1 July, but only if:
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
note: FWC must be satisfied with exceptional circumstances before adjusting employment terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 July in the year of operation. However, an adjustment referred to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
note: Adjustment takes effect in relation to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relates to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval starts on or after a specified day
modality: AllenInterval
operator: starts on or after
premise text: First full pay period starts on or after a specified day

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relates to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognizes adjustment
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes adjustment
premise text: Adjustment is specified in subsection (4)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relates to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation takes effect
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
premise text: Adjustment is specified in subsection (4)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relates to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Adjustment diffuses to employees
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses to employees
premise text: Adjustment is specified in subsection (4)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relates to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval has an ordered trace
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
premise text: First full pay period starts on or after a specified day

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 July in the year of operation. However, an adjustment referred to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the exceptional circumstances occur during the adjustment if (a)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exceptional circumstances and adjustment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) the FWC is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the adjustment taking effect on that day;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the adjustment must take effect on that day if (a)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (a) the FWC is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the adjustment taking effect on that day;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the adjustment must be limited to that situation if (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (b) the adjustment is limited just to the particular situation to which the exceptional circumstances relate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC must adjust employment terms if (a)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation for FWC to adjust employment terms
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (a) the FWC is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the adjustment taking effect on that day;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the adjustment occurs every time the exceptional circumstances occur in that situation if (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of exceptional circumstances and adjustment
modality: LTL
operator: every
premise text: (b) the adjustment is limited just to the particular situation to which the exceptional circumstances relate.

16 December 1966 ([1976] ATS 5); and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Obligation to comply with ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between employment and occupation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (c) the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, done at Geneva on

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of employment and occupation on discrimination
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: (c) the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, done at Geneva on

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive aspect of employment and occupation
modality: CogAI
operator: cognition
premise text: (c) the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, done at Geneva on

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with ILO Convention (No. 111)
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (c) the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, done at Geneva on

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of employment and occupation to discrimination
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: (c) the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, done at Geneva on

18 December 1979 ([1983] ATS 9); and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

2 April 2026
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The text is a classification of the Fair Work Act 2009.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Fair Work Act 2009.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text describes the compilation date and contents.

25 June 1958 ([1974] ATS 12); and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Prohibits sexual harassment of workers, persons seeking to become workers and persons conducting businesses or undertakings.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 June 1958 ([1974] ATS 12); and

258 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.31
note: The FWC must make a workplace determination if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-258-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-258-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-258
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-258-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must make a workplace determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-258-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 258 Guide to this Part

259 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-259
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employer must provide employees with terms and conditions of employment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: employer means a national system employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer is responsible for ensuring employees comply with terms and conditions of employment.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: employee means a national system employee, and employer means a national system employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: employee and employer are defined as national system employee and national system employer respectively.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 259 Meanings of employee and employer

266 When the FWC must make an industrial action related
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 266(1) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
has part: 266(2) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
has part: 266(3) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-266
schema version: 2

266(1) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
note: FWC must make an industrial action related workplace determination after a post-industrial action negotiating period ends and bargaining representatives have not settled all matters.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-266-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 266 When the FWC must make an industrial action related

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 266(1) When the FWC must make an industrial action related

266(2) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
note: Termination of industrial action instrument
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-266-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 266 When the FWC must make an industrial action related

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to terminate protected industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A termination of industrial action instrument in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement is:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 266(2) When the FWC must make an industrial action related

266(3) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
note: Post-industrial action negotiating period starts on termination of industrial action instrument day
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-266-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 266 When the FWC must make an industrial action related

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between post-industrial action negotiating period start and termination of industrial action instrument day
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS_AT
premise text: (a) starts on the day on which the termination of industrial action instrument is made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Chapter 2 terms and conditions of employment imply end of negotiating period
modality: Argumentation
operator: CONCLUSION
premise text: (b) ends: Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to negotiate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The post-industrial action negotiating period is the period that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Negotiating period ends when post-industrial action negotiating period ends
modality: LinearLogic
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (b) ends: Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 266(3) When the FWC must make an industrial action related

267 Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 267(1) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
has part: 267(2) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
has part: 267(3) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
has part: 267(4) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-267
schema version: 2

267(1) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
type: Concept
description: Terms set out in subsections (2) and (3), core terms set out in section 272, and mandatory terms set out in section 273.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Industrial action related workplace determination must comply with certain terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-267-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 267 Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 267(1) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace

267(2) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Agreed terms for an industrial action must be included in the determination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-267-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 267 Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The determination must include agreed terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 267(2) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace

267(3) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Determination must include terms related to matters still at issue after post-industrial action negotiating period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-267-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 267 Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide terms
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 267(3) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace

267(4) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
note: Must express determination covering employers, employees, and employee organisations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-267-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 267 Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Express determination covering employers, employees, and employee organisations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST Express

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 267(4) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace

268 No other terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
note: No other terms can be included in an industrial action related workplace determination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-268-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-268-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-268
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-268-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No other terms allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of additional terms
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Subsection 267(1) requirements

269 When the FWC must make an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: FWC must make intractable bargaining workplace determination after declaration or post-declaration negotiating period ends.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-269-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-269-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-269
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-269-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-269-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 269 When the FWC must make an intractable bargaining workplace

270 Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 270(1) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
has part: 270(2) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
has part: 270(3) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
has part: 270(4) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-270
schema version: 2

270(1) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
description: Terms, core terms, mandatory terms
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Intractable bargaining workplace determination must comply with subsection (4) and include specific terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-270-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with subsection (4)
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(1) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace

270(2) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Must include agreed terms for determination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-270-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) The determination must include the agreed terms (see subsection 274(3)) for the determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes agreed terms
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Workplace determinations Part 2-5 Intractable bargaining workplace determinations Division 4 Section 270A Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(2) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace

270(3) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Terms that must be included in a determination after a post-declaration negotiating period
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-270-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide terms
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(3) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace

270(4) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
note: Must express determination covering employers, employees, and employee organizations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-270-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Express determination covering employers, employees, and employee organizations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST Express

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(4) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace

270A Terms dealing with matters at issue
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
curation status: Proposed
has part: 270A(1) Terms dealing with matters at issue
has part: 270A(2) Terms dealing with matters at issue
has part: 270A(3) Terms dealing with matters at issue
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-270a
schema version: 2

270A(1) Terms dealing with matters at issue
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Enterprise agreement applies before determination is made
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-270a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 270A Terms dealing with matters at issue

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Determination is made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: Enterprise agreement exists

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270A(1) Terms dealing with matters at issue

270A(2) Terms dealing with matters at issue
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Term must be not less favourable to employees than enterprise agreement term
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-270a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 270A Terms dealing with matters at issue

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Term must be not less favourable
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270A(2) Terms dealing with matters at issue

270A(3) Terms dealing with matters at issue
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
note: Assumes term is not less favourable to employee if no evidence to the contrary
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-270a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 270A Terms dealing with matters at issue

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Term is not less favourable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Assumes a term is not less favourable if no evidence to the contrary
modality: Deontic
operator: assume
premise text: No evidence to the contrary

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Term is not less favourable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Infer term is not less favourable based on lack of evidence
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: infer
premise text: Lack of evidence

271 No other terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
note: No other terms can be included in an intractable bargaining workplace determination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-271-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-271-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-271
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-271-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on additional terms
modality: Deontic
operator: not include

272 Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 272(1) Core terms of workplace determinations
has part: 272(2) Core terms of workplace determinations
has part: 272(3) Core terms of workplace determinations
has part: 272(4) Core terms of workplace determinations
has part: 272(5) Core terms of workplace determinations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-272
schema version: 2

272(1) Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
description: Nominal expiry date
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
note: Workplace determination must include core terms
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-272-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Core terms of workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide core terms
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(1) Core terms of workplace determinations

272(2) Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
note: Specify nominal expiry date not more than 4 years after operation start
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-272-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Core terms of workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify nominal expiry date
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(2) Core terms of workplace determinations

272(3) Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
note: Terms that would be unlawful if the determination were an enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-272-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Core terms of workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Terms that would be unlawful if the determination were an enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

272(4) Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
description: Safety net requirements
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
note: Determination must pass better off overall test under section 193.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-272-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Core terms of workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide safety net requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(4) Core terms of workplace determinations

272(5) Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
note: Determination must not include a term that would prevent approval of an agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-272-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 272 Core terms of workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would mean that the FWC could not approve...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents approval
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Determination must not include...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 272(5) Core terms of workplace determinations

273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 273(1) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
has part: 273(2) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
has part: 273(3) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
has part: 273(4) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
has part: 273(5) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-273
schema version: 2

273(1) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-273-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include term in workplace determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(1) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations

273(2) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: Procedure for settling disputes under workplace determinations
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-273-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide procedure for settling disputes
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(2) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations

273(3) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: FWC must ensure an agreed term satisfies dispute settlement terms in enterprise agreements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-273-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Determine when the FWC must ensure compliance.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply to the determination if the FWC is satisfied that an agreed term for the determination would, if the determination were an enterprise agreement, satisfy paragraphs 186(6)(a) and (b).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure compliance with agreed terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: FWC must ensure an agreed term satisfies dispute settlement terms in enterprise agreements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread knowledge of FWC's actions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information dissemination
premise text: The FWC must ensure an agreed term satisfies dispute settlement terms in enterprise agreements.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Identify the pattern of FWC's actions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: The FWC is satisfied that an agreed term for the determination would, if the determination were an enterprise agreement, satisfy paragraphs 186(6)(a) and (b).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(3) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations

273(4) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: Model flexibility term must be included in workplace determinations unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-273-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include model flexibility term
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(4) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations

273(5) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
note: Determination must include model consultation term unless FWC is satisfied that an agreed term can be used.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-273-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determination must include model consultation term.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 273(5) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations

274 Agreed terms for workplace determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.41
curation status: Proposed
has part: 274(2) Agreed terms for workplace determinations
has part: 274(3) Agreed terms for workplace determinations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-274
schema version: 2

274(2) Agreed terms for workplace determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.41
note: Agreed term for an industrial action related workplace determination must be included in the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-274-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 274 Agreed terms for workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide an agreed term
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 274(2) Agreed terms for workplace determinations

274(3) Agreed terms for workplace determinations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.41
note: Agreed term for an intractable bargaining workplace determination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-274-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 274 Agreed terms for workplace determinations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: should be included in the agreement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes agreed terms from the application
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a term that the bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement concerned had agreed...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: should be included in the agreement
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires inclusion of agreed terms from the application
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) a term that the bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement concerned had agreed...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an agreed term for an intractable bargaining workplace determination
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes agreed terms from the application as part of the workplace determination
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) a term that the bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement concerned had agreed...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an agreed term for an intractable bargaining workplace determination
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes an agreed term as part of the workplace determination
modality: Deontic
operator: is-a
premise text: (a) a term that the bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement concerned had agreed...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an agreed term for an intractable bargaining workplace determination
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires inclusion of agreed terms from the application as part of the workplace determination
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) a term that the bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement concerned had agreed...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 274(3) Agreed terms for workplace determinations

275 Factors the FWC must take into account in deciding terms of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.42
note: Factors for workplace determination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-275-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-275-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-275
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-275-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Factors for workplace determination
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-275-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 275 Factors the FWC must take into account in deciding terms of a

276 When a workplace determination operates etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
curation status: Proposed
has part: 276(1) When a workplace determination operates etc.
has part: 276(2) When a workplace determination operates etc.
has part: 276(3) When a workplace determination operates etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-276
schema version: 2

276(1) When a workplace determination operates etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
note: Workplace determination operates from the day it is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-276-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 276 When a workplace determination operates etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The creation of the workplace determination overlaps with its operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Allen interval overlaps with the creation of the workplace determination.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) A workplace determination operates from the day on which it is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The operation of the workplace determination is recognized.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The CogAI recognizes the operation of the workplace determination.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (1) A workplace determination operates from the day on which it is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A workplace determination operates from the day it is made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The workplace determination holds from its creation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
premise text: (1) A workplace determination operates from the day on which it is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The operation of the workplace determination diffuses.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The diffusion diffuses the operation of the workplace determination.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) A workplace determination operates from the day on which it is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The operation of the workplace determination is traced.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The LTL traces the operation of the workplace determination.
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
premise text: (1) A workplace determination operates from the day on which it is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 276(1) When a workplace determination operates etc.

276(2) When a workplace determination operates etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
note: Workplace determination ceases on specified days.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-276-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 276 When a workplace determination operates etc.

276(3) When a workplace determination operates etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
note: A workplace determination that has ceased to operate can never operate again.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-276-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 276 When a workplace determination operates etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of reoperation
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (3) A workplace determination that has ceased to operate can never operate again.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 276(3) When a workplace determination operates etc.

277 Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
curation status: Proposed
has part: 277(1) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
has part: 277(2) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-277
schema version: 2

277(1) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
note: Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a determination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-277-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-277-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 277 Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-277-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 277(1) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a

277(2) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
note: Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a workplace determination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-277-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-277-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 277 Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-277-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 277(2) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a

278 Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 278(1A) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
has part: 278(1) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
has part: 278(2) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-278
schema version: 2

278(1) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.44
note: Workplace determination ceases to apply if enterprise agreement comes into operation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-278-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 278 Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the determination ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between workplace determinations and enterprise agreements.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) If: (a) a workplace determination applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) an enterprise agreement that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the determination ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes a relationship between workplace determinations and enterprise agreements using cognitive AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (1) If: (a) a workplace determination applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) an enterprise agreement that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the determination ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents workplace determination from applying again.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a workplace determination applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) an enterprise agreement that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the determination ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes a causal relationship between workplace determinations and enterprise agreements.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
premise text: (1) If: (a) a workplace determination applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) an enterprise agreement that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the determination ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a recurring relationship between workplace determinations and enterprise agreements.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (1) If: (a) a workplace determination applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) an enterprise agreement that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 278(1) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise

278(1A) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.44
note: Enterprise agreement ceases to apply if a workplace determination comes into operation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-278-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 278 Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the enterprise agreement ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits enterprise agreement application
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) a workplace determination that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 278(1A) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise

278(2) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.44
note: Earlier determination ceases to apply when later determination comes into operation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-278-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 278 Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the earlier determination ceases to apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceases to apply
modality: Deontic
operator: CEASES
premise text: (2) If a workplace determination applies...

279 Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 279(1) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
has part: 279(2) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-279
schema version: 2

279(1) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45
note: Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-279-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 279 Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if it were an enterprise agreement that is in operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the Act and a workplace determination.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) This Act applies to...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if it were an enterprise agreement that is in operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference of applicability from the text.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (1) This Act applies to...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if it were an enterprise agreement that is in operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of the Act to a workplace determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) This Act applies...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if it were an enterprise agreement that is in operation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of applicability to a workplace determination.
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (1) This Act applies to...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279(1) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an

279(2) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45
note: Exemptions from certain provisions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-279-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 279 Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from enterprise agreement provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279(2) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an

280 Contravening a workplace determination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
note: Prohibition on contravening a workplace determination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-280-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-280-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-280
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-280-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids contravention of workplace determinations
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-280-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 280 Contravening a workplace determination

281 Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 281(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
has part: 281(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281
schema version: 2

281(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
note: Applications by bargaining representatives
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 281 Applications by bargaining representatives

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) This section applies if a provision of this Part permits an application to be made by a bargaining representative of an employer that would have been covered by a proposed enterprise agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the type of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) This section applies if a provision of this Part permits an application to be made by a bargaining representative of an employer that would have been covered by a proposed enterprise agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the trace for conditional commencement
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) This section applies if a provision of this Part permits an application to be made by a bargaining representative of an employer that would have been covered by a proposed enterprise agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 281(1) Applications by bargaining representatives

281(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
note: Application for proposed enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 281 Applications by bargaining representatives

281A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 281A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 281A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 281A(3) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 281A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281a
schema version: 2

281A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
note: Employers, employees, and employee organisations must specify covered parties in a workplace determination or instrument.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 281A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires specification of covered parties
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 281A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

281A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
note: Employees may be specified by class or by name.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 281A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 281A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

281A(3) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
description: Name
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
note: Must specify by name
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 281A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify by name
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

281A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
note: Employees, employers and employee organisations must describe a class by reference to one or more of the following.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 281A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 281A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to

281AA Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
note: Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281aa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-281aa
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281aa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 281AA Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions

282 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.49
note: Establishes minimum wages for national system employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-282-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-282-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-282
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-282-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes minimum wages
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-282-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 282 Guide to this Part

283 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-283-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-283
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-283-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 283 Meanings of employee and employer

284 The minimum wages objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
curation status: Proposed
has part: 284(1) The minimum wages objective
has part: 284(2) The minimum wages objective
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-284
schema version: 2

284(1) The minimum wages objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
note: Establish and maintain a safety net of fair minimum wages.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-284-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 284 The minimum wages objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure the establishment of a safety net.
modality: Deontic
operator: establish

fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 284(1) The minimum wages objective

284(2) The minimum wages objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
note: The minimum wages objective applies to the performance or exercise of certain functions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-284-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 284 The minimum wages objective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The minimum wages objective applies to the performance or exercise of certain functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 284(2) The minimum wages objective

285 Annual wage reviews to be conducted
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 285(1) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
has part: 285(2) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
has part: 285(3) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-285
schema version: 2

285(1) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
note: The FWC must conduct an annual wage review
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-285-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 285 Annual wage reviews to be conducted

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to conduct annual wage reviews
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 285(1) Annual wage reviews to be conducted

285(2) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
note: Annual wage reviews must review modern award minimum wages and national minimum wage orders.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-285-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 285 Annual wage reviews to be conducted

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review modern award minimum wages and national minimum wage orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 285(2) Annual wage reviews to be conducted

285(3) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
note: The FWC must consider the proposed national minimum wage rate in annual wage reviews.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-285-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 285 Annual wage reviews to be conducted

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must consider the proposed national minimum wage rate.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 285(3) Annual wage reviews to be conducted

286 When annual wage review determinations varying modern
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
note: Determination of modern awards comes into operation on 1 July
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-286-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-286
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-286-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 286 When annual wage review determinations varying modern

287 When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 287(1) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
has part: 287(2) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
has part: 287(3) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
has part: 287(4) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-287
schema version: 2

287(1) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54
note: National minimum wage order comes into operation on July 1st in the next financial year.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-287-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 287 When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 287(1) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.

287(2) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54
note: National minimum wage must be uniform for all employees unless justified by exceptional circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-287-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 287 When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The national minimum wage must be the same for all employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Uniformity obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: National minimum wage orders must be uniform.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The national minimum wage may not be uniform for all employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification for non-uniformity
modality: Deontic
operator: <->
premise text: There are exceptional circumstances justifying setting different wages or loadings.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The national minimum wage may not be uniform for all employees unless justified by exceptional circumstances and limited in scope.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limitation on non-uniformity
modality: Deontic
operator: <->
premise text: The setting of different wages or loadings is limited just to the extent necessary.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The national minimum wage may not be uniform for all employees unless justified by exceptional circumstances and limited in scope to a specific situation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Scope of non-uniformity
modality: Deontic
operator: <->
premise text: The particular situation to which the exceptional circumstances relate is limited.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There are exceptional circumstances justifying setting different wages or loadings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification for non-uniformity
modality: Deontic
operator: <->
premise text: The FWC is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying setting different wages or loadings.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 287(2) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.

287(3) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54
note: National minimum wage must be the same for all employees in a specified class, unless exceptional circumstances justify setting different wages.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-287-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 287 When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Adjustments taking effect during year of operation only permitted in exceptional circumstances.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Unless exceptional circumstances justify setting different wages.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Equality obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: National minimum wage must be the same for all employees in a specified class.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Unless exceptional circumstances justify setting different wages.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The special national minimum wage set by the order must be the same for all employees in that class.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 287(3) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.

287(4) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54
note: Specifies the effective date for adjustments to national minimum wage, casual loading, or special national minimum wage.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-287-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 287 When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.

288 General
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
note: References other provisions in Part 5-1 for annual wage reviews
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-288-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-288
schema version: 2

289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 289(1) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
has part: 289(2) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
has part: 289(3) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
has part: 289(4) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
has part: 289(5) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
has part: 289(6) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-289
schema version: 2

289(1) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
note: Everyone must have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-289-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 289(1) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and

289(2) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
note: Publish all submissions made to the FWC for consideration in the review.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-289-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publish all submissions made to the FWC for consideration in the review.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 289(2) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and

289(3) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
note: The FWC may decide not to publish confidential or commercially sensitive information.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-289-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withhold publication
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies information as confidential or commercially sensitive
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

289(4) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
note: Everyone must provide a summary or statement when submitting under this section.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-289-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a summary or statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies submissions as requiring a summary or statement.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 289(4) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and

289(5) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
note: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make comments.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-289-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Comments must be made during a reasonable time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make comments.
modality: Argumentation
operator: must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make comments.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Comments must be made in a timely manner.
modality: Diffusion
operator: must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 289(5) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and

289(6) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
note: Publishing of material may be done through various means.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-289-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and

290 President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
curation status: Proposed
has part: 290(1) President may direct investigations and reports
has part: 290(2) President may direct investigations and reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-290
schema version: 2

290(1) President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
note: The President may give a direction requiring an investigation and report.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-290-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 290 President may direct investigations and reports

fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

290(2) President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
note: Direction of investigations and reports may be given to an Expert Panel or Chapter 2 terms and conditions of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-290-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 290 President may direct investigations and reports

fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to direct investigations and reports
modality: Deontic
operator: may

291 Research must be published
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
curation status: Proposed
has part: 291(1) Research must be published
has part: 291(2) Research must be published
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-291
schema version: 2

291(1) Research must be published
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
note: The FWC must publish research for annual wage review submissions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-291-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 291 Research must be published

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish research
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 291(1) Research must be published

291(2) Research must be published
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
note: Publication of research must be done by the FWC.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-291-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 291 Research must be published

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for publication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) The publication may be on the FWC’s website or by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of publication means
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLICATION
premise text: (2) The publication may be on the FWC’s website or by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recommendation for publication means
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOMMENDATION
premise text: (2) The publication may be on the FWC’s website or by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish research
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of publication means
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
premise text: (2) The publication may be on the FWC’s website or by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Distribution of research publication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DISTRIBUTION
premise text: (2) The publication may be on the FWC’s website or by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 291(2) Research must be published

292 Varied wage rates must be published
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
curation status: Proposed
has part: 292(1) Varied wage rates must be published
has part: 292(2) Varied wage rates must be published
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-292
schema version: 2

292(1) Varied wage rates must be published
type: Concept
description: Rates of wages in a modern award
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
note: Publish modern award rates as varied
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-292-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 292 Varied wage rates must be published

fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publish rates as varied
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 292(1) Varied wage rates must be published

292(2) Varied wage rates must be published
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
note: Publication of varied wage rates must be done by the FWC.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-292-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 292 Varied wage rates must be published

fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish varied wage rates.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Publication is a type of obligation.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 292(2) Varied wage rates must be published

293 Contravening a national minimum wage order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59
note: Employer must not contravene a term of a national minimum wage order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-293-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-293-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-293
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-293-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-293-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 293 Contravening a national minimum wage order

294 Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59
curation status: Proposed
has part: 294(1) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
has part: 294(2) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-294
schema version: 2

294(1) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59
note: National minimum wage order must set national minimum wage and special wages for certain employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-294-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 294 Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Special national minimum wages for certain employees
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (b) must set special national minimum wages for all award/agreement free employees in the following classes:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide national minimum wage order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Casual loading for award/agreement free employees
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (c) must set the casual loading for award/agreement free employees.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 294(1) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions

294(2) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59
note: Employers must pay employees a base rate of pay that at least equals the national minimum wage.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-294-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 294 Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must pay employees a base rate of pay that at least equals the national minimum wage.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 294(2) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions

295 Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.60
curation status: Proposed
has part: 295(1) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
has part: 295(2) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295
schema version: 2

295(1) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
type: Concept
description: Monetary amount per hour and percentage for casual loading.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.60
note: Express national minimum wage and casual loading in a specific way.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 295 Content of national minimum wage order—other matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for expressing national minimum wage and casual loading.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) the national minimum wage, and the special national minimum wages, set by the order must be expressed in a way that produces a monetary amount per hour; (b) the casual loading for award/agreement free employees must be expressed as a percentage.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Argumentation about national minimum wage and casual loading.
modality: Argumentation
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) the national minimum wage, and the special national minimum wages, set by the order must be expressed in a way that produces a monetary amount per hour; (b) the casual loading for award/agreement free employees must be expressed as a percentage.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Express national minimum wage and casual loading in a specific way.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST Express

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of national minimum wage order content.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
premise text: (a) the national minimum wage, and the special national minimum wages, set by the order must be expressed in a way that produces a monetary amount per hour; (b) the casual loading for award/agreement free employees must be expressed as a percentage.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about national minimum wage and casual loading.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) the national minimum wage, and the special national minimum wages, set by the order must be expressed in a way that produces a monetary amount per hour; (b) the casual loading for award/agreement free employees must be expressed as a percentage.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for expressing national minimum wage and casual loading.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) the national minimum wage, and the special national minimum wages, set by the order must be expressed in a way that produces a monetary amount per hour; (b) the casual loading for award/agreement free employees must be expressed as a percentage.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295(1) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters

295(2) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.60
note: Terms about how the order applies
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-295-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 295 Content of national minimum wage order—other matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 295(2) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters

296 Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.61
curation status: Proposed
has part: 296(1) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
has part: 296(2) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
has part: 296(3) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-296
schema version: 2

296(1) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.61
note: The FWC may make a determination varying a national minimum wage order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-296-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 296 Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make a determination varying a national minimum wage order.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 296(1) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity

296(2) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.61
note: Publish national minimum wage order variation on website or other means.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-296-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 296 Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of national minimum wage order variation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 296(2) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity

296(3) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.61
note: Cannot be varied or revoked
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-296-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 296 Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of variation
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (3) A national minimum wage order:

297 When determinations varying national minimum wage orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.61
note: Determinations come into operation on specified day
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-297-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-297
schema version: 2

298 Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 298(1) Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
has part: 298(2) Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-298
schema version: 2

298(1) Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
note: No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past conduct
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-298-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 298 Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits creation of liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

298(2) Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
note: No pecuniary penalty for conduct before determination if retrospective effect would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-298-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 298 Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The retrospective effect of the determination overlaps with the conduct before determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The retrospective effect of the determination overlaps with the conduct before determination.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If: (a) a person engaged in conduct before the determination was made; and (b) but for the retrospective effect of the determination, the conduct would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or an enterprise agreement;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A court must not order the person to pay a pecuniary penalty under Division 2 of Part 4-1 in relation to the conduct, on the grounds that the conduct contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts conduct from pecuniary penalty if retrospective effect would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (2) If: (a) a person engaged in conduct before the determination was made; and (b) but for the retrospective effect of the determination, the conduct would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or an enterprise agreement;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is permitted if the retrospective effect would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits conduct before determination if retrospective effect would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permissive
premise text: (2) If: (a) a person engaged in conduct before the determination was made; and (b) but for the retrospective effect of the determination, the conduct would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or an enterprise agreement;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct before determination repeats the conduct after determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The conduct before determination repeats the conduct after determination in terms of its impact on the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (2) If: (a) a person engaged in conduct before the determination was made; and (b) but for the retrospective effect of the determination, the conduct would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or an enterprise agreement;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 298(2) Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum

299 When a national minimum wage order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.63
note: National minimum wage order continues in operation until next order comes into effect.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-299-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-299
schema version: 2

300 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
note: Ensure equal remuneration for men and women workers of equal or comparable value.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-300-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-300-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-300
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-300-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure equal remuneration
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-300-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 300 Guide to this Part

301 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
note: Defines employee and employer terms for Fair Work Act 2009.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-301
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to follow definitions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines terms
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: employee and employer definitions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Classification of employee and employer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies employee and employer
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Division 2 of Part 6-4A (TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain circumstances)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 301 Meanings of employee and employer

302 FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
curation status: Proposed
has part: 302(1) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
has part: 302(2) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
has part: 302(3) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
has part: 302(3A) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-302
schema version: 2

302(1) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
note: The FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-302-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 302 FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 302(1) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration

302(2) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
note: Equal remuneration for work of equal or comparable value
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-302-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 302 FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires equal remuneration
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of work with comparable value
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 302(2) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration

302(3) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
note: FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-302-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 302 FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 302(3) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration

302(3A) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
note: FWC may take into account certain factors when deciding on equal remuneration.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-302-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 302 FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 302(3A) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration

303 Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
curation status: Proposed
has part: 303(1) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
has part: 303(2) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303
schema version: 2

303(1) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
type: Concept
description: equal remuneration for work of equal or comparable value
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
note: Equal remuneration order may increase rates of remuneration.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 303 Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide equal remuneration
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 303(1) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,

303(2) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
note: Must not reduce employee's rate of remuneration
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-303-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 303 Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,

fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reduction in employee's rate of remuneration
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 303(2) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,

304 Equal remuneration order may implement equal remuneration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
note: Implement equal remuneration in stages if not feasible upon operation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-304-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-304-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-304
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-304-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to implement equal remuneration in stages.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-304-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 304 Equal remuneration order may implement equal remuneration

305 Contravening an equal remuneration order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
note: Employer must not contravene an equal remuneration order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-305-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-305-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-305
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-305-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening an equal remuneration order
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-305-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 305 Contravening an equal remuneration order

306 Inconsistency with modern awards, enterprise agreements and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
note: Employee's remuneration is not affected by inconsistent terms from modern awards, enterprise agreements or FWC orders.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Equal remuneration order is more beneficial to employee
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Inconsistent terms are less beneficial than equal remuneration orders
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Term of modern award, enterprise agreement or FWC order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No effect on employee's remuneration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Remuneration is unaffected by inconsistent terms
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Term of modern award, enterprise agreement or FWC order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No effect on employee's remuneration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Inconsistent terms do not affect employee's remuneration
modality: Diffusion
operator: not
premise text: Term of modern award, enterprise agreement or FWC order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Equal remuneration order is more beneficial to employee
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Inconsistent terms are less beneficial than equal remuneration orders
modality: LTL
operator: <
premise text: Term of modern award, enterprise agreement or FWC order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306 Inconsistency with modern awards, enterprise agreements and

306A Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
note: Regulated labour hire arrangement orders and their obligations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement orders impose obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306A Guide to this Part

306B Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306b
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the terms into categories.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306B Meanings of employee and employer

306C Meaning of regulated host
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
note: Defines regulated host
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306c
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines regulated host
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or any person in a State that is a referring State because of Division 2A or 2B of Part 1-3.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Regulated host is a constitutional corporation; or the Commonwealth; or a Commonwealth authority; or...

306D References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.69
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306D(1) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
has part: 306D(2) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306d
schema version: 2

306D(1) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.69
note: Reference to work of a kind includes reference to work substantially of that kind.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306D References to kinds of work and work performed for a person

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Claim about the nature of work
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit class/type/subclass hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread or dissemination
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306D(1) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person

306D(2) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.69
note: Defines work performed for a person, including enterprise and joint venture
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306D References to kinds of work and work performed for a person

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Benefit of the person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: wholly or principally
premise text: Work performed wholly or principally

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Enterprise or joint venture
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Work performed for a person

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306D(2) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person

306E FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.71
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306E(1) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
has part: 306E(1A) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
has part: 306E(2) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
has part: 306E(3) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306e
schema version: 2

306E(1) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.71
note: FWC must make a regulated labour hire arrangement order on application by a person mentioned in subsection (7)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306E FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306E(1) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order

306E(1A) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.71
note: FWC must not make order unless work is for supply of labour
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306e-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 306E FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306E(1A) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order

306E(2) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.71
note: FWC cannot make order if not fair and reasonable
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306E FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC's satisfaction is tied to this temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of submissions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: In relation to
premise text: Submissions have been made in subsection (8)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not make order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making order
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: FWC is satisfied it is not fair and reasonable

306E(3) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.71
note: FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 306E FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306E(3) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order

306EA Regulated labour hire arrangement order may cover
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.75
note: Determination that application covers additional employers and employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ea-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306ea
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ea-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306EA Regulated labour hire arrangement order may cover

306EB Application of regulated labour hire arrangement order to
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.77
note: Application of regulated labour hire arrangement order to new covered employment instrument
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306eb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306eb
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306eb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306EB Application of regulated labour hire arrangement order to

306EC Notification requirements in relation to new covered
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306EC(1) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
has part: 306EC(2) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
has part: 306EC(3) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306ec
schema version: 2

306EC(1) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
type: Concept
description: (a) the event; and (b) the effect that the event will have or would have in relation to the order.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
note: Regulated host must provide written notice to employers after an event occurs.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306ec-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306EC Notification requirements in relation to new covered

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the event; and (b) the effect that the event will have or would have in relation to the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated host has a duty to provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

306EC(2) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
type: Concept
description: Notification by FWC
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
note: Notification requirements in relation to new covered employment instrument
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306ec-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306EC Notification requirements in relation to new covered

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between approval and operation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification by FWC
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306EC(2) Notification requirements in relation to new covered

306EC(3) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
type: Concept
description: Written notice to employers covered by the order
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
note: Employers must be notified of FWC approval and its effect on the order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306ec-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 306EC Notification requirements in relation to new covered

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employers must provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306EC(3) Notification requirements in relation to new covered

306ED Varying regulated labour hire arrangement order to cover
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
note: New employers must comply with regulated labour hire arrangement order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306ed
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of regulated labour hire arrangement order
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306ED Varying regulated labour hire arrangement order to cover

306EE Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306EE(1) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
has part: 306EE(2) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
has part: 306EE(3) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306ee
schema version: 2

306EE(1) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.82
note: Notify tenderers of regulated labour hire arrangement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306ee-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306EE Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated host must notify tenderers
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

306EE(2) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
description: Information about potential employer coverage
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.82
note: Regulated host must inform tenderers of potential employer coverage
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306ee-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306EE Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated host must inform tenderers
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306EE(2) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire

306EE(3) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
description: Information about the effect of subsection 306ED(11)
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.82
note: Notify successful tenderer of regulated labour hire application requirements
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306ee-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 306EE Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated host must notify successful tenderer
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

306F Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.83
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306F(1) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
has part: 306F(2) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
has part: 306F(3) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306f
schema version: 2

306F(1) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.83
note: Employer must not pay less than protected rate of pay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306F Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated labour hire arrangement order (temporal interval)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for regulated labour hire arrangement order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) This section applies if a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated labour hire arrangement order (knowledge representation)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation for regulated labour hire arrangement order
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (1) This section applies if a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must not pay less than protected rate of pay
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on paying less than protected rate of pay
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) This section applies...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated labour hire arrangement order (recurring trace)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for regulated labour hire arrangement order
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1) This section applies if a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated labour hire arrangement order (schema validation)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Schema validation for regulated labour hire arrangement order
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
premise text: (1) This section applies if a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force...

306F(2) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
type: Concept
description: Payment
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.83
note: Employer must pay regulated employee at least the protected rate of pay.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306F Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay the regulated employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

306F(3) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
type: Concept
description: Information about protected rate of pay
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.83
note: Employer must pay regulated employee at protected rate of pay if provided with accurate information.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 306F Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer does not contravene subsection (2) if provided with accurate information.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply with obligation to pay regulated employee at protected rate of pay.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Employer pays less than protected rate of pay without information from regulated host.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306F(3) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated

306G Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306G(1) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
has part: 306G(2) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
has part: 306G(3) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306g
schema version: 2

306G(1) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
note: Exempts regulated employees from paying protected rate of pay under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306G Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal interval during which regulated employees are exempt from paying protected rate of pay.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) Section 306F does not apply to a regulated employee if a training arrangement applies to the employee in respect of the work performed for the regulated host.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The provision uses knowledge representation to classify regulated employees as exempt from paying protected rate of pay under certain conditions.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (1) Section 306F does not apply to a regulated employee if a training arrangement applies to the employee in respect of the work performed for the regulated host.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated employees are exempt from paying protected rate of pay under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Section 306F does not apply to a regulated employee if a training arrangement applies to the employee in respect of the work performed for the regulated host.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision has a diffusive effect on regulated employees who are exempt from paying protected rate of pay under certain conditions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusive Effect
premise text: (1) Section 306F does not apply to a regulated employee if a training arrangement applies to the employee in respect of the work performed for the regulated host.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision specifies a recurring trace of regulated employees who are exempt from paying protected rate of pay under certain conditions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1) Section 306F does not apply to a regulated employee if a training arrangement applies to the employee in respect of the work performed for the regulated host.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306G(1) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay

306G(2) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
note: Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306G Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306G(2) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay

306G(3) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
note: Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 306G Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306G(3) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay

306H Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306H(1) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
has part: 306H(2) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
has part: 306H(3) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
has part: 306H(4) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306h
schema version: 2

306H(1) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
note: Regulated hosts must provide information regarding protected rate of pay to employers covered by a regulated labour hire arrangement order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306H Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated hosts have a duty to provide information regarding protected rate of pay.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

306H(2) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
note: Employer may request specified information from regulated host.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306H Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has the right to request information.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Employer believes they lack necessary information.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employer traces the need for information.
modality: LTL
operator: Traces

306H(3) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
note: Regulated host must comply with request within a reasonable period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 306H Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated host has an obligation to comply with the request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

306H(4) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
note: Regulated host must provide information to employer
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306h-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 306H Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

306J Determination altering exemption period for short-term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306J(1) Determination altering exemption period for short-term
has part: 306J(2) Determination altering exemption period for short-term
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306j
schema version: 2

306J(1) Determination altering exemption period for short-term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88
note: Regulated labour hire arrangement order conditions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306J Determination altering exemption period for short-term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: exemption period for short-term work
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The exemption period for short-term work overlaps with the regulated labour hire arrangement order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If an application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order has been made but not finally determined, then the exemption period for short-term work is altered.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (c)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: regulated labour hire arrangement order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The CogAI recognizes the regulated host, employer, and regulated employees.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (a) or (b)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force or made but not yet in force, then the exemption period for short-term work is altered.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (a) or (b)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: regulated labour hire arrangement order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The regulated labour hire arrangement order diffuses to the FWC under section 306E.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (a) or (b) or (c)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306J(1) Determination altering exemption period for short-term

306J(2) Determination altering exemption period for short-term
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88
note: Determination of exemption period for regulated host
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306J Determination altering exemption period for short-term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306J(2) Determination altering exemption period for short-term

306K Determination of recurring extended exemption period
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306K(1) Determination of recurring extended exemption period
has part: 306K(2) Determination of recurring extended exemption period
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306k
schema version: 2

306K(1) Determination of recurring extended exemption period
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88
note: Regulated labour hire arrangement order in force or application pending
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306K Determination of recurring extended exemption period

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Order has been in force for at least some time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (b) a regulated labour hire arrangement order has been made but is not yet in force that covers a regulated host, one or more employers and one or more regulated employees performing work for the regulated host;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Order is in force
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) This section applies if: Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Regulated labour hire arrangement orders Part 2-7A Regulated labour hire arrangement orders Division 2 Section 306L Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application is pending
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (c) an application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order that would cover a regulated host, one or more employers and one or more regulated employees performing work for the regulated host has been made to the FWC under section 306E but has not been finally determined.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Order is in force
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (a) a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force that covers a regulated host, one or more employers and one or more regulated employees performing work for the regulated host;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application has been made to FWC but not yet determined
modality: LTL
operator: for-all
premise text: (c) an application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order that would cover a regulated host, one or more employers and one or more regulated employees performing work for the regulated host has been made to the FWC under section 306E but has not been finally determined.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306K(1) Determination of recurring extended exemption period

306K(2) Determination of recurring extended exemption period
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88
note: Defines recurring extended exemption period for regulated host
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306K Determination of recurring extended exemption period

306L Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.89
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306L(1) Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
has part: 306L(2) Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306l
schema version: 2

306L(1) Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.89
note: Determination under this Subdivision must be made on application by regulated host, employer or organisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306L Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

306L(2) Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.89
note: The FWC must decide whether or not to make the determination as quickly as possible after the application is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306L Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to decide quickly
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306L(2) Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision

306M Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306M(1) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
has part: 306M(2) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306m
schema version: 2

306M(1) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91
note: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force or application made to FWC under section 306E
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306M Making an alternative protected rate of pay order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force between certain dates
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) a regulated labour hire arrangement order has been made but is not yet in force that covers a regulated host, an employer and a regulated employee of the employer performing work for the regulated host;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force or application made to FWC under section 306E
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force or application made to FWC under section 306E
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force that covers a regulated host, an employer and a regulated employee of the employer performing work for the regulated host;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force or application made to FWC under section 306E
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) a regulated labour hire arrangement order has been made but is not yet in force that covers a regulated host, an employer and a regulated employee of the employer performing work for the regulated host;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force between certain dates
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (c) an application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order that would cover a regulated host, an employer and a regulated employee of the employer performing work for the regulated host has been made to the FWC under section 306E but has not been finally determined.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306M(1) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order

306M(2) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91
note: The FWC may make an order specifying terms and conditions of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306M Making an alternative protected rate of pay order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306M(2) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order

306N Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306N(1) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
has part: 306N(2) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
has part: 306N(3) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306n
schema version: 2

306N(1) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
note: Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306N Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A relation between identifiable temporal intervals is required.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (i) on the day the regulated labour hire arrangement order comes into force; or (ii) on a later day specified in the alternative protected rate of pay order;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The regulated labour hire arrangement order is classified as an obligation.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the regulated labour hire arrangement order as an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) An alternative protected rate of pay order comes into force:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The day on which the alternative protected rate of pay order comes into force is classified as a right.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the day on which the alternative protected rate of pay order comes into force as a right
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (a) if the order is made before the regulated labour hire arrangement order to which the order relates comes into force:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An ordered or recurring trace is required.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (i) on the day the regulated labour hire arrangement order comes into force; or (ii) on a later day specified in the alternative protected rate of pay order;

306N(2) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
note: No contravention of alternative protected rate of pay order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306N Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person must not contravene an alternative protected rate of pay order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306N(2) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order

306N(3) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
note: Prohibition on contravening alternative protected rate of pay order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 306N Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person must not contravene a term of an alternative protected rate of pay order.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enforcement of obligation to comply with protected rate of pay order
modality: Deontic
operator: Enforce
premise text: (3) A person must not contravene a term of an alternative protected rate of pay order.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification of obligation to comply with protected rate of pay order
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
premise text: (3) A person must not contravene a term of an alternative protected rate of pay order.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of obligation on agent's behavior
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) A person must not contravene a term of an alternative protected rate of pay order.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306N(3) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order

306NA Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.95
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306NA(1) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
has part: 306NA(2) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306na
schema version: 2

306NA(1) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.95
note: Employment termination payment determination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306na-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306NA Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306NA(1) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of

306NA(2) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.95
note: Employer must pay employee upon termination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306na-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306NA Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay the employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306NA(2) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of

306P Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306P(1) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(2) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(3) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(4) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(5) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(6) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(7) Disputes about the operation of this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306p
schema version: 2

306P(1) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
note: Disputes about operation of Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306P(1) Disputes about the operation of this Part

306P(2) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
note: Parties must attempt to resolve dispute at workplace level
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), this Division applies to a dispute about:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must attempt to resolve dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306P(2) Disputes about the operation of this Part

306P(3) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
note: Parties must attempt to resolve disputes at the workplace level.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must attempt to resolve disputes.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306P(3) Disputes about the operation of this Part

306P(4) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
note: Party must apply to FWC for dispute resolution if discussions at workplace level fail.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306p-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply FWC for dispute resolution
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306P(4) Disputes about the operation of this Part

306P(5) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
note: FWC must deal with dispute by means other than arbitration unless exceptional circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306p-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must deal with dispute.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: FWC is a legal person.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306P(5) Disputes about the operation of this Part

306P(6) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
note: Permission for representation by lawyer or paid agent before FWC
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306p-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to represent
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

306P(7) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
note: Joinder of employees in disputes about the operation of this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306p-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide joinder of employees
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306P(7) Disputes about the operation of this Part

306Q Dealing with disputes by arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
note: Employer must pay employee a certain rate of pay.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306q-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306q-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306q
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to pay employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306q-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306Q Dealing with disputes by arbitration

306R Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306R(1) Application fees
has part: 306R(2) Application fees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306r
schema version: 2

306R(1) Application fees
type: Concept
description: yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101
note: Must provide application fee with regulations
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306R Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay fee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306R(1) Application fees

306R(2) Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101
note: Application fee regulation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306R Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires payment of application fee
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306R(2) Application fees

306S Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306S(1) Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
has part: 306S(2) Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306s
schema version: 2

306S(1) Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
note: Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306s-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306S Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making of regulated labour hire arrangement
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306s-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306S(1) Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement

306S(2) Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
note: Definition of scheme
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306s-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306S Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement

306SA Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306SA(1) Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
has part: 306SA(2) Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306sa
schema version: 2

306SA(1) Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
note: Avoiding application of regulated labour hire is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306sa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306SA Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306SA(1) Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire

306SA(2) Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
note: Definition of scheme
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306sa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306SA Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines the term 'scheme'
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition

306T Short-term arrangements—engaging other employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.103
note: Employer must pay regulated employee at a rate determined under or in accordance with this Part.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306t-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306t-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306t
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employer from not paying regulated employee at a rate determined under or in accordance with this Part.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306t-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306T Short-term arrangements—engaging other employees

306U Short-term arrangements—entering into other labour hire
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
note: Regulated host covered by a regulated labour hire arrangement contravenes this section if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306u-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306u-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306u
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated host is prohibited from contravening the section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Regulated host covered by a regulated labour hire arrangement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306u-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306U Short-term arrangements—entering into other labour hire

306V Engaging independent contractors
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
note: Employer must not dismiss employee and engage independent contractor to avoid paying a worker.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306v-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306v-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306v
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the employer from dismissing an employee and engaging an independent contractor.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306v-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306V Engaging independent contractors

306W Guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 306W(1) Guidelines
has part: 306W(2) Guidelines
has part: 306W(3) Guidelines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306w
schema version: 2

306W(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
note: The FWC may make written guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306w-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 306W Guidelines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306W(1) Guidelines

306W(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
note: Legislative instruments are not guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306w-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 306W Guidelines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Guidelines are not legislative instruments.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306W(2) Guidelines

306W(3) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
note: Ensure guidelines are in force by November 2024 and at all times thereafter.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-306w-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 306W Guidelines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Guidelines must be in force from November 2024 onwards
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (3) The FWC must ensure that guidelines under subsection (1) are in force:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure guidelines are in force
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The FWC must ensure that guidelines under subsection (1) are in force:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Guidelines must be in force from November 2024 onwards
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (3) The FWC must ensure that guidelines under subsection (1) are in force:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 306W(3) Guidelines

307 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-307-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-307
schema version: 2

308 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
note: Defines employee and employer terms
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-308-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-308-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-308
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-308-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-308-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 308 Meanings of employee and employer

309 Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.108
note: Balancing protection of employees' terms and conditions with employers' interests in running enterprises efficiently.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-309-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-309-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-309
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-309-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to balance competing interests.
modality: Deontic
operator: !

fair-work-act-2009-sec-309-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 309 Object of this Part

310 Application of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
note: Transfer of rights and obligations under enterprise agreements, modern awards, and other instruments upon business transfer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-310-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-310-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-310
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-310-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to provide for the transfer of rights and obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-310-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 310 Application of this Division

311 When does a transfer of business occur
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
curation status: Proposed
has part: 311(1) When does a transfer of business occur
has part: 311(2) When does a transfer of business occur
has part: 311(3) When does a transfer of business occur
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-311
schema version: 2

311(1) When does a transfer of business occur
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
note: Transfer of business occurs under specific conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-311-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 311 When does a transfer of business occur

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the work the employee performed for the old employer;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of transfer of business
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (1) There is a transfer of business...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 311(1) When does a transfer of business occur

311(2) When does a transfer of business occur
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
note: Definition of transferring employee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-311-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 311 When does a transfer of business occur

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Satisfying Requirements
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to satisfy requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: has-duty
premise text: Requirements in paragraphs (1)(a), (b) and (c)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 311(2) When does a transfer of business occur

311(3) When does a transfer of business occur
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
note: Connection between old and new employer requires arrangement between Chapter 2 terms and conditions of employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-311-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 311 When does a transfer of business occur

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires an arrangement between Chapter 2 terms and conditions of employment.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 311(3) When does a transfer of business occur

312 Instruments that may transfer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
curation status: Proposed
has part: 312(1) Instruments that may transfer
has part: 312(2) Instruments that may transfer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-312
schema version: 2

312(1) Instruments that may transfer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
note: List of transferable instruments
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-312-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-312-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 312 Instruments that may transfer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-312-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 312(1) Instruments that may transfer

312(2) Instruments that may transfer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
note: Named employers that may transfer under modern awards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-312-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-312-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 312 Instruments that may transfer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-312-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 312(2) Instruments that may transfer

313 Transferring employees and new employer covered by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
note: Transferable instrument coverage after employment change
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-313-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-313
schema version: 2

314 New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
curation status: Proposed
has part: 314(1) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
has part: 314(2) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
has part: 314(3) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-314
schema version: 2

314(1) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
note: Transferable instrument covers new employer and non-transferring employee in relation to that work.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-314-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 314 New non-transferring employees of new employer may be

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) If: ... then the transferable instrument covers the new employer and the non-transferring employee in relation to that work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Transferable instrument starts during employment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) after the transferable instrument starts to cover the new employer, the new employer employs a non-transferring employee; and (c) the non-transferring employee performs the transferring work;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) If: ... then the transferable instrument covers the new employer and the non-transferring employee in relation to that work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Transferable instrument obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
premise text: (a) a transferable instrument covers the new employer because of paragraph 313(1)(a); and (b) after the transferable instrument starts to cover the new employer, the new employer employs a non-transferring employee; and (c) the non-transferring employee performs the transferring work; and (d) at the time the non-transferring employee is employed, no other enterprise agreement or modern award covers the new employer and the non-transferring employee in relation to that work;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) If: ... then the transferable instrument covers the new employer and the non-transferring employee in relation to that work.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Transferable instrument starts during employment
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (b) after the transferable instrument starts to cover the new employer, the new employer employs a non-transferring employee; and (c) the non-transferring employee performs the transferring work;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 314(1) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be

314(2) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
note: Defines non-transferring employee in relation to business transfer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-314-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 314 New non-transferring employees of new employer may be

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 314(2) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be

314(3) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
note: Subject to FWC order under subsection 319(1)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-314-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 314 New non-transferring employees of new employer may be

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section has effect subject to such order
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Depends on FWC order
modality: Deontic
operator: Subjunctive
premise text: FWC order under subsection 319(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 314(3) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be

315 Organisations covered by transferable instrument
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
curation status: Proposed
has part: 315(1) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
has part: 315(2) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
has part: 315(3) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-315
schema version: 2

315(1) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
note: Named employer award covers new employer if certain conditions met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-315-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 315 Organisations covered by transferable instrument

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: then the named employer award covers the employer organisation in relation to the new employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A, then B.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (a) a named employer award covers the new employer because of paragraph 313(1)(a); and (b) the named employer award covered an employer organisation in relation to the old employer immediately before the termination of a transferring employee’s employment with the old employer;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 315(1) Organisations covered by transferable instrument

315(2) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
note: Named employer award covers employee organisation in relation to transferring employee and non-transferring employees performing same work.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-315-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 315 Organisations covered by transferable instrument

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Named employer award covers employee organisation immediately before termination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Termination of transferring employee's employment with old employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Named employer award covers employee organisation in relation to transferring employee and non-transferring employees performing same work.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 315(2) Organisations covered by transferable instrument

315(3) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
note: Organisations covered by transferable instrument
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-315-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 315 Organisations covered by transferable instrument

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 315(3) Organisations covered by transferable instrument

316 Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
curation status: Proposed
has part: 316(1) Transferring employees who are high income employees
has part: 316(2) Transferring employees who are high income employees
has part: 316(3) Transferring employees who are high income employees
has part: 316(4) Transferring employees who are high income employees
has part: 316(5) Transferring employees who are high income employees
has part: 316(6) Transferring employees who are high income employees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-316
schema version: 2

316(1) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
note: Guarantee of annual earnings for a guaranteed period to a transferring employee applies if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-316-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) the old employer had given a guarantee of annual earnings for a guaranteed period to a transferring employee; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the old employer gave a guarantee, then it must provide for the transferring employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (a) The old employer had given a guarantee of annual earnings for a guaranteed period to a transferring employee; and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (b) The transferring employee was a high income employee immediately before the termination of the transferring employee’s employment with the old employer; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The obligation applies to the transferring employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
premise text: (b) The transferring employee was a high income employee immediately before the termination of the transferring employee’s employment with the old employer; and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (c) some of the guaranteed period occurs after the time (the transfer time) the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The obligation applies to the new employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
premise text: (c) Some of the guaranteed period occurs after the time (the transfer time) the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer; and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (d) an enterprise agreement does not apply to the transferring employee in relation to the transferring work at the transfer time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The obligation applies to the enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
premise text: (d) an enterprise agreement does not apply to the transferring employee in relation to the transferring work at the transfer time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 316(1) Transferring employees who are high income employees

316(2) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
note: Guarantee of annual earnings has effect after transfer as if given to the transferring employee by the new employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-316-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The guarantee of annual earnings has effect after the transfer time as if it had been given to the transferring employee by the new employer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The guarantee applies during the transfer period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The guarantee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the transfer occurs, then the new employer must pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The guarantee entails that the new employer must pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
modality: CogAI
operator: entails
premise text: (2) The guarantee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The new employer is obligated to pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The state guarantees annual earnings.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (2) The guarantee of annual earnings...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The new employer is obligated to pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The guarantee diffuses to the new employer.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (2) The guarantee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the transfer occurs, then the new employer must pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: The transfer implies that the new employer is obligated to pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (2) The guarantee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 316(2) Transferring employees who are high income employees

316(3) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
note: New employer not required to comply with guarantee of annual earnings before transfer time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-316-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees

316(4) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
note: New employer is not required to pay more than the annual rate of the guarantee of annual earnings.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-316-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluding higher rates from the new employer's obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion

316(5) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
description: Amount of money equivalent to agreed benefits
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
note: Guarantee of annual earnings must be varied if non-monetary benefits cannot be provided.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-316-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Guarantee of annual earnings is varied
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Guarantee must be varied
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Non-monetary benefits cannot be provided

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 316(5) Transferring employees who are high income employees

316(6) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
note: Old employer's obligations regarding guarantee of annual earnings unaffected
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-316-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Old employer's obligations unaffected
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues existing obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: Old employer's obligations arose before transfer time

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 316(6) Transferring employees who are high income employees

317 FWC may make orders in relation to a transfer of business
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116
note: FWC may make orders in relation to a transfer of business
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-317-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-317
schema version: 2

318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116
curation status: Proposed
has part: 318(1) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 318(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 318(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 318(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-318
schema version: 2

318(1) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116
note: Application for order regarding transfer of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-318-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has obligation to make order
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 318(1) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

318(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116
note: The FWC may make an order only on application by certain parties.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-318-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 318(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

318(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116
note: Consider views of new employer, employees, and public interest when deciding whether to make an order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-318-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 318(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

318(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116
note: Order must not come into operation before transferring employee becomes employed or order is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-318-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the day on which the order is made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between specified conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on operation before specified conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 318(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

319 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
curation status: Proposed
has part: 319(1) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 319(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 319(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 319(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-319
schema version: 2

319(1) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
note: The FWC may not make a transferable instrument that covers a non-transferring employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-319-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 319 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making a transferable instrument that covers a non-transferring employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

319(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
note: The FWC may make an order only on application by certain parties.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-319-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 319 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 319(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

319(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
note: Consider views of new employer and employees when deciding whether to make an order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-319-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 319 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 319(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

319(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
note: Order must not come into operation before a non-transferring employee starts to perform transferring work.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-319-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 319 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between order and specified condition.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular non-transferring employee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...before the later of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on operation before specified condition is met.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular non-transferring employee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Order is mandatory when conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular non-transferring employee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal overlap between order and specified condition.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular non-transferring employee...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 319(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and

320 Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 320(1) Variation of transferable instruments
has part: 320(2) Variation of transferable instruments
has part: 320(3) Variation of transferable instruments
has part: 320(4) Variation of transferable instruments
has part: 320(5) Variation of transferable instruments
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-320
schema version: 2

320(1) Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: Power to vary transferable instrument
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-320-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 320 Variation of transferable instruments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

320(2) Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: Variation of transferable instruments
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-320-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 320 Variation of transferable instruments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 320(2) Variation of transferable instruments

320(3) Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: Application requirements for variation of transferable instruments
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-320-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 320 Variation of transferable instruments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires application by a person or employee organisation
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: The FWC may make the variation only on application by...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 320(3) Variation of transferable instruments

320(4) Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: Consider views of new employer and employees when deciding to make variation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-320-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 320 Variation of transferable instruments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 320(4) Variation of transferable instruments

320(5) Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
note: Variation of transferable instruments must not come into operation before certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-320-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 320 Variation of transferable instruments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not come into operation before the later of...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on premature variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (5) A variation of a transferable instrument under subsection (2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must come into operation on or after...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Condition for variation to take effect
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (a) the time when the transferable instrument starts to cover the new employer

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must come into operation on or after...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Condition for variation to take effect
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (b) the day on which the variation is made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 320(5) Variation of transferable instruments

321 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122
note: Employer must pay certain amounts to national system employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-321-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-321-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-321
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-321-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must pay certain amounts.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-321-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 321 Guide to this Part

322 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
note: Defines employee and employer terms
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-322-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-322-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-322
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-322-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-322-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 322 Meanings of employee and employer

323 Method and frequency of payment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 323(1) Method and frequency of payment
has part: 323(2) Method and frequency of payment
has part: 323(3) Method and frequency of payment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-323
schema version: 2

323(1) Method and frequency of payment
type: Concept
description: Amounts payable to the employee
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
note: Employer must pay employee amounts payable in relation to work performance.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-323-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 323 Method and frequency of payment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Payment must be made within a certain timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (c) at least monthly.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must pay
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 323(1) Method and frequency of payment

323(2) Method and frequency of payment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
note: Methods of payment for employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-323-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 323 Method and frequency of payment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Methods of payment for employees
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

323(3) Method and frequency of payment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
note: Employer must pay money by specified method.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-323-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 323 Method and frequency of payment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay by specified method.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 323(3) Method and frequency of payment

324 Permitted deductions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.125
curation status: Proposed
has part: 324(1) Permitted deductions
has part: 324(1A) Permitted deductions
has part: 324(2) Permitted deductions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-324
schema version: 2

324(1) Permitted deductions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.125
note: Employer may deduct amount from employee's pay if authorized in writing or by agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-324-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 324 Permitted deductions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to deduct amount from employee's pay.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 324(1) Permitted deductions

324(1A) Permitted deductions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.125
note: Deduction for employer benefit is prohibited
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-324-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 324 Permitted deductions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits deduction for employer benefit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1A) However, an employer must not...

324(2) Permitted deductions
type: Concept
description: Amount of deduction
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.125
note: Specify amount of deduction for single deduction
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-324-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 324 Permitted deductions

325 Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 325(1) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
has part: 325(1A) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
has part: 325(2) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-325
schema version: 2

325(1) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
note: Employer cannot require employee to spend or pay amount of their money.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-325-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 325 Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal interval between requirement and payment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) the requirement is unreasonable in the circumstances; and (b) for a payment—the payment is directly or indirectly for the benefit of the employer...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employer from requiring employee to spend or pay amount.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits payment for benefit of employer or related party.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) for a payment—the payment is directly or indirectly for the benefit of the employer or a party related to the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits indirect requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) An employer must not directly or indirectly require an employee to spend, or pay to the employer or another person...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires recurring trace between employee and employer.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (a) the requirement is unreasonable in the circumstances; and (b) for a payment—the payment is directly or indirectly for the benefit of the employer...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 325(1) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount

325(1A) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
note: Employer cannot require employee to spend or pay an amount of their money under certain circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-325-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 325 Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an amount of the prospective employee’s money if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for requirement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1A) An employer (the prospective employer) must not...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an amount of the prospective employee’s money if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits direct or indirect spending or payment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1A) An employer (the prospective employer) must not...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an amount of the prospective employee’s money if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits indirect spending or payment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) the payment is directly or indirectly for the benefit of the prospective employer or a party related to the prospective employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an amount of the prospective employee’s money if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for requirement.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1A) An employer (the prospective employer) must not...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 325(1A) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount

325(2) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
note: Circumstances in which a requirement is or is not reasonable
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-325-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 325 Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 325(2) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount

326 Certain terms have no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
curation status: Proposed
has part: 326(1) Certain terms have no effect
has part: 326(2) Certain terms have no effect
has part: 326(3) Certain terms have no effect
has part: 326(4) Certain terms have no effect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-326
schema version: 2

326(1) Certain terms have no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
note: Employer may not deduct an amount from employee's pay if it benefits employer or related party and is unreasonable.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-326-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 326 Certain terms have no effect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits deduction for employer benefit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits unreasonable deduction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (b) unreasonable in the circumstances

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 326(1) Certain terms have no effect

326(2) Certain terms have no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
note: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for a deduction to be reasonable.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-326-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 326 Certain terms have no effect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: mayPrescribe

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 326(2) Certain terms have no effect

326(3) Certain terms have no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
note: Employer requirements that contravene subsection 325(1) are prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-326-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 326 Certain terms have no effect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employer requirements that contravene subsection 325(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that the term: (a) permits, or has the effect of permitting, an employer to make a requirement that would contravene subsection 325(1); or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employee requirements that contravene subsection 325(1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that the term: (b) directly or indirectly requires an employee to spend or pay an amount, if the requirement would contravene subsection 325(1) if it had been made by an employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Traces the temporal relationship between terms and prohibited employer requirements
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that the term: (a) permits, or has the effect of permitting, an employer to make a requirement that would contravene subsection 325(1); or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Traces the temporal relationship between employee requirements and prohibited employer requirements
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that the term: (b) directly or indirectly requires an employee to spend or pay an amount, if the requirement would contravene subsection 325(1) if it had been made by an employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 326(3) Certain terms have no effect

326(4) Certain terms have no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
note: Deduction of amount from employee's payment is prohibited for minors without parental consent.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-326-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 326 Certain terms have no effect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for deduction prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (4) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation for deduction prohibition
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (4) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of deduction
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for deduction prohibition
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (4) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation for deduction prohibition
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
premise text: (4) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that...

327 Things given or provided, and amounts required to be spent or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
note: Employer must not give or provide something contrary to paragraph 323(1)(b) and subsection 323(3)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-327
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of giving or providing something
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 327 Things given or provided, and amounts required to be spent or

327A Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
curation status: Proposed
has part: 327A(1) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
has part: 327A(2) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
has part: 327A(3) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-327a
schema version: 2

327A(1) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
note: Employer must pay required amounts to employees on time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-327a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 327A Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay required amounts.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 327A(1) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required

327A(2) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
note: Failing to pay certain amounts as required is an offence.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-327a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 327A Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the payment and the required amounts.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), an amount is covered by this subsection if:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failing to pay certain amounts as required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on employers to pay certain amounts as required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), an amount is covered by this subsection if:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failure to pay certain amounts as required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), an amount is covered by this subsection if:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 327A(2) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required

327A(3) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
note: Failing to pay certain amounts as required is an offence.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-327a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 327A Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failing to pay certain amounts as required.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 327A(3) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required

327B The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
curation status: Proposed
has part: 327B(1) The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
has part: 327B(2) The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-327b
schema version: 2

327B(1) The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
note: The Minister may declare a Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-327b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 327B The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

327B(2) The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
note: Cannot refer conduct to DPP or AFP for possible offence
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-327b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 327B The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: refer conduct to DPP or AFP
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Fair Work Ombudsman

327C Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 327C(1) Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
has part: 327C(2) Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-327c
schema version: 2

327C(1) Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
note: Only the Director of Public Prosecutions or Australian Federal Police can commence proceedings for certain offences against this Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-327c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 327C Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits commencement of proceedings by anyone other than the Director of Public Prosecutions or Australian Federal Police.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against subsection 327A(1); may be commenced only by the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Australian Federal Police.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts the commencement of proceedings for certain offences against this Act to the Director of Public Prosecutions or Australian Federal Police.
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against subsection 327A(1); may be commenced only by the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Australian Federal Police.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies the agents that can commence proceedings for certain offences against this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Specify
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against subsection 327A(1); may be commenced only by the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Australian Federal Police.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies the agents that can commence proceedings for certain offences against this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Specify
premise text: (b) a related offence provision, to the extent that the related offence provision relates to an offence against subsection 327A(1); may be commenced only by the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Australian Federal Police.

327C(2) Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
note: No proceedings for certain offences against this Act may be commenced after 6 years.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-327c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 327C Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No proceedings for certain offences against this Act may be commenced after 6 years.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

328 Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.133
curation status: Proposed
has part: 328(1) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
has part: 328(2) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-328
schema version: 2

328(1) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.133
note: Employer must comply with guarantee during certain periods.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-328-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 328 Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The guarantee applies during the period specified in the promise
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Guarantee applies during specific periods
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The employee is entitled to receive a certain amount of money for a specific period

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: However, during certain periods, the employer must comply with the guarantee
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Employer's compliance with guarantee is justified by the circumstances
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
premise text: The employer is required to reduce the employee's earnings under certain circumstances

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The guarantee must be complied with during certain periods based on AI analysis
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Employer's compliance with guarantee is supported by AI analysis
modality: CogAI
operator: must
premise text: The employer has given a guarantee of annual earnings to the employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer must comply with the guarantee during certain periods
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to comply with the guarantee
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: The employer gave a guarantee of annual earnings to the employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The guarantee applies to all employees covered by the modern award during certain periods
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Guarantee spreads to other employees covered by the modern award
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
premise text: The employee is covered by a modern award that is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 328(1) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual

328(2) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.133
note: Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-328-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 328 Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to provide a guarantee of annual earnings
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 328(2) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual

329 High income employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.134
curation status: Proposed
has part: 329(1) High income employee
has part: 329(2) High income employee
has part: 329(3) High income employee
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-329
schema version: 2

329(1) High income employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.134
note: Definition of high income employee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-329-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 329 High income employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 329(1) High income employee

329(2) High income employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.134
note: Guarantee of annual earnings for high-income employee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-329-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 329 High income employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has obligation to provide guarantee of annual earnings
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 329(2) High income employee

329(3) High income employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.134
note: Employee does not have a guarantee of annual earnings if employer revokes with agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-329-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 329 High income employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 329(3) High income employee

330 Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.135
curation status: Proposed
has part: 330(1) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
has part: 330(2) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
has part: 330(3) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-330
schema version: 2

330(1) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
type: Concept
description: Annual earnings
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.135
note: Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-330-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 330 Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The periods overlap
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Undertaking and employee's employment start within 14 days
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The undertaking and employee's agreement are given before the start of the period

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to receive annual earnings
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Employer's obligation implies employee's right to receive annual earnings
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: The employer undertakes to pay the employee an amount of earnings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The guarantee is recognized as a modern award requirement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Guarantee is a modern award requirement
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The employee is covered by a modern award that is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to receive annual earnings
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's obligation to provide annual earnings
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The employer undertakes to pay the employee an amount of earnings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The guarantee is distinct from the enterprise agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Guarantee does not apply to enterprise agreement
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffersFrom
premise text: An enterprise agreement does not apply to the employee's employment at the start of the period

330(2) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.135
note: Exemption from guarantee period for certain employees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-330-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 330 Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates conditions under which the undertaking may be given
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

330(3) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.135
note: Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-330-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 330 Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 330(3) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee

331 Guaranteed period
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
note: Defines the guaranteed period for a guarantee of annual earnings.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-331-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-331
schema version: 2

332 Earnings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
curation status: Proposed
has part: 332(1) Earnings
has part: 332(2) Earnings
has part: 332(3) Earnings
has part: 332(4) Earnings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-332
schema version: 2

332(1) Earnings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
note: Employee earnings definition
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-332-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 332 Earnings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines employee earnings
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 332(1) Earnings

332(2) Earnings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
note: Employee earnings do not include certain payments and reimbursements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-332-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 332 Earnings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of specific types of payments from employee earnings.
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
premise text: (2) However, an employee’s earnings do not include the following:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 332(2) Earnings

332(3) Earnings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
note: Employee entitlement to non-monetary benefits
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-332-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 332 Earnings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Benefits are granted during employment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Benefits are granted during employment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Employment is a temporal interval

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee has a right to non-monetary benefits
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has a right to non-monetary benefits
modality: Deontic
operator: entails
premise text: Employee is entitled to performance-based benefits

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 332(3) Earnings

332(4) Earnings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
note: Employer must contribute to superannuation fund under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-332-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 332 Earnings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must contribute.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 332(4) Earnings

333 High income threshold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333(1) High income threshold
has part: 333(2) High income threshold
has part: 333(3) High income threshold
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333
schema version: 2

333(1) High income threshold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: Prescribes high income threshold amount
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333 High income threshold

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333(1) High income threshold

333(2) High income threshold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: No effect on high income threshold if reducing its amount
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333 High income threshold

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent that it would have the effect of reducing the amount of the high income threshold.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: No effect on high income threshold
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A regulation made for the purposes of subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent that it would have the effect of reducing the amount of the high income threshold.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: No effect on high income threshold
modality: CogAI
operator: No CogAI
premise text: (2) A regulation made for the purposes of subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent that it would have the effect of reducing the amount of the high income threshold.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No effect on high income threshold
modality: Deontic
operator: Negative Obligation
premise text: (2) A regulation made for the purposes of subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent that it would have the effect of reducing the amount of the high income threshold.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: No effect on high income threshold
modality: Diffusion
operator: No Diffusion
premise text: (2) A regulation made for the purposes of subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent that it would have the effect of reducing the amount of the high income threshold.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: No effect on high income threshold
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Negative
premise text: (2) A regulation made for the purposes of subsection (1)

333(3) High income threshold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
note: If regulations specify a particular matter or state of affairs, the amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than it was on the last occasion.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 333 High income threshold

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than it was on the last occasion.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: Change in matter or state of affairs occurs before change in amount of high income threshold.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than or equal to the amount of high income threshold on the last occasion.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison with inequality
modality: CogAI
operator: ≤
premise text: Change in matter or state of affairs occurs before change in amount of high income threshold.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than it was on the last occasion.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: Regulations specify a particular matter or state of affairs.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than or equal to the amount of high income threshold on the last occasion.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison with inequality
modality: Diffusion
operator: ≤
premise text: Change in matter or state of affairs occurs before change in amount of high income threshold.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than it was on the last occasion.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
modality: LTL
operator: <
premise text: Change in matter or state of affairs occurs before change in amount of high income threshold.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333(3) High income threshold

333A Prospective employees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.138
note: Employer's guarantee of annual earnings obligation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee entitled to earnings
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Employer gives undertaking

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333A Prospective employees

333B Employees not subject to pay secrecy
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.139
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333B(1) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
has part: 333B(2) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
has part: 333B(3) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333b
schema version: 2

333B(1) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.139
note: Disclosure of employee remuneration and employment terms is permitted.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333B Employees not subject to pay secrecy

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of disclosure requirements
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

333B(2) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.139
note: Employees can ask other employees about their remuneration and employment terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333B Employees not subject to pay secrecy

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to ask
modality: Deontic
operator: Can

333B(3) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.139
note: Workplace rights are not prevented by termination of employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 333B Employees not subject to pay secrecy

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to respect workplace rights
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333B(3) Employees not subject to pay secrecy

333C Pay secrecy terms to have no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
note: Term of employment contract has no effect if inconsistent with employee pay secrecy rights
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333c
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A implies ¬A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If term is inconsistent, then it has no effect
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Term = A

333D Prohibition on pay secrecy terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
note: Employer prohibited from including pay secrecy terms in employment contracts.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333d
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employer from entering into contracts with pay secrecy terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as a prohibition on pay secrecy terms.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333D Prohibition on pay secrecy terms

333E Limitations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333E(1) Limitations
has part: 333E(2) Limitations
has part: 333E(3) Limitations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333e
schema version: 2

333E(1) Limitations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
note: Entering into a contract of employment with an employee that includes a term providing for termination at the end of an identifiable period is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333E Limitations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person contravenes this subsection if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits entering into a contract of employment with an employee that includes a term providing for termination at the end of an identifiable period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person enters into a contract of employment with an employee; and (b) the contract includes a term that provides the contract will terminate at the end of an identifiable period

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (c) the employee is not a casual employee of the employer for whom the period referred to in paragraph (b) is identified by reference to the completion of the shift of work to which the contract relates; and (d) subsection (2), (3) or (4) applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies the conditions under which a contract is prohibited.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Identifies
premise text: (c) the employee is not a casual employee of the employer for whom the period referred to in paragraph (b) is identified by reference to the completion of the shift of work to which the contract relates; and (d) subsection (2), (3) or (4) applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333E(1) Limitations

333E(2) Limitations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
note: Renewable contracts apply if period is greater than 2 years.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333E Limitations

333E(3) Limitations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
note: Contract extension limit
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 333E Limitations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This subsection applies if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Condition for application
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (sum of identifiable period and any other period for which contract may be extended or renewed) > 2 years

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333E(3) Limitations

333F Exceptions to limitations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.143
note: Exceptions to limitations for contracts of employment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333f
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The work is undertaken during a peak demand period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Peak demand period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during a peak demand period
premise text: (c) the employee is engaged under the contract to undertake essential work during a peak demand period

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 333E(1) does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from general rule
modality: Deontic
operator: excepts
premise text: (1) Subsection 333E(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The work is undertaken during emergency circumstances or a temporary absence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from general rule
modality: Deontic
operator: excepts
premise text: (d) the employee is engaged under the contract to undertake work during emergency circumstances or during a temporary absence of another employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The contract is for a governance position with a time limit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from general rule
modality: Deontic
operator: excepts
premise text: (g) the contract relates to a governance position that has a time limit under the governing rules of a corporation or association of persons

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The task is distinct and identifiable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Distinct and identifiable task
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is a task involving specialised skills
premise text: (a) the employee is engaged under the contract to perform only a distinct and identifiable task

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The work is funded by government funding
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Government funding
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is funded in whole or in part by government funding
premise text: (f) the contract relates to a position for the performance of work that is funded in whole or in part by government funding

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333F Exceptions to limitations

333G Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.144
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333G(1) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
has part: 333G(2) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333g
schema version: 2

333G(1) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.144
note: Entering a prohibited fixed term contract is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333G Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits entering a prohibited fixed term contract.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333G(1) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract

333G(2) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.144
note: Imposes obligation on Commonwealth, States, and Territories regarding prohibited fixed term contracts.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333G Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333G(2) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract

333H Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333H(1) Anti-avoidance
has part: 333H(2) Anti-avoidance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333h
schema version: 2

333H(1) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
note: Prohibition on avoiding rights or prohibitions under the Division
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333H Anti-avoidance

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits actions to avoid rights or prohibitions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies actions as prohibited
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333H(1) Anti-avoidance

333H(2) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
note: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333H Anti-avoidance

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333H(2) Anti-avoidance

333J Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333J(1) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
has part: 333J(2) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333j
schema version: 2

333J(1) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must prepare and publish a Fixed Term Contract Information Statement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333J Fixed Term Contract Information Statement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333J(1) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement

333J(2) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
note: Must include information about Subdivision A and section 333L.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333J Fixed Term Contract Information Statement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333J(2) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement

333K Giving new employees the Fixed Term Contract Information
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
note: Employee must provide Fixed Term Contract Information Statement before or as soon as the contract is entered into.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333k
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of civil remedy provision (Part 4-1)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333K Giving new employees the Fixed Term Contract Information

333L Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333L(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 333L(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 333L(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 333L(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 333L(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333l
schema version: 2

333L(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
note: Applicable to disputes between employer and employee about the operation of this Division.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333L Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applicable during disputes between employer and employee.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) This section applies to a dispute between an employer and employee about the operation of this Division.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Relevant to disputes between employer and employee.
modality: Argumentation
operator: relevantTo
premise text: (1) This section applies to a dispute between an employer and employee about the operation of this Division.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicable to disputes between employer and employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: applicableTo
premise text: (1) This section applies to a dispute between an employer and employee about the operation of this Division.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Relevant to disputes between employer and employee.
modality: Diffusion
operator: relevantTo
premise text: (1) This section applies to a dispute between an employer and employee about the operation of this Division.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Applicable to disputes about the operation of this Division.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: appliesTo
premise text: (1) This section applies to a dispute between an employer and employee about the operation of this Division.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333L(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division

333L(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
note: Parties must attempt to resolve disputes at the workplace level.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333L Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The dispute resolution attempt occurs within the specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution attempt
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The parties' discussions must occur within a specific time frame.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Attempt to resolve dispute at the workplace level.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to attempt resolution
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Parties are required to resolve disputes.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Resolve dispute at the workplace level.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to resolve disputes
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Parties are required to resolve disputes.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The dispute resolution attempt occurs within the specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution attempt
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The parties' discussions must occur within a specific time frame.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333L(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division

333L(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
note: Party must refer dispute to FWC if discussions at workplace level do not resolve it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 333L Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer dispute to FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333L(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division

333L(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
note: FWC must deal with disputes referred under subsection (3)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333l-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 333L Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333L(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division

333L(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
note: Employer or employee may appoint a person or industrial association to provide support or representation for dispute resolution purposes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333l-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 333L Disputes about the operation of this Division

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May appoint a person or industrial association to provide support or representation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333L(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division

333M Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333M(1) Employee right to disconnect
has part: 333M(2) Employee right to disconnect
has part: 333M(3) Employee right to disconnect
has part: 333M(4) Employee right to disconnect
has part: 333M(5) Employee right to disconnect
has part: 333M(6) Employee right to disconnect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333m
schema version: 2

333M(1) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: Employee has right to disconnect from work outside working hours.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right exists
modality: Deontic
operator: =

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: Agent
part of: 333M(1) Employee right to disconnect

333M(2) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: Employee right to disconnect outside working hours
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has a right
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 333M(2) Employee right to disconnect

333M(3) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: Employee right to disconnect guidelines
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a right
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a descriptive clause
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 333M(3) Employee right to disconnect

333M(4) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: Employee right to disconnect is a workplace right within the meaning of Part 3-1.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333m-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee has right to disconnect during work hours
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Right to disconnect applies during work hours
modality: AllenInterval
operator: duringWorkHours
premise text: Section 333N defines a workplace right

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee has workplace right within Part 3-1
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has right to disconnect
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToDisconnect
premise text: Section 333N of the Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 333M(4) prohibits adverse action
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer cannot take adverse action against employee for exercising workplace right
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibitsAdverseAction
premise text: Part 3-1 general protections provisions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee exercise of workplace right implies right to disconnect
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Exercise of workplace right implies employee has right to disconnect
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: Section 333N defines a workplace right

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 333M(4) Employee right to disconnect

333M(5) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: Employee must respond to required contact under law.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333m-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee must respond
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide response
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Contact is required under law

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333M(5) Employee right to disconnect

333M(6) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
note: Employee right to disconnect prevails over company rights if more favorable
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333m-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Company rights are overridden by employee right
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right prevails over obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
premise text: Employee right to disconnect is a right

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee right to disconnect is included in enterprise agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Enterprise agreement includes more favorable right to disconnect term
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: Enterprise agreement contains right to disconnect term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 333M(6) Employee right to disconnect

333N Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333N(1) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
has part: 333N(2) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333n
schema version: 2

333N(1) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
note: Employer and employee must resolve dispute about employee's refusal to monitor contact.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333N Disputes about the employee right to disconnect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer and employee have an obligation to resolve the dispute.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333N(1) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect

333N(2) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
note: Employer's reasonable belief about employee refusal
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333N Disputes about the employee right to disconnect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Duty to act reasonably
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's belief is a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Believes
premise text: Reasonable belief

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333N(2) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect

333P Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333P(1) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
has part: 333P(2) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
has part: 333P(3) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333p
schema version: 2

333P(1) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.150
note: FWC may make an order to stop refusing contact or taking certain actions if there is a risk of disciplinary action or continued requirement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333P Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must make an order if certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC has the power to make orders under this section.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer must not take disciplinary action or continue to require the employee to monitor contact if the employee has refused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disciplinary action or continued requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_NOT
premise text: The employer cannot take disciplinary action or continue to require the employee to monitor contact if the employee has refused.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must stop the employee from refusing contact or taking certain actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to stop refusing contact or taking certain actions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC must make an order if the employee has unreasonably refused to monitor contact.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee right to disconnect is a specific type of order that can be made under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of employee right to disconnect
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: This section defines the employee right to disconnect.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee right to disconnect is a specific type of order that can be made under this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of employee right to disconnect (again)
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: This section defines the employee right to disconnect again.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If there is a risk that the employer will take disciplinary action or continue to require the employee to monitor contact, then the FWC must make an order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Conditional order based on risk of disciplinary action or continued requirement
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>
premise text: The FWC may make an order if there is a risk that the employer will take disciplinary action or continue to require the employee to monitor contact.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333P(1) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain

333P(2) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.150
note: FWC may make order to prevent employee from refusing contact or taking certain actions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333P Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may make order
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333P(2) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain

333P(3) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.150
note: The FWC must deal with an application within 14 days and as soon as reasonably practicable after starting to deal with it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 333P Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must deal with the application.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Deal with the application within 14 days and as soon as reasonably practicable after starting to deal with it.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333P(3) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain

333Q Contravening an order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
note: Must not contravene a term of an order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333q-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333q-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333q
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contravention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: Order term

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333q-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333Q Contravening an order

333R Actions under work health and safety laws permitted
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
note: Removes prohibition on proceeding under WHS laws for same conduct
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333r
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application for order under section 333P overlaps
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section 115 prohibition overlaps with application for order under section 333P
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Section 115 prohibition applied

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceeding allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Removal of prohibition implies allowance of proceeding
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Prohibition removed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceeding allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows proceeding under WHS laws
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Section 115 prohibition removed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order under section 333P included
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes application for order under section 333P
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Application for order under section 333P made

333S This Subdivision is not to prejudice Australia’s defence,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
note: No action can be taken that would prejudice Australia's defence, national security, or covert/ international operations of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333s
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or the refraining from taking the action, would be, or could reasonably be expected to be...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap with prohibited actions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (b) Australia’s national security;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or the refraining from taking the action, would be, or could reasonably be expected to be...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes prohibited actions
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (b) Australia’s national security;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would prejudice Australia's defence, national security...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on prejudicial actions
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: No action can be taken...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or the refraining from taking the action, would be, or could reasonably be expected to be...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for prohibited actions
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (b) Australia’s national security;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or the refraining from taking the action, would be, or could reasonably be expected to be...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation with prohibited actions
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (b) Australia’s national security;

333T Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333T(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
has part: 333T(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333t
schema version: 2

333T(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
note: Director-General may declare exemptions from certain provisions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333T Declarations by the Director-General of Security

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exempt
modality: Deontic
operator: may

333T(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333T Declarations by the Director-General of Security

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333T(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security

333U Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333U(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
has part: 333U(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333u
schema version: 2

333U(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
note: Permits Director-General to declare exemptions from Subdivision provisions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333u-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333U Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows the Director-General to make declarations
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

333U(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333u-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333U Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333U(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS

333V Dealing with disputes in other ways
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
note: FWC must deal with disputes under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333v
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of FWC's action as a dispute resolution mechanism
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333V Dealing with disputes in other ways

333W Guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333W(1) Guidelines
has part: 333W(2) Guidelines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333w
schema version: 2

333W(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
note: The FWC must make written guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333w-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333W Guidelines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333W(1) Guidelines

333W(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
note: Guidelines made under subsection (1) are not a legislative instrument.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333w-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333W Guidelines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333W(2) Guidelines

333X Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 333X(1) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
has part: 333X(2) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
has part: 333X(3) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333x
schema version: 2

333X(1) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
note: Employer must allow employee to take paid parental leave
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333x-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 333X Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee's entitlement to leave is related to the child's birth
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between child's birth and employee's entitlement to leave
modality: AllenInterval
operator: RelatesTo
premise text: Child must be born alive for employee to be entitled to leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee has a right to take paid parental leave
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Employer's obligation implies a right in employee
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
premise text: Section preserves if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee must be allowed to take paid parental leave
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to allow employee to take paid parental leave
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Section applies if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is affected by employer's obligation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Obligation spreads from employer to employee
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: Employer must allow employee to take leave

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333X(1) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is

333X(2) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
note: Employer cannot refuse to allow employee to take leave or cancel part of leave without request.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333x-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 333X Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No refusal or cancellation allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employer must not refuse to allow employee to take leave or cancel part of leave.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333X(2) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is

333X(3) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
note: Employer may refuse or cancel paid parental leave under employment terms and conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-333x-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 333X Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 333X(3) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is

334 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.157
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-334-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-334
schema version: 2

335 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.158
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-335-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-335-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-335
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-335-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

336 Objects of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.158
curation status: Proposed
has part: 336(1) Objects of this Part
has part: 336(2) Objects of this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-336
schema version: 2

336(1) Objects of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.158
note: Objects of this Part are to protect workplace rights and freedom of association.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-336-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 336 Objects of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protects workplace rights
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 336(1) Objects of this Part

336(2) Objects of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.158
note: Protection for employees, employers, and organisations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-336-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 336 Objects of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State provides protection
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee protection right
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: Employee is a person

fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 336(2) Objects of this Part

337 Application of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
note: This Part applies only to the extent provided by this Division.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-337-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-337
schema version: 2

338 Action to which this Part applies
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
curation status: Proposed
has part: 338(1) Action to which this Part applies
has part: 338(2) Action to which this Part applies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-338
schema version: 2

338(1) Action to which this Part applies
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
note: Action taken by a constitutionally-covered entity or with intent to affect its activities
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-338-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 338 Action to which this Part applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Action taken by a constitutionally-covered entity
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
premise text: (1) This Part applies to the following action:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 338(1) Action to which this Part applies

338(2) Action to which this Part applies
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
note: Entities covered by this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-338-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 338 Action to which this Part applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part applies to Chapter 3
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classification of entities
modality: Deontic
operator: isA
premise text: Chapter 3 is a rights and responsibilities part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Part applies to Chapter 3
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity coverage
modality: Deontic
operator: isCoveredBy
premise text: Chapter 3 is covered by this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 338(2) Action to which this Part applies

338A Meaning of independent contractor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
note: A regulated worker must be an individual
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-338a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An individual is a regulated worker
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of a regulated worker
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
premise text: A regulated worker must be an individual

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 338A Meaning of independent contractor

339 Additional effect of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
note: Additional effect of this Part also has the effect it would have if any one or more of the following applied.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-339
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision applies during the period of time when any one or more of the listed conditions apply.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to any one or more of the listed conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 339 Additional effect of this Part

340 Protection
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
curation status: Proposed
has part: 340(1) Protection
has part: 340(2) Protection
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-340
schema version: 2

340(1) Protection
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
note: Prohibition on taking adverse action against another person due to workplace rights.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-340-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 340 Protection

fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not take adverse action against another person:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on taking adverse action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person must not take adverse action...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 340(1) Protection

340(2) Protection
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
note: Protection from taking adverse action against another person due to exercising a workplace right.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-340-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 340 Protection

fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protection from adverse action
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of taking adverse action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Exercise of workplace right

fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Civil remedy provision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of protection as a civil remedy provision
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Part 4-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 340(2) Protection

341 Meaning of workplace right
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
curation status: Proposed
has part: 341(1) Meaning of workplace right
has part: 341(2) Meaning of workplace right
has part: 341(3) Meaning of workplace right
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-341
schema version: 2

341(1) Meaning of workplace right
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
note: A person has a workplace right if they meet certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-341-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 341 Meaning of workplace right

fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a right.
modality: Deontic
operator: =

fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 341(1) Meaning of workplace right

341(2) Meaning of workplace right
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
note: Defines workplace processes and proceedings under a workplace law or instrument.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-341-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 341 Meaning of workplace right

fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the scope of workplace processes and proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (2) Each of the following is a process or proceedings under a workplace law or workplace instrument:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 341(2) Meaning of workplace right

341(3) Meaning of workplace right
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
note: Prospective employee has workplace rights as if employed
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-341-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 341 Meaning of workplace right

fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prospective employee
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Employment

342 Meaning of adverse action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.164
note: Employer must not take adverse action against employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-342
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval for adverse action is defined.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for adverse action.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Adverse action occurs when...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee has right to protection.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employer from taking adverse action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Employer must not take adverse action.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 342 Meaning of adverse action

343 Coercion
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
curation status: Proposed
has part: 343(1) Coercion
has part: 343(2) Coercion
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-343
schema version: 2

343(1) Coercion
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
note: Coercion of another person to exercise or not exercise a workplace right is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-343-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 343 Coercion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Coercion is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of coercion
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person must not organise or take, or threaten to organise or take...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Coercion by threat is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of coercion by threat
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) exercise, or propose to exercise, a workplace right in a particular way.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Coercion implies exercising or not exercising a workplace right.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of coercion on workplace rights
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (a) exercise or not exercise, or propose to exercise or not exercise, a workplace right;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 343(1) Coercion

343(2) Coercion
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
note: Exempts protected industrial action from coercion prohibition
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-343-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 343 Coercion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows protected industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to protected industrial action.

344 Undue influence or pressure
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
note: An employer must not exert undue influence or pressure on an employee in relation to certain decisions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-344
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No undue influence or pressure allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of undue influence or pressure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employer must not exert undue influence or pressure on employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No undue influence or pressure allowed in relation to employee decisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of undue influence or pressure in relation to employee decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employer must not exert undue influence or pressure on employee in relation to certain decisions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No undue influence or pressure allowed in relation to employee rights
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of undue influence or pressure in relation to employee rights
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employer must not exert undue influence or pressure on employee in relation to certain rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undue influence or pressure is a recurring issue that must be prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring prohibition of undue influence or pressure
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Undue influence or pressure is a recurring issue that must be prohibited

345 Misrepresentations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
curation status: Proposed
has part: 345(1) Misrepresentations
has part: 345(2) Misrepresentations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-345
schema version: 2

345(1) Misrepresentations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
note: Making false or misleading representations about workplace rights is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-345-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 345 Misrepresentations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making false or misleading representations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: A person must not knowingly or recklessly make a false or misleading representation about: (a) the workplace rights of another person; or (b) the exercise, or the effect of the exercise, of a workplace right by another person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 345(1) Misrepresentations

345(2) Misrepresentations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
note: No reliance expected on misrepresentation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-345-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 345 Misrepresentations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 345(2) Misrepresentations

346 Protection
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.170
note: Taking adverse action against another person due to their industrial activity is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-ltl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-346
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval starts from the engagement in industrial activity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the prohibition.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: The other person engages, or has at any time engaged or proposed to engage, in industrial activity within the meaning of paragraph 347(a) or (b).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Taking adverse action is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking adverse action against another person due to their industrial activity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The other person engages in industrial activity within the meaning of paragraph 347(a) or (b).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Taking adverse action is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking adverse action against another person due to their industrial activity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The other person does not engage in industrial activity within the meaning of paragraphs 347(c) to (g).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Taking adverse action is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking adverse action against another person due to their industrial activity.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The other person is or was an officer or member of an industrial association.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval ends from the non-engagement in industrial activity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the prohibition.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: The other person does not engage, or has at any time not engaged or proposed to not engage, in industrial activity within the meaning of paragraphs 347(c) to (g).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 346 Protection

347 Meaning of engages in industrial activity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.170
note: Engages in industrial activity if meets certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-347-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-347-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-347
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-347-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If person becomes or does not become an officer, they engage in industrial activity.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-347-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 347 Meaning of engages in industrial activity

348 Coercion
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.171
note: Coercion of industrial activity is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-348-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-348-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-348
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-348-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits coercion.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-348-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 348 Coercion

349 Misrepresentations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.171
note: Making false or misleading representations about another person's industrial activity obligations is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-349
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Representations must not be made within the defined temporal scope
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between representation and industrial activity obligation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: State defines temporal scope of representation prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Individuals must not knowingly or recklessly make false or misleading representations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: State imposes obligation on individuals to not make false or misleading representations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Individuals must not knowingly or recklessly make false or misleading representations about their disclosure obligations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations about disclosure obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: State imposes obligation on individuals to disclose certain information

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Individuals must not knowingly or recklessly make false or misleading representations that can be spread by others
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of false or misleading information
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread of information
premise text: State imposes obligation on individuals to prevent spread of false or misleading information

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Individuals must not knowingly or recklessly make recurring false or misleading representations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of false or misleading representations
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: State imposes obligation on individuals to not make recurring false or misleading representations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 349 Misrepresentations

350 Inducements—membership action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
curation status: Proposed
has part: 350(1) Inducements—membership action
has part: 350(2) Inducements—membership action
has part: 350(2A) Inducements—membership action
has part: 350(3) Inducements—membership action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350
schema version: 2

350(1) Inducements—membership action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Employer cannot induce employee to take membership action
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 350 Inducements—membership action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing membership action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 350(1) Inducements—membership action

350(2) Inducements—membership action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Cannot induce independent contractor to take membership action
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 350 Inducements—membership action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: During the term of the contract, person who has entered into a contract for services must not induce independent contractor to take membership action
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during the term of the contract
premise text: Person who has entered into a contract for services must not induce independent contractor to take membership action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must not induce independent contractor to take membership action
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Argumentation
operator: must not
premise text: Person who has entered into a contract for services with an independent contractor

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot induce independent contractor to take membership action
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing membership action
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Contract for services with independent contractor

350(2A) Inducements—membership action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Regulated businesses cannot induce regulated contractors to take membership action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 350 Inducements—membership action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing membership action
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

350(3) Inducements—membership action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Membership action requires becoming, not becoming, remaining or ceasing to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 350 Inducements—membership action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Membership action occurs during becoming, remaining, or ceasing to be an officer or member of an industrial association
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Membership action is true if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: (3) A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Membership action is a taking
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: (3) A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Membership action is true if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: (3) A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Membership action occurs during becoming, remaining, or ceasing to be an officer or member of an industrial association
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 350(3) Inducements—membership action

350A Protection for workplace delegates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
curation status: Proposed
has part: 350A(1) Protection for workplace delegates
has part: 350A(2) Protection for workplace delegates
has part: 350A(3) Protection for workplace delegates
has part: 350A(4) Protection for workplace delegates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350a
schema version: 2

350A(1) Protection for workplace delegates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Employer must not unreasonably fail or refuse to deal with the workplace delegate, make false representations, or hinder exercise of rights.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 350A Protection for workplace delegates

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on employer actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employer must not...

350A(2) Protection for workplace delegates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Employees must comply with workplace delegate instructions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 350A Protection for workplace delegates

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Workplace delegate instructions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 350A(2) Protection for workplace delegates

350A(3) Protection for workplace delegates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Employer bears burden of proving conduct is reasonable
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 350A Protection for workplace delegates

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has obligation to prove reasonableness
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

350A(4) Protection for workplace delegates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for conduct required by law
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 350A Protection for workplace delegates

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts subsection (1) from its application
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
premise text: (4) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct required by or under a law of the Commonwealth or a State or a Territory.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits subsection (1) to be applied in certain circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: (4) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct required by or under a law of the Commonwealth or a State or a Territory.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes subsection (1) from its application for conduct not required by law
modality: Deontic
operator: Excludes
premise text: (4) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct required by or under a law of the Commonwealth or a State or a Territory.

350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
curation status: Proposed
has part: 350B(1) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
has part: 350B(2) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
has part: 350B(3) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
has part: 350B(4) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
has part: 350B(5) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350b
schema version: 2

350B(1) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: Regulated business must not unreasonably fail or refuse to deal with the workplace delegate, make false representations, or hinder exercise of rights.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: workplace delegate who is a regulated worker
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated business must not unreasonably fail or refuse to deal with the workplace delegate.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: associated regulated business

350B(2) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: Clarifies scope of subsection (1)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 350B(2) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers

350B(3) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: Burden of proof lies on associated regulated business
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prove conduct is unreasonable
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

350B(4) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: Exempts conduct required by law from regulation under the Act.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts conduct required by law from regulation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (4) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct required by or under a law of the Commonwealth or a State or a Territory.

350B(5) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
note: The associated regulated business for a workplace delegate who is a regulated worker is the regulated business that engaged the workplace delegate under a services contract.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the regulated business for a workplace delegate
modality: Deontic
operator: is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 350B(5) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers

350C Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
curation status: Proposed
has part: 350C(1) Workplace delegates and their rights
has part: 350C(2) Workplace delegates and their rights
has part: 350C(3) Workplace delegates and their rights
has part: 350C(4) Workplace delegates and their rights
has part: 350C(5) Workplace delegates and their rights
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350c
schema version: 2

350C(1) Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: Definition of a workplace delegate
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 350C Workplace delegates and their rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 350C(1) Workplace delegates and their rights

350C(2) Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: Workplace delegate has right to represent industrial interests in disputes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 350C Workplace delegates and their rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a right.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 350C(2) Workplace delegates and their rights

350C(3) Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: Workplace delegate has right to reasonable access and communication with employees and regulated workers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 350C Workplace delegates and their rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right exists
modality: Deontic
operator: =

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-3-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 350C(3) Workplace delegates and their rights

350C(4) Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: Employer must comply with workplace delegate's rights term in the fair work instrument.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 350C Workplace delegates and their rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer must afford the workplace delegate the rights mentioned in subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employer's compliance with fair work instrument overlaps with workplace delegate's rights.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The employer or regulated business has complied with the delegates' rights term in the fair work instrument.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer must afford the workplace delegate the rights mentioned in subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Employer's compliance with fair work instrument implies that they must afford workplace delegate the rights.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: The employer or regulated business has complied with the delegates' rights term in the fair work instrument.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer must afford the workplace delegate the rights mentioned in subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to comply with workplace delegate's rights term.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The employer or regulated business has complied with the delegates' rights term in the fair work instrument.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer must afford the workplace delegate the rights mentioned in subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer is permitted to comply with workplace delegate's rights term.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The employer or regulated business has complied with the delegates' rights term in the fair work instrument.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employer must afford the workplace delegate the rights mentioned in subsection (3).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employer's compliance with fair work instrument is a recurring obligation.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: The employer or regulated business has complied with the delegates' rights term in the fair work instrument.

350C(5) Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
note: Employer must consider size and nature of enterprise, resources, and facilities when determining what is reasonable for purposes of subsection (3).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-350c-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 350C Workplace delegates and their rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...what is reasonable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to consider...
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: subsection (3)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 350C(5) Workplace delegates and their rights

351 Discrimination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
curation status: Proposed
has part: 351(1) Discrimination
has part: 351(2) Discrimination
has part: 351(3) Discrimination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-351
schema version: 2

351(1) Discrimination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: Employer cannot take adverse action against an employee due to certain characteristics.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-351-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 351 Discrimination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Due to certain characteristics, employer cannot take adverse action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of adverse action based on protected characteristics.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employer must not take adverse action.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 351(1) Discrimination

351(2) Discrimination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: Exemptions from anti-discrimination law
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-351-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 351 Discrimination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 351(2) Discrimination

351(3) Discrimination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
note: List of anti-discrimination laws
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-351-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 351 Discrimination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Listing of anti-discrimination laws
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 351(3) Discrimination

352 Temporary absence—illness or injury
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: Cannot dismiss employee due to temporary illness or injury
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-352-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-352-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-352
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-352-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee has right to remain employed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of dismissal
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Employer must not dismiss employee

353 Bargaining services fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
curation status: Proposed
has part: 353(1) Bargaining services fees
has part: 353(2) Bargaining services fees
has part: 353(3) Bargaining services fees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-353
schema version: 2

353(1) Bargaining services fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: No demanding or purporting to demand payment of a bargaining services fee
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-353-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 353 Bargaining services fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

353(2) Bargaining services fees
type: Concept
description: Membership fees are excluded
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: Payable fee for provision of bargaining services
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-353-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 353 Bargaining services fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Payable fee for provision of bargaining services
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

353(3) Bargaining services fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
note: Bargaining services fees
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-353-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 353 Bargaining services fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 353(3) Bargaining services fees

354 Coverage by particular instruments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
curation status: Proposed
has part: 354(1) Coverage by particular instruments
has part: 354(2) Coverage by particular instruments
has part: 354(3) Coverage by particular instruments
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-354
schema version: 2

354(1) Coverage by particular instruments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: Discrimination against an employer based on certain factors is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-354-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 354 Coverage by particular instruments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of discrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person must not discriminate...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...or a particular type of workplace instrument...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of workplace instruments
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (i) provisions of the National Employment Standards;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 354(1) Coverage by particular instruments

354(2) Coverage by particular instruments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for protected industrial action
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-354-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 354 Coverage by particular instruments

354(3) Coverage by particular instruments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
note: Discrimination against a regulated business is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-354-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 354 Coverage by particular instruments

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by a particular kind of workplace instrument within a type of workplace instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between regulated workers and workplace instruments
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: (a) regulated workers in relation to the regulated business are covered, or not covered, by a particular type of workplace instrument...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by a particular kind of workplace instrument within a type of workplace instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of regulated workers and workplace instruments
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (a) regulated workers in relation to the regulated business are covered, or not covered, by a particular type of workplace instrument...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...against a regulated business
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of discrimination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person must not discriminate...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by a particular kind of workplace instrument within a type of workplace instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of workplace instruments
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) regulated workers in relation to the regulated business are covered, or not covered, by a particular type of workplace instrument...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by a particular kind of workplace instrument within a type of workplace instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of regulated workers and workplace instruments
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (a) regulated workers in relation to the regulated business are covered, or not covered, by a particular type of workplace instrument...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by a particular kind of workplace instrument within a type of workplace instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of regulated workers and workplace instruments
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (a) regulated workers in relation to the regulated business are covered, or not covered, by a particular type of workplace instrument...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 354(3) Coverage by particular instruments

355 Coercion—allocation of duties etc. to particular person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
note: Coercion is prohibited
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-355-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-355-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-355
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-355-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits coercion
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

356 Objectionable terms
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
note: Terms with no effect due to being objectionable
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-356-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-356
schema version: 2

357 Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
curation status: Proposed
has part: 357(1) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
has part: 357(2) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
has part: 357(3) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-357
schema version: 2

357(1) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
note: Employer cannot misrepresent employment as independent contracting.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-357-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 357 Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employer's action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 357(1) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting

357(2) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
note: Employer's reasonable belief is a defense to misrepresentation of independent contracting.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-357-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 357 Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the employer reasonably believed...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employer's reasonable belief overlaps with the obligation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OVERLAPS
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the employer reasonably believed...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's belief is an exception to the obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 357(2) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting

357(3) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
note: Employer must consider size and nature of enterprise when determining reasonableness of belief
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-357-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 357 Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to consider size and nature of enterprise
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 357(3) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting

358 Dismissing to engage as independent contractor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
note: Employer cannot dismiss or threaten dismissal of an employee to engage as independent contractor.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-358-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-358-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-358
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-358-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on dismissing an employee to engage as independent contractor.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-358-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 358 Dismissing to engage as independent contractor

359 Misrepresentation to engage as independent contractor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: Employer must not make false statements to persuade an individual to enter into a contract as an independent contractor.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-359
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements to persuade an individual to enter into a contract.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 359 Misrepresentation to engage as independent contractor

359B Dismissing to engage as casual employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: Employer cannot dismiss or threaten dismissal of an employee to engage them as a casual employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-359b
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of dismissal
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 359B Dismissing to engage as casual employee

359C Misrepresentation to engage as casual employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
note: Employer must not make false statements to persuade or influence an individual to enter into a contract for casual employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-359c
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must be aware of the potential for false statements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requires the employer to recognize the potential for misleading statements.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: Employer has access to information about the individual's employment decision.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must not make the statement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements to influence an individual's employment decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employer knows the statement is false.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must not make false statements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obliges the employer to refrain from making false statements.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
premise text: Employer has a duty to provide accurate information.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must not make the statement if they know it is false.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Requires the employer to believe the statement is true before making it.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe
premise text: Employer knows the statement is false.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer's statement contributes to the individual's employment decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Traces the employer's statement as a causal factor in the individual's employment decision.
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: Individual is persuaded or influenced by the statement.

360 Multiple reasons for action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-360
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between actions and reasons
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The action occurs during the period of taking action for a particular reason.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference from premises to conclusion
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
premise text: The reasons for the action are included in the list of reasons.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: if-then
premise text: The system processes the list of reasons and determines the action.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: The reasons for the action include that reason.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of information or influence
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
premise text: The reasons for the action are communicated to others.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 360 Multiple reasons for action

361 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
curation status: Proposed
has part: 361(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
has part: 361(2) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-361
schema version: 2

361(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: Presumption of action being taken for a particular reason or intent unless proven otherwise.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-361-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 361 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval application.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) taking that action for that reason or with that intent would constitute a contravention of this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Application to cognitive agents.
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (b) taking that action for that reason or with that intent would constitute a contravention of this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it is presumed that the action was, or is being, taken for that reason or with that intent, unless the person proves otherwise.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presumption of action being taken for a particular reason or intent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) If: (a) in an application in relation to a contravention of this Part, it is alleged that a person took, or is taking, action for a particular reason or with a particular intent; and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Application to diffusion.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (b) taking that action for that reason or with that intent would constitute a contravention of this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval application.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) taking that action for that reason or with that intent would constitute a contravention of this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 361(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise

361(2) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: Presumption of action unless proved otherwise
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-361-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 361 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Unless proved otherwise
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Presumption of action
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: None

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 361(2) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise

362 Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
curation status: Proposed
has part: 362(1) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
has part: 362(2) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-362
schema version: 2

362(1) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: Coercion of action contravenes a provision of this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-362-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 362 Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the first person is taken to have contravened the provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Action overlaps with a provision of this Part
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the action, if taken by the second person for the first person’s reason, would contravene a provision of this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the first person is taken to have contravened the provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Coercion is prohibited
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) for a particular reason (the first person’s reason), a person advises, encourages or incites, or takes any action with intent to coerce...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the first person is taken to have contravened the provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Coercion is prohibited
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (b) the action, if taken by the second person for the first person’s reason, would contravene a provision of this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the first person is taken to have contravened the provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Action diffuses a prohibition of this Part
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) for a particular reason (the first person’s reason), a person advises, encourages or incites, or takes any action with intent to coerce...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the first person is taken to have contravened the provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Action until a provision of this Part
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (b) the action, if taken by the second person for the first person’s reason, would contravene a provision of this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 362(1) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action

362(2) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: No limitation on section 550
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-362-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 362 Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 362(2) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action

363 Actions of industrial associations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
curation status: Proposed
has part: 363(1) Actions of industrial associations
has part: 363(2) Actions of industrial associations
has part: 363(3) Actions of industrial associations
has part: 363(4) Actions of industrial associations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-363
schema version: 2

363(1) Actions of industrial associations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: Action of an industrial association is defined as certain actions taken by its members or agents.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-363-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 363 Actions of industrial associations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Action of an industrial association is defined.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 363(1) Actions of industrial associations

363(2) Actions of industrial associations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: Prevents actions by industrial association members without reasonable steps taken. Employees must comply with liabilities of bodies corporate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-363-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 363 Actions of industrial associations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has taken all reasonable steps to prevent the action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap for reasonable steps
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) the committee of management of the industrial association; or (b) a person authorised by the committee; or (c) an officer of the industrial association;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has taken all reasonable steps to prevent the action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines cognitive agent for obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (a) the committee of management of the industrial association; or (b) a person authorised by the committee; or (c) an officer of the industrial association;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has taken all reasonable steps to prevent the action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the committee of management of the industrial association; or (b) a person authorised by the committee; or (c) an officer of the industrial association;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has taken all reasonable steps to prevent the action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines diffusion of obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) the committee of management of the industrial association; or (b) a person authorised by the committee; or (c) an officer of the industrial association;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has taken all reasonable steps to prevent the action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal condition for reasonable steps
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) the committee of management of the industrial association; or (b) a person authorised by the committee; or (c) an officer of the industrial association;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 363(2) Actions of industrial associations

363(3) Actions of industrial associations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: Establishing state of mind of industrial association
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-363-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 363 Actions of industrial associations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 363(3) Actions of industrial associations

363(4) Actions of industrial associations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
note: Actions of industrial associations have effect despite subsections 793(1) and
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-363-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 363 Actions of industrial associations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 363(4) Actions of industrial associations

364 Unincorporated industrial associations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
curation status: Proposed
has part: 364(1) Unincorporated industrial associations
has part: 364(2) Unincorporated industrial associations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-364
schema version: 2

364(1) Unincorporated industrial associations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
note: Liability for contraventions by unincorporated industrial associations
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-364-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 364 Unincorporated industrial associations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Liability for contraventions by unincorporated industrial associations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes references to persons and unincorporated industrial associations
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, a reference to a person includes a reference to an unincorporated industrial association.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Liability for contraventions by unincorporated industrial associations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes references to persons and unincorporated industrial associations
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, a reference to a person includes a reference to an unincorporated industrial association.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 364(1) Unincorporated industrial associations

364(2) Unincorporated industrial associations
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
note: Each member, officer or agent of the industrial association who took part in the relevant action is also liable.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-364-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 364 Unincorporated industrial associations

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The liability overlaps with the temporal interval of the relevant action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The excerpt specifies the temporal overlap between the relevant action and the liability.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The state imposes liability on members, officers and agents who took part in the relevant action.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The excerpt represents the knowledge graph of individuals subject to liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The excerpt represents a knowledge graph of individuals subject to liability.
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeGraph
premise text: The state defines a class of individuals subject to liability.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Each member, officer or agent who took part in the relevant action is also liable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Each member, officer or agent of the industrial association is also liable.
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
premise text: The state imposes liability on members, officers and agents.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a recurring pattern of liability for members, officers and agents.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The excerpt specifies a recurring pattern of liability for members, officers and agents.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: The state imposes liability on members, officers and agents who took part in the relevant action.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The excerpt validates the structure of the class of individuals subject to liability.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: The excerpt validates the structure of the class of individuals subject to liability.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
premise text: The state defines a class of individuals subject to liability.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 364(2) Unincorporated industrial associations

365 Application for the FWC to deal with a dismissal dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
note: Application for FWC to deal with dismissal dispute
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-365-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-365
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-365-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 365 Application for the FWC to deal with a dismissal dispute

366 Time for application
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
curation status: Proposed
has part: 366(1) Time for application
has part: 366(2) Time for application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-366
schema version: 2

366(1) Time for application
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
note: Application must be made within a specified time period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-366-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 366 Time for application

fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be made within the specified time period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 366(1) Time for application

366(2) Time for application
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
note: Allow further period for application under exceptional circumstances
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-366-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 366 Time for application

fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The FWC may allow a further period...

367 Application fees
type: Concept
description: fee
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-367-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-367-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-367
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-367-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide fee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-367-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 367 Application fees

368 Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
curation status: Proposed
has part: 368(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 368(2) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 368(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 368(4) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-368
schema version: 2

368(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
note: FWC must deal with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-368-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 368 Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 368(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)

368(2) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
note: Conferences must be conducted in private.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-368-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 368 Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conferences from being public.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

368(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
note: FWC must issue certificate if dispute resolution attempts are unsuccessful
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-368-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 368 Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 368(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)

368(4) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
note: Application for orders in relation to a contravention of this Part.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-368-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 368 Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 368(4) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)

369 Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
curation status: Proposed
has part: 369(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
has part: 369(2) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
has part: 369(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-369
schema version: 2

369(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
note: Notification of FWC arbitration is required within 14 days after certificate issuance.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-369-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 369 Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification is mandatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 369(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration

369(2) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
note: FWC may deal with dismissal dispute by arbitration, including making orders for reinstatement or compensation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-369-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 369 Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may deal with dismissal dispute by arbitration.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 369(2) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration

369(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
note: Must not contravene a term of the order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-369-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 369 Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 369(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration

370 Taking a dismissal dispute to court
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
note: No general protections court application allowed unless FWC certificate issued or interim injunction applied for.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-370
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No general protections court application allowed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of applications based on FWC certificate and interim injunction.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 370 Taking a dismissal dispute to court

372 Application for the FWC to deal with a non-dismissal dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
note: Application for FWC to deal with non-dismissal dispute
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-372
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: During the period when a person alleges a contravention of this Part and is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: If: (a) a person alleges a contravention of this Part; (b) the person is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365 for the FWC to deal with the dispute;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a person alleges a contravention of this Part and is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365, then the person may apply to the FWC under this section for the FWC to deal with the dispute.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of eligibility for dispute resolution
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (a) a person alleges a contravention of this Part; and (b) the person is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365 for the FWC to deal with the dispute;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person may apply to the FWC under this section for the FWC to deal with the dispute.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission for dispute resolution
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: the person may apply to the FWC under this section for the FWC to deal with the dispute.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must apply to the FWC under this section for the FWC to deal with the dispute.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation for dispute resolution
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: the person may apply to the FWC under this section for the FWC to deal with the dispute.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Until the period when a person alleges a contravention of this Part and is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (a) a person alleges a contravention of this Part; and (b) the person is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365 for the FWC to deal with the dispute;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 372 Application for the FWC to deal with a non-dismissal dispute

373 Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
curation status: Proposed
has part: 373(1) Application fees
has part: 373(2) Application fees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-373
schema version: 2

373(1) Application fees
type: Concept
description: Fee
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-373-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 373 Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide fee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 373(1) Application fees

373(2) Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
note: Application fee regulation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-373-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 373 Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires payment of application fee
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 373(2) Application fees

374 Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
curation status: Proposed
has part: 374(1) Conferences
has part: 374(2) Conferences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-374
schema version: 2

374(1) Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
note: The FWC must conduct a conference to deal with the dispute if an application is made under section 372 and the parties agree to participate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-374-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 374 Conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must conduct a conference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must conduct a conference.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: An application is made under section 372.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The parties to the dispute must agree to participate in a conference.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The parties to the dispute must agree to participate in a conference.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: An application is made under section 372 and the parties agree to participate.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC may deal with a dispute by mediation or conciliation, or by making a recommendation or expressing an opinion.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may deal with a dispute by mediation or conciliation, or by making a recommendation or expressing an opinion.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 372 defines the FWC's obligations.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must conduct a conference if an application is made under section 372 and the parties agree to participate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must conduct a conference if an application is made under section 372 and the parties agree to participate.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 372 defines the FWC's obligations.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 374(1) Conferences

374(2) Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
note: The FWC must conduct a conference in private.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-374-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 374 Conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 374(2) Conferences

375 Advice on general protections court application
type: Concept
description: Advice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
note: Must advise parties on general protections court application prospects
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-375
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to advise parties
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

375A Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
curation status: Proposed
has part: 375A(1) Appeal rights
has part: 375A(2) Appeal rights
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-375a
schema version: 2

375A(1) Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: FWC cannot grant permission to appeal from a decision made by the FWC under subsection 369(2) unless it is in the public interest.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-375a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 375A Appeal rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: before granting permission to appeal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between FWC's decision-making power and public interest
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: FWC must consider the public interest

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless it is in the public interest
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of granting permission to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: FWC must not grant permission

375A(2) Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: Appeal rights limited to questions of fact
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-375a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 375A Appeal rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits appeal rights
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 375A(2) Appeal rights

375B Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
curation status: Proposed
has part: 375B(1) Costs orders against parties
has part: 375B(2) Costs orders against parties
has part: 375B(3) Costs orders against parties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-375b
schema version: 2

375B(1) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: The FWC may order costs against a party to a dispute if they caused the other party's costs.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-375b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 375B Costs orders against parties

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first party's action (application) is before the second party's action (costs incurred).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between parties' actions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (a) an application for the FWC to deal with...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first party's action (unreasonable act or omission) causes the second party's cost.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: First party's actions cause costs for the other party
modality: CogAI
operator: causes
premise text: (b) the FWC is satisfied that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A party must pay costs incurred by the other party.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: The FWC may make an order for costs...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first party's action (unreasonable act or omission) causes the second party's cost.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: First party's actions cause costs for the other party
modality: Diffusion
operator: causes
premise text: (b) the FWC is satisfied that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first party's action (application) is before the second party's action (costs incurred).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between parties' actions
modality: LTL
operator: between
premise text: (a) an application for the FWC to deal with...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 375B(1) Costs orders against parties

375B(2) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: The FWC may make an order only if the other party applies for it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-375b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 375B Costs orders against parties

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knows the other party applied
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS
premise text: The FWC knows the other party applied.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Contains a temporal interval
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The order is made at some point in time.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 375B(2) Costs orders against parties

375B(3) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: The FWC's power to order costs under section 611 is not limited by this section.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-375b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 375B Costs orders against parties

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC's power to order costs under section 611 is not limited by this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 375B(3) Costs orders against parties

376 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
curation status: Proposed
has part: 376(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 376(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 376(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 376(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-376
schema version: 2

376(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: Application of costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-376-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 376 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation on the state to apply costs orders
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 376(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

376(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: Order for costs against a representative if they caused costs to be incurred due to unreasonable conduct.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-376-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 376 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order for costs against representative
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Representative caused costs to be incurred

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 376(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

376(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: FWC may only make costs order if other party applies
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-376-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 376 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may order costs
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: Other party must apply

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 376(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

376(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
note: Limitation on FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-376-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 376 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits FWC's power to order costs
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 376(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

377 Applications for costs orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
note: Application for costs order must be made within 14 days after dispute resolution.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-377-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-377-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-377
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-377-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within 14 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-377-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 377 Applications for costs orders

377A Schedule of costs
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
note: A schedule of costs may be prescribed.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-377a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-377a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-377a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-377a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prescribe a schedule of costs
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-377a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 377A Schedule of costs

378 Contravening costs orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
note: Must not contravene a term of the order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-378-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-378-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-378
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-378-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-378-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 378 Contravening costs orders

379 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-379-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-379
schema version: 2

380 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-380
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a definition.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 380 Meanings of employee and employer

381 Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
note: Establishes a framework for dealing with unfair dismissal balancing business and employee needs.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-381-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-381-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-381
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-381-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-381-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 381 Object of this Part

382 When a person is protected from unfair dismissal
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
note: Protection from unfair dismissal under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-382
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is protected from unfair dismissal if their annual rate of earnings meets the threshold.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Annual rate of earnings threshold
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
premise text: The sum of the person's annual rate of earnings and other amounts is less than the high income threshold.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is protected from unfair dismissal if a modern award applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Modern award coverage
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A modern award covers the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is protected from unfair dismissal if an enterprise agreement applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enterprise agreement applicability
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: An enterprise agreement applies to the person in relation to the employment.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is protected from unfair dismissal if their annual rate of earnings meets the threshold.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: High income threshold
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The sum of the person's annual rate of earnings and other amounts is less than the high income threshold.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 382 When a person is protected from unfair dismissal

383 Meaning of minimum employment period
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
note: Minimum employment period for dismissal
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-383-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-383-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-383
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-383-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has obligation to provide minimum employment period
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

384 Period of employment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
curation status: Proposed
has part: 384(1) Period of employment
has part: 384(2) Period of employment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-384
schema version: 2

384(1) Period of employment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
note: Defines an employee's period of employment with an employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-384-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 384 Period of employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A temporal relation between 'period of employment' and 'continuous service' is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (1) An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that time as an employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A cognitive agent is required to understand 'period of employment' and 'continuous service'.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requires a cognitive agent
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (1) An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that time as an employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An employee's period of employment is defined.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that time as an employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A diffusion relation between 'period of employment' and 'continuous service' is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Requires a diffusion relation
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (1) An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that time as an employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A trace between 'period of employment' and 'continuous service' is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires a trace
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (1) An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that time as an employee.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 384(1) Period of employment

384(2) Period of employment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
note: Employee rights and responsibilities
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-384-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 384 Period of employment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 384(2) Period of employment

385 What is an unfair dismissal
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
note: A person has been unfairly dismissed if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-385-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-385-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-385
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-385-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The dismissal is unfair.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the dismissal meets all conditions, it is unfair.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: The person has been dismissed.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-385-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 385 What is an unfair dismissal

386 Meaning of dismissed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
curation status: Proposed
has part: 386(1) Meaning of dismissed
has part: 386(2) Meaning of dismissed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-386
schema version: 2

386(1) Meaning of dismissed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
note: A person has been dismissed if their employment was terminated or they resigned due to employer conduct.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-386-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 386 Meaning of dismissed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Employment termination occurs during the employment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) A person has been dismissed if: (a) the person’s employment with his or her employer has been terminated on the employer’s initiative; or (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employment termination or resignation due to employer conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasBeenDismissed
premise text: (1) A person has been dismissed if: (a) the person’s employment with his or her employer has been terminated on the employer’s initiative; or (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Employment termination occurs during the employment.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 386(1) Meaning of dismissed

386(2) Meaning of dismissed
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
note: A person has not been dismissed if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-386-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 386 Meaning of dismissed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 386(2) Meaning of dismissed

387 Criteria for considering harshness etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
note: Criteria for considering harshness etc.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-387-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-387
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-387-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 387 Criteria for considering harshness etc.

388 The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
curation status: Proposed
has part: 388(1) The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
has part: 388(2) The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-388
schema version: 2

388(1) The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
note: The Minister may declare a Small Business Fair Dismissal Code.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-388-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 388 The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code

fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

388(2) The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
note: Employer must comply with Small Business Fair Dismissal Code.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-388-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 388 The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code

fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 388(2) The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code

389 Meaning of genuine redundancy
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
curation status: Proposed
has part: 389(1) Meaning of genuine redundancy
has part: 389(2) Meaning of genuine redundancy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-389
schema version: 2

389(1) Meaning of genuine redundancy
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
note: Employer must consult about redundancy before dismissing an employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-389-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 389 Meaning of genuine redundancy

fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to consult about redundancy.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 389(1) Meaning of genuine redundancy

389(2) Meaning of genuine redundancy
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
note: Employer must redeploy dismissed employee within the enterprise or associated entity.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-389-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 389 Meaning of genuine redundancy

fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to redeploy dismissed employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 389(2) Meaning of genuine redundancy

390 When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
curation status: Proposed
has part: 390(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
has part: 390(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
has part: 390(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-390
schema version: 2

390(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
note: The FWC may order reinstatement or compensation for unfair dismissal.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-390-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 390 When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 390(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal

390(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
note: The FWC may make an order for unfair dismissal only if an application under section 394 has been made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-390-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 390 When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 390(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal

390(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
note: FWC must consider payment of compensation before ordering reinstatement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-390-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 390 When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider payment of compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 390(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal

391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
curation status: Proposed
has part: 391(1) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
has part: 391(1A) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
has part: 391(2) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
has part: 391(3) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
has part: 391(4) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-391
schema version: 2

391(1) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
note: Employer must reinstate employee under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-391-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to reinstate employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 391(1) Remedy—reinstatement etc.

391(1A) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
note: Employer must appoint employee to equivalent position or another with no less favourable terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-391-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must appoint employee to equivalent position or another with no less favourable terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 391(1A) Remedy—reinstatement etc.

391(2) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
note: Order to restore lost pay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-391-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period of the person’s continuous service with the employer, or...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for employment continuity
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (a) the continuity of the person’s employment;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC MUST make any order that the FWC considers appropriate...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to restore lost pay
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If the FWC makes an order...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC MUST also make any order that the FWC considers appropriate...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to maintain employment continuity
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If the FWC makes an order under subsection (1)...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the associated entity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for continuous service
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (b) the period of the person’s continuous service with the employer,

391(3) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
note: Employer must pay remuneration lost due to dismissal.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-391-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must pay remuneration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 391(3) Remedy—reinstatement etc.

391(4) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
note: Consider remuneration earned by person during period between dismissal and reinstatement order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-391-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 391(4) Remedy—reinstatement etc.

392 Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
curation status: Proposed
has part: 392(1) Remedy—compensation
has part: 392(2) Remedy—compensation
has part: 392(3) Remedy—compensation
has part: 392(4) Remedy—compensation
has part: 392(5) Remedy—compensation
has part: 392(6) Remedy—compensation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-392
schema version: 2

392(1) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: Employer must pay compensation to employee upon dismissal.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-392-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

392(2) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
description: Remuneration earned by the person from employment or other work during the period between dismissal and making of the order for compensation.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: Determine compensation amount considering various circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-392-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consider various circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) In determining an amount for the purposes of an order under subsection (1),

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 392(2) Remedy—compensation

392(3) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: The FWC must reduce the amount of compensation by an appropriate amount on account of misconduct.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-392-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC has an obligation to reduce the amount of compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 392(3) Remedy—compensation

392(4) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: No compensation for emotional harm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-392-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

392(5) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
description: Amount of compensation
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: Maximum compensation amount
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-392-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Upper bound
modality: Deontic
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 392(5) Remedy—compensation

392(6) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
note: Employee is entitled to compensation for a certain period of employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-392-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to receive compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 392(6) Remedy—compensation

393 Monetary orders may be in instalments
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.203
note: Employer may pay amount in instalments
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-393-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-393
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-393-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 393 Monetary orders may be in instalments

394 Application for unfair dismissal remedy
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
note: Application for unfair dismissal remedy is allowed.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-394
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who has been dismissed may apply to the FWC for an order under Division 4 granting a remedy.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Existence of application
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: For application fees, see section 395.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Existence of application fee section
modality: Deontic
operator: has

fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 394 Application for unfair dismissal remedy

395 Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
curation status: Proposed
has part: 395(1) Application fees
has part: 395(2) Application fees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-395
schema version: 2

395(1) Application fees
type: Concept
description: Fee prescribed by regulations
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
note: Application fee must be paid with application to FWC under this Division.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-395-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 395 Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application fee must be paid
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 395(1) Application fees

395(2) Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
note: Application fee regulation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-395-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 395 Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulates application fees
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 395(2) Application fees

396 Initial matters to be considered before merits
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
note: Consideration of application matters before merits
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-396-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-396-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-396
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-396-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: subsection 394(2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-396-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 396 Initial matters to be considered before merits

397 Matters involving contested facts
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
note: Conduct conference or hold hearing on disputed facts
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-397-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-397-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-397
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-397-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct conference or hold hearing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

398 Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
curation status: Proposed
has part: 398(1) Conferences
has part: 398(2) Conferences
has part: 398(3) Conferences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-398
schema version: 2

398(1) Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
note: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part if the FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-398-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 398 Conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI's inference
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 398(1) Conferences

398(2) Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
note: The FWC must conduct a private conference.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-398-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 398 Conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 398(2) Conferences

398(3) Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
note: Consider circumstances of parties in considering application and informing self.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-398-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 398 Conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) informing itself in relation to the application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consideration obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: (a) considering the application

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 398(3) Conferences

399 Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
curation status: Proposed
has part: 399(1) Hearings
has part: 399(2) Hearings
has part: 399(3) Hearings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-399
schema version: 2

399(1) Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
note: No hearing unless FWC considers it appropriate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-399-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 399 Hearings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Hearing is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: FWC must not hold a hearing

399(2) Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
note: FWC may decide not to hold hearing in relation to parts of matter.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-399-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 399 Hearings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to decide not to hold hearing.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

399(3) Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
note: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing at any time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-399-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 399 Hearings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

399A Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
curation status: Proposed
has part: 399A(1) Dismissing applications
has part: 399A(2) Dismissing applications
has part: 399A(3) Dismissing applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-399a
schema version: 2

399A(1) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
note: Dismissal of applications for orders under Division 4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-399a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 399A Dismissing applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No dismissal allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may not dismiss applications
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 399A(1)

399A(2) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
note: Employer may apply for power to dismiss applications.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-399a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 399A Dismissing applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has the right to apply for power.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 399A(2) Dismissing applications

399A(3) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
note: The FWC may dismiss an application at any time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-399a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 399A Dismissing applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC has the power to dismiss an application.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: If the FWC may dismiss an application, it must do so.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: →

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 399A(3) Dismissing applications

400 Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
curation status: Proposed
has part: 400(1) Appeal rights
has part: 400(2) Appeal rights
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-400
schema version: 2

400(1) Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
note: FWC cannot grant permission to appeal from a decision unless in the public interest.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-400-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 400 Appeal rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless in the public interest
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of granting permission to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: FWC must not grant permission

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to appeal from a decision made by the FWC under this Part
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC's obligation to consider public interest when granting permission to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: FWC must not grant permission unless in the public interest

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to appeal from a decision made by the FWC under this Part
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC's permission to grant permission to appeal is conditional on public interest
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: FWC must not grant permission unless in the public interest

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to appeal from a decision made by the FWC under this Part
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Conditional relationship between granting permission and public interest
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: FWC must not grant permission to appeal unless in the public interest

400(2) Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
note: Appeal rights limited to questions of fact
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-400-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 400 Appeal rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits appeal rights
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 400(2) Appeal rights

400A Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
curation status: Proposed
has part: 400A(1) Costs orders against parties
has part: 400A(2) Costs orders against parties
has part: 400A(3) Costs orders against parties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-400a
schema version: 2

400A(1) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
note: Order for costs against a party to a matter arising under this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-400a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 400A Costs orders against parties

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 400A(1) Costs orders against parties

400A(2) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
note: The FWC may make an order only if the other party applies for it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-400a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 400A Costs orders against parties

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The order is made during the application period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If the other party applies, then the FWC may make an order.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: The other party applies for it in accordance with section 402.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Might

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: The other party must know about the application.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
premise text: The other party applies for it in accordance with section 402.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The order is made until the other party withdraws the application.
modality: LTL
operator: Until

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 400A(2) Costs orders against parties

400A(3) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
note: Limits FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-400a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 400A Costs orders against parties

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 400A(3) Costs orders against parties

401 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
note: Applicable if an application for unfair dismissal remedy has been made under section 394.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-401
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies during the application period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to section 394
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Section 394 has been applied for

fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Application for unfair dismissal remedy has been made under section 394.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 401 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

402 Applications for costs orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
note: Application for costs order must be made within 14 days after FWC determines matter or matter is discontinued.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-402-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-402-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-402
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-402-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within 14 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-402-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 402 Applications for costs orders

403 Schedule of costs
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
curation status: Proposed
has part: 403(1) Schedule of costs
has part: 403(2) Schedule of costs
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-403
schema version: 2

403(1) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
note: A schedule of costs may be prescribed in relation to items of expenditure likely to be incurred.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-403-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-403-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 403 Schedule of costs

fair-work-act-2009-sec-403-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 403(1) Schedule of costs

403(2) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
note: Limitation on awarding costs in relation to items in the schedule
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-403-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-403-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-403-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 403 Schedule of costs

fair-work-act-2009-sec-403-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding costs in relation to items in the schedule
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

404 Security for costs
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209
note: Security for costs may be provided by procedural rules.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-404-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-404-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-404
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-404-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide security for costs
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-404-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 404 Security for costs

405 Contravening orders under this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209
note: Must not contravene a term of an order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-405-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-405-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-405
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-405-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on action
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-405-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 405 Contravening orders under this Part

406 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.210
note: Industrial action must be organised or engaged in by certain persons after the nominal expiry date of an enterprise agreement or workplace determination has passed.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-406-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-406-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-406
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-406-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be organised or engaged in by certain persons after the nominal expiry date of an enterprise agreement or workplace determination has passed.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-406-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 406 Guide to this Part

407 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-407-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-407
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-407-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 407 Meanings of employee and employer

408 Protected industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
note: Industrial action is protected under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-408-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-408-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-408
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-408-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Industrial action is protected.
modality: Deontic
operator: isProtected

fair-work-act-2009-sec-408-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 408 Protected industrial action

409 Employee claim action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
curation status: Proposed
has part: 409(1) Employee claim action
has part: 409(2) Employee claim action
has part: 409(3) Employee claim action
has part: 409(4) Employee claim action
has part: 409(5) Employee claim action
has part: 409(6) Employee claim action
has part: 409(6A) Employee claim action
has part: 409(7) Employee claim action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-409
schema version: 2

409(1) Employee claim action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
note: Employee claim action for a proposed enterprise agreement is industrial action that meets certain requirements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-409-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 409 Employee claim action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by: (ii) an employee who is included in a group or groups of employees specified in a protected action ballot order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Occurs during the period of the protected action ballot.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (ii) an employee who is included in a group or groups of employees specified in a protected action ballot order for the industrial action;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...meets the common requirements set out in Subdivision B;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires meeting common requirements and additional requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) is organised or engaged in for the purpose of supporting or advancing claims...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for the industrial action;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Occurs everywhere that the protected action ballot is necessary.
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: Protected action ballot is necessary

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 409(1) Employee claim action

409(2) Employee claim action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
note: Industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-409-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 409 Employee claim action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for protected action ballot.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) The industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot (see Division 8 of this Part).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies reasoning to protected action ballot.
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (2) The industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot (see Division 8 of this Part).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Unlawful terms
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action without protected action ballot.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot (see Division 8 of this Part).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses protected action ballot to industrial action.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) The industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot (see Division 8 of this Part).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for protected action ballot.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) The industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot (see Division 8 of this Part).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 409(2) Employee claim action

409(3) Employee claim action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
note: Industrial action must not be in support of or to advance claims to include unlawful terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-409-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 409 Employee claim action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action in support of or to advance unlawful claims.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) The industrial action must not be in support of, or to advance, claims to include unlawful terms in the agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Industrial action implies a prohibition on supporting or advancing unlawful claims.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (3) The industrial action must not be in support of, or to advance, claims to include unlawful terms in the agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 409(3) Employee claim action

409(4) Employee claim action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
note: Bargaining representative must not engage in pattern bargaining.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-409-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 409 Employee claim action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not be engaging in pattern bargaining...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of engaging in pattern bargaining.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (4) A bargaining representative...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 409(4) Employee claim action

409(5) Employee claim action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
note: No relation to demarcation dispute or FWC order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-409-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 409 Employee claim action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 409(5) Employee claim action

409(6) Employee claim action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
note: Must meet notice requirements of section 430 if section 429 applies in relation to industrial action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-409-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 409 Employee claim action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 409(6) Employee claim action

409(6A) Employee claim action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
note: Cannot have contravened any order made under section 448A
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-409-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 409 Employee claim action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot have contravened any order made under section 448A
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

409(7) Employee claim action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
note: Bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement must comply with Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-409-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 409 Employee claim action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement covers Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: COVERS

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is a type of Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS A TYPE OF

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is a type of Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS A TYPE OF

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement covers Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
modality: LTL
operator: COVERS

410 Employee response action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
curation status: Proposed
has part: 410(1) Employee response action
has part: 410(2) Employee response action
has part: 410(3) Employee response action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-410
schema version: 2

410(1) Employee response action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
note: Industrial action must not relate to a demarcation dispute etc.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-410-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 410 Employee response action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action related to demarcation disputes
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

410(2) Employee response action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
note: No relation to demarcation dispute or FWC order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-410-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 410 Employee response action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not...

410(3) Employee response action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
note: Employee organization's officer is a bargaining representative.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-410-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 410 Employee response action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference to a bargaining representative includes an officer
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (3) If an employee organization is a bargaining representative...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Officer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Employee organization

fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 410(3) Employee response action

411 Employer response action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
curation status: Proposed
has part: 411(1) Employer response action
has part: 411(2) Employer response action
has part: 411(3) Employer response action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-411
schema version: 2

411(1) Employer response action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
note: Employer must respond to proposed enterprise agreement with industrial action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-411-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 411 Employer response action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Industrial action is a response to employee action.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS A

411(2) Employer response action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
note: Employer must respond to industrial action authorized by a protected action ballot.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-411-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 411 Employer response action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for response.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must respond.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 411(2) Employer response action

411(3) Employer response action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
note: Employer cannot have contravened a mediation and conciliation conference order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-411-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 411 Employer response action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening a mediation and conciliation conference order.
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 411(3) Employer response action

412 Pattern bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
note: Pattern bargaining requires being a bargaining representative for 2 or more proposed enterprise agreements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-412-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-412-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-412
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-412-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Pattern bargaining requires a condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
curation status: Proposed
has part: 413(1) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
has part: 413(2) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
has part: 413(3) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
has part: 413(4) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
has part: 413(5) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-413
schema version: 2

413(1) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
note: Common requirements for industrial action to be protected
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-413-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 413(1) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be

413(2) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
note: Industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-413-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between industrial action and proposed enterprise agreements
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relationship between industrial action and proposed enterprise agreements
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relationship between industrial action and proposed enterprise agreements
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between industrial action and proposed enterprise agreements
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.

413(3) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
note: Only persons genuinely trying to reach an agreement are allowed.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-413-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The person organising or engaging in the industrial action must have a genuine attempt to reach an agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Person organising or engaging in the industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Only persons genuinely trying to reach an agreement are allowed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Bargaining representative for the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The person organising or engaging in the industrial action must be a bargaining representative for the agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: Person organising or engaging in the industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The person organising or engaging in the industrial action must continue to genuinely try to reach an agreement until it is successful.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Person organising or engaging in the industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 413(3) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be

413(4) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
note: Compliance with orders is required
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-413-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with orders
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 413(4) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be

413(5) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
note: Must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and relate to industrial action
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-413-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Persons are related to orders during a certain time period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between persons and orders
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The following persons must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and that relate to industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligations are applied by artificial intelligence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application of obligations
modality: CogAI
operator: must-not
premise text: The following persons must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and that relate to industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No contravention is allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening orders
modality: Deontic
operator: must-not
premise text: The following persons must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and that relate to industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligations are spread among persons
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of obligations among persons
modality: Diffusion
operator: must-not
premise text: The following persons must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and that relate to industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Persons are related to orders during a certain time period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between persons and orders
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The following persons must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and that relate to industrial action

414 Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
curation status: Proposed
has part: 414(1) Notice requirements for industrial action
has part: 414(2) Notice requirements for industrial action
has part: 414(3) Notice requirements for industrial action
has part: 414(4) Notice requirements for industrial action
has part: 414(5) Notice requirements for industrial action
has part: 414(6) Notice requirements for industrial action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-414
schema version: 2

414(1) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: Employer must receive written notice before engaging in employee claim action for a proposed enterprise agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-414-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 414(1) Notice requirements for industrial action

414(2) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
description: Notice period
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: Minimum notice period for industrial action
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-414-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 120 hours
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minimum notice period for industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 414(2) Notice requirements for industrial action

414(3) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: No notice can be given until after the results of the protected action ballot have been declared.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-414-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No notice can be given.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

414(4) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: Employer must respond to written notice of employee response action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-414-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must respond.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 414(4) Notice requirements for industrial action

414(5) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
description: Notice of action
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: Employer must give written notice to bargaining representatives and employees before engaging in employer response action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-414-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 414(5) Notice requirements for industrial action

414(6) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
note: Notice must specify nature of action and start date.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-414-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 414(6) Notice requirements for industrial action

415 Immunity provision
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
curation status: Proposed
has part: 415(1) Immunity provision
has part: 415(2) Immunity provision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-415
schema version: 2

415(1) Immunity provision
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: No action lies under any law in relation to protected industrial action unless it involves personal injury, wilful or reckless destruction of property, or unlawful taking, keeping, or use of property.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-415-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 415 Immunity provision

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the industrial action has involved or is likely to involve: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies temporal intervals involved in protected industrial action.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the industrial action has involved or is likely to involve: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Identifies protected industrial action using AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the industrial action has involved or is likely to involve: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action unless it involves specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) No action lies under any law (whether written or unwritten) in relation to any industrial action that is protected industrial action...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the industrial action has involved or is likely to involve: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads protected industrial action to related conditions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless the industrial action has involved or is likely to involve: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Identifies recurring protected industrial action.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.

415(2) Immunity provision
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: No defamation action can be brought in relation to industrial action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-415-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 415 Immunity provision

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No defamation action can be brought.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defamation can be brought in other contexts.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) However, subsection (1) does not prevent an action for defamation being brought in relation to anything that occurred in the course of industrial action.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection (1) imposes a duty to prevent defamation during industrial action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) However, subsection (1) does not prevent an action for defamation being brought in relation to anything that occurred in the course of industrial action.

416 Employer response action—employer may refuse to make
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Employer may refuse to make payments to employees in relation to the period of action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-416-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-416
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-416-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 416 Employer response action—employer may refuse to make

416A Employer response action does not affect continuity of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
note: Employer response action does not affect continuity of employment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-416a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-416a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-416a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-416a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to not affect continuity of employment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

417 Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
curation status: Proposed
has part: 417(1) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
has part: 417(2) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
has part: 417(2A) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-417
schema version: 2

417(1) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
note: Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before certain events occur.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-417-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 417 Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 417(1) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before

417(2) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
note: Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-417-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 417 Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: before
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
premise text: (2) The persons are:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be organised or engaged in before
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (2) The persons are:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 417(2) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before

417(2A) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
note: Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before a variation starts to operate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-dialectical-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-417-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 417 Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: States that industrial action before a variation starts to operate starts at the start of the variation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAt
premise text: (2A) If the person is an employer or employee covered by an enterprise agreement...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognises industrial action before a variation starts to operate as prohibited.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise
premise text: (2A) If the person is an employer or employee covered by an enterprise agreement...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action before a variation starts to operate.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2A) If the person is an employer or employee covered by an enterprise agreement...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-dialectical-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
logic summary: Negates the possibility of industrial action before a variation starts to operate.
modality: Dialectical
operator: Negate
premise text: (2A) If the person is an employer or employee covered by an enterprise agreement...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies that industrial action before a variation starts to operate is prohibited.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (2A) If the person is an employer or employee covered by an enterprise agreement...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 417(2A) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before

418 FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
curation status: Proposed
has part: 418(1) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
has part: 418(2) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
has part: 418(3) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
has part: 418(4) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-418
schema version: 2

418(1) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
note: FWC must order that industrial action by employees or employers stop.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-418-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 418 FWC must order that industrial action by employees or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the stop period specified in the order.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with protected industrial action periods
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action by one or more employees or employers...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the stop period specified in the order.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes unprotected industrial action
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action by one or more employees or employers...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action by one or more employees or employers...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the stop period specified in the order.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses protection of industrial action
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action by one or more employees or employers...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the stop period specified in the order.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Eventually stops industrial action
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action by one or more employees or employers...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 418(1) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or

418(2) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
note: FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-418-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 418 FWC must order that industrial action by employees or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 418(2) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or

418(3) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
note: FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-418-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 418 FWC must order that industrial action by employees or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 418(3) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or

418(4) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
note: FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-418-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 418 FWC must order that industrial action by employees or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 418(4) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or

419 FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
curation status: Proposed
has part: 419(1) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
has part: 419(2) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
has part: 419(3) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-419
schema version: 2

419(1) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
note: FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system stop.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-419-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 419 FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with business operations.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) is: (i) happening; or (ii) threatened, impending or probable; or (iii) being organised;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes threat to business.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (b) will, or would, be likely to have the effect of causing substantial loss or damage...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action by non-national system employees or employers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads to business operations.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (a) is: (i) happening; or (ii) threatened, impending or probable; or (iii) being organised;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Eventually leads to business disruption.
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: (b) will, or would, be likely to have the effect of causing substantial loss or damage...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 419(1) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system

419(2) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
note: FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-419-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 419 FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 419(2) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system

419(3) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
note: FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-419-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 419 FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC's obligation and industrial action
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to order industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 419(3) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system

420 Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
curation status: Proposed
has part: 420(1) Interim orders etc.
has part: 420(2) Interim orders etc.
has part: 420(3) Interim orders etc.
has part: 420(4) Interim orders etc.
has part: 420(5) Interim orders etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-420
schema version: 2

420(1) Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
note: Determine an application for an order within 2 days after the application is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-420-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 420 Interim orders etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must determine an application for an order within 2 days after the application is made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to determine an application within a specified timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (1) As far as practicable, the FWC must determine an application for an order under section 418 or 419 within 2 days after the application is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must make a decision on an application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to make a decision on an application.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (1) As far as practicable, the FWC must determine an application for an order under section 418 or 419 within 2 days after the application is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC must take action on an application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to take action on an application.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (1) As far as practicable, the FWC must determine an application for an order under section 418 or 419 within 2 days after the application is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application must be determined within 2 days after the application is made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Application must be determined within a specified timeframe.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) As far as practicable, the FWC must determine an application for an order under section 418 or 419 within 2 days after the application is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 420(1) Interim orders etc.

420(2) Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
note: Interim order must stop industrial action from occurring.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-420-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 420 Interim orders etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 420(2) Interim orders etc.

420(3) Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
note: FWC cannot make interim order if it would be contrary to public interest.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-420-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 420 Interim orders etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it would be contrary to public interest
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Interim order cannot be made during period when it would be contrary to public interest
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: FWC must not make interim order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it would be contrary to public interest
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: FWC must consider implications of making interim order on public interest
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
premise text: FWC must not make interim order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it would be contrary to public interest
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making interim order
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: FWC must not make interim order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it would be contrary to public interest
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Interim order cannot be made if it would be contrary to public interest
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: FWC must not make interim order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it would be contrary to public interest
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Not making interim order is permissible if it would be contrary to public interest
modality: LinearLogic
operator: not
premise text: FWC must not make interim order

420(4) Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
note: The FWC does not have to specify the particular industrial action in making an interim order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-420-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 420 Interim orders etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 420(4) Interim orders etc.

420(5) Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
note: An interim order continues in operation until the application is determined.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-420-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 420 Interim orders etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continuation of interim order
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: (5) An interim order continues in operation until the application is determined.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 420(5) Interim orders etc.

421 Contravening an order etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
curation status: Proposed
has part: 421(1) Contravening an order etc.
has part: 421(2) Contravening an order etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-421
schema version: 2

421(1) Contravening an order etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
note: Must not contravene a term of the order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-421-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 421 Contravening an order etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 421(1) Contravening an order etc.

421(2) Contravening an order etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
note: Exemption from complying with an order under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-421-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 421 Contravening an order etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (2) However, a person is not required to comply with an order...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 421(2) Contravening an order etc.

422 Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.227
curation status: Proposed
has part: 422(1) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
has part: 422(2) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-422
schema version: 2

422(1) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.227
note: Granting of injunction against industrial action
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-422-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 422 Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may grant an injunction on such terms as the court considers appropriate if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may grant an injunction on such terms as the court considers appropriate if...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of industrial action
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (1) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may grant an injunction on such terms as the court considers appropriate if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if: (a) a person has applied for the injunction; and (b) the requirement set out in subsection (2) is met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of information about industrial action
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
premise text: (a) a person has applied for the injunction; and (b) the requirement set out in subsection (2) is met.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if: (a) a person has applied for the injunction; and (b) the requirement set out in subsection (2) is met.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of industrial action
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (a) a person has applied for the injunction; and (b) the requirement set out in subsection (2) is met.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 422(1) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining

422(2) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.227
note: Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining representative is engaging in pattern bargaining.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-422-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 422 Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is engaging in pattern bargaining...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action during a period when a bargaining representative is engaging in pattern bargaining.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (2) The court is satisfied that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is engaging in pattern bargaining...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action if a bargaining representative is engaging in pattern bargaining.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The court is satisfied that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is engaging in pattern bargaining...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action if a bargaining representative is engaging in pattern bargaining.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The court is satisfied that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is engaging in pattern bargaining...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action if a bargaining representative is engaging in pattern bargaining.
modality: LTL
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The court is satisfied that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 422(2) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining

423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
curation status: Proposed
has part: 423(1) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(2) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(3) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(4) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(5) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(6) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(7) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-423
schema version: 2

423(1) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-423-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 423(1) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

423(2) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: FWC must be satisfied that protected industrial action is causing significant economic harm to the employer or employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-423-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC MUST BE SATISFIED...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must be satisfied...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 423(2) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

423(3) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: FWC must be satisfied that protected industrial action is causing significant economic harm to employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-423-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must be satisfied...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 423(3) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

423(4) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: Factors relevant to working out whether protected industrial action is causing or threatening to cause significant economic harm.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-423-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 423(4) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

423(5) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: FWC must be satisfied that harm is imminent before suspending or terminating protected industrial action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-423-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 423(5) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

423(6) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: FWC must be satisfied that protected industrial action has been engaged in for a protracted period of time and the dispute will not be resolved in the reasonably foreseeable future.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-423-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to suspend or terminate protected industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 423(6) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

423(7) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
note: FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-423-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 423(7) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230
curation status: Proposed
has part: 424(1) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 424(2) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 424(3) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 424(4) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 424(5) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-424
schema version: 2

424(1) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230
note: FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-424-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits FWC from failing to suspend or terminate protected industrial action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) The FWC must make an order suspending or terminating protected industrial action for a proposed enterprise agreement that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 424(1) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

424(2) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230
note: FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-424-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of suspension or termination
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 424(2) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

424(3) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230
note: FWC must determine application within 5 days after it is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-424-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to determine application within 5 days
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 424(3) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

424(4) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230
note: FWC must make an interim order suspending protected industrial action if unable to determine application within period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-424-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Interim order must be in effect until application is determined
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to suspend protected industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 424(4) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

424(5) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230
note: FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-424-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 424(5) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—

425 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—cooling off
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
note: FWC must suspend protected industrial action—cooling off
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-425-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-425-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-425
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-425-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide suspension order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-425-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 425 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—cooling off

426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
curation status: Proposed
has part: 426(1) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
has part: 426(2) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
has part: 426(3) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
has part: 426(4) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
has part: 426(5) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
has part: 426(6) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-426
schema version: 2

426(1) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: FWC must suspend protected industrial action for a proposed enterprise agreement if certain requirements are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-426-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the requirements set out in this section are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to suspend protected industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC must make an order suspending protected industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 426(1) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant

426(2) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: FWC must be satisfied that protected industrial action is adversely affecting the employer or employees covered by the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-426-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to suspend protected industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is adversely affecting the employer or employees covered by the agreement.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 426(2) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant

426(3) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: FWC must suspend protected industrial action if it threatens harm to anyone other than a bargaining representative or an employee covered by the agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-426-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The protected industrial action occurs after FWC's obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC's obligation and the protected industrial action
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is threatening to cause significant harm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must suspend protected industrial action
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to suspend protected industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is threatening to cause significant harm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is not required that FWC suspend the protected industrial action
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on suspending protected industrial action if it does not threaten harm
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_NOT
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is threatening to cause significant harm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the protected industrial action threatens harm, then FWC must suspend it
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional relationship between FWC's obligation and the protected industrial action
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is threatening to cause significant harm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The protected industrial action occurs before or at the same time as FWC's obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC's obligation and the protected industrial action
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is threatening to cause significant harm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 426(3) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant

426(4) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-426-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period during which the protected industrial action is suspended
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for suspension
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the FWC may take into account...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period during which the protected industrial action is suspended
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval for suspension
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the FWC may take into account...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Requirement—suspension is appropriate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide suspension
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the FWC may take into account...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period during which the protected industrial action is suspended
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval for suspension
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the FWC may take into account...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period during which the protected industrial action is suspended
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for suspension
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the FWC may take into account...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 426(4) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant

426(5) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-426-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 426(5) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant

426(6) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
note: FWC may make order on application by certain parties
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-426-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make order
modality: Deontic
operator: may

427 FWC must specify the period of suspension
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
curation status: Proposed
has part: 427(1) FWC must specify the period of suspension
has part: 427(2) FWC must specify the period of suspension
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-427
schema version: 2

427(1) FWC must specify the period of suspension
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
note: FWC must specify suspension period for protected industrial action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-427-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 427 FWC must specify the period of suspension

fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide suspension period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 427(1) FWC must specify the period of suspension

427(2) FWC must specify the period of suspension
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
note: FWC must specify the period of suspension for protected industrial action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-427-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 427 FWC must specify the period of suspension

fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a specified period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 427(2) FWC must specify the period of suspension

428 Extension of a period of suspension
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
curation status: Proposed
has part: 428(1) Extension of a period of suspension
has part: 428(2) Extension of a period of suspension
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-428
schema version: 2

428(1) Extension of a period of suspension
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
note: Extension of a period of suspension for a proposed enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-428-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-428-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 428 Extension of a period of suspension

428(2) Extension of a period of suspension
type: Concept
description: period of extension
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
note: FWC must specify period of extension in order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-428-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-428-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-428-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 428 Extension of a period of suspension

fair-work-act-2009-sec-428-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must specify period of extension
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

429 Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
curation status: Proposed
has part: 429(1) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
has part: 429(2) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
has part: 429(3) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
has part: 429(4) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-429
schema version: 2

429(1) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
note: No further protected action ballot required for employee claim action during suspension period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-429-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 429 Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: suspension period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies temporal interval during which further protected action ballot is not required.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) the suspension period (including any extension under section 428) ends, or the order is revoked before the end of that period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...which had not ended before the beginning of the suspension period;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits further protected action ballot for employee claim action during suspension period.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (a) an order suspending the employee claim action has been made; and (b) a protected action ballot authorised the employee claim action: ...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...which had not ended before the beginning of the suspension period;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking further protected action ballot during specified temporal interval.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (i) some or all of which had not been taken before the beginning of the period (the suspension period) of suspension specified in the order; or (ii) which had not ended before the beginning of the suspension period; or (iii) beyond the suspension period;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...beyond the suspension period;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking further protected action ballot during specified temporal interval.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (i) some or all of which had not been taken before the beginning of the period (the suspension period) of suspension specified in the order; or (ii) which had not ended before the beginning of the suspension period; or (iii) beyond the suspension period;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: end of suspension period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies temporal interval until which further protected action ballot is not required.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (c) the suspension period (including any extension under section 428) ends, or the order is revoked before the end of that period.

429(2) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
note: Allow employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-429-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 429 Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage in employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

429(3) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
note: Employee claim action must be engaged in without considering suspension period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-429-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 429 Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 429(3) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot

429(4) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
note: No employee claim action different in type or duration from authorized by protected action ballot.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-429-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 429 Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits employee claim actions different in type or duration from authorized by protected action ballot.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 429(4) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot

430 Notice of employee claim action engaged in after a period of
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
note: Employer must receive written notice before engaging in employee claim action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-430-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-430-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-430
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-430-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide written notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-430-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 430 Notice of employee claim action engaged in after a period of

431 Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
curation status: Proposed
has part: 431(1) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
has part: 431(2) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
has part: 431(3) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-431
schema version: 2

431(1) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Terminating protected industrial action for a proposed enterprise agreement if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-431-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 431 Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister is satisfied that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Determines if industrial action overlaps with certain conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) the industrial action is being engaged in, or is threatened, impending or probable; and (b) the industrial action is threatening, or would threaten: ...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister may make a declaration terminating protected industrial action...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes protected industrial action.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (a) the industrial action is being engaged in, or is threatened, impending or probable; and (b) the industrial action is threatening, or would threaten: ...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister may make a declaration terminating protected industrial action...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits protected industrial action for a proposed enterprise agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the industrial action is being engaged in, or is threatened, impending or probable; and (b) the industrial action is threatening, or would threaten: ...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister may make a declaration terminating protected industrial action...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about protected industrial action.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) the industrial action is being engaged in, or is threatened, impending or probable; and (b) the industrial action is threatening, or would threaten: ...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister may make a declaration terminating protected industrial action...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Determines if industrial action will eventually meet certain conditions.
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: (a) the industrial action is being engaged in, or is threatened, impending or probable; and (b) the industrial action is threatening, or would threaten: ...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 431(1) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action

431(2) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Declaration comes into operation on the day it is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-431-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 431 Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action

431(3) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: A declaration under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-431-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 431 Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action

432 Informing people of declaration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
curation status: Proposed
has part: 432(1) Informing people of declaration
has part: 432(2) Informing people of declaration
has part: 432(3) Informing people of declaration
has part: 432(4) Informing people of declaration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-432
schema version: 2

432(1) Informing people of declaration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Declaration under subsection 431(1) triggers this section.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-432-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 432 Informing people of declaration

432(2) Informing people of declaration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Publish declaration in Gazette
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-432-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 432 Informing people of declaration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 432(2) Informing people of declaration

432(3) Informing people of declaration
type: Concept
description: Declaration
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Informing FWC of declaration making
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-432-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 432 Informing people of declaration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

432(4) Informing people of declaration
type: Concept
description: (a) of the making of the declaration; (b) of the effect of Part 2-5
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
note: Informing bargaining representatives of declaration and its effect
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-432-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 432 Informing people of declaration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as soon as practicable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for informing is immediate
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (4) The Minister must...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...take all reasonable steps...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) The Minister must...

433 Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
curation status: Proposed
has part: 433(1) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
has part: 433(2) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
has part: 433(3) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-433
schema version: 2

433(1) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: Minister's directions to specified persons regarding actions under a proposed enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-433-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 433 Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat

fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: specified persons must take or refrain from taking actions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires Minister's directions to be followed
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Minister gives directions

433(2) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: Minister's obligation to give directions for removing or reducing threat
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-433-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 433 Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat

fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: that are reasonably directed to removing or reducing the threat
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's obligation to give directions
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Minister may only give directions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: that are reasonably directed to removing or reducing the threat
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's permission to give directions
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The Minister may only give directions

433(3) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: A direction under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-433-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 433 Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat

fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 433(3) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat

434 Contravening a Ministerial direction
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
note: Must not contravene a ministerial direction.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-434-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-434-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-434
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-434-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits contravening a ministerial direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-434-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 434 Contravening a Ministerial direction

435 Guide to this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.239
note: Establishes process for employees to choose protected industrial action through a secret ballot.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-435
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes process for employees to choose protected industrial action.
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the process as a guide to this Division.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 435 Guide to this Division

436 Object of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.239
note: Employees must engage in protected industrial action if they wish to determine whether a bargaining representative can establish a fair process.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-436-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-436-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-436
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-436-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employees must engage in protected industrial action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-436-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 436 Object of this Division

437 Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
curation status: Proposed
has part: 437(1) Application for a protected action ballot order
has part: 437(2) Application for a protected action ballot order
has part: 437(2A) Application for a protected action ballot order
has part: 437(3) Application for a protected action ballot order
has part: 437(5) Application for a protected action ballot order
has part: 437(6) Application for a protected action ballot order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-437
schema version: 2

437(1) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Application for a protected action ballot order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-437-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement, or 2 or more such bargaining representatives (acting jointly), may apply to the FWC for an order (a protected action ballot order)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of application for a protected action ballot order
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (1) A bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement, or 2 or more such bargaining representatives (acting jointly), may apply to the FWC for an order (a protected action ballot order)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of application for a protected action ballot order by the FWC
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (1) A bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement, or 2 or more such bargaining representatives (acting jointly), may apply to the FWC for an order (a protected action ballot order)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal obligation to apply for a protected action ballot order
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about application for a protected action ballot order
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (1) A bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement, or 2 or more such bargaining representatives (acting jointly), may apply to the FWC for an order (a protected action ballot order)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 437(1) Application for a protected action ballot order

437(2) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for specific types of agreements
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-437-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order

437(2A) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Notification time must be specified in application for protected industrial action.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-437-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification time
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 437(2A) Application for a protected action ballot order

437(3) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
description: The application must specify the group or groups of employees, questions to be put to the employees, and the name of the person or entity that wishes to be the protected action ballot agent.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Application requirements for a protected action ballot order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-437-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must specify requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 437(3) Application for a protected action ballot order

437(5) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Employees must be specified in a protected action ballot order application
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-437-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee specification
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (a) will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement; and (b) either: (i) are represented by a bargaining representative who is an applicant for the protected action ballot order; or (ii) are bargaining representatives for themselves but are members of an employee organisation that is an applicant for the protected action ballot order.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 437(5) Application for a protected action ballot order

437(6) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
note: Application must be accompanied by prescribed documents and information.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-437-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide required documents and information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 437(6) Application for a protected action ballot order

437A Application for a protected action ballot order—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241
curation status: Proposed
has part: 437A(1) Application for a protected action ballot order—
has part: 437A(2) Application for a protected action ballot order—
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-437a
schema version: 2

437A(1) Application for a protected action ballot order—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241
note: Application for a protected action ballot order is required if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-437a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 437A Application for a protected action ballot order—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application can only be made if conditions are met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditions must be met for an application to be made
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (a) and (b)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 437A(1) Application for a protected action ballot order—

437A(2) Application for a protected action ballot order—
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241
note: Application for a protected action ballot order has effect as if it were multiple applications.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-437a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 437A Application for a protected action ballot order—

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for a protected action ballot order has effect as if it were multiple applications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 437A(2) Application for a protected action ballot order—

438 Restriction on when application may be made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
curation status: Proposed
has part: 438(1) Restriction on when application may be made
has part: 438(2) Restriction on when application may be made
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-438
schema version: 2

438(1) Restriction on when application may be made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Prohibition on making an application before a certain time
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-438-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 438 Restriction on when application may be made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts when an application can be made
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) If one or more enterprise agreements cover the employees...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 438(1) Restriction on when application may be made

438(2) Restriction on when application may be made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Making an application for a protected action ballot order is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-438-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 438 Restriction on when application may be made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Organising industrial action is permitted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making an application for a protected action ballot order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, making an application for a protected action ballot order does not constitute organising industrial action.

439 Joint applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
note: Rules for joint applications in protected action ballots
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-439-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-439
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-439-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 439 Joint applications

440 Notice of application
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
note: Applicant must notify employer and specified entity of application within 24 hours.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-440-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-440-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-440
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-440-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice to employer and entity within 24 hours.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-440-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 440 Notice of application

441 Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
curation status: Proposed
has part: 441(1) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
has part: 441(2) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-441
schema version: 2

441(1) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
note: Determine an application for a protected action ballot order within 2 working days after it is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-441-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 441 Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must determine an application
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 441(1) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made

441(2) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
note: Application must comply with section 440 before FWC can determine it
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-441-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 441 Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made

fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must comply with section 440
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 441(2) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made

442 Dealing with multiple applications together
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
note: FWC may deal with multiple applications for a protected action ballot order at the same time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-442-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-442
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-442-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 442 Dealing with multiple applications together

443 When the FWC must make a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
note: FWC must make protected action ballot order for proposed enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-443-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-443-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-443
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-443-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make protected action ballot order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-443-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 443 When the FWC must make a protected action ballot order

444 Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
curation status: Proposed
has part: 444(1) Ballot agent and independent advisor
has part: 444(1A) Ballot agent and independent advisor
has part: 444(1B) Ballot agent and independent advisor
has part: 444(1C) Ballot agent and independent advisor
has part: 444(1D) Ballot agent and independent advisor
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-444
schema version: 2

444(1) Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
note: Protected action ballot agent obligation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-444-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 444 Ballot agent and independent advisor

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protected action ballot agent
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between protected actions and ballot orders
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) This section applies if the FWC must make a protected action ballot order under subsection 443(1).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protected action ballot agent
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of protected actions on ballot orders
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) This section applies if the FWC must make a protected action ballot order under subsection 443(1).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ballot agent and independent advisor
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of ballot agents and independent advisors by AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (1) This section applies if the FWC must make a protected action ballot order under subsection 443(1).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protected action ballot agent
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a protected action ballot order
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies if the FWC must make a protected action ballot order under subsection 443(1).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protected action ballot agent
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of obligations to ballot agents
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) This section applies if the FWC must make a protected action ballot order under subsection 443(1).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 444(1) Ballot agent and independent advisor

444(1A) Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
note: Designate protected action ballot agent
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-444-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 444 Ballot agent and independent advisor

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must designate a protected action ballot agent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 444(1A) Ballot agent and independent advisor

444(1B) Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
note: Specify protected action ballot agent
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-444-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 444 Ballot agent and independent advisor

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be specified
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 444(1B) Ballot agent and independent advisor

444(1C) Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
note: Must be an eligible protected action ballot agent.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-444-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 444 Ballot agent and independent advisor

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to be an eligible protected action ballot agent.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST BE

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 444(1C) Ballot agent and independent advisor

444(1D) Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
note: Exceptions to subsection (1C) for a person conducting the ballot
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1d-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-444-ss-1d
schema version: 2
part of: 444 Ballot agent and independent advisor

445 Notice of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Must provide notice of protected action ballot order to applicants, employer, and protected action ballot agent.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-445-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-445-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-445
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-445-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice of protected action ballot order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

446 Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
curation status: Proposed
has part: 446(1) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
has part: 446(2) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-446
schema version: 2

446(1) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: Protected action ballot order requires a protected action ballot to be held in relation to industrial action by employees of the same employer or employees at the same workplace.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-446-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 446 Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During industrial action by employees of the same employer or employees at the same workplace
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires a protected action ballot to be held
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During industrial action by employees of the same employer or employees at the same workplace
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 446(1) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected

446(2) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
note: The FWC may require protected action ballots to be held at the same time under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-446-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 446 Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the FWC is satisfied: (a) that the level of disruption of the employer’s enterprise, or at the workplace, could be reduced if the ballots were held at the same time; and (b) that requiring the ballots to be held at the same time will not unreasonably delay either ballot.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The protected action ballots are held during a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The FWC may make, or vary, the protected action ballot orders so as to require the protected action ballots to be held at the same time;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the FWC is satisfied: (a) that the level of disruption of the employer’s enterprise, or at the workplace, could be reduced if the ballots were held at the same time; and (b) that requiring the ballots to be held at the same time will not unreasonably delay either ballot.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The protected action ballots are held during a specific time period.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) The FWC may make, or vary, the protected action ballot orders so as to require the protected action ballots to be held at the same time;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) that requiring the ballots to be held at the same time will not unreasonably delay either ballot.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires protected action ballots to be held at the same time.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) that the level of disruption of the employer’s enterprise, or at the workplace, could be reduced if the ballots were held at the same time;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the FWC is satisfied: (a) that the level of disruption of the employer’s enterprise, or at the workplace, could be reduced if the ballots were held at the same time; and (b) that requiring the ballots to be held at the same time will not unreasonably delay either ballot.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The protected action ballots are held during a specific time period.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) The FWC may make, or vary, the protected action ballot orders so as to require the protected action ballots to be held at the same time;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the FWC is satisfied: (a) that the level of disruption of the employer’s enterprise, or at the workplace, could be reduced if the ballots were held at the same time; and (b) that requiring the ballots to be held at the same time will not unreasonably delay either ballot.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The protected action ballots are held during a specific time period.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) The FWC may make, or vary, the protected action ballot orders so as to require the protected action ballots to be held at the same time;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 446(2) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected

447 Variation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
curation status: Proposed
has part: 447(1) Variation of protected action ballot order
has part: 447(2) Variation of protected action ballot order
has part: 447(3) Variation of protected action ballot order
has part: 447(4) Variation of protected action ballot order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-447
schema version: 2

447(1) Variation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
note: An applicant may apply to vary the protected action ballot order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-447-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 447 Variation of protected action ballot order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicant has permission to apply.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 447(1) Variation of protected action ballot order

447(2) Variation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
note: Variation of protected action ballot order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-447-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 447 Variation of protected action ballot order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to vary the protected action ballot order
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

447(3) Variation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
note: Application can be made before or after voting closes with FWC consent
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-447-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 447 Variation of protected action ballot order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply before or after voting closes
modality: Deontic
operator: Can

447(4) Variation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
note: FWC may vary protected action ballot order on application.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-447-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 447 Variation of protected action ballot order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 447(4) Variation of protected action ballot order

448 Revocation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
curation status: Proposed
has part: 448(1) Revocation of protected action ballot order
has part: 448(2) Revocation of protected action ballot order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-448
schema version: 2

448(1) Revocation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: Duty to revoke protected action ballot order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-448-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 448 Revocation of protected action ballot order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicant must revoke the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to revoke
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 448(1) Revocation of protected action ballot order

448(2) Revocation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: FWC must revoke protected action ballot order upon application.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-448-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 448 Revocation of protected action ballot order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to revoke
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 448(2) Revocation of protected action ballot order

448A FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
curation status: Proposed
has part: 448A(1) FWC must conduct conferences
has part: 448A(2) FWC must conduct conferences
has part: 448A(3) FWC must conduct conferences
has part: 448A(4) FWC must conduct conferences
has part: 448A(5) FWC must conduct conferences
has part: 448A(6) FWC must conduct conferences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-448a
schema version: 2

448A(1) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: FWC must attend a conference with bargaining representatives for an agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-448a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for conference attendance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) If the FWC has made a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement, the FWC must make an order directing the bargaining representatives for the agreement to attend a conference:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Reasoning for attending a conference
modality: Argumentation
operator: should
premise text: (a) at a specified time or times during a specified period; and (b) at a specified place, or by specified means;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for conference attendance
modality: CogAI
operator: must
premise text: (1) If the FWC has made a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement, the FWC must make an order directing the bargaining representatives for the agreement to attend a conference:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to attend a conference
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Conference details specified
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
premise text: (a) at a specified time or times during a specified period; and (b) at a specified place, or by specified means;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about conference attendance
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
premise text: (1) If the FWC has made a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement, the FWC must make an order directing the bargaining representatives for the agreement to attend a conference:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 448A(1) FWC must conduct conferences

448A(2) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: Conferences must be conducted by the FWC within a specified period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-448a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct conferences
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The specified period must end on or before...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 448A(2) FWC must conduct conferences

448A(3) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: FWC must conduct conferences
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-448a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct conferences
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 448A(3) FWC must conduct conferences

448A(4) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: The conference must be conducted in private.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-448a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must conduct the conference in private.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

448A(5) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: FWC must conduct conferences and may mediate or conciliate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-448a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct conferences
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 448A(5) FWC must conduct conferences

448A(6) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
note: FWC must conduct conferences
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-448a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

449 Conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
curation status: Proposed
has part: 449(1) Conduct of protected action ballot
has part: 449(2) Conduct of protected action ballot
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-449
schema version: 2

449(1) Conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
note: Must be conducted by a specified person or entity.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-449-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 449 Conduct of protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct the ballot by a specified person or entity.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 449(1) Conduct of protected action ballot

449(2) Conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
note: Must conduct protected action ballot expeditiously and in accordance with certain procedures.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-449-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 449 Conduct of protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Must conduct within certain timeframe.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (b) the timetable for the ballot;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must conduct protected action ballot expeditiously.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) The protected action ballot agent...

450 Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
curation status: Proposed
has part: 450(1) Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
has part: 450(2) Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-450
schema version: 2

450(1) Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
note: This section applies if the protected action ballot agent is not the Australian Electoral Commission.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-450-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 450 Directions for conduct of protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: The protected action ballot agent is not the Australian Electoral Commission.

450(2) Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
description: yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
note: FWC must provide written directions to protected action ballot agents on specific matters.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-450-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 450 Directions for conduct of protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide directions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

451 Timetable for protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
curation status: Proposed
has part: 451(1) Timetable for protected action ballot
has part: 451(2) Timetable for protected action ballot
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-451
schema version: 2

451(1) Timetable for protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
note: Must comply with section if FWC directs or Australian Electoral Commission is the agent
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-451-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 451 Timetable for protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with section
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with directions given by FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: If this section does not apply, the protected action ballot agent must comply with directions given by the FWC in relation to the matters dealt with by this section (see section 450).

451(2) Timetable for protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
note: Develop a timetable for the conduct of the protected action ballot and determine the voting method.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-451-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 451 Timetable for protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must develop a timetable
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

452 Compilation of roll of voters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
curation status: Proposed
has part: 452(1) Compilation of roll of voters
has part: 452(2) Compilation of roll of voters
has part: 452(3) Compilation of roll of voters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-452
schema version: 2

452(1) Compilation of roll of voters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
note: Must comply with section if FWC directs or Australian Electoral Commission is the protected action ballot agent.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-452-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 452 Compilation of roll of voters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with section
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with directions given by FWC if section does not apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: If this section does not apply, the protected action ballot agent must comply with directions given by the FWC in relation to the matters dealt with by this section (see section 450).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with section if FWC directs
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) the FWC has directed the protected action ballot agent to comply with this section.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with section if Australian Electoral Commission is protected action ballot agent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) the protected action ballot agent is the Australian Electoral Commission.

452(2) Compilation of roll of voters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
note: Must compile roll of voters after receiving protected action ballot order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-452-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 452 Compilation of roll of voters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to compile roll of voters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

452(3) Compilation of roll of voters
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
note: Employer must provide names and other information to ballot agent for compiling roll of voters.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-452-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 452 Compilation of roll of voters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 452(3) Compilation of roll of voters

453 Who is eligible to be included on the roll of voters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
note: Eligibility for voter roll based on proposed enterprise agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-453
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Eligibility for voter roll based on proposed enterprise agreement is during the period when employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Employee has right to be included on voter roll if covered by proposed enterprise agreement
modality: CogAI
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: Employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is eligible to be included on the roll of voters
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee has right to be included on voter roll if covered by proposed enterprise agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: Employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Eligibility for voter roll based on proposed enterprise agreement is if and only if employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement
modality: Diffusion
operator: ifAndOnlyIf
premise text: Employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Eligibility for voter roll based on proposed enterprise agreement is everywhere in the context of employee rights
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.

454 Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
curation status: Proposed
has part: 454(1) Variation of roll of voters
has part: 454(2) Variation of roll of voters
has part: 454(3) Variation of roll of voters
has part: 454(4) Variation of roll of voters
has part: 454(5) Variation of roll of voters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-454
schema version: 2

454(1) Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
note: Protected action ballot agent must comply with subsections (2) to (4)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-454-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 454 Variation of roll of voters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with subsections (2) to (4)
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) the protected action ballot agent is the Australian Electoral Commission; or (b) the FWC has directed the protected action ballot agent to comply with those subsections.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 454(1) Variation of roll of voters

454(2) Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
note: Employee must be included on the roll of voters if requested by applicant, employee, or employer.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-454-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 454 Variation of roll of voters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide employee's name on the roll of voters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 454(2) Variation of roll of voters

454(3) Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
note: Must remove employee's name from roll of voters under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-454-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 454 Variation of roll of voters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The protected action ballot agent must remove the employee's name from the roll of voters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Protected action ballot agent must remove employee's name from roll of voters.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 454(3) Variation of roll of voters

454(4) Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
note: Must remove person's name from roll of voters under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-454-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 454 Variation of roll of voters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: must

454(5) Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
note: The Commission must include an employee's name on the roll of voters if eligible.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-454-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 454 Variation of roll of voters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission must include an employee's name on the roll of voters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 454(5) Variation of roll of voters

455 Protected action ballot papers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
curation status: Proposed
has part: 455(1) Protected action ballot papers
has part: 455(2) Protected action ballot papers
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-455
schema version: 2

455(1) Protected action ballot papers
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
note: Ballot paper must be in prescribed form and include required information.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-455-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 455 Protected action ballot papers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide specific information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 455(1) Protected action ballot papers

455(2) Protected action ballot papers
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
note: Definition of ballot paper
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-455-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 455 Protected action ballot papers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ballot papers are used during elections
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Ballot papers are used during elections

fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ballot paper is a subclass of voting method
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Ballot paper is a subclass of voting method

456 Who may vote in protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
note: Employee must be on voter roll to vote in protected action ballot
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-456-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-456-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-456
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-456-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is on voter roll
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee must be on voter roll to vote
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Employee votes in protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-456-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 456 Who may vote in protected action ballot

457 Results of protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
curation status: Proposed
has part: 457(1) Results of protected action ballot
has part: 457(2) Results of protected action ballot
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-457
schema version: 2

457(1) Results of protected action ballot
type: Concept
description: declaration, information to persons
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
note: Declare and inform results of protected action ballot
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-457-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 457 Results of protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must declare and inform results
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

457(2) Results of protected action ballot
type: Concept
description: Results of protected action ballot
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
note: Publish results of protected action ballot as soon as practicable.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-457-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 457 Results of protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish results
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Publish on website or other means
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: PUBLISH

fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 457(2) Results of protected action ballot

458 Report about conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
curation status: Proposed
has part: 458(1) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
has part: 458(2) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
has part: 458(3) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-458
schema version: 2

458(1) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
note: Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-458-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 458 Report about conduct of protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The report must be prepared after the protected action ballot is conducted.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (b) the Commission: ...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) the protected action ballot agent is the Australian Electoral Commission; and (b) the Commission: ...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission must give the written report to the FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (b) the Commission: ...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...this section may be cited as [Section 458(1)] of this Act.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may be cited in other laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: This section may be cited as [Section 458(1)] of this Act.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The report must be given to the FWC after the protected action ballot is conducted.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (b) the Commission: ...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 458(1) Report about conduct of protected action ballot

458(2) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
description: Report about the conduct of the ballot
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
note: Must prepare a report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to FWC if complaints or irregularities are received.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-458-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 458 Report about conduct of protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must provide a report
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

458(3) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
note: Report about conduct of protected action ballot
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-458-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 458 Report about conduct of protected action ballot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: protected action ballot agent must report
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 458(3) Report about conduct of protected action ballot

459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
curation status: Proposed
has part: 459(1) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
has part: 459(2) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
has part: 459(3) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-459
schema version: 2

459(1) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
note: Industrial action is authorized by a protected action ballot if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-459-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action must occur within a specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap with declaration period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (d) the action commences: (i) during the 30-day period starting on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot; or (ii) if the FWC has extended that period under subsection (3)—during the extended period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action is approved by a majority of votes if it occurs within the specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Relationship between action and ballot outcome
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (c) more than 50% of the valid votes were votes approving the action; and (d) the action commences: (i) during the 30-day period starting on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot; or (ii) if the FWC has extended that period under subsection (3)—during the extended period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action is authorized if the conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorization obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) the action was the subject of the ballot; and (b) at least 50% of the employees on the roll of voters for the ballot voted in the ballot.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorization spreads to a significant portion of employees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of authorization to employees
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) the action was the subject of the ballot; and (b) at least 50% of the employees on the roll of voters for the ballot voted in the ballot.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The action occurs until a specified time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship with declaration period
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (d) the action commences: (i) during the 30-day period starting on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot; or (ii) if the FWC has extended that period under subsection (3)—during the extended period.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 459(1) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by

459(2) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
note: Industrial action is authorised under specific circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-459-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorizes industrial action under specified conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: authorizes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 459(2) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by

459(3) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
note: Extension of time limit for protected action ballot order application
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-459-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) The FWC may extend...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 459(3) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by

460 Immunity for persons who act in good faith on protected action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
note: Immunity for persons who act in good faith on protected action
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-460-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-460
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-460-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 460 Immunity for persons who act in good faith on protected action

461 Validity of protected action ballot etc. not affected by technical
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
note: Validity of protected action ballot etc. not affected by technical breaches
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-461-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-461-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-461
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-461-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct of a protected action ballot.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from breach do not affect validity
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemptions
premise text: A technical breach of a provision does not affect the validity of...

462 Interferences etc. with protected action ballot
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
note: Interfering with protected action ballot
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-462-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-462-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-462
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-462-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits interfering with protected action ballot
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-462-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 462 Interferences etc. with protected action ballot

463 Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
curation status: Proposed
has part: 463(1) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
has part: 463(2) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
has part: 463(3) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-463
schema version: 2

463(1) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: Prohibition on contravening protected action ballot order terms
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-463-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 463 Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: (1) A person must not contravene...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 463(1) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.

463(2) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: No contravening a protected action ballot order or agent.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-463-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 463 Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No contravening.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) A person must not...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 463(2) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.

463(3) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: Prohibition on making an order under Division 2 of Part 4-1 in relation to a contravention by the Australian Electoral Commission.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-463-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 463 Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) However, an order cannot be made under Division 2 of Part 4-1 in relation to a contravention (or alleged contravention) of subsection (1) or (2) by the Australian Electoral Commission.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prohibition on actions
modality: LTL
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) However, an order cannot be made under Division 2 of Part 4-1 in relation to a contravention (or alleged contravention) of subsection (1) or (2) by the Australian Electoral Commission.

464 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
curation status: Proposed
has part: 464(1) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
has part: 464(2) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
has part: 464(3) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-464
schema version: 2

464(1) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: The Australian Electoral Commission is responsible for the costs of a protected action ballot.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-464-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 464 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian

fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Australian Electoral Commission has an obligation to cover the costs.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

464(2) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: Commonwealth liable for costs of protected action ballot
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-464-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 464 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian

fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commonwealth is liable for costs
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability

fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 464(2) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian

464(3) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
note: Commonwealth not liable for costs incurred by Australian Electoral Commission
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-464-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 464 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian

fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commonwealth obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
curation status: Proposed
has part: 465(1) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
has part: 465(2) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
has part: 465(3) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
has part: 465(4) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
has part: 465(5) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-465
schema version: 2

465(1) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
note: This section applies if the protected action ballot agent is not the Australian Electoral Commission.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-465-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The protected action ballot agent is not the Australian Electoral Commission.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of applicability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: This section applies if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: The protected action ballot agent is not the Australian Electoral Commission.

465(2) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
note: Liability for costs of conducting a protected action ballot
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-465-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: liability

465(3) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
note: Jointly and severally liable for costs of protected action ballot
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-465-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Joint liability for costs
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

465(4) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
note: Protected action ballot agent must pay costs to applicants
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-465-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide costs
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 465(4) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action

465(5) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
note: Exempts costs of legal challenges from protected action ballot costs
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-465-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts costs of legal challenges
modality: Deontic
operator: EXEMPT

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 465(5) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action

466 Costs of legal challenges
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
curation status: Proposed
has part: 466(1) Costs of legal challenges
has part: 466(2) Costs of legal challenges
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-466
schema version: 2

466(1) Costs of legal challenges
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
note: Who is liable for costs incurred in relation to legal challenges.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-466-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 466 Costs of legal challenges

fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Liability for costs
modality: Deontic
operator: liability

fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 466(1) Costs of legal challenges

466(2) Costs of legal challenges
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
note: A person who is liable for costs may be indemnified by another person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-466-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 466 Costs of legal challenges

fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Liability for costs
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 466(2) Costs of legal challenges

467 Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
curation status: Proposed
has part: 467(1) Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
has part: 467(2) Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-467
schema version: 2

467(1) Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
note: Disclose employee information about employees on roll of voters not to be disclosed.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-467-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 467 Information about employees on roll of voters not to be

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclose employee information about employees on roll of voters not to be disclosed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: None

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 467(1) Information about employees on roll of voters not to be

467(2) Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
note: Disclosure of employee information is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-467-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 467 Information about employees on roll of voters not to be

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) the disclosure is required or authorised by or under a law; or

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose employee information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose employee information under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Note 1:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure requirements.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (c) the employee has consented, in writing, to the disclosure.

468 Records
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
curation status: Proposed
has part: 468(1) Records
has part: 468(2) Records
has part: 468(3) Records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-468
schema version: 2

468(1) Records
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: Protected action ballot agent must keep certain records.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-468-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 468 Records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 468(1) Records

468(2) Records
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: Must keep ballot material for one year after the day on which the protected action ballot closed.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-468-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 468 Records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must keep ballot material for one year after the day on which the protected action ballot closed.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 468(2) Records

468(3) Records
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: Comply with regulations for keeping ballot material.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-468-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 468 Records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 468(3) Records

468A Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
curation status: Proposed
has part: 468A(1) Eligible protected action ballot agents
has part: 468A(2) Eligible protected action ballot agents
has part: 468A(3) Eligible protected action ballot agents
has part: 468A(4) Eligible protected action ballot agents
has part: 468A(5) Eligible protected action ballot agents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-468a
schema version: 2

468A(1) Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: Eligible protected action ballot agents must be approved by the FWC.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-468a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 468A Eligible protected action ballot agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be approved
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Each of the following is an eligible protected action ballot agent:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 468A(1) Eligible protected action ballot agents

468A(2) Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: Approval of eligible protected action ballot agents
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-468a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 468A Eligible protected action ballot agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

468A(3) Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: Conditions for a person to be an eligible protected action ballot agent
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-468a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 468A Eligible protected action ballot agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the key as prescribing regulations
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 468A(3) Eligible protected action ballot agents

468A(4) Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: The FWC must re-evaluate the eligibility of protected action ballot agents every 3 years.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-468a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 468A Eligible protected action ballot agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to re-evaluate eligibility
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 468A(4) Eligible protected action ballot agents

468A(5) Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
note: FWC must take action if eligible protected action ballot agent no longer meets requirements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-468a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 468A Eligible protected action ballot agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 468A(5) Eligible protected action ballot agents

469 Regulations
type: Concept
description: procedures, form and content of ballot paper, qualifications and duties of scrutineers, preparation of reports, records to be kept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
note: Regulations for protected action ballots
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-469
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between regulations and protected action ballots
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: procedures, form and content of ballot paper, qualifications and duties of scrutineers, preparation of reports, records to be kept
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations for protected action ballots
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 469 Regulations

470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
curation status: Proposed
has part: 470(1) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 470(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 470(3) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 470(4) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 470(5) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-470
schema version: 2

470(1) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
note: Employer must not make payment to employee in relation to industrial action
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-470-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of payment
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Employer must not make payment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 470(1) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

470(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
note: Payments not made for certain periods of partial work bans.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-470-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 470(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

470(3) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
note: Partial work ban is not a failure or refusal to attend for work, perform work at all, or overtime ban.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-470-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: it is not an overtime ban
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (3) A partial work ban is industrial action that is not...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 470(3) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

470(4) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
note: Payment of overtime ban is exempt if employer requests and employee refuses.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-470-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment not applicable during overlapping periods
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Payment of overtime ban is exempt if employer requests and employee refuses.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Overtime work overlaps with periods of overtime to which the ban applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment not applicable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Payment of overtime ban is exempt if employer requests and employee refuses.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Employer requested overtime work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Periods of overtime are included in the ban
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Overtime ban includes periods of overtime to which the ban applies.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Overtime ban is defined as a period of overtime

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment not applicable during recurring periods
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Payment of overtime ban is exempt if employer requests and employee refuses.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Overtime work is recurring

470(5) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
note: Total duration of industrial action includes overtime ban period
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-470-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation includes overtime ban period
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 470(5) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

471 Payments relating to partial work bans
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
curation status: Proposed
has part: 471(1) Payments relating to partial work bans
has part: 471(2) Payments relating to partial work bans
has part: 471(3) Payments relating to partial work bans
has part: 471(4) Payments relating to partial work bans
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-471
schema version: 2

471(1) Payments relating to partial work bans
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: Employee's payments reduced due to partial work ban
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-471-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Payments relating to partial work bans

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to reduce payments
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(1) Payments relating to partial work bans

471(2) Payments relating to partial work bans
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: Employee payments reduced by proportion specified in notice or order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-471-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Payments relating to partial work bans

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to reduce employee payments
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(2) Payments relating to partial work bans

471(3) Payments relating to partial work bans
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: Employer must provide notice of non-payment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-471-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Payments relating to partial work bans

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

471(4) Payments relating to partial work bans
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
note: Employee must engage in protected industrial action on a day.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-471-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 471 Payments relating to partial work bans

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 471(4) Payments relating to partial work bans

472 Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
curation status: Proposed
has part: 472(1) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
has part: 472(2) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-472
schema version: 2

472(1) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
note: The FWC may make an order varying the proportion by which an employee’s payments are reduced.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-472-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-472-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 472 Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans

fair-work-act-2009-sec-472-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 472(1) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans

472(2) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
note: FWC may make order only if person applies under subsection (4).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-472-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-472-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 472 Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans

fair-work-act-2009-sec-472-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 472(2) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans

473 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
curation status: Proposed
has part: 473(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
has part: 473(2) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-473
schema version: 2

473(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
note: An employee must not accept a payment from an employer if the employer would contravene section 470 by making the payment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-473-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 473 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial

fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An employee must not accept such a payment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits accepting payments from employers that would contravene section 470.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 470 prohibits certain employer actions.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An employee must not ask the employer to make such a payment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits asking employers to make payments that would contravene section 470.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 470 prohibits certain employer actions.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An employee must not engage in such behavior.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits acts of coercion or misrepresentations relating to payments that would contravene section 470.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 348 and 349 prohibit certain actions.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 473(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial

473(2) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
note: An employer must not make a payment to an employee if it would contravene section 470.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-473-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 473 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial

fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer must not make payment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making payments to employees if it would contravene section 470.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Section 470 prohibits such payments.

474 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
curation status: Proposed
has part: 474(1) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 474(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 474(2A) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-474
schema version: 2

474(1) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: Employer cannot make payment to employee if industrial action exceeds 4 hours.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-474-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer cannot make payment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of payment
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Industrial action exceeds 4 hours

474(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: Employer must request or require employee to work overtime, and employee must refuse.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-474-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 474(2) does not apply to a period of overtime to which the ban applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overtime ban and section 474(2) apply during the same period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The industrial action includes an overtime ban.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee refused to work overtime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's request or requirement is a necessary condition for employee's refusal.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Employer requested or required the employee to work overtime.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The refusal was a contravention of the employee’s obligations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee's refusal is a consequence of their obligations under a modern award, enterprise agreement, or contract of employment.
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
premise text: The employee refused to work the period of overtime.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee refused to work overtime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employee's refusal is allowed under certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
premise text: An employee can refuse to work additional hours if they are unreasonable.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The refusal was a contravention of the employee’s obligations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Employee's refusal is a subclass of their obligations under a modern award, enterprise agreement, or contract of employment.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: The employee refused to work overtime.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 474(2) does not apply to a period of overtime to which the ban applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Overtime ban and section 474(2) do not overlap in time.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The industrial action is, or includes, an overtime ban.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

474(2A) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
note: Total duration of industrial action includes overtime ban period
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-474-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 474 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 474(2A) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of

475 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
curation status: Proposed
has part: 475(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
has part: 475(2) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-475
schema version: 2

475(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: An employee must not accept a payment from an employer if the employer would contravene section 474 by making the payment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-475-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 475 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial

fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 475(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial

475(2) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
note: Employers must not make payments to employees if it would contravene section 474.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-475-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 475 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial

fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Payment to employee
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making payments to employees if it would contravene section 474.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Section 474

476 Other responses to industrial action unaffected
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.273
note: Employer's right to respond to industrial action without payment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-476
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Industrial action and Chapter 3 overlap
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Industrial action overlaps with Chapter 3
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: If an employee engaged, or engages, in industrial action against an employer...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer's response implies an obligation to do something
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Employer's response implies a right to do something
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: This Division does not affect any right of the employer...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes the employer's obligation to do something
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI recognizes the employer's obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: This Division does not affect any right of the employer...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employer has an obligation to do anything in response to industrial action that does not involve payments to the employee.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's obligation to respond to industrial action
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: This Division does not affect any right of the employer...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Industrial action diffuses to Chapter 3
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Industrial action diffuses to Chapter 3
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: If an employee engaged, or engages, in industrial action against an employer...

477 Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274
curation status: Proposed
has part: 477(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
has part: 477(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-477
schema version: 2

477(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274
note: Applications by bargaining representatives
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-477-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-477-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 477 Applications by bargaining representatives

fair-work-act-2009-sec-477-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 477(1) Applications by bargaining representatives

477(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274
note: Application by bargaining representative on behalf of others
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-477-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-477-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 477 Applications by bargaining representatives

fair-work-act-2009-sec-477-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 477(2) Applications by bargaining representatives

478 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
note: Permit holders must comply with requirements when exercising rights under Division 2.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-478-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-478-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-478
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-478-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holders must comply with requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-478-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 478 Guide to this Part

479 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-479-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-479-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-479
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-479-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-479-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 479 Meanings of employee and employer

480 Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.276
note: Right of entry for officials of organisations to investigate suspected contraventions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-480-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-480-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-480-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-480
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-480-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Right of entry during work hours
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Right of entry during work hours
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Section 481: Fair Work Act 2009

fair-work-act-2009-sec-480-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employees, Employers, Occupiers of premises must provide access
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right of entry for officials of organisations
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: Organisations have the right to investigate suspected contraventions

481 Entry to investigate suspected contravention
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
curation status: Proposed
has part: 481(1) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
has part: 481(2) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
has part: 481(3) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-481
schema version: 2

481(1) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: Permit holder may enter premises for investigation of suspected contravention.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-481-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 481 Entry to investigate suspected contravention

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder has the right to enter premises.
modality: Deontic
operator: Can

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 481(1) Entry to investigate suspected contravention

481(2) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: The fair work instrument must apply or have applied to the member.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-481-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 481 Entry to investigate suspected contravention

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The fair work instrument must apply or have applied to the member.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST APPLY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 481(2) Entry to investigate suspected contravention

481(3) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
note: Must reasonably suspect contravention has occurred or is occurring.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-481-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 481 Entry to investigate suspected contravention

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must reasonably suspect contravention has occurred or is occurring.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Must believe suspicion is reasonable.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
premise text: Suspicion is reasonable.

482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
curation status: Proposed
has part: 482(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
has part: 482(1A) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
has part: 482(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
has part: 482(2A) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
has part: 482(3) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-482
schema version: 2

482(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Permit holder's rights while on premises
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-482-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to inspect and interview
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 482(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises

482(1A) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Occupier or affected employer not required to allow inspection of records or documents that contravene a law.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-482-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of inspection of records or documents that contravene a law.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 482(1A) Rights that may be exercised while on premises

482(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Definition of affected employer for entry onto premises
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-482-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Entry onto premises is permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for entry onto premises
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: The suspected contravention relates to, or affects, the member

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 482(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises

482(2A) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Cannot contravene requirement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-482-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The requirement applies from now until the end of the permit holder's organisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for the requirement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2A) A non-member record or document is a record or document that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The requirement can be represented as a knowledge rule: if (record or document is a non-member record or document) then (occupier and affected employer must not contravene requirement)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation for the requirement
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (2A) A non-member record or document is a record or document that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Occupier and affected employer must not contravene requirement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening the requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2A) A non-member record or document is a record or document that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The requirement recurs every time a non-member record or document is created or updated
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for the requirement
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2A) A non-member record or document is a record or document that...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The schema for the requirement can be defined as: Record or Document: non-member record or document
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Schema definition for the requirement
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Definition
premise text: (2A) A non-member record or document is a record or document that...

482(3) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
note: Occupier or affected employer must not contravene a requirement under paragraph (1)(c).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-482-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 482(3) Rights that may be exercised while on premises

483 Later access to record or document
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
curation status: Proposed
has part: 483(1) Later access to record or document
has part: 483(1A) Later access to record or document
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483
schema version: 2

483(1) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
note: Require affected employer to produce or provide access to relevant record or document
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 483 Later access to record or document

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the affected employer
modality: Deontic
operator: require

483(1A) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
note: Employer not required to produce or provide access to record or document if it would contravene a law.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 483 Later access to record or document

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits production or provision of record or document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

483A Entry to investigate suspected contravention relating to TCF
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.281
note: Permit holder may enter premises and exercise a right to investigate suspected contravention of TCF award worker's industrial interests.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder has a right to enter premises.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483a-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 483A Entry to investigate suspected contravention relating to TCF

483AA Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
curation status: Proposed
has part: 483AA(1) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
has part: 483AA(2) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
has part: 483AA(3) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
has part: 483AA(4) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483aa
schema version: 2

483AA(1) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Permit holder may apply for order allowing inspection of non-member records.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 483AA Application to the FWC for access to non-member records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder may apply for order.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483AA(1) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records

483AA(2) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: FWC must have regard to conditions before making an order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 483AA Application to the FWC for access to non-member records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483AA(2) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records

483AA(3) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: This subdivision has effect accordingly if the FWC makes the order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 483AA Application to the FWC for access to non-member records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This subdivision has effect accordingly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: The FWC makes the order.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483AA(3) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records

483AA(4) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
type: Concept
description: Reason for application
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
note: Application for an order under this section must set out the reason for the application.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483aa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 483AA Application to the FWC for access to non-member records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483AA(4) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records

483B Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
curation status: Proposed
has part: 483B(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
has part: 483B(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483b
schema version: 2

483B(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
note: Permit holder has right to inspect and interview on premises.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 483B Rights that may be exercised while on premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The permit holder may inspect and interview.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder has right to inspect and interview.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: The permit holder is entitled to exercise this right.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The permit holder may inspect and interview.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder has permission to inspect and interview.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo
premise text: The occupier or affected employer must allow inspection and interviewing.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The permit holder may interview.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder has right to interview on premises.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: The permit holder is entitled to exercise this right.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The permit holder may inspect and interview.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Permit holder has right to inspect and interview everywhere on premises.
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: The permit holder is entitled to exercise this right.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 483B(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises

483B(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
note: No inspection or copying of records allowed if it contravenes a law.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 483B Rights that may be exercised while on premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No inspection or copying allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of inspection or copying
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Contravenes a law

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483B(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises

483C Later access to record or document
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
curation status: Proposed
has part: 483C(1) Later access to record or document
has part: 483C(2) Later access to record or document
has part: 483C(3) Later access to record or document
has part: 483C(4) Later access to record or document
has part: 483C(5) Later access to record or document
has part: 483C(6) Later access to record or document
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483c
schema version: 2

483C(1) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
note: Permit holder can request access to records or documents
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 483C Later access to record or document

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder has the right to request access
modality: Deontic
operator: Can

483C(2) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
note: No obligation to produce or provide access to a record or document if it would contravene a law.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 483C Later access to record or document

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of production or provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483C(2) Later access to record or document

483C(3) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
note: Must not be earlier than 14 days after notice is given.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 483C Later access to record or document

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The day or days specified in the notice starts at 14 days after the notice is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Day or days specified in the notice starts at 14 days after the notice is given.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAt
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
modality: CogAI
operator: Until
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not be earlier than specified day.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Until
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483C(3) Later access to record or document

483C(4) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
note: Cannot contravene requirement after notice is given
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 483C Later access to record or document

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot contravene requirement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Notice is given

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot contravene requirement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention by occupier and affected employer
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Occupier and affected employer are specified

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot contravene requirement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of prohibition on contravention
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: Notice is given

483C(5) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
note: Occupier or affected employer must not contravene a requirement under subsection (1).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483c-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 483C Later access to record or document

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483C(5) Later access to record or document

483C(6) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
note: Permit holder's right to inspect and make copies of records or documents
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483c-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 483C Later access to record or document

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder has right to inspect and make copies
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight

483D Entry onto other premises to access records and documents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285
note: Permit holder has right to enter other premises for records and documents
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483d-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483d
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to access records and documents
modality: Deontic
operator: has right

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483d-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 483D Entry onto other premises to access records and documents

483E Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
curation status: Proposed
has part: 483E(1) Later access to record or document—other premises
has part: 483E(2) Later access to record or document—other premises
has part: 483E(3) Later access to record or document—other premises
has part: 483E(4) Later access to record or document—other premises
has part: 483E(5) Later access to record or document—other premises
has part: 483E(6) Later access to record or document—other premises
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483e
schema version: 2

483E(1) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: Require occupier to produce or provide access to a record or document.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483E(1) Later access to record or document—other premises

483E(2) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: Occupier not required to produce or provide access to a record or document if it would contravene a law of the Commonwealth or a State or Territory.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483E(2) Later access to record or document—other premises

483E(3) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: Must not be earlier than 14 days after notice is given.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The specified days meets a temporal interval of at least 14 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Must meet a temporal interval of at least 14 days.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Meets
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The specified days meets a cogAI condition of at least 14 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Must meet a cogAI condition of at least 14 days.
modality: CogAI
operator: Until
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The specified days must not be earlier than 14 days after notice is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not be earlier than specified days.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The specified days meets a diffusion condition of at least 14 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Must meet a diffusion condition of at least 14 days.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Until
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The specified days meets an until condition of at least 14 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Must meet an until condition of at least 14 days.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483E(3) Later access to record or document—other premises

483E(4) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: Must not contravene requirement after notice is given
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice may be given: (a) while the permit holder is on the other premises; or (b) within 5 days after the entry.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice and contravention
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (b) within 5 days after the entry.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The notice may be given: (a) while the permit holder is on the other premises; or (b) within 5 days after the entry.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of contravention on permit holder
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) while the permit holder is on the other premises; or (b) within 5 days after the entry.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Occupier must not contravene requirement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) The notice may be given:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Occupier must not contravene requirement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagated prohibition of contravention
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (4) The notice may be given:

483E(5) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: Occupier must not contravene a requirement under subsection (1).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483e-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483E(5) Later access to record or document—other premises

483E(6) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
note: Permit holder may inspect and make copies of record or document at other premises.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-483e-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder has permission to inspect and copy record or document.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 483E(6) Later access to record or document—other premises

484 Entry to hold discussions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287
note: Permit holder may enter premises for discussions with employees or TCF award workers
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-484-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-484-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-484
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-484-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
modality: Deontic
operator: may

486 Permit holder must not contravene this Subdivision
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
note: Permit holder must not contravene this Subdivision
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-486-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-486-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-486
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-486-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
curation status: Proposed
has part: 487(1) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
has part: 487(2) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
has part: 487(3) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
has part: 487(4) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
has part: 487(5) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-487
schema version: 2

487(1) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
description: entry notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
note: Give entry notice before entering premises
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-487-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must give entry notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

487(2) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
note: An entry notice must comply with section 518.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-487-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 487(2) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate

487(3) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
note: Entry notice must be given within a specified time frame.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-487-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide entry notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 487(3) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate

487(4) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
description: yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
note: Provide exemption certificate upon entry
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-487-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide exemption certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

487(5) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
description: entry notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
note: Give entry notice upon entering premises under Subdivision AA
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-487-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide entry notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

488 Contravening entry permit conditions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
note: Permit holder must not contravene entry permit conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-488-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-488-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-488
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-488-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-488-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 488 Contravening entry permit conditions

489 Producing authority documents
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
note: Produce authority documents upon request or before making certain requirements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-489-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-489-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-489
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-489-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must produce authority documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

490 When right may be exercised
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
curation status: Proposed
has part: 490(1) When right may be exercised
has part: 490(2) When right may be exercised
has part: 490(3) When right may be exercised
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-490
schema version: 2

490(1) When right may be exercised
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Exercise right during working hours.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-490-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 490 When right may be exercised

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exercise of the right occurs during the permitted time period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exercise right within specified time interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The permit holder may exercise a right under Subdivision A, AA or B only during working hours.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exercise of the right is part of the permitted activity.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Exercise right within specified time interval.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (1) The permit holder may exercise a right under Subdivision A, AA or B only during working hours.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The permit holder can exercise the right during working hours.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to exercise during working hours.
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: (1) The permit holder may exercise a right under Subdivision A, AA or B only during working hours.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exercise of the right is part of the permitted activity.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Exercise right within specified time interval.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (1) The permit holder may exercise a right under Subdivision A, AA or B only during working hours.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exercise of the right is part of the permitted activity.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Exercise right within specified time interval.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) The permit holder may exercise a right under Subdivision A, AA or B only during working hours.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 490(1) When right may be exercised

490(2) When right may be exercised
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Permit holder may hold discussions during mealtimes or breaks.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-490-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 490 When right may be exercised

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder may hold discussions.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 490(2) When right may be exercised

490(3) When right may be exercised
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Permit holder may enter premises under specified conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-490-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 490 When right may be exercised

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 490(3) When right may be exercised

491 Occupational health and safety requirements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Comply with reasonable requests for occupational health and safety requirements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-491-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-491-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-491
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-491-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance with requests.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

492 Location of interviews and discussions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
curation status: Proposed
has part: 492(1) Location of interviews and discussions
has part: 492(2) Location of interviews and discussions
has part: 492(3) Location of interviews and discussions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-492
schema version: 2

492(1) Location of interviews and discussions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Conduct interviews or hold discussions in agreed premises
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-492-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 492 Location of interviews and discussions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to conduct interviews or hold discussions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

492(2) Location of interviews and discussions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Permit holder and occupier must agree on interview location.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-492-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 492 Location of interviews and discussions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to agree
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Permit holder and occupier cannot agree on interview location.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 492(2) Location of interviews and discussions

492(3) Location of interviews and discussions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
note: Permit holder may conduct interviews or discussions in certain rooms or areas.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-492-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 492 Location of interviews and discussions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Rooms or areas where one or more persons take meal or breaks overlap with permitted rooms or areas.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) that is provided by the occupier for the purpose of taking meal or other breaks.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder may conduct interviews or discussions.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder may not be subject to an order if rights under this section are misused.
modality: Deontic
operator: MayNot
premise text: Note 1: The permit holder may be subject to an order by the FWC under section 508 if rights under this section are misused.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder must not intentionally hinder or obstruct others exercising rights under this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: MayNot
premise text: Note 2: A person must not intentionally hinder or obstruct a permit holder exercising rights under this section, or otherwise act in an improper manner (see section 502).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 492(3) Location of interviews and discussions

492A Route to location of interview and discussions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
curation status: Proposed
has part: 492A(1) Route to location of interview and discussions
has part: 492A(2) Route to location of interview and discussions
has part: 492A(3) Route to location of interview and discussions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-492a
schema version: 2

492A(1) Route to location of interview and discussions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
note: Comply with reasonable requests from premises occupier
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-492a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 492A Route to location of interview and discussions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The permit holder must comply...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with requests
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 492(1)

492A(2) Route to location of interview and discussions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
note: Request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable due to route choice.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-492a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 492A Route to location of interview and discussions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Route choice does not affect temporal overlap of request and interview.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable only because the route is not that which the permit holder would have chosen.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Request and interview may be recognized as related.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable only because the route is not that which the permit holder would have chosen.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide reasonable route for interview and discussions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable only because the route is not that which the permit holder would have chosen.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Request and interview may diffuse to same location.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable only because the route is not that which the permit holder would have chosen.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Request and interview may trace to same location.
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable only because the route is not that which the permit holder would have chosen.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 492A(2) Route to location of interview and discussions

492A(3) Route to location of interview and discussions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
note: Prescribes circumstances for a request under subsection (1) to be reasonable.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-492a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 492A Route to location of interview and discussions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prescribes circumstances for a request under subsection (1) to be reasonable.
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 492A(3) Route to location of interview and discussions

493 Residential premises
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
note: Restriction on entering residential premises
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-493-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-493-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-493
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-493-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: sec-493
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of entry into residential premises
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Chapter 3

494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
curation status: Proposed
has part: 494(1) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
has part: 494(2) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
has part: 494(3) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
has part: 494(4) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
has part: 494(5) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-494
schema version: 2

494(1) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
note: Official must not exercise State or Territory OHS right unless permit holder.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-494-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Official must not exercise State or Territory OHS right.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 494(1) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory

494(2) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
note: Right to enter premises requires permit holder
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-494-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The State or Territory OHS law has the right to enter premises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State or Territory OHS law has right to enter premises
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: (2) A right to enter premises, or to inspect or otherwise access an employee record of an employee that is on premises...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The State or Territory has the obligation to permit holder to exercise the right.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State or Territory has obligation to permit holder to exercise right
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligationTo
premise text: (2) A right to enter premises, or to inspect or otherwise access an employee record of an employee that is on premises...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The permit holder has the right to enter premises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder has right to enter premises
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
premise text: (2) A right to enter premises, or to inspect or otherwise access an employee record of an employee that is on premises...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The permit holder has the obligation to exercise the right.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder has obligation to exercise right
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligationTo
premise text: (2) A right to enter premises, or to inspect or otherwise access an employee record of an employee that is on premises...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The permit holder has the permission to enter premises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holder has permission to enter premises
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo
premise text: (2) A right to enter premises, or to inspect or otherwise access an employee record of an employee that is on premises...

494(3) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
note: Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-494-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval for permit holder exercise
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for permit holder exercise
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: Official must exercise State or Territory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Official must be permit holder
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide permit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Official must exercise State or Territory

494(4) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
note: Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-494-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official must be permit holder
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 494(4) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory

494(5) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
note: Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-494-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be a permit holder
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (5) However, sections 499 to 504 do apply in relation to the official:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 494(5) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory

495 Giving notice of entry
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
curation status: Proposed
has part: 495(1) Giving notice of entry
has part: 495(2) Giving notice of entry
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-495
schema version: 2

495(1) Giving notice of entry
type: Concept
description: written notice setting out intention and reasons
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
note: Exercise of State or Territory OHS right to inspect employee record requires notice and waiting period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-495-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 495 Giving notice of entry

fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exercise of State or Territory OHS right to inspect employee record without notice and waiting period is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

495(2) Giving notice of entry
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
note: A person is an affected employer if one or more of their employees perform work on the premises.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-495-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 495 Giving notice of entry

fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of affected employer
modality: Deontic
operator: is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 495(2) Giving notice of entry

496 Contravening entry permit conditions
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.295
note: Must not contravene a condition imposed on entry permit
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-496-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-496-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-496
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-496-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: permit holder must not contravene a condition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: State or Territory OHS right

497 Producing entry permit
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.295
note: Must produce entry permit upon request for inspection
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-497-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-497-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-497
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-497-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exercise of State or Territory OHS right without permit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

498 When right may be exercised
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.295
note: Exercise of State or Territory OHS right during working hours.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-498-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-498
schema version: 2

499 Occupational health and safety requirements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.295
note: Must comply with requests for occupational health and safety requirements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-499-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-499-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-499
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-499-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exercise of State or Territory OHS right without compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

500 Permit holder must not hinder or obstruct
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
note: Must not hinder or obstruct others
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-500-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-500-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-500
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-500-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-500-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 500 Permit holder must not hinder or obstruct

501 Person must not refuse or delay entry
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
note: Refusal or delay of entry onto premises by a permit holder is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-501-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-501-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-501
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-501-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person must not refuse or unduly delay entry onto premises by a permit holder who is entitled to enter the premises in accordance with this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal or delay
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: This section is a civil remedy provision (see Part 4-1).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-501-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 501 Person must not refuse or delay entry

502 Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
curation status: Proposed
has part: 502(1) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
has part: 502(2) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
has part: 502(3) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-502
schema version: 2

502(1) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
note: Hinder or obstruct permit holder
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-502-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 502 Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 502(1) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.

502(2) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
note: Failure to agree on a place does not constitute conduct referred to in subsection (1).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-502-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 502 Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 502(2) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.

502(3) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
note: Hinder or obstruct permit holder
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-502-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 502 Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Hinder or obstruct permit holder
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: State

fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 502(3) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.

503 Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
curation status: Proposed
has part: 503(1) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
has part: 503(2) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-503
schema version: 2

503(1) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
note: Taking action with the intention of giving a false impression that something is authorized by this Part is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-503-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 503 Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of action with the intention of giving a false impression.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: This subsection is a civil remedy provision (see Part 4-1).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 503(1) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part

503(2) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
note: No obligation if reasonably believed authorized
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-503-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 503 Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excemption from obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Excemption
premise text: Reasonable belief of authorization

fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Authorization believed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Belief of authorization
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
premise text: Reasonable belief of authorization

fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 503(2) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part

504 Unauthorised use or disclosure of information or documents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
note: Prohibition on using or disclosing information without investigation purpose
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-504-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-504-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-504
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-504-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on unauthorized use
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-504-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 504 Unauthorised use or disclosure of information or documents

505 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
curation status: Proposed
has part: 505(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
has part: 505(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-505
schema version: 2

505(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-505-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 505 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may deal with a dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 505(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

505(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
note: FWC may impose conditions on an entry permit
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-505-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 505 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 505(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

505A FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
curation status: Proposed
has part: 505A(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
has part: 505A(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
has part: 505A(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
has part: 505A(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-505a
schema version: 2

505A(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold discussions or TCF award workers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-505a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 505A FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May deal with a dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 505A(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold

505A(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-505a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 505A FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 505A(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold

505A(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold orders
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-505a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 505A FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May impose conditions on an entry permit
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 505A(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold

505A(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
note: FWC must be satisfied that frequency of entry is correct before making an order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-505a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 505A FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may only make an order under subsection (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that the frequency of entry is correct before making an order.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (4) However

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may only make an order under subsection (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must satisfy condition
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC is satisfied that the frequency of entry by the permit...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may only make an order under subsection (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that the frequency of entry by the permit is correct.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: the FWC is satisfied that the frequency of entry by the permit...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC is satisfied that the frequency of entry by the permit...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that the frequency of entry is correct before making an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) However, the FWC may only make an order under subsection (3)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC may only make an order under subsection (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that the frequency of entry is correct before making an order.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (4) However

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 505A(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold

506 Contravening order made to deal with dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Prohibition on contravening an order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-506-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-506-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-506
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-506-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contravening the order is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids action
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Order made under subsection 505(2) or subsection 505A(3)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-506-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 506 Contravening order made to deal with dispute

507 FWC may take action against permit holder
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
curation status: Proposed
has part: 507(1) FWC may take action against permit holder
has part: 507(2) FWC may take action against permit holder
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-507
schema version: 2

507(1) FWC may take action against permit holder
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: Revocation of entry permit
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-507-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 507 FWC may take action against permit holder

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 507(1) FWC may take action against permit holder

507(2) FWC may take action against permit holder
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
note: FWC must consider permit qualification matters when taking action against a permit holder.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-507-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 507 FWC may take action against permit holder

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the timeframe for FWC's action includes considering permit qualification matters
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: FWC's action is within a timeframe that considers permit qualification matters
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: In deciding whether to take action under subsection (1), the FWC must take into account the permit qualification matters.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: considering permit qualification matters is a condition of taking action
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider permit qualification matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must take action under subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: considering permit qualification matters is a condition of FWC's action
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC has a duty to consider permit qualification matters when taking action against a permit holder
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC must take into account the permit qualification matters.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the process for FWC's action includes considering permit qualification matters
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: FWC's action is part of a recurring process that considers permit qualification matters
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: In deciding whether to take action under subsection (1), the FWC must take into account the permit qualification matters.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 507(2) FWC may take action against permit holder

508 FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303
curation status: Proposed
has part: 508(1) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
has part: 508(2) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
has part: 508(3) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-508
schema version: 2

508(1) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303
note: Restrict rights exercisable under this Part if misuse detected
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-508-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 508 FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Rights restricted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restrict rights
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Misuse detected

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 508(1) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused

508(2) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303
note: Restrictions on entry permits and exemption certificates for an organisation suspected of misuse.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-508-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 508 FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the organisation as a suspect of misuse.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 508(2) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused

508(3) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303
note: FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-508-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 508 FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 508(3) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused

509 Contravening order made for misuse of rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: Prohibition on contravening a term of an order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-509-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-509-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-509
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-509-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a term of an order
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-509-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 509 Contravening order made for misuse of rights

510 When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
curation status: Proposed
has part: 510(1) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
has part: 510(2) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
has part: 510(3) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-510
schema version: 2

510(1) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: FWC must revoke or suspend entry permits under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-510-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 510 When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation or suspension is required within 30 days of payment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: FWC must revoke or suspend permits within a certain timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Permit holder was ordered to pay a pecuniary penalty under this Act

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation or suspension is implied by court decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: FWC must revoke or suspend permits based on court decisions
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Court cancelled or suspended a right of entry for industrial purposes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation or suspension is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of revocation or suspension
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: FWC must impose conditions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation or suspension is prohibited based on permit holder's conduct
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of revocation or suspension based on permit holder's conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Permit holder was found to have contravened subsection 503(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation or suspension is inferred from Information Commissioner's finding
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: FWC must revoke or suspend permits based on information commissioner findings
modality: Diffusion
operator: Inference
premise text: Information Commissioner found substantiated a complaint relating to action taken by the permit holder

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 510(1) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend

510(2) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: FWC is not required to suspend or revoke an entry permit under certain circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-510-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 510 When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Suspension or revocation is separate from entry permit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Suspension or revocation does not overlap with entry permit
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: FWC must impose conditions on permits

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No obligation to suspend or revoke
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to suspend or revoke
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: FWC must impose conditions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC has discretion to suspend or revoke
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC has permission to suspend or revoke under certain circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: FWC must impose conditions on permits

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Suspension or revocation is affected by circumstances
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Harsh/unreasonable circumstances diffuse to suspension or revocation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: FWC must impose conditions on permits

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Suspension or revocation is conditional on circumstances
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Suspension or revocation occurs until harsh/unreasonable circumstances are met
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: FWC must impose conditions on permits

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 510(2) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend

510(3) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
note: FWC must consider previous circumstances when taking action under subsection (1)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-510-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 510 When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: FWC took the circumstance into account on a previous occasion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: The FWC took action under subsection (1) on a previous occasion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must consider previous circumstances when taking action under subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Consideration
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to a circumstance referred to in a paragraph of that subsection if the FWC took the circumstance into account when taking action under that subsection on a previous occasion.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 510(3) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend

511 General rules for suspending entry permits
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
note: Suspension of entry permit must be for a specified period and does not prevent revocation or imposition of conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-511-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-511-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-511-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-511
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-511-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The suspension must be for a specified period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-511-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The suspension does not prevent revocation or imposition of conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Incompatibility

512 FWC may issue entry permits
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
note: FWC may issue entry permits to officials of organisations that meet certain criteria.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-512-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-512
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-512-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 512 FWC may issue entry permits

513 Considering application
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
note: Official must consider permit qualification matters when deciding fitness and propriety.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-513-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-513-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-513
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-513-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Official must consider permit qualification matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-513-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 513 Considering application

514 When the FWC must not issue permit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: FWC must not issue permit under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-514-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-514-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-514
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-514-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing permit
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-514-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 514 When the FWC must not issue permit

515 Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
curation status: Proposed
has part: 515(1) Conditions on entry permit
has part: 515(2) Conditions on entry permit
has part: 515(3) Conditions on entry permit
has part: 515(4) Conditions on entry permit
has part: 515(5) Conditions on entry permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-515
schema version: 2

515(1) Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: FWC may impose conditions on an entry permit when issued.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-515-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 515 Conditions on entry permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 515(1) Conditions on entry permit

515(2) Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: Consider permit qualification matters when imposing conditions on entry permits.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-515-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 515 Conditions on entry permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: impose conditions under subsection (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider permit qualification matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: should
premise text: FWC must take into account...

515(3) Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: Record conditions on entry permit
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-515-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 515 Conditions on entry permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to record conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 515(3) Conditions on entry permit

515(4) Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: Permit ceases to be in force until condition is recorded.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-515-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 515 Conditions on entry permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing a permit with conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

515(5) Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
note: Avoid contravening an FWC order due to permit conditions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-515-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 515 Conditions on entry permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

516 Expiry of entry permit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
curation status: Proposed
has part: 516(1) Expiry of entry permit
has part: 516(2) Expiry of entry permit
has part: 516(3) Expiry of entry permit
has part: 516(4) Expiry of entry permit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-516
schema version: 2

516(1) Expiry of entry permit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
note: Permit expires after 3 years or when holder ceases to be official.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-516-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 516 Expiry of entry permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits holding permit after specified period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) Unless it is revoked, an entry permit expires...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 516(1) Expiry of entry permit

516(2) Expiry of entry permit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
note: FWC may extend old permit period under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-516-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 516 Expiry of entry permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit extension is permitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 516(2) Expiry of entry permit

516(3) Expiry of entry permit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
note: The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-516-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 516 Expiry of entry permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the period specified and the FWC's consideration period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OverlapsWith
premise text: (3) The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary for it to determine the application.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on exceeding the period specified by FWC.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotExceed
premise text: (3) The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary for it to determine the application.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restriction on the length of the period specified.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustBeLessThanOrEqual
premise text: (3) The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary for it to determine the application.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classification of section as an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: IsAnObligation
premise text: (3) The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary for it to determine the application.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval contained within the FWC's consideration period.
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: (3) The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary for it to determine the application.

516(4) Expiry of entry permit
type: Concept
description: copies of records or documents, or other information
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
note: FWC cannot extend period under subsection (2) if requested information is provided
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-516-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 516 Expiry of entry permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on extending period
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

517 Return of entry permits to the FWC
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
curation status: Proposed
has part: 517(1) Return of entry permits to the FWC
has part: 517(2) Return of entry permits to the FWC
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-517
schema version: 2

517(1) Return of entry permits to the FWC
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
note: Return entry permit to FWC within 7 days of revocation, suspension, or expiration.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-517-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 517 Return of entry permits to the FWC

fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to return permit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

517(2) Return of entry permits to the FWC
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
note: Return of entry permits after suspension period ends
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-517-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 517 Return of entry permits to the FWC

fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to return entry permit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 517(2) Return of entry permits to the FWC

518 Entry notice requirements
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
curation status: Proposed
has part: 518(1) Entry notice requirements
has part: 518(2) Entry notice requirements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-518
schema version: 2

518(1) Entry notice requirements
type: Concept
description: entry notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
note: Entry notice must specify premises, day of entry, and organisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-518-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 518 Entry notice requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide entry notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 518(1) Entry notice requirements

518(2) Entry notice requirements
type: Concept
description: Particulars of suspected contraventions or contraventions
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
note: Entry notice requirements for certain types of entries under sections 481, 483A, or 483D.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-518-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 518 Entry notice requirements

fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Entry notice requirements apply between the permit holder's organisation and the affected parties
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide particulars of suspected contraventions or contraventions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 518(2) Entry notice requirements

519 Exemption certificates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
curation status: Proposed
has part: 519(1) Exemption certificates
has part: 519(2) Exemption certificates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-519
schema version: 2

519(1) Exemption certificates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: Issue exemption certificate to organisation upon application and reasonable belief of hindering investigation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-519-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 519 Exemption certificates

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The timeframe for issuing the exemption certificate is reasonable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exemption certificates are issued within a reasonable timeframe after application.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: The FWC must issue the certificate (an exemption certificate) within a reasonable timeframe after receiving the application.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The organisation has the right to expect the FWC to issue a certificate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issue exemption certificate upon application and reasonable belief.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The FWC must issue a certificate (an exemption certificate) to an organisation for an entry under section 481.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The organisation is not required to have an exemption certificate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption certificates are not mandatory but may be issued at discretion.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: The FWC has the discretion to issue a certificate (an exemption certificate) upon application and reasonable belief.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption certificate is recurring.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Exemption certificates are issued in response to repeated applications.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: The organisation has applied multiple times and the FWC must issue a certificate (an exemption certificate) upon each application.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 519(1) Exemption certificates

519(2) Exemption certificates
type: Concept
description: Particulars of suspected contravention, organisation name, permit holder names (if applicable)
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
note: Exemption certificate requirements
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-519-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 519 Exemption certificates

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption certificate specifications
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 519(2) Exemption certificates

520 Affected member certificates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
curation status: Proposed
has part: 520(1) Affected member certificates
has part: 520(2) Affected member certificates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-520
schema version: 2

520(1) Affected member certificates
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
note: Issue affected member certificate on application by organisation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-520-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 520 Affected member certificates

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Satisfied that a member performs work on premises
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between FWC's satisfaction and issuing certificate
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) The FWC must, on application by an organisation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issue affected member certificate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of FWC's satisfaction on issuing certificate
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) a member of the organisation performs work on particular premises...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issue affected member certificate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuing certificate is an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) The FWC must, on application by an organisation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issue affected member certificate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of obligation to issue certificate
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) The FWC must, on application by an organisation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 520(1) Affected member certificates

520(2) Affected member certificates
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
note: Affected member certificate must state certain information.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-520-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 520 Affected member certificates

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide specific information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 520(2) Affected member certificates

521 Regulations dealing with instruments under this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
note: Regulations dealing with instruments under this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521
schema version: 2

521A Meaning of accommodation arrangement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
curation status: Proposed
has part: 521A(1) Meaning of accommodation arrangement
has part: 521A(2) Meaning of accommodation arrangement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521a
schema version: 2

521A(1) Meaning of accommodation arrangement
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
note: Occupier must provide accommodation arrangement under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 521A Meaning of accommodation arrangement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide accommodation arrangement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) If an occupier of premises enters into an arrangement with an organisation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 521A(1) Meaning of accommodation arrangement

521A(2) Meaning of accommodation arrangement
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
note: Occupier must provide accommodation arrangement if permit holder is assisted to exercise rights.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 521A Meaning of accommodation arrangement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Occupier has an obligation to provide accommodation arrangement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permit holders are permitted to enter into accommodation arrangements with occupiers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (2) If an occupier enters into an arrangement with a permit holder...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Occupiers have an obligation to provide accommodation arrangements if they enter into agreements with permit holders.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) If an occupier enters into an arrangement with a permit holder...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 521A(2) Meaning of accommodation arrangement

521B Meaning of transport arrangement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
curation status: Proposed
has part: 521B(1) Meaning of transport arrangement
has part: 521B(2) Meaning of transport arrangement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521b
schema version: 2

521B(1) Meaning of transport arrangement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
note: Transport arrangement required for permit holder assistance
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 521B Meaning of transport arrangement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the transport arrangement is related to the permit holder's exercise of rights.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Transport arrangement relates to permit holder assistance during arrangement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) an occupier of premises enters into an arrangement with an organisation;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the arrangement is a transport arrangement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Transport arrangement implies permit holder assistance
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (b) under the terms of the arrangement, a permit holder is provided with transport for the purpose of assisting him or her to exercise rights under this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the arrangement provides transport assistance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Transport arrangement recognized as providing assistance
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (b) under the terms of the arrangement, a permit holder is provided with transport for the purpose of assisting him or her to exercise rights under this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the arrangement is a transport arrangement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires transport arrangement
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (1) If an occupier of premises enters into an arrangement with an organisation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the arrangement provides transport assistance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Transport arrangement diffuses assistance to permit holder
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (b) under the terms of the arrangement, a permit holder is provided with transport for the purpose of assisting him or her to exercise rights under this Part;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 521B(1) Meaning of transport arrangement

521B(2) Meaning of transport arrangement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
note: Occupier of premises must enter into an arrangement with a permit holder.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 521B Meaning of transport arrangement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an occupier of premises must enter into an arrangement with a permit holder.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide an arrangement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) If:...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 521B(2) Meaning of transport arrangement

521C Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
curation status: Proposed
has part: 521C(1) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
has part: 521C(2) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
has part: 521C(3) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
has part: 521C(4) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521c
schema version: 2

521C(1) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
note: Occupier must provide accommodation to permit holder exercising rights.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 521C Accommodation arrangements for remote areas

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide accommodation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 521C(1) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas

521C(2) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
note: Must provide accommodation if requested by permit holder within reasonable period and unable to enter into arrangement by consent.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 521C Accommodation arrangements for remote areas

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

521C(3) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
note: Occupier must not charge excessive fee for accommodation under arrangement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 521C Accommodation arrangements for remote areas

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of excessive fee charging
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

521C(4) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
note: Permit holder's conduct in accommodation under arrangement is considered exercise of rights
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 521C Accommodation arrangements for remote areas

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on permit holder
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 521C(4) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas

521D Transport arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
curation status: Proposed
has part: 521D(1) Transport arrangements for remote areas
has part: 521D(2) Transport arrangements for remote areas
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521d
schema version: 2

521D(1) Transport arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
note: Occupier must provide transport for permit holder in remote areas.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 521D Transport arrangements for remote areas

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide transport
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 521D(1) Transport arrangements for remote areas

521D(2) Transport arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
description: transport to the premises
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
note: Transport arrangements for remote areas must be provided if requested by the permit holder.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-521d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 521D Transport arrangements for remote areas

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: transport to the premises
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for transport provision
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: the permit holder requests transport

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: transport to the premises
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The occupier must provide transport if requested.

522 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: Employer may stand down employee without pay in certain circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-522-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-522
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-522-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 522 Guide to this Part

523 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-523-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-523
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-523-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 523 Meanings of employee and employer

524 Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
curation status: Proposed
has part: 524(1) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
has part: 524(2) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
has part: 524(3) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-524
schema version: 2

524(1) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
note: Employer may stand down employees under certain circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-524-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 524 Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances

fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 524(1) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances

524(2) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
note: Employer may stand down employees under certain circumstances
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-524-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 524 Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances

fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to stand down employees
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 524(2) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances

524(3) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
note: Employer not required to make payments during stand down period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-524-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 524 Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances

fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No payment required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's obligation to make payments
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Employer stands down employee

525 Employee not stood down during a period of authorised leave or
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
note: An employee is not taken to be stood down under subsection 524(1) during a period when the employee is taking authorised leave.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-525
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee's absence overlaps with the period during which they would otherwise be stood down.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The employee's absence overlaps with the period during which they would otherwise be stood down.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Employee is taking paid or unpaid leave that is authorised by the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system recognises the employee's absence as authorised leave.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The system recognises the employee's absence as authorised leave.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
premise text: Employee is taking paid or unpaid leave that is authorised by the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee is not stood down under subsection 524(1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If an employee takes authorised leave, they are not stood down.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Employee is taking paid or unpaid leave that is authorised by the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Other employees who are also taking authorised leave diffuse to the employee's absence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The employee's absence diffuses to other employees who are also taking authorised leave.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Employee is taking paid or unpaid leave that is authorised by the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The employee's absence repeats the pattern of taking authorised leave.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The employee's absence repeats the pattern of taking authorised leave.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: Employee is taking paid or unpaid leave that is authorised by the employer.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 525 Employee not stood down during a period of authorised leave or

526 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
curation status: Proposed
has part: 526(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
has part: 526(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
has part: 526(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
has part: 526(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-526
schema version: 2

526(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
note: The FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-526-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 526 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May deal with a dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 526(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

526(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part through arbitration, mediation, conciliation, or making a recommendation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-526-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 526 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission for FWC to deal with disputes.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 526(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

526(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part on application by certain parties.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-526-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 526 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may deal with a dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 526(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

526(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
note: FWC must consider fairness in dispute resolution.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-526-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 526 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Consider fairness between parties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider fairness.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must deal with the dispute.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 526(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part

527 Contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about the
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
note: Prohibits contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about the operation of this Part.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527 Contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about the

527A Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
note: Sexual harassment is prohibited in certain situations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Harassment overlaps with the other person's employment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Harassment occurs during the same time period as the other person's employment.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The harassment occurs in connection with the other person being a person of the relevant kind.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A stop order is implied in cases of alleged contravention.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implicates the need for a stop order in cases of alleged contravention.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
premise text: Applications may be made to the FWC to deal with a dispute about an alleged contravention of this Part...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A court hearing is recognized in cases where a dispute has not been resolved.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the need for a court hearing in cases where a dispute has not been resolved by the FWC.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: In most cases, a dispute about an alleged contravention of this Part will be dealt with by a court only if the dispute has not been resolved by the FWC.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sexual harassment is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits sexual harassment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The other person is a worker in a business or undertaking...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Responsibility for sexual harassment is diffused to employees or agents.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for sexual harassment to employees or agents.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Persons may be liable for acts contravening this Part that are performed by their employees or agents.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527A Guide to this Part

527B Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527b
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527B Meaning of employee and employer

527C Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
note: Object of this Part is to give effect, or further effect, to Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527c-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527c
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527C Object of this Part

527CA Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527CA(1) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
has part: 527CA(2) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
has part: 527CA(3) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
has part: 527CA(4) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527ca
schema version: 2

527CA(1) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: No exclusion of concurrent State and Territory laws
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527ca-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527CA Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Concurrent laws overlap in time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (1) This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory that is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Concurrent laws are cognizable by CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (1) This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory that is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No exclusion
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (1) This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory that is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Concurrent laws diffuse through time
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (1) This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory that is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Concurrent laws have recurring traces
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
premise text: (1) This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory that is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.

527CA(2) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527ca-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527CA Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws

527CA(3) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Allowing concurrent operation of State and Territory laws to prevent sexual harassment or deal with disputes related to it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527ca-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 527CA Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission for concurrent operation of laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

527CA(4) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
note: Section 26 has effect subject to this section.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527ca-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 527CA Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws

527D Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527D(1) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
has part: 527D(2) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
has part: 527D(3) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
has part: 527D(4) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527d
schema version: 2

527D(1) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
note: Prohibits sexual harassment in connection with work
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527D Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527D(1) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work

527D(2) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
note: Prohibits sexual harassment in connection with work
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527D Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope of worker definition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
premise text: When a person is a worker in a business or undertaking

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527D(2) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work

527D(3) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
note: A person carrying out work for a business or undertaking is considered a worker in that business or undertaking.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 527D Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implication of a worker's status
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: None

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527D(3) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work

527D(4) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
note: Defines meaning of terms for Work Health and Safety Act 2011 in this section.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 527D Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527D(4) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work

527E Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527E(1) Vicarious liability etc.
has part: 527E(2) Vicarious liability etc.
has part: 527E(2A) Vicarious liability etc.
has part: 527E(2B) Vicarious liability etc.
has part: 527E(3) Vicarious liability etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527e
schema version: 2

527E(1) Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
note: Principal liable for employee's actions under certain circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527E Vicarious liability etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Act applies to the principal if they had also done the act during the same temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between employee's actions and the Act's application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Employee's actions occur during their employment or duties as an agent.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal is liable for the employee's actions under certain circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference of liability from employee's actions
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Employee's actions are subject to the Act's application.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal is liable for the employee's actions under certain circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence inference of liability
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Employee's actions are subject to the Act's application.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Principal is liable for employee's actions under certain circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Vicarious liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Employee's actions are subject to the principal's liability.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The principal is liable for the employee's actions under certain circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of liability from employee to principal
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: Employee's actions are subject to the Act's application.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527E(1) Vicarious liability etc.

527E(2) Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
note: Principal must take reasonable steps to prevent employee/agent from contravening subsection 527D(1).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527E Vicarious liability etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reasonable steps occurred within a specific temporal interval
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for reasonable steps
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
premise text: Principal took all reasonable steps to prevent employee/agent from doing acts that would contravene subsection 527D(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to prevent contravention exists
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference of obligation based on principal's actions
modality: Argumentation
operator: inference
premise text: Principal must take reasonable steps to prevent employee/agent from contravening subsection 527D(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Principal's cognitive action prevents contravention
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive action of principal in preventing employee/agent from contravening subsection 527D(1)
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive action
premise text: Principal must take reasonable steps to prevent employee/agent from doing acts that would contravene subsection 527D(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee/agent cannot contravene subsection 527D(1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prevent contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Principal must take reasonable steps

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation diffuses through principal's actions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation through principal's actions
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: Principal took all reasonable steps to prevent employee/agent from doing acts that would contravene subsection 527D(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527E(2) Vicarious liability etc.

527E(2A) Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
note: Commonwealth liable for act done by defence member
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527e-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 527E Vicarious liability etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act applies in relation to the Commonwealth...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State liability for Commonwealth action
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
premise text: (2A) If a person does an act that contravenes subsection 527D(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act applies in relation to the Commonwealth...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of liability on Commonwealth action
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (2A) If a person does an act that contravenes subsection 527D(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527E(2A) Vicarious liability etc.

527E(2B) Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
note: The Commonwealth must take reasonable steps to prevent the person from doing acts that would contravene subsection 527D(1).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527e-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 527E Vicarious liability etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take reasonable steps
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

527E(3) Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
note: No vicarious liability for certain subsections
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 527E Vicarious liability etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527E(3) Vicarious liability etc.

527F Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527F(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
has part: 527F(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
has part: 527F(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
has part: 527F(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527f
schema version: 2

527F(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: A person may apply for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment dispute.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527F Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The FWC may allow an application to be amended if, for example, the applicant wishes the FWC to deal with the dispute in a way not initially applied for.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the applicant may make a sexual harassment court application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If the FWC has dealt with the dispute as mentioned in paragraph (b) and is satisfied that all reasonable attempts to resolve the dispute...
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: The FWC has dealt with the dispute as mentioned in paragraph (b).

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment dispute.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527F(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment

527F(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: List of persons entitled to deal with sexual harassment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527F Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527F(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment

527F(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: Cannot apply for a stop sexual harassment order if the aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 527F Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Excluded from applying for stop sexual harassment order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Exclusion based on temporal relationship between defence membership and alleged harassment
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Defence member
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of individuals who cannot apply for a stop sexual harassment order
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on applying for a stop sexual harassment order
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot apply for stop sexual harassment order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace based on defence membership and alleged harassment
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Valid exclusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of individuals who cannot apply for a stop sexual harassment order
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
premise text: aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527F(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment

527F(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
note: Industrial associations may represent aggrieved persons for applications.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 527F Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Industrial associations may represent aggrieved persons for applications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527F(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment

527G Time for application
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
note: Dismissal of applications under section 527F after a certain time period.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527g-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527g
schema version: 2

527H Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527H(1) Application fees
has part: 527H(2) Application fees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527h
schema version: 2

527H(1) Application fees
type: Concept
description: Fee
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527H Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a fee
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527H(1) Application fees

527H(2) Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
note: Application fee regulation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527H Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulates fee
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527H(2) Application fees

527J Stop sexual harassment orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527J(1) Stop sexual harassment orders
has part: 527J(2) Stop sexual harassment orders
has part: 527J(3) Stop sexual harassment orders
has part: 527J(4) Stop sexual harassment orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527j
schema version: 2

527J(1) Stop sexual harassment orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
note: The FWC may make an order to prevent sexual harassment.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527J Stop sexual harassment orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Has part: prevent sexual harassment
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527J(1) Stop sexual harassment orders

527J(2) Stop sexual harassment orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
note: FWC must deal with stop sexual harassment order applications within 14 days.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527J Stop sexual harassment orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to deal with applications
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527J(2) Stop sexual harassment orders

527J(3) Stop sexual harassment orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
note: FWC must consider certain outcomes and procedures when issuing a stop sexual harassment order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 527J Stop sexual harassment orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory consideration of outcomes and procedures
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527J(3) Stop sexual harassment orders

527J(4) Stop sexual harassment orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
note: Application for stop sexual harassment order may be dismissed if it relates to Australia's defence, national security, covert operation, or international operation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527j-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 527J Stop sexual harassment orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for stop sexual harassment order may be dismissed if it relates to Australia's defence, national security, covert operation, or international operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

527K Contravening a stop sexual harassment order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
note: Prohibition on contravening a stop sexual harassment order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527k-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527k-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527k
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not contravene a term of the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a stop sexual harassment order
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: A person to whom a stop sexual harassment order applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527k-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527K Contravening a stop sexual harassment order

527L Actions under work health and safety laws permitted
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
note: Removes prohibition on proceeding under WHS laws for same conduct
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527l-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527l-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527l-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527l
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows proceeding under WHS laws
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527l-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes corresponding provisions of WHS laws
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

527M This Subdivision is not to prejudice Australia’s defence,
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
note: Prejudicial action to Australia's defence, national security, or covert/ international operations of the Australian Federal Police.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527m
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Action overlaps with specified temporal intervals if it would be prejudicial.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies temporal intervals where action would be prejudicial.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlapsWith
premise text: ...or could reasonably be expected to be, prejudicial to:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: System recognizes action as potentially prejudicial if it relates to specified interests.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes how system recognizes action as potentially prejudicial.
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: ...or could reasonably be expected to be, prejudicial to:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Action is prohibited if it would be prejudicial to specified interests.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking or refraining from taking action that would be prejudicial to specified interests.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: Nothing in this Subdivision requires or permits a person to take, or to refrain from taking, any action...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Action diffuses into specified interests if it would be prejudicial.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how action affects specified interests.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
premise text: ...or could reasonably be expected to be, prejudicial to:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Action occurs before specified conditions if it would be prejudicial.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes conditions under which action is prohibited.
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
premise text: ...or the taking of the action, or the refraining from taking the action...

527N Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527N(1) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
has part: 527N(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527n
schema version: 2

527N(1) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
note: The Chief of the Defence Force may declare exemptions from certain provisions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527N Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the time period during which exemptions are allowed
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a specified activity.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the method used to make exemptions
modality: CogAI
operator: By
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a specified activity.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exempt
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the mechanism through which exemptions are communicated
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a specified activity.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Describes the purpose for which exemptions are made
modality: N3Logic
operator: For
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a specified activity.

527N(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527N Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has effect according to its terms.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (2) A declaration under subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527N(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force

527P Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527P(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
has part: 527P(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527p
schema version: 2

527P(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
note: Director-General may declare exemptions from Subdivision provisions
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527P Declarations by the Director-General of Security

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exempt
modality: Deontic
operator: may

527P(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527P Declarations by the Director-General of Security

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has effect according to its terms.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Declaration has effect during the period of approval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) A declaration under subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has effect according to its terms.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (2) A declaration under subsection (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527P(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security

527Q Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527Q(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
has part: 527Q(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527q
schema version: 2

527Q(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
note: Permits Director-General to declare exemptions from certain provisions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527Q Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope of the exemption.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Director-General of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a person carrying out work for the Director-General.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the mechanism by which the exemption is granted.
modality: CogAI
operator: may
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Director-General of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a person carrying out work for the Director-General.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the mechanism by which the exemption is granted.
modality: Diffusion
operator: may
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Director-General of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a person carrying out work for the Director-General.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope of the exemption.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Director-General of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a person carrying out work for the Director-General.

527Q(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527Q Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires approval from Minister
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

527R Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527R(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
has part: 527R(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
has part: 527R(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527r
schema version: 2

527R(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: FWC must deal with a dispute (other than by arbitration) if an application is made under section 527F and does not consist solely of an application for a stop sexual harassment order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527R Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to deal with a dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527R(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by

527R(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: Private conferences for dealing with sexual harassment disputes
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527R Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be conducted in private
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527R(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by

527R(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: FWC must issue certificate if dispute resolution attempts are unsuccessful
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527r-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 527R Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527R(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by

527S Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527S(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
has part: 527S(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
has part: 527S(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527s
schema version: 2

527S(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
description: Notification within 60 days after certificate issue or application made during/after those 60 days
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: Notification of FWC for arbitration of sexual harassment dispute
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527S Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify FWC for arbitration of sexual harassment dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527S(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration

527S(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: The FWC must remove a party from the dispute and notify them.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527S Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must remove a party from the dispute.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527S(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration

527S(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
note: FWC may make orders to redress loss or damage suffered by an aggrieved person in relation to a dispute.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527s-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 527S Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The FWC's actions occur between the dispute and redressing loss or damage.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must make orders to redress loss or damage suffered by an aggrieved person in relation to a dispute.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527S(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration

527T Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
curation status: Proposed
has part: 527T(1) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
has part: 527T(2) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
has part: 527T(3) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527t
schema version: 2

527T(1) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: No court application allowed unless FWC has issued a certificate or interim injunction is applied for.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 527T Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No court application allowed unless FWC has issued a certificate or interim injunction is applied for.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A court application is prohibited unless this condition is met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identifies the FWC's role in certifying disputes
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The FWC has issued a certificate under paragraph 527R(3)(a)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A court application is prohibited unless this condition is met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Specifies the time frame for making a court application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The sexual harassment court application must be made within a period specified in subsection (3)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A court application is permitted if it includes this condition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Allows for interim injunction applications
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The sexual harassment court application includes an application for an interim injunction

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527T(1) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court

527T(2) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: A sexual harassment court application is an application to a court under Division 2 of Part 4-1 for orders in relation to a contravention of Division 2 of this Part.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 527T Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the employer to prevent sexual harassment.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527T(2) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court

527T(3) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
note: Specify periods for taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-527t-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 527T Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal intervals are specified
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specify temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The provision mentions specific periods

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify periods for taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 527T(3) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court

528 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
note: National system employer obligations regarding employee dismissals and records.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-528-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-528-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-528
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-528-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification is mandatory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must notify CEO of proposed dismissals.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 528(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-528-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 528 Guide to this Part

529 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-529
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: employer means a national system employer
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: employee means a national system employee

fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: organisation etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 529 Meanings of employee and employer

530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
curation status: Proposed
has part: 530(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
has part: 530(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
has part: 530(3) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
has part: 530(4) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
has part: 530(5) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-530
schema version: 2

530(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
description: Written notice about the proposed dismissals
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-530-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 530(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals

530(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-530-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Dismissals must occur after notice is given.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) The notice must be in the form (if any) prescribed by the regulations and set out:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 530(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals

530(3) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-530-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

530(4) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-530-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to notify Centrelink.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

530(5) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
note: Employer must not dismiss employees except as permitted by the order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-530-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits dismissal of employees without permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

531 FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341
curation status: Proposed
has part: 531(1) FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
has part: 531(2) FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-531
schema version: 2

531(1) FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
type: Concept
description: Notification of relevant registered employee associations
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341
note: Employer must notify registered employee associations before dismissing 15 or more employees.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-531-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 531 FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult

fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply with notification requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 531(1) FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult

531(2) FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
type: Concept
description: Notice of proposed dismissals and reasons
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341
note: Employer must notify registered employee association of proposed dismissals and reasons.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-531-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 531 FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult

fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must comply with subsection
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

532 Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
curation status: Proposed
has part: 532(1) Orders that the FWC may make
has part: 532(2) Orders that the FWC may make
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-532
schema version: 2

532(1) Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: The FWC may make orders to put employees in the same position as if the employer had complied with subsections 531(2) and (3).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-532-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 532 Orders that the FWC may make

fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may make orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 532(1) Orders that the FWC may make

532(2) Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
note: FWC cannot make orders for certain things
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-532-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 532 Orders that the FWC may make

fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot impose duty on FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

533 Application for an FWC order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
note: Application for an FWC order is required.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-533-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-533-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-533
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-533-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application is mandatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-533-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 533 Application for an FWC order

534 Limits on scope of this Division
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
note: Exemptions from application of Division 534
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-534-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-534
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-534-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 534 Limits on scope of this Division

535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
curation status: Proposed
has part: 535(1) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
has part: 535(2) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
has part: 535(3) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
has part: 535(4) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
has part: 535(5) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-535
schema version: 2

535(1) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
description: employee records of the kind prescribed by the regulations in relation to each of its employees
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
note: Employer must keep employee records for 7 years.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-535-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must keep employee records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 535(1) Employer obligations in relation to employee records

535(2) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
note: Employer must provide employee records in prescribed form and include required information.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-535-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer must provide employee records.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 535(2) Employer obligations in relation to employee records

535(3) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
note: Employer must comply with regulations regarding employee records inspection.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-535-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

535(4) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
note: Employer must not make or keep false records.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-535-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making false records.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

535(5) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
note: Employer obligations in relation to employee records do not apply if the record is not false or misleading in a material particular.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-535-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 535(5) Employer obligations in relation to employee records

536 Employer obligations in relation to pay slips
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
note: Employer must provide pay slip within one working day of paying an employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide pay slip.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

536A Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
note: Corrupting benefits provided to or in relation to organisations are prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536a
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits corrupting benefits.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536A Guide to this Part

536AA Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536AA(1) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
has part: 536AA(2) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
has part: 536AA(3) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536aa
schema version: 2

536AA(1) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
note: Employer cannot advertise employment at a rate of pay that contravenes the Act or a fair work instrument.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536AA Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the advertised employment occurred:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for advertising employment rates.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...contravene either of the following...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of advertising employment at a rate of pay that contravenes the Act or a fair work instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) An employer must not advertise...

536AA(2) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
type: Concept
description: (c) or (d)
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
note: Employer must specify rate of pay in advertising
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536AA Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536AA(2) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay

536AA(3) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
note: Employer has a reasonable excuse to exempt from subsections (1) and (2)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536AA Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Employer's excuse
modality: Deontic
operator: Excuse
premise text: Reasonable excuse

536B Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536b
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536B Meanings of employee and employer

536C Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536C(1) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
has part: 536C(2) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
has part: 536C(3) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536c
schema version: 2

536C(1) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
note: No exclusion of concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536C Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law is still in effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Concurrent laws overlap with this Part
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law is still in effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Concurrent laws incorporate this Part
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
premise text: This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law is still in effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No exclusion
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law is still in effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Concurrent laws diffuse with this Part
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The law is still in effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Concurrent laws repeat with this Part
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory

536C(2) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
note: Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536C Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws

536C(3) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
note: States and Territories may not provide different penalties or fault elements for the same offence.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536C Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Laws may overlap.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: States and Territories' laws may overlap with the Commonwealth's laws for the same offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: State/Territory law differs from Commonwealth law.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Laws must be consistent.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: States and Territories' laws must be consistent with the Commonwealth's laws for the same offence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Consistency
premise text: State/Territory law differs from Commonwealth law.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No difference in penalties or fault elements allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States and Territories must not provide different penalties or fault elements.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: State/Territory law differs from Commonwealth law.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No difference in defences or exceptions allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States and Territories must not provide different defences or exceptions for the same offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: State/Territory law differs from Commonwealth law.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Laws are valid.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: States and Territories' laws are valid if they do not differ from the Commonwealth's laws for the same offence.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validity
premise text: State/Territory law differs from Commonwealth law.

536CA Dishonesty
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536CA(1) Dishonesty
has part: 536CA(2) Dishonesty
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ca
schema version: 2

536CA(1) Dishonesty
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
note: Definition of dishonesty
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ca-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536CA Dishonesty

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with normative force
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536CA(1) Dishonesty

536CA(2) Dishonesty
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
note: Determination of dishonesty is a matter for the trier of fact.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ca-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536CA Dishonesty

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536CA(2) Dishonesty

536D Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536D(1) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
has part: 536D(2) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
has part: 536D(3) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536d
schema version: 2

536D(1) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
note: Receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536D Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536D(1) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit

536D(2) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
note: Requesting, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit is an offence.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536D Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits requesting, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536D(2) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit

536D(3) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
note: Defendant's intention does not need to be in relation to a particular registered organisations officer or employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536D Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536D(3) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit

536E Meaning of registered organisations officer or employee
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352
note: Defines who is considered a registered organisations officer or employee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536e
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an officer (within the meaning of the Registered Organisations Act) of an organisation or branch of an organisation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal relationship between the subject and the organisation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: Each of the following is a registered organisations officer or employee:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an officer (within the meaning of the Registered Organisations Act) of an organisation or branch of an organisation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes the identity of the subject.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Each of the following is a registered organisations officer or employee:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an employee of an organisation or branch of an organisation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes the identity of the subject.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: Each of the following is a registered organisations officer or employee:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: an employee of an organisation or branch of an organisation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes the temporal relationship between the subject and the organisation.
modality: LTL
operator: occurs-before
premise text: Each of the following is a registered organisations officer or employee:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: LegalPerson
part of: 536E Meaning of registered organisations officer or employee

536F Giving a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536F(1) Giving a cash or in kind payment
has part: 536F(3) Giving a cash or in kind payment
has part: 536F(4) Giving a cash or in kind payment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536f
schema version: 2

536F(1) Giving a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
note: Providing cash or in-kind payment to an employee organisation or prohibited beneficiary is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536F Giving a cash or in kind payment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person (the defendant) commits an offence...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536F(1) Giving a cash or in kind payment

536F(3) Giving a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) of section 536F
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536F Giving a cash or in kind payment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536F(3) Giving a cash or in kind payment

536F(4) Giving a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
note: Definition of a cash or in kind payment
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536F Giving a cash or in kind payment

536G Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.356
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536G(1) Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
has part: 536G(2) Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536g
schema version: 2

536G(1) Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.356
note: Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment from an employee organisation's employer is prohibited.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536G Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536g-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536G(1) Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment

536G(2) Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.356
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain payments
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536g-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536G Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment

536H Implied freedom of political communication
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.357
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536H(1) Implied freedom of political communication
has part: 536H(2) Implied freedom of political communication
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536h
schema version: 2

536H(1) Implied freedom of political communication
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.357
note: Implies that the Division does not apply to any extent that infringes on implied freedom of political communication.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536H Implied freedom of political communication

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Division's applicability is limited by its potential infringement on implied freedom of political communication within a certain scope.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal interval relationship.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to the extent (if any) that it would infringe any constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Division's applicability is limited by its potential infringement on implied freedom of political communication within a certain scope.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the processing of knowledge or information.
modality: CogAI
operator: within
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to the extent (if any) that it would infringe any constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Division does not apply to any extent that infringes on implied freedom of political communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to the extent (if any) that it would infringe any constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Division's applicability is limited by its potential infringement on implied freedom of political communication within a certain scope.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the spread of information or influence.
modality: Diffusion
operator: within
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to the extent (if any) that it would infringe any constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Division's applicability is limited by its potential infringement on implied freedom of political communication within a certain scope.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes an ordered temporal interval relationship.
modality: LTL
operator: within
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to the extent (if any) that it would infringe any constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536H(1) Implied freedom of political communication

536H(2) Implied freedom of political communication
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.357
note: No limitation on section 15A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536H Implied freedom of political communication

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes limitation on section 15A
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

536J Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: Guide to this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536j-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536j
schema version: 2

536JA Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
note: Defines employee and employer terms for the Fair Work Act 2009.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ja-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ja
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ja-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JA Meaning of employee and employer

536JB Contravening a minimum standards order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359
note: Prohibition on contravening a minimum standards order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jb-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jb-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jb
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids contravention of a minimum standards order
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jb-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JB Contravening a minimum standards order

536JC The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JC(1) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
has part: 536JC(2) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jc
schema version: 2

536JC(1) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359
note: A minimum standards order does not impose obligations on a person, unless the order applies to the person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jc-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JC The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JC(1) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a

536JC(2) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359
note: A minimum standards order does not give a person an entitlement unless the order applies to the person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jc-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JC The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JC(2) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a

536JD When a minimum standards order applies to a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359
note: A minimum standards order applies to a regulated worker if it covers and is in operation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jd-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jd-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jd
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jd-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A minimum standards order applies to a regulated worker if it covers and is in operation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jd-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JD When a minimum standards order applies to a person

536JE When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.361
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JE(1) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
has part: 536JE(2) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
has part: 536JE(3) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536je
schema version: 2

536JE(1) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.361
note: A minimum standards order covers a regulated worker or business if expressed to do so.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536je-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JE When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JE(1) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker

536JE(2) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.361
note: A minimum standards order covers a regulated worker or business if it provides or has the effect of covering them under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536je-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JE When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The coverage is during the provision or effect of the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The order covers the worker or business if it provides or has the effect of covering them under certain conditions.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an implication from the provision or effect of the order to the coverage.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes implication relationship
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: The order provides or has the effect of covering the worker or business.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to cover the worker or business.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
premise text: The order provides or has the effect of covering the worker or business.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a diffusion from the provision or effect of the order to the coverage.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes conditional relationship
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: The order covers the worker or business if it provides or has the effect of covering them under certain conditions.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The coverage is until the provision or effect of the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The order covers the worker or business if it provides or has the effect of covering them under certain conditions.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JE(2) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker

536JE(3) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.361
note: Minimum standards order does not cover a regulated worker if any of Chapter 3A Minimum standards for regulated workers applies.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536je-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536JE When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minimum standards order does not cover a regulated worker if any of Chapter 3A Minimum standards for regulated workers applies.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JE(3) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker

536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JF(1) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(2) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(2A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(3) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(3A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(4) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(5) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(6) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(6A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(7) When a minimum standards order is in operation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jf
schema version: 2

536JF(1) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: Minimum standards order comes into operation on specified day.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation

536JF(2) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: Minimum standards order must not be made before specified day.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minimum standards order starts at specified day.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAt
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards order is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Minimum standards order implies a specific day for its commencement.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards order is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Minimum standards order inference engine infers a specific day for its commencement.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards order is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on making minimum standards order before specified day.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards order is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Minimum standards order propagates to all relevant parties on specified day.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards order is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JF(2) When a minimum standards order is in operation

536JF(2A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: Specifies a day for an employee-like worker minimum standards order that allows sufficient time for consultation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies a temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

536JF(3) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: Minimum standards order commencement delay
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

536JF(3A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: Specify a day not earlier than 6 months after the relevant notice of intent for the order was published, if circumstances urgently require it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify a day not earlier than 6 months after the relevant notice of intent for the order was published.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JF(3A) When a minimum standards order is in operation

536JF(4) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: Conditional commencement of a minimum standards order determination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation

536JF(5) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: Minimum standards orders operate until revoked
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Minimum standards orders operate until revoked

536JF(6) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: Minimum standards order continues in operation until revoked.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation

536JF(6A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: Relevant notice of intent for employee-like worker minimum standards order must be published at the same time as the draft.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-6a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish notice of intent at the same time as draft
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-6a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JF(6A) When a minimum standards order is in operation

536JF(7) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
note: Relevant notice of intent must be published at the same time as the draft order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice of intent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JF(7) When a minimum standards order is in operation

536JG When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JG(1) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
has part: 536JG(2) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jg
schema version: 2

536JG(1) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363
note: Guidelines cover regulated workers or businesses if they explicitly state so.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JG When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal coverage
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (1) Minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if the guidelines are expressed to cover the regulated worker or the regulated business.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence coverage
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: (1) Minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if the guidelines are expressed to cover the regulated worker or the regulated business.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed coverage
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) Minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if the guidelines are expressed to cover the regulated worker or the regulated business.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information coverage
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (1) Minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if the guidelines are expressed to cover the regulated worker or the regulated business.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal coverage
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (1) Minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if the guidelines are expressed to cover the regulated worker or the regulated business.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JG(1) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated

536JG(2) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363
note: Guidelines cover regulated workers or businesses under certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JG When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision of this Act.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) Minimum standards guidelines also cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the guidelines cover the regulated worker or the regulated business:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision of this Act.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (2) Minimum standards guidelines also cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the guidelines cover the regulated worker or the regulated business:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated worker or business must meet guidelines.
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
premise text: (2) Minimum standards guidelines also cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the guidelines cover the regulated worker or the regulated business:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision of this Act.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) Minimum standards guidelines also cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the guidelines cover the regulated worker or the regulated business:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision of this Act.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) Minimum standards guidelines also cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the guidelines cover the regulated worker or the regulated business:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JG(2) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated

536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JH(1) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
has part: 536JH(2) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
has part: 536JH(3) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
has part: 536JH(4) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
has part: 536JH(5) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jh
schema version: 2

536JH(1) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
note: Minimum standards guidelines come into operation on the specified day.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation

536JH(2) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
note: Minimum standards guidelines must not be earlier than the day they are made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on early implementation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards guidelines are made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JH(2) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation

536JH(3) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
note: Determination takes effect on specified day
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Determination takes effect during specified day
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

536JH(4) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
note: Minimum standards guidelines cannot be earlier than the day of determination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jh-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minimum standards guidelines cannot be earlier than the day of determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the determination is made.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JH(4) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation

536JH(5) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
note: Minimum standards guidelines continue in operation until revoked.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jh-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation

536JJ Contravening a collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
note: Prohibition on contravening a collective agreement term.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jj-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jj-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jj
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids action.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jj-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JJ Contravening a collective agreement

536JK The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JK(1) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
has part: 536JK(2) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jk
schema version: 2

536JK(1) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
note: A collective agreement imposes obligations on a person unless the agreement applies to the person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JK The significance of a collective agreement applying to a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) The agreement applies to the person if and only if the person is subject to the agreement during some time interval I.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: A and B overlap if there exists a time interval I such that A starts before I ends and I ends after B starts.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) Collective agreement does not impose obligations on a person, and a person does not contravene a term of a collective agreement, unless the agreement applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) The agreement is a rule that governs the behavior of persons if and only if every person is subject to the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: A is a subclass of B if A is an instance of B.
modality: CogAI
operator: IsA
premise text: (1) Collective agreement does not impose obligations on a person, and a person does not contravene a term of a collective agreement, unless the agreement applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (B) A collective agreement imposes obligations on a person unless the agreement applies to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A, then B.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (A) Collective agreement does not impose obligations on a person, and a person does not contravene a term of a collective agreement, unless the agreement applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) The agreement applies to all persons if and only if every person is subject to the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: A diffuses B if every instance of A is an instance of B.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) Collective agreement does not impose obligations on a person, and a person does not contravene a term of a collective agreement, unless the agreement applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2) The agreement imposes obligations on a person only during some time interval I.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: A holds until B if A starts before B ends.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) Collective agreement does not impose obligations on a person, and a person does not contravene a term of a collective agreement, unless the agreement applies to the person.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JK(1) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a

536JK(2) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
note: Entitlement requires application to the person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JK The significance of a collective agreement applying to a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires application for entitlement.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JK(2) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a

536JL When a collective agreement applies to a person
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
note: A collective agreement applies to a regulated worker if it covers and is in operation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jl-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jl-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jl
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The collective agreement applies to the regulated worker if it meets all conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Multiple conditions for applicability
modality: Deontic
operator: and
premise text: (a) The collective agreement covers the regulated worker; (b) The collective agreement is in operation; (c) No other provision of this Act provides, or has the effect, that the collective agreement does not apply to the regulated worker.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jl-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JL When a collective agreement applies to a person

536JM When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JM(1) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
has part: 536JM(2) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
has part: 536JM(3) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
has part: 536JM(4) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jm
schema version: 2

536JM(1) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
note: A collective agreement covers a regulated worker, business or organisation if the agreement is expressed to cover.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JM When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JM(1) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a

536JM(2) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
note: A collective agreement covers a regulated worker, business or organisation if it provides or has the effect that it covers them.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JM When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Coverage of regulated worker, business or organisation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provision of Act implies coverage
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: Provision of Act

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JM(2) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a

536JM(3) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
note: A collective agreement does not cover a regulated worker, business or organisation if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the agreement does not cover.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536JM When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JM(3) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a

536JM(4) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
note: Collective agreement no longer covers regulated worker, business or organisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jm-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536JM When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a collective agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover regulated worker, a regulated business or an organisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excludes collective agreement coverage during cessation period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Exclude
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a collective agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover regulated worker, a regulated business or an organisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes exclusion of collective agreement coverage during cessation period
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a collective agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover regulated worker, a regulated business or an organisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits collective agreement coverage
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a collective agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover regulated worker, a regulated business or an organisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses exclusion of collective agreement coverage during cessation period
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagate
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a collective agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover regulated worker, a regulated business or an organisation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring exclusion of collective agreement coverage during cessation period
modality: LTL
operator: Recur
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JM(4) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a

536JN When a collective agreement is in operation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
note: Collective agreement comes into operation on registration day or specified later day.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jn
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Collective agreement comes into operation on registration day or specified later day.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JN When a collective agreement is in operation

536JP Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.369
note: Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws from affecting regulated workers, businesses, or parties to services contracts.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jp
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes certain laws from affecting regulated entities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class/type/subclass hierarchies.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassHierarchy

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JP Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws

536JQ What are workplace relations matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JQ(1) What are workplace relations matters
has part: 536JQ(2) What are workplace relations matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jq
schema version: 2

536JQ(1) What are workplace relations matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
note: Defines workplace relations matters for the purposes of this Chapter.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jq-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JQ What are workplace relations matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JQ(1) What are workplace relations matters

536JQ(2) What are workplace relations matters
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
note: Exclusion of certain matters from workplace relations
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jq-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JQ What are workplace relations matters

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JQ(2) What are workplace relations matters

536JR What is an unfairness ground
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JR(1) What is an unfairness ground
has part: 536JR(2) What is an unfairness ground
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jr
schema version: 2

536JR(1) What is an unfairness ground
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
note: Unfairness grounds in relation to a services contract
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JR What is an unfairness ground

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grounds for unfairness
modality: Deontic
operator: is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JR(1) What is an unfairness ground

536JR(2) What is an unfairness ground
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
note: Grounds specified in subsection (1) are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JR What is an unfairness ground

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These grounds are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between grounds and non-workplace relations matters
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: Subsection (1) specifies grounds for unfairness

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These grounds are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of non-workplace relations matters through grounds
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: Subsection (1) specifies grounds for unfairness

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These grounds are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluding certain grounds from unfairness grounds
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
premise text: Subsection (1) specifies grounds for unfairness

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These grounds are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of non-workplace relations matters through grounds
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Subsection (1) specifies grounds for unfairness

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These grounds are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal containment of non-workplace relations matters within grounds
modality: LTL
operator: contains
premise text: Subsection (1) specifies grounds for unfairness

536JS Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JS(1) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
has part: 536JS(1A) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
has part: 536JS(2) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
has part: 536JS(3) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536js
schema version: 2

536JS(1) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
note: Minimum standards order prevails over State law to extent of inconsistency.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536js-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JS Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State law
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Overriding power
modality: Deontic
operator: >!
premise text: Minimum standards order

536JS(1A) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
note: Chapter applies to the exclusion of other laws affecting employee-like worker rights.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536js-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 536JS Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chapter applies to the exclusion of other laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JS(1A) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and

536JS(2) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
note: Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and Territory laws
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536js-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JS Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law is so specified;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Term applies to specified State or Territory law
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (a) a law of a State or Territory specified in regulations...

536JS(3) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
note: Reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument made pursuant to a law of a State or Territory
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536js-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536JS Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument made pursuant to a law of a State or Territory
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit class/type/subclass hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JS(3) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and

536JT Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JT(1) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
has part: 536JT(2) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
has part: 536JT(3) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
has part: 536JT(4) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jt
schema version: 2

536JT(1) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: Authorises collective agreements under specific circumstances.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JT Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows collective agreements
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

536JT(2) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: Authorisation of conduct for making collective agreements
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JT Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify and authorise conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection 51(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JT(2) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition

536JT(3) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jt-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536JT Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

536JT(4) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
note: Conduct is not specified in or specifically authorised by this Act if it satisfies certain conditions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jt-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536JT Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates permission to engage in conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: !

536JV Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
note: Sets minimum standards for regulated workers
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jv-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jv
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jv-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JV Guide to this Part

536JW Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
note: Defines employee and employer terms for minimum standards regulation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jw-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jw-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jw
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key terms with ordinary meanings.
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jw-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JW Meaning of employee and employer

536JX The minimum standards objective
type: Concept
description: clear and simple standards, fair and relevant standards, standards that recognize the perspectives of regulated workers, etc.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.377
note: The FWC must take into account the need for minimum standards for regulated workers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jx-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jx-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jx-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jx
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jx-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must take into account...
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jx-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The standards must be clear and simple.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

536JY Minimum standards orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536JY(1) Minimum standards orders
has part: 536JY(2) Minimum standards orders
has part: 536JY(3) Minimum standards orders
has part: 536JY(4) Minimum standards orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jy
schema version: 2

536JY(1) Minimum standards orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
note: FWC may make minimum standards orders for employee-like workers and regulated road transport contractors.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jy-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536JY Minimum standards orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JY(1) Minimum standards orders

536JY(2) Minimum standards orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
note: Minimum standards order for employee-like workers is an obligation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jy-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536JY Minimum standards orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: employee-like worker minimum standards order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of minimum standards order
modality: Deontic
operator: is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JY(2) Minimum standards orders

536JY(3) Minimum standards orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
note: A minimum standards order for regulated road transport contractors is a road transport minimum standards order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jy-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536JY Minimum standards orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: road transport minimum standards order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the type of obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JY(3) Minimum standards orders

536JY(4) Minimum standards orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
note: FWC may make minimum standards order on its own initiative or on application.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jy-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536JY Minimum standards orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make minimum standards order
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JY(4) Minimum standards orders

536JZ Applications for minimum standards orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
note: Organisations may apply for minimum standards orders
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536jz
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Organisations may apply for minimum standards orders
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536JZ Applications for minimum standards orders

536K Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536K(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
has part: 536K(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
has part: 536K(3) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
has part: 536K(4) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536k
schema version: 2

536K(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
description: Notice of intent, draft order
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
note: Publish notice of intent and draft proposed order before making employee-like worker minimum standards order. FWC must take into account certain matters when making a decision on employee-like worker minimum standards orders.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536K Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publish notice and draft before making order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536K(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

536K(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
note: Publish notice and draft order on website and other means. Consider persons included in class of employee-like workers
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536K Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Publishing requirement
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: PUBLISH

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a decision
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536K(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

536K(3) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
note: FWC must decide to refuse to consider an application if not satisfied about employee-like workers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536K Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must decide
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to decide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision-making process is about employee-like workers
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of FWC's decision-making process
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: FWC is responsible for making decisions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536K(3) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

536K(4) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
note: FWC must engage with parties and follow consultation process before making or varying employee-like worker minimum standards order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536k-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536K Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to engage with parties and follow consultation process.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536K(4) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

536KA Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KA(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
has part: 536KA(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ka
schema version: 2

536KA(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
note: FWC must take into account certain matters when making a road transport minimum standards order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ka-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KA Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC must take into account these matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between consideration and action
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport minimum standards order...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC must take into account these matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference from consideration to action
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport minimum standards order...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC must take into account these matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of AI systems in relation to consideration
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
premise text: (b) the FWC is considering making or varying a minimum standards order...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC must take into account these matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport minimum standards order...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the FWC must take into account these matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of consideration to other orders
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
premise text: (b) the FWC is considering making or varying a minimum standards order...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KA(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

536KA(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
note: FWC must consult parties and Road Transport Advisory Group before making or varying road transport minimum standards orders.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ka-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KA Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: FWC must have regard to commercial realities of the road transport industry.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (d) must have regard to the commercial realities of the road transport industry; and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult parties and Road Transport Advisory Group.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that making or varying the road transport minimum standards order will not unduly affect the viability and competitiveness of owner drivers or other similar persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (e) must be satisfied that making or varying the road transport minimum standards order will not unduly affect the viability and competitiveness of owner drivers or other similar persons.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC must consult parties to be covered.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) must not make or vary the road transport minimum standards order unless there has been genuine engagement with the parties to be covered; and

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KA(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a

536KB FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KB(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
has part: 536KB(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kb
schema version: 2

536KB(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
note: Publish a notice of intent and a draft of the proposed road transport minimum standards order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KB FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publish a notice of intent and a draft.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KB(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport

536KB(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
note: FWC must publish notice and draft on website and other means.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KB FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subject: FWC
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KB(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport

536KC Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KC(1) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
has part: 536KC(2) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
has part: 536KC(3) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kc
schema version: 2

536KC(1) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
note: Ensure affected entities have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KC Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure affected entities have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KC(1) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable

536KC(2) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
note: The FWC must publish submissions made to the FWC.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KC Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KC(2) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable

536KC(3) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
note: The FWC may decide not to publish confidential or commercially sensitive information.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536KC Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to withhold information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies information as confidential or commercially sensitive
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

536KD Hearings in relation to draft order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
note: The FWC may hold a hearing in relation to a draft order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kd-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kd
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kd-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KD Hearings in relation to draft order

536KE Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KE(1) Finalising draft order
has part: 536KE(2) Finalising draft order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ke
schema version: 2

536KE(1) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
note: The FWC may make changes to a draft order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ke-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KE Finalising draft order

536KE(2) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
note: If changes are significant, FWC must decide not to make order and publish revised draft.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ke-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KE Finalising draft order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: 12-month period of consultation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

536KF Decision not to make order based on the draft
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
note: Publish notice of decision on website and other means.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kf-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kf-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kf-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kf
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kf-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kf-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subdivision E—Decisions on minimum standards orders
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

536KG Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KG(1) Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
has part: 536KG(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kg
schema version: 2

536KG(1) Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
note: Decision on application for minimum standards order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KG Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision to refuse or make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: may

536KG(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
note: Refusal of application based on prioritisation direction
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KG Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal of application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Prioritisation direction

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KG(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders

536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KH(1) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
has part: 536KH(2) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
has part: 536KH(3) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
has part: 536KH(4) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
has part: 536KH(5) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kh
schema version: 2

536KH(1) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: Employee-like worker minimum standards order must include specific terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide specified terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KH(1) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker

536KH(2) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: Employee-like worker minimum standards order must cover specified digital labour platform operators and employee-like workers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision
modality: Deontic
operator: must

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy application
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: covers

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KH(2) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker

536KH(3) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: Specify digital labour platform operators responsible for employee-like worker entitlements.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify digital labour platform operators
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KH(3) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker

536KH(4) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: Digital labour platform operators and employee-like workers must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or classes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kh-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A requirement exists for digital labour platform operators and employee-like workers to be specified.
modality: Deontic
operator: requirement

536KH(5) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
note: Class description must include industry or sector reference
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kh-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Class description requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: must include

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KH(5) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker

536KJ Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KJ(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
has part: 536KJ(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
has part: 536KJ(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
has part: 536KJ(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kj
schema version: 2

536KJ(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
type: Concept
description: (a) the work in the road transport industry covered by the road transport minimum standards order; (b) the regulated road transport contractors covered by the road transport minimum standards order; (c) the road transport businesses covered by the road transport minimum standards order.
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
note: Must include terms in road transport minimum standards order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KJ Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Covers work in road transport industry
modality: AllenInterval
operator: COVERS
premise text: (a) the work in the road transport industry covered by the road transport minimum standards order.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must include terms
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) the work in the road transport industry covered by the road transport minimum standards order; (b) the regulated road transport contractors covered by the road transport minimum standards order; (c) the road transport businesses covered by the road transport minimum standards order.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must include terms
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) the road transport businesses covered by the road transport minimum standards order.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Covers regulated road transport contractors
modality: LTL
operator: COVERS
premise text: (b) the regulated road transport contractors covered by the road transport minimum standards order.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KJ(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum

536KJ(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
note: Must include specified road transport businesses and contractors in a minimum standards order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KJ Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KJ(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum

536KJ(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
note: Road transport businesses must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or classes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kj-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536KJ Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be specified
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KJ(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum

536KJ(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
note: Class description may be by reference to industry or sector
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kj-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536KJ Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KJ(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum

536KK Term about settling disputes must be included in a
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
note: A minimum standards order must include a term that provides a procedure for settling disputes about any matters arising under the order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kk-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kk-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kk
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a procedure for settling disputes
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kk-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KK Term about settling disputes must be included in a

536KL Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KL(1) Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
has part: 536KL(2) Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kl
schema version: 2

536KL(1) Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
note: Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kl-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KL Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with record-keeping in relation to matters covered by the Act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlapsWith
premise text: (d) record-keeping in relation to matters covered by or required by this Act, or by an order or instrument made under this Act, being matters that concern regulated workers or regulated businesses;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes terms about payment terms, deductions, etc.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Occurs during the implementation of minimum standards orders
modality: LTL
operator: occursDuring
premise text: (1) A minimum standards order may include terms about any of the following matters:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KL(1) Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order

536KL(2) Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
note: No limitation on terms in minimum standards order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kl-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KL Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order

536KM Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KM(1) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
has part: 536KM(3) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536km
schema version: 2

536KM(1) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
note: Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards order Terms about penalty rates, payment for time before or between engagements, and minimum engagement periods must not be included in an employee-like worker minimum standards order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536km-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KM Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal exclusion for certain matters
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal exclusion
premise text: (f) a matter prescribed by the regulations, or belonging to a class of matter prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Excluded matters are excluded from the scope of the minimum standards order
modality: Argumentation
operator: exclusion
premise text: (a) overtime rates; (b) rostering arrangements; (c) matters that are primarily of a commercial nature that do not affect the terms and conditions of engagement of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order; (d) a term that would change the form of the engagement or the status of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order including, but not limited to, a term that deems a regulated worker to be an employee; (e) a matter relating to work health and safety that is otherwise comprehensively dealt with by a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excluded matters are classified as such
modality: CogAI
operator: classification
premise text: (a) overtime rates; (b) rostering arrangements; (c) matters that are primarily of a commercial nature that do not affect the terms and conditions of engagement of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order; (d) a term that would change the form of the engagement or the status of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order including, but not limited to, a term that deems a regulated worker to be an employee; (e) a matter relating to work health and safety that is otherwise comprehensively dealt with by a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of certain terms
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: These terms must not be included.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of specific terms
modality: Deontic
operator: forbidden
premise text: The state prohibits the inclusion of these terms.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excluded matters are diffused throughout the minimum standards order
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: (a) overtime rates; (b) rostering arrangements; (c) matters that are primarily of a commercial nature that do not affect the terms and conditions of engagement of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order; (d) a term that would change the form of the engagement or the status of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order including, but not limited to, a term that deems a regulated worker to be an employee; (e) a matter relating to work health and safety that is otherwise comprehensively dealt with by a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KM(1) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards

536KM(3) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
note: Regulations may specify matters not covered by Commonwealth, State or Territory laws.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536km-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536KM Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may specify matters not covered by laws.
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KM(3) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards

536KN Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KN(1) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
has part: 536KN(2) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kn
schema version: 2

536KN(1) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: Cannot include certain matters in a road transport minimum standards order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kn-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KN Further terms that must not be included in a road transport

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excludes certain matters from being included in a road transport minimum standards order due to temporal overlap.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: (b) a matter prescribed by the regulations, or belonging to a class of matter prescribed by the regulations.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies certain matters as prohibited in a road transport minimum standards order using artificial intelligence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (a) a matter relating to road transport that is otherwise comprehensively dealt with: (i) by the Heavy Vehicle National Law as set out in the Schedule to the Heavy Vehicle National Law Act 2012 (Qld); or (ii) by another law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits including certain matters in a road transport minimum standards order.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) In addition to the matters in section 536KM, a road transport minimum standards order must not include terms about any of the following matters:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excludes certain matters from being included in a road transport minimum standards order due to temporal overlap.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: (b) a matter prescribed by the regulations, or belonging to a class of matter prescribed by the regulations.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excludes certain matters from being included in a road transport minimum standards order due to temporal overlap.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: (b) a matter prescribed by the regulations, or belonging to a class of matter prescribed by the regulations.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KN(1) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport

536KN(2) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
note: Regulations may specify matters dealt with comprehensively by the Heavy Vehicle National Law.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kn-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KN Further terms that must not be included in a road transport

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Schedule to the Heavy Vehicle National Law Act 2012 (Qld)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
premise text: Heavy Vehicle National Law Act 2012 (Qld)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on including certain matters in regulations
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b):

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Schedule to the Heavy Vehicle National Law Act 2012 (Qld)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Heavy Vehicle National Law Act 2012 (Qld)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KN(2) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport

536KO Achieving the minimum standards objective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
note: Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ko-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ko
schema version: 2

536KP Applications to vary or revoke minimum standards orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
note: Organisations and businesses can apply for a determination to vary or revoke minimum standards orders.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kp-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kp-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kp
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows the FWC to vary or revoke minimum standards orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kp-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KP Applications to vary or revoke minimum standards orders

536KQ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards orders if
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
note: FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards orders if consistent with the minimum standards objective.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kq-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kq
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kq-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KQ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards orders if

536KR Minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KR(1) Minimum standards guidelines
has part: 536KR(2) Minimum standards guidelines
has part: 536KR(3) Minimum standards guidelines
has part: 536KR(4) Minimum standards guidelines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kr
schema version: 2

536KR(1) Minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
note: The FWC may make minimum standards guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KR Minimum standards guidelines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KR(1) Minimum standards guidelines

536KR(2) Minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
note: Minimum standards guidelines for employee-like workers are employee-like worker guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KR Minimum standards guidelines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide minimum standards guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KR(2) Minimum standards guidelines

536KR(3) Minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
note: Minimum standards guidelines for regulated road transport contractors are road transport guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kr-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536KR Minimum standards guidelines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide minimum standards guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) Minimum standards guidelines for regulated road transport contractors are road transport guidelines.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KR(3) Minimum standards guidelines

536KR(4) Minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
note: FWC may make minimum standards guidelines under this section
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kr-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536KR Minimum standards guidelines

536KS Applications for minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
note: Organisations and businesses may apply for minimum standards guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ks
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Organisations and businesses may apply for minimum standards guidelines.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isA

536KT Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KT(1) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
has part: 536KT(2) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
has part: 536KT(3) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kt
schema version: 2

536KT(1) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
note: This section applies to a decision to make or vary employee-like worker guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KT Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The section applies to a decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KT(1) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker

536KT(2) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
note: Consider persons included in class of employee-like workers before making a decision under section 536KU.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KT Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC considers whether, on the whole, the persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of persons included in class of employee-like workers
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC recognizes whether, on the whole, the persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of persons included in class of employee-like workers
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC MUST consider whether, on the whole, the persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider persons included in class of employee-like workers
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Consider persons included in class of employee-like workers is a requirement for decision-making under section 536KU
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC considers whether, on the whole, the persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of consideration to persons included in class of employee-like workers
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The FWC considers whether, on the whole, the persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring consideration of persons included in class of employee-like workers
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KT(2) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker

536KT(3) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
note: FWC must decide to refuse or not consider the application
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kt-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536KT Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must decide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class of employee-like workers
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KT(3) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker

536KU Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KU(1) Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
has part: 536KU(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ku
schema version: 2

536KU(1) Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
note: The FWC may decide to refuse, make, or not make minimum standards guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ku-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KU Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The FWC may decide to refuse, make, or not make minimum standards guidelines.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may decide to refuse, make, or not make minimum standards guidelines.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

536KU(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
note: Refusal of application based on prioritisation direction
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ku-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KU Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal of application
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Prioritisation direction

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KU(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines

536KV Minimum standards guidelines not to be made if a minimum
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
note: No minimum standards guidelines can be made for regulated workers and businesses under the same matters as an existing order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kv
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During the operation of an existing order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KV Minimum standards guidelines not to be made if a minimum

536KW Terms that must be included in minimum standards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
note: Minimum standards guidelines must include specific terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kw-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kw-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kw
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kw-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KW Terms that must be included in minimum standards

536KX Terms that may be included in minimum standards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
note: Terms that may be included in minimum standards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kx-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kx-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kx
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kx-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation/Prohibition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the type of obligation or prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: None

536KY Terms that must not be included in minimum standards
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
note: Terms that must not be included in minimum standards
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ky-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ky
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ky-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KY Terms that must not be included in minimum standards

536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536KZ(1) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
has part: 536KZ(2) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
has part: 536KZ(3) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
has part: 536KZ(4) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
has part: 536KZ(5) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
has part: 536KZ(6) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kz
schema version: 2

536KZ(1) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
note: FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if consistent with certain objectives.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC's decision and objectives
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking minimum standards guidelines if the FWC is satisfied that making the determination is consistent with:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Use of artificial intelligence in FWC's decision-making process
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: (b) if the President considers that the determination might relate to the road transport industry—the road transport objective.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allowance of variation or revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of FWC's decision to related objectives
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: (b) if the President considers that the determination might relate to the road transport industry—the road transport objective.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC's decision and objectives
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking minimum standards guidelines if the FWC is satisfied that making the determination is consistent with:

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KZ(1) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

536KZ(2) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
note: FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allowance of variation in minimum standards guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KZ(2) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

536KZ(3) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
note: FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if necessary.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KZ(3) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

536KZ(4) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
note: FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to vary or revoke guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KZ(4) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

536KZ(5) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
note: FWC must revoke minimum standards guidelines upon operation of minimum standards order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to revoke guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KZ(5) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

536KZ(6) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
note: FWC must vary minimum standards guidelines if a new order is made
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to vary guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536KZ(6) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if

536L Applications to vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
note: Organisations and businesses may apply for a determination varying or revoking minimum standards guidelines.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536l-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536l-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536l
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to apply for a determination
modality: Deontic
operator: May

536LB Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
note: Guides this Part about unfair deactivation and termination of services contracts.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lb
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LB Guide to this Part

536LC Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536LC(1) Object of this Part
has part: 536LC(2) Object of this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lc
schema version: 2

536LC(1) Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
note: Establishes a framework for dealing with unfair deactivation and termination of regulated workers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536LC Object of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a framework for dealing with unfair deactivation and termination.
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LC(1) Object of this Part

536LC(2) Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
note: Ensure a fair go all round for regulated businesses and workers
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536LC Object of this Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure a fair go all round
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LC(2) Object of this Part

536LD When a person is protected from unfair deactivation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Protection from unfair deactivation for employees-like workers
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ld
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Eligible for protection
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Regular work period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: 6 months of regular work

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Protection from unfair deactivation for employees-like workers
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Protected from unfair deactivation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Employee-like worker

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LD When a person is protected from unfair deactivation

536LE When a person is protected from unfair termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
note: Protection from unfair termination for regulated road transport contractors
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536le
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period of service is at least 6 months.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The person has been performing work in the road transport industry under a services contract for at least 6 months.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is an obligation to protect the person from unfair termination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A person is protected from unfair termination at a time if...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LE When a person is protected from unfair termination

536LF What is an unfair deactivation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427
note: A person has been unfairly deactivated if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lf
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC is satisfied that the person has been unfairly deactivated
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must have reason to believe
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: the person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the deactivation was unfair
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must not have reason to believe the person has been unfairly deactivated
modality: Deontic
operator: must-not
premise text: the FWC is satisfied that the person has been unfairly deactivated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the FWC is satisfied that the person has been unfairly deactivated
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must have reason to believe the person has been unfairly deactivated
modality: Deontic
operator: must-have
premise text: the person has been unfairly deactivated

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the deactivation was unfair
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must have reason to believe the deactivation was unfair
modality: Deontic
operator: must-have
premise text: the deactivation was not consistent with the Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LF What is an unfair deactivation

536LG Meaning of deactivated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427
note: A person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-ltl-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lg
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The period during which the person was deactivated
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval during which the person was deactivated
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
premise text: A person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform if: (a) the person performed digital platform work through or by means of the digital labour platform; and (b) the digital labour platform operator modified, suspended, or terminated the person’s access to the digital labour platform; and (c) the person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract, or the ability of the person to do so is so significantly altered that in effect the person is no longer able to perform such work.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The digital labour platform operator has a duty to deactivate the person
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the obligation as a duty of the digital labour platform operator
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: A person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform if: (a) the person performed digital platform work through or by means of the digital labour platform; and (b) the digital labour platform operator modified, suspended, or terminated the person’s access to the digital labour platform; and (c) the person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract, or the ability of the person to do so is so significantly altered that in effect the person is no longer able to perform such work.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the person as deactivated based on conditions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The person performed digital platform work through or by means of the digital labour platform.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the digital labour platform operator as responsible for modifying, suspending, or terminating access
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The digital labour platform operator modified, suspended, or terminated the person’s access to the digital labour platform.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the person as unable to perform work due to significant alteration of ability
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: The person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract, or the ability of the person to do so is so significantly altered that in effect the person is no longer able to perform such work.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conditions imply that the person was deactivated
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the conditions and the consequence of being deactivated
modality: LTL
operator: <
premise text: A person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform if: (a) the person performed digital platform work through or by means of the digital labour platform; and (b) the digital labour platform operator modified, suspended, or terminated the person’s access to the digital labour platform; and (c) the person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract, or the ability of the person to do so is so significantly altered that in effect the person is no longer able to perform such work.

536LH Criteria for considering whether a deactivation was unfair
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427
note: Criteria for considering whether a deactivation was unfair
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lh-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lh
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lh-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LH Criteria for considering whether a deactivation was unfair

536LJ Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536LJ(1) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
has part: 536LJ(2) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
has part: 536LJ(2A) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
has part: 536LJ(2B) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lj
schema version: 2

536LJ(1) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
note: Minister must make Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536LJ Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make code
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

536LJ(2) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
note: Minister must deal with specified matters in the Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536LJ Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must deal with specified matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LJ(2) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation

536LJ(2A) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
note: Public consultation requirement before code development
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lj-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 536LJ Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct public consultation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

536LJ(2B) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
note: Variation or revocation of Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lj-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 536LJ Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation

536LK What is an unfair termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: Termination is unfair if it does not comply with the Road Transport Industry Termination Code.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lk-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lk
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lk-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LK What is an unfair termination

536LL Meaning of terminated
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
note: Terminated person performed work as a regulated road transport contractor under a services contract.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ll-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ll
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ll-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LL Meaning of terminated

536LM Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536LM(1) Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
has part: 536LM(2) Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lm
schema version: 2

536LM(1) Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
note: Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536LM Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LM(1) Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair

536LM(2) Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
note: Termination due to serious misconduct is not considered unfair.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536LM Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for consideration of termination fairness.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1) and any other provision of this Part, a termination that occurs because of serious misconduct of the person who was deactivated is not unfair.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines termination fairness consideration.
modality: CogAI
operator: AppliesTo
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1) and any other provision of this Part, a termination that occurs because of serious misconduct of the person who was deactivated is not unfair.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits termination due to serious misconduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1) and any other provision of this Part, a termination that occurs because of serious misconduct of the person who was deactivated is not unfair.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applies to termination fairness consideration.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1) and any other provision of this Part, a termination that occurs because of serious misconduct of the person who was deactivated is not unfair.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines termination condition for unfairness consideration.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1) and any other provision of this Part, a termination that occurs because of serious misconduct of the person who was deactivated is not unfair.

536LN Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536LN(1) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
has part: 536LN(2) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
has part: 536LN(3) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ln
schema version: 2

536LN(1) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
note: Minister has permission to make a code.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ln-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536LN Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission

536LN(2) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
note: Matters that must be dealt with in the Road Transport Industry Termination Code
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ln-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536LN Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination

536LN(3) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
note: Regulated road transport business must meet minimum standards for workers before termination.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ln-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536LN Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated road transport business must meet minimum standards.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LN(3) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination

536LP When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536LP(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
has part: 536LP(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
has part: 536LP(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lp
schema version: 2

536LP(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
note: The FWC may order a person's reactivation if certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536LP When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LP(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation

536LP(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
note: The FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation if an application under section 536LU is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536LP When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may order remedy.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LP(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation

536LP(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
note: FWC cannot order payment of compensation to the person.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536LP When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on ordering compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LP(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation

536LQ Remedy—reactivation etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
note: Digital labour platform operator must restore person to previous position after reactivation order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lq-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lq-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lq
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Digital labour platform operator must restore person to previous position
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

536LR When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536LR(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
has part: 536LR(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
has part: 536LR(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lr
schema version: 2

536LR(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
note: FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536LR When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide remedy
modality: Deontic
operator: may

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LR(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination

536LR(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
note: The FWC may order remedy for unfair termination if an application under section 536LU is made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536LR When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may order remedy.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LR(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination

536LR(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
note: FWC must consider payment of compensation before ordering it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lr-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536LR When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must consider payment of compensation before ordering it.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider payment of compensation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must not order the payment of compensation to the person unless...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LR(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination

536LS Remedy—new contract, etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536LS(1) Remedy—new contract, etc.
has part: 536LS(2) Remedy—new contract, etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ls
schema version: 2

536LS(1) Remedy—new contract, etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
note: Road transport business must enter into a new contract in the same terms as the services contract.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ls-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536LS Remedy—new contract, etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to enter into a new contract
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LS(1) Remedy—new contract, etc.

536LS(2) Remedy—new contract, etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
note: If road transport business is no longer a road transport business, an associated entity must be a road transport business.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ls-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536LS Remedy—new contract, etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) an associated entity of the road transport business is a road transport business;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (a) the road transport business at the time of the termination is no longer a road transport business;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LS(2) Remedy—new contract, etc.

536LT Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536LT(1) Remedy—compensation
has part: 536LT(2) Remedy—compensation
has part: 536LT(3) Remedy—compensation
has part: 536LT(4) Remedy—compensation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lt
schema version: 2

536LT(1) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
note: Compensation order must pay compensation to a person in lieu of entering into a new services contract.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536LT Remedy—compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LT(1) Remedy—compensation

536LT(2) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
note: FWC must consider various circumstances when determining compensation amount.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536LT Remedy—compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to consider circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LT(2) Remedy—compensation

536LT(3) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
note: Reduce compensation amount by an appropriate amount on account of misconduct.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lt-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536LT Remedy—compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between FWC's satisfaction and reduction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must reduce compensation amount.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

536LT(4) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
note: No compensation for emotional harm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lt-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536LT Remedy—compensation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits compensation for emotional harm
modality: Deontic
operator: !

536LU Application for unfair deactivation or unfair termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
note: Application for unfair deactivation or unfair termination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lu-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lu-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lu
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to apply for remedy
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo

536LV Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536LV(1) Application fees
has part: 536LV(2) Application fees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lv
schema version: 2

536LV(1) Application fees
type: Concept
description: Fee
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536LV Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay the fee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LV(1) Application fees

536LV(2) Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
note: Application fee regulation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536LV Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires payment of application fee
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LV(2) Application fees

536LW Initial matters to be considered before merits
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
note: Consideration of specific matters before merits consideration
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lw-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lw-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lw
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Matters to be considered before merits consideration
modality: Deontic
operator: mustConsider

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lw-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LW Initial matters to be considered before merits

536LX Matters involving contested facts
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
note: Must conduct a conference or hold a hearing if facts are in dispute.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lx
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if, and to the extent that...,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for conducting a conference or holding a hearing.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The FWC must conduct a conference or hold a hearing in relation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if, and to the extent that...,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of the provision as an obligation.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: The FWC must conduct a conference or hold a hearing in relation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if, and to the extent that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct a conference or hold a hearing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The FWC must...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if, and to the extent that...,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional obligation to conduct a conference or hold a hearing.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
premise text: The FWC must conduct a conference or hold a hearing in relation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if, and to the extent that...,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for conducting a conference or holding a hearing.
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The FWC must conduct a conference or hold a hearing in relation...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LX Matters involving contested facts

536LY Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536LY(1) Conferences
has part: 536LY(2) Conferences
has part: 536LY(3) Conferences
has part: 536LY(4) Conferences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ly
schema version: 2

536LY(1) Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
note: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part if the FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ly-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536LY Conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to a matter arising under this Part if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: This section applies...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: the FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LY(1) Conferences

536LY(2) Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
note: The FWC must conduct a private conference.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ly-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536LY Conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LY(2) Conferences

536LY(3) Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
note: Consider circumstances of parties to matter when considering application and informing self.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ly-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536LY Conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in: considering the application; and informing itself in relation to the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consider temporal intervals of circumstances of parties to matter.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: consider
premise text: (3) The FWC must take into account any difference in the circumstances of the parties to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in: considering the application; and informing itself in relation to the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classify circumstances of parties to matter using CogAI.
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
premise text: (3) The FWC must take into account any difference in the circumstances of the parties to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in: considering the application; and informing itself in relation to the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider circumstances of parties to matter.
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: (3) The FWC must take into account any difference in the circumstances of the parties to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in: considering the application; and informing itself in relation to the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consider diffusion of circumstances of parties to matter.
modality: Diffusion
operator: consider
premise text: (3) The FWC must take into account any difference in the circumstances of the parties to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in: considering the application; and informing itself in relation to the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Consider temporal intervals of circumstances of parties to matter.
modality: LTL
operator: consider
premise text: (3) The FWC must take into account any difference in the circumstances of the parties to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LY(3) Conferences

536LY(4) Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
note: FWC must consider parties' wishes when processing applications.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ly-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536LY Conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: FWC's actions are contained within consideration of parties' wishes.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) The FWC must take into account the wishes of the parties to the matter...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Parties' wishes imply FWC's actions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (4) The FWC must take into account the wishes of the parties to the matter...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: FWC's AI system requires consideration of parties' wishes.
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
premise text: (4) The FWC must take into account the wishes of the parties to the matter...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory consideration of parties' wishes.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) The FWC must take into account the wishes of the parties to the matter...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: FWC's consideration of parties' wishes spreads to other actions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (4) The FWC must take into account the wishes of the parties to the matter...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536LY(4) Conferences

536LZ Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536LZ(1) Hearings
has part: 536LZ(2) Hearings
has part: 536LZ(3) Hearings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lz
schema version: 2

536LZ(1) Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
note: No hearing unless FWC considers it appropriate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lz-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536LZ Hearings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not hold a hearing
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: FWC must hold a hearing

536LZ(2) Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
note: FWC may decide not to hold a hearing in relation to parts of the matter.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lz-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536LZ Hearings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to decide not to hold a hearing.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

536LZ(3) Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
note: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing at any time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536lz-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536LZ Hearings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

536M Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536M(1) Dismissing applications
has part: 536M(2) Dismissing applications
has part: 536M(3) Dismissing applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536m
schema version: 2

536M(1) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: Dismissal of applications for orders under Division 4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536M Dismissing applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may not dismiss applications
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

536M(2) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: FWC may exercise its power on application by a regulated business.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536M Dismissing applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may exercise its power
modality: Deontic
operator: May

536M(3) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: The FWC may dismiss an application at any time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536m-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536M Dismissing applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC has the power to dismiss an application.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: If the FWC may dismiss an application, it must do so.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: →

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536M(3) Dismissing applications

536MA Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MA(1) Appeal rights
has part: 536MA(2) Appeal rights
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ma
schema version: 2

536MA(1) Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: FWC cannot grant permission to appeal from a decision unless in the public interest.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ma-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MA Appeal rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of granting permission to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

536MA(2) Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: Appeal rights limited to questions of fact
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ma-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MA Appeal rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits appeal rights
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 604(1), an appeal...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MA(2) Appeal rights

536MB Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MB(1) Costs orders against parties
has part: 536MB(2) Costs orders against parties
has part: 536MB(3) Costs orders against parties
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mb
schema version: 2

536MB(1) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: Order for costs against a party to a matter arising under this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MB Costs orders against parties

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MB(1) Costs orders against parties

536MB(2) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: The FWC may make an order only if the other party applies for it.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MB Costs orders against parties

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Only if the other party applies for it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
premise text: The FWC may make an order.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MB(2) Costs orders against parties

536MB(3) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
note: No limitation on FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MB Costs orders against parties

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MB(3) Costs orders against parties

536MC Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MC(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 536MC(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 536MC(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 536MC(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mc
schema version: 2

536MC(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
note: Duty to seek permission before engaging a representative
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MC Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must seek permission before engaging a representative.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to seek permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) an application for an unfair deactivation or unfair termination remedy has been made under section 536LU; and (b) a person who is a party to the matter has engaged a lawyer or paid agent (the representative) to represent the person in the matter;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MC(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

536MC(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
note: FWC may order costs against a representative for causing costs to be incurred by the other party.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MC Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MC(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

536MC(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
note: FWC must obtain consent from other party before making costs order
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MC Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order under section 536MC(3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must obtain consent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 536MD

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MC(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

536MC(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
note: Limitation on FWC's power to order costs
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536MC Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits FWC's power
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MC(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents

536MD Applications for costs orders
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.444
note: Application for costs order must be made within 14 days after FWC determines matter or matter is discontinued.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536md-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536md-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536md
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536md-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within specified timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536md-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MD Applications for costs orders

536ME Schedule of costs
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.444
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536ME(1) Schedule of costs
has part: 536ME(2) Schedule of costs
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536me
schema version: 2

536ME(1) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.444
note: Prescribing schedule of costs for certain expenditures
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536me-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536ME Schedule of costs

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to prescribe schedule of costs
modality: Deontic
operator: may

536ME(2) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.444
note: Must not award costs in relation to an item at a rate or of an amount exceeding the rate or amount appearing in the schedule.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536me-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536ME Schedule of costs

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits awarding costs exceeding the rate or amount in the schedule.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

536MF Security for costs
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.444
note: Security for costs may be provided
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mf-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mf
schema version: 2

536MG Contravening orders under this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
note: Must not contravene a term of an order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mg-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mg-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mg
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening orders.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mg-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MG Contravening orders under this Part

536MH Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446
note: Defines collective agreements and their scope.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mh-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mh
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mh-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MH Guide to this Part

536MJ Object of this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446
note: Object of this Part is to provide a simple, flexible and fair framework that enables collective agreements to be made by consent for employee-like workers; regulated road transport contractors.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mj-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mj
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mj-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MJ Object of this Part

536MK Making a collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MK(1) Making a collective agreement
has part: 536MK(2) Making a collective agreement
has part: 536MK(3) Making a collective agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mk
schema version: 2

536MK(1) Making a collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
note: Regulated business must make a collective agreement with an organisation representing industrial interests of workers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mk-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MK Making a collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated business must make a collective agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MK(1) Making a collective agreement

536MK(2) Making a collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
note: Collective agreement may be made between a digital labour platform operator and an organisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mk-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MK Making a collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The entities are classified as such.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the entities involved in the collective agreement.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: A digital labour platform operator and an organisation are parties to a collective agreement.

536MK(3) Making a collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
note: A collective agreement may be made between a road transport business and an organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of one or more regulated road transport contractors.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mk-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MK Making a collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May be made
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MK(3) Making a collective agreement

536ML Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536ML(1) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
has part: 536ML(2) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ml
schema version: 2

536ML(1) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: Entities must give a notice under this section for a proposed collective agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ml-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536ML Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entities must give a notice under this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536ML(1) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective

536ML(2) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
type: Concept
description: yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
note: A consultation notice for a proposed collective agreement must specify certain matters.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ml-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536ML Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of regulated workers and businesses
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536ML(2) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective

536MM Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MM(1) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
has part: 536MM(2) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
has part: 536MM(3) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mm
schema version: 2

536MM(1) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
note: Consultation notice must be given to FWC and/or relevant organisation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mm-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MM Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Consultation notice must be given

536MM(2) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
note: Notify FWC and negotiating entities of consultation notice.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mm-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MM Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation notice is given to the entity to which it is directed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The notifying entity must notify FWC and negotiating entities.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MM(2) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.

536MM(3) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
note: Publish consultation notice on FWC's website.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mm-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MM Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must publish consultation notice on FWC's website.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

536MN Notice to be given to regulated workers
type: Concept
description: true
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
note: Must provide notice under Chapter 3A minimum standards for regulated workers
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mn-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mn-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mn
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mn-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MN Notice to be given to regulated workers

536MP Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MP(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
has part: 536MP(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
has part: 536MP(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mp
schema version: 2

536MP(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: Neither party can apply to the FWC for dispute resolution.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MP Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on applying to the FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MP(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute

536MP(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: FWC must deal with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MP Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must deal with the dispute
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MP(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute

536MP(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: FWC may dismiss an application if no reasonable prospects of collective agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MP Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC can dismiss an application
modality: Deontic
operator: can

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MP(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute

536MQ Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MQ(1) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
has part: 536MQ(2) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
has part: 536MQ(3) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mq
schema version: 2

536MQ(1) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: Request to sign an agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MQ Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity

536MQ(2) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: Request must not be made earlier than 30 days after notice was given to employee-like worker or regulated road transport contractor.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MQ Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not be made earlier than 30 days after the last day...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Request timing overlaps with notice period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) must not...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not be made earlier than 30 days after the last day...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on making request earlier than specified period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) must not be made...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must be made after the last day on which a notice was given...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request timing is dependent on notice period.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustBeMadeAfter
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) must not...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not be made earlier than 30 days after the last day...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Request timing overlaps with notice period.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) must not...

536MQ(3) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
note: Both negotiating parties must sign the agreement for a collective agreement to be made.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mq-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MQ Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for collective agreement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Both parties must sign the agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

536MR Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MR(1) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
has part: 536MR(2) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
has part: 536MR(3) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
has part: 536MR(4) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mr
schema version: 2

536MR(1) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
note: Application for registration of collective agreement
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mr-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MR Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MR(1) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement

536MR(2) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
type: Concept
description: signed copy of the collective agreement
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
note: Application must be accompanied by a signed copy of the collective agreement identifying regulated business, organisation, and class of workers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mr-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MR Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be provided
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Collective agreement identifies regulated business, organisation, and class of workers
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MR(2) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement

536MR(3) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
type: Concept
description: declaration, explanation, notice
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
note: Application must be accompanied by a declaration signed by the regulated business and the organisation covered by the collective agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mr-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MR Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration must be signed by the regulated business and the organisation covered by the collective agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The declaration must state that the regulated business and the organisation explained the terms of the agreement and their effect to the regulated workers covered by the agreement.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MR(3) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement

536MR(4) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
note: Application must be accompanied by required declaration.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mr-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536MR Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide required declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MR(4) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement

536MS FWC must register collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MS(1) FWC must register collective agreement
has part: 536MS(2) FWC must register collective agreement
has part: 536MS(3) FWC must register collective agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ms
schema version: 2

536MS(1) FWC must register collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
note: FWC must register collective agreement if requirements are met
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ms-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MS FWC must register collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MS(1) FWC must register collective agreement

536MS(2) FWC must register collective agreement
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
note: The FWC must register a collective agreement that includes a procedure for settling disputes.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ms-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MS FWC must register collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC must register a collective agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The collective agreement includes a procedure for settling disputes.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MS(2) FWC must register collective agreement

536MS(3) FWC must register collective agreement
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
note: FWC must register collective agreement with specified terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ms-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MS FWC must register collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to register collective agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Collective agreement must include specified terms
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MS(3) FWC must register collective agreement

536MT Application for variation of a collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MT(1) Application for variation of a collective agreement
has part: 536MT(2) Application for variation of a collective agreement
has part: 536MT(3) Application for variation of a collective agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mt
schema version: 2

536MT(1) Application for variation of a collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
note: Application for variation of a collective agreement is allowed
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mt-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MT Application for variation of a collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application for variation of a collective agreement is allowed
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MT(1) Application for variation of a collective agreement

536MT(2) Application for variation of a collective agreement
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
note: Must provide signed copy of collective agreement with specified information.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mt-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MT Application for variation of a collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) the organisation covered by the collective agreement;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identify regulated business, organisation, and class of workers
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
premise text: (a) the regulated business covered by the collective agreement;

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Identify class of regulated workers
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
premise text: (c) the class of regulated workers covered by the collective agreement as proposed to be varied.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MT(2) Application for variation of a collective agreement

536MT(3) Application for variation of a collective agreement
type: Concept
description: Declaration with explanation of terms and effect on workers
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
note: Application must be accompanied by a declaration signed by the regulated business and organisation.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mt-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MT Application for variation of a collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration must be signed by regulated business and organisation
modality: Deontic
operator: >

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

536MU FWC must vary collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MU(1) FWC must vary collective agreement
has part: 536MU(1A) FWC must vary collective agreement
has part: 536MU(2) FWC must vary collective agreement
has part: 536MU(3) FWC must vary collective agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mu
schema version: 2

536MU(1) FWC must vary collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
note: FWC must register a varied collective agreement if requirements are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MU FWC must vary collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to register a varied collective agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MU(1) FWC must vary collective agreement

536MU(1A) FWC must vary collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
note: FWC must consider public interest when varying collective agreement.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mu-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 536MU FWC must vary collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider public interest
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MU(1A) FWC must vary collective agreement

536MU(2) FWC must vary collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
note: FWC must publish a copy of the collective agreement as varied and the declaration referred to in subsection 536MT(3) on the FWC’s website.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MU FWC must vary collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MU(2) FWC must vary collective agreement

536MU(3) FWC must vary collective agreement
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
note: The FWC must vary collective agreements upon registration.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mu-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MU FWC must vary collective agreement

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to vary collective agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MU(3) FWC must vary collective agreement

536MV FWC must be notified of termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MV(1) FWC must be notified of termination
has part: 536MV(2) FWC must be notified of termination
has part: 536MV(3) FWC must be notified of termination
has part: 536MV(4) FWC must be notified of termination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mv
schema version: 2

536MV(1) FWC must be notified of termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: Notify FWC of termination before agreement end.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mv-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MV FWC must be notified of termination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MV(1) FWC must be notified of termination

536MV(2) FWC must be notified of termination
type: Concept
description: Declaration that must accompany application
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: Notify FWC of termination with consent
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mv-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MV FWC must be notified of termination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must notify FWC
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

536MV(3) FWC must be notified of termination
type: Concept
description: Notice with declaration signed by regulated business and organisation
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: Regulated business must notify organisation of termination and specify date of effect.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mv-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MV FWC must be notified of termination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulated business must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

536MV(4) FWC must be notified of termination
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: FWC must be notified of termination
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mv-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 536MV FWC must be notified of termination

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Notification obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MV(4) FWC must be notified of termination

536MW FWC must register termination notice
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MW(1) FWC must register termination notice
has part: 536MW(2) FWC must register termination notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mw
schema version: 2

536MW(1) FWC must register termination notice
type: Concept
description: Notice of collective agreement termination and date of effect
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: FWC must register termination notice on its website.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mw-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MW FWC must register termination notice

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to register notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MW(1) FWC must register termination notice

536MW(2) FWC must register termination notice
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
note: The collective agreement ceases to operate on the specified date.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mw-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MW FWC must register termination notice

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The termination notice occurs on the specified date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the termination notice and the cessation of operation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: on
premise text: (2) The collective agreement ceases to operate...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The termination notice is related to the cessation of operation on the specified date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the cognitive relationship between the termination notice and the cessation of operation
modality: CogAI
operator: on
premise text: (2) The collective agreement ceases to operate...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The collective agreement ceases to operate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies cessation of operation
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
premise text: (2) The collective agreement ceases to operate...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cessation of operation is propagated on the specified date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the propagation of the cessation of operation
modality: Diffusion
operator: on
premise text: (2) The collective agreement ceases to operate...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The termination notice occurs on the specified date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the termination notice and the cessation of operation
modality: LTL
operator: on
premise text: (2) The collective agreement ceases to operate...

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MW(2) FWC must register termination notice

536MX Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536MX(1) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
has part: 536MX(2) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
has part: 536MX(3) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mx
schema version: 2

536MX(1) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: A term of a collective agreement has no effect to the extent that it is not about a matter mentioned in subsection 536MK(2) or (3).
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mx-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536MX Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MX(1) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect

536MX(2) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect to the extent they do not affect the terms and conditions of engagement of regulated workers.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mx-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536MX Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MX(2) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect

536MX(3) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
note: Inclusion of a term with no effect does not prevent the agreement from being valid.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mx-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536MX Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of a term with no effect does not prevent the agreement from being valid.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The inclusion of a term with no effect does not affect the validity of the agreement.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of a collective agreement
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: A collective agreement is defined as an agreement that includes certain terms.

536MY Guide to this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.459
note: Framework for dealing with unfair contract terms
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536my-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536my
schema version: 2

536MZ Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.459
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mz-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mz-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536mz
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mz-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes ordinary meanings for employee and employer.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mz-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536MZ Meaning of employee and employer

536N Object of Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.460
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536N(1) Object of Part
has part: 536N(2) Object of Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536n
schema version: 2

536N(1) Object of Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.460
note: Establishes a framework for dealing with unfair contract terms of services contracts.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536N Object of Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a framework for dealing with unfair contract terms.
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536N(1) Object of Part

536N(2) Object of Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.460
note: Ensure a fair go all round for principals and independent contractors.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536N Object of Part

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure a fair go all round
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536N(2) Object of Part

536NA When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NA(1) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
has part: 536NA(2) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
has part: 536NA(3) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536na
schema version: 2

536NA(1) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461
note: FWC may make an order under this Part in relation to a services contract if the FWC is satisfied that the services contract includes one or more unfair contract terms.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536na-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NA When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NA(1) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair

536NA(2) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461
note: The FWC may make an order only if a person has made an application under section 536ND.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536na-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NA When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC can make an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NA(2) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair

536NA(3) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461
note: FWC must consider fairness when making an order.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536na-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536NA When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: when making an order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: FWC must take into account fairness

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in deciding whether to make an order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of fairness
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
premise text: fairness between the parties concerned

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NA(3) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair

536NB Matters to be considered in deciding whether a term of a
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461
note: Guidelines for determining unfair contract terms
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nb
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nb-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NB Matters to be considered in deciding whether a term of a

536NC Remedy—order to set aside etc. contract
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.462
note: The FWC may make an order under this section setting aside or amending a services contract related to workplace relations.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nc-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nc-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nc
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nc-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NC Remedy—order to set aside etc. contract

536ND Application for unfair contract term remedy
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536ND(1) Application for unfair contract term remedy
has part: 536ND(2) Application for unfair contract term remedy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nd
schema version: 2

536ND(1) Application for unfair contract term remedy
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
note: Application for unfair contract term remedy
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536ND Application for unfair contract term remedy

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536ND(1) Application for unfair contract term remedy

536ND(2) Application for unfair contract term remedy
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
note: Application for unfair contract term remedy is prohibited unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536ND Application for unfair contract term remedy

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of application for unfair contract term remedy
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) An application must not be made in relation to a services contract

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536ND(2) Application for unfair contract term remedy

536NE Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NE(1) Application fees
has part: 536NE(2) Application fees
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ne
schema version: 2

536NE(1) Application fees
type: Concept
description: Fee
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ne-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NE Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay the fee.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NE(1) Application fees

536NE(2) Application fees
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
note: Application fee regulation
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ne-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NE Application fees

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires payment of application fee
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NE(2) Application fees

536NF Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NF(1) Conferences
has part: 536NF(2) Conferences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nf
schema version: 2

536NF(1) Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
note: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part if the FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NF Conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial agent's obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: if
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NF(1) Conferences

536NF(2) Conferences
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
note: The FWC must conduct a private conference.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NF Conferences

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NF(2) Conferences

536NG Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NG(1) Hearings
has part: 536NG(2) Hearings
has part: 536NG(3) Hearings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ng
schema version: 2

536NG(1) Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
note: No hearing unless FWC considers it appropriate.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ng-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NG Hearings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The matter arises during the period when the FWC considers it appropriate to hold a hearing
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between hearing and matter
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Hearing occurs during consideration by FWC

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no need for a hearing if the FWC considers it appropriate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference from condition to conclusion
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: If FWC considers it appropriate, then there is no need for a hearing

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Both the views of parties and consideration by FWC are necessary for a hearing to be held
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Combination of conditions
modality: CogAI
operator: and
premise text: The views of parties and consideration by FWC are necessary conditions

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: FWC must not hold a hearing
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: FWC must hold a hearing

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Both the views of parties and consideration by FWC are necessary for a hearing to be held
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Combination of conditions
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
premise text: The views of parties and consideration by FWC are necessary conditions

536NG(2) Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
note: FWC may decide not to hold a hearing in relation to parts of the matter.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ng-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NG Hearings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to decide not to hold a hearing.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

536NG(3) Hearings
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
note: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing at any time.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536ng-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536NG Hearings

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

536NH Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NH(1) Dismissing applications
has part: 536NH(2) Dismissing applications
has part: 536NH(3) Dismissing applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nh
schema version: 2

536NH(1) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
note: Dismissal of applications for orders under Division 3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NH Dismissing applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application dismissed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may dismiss applications
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 536NH(1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application dismissed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: FWC may dismiss applications for orders under Division 3
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 536NH(2)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application dismissed due to failure to attend conference
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: FWC may dismiss applications based on failure to attend conferences or hearings
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: Section 536NH(1)(a)

536NH(2) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
note: The FWC may exercise its power under subsection (1) on application by a party to the matter or an organisation entitled to represent the industrial interests of a party to the matter.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NH Dismissing applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The FWC may exercise its power
modality: Deontic
operator: May

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NH(2) Dismissing applications

536NH(3) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
note: No limitation on FWC's power to dismiss applications.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 536NH Dismissing applications

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: None

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NH(3) Dismissing applications

536NJ Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
curation status: Proposed
has part: 536NJ(1) Appeal rights
has part: 536NJ(2) Appeal rights
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nj
schema version: 2

536NJ(1) Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
note: FWC cannot grant permission to appeal from a decision unless in the public interest.
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nj-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 536NJ Appeal rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of granting permission to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

536NJ(2) Appeal rights
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
note: Appeal rights limited to questions of fact
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nj-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 536NJ Appeal rights

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits appeal rights
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NJ(2) Appeal rights

536NK Contravening orders under this Part
type: Concept
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
note: Prohibition on contravening orders under this Part
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nk-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nk-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-536nk
schema version: 2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person must not contravene an order under this Part.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: This section is a civil remedy provision (see Part 4-1)

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nk-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 536NK Contravening orders under this Part

Fair Work Act 2009
type: Document
date: 2 April 2026
identifier: No. 28 of 2009
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU