute by means other than arbitration unless exceptional circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66m-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 66M Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to deal with dispute by means other than arbitration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: FWC is an agent that must deal with disputes.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

66MA Arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
curation status: Proposed
has part: 66MA(1) Arbitration
has part: 66MA(2) Arbitration
has part: 66MA(3) Arbitration
has part: 66MA(4) Arbitration
has part: 66MA(5) Arbitration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66ma
schema version: 2

66MA(1) Arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
note: FWC may deal with dispute by arbitration, including making orders it considers appropriate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66ma-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 66MA Arbitration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May deal with dispute by arbitration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66MA(1) Arbitration

66MA(2) Arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
note: FWC cannot make an order under this section unless it considers fair and reasonable.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66ma-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 66MA Arbitration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making an order under this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

66MA(3) Arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
note: FWC must not make an order inconsistent with a provision of this Act or a term of a fair work instrument.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66ma-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 66MA Arbitration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not make an order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: FWC must make an order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66MA(3) Arbitration

66MA(4) Arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
note: Employee must be treated as full-time or part-time employee from first day of next pay period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66ma-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 66MA Arbitration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to treat employee as full-time or part-time
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66MA(4) Arbitration

66MA(5) Arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
note: FWC must consider substantial changes to employee terms and conditions when making an order under subsection (1)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-66ma-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 66MA Arbitration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must consider substantial changes to employee terms and conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66MA(5) Arbitration

67 General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
curation status: Proposed
has part: 67(1) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
has part: 67(1A) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
has part: 67(2) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67
schema version: 2

67(1) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
note: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of continuous service to be entitled to leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 67 General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of continuous service.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67(1) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months

67(1A) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
note: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 67 General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of employment.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67(1A) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months

67(2) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
note: Employee must have completed at least 12 months to be entitled to leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-67-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 67 General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must have completed at least 12 months.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 67(2) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months

68 General rule for adoption-related leave—child must be under 16
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
note: Eligibility for adoption-related leave based on child's age and residency.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-68
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: 6-month residency requirement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: has not lived continuously with employee for a period of 6 months as at day of placement or expected day of placement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Child must meet both conditions to be eligible
modality: Deontic
operator: and
premise text: (a) is, or will be, under 16 as at the day of placement, or the expected day of placement, of the child; and (b) has not, or will not have, lived continuously with the employee for a period of 6 months or more as at the day of placement, or the expected day of placement, of the child;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Child cannot be employee's child or spouse/partner
modality: Deontic
operator: and
premise text: is not (otherwise than because of the adoption) a child of the employee or the employee’s spouse or de facto partner.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee's eligibility for leave is tied to these conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: An employee is not entitled to adoption-related leave unless the child that is, or is to be, placed with the employee for adoption: ...

69 Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69(1) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
has part: 69(2) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69
schema version: 2

69(1) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
note: Employee entitled to continue leave period upon transfer of employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee is entitled to continue on that leave for the rest of that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Leave period overlaps with new employment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the employee has already started a period of leave under this Division when the employee’s employment with the first employer ends;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee’s employment with the first employer ends;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Employee situation recognized upon transfer of employment.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (a) there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee is entitled to continue on that leave for the rest of that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has a right to continue leave period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) If there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee; and the employee has already started a period of leave under this Division when the employee’s employment with the first employer ends;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee is entitled to continue on that leave for the rest of that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Leave period diffuses into new employment.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (b) the employee has already started a period of leave under this Division when the employee’s employment with the first employer ends;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee’s employment with the first employer ends;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employee situation recurrent upon transfer of employment.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (a) there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(1) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled

69(2) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
note: Employee's step in relation to first employer is transferred to second employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-69-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69 Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee's step in relation to the first employer is transferred to the second employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: A ⊆ B.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
premise text: (b) the employee has, in relation to the first employer, already taken a step that is required or permitted by a provision of this Division in relation to taking a period of leave;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee's step in relation to the first employer is not transferred to the second employer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: A ⊕ B.
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊕
premise text: (a) there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee is taken to have taken the step in relation to the second employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A, then B.
modality: Deontic
operator: →
premise text: (a) there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee's step in relation to the first employer is not transferred to the second employer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: A ⊕ B.
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊕
premise text: (b) the employee has, in relation to the first employer, already taken a step that is required or permitted by a provision of this Division in relation to taking a period of leave;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee's step in relation to the first employer is not transferred to the second employer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: A ⊕ B.
modality: LTL
operator: ⊕
premise text: (a) there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69(2) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled

6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6A(1) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
has part: 6A(2) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
has part: 6A(3) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
has part: 6A(4) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
has part: 6A(5) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
has part: 6A(6) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a
schema version: 2

6A(1) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers and businesses.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...of certain regulated workers who perform work under services contracts...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a right.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: (1) Chapter 3A sets out rights and responsibilities...

6A(2) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Regulated workers have core provisions for compliance and interaction issues.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated workers have obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A(2) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated

6A(3) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Regulated workers have minimum standards orders and guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated workers must comply with minimum standards.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A(3) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated

6A(4) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Granting of remedies for unfair termination and deactivation of regulated workers
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated workers have a right to remedies for unfair termination and deactivation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-4-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 6A(4) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated

6A(5) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Definition of collective agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-5-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 6A(5) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated

6A(6) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-6-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 6A(6) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated

6B Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6B(1) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
has part: 6B(2) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
has part: 6B(3) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6b
schema version: 2

6B(1) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport contractual chain.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6B Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 6B(1) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport

6B(2) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6B Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Part 3B-1 has the core provisions for the Chapter.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to comply with road transport contractual chain orders
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: (2) Part 3B-1 has the core provisions for the Chapter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 6B(2) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport

6B(3) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Part 3B-2 is about road transport contractual chain orders and guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6B Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6B(3) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport

7 April 2009
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

7 Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7(1) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
has part: 7(2) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
has part: 7(3) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-2
schema version: 2

7(1) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Chapter 4 provides for compliance with this Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(1) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)

7(2) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Imposes obligations on certain persons for contraventions of civil remedy provisions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on certain persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(2) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)

7(3) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Court jurisdiction and powers in relation to matters arising under the Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court has jurisdiction over matters arising under the Act during its period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Court jurisdiction and powers during the period of the Act.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Part 4-2 is about the jurisdiction and powers of the courts in relation to matters arising under this Act.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court classifies matters arising under the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Court classification of matters arising under the Act.
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
premise text: Part 4-2 is about the jurisdiction and powers of the courts in relation to matters arising under this Act.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court has jurisdiction over matters arising under the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has jurisdiction over matters arising under the Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
premise text: Part 4-2 is about the jurisdiction and powers of the courts in relation to matters arising under this Act.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court has an influence on matters arising under the Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Court influence on matters arising under the Act.
modality: Diffusion
operator: influence
premise text: Part 4-2 is about the jurisdiction and powers of the courts in relation to matters arising under this Act.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court has jurisdiction over matters arising under the Act during its period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Court jurisdiction and powers during the period of the Act.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Part 4-2 is about the jurisdiction and powers of the courts in relation to matters arising under this Act.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(3) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)

70 Entitlement to unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
note: Entitlement to unpaid parental leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-70-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-70
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: has

71 The period of leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
curation status: Proposed
has part: 71(1) The period of leave
has part: 71(2) The period of leave
has part: 71(3) The period of leave
has part: 71(4) The period of leave
has part: 71(5) The period of leave
has part: 71(6) The period of leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71
schema version: 2

71(1) The period of leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
note: Employee must take leave in single continuous period
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 71 The period of leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take leave
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(1) The period of leave

71(2) The period of leave
type: Concept
references: subsection 72A(11)
references: subsection 73(4)
references: paragraph 78A(2)(b)
references: subsection 79A(1)
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
note: Employee must take leave in a single continuous period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 71 The period of leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must take leave in a single continuous period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(2) The period of leave

71(3) The period of leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
note: Employee is entitled to leave for birth-related purposes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 71 The period of leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to take leave for birth-related purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(3) The period of leave

71(4) The period of leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
note: The period of leave must start and end during the 24-month period starting on the date of birth of the child.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 71 The period of leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The period of leave must start and end during the 24-month period starting on the date of birth of the child.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(4) The period of leave

71(5) The period of leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
note: The period of leave must start and end during the 24-month period starting on the day of placement of the child.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 71 The period of leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The period of leave must start and end during the 24-month period starting on the day of placement of the child.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(5) The period of leave

71(6) The period of leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
note: Employee may take unpaid parental leave under this section if the period of leave is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-71-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 71 The period of leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period of leave is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The leave period must be within a certain time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (6) The employee may take unpaid parental leave under this section only if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period of leave is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The system can infer the conditions for the permission
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (6) The employee may take unpaid parental leave under this section only if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to take unpaid parental leave
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period of leave is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The permission can be propagated to others
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (6) The employee may take unpaid parental leave under this section only if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period of leave is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The leave can be taken repeatedly
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (6) The employee may take unpaid parental leave under this section only if...

72A Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
curation status: Proposed
has part: 72A(1) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(2) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(2A) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(2B) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(2C) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(3) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(4) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(5) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(6) Flexible unpaid parental leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72a
schema version: 2

72A(1) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Employee has an obligation to take up to 100 days of flexible unpaid parental leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

72A(2) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Flexible unpaid parental leave is available to employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide flexible unpaid parental leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72A(2) Flexible unpaid parental leave

72A(2A) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Employee must take flexible unpaid parental leave before expected birth date if requirements are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72a-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Flexible unpaid parental leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must take leave
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 72A(2A)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72A(2A) Flexible unpaid parental leave

72A(2B) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Flexible unpaid parental leave available to pregnant part-time and casual employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72a-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has right to flexible unpaid parental leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2b-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 72A(2B) Flexible unpaid parental leave

72A(2C) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Reduction of flexible unpaid parental leave entitlement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72a-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72A(2C) Flexible unpaid parental leave

72A(3) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Employee must take flexible unpaid parental leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take flexible unpaid parental leave
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

72A(4) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Flexible unpaid parental leave may be taken regardless of prior leave under another provision.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits flexible unpaid parental leave regardless of prior leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

72A(5) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Employee must take flexible unpaid parental leave after exceeding a certain period of unpaid parental leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The time period for flexible unpaid parental leave is between 12 months and the employee’s notional flexible period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Time period for flexible unpaid parental leave
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The total of those periods (disregarding any extension under section 76A) is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee’s notional flexible period is a type of leave that must be taken into account.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Employee’s notional flexible period
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: Less the employee’s notional flexible period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee must take flexible unpaid parental leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take flexible unpaid parental leave
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Employee has taken one or more periods of unpaid parental leave under another provision.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee’s notional flexible period is a type of leave that must be taken into account.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Employee’s notional flexible period
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: Less the employee’s notional flexible period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The time period for flexible unpaid parental leave is between 12 months and the employee’s notional flexible period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Time period for flexible unpaid parental leave
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The total of those periods (disregarding any extension under section 76A) is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.

72A(6) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
note: Employee's notional flexible period is the period during which the employee would be on flexible unpaid parental leave if the employee took leave for all the employee's flexible days in a single continuous period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-72a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72A(6) Flexible unpaid parental leave

73 Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
curation status: Proposed
has part: 73(1) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
has part: 73(2) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73
schema version: 2

73(1) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: Employer may ask employee to provide medical certificate
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(1) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental

73(2) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: Employer may require employee to take unpaid parental leave if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-73-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 73 Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer may require employee to take unpaid parental leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer is prohibited from requiring employee to take unpaid parental leave without proper certification.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employee does not give employer requested certificate within 7 days

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision applies to employees who give employer medical certificate stating fit for work but not advisable to continue in present position
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer is permitted to require employee to take unpaid parental leave if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Employee gives employer medical certificate stating fit for work but not advisable to continue in present position

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision does not apply to employees who give employer medical certificate stating fit for work but not advisable to continue in present position and have complied with notice and evidence requirements of section 74
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer is prohibited from requiring employee to take unpaid parental leave if certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employee gives employer medical certificate stating fit for work but not advisable to continue in present position and has complied with notice and evidence requirements of section 74

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision applies to employees who have not complied with notice and evidence requirements of section 74
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision requires an employee to take unpaid parental leave if certain conditions are met.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Employee has not complied with notice and evidence requirements of section 74 for taking unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(2) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental

74 Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
curation status: Proposed
has part: 74(1) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(2) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(2A) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(3) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(3C) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(3D) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(4) Notice and evidence requirements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74
schema version: 2

74(1) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Employee must provide written notice to employer before taking unpaid parental leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(1) Notice and evidence requirements

74(2) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
description: True
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Employee must provide notice to employer at least 10 weeks before starting leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

74(2A) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Employer's agreement allows for notice to be given at a later time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by employer
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Employer agrees

74(3) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
description: Notice specifying start and end dates
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Notice must specify start and end dates of leave under section 71.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(3) Notice and evidence requirements

74(3C) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
description: Notice must specify total number of flexible unpaid parental leave days.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Employee must specify total number of flexible unpaid parental leave days in notice.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-3c
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice with specified leave days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(3C) Notice and evidence requirements

74(3D) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Employee may reduce or increase flexible days under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3d-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-3d
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to modify flexible days
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3d-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(3D) Notice and evidence requirements

74(4) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
description: Notice and evidence requirements
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Employee must provide notice of leave under section 71
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-74-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

75 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
curation status: Proposed
has part: 75(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
has part: 75(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75
schema version: 2

75(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
note: Employee must give notice of taking unpaid parental leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use

fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use

75(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
note: Employee's available parental leave period is 12 months, less certain periods.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-75-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use

fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts parental leave period
modality: Deontic
operator: less than or equal to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use

76 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
has part: 76(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
has part: 76(7) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76
schema version: 2

76(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
note: Request for extension of unpaid parental leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to

76(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
type: Concept
description: Written request
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
note: Employer must receive written request for extension of unpaid parental leave at least 4 weeks before the end of the available period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply with written request
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to

76(7) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
note: Employee cannot extend unpaid parental leave beyond 24 months.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits extending unpaid parental leave beyond 24 months.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(7) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to

76A Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76A(1) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76A(2) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76A(3) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a
schema version: 2

76A(1) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
description: Written response
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
note: Employer must respond to employee's request for extension of unpaid parental leave within 21 days.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76A Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond within 21 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76A(1) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave

76A(2) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
note: Employer must respond to request for extension of unpaid parental leave with specified information.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76A Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond with specified information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76A(2) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave

76A(3) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
note: Employer must discuss request with employee before refusing.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 76A Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to discuss request with employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76A(3) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave

76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76B(1) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76B(2) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76B(3) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76B(4) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76B(5) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b
schema version: 2

76B(1) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
description: Written response
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: Employer must respond to employee's request for extension of unpaid parental leave within 21 days.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond within 21 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76B(1) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave

76B(2) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: Parties must attempt to resolve disputes at the workplace level.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must attempt to resolve disputes
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

76B(3) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: Party must refer dispute to FWC if discussions at workplace level do not resolve it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Dispute is contained within the temporal interval for referring it to FWC
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for referring dispute to FWC
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: Party must refer dispute to FWC within a certain timeframe

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Dispute is resolved
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Referral to FWC implies resolution of dispute
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Party refers dispute to FWC

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must refer dispute to FWC
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer dispute to FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Party is a party to the dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76B(3) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave

76B(4) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: FWC must deal with dispute by means other than arbitration unless exceptional circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to deal with dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: FWC is a legal person
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76B(4) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave

76B(5) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: Permission for FWC to permit representation by lawyer or paid agent in a matter before the FWC.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

76C Arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.229
note: Employer must respond to employee's request under section 76A.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-76c
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must respond to employee's request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76C Arbitration

77 Reducing period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
note: Employee may reduce period of unpaid parental leave with employer's agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee may reduce leave period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Employer agrees

77A Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77A(1) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
has part: 77A(2) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
has part: 77A(3) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
has part: 77A(4) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77a
schema version: 2

77A(1) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
note: Employee entitled to unpaid parental leave despite stillbirth of child.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the employee is taken to be entitled to the unpaid parental leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Stillbirth does not interrupt the start of unpaid parental leave.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OverlapsWith
premise text: (1) If a child is stillborn; and (b) an employee would have been entitled to unpaid parental leave that is birth-related leave, if the child had been born alive;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the employee is taken to be entitled to the unpaid parental leave
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Stillbirth recognized as a factor in determining unpaid parental leave entitlement.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (1) If a child is stillborn; and (b) an employee would have been entitled to unpaid parental leave that is birth-related leave, if the child had been born alive;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the employee is taken to be entitled to the unpaid parental leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to receive unpaid parental leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: Entails
premise text: (1) If a child is stillborn; and (b) an employee would have been entitled to unpaid parental leave that is birth-related leave, if the child had been born alive;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the employee is taken to be entitled to the unpaid parental leave
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Stillbirth does not diffuse into other employees' unpaid parental leave entitlements.
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffusesInto
premise text: (1) If a child is stillborn; and (b) an employee would have been entitled to unpaid parental leave that is birth-related leave, if the child had been born alive;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the employee is taken to be entitled to the unpaid parental leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Stillbirth does not interrupt the repetition of unpaid parental leave.
modality: LTL
operator: RepeatsEvery
premise text: (1) If a child is stillborn; and (b) an employee would have been entitled to unpaid parental leave that is birth-related leave, if the child had been born alive;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77A(1) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave

77A(2) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
note: Stillborn child definition
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...then it is a stillborn child
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Stillborn child has gestation period >= 20 weeks

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Stillborn child definition
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77A(2) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave

77A(3) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
description: Notice in accordance with section 74
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
note: Employee must provide notice after stillbirth or death of child
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77A(3) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave

77A(4) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
description: unpaid parental leave
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
note: Employee must provide unpaid parental leave if child dies within 24 months of birth.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-77a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide unpaid parental leave
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77A(4) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave

78 Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(1) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
has part: 78(2) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
has part: 78(3) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
has part: 78(4) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78
schema version: 2

78(1) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
type: Concept
description: Responsibility for care of child
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: Employee must provide care for child after parental leave ends
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for parental leave and care responsibility overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) This section applies to an employee who has taken unpaid parental leave in relation to a child if the employee ceases to have any responsibility for the care of the child for a reason other than because the child:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Automated recognition of parental leave and care responsibility
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (1) This section applies to an employee who has taken unpaid parental leave in relation to a child if the employee ceases to have any responsibility for the care of the child for a reason other than because the child:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee must provide care for child after parental leave ends
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Parental leave affects care responsibility diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) This section applies to an employee who has taken unpaid parental leave in relation to a child if the employee ceases to have any responsibility for the care of the child for a reason other than because the child:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Parental leave and care responsibility repeat over time
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (a) is stillborn; or (b) dies during the 24-month period starting on the child’s date of birth

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(1) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child

78(2) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: Employer must give employee written notice requiring return to work on a specified day.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must give notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(2) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child

78(3) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: Employee must provide at least 4 weeks' notice before ceasing responsibility for child care.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(3) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child

78(4) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: Employee's entitlement ends immediately before specified day.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee's entitlement ends immediately before the specified day.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation ends
modality: Deontic
operator: ends
premise text: (4) The employee’s entitlement to unpaid parental leave...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(4) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child

78A Hospitalised children
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78A(1) Hospitalised children
has part: 78A(2) Hospitalised children
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78a
schema version: 2

78A(1) Hospitalised children
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
note: Employee may agree to work during a child's hospitalization in exchange for parental leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78A Hospitalised children

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee work during child's hospitalization.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employee work and child's hospitalization.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: Section 78A(1) of the Act.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee justification for working during child's hospitalization.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rationale for employee agreement to work during child's hospitalization.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: Section 74 of the taking of a period of unpaid parental leave.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee agreement analyzed by AI.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence analysis of employee agreement to work during child's hospitalization.
modality: CogAI
operator: Analysis
premise text: Section 78A(1) of the Act.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee agreement to work during child's hospitalization.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee obligation to work during child's hospitalization.
modality: Deontic
operator: May
premise text: Section 74 of the taking of a period of unpaid parental leave.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee agreement propagates through the organization.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of information about employee agreement to work during child's hospitalization.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Section 78A(1) of the Act.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78A(1) Hospitalised children

78A(2) Hospitalised children
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
note: Employee and employer agreement on rules for unpaid parental leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-78a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78A Hospitalised children

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rules have effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between rules and leave
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: If the employee and employer so agree

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rules have effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer and employee agreement on rules
modality: Deontic
operator: Agreement
premise text: The employee and employer so agree

79 Interaction with paid leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
curation status: Proposed
has part: 79(1) Interaction with paid leave
has part: 79(2) Interaction with paid leave
has part: 79(3) Interaction with paid leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79
schema version: 2

79(1) Interaction with paid leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
note: Employee may take other paid leave while on unpaid parental leave without breaking continuity.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Interaction with paid leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No break in continuity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Taking other paid leave overlaps with unpaid parental leave
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: If the employee does so

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No break in continuity
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to take other paid leave
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Employee may take other paid leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee may take other paid leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subdivision does not prevent taking other paid leave
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: This Subdivision (except for subsections (2) and (3))

79(2) Interaction with paid leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
note: Prohibition on taking paid personal/carers leave while on unpaid parental leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Interaction with paid leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compassionate leave must occur after unpaid parental leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between unpaid parental leave and compassionate leave
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Unpaid parental leave ends before compassionate leave begins

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compassionate leave is permitted on certain occasions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies compassionate leave as a type of leave
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
premise text: Compassionate leave is a type of leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot take paid personal/carers leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking paid personal/carers leave while on unpaid parental leave
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Employee is taking unpaid parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compassionate leave is permitted on this occasion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines conditions for compassionate leave
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
premise text: Permissible occasion is the stillbirth or death of the child

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Paid personal/carers leave must occur before or after unpaid parental leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between paid personal/carers leave and unpaid parental leave
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Paid personal/carers leave cannot occur during unpaid parental leave

79(3) Interaction with paid leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
note: No payment under Division 8 for activities during unpaid parental leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Interaction with paid leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to activities the employee engages in while taking unpaid parental leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between paid and unpaid leave
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) An employee is not entitled...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to activities the employee engages in while taking unpaid parental leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes recognition of obligation to pay under Division 8
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (3) An employee is not entitled...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to activities the employee engages in while taking unpaid parental leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits payment under Division 8 for activities during unpaid parental leave
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) An employee is not entitled to any payment...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to activities the employee engages in while taking unpaid parental leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes spreading of obligation to pay under Division 8
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) An employee is not entitled...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to activities the employee engages in while taking unpaid parental leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes recurring relationship between paid and unpaid leave
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (3) An employee is not entitled...

79A Keeping in touch days
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
curation status: Proposed
has part: 79A(1) Keeping in touch days
has part: 79A(2) Keeping in touch days
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79a
schema version: 2

79A(1) Keeping in touch days
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
note: An employee can perform work for their employer on a keeping in touch day while taking unpaid parental leave without breaking the continuity of the leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 79A Keeping in touch days

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows performance of work on a keeping in touch day
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: None

79A(2) Keeping in touch days
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
note: Employee must keep in touch with employment during leave period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 79A Keeping in touch days

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep in touch with employment
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79A(2) Keeping in touch days

79B Unpaid parental leave not extended by paid leave or keeping in
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day does not extend unpaid parental leave period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-79b
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The unpaid parental leave period overlaps with these activities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The taking of paid leave and the performance of work on a keeping in touch day overlap with the unpaid parental leave period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Unpaid parental leave period is not extended.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day, then unpaid parental leave period is not extended.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These activities diffuse into the unpaid parental leave period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The taking of paid leave and the performance of work on a keeping in touch day diffuse into the unpaid parental leave period.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The unpaid parental leave period is not extended.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: If taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day, then the unpaid parental leave period is not extended.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These activities repeat within the unpaid parental leave period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The taking of paid leave and the performance of work on a keeping in touch day repeat within the unpaid parental leave period.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day.

8 Administration (Chapter 5)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(1) Administration (Chapter 5)
has part: 8(2) Administration (Chapter 5)
has part: 8(3) Administration (Chapter 5)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

8(1) Administration (Chapter 5)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Establishes Fair Work Commission and Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman for administration of this Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Administration (Chapter 5)

8(2) Administration (Chapter 5)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Establishes and confers functions on the FWC.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Administration (Chapter 5)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC has functions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(2) Administration (Chapter 5)

8(3) Administration (Chapter 5)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Establishes and confers functions on the Fair Work Ombudsman.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Administration (Chapter 5)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes functions
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(3) Administration (Chapter 5)

80 Unpaid special parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
curation status: Proposed
has part: 80(1) Unpaid special parental leave
has part: 80(2) Unpaid special parental leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80
schema version: 2

80(1) Unpaid special parental leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Entitlement to unpaid special parental leave under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Unpaid special parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 80(1) and section 67 overlap.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The section overlaps with section 67 regarding service length.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Note 1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee must provide notice and evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to take unpaid special parental leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: Entails
premise text: Section 80(1)

80(2) Unpaid special parental leave
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Employee must give notice of taking unpaid special parental leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-80-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Unpaid special parental leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(2) Unpaid special parental leave

81 Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81(1) Transfer to a safe job
has part: 81(2) Transfer to a safe job
has part: 81(3) Transfer to a safe job
has part: 81(4) Transfer to a safe job
has part: 81(5) Transfer to a safe job
has part: 81(6) Transfer to a safe job
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81
schema version: 2

81(1) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
description: evidence that the employee is fit for work
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: Employer must provide a safe job for pregnant employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to provide a safe job.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(1) Transfer to a safe job

81(2) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: Must transfer employee to safe job if available.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the employer must transfer the employee to that job for the risk period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to transfer employee to safe job.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: If there is an appropriate safe job available, then...

81(3) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: Employee must agree on safe job hours
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(3) Transfer to a safe job

81(4) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
description: Payment for safe job
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: Pay employee for safe job at full rate of pay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must pay employee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

81(5) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: Risk period ends when pregnancy ends.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the risk period ends when the pregnancy ends.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Risk period and pregnancy have a temporal relation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (5) If the employee’s pregnancy ends before the end of the risk period,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the risk period ends when the pregnancy ends.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Risk period and pregnancy have a temporal relation.
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (5) If the employee’s pregnancy ends before the end of the risk period,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the risk period ends when the pregnancy ends.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: End of risk period equals end of pregnancy.
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (5) If the employee’s pregnancy ends before the end of the risk period,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the risk period ends when the pregnancy ends.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Risk period and pregnancy have a temporal relation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (5) If the employee’s pregnancy ends before the end of the risk period,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the risk period ends when the pregnancy ends.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Risk period and pregnancy have a temporal relation.
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (5) If the employee’s pregnancy ends before the end of the risk period,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(5) Transfer to a safe job

81(6) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: Employer may require medical certificate as evidence.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(6) Transfer to a safe job

81A Paid no safe job leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.239
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81A(1) Paid no safe job leave
has part: 81A(2) Paid no safe job leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a
schema version: 2

81A(1) Paid no safe job leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.239
note: Employee entitled to paid no safe job leave under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81A Paid no safe job leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Paid no safe job leave occurs during the risk period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) If: ...; then the employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave for the risk period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to take paid no safe job leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: entails
premise text: (1) If: ...; then the employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave for the risk period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Paid no safe job leave diffuses to all employees.
modality: Diffusion
operator: everywhere
premise text: (1) If: ...; then the employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave for the risk period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Taking unpaid parental leave implies compliance with notice and evidence requirements.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (a) section 81 applies to a pregnant employee but there is no appropriate safe job available; (b) the employee is entitled to unpaid parental leave; (c) the employee has complied with the notice and evidence requirements of section 74 for taking unpaid parental leave;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Paid no safe job leave applies everywhere.
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (1) If: ...; then the employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave for the risk period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81A(1) Paid no safe job leave

81A(2) Paid no safe job leave
type: Concept
description: Payment
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.239
note: Employer must pay employee at base rate for ordinary hours worked during risk period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-81a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81A Paid no safe job leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

82 Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
curation status: Proposed
has part: 82(1) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
has part: 82(2) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
has part: 82(3) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
has part: 82(4) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82
schema version: 2

82(1) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Employer may ask employee to provide medical certificate stating fitness for work.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer may ask employee to provide medical certificate.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

82(2) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
type: Concept
description: Certificate
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Employee must provide certificate within 7 days or face unpaid leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer may require employee to take unpaid leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employee from taking unpaid leave without providing certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employee must provide certificate within 7 days

82(3) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Employee's entitlement ends when leave period starts
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employee from continuing paid no safe job leave
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

82(4) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Employee must provide information during paid no safe job leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82(4) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a

82A Unpaid no safe job leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
curation status: Proposed
has part: 82A(1) Unpaid no safe job leave
has part: 82A(2) Unpaid no safe job leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82a
schema version: 2

82A(1) Unpaid no safe job leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Employee entitled to unpaid no safe job leave if required by employer and evidence of pregnancy provided.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 82A Unpaid no safe job leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is entitled to unpaid no safe job leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to provide evidence of pregnancy.
modality: Deontic
operator: entails

82A(2) Unpaid no safe job leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Employer may require medical certificate as evidence for unpaid no safe job leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-82a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 82A Unpaid no safe job leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer obligation to provide medical certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82A(2) Unpaid no safe job leave

83 Consultation with employee on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
description: Information and opportunity to discuss
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241
note: Employer must inform employee about significant effects on pre-parental leave position.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-83-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-83
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

84 Return to work guarantee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241
note: Employee entitled to return to pre-parental leave position or nearest available qualified position.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-dialectical-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval of pre-parental leave period overlaps with temporal interval of employee's return to work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of pre-parental leave period overlaps with temporal interval of employee's return to work.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: Employee is entitled to return to work.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee must return to pre-parental leave position.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has obligation to return to pre-parental leave position.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: Employee is entitled to return to work.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-dialectical-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Return to pre-parental leave position implies employee's obligation to return to work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
logic summary: Return to pre-parental leave position implies employee's obligation to return to work.
modality: Dialectical
operator: implies
premise text: Employee is entitled to return to work.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State diffuses property of being nearest available qualified position to employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: State diffuses property of being nearest available qualified position to employee.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Employee is entitled to return to work.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee holds property of being nearest available qualified position.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employee holds property of being nearest available qualified position.
modality: LTL
operator: holds
premise text: Employee is entitled to return to work.

84A Replacement employees
type: Concept
description: Notification of temporary engagement
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241
note: Employer must notify replacement employee of temporary engagement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-84a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to notify replacement employee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
curation status: Proposed
has part: 85(1) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(2) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(3) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(4) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(5) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(6) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(7) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85
schema version: 2

85(1) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Employee entitled to up to 2 days of unpaid pre-adoption leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The leave can occur during certain times.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Leave can occur during certain times.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) An employee is entitled to up to 2 days of unpaid pre-adoption leave to attend any interviews or examinations required in order to obtain approval for the employee’s adoption of a child.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee has a right to unpaid pre-adoption leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has a right.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: Entitlement is also affected by section 68 (which deals with the age etc. of the adopted child).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee has an obligation to take unpaid pre-adoption leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
premise text: (1) An employee is entitled to up to 2 days of unpaid pre-adoption leave to attend any interviews or examinations required in order to obtain approval for the employee’s adoption of a child.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee has permission to take unpaid pre-adoption leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
premise text: (1) An employee is entitled to up to 2 days of unpaid pre-adoption leave to attend any interviews or examinations required in order to obtain approval for the employee’s adoption of a child.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The leave can occur during certain times.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Leave can occur during certain times.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) An employee is entitled to up to 2 days of unpaid pre-adoption leave to attend any interviews or examinations required in order to obtain approval for the employee’s adoption of a child.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 85(1) Unpaid pre-adoption leave

85(2) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Employee not entitled to unpaid pre-adoption leave if employer directs to take other form of leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to unpaid pre-adoption leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(2) Unpaid pre-adoption leave

85(3) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Employee can take unpaid pre-adoption leave in separate periods agreed upon by employee and employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee's right to take leave
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(3) Unpaid pre-adoption leave

85(4) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Employee must provide notice to employer before taking unpaid pre-adoption leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(4) Unpaid pre-adoption leave

85(5) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Employer must be advised of leave period upon request.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must be advised of leave period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(5) Unpaid pre-adoption leave

85(6) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Employee must provide evidence of leave reason to employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's request for evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 85(6) Unpaid pre-adoption leave

85(7) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Employee cannot take unpaid pre-adoption leave without complying with subsections (4) to (6).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-85-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking unpaid pre-adoption leave without compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

86 Division applies to employees other than casual employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: Division applies to employees other than casual employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-86-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-86
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Division applies to employees
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo

fair-work-act-2009-sec-86-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86 Division applies to employees other than casual employees

87 Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
curation status: Proposed
has part: 87(1) Entitlement to annual leave
has part: 87(2) Entitlement to annual leave
has part: 87(3) Entitlement to annual leave
has part: 87(4) Entitlement to annual leave
has part: 87(5) Entitlement to annual leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87
schema version: 2

87(1) Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: Employee entitlement to annual leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Entitlement to annual leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement exists
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(1) Entitlement to annual leave

87(2) Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: Employee entitlement to paid annual leave accrues progressively during a year of service.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Entitlement to annual leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The paid annual leave accrues during the year of service.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Paid annual leave accrues progressively during a year of service.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The employee's ordinary hours of work, and accumulates from year to year.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Fair Work Act 2009 has defined the entitlement to paid annual leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The Fair Work Act 2009 defines the entitlement to paid annual leave.
modality: CogAI
operator: has
premise text: The National Employment Standards Chapter 2 The National Employment Standards Part 2-2 Annual leave Division 6 Section 88 Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee accrues paid annual leave up to when the employment ends.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to accrue paid annual leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: The employee's employment ends during what would otherwise have been a year of service.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Every year, the paid annual leave accumulates.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Paid annual leave accumulates from year to year.
modality: LTL
operator: every
premise text: The employee's ordinary hours of work, and accumulates from year to year.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee's employment ending during a year of service affects their accrued paid annual leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: The employee's employment ends during what would otherwise have been a year of service.
modality: SHACL
operator: has
premise text: If an employee’s employment ends during what would otherwise have been a year of service, the employee accrues paid annual leave up to when the employment ends.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(2) Entitlement to annual leave

87(3) Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: Employee qualifies for shiftworker annual leave entitlement if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Entitlement to annual leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Qualifies for shiftworker annual leave entitlement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has obligation to take annual leave
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Employed in enterprise with continuously rostered shifts

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Class of employees prescribed by regulations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Employee is a shiftworker if meets conditions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: Prescribed by regulations as shiftworkers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(3) Entitlement to annual leave

87(4) Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: Employee does not qualify for shiftworker annual leave entitlement if in a prescribed class.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Entitlement to annual leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Prescribed class definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(4) Entitlement to annual leave

87(5) Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
note: Describes a class for annual leave entitlement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-87-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 87 Entitlement to annual leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87(5) Entitlement to annual leave

88 Taking paid annual leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
curation status: Proposed
has part: 88(1) Taking paid annual leave
has part: 88(2) Taking paid annual leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88
schema version: 2

88(1) Taking paid annual leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
note: Employee may take paid annual leave for a period agreed upon with the employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Taking paid annual leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to take paid annual leave
modality: Deontic
operator: May

88(2) Taking paid annual leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
note: Employer must agree to employee's request for paid annual leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-88-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 88 Taking paid annual leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to agree
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 88(2) Taking paid annual leave

89 Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89(1) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
has part: 89(2) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89
schema version: 2

89(1) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave on public holidays
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) Other periods of leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of public holiday days from paid annual leave
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: (1) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a day or part-day that is a public holiday in the place where the employee is based for work purposes, the employee is taken not to be on paid annual leave on that public holiday.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relationship between public holidays and paid annual leave
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(1) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times

89(2) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave during other leave or absence periods.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-89-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89 Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (paid annual leave and that other leave or absence period overlap).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between employee's paid annual leave and other leave or absence periods.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (paid annual leave is related to that other leave or absence period).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Relationship between employee's paid annual leave and other leave or absence periods.
modality: CogAI
operator: isRelatedTo
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (employee is taken not to be on paid annual leave for the period of that other leave or absence).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of paid annual leave during other leave or absence periods.
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (employee is not on paid annual leave for that period).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relationship between employee and paid annual leave.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (paid annual leave diffuses into that other leave or absence period).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion relationship between employee's paid annual leave and other leave or absence periods.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (paid annual leave occurs during that other leave or absence period).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employee's paid annual leave and other leave or absence periods.
modality: LTL
operator: occursDuring
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(2) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times

9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9(1) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(2) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(3) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(4) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(4A) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(5) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(5A) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(5B) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(6) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

9(1) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Chapter 6 is a collection of miscellaneous matters.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chapter 6 exists.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(1) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

9(2) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Prevents certain applications if other remedies are available and prevents multiple applications or complaints in relation to the same conduct.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents certain applications
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(2) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

9(3) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Dealing with disputes between national system employees and their employers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(3) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

9(4) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Extends provisions of the National Employment Standards to employees not otherwise covered.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extends obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: extends

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(4) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

9(4A) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Transfer of employment terms and conditions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-4a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

9(5) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Provisions for international agreements on termination of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

9(5A) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Special provisions about TCF outworkers in Part 6-4A
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-5a
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

9(5B) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Worker has right to apply for order to stop bullying.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-5b
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Worker has right to apply for order to stop bullying.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5b-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 9(5B) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

9(6) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: Part 6-5 deals with miscellaneous matters such as delegations and regulations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)

90 Payment for annual leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
curation status: Proposed
has part: 90(1) Payment for annual leave
has part: 90(2) Payment for annual leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90
schema version: 2

90(1) Payment for annual leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Employer must pay employee at base rate for ordinary hours of work during paid annual leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Payment for annual leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

90(2) Payment for annual leave
type: Concept
description: Payment
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Employer must pay employee for untaken annual leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-90-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 90 Payment for annual leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must pay employee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

91 Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
curation status: Proposed
has part: 91(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
has part: 91(2) Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91
schema version: 2

91(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Employee is not entitled to payment for untaken annual leave if service with first employer counts as service with second employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 91 Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to payment.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the second employer decides not to recognize the employee's service, then the employee is not entitled to payment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Second employer decides not to recognize employee's service.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee's entitlement to payment is conditional on recognition.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The employee's entitlement to payment depends on the second employer's recognition of their service.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Second employer's recognition of employee's service is necessary for payment.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is entitled to payment.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the second employer recognizes the employee's service, then the employee is entitled to payment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Second employer recognizes employee's service.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It applies to non-associated entities.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to transfers of employment between non-associated entities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: This provision applies to transfers of employment.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is a part of the Standards.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision is part of the National Employment Standards.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: This provision is in the National Employment Standards.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 91(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to

91(2) Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Employee is not entitled to be paid for untaken paid annual leave if subsection 22(5) applies.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-91-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 91 Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Transfer of employment in relation to an employee.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with transfer of employment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Subsection 22(5) provides that service with the first employer counts as service with the second employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to be paid.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits payment for untaken paid annual leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Subsection 22(5) applies.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to be paid.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of transfer of employment.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Subsection 22(5) applies.

92 Paid annual leave must not be cashed out except in accordance
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
note: Paid annual leave cannot be cashed out except in accordance with permitted terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-92-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-92
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cashing out paid annual leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-92-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 92 Paid annual leave must not be cashed out except in accordance

93 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
curation status: Proposed
has part: 93(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
has part: 93(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93
schema version: 2

93(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
note: Employer may include terms for cashing out paid annual leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cashing out of paid annual leave occurs during the period of employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Cashing out paid annual leave during employment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: A modern award or enterprise agreement may include terms providing for the cashing out of paid annual leave by an employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a modern award or enterprise agreement includes terms, then it implies that the employer must take a cognitive action to provide terms for cashing out paid annual leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Employer obligation implies cognitive action of providing terms for cashing out paid annual leave
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: A modern award or enterprise agreement may include terms providing for the cashing out of paid annual leave by an employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must provide terms for cashing out paid annual leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer obligation to include terms
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a modern award or enterprise agreement includes terms, then it implies that the employer must diffuse the provision for cashing out paid annual leave to all employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Employer obligation implies diffusion of provision for cashing out paid annual leave
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: A modern award or enterprise agreement may include terms providing for the cashing out of paid annual leave by an employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a modern award or enterprise agreement includes terms, then it implies that the employer must provide for the cashing out of paid annual leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Employer obligation implies provision for cashing out paid annual leave
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: A modern award or enterprise agreement may include terms providing for the cashing out of paid annual leave by an employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms

93(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
note: Paid annual leave must not be cashed out if it would result in less than 4 weeks of accrued entitlement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-93-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 93 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cashing out paid annual leave under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms

94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
curation status: Proposed
has part: 94(1) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
has part: 94(2) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
has part: 94(3) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
has part: 94(4) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
has part: 94(5) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
has part: 94(6) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94
schema version: 2

94(1) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: Employer and employee may agree to cash out accrued paid annual leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of paid annual leave
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Employer and employee agreement justification
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Employer and employee agreement
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94(1) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement

94(2) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: Employer and employee cannot agree to cashing out paid annual leave if it would result in less than 4 weeks of remaining entitlement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits agreement to cashing out paid annual leave
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94(2) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement

94(3) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: Each agreement to cash out a particular amount of paid annual leave must be in writing.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94(3) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement

94(4) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
description: Payment for unpaid annual leave
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: Employer must pay employee the full amount of paid annual leave forgone.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

94(5) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: Employer may require employee to take paid annual leave if reasonable.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94(5) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement

94(6) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: Employer and employee may agree on when paid annual leave can be taken.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-94-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for paid annual leave
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer and employee may agree on when paid annual leave can be taken.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94(6) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement

95 Subdivision applies to employees other than casual employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
note: Subdivision applies to employees other than casual employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-95-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-95
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applies to employees
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo

fair-work-act-2009-sec-95-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 95 Subdivision applies to employees other than casual employees

96 Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96(1) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
has part: 96(2) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96
schema version: 2

96(1) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
note: Employee entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Service years are related to employment years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (1) For each year of service with an employer (other than periods of employment as a casual employee of the employer)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An employee is entitled to 10 days of paid personal/carer’s leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) For each year of service with an employer (other than periods of employment as a casual employee of the employer)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An obligation exists to provide paid personal/carer’s leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) For each year of service with an employer (other than periods of employment as a casual employee of the employer)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An obligation exists to accrue paid personal/carer’s leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (Accrual of leave)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Service years form a recurring pattern.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (1) For each year of service with an employer (other than periods of employment as a casual employee of the employer)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 96(1) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave

96(2) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
note: Employee entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave accrues progressively during a year of service.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-96-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to accrue paid personal/carer’s leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96(2) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave

97 Taking paid personal/carer’s leave
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
note: An employee may take paid personal/carer’s leave under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-97-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-97
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

98 Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
curation status: Proposed
has part: 98(1) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
has part: 98(2) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98
schema version: 2

98(1) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
note: Employee not entitled to paid personal/carer’s leave on public holidays
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee obligation to work on public holidays
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Employee class inclusion in paid personal/carer’s leave
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(1) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at

98(2) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
note: Employee not on paid personal/carer’s leave for period of paid family and domestic violence leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-98-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 98 Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the periods overlap if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Paid family and domestic violence leave overlaps with paid personal/carer’s leave.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the system recognizes the overlap if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The system recognizes the overlap between paid family and domestic violence leave and paid personal/carer’s leave.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee is taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for the period of that paid family and domestic violence leave.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave, then they are not on paid family and domestic violence leave.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the employee's leave includes paid family and domestic violence leave if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Employee's leave includes paid family and domestic violence leave if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the diffusion spreads if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Paid family and domestic violence leave diffuses into paid personal/carer’s leave.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the periods repeat if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Paid family and domestic violence leave repeats with paid personal/carer’s leave.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 98(2) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at

99 Payment for paid personal/carer’s leave
type: Concept
description: Payment
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
note: Employer must pay employee at base rate for paid personal/carer’s leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-99-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-99
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay employee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

9A Application, transitional and saving provisions for amendments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
note: Application, transitional and saving provisions for amendments
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9a
schema version: 2

Fair Work Act 2009
type: Document
date: 2 April 2026
identifier: No. 28 of 2009
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU