Fair Work Act 2009
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 28 of 2009
date: 2 April 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

2 April 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, saving, transitional provisions, editorial changes, presentational changes, modifications, and self-repealing provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Fair Work Act 2009.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for the compilation date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Commencement rules for provisions in the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Table of sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-norm

7 April 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-3
note: Commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-3-logic-alleninterval-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 May 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
note: Chapter 1 Introduction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.27
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: A Proclamation must not specify a day that occurs before the day on which the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of specifying a day before the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 receives Royal Assent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Commencement on the first day after the end of a 12-month period beginning on the day the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 receives Royal Assent.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Provisions that do not commence within the specified period will start on the first day after the end of that period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 January 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
note: References F2009L02563
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-3-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-norm

26 May 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-2-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Cannot specify a day before the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 receives Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on specifying a day before the Act receives Royal Assent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 July 2009 (see
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-4
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-4-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-norm

26 May 2009
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-3
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.28
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-3-norm

3 Object of this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: Promotes national economic prosperity and social inclusion for all Australians.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.30
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Object of this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Establishes a duty to promote national economic prosperity and social inclusion.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Guide to this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2
has part: 4(1) Guide to this Act
has part: 4(2) Guide to this Act
has part: 4(3) Guide to this Act
has part: 4(4) Guide to this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32

4(1) Guide to this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2-ss-1
part of: 4 Guide to this Act
note: Provides for compliance with and enforcement of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(1) Guide to this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

4(2) Guide to this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2-ss-2
part of: 4 Guide to this Act
note: Guide to this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-2-norm

4(3) Guide to this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2-ss-3
part of: 4 Guide to this Act
note: Guide to this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-3-norm

4(4) Guide to this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2-ss-4
part of: 4 Guide to this Act
note: Contains application, saving and transitional provisions relating to amendments of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-4-2-ss-4-norm

5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2
has part: 5(1) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
has part: 5(2) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
has part: 5(3) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
has part: 5(4) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
has part: 5(5) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33

5(1) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2-ss-1
part of: 5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
note: Employment terms and conditions for national system employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(1) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5(2) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2-ss-2
part of: 5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
note: Main terms and conditions of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(2) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Obligation to comply with main terms and conditions
premise text: Section 279
conclusion text: Workplace determinations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5(3) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2-ss-3
part of: 5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
note: Minimum terms and conditions for national system employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(3) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Applicable obligation
conclusion text: National Employment Standards apply to all national system employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5(4) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2-ss-4
part of: 5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
note: Modern awards provide additional minimum terms and conditions for national system employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-shacl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(4) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Defines a modern award as part of the National Employment Standards.
premise text: (4) Part 2-3 is about modern awards.
conclusion text: A modern award is made for a particular industry or occupation and provides additional minimum terms and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Modern awards imply additional minimum terms and conditions for national system employees.
premise text: (4) Part 2-3 is about modern awards.
conclusion text: A modern award provides additional minimum terms and conditions for those national system employees to whom it applies.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Modern awards apply during the term of employment.
premise text: (4) Part 2-3 is about modern awards.
conclusion text: A modern award can have terms that are ancillary or supplementary to the National Employment Standards.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: isDefinedBy
logic summary: Modern awards define minimum terms and conditions for national system employees.
premise text: (4) Part 2-3 is about modern awards.
conclusion text: A modern award provides additional minimum terms and conditions for those national system employees to whom it applies.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: asserts
logic summary: Modern awards assert the existence of additional minimum terms and conditions.
premise text: (4) Part 2-3 is about modern awards.
conclusion text: A modern award can have terms that are ancillary or supplementary to the National Employment Standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5(5) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2-ss-5
part of: 5 Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
note: Enterprise agreement terms and conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-5-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-5-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(5) Terms and conditions of employment (Chapter 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2
has part: 6(1) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(2) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(3) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(4) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(5) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(6) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(6A) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(7) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
has part: 6(8) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34

6(1) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-1
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
note: Rights and responsibilities of national system employees, employers, organisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has right to rights and responsibilities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-2
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
note: Protects workplace rights, freedom of association and involvement in lawful industrial activities, and other protections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
logic summary: The provision holds a right.
premise text: (2) Part 3-1 provides general workplace protections.
conclusion text: Part 3-1 protects workplace rights.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
logic summary: The provision holds a right to freedom of association and involvement in lawful industrial activities.
premise text: (2) Part 3-1 provides general workplace protections.
conclusion text: Part 3-1 protects freedom of association and involvement in lawful industrial activities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
logic summary: The provision holds a right to other protections.
premise text: (2) Part 3-1 provides general workplace protections.
conclusion text: Part 3-1 provides other protections.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
logic summary: The provision holds a right to protection from discrimination.
premise text: (2) Part 3-1 provides general workplace protections.
conclusion text: Part 3-1 protects from discrimination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The provision overlaps with other provisions that provide general workplace protections.
premise text: (2) Part 3-1 provides general workplace protections.
conclusion text: Part 3-1 overlaps with other provisions that provide general workplace protections.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6(3) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-3
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
note: Grants remedies for unfair dismissal of national system employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Defines a right
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(4) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-4
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
note: No action lies under any law in force in a State or Territory in relation to protected industrial action except in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-4-norm

6(5) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-5
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
note: Comply with requirements set out in Part 3-4 when exercising rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(6) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-6
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
note: Employer can stand down employee without pay in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-6-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(6) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6(6A) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-6a
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
note: Part 3-5A prohibits sexual harassment of workers and others.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-6a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sexual harassment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(7) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-7
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
note: Employees have a right to termination pay and payslips.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-7-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(7) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
held by: LegalPerson
scope note: held by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Employees have a right to termination pay and payslips.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(8) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2-ss-8
part of: 6 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
note: Part 3-7 deals with offences in relation to corrupting benefits.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-8-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6-2-ss-8-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(8) Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a
has part: 6A(1) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
has part: 6A(2) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
has part: 6A(3) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
has part: 6A(4) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
has part: 6A(5) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
has part: 6A(6) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36

6A(1) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a-ss-1
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
note: Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers and businesses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Defines a right.
premise text: (1) Chapter 3A sets out rights and responsibilities...
conclusion text: ...of certain regulated workers who perform work under services contracts...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A(2) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a-ss-2
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
note: Regulated workers have core provisions for compliance and interaction issues.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(2) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Regulated workers have obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A(3) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a-ss-3
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
note: Regulated workers have minimum standards orders and guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(3) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Regulated workers must comply with minimum standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A(4) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a-ss-4
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
note: Granting of remedies for unfair termination and deactivation of regulated workers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-4-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(4) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Regulated workers have a right to remedies for unfair termination and deactivation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A(5) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a-ss-5
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
note: Definition of collective agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-5-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-5-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(5) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6A(6) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a-ss-6
part of: 6A Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
note: Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-6-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6a-ss-6-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(6) Rights and responsibilities of regulated workers, regulated
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6B Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6b
has part: 6B(1) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
has part: 6B(2) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
has part: 6B(3) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36

6B(1) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6b-ss-1
part of: 6B Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
note: Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport contractual chain.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 6B(1) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6B(2) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6b-ss-2
part of: 6B Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
note: Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 6B(2) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has right to comply with road transport contractual chain orders
premise text: (2) Part 3B-1 has the core provisions for the Chapter.
conclusion text: Part 3B-1 has the core provisions for the Chapter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6B(3) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6b-ss-3
part of: 6B Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
note: Part 3B-2 is about road transport contractual chain orders and guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-6b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6B(3) Rights and responsibilities of persons in a road transport
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7 Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-2
has part: 7(1) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
has part: 7(2) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
has part: 7(3) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37

7(1) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-2-ss-1
part of: 7 Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
note: Chapter 4 provides for compliance with this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(2) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-2-ss-2
part of: 7 Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
note: Imposes obligations on certain persons for contraventions of civil remedy provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(2) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on certain persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(3) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7-2-ss-3
part of: 7 Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
note: Court jurisdiction and powers in relation to matters arising under the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(3) Compliance and enforcement (Chapter 4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Court has jurisdiction over matters arising under the Act.
premise text: Part 4-2 is about the jurisdiction and powers of the courts in relation to matters arising under this Act.
conclusion text: The court has jurisdiction over matters arising under the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Court jurisdiction and powers during the period of the Act.
premise text: Part 4-2 is about the jurisdiction and powers of the courts in relation to matters arising under this Act.
conclusion text: The court has jurisdiction over matters arising under the Act during its period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Court jurisdiction and powers during the period of the Act.
premise text: Part 4-2 is about the jurisdiction and powers of the courts in relation to matters arising under this Act.
conclusion text: The court has jurisdiction over matters arising under the Act during its period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: influence
logic summary: Court influence on matters arising under the Act.
premise text: Part 4-2 is about the jurisdiction and powers of the courts in relation to matters arising under this Act.
conclusion text: The court has an influence on matters arising under the Act.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
logic summary: Court classification of matters arising under the Act.
premise text: Part 4-2 is about the jurisdiction and powers of the courts in relation to matters arising under this Act.
conclusion text: The court classifies matters arising under the Act.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Administration (Chapter 5)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
has part: 8(1) Administration (Chapter 5)
has part: 8(2) Administration (Chapter 5)
has part: 8(3) Administration (Chapter 5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37

8(1) Administration (Chapter 5)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
part of: 8 Administration (Chapter 5)
note: Establishes Fair Work Commission and Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman for administration of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-1-norm

8(2) Administration (Chapter 5)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 Administration (Chapter 5)
note: Establishes and confers functions on the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(2) Administration (Chapter 5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishes a duty.
conclusion text: FWC has functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(3) Administration (Chapter 5)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
part of: 8 Administration (Chapter 5)
note: Establishes and confers functions on the Fair Work Ombudsman.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(3) Administration (Chapter 5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishes functions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
has part: 9(1) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(2) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(3) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(4) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(4A) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(5) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(5A) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(5B) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
has part: 9(6) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38

9(1) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-1
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
note: Chapter 6 is a collection of miscellaneous matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(1) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Chapter 6 exists.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(2) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-2
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
note: Prevents certain applications if other remedies are available and prevents multiple applications or complaints in relation to the same conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(2) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents certain applications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(3) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-3
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
note: Dealing with disputes between national system employees and their employers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(3) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9(4) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-4
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
note: Extends provisions of the National Employment Standards to employees not otherwise covered.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(4) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(4A) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-4a
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
note: Transfer of employment terms and conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-4a-norm

9(5) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-5
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
note: Provisions for international agreements on termination of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5-norm

9(5A) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-5a
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
note: Special provisions about TCF outworkers in Part 6-4A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5a-norm

9(5B) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-5b
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
note: Worker has right to apply for order to stop bullying.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5b-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(5B) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Worker has right to apply for order to stop bullying.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(6) Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-6
part of: 9 Miscellaneous (Chapter 6)
note: Part 6-5 deals with miscellaneous matters such as delegations and regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9-ss-6-norm

9A Application, transitional and saving provisions for amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9a
note: Application, transitional and saving provisions for amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-9a-norm

10 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-10-norm

11 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-11-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 The Dictionary
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Defines terms for affected employees and employers in enterprise agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.41
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-12-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 The Dictionary
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

13 Meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
note: Defines national system employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-13-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Meaning of national system employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a type of employment relationship
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
note: Defines what constitutes a national system employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Meaning of national system employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal intervals are not explicitly defined, but the context suggests a focus on employment periods.
premise text: (a) a constitutional corporation, so far as it employs, or usually employs, an individual;
conclusion text: The definition implies a focus on employment periods.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal intervals are not explicitly defined, but the context suggests a focus on employment periods.
premise text: (a) a constitutional corporation, so far as it employs, or usually employs, an individual;
conclusion text: The definition implies a focus on employment periods.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines the scope of national system employers.
premise text: (1) A national system employer is: (a) a constitutional corporation, so far as it employs, or usually employs, an individual;
conclusion text: The definition establishes a clear scope for national system employers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-14-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines the scope of national system employers.
premise text: (b) the Commonwealth, so far as it employs, or usually employs, an individual;
conclusion text: The definition establishes a clear scope for national system employers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14A Transitional matters relating to employers etc. becoming, or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14a
note: Transitional provisions for employers and employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.89
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-14a-norm

15 Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
has part: 15(1) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 15(2) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90

15(1) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-1
part of: 15 Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
note: Defines employee and employer for the purpose of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(1) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes a person who is usually an employee.
premise text: (a) includes a reference to a person who is usually such an employee;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Does not include a person on a vocational placement.
premise text: (b) does not include a person on a vocational placement;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(2) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-2
part of: 15 Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
note: Defines employer with ordinary meaning including a person usually acting as such.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(2) Ordinary meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies employee and employer
premise text: Subsections 30E(2) and 30P(2)
conclusion text: employer with ordinary meaning
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Extends the meaning of employer
premise text: Note: Subsections 30E(2) and 30P(2)
conclusion text: a person who is usually such an employer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a referring State
premise text: Note: Subsections 30E(2) and 30P(2)
conclusion text: a referring State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AA Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15aa
has part: 15AA(1) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 15AA(2) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 15AA(3) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90

15AA(1) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15aa-ss-1
part of: 15AA Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
note: Determines the ordinary meaning of employee and employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AA(1) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Defines relationship between individual and person
premise text: Relationship between individual and person
conclusion text: Individual is employee or employer if relationship meets ordinary meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AA(2) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15aa-ss-2
part of: 15AA Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
note: Consider totality of relationship between individual and person for determining real substance, practical reality, and true nature of the relationship.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AA(2) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to consider the totality of the relationship.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AA(3) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15aa-ss-3
part of: 15AA Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
note: Exemptions from subsections (1) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.90
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AA(3) Determining the ordinary meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15AB Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ab
has part: 15AB(1) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
has part: 15AB(2) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91

15AB(1) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ab-ss-1
part of: 15AB Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
note: Notification of opt-out before section 15AA commencement.
description: Opt out notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AB(1) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AB(2) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ab-ss-2
part of: 15AB Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
note: Individual may give opt out notice before section 15AA commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AB(2) Individual may elect that section 15AA does not apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Individual has an obligation to provide opt out notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AC Effect of an opt out notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ac
has part: 15AC(1) Effect of an opt out notice
has part: 15AC(2) Effect of an opt out notice
has part: 15AC(3) Effect of an opt out notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.93

15AC(1) Effect of an opt out notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ac-ss-1
part of: 15AC Effect of an opt out notice
note: Individual must provide opt out notice before commencement of section 15AA.
description: Opt out notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.93
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AC(1) Effect of an opt out notice
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide opt out notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AC(2) Effect of an opt out notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ac-ss-2
part of: 15AC Effect of an opt out notice
note: Section 15AA does not apply to the relationship after commencement unless opt out notice is revoked.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.93
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Section 15AA prohibition
conclusion text: Section 15AA does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AC(3) Effect of an opt out notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ac-ss-3
part of: 15AC Effect of an opt out notice
note: Section 15AA ceases to apply on the day of opt out notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.93
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Section 15AA is prohibited from applying.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AD Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ad
has part: 15AD(1) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
has part: 15AD(2) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
has part: 15AD(3) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
has part: 15AD(4) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94

15AD(1) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ad-ss-1
part of: 15AD Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
note: An individual can revoke an opt out notice at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AD(1) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Revoke opt out notice
premise text: (1) An individual who has given an opt out notice to a person may...
conclusion text: ...revocation notice to the person that the individual elects that section 15AA is to apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between opt out notice and revocation
premise text: (1) An individual who has given an opt out notice to a person...
conclusion text: ...at any time after giving the opt out notice, revoke the opt out notice by giving written notice (a revocation notice)...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of individual's actions
premise text: (1) An individual who has given an opt out notice to a person...
conclusion text: ...at any time after giving the opt out notice, revoke the opt out notice by giving written notice (a revocation notice)...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to revoke opt out notice
premise text: (1) An individual who has given an opt out notice to a person...
conclusion text: ...revocation notice (a revocation notice) to the person that the individual elects that section 15AA is to apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide revocation notice
premise text: (1) An individual who has given an opt out notice to a person...
conclusion text: ...revocation notice (a revocation notice) to the person that the individual elects that section 15AA is to apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AD(2) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ad-ss-2
part of: 15AD Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
note: An individual can revoke an opt out notice before the commencement of section 15AA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AD(2) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Revoke opt out notice
premise text: Individual gives revocation notice
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between revocation notice and section 15AA commencement
premise text: Revocation notice given before section 15AA commencement
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to relationship on or after commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of revocation notice on section 15AA application
premise text: Individual gives revocation notice before section 15AA commencement
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to relationship
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of section 15AA application through relationships
premise text: Relationship between person and individual on or after commencement
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to all affected relationships
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of revocation notice and section 15AA application
premise text: Individual gives revocation notice before section 15AA commencement
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to relationship on or after commencement
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AD(3) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ad-ss-3
part of: 15AD Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
note: An individual can revoke an opt out notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15AD(3) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Revoke opt out notice
premise text: Given an individual gives a revocation notice
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between revocation notice and commencement of section 15AA
premise text: Revocation notice given on or after commencement of section 15AA
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to the relationship from the day of revocation notice
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of revocation notice on section 15AA application
premise text: Given an individual gives a revocation notice
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to the relationship
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of section 15AA through relationships affected by revocation notice
premise text: Given an individual gives a revocation notice on or after commencement of section 15AA
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to the relationship from the day of revocation notice
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of relationships affected by section 15AA
premise text: Given an individual gives a revocation notice on or after commencement of section 15AA
conclusion text: Section 15AA applies to the relationship from the day of revocation notice
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15AD(4) Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ad-ss-4
part of: 15AD Opt out notice may be revoked by an individual
note: An individual may give only one revocation notice in respect of a particular relationship.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ad-ss-4-norm

15A Meaning of casual employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15a
has part: 15A(1) Meaning of casual employee
has part: 15A(2) Meaning of casual employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94

15A(1) Meaning of casual employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15a-ss-1
part of: 15A Meaning of casual employee
note: An employee is a casual employee of an employer only if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15A(1) Meaning of casual employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Describes the duration of employment as a casual employee
premise text: An employee who commences employment as a casual employee remains a casual employee until the occurrence of a specified event (see subsection (5));
conclusion text: The employment relationship lasts for at least...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the conditions for an employee to be considered a casual employee
premise text: (a) the employment relationship is characterised by an absence of a firm advance commitment to continuing and indefinite work; and (b) the employee would be entitled to a casual loading or a specific rate of pay for casual employees under the terms of a fair work instrument if the employee were a casual employee, or the employee is entitled to such a loading or rate of pay under the contract of employment.
conclusion text: The conditions are:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the entitlement to a casual loading or specific rate of pay for casual employees
premise text: (b) the employee would be entitled to a casual loading or a specific rate of pay for casual employees under the terms of a fair work instrument if the employee were a casual employee, or the employee is entitled to such a loading or rate of pay under the contract of employment.
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to a casual loading or specific rate of pay if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15A(2) Meaning of casual employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15a-ss-2
part of: 15A Meaning of casual employee
note: Employment relationship characterized by absence of firm advance commitment to continuing and indefinite work is to be assessed based on real substance, practical reality, and true nature.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15A(2) Meaning of casual employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has obligation to provide continuing work
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of employment relationship based on real substance, practical reality, and true nature
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(a), whether the employment relationship is characterised by an absence of a firm advance commitment to continuing and indefinite work is to be assessed:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Employer's ability to offer or not offer work may indicate presence of firm advance commitment
premise text: (i) whether there is an inability of the employer to elect to offer, or not offer, work or an inability of the employee to elect to accept or reject work (and whether this occurs in practice);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Future availability of continuing work may indicate presence of firm advance commitment
premise text: (ii) whether, having regard to the nature of the employer’s enterprise, it is reasonably likely that there will be future availability of continuing work in that enterprise of the kind usually performed by the employee;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employee has obligation to accept or reject work
premise text: (b) on the basis that a firm advance commitment can be in the form of the contract of employment or, in addition to the terms of that contract, in the form of a mutual understanding or expectation between the employer and employee not rising to the level of a term of that contract (or to a variation of any such term);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of mutual understanding or expectation between employer and employee
premise text: (b) on the basis that a firm advance commitment can be in the form of the contract of employment or, in addition to the terms of that contract, in the form of a mutual understanding or expectation between the employer and employee not rising to the level of a term of that contract (or to a variation of any such term);
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15B Meaning of collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15b
note: Defines collective agreement types
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15b-norm

15C Meaning of contractor high income threshold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15c
has part: 15C(1) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
has part: 15C(2) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
has part: 15C(3) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98

15C(1) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15c-ss-1
part of: 15C Meaning of contractor high income threshold
note: Prescribes the contractor high income threshold amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15C(1) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15C(2) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15c-ss-2
part of: 15C Meaning of contractor high income threshold
note: Regulations cannot reduce the contractor high income threshold.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on reducing the threshold.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15C(3) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15c-ss-3
part of: 15C Meaning of contractor high income threshold
note: Contractor high income threshold is the amount that it would be if a change had not occurred.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15C(3) Meaning of contractor high income threshold
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Applies to changes in contractor high income threshold
premise text: None
conclusion text: Contractor high income threshold is the amount that it would be if a change had not occurred.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between changes and contractor high income threshold
premise text: None
conclusion text: Contractor high income threshold is the amount that it would be if a change had not occurred.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <>
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between changes and contractor high income threshold
premise text: None
conclusion text: Contractor high income threshold is the amount that it would be if a change had not occurred.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15D Meaning of minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15d
note: Defines minimum standards guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15d-norm

15E Meaning of minimum standards order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15e
note: Defines minimum standards order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15e-norm

15F Meaning of regulated business
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15f
note: Defines regulated business as digital labour platform operator or road transport business.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15f-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15F Meaning of regulated business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15G Meaning of regulated worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15g
note: Defines regulated worker based on employee-like worker or regulated road transport contractor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15g-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Defines a specific category of workers
premise text: Section 15P and section 15Q
conclusion text: Regulated worker
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15H Meaning of services contract
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15h
note: Defines services contract as a contract for individual work with constitutional connection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15h-norm

15J Prospective regulated workers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15j
note: A reference to a regulated worker includes a person who may become one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15J Prospective regulated workers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: A regulated worker is a person who may become one.
conclusion text: A reference to a regulated worker includes this person.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15j-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusive relation
premise text: A reference to a regulated worker is an inclusive relation.
conclusion text: This person is included in the definition of a regulated worker.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15K Effect of Chapter in determining whether a person is an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15k
note: Disregard minimum standards orders, guidelines, or collective agreements when determining employee/employer relationships.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15k-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15k-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludedBy
logic summary: Obligation exclusion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15KA Specific provision about the effect of certain provisions in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ka
note: Defines relationship between individual and digital labour platform operator for ascertaining real substance of the relationship.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ka-norm

15L Meaning of digital labour platform
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15l
has part: 15L(1) Meaning of digital labour platform
has part: 15L(2) Meaning of digital labour platform
has part: 15L(3) Meaning of digital labour platform
has part: 15L(4) Meaning of digital labour platform
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102

15L(1) Meaning of digital labour platform
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15l-ss-1
part of: 15L Meaning of digital labour platform
note: Defines digital labour platform
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15L(1) Meaning of digital labour platform
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Digital labour platform is an online enabled application, website or system
conclusion text: is a digital labour platform
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15L(2) Meaning of digital labour platform
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15l-ss-2
part of: 15L Meaning of digital labour platform
note: Definition of digital labour platform
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-2-norm

15L(3) Meaning of digital labour platform
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15l-ss-3
part of: 15L Meaning of digital labour platform
note: Digital labour platform definition excludes online applications, websites or systems prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-3-norm

15L(4) Meaning of digital labour platform
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15l-ss-4
part of: 15L Meaning of digital labour platform
note: Specifies forms of digital platform work for which an online application, website or system may be specified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15L(4) Meaning of digital labour platform
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Specifies forms of digital platform work for which an online application, website or system may be specified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15l-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: digital platform work
conclusion text: online application, website or system
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15M Meaning of digital labour platform operator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15m
note: Defines digital labour platform operator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.103
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15m-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15m-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15M Meaning of digital labour platform operator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15N Meaning of digital platform work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15n
note: Definition of digital platform work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.103
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15n-norm

15P Meaning of employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15p
has part: 15P(1) Meaning of employee-like worker
has part: 15P(2) Meaning of employee-like worker
has part: 15P(3) Meaning of employee-like worker
has part: 15P(4) Meaning of employee-like worker
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104

15P(1) Meaning of employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15p-ss-1
part of: 15P Meaning of employee-like worker
note: A person is an employee-like worker if they meet specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15P(1) Meaning of employee-like worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Imposes obligations on employers and workers
premise text: The Act requires employers to ensure their employees-like workers meet specific conditions.
conclusion text: Employers must comply with the definition of employee-like worker.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between employment and work
premise text: The Act requires employees-like workers to perform work under a services contract.
conclusion text: Employees-like workers must perform work within a specific timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between the worker and the platform
premise text: The Act requires digital platforms to ensure their employees-like workers meet specific conditions.
conclusion text: Digital platforms must comply with the definition of employee-like worker.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between the worker and the platform
premise text: The Act requires digital platforms to ensure their employees-like workers meet specific conditions.
conclusion text: Digital platforms must comply with the definition of employee-like worker.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15P(2) Meaning of employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15p-ss-2
part of: 15P Meaning of employee-like worker
note: Defines employee-like worker for independent contractor reference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15P(2) Meaning of employee-like worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15P(3) Meaning of employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15p-ss-3
part of: 15P Meaning of employee-like worker
note: Regulations may specify characteristics for a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15P(3) Meaning of employee-like worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15P(4) Meaning of employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15p-ss-4
part of: 15P Meaning of employee-like worker
note: Disregard minimum standards orders, guidelines, or collective agreements when determining employee-like worker criteria.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
logic summary: Ignoring minimum standards orders, guidelines, or collective agreements is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15Q Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15q
has part: 15Q(1) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
has part: 15Q(2) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106

15Q(1) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15q-ss-1
part of: 15Q Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
note: A person is a regulated road transport contractor if they meet specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15Q(1) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to regulate road transport contractors
premise text: The state has the power to regulate road transport contractors
conclusion text: The state must regulate road transport contractors who meet specific conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for regulation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: >
logic summary: Supports an argument that the state has a duty to regulate road transport contractors
premise text: The state has the power to regulate road transport contractors
conclusion text: The state must regulate road transport contractors who meet specific conditions.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: <=
logic summary: Limits the scope of regulation to those who meet specific conditions
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15Q(2) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15q-ss-2
part of: 15Q Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
note: Defines regulated road transport contractor for the purpose of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15Q(2) Meaning of regulated road transport contractor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusive definition
premise text: Independent contractor is defined as a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)
conclusion text: This Part refers to an independent contractor including an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: A reference to an independent contractor includes a reference to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)
conclusion text: This Part refers to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation definition
premise text: A reference to an independent contractor includes a reference to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)
conclusion text: This Part refers to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor during this Part
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Inference from definition
premise text: A reference to an independent contractor includes a reference to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)
conclusion text: This Part refers to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusive definition
premise text: A reference to an independent contractor includes a reference to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)
conclusion text: This Part refers to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor including other definitions
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15q-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusive definition
premise text: A reference to an independent contractor includes a reference to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor within the meaning of subsection (1)
conclusion text: This Part refers to an individual who is a regulated road transport contractor including other definitions
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15R Meaning of road transport business
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15r
has part: 15R(1) Meaning of road transport business
has part: 15R(2) Meaning of road transport business
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107

15R(1) Meaning of road transport business
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15r-ss-1
part of: 15R Meaning of road transport business
note: Defines road transport business
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15r-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15R(1) Meaning of road transport business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15R(2) Meaning of road transport business
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15r-ss-2
part of: 15R Meaning of road transport business
note: Business or undertaking may be specified by name or class.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15r-ss-2-norm

15RA Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ra
has part: 15RA(1) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
has part: 15RA(2) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107

15RA(1) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ra-ss-1
part of: 15RA Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
note: Defines road transport contractual chain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ra-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ra-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15RA(1) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15RA(2) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15ra-ss-2
part of: 15RA Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
note: Defines a person in a road transport contractual chain.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ra-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15ra-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15RA(2) Meanings of road transport contractual chain and in a road
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15RB Meaning of a road transport employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15rb
note: Defines road transport employee-like worker
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15rb-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15rb-logic-descriptionlogic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15rb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15RB Meaning of a road transport employee-like worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15rb-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Employee-like worker
conclusion text: Road transport employee-like worker
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15S Meaning of road transport industry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15s
note: Defines road transport industry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15s-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-15s-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15s-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15S Meaning of road transport industry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-15s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines the scope of the term
conclusion text: road transport industry means...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Meaning of base rate of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
has part: 16(1) Meaning of base rate of pay
has part: 16(2) Meaning of base rate of pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111

16(1) Meaning of base rate of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-1
part of: 16 Meaning of base rate of pay
note: Defines base rate of pay for national system employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(1) Meaning of base rate of pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(2) Meaning of base rate of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-2
part of: 16 Meaning of base rate of pay
note: Employee's base rate of pay for National Employment Standards entitlements is specified by a modern award, enterprise agreement, or regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(2) Meaning of base rate of pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Specifies entitlements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Meaning of child of a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
has part: 17(1) Meaning of child of a person
has part: 17(2) Meaning of child of a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112

17(1) Meaning of child of a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-1
part of: 17 Meaning of child of a person
note: Defines child of a person for family law purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(1) Meaning of child of a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

17(2) Meaning of child of a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-2
part of: 17 Meaning of child of a person
note: Determine family relationships based on child being a child of another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(2) Meaning of child of a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

17A Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17a
has part: 17A(1) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
has part: 17A(2) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
has part: 17A(3) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112

17A(1) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17a-ss-1
part of: 17A Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
note: Defines chain of arrangements for supply or production of goods produced by TCF work performed by a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-1-norm

17A(2) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17a-ss-2
part of: 17A Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
note: Exemptions from direct or indirect performance of TCF work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17A(2) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

17A(3) Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17a-ss-3
part of: 17A Meaning of directly and indirectly (in relation to TCF work)
note: Exemption from application of section for Division 2A or 2B
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-17a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Section does not apply for specified divisions
premise text: (3) This section does not apply...
conclusion text: ...for the purposes of Division 2A or 2B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Meaning of full rate of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
has part: 18(1) Meaning of full rate of pay
has part: 18(2) Meaning of full rate of pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113

18(1) Meaning of full rate of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
part of: 18 Meaning of full rate of pay
note: Defines full rate of pay for national system employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(1) Meaning of full rate of pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Meaning of full rate of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Meaning of full rate of pay
note: Employee's full rate of pay is adjusted based on applicable paragraphs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(2) Meaning of full rate of pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

19 Meaning of industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
has part: 19(1) Meaning of industrial action
has part: 19(2) Meaning of industrial action
has part: 19(3) Meaning of industrial action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114

19(1) Meaning of industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 Meaning of industrial action
note: Restricts certain actions by employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) Meaning of industrial action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
premise text: (1) Industrial action means...
conclusion text: ...the adoption of a practice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Defines industrial action as a subclass of work-related actions
premise text: (a) the performance of work by an employee...
conclusion text: ...the result of which is a restriction or limitation on, or a delay in, the performance of the work;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Restricts actions during work hours
premise text: (b) a ban, limitation or restriction on...
conclusion text: ...the acceptance of or offering for work by an employee;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Limits actions until work is performed
premise text: (c) a failure or refusal by employees to attend...
conclusion text: ...the performance of any work at all by employees who attend for work;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits lockout of employees
premise text: (d) the lockout of employees from their employment...
conclusion text: ...by the employer of the employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Meaning of industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
part of: 19 Meaning of industrial action
note: Definition of industrial action, excluding certain actions authorized or agreed upon by the employer or employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(2) Meaning of industrial action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes certain actions from industrial action.
premise text: (2) However, industrial action does not include the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap between employee actions and employer directions.
premise text: (ii) the employee did not unreasonably fail to comply with a direction of his or her employer to perform other available work, whether at the same or another workplace, that was safe and appropriate for the employee to perform.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(3) Meaning of industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-3
part of: 19 Meaning of industrial action
note: Prevents employees from performing work under their contracts of employment without terminating those contracts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits employees from performing work without terminating their contracts.
premise text: (3) An employer locks out employees...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19A Meaning of industrial action: regulated workers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19a
note: Regulated workers and businesses must comply with minimum standards order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.115
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19A Meaning of industrial action: regulated workers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-19a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Regulated worker and business
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
has part: 20(1) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
has part: 20(2) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.117

20(1) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-1
part of: 20 Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
note: Defines ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.117
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(1) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20(2) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-ss-2
part of: 20 Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
note: Defines ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.117
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2) Meaning of ordinary hours of work for award/agreement free
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-20-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a specific obligation
premise text: (2) If there is no agreement...
conclusion text: 38 hours
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
has part: 21(1) Meaning of pieceworker
has part: 21(2) Meaning of pieceworker
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118

21(1) Meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-1
part of: 21 Meaning of pieceworker
note: Definition of a pieceworker
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(1) Meaning of pieceworker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Award/agreement free employee
conclusion text: pieceworker
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: National system employee
conclusion text: pieceworker
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2) Meaning of pieceworker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-2
part of: 21 Meaning of pieceworker
note: Definition of pieceworker class
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-ltl-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(2) Meaning of pieceworker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
premise text: (2) Without limiting the way in which a class may be described for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c)
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Explicit subclass hierarchy
premise text: (a) a particular industry or part of an industry;
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following: (a) a particular industry or part of an industry;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Explicit subclass hierarchy
premise text: (b) a particular kind of work;
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following: (b) a particular kind of work;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Explicit subclass hierarchy
premise text: (c) a particular type of employment.
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following: (c) a particular type of employment.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap
premise text: (2) Without limiting the way in which a class may be described for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c)
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-21-ss-2-logic-ltl-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (2) Without limiting the way in which a class may be described for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c)
conclusion text: The pieceworker class can be described by reference to one or more of the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

22 Meanings of service and continuous service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
has part: 22(1) Meanings of service and continuous service
has part: 22(2) Meanings of service and continuous service
has part: 22(3) Meanings of service and continuous service
has part: 22(3A) Meanings of service and continuous service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.119

22(1) Meanings of service and continuous service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-1
part of: 22 Meanings of service and continuous service
note: Defines service period for national system employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.119
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(1) Meanings of service and continuous service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes excluded periods in total service count
premise text: (1) A period of service by a national system employee with his or her national system employer is a period during which the employee is employed by the employer, but does not include any period (an excluded period) that does not count as service because of subsection (2).
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes excluded periods in total service count
premise text: (1) A period of service by a national system employee with his or her national system employer is a period during which the employee is employed by the employer, but does not include any period (an excluded period) that does not count as service because of subsection (2).
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes excluded periods in total service count
premise text: (1) A period of service by a national system employee with his or her national system employer is a period during which the employee is employed by the employer, but does not include any period (an excluded period) that does not count as service because of subsection (2).
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes excluded periods in total service count
premise text: (1) A period of service by a national system employee with his or her national system employer is a period during which the employee is employed by the employer, but does not include any period (an excluded period) that does not count as service because of subsection (2).
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes excluded periods in total service count
premise text: (1) A period of service by a national system employee with his or her national system employer is a period during which the employee is employed by the employer, but does not include any period (an excluded period) that does not count as service because of subsection (2).
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

22(2) Meanings of service and continuous service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-2
part of: 22 Meanings of service and continuous service
note: Exemptions from service calculation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.119
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(2) Meanings of service and continuous service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Exemptions from service calculation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Describes temporal intervals
premise text: (a) any period of unauthorised absence;
conclusion text: Unauthorised absence is not counted as service
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(3) Meanings of service and continuous service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-3
part of: 22 Meanings of service and continuous service
note: Does not break continuous service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.119
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(3) Meanings of service and continuous service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (3) An excluded period does not break...
conclusion text: ...but does not count towards the length of...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(3A) Meanings of service and continuous service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-ss-3a
part of: 22 Meanings of service and continuous service
note: Prescribes different kinds of periods for the purposes of different provisions of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.119
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(3A) Meanings of service and continuous service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-22-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23 Meaning of small business employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
has part: 23(1) Meaning of small business employer
has part: 23(2) Meaning of small business employer
has part: 23(3) Meaning of small business employer
has part: 23(4) Meaning of small business employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122

23(1) Meaning of small business employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-ss-1
part of: 23 Meaning of small business employer
note: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees at a particular time to be considered a small business employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(1) Meaning of small business employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees.
premise text: (1) A national system employer is a small business employer at a particular time if the employer employs fewer than 15 employees at that time.
conclusion text: The employer has fewer than 15 employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
premise text: (1) A national system employer is a small business employer at a particular time if the employer employs fewer than 15 employees at that time.
conclusion text: The employer has fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
premise text: (1) A national system employer is a small business employer at a particular time if the employer employs fewer than 15 employees at that time.
conclusion text: The employer has fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
premise text: (1) A national system employer is a small business employer at a particular time if the employer employs fewer than 15 employees at that time.
conclusion text: The employer has fewer than 15 employees during the relevant time period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: has
logic summary: Employer must have fewer than 15 employees.
premise text: (1) A national system employer is a small business employer at a particular time if the employer employs fewer than 15 employees at that time.
conclusion text: The employer has fewer than 15 employees.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2) Meaning of small business employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-ss-2
part of: 23 Meaning of small business employer
note: Count all employees employed by the employer at a particular time, except for casual employees not regularly employed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(2) Meaning of small business employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to count all employees
premise text: The employer must count all employees
conclusion text: All employees must be counted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(3) Meaning of small business employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-ss-3
part of: 23 Meaning of small business employer
note: Associated entities are taken to be one entity for calculating the number of employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(3) Meaning of small business employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Entity classification obligation
premise text: Associated entities are taken to be one entity.
conclusion text: One entity for calculation purposes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(4) Meaning of small business employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-ss-4
part of: 23 Meaning of small business employer
note: Employees to be counted in determining small business employer status
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(4) Meaning of small business employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal relation between employee dismissal/termination and small business employer status
premise text: Employee dismissal/termination occurs at a particular time
conclusion text: Small business employer status determination at that time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Obligation to count employees in determining small business employer status
premise text: Employees are to be counted
conclusion text: Small business employer status determination is possible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: entails
logic summary: Inference of small business employer status from employee dismissal/termination
premise text: Employee dismissal/termination occurs at a particular time
conclusion text: Small business employer status determination is possible
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
logic summary: Universal quantification of employees to be counted in determining small business employer status
premise text: Employees are to be counted
conclusion text: Small business employer status determination is possible for all employees
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to count employees in determining small business employer status
premise text: Employees are to be counted
conclusion text: Small business employer status determination is possible
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23A Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23a
has part: 23A(1) Terms relating to superannuation
has part: 23A(1A) Terms relating to superannuation
has part: 23A(1B) Terms relating to superannuation
has part: 23A(2) Terms relating to superannuation
has part: 23A(3) Terms relating to superannuation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123

23A(1) Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23a-ss-1
part of: 23A Terms relating to superannuation
note: Defines MySuper product meaning
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23A(1) Terms relating to superannuation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of term
premise text: MySuper product has the meaning given by...
conclusion text: ...the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23A(1A) Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23a-ss-1a
part of: 23A Terms relating to superannuation
note: A standard MySuper product must not be an employer MySuper product.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23A(1A) Terms relating to superannuation
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on standard MySuper products being employer MySuper products.
premise text: (1A) A standard MySuper product is a MySuper product that is not an employer MySuper product.
conclusion text: It must not be the case that a standard MySuper product is an employer MySuper product.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23A(1B) Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23a-ss-1b
part of: 23A Terms relating to superannuation
note: Employer must provide a tailored or corporate MySuper product.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23A(1B) Terms relating to superannuation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Employer must provide a tailored or corporate MySuper product.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23A(2) Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23a-ss-2
part of: 23A Terms relating to superannuation
note: A tailored MySuper product must satisfy section 29TB of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23A(2) Terms relating to superannuation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must satisfy
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between sections
premise text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23A(3) Terms relating to superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23a-ss-3
part of: 23A Terms relating to superannuation
note: Definition of a corporate MySuper product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23A(3) Terms relating to superannuation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: has one standard employer-sponsor
conclusion text: within the meaning of that Act
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23B Meaning of general building and construction work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23b
has part: 23B(1) Meaning of general building and construction work
has part: 23B(2) Meaning of general building and construction work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124

23B(1) Meaning of general building and construction work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23b-ss-1
part of: 23B Meaning of general building and construction work
note: Defines general building and construction work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23B(1) Meaning of general building and construction work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (i) general building and construction within the meaning of paragraph 4.3(a) of the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020 as in force at the applicable time;
conclusion text: ...or (ii) civil construction within the meaning of paragraph 4.3(b) of the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020 as in force at the applicable time;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (xiii) work in the asphalt industry within the meaning of clause 4.2 of the Asphalt Industry Award 2020 as in force at the applicable time;
conclusion text: ...or (xiv) work, in that part of the industry of civil construction described in subparagraph 4.3(b)(i) of the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020 as in force at the applicable time, that is the construction, repair, maintenance or demolition of power houses or other structures...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Duty
premise text: (a) the work is done onsite by an employee in the industry of:
conclusion text: ...or (b) the work is not any of the following...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Duty
premise text: (b) the work is not any of the following:
conclusion text: ...or (vii) work in the black coal mining industry within the meaning of clause 4.2 of the Black Coal Mining Industry Award 2020 as in force at the applicable time;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23B(2) Meaning of general building and construction work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23b-ss-2
part of: 23B Meaning of general building and construction work
note: Defines applicable time as start of day before section commences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-23b-ss-2-norm

24 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-24-norm

25 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Defines employee and employer terms for this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has meaning
logic summary: Defines terms for legal interpretation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-4
has part: 26(1) Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
has part: 26(2) Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127

26(1) Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-4-ss-1
part of: 26 Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
note: Exclusion of State or Territory industrial laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of laws
premise text: (State or Territory industrial laws)
conclusion text: (This Act)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(2) Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26-4-ss-2
part of: 26 Act excludes State or Territory industrial laws
note: Defines what constitutes a State or Territory industrial law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the type of law.
premise text: (2) A State or Territory industrial law is:
conclusion text: a general State industrial law; or an Act of a State or Territory that applies to employment...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope.
premise text: (2) A State or Territory industrial law is:
conclusion text: a general State industrial law; or an Act of a State or Territory that applies to employment...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes the termination condition.
premise text: (2) A State or Territory industrial law is:
conclusion text: a general State industrial law; or an Act of a State or Territory that applies to employment...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
logic summary: Combines the conditions.
premise text: (2) A State or Territory industrial law is:
conclusion text: a general State industrial law; or an Act of a State or Territory that applies to employment...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-26-4-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: or
logic summary: Combines the alternatives.
premise text: (2) A State or Territory industrial law is:
conclusion text: a general State industrial law; or an Act of a State or Territory that applies to employment...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
has part: 27(1A) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
has part: 27(1) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
has part: 27(2) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.129

27(1A) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-ss-1a
part of: 27 State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
note: Exemptions from section 26
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.129
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: State and Territory laws exempted
premise text: Section 26 does not apply to...
conclusion text: ...the listed laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(1) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-ss-1
part of: 27 State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
note: Section 26 does not apply to certain State and Territory laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.129
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion from section 26
premise text: Section 26 does not apply to a law of a State or Territory
conclusion text: The law is prescribed by the regulations as a law to which section 26 does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

27(2) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-ss-2
part of: 27 State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
note: List of non-excluded matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.129
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(2) State and Territory laws that are not excluded by section 26
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: list
logic summary: Enumerates non-excluded matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
has part: 28(1) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
has part: 28(2) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
has part: 28(3) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130

28(1) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-1
part of: 28 Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
note: Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(1) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(2) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-2
part of: 28 Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
note: The Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(2) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes prescribed State and Territory laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(3) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-ss-3
part of: 28 Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
note: Section 27 is not applicable to the law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.130
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(3) Act excludes prescribed State and Territory laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If section 26 applies, then section 27 does not apply.
premise text: Section 26 applies.
conclusion text: Section 27 does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Does not limit
logic summary: Subsection (1) does not limit subsection (1).
premise text: Subsection (1) has effect.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not limit itself.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the law is covered by section 27, then subsection (1) does not apply.
premise text: The law is covered by section 27.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Does not limit
logic summary: Section 26 does not apply to the law.
premise text: The law is covered by section 27.
conclusion text: Section 26 does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-28-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If subsection (1) has effect, then the law is covered by section 27.
premise text: Subsection (1) has effect.
conclusion text: The law is covered by section 27.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29
has part: 29(1) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
has part: 29(2) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
has part: 29(3) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131

29(1) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-1
part of: 29 Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
note: Modern awards and enterprise agreements take precedence over state laws in case of inconsistency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Precedence obligation
premise text: Modern awards and enterprise agreements take precedence over state laws.
conclusion text: State laws are overridden by modern awards and enterprise agreements in case of inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(2) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-2
part of: 29 Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
note: Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with state laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(2) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Term applies subject to certain laws
premise text: subsection (1)
conclusion text: term of a modern award or enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: so far as
logic summary: Law applies to enterprise agreement so far as it is covered by paragraph 27(1)(b), (c) or (d)
premise text: paragraph 27(1A)
conclusion text: law of a State or Territory
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Term requires designated emergency management body to act in accordance with state law
premise text: paragraph 194(baa)
conclusion text: term of an enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permits
logic summary: Term permits designated emergency management body to act other than in accordance with state law
premise text: paragraph 253(1)(b)
conclusion text: term of an enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

29(3) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-3
part of: 29 Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
note: Term of modern award or enterprise agreement not subject to State law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(3) Interaction of modern awards and enterprise agreements with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-29-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion from State law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Act may exclude State and Territory laws etc. in other cases
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
note: Act may exclude State and Territory laws etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30-norm

30A Meaning of terms used in this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30a
note: Defines terms used in Division 2A of the Fair Work Act 2009.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30a-norm

30B Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30b
has part: 30B(1) Meaning of referring State
has part: 30B(4) Meaning of referring State
has part: 30B(2) Meaning of referring State
has part: 30B(3) Meaning of referring State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137

30B(1) Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30b-ss-1
part of: 30B Meaning of referring State
note: A State is a referring State if the Parliament of the State has referred matters before 1 July 2009.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30B(1) Meaning of referring State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: State has referred matters
premise text: (1) A State is a referring State if...
conclusion text: ...the Parliament of the State has referred the matters covered by subsections (3),
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Matters were referred before 1 July 2009
premise text: (1) A State is a referring State if...
conclusion text: ...the Parliament of the State has referred matters covered by subsections (3),
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Referred matters imply State is referring
premise text: (1) A State is a referring State if...
conclusion text: ...the Parliament of the State has referred matters before 1 July 2009,
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: State diffuses referring matter
premise text: (1) A State is a referring State if...
conclusion text: ...the Parliament of the State has referred matters covered by subsections (3),
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: State asserts referring matter
premise text: (1) A State is a referring State if...
conclusion text: ...the Parliament of the State has referred matters before 1 July 2009,
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

30B(4) Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30b-ss-4
part of: 30B Meaning of referring State
note: States legislative powers in relation to the Parliament of the Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30B(4) Meaning of referring State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: States matters not included in Commonwealth legislative powers
premise text: (b) if and to the extent that the matters are included in the legislative powers of the Parliament of the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: States matters not otherwise included in Commonwealth legislative powers
premise text: (a) if and to the extent that the matters are not otherwise included in the legislative powers of the Parliament of the Commonwealth (otherwise than by a reference under paragraph 51(xxxvii) of the Constitution);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: States temporal interval for Commonwealth reference
premise text: (4) and (5) in relation to the State to the Parliament of the Commonwealth for the purposes of paragraph 51(xxxvii) of the Constitution:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: States matters in relation to Commonwealth legislative powers
premise text: (a) if and to the extent that the matters are not otherwise included in the legislative powers of the Parliament of the Commonwealth (otherwise than by a reference under paragraph 51(xxxvii) of the Constitution);
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: States matters included in State legislative powers
premise text: (b) if and to the extent that the matters are included in the legislative powers of the Parliament of the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30B(2) Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30b-ss-2
part of: 30B Meaning of referring State
note: A State is a referring State even if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30B(2) Meaning of referring State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditions for being a referring State
premise text: (a) the State’s referral law provides that...
conclusion text: ...the State is a referring State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30B(3) Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30b-ss-3
part of: 30B Meaning of referring State
note: Defines scope of referred provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30b-ss-3-norm

30C Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30c
has part: 30C(1) Extended meaning of national system employee
has part: 30C(2) Extended meaning of national system employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140

30C(1) Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30c-ss-1
part of: 30C Extended meaning of national system employee
note: Defines a national system employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30c-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30C(1) Extended meaning of national system employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30C(2) Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30c-ss-2
part of: 30C Extended meaning of national system employee
note: Section does not limit operation of section 13.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30c-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30C(2) Extended meaning of national system employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30D Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30d
has part: 30D(1) Extended meaning of national system employer
has part: 30D(2) Extended meaning of national system employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140

30D(1) Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30d-ss-1
part of: 30D Extended meaning of national system employer
note: Defines national system employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30d-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30D(1) Extended meaning of national system employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30D(2) Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30d-ss-2
part of: 30D Extended meaning of national system employer
note: Section 14 is not limited by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30d-ss-2-norm

30E Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30e
has part: 30E(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 30E(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 30E(3) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141

30E(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30e-ss-1
part of: 30E Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
note: A reference to an employee includes a law enforcement officer of a State that is a referring State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30E(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30E(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30e-ss-2
part of: 30E Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
note: A reference to an employer includes a holder of an office in a referring State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30E(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30E(3) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30e-ss-3
part of: 30E Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
note: Section does not limit operation of section 15.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies the operation of section 15 is not limited.
premise text: Section 30E(3)
conclusion text: Section 15 is not limited by this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

30F Extended meaning of outworker entity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30f
note: Defines outworker entity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30f-norm

30G General protections
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30g
has part: 30G(1) General protections
has part: 30G(2) General protections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142

30G(1) General protections
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30g-ss-1
part of: 30G General protections
note: Part 3-1 applies to action taken in a State that is a referring State because of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30G(1) General protections
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Part 3-1 applies to action taken in a State that is a referring State because of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30G(2) General protections
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30g-ss-2
part of: 30G General protections
note: Section 30G(2) applies despite section 337 and does not limit the operation of sections 338 and 339.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30G(2) General protections
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies despite other provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30H Division only has effect if supported by reference
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30h
note: Division has effect only if supported by reference to Parliament of the Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.142
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30h-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30h-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30H Division only has effect if supported by reference
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Division has effect only if supported by reference to Parliament of the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 January 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.143
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-5-norm

30K Meaning of terms used in this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30k
note: Definition of excluded subject matter
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.143
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30K Meaning of terms used in this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of excluded subject matter
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: terms used in this Division
conclusion text: excluded subject matter
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30L Meaning of referring State
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30l
note: Definition of referring State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30l-norm

1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6
has part: 1(2) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
has part: 1(3) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
has part: 1(4) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
has part: 1(5) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
has part: 1(6) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
has part: 1(7) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148

1(2) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-2
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
note: A State is a referring State even if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(2) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval for the referral law
premise text: July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010
conclusion text: the State's referral law provides that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=>
logic summary: Describes the relationship between the referral law and the Parliament of the Commonwealth
premise text: the State's referral law provides that the reference to the Parliament of the Commonwealth of any or all of the matters covered by subsections (3), (4) and (5) is to terminate in particular circumstances
conclusion text: A State is a referring State even if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <=>
logic summary: Describes the relationship between the referral law and the Parliament of the Commonwealth
premise text: the State's referral law provides that particular matters, or all matters, relating to State public sector employees, or State public sector employers, of the State are not included in any or all of the matters covered by subsections (3), (4) and (5)
conclusion text: A State is a referring State even if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1(3) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-3
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
note: Amending this Act to include referred provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-3-norm

1(4) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-4
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
note: Express amendments of this Act to cover referred subject matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-4-norm

1(5) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-5
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
note: Transition from Workplace Relations Act 1996 and State laws to this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-5-norm

1(6) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-6
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
note: A State ceases to be a referring State under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(6) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits a State from being a referring State under certain conditions.
premise text: (6) Despite anything to the contrary in a referral law of a State, a State ceases to be a referring State if any or all of the following occurs:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Termination
logic summary: Describes the termination of a State's initial, amendment, or transition references.
premise text: (b) the State’s amendment reference terminates, and neither of subsections (7) and (8) apply to the termination;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Termination
logic summary: Describes the termination of a State's transition reference.
premise text: (c) the State’s transition reference terminates.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1(7) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6-ss-7
part of: 1 July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
note: A State does not cease to be a referring State under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-7-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-6-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(7) July 2009 but on or before 1 January 2010, referred the matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30M Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30m
has part: 30M(1) Extended meaning of national system employee
has part: 30M(2) Extended meaning of national system employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151

30M(1) Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30m-ss-1
part of: 30M Extended meaning of national system employee
note: Defines a national system employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30m-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30M(1) Extended meaning of national system employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30M(2) Extended meaning of national system employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30m-ss-2
part of: 30M Extended meaning of national system employee
note: Section does not limit operation of section 13.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30m-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30M(2) Extended meaning of national system employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30N Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30n
has part: 30N(1) Extended meaning of national system employer
has part: 30N(2) Extended meaning of national system employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151

30N(1) Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30n-ss-1
part of: 30N Extended meaning of national system employer
note: Defines national system employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30N(1) Extended meaning of national system employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes persons and holders of offices
premise text: (a) any person in a State...
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass of referring States and holders of offices
premise text: (1) A national system employer includes: (a) any person in a State...
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office to whom subsection 30P(2) applies.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Employment duration
premise text: (a) any person in a State that is a referring State because of this Division so far as the person employs, or usually employs, an individual;
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office to whom subsection 30P(2) applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Employment duration
premise text: (a) any person in a State that is a referring State because of this Division so far as the person employs, or usually employs, an individual;
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office to whom subsection 30P(2) applies.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes persons and holders of offices
premise text: (1) A national system employer includes: (a) any person in a State that is a referring State because of this Division so far as the person employs, or usually employs, an individual;
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office to whom subsection 30P(2) applies.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes persons and holders of offices
premise text: (1) A national system employer includes: (a) any person in a State that is a referring State because of this Division so far as the person employs, or usually employs, an individual;
conclusion text: ...and (b) a holder of an office to whom subsection 30P(2) applies.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

30N(2) Extended meaning of national system employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30n-ss-2
part of: 30N Extended meaning of national system employer
note: Does not limit operation of section 14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.151
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not imply
logic summary: Limits operation of section 14
premise text: Section 30N(2)
conclusion text: Section 14
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30P Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30p
has part: 30P(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 30P(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
has part: 30P(3) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152

30P(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30p-ss-1
part of: 30P Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
note: A law enforcement officer of a referring State is included in the definition of employee if the State's referral law so provides.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30P(1) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion in a definition is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: The law enforcement officer is a subclass of employee.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30P(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30p-ss-2
part of: 30P Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
note: A reference to an employer includes a holder of an office of the State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30P(2) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: type equality
logic summary: Type equality
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30P(3) Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30p-ss-3
part of: 30P Extended ordinary meanings of employee and employer
note: Section does not limit operation of section 15.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30p-ss-3-norm

30Q Extended meaning of outworker entity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30q
has part: 30Q(1) Extended meaning of outworker entity
has part: 30Q(2) Extended meaning of outworker entity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152

30Q(1) Extended meaning of outworker entity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30q-ss-1
part of: 30Q Extended meaning of outworker entity
note: An outworker entity includes a person who arranges for work to be performed in a State that is a referring State because of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30Q(1) Extended meaning of outworker entity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies outworker entity based on arrangement and work type
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines the scope of an outworker entity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30Q(2) Extended meaning of outworker entity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30q-ss-2
part of: 30Q Extended meaning of outworker entity
note: Does not limit the operation of the definition of outworker entity in section 12.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30q-ss-2-norm

30R General protections
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30r
has part: 30R(1) General protections
has part: 30R(2) General protections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153

30R(1) General protections
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30r-ss-1
part of: 30R General protections
note: Applicability of general protections to referring States
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30R(1) General protections
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: General protections apply to referring States
premise text: (1) Part 3-1 applies to action taken in a State that is a referring State because of this Division.
conclusion text: Part 3-1 applies to action taken in a State that is a referring State because of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

30R(2) General protections
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30r-ss-2
part of: 30R General protections
note: Section 30R(2) applies despite section 337 and does not limit the operation of sections 338 and 339.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30R(2) General protections
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies despite other provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30S Division only has effect if supported by reference
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30s
note: Division has effect only if supported by reference to Parliament of the Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30s-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-30s-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30s-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30S Division only has effect if supported by reference
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-30s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-and-only-if
logic summary: Division has effect only if supported by reference to Parliament of the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
has part: 31(1) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
has part: 31(2) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154

31(1) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-1
part of: 31 Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
note: A provision of this Act does not apply to a person or entity in Australia prescribed by the regulations as a person to whom, or an entity to which, the provision does not apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(1) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

31(2) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-ss-2
part of: 31 Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
note: Minister must be satisfied that provision should not apply to person or entity in Australia due to insufficient connection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(2) Exclusion of persons etc. insufficiently connected with Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to ensure provision does not apply.
premise text: The Minister must be satisfied that the provision should not apply.
conclusion text: There is a sufficient connection between the person or entity and Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The temporal interval of the provision's application overlaps with the temporal interval of the person or entity's connection to Australia.
premise text: There is not a sufficient connection between the person or entity and Australia.
conclusion text: The provision should not apply to the person or entity in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The provision's application continues until the temporal interval of the person or entity's connection to Australia ends.
premise text: There is not a sufficient connection between the person or entity and Australia.
conclusion text: The provision should not apply to the person or entity in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The diffusion of information about the provision's application is affected by the temporal interval of the person or entity's connection to Australia.
premise text: There is not a sufficient connection between the person or entity and Australia.
conclusion text: The provision should not apply to the person or entity in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-31-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: The CogAI system can infer that the provision does not apply to the person or entity in Australia due to insufficient connection.
premise text: There is not a sufficient connection between the person or entity and Australia.
conclusion text: The provision should not apply to the person or entity in Australia.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Regulations may modify application of this Act in certain parts of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32
note: Regulations may modify application of this Act in certain parts of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32 Regulations may modify application of this Act in certain parts of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulations may modify application of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32A Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32a
has part: 32A(1) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
has part: 32A(2) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
has part: 32A(3) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155

32A(1) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32a-ss-1
part of: 32A Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
note: The Minister may make rules modifying the Act's application in Norfolk Island.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32A(1) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Minister may make rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32A(2) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32a-ss-2
part of: 32A Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
note: Rules cannot create an offence or civil penalty, provide powers of arrest or detention, entry, search or seizure, impose a tax, set an amount to be appropriated from the Consolidated Revenue Fund, or directly amend the text of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32A(2) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Rules cannot create an offence or civil penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32A(3) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32a-ss-3
part of: 32A Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
note: This Act has effect as modified in relation to Norfolk Island.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32A(3) Rules may modify application of this Act in Norfolk Island
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-32a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffectAs
logic summary: This Act has effect as modified in relation to Norfolk Island.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33
has part: 33(1) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
has part: 33(2) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
has part: 33(3) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
has part: 33(4) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
has part: 33(5) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
has part: 33(6) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156

33(1) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-1
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
note: This Act extends to or in relation to certain ships and platforms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(1) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extension of the Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal relation to ships and platforms
premise text: (i) supplies, services or otherwise operates in connection with a fixed platform in the exclusive economic zone or in the waters above the continental shelf; (ii) operates to and from an Australian port;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of ship operation on base usage
premise text: (i) is operated or chartered by an Australian employer; (ii) uses Australia as a base;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of ship operation to platform usage
premise text: (i) supplies, services or otherwise operates in connection with a fixed platform in the exclusive economic zone or in the waters above the continental shelf; (ii) operates to and from an Australian port;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of ship operation on base usage
premise text: (i) is operated or chartered by an Australian employer; (ii) uses Australia as a base;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(2) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-2
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
note: References to Australian employer and employee are included in provisions of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(2) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of Australian employer and employee references.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(3) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-3
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
note: Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the waters above the continental shelf.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(3) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

33(4) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-4
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
note: Modifications of this Act for its operation in the exclusive economic zone or continental shelf.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-4-norm

33(5) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-5
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
note: Prescribes modifications in relation to different parts of the exclusive economic zone or continental shelf.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-5-norm

33(6) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-6
part of: 33 Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
note: Extension of this Act has effect in relation to acts, omissions, matters and things directly or indirectly connected with the exploration of, or exploitation of the natural resources of, the continental shelf in the Greater Sunrise special regime area.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.156
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(6) Extension of this Act to the exclusive economic zone and the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-33-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: The extension of this Act has effect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Extension of this Act beyond the exclusive economic zone and the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34
note: Extension of this Act beyond the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.157
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-34-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal interval
conclusion text: Relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35
has part: 35(1) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
has part: 35(2) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159

35(1) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-1
part of: 35 Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
note: Definition of Australian employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(1) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

35(2) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35-ss-2
part of: 35 Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
note: Defines Australian-based employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(2) Meanings of Australian employer and Australian-based employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term
premise text: (2) An Australian-based employee is an employee:
conclusion text: An Australian-based employee is an employee who...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A Regulations excluding application of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a
has part: 35A(1) Regulations excluding application of Act
has part: 35A(2) Regulations excluding application of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160

35A(1) Regulations excluding application of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-1
part of: 35A Regulations excluding application of Act
note: Regulations may exclude application of Act in certain areas.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35A(1) Regulations excluding application of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulations may exclude application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

35A(2) Regulations excluding application of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-2
part of: 35A Regulations excluding application of Act
note: Regulations excluding application of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35A(2) Regulations excluding application of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclude application in specified area or part
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Geographical application of offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36
note: Geographical application of offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-36-norm

37 Act binds Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37
has part: 37(1) Act binds Crown
has part: 37(2) Act binds Crown
has part: 37(3) Act binds Crown
has part: 37(4) Act binds Crown
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161

37(1) Act binds Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-1
part of: 37 Act binds Crown
note: The Act binds the Crown in all its capacities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: binds
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Crown.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) Act binds Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-2
part of: 37 Act binds Crown
note: The Crown is not liable to prosecution for an offence, except as provided by subsection (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2) Act binds Crown
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the Crown is not liable, then prosecution is not allowed.
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to be prosecuted.
conclusion text: Prosecution is not allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excludes
logic summary: The provision excludes certain cases where the Crown may be liable to prosecution.
premise text: This Act does not make the Crown liable to be prosecuted, except as provided for by subsection (3).
conclusion text: There are exceptions to this rule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If there is an exception, then prosecution may be allowed in that case.
premise text: The Crown is not liable to prosecution for an offence, except as provided for by subsection (3).
conclusion text: Prosecution may be allowed in that case.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ForAll
logic summary: This provision applies to all cases where the Crown is not liable to prosecution.
premise text: The Act does not make the Crown liable to be prosecuted, except as provided for by subsection (3).
conclusion text: This provision applies to all such cases.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ForSome
logic summary: There may be cases where the Crown is not liable to prosecution.
premise text: The Crown is not liable to prosecution for an offence, except as provided for by subsection (3).
conclusion text: There may be such cases.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

37(3) Act binds Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-3
part of: 37 Act binds Crown
note: The Crown is liable to prosecution for certain offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the Crown from committing certain acts.
premise text: (3) The Crown in right of the Commonwealth is liable to be prosecuted for an offence against any of the following provisions:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines overlapping temporal intervals.
premise text: (3) The Crown in right of the Commonwealth is liable to be prosecuted for an offence against any of the following provisions:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes a logical implication.
premise text: (3) The Crown in right of the Commonwealth is liable to be prosecuted for an offence against any of the following provisions:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses information about related offences.
premise text: (a) subsection 327A(1); (b) a related offence provision, to the extent that the related offence provision relates to an offence against subsection 327A(1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the Crown's liability.
premise text: (3) The Crown in right of the Commonwealth is liable to be prosecuted for an offence against any of the following provisions:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

37(4) Act binds Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37-ss-4
part of: 37 Act binds Crown
note: The Crown is liable for contravention of civil remedy provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(4) Act binds Crown
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-37-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Crown is liable for contravention of civil remedy provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Act not to apply so as to exceed Commonwealth power
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38
note: Act not to apply so as to exceed Commonwealth power
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.161
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-38-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Act not to apply so as to exceed Commonwealth power
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

39 Acquisition of property
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39
note: Acquisition of property from a person not on just terms is excluded.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-39-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion of acquisition of property on just terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40
has part: 40(1) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
has part: 40(2) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
has part: 40(3) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
has part: 40(4) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163

40(1) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-1
part of: 40 Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
note: Public sector employment law prevails over fair work instruments on inconsistency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(1) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >!
logic summary: Precedence of public sector employment law over fair work instruments.
premise text: (1) A public sector employment law prevails...
conclusion text: ...to the extent of any inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(2) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-2
part of: 40 Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
note: Public sector employment law prevails over fair work instruments to the extent of any inconsistency if the instrument or term is prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(2) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails over
logic summary: Obligation to prioritize public sector employment law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Fair work instruments are included in a class of instruments prescribed by regulations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(3) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-3
part of: 40 Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
note: Fair work instruments do not prevail over public sector employment laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: Prohibition of fair work instruments over public sector employment laws
premise text: (3) A public sector employment law is a law of the Commonwealth...
conclusion text: Laws that fair work instruments never prevail over
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Fair work instruments do not overlap with public sector employment laws
premise text: (3) A public sector employment law is a law of the Commonwealth...
conclusion text: Laws that fair work instruments never prevail over
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Contradicts
logic summary: Fair work instruments contradict public sector employment laws
premise text: (3) A public sector employment law is a law of the Commonwealth...
conclusion text: Laws that fair work instruments never prevail over
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DoesNotDiffuse
logic summary: Fair work instruments do not diffuse to public sector employment laws
premise text: (3) A public sector employment law is a law of the Commonwealth...
conclusion text: Laws that fair work instruments never prevail over
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: DoesNotApply
logic summary: Fair work instruments do not apply to public sector employment laws
premise text: (3) A public sector employment law is a law of the Commonwealth...
conclusion text: Laws that fair work instruments never prevail over
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(4) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-4
part of: 40 Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
note: Exempts certain public sector employment laws from subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.163
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(4) Interaction between fair work instruments and public sector
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts certain public sector employment laws from subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws during their commencement
premise text: (4) Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws: (a) the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988; (b) the Superannuation Act 1976; (c) the Superannuation Act 1990; (d) the Superannuation Act 2005; (e) the Superannuation (Productivity Benefit) Act 1988;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws during their commencement
premise text: (4) Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws: (a) the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988; (b) the Superannuation Act 1976; (c) the Superannuation Act 1990; (d) the Superannuation Act 2005; (e) the Superannuation (Productivity Benefit) Act 1988;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws during their commencement
premise text: (4) Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws: (a) the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988; (b) the Superannuation Act 1976; (c) the Superannuation Act 1990; (d) the Superannuation Act 2005; (e) the Superannuation (Productivity Benefit) Act 1988;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws during their commencement
premise text: (4) Subsection (2) does not apply to any provisions of the following that are public sector employment laws: (a) the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988; (b) the Superannuation Act 1976; (c) the Superannuation Act 1990; (d) the Superannuation Act 2005; (e) the Superannuation (Productivity Benefit) Act 1988;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40A Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40a
has part: 40A(1) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
has part: 40A(2) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.164

40A(1) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40a-ss-1
part of: 40A Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
note: Applicability of Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.164
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40a-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40A(1) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40A(2) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40a-ss-2
part of: 40A Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
note: Amendments to Acts Interpretation Act 1901 do not apply to this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.164
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40a-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40A(2) Application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40B Effect of the Migration Act 1958
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40b
note: Disregard effect of Migration Act 1958 on contract validity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.164
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40B Effect of the Migration Act 1958
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40C Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40c
note: Must regard the road transport objective when performing functions and exercising powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.165
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40c-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to regard the road transport objective.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has regard to
logic summary: Expert Panel's responsibility to consider the road transport objective.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40D The road transport objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40d
note: Must consider minimum standards for regulated road transport workers and employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.166
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40d-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40d-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider minimum standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40E Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40e
has part: 40E(1) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
has part: 40E(2) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
has part: 40E(3) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
has part: 40E(4) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167

40E(1) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40e-ss-1
part of: 40E Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
note: Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40E(1) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Creates an obligation to establish a group
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40E(2) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40e-ss-2
part of: 40E Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
note: The Road Transport Advisory Group must advise the FWC on matters related to the road transport industry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40E(2) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40E(3) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40e-ss-3
part of: 40E Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
note: Consultation requirement before advising FWC on a matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
premise text: The Road Transport Advisory Group must consult...
conclusion text: ...before advising FWC on a matter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation requirement
premise text: (3) Before advising the FWC in relation to a matter, the Road Transport Advisory Group must consult...
conclusion text: ...any relevant subcommittee established under section 40G.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Consultation requirement implies advising FWC on a matter
premise text: The Road Transport Advisory Group must consult any relevant subcommittee...
conclusion text: ...before advising FWC on a matter.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Consultation requirement spreads to other advisory groups
premise text: The Road Transport Advisory Group must consult any relevant subcommittee...
conclusion text: ...established under section 40G.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Consultation requirement requires expertise in road transport advisory group
premise text: The Road Transport Advisory Group must consult any relevant subcommittee...
conclusion text: ...established under section 40G.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40E(4) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40e-ss-4
part of: 40E Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
note: The President must consult with the Road Transport Advisory Group.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40E(4) Establishment of Road Transport Advisory Group
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40F Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40f
has part: 40F(1) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
has part: 40F(2) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167

40F(1) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40f-ss-1
part of: 40F Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
note: The Minister must appoint members to the Road Transport Advisory Group.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40F(1) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40F(2) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40f-ss-2
part of: 40F Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
note: Ensure membership of Road Transport Advisory Group consists of specified persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.167
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40F(2) Membership of Road Transport Advisory Group
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure membership
premise text: The Minister must appoint members.
conclusion text: Membership consists of specified persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40G Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40g
has part: 40G(1) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
has part: 40G(2) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
has part: 40G(3) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168

40G(1) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40g-ss-1
part of: 40G Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
note: Establish subcommittees to advise the Road Transport Advisory Group.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establish
logic summary: Establishes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40G(2) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40g-ss-2
part of: 40G Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
note: A subcommittee must be chaired by a member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40G(2) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must chair a subcommittee
premise text: (2) A subcommittee may include persons who are not members of the Road Transport Advisory Group, but a subcommittee must be chaired by a member.
conclusion text: A subcommittee must be chaired by a member.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Chairing a subcommittee implies membership in the Road Transport Advisory Group
premise text: (2) A subcommittee may include persons who are not members of the Road Transport Advisory Group, but a subcommittee must be chaired by a member.
conclusion text: If a subcommittee is chaired by a member, then that member is a member of the Road Transport Advisory Group
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Chairing a subcommittee implies being part of the Road Transport Advisory Group at some point
premise text: (2) A subcommittee may include persons who are not members of the Road Transport Advisory Group, but a subcommittee must be chaired by a member.
conclusion text: There exists a time interval where the chairperson is a member of the Road Transport Advisory Group
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: A subcommittee must have a chairperson
premise text: (2) A subcommittee may include persons who are not members of the Road Transport Advisory Group, but a subcommittee must be chaired by a member.
conclusion text: A subcommittee must have a chairperson
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40G(3) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40g-ss-3
part of: 40G Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
note: Establish a subcommittee with majority owner drivers or representatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40G(3) Road Transport Advisory Group subcommittees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-40g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST ESTABLISH
logic summary: Establish a subcommittee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.170
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-41-norm

42 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42
note: Defines employee and employer terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.171
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-42-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Terms and conditions of employment provided under this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43
note: Main terms and conditions of employment provided under this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-43-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Terms and conditions of employment provided under this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Employment terms are obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Contravening the National Employment Standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44
note: Employer must not contravene National Employment Standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-44-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-44-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 44 Contravening the National Employment Standards
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening the National Employment Standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Contravening a modern award
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45
note: Prohibition on contravening a modern award term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-45-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-45-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 Contravening a modern award
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids contravention of a modern award term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 The significance of a modern award applying to a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46
has part: 46(1) The significance of a modern award applying to a person
has part: 46(2) The significance of a modern award applying to a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173

46(1) The significance of a modern award applying to a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46-ss-1
part of: 46 The significance of a modern award applying to a person
note: A modern award imposes obligations on a person unless the award applies to the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(1) The significance of a modern award applying to a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If A, then B.
premise text: (A) Modern award does not impose obligations on a person, and (B) Person does not contravene a term of a modern award.
conclusion text: (A or B) and (not A or not B)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: NotImplying
logic summary: A modern award may not impose obligations on a person unless the award applies to the person.
premise text: (A) Modern award does not impose obligations on a person, and (B) Person does not contravene a term of a modern award.
conclusion text: (not A or B)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The applicability of a modern award to a person overlaps with the obligation imposed by the award.
premise text: (A) Modern award does not impose obligations on a person, and (B) Person does not contravene a term of a modern award.
conclusion text: Applicability of A ⊆ Obligation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The obligation imposed by a modern award is until the applicability of the award to the person.
premise text: (A) Modern award does not impose obligations on a person, and (B) Person does not contravene a term of a modern award.
conclusion text: Obligation ⊆ Until(A)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the applicability of a modern award to a person overlaps with the obligation imposed by the award, then the award imposes obligations on the person.
premise text: (A) Modern award does not impose obligations on a person, and (B) Person does not contravene a term of a modern award.
conclusion text: (not A or B)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46(2) The significance of a modern award applying to a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46-ss-2
part of: 46 The significance of a modern award applying to a person
note: Award must apply to a person for entitlement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(2) The significance of a modern award applying to a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Award application is necessary for entitlement
premise text: (2) A modern award does not give a person an entitlement unless the award applies to the person.
conclusion text: If the award applies, then the person has an entitlement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Award application is permissive for entitlement
premise text: (2) A modern award does not give a person an entitlement unless the award applies to the person.
conclusion text: The award allows the person to have an entitlement if it applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Award application is prohibited for entitlement
premise text: (2) A modern award does not give a person an entitlement unless the award applies to the person.
conclusion text: The award does not allow the person to have an entitlement if it does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Award application is a right for entitlement
premise text: (2) A modern award does not give a person an entitlement unless the award applies to the person.
conclusion text: The award gives the person a right to have an entitlement if it applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-46-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Undertaking
logic summary: Award application is an undertaking for entitlement
premise text: (2) A modern award does not give a person an entitlement unless the award applies to the person.
conclusion text: The award undertakes to give the person an entitlement if it applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47
has part: 47(1) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
has part: 47(2) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
has part: 47(3) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174

47(1) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
note: A modern award applies to an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: States conditions for applicability
premise text: (a) the modern award covers the employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity; and (b) the modern award is in operation; and (c) no other provision of this Act provides, or has the effect, that the modern award does not apply to the employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: and
logic summary: Combines conditions for applicability
premise text: (a) and (b) and (c)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(2) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
note: Modern awards do not apply to high income employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(2) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits modern awards from applying to high income employees.
premise text: Modern award applies to employees in relation to particular employment
conclusion text: Modern award does not apply to employee at a time when the employee is a high income employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(3) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-3
part of: 47 When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
note: A reference to a modern award applying to an employee is a reference to the award applying to the employee in relation to particular employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(3) When a modern award applies to an employer, employee,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: Reference to a modern award
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48
has part: 48(1) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
has part: 48(2) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
has part: 48(3) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
has part: 48(4) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175

48(1) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-1
part of: 48 When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
note: A modern award covers an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if the award is expressed to cover the employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(1) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional coverage
premise text: (award is expressed to cover the employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(2) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-2
part of: 48 When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
note: A modern award covers an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-ltl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(2) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Provision of Act or Registered Organisations Act
premise text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity
conclusion text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if provision of Act is met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: FWC order under Act
premise text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity
conclusion text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if FWC order is met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Court order
premise text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity
conclusion text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if court order is met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval of provision of Act or Registered Organisations Act
premise text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity
conclusion text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if temporal interval of provision is met
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >
logic summary: Ordered trace of FWC order under Act
premise text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity
conclusion text: Award covers employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity if ordered trace of FWC order is met
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(3) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-3
part of: 48 When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
note: Exemptions from modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(3) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Exemptions from modern awards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(4) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48-ss-4
part of: 48 When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
note: A modern award that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.175
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(4) When a modern award covers an employer, employee,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: A modern award that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-48-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49
has part: 49(1) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(2) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(3) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(4) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(5) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(6) When a modern award is in operation
has part: 49(7) When a modern award is in operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176

49(1) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-1
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation
note: Modern award commences on a specific date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-1-norm

49(2) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-2
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation
note: The FWC must specify a day for the modern award to come into operation unless it is satisfied that another day is appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(2) When a modern award is in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must specify a day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(3) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-3
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation
note: Cannot be earlier than the day of modern award making
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(3) When a modern award is in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on early commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(4) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-4
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation
note: Determination revoking a modern award comes into operation on the specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-4-norm

49(5) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-5
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation
note: Must not be earlier than the day of determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(5) When a modern award is in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on early commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(6) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-6
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation
note: Modern award takes effect on first full pay period after operation day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(6) When a modern award is in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takesEffect
logic summary: Modern award takes effect on first full pay period after operation day
premise text: (6) A modern award, or a determination revoking a modern award, does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Core provisions for this Chapter Division 2 Section 50 Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: (start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the award or determination comes into operation.)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Modern award takes effect during first full pay period after operation day
premise text: (6) A modern award, or a determination revoking a modern award, does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Core provisions for this Chapter Division 2 Section 50 Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: (start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the award or determination comes into operation.)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Modern award takes effect during first full pay period after operation day
premise text: (6) A modern award, or a determination revoking a modern award, does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Core provisions for this Chapter Division 2 Section 50 Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: (start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the award or determination comes into operation.)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Modern award takes effect during first full pay period after operation day
premise text: (6) A modern award, or a determination revoking a modern award, does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Core provisions for this Chapter Division 2 Section 50 Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: (start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the award or determination comes into operation.)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Modern award takes effect during first full pay period after operation day
premise text: (6) A modern award, or a determination revoking a modern award, does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Core provisions for this Chapter Division 2 Section 50 Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: (start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the award or determination comes into operation.)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49(7) When a modern award is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49-ss-7
part of: 49 When a modern award is in operation
note: Modern award continues in operation until revoked.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49(7) When a modern award is in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation to maintain modern award in operation
premise text: (7) A modern award continues in operation until it is revoked.
conclusion text: The modern award must continue in operation until revoked.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between modern award and revocation
premise text: (7) A modern award continues in operation until it is revoked.
conclusion text: The modern award operates during the period before revocation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of modern award continuation on employment terms
premise text: (7) A modern award continues in operation until it is revoked.
conclusion text: The continued operation of the modern award implies certain employment terms.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuse implications of modern award continuation on employment terms
premise text: (7) A modern award continues in operation until it is revoked.
conclusion text: The continued operation of the modern award diffuses certain employment terms.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-49-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of modern award continuation by AI systems
premise text: (7) A modern award continues in operation until it is revoked.
conclusion text: AI systems recognize the continued operation of the modern award as a certain employment term.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Contravening an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50
note: Prohibition on contravening an enterprise agreement term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-50-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-50-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 50 Contravening an enterprise agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids contravention of enterprise agreement terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51
has part: 51(1) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
has part: 51(2) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177

51(1) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
note: An enterprise agreement does not impose obligations on a person unless the agreement applies to the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(1) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negation of obligation
premise text: An enterprise agreement does not impose obligations on a person.
conclusion text: A person is not obligated by an enterprise agreement unless the agreement applies to the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Equivalence of obligation and applicability
premise text: An enterprise agreement does not impose obligations on a person unless the agreement applies to the person.
conclusion text: A person is obligated by an enterprise agreement if and only if the agreement applies to the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Implication of obligation and applicability
premise text: An enterprise agreement does not impose obligations on a person unless the agreement applies to the person.
conclusion text: If an enterprise agreement does not impose obligations on a person, then the agreement does not apply to the person.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Temporal inclusion of obligation commencement
premise text: An enterprise agreement commences when it applies to a person.
conclusion text: The obligation imposed by an enterprise agreement commences when the agreement applies to a person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ~
logic summary: Negation of obligation applicability
premise text: An enterprise agreement does not apply to a person unless the agreement imposes obligations on the person.
conclusion text: A person is not obligated by an enterprise agreement if and only if the agreement does not apply to the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
note: An enterprise agreement does not give a person an entitlement unless the agreement applies to the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-51-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(2) The significance of an enterprise agreement applying to a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

52 When an enterprise agreement applies to an employer, employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52
note: Enterprise agreement applies to employee, employer or organisation if it is in operation and covers the relevant party.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52 When an enterprise agreement applies to an employer, employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (a) the agreement is in operation; (b) the agreement covers the employee, employer or organisation
conclusion text: then it applies to the relevant party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
logic summary: Conjunction of conditions
premise text: (a) the agreement is in operation; (b) the agreement covers the employee, employer or organisation
conclusion text: then it applies to the relevant party.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: and
logic summary: Temporal conjunction of conditions
premise text: (a) the agreement is in operation; (b) the agreement covers the employee, employer or organisation
conclusion text: then it applies to the relevant party.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-52-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Identity of obligation
premise text: The enterprise agreement is in operation and covers the employee, employer or organisation
conclusion text: then it applies to the relevant party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53
has part: 53(1) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
has part: 53(2) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
has part: 53(3) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
has part: 53(4) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
has part: 53(5) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
has part: 53(6) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178

53(1) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-1
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
note: An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(1) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (1) An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.
conclusion text: Enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (1) An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.
conclusion text: Employee organisations are covered by the enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (1) An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.
conclusion text: Enterprise agreement obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (1) An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.
conclusion text: Employer obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (1) An enterprise agreement covers an employee or employer if the agreement is expressed to cover (however described) the employee or the employer.
conclusion text: Employee obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(2) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-2
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
note: Enterprise agreement covers an employee organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(2) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
logic summary: Enterprise agreement covers an employee organisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(3) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-3
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
note: An enterprise agreement also covers an employee, employer or organisation if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the agreement covers the employee, employer or organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(3) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

53(4) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-4
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
note: Enterprise agreements do not cover employees, employers, or organisations if another provision of this Act, an FWC order under another provision of this Act, or a court order applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(4) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Enterprise agreements do not cover employees, employers, or organisations if another provision of this Act, an FWC order under another provision of this Act, or a court order applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(5) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-5
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
note: Enterprise agreements cease to cover employees after operation ends.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(5) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits enterprise agreements from covering employees after operation ends.
premise text: (5) Despite subsections (1), (2) and (3), an enterprise agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer or employee organisation.
conclusion text: An enterprise agreement ceases to cover employees after it has ceased to operate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Enterprise agreements terminate at the time of operation cessation.
premise text: (5) Despite subsections (1), (2) and (3), an enterprise agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer or employee organisation.
conclusion text: The operation cessation of an enterprise agreement overlaps with its termination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Enterprise agreements terminate at the time of operation cessation in a recurring manner.
premise text: (5) Despite subsections (1), (2) and (3), an enterprise agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer or employee organisation.
conclusion text: The termination of an enterprise agreement is recurring at the time of operation cessation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Enterprise agreements diffuse their coverage to employees upon operation end.
premise text: (5) Despite subsections (1), (2) and (3), an enterprise agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer or employee organisation.
conclusion text: The diffusion of an enterprise agreement's coverage ends at the time of its operation cessation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
logic summary: CogAI recognises the termination of enterprise agreements upon operation end.
premise text: (5) Despite subsections (1), (2) and (3), an enterprise agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover an employee, employer or employee organisation.
conclusion text: CogAI recognises the termination of an enterprise agreement at the time of its operation cessation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(6) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-6
part of: 53 When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
note: A reference to an enterprise agreement covering an employee is a reference to the agreement covering the employee in relation to particular employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(6) When an enterprise agreement covers an employer, employee or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: A reference to an enterprise agreement covering an employee is a reference to the agreement covering the employee in relation to particular employment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-53-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 When an enterprise agreement is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54
has part: 54(1) When an enterprise agreement is in operation
has part: 54(2) When an enterprise agreement is in operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179

54(1) When an enterprise agreement is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-1
part of: 54 When an enterprise agreement is in operation
note: Enterprise agreement commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-54-ss-1-norm

54(2) When an enterprise agreement is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-2
part of: 54 When an enterprise agreement is in operation
note: Enterprise agreement ceases operation on specified days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-54-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(2) When an enterprise agreement is in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits termination of enterprise agreement
premise text: (2) An enterprise agreement ceases to operate...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
has part: 55(1) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
has part: 55(2) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
has part: 55(3) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181

55(1) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-1
part of: 55 Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
note: Cannot exclude National Employment Standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(1) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

55(2) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-2
part of: 55 Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
note: Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include certain terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-2-norm

55(3) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55-ss-3
part of: 55 Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
note: Terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement override National Employment Standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(3) Interaction between the National Employment Standards and a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Obligation to comply with terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement
premise text: National Employment Standards
conclusion text: Terms of the modern award or enterprise agreement override National Employment Standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval for compliance with terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement
premise text: National Employment Standards
conclusion text: Terms of the modern award or enterprise agreement override National Employment Standards.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-55-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <
logic summary: Prohibition on overriding terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement
premise text: National Employment Standards
conclusion text: Terms of the modern award or enterprise agreement override National Employment Standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement contravening
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56
note: Terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement that contravene section 55 have no effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.183
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-56-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-56-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits terms of a modern award or enterprise agreement that contravene section 55.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57
has part: 57(1) Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
has part: 57(2) Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184

57(1) Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-1
part of: 57 Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
note: A modern award does not apply to an employee in relation to particular employment at a time when an enterprise agreement applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57(1) Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If an enterprise agreement applies, then a modern award does not apply.
premise text: An enterprise agreement applies.
conclusion text: A modern award does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57(2) Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-2
part of: 57 Interaction between modern awards and enterprise agreements
note: Award does not apply to employer or employee organisation if modern award does not apply to employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If A, then B.
premise text: (modern award does not apply to employee) -> (award does not apply to employer or employee organisation)
conclusion text: (modern award does not apply to employee) -> (award does not apply to employer or employee organisation)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57a
has part: 57A(1) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
has part: 57A(2) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
has part: 57A(3) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184

57A(1) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57a-ss-1
part of: 57A Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
note: Enterprise agreement and modern award conditions apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(1) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Applicable obligation
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement applies to an employer; and (b) a modern award covers the employer...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Modern award includes designated outworker terms
premise text: (c) the modern award includes one or more designated outworker terms.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(2) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57a-ss-2
part of: 57A Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
note: Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(2) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continues
logic summary: Term continues in effect
premise text: (2) Despite section 57, the designated outworker terms of the modern award apply at that time.
conclusion text: The designated outworker terms continue to apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Term applies during specified time period
premise text: (2) Despite section 57, the designated outworker terms of the modern award apply at that time to the following:
conclusion text: The term applies during the specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Term implies continued application
premise text: (2) Despite section 57, the designated outworker terms of the modern award apply at that time to the following:
conclusion text: The term implies continued application.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Term propagates to employees and employer organizations
premise text: (a) the employer;
conclusion text: The term propagates to the employees and employer organizations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(3) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57a-ss-3
part of: 57A Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
note: Designated outworker terms of a modern award can apply to an employer under subsection (2) even if none of the employees of the employer is an outworker.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(3) Designated outworker terms of a modern award continue to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The designated outworker terms of a modern award apply to the employer, employee or organisation.
premise text: (a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
logic summary: The text describes a temporal interval: the extent to which designated outworker terms of a modern award apply to an employer.
premise text: (a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: applies
logic summary: The text describes an ordered or recurring trace: the interaction between one or more enterprise agreements.
premise text: Subdivision C—Interaction between one or more enterprise agreements
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies
logic summary: The text describes a diffusion of obligations: the employer, employee or organisation must comply with the designated outworker terms.
premise text: (a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
logic summary: The text describes a cognitive process: the interpretation of the designated outworker terms.
premise text: (a) and (b)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58
has part: 58(1) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
has part: 58(2) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185

58(1) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-1
part of: 58 Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
note: Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee at a particular time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(1) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(2) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-2
part of: 58 Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
note: Cannot apply later agreement until earlier one expires
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(2) Only one enterprise agreement can apply to an employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Cannot apply later agreement until earlier one expires
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval for earlier agreement's expiry date
premise text: Earlier agreement has not passed its nominal expiry date
conclusion text: Later agreement cannot apply until earlier one expires
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59
note: Employers must comply with National Employment Standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-59-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-59-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Classifies employee and employer
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61
has part: 61(1) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
has part: 61(2) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
has part: 61(3) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190

61(1) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-1
part of: 61 The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
note: Sets minimum standards for employment that cannot be displaced
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(1) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires setting of minimum standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies to employment of employees
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(2) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-2
part of: 61 The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
note: List of matters covered by the National Employment Standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(2) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

61(3) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61-ss-3
part of: 61 The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
note: Divisions 3 to 12 constitute the National Employment Standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(3) The National Employment Standards are minimum standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-61-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Division constitutes the National Employment Standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Maximum weekly hours
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62
has part: 62(1) Maximum weekly hours
has part: 62(2) Maximum weekly hours
has part: 62(3) Maximum weekly hours
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191

62(1) Maximum weekly hours
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62-ss-1
part of: 62 Maximum weekly hours
note: Maximum weekly hours
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of excessive work hours
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between work hours and maximum weekly hours
premise text: (a) for a full-time employee—38 hours; or (b) for an employee who is not a full-time employee—the lesser of:...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Employee's refusal to work unreasonable additional hours implies prohibition of excessive work hours
premise text: Employee may refuse to work unreasonable additional hours
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(2) Maximum weekly hours
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62-ss-2
part of: 62 Maximum weekly hours
note: Employee may refuse additional hours beyond reasonable limits.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to refuse additional hours
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(3) Maximum weekly hours
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62-ss-3
part of: 62 Maximum weekly hours
note: Employee health and safety, personal circumstances, workplace needs, and compensation must be considered when determining reasonable additional hours.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(3) Maximum weekly hours
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Employee health and safety, personal circumstances, workplace needs, and compensation must be considered when determining reasonable additional hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-62-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval consideration
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63
has part: 63(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
has part: 63(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192

63(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-1
part of: 63 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
note: Maximum weekly hours for full-time and non-full-time employees
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Exceeding maximum weekly hours is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-2
part of: 63 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
note: Allowing for average weekly hours exceeding the standard if reasonable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-63-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Permits exceeding standard hours under certain conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64
has part: 64(1) Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
has part: 64(2) Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193

64(1) Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64-ss-1
part of: 64 Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
note: Employer and employee may agree on averaging arrangement for award/agreement free employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-64-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-64-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(1) Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

64(2) Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64-ss-2
part of: 64 Averaging of hours of work for award/agreement free employees
note: Allowing for average weekly hours exceeding the standard hours if reasonable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Permitting averaging arrangements with excess hours
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

65 Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65
has part: 65(1) Requests for flexible working arrangements
has part: 65(1A) Requests for flexible working arrangements
has part: 65(1B) Requests for flexible working arrangements
has part: 65(2) Requests for flexible working arrangements
has part: 65(2A) Requests for flexible working arrangements
has part: 65(3) Requests for flexible working arrangements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194

65(1) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-1
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements
note: Employees may request flexible working arrangements under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to change working arrangements
premise text: Employee requests flexible working arrangement
conclusion text: Employer must consider request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Request must overlap with circumstances
premise text: Circumstances apply to employee
conclusion text: Request for change in working arrangements overlaps with circumstances
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(1A) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-1a
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements
note: Flexible working arrangements for specified circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employee must provide flexible working arrangements for specified circumstances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between circumstances and flexible working arrangements
premise text: (aa) the employee is pregnant; (a) the employee is the parent, or has responsibility for the care, of a child who is of school age or younger;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring flexible working arrangements for employees experiencing family and domestic violence
premise text: (e) the employee provides care or support to a member of the employee’s immediate family, or a member of the employee’s household, who requires care or support because the member is experiencing family and domestic violence;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of flexible working arrangements to employees with disabilities
premise text: (c) the employee has a disability;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(1B) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-1b
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements
note: Request for part-time work to care for a child
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (1B) To avoid doubt, and without limiting subsection (1)
conclusion text: An employee may request to work part-time...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Conditional commencement
premise text: (1B) To avoid doubt...
conclusion text: ...without limiting subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

65(2) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-2
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements
note: Request for flexible working arrangements requires minimum service period or regular casual employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires employee to meet certain conditions before making a request
premise text: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of continuous service or be a regular casual employee with a reasonable expectation of continuing employment
conclusion text: Request for flexible working arrangements is only allowed under these conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of continuous service or be employed on a regular casual basis during a period of at least 12 months
premise text: Employee has completed at least 12 months of continuous service or is employed on a regular casual basis during a period of at least 12 months
conclusion text: This condition applies to the request for flexible working arrangements
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Employee must meet both conditions before making a request for flexible working arrangements
premise text: Employee has completed at least 12 months of continuous service or is a regular casual employee with a reasonable expectation of continuing employment
conclusion text: This condition applies to the request for flexible working arrangements
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Employer must not allow requests for flexible working arrangements unless employee meets these conditions
premise text: Employee has completed at least 12 months of continuous service or is a regular casual employee with a reasonable expectation of continuing employment
conclusion text: Employer must not allow requests for flexible working arrangements unless employee meets these conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(2A) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-2a
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements
note: Employee's regular casual employment period is taken as continuous service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(2A) Requests for flexible working arrangements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(3) Requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-3
part of: 65 Requests for flexible working arrangements
note: Request for flexible working arrangements must be in writing and set out details of the change sought.
description: Details of the change sought and reasons for the change
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.194
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(3) Requests for flexible working arrangements
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide details in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65A Responding to requests for flexible working arrangements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65a
note: Employer must respond to employee's request for flexible working arrangements within 21 days.
description: Written response
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65B Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65b
has part: 65B(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 65B(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 65B(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 65B(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 65B(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198

65B(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65b-ss-1
part of: 65B Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: Employer must respond to employee's request for change in working arrangements within 21 days.
description: Written response
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65B(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond to employee's request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65B(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65b-ss-2
part of: 65B Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: Parties must attempt to resolve disputes at the workplace level.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65B(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must attempt to resolve disputes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65B(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65b-ss-3
part of: 65B Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: Refer dispute to FWC if discussions at workplace level do not resolve it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65B(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to refer dispute to FWC
premise text: Discussion at workplace level does not resolve dispute
conclusion text: Refer dispute to FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65B(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65b-ss-4
part of: 65B Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: FWC must deal with dispute by means other than arbitration unless exceptional circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65B(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to deal with dispute by means other than arbitration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: FWC is an agent that must deal with disputes.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65B(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65b-ss-5
part of: 65B Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: Permission for FWC to permit representation by lawyer or paid agent in a matter before the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65C Arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65c
note: FWC may deal with dispute by arbitration if employer has not responded to employee's request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-65c-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65C Arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-65c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must respond to employee's request.
premise text: Section 65A(1)
conclusion text: Section 65C(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 State and Territory laws that are not excluded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66
note: Exclusion of State and Territory laws on employee entitlements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.201
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of State and Territory laws
premise text: This Act is not intended to apply
conclusion text: to the exclusion of laws of a State or Territory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66A Division applies to casual employees etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66a
has part: 66A(1) Division applies to casual employees etc.
has part: 66A(2) Division applies to casual employees etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202

66A(1) Division applies to casual employees etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66a-ss-1
part of: 66A Division applies to casual employees etc.
note: Employer must respond to employee notification within 21 days. Division applies in relation to casual employees.
description: Written response with specified information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66A(1) Division applies to casual employees etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66A(2) Division applies to casual employees etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66a-ss-2
part of: 66A Division applies to casual employees etc.
note: Employer must respond in writing to notification Employee must notify employer of change in employment status within 6 months.
description: Response including statement of acceptance or rejection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66A(2) Division applies to casual employees etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must respond in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66K Effect of change
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66k
note: Employee is taken for purposes of Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66k-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66k-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66K Effect of change
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

66L Other rights and obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66l
has part: 66L(1) Other rights and obligations
has part: 66L(2) Other rights and obligations
has part: 66L(3) Other rights and obligations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206

66L(1) Other rights and obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66l-ss-1
part of: 66L Other rights and obligations
note: Employer cannot reduce or vary employee's hours of work, change pattern of work, or terminate employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 66L(1) Other rights and obligations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of employer's actions
premise text: (1) An employer must not do any of the following...
conclusion text: ...reduce or vary an employee’s hours of work;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66L(2) Other rights and obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66l-ss-2
part of: 66L Other rights and obligations
note: No requirement or permission to change employment status.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66L(2) Other rights and obligations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Division:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative permission
premise text: (b) permits an employer to require an employee to change to full-time employment or part-time employment under this Division;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Temporal inclusion
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Division:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66L(3) Other rights and obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66l-ss-3
part of: 66L Other rights and obligations
note: Notification and response requirements for workplace rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66L(3) Other rights and obligations
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires notification and response from employer
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, each of the following is a workplace right within the meaning of Part 3-1:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires response from employer in accordance with section 66AAC
premise text: (b) receiving a response from an employer in accordance with section 66AAC;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires being taken to be full-time or part-time employee under section 66AAD
premise text: (c) being taken to be a full-time employee or part-time employee under section 66AAD;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires receiving offer or notice in accordance with sections 66B and 66C
premise text: (d) receiving an offer or notice in accordance with sections 66B and 66C;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66l-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires accepting offer and receiving notice under section 66E
premise text: (e) accepting an offer and receiving a notice under section 66E;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66M Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66m
has part: 66M(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 66M(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 66M(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 66M(6) Disputes about the operation of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207

66M(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66m-ss-1
part of: 66M Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: Applicable to disputes between employer and employee about operation of Subdivision B.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66M(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applicableTo
logic summary: Applicable to disputes
premise text: (1) This section applies...
conclusion text: ...Resolving disputes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66M(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66m-ss-4
part of: 66M Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: Parties must attempt to resolve disputes at the workplace level through discussions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66M(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to resolve disputes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Term has no effect if it contravenes section 55
premise text: A term of a modern award or an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent it contravenes section 55
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY BE DEALT WITH
logic summary: FWC may deal with disputes
premise text: The FWC may deal with disputes that cannot be resolved at the workplace level
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66M(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66m-ss-5
part of: 66M Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: Party must refer dispute to FWC if discussions at workplace level do not resolve it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66M(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to refer dispute to FWC
premise text: Party is a party to the dispute
conclusion text: Must refer dispute to FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for when the obligation applies
premise text: The obligation applies when discussions at workplace level do not resolve the dispute
conclusion text: The temporal interval for when the obligation applies is after discussions at workplace level have failed to resolve the dispute
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal logic for when the obligation applies
premise text: The obligation applies when discussions at workplace level do not resolve the dispute
conclusion text: The temporal logic for when the obligation applies is that it must apply after discussions at workplace level have failed to resolve the dispute
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Definition of 'dispute' used in obligation
premise text: Dispute is defined as a disagreement between parties
conclusion text: The definition of 'dispute' supports the obligation
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Definition of 'party' used in obligation
premise text: Party is defined as an entity that can be a party to the dispute
conclusion text: The definition of 'party' supports the obligation
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66M(6) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66m-ss-6
part of: 66M Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: FWC must deal with dispute by means other than arbitration unless exceptional circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to deal with dispute by means other than arbitration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66m-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: FWC is an agent that must deal with disputes.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66MA Arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66ma
has part: 66MA(1) Arbitration
has part: 66MA(2) Arbitration
has part: 66MA(3) Arbitration
has part: 66MA(4) Arbitration
has part: 66MA(5) Arbitration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208

66MA(1) Arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66ma-ss-1
part of: 66MA Arbitration
note: FWC may deal with dispute by arbitration, including making orders it considers appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66MA(1) Arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May deal with dispute by arbitration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

66MA(2) Arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66ma-ss-2
part of: 66MA Arbitration
note: FWC cannot make an order under this section unless it considers fair and reasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making an order under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66MA(3) Arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66ma-ss-3
part of: 66MA Arbitration
note: FWC must not make an order inconsistent with a provision of this Act or a term of a fair work instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 66MA(3) Arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: FWC must make an order
conclusion text: FWC must not make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66MA(4) Arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66ma-ss-4
part of: 66MA Arbitration
note: Employee must be treated as full-time or part-time employee from first day of next pay period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66MA(4) Arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to treat employee as full-time or part-time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66MA(5) Arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66ma-ss-5
part of: 66MA Arbitration
note: FWC must consider substantial changes to employee terms and conditions when making an order under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66MA(5) Arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-66ma-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC must consider substantial changes to employee terms and conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

67 General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67
has part: 67(1) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
has part: 67(1A) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
has part: 67(2) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211

67(1) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-1
part of: 67 General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
note: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of continuous service to be entitled to leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67(1) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of continuous service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67(1A) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-1a
part of: 67 General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
note: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67(1A) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employee must have completed at least 12 months of employment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67(2) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67-ss-2
part of: 67 General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
note: Employee must have completed at least 12 months to be entitled to leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67(2) General rule—employee must have completed at least 12 months
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-67-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employee must have completed at least 12 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 General rule for adoption-related leave—child must be under 16
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68
note: Eligibility for adoption-related leave based on child's age and residency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: 6-month residency requirement
premise text: has not lived continuously with employee for a period of 6 months as at day of placement or expected day of placement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: and
logic summary: Child must meet both conditions to be eligible
premise text: (a) is, or will be, under 16 as at the day of placement, or the expected day of placement, of the child; and (b) has not, or will not have, lived continuously with the employee for a period of 6 months or more as at the day of placement, or the expected day of placement, of the child;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: and
logic summary: Child cannot be employee's child or spouse/partner
premise text: is not (otherwise than because of the adoption) a child of the employee or the employee’s spouse or de facto partner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-68-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Employee's eligibility for leave is tied to these conditions
premise text: An employee is not entitled to adoption-related leave unless the child that is, or is to be, placed with the employee for adoption: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69
has part: 69(1) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
has part: 69(2) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213

69(1) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-1
part of: 69 Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
note: Employee entitled to continue leave period upon transfer of employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(1) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employee has a right to continue leave period.
premise text: (1) If there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee; and the employee has already started a period of leave under this Division when the employee’s employment with the first employer ends;
conclusion text: the employee is entitled to continue on that leave for the rest of that period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Leave period overlaps with new employment.
premise text: (b) the employee has already started a period of leave under this Division when the employee’s employment with the first employer ends;
conclusion text: the employee is entitled to continue on that leave for the rest of that period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Employee situation recurrent upon transfer of employment.
premise text: (a) there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee;
conclusion text: the employee’s employment with the first employer ends;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Leave period diffuses into new employment.
premise text: (b) the employee has already started a period of leave under this Division when the employee’s employment with the first employer ends;
conclusion text: the employee is entitled to continue on that leave for the rest of that period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Employee situation recognized upon transfer of employment.
premise text: (a) there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee;
conclusion text: the employee’s employment with the first employer ends;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(2) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69-ss-2
part of: 69 Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
note: Employee's step in relation to first employer is transferred to second employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.213
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(2) Transfer of employment situations in which employee is entitled
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: →
logic summary: If A, then B.
premise text: (a) there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee;
conclusion text: the employee is taken to have taken the step in relation to the second employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: A ⊆ B.
premise text: (b) the employee has, in relation to the first employer, already taken a step that is required or permitted by a provision of this Division in relation to taking a period of leave;
conclusion text: the employee's step in relation to the first employer is transferred to the second employer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ⊕
logic summary: A ⊕ B.
premise text: (a) there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee;
conclusion text: the employee's step in relation to the first employer is not transferred to the second employer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊕
logic summary: A ⊕ B.
premise text: (b) the employee has, in relation to the first employer, already taken a step that is required or permitted by a provision of this Division in relation to taking a period of leave;
conclusion text: the employee's step in relation to the first employer is not transferred to the second employer.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-69-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊕
logic summary: A ⊕ B.
premise text: (a) there is a transfer of employment in relation to an employee;
conclusion text: the employee's step in relation to the first employer is not transferred to the second employer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

70 Entitlement to unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70
note: Entitlement to unpaid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-70-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-70-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 The period of leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71
has part: 71(1) The period of leave
has part: 71(2) The period of leave
has part: 71(3) The period of leave
has part: 71(4) The period of leave
has part: 71(5) The period of leave
has part: 71(6) The period of leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214

71(1) The period of leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-1
part of: 71 The period of leave
note: Employee must take leave in single continuous period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(1) The period of leave
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(2) The period of leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-2
part of: 71 The period of leave
note: Employee must take leave in a single continuous period.
references: subsection 72A(11)
references: subsection 73(4)
references: paragraph 78A(2)(b)
references: subsection 79A(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(2) The period of leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employee must take leave in a single continuous period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

71(3) The period of leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-3
part of: 71 The period of leave
note: Employee is entitled to leave for birth-related purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(3) The period of leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to take leave for birth-related purposes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(4) The period of leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-4
part of: 71 The period of leave
note: The period of leave must start and end during the 24-month period starting on the date of birth of the child.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(4) The period of leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The period of leave must start and end during the 24-month period starting on the date of birth of the child.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(5) The period of leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-5
part of: 71 The period of leave
note: The period of leave must start and end during the 24-month period starting on the day of placement of the child.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(5) The period of leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The period of leave must start and end during the 24-month period starting on the day of placement of the child.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(6) The period of leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-6
part of: 71 The period of leave
note: Employee may take unpaid parental leave under this section if the period of leave is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to take unpaid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: The leave period must be within a certain time frame
premise text: (6) The employee may take unpaid parental leave under this section only if...
conclusion text: ...the period of leave is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The leave can be taken repeatedly
premise text: (6) The employee may take unpaid parental leave under this section only if...
conclusion text: ...the period of leave is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: The permission can be propagated to others
premise text: (6) The employee may take unpaid parental leave under this section only if...
conclusion text: ...the period of leave is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-71-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: The system can infer the conditions for the permission
premise text: (6) The employee may take unpaid parental leave under this section only if...
conclusion text: ...the period of leave is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72a
has part: 72A(1) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(2) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(2A) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(2B) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(2C) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(3) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(4) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(5) Flexible unpaid parental leave
has part: 72A(6) Flexible unpaid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216

72A(1) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72a-ss-1
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave
note: Employee has an obligation to take up to 100 days of flexible unpaid parental leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A(2) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72a-ss-2
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave
note: Flexible unpaid parental leave is available to employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72A(2) Flexible unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employer must provide flexible unpaid parental leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A(2A) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72a-ss-2a
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave
note: Employee must take flexible unpaid parental leave before expected birth date if requirements are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72A(2A) Flexible unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employee must take leave
premise text: Section 72A(2A)
conclusion text: Flexible unpaid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A(2B) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72a-ss-2b
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave
note: Flexible unpaid parental leave available to pregnant part-time and casual employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2b-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 72A(2B) Flexible unpaid parental leave
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Employee has right to flexible unpaid parental leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A(2C) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72a-ss-2c
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave
note: Reduction of flexible unpaid parental leave entitlement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2c-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-2c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72A(2C) Flexible unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

72A(3) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72a-ss-3
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave
note: Employee must take flexible unpaid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take flexible unpaid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A(4) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72a-ss-4
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave
note: Flexible unpaid parental leave may be taken regardless of prior leave under another provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits flexible unpaid parental leave regardless of prior leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A(5) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72a-ss-5
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave
note: Employee must take flexible unpaid parental leave after exceeding a certain period of unpaid parental leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take flexible unpaid parental leave
premise text: Employee has taken one or more periods of unpaid parental leave under another provision.
conclusion text: Employee must take flexible unpaid parental leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Time period for flexible unpaid parental leave
premise text: The total of those periods (disregarding any extension under section 76A) is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
conclusion text: The time period for flexible unpaid parental leave is between 12 months and the employee’s notional flexible period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Time period for flexible unpaid parental leave
premise text: The total of those periods (disregarding any extension under section 76A) is no longer than 12 months, less the employee’s notional flexible period.
conclusion text: The time period for flexible unpaid parental leave is between 12 months and the employee’s notional flexible period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Employee’s notional flexible period
premise text: Less the employee’s notional flexible period.
conclusion text: The employee’s notional flexible period is a type of leave that must be taken into account.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Employee’s notional flexible period
premise text: Less the employee’s notional flexible period.
conclusion text: The employee’s notional flexible period is a type of leave that must be taken into account.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A(6) Flexible unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72a-ss-6
part of: 72A Flexible unpaid parental leave
note: Employee's notional flexible period is the period during which the employee would be on flexible unpaid parental leave if the employee took leave for all the employee's flexible days in a single continuous period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.216
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-6-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-72a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72A(6) Flexible unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

73 Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73
has part: 73(1) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
has part: 73(2) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218

73(1) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-1
part of: 73 Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
note: Employer may ask employee to provide medical certificate
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(1) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Employer obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(2) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73-ss-2
part of: 73 Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
note: Employer may require employee to take unpaid parental leave if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(2) Pregnant employee may be required to take unpaid parental
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Employer is prohibited from requiring employee to take unpaid parental leave without proper certification.
premise text: Employee does not give employer requested certificate within 7 days
conclusion text: Employer may require employee to take unpaid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The provision requires an employee to take unpaid parental leave if certain conditions are met.
premise text: Employee has not complied with notice and evidence requirements of section 74 for taking unpaid parental leave
conclusion text: The provision applies to employees who have not complied with notice and evidence requirements of section 74
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Employer is permitted to require employee to take unpaid parental leave if certain conditions are met.
premise text: Employee gives employer medical certificate stating fit for work but not advisable to continue in present position
conclusion text: The provision applies to employees who give employer medical certificate stating fit for work but not advisable to continue in present position
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-73-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Employer is prohibited from requiring employee to take unpaid parental leave if certain conditions are met.
premise text: Employee gives employer medical certificate stating fit for work but not advisable to continue in present position and has complied with notice and evidence requirements of section 74
conclusion text: The provision does not apply to employees who give employer medical certificate stating fit for work but not advisable to continue in present position and have complied with notice and evidence requirements of section 74
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74
has part: 74(1) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(2) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(2A) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(3) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(3C) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(3D) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 74(4) Notice and evidence requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220

74(1) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-1
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Employee must provide written notice to employer before taking unpaid parental leave.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(1) Notice and evidence requirements
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(2) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-2
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Employee must provide notice to employer at least 10 weeks before starting leave.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employee must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(2A) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-2a
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Employer's agreement allows for notice to be given at a later time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted by employer
premise text: Employer agrees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(3) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-3
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Notice must specify start and end dates of leave under section 71.
description: Notice specifying start and end dates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(3) Notice and evidence requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(3C) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-3c
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Employee must specify total number of flexible unpaid parental leave days in notice.
description: Notice must specify total number of flexible unpaid parental leave days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(3C) Notice and evidence requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice with specified leave days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(3D) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-3d
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Employee may reduce or increase flexible days under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3d-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3d-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3d-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(3D) Notice and evidence requirements
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-3d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to modify flexible days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(4) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-4
part of: 74 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Employee must provide notice of leave under section 71
description: Notice and evidence requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employee must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75
has part: 75(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
has part: 75(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223

75(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75-ss-1
part of: 75 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
note: Employee must give notice of taking unpaid parental leave
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75-ss-2
part of: 75 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
note: Employee's available parental leave period is 12 months, less certain periods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending to use
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: less than or equal to
logic summary: Restricts parental leave period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76
has part: 76(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
has part: 76(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
has part: 76(7) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224

76(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-1
part of: 76 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
note: Request for extension of unpaid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(1) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

76(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-2
part of: 76 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
note: Employer must receive written request for extension of unpaid parental leave at least 4 weeks before the end of the available period.
description: Written request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(2) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must comply with written request
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(7) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-7
part of: 76 Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
note: Employee cannot extend unpaid parental leave beyond 24 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(7) Extending period of unpaid parental leave—extending for up to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits extending unpaid parental leave beyond 24 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76A Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a
has part: 76A(1) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76A(2) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76A(3) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225

76A(1) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a-ss-1
part of: 76A Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
note: Employer must respond to employee's request for extension of unpaid parental leave within 21 days.
description: Written response
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76A(1) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond within 21 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76A(2) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a-ss-2
part of: 76A Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
note: Employer must respond to request for extension of unpaid parental leave with specified information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76A(2) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond with specified information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76A(3) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76a-ss-3
part of: 76A Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
note: Employer must discuss request with employee before refusing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76A(3) Responding to requests for extension of unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to discuss request with employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b
has part: 76B(1) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76B(2) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76B(3) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76B(4) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
has part: 76B(5) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228

76B(1) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b-ss-1
part of: 76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
note: Employer must respond to employee's request for extension of unpaid parental leave within 21 days.
description: Written response
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76B(1) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond within 21 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76B(2) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b-ss-2
part of: 76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
note: Parties must attempt to resolve disputes at the workplace level.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must attempt to resolve disputes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76B(3) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b-ss-3
part of: 76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
note: Party must refer dispute to FWC if discussions at workplace level do not resolve it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76B(3) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to refer dispute to FWC
premise text: Party is a party to the dispute
conclusion text: Must refer dispute to FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for referring dispute to FWC
premise text: Party must refer dispute to FWC within a certain timeframe
conclusion text: Dispute is contained within the temporal interval for referring it to FWC
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Referral to FWC implies resolution of dispute
premise text: Party refers dispute to FWC
conclusion text: Dispute is resolved
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76B(4) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b-ss-4
part of: 76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
note: FWC must deal with dispute by means other than arbitration unless exceptional circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76B(4) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to deal with dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: FWC is a legal person
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76B(5) Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76b-ss-5
part of: 76B Disputes about extension of period of unpaid parental leave
note: Permission for FWC to permit representation by lawyer or paid agent in a matter before the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

76C Arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76c
note: Employer must respond to employee's request under section 76A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.229
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-76c-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76C Arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-76c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must respond to employee's request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Reducing period of unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77
note: Employee may reduce period of unpaid parental leave with employer's agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Employer agrees
conclusion text: Employee may reduce leave period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77a
has part: 77A(1) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
has part: 77A(2) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
has part: 77A(3) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
has part: 77A(4) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231

77A(1) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77a-ss-1
part of: 77A Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
note: Employee entitled to unpaid parental leave despite stillbirth of child.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77A(1) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Entails
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to receive unpaid parental leave.
premise text: (1) If a child is stillborn; and (b) an employee would have been entitled to unpaid parental leave that is birth-related leave, if the child had been born alive;
conclusion text: then the employee is taken to be entitled to the unpaid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OverlapsWith
logic summary: Stillbirth does not interrupt the start of unpaid parental leave.
premise text: (1) If a child is stillborn; and (b) an employee would have been entitled to unpaid parental leave that is birth-related leave, if the child had been born alive;
conclusion text: then the employee is taken to be entitled to the unpaid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RepeatsEvery
logic summary: Stillbirth does not interrupt the repetition of unpaid parental leave.
premise text: (1) If a child is stillborn; and (b) an employee would have been entitled to unpaid parental leave that is birth-related leave, if the child had been born alive;
conclusion text: then the employee is taken to be entitled to the unpaid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffusesInto
logic summary: Stillbirth does not diffuse into other employees' unpaid parental leave entitlements.
premise text: (1) If a child is stillborn; and (b) an employee would have been entitled to unpaid parental leave that is birth-related leave, if the child had been born alive;
conclusion text: then the employee is taken to be entitled to the unpaid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Stillbirth recognized as a factor in determining unpaid parental leave entitlement.
premise text: (1) If a child is stillborn; and (b) an employee would have been entitled to unpaid parental leave that is birth-related leave, if the child had been born alive;
conclusion text: then the employee is taken to be entitled to the unpaid parental leave
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

77A(2) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77a-ss-2
part of: 77A Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
note: Stillborn child definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77A(2) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Stillborn child definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Stillborn child has gestation period >= 20 weeks
conclusion text: ...then it is a stillborn child
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A(3) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77a-ss-3
part of: 77A Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
note: Employee must provide notice after stillbirth or death of child
description: Notice in accordance with section 74
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77A(3) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A(4) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77a-ss-4
part of: 77A Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
note: Employee must provide unpaid parental leave if child dies within 24 months of birth.
description: unpaid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77A(4) Effect of stillbirth or death of child on unpaid parental leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-77a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide unpaid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78
has part: 78(1) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
has part: 78(2) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
has part: 78(3) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
has part: 78(4) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232

78(1) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
note: Employee must provide care for child after parental leave ends
description: Responsibility for care of child
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(1) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory duty
conclusion text: Employee must provide care for child after parental leave ends
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval for parental leave and care responsibility overlap
premise text: (1) This section applies to an employee who has taken unpaid parental leave in relation to a child if the employee ceases to have any responsibility for the care of the child for a reason other than because the child:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Parental leave and care responsibility repeat over time
premise text: (a) is stillborn; or (b) dies during the 24-month period starting on the child’s date of birth
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Parental leave affects care responsibility diffusion
premise text: (1) This section applies to an employee who has taken unpaid parental leave in relation to a child if the employee ceases to have any responsibility for the care of the child for a reason other than because the child:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Automated recognition of parental leave and care responsibility
premise text: (1) This section applies to an employee who has taken unpaid parental leave in relation to a child if the employee ceases to have any responsibility for the care of the child for a reason other than because the child:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

78(2) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
note: Employer must give employee written notice requiring return to work on a specified day.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(2) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(3) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-3
part of: 78 Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
note: Employee must provide at least 4 weeks' notice before ceasing responsibility for child care.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(3) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(4) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-4
part of: 78 Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
note: Employee's entitlement ends immediately before specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(4) Employee who ceases to have responsibility for care of child
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ends
logic summary: Obligation ends
premise text: (4) The employee’s entitlement to unpaid parental leave...
conclusion text: The employee's entitlement ends immediately before the specified day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78A Hospitalised children
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78a
has part: 78A(1) Hospitalised children
has part: 78A(2) Hospitalised children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233

78A(1) Hospitalised children
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78a-ss-1
part of: 78A Hospitalised children
note: Employee may agree to work during a child's hospitalization in exchange for parental leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78A(1) Hospitalised children
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Employee obligation to work during child's hospitalization.
premise text: Section 74 of the taking of a period of unpaid parental leave.
conclusion text: Employee agreement to work during child's hospitalization.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employee work and child's hospitalization.
premise text: Section 78A(1) of the Act.
conclusion text: Employee work during child's hospitalization.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Rationale for employee agreement to work during child's hospitalization.
premise text: Section 74 of the taking of a period of unpaid parental leave.
conclusion text: Employee justification for working during child's hospitalization.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Spread of information about employee agreement to work during child's hospitalization.
premise text: Section 78A(1) of the Act.
conclusion text: Employee agreement propagates through the organization.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analysis
logic summary: Artificial intelligence analysis of employee agreement to work during child's hospitalization.
premise text: Section 78A(1) of the Act.
conclusion text: Employee agreement analyzed by AI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

78A(2) Hospitalised children
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78a-ss-2
part of: 78A Hospitalised children
note: Employee and employer agreement on rules for unpaid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Agreement
logic summary: Employer and employee agreement on rules
premise text: The employee and employer so agree
conclusion text: The rules have effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-78a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between rules and leave
premise text: If the employee and employer so agree
conclusion text: The rules have effect
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Interaction with paid leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79
has part: 79(1) Interaction with paid leave
has part: 79(2) Interaction with paid leave
has part: 79(3) Interaction with paid leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235

79(1) Interaction with paid leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79-ss-1
part of: 79 Interaction with paid leave
note: Employee may take other paid leave while on unpaid parental leave without breaking continuity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to take other paid leave
premise text: Employee may take other paid leave
conclusion text: No break in continuity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Subdivision does not prevent taking other paid leave
premise text: This Subdivision (except for subsections (2) and (3))
conclusion text: Employee may take other paid leave
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Taking other paid leave overlaps with unpaid parental leave
premise text: If the employee does so
conclusion text: No break in continuity
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(2) Interaction with paid leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79-ss-2
part of: 79 Interaction with paid leave
note: Prohibition on taking paid personal/carers leave while on unpaid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits taking paid personal/carers leave while on unpaid parental leave
premise text: Employee is taking unpaid parental leave
conclusion text: Cannot take paid personal/carers leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between unpaid parental leave and compassionate leave
premise text: Unpaid parental leave ends before compassionate leave begins
conclusion text: Compassionate leave must occur after unpaid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Defines temporal relationship between paid personal/carers leave and unpaid parental leave
premise text: Paid personal/carers leave cannot occur during unpaid parental leave
conclusion text: Paid personal/carers leave must occur before or after unpaid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
logic summary: Defines conditions for compassionate leave
premise text: Permissible occasion is the stillbirth or death of the child
conclusion text: Compassionate leave is permitted on this occasion
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
logic summary: Classifies compassionate leave as a type of leave
premise text: Compassionate leave is a type of leave
conclusion text: Compassionate leave is permitted on certain occasions
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(3) Interaction with paid leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79-ss-3
part of: 79 Interaction with paid leave
note: No payment under Division 8 for activities during unpaid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits payment under Division 8 for activities during unpaid parental leave
premise text: (3) An employee is not entitled to any payment...
conclusion text: ...in relation to activities the employee engages in while taking unpaid parental leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between paid and unpaid leave
premise text: (3) An employee is not entitled...
conclusion text: ...in relation to activities the employee engages in while taking unpaid parental leave.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Describes recurring relationship between paid and unpaid leave
premise text: (3) An employee is not entitled...
conclusion text: ...in relation to activities the employee engages in while taking unpaid parental leave.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes spreading of obligation to pay under Division 8
premise text: (3) An employee is not entitled...
conclusion text: ...in relation to activities the employee engages in while taking unpaid parental leave.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Describes recognition of obligation to pay under Division 8
premise text: (3) An employee is not entitled...
conclusion text: ...in relation to activities the employee engages in while taking unpaid parental leave.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79A Keeping in touch days
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79a
has part: 79A(1) Keeping in touch days
has part: 79A(2) Keeping in touch days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235

79A(1) Keeping in touch days
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79a-ss-1
part of: 79A Keeping in touch days
note: An employee can perform work for their employer on a keeping in touch day while taking unpaid parental leave without breaking the continuity of the leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Allows performance of work on a keeping in touch day
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79A(2) Keeping in touch days
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79a-ss-2
part of: 79A Keeping in touch days
note: Employee must keep in touch with employment during leave period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79A(2) Keeping in touch days
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep in touch with employment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79B Unpaid parental leave not extended by paid leave or keeping in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79b
note: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day does not extend unpaid parental leave period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-diffusion-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day, then unpaid parental leave period is not extended.
premise text: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day.
conclusion text: Unpaid parental leave period is not extended.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: If taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day, then the unpaid parental leave period is not extended.
premise text: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day.
conclusion text: The unpaid parental leave period is not extended.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The taking of paid leave and the performance of work on a keeping in touch day overlap with the unpaid parental leave period.
premise text: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day.
conclusion text: The unpaid parental leave period overlaps with these activities.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The taking of paid leave and the performance of work on a keeping in touch day repeat within the unpaid parental leave period.
premise text: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day.
conclusion text: These activities repeat within the unpaid parental leave period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-79b-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The taking of paid leave and the performance of work on a keeping in touch day diffuse into the unpaid parental leave period.
premise text: Taking paid leave or performing work on a keeping in touch day.
conclusion text: These activities diffuse into the unpaid parental leave period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Unpaid special parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80
has part: 80(1) Unpaid special parental leave
has part: 80(2) Unpaid special parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237

80(1) Unpaid special parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80-ss-1
part of: 80 Unpaid special parental leave
note: Entitlement to unpaid special parental leave under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Entails
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to take unpaid special parental leave.
premise text: Section 80(1)
conclusion text: Employee must provide notice and evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The section overlaps with section 67 regarding service length.
premise text: Note 1
conclusion text: Section 80(1) and section 67 overlap.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(2) Unpaid special parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80-ss-2
part of: 80 Unpaid special parental leave
note: Employee must give notice of taking unpaid special parental leave.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(2) Unpaid special parental leave
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81
has part: 81(1) Transfer to a safe job
has part: 81(2) Transfer to a safe job
has part: 81(3) Transfer to a safe job
has part: 81(4) Transfer to a safe job
has part: 81(5) Transfer to a safe job
has part: 81(6) Transfer to a safe job
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238

81(1) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-1
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job
note: Employer must provide a safe job for pregnant employees.
description: evidence that the employee is fit for work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(1) Transfer to a safe job
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to provide a safe job.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(2) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-2
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job
note: Must transfer employee to safe job if available.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to transfer employee to safe job.
premise text: If there is an appropriate safe job available, then...
conclusion text: ...the employer must transfer the employee to that job for the risk period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(3) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-3
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job
note: Employee must agree on safe job hours
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(3) Transfer to a safe job
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

81(4) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-4
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job
note: Pay employee for safe job at full rate of pay
description: Payment for safe job
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must pay employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(5) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-5
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job
note: Risk period ends when pregnancy ends.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(5) Transfer to a safe job
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: End of risk period equals end of pregnancy.
premise text: (5) If the employee’s pregnancy ends before the end of the risk period,
conclusion text: the risk period ends when the pregnancy ends.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Risk period and pregnancy have a temporal relation.
premise text: (5) If the employee’s pregnancy ends before the end of the risk period,
conclusion text: the risk period ends when the pregnancy ends.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Risk period and pregnancy have a temporal relation.
premise text: (5) If the employee’s pregnancy ends before the end of the risk period,
conclusion text: the risk period ends when the pregnancy ends.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Risk period and pregnancy have a temporal relation.
premise text: (5) If the employee’s pregnancy ends before the end of the risk period,
conclusion text: the risk period ends when the pregnancy ends.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Risk period and pregnancy have a temporal relation.
premise text: (5) If the employee’s pregnancy ends before the end of the risk period,
conclusion text: the risk period ends when the pregnancy ends.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(6) Transfer to a safe job
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81-ss-6
part of: 81 Transfer to a safe job
note: Employer may require medical certificate as evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-6-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(6) Transfer to a safe job
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

81A Paid no safe job leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a
has part: 81A(1) Paid no safe job leave
has part: 81A(2) Paid no safe job leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.239

81A(1) Paid no safe job leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a-ss-1
part of: 81A Paid no safe job leave
note: Employee entitled to paid no safe job leave under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.239
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81A(1) Paid no safe job leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: entails
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to take paid no safe job leave.
premise text: (1) If: ...; then the employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave for the risk period.
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Taking unpaid parental leave implies compliance with notice and evidence requirements.
premise text: (a) section 81 applies to a pregnant employee but there is no appropriate safe job available; (b) the employee is entitled to unpaid parental leave; (c) the employee has complied with the notice and evidence requirements of section 74 for taking unpaid parental leave;
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Paid no safe job leave occurs during the risk period.
premise text: (1) If: ...; then the employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave for the risk period.
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Paid no safe job leave applies everywhere.
premise text: (1) If: ...; then the employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave for the risk period.
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Paid no safe job leave diffuses to all employees.
premise text: (1) If: ...; then the employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave for the risk period.
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to paid no safe job leave.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81A(2) Paid no safe job leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81a-ss-2
part of: 81A Paid no safe job leave
note: Employer must pay employee at base rate for ordinary hours worked during risk period.
description: Payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.239
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-81a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82
has part: 82(1) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
has part: 82(2) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
has part: 82(3) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
has part: 82(4) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240

82(1) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-1
part of: 82 Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
note: Employer may ask employee to provide medical certificate stating fitness for work.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Employer may ask employee to provide medical certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(2) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-2
part of: 82 Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
note: Employee must provide certificate within 7 days or face unpaid leave
description: Certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits employee from taking unpaid leave without providing certificate
premise text: Employee must provide certificate within 7 days
conclusion text: Employer may require employee to take unpaid leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(3) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-3
part of: 82 Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
note: Employee's entitlement ends when leave period starts
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits employee from continuing paid no safe job leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(4) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82-ss-4
part of: 82 Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
note: Employee must provide information during paid no safe job leave.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(4) Employee on paid no safe job leave may be asked to provide a
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82A Unpaid no safe job leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82a
has part: 82A(1) Unpaid no safe job leave
has part: 82A(2) Unpaid no safe job leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240

82A(1) Unpaid no safe job leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82a-ss-1
part of: 82A Unpaid no safe job leave
note: Employee entitled to unpaid no safe job leave if required by employer and evidence of pregnancy provided.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: entails
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to provide evidence of pregnancy.
conclusion text: Employee is entitled to unpaid no safe job leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82A(2) Unpaid no safe job leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82a-ss-2
part of: 82A Unpaid no safe job leave
note: Employer may require medical certificate as evidence for unpaid no safe job leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82A(2) Unpaid no safe job leave
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-82a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Employer obligation to provide medical certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Consultation with employee on unpaid parental leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83
note: Employer must inform employee about significant effects on pre-parental leave position.
description: Information and opportunity to discuss
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-83-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-83-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-83-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Return to work guarantee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84
note: Employee entitled to return to pre-parental leave position or nearest available qualified position.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-dialectical-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-diffusion-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Employee has obligation to return to pre-parental leave position.
premise text: Employee is entitled to return to work.
conclusion text: Employee must return to pre-parental leave position.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval of pre-parental leave period overlaps with temporal interval of employee's return to work.
premise text: Employee is entitled to return to work.
conclusion text: Temporal interval of pre-parental leave period overlaps with temporal interval of employee's return to work.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holds
logic summary: Employee holds property of being nearest available qualified position.
premise text: Employee is entitled to return to work.
conclusion text: Employee holds property of being nearest available qualified position.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-dialectical-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Dialectical
operator: implies
logic summary: Return to pre-parental leave position implies employee's obligation to return to work.
premise text: Employee is entitled to return to work.
conclusion text: Return to pre-parental leave position implies employee's obligation to return to work.
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: State diffuses property of being nearest available qualified position to employee.
premise text: Employee is entitled to return to work.
conclusion text: State diffuses property of being nearest available qualified position to employee.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84A Replacement employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84a
note: Employer must notify replacement employee of temporary engagement.
description: Notification of temporary engagement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-84a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-84a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to notify replacement employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85
has part: 85(1) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(2) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(3) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(4) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(5) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(6) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
has part: 85(7) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242

85(1) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-1
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave
note: Employee entitled to up to 2 days of unpaid pre-adoption leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(1) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Employee has a right.
premise text: Entitlement is also affected by section 68 (which deals with the age etc. of the adopted child).
conclusion text: The employee has a right to unpaid pre-adoption leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Employee has an obligation.
premise text: (1) An employee is entitled to up to 2 days of unpaid pre-adoption leave to attend any interviews or examinations required in order to obtain approval for the employee’s adoption of a child.
conclusion text: The employee has an obligation to take unpaid pre-adoption leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Leave can occur during certain times.
premise text: (1) An employee is entitled to up to 2 days of unpaid pre-adoption leave to attend any interviews or examinations required in order to obtain approval for the employee’s adoption of a child.
conclusion text: The leave can occur during certain times.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Leave can occur during certain times.
premise text: (1) An employee is entitled to up to 2 days of unpaid pre-adoption leave to attend any interviews or examinations required in order to obtain approval for the employee’s adoption of a child.
conclusion text: The leave can occur during certain times.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Employee has permission.
premise text: (1) An employee is entitled to up to 2 days of unpaid pre-adoption leave to attend any interviews or examinations required in order to obtain approval for the employee’s adoption of a child.
conclusion text: The employee has permission to take unpaid pre-adoption leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(2) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-2
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave
note: Employee not entitled to unpaid pre-adoption leave if employer directs to take other form of leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(2) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to unpaid pre-adoption leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(3) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-3
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave
note: Employee can take unpaid pre-adoption leave in separate periods agreed upon by employee and employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(3) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Employee's right to take leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(4) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-4
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave
note: Employee must provide notice to employer before taking unpaid pre-adoption leave.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(4) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(5) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-5
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave
note: Employer must be advised of leave period upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(5) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must be advised of leave period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(6) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-6
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave
note: Employee must provide evidence of leave reason to employer.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(6) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES
logic summary: Employer's request for evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(7) Unpaid pre-adoption leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-7
part of: 85 Unpaid pre-adoption leave
note: Employee cannot take unpaid pre-adoption leave without complying with subsections (4) to (6).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-85-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits taking unpaid pre-adoption leave without compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Division applies to employees other than casual employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86
note: Division applies to employees other than casual employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-86-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-86-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-86-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86 Division applies to employees other than casual employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Division applies to employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87
has part: 87(1) Entitlement to annual leave
has part: 87(2) Entitlement to annual leave
has part: 87(3) Entitlement to annual leave
has part: 87(4) Entitlement to annual leave
has part: 87(5) Entitlement to annual leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244

87(1) Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-1
part of: 87 Entitlement to annual leave
note: Employee entitlement to annual leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(1) Entitlement to annual leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Entitlement exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(2) Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-2
part of: 87 Entitlement to annual leave
note: Employee entitlement to paid annual leave accrues progressively during a year of service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(2) Entitlement to annual leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to accrue paid annual leave.
premise text: The employee's employment ends during what would otherwise have been a year of service.
conclusion text: The employee accrues paid annual leave up to when the employment ends.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Paid annual leave accrues progressively during a year of service.
premise text: The employee's ordinary hours of work, and accumulates from year to year.
conclusion text: The paid annual leave accrues during the year of service.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: every
logic summary: Paid annual leave accumulates from year to year.
premise text: The employee's ordinary hours of work, and accumulates from year to year.
conclusion text: Every year, the paid annual leave accumulates.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: has
logic summary: The Fair Work Act 2009 defines the entitlement to paid annual leave.
premise text: The National Employment Standards Chapter 2 The National Employment Standards Part 2-2 Annual leave Division 6 Section 88 Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: The Fair Work Act 2009 has defined the entitlement to paid annual leave.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: has
logic summary: The employee's employment ends during what would otherwise have been a year of service.
premise text: If an employee’s employment ends during what would otherwise have been a year of service, the employee accrues paid annual leave up to when the employment ends.
conclusion text: The employee's employment ending during a year of service affects their accrued paid annual leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(3) Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-3
part of: 87 Entitlement to annual leave
note: Employee qualifies for shiftworker annual leave entitlement if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(3) Entitlement to annual leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has obligation to take annual leave
premise text: Employed in enterprise with continuously rostered shifts
conclusion text: Qualifies for shiftworker annual leave entitlement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Employee is a shiftworker if meets conditions
premise text: Prescribed by regulations as shiftworkers
conclusion text: Class of employees prescribed by regulations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(4) Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-4
part of: 87 Entitlement to annual leave
note: Employee does not qualify for shiftworker annual leave entitlement if in a prescribed class.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(4) Entitlement to annual leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Prescribed class definition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(5) Entitlement to annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-5
part of: 87 Entitlement to annual leave
note: Describes a class for annual leave entitlement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.244
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-5-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-87-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87(5) Entitlement to annual leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

88 Taking paid annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88
has part: 88(1) Taking paid annual leave
has part: 88(2) Taking paid annual leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245

88(1) Taking paid annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-1
part of: 88 Taking paid annual leave
note: Employee may take paid annual leave for a period agreed upon with the employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to take paid annual leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88(2) Taking paid annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88-ss-2
part of: 88 Taking paid annual leave
note: Employer must agree to employee's request for paid annual leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88(2) Taking paid annual leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-88-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Employer has a duty to agree
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89
has part: 89(1) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
has part: 89(2) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246

89(1) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-1
part of: 89 Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
note: Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave on public holidays
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(1) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of public holiday days from paid annual leave
premise text: (1) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a day or part-day that is a public holiday in the place where the employee is based for work purposes, the employee is taken not to be on paid annual leave on that public holiday.
conclusion text: (2) Other periods of leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relationship between public holidays and paid annual leave
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(2) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-2
part of: 89 Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
note: Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave during other leave or absence periods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(2) Employee not taken to be on paid annual leave at certain times
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of paid annual leave during other leave or absence periods.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...
conclusion text: (employee is taken not to be on paid annual leave for the period of that other leave or absence).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relationship between employee and paid annual leave.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...
conclusion text: (employee is not on paid annual leave for that period).
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Overlap between employee's paid annual leave and other leave or absence periods.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...
conclusion text: (paid annual leave and that other leave or absence period overlap).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursDuring
logic summary: Temporal relationship between employee's paid annual leave and other leave or absence periods.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...
conclusion text: (paid annual leave occurs during that other leave or absence period).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
logic summary: Diffusion relationship between employee's paid annual leave and other leave or absence periods.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...
conclusion text: (paid annual leave diffuses into that other leave or absence period).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-89-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: isRelatedTo
logic summary: Relationship between employee's paid annual leave and other leave or absence periods.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid annual leave includes a period of any other leave (other than unpaid parental leave) under this Part, or a period of absence from employment under Division 8...
conclusion text: (paid annual leave is related to that other leave or absence period).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Payment for annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90
has part: 90(1) Payment for annual leave
has part: 90(2) Payment for annual leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246

90(1) Payment for annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90-ss-1
part of: 90 Payment for annual leave
note: Employer must pay employee at base rate for ordinary hours of work during paid annual leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(2) Payment for annual leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90-ss-2
part of: 90 Payment for annual leave
note: Employer must pay employee for untaken annual leave
description: Payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must pay employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91
has part: 91(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
has part: 91(2) Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246

91(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91-ss-1
part of: 91 Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
note: Employee is not entitled to payment for untaken annual leave if service with first employer counts as service with second employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the second employer decides not to recognize the employee's service, then the employee is not entitled to payment.
premise text: Second employer decides not to recognize employee's service.
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to payment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: The employee's entitlement to payment depends on the second employer's recognition of their service.
premise text: Second employer's recognition of employee's service is necessary for payment.
conclusion text: Employee's entitlement to payment is conditional on recognition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the second employer recognizes the employee's service, then the employee is entitled to payment.
premise text: Second employer recognizes employee's service.
conclusion text: Employee is entitled to payment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: The provision applies to transfers of employment between non-associated entities.
premise text: This provision applies to transfers of employment.
conclusion text: It applies to non-associated entities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: The provision is part of the National Employment Standards.
premise text: This provision is in the National Employment Standards.
conclusion text: It is a part of the Standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

91(2) Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91-ss-2
part of: 91 Transfer of employment situations that affect entitlement to
note: Employee is not entitled to be paid for untaken paid annual leave if subsection 22(5) applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits payment for untaken paid annual leave.
premise text: Subsection 22(5) applies.
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to be paid.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with transfer of employment.
premise text: Subsection 22(5) provides that service with the first employer counts as service with the second employer.
conclusion text: Transfer of employment in relation to an employee.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-91-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of transfer of employment.
premise text: Subsection 22(5) applies.
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to be paid.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Paid annual leave must not be cashed out except in accordance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92
note: Paid annual leave cannot be cashed out except in accordance with permitted terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-92-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-92-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-92-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 92 Paid annual leave must not be cashed out except in accordance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-92-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits cashing out paid annual leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93
has part: 93(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
has part: 93(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247

93(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-1
part of: 93 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
note: Employer may include terms for cashing out paid annual leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Employer obligation to include terms
premise text: Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
conclusion text: Employer must provide terms for cashing out paid annual leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Employer obligation implies provision for cashing out paid annual leave
premise text: A modern award or enterprise agreement may include terms providing for the cashing out of paid annual leave by an employee.
conclusion text: If a modern award or enterprise agreement includes terms, then it implies that the employer must provide for the cashing out of paid annual leave.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Cashing out paid annual leave during employment
premise text: A modern award or enterprise agreement may include terms providing for the cashing out of paid annual leave by an employee.
conclusion text: The cashing out of paid annual leave occurs during the period of employment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Employer obligation implies diffusion of provision for cashing out paid annual leave
premise text: A modern award or enterprise agreement may include terms providing for the cashing out of paid annual leave by an employee.
conclusion text: If a modern award or enterprise agreement includes terms, then it implies that the employer must diffuse the provision for cashing out paid annual leave to all employees.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Employer obligation implies cognitive action of providing terms for cashing out paid annual leave
premise text: A modern award or enterprise agreement may include terms providing for the cashing out of paid annual leave by an employee.
conclusion text: If a modern award or enterprise agreement includes terms, then it implies that the employer must take a cognitive action to provide terms for cashing out paid annual leave.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-2
part of: 93 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
note: Paid annual leave must not be cashed out if it would result in less than 4 weeks of accrued entitlement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 93(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cashing out paid annual leave under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94
has part: 94(1) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
has part: 94(2) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
has part: 94(3) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
has part: 94(4) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
has part: 94(5) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
has part: 94(6) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248

94(1) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94-ss-1
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
note: Employer and employee may agree to cash out accrued paid annual leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 94(1) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Employer and employee agreement
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval of paid annual leave
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Employer and employee agreement justification
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94(2) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94-ss-2
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
note: Employer and employee cannot agree to cashing out paid annual leave if it would result in less than 4 weeks of remaining entitlement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 94(2) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits agreement to cashing out paid annual leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94(3) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94-ss-3
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
note: Each agreement to cash out a particular amount of paid annual leave must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94(3) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94(4) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94-ss-4
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
note: Employer must pay employee the full amount of paid annual leave forgone.
description: Payment for unpaid annual leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94(5) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94-ss-5
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
note: Employer may require employee to take paid annual leave if reasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-5-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94(5) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

94(6) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94-ss-6
part of: 94 Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
note: Employer and employee may agree on when paid annual leave can be taken.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 94(6) Cashing out and taking paid annual leave for award/agreement
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Employer and employee may agree on when paid annual leave can be taken.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-94-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for paid annual leave
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95 Subdivision applies to employees other than casual employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95
note: Subdivision applies to employees other than casual employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-95-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-95-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-95-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95 Subdivision applies to employees other than casual employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies to employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96 Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96
has part: 96(1) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
has part: 96(2) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250

96(1) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-1
part of: 96 Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
note: Employee entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(1) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Entitlement
premise text: (1) For each year of service with an employer (other than periods of employment as a casual employee of the employer)
conclusion text: An employee is entitled to 10 days of paid personal/carer’s leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) For each year of service with an employer (other than periods of employment as a casual employee of the employer)
conclusion text: Service years are related to employment years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: (1) For each year of service with an employer (other than periods of employment as a casual employee of the employer)
conclusion text: Service years form a recurring pattern.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (1) For each year of service with an employer (other than periods of employment as a casual employee of the employer)
conclusion text: An obligation exists to provide paid personal/carer’s leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (Accrual of leave)
conclusion text: An obligation exists to accrue paid personal/carer’s leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(2) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96-ss-2
part of: 96 Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
note: Employee entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave accrues progressively during a year of service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(2) Entitlement to paid personal/carer’s leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-96-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to accrue paid personal/carer’s leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97 Taking paid personal/carer’s leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-97
note: An employee may take paid personal/carer’s leave under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-97-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-97-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98
has part: 98(1) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
has part: 98(2) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251

98(1) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-1
part of: 98 Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
note: Employee not entitled to paid personal/carer’s leave on public holidays
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(1) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employee obligation to work on public holidays
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Employee class inclusion in paid personal/carer’s leave
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(2) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-2
part of: 98 Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
note: Employee not on paid personal/carer’s leave for period of paid family and domestic violence leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(2) Employee taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave at
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave, then they are not on paid family and domestic violence leave.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,
conclusion text: the employee is taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for the period of that paid family and domestic violence leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Employee's leave includes paid family and domestic violence leave if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,
conclusion text: the employee's leave includes paid family and domestic violence leave if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Paid family and domestic violence leave overlaps with paid personal/carer’s leave.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,
conclusion text: the periods overlap if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Paid family and domestic violence leave repeats with paid personal/carer’s leave.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,
conclusion text: the periods repeat if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Paid family and domestic violence leave diffuses into paid personal/carer’s leave.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,
conclusion text: the diffusion spreads if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-98-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The system recognizes the overlap between paid family and domestic violence leave and paid personal/carer’s leave.
premise text: (2) If the period during which an employee takes paid personal/carer’s leave includes a period of paid family and domestic violence leave,
conclusion text: the system recognizes the overlap if they are taken not to be on paid personal/carer’s leave for that period.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99 Payment for paid personal/carer’s leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-99
note: Employer must pay employee at base rate for paid personal/carer’s leave
description: Payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-99-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-99-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-99-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100 Paid personal/carer’s leave must not be cashed out except in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100
note: Paid personal/carer’s leave cannot be cashed out except in accordance with permitted terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-100-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-100-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-100-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 100 Paid personal/carer’s leave must not be cashed out except in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-100-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cashing out paid personal/carer’s leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101
has part: 101(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
has part: 101(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252

101(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101-ss-1
part of: 101 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
note: Employer may include terms for cashing out paid personal/carer’s leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(1) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Employer obligation to include terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101-ss-2
part of: 101 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
note: Paid personal/carer’s leave terms must be included in modern awards and enterprise agreements.
description: Separate written agreement between employer and employee for each cashing out of paid personal/carer’s leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(2) Modern awards and enterprise agreements may include terms
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-101-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include paid personal/carer’s leave terms in modern awards and enterprise agreements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Entitlement to unpaid carer’s leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102
note: Entitlement to unpaid carer’s leave for family members or household members requiring care due to illness, injury, or emergency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-102-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-102-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to take unpaid carer’s leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103 Taking unpaid carer’s leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103
has part: 103(1) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
has part: 103(2) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
has part: 103(3) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253

103(1) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-1
part of: 103 Taking unpaid carer’s leave
note: An employee may take unpaid carer’s leave for a particular permissible occasion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to take unpaid carer’s leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103(2) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-2
part of: 103 Taking unpaid carer’s leave
note: Employee may take unpaid carer’s leave for a particular occasion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-2-norm

103(3) Taking unpaid carer’s leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-3
part of: 103 Taking unpaid carer’s leave
note: Cannot take unpaid carer’s leave during a particular period if paid personal/carer’s leave is available.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-103-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of taking unpaid carer’s leave
premise text: Employee can take paid personal/carer’s leave
conclusion text: Cannot take unpaid carer’s leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104 Entitlement to compassionate leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104
note: Entitlement to compassionate leave for specified family and personal circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.253
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-104-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-104-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to take compassionate leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105 Taking compassionate leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105
has part: 105(1) Taking compassionate leave
has part: 105(2) Taking compassionate leave
has part: 105(3) Taking compassionate leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254

105(1) Taking compassionate leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-1
part of: 105 Taking compassionate leave
note: Employee may take compassionate leave for a particular occasion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to take compassionate leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105(2) Taking compassionate leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-2
part of: 105 Taking compassionate leave
note: Employee may take compassionate leave for a particular occasion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 105(2) Taking compassionate leave
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

105(3) Taking compassionate leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-3
part of: 105 Taking compassionate leave
note: Employee may take compassionate leave at any time while illness or injury persists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-105-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Payment for compassionate leave (other than for casual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106
note: Employer must pay employee at base rate for compassionate leave
description: Payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106 Payment for compassionate leave (other than for casual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide payment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106A Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106a
has part: 106A(1) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106A(2) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106A(3) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106A(4) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255

106A(1) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106a-ss-1
part of: 106A Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
note: Employee entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 106A(1) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Entitlement
premise text: An employee is entitled to...
conclusion text: ...10 days of paid family and domestic violence leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106A(2) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106a-ss-2
part of: 106A Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
note: Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 106A(2) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Employee has right to paid family and domestic violence leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106A(3) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106a-ss-3
part of: 106A Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
note: Employee's employment start date with a particular employer is determined.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106A(3) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
logic summary: Employment start date determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106A(4) Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106a-ss-4
part of: 106A Entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
note: Employee entitlement to paid family and domestic violence leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106B Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106b
has part: 106B(1) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106B(2) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106B(3) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256

106B(1) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106b-ss-1
part of: 106B Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
note: Employee has an obligation to take paid family and domestic violence leave under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has an obligation.
premise text: The employee needs to do something to deal with the impact of family and domestic violence.
conclusion text: The employee must take paid family and domestic violence leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Employee must take leave during work hours.
premise text: It is impractical for the employee to do that thing outside the employee’s work hours.
conclusion text: The employee's leave must occur during their work hours.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: every
logic summary: Employee must take leave every time they need to deal with family and domestic violence.
premise text: The employee needs to do something to deal with the impact of family and domestic violence.
conclusion text: The employee must take paid family and domestic violence leave every time they need to deal with family and domestic violence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Employer must comply with notice and evidence requirements of section 107.
premise text: The notice and evidence requirements of section 107 must be complied with.
conclusion text: The employer must comply with the notice and evidence requirements of section 107.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Employer must provide a safe work environment.
premise text: Examples of actions, by an employee who is experiencing family and domestic violence, that could be covered by paragraph (b) include...
conclusion text: The employer must provide a safe work environment for the employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106B(2) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106b-ss-2
part of: 106B Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
note: Family and domestic violence is defined as violent, threatening or abusive behavior by a close relative, household member, or intimate partner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106B(2) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of family and domestic violence is a deontic obligation.
premise text: Family and domestic violence is defined as...
conclusion text: ...a violent, threatening or abusive behavior.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106B(3) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106b-ss-3
part of: 106B Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
note: Defines a close relative for paid family and domestic violence leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106B(3) Taking paid family and domestic violence leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

106BA Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106ba
has part: 106BA(1) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106BA(2) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
has part: 106BA(3) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257

106BA(1) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106ba-ss-1
part of: 106BA Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
note: Employer must pay employee at full rate of pay during paid family and domestic violence leave.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must pay employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106BA(2) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106ba-ss-2
part of: 106BA Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
note: An employee is taken to have been rostered to work hours if they accept an offer by the employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer's obligation to roster employee
premise text: Employee accepts offer
conclusion text: Employee is rostered
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106BA(3) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106ba-ss-3
part of: 106BA Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
note: Employer not required to pay employee for unpaid hours during paid family and domestic violence leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 106BA(3) Payment for paid family and domestic violence leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents employer from paying employee for unpaid hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106C Confidentiality
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106c
has part: 106C(1) Confidentiality
has part: 106C(2) Confidentiality
has part: 106C(3) Confidentiality
has part: 106C(4) Confidentiality
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257

106C(1) Confidentiality
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106c-ss-1
part of: 106C Confidentiality
note: Employers must take steps to ensure employee confidentiality.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers have a duty to maintain confidentiality.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106C(2) Confidentiality
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106c-ss-2
part of: 106C Confidentiality
note: Employer must not use employee information for purposes other than leave entitlement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 106C(2) Confidentiality
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of using employee information for unauthorized purposes.
premise text: Employer must not use such information for a purpose other than satisfying itself in relation to the employee’s entitlement to leave under this Subdivision.
conclusion text: An employer must not use such information for a purpose other than satisfying itself in relation to the employee’s entitlement to leave under this Subdivision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of taking adverse action against an employee.
premise text: In particular, an employer must not use such information to take adverse action against an employee.
conclusion text: An employer must not use such information to take adverse action against an employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of using confidential information for purposes other than leave entitlement.
premise text: (2) An employer must not, other than with the consent of the employee, use such information for a purpose other than satisfying itself in relation to the employee’s entitlement to leave under this Subdivision.
conclusion text: An employer must not use such information for a purpose other than satisfying itself in relation to the employee’s entitlement to leave under this Subdivision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106C(3) Confidentiality
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106c-ss-3
part of: 106C Confidentiality
note: Conditional effect of subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-3-norm

106C(4) Confidentiality
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106c-ss-4
part of: 106C Confidentiality
note: Employer may deal with employee information if required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106C(4) Confidentiality
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to deal with employee information
premise text: Nothing prevents an employer from doing so
conclusion text: Employer may deal with employee information if required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

106D Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106d
has part: 106D(1) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
has part: 106D(2) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
has part: 106D(3) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258

106D(1) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106d-ss-1
part of: 106D Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
note: Leave for victims of crime is not excluded by this Subdivision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106D(1) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106D(2) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106d-ss-2
part of: 106D Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
note: If an employee is entitled to leave under another law, that law applies in addition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106D(2) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

106D(3) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106d-ss-3
part of: 106D Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
note: A national system employee is entitled to leave under this Subdivision only to the extent that the leave would not constitute leave for victims of crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106D(3) Operation of paid family and domestic violence leave and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Entitlement
logic summary: A person has an entitlement to leave under this Subdivision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106E Entitlement to days of leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106e
note: Defines what constitutes a day of leave for purposes of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-106e-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-106e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106E Entitlement to days of leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

107 Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107
has part: 107(1) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 107(2) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 107(3) Notice and evidence requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259

107(1) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107-ss-1
part of: 107 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Employee must give notice of leave taking under this Division.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107(1) Notice and evidence requirements
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107(2) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107-ss-2
part of: 107 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Notice must be given to employer within a specified period.
description: Notice and evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107(3) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107-ss-3
part of: 107 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Provide evidence of leave reason upon request
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Leave reason falls within a specific time frame
premise text: (a) if it is paid personal/carer’s leave—the leave is taken for a reason specified in section 97; or (b) if it is unpaid carer’s leave—the leave is taken for a permissible occasion in circumstances specified in subsection 103(1); or (c) if it is compassionate leave—the leave is taken for a permissible occasion in circumstances specified in subsection 105(1); or (d) if it is paid family and domestic violence leave, and the employee has met the requirement specified in paragraph 106B(1)(a)—the leave is taken for the purpose specified in paragraph 106B(1)(b), and the requirement specified in paragraph 106B(1)(c) is met.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Leave reason has a specific temporal relationship
premise text: (a) if it is paid personal/carer’s leave—the leave is taken for a reason specified in section 97; or (b) if it is unpaid carer’s leave—the leave is taken for a permissible occasion in circumstances specified in subsection 103(1); or (c) if it is compassionate leave—the leave is taken for a permissible occasion in circumstances specified in subsection 105(1); or (d) if it is paid family and domestic violence leave, and the employee has met the requirement specified in paragraph 106B(1)(a)—the leave is taken for the purpose specified in paragraph 106B(1)(b), and the requirement specified in paragraph 106B(1)(c) is met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-107-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence upon request
premise text: (3) An employee who has given his or her employer notice of the taking of leave under this Division must, if required by the employer, give the employer evidence that would satisfy a reasonable person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Entitlement to be absent from employment for engaging in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108
note: Eligible community service activity entitlement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-108-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-108-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to be absent from employment for eligible community service activity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109 Meaning of eligible community service activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109
has part: 109(1) Meaning of eligible community service activity
has part: 109(2) Meaning of eligible community service activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261

109(1) Meaning of eligible community service activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109-ss-1
part of: 109 Meaning of eligible community service activity
note: Eligible community service activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 109(1) Meaning of eligible community service activity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

109(2) Meaning of eligible community service activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109-ss-2
part of: 109 Meaning of eligible community service activity
note: Employee must engage in voluntary emergency management activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 109(2) Meaning of eligible community service activity
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-109-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide voluntary emergency management activity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110
has part: 110(1) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 110(2) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 110(3) Notice and evidence requirements
has part: 110(4) Notice and evidence requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263

110(1) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-1
part of: 110 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Employee must provide notice of absence before it is covered by the Division.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(1) Notice and evidence requirements
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(2) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-2
part of: 110 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Notice must be given to employer as soon as practicable and advise of absence period.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(3) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-3
part of: 110 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Employee must provide evidence of community service activity upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(3) Notice and evidence requirements
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between absence and community service activity
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

110(4) Notice and evidence requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-4
part of: 110 Notice and evidence requirements
note: Employee must comply with section for absence to be covered by the Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(4) Notice and evidence requirements
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-110-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with section for absence to be covered by the Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111 Payment to employees (other than casuals) on jury service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111
note: Payment to employees on jury service is mandatory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-111-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-111-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-111-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 111 Payment to employees (other than casuals) on jury service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-111-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory payment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112 State and Territory laws that are not excluded
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112
note: Exclusion of State and Territory laws not applying to employee entitlements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-112-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-112-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of laws
premise text: This Act is not intended to apply
conclusion text: to the exclusion of laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113 Entitlement to long service leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113
has part: 113(1) Entitlement to long service leave
has part: 113(2) Entitlement to long service leave
has part: 113(3) Entitlement to long service leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267

113(1) Entitlement to long service leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-1
part of: 113 Entitlement to long service leave
note: Entitlement to long service leave based on applicable award-derived terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 113(1) Entitlement to long service leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee has entitlement to long service leave.
premise text: Applicable award-derived terms exist.
conclusion text: Employee is entitled to long service leave.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113(2) Entitlement to long service leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-2
part of: 113 Entitlement to long service leave
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain agreements or instruments that deal with long service leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Indicates that subsection (1) does not apply to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113(3) Entitlement to long service leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113-ss-3
part of: 113 Entitlement to long service leave
note: Applicable award-derived long service leave terms for an employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 113(3) Entitlement to long service leave
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applicable
logic summary: Applicable award-derived long service leave terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113A Enterprise agreements may contain terms discounting service
type: Concept
realized by: sec-113a
note: Enterprise agreements may contain terms discounting service under prior agreements in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 113A Enterprise agreements may contain terms discounting service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If an enterprise agreement applies, then it may contain terms discounting service.
premise text: Enterprise agreements apply.
conclusion text: Terms discounting service may be contained in enterprise agreements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: The commencement of this Part overlaps with the operation of certain instruments that came into effect before its commencement.
premise text: This Part commences after a certain date.
conclusion text: Certain instruments that came into effect before this Part's commencement overlap with its commencement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-113a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: overlaps
logic summary: The operation of enterprise agreements overlaps with the operation of workplace agreements.
premise text: Enterprise agreements operate.
conclusion text: Workplace agreements also operate.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

114 Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
type: Concept
realized by: sec-114
has part: 114(1) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
has part: 114(2) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
has part: 114(3) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
has part: 114(4) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271

114(1) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
type: Concept
realized by: sec-114-ss-1
part of: 114 Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
note: Employee entitlement to be absent on public holiday
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 114(1) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Employee has right to absence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114(2) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
type: Concept
realized by: sec-114-ss-2
part of: 114 Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
note: An employer may request an employee to work on a public holiday if the request is reasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to work on a public holiday
premise text: Employer requests
conclusion text: Employee may work
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114(3) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
type: Concept
realized by: sec-114-ss-3
part of: 114 Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
note: Employee may refuse request to work on public holiday if unreasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to refuse
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114(4) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
type: Concept
realized by: sec-114-ss-4
part of: 114 Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
note: Employer must consider employee's personal circumstances when determining reasonableness of request to work on public holiday.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 114(4) Entitlement to be absent from employment on public holiday
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to consider employee's personal circumstances.
premise text: (4) In determining whether a request, or a refusal of a request, to work on a public holiday is reasonable...
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Employer's workplace or enterprise and employee's personal circumstances are relevant factors.
premise text: (a) the nature of the employer’s workplace or enterprise...
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Employer's request for work on public holiday may overlap with employee's family responsibilities.
premise text: (b) the employee’s personal circumstances, including family responsibilities...
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Employer may request work on public holiday if employee is entitled to overtime payments.
premise text: (d) whether the employee is entitled to receive overtime payments...
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Employer may request work on public holiday if employee is not entitled to overtime payments.
premise text: (c) whether the employee could reasonably expect that the employer might request work on the public holiday...
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-114-ss-4-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to consider type of employment.
premise text: (e) the type of employment of the employee...
conclusion text: ...the following must be taken into account:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115 Meaning of public holiday
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115
has part: 115(1) Meaning of public holiday
has part: 115(2) Meaning of public holiday
has part: 115(3) Meaning of public holiday
has part: 115(4) Meaning of public holiday
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272

115(1) Meaning of public holiday
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115-ss-1
part of: 115 Meaning of public holiday
note: List of public holidays
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes specific days and types of days as public holidays
premise text: (a) each of these days:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclasses other days or part-days declared by law as public holidays
premise text: (b) any other day, or part-day, declared or prescribed by or under a law of a State or Territory to be observed generally within the State or Territory, or a region of the State or Territory, as a public holiday
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes specific types of days excluded from counting as public holidays
premise text: other than a day or part-day, or a kind of day or part-day, that is excluded by the regulations from counting as a public holiday
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes substituted public holidays under State or Territory laws
premise text: Substituted public holidays under State or Territory laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115(2) Meaning of public holiday
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115-ss-2
part of: 115 Meaning of public holiday
note: Substituted day or part-day is the public holiday.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 115(2) Meaning of public holiday
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

115(3) Meaning of public holiday
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115-ss-3
part of: 115 Meaning of public holiday
note: Allowing substitution of public holidays for award/agreement free employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of substituted public holidays for award/agreement free employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115(4) Meaning of public holiday
type: Concept
realized by: sec-115-ss-4
part of: 115 Meaning of public holiday
note: Employer and employee may agree on substitution of a day or part-day for a public holiday.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-4-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-115-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 115(4) Meaning of public holiday
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

116 Payment for absence on public holiday
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116
note: Employer must pay employee at base rate for ordinary hours worked on public holiday.
description: Payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.273
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must pay employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116A Division does not apply to certain employees or employers in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116a
note: Division does not apply to certain employees or employers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116a-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116A Division does not apply to certain employees or employers in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

116B Employer’s obligation to make superannuation contributions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116b
note: Employer must make superannuation contributions for employee's benefit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116B Employer’s obligation to make superannuation contributions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to make superannuation contributions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116C Reduction of employer’s liability to the extent of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116c
note: Reduction of employer's liability for superannuation charge payments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116c-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116C Reduction of employer’s liability to the extent of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Reduction of employer's liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116D Preventing multiple actions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116d
has part: 116D(1) Preventing multiple actions
has part: 116D(2) Preventing multiple actions
has part: 116D(3) Preventing multiple actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275

116D(1) Preventing multiple actions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116d-ss-1
part of: 116D Preventing multiple actions
note: No application for orders in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 116D(1) Preventing multiple actions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents applications
premise text: (1) This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
logic summary: Restricts time frame for applications
premise text: (b) the contravention, or alleged contravention, relates wholly or partly to an employee...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring pattern of restrictions
premise text: (c) the employee or another person referred to in an item in column 2 of the table...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads restrictions across related situations
premise text: No application for orders in certain circumstances
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116D(2) Preventing multiple actions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116d-ss-2
part of: 116D Preventing multiple actions
note: Preventing multiple actions: cannot make application if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 116D(2) Preventing multiple actions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Cannot make application if certain conditions are met.
premise text: Commissioner of Taxation has commenced proceedings against the employer to recover an amount of superannuation guarantee charge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Employer's superannuation guarantee shortfall includes individual superannuation guarantee shortfall for the employee.
premise text: The employer’s superannuation guarantee shortfall in respect of which the charge is imposed includes an individual superannuation guarantee shortfall for the employee.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Proceedings have not been finally disposed of and Commissioner has not discontinued them.
premise text: Proceedings have not been finally disposed of and Commissioner has not discontinued the proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Commissioner has obtained an order for recovery of the charge.
premise text: The Commissioner has obtained an order for recovery of the charge.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116D(3) Preventing multiple actions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116d-ss-3
part of: 116D Preventing multiple actions
note: Terms defined in another Act have the same meaning here.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Terms defined in another Act have the same meaning here.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116E Orders for compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116e
has part: 116E(1) Orders for compensation
has part: 116E(2) Orders for compensation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.276

116E(1) Orders for compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116e-ss-1
part of: 116E Orders for compensation
note: Court order for compensation if a civil remedy provision is contravened
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.276
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116E(1) Orders for compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court order for compensation if a civil remedy provision is contravened
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 at some point in time
premise text: This section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 awarding compensation to an employee for a contravention of a civil remedy provision that relates to a contravention of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 at some point in time
premise text: This section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 awarding compensation to an employee for a contravention of a civil remedy provision that relates to a contravention of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 at some point in time
premise text: This section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 awarding compensation to an employee for a contravention of a civil remedy provision that relates to a contravention of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 at some point in time
premise text: This section applies if a court makes an order under section 545 awarding compensation to an employee for a contravention of a civil remedy provision that relates to a contravention of this Division.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116E(2) Orders for compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-116e-ss-2
part of: 116E Orders for compensation
note: Court must consider paying compensation to a superannuation fund for the benefit of the employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.276
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116E(2) Orders for compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-116e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider paying compensation to a superannuation fund for the benefit of the employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117 Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
type: Concept
realized by: sec-117
has part: 117(1) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
has part: 117(2) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
has part: 117(3) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277

117(1) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
type: Concept
realized by: sec-117-ss-1
part of: 117 Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
note: Employer must not terminate employee's employment without written notice.
description: Written notice of termination day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 117(1) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on terminating employment without written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117(2) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
type: Concept
realized by: sec-117-ss-2
part of: 117 Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
note: Employer must provide notice of termination or payment in lieu.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117(2) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117(3) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
type: Concept
realized by: sec-117-ss-3
part of: 117 Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
note: Minimum period of notice for termination or payment in lieu
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117(3) Requirement for notice of termination or payment in lieu
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-117-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires minimum period of notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118
note: Employees must give notice of termination before leaving employment.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-118-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-118-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-118-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119 Redundancy pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119
has part: 119(1) Redundancy pay
has part: 119(2) Redundancy pay
has part: 119(3) Redundancy pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278

119(1) Redundancy pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-1
part of: 119 Redundancy pay
note: Entitlement to redundancy pay upon termination of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to provide redundancy pay
premise text: Section 119(1)
conclusion text: Redundancy pay entitlement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(2) Redundancy pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-2
part of: 119 Redundancy pay
note: Redundancy pay calculation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(2) Redundancy pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Equals
premise text: The amount of the redundancy pay equals...
conclusion text: the total amount payable to the employee for...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Greater than
premise text: At least 1 year but less than 2 years 4 weeks
conclusion text: 11 weeks
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(3) Redundancy pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-3
part of: 119 Redundancy pay
note: Employment as a casual employee is excluded from continuous service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(3) Redundancy pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Employment as a casual employee is excluded from continuous service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: not includes
logic summary: Temporal interval exclusion
premise text: The section defines continuous service with the employer.
conclusion text: Employment as a casual employee is not included in this definition.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120 Variation of redundancy pay for other employment or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-120
note: Variation of redundancy pay for other employment or incapacity to pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-120-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-120-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120 Variation of redundancy pay for other employment or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121
has part: 121(1) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
has part: 121(2) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
has part: 121(3) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
has part: 121(4) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
has part: 121(5) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
has part: 121(6) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280

121(1) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-1
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
note: Exemptions from redundancy pay obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(1) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

121(2) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-2
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
note: Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-2-norm

121(3) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-3
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
note: Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(3) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

121(4) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-4
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
note: Entitlement to redundancy pay under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(4) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Entails
logic summary: Employee has a right to redundancy pay
premise text: Employment termination
conclusion text: Entitlement to redundancy pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121(5) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-5
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
note: Exemptions from paying redundancy pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(5) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts members' voluntary winding up from paying redundancy pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121(6) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121-ss-6
part of: 121 Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
note: Exemptions from paying redundancy pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(6) Exclusions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-121-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from obligation to pay redundancy pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122 Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122
has part: 122(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
has part: 122(2) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
has part: 122(3) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
has part: 122(4) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282

122(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122-ss-1
part of: 122 Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
note: Employee is not entitled to redundancy pay if service with first employer counts as service with second employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(1) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits redundancy pay for employees whose service is counted with the second employer
premise text: (1) Subsection 22(5) does not apply (for the purpose of this Subdivision) to a transfer of employment between non-associated entities in relation to an employee if the second employer decides not to recognise the employee’s service with the first employer (for the purpose of this Subdivision).
conclusion text: (Employee is not entitled to redundancy pay if service with first employer counts as service with second employer)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with transfer of employment between non-associated entities
premise text: (1) Subsection 22(5) does not apply (for the purpose of this Subdivision) to a transfer of employment between non-associated entities in relation to an employee if the second employer decides not to recognise the employee’s service with the first employer (for the purpose of this Subdivision).
conclusion text: (Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to redundancy pay)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace for transfer of employment between non-associated entities
premise text: (1) Subsection 22(5) does not apply (for the purpose of this Subdivision) to a transfer of employment between non-associated entities in relation to an employee if the second employer decides not to recognise the employee’s service with the first employer (for the purpose of this Subdivision).
conclusion text: (Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to redundancy pay)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses prohibition on redundancy pay for employees whose service is counted with the second employer
premise text: (1) Subsection 22(5) does not apply (for the purpose of this Subdivision) to a transfer of employment between non-associated entities in relation to an employee if the second employer decides not to recognise the employee’s service with the first employer (for the purpose of this Subdivision).
conclusion text: (Employee is not entitled to redundancy pay if service with first employer counts as service with second employer)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise
logic summary: Recognises transfer of employment between non-associated entities as affecting the obligation to redundancy pay
premise text: (1) Subsection 22(5) does not apply (for the purpose of this Subdivision) to a transfer of employment between non-associated entities in relation to an employee if the second employer decides not to recognise the employee’s service with the first employer (for the purpose of this Subdivision).
conclusion text: (Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to redundancy pay)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(2) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122-ss-2
part of: 122 Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
note: Employee not entitled to redundancy pay if refuses employment in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(2) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits employee from receiving redundancy pay
premise text: Subsection 22(5) applies to transfer of employment
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to redundancy pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of transfer of employment
premise text: Subsection 22(5) provides that service with the first employer counts as service with the second employer
conclusion text: Employee is not entitled to redundancy pay
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits employee from refusing employment in certain circumstances
premise text: Subsection 22(5) applies to transfer of employment
conclusion text: Employee must accept employment offer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(3) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122-ss-3
part of: 122 Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
note: Employee not entitled to redundancy pay if they reject a better offer from another employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits redundancy pay for employees who reject a better offer.
premise text: Employee rejects an offer of employment from another employer.
conclusion text: No redundancy pay is due.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with the employee's employment period.
premise text: Employee's employment with the first employer ends on a specific date.
conclusion text: The employee's employment period overlaps with the redundancy pay period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of the employee's employment history.
premise text: Employee has worked for multiple employers.
conclusion text: The employee's employment history is a recurring trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the information about the employee's situation.
premise text: Employer notifies the employee of their redundancy pay entitlement.
conclusion text: The information is diffused to all relevant parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes the employee's service with the first employer.
premise text: Employer recognizes the employee's service.
conclusion text: The employee's service is recognized.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(4) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122-ss-4
part of: 122 Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
note: First employer must pay employee a specified amount of redundancy pay.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.282
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(4) Transfer of employment situations that affect the obligation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-122-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay redundancy pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

123 Limits on scope of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-123
note: Employees not covered by this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-123-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-123-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 123 Limits on scope of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

124 Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124
has part: 124(1) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
has part: 124(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
has part: 124(3) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
has part: 124(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286

124(1) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124-ss-1
part of: 124 Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
note: Fair Work Ombudsman must prepare and publish Fair Work Information Statement.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(1) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124-ss-2
part of: 124 Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
note: Must contain specific information about employment standards and regulations.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(3) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124-ss-3
part of: 124 Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must prepare and publish the Fair Work Information Statement.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(3) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124-ss-4
part of: 124 Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
note: Employers must provide employees with a certain form of the Statement.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Fair Work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers must provide employees with a certain form of the Statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing the Statement.
premise text: (4) The regulations may prescribe other matters relating to the content or form of the Statement, or the manner in which employers may give the Statement to employees.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing the Statement.
premise text: (4) The regulations may prescribe other matters relating to the content or form of the Statement, or the manner in which employers may give the Statement to employees.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Diffusion of information about the Statement.
premise text: (4) The regulations may prescribe other matters relating to the content or form of the Statement, or the manner in which employers may give the Statement to employees.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-124-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Artificial intelligence involved in providing the Statement.
premise text: (4) The regulations may prescribe other matters relating to the content or form of the Statement, or the manner in which employers may give the Statement to employees.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125 Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125
has part: 125(1) Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
has part: 125(2) Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286

125(1) Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125-ss-1
part of: 125 Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
note: Employer must provide Fair Work Information Statement to employee before or after employment starts.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide Fair Work Information Statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125(2) Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125-ss-2
part of: 125 Giving new employees the Fair Work Information Statement
note: No requirement to provide Fair Work Information Statement more than once in 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125-ss-2-norm

125A Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125a
has part: 125A(1) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
has part: 125A(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
has part: 125A(3) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
has part: 125A(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287

125A(1) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125a-ss-1
part of: 125A Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
note: Prepare and publish Casual Employment Information Statement.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must prepare and publish statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125A(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125a-ss-2
part of: 125A Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
note: Employer must provide information about casual employment to the Fair Work Ombudsman.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125A(2) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125A(3) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125a-ss-3
part of: 125A Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
note: The Casual Employment Information Statement must be prepared and published.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare and publish the Casual Employment Information Statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125A(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125a-ss-4
part of: 125A Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
note: Employers must provide employees with a Statement in the prescribed form.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125A(4) Fair Work Ombudsman to prepare and publish Casual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers must provide employees with a Statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125B Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125b
has part: 125B(1) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
has part: 125B(2) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
has part: 125B(3) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288

125B(1) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125b-ss-1
part of: 125B Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
note: Employer must provide Casual Employment Information Statement to casual employee at specified times.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide Casual Employment Information Statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125B(2) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125b-ss-2
part of: 125B Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
note: Employer must provide casual employment information to employees under certain conditions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125B(2) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to provide casual employment information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125B(3) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125b-ss-3
part of: 125B Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
note: Employer does not need to provide the Statement more than once in a 12-month period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 125B(3) Giving employees the Casual Employment Information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-125b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No obligation to provide the Statement more than once in a 12-month period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
type: Concept
realized by: sec-126
note: School-based apprentices and trainees must be paid loadings in lieu of certain leave types.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-126-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-126-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-126-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126 Modern awards and enterprise agreements may provide for
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be paid loadings in lieu of certain leave types.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

127 Regulations about what modern awards and enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-127
note: Permits modern awards or enterprise agreements to include terms contrary to this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-127-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-127-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-127-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 127 Regulations about what modern awards and enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-127-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows modern awards or enterprise agreements to include terms contrary to this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128 Relationship between National Employment Standards and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-128
note: Permits agreements between employer and award/agreement free employee that is expressly permitted by regulations made for the purpose of section 129.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 128 Relationship between National Employment Standards and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition
premise text: The National Employment Standards have effect subject to: (a) an agreement between an employer and an award/agreement free employee or a requirement made by an employer of an award/agreement free employee, that is expressly permitted by a provision of this Part;
conclusion text: or (b) an agreement between an employer and an award/agreement free employee that is expressly permitted by regulations made for the purpose of section 129.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Traces agreements between employer and award/agreement free employee
premise text: The National Employment Standards have effect subject to: (a) an agreement between an employer and an award/agreement free employee or a requirement made by an employer of an award/agreement free employee, that is expressly permitted by a provision of this Part;
conclusion text: or (b) an agreement between an employer and an award/agreement free employee that is expressly permitted by regulations made for the purpose of section 129.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies agreements between employer and award/agreement free employee as permissible
premise text: agreements etc. permitted by this Part for award/agreement free employees
conclusion text: is expressly permitted by a provision of this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-128-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies agreements between employer and award/agreement free employee as permissible
premise text: agreements etc. permitted by this Part for award/agreement free employees
conclusion text: is expressly permitted by regulations made for the purpose of section 129.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

129 Regulations about what can be agreed to etc. in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-129
note: Allow employers and award/agreement free employees to agree on matters contrary to this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-129-norm

130 Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
type: Concept
realized by: sec-130
has part: 130(1) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
has part: 130(2) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
has part: 130(3) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290

130(1) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
type: Concept
realized by: sec-130-ss-1
part of: 130 Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
note: Employee cannot take leave or accrue absence during compensation period due to personal illness or injury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 130(1) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of taking leave or accrual during compensation period
premise text: Employee absent due to personal illness/injury receiving compensation
conclusion text: No leave/absence allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlap between employee's absence and compensation period
premise text: Employee absent due to personal illness/injury receiving compensation
conclusion text: Compensation period overlaps with employee's absence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of employee's absence during compensation period
premise text: Employee absent due to personal illness/injury receiving compensation
conclusion text: Recurring trace of employee's absence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of information about employee's absence during compensation period
premise text: Employee absent due to personal illness/injury receiving compensation
conclusion text: Information diffused about employee's absence
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of employee's absence during compensation period by AI system
premise text: Employee absent due to personal illness/injury receiving compensation
conclusion text: AI system recognizes employee's absence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130(2) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
type: Concept
realized by: sec-130-ss-2
part of: 130 Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
note: Employee may take leave during compensation period if permitted by law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 130(2) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Permits taking leave during compensation period
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent an employee from taking or accruing leave...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Leave overlaps with compensation period
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent an employee from taking or accruing leave...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

130(3) Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
type: Concept
realized by: sec-130-ss-3
part of: 130 Restriction on taking or accruing leave or absence while
note: Allowance of unpaid parental leave during a compensation period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-130-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) does not prevent an employee from taking unpaid parental leave during a compensation period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131 Relationship with other Commonwealth laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-131
note: Supplements entitlements under other Commonwealth laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-131-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131 Relationship with other Commonwealth laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

132 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-132
note: Modern awards may set minimum terms and conditions for national system employees in particular industries or occupations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with modern awards
premise text: Section 45 of the Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: Comply with modern awards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CAN
logic summary: Modern awards can have terms that are ancillary or supplementary to the National Employment Standards
premise text: Section 132 of the Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: Modern awards can have ancillary or supplementary terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The FWC must conduct 4 yearly reviews of default fund terms of modern awards
premise text: Section 132(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: Default fund terms of modern awards are reviewed every 4 years
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must ensure that modern awards, together with the National Employment Standards, provide a fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions
premise text: Section 132(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: Modern awards and National Employment Standards provide a fair and relevant minimum safety net
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-132-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CAN
logic summary: The FWC can exercise modern award powers in certain circumstances
premise text: Section 132(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: Modern award powers can be exercised in certain circumstances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

133 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-133
note: Defines employee and employer terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.293
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-133-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-133-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-133-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-133-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134 The modern awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134
has part: 134(1) The modern awards objective
has part: 134(2) The modern awards objective
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294

134(1) The modern awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134-ss-1
part of: 134 The modern awards objective
note: Ensure modern awards provide a fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions.
description: fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(1) The modern awards objective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure modern awards provide a fair and relevant minimum safety net of terms and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(2) The modern awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134-ss-2
part of: 134 The modern awards objective
note: The modern awards objective applies to the performance or exercise of FWC's modern award powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(2) The modern awards objective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The modern awards objective applies to the performance or exercise of FWC's modern award powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135 Special provisions relating to modern award minimum wages
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135
note: Cannot vary modern award minimum wages except under specified conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.295
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
logic summary: Prohibition of varying modern award minimum wages
premise text: (1) Modern award minimum wages cannot be varied under this Part
conclusion text: Modern award minimum wages can only be varied under specified conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation of modern award minimum wages
premise text: (a) modern award minimum wages can be varied if the FWC is satisfied that the variation is justified by work value reasons
conclusion text: Variation of modern award minimum wages requires FWC approval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: =>
logic summary: Justification for varying modern award minimum wages
premise text: (a) modern award minimum wages can be varied if the FWC is satisfied that the variation is justified by work value reasons
conclusion text: Variation of modern award minimum wages requires justification by FWC
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: <=>
logic summary: Relationship between FWC and variation of modern award minimum wages
premise text: (a) modern award minimum wages can be varied if the FWC is satisfied that the variation is justified by work value reasons
conclusion text: Variation of modern award minimum wages requires FWC approval
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of modern award minimum wages in AI systems
premise text: For the meanings of modern award minimum wages, and setting and varying such wages, see section 284
conclusion text: Modern award minimum wages are defined in section 284 for AI systems
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135A Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135a
has part: 135A(1) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
has part: 135A(2) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
has part: 135A(3) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296

135A(1) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135a-ss-1
part of: 135A Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
note: Ensure that penalty rates and overtime rates are not reduced.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135A(1) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Ensures the rate of a penalty rate or an overtime rate is not reduced.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135A(2) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135a-ss-2
part of: 135A Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
note: Does not limit operation of other sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135A(2) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not imply
logic summary: Limits the operation of other sections
premise text: (1) does not limit the operation of section 144
conclusion text: (2) does not limit the operation of section 160
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Temporal relation between sections
premise text: (1) before section 144
conclusion text: (2) before section 160
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

135A(3) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135a-ss-3
part of: 135A Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
note: No duty requires FWC to exercise powers under this Part regarding modern awards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135A(3) Special provisions relating to penalty rates and overtime rates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-135a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Nothing in subsection (1)
conclusion text: No duty requires FWC to exercise powers under this Part regarding modern awards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136 What can be included in modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136
note: Terms that must be included in modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-136-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-136-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-136-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136 What can be included in modern awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must be included
logic summary: Obligation to include terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137 Terms that contravene section 136 have no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137
note: Terms of modern awards that contravene section 136 have no effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Section 137 implies that terms of modern awards with effect must comply with section 136.
premise text: Terms of a modern award have no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 136.
conclusion text: If a term of a modern award has effect, then it complies with section 136.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Section 137 implies that terms of modern awards with effect must comply with section 136 within the same temporal interval.
premise text: Terms of a modern award have no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 136.
conclusion text: If a term of a modern award has effect, then it overlaps with section 136 within the same temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
logic summary: Section 137 implies that terms of modern awards with effect must comply with section 136 for all possible traces.
premise text: Terms of a modern award have no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 136.
conclusion text: If a term of a modern award has effect, then it holds for all possible traces that it complies with section 136.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Section 137 implies that terms of modern awards with effect must diffuse to all agents affected by the term.
premise text: Terms of a modern award have no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 136.
conclusion text: If a term of a modern award has effect, then it diffuses to all agents affected by the term.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-137-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Section 137 implies that terms of modern awards with effect must be processed by AI systems in accordance with section 136.
premise text: Terms of a modern award have no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 136.
conclusion text: If a term of a modern award has effect, then it implies that AI systems process terms of modern awards in accordance with section 136.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

138 Achieving the modern awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-138
note: Terms that may be included in modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-138-norm

139 Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139
has part: 139(1) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
has part: 139(2) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298

139(1) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139-ss-1
part of: 139 Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
note: Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(1) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

139(2) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139-ss-2
part of: 139 Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
note: Allowances in modern awards must be clearly identified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.298
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(2) Terms that may be included in modern awards—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-139-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be clearly identified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 Outworker terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-140
has part: 140(1) Outworker terms
has part: 140(2) Outworker terms
has part: 140(3) Outworker terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299

140(1) Outworker terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-140-ss-1
part of: 140 Outworker terms
note: Employer must comply with outworker terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(1) Outworker terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(2) Outworker terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-140-ss-2
part of: 140 Outworker terms
note: Outworker terms must include pay or conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(2) Outworker terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide outworker terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(3) Outworker terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-140-ss-3
part of: 140 Outworker terms
note: Defines outworker terms within a modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(3) Outworker terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-140-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Outworker terms are specified by the legislation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141 Industry-specific redundancy schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-141
has part: 141(1) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
has part: 141(2) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
has part: 141(3) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300

141(1) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-141-ss-1
part of: 141 Industry-specific redundancy schemes
note: An industry-specific redundancy scheme may be included in a modern award if it was included in the award modernisation process or in accordance with subsection (2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 141(1) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

141(2) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-141-ss-2
part of: 141 Industry-specific redundancy schemes
note: The FWC may include an industry-specific redundancy scheme in another modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 141(2) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may include the scheme.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: The scheme is included in another modern award.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141(3) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-141-ss-3
part of: 141 Industry-specific redundancy schemes
note: The FWC may only vary an industry-specific redundancy scheme in a modern award under Division 5.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.300
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 141(3) Industry-specific redundancy schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to vary the scheme
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141A Terms permitting fixed term contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-141a
has part: 141A(1) Terms permitting fixed term contracts
has part: 141A(2) Terms permitting fixed term contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301

141A(1) Terms permitting fixed term contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-141a-ss-1
part of: 141A Terms permitting fixed term contracts
note: Employee can be employed under a contract with a fixed term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Employee can be employed under a contract with a fixed term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141A(2) Terms permitting fixed term contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-141a-ss-2
part of: 141A Terms permitting fixed term contracts
note: Allowance of certain circumstances in modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-141a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of terms in modern awards
premise text: Terms permitting fixed term contracts
conclusion text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Incidental and machinery terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142
note: Definition of incidental terms in modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-142-norm

143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143
has part: 143(1) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(2) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(3) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(4) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(5) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(6) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(7) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(8) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
has part: 143(9) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302

143(1) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-1
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
note: Must include coverage terms setting out covered parties
description: Coverage terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must include
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143(2) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-2
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
note: Must cover specified employers and employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST COVER
logic summary: Expressed coverage terms
premise text: (2) A modern award must be expressed to cover:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143(3) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-3
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
note: Specify organisations covered by a modern award
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-3-norm

143(4) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-4
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
note: Specify outworker entities for modern award coverage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Specify outworker entities for modern award coverage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143(5) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-5
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
note: Employers and employees must be specified by inclusion in a class or classes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143(5) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers and employees must be specified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143(6) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-6
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
note: Employees not traditionally covered by awards may be described by reference to a particular industry or part of an industry, or particular kinds of work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-6-norm

143(7) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-7
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
note: Cannot cover classes of employees with traditionally not been covered by awards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 143(7) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (7) A modern award must not be expressed to cover classes of employees:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (7) A modern award must not be expressed to cover classes of employees:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143(8) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-8
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
note: Must not cover employees covered by a modern enterprise award or an enterprise instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-8-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143(9) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-9
part of: 143 Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
note: Exemption from application for modern enterprise awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-9-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143(9) Coverage terms of modern awards other than modern
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exempts modern enterprise awards from application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a
has part: 143A(1) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(2) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(3) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(4) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(5) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(6) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(7) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
has part: 143A(8) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304

143A(1) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a-ss-1
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
note: Defines coverage terms for modern enterprise awards
description: Enterprise or enterprises to which the modern enterprise award relates; Employers, employees and organisations that are covered by the modern enterprise award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143A(1) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustInclude
logic summary: Requires the inclusion of specific information in modern enterprise awards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143A(2) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a-ss-2
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
note: Modern enterprise award must relate to a single enterprise or one or more enterprises under specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlapsWith
logic summary: Temporal overlap relation
premise text: (2) A modern enterprise award must be expressed to relate...
conclusion text: ...to one or more enterprises, but only if the employers all carry on similar business activities under the same franchise and are:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursDuring
logic summary: Temporal occurrence relation
premise text: (2) A modern enterprise award must be expressed to relate...
conclusion text: ...if the employers all carry on similar business activities under the same franchise and are:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeExpressedTo
logic summary: Obligation relation
premise text: (2) A modern enterprise award must be expressed to relate...
conclusion text: ...a single enterprise (or a part of a single enterprise) only; or...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143A(3) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a-ss-3
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
note: Must cover specified employer and employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143A(3) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST COVER
logic summary: Expresses obligation to cover employers and employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143A(4) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a-ss-4
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
note: Specify organisations covered by modern enterprise award
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-4-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143A(4) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

143A(5) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a-ss-5
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
note: Cannot cover outworker entities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 143A(5) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Cannot cover outworker entities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjointWith
logic summary: Temporal disjointness
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

143A(6) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a-ss-6
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
note: Enterprise must be specified by name or franchise name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143A(6) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Enterprise must be specified by name or franchise name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143A(7) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a-ss-7
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
note: Employer and employee specifications for modern enterprise awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143A(7) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specification
logic summary: Employer and employee specification
premise text: (7) For the purposes of subsections (3) and (4):
conclusion text: an employer or employers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between employer and employee specifications
premise text: (a) an employer or employers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
conclusion text: and (b) employees must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: Ordered trace of employer and employee specifications
premise text: (a) an employer or employers may be specified by name or by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
conclusion text: and (b) employees must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or specified classes;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specification
logic summary: Organisation specification
premise text: (c) organisations must be specified by name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

143A(8) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143a-ss-8
part of: 143A Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
note: Cannot cover classes of employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-8-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-8-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 143A(8) Coverage terms of modern enterprise awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143b
has part: 143B(1) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
has part: 143B(2) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
has part: 143B(3) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
has part: 143B(4) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
has part: 143B(5) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306

143B(1) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143b-ss-1
part of: 143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
note: Must include coverage terms setting out covered parties
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include coverage terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143B(2) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143b-ss-2
part of: 143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
note: Only specified State reference public sector employers and employees are covered by the modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: only if
logic summary: Conditional coverage
premise text: (2) The coverage terms must be such that:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143B(3) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143b-ss-3
part of: 143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
note: Specify organisations covered by a State reference public sector modern award
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-3-norm

143B(4) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143b-ss-4
part of: 143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
note: Cannot cover outworker entities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 143B(4) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Cannot cover outworker entities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143B(5) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143b-ss-5
part of: 143B Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
note: Employers and employees must be specified by name or inclusion in a class.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143B(5) Coverage terms of State reference public sector modern
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specification
logic summary: Employer and employee specification is obligatory.
premise text: (5) For the purposes of this section:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-143b-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specification
logic summary: Organisation specification is obligatory.
premise text: (c) organisations must be specified by name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144 Flexibility terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144
has part: 144(1) Flexibility terms
has part: 144(2) Flexibility terms
has part: 144(3) Flexibility terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307

144(1) Flexibility terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-1
part of: 144 Flexibility terms
note: Employee and employer must agree on individual flexibility arrangements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144(1) Flexibility terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide individual flexibility arrangements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144(2) Flexibility terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-2
part of: 144 Flexibility terms
note: Employee and employer must agree to individual flexibility arrangement under a flexibility term in a modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144(2) Flexibility terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employee and employer must agree to individual flexibility arrangement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144(3) Flexibility terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144-ss-3
part of: 144 Flexibility terms
note: Does not change effect of modern award on employer and other employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144(3) Flexibility terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-144-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies no change to modern award effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

145 Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145
has part: 145(1) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
has part: 145(2) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
has part: 145(3) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
has part: 145(4) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308

145(1) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145-ss-1
part of: 145 Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
note: Arrangement that does not meet a requirement may be a contravention of a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 145(1) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the arrangement that does not meet a requirement.
premise text: A failure to meet such a requirement may be a contravention of a provision.
conclusion text: The arrangement is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

145(2) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145-ss-2
part of: 145 Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
note: Employer contravenes flexibility term in specified circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening flexibility term
premise text: (2) The arrangement has effect as if it were an individual flexibility arrangement.
conclusion text: Employer contravenes flexibility term in specified circumstances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

145(3) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145-ss-3
part of: 145 Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
note: Employer must ensure flexibility arrangement meets requirement or face contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance with flexibility arrangement requirement.
premise text: Subsection 144(4) requires employer to ensure arrangement meets requirement.
conclusion text: Employer contravenes flexibility term if arrangement does not meet requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlap between flexibility arrangement and requirement.
premise text: Subsection 144(4) requires employer to ensure arrangement meets requirement.
conclusion text: Requirement overlaps with flexibility arrangement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

145(4) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145-ss-4
part of: 145 Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
note: Employee and employer can terminate individual flexibility arrangement with written notice.
description: Written notice of termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 145(4) Effect of individual flexibility arrangement that does not meet
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Employee and employer can terminate arrangement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has part
logic summary: Termination requires written notice
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

145A Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145a
has part: 145A(1) Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
has part: 145A(2) Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309

145A(1) Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145a-ss-1
part of: 145A Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
note: Employer must consult employees about changes to roster or hours of work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 145A(1) Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must consult employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

145A(2) Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145a-ss-2
part of: 145A Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work
note: Employer must provide information to employees about changes to rosters or hours of work.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-145a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 Terms about settling disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-146
note: A modern award must include a procedure for settling disputes.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-146-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-146-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-146-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 146 Terms about settling disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a procedure for settling disputes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

147 Ordinary hours of work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147
note: Ordinary hours of work must be specified for each classification and type of employment.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 147 Ordinary hours of work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to specify ordinary hours of work
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-147-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification-based specification of ordinary hours of work
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 Base and full rates of pay for pieceworkers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-148
note: Award must specify base and full rates of pay for pieceworkers.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-148-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-148-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-148-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148 Base and full rates of pay for pieceworkers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-148-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Award must specify base and full rates of pay.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149 Automatic variation of allowances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149
note: Automatic variation of allowances when wage rates in the award are varied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149 Automatic variation of allowances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include terms providing for automatic variation of allowances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF
logic summary: Allowances are a kind that should be varied when wage rates in the award are varied.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149B Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149b
has part: 149B(1) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
has part: 149B(2) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311

149B(1) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149b-ss-1
part of: 149B Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
note: Employer must make superannuation contributions to avoid liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149B(1) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must make superannuation contributions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149B(2) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149b-ss-2
part of: 149B Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
note: Employer's obligation to make contributions for employee's benefit under a term does not apply in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149B(2) Term requiring avoidance of liability to pay superannuation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Employer's exemption from obligation to make contributions for employee's benefit under a term.
premise text: (2) The obligation of an employer...
conclusion text: The obligation does not apply in certain circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Employer's charge payment overlaps with employee's benefit under Part 8 of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992.
premise text: (a) the employer has made a charge payment...
conclusion text: The charge payment overlaps with the employee's benefit.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: repeats
logic summary: Employer's obligation to make contributions for employee's benefit under a term repeats in certain circumstances.
premise text: (2) The obligation of an employer...
conclusion text: The obligation repeats in certain circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Employer's exemption from obligation to make contributions for employee's benefit under a term diffuses the liability to pay superannuation.
premise text: (2) The obligation of an employer...
conclusion text: The liability is diffused.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149b-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Employer's exemption from obligation to make contributions for employee's benefit under a term recognizes the exemption.
premise text: (2) The obligation of an employer...
conclusion text: The exemption is recognized.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149C Default fund terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149c
has part: 149C(1) Default fund terms
has part: 149C(2) Default fund terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311

149C(1) Default fund terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149c-ss-1
part of: 149C Default fund terms
note: A modern award must include a default fund term that complies with section 149D.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149C(1) Default fund terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149C(2) Default fund terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149c-ss-2
part of: 149C Default fund terms
note: Employer must make terms and conditions of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.311
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149C(2) Default fund terms
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires an employer to make terms and conditions of employment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149d
has part: 149D(1) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
has part: 149D(1A) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
has part: 149D(2) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
has part: 149D(3) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
has part: 149D(4) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312

149D(1) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149d-ss-1
part of: 149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
note: Employer must make contributions to a superannuation fund for the benefit of an employee.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a moral obligation to make contributions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149D(1A) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149d-ss-1a
part of: 149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
note: Employer must make contributions to a superannuation fund for default fund employees.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149D(1A) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must make contributions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during a 4 yearly review
logic summary: Review occurs every 4 years.
premise text: Note: The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products is made during a 4 yearly review...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: Contribution must be part of an ordered sequence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149D(2) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149d-ss-2
part of: 149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
note: Employer must make contributions to a superannuation fund for default fund employees
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must make contributions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149D(3) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149d-ss-3
part of: 149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
note: Employer must make contributions to a default fund employee's superannuation fund.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must make contributions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149D(4) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149d-ss-4
part of: 149D Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
note: Employer must make contributions to a superannuation fund for default fund employee
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149D(4) Default fund term must provide for contributions to be made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must make contributions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149E Workplace delegates’ rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149e
note: Delegates' rights term must be included in modern awards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149e-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149e-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149E Workplace delegates’ rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Award must include delegates' rights term.
premise text: Award requirements
conclusion text: Delegates' rights term obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149F Right to disconnect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149f
note: Right to disconnect term in modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149f-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-149f-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149f-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 149F Right to disconnect
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-149f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has right
logic summary: Right exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150 Objectionable terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-150
note: No objectionable terms allowed in modern awards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-150-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-150-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-150-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 150 Objectionable terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-150-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of objectionable terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151 Terms about payments and deductions for benefit of employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151
note: No term with no effect due to subsections 326(1), (3), or (4) can be included in a modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-151-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-151-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-151-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151 Terms about payments and deductions for benefit of employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain terms in modern awards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152 Terms about right of entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-152
note: No official of an organisation can enter premises for certain purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-152-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-152-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: A modern award must not include terms that require or authorise an official of an organisation to enter premises.
conclusion text: No entry is allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

153 Terms that are discriminatory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-153
has part: 153(1) Terms that are discriminatory
has part: 153(2) Terms that are discriminatory
has part: 153(3) Terms that are discriminatory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315

153(1) Terms that are discriminatory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-153-ss-1
part of: 153 Terms that are discriminatory
note: Terms that discriminate against employees on certain grounds are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 153(1) Terms that are discriminatory
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits discriminatory terms in modern awards.
premise text: Modern award must not include...
conclusion text: ...discriminatory terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

153(2) Terms that are discriminatory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-153-ss-2
part of: 153 Terms that are discriminatory
note: No discrimination against employees based on inherent position requirements or religious susceptibilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 153(2) Terms that are discriminatory
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No discrimination allowed
premise text: (2) A term of a modern award does not discriminate against an employee:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Good faith and avoiding injury to religious susceptibilities are permitted reasons for discrimination
premise text: (i) in good faith; and (ii) to avoid injury to the religious susceptibilities of adherents of that religion or creed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal intervals for discrimination based on inherent position requirements overlap with employee's term
premise text: (2) A term of a modern award does not discriminate against an employee:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Temporal intervals for discrimination based on religious susceptibilities repeat with each employment as staff member
premise text: (b) merely because it discriminates, in relation to employment of the employee as a member of the staff of an institution that is conducted in accordance with the doctrines, tenets, beliefs or teachings of a particular religion or creed:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

153(3) Terms that are discriminatory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-153-ss-3
part of: 153 Terms that are discriminatory
note: Minimum wages for junior employees do not discriminate against an employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 153(3) Terms that are discriminatory
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not
logic summary: No discrimination in minimum wages for junior employees.
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award does not discriminate against an employee merely because it provides for minimum wages...
conclusion text: Minimum wages for junior employees do not discriminate against an employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is a subclass of
logic summary: Junior employees are a class of employees.
premise text: (a) all junior employees, or a class of junior employees;
conclusion text: Junior employees are a class of employees.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps with
logic summary: Minimum wages for junior employees overlap with minimum wages for all employees.
premise text: (a) all junior employees, or a class of junior employees;
conclusion text: Minimum wages for junior employees overlap with minimum wages for all employees.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: is part of
logic summary: Minimum wages for junior employees are part of the modern award terms.
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award does not discriminate against an employee merely because it provides for minimum wages...
conclusion text: Minimum wages for junior employees are part of the modern award terms.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: is related to
logic summary: Minimum wages for junior employees relate to diffusion in employment.
premise text: (a) all junior employees, or a class of junior employees;
conclusion text: Minimum wages for junior employees relate to diffusion in employment.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-153-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is applicable to
logic summary: Minimum wages for junior employees are applicable to CogAI.
premise text: (a) all junior employees, or a class of junior employees;
conclusion text: Minimum wages for junior employees are applicable to CogAI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154 Terms that contain State-based differences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-154
has part: 154(1) Terms that contain State-based differences
has part: 154(2) Terms that contain State-based differences
has part: 154(3) Terms that contain State-based differences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316

154(1) Terms that contain State-based differences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-154-ss-1
part of: 154 Terms that contain State-based differences
note: Terms and conditions of employment cannot be State-based difference terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-ltl-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 154(1) Terms that contain State-based differences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (a) are determined by reference to State or Territory boundaries;
conclusion text: must not include terms and conditions of employment (State-based difference terms)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (b) are expressed to operate in one or more, but not every, State and Territory.
conclusion text: must not include terms and conditions of employment (State-based difference terms)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal relation between State-based difference terms
premise text: (a) are determined by reference to State or Territory boundaries;
conclusion text: are expressed to operate in one or more, but not every, State and Territory.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal relation between State-based difference terms
premise text: (a) are determined by reference to State or Territory boundaries;
conclusion text: are expressed to operate in one or more, but not every, State and Territory.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

154(2) Terms that contain State-based differences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-154-ss-2
part of: 154 Terms that contain State-based differences
note: Limitation on inclusion of State-based difference terms in modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 154(2) Terms that contain State-based differences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Limits the scope of State-based difference terms
premise text: (2) However, a modern award may include...
conclusion text: ...but only for up to 5 years...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAt
logic summary: Specifies the starting point of the limitation
premise text: ...starting on the day on which the first modern award that included those terms came into operation.
conclusion text: ...starting on the day...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: StartsAt
logic summary: Specifies the starting point of the limitation
premise text: ...starting on the day on which the first modern award that included those terms came into operation.
conclusion text: ...starting on the day...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

154(3) Terms that contain State-based differences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-154-ss-3
part of: 154 Terms that contain State-based differences
note: The FWC may include State-based difference terms in another modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 154(3) Terms that contain State-based differences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to include terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Terms and conditions of employment
premise text: Chapter 2 Modern awards Part 2-3 Terms of modern awards Division 3 Section 155
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between FWC's actions and modern award terms
premise text: (a) a modern award includes State-based difference terms as permitted under subsection (2); and (b) the FWC is making or varying another modern award so that it (rather than the modern award referred to in paragraph (a)) will cover some or all of the classes of employees who are covered by those terms;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repeating pattern of FWC's actions and modern award terms
premise text: (a) a modern award includes State-based difference terms as permitted under subsection (2); and (b) the FWC is making or varying another modern award so that it (rather than the modern award referred to in paragraph (a)) will cover some or all of the classes of employees who are covered by those terms;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-154-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on extending coverage of terms
premise text: However, the FWC must not extend the coverage of those terms to classes of employees that they did not previously cover.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

155 Terms dealing with long service leave
type: Concept
realized by: sec-155
note: No modern award may include terms dealing with long service leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-155-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-155-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156B Making the Default Superannuation List
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156b
has part: 156B(1) Making the Default Superannuation List
has part: 156B(2) Making the Default Superannuation List
has part: 156B(3) Making the Default Superannuation List
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319

156B(1) Making the Default Superannuation List
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156b-ss-1
part of: 156B Making the Default Superannuation List
note: The FWC must make and publish the Default Superannuation List.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156B(1) Making the Default Superannuation List
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make and publish the Default Superannuation List.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156B(2) Making the Default Superannuation List
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156b-ss-2
part of: 156B Making the Default Superannuation List
note: Specify each standard MySuper product determined by FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156B(2) Making the Default Superannuation List
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156B(3) Making the Default Superannuation List
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156b-ss-3
part of: 156B Making the Default Superannuation List
note: Cannot specify other products
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 156B(3) Making the Default Superannuation List
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Default Superannuation List must not specify other products
conclusion text: Cannot specify other products
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: The Default Superannuation List must not specify other products during its existence
conclusion text: The Default Superannuation List must exist before specifying other products
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: The Default Superannuation List must not specify other products until its existence ends
conclusion text: The Default Superannuation List must end before specifying other products
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustNotSpecify
logic summary: Diffusion logic
premise text: The Default Superannuation List must not specify other products in all possible worlds
conclusion text: Cannot specify other products
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156b-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: mustNotSpecify
logic summary: CogAI logic
premise text: The Default Superannuation List must not specify other products using CogAI rules
conclusion text: Cannot specify other products
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156C Applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156c
has part: 156C(1) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
has part: 156C(2) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
has part: 156C(3) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
has part: 156C(4) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319

156C(1) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156c-ss-1
part of: 156C Applications to list a standard MySuper product
note: Superannuation funds must apply to have a standard MySuper product included on the list.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156C(1) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156C(2) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156c-ss-2
part of: 156C Applications to list a standard MySuper product
note: Specify period for application
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156C(2) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156C(3) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156c-ss-3
part of: 156C Applications to list a standard MySuper product
note: Application for standard MySuper product inclusion on the list
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Application for standard MySuper product inclusion on the list
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Timing of application
premise text: The notice is published after the interval starts
conclusion text: The application can be made during this time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156C(4) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156c-ss-4
part of: 156C Applications to list a standard MySuper product
note: Application must meet certain terms and conditions of employment
description: Terms and conditions of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156C(4) Applications to list a standard MySuper product
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must meet certain terms and conditions
premise text: Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156D Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156d
has part: 156D(1) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
has part: 156D(2) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
has part: 156D(3) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320

156D(1) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156d-ss-1
part of: 156D Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
note: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156D(1) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156D(2) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156d-ss-2
part of: 156D Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
note: Disclosure of interest in relation to a superannuation fund
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156D(2) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156D(3) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156d-ss-3
part of: 156D Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
note: The FWC must publish any submission that is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156D(3) Submissions on applications to list a standard MySuper
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156E Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156e
has part: 156E(1) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
has part: 156E(2) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321

156E(1) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156e-ss-1
part of: 156E Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
note: FWC must make a determination about including a standard MySuper product on the list.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156E(1) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to make a determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156E(2) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156e-ss-2
part of: 156E Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
note: FWC must not determine product inclusion unless in best interests of default fund employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 156E(2) Determining applications to list a standard MySuper product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: FWC must not determine product inclusion.
conclusion text: unless in best interests of default fund employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification criteria
premise text: taking into account the information provided in the application; and the first stage criteria; and any submissions that were made in relation to the application;
conclusion text: the FWC is satisfied that including the product on the list would be in the best interests of default fund employees.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration
premise text: the first stage criteria;
conclusion text: within a specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156F First stage criteria
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156f
note: Criteria for MySuper product approval
description: The superannuation fund must deliver on the long term investment return target.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156f-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156f-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156F First stage criteria
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
conclusion text: The superannuation fund must deliver on the long term investment return target.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156G Review of the default fund term of modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156g
has part: 156G(1) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
has part: 156G(2) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
has part: 156G(3) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
has part: 156G(4) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322

156G(1) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156g-ss-1
part of: 156G Review of the default fund term of modern awards
note: The FWC must review the default fund term of each modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156G(1) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review default fund term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156G(2) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156g-ss-2
part of: 156G Review of the default fund term of modern awards
note: Employers and organisations must provide employees with a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions regarding the default fund term of modern awards.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156G(2) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers and organisations must provide employees with a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: The FWC must ensure that the following persons have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
premise text: FWC
conclusion text: the default fund term of modern awards
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The FWC must ensure that the following persons have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions at least as early as the commencement date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: FOR ALL
logic summary: The FWC must ensure that the following persons have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions for all time periods within the default fund term.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY BE CITED
logic summary: The FWC must ensure that the following persons have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156G(3) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156g-ss-3
part of: 156G Review of the default fund term of modern awards
note: Must disclose interest in superannuation fund if making a written submission.
description: Interest in relation to the superannuation fund mentioned in the submission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156G(3) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose interest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156G(4) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156g-ss-4
part of: 156G Review of the default fund term of modern awards
note: The FWC must publish any submission that is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156G(4) Review of the default fund term of modern awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156H Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156h
has part: 156H(1) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
has part: 156H(2) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
has part: 156H(3) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323

156H(1) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156h-ss-1
part of: 156H Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
note: FWC must vary default fund term to specify certain superannuation funds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156H(1) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to vary default fund term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156H(2) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156h-ss-2
part of: 156H Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
note: Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156H(2) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must satisfy the second stage test
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The FWC considers relevant any submissions that were made in relation to the default fund term of the award and any other matter
premise text: taking into account:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The FWC considers relevant any submissions that were made in relation to the default fund term of the award and any other matter
premise text: taking into account:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC is satisfied that specifying a superannuation fund in relation to the product in the default fund term of the modern award would be in the best interests of the default fund employees to whom the modern award applies
premise text: (b) the FWC is satisfied that specifying a superannuation fund in relation to the product in the default fund term of the modern award would be in the best interests of the default fund employees to whom the modern award applies, taking into account:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156H(3) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156h-ss-3
part of: 156H Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
note: Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156H(3) Default fund term must specify certain superannuation funds
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156J Variation to comply with section 149D
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156j
note: FWC must vary modern award term if it does not comply with section 149D
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156j-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156j-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156J Variation to comply with section 149D
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to vary term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156K Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156k
has part: 156K(1) Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
has part: 156K(2) Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324

156K(1) Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156k-ss-1
part of: 156K Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
note: Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156k-ss-1-norm

156K(2) Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156k-ss-2
part of: 156K Transitional authorisation for certain superannuation funds
note: Transitional authorisation comes into operation on the day it is made and ceases to be in operation on the day specified in the authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156k-ss-2-norm

156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156l
has part: 156L(1) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
has part: 156L(2) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
has part: 156L(3) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
has part: 156L(4) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
has part: 156L(5) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324

156L(1) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156l-ss-1
part of: 156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
note: Employer must make and publish Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products.
description: Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156L(1) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must make and publish Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156L(2) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156l-ss-2
part of: 156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
note: Specify employer MySuper product to be included on the schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156L(2) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify employer MySuper product to be included on the schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156L(3) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156l-ss-3
part of: 156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
note: Must amend schedule after determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156L(3) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to amend
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156L(4) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156l-ss-4
part of: 156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
note: Publish schedule as amended upon amendment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-4-norm

156L(5) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156l-ss-5
part of: 156L The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
note: Cannot specify other product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 156L(5) The Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specifying other products
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156M FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156m
has part: 156M(1) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
has part: 156M(2) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325

156M(1) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156m-ss-1
part of: 156M FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
note: FWC must invite applications to include employer MySuper product on schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156M(1) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to invite applications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156M(2) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156m-ss-2
part of: 156M FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
note: Specify period for application submission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156M(2) FWC to invite applications to include employer MySuper
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Specify period for application submission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156N Making applications to include employer MySuper products
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156n
has part: 156N(1) Making applications to include employer MySuper products
has part: 156N(2) Making applications to include employer MySuper products
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325

156N(1) Making applications to include employer MySuper products
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156n-ss-1
part of: 156N Making applications to include employer MySuper products
note: Employer must apply to include MySuper product on schedule
description: (a) a superannuation fund that offers the product; (b) an employer to which the product relates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156N(1) Making applications to include employer MySuper products
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must apply
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for application
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156N(2) Making applications to include employer MySuper products
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156n-ss-2
part of: 156N Making applications to include employer MySuper products
note: Application must be made within specified periods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.325
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156N(2) Making applications to include employer MySuper products
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Application must be made within specified periods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156n-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156P FWC to determine applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156p
has part: 156P(1) FWC to determine applications
has part: 156P(2) FWC to determine applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326

156P(1) FWC to determine applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156p-ss-1
part of: 156P FWC to determine applications
note: FWC must determine whether to include MySuper product on the schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156P(1) FWC to determine applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to make a determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156P(2) FWC to determine applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156p-ss-2
part of: 156P FWC to determine applications
note: FWC must not determine product inclusion unless tests are met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 156P(2) FWC to determine applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of FWC determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156Q The first stage test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156q
note: Employer MySuper product must satisfy first stage test in best interests of default fund employees or a particular class thereof.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156Q The first stage test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Satisfies
logic summary: Must satisfy first stage test
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156q-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classifies as MySuper product
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156R Submissions about the first stage test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156r
has part: 156R(1) Submissions about the first stage test
has part: 156R(2) Submissions about the first stage test
has part: 156R(3) Submissions about the first stage test
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327

156R(1) Submissions about the first stage test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156r-ss-1
part of: 156R Submissions about the first stage test
note: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156R(1) Submissions about the first stage test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156R(2) Submissions about the first stage test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156r-ss-2
part of: 156R Submissions about the first stage test
note: Disclose interest in relation to a superannuation fund when making a written submission.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156R(2) Submissions about the first stage test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to disclose interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156R(3) Submissions about the first stage test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156r-ss-3
part of: 156R Submissions about the first stage test
note: The FWC must publish any submission that is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156R(3) Submissions about the first stage test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156S The second stage test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156s
note: Employer must satisfy FWC that including product on Schedule of Approved Employer MySuper Products is in best interests of default fund employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156S The second stage test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must satisfy FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156s-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Product on Schedule is in best interests of default fund employees
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156T Submissions about the second stage test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156t
has part: 156T(1) Submissions about the second stage test
has part: 156T(2) Submissions about the second stage test
has part: 156T(3) Submissions about the second stage test
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328

156T(1) Submissions about the second stage test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156t-ss-1
part of: 156T Submissions about the second stage test
note: Employers and their representatives must make written submissions to the FWC about MySuper products.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156T(1) Submissions about the second stage test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers must make submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156T(2) Submissions about the second stage test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156t-ss-2
part of: 156T Submissions about the second stage test
note: Disclose interest in relation to superannuation fund if applicable.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156T(2) Submissions about the second stage test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156T(3) Submissions about the second stage test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156t-ss-3
part of: 156T Submissions about the second stage test
note: The FWC must publish any submission that is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156T(3) Submissions about the second stage test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156U Publishing documents under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156u
note: Publishing documents under this Division
description: document on its website or by any other means
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156u-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156u-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-156u-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publishing obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-156u-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF
logic summary: Classifies documents as part of this Division
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157
has part: 157(1) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
has part: 157(2) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
has part: 157(2A) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
has part: 157(2B) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
has part: 157(3) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330

157(1) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-1
part of: 157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
note: The FWC may vary modern awards if necessary to achieve the objective.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-1-norm

157(2) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-2
part of: 157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
note: FWC may vary modern award minimum wages if justified by work value reasons and necessary to achieve the modern awards objective.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(2) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May vary modern award minimum wages
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: necessary to achieve the modern awards objective
logic summary: Necessary to achieve the modern awards objective
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157(2A) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-2a
part of: 157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
note: Work value reasons justifying employee pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2a-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(2A) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

157(2B) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-2b
part of: 157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
note: FWC must consider work value reasons without gender assumptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(2B) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider work value reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157(3) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-3
part of: 157 FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
note: FWC may make a determination or modern award under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(3) FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-157-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May make a determination or modern award.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158 Applications to vary, revoke or make modern award
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158
note: Who may make an application for varying or revoking a modern award
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.331
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Who may make an application for varying or revoking a modern award
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classifies the entities that can make an application
premise text: The table sets out who may apply for...
conclusion text: Item Column 1 This kind of application …
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classifies the entities that can make an application
premise text: Item Column 2 may be made by …
conclusion text: an application to vary, omit or include terms...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classifies the entities that can make an application
premise text: (a) an employer, employee or organisation that is covered by the modern award;
conclusion text: or (b) an organisation that is entitled to represent...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classifies the entities that can make an application
premise text: the industrial interests of one or more employers or employees that are covered by the modern award.
conclusion text: or (b) an organisation that is entitled to represent...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

159 Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-159
has part: 159(1) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
has part: 159(2) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334

159(1) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-159-ss-1
part of: 159 Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
note: The FWC may make a determination varying a modern award to update or omit the name of an employer, organisation or outworker entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 159(1) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The FWC may make a determination varying a modern award.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

159(2) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-159-ss-2
part of: 159 Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
note: The FWC may make a determination under this section on its own initiative or on application by the employer, organisation, or outworker entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 159(2) Variation of modern award to update or omit name of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may make a determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

159A Variation of default fund term of modern award
type: Concept
realized by: sec-159a
has part: 159A(1) Variation of default fund term of modern award
has part: 159A(2) Variation of default fund term of modern award
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334

159A(1) Variation of default fund term of modern award
type: Concept
realized by: sec-159a-ss-1
part of: 159A Variation of default fund term of modern award
note: The FWC may vary the default fund term of a modern award in relation to a superannuation fund.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The FWC may vary the default fund term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

159A(2) Variation of default fund term of modern award
type: Concept
realized by: sec-159a-ss-2
part of: 159A Variation of default fund term of modern award
note: FWC may make a determination on its own initiative or on application by an employee, employer, organisation or outworker entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 159A(2) Variation of default fund term of modern award
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-159a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: FWC may make a determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160 Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160
has part: 160(1) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
has part: 160(2) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.335

160(1) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160-ss-1
part of: 160 Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
note: The FWC may make a determination varying a modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.335
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 160(1) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC has the power to make a determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160(2) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160-ss-2
part of: 160 Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
note: The FWC may make a determination to remove ambiguity or uncertainty from modern awards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.335
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 160(2) Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC has the power to make a determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161 Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161
has part: 161(1) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
has part: 161(2) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
has part: 161(3) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336

161(1) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161-ss-1
part of: 161 Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
note: The FWC must review a modern award if it is referred to it under section 46PW of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(1) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must review a modern award.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(2) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161-ss-2
part of: 161 Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
note: Entitlement to make submissions for consideration in the review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: entitledTo
logic summary: Entitlement to make submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(3) Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161-ss-3
part of: 161 Variation of modern award on referral by Australian Human
note: FWC must vary modern award if it requires unlawful act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-161-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits doing an act that would be unlawful
premise text: Act would be unlawful under any of the Acts referred to in subsection (2)
conclusion text: FWC must vary modern award
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162 General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162
note: References other provisions in Part 5-1
references: sec-582
references: sec-590
references: sec-596
references: sec-601
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.337
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-162-norm

163 Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-163
has part: 163(1) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
has part: 163(2) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.337

163(1) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-163-ss-1
part of: 163 Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
note: Employers must not vary modern awards without proper justification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.337
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 163(1) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits varying modern awards without justification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163(2) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-163-ss-2
part of: 163 Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
note: FWC must consider varying an existing modern award before making a new one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.337
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 163(2) Special criteria relating to changing coverage of modern awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-163-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider varying an existing modern award.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164 Special criteria for revoking modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-164
note: FWC must not revoke modern awards without specific criteria
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-164-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-164-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-164-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 164 Special criteria for revoking modern awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-164-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of revocation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165 When variation determinations come into operation, other than
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165
has part: 165(1) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
has part: 165(2) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
has part: 165(3) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338

165(1) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165-ss-1
part of: 165 When variation determinations come into operation, other than
note: Determination under this Part that varies a modern award comes into operation on the specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(1) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: comes-into-operation
logic summary: Determination under this Part that varies a modern award comes into operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165(2) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165-ss-2
part of: 165 When variation determinations come into operation, other than
note: Determination must not be earlier than the specified day unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(2) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Determination must be made on or after the specified day.
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than...
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAt
logic summary: Determination must be made on or after the specified day.
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than...
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Determination takes effect from first full pay period.
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than...
conclusion text: ...Determinations take effect from first full pay period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Determination may be made earlier if exceptional circumstances justify it.
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than...
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Determination must be made on or after the specified day.
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than...
conclusion text: ...unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165(3) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165-ss-3
part of: 165 When variation determinations come into operation, other than
note: Determination takes effect on first full pay period after operation day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(3) When variation determinations come into operation, other than
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
logic summary: Determination takes effect on first full pay period after operation day
premise text: (3) The determination does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the determination comes into operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relates to temporal intervals
logic summary: Relates to temporal intervals
premise text: (3) The determination does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the determination comes into operation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: applies to trace of variation determinations
logic summary: Applies to trace of variation determinations
premise text: (3) The determination does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the determination comes into operation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses variation determinations
logic summary: Diffuses variation determinations
premise text: (3) The determination does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the determination comes into operation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-165-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: analyzes variation determinations
logic summary: Analyzes variation determinations
premise text: (3) The determination does not take effect in relation to a particular employee until the start of the employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after the day the determination comes into operation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166 When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-166
has part: 166(1) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
has part: 166(2) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
has part: 166(3) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339

166(1) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-166-ss-1
part of: 166 When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
note: Commencement of modern award minimum wages determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-1-norm

166(2) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-166-ss-2
part of: 166 When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
note: The FWC must not specify another day unless it is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(2) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: The FWC must not specify another day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MeetsCondition
logic summary: The specified day meets the condition for operation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(3) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-166-ss-3
part of: 166 When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
note: Must not be earlier than the day of determination unless certain conditions apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.339
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(3) When variation determinations setting, varying or revoking
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-166-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Must not be earlier than the day of determination unless certain conditions apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167 Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-167
has part: 167(1) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
has part: 167(2) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
has part: 167(3) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340

167(1) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-167-ss-1
part of: 167 Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
note: Section applies under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 167(1) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional application
premise text: subsection 165(2) or 166(3)
conclusion text: section applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
premise text: day before the day on which the determination is made
conclusion text: section applies
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167(2) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-167-ss-2
part of: 167 Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
note: Validity of approval unaffected by retrospective effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 167(2) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167(3) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-167-ss-3
part of: 167 Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
note: No pecuniary penalty for conduct before determination if it wouldn't have contravened a term of the modern award or enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 167(3) Special rules relating to retrospective variations of awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-167-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: No exemption applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168 Varied modern award must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168
has part: 168(1) Varied modern award must be published
has part: 168(2) Varied modern award must be published
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341

168(1) Varied modern award must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168-ss-1
part of: 168 Varied modern award must be published
note: FWC must publish varied modern award as soon as practicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168(1) Varied modern award must be published
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish varied modern award.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168(2) Varied modern award must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168-ss-2
part of: 168 Varied modern award must be published
note: Publication of modern award must be done by the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168(2) Varied modern award must be published
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish modern award.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Publication is a requirement for the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168A Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168a
has part: 168A(1) Modern enterprise awards
has part: 168A(2) Modern enterprise awards
has part: 168A(3) Modern enterprise awards
has part: 168A(4) Modern enterprise awards
has part: 168A(5) Modern enterprise awards
has part: 168A(6) Modern enterprise awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342

168A(1) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168a-ss-1
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards
note: Provisions in this Division have effect despite anything else in this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-1-norm

168A(2) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168a-ss-2
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards
note: Defines a modern enterprise award
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168A(2) Modern enterprise awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a temporal relationship between enterprises
premise text: (ii) related bodies corporate of the same franchisor
conclusion text: ...if the employers all carry on similar business activities under the same franchise...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Imposes a duty on employers to relate to a single enterprise or multiple enterprises
premise text: (a) a single enterprise (or a part of a single enterprise) only; or (b) one or more enterprises...
conclusion text: ...A modern enterprise award is a modern award that is expressed to relate to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Describes the scope of a modern enterprise award
premise text: (a) or (b)
conclusion text: ...A modern enterprise award is a modern award that is expressed to relate to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Describes the relationship between employers and franchisors using linear logic
premise text: (i) franchisees of the same franchisor; or (ii) related bodies corporate of the same franchisor
conclusion text: ...if the employers all carry on similar business activities under the same franchise...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168A(3) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168a-ss-3
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards
note: Definition of a single enterprise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-3-logic-ltl-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (3) A single enterprise is...
conclusion text: ...carried on by an employer; or...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ¬∃
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: (3) A single enterprise is...
conclusion text: ...the activities carried on by...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

168A(4) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168a-ss-4
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards
note: Joint venture employers are considered one employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implication
logic summary: Implies a duty to consider joint ventures as one employer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168A(5) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168a-ss-5
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards
note: Single enterprise considered one employer and single enterprise considered one single enterprise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168A(5) Modern enterprise awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Single enterprise considered one employer and single enterprise considered one single enterprise.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: 2 or more related bodies corporate carry on a single enterprise.
conclusion text: Single enterprise is considered one single enterprise.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168A(6) Modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168a-ss-6
part of: 168A Modern enterprise awards
note: Defines part of a single enterprise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168a-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Classifies part of an enterprise
premise text: (a) a geographically distinct part of the single enterprise; or (b) a distinct operational or organisational unit within the single enterprise.
conclusion text: A part of a single enterprise includes...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

168B The modern enterprise awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168b
has part: 168B(1) The modern enterprise awards objective
has part: 168B(2) The modern enterprise awards objective
has part: 168B(3) The modern enterprise awards objective
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343

168B(1) The modern enterprise awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168b-ss-1
part of: 168B The modern enterprise awards objective
note: The FWC must recognise that modern enterprise awards may provide terms and conditions tailored to reflect employment arrangements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168B(1) The modern enterprise awards objective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must recognise that modern enterprise awards may provide terms and conditions tailored to reflect employment arrangements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168B(2) The modern enterprise awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168b-ss-2
part of: 168B The modern enterprise awards objective
note: The modern enterprise awards objective applies to the performance of FWC's functions or powers under this Act, so far as they relate to modern enterprise awards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168B(2) The modern enterprise awards objective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to the performance of FWC's functions or powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168B(3) The modern enterprise awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168b-ss-3
part of: 168B The modern enterprise awards objective
note: Reference to modern enterprise awards objective is taken to include a reference to the modern enterprise awards objective.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168B(3) The modern enterprise awards objective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Reference is taken
premise text: Modern enterprise awards objective
conclusion text: Reference to modern enterprise awards objective
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168C Rules about making and revoking modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168c
note: FWC cannot make or vary modern enterprise awards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168c-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 168C Rules about making and revoking modern enterprise awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making modern enterprise awards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168D Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168d
has part: 168D(1) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
has part: 168D(2) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345

168D(1) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168d-ss-1
part of: 168D Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
note: FWC must not vary modern enterprise award to extend its coverage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 168D(1) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: FWC must not vary modern enterprise award.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168D(2) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168d-ss-2
part of: 168D Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
note: Considerations for varying modern enterprise award coverage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168D(2) Rules about changing coverage of modern enterprise awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider certain factors when varying coverage
premise text: (2) In deciding whether to make a determination varying the coverage of a modern enterprise award...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Contains temporal interval for decision-making process
premise text: (2) In deciding whether to make a determination varying the coverage of a modern enterprise award...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168E State reference public sector modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168e
has part: 168E(1) State reference public sector modern awards
has part: 168E(2) State reference public sector modern awards
has part: 168E(3) State reference public sector modern awards
has part: 168E(4) State reference public sector modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346

168E(1) State reference public sector modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168e-ss-1
part of: 168E State reference public sector modern awards
note: Provisions in this Division have effect despite anything else in this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-1-norm

168E(2) State reference public sector modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168e-ss-2
part of: 168E State reference public sector modern awards
note: Employers and employees must be specified in the modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168E(2) State reference public sector modern awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Employers and employees must be specified in the modern award.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168E(3) State reference public sector modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168e-ss-3
part of: 168E State reference public sector modern awards
note: Defines a State reference public sector employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168E(3) State reference public sector modern awards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of a State reference public sector employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168E(4) State reference public sector modern awards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168e-ss-4
part of: 168E State reference public sector modern awards
note: Definition of State reference public sector employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168e-ss-4-norm

168F The State reference public sector modern awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168f
has part: 168F(1) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
has part: 168F(2) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
has part: 168F(3) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346

168F(1) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168f-ss-1
part of: 168F The State reference public sector modern awards objective
note: The State must recognise the need to facilitate arrangements for State reference public sector employers and employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168F(1) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The State has an obligation to recognise...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168F(2) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168f-ss-2
part of: 168F The State reference public sector modern awards objective
note: The State reference public sector modern awards objective applies to the performance of the FWC’s functions or powers under this Act, so far as they relate to State reference public sector modern awards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168F(2) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to the performance of FWC’s functions or powers under this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168F(3) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168f-ss-3
part of: 168F The State reference public sector modern awards objective
note: Reference to modern awards objective includes State reference public sector modern awards objective.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.346
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168F(3) The State reference public sector modern awards objective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Reference to modern awards objective includes State reference public sector modern awards objective.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168G Making State reference public sector modern awards on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168g
has part: 168G(1) Making State reference public sector modern awards on
has part: 168G(2) Making State reference public sector modern awards on
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347

168G(1) Making State reference public sector modern awards on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168g-ss-1
part of: 168G Making State reference public sector modern awards on
note: FWC must make State reference public sector modern award on application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make State reference public sector modern award
premise text: Section 158
conclusion text: FWC must make award
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168G(2) Making State reference public sector modern awards on
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168g-ss-2
part of: 168G Making State reference public sector modern awards on
note: Specify employers, employees and organisations to be covered by the proposed award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168G(2) Making State reference public sector modern awards on
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Specify employers, employees and organisations to be covered by the proposed award.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168H State reference public sector modern awards may contain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168h
note: Section 154 does not apply in relation to State reference public sector modern awards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168h-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168h-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply
logic summary: Section 154 does not apply
premise text: Section 154
conclusion text: State reference public sector modern awards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168J When State reference public sector modern awards come into
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168j
note: Defines commencement of State reference public sector modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168j-norm

168K Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168k
has part: 168K(1) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
has part: 168K(2) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
has part: 168K(3) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349

168K(1) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168k-ss-1
part of: 168K Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
note: Determination to revoke State reference public sector modern award
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168K(2) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168k-ss-2
part of: 168K Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
note: No revocation of State reference public sector modern award without certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 168K(2) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No revocation without certain conditions.
premise text: FWC must not make a determination revoking a State reference public sector modern award.
conclusion text: unless the FWC is satisfied that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168K(3) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168k-ss-3
part of: 168K Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
note: Considerations for revoking a State reference public sector modern award
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168K(3) Rules about revoking State reference public sector modern
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State must consider certain factors when revoking an award
premise text: (3) In deciding whether to revoke a State reference public sector modern award...
conclusion text: The FWC must take into account the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Consideration of circumstances leading to award making
premise text: (a) the circumstances that led to the making of the modern award;
conclusion text: The FWC must consider the circumstances leading to the award making
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Consideration of views of persons covered by the modern award
premise text: (e) the views of the persons covered by the modern award;
conclusion text: The FWC must consider the views of the persons covered by the modern award
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168k-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State must provide certain information in regulations
premise text: (f) any other matter prescribed by the regulations.
conclusion text: The FWC must provide additional information in regulations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168L Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168l
has part: 168L(1) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
has part: 168L(2) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
has part: 168L(3) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350

168L(1) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168l-ss-1
part of: 168L Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
note: Determination of varying coverage of State reference public sector modern award
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-1-norm

168L(2) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168l-ss-2
part of: 168L Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
note: FWC must not vary coverage of State reference public sector modern award
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 168L(2) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (2) The FWC must not make a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award so that it ceases to be a State reference public sector modern award.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (2) The FWC must not make a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award so that it ceases to be a State reference public sector modern award.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition
premise text: (2) The FWC must not make a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award so that it ceases to be a State reference public sector modern award.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Cognitive AI application
premise text: (2) The FWC must not make a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award so that it ceases to be a State reference public sector modern award.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168L(3) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168l-ss-3
part of: 168L Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
note: Consider circumstances, terms and conditions of employment, impact on persons covered, views of persons covered, and other prescribed matters when deciding whether to make a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168L(3) Rules about varying coverage of State reference public sector
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain factors when making a determination varying the coverage of a State reference public sector modern award.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The FWC must consider the impact on persons covered, or proposed to be covered, by the modern award of a decision to make, or not make, the variation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-168l-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: A decision to make, or not make, the variation must be based on consideration of certain factors.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-169
note: Defines enterprise agreements and their terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.351
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-169-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-169-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-169-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 169 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-169-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Describes the types of matters that can be included in an enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

170 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-170
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 170 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a definition.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

171 Objects of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-171
note: Objects of this Part are to provide a simple, flexible and fair framework for collective bargaining in good faith.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-171-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-171-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 171 Objects of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

172 Making an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172
has part: 172(1) Making an enterprise agreement
has part: 172(2) Making an enterprise agreement
has part: 172(3) Making an enterprise agreement
has part: 172(3A) Making an enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354

172(1) Making an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172-ss-1
part of: 172 Making an enterprise agreement
note: Enterprise agreement matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-1-norm

172(2) Making an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172-ss-2
part of: 172 Making an enterprise agreement
note: Employers may make an enterprise agreement with employees or relevant employee organisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make an enterprise agreement
premise text: Employers may make an enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classification of employers and employees
premise text: Employer or employers are related employers
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(3) Making an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172-ss-3
part of: 172 Making an enterprise agreement
note: Multi-enterprise agreements can be made with employees or employee organisations under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the entities involved in the agreement
premise text: The agreement is made with employees or employee organisations
conclusion text: The entities are classified as employees or employee organisations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Specifies the conditions for approval
premise text: The FWC must not approve a multi-enterprise agreement that is not a greenfields agreement
conclusion text: There are conditions for approval
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for approval
premise text: The FWC must not approve a multi-enterprise agreement that is not a greenfields agreement within a certain time frame
conclusion text: There is a temporal interval for approval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >
logic summary: Specifies the trace of events for approval
premise text: The FWC must not approve a multi-enterprise agreement that is not a greenfields agreement if certain conditions are not met
conclusion text: There is a trace of events for approval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Specifies the type of agreement
premise text: The agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement
conclusion text: The agreement is of a certain type
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: >
logic summary: Classifies the entities involved in the agreement
premise text: The agreement is made with employees or employee organisations
conclusion text: The entities are classified as employees or employee organisations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(3A) Making an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172-ss-3a
part of: 172 Making an enterprise agreement
note: Two or more related employers may make a multi-enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Employers have the obligation to make a multi-enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172A Special measures to achieve equality
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172a
note: Special measures to achieve equality are permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.357
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-172a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 172A Special measures to achieve equality
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-172a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits special measures to achieve equality.
premise text: Section 172(1)(a)
conclusion text: Obligation to achieve equality through special measures.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

173 Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173
has part: 173(1) Notice of employee representational rights
has part: 173(2) Notice of employee representational rights
has part: 173(2A) Notice of employee representational rights
has part: 173(3) Notice of employee representational rights
has part: 173(4) Notice of employee representational rights
has part: 173(5) Notice of employee representational rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358

173(1) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173-ss-1
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights
note: Employer must give notice of employee representational rights
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 173(1) Notice of employee representational rights
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173(2) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173-ss-2
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights
note: Employer must notify employees of proposed enterprise agreement within specified timeframe.
description: Notice of employee representational rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 173(2) Notice of employee representational rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to notify employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173(2A) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173-ss-2a
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights
note: Employer must provide notice to bargaining representative when proposing single-enterprise agreement that replaces earlier agreement and meets certain conditions.
description: Notice in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 173(2A) Notice of employee representational rights
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173(3) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173-ss-3
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights
note: Employer must give notice within 14 days after agreement notification time.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 173(3) Notice of employee representational rights
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must give notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173(4) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173-ss-4
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights
note: No notice required if previous notice given within reasonable period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from notice requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173(5) Notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173-ss-5
part of: 173 Notice of employee representational rights
note: Regulations may prescribe how notices under subsection (1) may be given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 173(5) Notice of employee representational rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-173-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mayPrescribe
logic summary: Regulations prescribe how notices may be given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174
has part: 174(1) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
has part: 174(1A) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
has part: 174(1B) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
has part: 174(2) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
has part: 174(3) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
has part: 174(5) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360

174(1) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174-ss-1
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
note: Employer must give notice to employee under subsection 173(1)
description: Notice requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(1) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must give notice to employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174(1A) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174-ss-1a
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
note: Notice must contain prescribed content and be in prescribed form.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(1A) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice with prescribed content and form.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174(1B) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174-ss-1b
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
note: Employer must ensure notice complies with this section.
description: Notice of employee representational rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(1B) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must ensure notice complies with this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174(2) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174-ss-2
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
note: Employee must appoint a bargaining representative
description: Notice of employee representational rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(2) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must appoint a bargaining representative
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The notice contains information about the employee's right to appoint a bargaining representative
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174(3) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174-ss-3
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
note: Employee must provide notice of representation rights
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(3) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174(5) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174-ss-5
part of: 174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
note: Employee must receive notice explaining effect of paragraph 178(2)(a)
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.360
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(5) Content and form of notice of employee representational rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-174-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176 Bargaining representatives for proposed enterprise agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176
note: Employer and employee organisations are bargaining representatives for proposed enterprise agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.361
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-176-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-176-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-176-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176 Bargaining representatives for proposed enterprise agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-176-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Employer and employee organisations have a duty to be bargaining representatives.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

177 Bargaining representatives for proposed enterprise agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-177
note: Employer and employee organization must bargain for a proposed single-enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-177-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-177-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-177-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 177 Bargaining representatives for proposed enterprise agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-177-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer and employee organization must bargain for a proposed single-enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

177A Restrictions on removed persons being bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-177a
note: Definition of removed persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-177a-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-177a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 177A Restrictions on removed persons being bargaining
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

178 Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178
has part: 178(1) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
has part: 178(2) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
has part: 178(3) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367

178(1) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178-ss-1
part of: 178 Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
note: Appointment of bargaining representative comes into force on specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 178(1) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: comes-into-force
logic summary: Appointment takes effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178(2) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178-ss-2
part of: 178 Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
note: Employers and employees must provide certain information upon appointment of bargaining representatives.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers and employees must provide certain information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178(3) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178-ss-3
part of: 178 Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
note: Prescribes matters relating to qualifications or appointment of bargaining representatives.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 178(3) Appointment of bargaining representatives—other matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribe
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178A Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178a
has part: 178A(1) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
has part: 178A(2) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367

178A(1) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178a-ss-1
part of: 178A Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
note: Appointment of bargaining representative may be revoked by written instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 178A(1) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Appointment revocation obligation
premise text: (1) The appointment of a bargaining representative for an enterprise agreement may be revoked by written instrument.
conclusion text: The appointment can be revoked.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between revocation and appointment
premise text: (1) The appointment of a bargaining representative for an enterprise agreement may be revoked by written instrument.
conclusion text: Revocation and appointment have overlapping temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication from revocation to appointment cancellation
premise text: (1) The appointment of a bargaining representative for an enterprise agreement may be revoked by written instrument.
conclusion text: Revocation implies appointment cancellation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagated revocation to related entities
premise text: (1) The appointment of a bargaining representative for an enterprise agreement may be revoked by written instrument.
conclusion text: Revocation propagates to related entities
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inferred revocation from appointment cancellation
premise text: (1) The appointment of a bargaining representative for an enterprise agreement may be revoked by written instrument.
conclusion text: Revocation can be inferred from appointment cancellation
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

178A(2) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178a-ss-2
part of: 178A Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
note: Duty to revoke appointment of bargaining representatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 178A(2) Revocation of appointment of bargaining representatives etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to revoke appointment of bargaining representatives
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178B Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178b
has part: 178B(1) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
has part: 178B(2) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
has part: 178B(3) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368

178B(1) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178b-ss-1
part of: 178B Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
note: Employer must give written notice to employee organisations within a specified period.
description: Notice to employee organisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 178B(1) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178B(2) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178b-ss-2
part of: 178B Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
note: Employer must provide notice to employee organisations within a specified period.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 178B(2) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178B(3) Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178b-ss-3
part of: 178B Notified negotiation period for a proposed single-enterprise
note: Notice has no effect unless agreed upon by other employer or employers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.368
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-178b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negation of obligation
premise text: Notice has no effect unless agreed upon.
conclusion text: Agreement is required for notice to be effective.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179
has part: 179(1) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
has part: 179(2) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
has part: 179(3) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
has part: 179(4) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
has part: 179(5) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
has part: 179(6) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370

179(1) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179-ss-1
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
note: Organisations must provide disclosure documents to employers covered by an enterprise agreement.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179(1) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide disclosure documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179(2) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179-ss-2
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
note: List of persons required for disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179(2) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires disclosure of certain persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Discloses persons during certain periods
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

179(3) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179-ss-3
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
note: Organisations must disclose documents to employers before a certain time.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179(4) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179-ss-4
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
note: Organisations must disclose beneficial terms and conditions of employment.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179(4) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide disclosure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179(5) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179-ss-5
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
note: Organisations must not make false or misleading representations when providing documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits making false or misleading representations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179(6) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179-ss-6
part of: 179 Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
note: Definition of a section 179 disclosable benefit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.370
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179(6) Disclosure by organisations that are bargaining representatives
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasType
logic summary: Classification of benefits
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179A Disclosure by employers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179a
note: Employers must prepare a document if they will receive or obtain a section 179A disclosable benefit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-179a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-179a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers must prepare a document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180 Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180
has part: 180(1) Certain pre-approval requirements
has part: 180(4A) Certain pre-approval requirements
has part: 180(4B) Certain pre-approval requirements
has part: 180(4C) Certain pre-approval requirements
has part: 180(5) Certain pre-approval requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372

180(1) Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180-ss-1
part of: 180 Certain pre-approval requirements
note: Employer must comply with requirements before requesting employee approval for enterprise agreement.
description: Copy of disclosure documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to comply with requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180(4A) Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180-ss-4a
part of: 180 Certain pre-approval requirements
note: Employer must take reasonable steps to provide employees with a copy of the document before the voting process starts.
description: Copy of the document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide employees with a copy of the document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180(4B) Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180-ss-4b
part of: 180 Certain pre-approval requirements
note: Employer must provide employees with a copy of the document before voting process starts.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180(4B) Certain pre-approval requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide employees with a copy of the document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180(4C) Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180-ss-4c
part of: 180 Certain pre-approval requirements
note: False or misleading representation of employee access to documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on false or misleading representation
premise text: Employer must not make a false or misleading representation
conclusion text: No access to documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180(5) Certain pre-approval requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180-ss-5
part of: 180 Certain pre-approval requirements
note: Ensure explanation of terms and effect to employees
description: Explanation of terms and effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180A Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180a
has part: 180A(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
has part: 180A(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374

180A(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180a-ss-1
part of: 180A Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
note: This section applies to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a multi-enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180A(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to proposed enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180A(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180a-ss-2
part of: 180A Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
note: Employer cannot request employee approval for enterprise agreement without written agreement from bargaining representatives.
description: Written agreement from bargaining representatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 180A(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of requesting employee approval without written agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180B Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180b
has part: 180B(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
has part: 180B(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374

180B(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180b-ss-1
part of: 180B Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
note: This section applies to a proposed single-enterprise agreement if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180B(1) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Section applies if conditions are met.
premise text: (a) a single interest employer agreement or a supported bargaining agreement (each of which is an old agreement)
conclusion text: This section applies to a proposed single-enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Section applies during the nominal expiry date of the old agreement.
premise text: (b) the old agreement has not passed its nominal expiry date;
conclusion text: This section applies during the nominal expiry date of the old agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Section implies that the new agreement will cease to apply to the employee in relation to that employment.
premise text: (c) when the new agreement comes into operation, the old agreement will cease to apply to the employee in relation to that employment;
conclusion text: This section implies that the new agreement will cease to apply to the employee in relation to that employment.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Section implies that the old agreement is no longer applicable to the employee.
premise text: (c) when the new agreement comes into operation, the old agreement will cease to apply to the employee in relation to that employment;
conclusion text: This section implies that the old agreement is no longer applicable to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Section implies that the new agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
premise text: (a) a single interest employer agreement or a supported bargaining agreement (each of which is an old agreement)
conclusion text: This section implies that the new agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180B(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180b-ss-2
part of: 180B Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
note: Employer cannot request employee approval for new agreement without written agreement from employee organisations.
description: Written agreement from each employee organisation to which the old agreement applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 180B(2) Agreement of bargaining representatives that are employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-180b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of requesting employee approval without written agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181
has part: 181(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
has part: 181(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
has part: 181(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.375

181(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181-ss-1
part of: 181 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
note: Employers must request employee approval for proposed enterprise agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.375
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 181(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer obligation to request employee approval.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181-ss-2
part of: 181 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
note: Request for employee approval must wait 21 days after last notice under subsection 173(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.375
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-2-norm

181(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181-ss-3
part of: 181 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
note: Employees may vote by ballot or electronic method
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.375
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-181-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 181(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

182 When an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182
has part: 182(1) When an enterprise agreement is made
has part: 182(2) When an enterprise agreement is made
has part: 182(3) When an enterprise agreement is made
has part: 182(4) When an enterprise agreement is made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376

182(1) When an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182-ss-1
part of: 182 When an enterprise agreement is made
note: Approval by majority of employees for a proposed single-enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(1) When an enterprise agreement is made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to approve the agreement
premise text: Employees must approve the agreement
conclusion text: Approval is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between approval and agreement
premise text: Approval must occur before the agreement takes effect
conclusion text: Agreement commences after approval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182(2) When an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182-ss-2
part of: 182 When an enterprise agreement is made
note: Enterprise agreement approval process
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(2) When an enterprise agreement is made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Enterprise agreement approval by majority vote
premise text: (a) a proposed enterprise agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement; and (b) the employees of each of the employers that will be covered by the agreement have been asked to approve the agreement under subsection 181(1); and (c) those employees have voted on whether or not to approve the agreement; and (d) a majority of the employees of at least one of those employers who cast a valid vote have approved the agreement;
conclusion text: the agreement is made immediately after the end of the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between enterprise agreement approval and commencement
premise text: (2) If: (a) a proposed enterprise agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement; and (b) the employees of each of the employers that will be covered by the agreement have been asked to approve the agreement under subsection 181(1); and (c) those employees have voted on whether or not to approve the agreement; and (d) a majority of the employees of at least one of those employers who cast a valid vote have approved the agreement;
conclusion text: the agreement is made immediately after the end of the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Recurring approval process for enterprise agreements
premise text: (2) If: (a) a proposed enterprise agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement; and (b) the employees of each of the employers that will be covered by the agreement have been asked to approve the agreement under subsection 181(1); and (c) those employees have voted on whether or not to approve the agreement; and (d) a majority of the employees of at least one of those employers who cast a valid vote have approved the agreement;
conclusion text: the agreement is made immediately after the end of the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State's obligation to make enterprise agreements immediately after approval
premise text: (2) If: (a) a proposed enterprise agreement is a multi-enterprise agreement; and (b) the employees of each of the employers that will be covered by the agreement have been asked to approve the agreement under subsection 181(1); and (c) those employees have voted on whether or not to approve the agreement; and (d) a majority of the employees of at least one of those employers who cast a valid vote have approved the agreement;
conclusion text: the agreement is made immediately after the end of the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

182(3) When an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182-ss-3
part of: 182 When an enterprise agreement is made
note: Employers and employee organisations must sign a greenfields agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(3) When an enterprise agreement is made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers and employee organisations must sign a greenfields agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182(4) When an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182-ss-4
part of: 182 When an enterprise agreement is made
note: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement before applying for FWC approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(4) When an enterprise agreement is made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
logic summary: The employer's obligation is to give each of the employee organisations that were bargaining representatives for the agreement a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement, and then apply for FWC approval.
premise text: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement before applying for FWC approval.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The employer's obligation is to give each of the employee organisations that were bargaining representatives for the agreement a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement at least one day before applying for FWC approval.
premise text: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement before applying for FWC approval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: The employer's obligation is to give each of the employee organisations that were bargaining representatives for the agreement a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement, and then apply for FWC approval, in a recursive manner.
premise text: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement before applying for FWC approval.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-182-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: INCLUSIVE
logic summary: The employer's obligation is to give each of the employee organisations that were bargaining representatives for the agreement a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement, and then apply for FWC approval, in an inclusive manner.
premise text: Employer must give employee organisations a reasonable opportunity to sign the agreement before applying for FWC approval.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183 Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183
has part: 183(1) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
has part: 183(2) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.377

183(1) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183-ss-1
part of: 183 Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
note: Employee organisation can give notice to FWC for enterprise agreement coverage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.377
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183(1) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employee organisation has an obligation to give notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183(2) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183-ss-2
part of: 183 Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
note: Notice must be given to FWC and employers before approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.377
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183(2) Entitlement of an employee organisation to have an enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The notice must be given to the FWC, and a copy given to each employer covered by the enterprise agreement.
conclusion text: The employer must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation between notice and approval
premise text: The notice must be given before the FWC approves the agreement.
conclusion text: The notice is temporally related to the approval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-183-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Approval implies notice
premise text: If the FWC approves the agreement, then the employer must provide notice.
conclusion text: The approval implies that the notice was provided.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184
has part: 184(1) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
has part: 184(2) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
has part: 184(3) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
has part: 184(4) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
has part: 184(5) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378

184(1) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-1
part of: 184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
note: Variation of multi-enterprise agreement not approved by all employees is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(1) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of variation without employee approval.
premise text: (a) a multi-enterprise agreement is made; and (b) the agreement was not approved by the employees of all of the employers that made a request under subsection 181(1)
conclusion text: Variation of agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between employee approval and multi-enterprise agreement.
premise text: (a) a multi-enterprise agreement is made; and (b) the agreement was not approved by the employees of all of the employers that made a request under subsection 181(1)
conclusion text: Variation of agreement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of employee approval and multi-enterprise agreements.
premise text: (a) a multi-enterprise agreement is made; and (b) the agreement was not approved by the employees of all of the employers that made a request under subsection 181(1)
conclusion text: Variation of agreement
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of employee approval and multi-enterprise agreements.
premise text: (a) a multi-enterprise agreement is made; and (b) the agreement was not approved by the employees of all of the employers that made a request under subsection 181(1)
conclusion text: Variation of agreement
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of multi-enterprise agreements based on employee approval.
premise text: (a) a multi-enterprise agreement is made; and (b) the agreement was not approved by the employees of all of the employers that made a request under subsection 181(1)
conclusion text: Variation of agreement
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

184(2) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-2
part of: 184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
note: Variation of agreement to cover specific employers and employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expressed obligation
premise text: (2) Before a bargaining representative applies under section 185 for approval of the agreement...
conclusion text: The agreement must be varied so that it covers only the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval: Before a bargaining representative applies under section 185 for approval of the agreement...
premise text: (2) Before a bargaining representative applies under section 185 for approval of the agreement...
conclusion text: The variation must be expressed to cover only the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Recurring trace: The variation must cover only the following:
premise text: (a) each employer whose employees approved the agreement;
conclusion text: The variation must cover only the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expressed obligation: The bargaining representative must vary the agreement...
premise text: (2) Before a bargaining representative applies under section 185 for approval of the agreement...
conclusion text: The variation must be expressed to cover only the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184(3) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-3
part of: 184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
note: Notice must be given to other bargaining representatives
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(3) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: written notice must be given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184(4) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-4
part of: 184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
note: Employers must specify employees in a varied agreement.
description: Notice specifying employers and employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(4) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers must specify employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184(5) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-5
part of: 184 Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
note: No notice required for unknown bargaining representatives.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.378
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(5) Multi-enterprise agreement to be varied if not all employees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-184-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185
has part: 185(1) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
has part: 185(1A) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
has part: 185(2) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
has part: 185(3) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
has part: 185(4) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
has part: 185(5) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379

185(1) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185-ss-1
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
note: Must apply to FWC for approval of enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185(1A) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185-ss-1a
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
note: Application for FWC approval must be made by employer or employee organisation
description: Material to accompany the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185(1A) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185(2) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185-ss-2
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
note: Application must be accompanied by a signed copy of the agreement and required declarations.
description: Signed copy of the agreement and required declarations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185(3) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185-ss-3
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
note: Application for FWC approval must be made within 14 days or a further period as allowed by the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185(4) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185-ss-4
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
note: Application for FWC approval must be made within 14 days after agreement is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within 14 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185(5) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185-ss-5
part of: 185 Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
note: Must apply for FWC's approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185(5) Bargaining representative must apply for the FWC’s approval
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185A Material that must accompany an application under
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185a
note: Application must be accompanied by agreement and declarations.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-185a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185A Material that must accompany an application under
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-185a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by agreement and declarations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186
has part: 186(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 186(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 186(2A) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 186(2B) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380

186(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186-ss-1
part of: 186 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
note: The FWC must approve an enterprise agreement if requirements are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve an enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186-ss-2
part of: 186 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
note: The FWC must approve an enterprise agreement if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must approve an enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186(2A) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186-ss-2a
part of: 186 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
note: The FWC must approve a cooperative workplace agreement if some employees were represented by an employee organisation during bargaining.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186(2A) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must approve the agreement.
premise text: The FWC has a duty to approve cooperative workplace agreements.
conclusion text: The agreement must be approved by the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_NOT
logic summary: The agreement must not cover employees in relation to general building and construction work.
premise text: Multi-enterprise agreements must not cover employees in relation to general building and construction work.
conclusion text: The agreement cannot cover employees in relation to general building and construction work.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The FWC's approval is conditional on the representation of some employees during bargaining.
premise text: The FWC's approval is dependent on certain conditions being met.
conclusion text: The FWC's approval is conditional on the representation of some employees during bargaining.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: The agreement must be approved by the FWC if some employees were represented by an employee organisation during bargaining.
premise text: The agreement's approval is dependent on certain conditions being met.
conclusion text: The agreement must be approved by the FWC if some employees were represented by an employee organisation during bargaining.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC has a duty to approve cooperative workplace agreements that are not greenfields agreements.
premise text: The FWC has a responsibility to approve cooperative workplace agreements.
conclusion text: The FWC must approve cooperative workplace agreements that are not greenfields agreements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186(2B) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186-ss-2b
part of: 186 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
note: FWC must approve multi-enterprise agreement not covering general building and construction work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186(2B) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-186-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-187
has part: 187(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 187(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 187(3) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
has part: 187(4) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.383

187(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-187-ss-1
part of: 187 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
note: Requirement that approval not be inconsistent with good faith bargaining etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.383
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187(1) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Requirement to approve enterprise agreements in good faith
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-187-ss-2
part of: 187 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
note: FWC must approve enterprise agreement if it would undermine good faith bargaining.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.383
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187(2) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve enterprise agreement
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining.
conclusion text: FWC MUST approve enterprise agreement if it would undermine good faith bargaining.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: FWC must approve enterprise agreement within a certain timeframe
premise text: (2) The FWC must be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining by one or more bargaining representatives for a proposed enterprise agreement, or an enterprise agreement, in relation to which a scope order is in operation.
conclusion text: The FWC must approve the agreement within a certain timeframe if it would undermine good faith bargaining.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: FWC must approve enterprise agreement recursively
premise text: (2) The FWC must be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining by one or more bargaining representatives for a proposed enterprise agreement, or an enterprise agreement, in relation to which a scope order is in operation.
conclusion text: The FWC must approve the agreement recursively if it would undermine good faith bargaining.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining
premise text: (2) The FWC must be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining by one or more bargaining representatives for a proposed enterprise agreement, or an enterprise agreement, in relation to which a scope order is in operation.
conclusion text: The FWC MUST be satisfied that approving the agreement would not be inconsistent with or undermine good faith bargaining by one or more bargaining representatives for a proposed enterprise agreement, or an enterprise agreement, in relation to which a scope order is in operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187(3) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-187-ss-3
part of: 187 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
note: FWC must approve enterprise agreement variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.383
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187(3) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187(4) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-187-ss-4
part of: 187 When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
note: FWC must be satisfied with certain provisions of Subdivision E of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.383
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187(4) When the FWC must approve an enterprise agreement—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-187-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to be satisfied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188
has part: 188(1) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
has part: 188(2) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
has part: 188(2A) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
has part: 188(3) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
has part: 188(4) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384

188(1) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188-ss-1
part of: 188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
note: FWC must consider statement of principles when determining genuine agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(1) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider statement of principles
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(2) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188-ss-2
part of: 188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
note: Employees must request approval of an enterprise agreement by voting for it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(2) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employees must request approval of an enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(2A) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188-ss-2a
part of: 188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
note: Employer must comply with section 180A or 180B for an enterprise agreement to be considered genuinely agreed upon.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(2A) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(3) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188-ss-3
part of: 188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
note: Employer must take reasonable steps to give notice in relation to an enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(3) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must take reasonable steps.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(4) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188-ss-4
part of: 188 Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
note: Employer must comply with notice provisions for genuine agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(4) Determining whether an enterprise agreement has been
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188A Disclosure documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188a
note: Failure to comply with disclosure requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits non-compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188B Statement of principles on genuine agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188b
has part: 188B(1) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
has part: 188B(2) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
has part: 188B(3) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387

188B(1) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188b-ss-1
part of: 188B Statement of principles on genuine agreement
note: Employers must make a statement of principles on genuine agreement.
description: Statement of principles for employers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188B(1) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers must make a statement
conclusion text: Statement of principles for employers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188B(2) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188b-ss-2
part of: 188B Statement of principles on genuine agreement
note: Publish statement on website and other means
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188B(2) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
premise text: (2) The FWC must...
conclusion text: Publish the statement on the FWC’s website and by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188B(3) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188b-ss-3
part of: 188B Statement of principles on genuine agreement
note: Employees must be informed about certain matters before a proposed enterprise agreement is put to a vote.
description: Informing employees of bargaining, right to representation, reasonable opportunity to consider and vote on the agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188B(3) Statement of principles on genuine agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-188b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employees must be informed about certain matters before a proposed enterprise agreement is put to a vote.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

189 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
type: Concept
realized by: sec-189
has part: 189(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
has part: 189(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
has part: 189(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
has part: 189(4) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388

189(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
type: Concept
realized by: sec-189-ss-1
part of: 189 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
note: FWC must approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass the better off overall test.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve an enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

189(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
type: Concept
realized by: sec-189-ss-2
part of: 189 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
note: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Approval is contingent on exceptional circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

189(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
type: Concept
realized by: sec-189-ss-3
part of: 189 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
note: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

189(4) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
type: Concept
realized by: sec-189-ss-4
part of: 189 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement that does not pass
note: Nominal expiry date of an enterprise agreement approved by FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-189-ss-4-norm

190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-190
has part: 190(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
has part: 190(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
has part: 190(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
has part: 190(4) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
has part: 190(5) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389

190(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-190-ss-1
part of: 190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
note: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the type of obligation or prohibition
premise text: The text describes an action that the FWC may take (approve an agreement with undertakings)
conclusion text: Permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

190(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-190-ss-2
part of: 190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
note: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as a permission or right
premise text: Undertaking for titles, commencement, definitions, descriptive clauses, and amendment machinery
conclusion text: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition
conclusion text: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

190(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-190-ss-3
part of: 190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
note: FWC must seek views of bargaining representatives before accepting a written undertaking from one or more employers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 190(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to seek views of bargaining representatives
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

190(4) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-190-ss-4
part of: 190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
note: FWC must seek views of bargaining representatives before accepting an undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-ltl-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 190(4) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to seek views of bargaining representatives.
premise text: FWC must not accept an undertaking unless...
conclusion text: ...the FWC has sought the views of each person who the FWC knows is a bargaining representative for the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide signature requirements.
premise text: (4) The FWC must not accept an undertaking unless...
conclusion text: ...the FWC has sought the views of each person who the FWC knows is a bargaining representative for the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for seeking views of bargaining representatives.
premise text: (4) The FWC must not accept an undertaking unless...
conclusion text: ...the FWC has sought the views of each person who the FWC knows is a bargaining representative for the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for accepting undertakings.
premise text: (4) The FWC must not accept an undertaking unless...
conclusion text: ...the FWC has sought the views of each person who the FWC knows is a bargaining representative for the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

190(5) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-190-ss-5
part of: 190 FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with undertakings
note: The undertaking must meet any requirements relating to the signing of undertakings that are prescribed by the regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-190-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Implies a duty
conclusion text: The undertaking must meet...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191 Effect of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-191
note: Defines terms and conditions of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Establishes obligations for employers
premise text: Employment terms
conclusion text: Obligations for employers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191A FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-191a
has part: 191A(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
has part: 191A(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
has part: 191A(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390

191A(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-191a-ss-1
part of: 191A FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
note: FWC must approve enterprise agreement with amendments if it does not meet better off overall test
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 191A(1) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191A(2) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-191a-ss-2
part of: 191A FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
note: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191A(3) FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-191a-ss-3
part of: 191A FWC may approve an enterprise agreement with amendments
note: Seek views of employer, award employees, and bargaining representative before specifying an amendment under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to seek views of employer, award employees, and bargaining representative
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191B Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-191b
has part: 191B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
has part: 191B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391

191B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-191b-ss-1
part of: 191B Effect of amendment specified by FWC
note: The amendment is taken to be applied as the agreement applies to the employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 191B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to apply the amendment as specified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between the amendment and the agreement.
premise text: (1) If: (a) the FWC specifies an amendment in approving an enterprise agreement under subsection 191A(2); and (b) the agreement covers a single employer;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes the relationship between the amendment and its application.
premise text: (1) If: (a) the FWC specifies an amendment in approving an enterprise agreement under subsection 191A(2); and (b) the agreement covers a single employer;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Specifies how the amendment is applied.
premise text: (1) If: (a) the FWC specifies an amendment in approving an enterprise agreement under subsection 191A(2); and (b) the agreement covers a single employer;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Establishes the relationship between the amendment and its application.
premise text: (1) If: (a) the FWC specifies an amendment in approving an enterprise agreement under subsection 191A(2); and (b) the agreement covers a single employer;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-191b-ss-2
part of: 191B Effect of amendment specified by FWC
note: Agreement is taken to be amended by the amendment as it applies to each employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 191B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to amend the agreement as it applies to each employer.
premise text: (2) If:...
conclusion text: ...the agreement is taken to be amended by the amendment, as the agreement applies to each employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the amendment and the application of the agreement.
premise text: (2) If:...
conclusion text: ...as the agreement applies to each employer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-191b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the amendment and the application of the agreement.
premise text: (2) If:...
conclusion text: ...as the agreement applies to each employer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

192 When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-192
has part: 192(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
has part: 192(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
has part: 192(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391

192(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-192-ss-1
part of: 192 When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
note: FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement if it considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 192(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the FWC from approving an enterprise agreement under certain conditions.
premise text: The FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement if it considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The FWC shall not approve the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Indicates that the conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement overlap with the conditions under which a person commits an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or is liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve the agreement overlap with the conditions under which a person commits an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or is liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Indicates that the conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement repeat in certain circumstances.
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve the agreement repeat in certain circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Indicates that the conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement diffuse into other areas of law.
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve the agreement diffuse into other areas of law.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Indicates that the CogAI system recognizes the conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement.
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: The CogAI system recognizes the conditions under which the FWC may refuse to approve the agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

192(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-192-ss-2
part of: 192 When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
note: The FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

192(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-192-ss-3
part of: 192 When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
note: FWC may refer agreement to any person or body
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.391
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 192(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve an enterprise agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-192-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by FWC
premise text: FWC considers appropriate person or body
conclusion text: Agreement may be referred to person or body
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

193 Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193
has part: 193(1) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(1A) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(2) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(2A) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(3) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(4) Passing the better off overall test
has part: 193(5) Passing the better off overall test
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392

193(1) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193-ss-1
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test
note: Enterprise agreement must pass better off overall test for covered employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193(1) Passing the better off overall test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Enterprise agreement must pass better off overall test.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193(1A) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193-ss-1a
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test
note: FWC must undertake assessment against paragraph (1)(b) for employees with dual status.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-1a-norm

193(2) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193-ss-2
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test
note: FWC must disregard individual flexibility arrangement for the purposes of determining whether the agreement passes the better off overall test.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193(2) Passing the better off overall test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The FWC must disregard individual flexibility arrangements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193(2A) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193-ss-2a
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test
note: Disregard individual flexibility arrangement for better off overall test purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193(2A) Passing the better off overall test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193(3) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193-ss-3
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test
note: Ensure greenfields agreement passes better off overall test for all reasonably foreseeable employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193(3) Passing the better off overall test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Ensure compliance with obligation.
premise text: The FWC must be satisfied that each reasonably foreseeable employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to the employee.
conclusion text: The greenfields agreement passes the better off overall test under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Ensure overlap between test time and agreement application.
premise text: The FWC must be satisfied as at the test time that each reasonably foreseeable employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to the employee.
conclusion text: The greenfields agreement passes the better off overall test under this section during the relevant modern award period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRecurring
logic summary: Ensure recurring compliance with obligation.
premise text: The FWC must be satisfied as at the test time that each reasonably foreseeable employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to the employee.
conclusion text: The greenfields agreement passes the better off overall test under this section for all employees during the relevant modern award period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: InformationSpread
logic summary: Ensure information about the better off overall test is disseminated.
premise text: The FWC must be satisfied as at the test time that each reasonably foreseeable employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to the employee.
conclusion text: The greenfields agreement passes the better off overall test under this section for all employees who receive information about the relevant modern award.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeUpdate
logic summary: Ensure AI system updates knowledge about the better off overall test.
premise text: The FWC must be satisfied as at the test time that each reasonably foreseeable employee would be better off overall if the agreement applied to the employee.
conclusion text: The greenfields agreement passes the better off overall test under this section for all employees who receive knowledge updates about the relevant modern award.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193(4) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193-ss-4
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test
note: Employee must meet certain conditions to be covered by a modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193(4) Passing the better off overall test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustMeetConditions
logic summary: Employee must meet conditions to be covered by a modern award.
premise text: (4) An award covered employee for an enterprise agreement is an employee who:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Employee must be during the relevant modern award to be covered.
premise text: (ii) is in operation; and (iii) covers his or her employer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193(5) Passing the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193-ss-5
part of: 193 Passing the better off overall test
note: A reasonably foreseeable employee for an enterprise agreement is a person who would be covered by the agreement and a modern award.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-argumentation-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193(5) Passing the better off overall test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of a reasonably foreseeable employee
premise text: (5) A reasonably foreseeable employee for an enterprise agreement is...
conclusion text: ...a person who would be covered by the agreement and a modern award.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of the definition
premise text: (5) A reasonably foreseeable employee for an enterprise agreement is...
conclusion text: ...at the test time of an employer covered by the agreement:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Combination of conditions
premise text: (5) A reasonably foreseeable employee for an enterprise agreement is...
conclusion text: ...a person who would be covered by the agreement and a modern award.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193-ss-5-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of the definition
premise text: (5) A reasonably foreseeable employee for an enterprise agreement is...
conclusion text: ...would be covered by the agreement and a modern award.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193A Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193a
has part: 193A(1) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(2) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(3) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(4) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(5) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(6) Applying the better off overall test
has part: 193A(6A) Applying the better off overall test
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394

193A(1) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193a-ss-1
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test
note: Applying the better off overall test
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193A(1) Applying the better off overall test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Applies to determining whether an enterprise agreement passes the better off overall test
premise text: (1) This section applies for the purposes of determining...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193A(2) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193a-ss-2
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test
note: Undertake a global assessment of whether each employee concerned would be better off having regard to certain terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-2-norm

193A(3) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193a-ss-3
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test
note: Consider views from employer, employees, and bargaining representative on whether agreement passes better off overall test.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to consider views from employer, employees, and bargaining representative.
premise text: FWC must give consideration to any views relating to whether the agreement passes the better off overall test.
conclusion text: The FWC must consider these views.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The key overlaps with other sections in the Fair Work Act 2009.
premise text: sec-193a-ss-3 overlaps with sec-193a-ss-2 and sec-193a-ss-4.
conclusion text: sec-193a-ss-3 overlaps with other sections in Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The key repeats a section number from another part of the Fair Work Act 2009.
premise text: sec-193a-ss-3 is numbered similarly to sec-193a-ss-2 and sec-193a-ss-4.
conclusion text: sec-193a-ss-3 repeats a section number from Part 1 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Contains
logic summary: The key contains information about an enterprise agreement.
premise text: sec-193a-ss-3 is part of a section that deals with enterprise agreements.
conclusion text: sec-193a-ss-3 contains information about an enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The key recognizes the existence of a bargaining representative for the agreement.
premise text: The FWC must give consideration to any views from a bargaining representative.
conclusion text: sec-193a-ss-3 recognizes the existence of a bargaining representative.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193A(4) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193a-ss-4
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test
note: Primary consideration must be given to a common view on whether the agreement passes the better off overall test.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193A(4) Applying the better off overall test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Primary consideration must be given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193A(5) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193a-ss-5
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test
note: Does not apply if agreement is a greenfields agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-5-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193A(5) Applying the better off overall test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

193A(6) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193a-ss-6
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test
note: The FWC must only consider reasonably foreseeable patterns or kinds of work when applying the better off overall test.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193A(6) Applying the better off overall test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must only consider reasonably foreseeable patterns or kinds of work.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193A(6A) Applying the better off overall test
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193a-ss-6a
part of: 193A Applying the better off overall test
note: Employer must determine foreseeability of work type or employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.394
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193A(6A) Applying the better off overall test
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must determine foreseeability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-193a-ss-6a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Determining foreseeability is a task
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194 Meaning of unlawful term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-194
note: Terms that meet certain criteria are prohibited in enterprise agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.396
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-194-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-194-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-194-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits terms that meet certain criteria.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195 Meaning of discriminatory term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-195
note: Discriminatory term is defined as a term that discriminates against an employee based on certain characteristics.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.397
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 195 Meaning of discriminatory term
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Term is discriminatory if it discriminates against an employee.
premise text: Discriminatory term (1)
conclusion text: Term is discriminatory if it discriminates against an employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Term is discriminatory if it discriminates against an employee during the term of the agreement.
premise text: Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment
conclusion text: Term is discriminatory if it discriminates against an employee during the term of the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: If a term is discriminatory, then it implies that the employer is obligated to ensure equal treatment for employees.
premise text: Discriminatory term (1)
conclusion text: Employer is obligated to ensure equal treatment for employees.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
logic summary: If an employee is covered by the agreement, then the employer must comply with the non-discriminatory terms of the agreement.
premise text: Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment
conclusion text: Employer must comply with non-discriminatory terms of the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must
logic summary: The employer must ensure that all employees are treated equally regardless of their characteristics.
premise text: Discriminatory term (1)
conclusion text: Employer must ensure equal treatment for employees.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

195A Meaning of objectionable emergency management term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-195a
note: Restricting or limiting emergency management body's ability to engage volunteers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.399
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-195a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 195A Meaning of objectionable emergency management term
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-195a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Restricting or limiting emergency management body's ability.
premise text: The term has, or is likely to have, the effect of restricting or limiting the body’s ability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196 Shiftworkers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-196
has part: 196(1) Shiftworkers
has part: 196(2) Shiftworkers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402

196(1) Shiftworkers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-196-ss-1
part of: 196 Shiftworkers
note: Defines shiftworker for National Employment Standards purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 196(1) Shiftworkers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196(2) Shiftworkers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-196-ss-2
part of: 196 Shiftworkers
note: The FWC must be satisfied that the agreement defines or describes an employee as a shiftworker.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 196(2) Shiftworkers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must be satisfied
premise text: The agreement defines or describes an employee as a shiftworker
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The FWC must be satisfied for at least the duration of the shiftwork
premise text: The agreement defines or describes an employee as a shiftworker
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied for at least the duration of the shiftwork
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The enterprise agreement must define or describe the employee as a shiftworker
premise text: The agreement defines or describes an employee as a shiftworker
conclusion text: The enterprise agreement must define or describe the employee as a shiftworker
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-196-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must be satisfied that the employee is a shiftworker for the purposes of the National Employment Standards
premise text: The agreement defines or describes an employee as a shiftworker
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied that the employee is a shiftworker for the purposes of the National Employment Standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-197
has part: 197(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
has part: 197(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402

197(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-197-ss-1
part of: 197 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
note: Enterprise agreement must include pieceworker term if modern award does not.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 197(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide pieceworker term in enterprise agreement.
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee includes a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker;
conclusion text: No detriment test
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: INCLUDES
logic summary: Enterprise agreement must include specified term.
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee includes a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Must not omit pieceworker term in modern award.
premise text: (b) a modern award that is in operation and covers the employee does not include such a term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide pieceworker term if modern award does not.
premise text: (b) a modern award that is in operation and covers the employee does not include such a term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between enterprise agreement and modern award.
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee includes a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide pieceworker term in modern award.
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee includes a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-197-ss-2
part of: 197 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
note: FWC must be satisfied that including a term in the agreement does not harm employee entitlements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.402
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 197(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement includes pieceworker term
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to ensure employee entitlements are not harmed.
premise text: Including a term in the agreement may harm employee entitlements.
conclusion text: FWC must be satisfied that including such a term does not harm employee entitlements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The effect of including the term overlaps with employee entitlements.
premise text: Including a term in the agreement may affect employee entitlements.
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied that including such a term does not harm employee entitlements.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: The effect of including the term is recurrently related to employee entitlements.
premise text: Including a term in the agreement may affect employee entitlements.
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied that including such a term does not harm employee entitlements.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The effect of including the term diffuses to employee entitlements.
premise text: Including a term in the agreement may affect employee entitlements.
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied that including such a term does not harm employee entitlements.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-197-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: The FWC can infer that including the term will not harm employee entitlements.
premise text: Including a term in the agreement may affect employee entitlements.
conclusion text: The FWC must be satisfied that including such a term does not harm employee entitlements.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

198 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-198
has part: 198(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
has part: 198(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403

198(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-198-ss-1
part of: 198 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
note: No detriment test if enterprise agreement does not include a term defining the employee as a pieceworker and a modern award includes such a term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-ltl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 198(1) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If an enterprise agreement does not include a term defining the employee as a pieceworker, then no detriment test applies.
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee does not include a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker
conclusion text: No detriment test
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: The modern award is classified as including a term defining the employee as a pieceworker.
premise text: (b) a modern award that is in operation and covers the employee includes such a term
conclusion text: Modern award includes term
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If a modern award includes a term defining the employee as a pieceworker, then no detriment test applies.
premise text: (b) a modern award that is in operation and covers the employee includes such a term
conclusion text: No detriment test
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The commencement of this section overlaps with the commencement of the modern award.
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee does not include a term that defines or describes the employee as a pieceworker
conclusion text: Commencement overlap
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The no detriment test repeats for each employee covered by the modern award.
premise text: (b) a modern award that is in operation and covers the employee includes such a term
conclusion text: No detriment test repetition
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

198(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-198-ss-2
part of: 198 Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
note: FWC must be satisfied that not including a term in the agreement is not detrimental to employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 198(2) Pieceworkers—enterprise agreement does not include a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-198-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

199 School-based apprentices and school-based trainees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-199
note: Employee loadings in lieu of certain leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.403
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-199-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-199-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-199-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 199 School-based apprentices and school-based trainees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-199-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay loadings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

200 Outworkers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-200
has part: 200(1) Outworkers
has part: 200(2) Outworkers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404

200(1) Outworkers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-200-ss-1
part of: 200 Outworkers
note: Enterprise agreement must include outworker terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 200(1) Outworkers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide outworker terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF
logic summary: Outworker terms are a subclass of enterprise agreement terms.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

200(2) Outworkers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-200-ss-2
part of: 200 Outworkers
note: FWC must be satisfied that agreement terms are not detrimental to employee compared to outworker terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 200(2) Outworkers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-200-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201 Approval decision to note certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-201
has part: 201(1) Approval decision to note certain matters
has part: 201(1A) Approval decision to note certain matters
has part: 201(2) Approval decision to note certain matters
has part: 201(2A) Approval decision to note certain matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404

201(1) Approval decision to note certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-201-ss-1
part of: 201 Approval decision to note certain matters
note: FWC must note certain terms in its decision to approve an enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 201(1) Approval decision to note certain matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to note terms
premise text: FWC approves an enterprise agreement
conclusion text: Note those terms in its decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201(1A) Approval decision to note certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-201-ss-1a
part of: 201 Approval decision to note certain matters
note: FWC must note certain matters in its decision to approve an enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 201(1A) Approval decision to note certain matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to note certain matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201(2) Approval decision to note certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-201-ss-2
part of: 201 Approval decision to note certain matters
note: The FWC must note in its decision to approve the agreement that the agreement covers the organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 201(2) Approval decision to note certain matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must note in its decision to approve the agreement that the agreement covers the organisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201(2A) Approval decision to note certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-201-ss-2a
part of: 201 Approval decision to note certain matters
note: Approval decision required for certain agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.404
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 201(2A) Approval decision to note certain matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires FWC approval
premise text: (2A) If an agreement is made under subsection 182(4)
conclusion text: the FWC must approve the agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Approval decision timing not specified
premise text: (2A) If an agreement is made under subsection 182(4)
conclusion text: the approval decision must occur during the agreement-making process
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Approval decision implies employment terms
premise text: (2A) If an agreement is made under subsection 182(4)
conclusion text: the FWC approval implies the employment terms
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Approval decision spreads to employment terms
premise text: (2A) If an agreement is made under subsection 182(4)
conclusion text: the FWC approval diffuses to the employment terms
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-201-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Approval decision recognized by AI system
premise text: (2A) If an agreement is made under subsection 182(4)
conclusion text: the FWC approval is recognized by the AI system
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-202
has part: 202(1) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
has part: 202(2) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
has part: 202(3) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
has part: 202(4) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
has part: 202(5) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
has part: 202(6) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407

202(1) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-202-ss-1
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
note: Enterprise agreement must include a flexibility term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 202(1) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a flexibility term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202(2) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-202-ss-2
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
note: Employee and employer must agree to individual flexibility arrangement under a flexibility term in an enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 202(2) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must agree to individual flexibility arrangement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202(3) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-202-ss-3
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
note: Does not change effect of agreement on employer and other employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 202(3) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202(4) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-202-ss-4
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
note: If an enterprise agreement does not include a flexibility term, the model flexibility term is taken to be a term of the agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 202(4) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202(5) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-202-ss-5
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
note: The FWC must determine the model flexibility term for enterprise agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 202(5) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to determine the model flexibility term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202(6) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-202-ss-6
part of: 202 Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
note: Duty to include flexibility term in enterprise agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.407
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 202(6) Enterprise agreements to include a flexibility term etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-202-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include flexibility term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-203
has part: 203(1) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(2) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(2A) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(3) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(4) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(5) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
has part: 203(6) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408

203(1) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-203-ss-1
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
note: A flexibility term in an enterprise agreement must meet the requirements set out in this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(1) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must meet requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(2) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-203-ss-2
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
note: Employer must ensure individual flexibility arrangements comply with enterprise agreement terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(2) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must ensure compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(2A) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-203-ss-2a
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
note: Must not allow effect of outworker terms to be varied
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(2A) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits variation of outworker terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Requires inclusion in modern award
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(3) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-203-ss-3
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
note: Employer and employee must agree on individual flexibility arrangement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(3) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires genuine agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(4) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-203-ss-4
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
note: Employee must be better off overall than without individual flexibility arrangement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must ensure employee is better off overall
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(5) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-203-ss-5
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
note: Employer must ensure individual flexibility arrangement is not approved or consented to by another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Employer has a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(6) Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-203-ss-6
part of: 203 Requirements to be met by a flexibility term
note: Employee must be able to terminate individual flexibility arrangement with written notice of not more than 28 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.408
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-203-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Employer must ensure employee can terminate arrangement
premise text: Flexibility term requires termination notice
conclusion text: Employee can terminate arrangement with written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

204 Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-204
has part: 204(1) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
has part: 204(2) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
has part: 204(3) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
has part: 204(4) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.410

204(1) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-204-ss-1
part of: 204 Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
note: Arrangements not meeting requirements may be a contravention of general protections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.410
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 204(1) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on non-compliant arrangements
premise text: Failure to meet requirements may be a contravention of general protections.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

204(2) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-204-ss-2
part of: 204 Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
note: Employer contravenes flexibility term in specified circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.410
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening flexibility term
premise text: Employer must comply with flexibility terms
conclusion text: Employer contravenes flexibility term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

204(3) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-204-ss-3
part of: 204 Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
note: Employer must ensure arrangement meets requirements to avoid contravening flexibility term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.410
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 204(3) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention
premise text: Employer must ensure arrangement meets requirements.
conclusion text: Contravening flexibility term is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlap between employer's action and flexibility term
premise text: Employer must ensure arrangement meets requirements.
conclusion text: Flexibility term overlaps with employer's action.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

204(4) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-204-ss-4
part of: 204 Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
note: Arrangement must be able to be terminated by either party with written notice.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.410
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 204(4) Effect of arrangement that does not meet requirements of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-204-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to terminate arrangement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

205 Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-205
has part: 205(1) Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
has part: 205(1A) Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411

205(1) Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-205-ss-1
part of: 205 Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
note: Consultation term for major workplace changes or roster changes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must consult employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

205(1A) Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-205-ss-1a
part of: 205 Enterprise agreements to include a consultation term etc.
note: Employer must provide information to employees about changes to the regular roster or ordinary hours of work.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.411
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

205A Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-205a
has part: 205A(1) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
has part: 205A(2) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
has part: 205A(3) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413

205A(1) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-205a-ss-1
part of: 205A Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
note: Enterprise agreement must include a delegates' rights term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 205A(1) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a delegates' rights term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

205A(2) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-205a-ss-2
part of: 205A Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
note: Delegates' rights term in enterprise agreement must be at least as favourable as modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 205A(2) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

205A(3) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-205a-ss-3
part of: 205A Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
note: Term does not change if modern award changes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.413
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-205a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 205A(3) Enterprise agreements to include a delegates’ rights term etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

206 Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
type: Concept
realized by: sec-206
has part: 206(1) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
has part: 206(2) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
has part: 206(3) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
has part: 206(4) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414

206(1) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
type: Concept
realized by: sec-206-ss-1
part of: 206 Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
note: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less than the award rate if a modern award applies to the employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 206(1) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on lower base rate of pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206(2) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
type: Concept
realized by: sec-206-ss-2
part of: 206 Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
note: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less than the award rate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 206(2) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits lower base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206(3) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
type: Concept
realized by: sec-206-ss-3
part of: 206 Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
note: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less than the employee's order rate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 206(3) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits lower base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement.
premise text: (3) If: ...; the base rate of pay payable to the employee under the enterprise agreement (the agreement rate) must not be less than the employee’s order rate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement is between the employee's order rate and the national minimum wage.
premise text: (3) If: ...; the base rate of pay payable to the employee under the enterprise agreement (the agreement rate) must not be less than the employee’s order rate.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement is recurring at least every pay period.
premise text: (3) If: ...; the base rate of pay payable to the employee under the enterprise agreement (the agreement rate) must not be less than the employee’s order rate.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement is diffuse to all employees covered by the agreement.
premise text: (3) If: ...; the base rate of pay payable to the employee under the enterprise agreement (the agreement rate) must not be less than the employee’s order rate.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: If an enterprise agreement applies to an employee, then the base rate of pay under the agreement must not be less than the employee's order rate.
premise text: (3) If: ...; the base rate of pay payable to the employee under the enterprise agreement (the agreement rate) must not be less than the employee’s order rate.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206(4) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
type: Concept
realized by: sec-206-ss-4
part of: 206 Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
note: Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less than the employee's order rate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.414
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 206(4) Base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement must not be less
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-206-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits lower base rate of pay under an enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207 Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-207
has part: 207(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
has part: 207(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
has part: 207(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
has part: 207(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416

207(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-207-ss-1
part of: 207 Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
note: Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by the employer and employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 207(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make a variation of an enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-207-ss-2
part of: 207 Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
note: Employees must be affected for variation approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 207(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
premise text: Variation has no effect unless approved by the FWC
conclusion text: Employees must be affected for variation approval.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-207-ss-3
part of: 207 Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
note: Approval by FWC is required for variation of an enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 207(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval by FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-207-ss-4
part of: 207 Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
note: Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by one or more persons who will be necessary for the normal conduct of the enterprise concerned and are covered by the agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.416
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 207(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement may be made by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make variation of enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207A Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-207a
has part: 207A(1) Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
has part: 207A(2) Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417

207A(1) Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-207a-ss-1
part of: 207A Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
note: This section applies to a proposed variation of a multi-enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 207A(1) Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to proposed variation of multi-enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207A(2) Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-207a-ss-2
part of: 207A Agreement of employee organisations covered by the
note: Employer cannot request employee approval for variation without written agreement from each organisation or a voting request order
description: Written agreement from each organisation or a voting request order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-207a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of requesting employee approval without written agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

208 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-208
has part: 208(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
has part: 208(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417

208(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-208-ss-1
part of: 208 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
note: Employers must request employee approval for proposed variation of the agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 208(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers must request employee approval.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

208(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-208-ss-2
part of: 208 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
note: Request for employee approval of proposed changes to terms and conditions of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.417
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by employer
premise text: Employer requests approval from employees
conclusion text: Employees may approve or reject proposed changes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Request for employee approval can occur at any time during employment
premise text: Employment can start at any time
conclusion text: Request for employee approval can overlap with employment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Approval by employees implies acceptance of proposed changes to terms and conditions of employment
premise text: Employees approve or reject proposed changes
conclusion text: Approval by employees implies acceptance of proposed changes
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Request for employee approval can diffuse to other employees through communication channels
premise text: Employees communicate with each other about proposed changes
conclusion text: Request for employee approval can diffuse to other employees
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-208-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
logic summary: Request for employee approval incorporates AI-driven decision-making processes
premise text: Employer uses AI to facilitate request for employee approval
conclusion text: Request for employee approval incorporates AI-driven decision-making processes
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

209 When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-209
has part: 209(1) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
has part: 209(2) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418

209(1) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-209-ss-1
part of: 209 When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
note: Majority approval required for variation of enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 209(1) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
premise text: A majority of affected employees must approve the variation
conclusion text: The variation is made when a majority approves
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation approval
premise text: The variation is approved when the majority votes within a certain timeframe
conclusion text: The variation is approved between the start and end of the voting period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation approval
premise text: The variation is approved when the majority votes within a certain timeframe
conclusion text: The variation is approved between the start and end of the voting period
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Diffusion of variation approval process
premise text: The process involves the diffusion of information to affected employees
conclusion text: The process is defined as the diffusion of information to affected employees
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for variation approval
premise text: The process may involve artificial intelligence applications
conclusion text: The process is defined as an AI application for variation approval
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

209(2) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-209-ss-2
part of: 209 When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
note: Majority approval required for variation of enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 209(2) When a variation of an enterprise agreement is made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-209-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210 Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-210
has part: 210(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
has part: 210(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
has part: 210(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
has part: 210(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418

210(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-210-ss-1
part of: 210 Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
note: Application for FWC approval of variation to enterprise agreement
description: Material accompanying the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 210(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to apply for approval
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-210-ss-2
part of: 210 Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
note: Application requirements for FWC approval of variation
description: signed copy of the variation, agreement as proposed to be varied, and required declarations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 210(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by specific documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-210-ss-3
part of: 210 Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
note: Application must be made within a specified time period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 210(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to make application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-210-ss-4
part of: 210 Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
note: Requirements for signing variations of enterprise agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.418
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 210(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-210-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires regulations to prescribe requirements
premise text: Regulations may prescribe requirements
conclusion text: Requirements must be prescribed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

211 When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-211
has part: 211(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
has part: 211(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419

211(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-211-ss-1
part of: 211 When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
note: FWC must approve variation of enterprise agreement under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 211(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
premise text: The FWC must approve the variation.
conclusion text: If the conditions are met, the FWC must approve the variation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for approval of variation
premise text: The FWC must approve the variation within 4 years after its initial approval.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for approval is between 0 and 4 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Implication of FWC's obligation to approve variation
premise text: If the conditions are met, the FWC must approve the variation.
conclusion text: The approval of the variation implies that the FWC has fulfilled its obligations.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to approve variation
premise text: The FWC's obligation to approve the variation is a requirement for all relevant parties.
conclusion text: The diffusion of the obligation implies that it applies to all relevant parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classification of FWC's obligation as a cogent AI requirement
premise text: The FWC's obligation to approve the variation is a requirement for all relevant parties.
conclusion text: The classification implies that it is a cogent AI requirement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

211(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-211-ss-1a
part of: 211 When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
note: FWC must not approve variation if employees not covered by agreement and employer specified in supported bargaining authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 211(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-211-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of FWC approval
premise text: FWC must approve variation
conclusion text: FWC must not approve variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

212 FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-212
has part: 212(1) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
has part: 212(2) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
has part: 212(3) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
has part: 212(4) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423

212(1) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-212-ss-1
part of: 212 FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
note: FWC must approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with undertakings if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 212(1) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation of enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

212(2) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-212-ss-2
part of: 212 FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
note: FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-2-norm

212(3) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-212-ss-3
part of: 212 FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
note: FWC may only accept a written undertaking from one or more employers covered by the agreement under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 212(3) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

212(4) FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
type: Concept
realized by: sec-212-ss-4
part of: 212 FWC may approve a variation of an enterprise agreement with
note: Regulations prescribe requirements for signing undertakings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-212-ss-4-norm

213 Effect of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-213
note: Approval of variation of enterprise agreement after accepting undertaking under subsection 212(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes duty
logic summary: Duty to approve variation after accepting undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

213A FWC may approve variation with amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-213a
has part: 213A(1) FWC may approve variation with amendments
has part: 213A(2) FWC may approve variation with amendments
has part: 213A(3) FWC may approve variation with amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424

213A(1) FWC may approve variation with amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-213a-ss-1
part of: 213A FWC may approve variation with amendments
note: FWC must approve variation with amendments if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 213A(1) FWC may approve variation with amendments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation with amendments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for approval of variation with amendments.
premise text: (1) This section applies if:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

213A(2) FWC may approve variation with amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-213a-ss-2
part of: 213A FWC may approve variation with amendments
note: FWC may approve variation with amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to approve variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

213A(3) FWC may approve variation with amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-213a-ss-3
part of: 213A FWC may approve variation with amendments
note: Seek views of employers and employee organisations before specifying an amendment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to seek views
premise text: The FWC must seek the views of employers and employee organisations.
conclusion text: An amendment can only be specified if the views are sought.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to inform
premise text: The FWC must inform employers and employee organisations of its intention to specify an amendment.
conclusion text: An amendment can only be specified if the views are informed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for seeking views
premise text: The FWC must seek the views of employers and employee organisations before specifying an amendment.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for seeking views is before specifying an amendment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for informing
premise text: The FWC must inform employers and employee organisations of its intention to specify an amendment.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for informing is before specifying an amendment.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Permissive provision
premise text: The FWC may seek the views of employers and employee organisations.
conclusion text: Seeking views is a permissive action for the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

213B Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-213b
has part: 213B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
has part: 213B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424

213B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-213b-ss-1
part of: 213B Effect of amendment specified by FWC
note: The variation is taken to be amended by the amendment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 213B(1) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes to be
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: the variation is taken to be amended by the amendment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

213B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-213b-ss-2
part of: 213B Effect of amendment specified by FWC
note: Variation in enterprise agreement is amended by the amendment as it applies to each employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 213B(2) Effect of amendment specified by FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-213b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Variation is amended by the amendment.
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: ...the variation is taken to be amended...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

214 When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-214
has part: 214(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
has part: 214(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
has part: 214(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.425

214(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-214-ss-1
part of: 214 When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an enterprise agreement if it may result in a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.425
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 214(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of approving the variation if it may result in a crime or penalty.
premise text: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The FWC may refuse to approve the variation if it may result in a crime or penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of approving the variation if it may result in a liability for a pecuniary penalty.
premise text: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The FWC may refuse to approve the variation if it may result in a liability for a pecuniary penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Overlap between the proposed variation and potential legal consequences.
premise text: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The FWC may refuse to approve the variation if it overlaps with potential legal consequences.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repetition of the condition that the FWC may refuse to approve the variation if it may result in a crime or penalty.
premise text: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The FWC may refuse to approve the variation if it repeats the condition that it may result in a crime or penalty.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of the prohibition from the FWC to the applicant.
premise text: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The diffusion of the prohibition from the FWC to the applicant is that they may refuse to approve the variation if it may result in a crime or penalty.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

214(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-214-ss-2
part of: 214 When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.425
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 214(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
logic summary: FWC obligation to approve variations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

214(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-214-ss-3
part of: 214 When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
note: FWC may refer an agreement to any person or body the FWC considers appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.425
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 214(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-214-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May refer an agreement to any person or body the FWC considers appropriate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

215 Approval decision to note undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-215
note: FWC must note undertaking as term of agreement upon approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.425
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-215-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-215-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-215-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 215 Approval decision to note undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-215-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to note undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

215A Approval decision to note amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-215a
note: FWC must note amendment in approval decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-215a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-215a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-215a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 215A Approval decision to note amendments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-215a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to note amendment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216 When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216
note: Variation of enterprise agreement approved under section 211 operates from the day specified in the decision to approve.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216-norm

216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216a
has part: 216A(1) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
has part: 216A(2) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
has part: 216A(3) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
has part: 216A(4) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
has part: 216A(5) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426

216A(1) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216a-ss-1
part of: 216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
note: Employer and employees may jointly add employer to supported bargaining agreement. Employer must explain proposed variation terms to employees before seeking approval.
description: Explanation of proposed variation terms and their effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216A(1) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must take action
conclusion text: Employer takes reasonable steps to ensure explanation is provided
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216A(2) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216a-ss-2
part of: 216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
note: Consider employees from diverse backgrounds, young employees, and those without a representative when complying with the paragraph. Employer may request approval from affected employees for proposed variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216A(2) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider employees from diverse backgrounds, young employees, and those without a representative when complying with the paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216A(3) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216a-ss-3
part of: 216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
note: Employer may request voting method
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 216A(3) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to request voting method
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216A(4) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216a-ss-4
part of: 216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
note: Majority of affected employees must approve variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216A(4) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216A(5) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216a-ss-5
part of: 216A Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
note: Employer must approve variation of supported bargaining agreement
description: Explanation to employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216A(5) Variation of supported bargaining agreement to add employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must approve variation
conclusion text: Obligation to approve
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216AA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216aa
has part: 216AA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
has part: 216AA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427

216AA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216aa-ss-1
part of: 216AA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
note: Employer must apply for FWC approval of variation to a supported bargaining agreement.
description: Material to accompany the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216AA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to apply for FWC approval.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216AA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216aa-ss-2
part of: 216AA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
note: Application must be accompanied by a signed copy of the variation and a copy of the agreement as proposed to be varied.
description: signed copy of the variation, copy of the agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216AA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be provided
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216AB When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ab
has part: 216AB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
has part: 216AB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
has part: 216AB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428

216AB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ab-ss-1
part of: 216AB When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
note: The FWC must approve a variation of a supported bargaining agreement if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216AB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must approve the variation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216AB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ab-ss-2
part of: 216AB When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
note: FWC must not approve variation if it covers general building and construction work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 216AB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: FWC must approve variation
conclusion text: FWC must not approve variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC approval and variation
premise text: FWC must approve variation before it is approved
conclusion text: Variation cannot be approved if FWC has not approved it
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional relationship between FWC approval and variation
premise text: FWC must approve variation
conclusion text: Variation cannot be approved if FWC has not approved it
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: not
logic summary: Absence of diffusion from FWC approval to variation
premise text: FWC approval does not imply variation approval
conclusion text: Variation cannot be approved if FWC has not approved it
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Matching between FWC approval and variation
premise text: FWC must approve variation
conclusion text: Variation cannot be approved if FWC has not approved it
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216AB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ab-ss-3
part of: 216AB When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
note: FWC must not approve variation if employer is specified in single interest employer authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.428
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 216AB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a supported
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216AC Determining whether the FWC would have been required to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ac
note: Procedure for determining whether FWC would have been required to make a supported bargaining authorisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ac-norm

216AD Determining whether a variation of a supported bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ad
note: Determine whether a variation of a supported bargaining agreement has been genuinely agreed to by affected employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ad-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ad-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ad-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216AD Determining whether a variation of a supported bargaining
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAgreedTo
logic summary: Determine whether a variation of a supported bargaining agreement has been genuinely agreed to by affected employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216AE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ae
has part: 216AE(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
has part: 216AE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
has part: 216AE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430

216AE(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ae-ss-1
part of: 216AE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
note: FWC may refuse to approve variation of bargaining agreement if it violates Commonwealth law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 216AE(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: FWC may refuse to approve variation.
conclusion text: Variation is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of variation
premise text: FWC considers that compliance with terms may result in a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: Variation is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216AE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ae-ss-2
part of: 216AE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a supported bargaining agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216AE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
logic summary: FWC obligation to approve variations of supported bargaining agreements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216AE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ae-ss-3
part of: 216AE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
note: FWC may refer agreement to any person or body the FWC considers appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ae-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216AE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

216AF When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216af
note: Variation of supported bargaining agreement operates from the day specified in the decision to approve.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216af-norm

216B Application for the FWC to vary a supported bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216b
note: Application for variation of a supported bargaining agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216b-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216B Application for the FWC to vary a supported bargaining
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

216BA When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ba
has part: 216BA(1) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
has part: 216BA(2) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
has part: 216BA(3) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
has part: 216BA(4) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.432

216BA(1) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ba-ss-1
part of: 216BA When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
note: The FWC must make a variation of a supported bargaining agreement if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.432
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216BA(1) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC has a duty to make a variation of the bargaining agreement.
premise text: The FWC is required to vary the agreement.
conclusion text: The employees want to be covered by the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216BA(2) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ba-ss-2
part of: 216BA When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
note: The FWC must consider the views of employee organisations and employers when determining whether it is appropriate for employees to be covered by an agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.432
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216BA(2) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must consider the views of employee organisations and employers.
premise text: The FWC is required to make a variation of a supported agreement.
conclusion text: The FWC must consider the views of employee organisations and employers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The FWC must consider the views of employee organisations and employers at least once.
premise text: The FWC has a duty to make a variation of a supported agreement.
conclusion text: The FWC must consider the views of employee organisations and employers at least once.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: The FWC's consideration of views is a recurring trace.
premise text: The FWC has a duty to make a variation of a supported agreement.
conclusion text: The FWC's consideration of views is a recurring trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The FWC may have regard to matters referred to in section 243.
premise text: The FWC has a duty to make a variation of a supported agreement.
conclusion text: The FWC may have regard to matters referred to in section 243.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216BA(3) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ba-ss-3
part of: 216BA When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
note: FWC must not make variation under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.432
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 216BA(3) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of FWC making variation
premise text: (3) Despite subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216BA(4) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ba-ss-4
part of: 216BA When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
note: FWC must not make variation if single interest employer authorisation applies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.432
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 216BA(4) When the FWC must make a variation of a supported
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of variation
premise text: Employer specified in single interest employer authorisation
conclusion text: FWC must not make variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216BB When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216bb
has part: 216BB(1) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
has part: 216BB(2) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
has part: 216BB(3) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433

216BB(1) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216bb-ss-1
part of: 216BB When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
note: FWC may refuse to make a variation of a supported bargaining agreement if it may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 216BB(1) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
logic summary: Prohibition of variation
premise text: FWC may refuse to make a variation
conclusion text: if it may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216BB(2) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216bb-ss-2
part of: 216BB When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
note: Refusal of variation without consent is allowed despite other provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 216BB(2) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Refusal of variation without consent is allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

216BB(3) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216bb-ss-3
part of: 216BB When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
note: FWC may refer agreement to any person or body
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216BB(3) When the FWC may refuse to make a variation of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by FWC
premise text: FWC has authority to make variations
conclusion text: FWC may refer agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

216BC When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216bc
note: Variation of cooperative workplace agreement takes effect on specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216bc-norm

216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216c
has part: 216C(1) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
has part: 216C(2) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
has part: 216C(3) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
has part: 216C(4) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
has part: 216C(5) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434

216C(1) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216c-ss-1
part of: 216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
note: Employer and employees may jointly make a variation to the cooperative workplace agreement. Employer must explain terms of proposed variation to affected employees.
description: Explanation of terms and effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216C(1) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make a variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must take reasonable steps to ensure explanation is provided.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216C(2) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216c-ss-2
part of: 216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
note: Employer may request affected employees to approve proposed variation. Consider employees from diverse backgrounds, young employees, and those without a representative when complying with the paragraph.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216C(2) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Consider employees from diverse backgrounds, young employees, and those without a representative when complying with the paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval consideration
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216C(3) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216c-ss-3
part of: 216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
note: Employer may request voting method
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 216C(3) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

216C(4) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216c-ss-4
part of: 216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
note: Majority of affected employees must approve variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216C(4) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
premise text: A majority of affected employees must approve the variation.
conclusion text: The variation is approved if a majority of affected employees approve it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for approval
premise text: The variation is made when a majority of the affected employees who cast a valid vote approve the variation.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for approval starts when the majority of affected employees cast their votes.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal trace for approval
premise text: The variation is made when a majority of the affected employees who cast a valid vote approve the variation.
conclusion text: There is a temporal trace from the moment the majority of affected employees cast their votes until the variation is approved.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Diffusion of approval
premise text: The variation is made when a majority of the affected employees who cast a valid vote approve the variation.
conclusion text: The diffusion of approval starts from the moment the majority of affected employees cast their votes.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for approval
premise text: The variation is made when a majority of the affected employees who cast a valid vote approve the variation.
conclusion text: An artificial intelligence system can be applied to facilitate the approval process.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216C(5) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216c-ss-5
part of: 216C Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
note: Approval by FWC is required for variation to take effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.434
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216C(5) Variation of cooperative workplace agreement to add
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval by FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216CA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ca
has part: 216CA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
has part: 216CA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
has part: 216CA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435

216CA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ca-ss-1
part of: 216CA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
note: Employer must apply for FWC approval of variation to cooperative workplace agreement.
description: Material accompanying the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to apply for FWC approval
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216CA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ca-ss-2
part of: 216CA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
note: Application requirements for FWC approval of variation
description: signed copy, agreement copy, declarations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216CA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Application requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216CA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ca-ss-3
part of: 216CA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
note: Application must be made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216CA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216CB When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216cb
has part: 216CB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
has part: 216CB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
has part: 216CB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436

216CB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216cb-ss-1
part of: 216CB When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
note: FWC must approve variation of cooperative workplace agreement if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216CB(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC must approve variation
premise text: Section 216CB(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216CB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216cb-ss-2
part of: 216CB When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
note: FWC must not approve variation if it covers general building and construction work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 216CB(2) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: FWC must approve variation
conclusion text: FWC must not approve variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216CB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216cb-ss-3
part of: 216CB When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
note: FWC must not approve variation if employer has supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 216CB(3) When the FWC must approve a variation of a cooperative
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216CC Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216cc
has part: 216CC(1) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
has part: 216CC(2) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.437

216CC(1) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216cc-ss-1
part of: 216CC Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
note: The FWC must determine whether a variation of a cooperative workplace has been genuinely agreed to by the affected employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.437
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216CC(1) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must determine...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216CC(2) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216cc-ss-2
part of: 216CC Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
note: FWC may disregard certain matters when determining a variation of a cooperative workplace agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.437
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216CC(2) Determining whether a variation of a cooperative workplace
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mayDisregard
logic summary: FWC may disregard certain matters.
premise text: Section 188B(3)(a) and (b)
conclusion text: Section 216CC(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Matters mentioned in paragraph 188B(3)(e) are taken to be matters relating to the variation.
premise text: Section 216CC(2)
conclusion text: Section 188B(3)(e)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeTakenIntoAccount
logic summary: FWC must take into account the statement of principles made under section 188B.
premise text: Section 216CC(2)
conclusion text: Section 188B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeDisregarded
logic summary: FWC may disregard matters mentioned in paragraphs 188B(3)(a) and (b).
premise text: Section 216CC(2)
conclusion text: Paragraphs 188B(3)(a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeRelatingTo
logic summary: Matters mentioned in paragraphs 188B(3)(c) and (d) are taken to be matters relating to the variation.
premise text: Section 216CC(2)
conclusion text: Paragraphs 188B(3)(c) and (d)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216CD When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216cd
has part: 216CD(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
has part: 216CD(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
has part: 216CD(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.438

216CD(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216cd-ss-1
part of: 216CD When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a cooperative workplace agreement if it may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.438
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 216CD(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
logic summary: Prohibition of approving the variation
premise text: compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty.
conclusion text: FWC may not approve the variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty during the period of variation
premise text: compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: Compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty during the period of variation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty during the period of variation
premise text: compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: Compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty during the period of variation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty if certain conditions are met
premise text: compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in: (a) a person committing an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; or (b) a person being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty in relation to a contravention of a law of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence against a law or a pecuniary penalty if certain conditions are met
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216CD(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216cd-ss-2
part of: 216CD When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a cooperative workplace agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.438
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216CD(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refuse
logic summary: FWC obligation to approve variations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216CD(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216cd-ss-3
part of: 216CD When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
note: FWC may refer agreement to any person or body the FWC considers appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.438
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216cd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216CD(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

216CE When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ce
note: Variation of single interest employer agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.438
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ce-norm

216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216d
has part: 216D(1) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
has part: 216D(2) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
has part: 216D(3) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
has part: 216D(4) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
has part: 216D(5) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439

216D(1) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216d-ss-1
part of: 216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
note: Employer must take reasonable steps to ensure affected employees approve proposed variation. Employers and employees must jointly approve a variation of the single interest employer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216D(1) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must take reasonable steps.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employers and employees must jointly approve a variation of the single interest employer agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216D(2) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216d-ss-2
part of: 216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
note: Approval by employee vote required for variation to take effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216D(2) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval by employee vote
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216D(3) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216d-ss-3
part of: 216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
note: Employees must approve proposed variation of single interest employer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 216D(3) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

216D(4) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216d-ss-4
part of: 216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
note: Employees may vote by ballot or electronic method
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 216D(4) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to vote
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

216D(5) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216d-ss-5
part of: 216D Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
note: Employees must approve variation of single interest employer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216D(5) Variation of single interest employer agreement to add
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216da
has part: 216DA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
has part: 216DA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
has part: 216DA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
has part: 216DA(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440

216DA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216da-ss-1
part of: 216DA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
note: Employer must apply for FWC approval of variation to single interest employer agreement.
description: Material to accompany the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to apply for FWC approval.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216da-ss-2
part of: 216DA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
note: Application requirements for FWC approval of variation
description: signed copy, agreement copy, declarations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Duty to provide required documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216da-ss-3
part of: 216DA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
note: Application must be made within a specified time period after variation is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within a specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DA(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216da-ss-4
part of: 216DA Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
note: Requirements for signing variations of single interest employer agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DA(4) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216da-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires regulations to prescribe requirements
premise text: Regulations may prescribe requirements
conclusion text: Requirements must be prescribed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DB Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216db
has part: 216DB(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
has part: 216DB(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441

216DB(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216db-ss-1
part of: 216DB Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
note: Employee organisation may apply for approval of a variation to an interest employer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DB(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for approval
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DB(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216db-ss-2
part of: 216DB Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
note: Application requirements for FWC approval of a variation
description: signed copy of the variation, agreement as proposed to be varied, and required declarations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DB(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a variation of a single
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216db-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must provide required documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DC When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216dc
has part: 216DC(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
has part: 216DC(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
has part: 216DC(1B) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
has part: 216DC(1C) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442

216DC(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216dc-ss-1
part of: 216DC When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
note: FWC must approve a variation of a single interest employer agreement under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DC(1) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC must approve the variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DC(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216dc-ss-1a
part of: 216DC When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
note: Employer must approve variation of single interest if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DC(1A) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must approve variation
premise text: Employer employed at least 20 employees
conclusion text: Employer must approve variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DC(1B) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216dc-ss-1b
part of: 216DC When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
note: FWC may work out whether a majority of affected employees want to be covered by the agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1b-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1b-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DC(1B) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

216DC(1C) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216dc-ss-1c
part of: 216DC When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
note: Employer must approve variation of single interest under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DC(1C) When the FWC must approve a variation of a single interest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dc-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must approve variation of single interest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DD Determining whether a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216dd
has part: 216DD(1) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
has part: 216DD(2) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
has part: 216DD(3) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446

216DD(1) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216dd-ss-1
part of: 216DD Determining whether a variation of a single interest
note: Determine whether a variation of a single interest has been genuinely agreed to by affected employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DD(1) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to determine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DD(2) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216dd-ss-2
part of: 216DD Determining whether a variation of a single interest
note: The FWC may disregard certain matters when taking into account the statement of principles made under section 188B.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DD(2) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The FWC may disregard certain matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DD(3) Determining whether a variation of a single interest
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216dd-ss-3
part of: 216DD Determining whether a variation of a single interest
note: Regulations may provide modifications to specified provisions of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216dd-ss-3-norm

216DE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216de
has part: 216DE(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
has part: 216DE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
has part: 216DE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447

216DE(1) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216de-ss-1
part of: 216DE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of an interest employer agreement if it may result in a person committing an offence or being liable to pay a pecuniary penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of variation approval
premise text: FWC may refuse to approve a variation
conclusion text: if it may result in an offence or pecuniary penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: FWC refusal to approve variation
premise text: FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence or pecuniary penalty
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Overlap between variation approval and offences/penalties
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence or pecuniary penalty
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Variation approval contains offences/penalties
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence or pecuniary penalty
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Variation approval diffuses to offences/penalties
premise text: The FWC considers that compliance with the terms of the agreement as proposed to be varied may result in an offence or pecuniary penalty
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216de-ss-2
part of: 216DE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
note: FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single interest employer agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DE(2) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May refuse to approve
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216DE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216de-ss-3
part of: 216DE When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
note: FWC may refer agreement to any person or body
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216DE(3) When the FWC may refuse to approve a variation of a single
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216de-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by FWC
premise text: FWC has authority to approve variations
conclusion text: Agreement may be referred to another person or body
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

216DF When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216df
note: Variation of multi-enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216df-norm

216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216e
has part: 216E(1) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(2) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(3) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(4) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(5) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(6) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
has part: 216E(7) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448

216E(1) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216e-ss-1
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
note: Employer and employees may jointly make a variation of a multi-enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216E(1) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Employer and employees may jointly make a variation of a multi-enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216E(2) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216e-ss-2
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
note: Approval by FWC required for variation of multi-enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216E(2) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval by FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216E(3) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216e-ss-3
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
note: Approval by employee vote required for variation to take effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216E(3) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval by employee vote
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the employer to obtain approval
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216E(4) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216e-ss-4
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
note: Request for employee approval of proposed variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-4-norm

216E(5) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216e-ss-5
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
note: Employer must notify employees before making a request to vary an enterprise agreement.
description: Notification of vote time and place, voting method
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Notification occurs before vote
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216E(6) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216e-ss-6
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
note: Employees may vote by ballot or electronic method
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-6-norm

216E(7) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216e-ss-7
part of: 216E Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
note: Approval by majority of affected employees required for variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216E(7) Variation of multi-enterprise agreement to remove employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
premise text: A majority of affected employees must approve the variation.
conclusion text: The variation is made when a majority of the affected employees cast a valid vote approve the variation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216e-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for approval
premise text: The variation must be approved within a specific temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

216EA Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ea
has part: 216EA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
has part: 216EA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
has part: 216EA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449

216EA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ea-ss-1
part of: 216EA Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
note: Must apply for FWC approval of variation
description: Material to accompany the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216EA(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216EA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ea-ss-2
part of: 216EA Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
note: Application must be accompanied by required declarations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216EA(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide required declarations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216EA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ea-ss-3
part of: 216EA Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
note: Application must be made within 14 days after variation is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216EA(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of variation
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ea-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within 14 days after variation is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216EB When the FWC must approve variation of multi-enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216eb
note: FWC must approve variation of multi-enterprise agreement if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216eb-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216eb-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216eb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216EB When the FWC must approve variation of multi-enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-216eb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216EC When variation comes into operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ec
note: Variation operates from the day specified in the decision to approve.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.450
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ec-norm

216ED Effect of variation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-216ed
note: A multi-enterprise agreement remains unchanged despite variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-216ed-norm

217 Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-217
has part: 217(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
has part: 217(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451

217(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-217-ss-1
part of: 217 Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
note: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty on application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 217(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the FWC.
premise text: The FWC has the power to vary an enterprise agreement.
conclusion text: The employers, employees, and employee organisations covered by the agreement may apply for variation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Variation can be applied on application by any of the following:
premise text: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement at any time.
conclusion text: The variation must occur during the application period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Variation can be applied on application by any of the following:
premise text: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement at any time.
conclusion text: The variation must occur during the application period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: has
logic summary: Variation can be applied on application by any of the following:
premise text: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement at any time.
conclusion text: The variation is applicable to employers, employees, and employee organisations covered by the agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: has
logic summary: Variation can be applied on application by any of the following:
premise text: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement at any time.
conclusion text: The variation is applicable to employers, employees, and employee organisations covered by the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

217(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-217-ss-2
part of: 217 Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
note: Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217-ss-2-norm

217A FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-217a
has part: 217A(1) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
has part: 217A(2) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
has part: 217A(3) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451

217A(1) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-217a-ss-1
part of: 217A FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
note: This section applies if a variation of an enterprise agreement is proposed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 217A(1) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (proposed)
conclusion text: (applicable)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

217A(2) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-217a-ss-2
part of: 217A FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
note: Employer or employee organisation can apply to FWC for dispute resolution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 217A(2) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Possibility of action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

217A(3) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-217a-ss-3
part of: 217A FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
note: FWC must not arbitrate certain disputes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 217A(3) FWC may deal with certain disputes about variations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-217a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of arbitration
premise text: (3) The FWC must not arbitrate (however described) the dispute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218 Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-218
has part: 218(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
has part: 218(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
has part: 218(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
has part: 218(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452

218(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-218-ss-1
part of: 218 Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
note: FWC must review enterprise agreement on referral by Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 218(1) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-218-ss-2
part of: 218 Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
note: List of entities entitled to make submissions for consideration in the review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 218(2) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: canMakeSubmission
logic summary: Authority to make submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-218-ss-3
part of: 218 Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
note: FWC must vary agreement if it requires unlawful act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 218(3) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory variation of agreement
premise text: FWC must vary agreement
conclusion text: Agreement no longer requires unlawful act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-218-ss-4
part of: 218 Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
note: Variation of enterprise agreement operates from the day specified in the decision to vary the agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 218(4) Variation of an enterprise agreement on referral by Australian
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to operate variation from specified day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218A Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-218a
has part: 218A(1) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
has part: 218A(2) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
has part: 218A(3) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453

218A(1) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-218a-ss-1
part of: 218A Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
note: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement to correct or amend errors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 218A(1) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218A(2) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-218a-ss-2
part of: 218A Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
note: Application for variation of enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 218A(2) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to vary enterprise agreements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218A(3) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-218a-ss-3
part of: 218A Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
note: Variation of enterprise agreements operates from the day specified in the decision to vary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 218A(3) Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-218a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Variation operates from a specified day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219 Employers and employees may agree to terminate an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-219
note: Employers and employees may agree to terminate an enterprise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-219-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-219-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-219-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to terminate an enterprise
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

220 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-220
has part: 220(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
has part: 220(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
has part: 220(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454

220(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-220-ss-1
part of: 220 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
note: Employers must request employee approval for proposed termination of an enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 220(1) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers must request employee approval.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

220(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-220-ss-2
part of: 220 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
note: Employers must notify employees before requesting approval for a proposed termination.
description: Reasonable steps to notify employees and a reasonable opportunity to decide.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 220(2) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers must take certain actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

220(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-220-ss-3
part of: 220 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
note: Employees may be requested to approve a proposed change by ballot or electronic method.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 220(3) Employers may request employees to approve a proposed
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-220-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted to employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

221 When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-221
has part: 221(1) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
has part: 221(2) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454

221(1) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-221-ss-1
part of: 221 When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
note: Majority vote required for termination of enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 221(1) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employees must approve termination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

221(2) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-221-ss-2
part of: 221 When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
note: Majority approval required for termination of enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.454
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 221(2) When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-221-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to obtain majority approval for termination
premise text: Employees must approve proposed termination
conclusion text: Termination agreed upon if majority approves
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222 Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-222
has part: 222(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
has part: 222(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
has part: 222(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455

222(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-222-ss-1
part of: 222 Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
note: Application for FWC approval of termination of enterprise agreement
description: Material to accompany the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 222(1) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to apply for approval
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-222-ss-2
part of: 222 Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
note: Application must be accompanied by required declarations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 222(2) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide required declarations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-222-ss-3
part of: 222 Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
note: Application deadline for FWC approval of termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 222(3) Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-222-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be made within a specified time frame
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-223
note: FWC must approve termination of enterprise if employers comply with subsection 220(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-223-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-223-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-223-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-223-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve termination
premise text: FWC has authority to approve terminations
conclusion text: FWC must approve if employers comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

224 When termination comes into operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-224
note: Termination operates from day specified in decision approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-224-norm

225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its
type: Concept
realized by: sec-225
note: Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-225-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-225-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

226 Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-226
has part: 226(1) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
has part: 226(1A) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
has part: 226(2) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457

226(1) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-226-ss-1
part of: 226 Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
note: FWC must terminate enterprise agreement if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 226(1) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory termination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

226(1A) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-226-ss-1a
part of: 226 Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
note: FWC must terminate enterprise agreement under subsection (1) only if satisfied it is appropriate in all circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 226(1A) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to terminate enterprise agreement
premise text: FWC must terminate...
conclusion text: ...if satisfied it is appropriate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

226(2) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-226-ss-2
part of: 226 Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
note: Termination of employment due to employer's initiative or insolvency/bankruptcy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 226(2) Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of termination without just cause
premise text: (2) This subsection covers a termination...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

226A Guarantee of termination entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-226a
has part: 226A(1) Guarantee of termination entitlements
has part: 226A(2) Guarantee of termination entitlements
has part: 226A(3) Guarantee of termination entitlements
has part: 226A(4) Guarantee of termination entitlements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458

226A(1) Guarantee of termination entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-226a-ss-1
part of: 226A Guarantee of termination entitlements
note: Guarantee of termination entitlements undertaking by employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-ltl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 226A(1) Guarantee of termination entitlements
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer's obligation to comply with subsection (3) if agreement is terminated.
premise text: (a) is an undertaking that the employer will comply with subsection (3)
conclusion text: if the agreement is terminated under section 226 and the employer terminates the employment of a protected employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Employer's permission for termination due to ordinary and customary turnover of labour.
premise text: (i) at the employer’s initiative because the employer no longer requires the job done by the employee to be done
conclusion text: by anyone, except where this is due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Employer's prohibition from terminating employment due to insolvency or bankruptcy.
premise text: (ii) because of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the employer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Termination can occur at any time after signing of undertaking.
premise text: if the agreement is terminated under section 226 and the employer terminates the employment of a protected employee
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Employer's obligation to comply with subsection (3) repeats indefinitely.
premise text: (a) is an undertaking that the employer will comply with subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

226A(2) Guarantee of termination entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-226a-ss-2
part of: 226A Guarantee of termination entitlements
note: Employee must be covered by the agreement before termination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 226A(2) Guarantee of termination entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
premise text: Employee must be covered by the agreement.
conclusion text: Obligation to cover employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship: Employee must be covered during the term of the agreement.
premise text: Employee must be covered by the agreement before termination.
conclusion text: Employee is covered during the term of the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: If employee would be covered, then they are protected.
premise text: Employee must be covered by the agreement before termination.
conclusion text: Employee is protected if they would be covered.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: iff
logic summary: Employee being protected implies they would be covered.
premise text: Employee is protected if they would be covered.
conclusion text: Employee being protected iff they would be covered.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

226A(3) Guarantee of termination entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-226a-ss-3
part of: 226A Guarantee of termination entitlements
note: Employer must comply with enterprise agreement terms for termination entitlements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 226A(3) Guarantee of termination entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must comply with enterprise agreement terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

226A(4) Guarantee of termination entitlements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-226a-ss-4
part of: 226A Guarantee of termination entitlements
note: Guarantee of termination entitlements comes into force on the day of agreement termination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 226A(4) Guarantee of termination entitlements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-226a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227 When termination comes into operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227
note: Termination operates from specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227-norm

227A Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227a
has part: 227A(1) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
has part: 227A(2) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
has part: 227A(4) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.462

227A(1) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227a-ss-1
part of: 227A Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
note: Permits reconsideration of enterprise agreement by employers, employees, or employee organisations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.462
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 227A(1) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227A(2) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227a-ss-2
part of: 227A Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
note: FWC must have regard to patterns of work when approving an agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.462
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 227A(2) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
logic summary: Regard to patterns of work is a requirement.
premise text: (a) before approving the agreement the FWC had regard, under subsection 193A(6), to patterns or kinds of work...
conclusion text: ...the condition in this subsection is satisfied.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS A CLASS OF EMPLOYEES
logic summary: Work on Saturdays and Sundays is a class of employees.
premise text: (i) the award covered employees for the agreement; and (ii) if the agreement is a single-enterprise agreement that covers one or more employees to whom a supported bargaining agreement or a single interest employer agreement applies—those employees...
conclusion text: ...the FWC did not have regard, under subsection 193A(6), to this pattern of work.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: FWC had regard before approving the agreement.
premise text: (a) before approving the agreement the FWC had regard, under subsection 193A(6), to patterns or kinds of work...
conclusion text: ...the condition in this subsection is satisfied.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: FWC did not have regard at the test time.
premise text: (b) at the test time or a later time, one or more employees covered by subsection (4) or (5) engaged in other patterns or kinds of work...
conclusion text: ...the FWC did not have regard, under subsection 193A(6), to this pattern of work.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT HAVE REGARD TO
logic summary: FWC must not have regard to certain patterns of work.
premise text: (b) at the test time or a later time, one or more employees covered by subsection (4) or (5) engaged in other patterns or kinds of work...
conclusion text: ...the FWC did not have regard, under subsection 193A(6), to this pattern of work.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS A CLASS OF EMPLOYEES
logic summary: Work on Sundays is a class of employees.
premise text: (ii) if the agreement is a single-enterprise agreement that covers one or more employees to whom a supported bargaining agreement or a single interest employer agreement applies—those employees...
conclusion text: ...the FWC did not have regard, under subsection 193A(6), to this pattern of work.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227A(4) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227a-ss-4
part of: 227A Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
note: Employee covered by subsection if meets test time assumption
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.462
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 227A(4) Application for FWC to reconsider whether an enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Conditional obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

227B Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227b
has part: 227B(1) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
has part: 227B(2) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463

227B(1) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227b-ss-1
part of: 227B Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
note: FWC must reconsider whether an enterprise agreement passes the better off overall test under section 193.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 227B(1) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to reconsider
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227B(2) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227b-ss-2
part of: 227B Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
note: Reconsideration of enterprise agreement passes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 227B(2) Reconsideration of whether an enterprise agreement passes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reconsideration obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227C Effect of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227c
has part: 227C(1) Effect of undertakings
has part: 227C(2) Effect of undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465

227C(1) Effect of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227c-ss-1
part of: 227C Effect of undertakings
note: The undertaking is taken to be a term of the agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 227C(1) Effect of undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Conditional obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227C(2) Effect of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227c-ss-2
part of: 227C Effect of undertakings
note: The undertaking is taken to be a term of the agreement as it applies to each employer that gave the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the provision as an obligation
premise text: (2) If: (a) the FWC accepts an undertaking under paragraph 227B(3)(a) in relation to an enterprise agreement; and (b) the agreement covers 2 or more employers;
conclusion text: the undertaking is taken to be a term of the agreement, as the agreement applies to each employer that gave the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for the provision to apply
premise text: (2) If: (a) the FWC accepts an undertaking under paragraph 227B(3)(a) in relation to an enterprise agreement; and (b) the agreement covers 2 or more employers;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace for the provision to apply
premise text: (2) If: (a) the FWC accepts an undertaking under paragraph 227B(3)(a) in relation to an enterprise agreement; and (b) the agreement covers 2 or more employers;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227c-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the provision as a right for the employers that gave the undertaking
premise text: (2) If: (a) the FWC accepts an undertaking under paragraph 227B(3)(a) in relation to an enterprise agreement; and (b) the agreement covers 2 or more employers;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227D Effect of amendment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227d
has part: 227D(1) Effect of amendment
has part: 227D(2) Effect of amendment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465

227D(1) Effect of amendment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227d-ss-1
part of: 227D Effect of amendment
note: The amendment takes effect as if it were part of the agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 227D(1) Effect of amendment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Implies an obligation for the state to take effect the amendment as part of the agreement
conclusion text: The amendment takes effect as if it were part of the agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between the amendment and the agreement
conclusion text: The amendment takes effect during the agreement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227D(2) Effect of amendment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227d-ss-2
part of: 227D Effect of amendment
note: Effect of amendment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227d-ss-2-norm

227E No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227e
has part: 227E(1) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
has part: 227E(2) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.466

227E(1) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227e-ss-1
part of: 227E No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
note: No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.466
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 227E(1) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No creation of liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227E(2) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
type: Concept
realized by: sec-227e-ss-2
part of: 227E No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
note: No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past conduct that would not have contravened an enterprise agreement term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.466
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 227E(2) No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If conduct would not have contravened an enterprise agreement term, no pecuniary penalty.
premise text: Conduct would not have contravened an enterprise agreement term.
conclusion text: No pecuniary penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-227e-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: The conduct must have occurred before the amendment was made.
premise text: Conduct occurred before amendment.
conclusion text: No pecuniary penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

228 Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-228
has part: 228(1) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
has part: 228(2) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.467

228(1) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-228-ss-1
part of: 228 Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
note: Bargaining representatives must meet good faith bargaining requirements.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.467
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 228(1) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide good faith bargaining requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

228(2) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-228-ss-2
part of: 228 Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
note: No requirement for a bargaining representative to make concessions during bargaining.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.467
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 228(2) Bargaining representatives must meet the good faith bargaining
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-228-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Good faith bargaining requirements do not require...
conclusion text: No requirement for a bargaining representative to make concessions during bargaining.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

229 Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-229
has part: 229(1) Applications for bargaining orders
has part: 229(2) Applications for bargaining orders
has part: 229(3) Applications for bargaining orders
has part: 229(4) Applications for bargaining orders
has part: 229(5) Applications for bargaining orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468

229(1) Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-229-ss-1
part of: 229 Applications for bargaining orders
note: Application for bargaining order under section 230
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 229(1) Applications for bargaining orders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Bargaining representative has obligation to apply for bargaining order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

229(2) Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-229-ss-2
part of: 229 Applications for bargaining orders
note: No application for bargaining order can be made in relation to a proposed multi-enterprise agreement unless a supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No application can be made
premise text: Supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is required
conclusion text: Application cannot be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Application timing must overlap with supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation
premise text: Supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation
conclusion text: Application timing overlaps with required authorisation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Application timing must overlap with supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation
premise text: Supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation
conclusion text: Application timing overlaps with required authorisation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Application timing must overlap with supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation
premise text: Supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation
conclusion text: Application timing overlaps with required authorisation
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Application timing must overlap with supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation
premise text: Supported authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation
conclusion text: Application timing overlaps with required authorisation
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

229(3) Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-229-ss-3
part of: 229 Applications for bargaining orders
note: Application for bargaining orders can be made at any time, except under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 229(3) Applications for bargaining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to make an application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

229(4) Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-229-ss-4
part of: 229 Applications for bargaining orders
note: Bargaining representative must apply for bargaining order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 229(4) Applications for bargaining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice to relevant bargaining representatives.
premise text: (b) has given a written notice setting out those concerns...
conclusion text: ...and (d) considers that the relevant bargaining representatives have not responded appropriately to those concerns.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must respond to written notice within a reasonable time.
premise text: (c) has given the relevant bargaining representatives a reasonable time...
conclusion text: ...and (d) considers that the relevant bargaining representatives have not responded appropriately to those concerns.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must meet good faith bargaining requirements.
premise text: (a) has concerns that one or more of the bargaining representatives for the agreement have not met, or are not meeting, the good faith bargaining requirements...
conclusion text: ...and (d) considers that the relevant bargaining representatives have not responded appropriately to those concerns.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must proceed with bargaining process fairly and efficiently.
premise text: (a) has concerns that the bargaining process is not proceeding efficiently or fairly because there are multiple bargaining representatives for the agreement...
conclusion text: ...and (d) considers that the relevant bargaining representatives have not responded appropriately to those concerns.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with notice requirements.
premise text: (4) The bargaining representative may only apply for the bargaining order if...
conclusion text: ...Non-compliance with notice requirements may be permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-4-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must not have concerns that are not addressed.
premise text: (d) considers that the relevant bargaining representatives have not responded appropriately to those concerns.
conclusion text: ...and (4) The bargaining representative may only apply for the bargaining order if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

229(5) Applications for bargaining orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-229-ss-5
part of: 229 Applications for bargaining orders
note: FWC may consider application despite non-compliance with certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.468
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 229(5) Applications for bargaining orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-229-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: FWC may consider application despite non-compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

230 When the FWC may make a bargaining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-230
note: The FWC may make a bargaining order under this section in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.469
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-230-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-230-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-230-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 230 When the FWC may make a bargaining order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-230-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: The FWC can make a bargaining order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

231 What a bargaining order must specify
type: Concept
realized by: sec-231
has part: 231(1) What a bargaining order must specify
has part: 231(2) What a bargaining order must specify
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.471

231(1) What a bargaining order must specify
type: Concept
realized by: sec-231-ss-1
part of: 231 What a bargaining order must specify
note: Bargaining order must specify certain actions and requirements for bargaining representatives.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.471
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 231(1) What a bargaining order must specify
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide specified actions and requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

231(2) What a bargaining order must specify
type: Concept
realized by: sec-231-ss-2
part of: 231 What a bargaining order must specify
note: Specify kinds of bargaining orders that the FWC may make.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.471
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 231(2) What a bargaining order must specify
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-231-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires certain actions from the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

232 Operation of a bargaining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-232
note: Bargaining order operation and cessation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.472
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-232-norm

233 Contravening a bargaining order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-233
note: Prohibition on contravening a bargaining order term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.472
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-233-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-233-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-233-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 233 Contravening a bargaining order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-233-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

234 Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-234
has part: 234(1) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
has part: 234(2) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473

234(1) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-234-ss-1
part of: 234 Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
note: Application for intractable bargaining declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 234(1) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Bargaining representative has obligation to apply for intractable bargaining declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

234(2) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-234-ss-2
part of: 234 Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
note: No application for intractable bargaining declaration can be made unless a supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 234(2) Applications for intractable bargaining declarations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No application can be made
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is required
conclusion text: Application cannot be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Application must overlap with existing authorisation
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation
conclusion text: Application overlaps with existing authorisation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Application must overlap with existing authorisation
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation
conclusion text: Application overlaps with existing authorisation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Application must overlap with existing authorisation
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation
conclusion text: Application overlaps with existing authorisation
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-234-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Application must overlap with existing authorisation
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation or single interest employer authorisation is in operation
conclusion text: Application overlaps with existing authorisation
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235 When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-235
has part: 235(1) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
has part: 235(2) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473

235(1) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-235-ss-1
part of: 235 When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
note: FWC may make intractable bargaining declaration under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 235(1) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: FWC obligation to make intractable bargaining declaration
premise text: Application for declaration made
conclusion text: Declaration made if conditions met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235(2) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-235-ss-2
part of: 235 When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
note: FWC must be satisfied with dispute handling and applicant participation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.473
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 235(2) When the FWC may make an intractable bargaining
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy conditions
premise text: FWC must be satisfied with dispute handling and applicant participation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235A Post-declaration negotiating period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-235a
has part: 235A(1) Post-declaration negotiating period
has part: 235A(2) Post-declaration negotiating period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.475

235A(1) Post-declaration negotiating period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-235a-ss-1
part of: 235A Post-declaration negotiating period
note: The FWC may specify a post-declaration negotiating period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.475
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 235A(1) Post-declaration negotiating period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May specify a post-declaration negotiating period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235A(2) Post-declaration negotiating period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-235a-ss-2
part of: 235A Post-declaration negotiating period
note: FWC may extend negotiating period under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.475
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 235A(2) Post-declaration negotiating period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-235a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May extend negotiating period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

236 Majority support determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-236
has part: 236(1) Majority support determinations
has part: 236(1A) Majority support determinations
has part: 236(1B) Majority support determinations
has part: 236(2) Majority support determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476

236(1) Majority support determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-236-ss-1
part of: 236 Majority support determinations
note: A bargaining representative may apply for a determination that a majority of employees want to bargain with the employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236(1) Majority support determinations
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply for a determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236(1A) Majority support determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-236-ss-1a
part of: 236 Majority support determinations
note: Bargaining representative cannot apply for determination if a supported bargaining authorisation specifies the employee is in operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 236(1A) Majority support determinations
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Describes a relationship between authorisation and employee
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236(1B) Majority support determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-236-ss-1b
part of: 236 Majority support determinations
note: Employee cannot apply for FWC determination under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 236(1B) Majority support determinations
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits application for FWC determination
premise text: (a) a single interest employer agreement or a supported bargaining agreement applies to the employee; and (b) the agreement has not passed its nominal expiry date.
conclusion text: (1B) Despite subsection (1), a bargaining representative of an employee may not apply to the FWC for a determination if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for expiry dates
premise text: (b) the agreement has not passed its nominal expiry date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236(2) Majority support determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-236-ss-2
part of: 236 Majority support determinations
note: Employer and employee information must be specified in the agreement.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236(2) Majority support determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-236-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer and employee information must be specified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-237
has part: 237(1) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
has part: 237(2) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
has part: 237(3) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
has part: 237(3A) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
has part: 237(4) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476

237(1) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-237-ss-1
part of: 237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination
note: FWC must make a majority support determination for proposed single-enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 237(1) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a majority support determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

237(2) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-237-ss-2
part of: 237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination
note: The FWC must make a majority support determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 237(2) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a majority support determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

237(3) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-237-ss-3
part of: 237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination
note: FWC may work out whether a majority of employees want to bargain using any method the FWC considers appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 237(3) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

237(3A) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-237-ss-3a
part of: 237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination
note: FWC must consider group of employees when making majority support determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 237(3A) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider group of employees
premise text: FWC must make a majority support determination
conclusion text: The FWC must take into account whether the group is geographically, operationally or organisationally distinct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

237(4) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-237-ss-4
part of: 237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination
note: FWC must make a majority support determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.476
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 237(4) When the FWC must make a majority support determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-237-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238 Scope orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-238
has part: 238(1) Scope orders
has part: 238(2) Scope orders
has part: 238(3) Scope orders
has part: 238(4) Scope orders
has part: 238(4A) Scope orders
has part: 238(5) Scope orders
has part: 238(6) Scope orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478

238(1) Scope orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-238-ss-1
part of: 238 Scope orders
note: A bargaining representative may apply for a scope order if they have concerns about the agreement covering appropriate employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 238(1) Scope orders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The bargaining representative has a duty to apply for an order if they have concerns.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238(2) Scope orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-238-ss-2
part of: 238 Scope orders
note: No scope order for proposed single-enterprise agreement if certain conditions apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of scope order
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), a bargaining representative may not apply to the FWC for a scope order in relation to a proposed single-enterprise agreement if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
logic summary: Two conditions must be met simultaneously
premise text: (a) a single interest employer agreement or a supported bargaining agreement applies to one or more employees who will be covered by the proposed single-enterprise agreement; and (b) the single interest employer agreement or supported bargaining agreement has not passed its nominal expiry date.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Conditions must apply before scope order application
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), a bargaining representative may not apply to the FWC for a scope order in relation to a proposed single-enterprise agreement if:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Scope order application conditional on certain conditions
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1), a bargaining representative may not apply to the FWC for a scope order in relation to a proposed single-enterprise agreement if:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238(3) Scope orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-238-ss-3
part of: 238 Scope orders
note: The bargaining representative must apply for a scope order if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 238(3) Scope orders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The bargaining representative must apply for a scope order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238(4) Scope orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-238-ss-4
part of: 238 Scope orders
note: FWC may make scope order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 238(4) Scope orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: FWC can make scope order under conditions
premise text: good faith bargaining requirements met or being met
conclusion text: making the order promotes fair and efficient conduct of bargaining
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: FWC must make scope order if conditions are met
premise text: good faith bargaining requirements met or being met
conclusion text: making the order promotes fair and efficient conduct of bargaining
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Scope order applies during good faith bargaining period
premise text: good faith bargaining requirements met or being met
conclusion text: making the order promotes fair and efficient conduct of bargaining during this period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Scope order applies everywhere in the workplace
premise text: group of employees fairly chosen
conclusion text: making the order promotes fair and efficient conduct of bargaining everywhere in the workplace
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: FWC may make scope order if reasonable in all circumstances
premise text: reasonable in all circumstances
conclusion text: making the order promotes fair and efficient conduct of bargaining
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238(4A) Scope orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-238-ss-4a
part of: 238 Scope orders
note: Employer must specify employer and employees to be covered in scope order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 238(4A) Scope orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must specify employer and employees to be covered.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238(5) Scope orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-238-ss-5
part of: 238 Scope orders
note: Specify employer and employees covered by a single-enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 238(5) Scope orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_SPECIFY
logic summary: Must specify employer and employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238(6) Scope orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-238-ss-6
part of: 238 Scope orders
note: Scope order must be in accordance with this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.478
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 238(6) Scope orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-238-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with the scope order
premise text: (6) The scope order: (a) must be in accordance with this section;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

239 Operation of a scope order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-239
note: Scope order operation and termination conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 239 Operation of a scope order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Scope order operation and termination conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-239-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240 Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-240
has part: 240(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
has part: 240(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
has part: 240(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
has part: 240(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480

240(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-240-ss-1
part of: 240 Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
note: A bargaining representative may apply to the FWC for the FWC to deal with a dispute about an enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-240-ss-2
part of: 240 Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
note: Application for FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 240(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-240-ss-3
part of: 240 Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
note: Bargaining representatives must agree to make an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory action
premise text: Bargaining representatives must agree.
conclusion text: Application must be made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-240-ss-4
part of: 240 Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
note: FWC may arbitrate dispute if bargaining representatives agree.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.480
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a bargaining dispute
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May do so.
premise text: (4) If the bargaining representatives have agreed...
conclusion text: FWC may do so.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for FWC's arbitration.
premise text: (4) If the bargaining representatives have agreed...
conclusion text: FWC may arbitrate dispute within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Bargaining representatives' agreement implies FWC's arbitration.
premise text: (4) If the bargaining representatives have agreed...
conclusion text: FWC may arbitrate dispute if bargaining representatives agree.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Diffusion of FWC's arbitration decision.
premise text: (4) If the bargaining representatives have agreed...
conclusion text: FWC may arbitrate dispute and diffuse its decision.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: FWD's arbitration as a cogent AI process.
premise text: (4) If the bargaining representatives have agreed...
conclusion text: FWC may arbitrate dispute and provide a cogent decision.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240A Application to FWC for voting request order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-240a
has part: 240A(1) Application to FWC for voting request order
has part: 240A(2) Application to FWC for voting request order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.481

240A(1) Application to FWC for voting request order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-240a-ss-1
part of: 240A Application to FWC for voting request order
note: Employer may request employee approval for enterprise agreement voting
description: Written agreement from employee organisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.481
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240A(1) Application to FWC for voting request order
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Employer obligation to request written agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

240A(2) Application to FWC for voting request order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-240a-ss-2
part of: 240A Application to FWC for voting request order
note: Permits an employer to make voting requests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.481
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 240A(2) Application to FWC for voting request order
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits an employer to make voting requests.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240B FWC must make voting request order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-240b
note: FWC must make voting request order if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.483
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-240b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240B FWC must make voting request order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-240b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make voting request order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

241 Objects of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-241
note: Objects of this Division are specified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.484
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-241-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-241-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 241 Objects of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

242 Supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-242
has part: 242(1) Supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 242(2) Supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 242(3) Supported bargaining authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.484

242(1) Supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-242-ss-1
part of: 242 Supported bargaining authorisations
note: Employers subject to certain rules in relation to the agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.484
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 242(1) Supported bargaining authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

242(2) Supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-242-ss-2
part of: 242 Supported bargaining authorisations
note: Employers and employees must be specified in the agreement.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.484
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 242(2) Supported bargaining authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers and employees must be specified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

242(3) Supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-242-ss-3
part of: 242 Supported bargaining authorisations
note: No application can be made in relation to a proposed greenfields agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.484
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-242-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Application under this section
conclusion text: Cannot be made in relation to a proposed greenfields agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243 When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-243
has part: 243(1) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
has part: 243(2) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.485

243(1) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-243-ss-1
part of: 243 When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
note: The FWC must make a supported bargaining authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.485
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 243(1) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must make a supported bargaining authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243(2) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-243-ss-2
part of: 243 When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
note: Examples of common interests that employers may have
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.485
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 243(2) When the FWC must make a supported bargaining
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-243a
has part: 243A(1A) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 243A(1) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 243A(2) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 243A(3) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
has part: 243A(4) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486

243A(1A) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-243a-ss-1a
part of: 243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
note: Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1a-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 243A(1A) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

243A(1) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-243a-ss-1
part of: 243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
note: FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 243A(1) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making a supported bargaining authorisation.
premise text: (1) The FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.
conclusion text: The FWC cannot make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the provision and the concept of a supported bargaining authorisation.
premise text: (1) The FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.
conclusion text: The provision overlaps with the concept of a supported bargaining authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Temporal containment between the provision and the concept of a single-enterprise agreement.
premise text: (1) The FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.
conclusion text: The provision contains the concept of a single-enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implicates
logic summary: Implication of the provision on the diffusion of supported bargaining authorisations.
premise text: (1) The FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.
conclusion text: The provision implies the diffusion of supported bargaining authorisations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: InferableFrom
logic summary: Inference from the provision to a conclusion about the FWC's actions.
premise text: (1) The FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.
conclusion text: The FWC will not make a supported bargaining authorisation specifying an employee who is covered by a single-enterprise agreement that has not passed its nominal expiry date.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243A(2) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-243a-ss-2
part of: 243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
note: No effect if covered by a single-enterprise agreement past its nominal expiry date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits effect if condition met
premise text: (single-enterprise agreement past nominal expiry date)
conclusion text: (supported bargaining authorisation has no effect)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Nominal expiry date overlaps with supported bargaining authorisation
premise text: (single-enterprise agreement nominal expiry date)
conclusion text: (supported bargaining authorisation has no effect)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243A(3) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-243a-ss-3
part of: 243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
note: Employer's main intention must not be to avoid being specified in a supported bargaining authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 243A(3) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Employer's intention is an obligation.
premise text: The FWC has the power to specify supported bargaining authorisations.
conclusion text: If the employer's main intention was not to avoid being specified, then they must be specified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The employer's intention overlaps with the concept of avoiding specification.
premise text: The FWC has the power to specify supported bargaining authorisations.
conclusion text: If the employer's main intention was not to avoid being specified, then they must be specified at some point in time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The employer's intention is an obligation until it is no longer true.
premise text: The FWC has the power to specify supported bargaining authorisations.
conclusion text: If the employer's main intention was not to avoid being specified, then they must be specified at some point in time and remain specified thereafter.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: The FWC has the power to specify supported bargaining authorisations.
premise text: If the employer's main intention was not to avoid being specified, then they must be specified.
conclusion text: The FWC can specify supported bargaining authorisations if the employer's main intention was not to avoid being specified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243A(4) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-243a-ss-4
part of: 243A Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
note: FWC cannot make a supported bargaining authorisation for general building and construction work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.486
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 243A(4) Restrictions on making supported bargaining authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-243a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: FWC must not make a supported bargaining authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

244 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-244
has part: 244(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
has part: 244(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.487

244(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-244-ss-1
part of: 244 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
note: Employer may apply for variation of supported bargaining authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.487
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 244(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Employer has the right to apply for variation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

244(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
type: Concept
realized by: sec-244-ss-2
part of: 244 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
note: FWC must vary authorisation if circumstances change
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.487
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 244(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—general
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-244-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to vary authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

245 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-245
has part: 245(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
has part: 245(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489

245(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-245-ss-1
part of: 245 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
note: Employer's name can be removed from supported bargaining authorization when covered by an enterprise agreement or workplace determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 245(1) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the FWC to vary the supported bargaining authorization.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

245(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-245-ss-2
part of: 245 Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
note: Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 245(2) Variation of supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to vary supported bargaining authorisations—enterprise
premise text: (2) The FWC is taken to have varied a supported bargaining authorisation...
conclusion text: ...to remove an employee when the employee is covered by an enterprise agreement, or a workplace determination, that is in operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal relationship between variation and removal of employees
premise text: (2) The FWC is taken to have varied a supported bargaining authorisation...
conclusion text: ...to remove an employee when the employee is covered by an enterprise agreement, or a workplace determination, that is in operation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between variation and removal of employees
premise text: (2) The FWC is taken to have varied a supported bargaining authorisation...
conclusion text: ...to remove an employee when the employee is covered by an enterprise agreement, or a workplace determination, that is in operation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
logic summary: Mechanism of variation and removal of employees
premise text: (2) The FWC is taken to have varied a supported bargaining authorisation...
conclusion text: ...to remove an employee when the employee is covered by an enterprise agreement, or a workplace determination, that is in operation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-245-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: By
logic summary: Mechanism of variation and removal of employees
premise text: (2) The FWC is taken to have varied a supported bargaining authorisation...
conclusion text: ...to remove an employee when the employee is covered by an enterprise agreement, or a workplace determination, that is in operation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

246 FWC’s assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-246
has part: 246(1) FWC’s assistance
has part: 246(2) FWC’s assistance
has part: 246(3) FWC’s assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489

246(1) FWC’s assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-246-ss-1
part of: 246 FWC’s assistance
note: FWC’s assistance applies if a supported bargaining authorisation is in operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 246(1) FWC’s assistance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation is in operation
conclusion text: FWC’s assistance applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship: FWC's assistance applies during supported bargaining authorisation
premise text: Supported bargaining authorisation is in operation
conclusion text: FWC's assistance applies
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

246(2) FWC’s assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-246-ss-2
part of: 246 FWC’s assistance
note: FWC may provide assistance to bargaining representatives.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 246(2) FWC’s assistance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to assist.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

246(3) FWC’s assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-246-ss-3
part of: 246 FWC’s assistance
note: FWC may direct a person to attend a conference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.489
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 246(3) FWC’s assistance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-246-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to direct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

248 Single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-248
has part: 248(1) Single interest employer authorisations
has part: 248(2) Single interest employer authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.491

248(1) Single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-248-ss-1
part of: 248 Single interest employer authorisations
note: Authorisation for a single interest employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.491
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 248(1) Single interest employer authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applicable to the FWC for an authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

248(2) Single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-248-ss-2
part of: 248 Single interest employer authorisations
note: Employers and employees must specify details for the agreement.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.491
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 248(2) Single interest employer authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-248-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers and employees must specify details.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

249 When the FWC must make a single interest employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-249
note: The FWC must make a single interest employer authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.491
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-249-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-249-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-249-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 249 When the FWC must make a single interest employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-249-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must make a single interest employer authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

249A Restriction on making single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-249a
note: FWC cannot make single interest employer authorisation for certain enterprise agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.495
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-249a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-249a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-249a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 249A Restriction on making single interest employer authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-249a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of single interest employer authorisation
premise text: FWC must not make...
conclusion text: ...for certain enterprise agreements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

250 What a single interest employer authorisation must specify
type: Concept
realized by: sec-250
note: Employers must specify covered employers, employees, and nominated person in a single interest employer authorisation.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.495
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-250-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-250-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-250-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 250 What a single interest employer authorisation must specify
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-250-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Employers must provide specified information in a single interest employer authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

251 Variation of single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-251
has part: 251(1) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
has part: 251(2) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
has part: 251(2A) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
has part: 251(2B) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.496

251(1) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-251-ss-1
part of: 251 Variation of single interest employer authorisations
note: Variation of single interest employer authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.496
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 251(1) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Allow variation of single interest employer authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

251(2) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-251-ss-2
part of: 251 Variation of single interest employer authorisations
note: The FWC must vary the authorisation to remove the employer’s name if certain requirements are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.496
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 251(2) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must vary the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

251(2A) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-251-ss-2a
part of: 251 Variation of single interest employer authorisations
note: Employers and employees must express views on single interest employer authorisations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.496
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 251(2A) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employers and employees must express views.
premise text: Change in employer's circumstances.
conclusion text: No longer appropriate for the employer to be specified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Change in employer's circumstances occurs between two points in time.
premise text: Change in employer's circumstances.
conclusion text: No longer appropriate for the employer to be specified.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

251(2B) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-251-ss-2b
part of: 251 Variation of single interest employer authorisations
note: Application must be made by a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.496
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 251(2B) Variation of single interest employer authorisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made by a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

251A Restriction on variation of single interest employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-251a
note: FWC must not vary single interest employer authorisation under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.501
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-251a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 251A Restriction on variation of single interest employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-251a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of varying single interest employer authorisation.
premise text: FWC must not vary...
conclusion text: ...authorisation under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

252 Variation to extend period single interest employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-252
has part: 252(1) Variation to extend period single interest employer
has part: 252(2) Variation to extend period single interest employer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.502

252(1) Variation to extend period single interest employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-252-ss-1
part of: 252 Variation to extend period single interest employer
note: Variation of single interest employer authorization
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.502
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 252(1) Variation to extend period single interest employer
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

252(2) Variation to extend period single interest employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-252-ss-2
part of: 252 Variation to extend period single interest employer
note: FWC may vary authorisation to extend period if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.502
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 252(2) Variation to extend period single interest employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to vary authorisation
premise text: FWC has authority to extend period
conclusion text: FWC may vary authorisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-252-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for varying authorisation
premise text: the authorisation is in operation for a longer period
conclusion text: the agreement will be made during the extended period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

253 Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-253
has part: 253(1) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
has part: 253(2) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503

253(1) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-253-ss-1
part of: 253 Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
note: Terms of an enterprise agreement that are not about permitted matters, unlawful terms, or designated outworker terms have no effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 253(1) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: invalidates
logic summary: Invalidates a term if it is not about permitted matters, unlawful terms, or designated outworker terms.
premise text: (a) it is not a term about a permitted matter; (b) it is an unlawful term; (c) it is a designated outworker term.
conclusion text: (1) A term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that: (a) it is not a term about a permitted matter; or (b) it is an unlawful term; or (c) it is a designated outworker term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Terms with no effect are those that occur during the commencement of the enterprise agreement.
premise text: Note 1: A term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 55 (see section 56).
conclusion text: (1) A term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 55.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Terms with no effect are those that occur during the commencement of the enterprise agreement.
premise text: Note 1: A term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 55 (see section 56).
conclusion text: (1) A term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes section 55.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

253(2) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-253-ss-2
part of: 253 Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
note: Inclusion of a term with no effect does not prevent an enterprise agreement from being valid.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 253(2) Terms of an enterprise agreement that are of no effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to include a term with no effect in an enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-253-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Term is included in the enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

254 Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-254
has part: 254(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
has part: 254(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503

254(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-254-ss-1
part of: 254 Applications by bargaining representatives
note: Applications by bargaining representatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 254(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

254(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-254-ss-2
part of: 254 Applications by bargaining representatives
note: Application for enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.503
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 254(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

254A Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-254a
has part: 254A(1) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
has part: 254A(2) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
has part: 254A(3) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504

254A(1) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-254a-ss-1
part of: 254A Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
note: Entitlement to make submissions for consideration in relation to a matter before the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 254A(1) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Entitlement is a right.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

254A(2) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-254a-ss-2
part of: 254A Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
note: Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 254A(2) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

254A(3) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-254a-ss-3
part of: 254A Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
note: Applicability of subsection (1) regardless of hearing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 254A(3) Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Applicability is necessary
premise text: (1) applies regardless of hearing
conclusion text: (3) applies regardless of hearing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-254a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Applicability overlaps with hearing
premise text: (1) applies regardless of hearing
conclusion text: (3) applies regardless of hearing
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

255 Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-255
has part: 255(1) Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
has part: 255(2) Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504

255(1) Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-255-ss-1
part of: 255 Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
note: Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits certain actions
premise text: (1) This Part does not empower the FWC to make an order that requires, or has the effect of requiring:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

255(2) Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-255-ss-2
part of: 255 Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
note: FWC may make an order regarding proposed enterprise agreement content during arbitration under section 240.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.504
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 255(2) Part does not empower the FWC to make certain orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

255A Limitations relating to greenfields agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-255a
note: Prohibits application of certain provisions after notified negotiation period ends
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.505
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 255A Limitations relating to greenfields agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits application of provisions
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...the following provisions do not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Provisions apply during notified negotiation period
premise text: (c) the notified negotiation period has ended;
conclusion text: ...the following provisions do not apply in relation to the agreement at any time after the end of the notified negotiation period:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Bargaining order ceases to have effect until end of negotiation period
premise text: (e) a bargaining order that relates to the agreement ceases to have effect at the end of the notified negotiation period.
conclusion text: ...a bargaining order that relates to the agreement ceases to have effect at the end of the notified negotiation period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exempts
logic summary: Exempts certain provisions from application
premise text: (d) the following provisions do not apply in relation to the agreement at any time after the end of the notified negotiation period:
conclusion text: ...the following provisions do not apply in relation to the agreement at any time after the end of the notified negotiation period:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-255a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: relates to
logic summary: Bargaining order relates to greenfields agreements
premise text: (i) section 228 (which deals with good faith bargaining requirements);
conclusion text: ...a bargaining order that relates to the agreement ceases to have effect at the end of the notified negotiation period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

256 Prospective employers and employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-256
note: Reference to employer or employee includes person who may become one
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 256 Prospective employers and employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

256A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-256a
has part: 256A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 256A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 256A(3) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 256A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506

256A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-256a-ss-1
part of: 256A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
note: Employers, employees, and employee organisations must specify covered parties in an enterprise agreement or other instrument.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 256A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires specification of covered parties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

256A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-256a-ss-2
part of: 256A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
note: Employees may be specified by class or by name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 256A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

256A(3) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-256a-ss-3
part of: 256A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
note: Must specify by name
description: Name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify by name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

256A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-256a-ss-4
part of: 256A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
note: Employees, employers and employee organisations must describe a class by reference to one or more of the following.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 256A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must describe a class by reference to one or more of the following.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-256a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Class description must be based on classification, job level or grade.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

257 Enterprise agreements may incorporate material in force from
type: Concept
realized by: sec-257
note: Enterprise agreements may incorporate material in force from time to time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.506
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-257-norm