Fair Work Act 2009
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 28 of 2009
date: 2 April 2026
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

2 April 2026
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments, applications, and modifications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text as a compilation of the Fair Work Act 2009.
premise text: The text describes the compilation date and contents.
conclusion text: The text is a classification of the Fair Work Act 2009.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

258 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-258
note: The FWC must make a workplace determination if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.31
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-258-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-258-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-258-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 258 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-258-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must make a workplace determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-259
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.32
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-alleninterval-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 259 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: employee and employer are defined as national system employee and national system employer respectively.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Employer is responsible for ensuring employees comply with terms and conditions of employment.
premise text: employee means a national system employee, and employer means a national system employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-259-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Employer must provide employees with terms and conditions of employment.
premise text: employer means a national system employer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

266 When the FWC must make an industrial action related
type: Concept
realized by: sec-266
has part: 266(1) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
has part: 266(2) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
has part: 266(3) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33

266(1) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
type: Concept
realized by: sec-266-ss-1
part of: 266 When the FWC must make an industrial action related
note: FWC must make an industrial action related workplace determination after a post-industrial action negotiating period ends and bargaining representatives have not settled all matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 266(1) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

266(2) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
type: Concept
realized by: sec-266-ss-2
part of: 266 When the FWC must make an industrial action related
note: Termination of industrial action instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 266(2) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to terminate protected industrial action
premise text: (2) A termination of industrial action instrument in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement is:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

266(3) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
type: Concept
realized by: sec-266-ss-3
part of: 266 When the FWC must make an industrial action related
note: Post-industrial action negotiating period starts on termination of industrial action instrument day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.33
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 266(3) When the FWC must make an industrial action related
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to negotiate
premise text: (3) The post-industrial action negotiating period is the period that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS_AT
logic summary: Temporal relationship between post-industrial action negotiating period start and termination of industrial action instrument day
premise text: (a) starts on the day on which the termination of industrial action instrument is made
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Negotiating period ends when post-industrial action negotiating period ends
premise text: (b) ends: Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-266-ss-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: CONCLUSION
logic summary: Chapter 2 terms and conditions of employment imply end of negotiating period
premise text: (b) ends: Chapter 2 Terms and conditions of employment
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267 Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-267
has part: 267(1) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
has part: 267(2) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
has part: 267(3) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
has part: 267(4) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34

267(1) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-267-ss-1
part of: 267 Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
note: Industrial action related workplace determination must comply with certain terms.
description: Terms set out in subsections (2) and (3), core terms set out in section 272, and mandatory terms set out in section 273.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267(1) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267(2) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-267-ss-2
part of: 267 Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
note: Agreed terms for an industrial action must be included in the determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267(2) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: The determination must include agreed terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267(3) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-267-ss-3
part of: 267 Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
note: Determination must include terms related to matters still at issue after post-industrial action negotiating period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267(3) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267(4) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-267-ss-4
part of: 267 Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
note: Must express determination covering employers, employees, and employee organisations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.34
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267(4) Terms etc. of an industrial action related workplace
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-267-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST Express
logic summary: Express determination covering employers, employees, and employee organisations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

268 No other terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-268
note: No other terms can be included in an industrial action related workplace determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.35
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-268-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-268-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-268-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of additional terms
premise text: Subsection 267(1) requirements
conclusion text: No other terms allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

269 When the FWC must make an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-269
note: FWC must make intractable bargaining workplace determination after declaration or post-declaration negotiating period ends.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-269-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-269-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-269-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 269 When the FWC must make an intractable bargaining workplace
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-269-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-270
has part: 270(1) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
has part: 270(2) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
has part: 270(3) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
has part: 270(4) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36

270(1) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-270-ss-1
part of: 270 Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
note: Intractable bargaining workplace determination must comply with subsection (4) and include specific terms.
description: Terms, core terms, mandatory terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(1) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with subsection (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270(2) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-270-ss-2
part of: 270 Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
note: Must include agreed terms for determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(2) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes agreed terms
premise text: Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Workplace determinations Part 2-5 Intractable bargaining workplace determinations Division 4 Section 270A Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: (2) The determination must include the agreed terms (see subsection 274(3)) for the determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270(3) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-270-ss-3
part of: 270 Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
note: Terms that must be included in a determination after a post-declaration negotiating period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(3) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270(4) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
type: Concept
realized by: sec-270-ss-4
part of: 270 Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
note: Must express determination covering employers, employees, and employee organizations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.36
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(4) Terms etc. of an intractable bargaining workplace
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST Express
logic summary: Express determination covering employers, employees, and employee organizations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270A Terms dealing with matters at issue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-270a
has part: 270A(1) Terms dealing with matters at issue
has part: 270A(2) Terms dealing with matters at issue
has part: 270A(3) Terms dealing with matters at issue
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37

270A(1) Terms dealing with matters at issue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-270a-ss-1
part of: 270A Terms dealing with matters at issue
note: Enterprise agreement applies before determination is made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270A(1) Terms dealing with matters at issue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation applies
premise text: Enterprise agreement exists
conclusion text: Determination is made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270A(2) Terms dealing with matters at issue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-270a-ss-2
part of: 270A Terms dealing with matters at issue
note: Term must be not less favourable to employees than enterprise agreement term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270A(2) Terms dealing with matters at issue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Term must be not less favourable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270A(3) Terms dealing with matters at issue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-270a-ss-3
part of: 270A Terms dealing with matters at issue
note: Assumes term is not less favourable to employee if no evidence to the contrary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.37
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: assume
logic summary: Assumes a term is not less favourable if no evidence to the contrary
premise text: No evidence to the contrary
conclusion text: Term is not less favourable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-270a-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: infer
logic summary: Infer term is not less favourable based on lack of evidence
premise text: Lack of evidence
conclusion text: Term is not less favourable
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271 No other terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-271
note: No other terms can be included in an intractable bargaining workplace determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.38
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-271-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-271-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-271-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not include
logic summary: Prohibition on additional terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-272
has part: 272(1) Core terms of workplace determinations
has part: 272(2) Core terms of workplace determinations
has part: 272(3) Core terms of workplace determinations
has part: 272(4) Core terms of workplace determinations
has part: 272(5) Core terms of workplace determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39

272(1) Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-272-ss-1
part of: 272 Core terms of workplace determinations
note: Workplace determination must include core terms
description: Nominal expiry date
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Core terms of workplace determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide core terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-272-ss-2
part of: 272 Core terms of workplace determinations
note: Specify nominal expiry date not more than 4 years after operation start
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(2) Core terms of workplace determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify nominal expiry date
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-272-ss-3
part of: 272 Core terms of workplace determinations
note: Terms that would be unlawful if the determination were an enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Terms that would be unlawful if the determination were an enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(4) Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-272-ss-4
part of: 272 Core terms of workplace determinations
note: Determination must pass better off overall test under section 193.
description: Safety net requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(4) Core terms of workplace determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide safety net requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(5) Core terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-272-ss-5
part of: 272 Core terms of workplace determinations
note: Determination must not include a term that would prevent approval of an agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.39
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(5) Core terms of workplace determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-272-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents approval
premise text: Determination must not include...
conclusion text: ...would mean that the FWC could not approve...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-273
has part: 273(1) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
has part: 273(2) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
has part: 273(3) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
has part: 273(4) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
has part: 273(5) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40

273(1) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-273-ss-1
part of: 273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
note: Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(1) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include term in workplace determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(2) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-273-ss-2
part of: 273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
note: Procedure for settling disputes under workplace determinations
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(2) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide procedure for settling disputes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(3) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-273-ss-3
part of: 273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
note: FWC must ensure an agreed term satisfies dispute settlement terms in enterprise agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(3) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Ensure compliance with agreed terms.
premise text: FWC must ensure an agreed term satisfies dispute settlement terms in enterprise agreements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Determine when the FWC must ensure compliance.
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply to the determination if the FWC is satisfied that an agreed term for the determination would, if the determination were an enterprise agreement, satisfy paragraphs 186(6)(a) and (b).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Identify the pattern of FWC's actions.
premise text: The FWC is satisfied that an agreed term for the determination would, if the determination were an enterprise agreement, satisfy paragraphs 186(6)(a) and (b).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information dissemination
logic summary: Spread knowledge of FWC's actions.
premise text: The FWC must ensure an agreed term satisfies dispute settlement terms in enterprise agreements.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(4) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-273-ss-4
part of: 273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
note: Model flexibility term must be included in workplace determinations unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(4) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include model flexibility term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273(5) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-273-ss-5
part of: 273 Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
note: Determination must include model consultation term unless FWC is satisfied that an agreed term can be used.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.40
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 273(5) Mandatory terms of workplace determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-273-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Determination must include model consultation term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274 Agreed terms for workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-274
has part: 274(2) Agreed terms for workplace determinations
has part: 274(3) Agreed terms for workplace determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.41

274(2) Agreed terms for workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-274-ss-2
part of: 274 Agreed terms for workplace determinations
note: Agreed term for an industrial action related workplace determination must be included in the agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.41
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 274(2) Agreed terms for workplace determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide an agreed term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274(3) Agreed terms for workplace determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-274-ss-3
part of: 274 Agreed terms for workplace determinations
note: Agreed term for an intractable bargaining workplace determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.41
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 274(3) Agreed terms for workplace determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes agreed terms from the application
premise text: (a) a term that the bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement concerned had agreed...
conclusion text: should be included in the agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires inclusion of agreed terms from the application
premise text: (a) a term that the bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement concerned had agreed...
conclusion text: should be included in the agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes agreed terms from the application as part of the workplace determination
premise text: (a) a term that the bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement concerned had agreed...
conclusion text: an agreed term for an intractable bargaining workplace determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Describes an agreed term as part of the workplace determination
premise text: (a) a term that the bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement concerned had agreed...
conclusion text: an agreed term for an intractable bargaining workplace determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-274-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires inclusion of agreed terms from the application as part of the workplace determination
premise text: (a) a term that the bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement concerned had agreed...
conclusion text: an agreed term for an intractable bargaining workplace determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

275 Factors the FWC must take into account in deciding terms of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-275
note: Factors for workplace determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.42
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-275-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-275-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-275-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 275 Factors the FWC must take into account in deciding terms of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-275-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Factors for workplace determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276 When a workplace determination operates etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-276
has part: 276(1) When a workplace determination operates etc.
has part: 276(2) When a workplace determination operates etc.
has part: 276(3) When a workplace determination operates etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43

276(1) When a workplace determination operates etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-276-ss-1
part of: 276 When a workplace determination operates etc.
note: Workplace determination operates from the day it is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276(1) When a workplace determination operates etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Holds
logic summary: The workplace determination holds from its creation.
premise text: (1) A workplace determination operates from the day on which it is made.
conclusion text: A workplace determination operates from the day it is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The Allen interval overlaps with the creation of the workplace determination.
premise text: (1) A workplace determination operates from the day on which it is made.
conclusion text: The creation of the workplace determination overlaps with its operation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
logic summary: The LTL traces the operation of the workplace determination.
premise text: (1) A workplace determination operates from the day on which it is made.
conclusion text: The operation of the workplace determination is traced.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The diffusion diffuses the operation of the workplace determination.
premise text: (1) A workplace determination operates from the day on which it is made.
conclusion text: The operation of the workplace determination diffuses.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The CogAI recognizes the operation of the workplace determination.
premise text: (1) A workplace determination operates from the day on which it is made.
conclusion text: The operation of the workplace determination is recognized.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276(2) When a workplace determination operates etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-276-ss-2
part of: 276 When a workplace determination operates etc.
note: Workplace determination ceases on specified days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-2-norm

276(3) When a workplace determination operates etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-276-ss-3
part of: 276 When a workplace determination operates etc.
note: A workplace determination that has ceased to operate can never operate again.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 276(3) When a workplace determination operates etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-276-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of reoperation
premise text: (3) A workplace determination that has ceased to operate can never operate again.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

277 Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-277
has part: 277(1) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
has part: 277(2) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43

277(1) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-277-ss-1
part of: 277 Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
note: Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-277-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-277-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 277(1) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

277(2) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-277-ss-2
part of: 277 Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
note: Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a workplace determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.43
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-277-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-277-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 277(2) Employers, employees and employee organisations covered by a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

278 Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-278
has part: 278(1A) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
has part: 278(1) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
has part: 278(2) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.44

278(1A) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-278-ss-1a
part of: 278 Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
note: Enterprise agreement ceases to apply if a workplace determination comes into operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.44
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 278(1A) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits enterprise agreement application
premise text: (a) an enterprise agreement applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) a workplace determination that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;
conclusion text: the enterprise agreement ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278(1) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-278-ss-1
part of: 278 Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
note: Workplace determination ceases to apply if enterprise agreement comes into operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.44
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 278(1) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents workplace determination from applying again.
premise text: (a) a workplace determination applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) an enterprise agreement that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;
conclusion text: the determination ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between workplace determinations and enterprise agreements.
premise text: (1) If: (a) a workplace determination applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) an enterprise agreement that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;
conclusion text: the determination ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Describes a recurring relationship between workplace determinations and enterprise agreements.
premise text: (1) If: (a) a workplace determination applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) an enterprise agreement that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;
conclusion text: the determination ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
logic summary: Describes a causal relationship between workplace determinations and enterprise agreements.
premise text: (1) If: (a) a workplace determination applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) an enterprise agreement that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;
conclusion text: the determination ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Describes a relationship between workplace determinations and enterprise agreements using cognitive AI.
premise text: (1) If: (a) a workplace determination applies to an employee in relation to particular employment; and (b) an enterprise agreement that covers the employee in relation to the same employment comes into operation;
conclusion text: the determination ceases to apply to the employee in relation to that employment, and can never so apply again.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278(2) Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-278-ss-2
part of: 278 Interaction of a workplace determination with enterprise
note: Earlier determination ceases to apply when later determination comes into operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.44
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-278-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CEASES
logic summary: Ceases to apply
premise text: (2) If a workplace determination applies...
conclusion text: ...the earlier determination ceases to apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279 Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-279
has part: 279(1) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
has part: 279(2) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45

279(1) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-279-ss-1
part of: 279 Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
note: Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 279(1) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Applicability of the Act to a workplace determination.
premise text: (1) This Act applies...
conclusion text: ...as if it were an enterprise agreement that is in operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the Act and a workplace determination.
premise text: (1) This Act applies to...
conclusion text: ...as if it were an enterprise agreement that is in operation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Inference of applicability from the text.
premise text: (1) This Act applies to...
conclusion text: ...as if it were an enterprise agreement that is in operation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Spread of applicability to a workplace determination.
premise text: (1) This Act applies to...
conclusion text: ...as if it were an enterprise agreement that is in operation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279(2) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
type: Concept
realized by: sec-279-ss-2
part of: 279 Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
note: Exemptions from certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.45
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 279(2) Act applies to a workplace determination as if it were an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-279-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from enterprise agreement provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280 Contravening a workplace determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-280
note: Prohibition on contravening a workplace determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-280-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-280-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-280-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 280 Contravening a workplace determination
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-280-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids contravention of workplace determinations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

281 Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281
has part: 281(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
has part: 281(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47

281(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281-ss-1
part of: 281 Applications by bargaining representatives
note: Applications by bargaining representatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 281(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the type of obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies if a provision of this Part permits an application to be made by a bargaining representative of an employer that would have been covered by a proposed enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval for conditional commencement
premise text: (1) This section applies if a provision of this Part permits an application to be made by a bargaining representative of an employer that would have been covered by a proposed enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the trace for conditional commencement
premise text: (1) This section applies if a provision of this Part permits an application to be made by a bargaining representative of an employer that would have been covered by a proposed enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

281(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281-ss-2
part of: 281 Applications by bargaining representatives
note: Application for proposed enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281-ss-2-norm

281AA Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281aa
note: Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.47
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281aa-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281aa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 281AA Entitlement for volunteer bodies to make submissions
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

281A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281a
has part: 281A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 281A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 281A(3) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
has part: 281A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48

281A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281a-ss-1
part of: 281A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
note: Employers, employees, and employee organisations must specify covered parties in a workplace determination or instrument.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 281A(1) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires specification of covered parties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

281A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281a-ss-2
part of: 281A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
note: Employees may be specified by class or by name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 281A(2) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

281A(3) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281a-ss-3
part of: 281A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
note: Must specify by name
description: Name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify by name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

281A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-281a-ss-4
part of: 281A How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
note: Employees, employers and employee organisations must describe a class by reference to one or more of the following.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.48
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 281A(4) How employees, employers and employee organisations are to
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-281a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-282
note: Establishes minimum wages for national system employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.49
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-282-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-282-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-282-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 282 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-282-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishes minimum wages
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

283 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-283
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.50
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-283-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-283-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 283 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

284 The minimum wages objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-284
has part: 284(1) The minimum wages objective
has part: 284(2) The minimum wages objective
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51

284(1) The minimum wages objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-284-ss-1
part of: 284 The minimum wages objective
note: Establish and maintain a safety net of fair minimum wages.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(1) The minimum wages objective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establish
logic summary: Ensure the establishment of a safety net.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

284(2) The minimum wages objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-284-ss-2
part of: 284 The minimum wages objective
note: The minimum wages objective applies to the performance or exercise of certain functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.51
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(2) The minimum wages objective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-284-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The minimum wages objective applies to the performance or exercise of certain functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

285 Annual wage reviews to be conducted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-285
has part: 285(1) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
has part: 285(2) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
has part: 285(3) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53

285(1) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-285-ss-1
part of: 285 Annual wage reviews to be conducted
note: The FWC must conduct an annual wage review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 285(1) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to conduct annual wage reviews
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

285(2) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-285-ss-2
part of: 285 Annual wage reviews to be conducted
note: Annual wage reviews must review modern award minimum wages and national minimum wage orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 285(2) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review modern award minimum wages and national minimum wage orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

285(3) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-285-ss-3
part of: 285 Annual wage reviews to be conducted
note: The FWC must consider the proposed national minimum wage rate in annual wage reviews.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 285(3) Annual wage reviews to be conducted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-285-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must consider the proposed national minimum wage rate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

286 When annual wage review determinations varying modern
type: Concept
realized by: sec-286
note: Determination of modern awards comes into operation on 1 July
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.53
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-286-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-286-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 286 When annual wage review determinations varying modern
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

287 When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-287
has part: 287(1) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
has part: 287(2) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
has part: 287(3) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
has part: 287(4) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54

287(1) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-287-ss-1
part of: 287 When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
note: National minimum wage order comes into operation on July 1st in the next financial year.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 287(1) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287(2) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-287-ss-2
part of: 287 When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
note: National minimum wage must be uniform for all employees unless justified by exceptional circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 287(2) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Uniformity obligation
premise text: National minimum wage orders must be uniform.
conclusion text: The national minimum wage must be the same for all employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <->
logic summary: Justification for non-uniformity
premise text: There are exceptional circumstances justifying setting different wages or loadings.
conclusion text: The national minimum wage may not be uniform for all employees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <->
logic summary: Limitation on non-uniformity
premise text: The setting of different wages or loadings is limited just to the extent necessary.
conclusion text: The national minimum wage may not be uniform for all employees unless justified by exceptional circumstances and limited in scope.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <->
logic summary: Scope of non-uniformity
premise text: The particular situation to which the exceptional circumstances relate is limited.
conclusion text: The national minimum wage may not be uniform for all employees unless justified by exceptional circumstances and limited in scope to a specific situation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <->
logic summary: Justification for non-uniformity
premise text: The FWC is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying setting different wages or loadings.
conclusion text: There are exceptional circumstances justifying setting different wages or loadings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287(3) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-287-ss-3
part of: 287 When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
note: National minimum wage must be the same for all employees in a specified class, unless exceptional circumstances justify setting different wages.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 287(3) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Equality obligation
premise text: National minimum wage must be the same for all employees in a specified class.
conclusion text: Unless exceptional circumstances justify setting different wages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: The special national minimum wage set by the order must be the same for all employees in that class.
conclusion text: Unless exceptional circumstances justify setting different wages.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
premise text: Adjustments taking effect during year of operation only permitted in exceptional circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287(4) When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-287-ss-4
part of: 287 When national minimum wage orders come into operation etc.
note: Specifies the effective date for adjustments to national minimum wage, casual loading, or special national minimum wage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.54
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-287-ss-4-norm

1 July, but only if:
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: FWC must be satisfied with exceptional circumstances before adjusting employment terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.55
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
premise text: (a) the FWC is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the adjustment taking effect on that day;
conclusion text: the adjustment must take effect on that day if (a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
premise text: (b) the adjustment is limited just to the particular situation to which the exceptional circumstances relate.
conclusion text: the adjustment must be limited to that situation if (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exceptional circumstances and adjustment
premise text: (a) the FWC is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the adjustment taking effect on that day;
conclusion text: the exceptional circumstances occur during the adjustment if (a)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: every
logic summary: Recurring trace of exceptional circumstances and adjustment
premise text: (b) the adjustment is limited just to the particular situation to which the exceptional circumstances relate.
conclusion text: the adjustment occurs every time the exceptional circumstances occur in that situation if (b)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation for FWC to adjust employment terms
premise text: (a) the FWC is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the adjustment taking effect on that day;
conclusion text: the FWC must adjust employment terms if (a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 July in the year of operation. However, an adjustment referred to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Adjustment takes effect in relation to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 July in the year of operation. However, an adjustment referred to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
logic summary: Obligation takes effect
premise text: Adjustment is specified in subsection (4)
conclusion text: Relates to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: starts on or after
logic summary: Temporal interval starts on or after a specified day
premise text: First full pay period starts on or after a specified day
conclusion text: Relates to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: Temporal interval has an ordered trace
premise text: First full pay period starts on or after a specified day
conclusion text: Relates to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses to employees
logic summary: Adjustment diffuses to employees
premise text: Adjustment is specified in subsection (4)
conclusion text: Relates to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-1-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes adjustment
logic summary: CogAI recognizes adjustment
premise text: Adjustment is specified in subsection (4)
conclusion text: Relates to a particular employee from the start of their first full pay period.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

288 General
type: Concept
realized by: sec-288
note: References other provisions in Part 5-1 for annual wage reviews
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-288-norm

289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-289
has part: 289(1) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
has part: 289(2) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
has part: 289(3) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
has part: 289(4) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
has part: 289(5) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
has part: 289(6) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56

289(1) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-289-ss-1
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
note: Everyone must have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 289(1) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

289(2) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-289-ss-2
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
note: Publish all submissions made to the FWC for consideration in the review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 289(2) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish all submissions made to the FWC for consideration in the review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

289(3) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-289-ss-3
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
note: The FWC may decide not to publish confidential or commercially sensitive information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withhold publication
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classifies information as confidential or commercially sensitive
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

289(4) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-289-ss-4
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
note: Everyone must provide a summary or statement when submitting under this section.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 289(4) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a summary or statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Classifies submissions as requiring a summary or statement.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

289(5) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-289-ss-5
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
note: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make comments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 289(5) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make comments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Comments must be made during a reasonable time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: Ensure all persons and bodies have a reasonable opportunity to make comments.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
logic summary: Comments must be made in a timely manner.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

289(6) Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-289-ss-6
part of: 289 Everyone to have a reasonable opportunity to make and
note: Publishing of material may be done through various means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.56
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-289-ss-6-norm

290 President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-290
has part: 290(1) President may direct investigations and reports
has part: 290(2) President may direct investigations and reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57

290(1) President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-290-ss-1
part of: 290 President may direct investigations and reports
note: The President may give a direction requiring an investigation and report.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

290(2) President may direct investigations and reports
type: Concept
realized by: sec-290-ss-2
part of: 290 President may direct investigations and reports
note: Direction of investigations and reports may be given to an Expert Panel or Chapter 2 terms and conditions of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.57
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-290-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to direct investigations and reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

291 Research must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-291
has part: 291(1) Research must be published
has part: 291(2) Research must be published
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58

291(1) Research must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-291-ss-1
part of: 291 Research must be published
note: The FWC must publish research for annual wage review submissions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 291(1) Research must be published
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish research
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

291(2) Research must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-291-ss-2
part of: 291 Research must be published
note: Publication of research must be done by the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 291(2) Research must be published
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish research
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of publication means
premise text: (2) The publication may be on the FWC’s website or by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for publication
premise text: (2) The publication may be on the FWC’s website or by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLICATION
logic summary: Implication of publication means
premise text: (2) The publication may be on the FWC’s website or by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DISTRIBUTION
logic summary: Distribution of research publication
premise text: (2) The publication may be on the FWC’s website or by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-291-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOMMENDATION
logic summary: Recommendation for publication means
premise text: (2) The publication may be on the FWC’s website or by any other means that the FWC considers appropriate.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

292 Varied wage rates must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-292
has part: 292(1) Varied wage rates must be published
has part: 292(2) Varied wage rates must be published
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58

292(1) Varied wage rates must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-292-ss-1
part of: 292 Varied wage rates must be published
note: Publish modern award rates as varied
description: Rates of wages in a modern award
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 292(1) Varied wage rates must be published
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish rates as varied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

292(2) Varied wage rates must be published
type: Concept
realized by: sec-292-ss-2
part of: 292 Varied wage rates must be published
note: Publication of varied wage rates must be done by the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.58
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 292(2) Varied wage rates must be published
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish varied wage rates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-292-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Publication is a type of obligation.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

293 Contravening a national minimum wage order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-293
note: Employer must not contravene a term of a national minimum wage order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-293-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-293-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-293-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 293 Contravening a national minimum wage order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-293-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

294 Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-294
has part: 294(1) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
has part: 294(2) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59

294(1) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-294-ss-1
part of: 294 Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
note: National minimum wage order must set national minimum wage and special wages for certain employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 294(1) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide national minimum wage order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Special national minimum wages for certain employees
premise text: (b) must set special national minimum wages for all award/agreement free employees in the following classes:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Casual loading for award/agreement free employees
premise text: (c) must set the casual loading for award/agreement free employees.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

294(2) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-294-ss-2
part of: 294 Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
note: Employers must pay employees a base rate of pay that at least equals the national minimum wage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.59
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 294(2) Content of national minimum wage order—main provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-294-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers must pay employees a base rate of pay that at least equals the national minimum wage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295 Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295
has part: 295(1) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
has part: 295(2) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.60

295(1) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295-ss-1
part of: 295 Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
note: Express national minimum wage and casual loading in a specific way.
description: Monetary amount per hour and percentage for casual loading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.60
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295(1) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST Express
logic summary: Express national minimum wage and casual loading in a specific way.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of national minimum wage order content.
premise text: (a) the national minimum wage, and the special national minimum wages, set by the order must be expressed in a way that produces a monetary amount per hour; (b) the casual loading for award/agreement free employees must be expressed as a percentage.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for expressing national minimum wage and casual loading.
premise text: (a) the national minimum wage, and the special national minimum wages, set by the order must be expressed in a way that produces a monetary amount per hour; (b) the casual loading for award/agreement free employees must be expressed as a percentage.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for expressing national minimum wage and casual loading.
premise text: (a) the national minimum wage, and the special national minimum wages, set by the order must be expressed in a way that produces a monetary amount per hour; (b) the casual loading for award/agreement free employees must be expressed as a percentage.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Diffusion of information about national minimum wage and casual loading.
premise text: (a) the national minimum wage, and the special national minimum wages, set by the order must be expressed in a way that produces a monetary amount per hour; (b) the casual loading for award/agreement free employees must be expressed as a percentage.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Argumentation about national minimum wage and casual loading.
premise text: (a) the national minimum wage, and the special national minimum wages, set by the order must be expressed in a way that produces a monetary amount per hour; (b) the casual loading for award/agreement free employees must be expressed as a percentage.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

295(2) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-295-ss-2
part of: 295 Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
note: Terms about how the order applies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.60
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-295-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295(2) Content of national minimum wage order—other matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

296 Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-296
has part: 296(1) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
has part: 296(2) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
has part: 296(3) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.61

296(1) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-296-ss-1
part of: 296 Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
note: The FWC may make a determination varying a national minimum wage order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.61
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 296(1) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may make a determination varying a national minimum wage order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

296(2) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-296-ss-2
part of: 296 Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
note: Publish national minimum wage order variation on website or other means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.61
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 296(2) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of national minimum wage order variation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

296(3) Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-296-ss-3
part of: 296 Variation of national minimum wage order to remove ambiguity
note: Cannot be varied or revoked
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.61
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-296-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of variation
premise text: (3) A national minimum wage order:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

297 When determinations varying national minimum wage orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-297
note: Determinations come into operation on specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.61
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-297-norm

298 Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
type: Concept
realized by: sec-298
has part: 298(1) Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
has part: 298(2) Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62

298(1) Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
type: Concept
realized by: sec-298-ss-1
part of: 298 Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
note: No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits creation of liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298(2) Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
type: Concept
realized by: sec-298-ss-2
part of: 298 Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
note: No pecuniary penalty for conduct before determination if retrospective effect would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.62
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 298(2) Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts conduct from pecuniary penalty if retrospective effect would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
premise text: (2) If: (a) a person engaged in conduct before the determination was made; and (b) but for the retrospective effect of the determination, the conduct would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or an enterprise agreement;
conclusion text: A court must not order the person to pay a pecuniary penalty under Division 2 of Part 4-1 in relation to the conduct, on the grounds that the conduct contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The retrospective effect of the determination overlaps with the conduct before determination.
premise text: (2) If: (a) a person engaged in conduct before the determination was made; and (b) but for the retrospective effect of the determination, the conduct would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or an enterprise agreement;
conclusion text: The retrospective effect of the determination overlaps with the conduct before determination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The conduct before determination repeats the conduct after determination in terms of its impact on the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
premise text: (2) If: (a) a person engaged in conduct before the determination was made; and (b) but for the retrospective effect of the determination, the conduct would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or an enterprise agreement;
conclusion text: The conduct before determination repeats the conduct after determination.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-298-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permissive
logic summary: Permits conduct before determination if retrospective effect would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
premise text: (2) If: (a) a person engaged in conduct before the determination was made; and (b) but for the retrospective effect of the determination, the conduct would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or an enterprise agreement;
conclusion text: The conduct is permitted if the retrospective effect would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

299 When a national minimum wage order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-299
note: National minimum wage order continues in operation until next order comes into effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.63
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-299-norm

300 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-300
note: Ensure equal remuneration for men and women workers of equal or comparable value.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-300-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-300-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-300-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 300 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-300-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to ensure equal remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

301 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-301
note: Defines employee and employer terms for Fair Work Act 2009.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.64
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 301 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines terms
premise text: employee and employer definitions
conclusion text: Obligation to follow definitions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-301-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies employee and employer
premise text: Division 2 of Part 6-4A (TCF contract outworkers taken to be employees in certain circumstances)
conclusion text: Classification of employee and employer
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

302 FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-302
has part: 302(1) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
has part: 302(2) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
has part: 302(3) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
has part: 302(3A) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65

302(1) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-302-ss-1
part of: 302 FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
note: The FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 302(1) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

302(2) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-302-ss-2
part of: 302 FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
note: Equal remuneration for work of equal or comparable value
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 302(2) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires equal remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass of work with comparable value
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

302(3) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-302-ss-3
part of: 302 FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
note: FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 302(3) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

302(3A) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-302-ss-3a
part of: 302 FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
note: FWC may take into account certain factors when deciding on equal remuneration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.65
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3a-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-302-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 302(3A) FWC may make an order requiring equal remuneration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

303 Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303
has part: 303(1) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
has part: 303(2) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67

303(1) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303-ss-1
part of: 303 Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
note: Equal remuneration order may increase rates of remuneration.
description: equal remuneration for work of equal or comparable value
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 303(1) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to provide equal remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

303(2) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-303-ss-2
part of: 303 Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
note: Must not reduce employee's rate of remuneration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 303(2) Equal remuneration order may increase, but must not reduce,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-303-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits reduction in employee's rate of remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

304 Equal remuneration order may implement equal remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-304
note: Implement equal remuneration in stages if not feasible upon operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-304-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-304-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-304-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 304 Equal remuneration order may implement equal remuneration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-304-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to implement equal remuneration in stages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

305 Contravening an equal remuneration order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-305
note: Employer must not contravene an equal remuneration order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-305-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-305-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-305-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 305 Contravening an equal remuneration order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-305-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening an equal remuneration order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306 Inconsistency with modern awards, enterprise agreements and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306
note: Employee's remuneration is not affected by inconsistent terms from modern awards, enterprise agreements or FWC orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.67
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306 Inconsistency with modern awards, enterprise agreements and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Remuneration is unaffected by inconsistent terms
premise text: Term of modern award, enterprise agreement or FWC order
conclusion text: No effect on employee's remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Inconsistent terms are less beneficial than equal remuneration orders
premise text: Term of modern award, enterprise agreement or FWC order
conclusion text: Equal remuneration order is more beneficial to employee
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <
logic summary: Inconsistent terms are less beneficial than equal remuneration orders
premise text: Term of modern award, enterprise agreement or FWC order
conclusion text: Equal remuneration order is more beneficial to employee
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: not
logic summary: Inconsistent terms do not affect employee's remuneration
premise text: Term of modern award, enterprise agreement or FWC order
conclusion text: No effect on employee's remuneration
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306A Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306a
note: Regulated labour hire arrangement orders and their obligations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306A Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement orders impose obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306B Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306b
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306B Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies the terms into categories.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306C Meaning of regulated host
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306c
note: Defines regulated host
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.68
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306c-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines regulated host
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Regulated host is a constitutional corporation; or the Commonwealth; or a Commonwealth authority; or...
conclusion text: ...or any person in a State that is a referring State because of Division 2A or 2B of Part 1-3.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306D References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306d
has part: 306D(1) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
has part: 306D(2) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.69

306D(1) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306d-ss-1
part of: 306D References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
note: Reference to work of a kind includes reference to work substantially of that kind.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.69
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306D(1) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Explicit class/type/subclass hierarchy
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Duty or obligation
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
logic summary: Claim about the nature of work
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Spread or dissemination
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (1) A reference in this Part to work of a kind includes a reference to work that is substantially of that kind.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306D(2) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306d-ss-2
part of: 306D References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
note: Defines work performed for a person, including enterprise and joint venture
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.69
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306D(2) References to kinds of work and work performed for a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Work performed for a person
conclusion text: Enterprise or joint venture
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: wholly or principally
logic summary: Temporal relationship
premise text: Work performed wholly or principally
conclusion text: Benefit of the person
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306E FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306e
has part: 306E(1) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
has part: 306E(1A) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
has part: 306E(2) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
has part: 306E(3) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.71

306E(1) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306e-ss-1
part of: 306E FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
note: FWC must make a regulated labour hire arrangement order on application by a person mentioned in subsection (7)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.71
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306E(1) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306E(1A) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306e-ss-1a
part of: 306E FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
note: FWC must not make order unless work is for supply of labour
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.71
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 306E(1A) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306E(2) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306e-ss-2
part of: 306E FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
note: FWC cannot make order if not fair and reasonable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.71
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making order
premise text: FWC is satisfied it is not fair and reasonable
conclusion text: FWC must not make order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: In relation to
logic summary: Temporal interval of submissions
premise text: Submissions have been made in subsection (8)
conclusion text: FWC's satisfaction is tied to this temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306E(3) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306e-ss-3
part of: 306E FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
note: FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.71
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306E(3) FWC may make a regulated labour hire arrangement order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306EA Regulated labour hire arrangement order may cover
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306ea
note: Determination that application covers additional employers and employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.75
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ea-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ea-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306EA Regulated labour hire arrangement order may cover
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

306EB Application of regulated labour hire arrangement order to
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306eb
note: Application of regulated labour hire arrangement order to new covered employment instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.77
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306eb-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306eb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306EB Application of regulated labour hire arrangement order to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

306EC Notification requirements in relation to new covered
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306ec
has part: 306EC(1) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
has part: 306EC(2) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
has part: 306EC(3) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78

306EC(1) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306ec-ss-1
part of: 306EC Notification requirements in relation to new covered
note: Regulated host must provide written notice to employers after an event occurs.
description: (a) the event; and (b) the effect that the event will have or would have in relation to the order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated host has a duty to provide notice.
conclusion text: (a) the event; and (b) the effect that the event will have or would have in relation to the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306EC(2) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306ec-ss-2
part of: 306EC Notification requirements in relation to new covered
note: Notification requirements in relation to new covered employment instrument
description: Notification by FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306EC(2) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
conclusion text: Notification by FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between approval and operation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

306EC(3) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306ec-ss-3
part of: 306EC Notification requirements in relation to new covered
note: Employers must be notified of FWC approval and its effect on the order.
description: Written notice to employers covered by the order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.78
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306EC(3) Notification requirements in relation to new covered
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ec-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employers must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306ED Varying regulated labour hire arrangement order to cover
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306ed
note: New employers must comply with regulated labour hire arrangement order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.79
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306ED Varying regulated labour hire arrangement order to cover
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ed-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF
logic summary: Subclass of regulated labour hire arrangement order
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306EE Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306ee
has part: 306EE(1) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
has part: 306EE(2) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
has part: 306EE(3) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.82

306EE(1) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306ee-ss-1
part of: 306EE Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
note: Notify tenderers of regulated labour hire arrangement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.82
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated host must notify tenderers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306EE(2) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306ee-ss-2
part of: 306EE Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
note: Regulated host must inform tenderers of potential employer coverage
description: Information about potential employer coverage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.82
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306EE(2) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated host must inform tenderers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306EE(3) Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306ee-ss-3
part of: 306EE Notifying tenderers etc. of regulated labour hire
note: Notify successful tenderer of regulated labour hire application requirements
description: Information about the effect of subsection 306ED(11)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.82
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306ee-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated host must notify successful tenderer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306F Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306f
has part: 306F(1) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
has part: 306F(2) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
has part: 306F(3) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.83

306F(1) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306f-ss-1
part of: 306F Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
note: Employer must not pay less than protected rate of pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.83
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on paying less than protected rate of pay
premise text: (1) This section applies...
conclusion text: Employer must not pay less than protected rate of pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for regulated labour hire arrangement order
premise text: (1) This section applies if a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force...
conclusion text: Regulated labour hire arrangement order (temporal interval)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for regulated labour hire arrangement order
premise text: (1) This section applies if a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force...
conclusion text: Regulated labour hire arrangement order (recurring trace)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for regulated labour hire arrangement order
premise text: (1) This section applies if a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force...
conclusion text: Regulated labour hire arrangement order (knowledge representation)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Schema validation for regulated labour hire arrangement order
premise text: (1) This section applies if a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force...
conclusion text: Regulated labour hire arrangement order (schema validation)
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306F(2) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306f-ss-2
part of: 306F Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
note: Employer must pay regulated employee at least the protected rate of pay.
description: Payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.83
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay the regulated employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306F(3) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306f-ss-3
part of: 306F Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
note: Employer must pay regulated employee at protected rate of pay if provided with accurate information.
description: Information about protected rate of pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.83
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306F(3) Protected rate of pay payable to employees if a regulated
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must comply with obligation to pay regulated employee at protected rate of pay.
premise text: Employer pays less than protected rate of pay without information from regulated host.
conclusion text: Employer does not contravene subsection (2) if provided with accurate information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306G Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306g
has part: 306G(1) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
has part: 306G(2) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
has part: 306G(3) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86

306G(1) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306g-ss-1
part of: 306G Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
note: Exempts regulated employees from paying protected rate of pay under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306G(1) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Regulated employees are exempt from paying protected rate of pay under certain conditions.
premise text: Section 306F does not apply to a regulated employee if a training arrangement applies to the employee in respect of the work performed for the regulated host.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal interval during which regulated employees are exempt from paying protected rate of pay.
premise text: (1) Section 306F does not apply to a regulated employee if a training arrangement applies to the employee in respect of the work performed for the regulated host.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: The provision specifies a recurring trace of regulated employees who are exempt from paying protected rate of pay under certain conditions.
premise text: (1) Section 306F does not apply to a regulated employee if a training arrangement applies to the employee in respect of the work performed for the regulated host.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusive Effect
logic summary: The provision has a diffusive effect on regulated employees who are exempt from paying protected rate of pay under certain conditions.
premise text: (1) Section 306F does not apply to a regulated employee if a training arrangement applies to the employee in respect of the work performed for the regulated host.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: The provision uses knowledge representation to classify regulated employees as exempt from paying protected rate of pay under certain conditions.
premise text: (1) Section 306F does not apply to a regulated employee if a training arrangement applies to the employee in respect of the work performed for the regulated host.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

306G(2) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306g-ss-2
part of: 306G Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
note: Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306G(2) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306G(3) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306g-ss-3
part of: 306G Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
note: Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.86
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306G(3) Exceptions from requirement to pay protected rate of pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

306H Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306h
has part: 306H(1) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
has part: 306H(2) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
has part: 306H(3) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
has part: 306H(4) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87

306H(1) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306h-ss-1
part of: 306H Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
note: Regulated hosts must provide information regarding protected rate of pay to employers covered by a regulated labour hire arrangement order.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated hosts have a duty to provide information regarding protected rate of pay.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306H(2) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306h-ss-2
part of: 306H Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
note: Employer may request specified information from regulated host.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Employer has the right to request information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believes
logic summary: Employer believes they lack necessary information.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
logic summary: Employer traces the need for information.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306H(3) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306h-ss-3
part of: 306H Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
note: Regulated host must comply with request within a reasonable period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Regulated host has an obligation to comply with the request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306H(4) Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306h-ss-4
part of: 306H Obligations of regulated hosts covered by a regulated labour
note: Regulated host must provide information to employer
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.87
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306J Determination altering exemption period for short-term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306j
has part: 306J(1) Determination altering exemption period for short-term
has part: 306J(2) Determination altering exemption period for short-term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88

306J(1) Determination altering exemption period for short-term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306j-ss-1
part of: 306J Determination altering exemption period for short-term
note: Regulated labour hire arrangement order conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306J(1) Determination altering exemption period for short-term
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force or made but not yet in force, then the exemption period for short-term work is altered.
premise text: (a) or (b)
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: The exemption period for short-term work overlaps with the regulated labour hire arrangement order.
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: exemption period for short-term work
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: If an application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order has been made but not finally determined, then the exemption period for short-term work is altered.
premise text: (c)
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: The regulated labour hire arrangement order diffuses to the FWC under section 306E.
premise text: (a) or (b) or (c)
conclusion text: regulated labour hire arrangement order
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: The CogAI recognizes the regulated host, employer, and regulated employees.
premise text: (a) or (b)
conclusion text: regulated labour hire arrangement order
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306J(2) Determination altering exemption period for short-term
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306j-ss-2
part of: 306J Determination altering exemption period for short-term
note: Determination of exemption period for regulated host
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306J(2) Determination altering exemption period for short-term
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

306K Determination of recurring extended exemption period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306k
has part: 306K(1) Determination of recurring extended exemption period
has part: 306K(2) Determination of recurring extended exemption period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88

306K(1) Determination of recurring extended exemption period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306k-ss-1
part of: 306K Determination of recurring extended exemption period
note: Regulated labour hire arrangement order in force or application pending
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306K(1) Determination of recurring extended exemption period
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Order is in force
premise text: (1) This section applies if: Terms and conditions of employment Chapter 2 Regulated labour hire arrangement orders Part 2-7A Regulated labour hire arrangement orders Division 2 Section 306L Fair Work Act 2009
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Order has been in force for at least some time
premise text: (b) a regulated labour hire arrangement order has been made but is not yet in force that covers a regulated host, one or more employers and one or more regulated employees performing work for the regulated host;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: for-all
logic summary: Application has been made to FWC but not yet determined
premise text: (c) an application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order that would cover a regulated host, one or more employers and one or more regulated employees performing work for the regulated host has been made to the FWC under section 306E but has not been finally determined.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Application is pending
premise text: (c) an application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order that would cover a regulated host, one or more employers and one or more regulated employees performing work for the regulated host has been made to the FWC under section 306E but has not been finally determined.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Order is in force
premise text: (a) a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force that covers a regulated host, one or more employers and one or more regulated employees performing work for the regulated host;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306K(2) Determination of recurring extended exemption period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306k-ss-2
part of: 306K Determination of recurring extended exemption period
note: Defines recurring extended exemption period for regulated host
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.88
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306k-ss-2-norm

306L Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306l
has part: 306L(1) Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
has part: 306L(2) Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.89

306L(1) Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306l-ss-1
part of: 306L Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
note: Determination under this Subdivision must be made on application by regulated host, employer or organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.89
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to make determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306L(2) Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306l-ss-2
part of: 306L Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
note: The FWC must decide whether or not to make the determination as quickly as possible after the application is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.89
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306L(2) Making and effect of determinations under this Subdivision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to decide quickly
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306M Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306m
has part: 306M(1) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
has part: 306M(2) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91

306M(1) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306m-ss-1
part of: 306M Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
note: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force or application made to FWC under section 306E
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306M(1) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force or application made to FWC under section 306E
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force between certain dates
premise text: (b) a regulated labour hire arrangement order has been made but is not yet in force that covers a regulated host, an employer and a regulated employee of the employer performing work for the regulated host;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force between certain dates
premise text: (c) an application for a regulated labour hire arrangement order that would cover a regulated host, an employer and a regulated employee of the employer performing work for the regulated host has been made to the FWC under section 306E but has not been finally determined.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force or application made to FWC under section 306E
premise text: (a) a regulated labour hire arrangement order is in force that covers a regulated host, an employer and a regulated employee of the employer performing work for the regulated host;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated labour hire arrangement order must be in force or application made to FWC under section 306E
premise text: (b) a regulated labour hire arrangement order has been made but is not yet in force that covers a regulated host, an employer and a regulated employee of the employer performing work for the regulated host;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306M(2) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306m-ss-2
part of: 306M Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
note: The FWC may make an order specifying terms and conditions of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.91
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306M(2) Making an alternative protected rate of pay order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306N Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306n
has part: 306N(1) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
has part: 306N(2) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
has part: 306N(3) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94

306N(1) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306n-ss-1
part of: 306N Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
note: Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: (i) on the day the regulated labour hire arrangement order comes into force; or (ii) on a later day specified in the alternative protected rate of pay order;
conclusion text: A relation between identifiable temporal intervals is required.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace
premise text: (i) on the day the regulated labour hire arrangement order comes into force; or (ii) on a later day specified in the alternative protected rate of pay order;
conclusion text: An ordered or recurring trace is required.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the regulated labour hire arrangement order as an obligation
premise text: (1) An alternative protected rate of pay order comes into force:
conclusion text: The regulated labour hire arrangement order is classified as an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the day on which the alternative protected rate of pay order comes into force as a right
premise text: (a) if the order is made before the regulated labour hire arrangement order to which the order relates comes into force:
conclusion text: The day on which the alternative protected rate of pay order comes into force is classified as a right.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

306N(2) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306n-ss-2
part of: 306N Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
note: No contravention of alternative protected rate of pay order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 306N(2) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: Person must not contravene an alternative protected rate of pay order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306N(3) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306n-ss-3
part of: 306N Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
note: Prohibition on contravening alternative protected rate of pay order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.94
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 306N(3) Effect of alternative protected rate of pay order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (3) A person must not contravene a term of an alternative protected rate of pay order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Enforce
logic summary: Enforcement of obligation to comply with protected rate of pay order
premise text: (3) A person must not contravene a term of an alternative protected rate of pay order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of obligation on agent's behavior
premise text: (3) A person must not contravene a term of an alternative protected rate of pay order.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306n-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
logic summary: Justification of obligation to comply with protected rate of pay order
premise text: (3) A person must not contravene a term of an alternative protected rate of pay order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306NA Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306na
has part: 306NA(1) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
has part: 306NA(2) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.95

306NA(1) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306na-ss-1
part of: 306NA Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
note: Employment termination payment determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.95
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306NA(1) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

306NA(2) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306na-ss-2
part of: 306NA Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
note: Employer must pay employee upon termination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.95
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306NA(2) Determining amounts of payments relating to termination of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306na-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay the employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306P Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306p
has part: 306P(1) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(2) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(3) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(4) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(5) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(6) Disputes about the operation of this Part
has part: 306P(7) Disputes about the operation of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98

306P(1) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306p-ss-1
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part
note: Disputes about operation of Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306P(1) Disputes about the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

306P(2) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306p-ss-2
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part
note: Parties must attempt to resolve dispute at workplace level
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306P(2) Disputes about the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must attempt to resolve dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), this Division applies to a dispute about:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306P(3) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306p-ss-3
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part
note: Parties must attempt to resolve disputes at the workplace level.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306P(3) Disputes about the operation of this Part
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must attempt to resolve disputes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306P(4) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306p-ss-4
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part
note: Party must apply to FWC for dispute resolution if discussions at workplace level fail.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306P(4) Disputes about the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to apply FWC for dispute resolution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306P(5) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306p-ss-5
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part
note: FWC must deal with dispute by means other than arbitration unless exceptional circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306P(5) Disputes about the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC must deal with dispute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: FWC is a legal person.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306P(6) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306p-ss-6
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part
note: Permission for representation by lawyer or paid agent before FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission to represent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

306P(7) Disputes about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306p-ss-7
part of: 306P Disputes about the operation of this Part
note: Joinder of employees in disputes about the operation of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.98
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306P(7) Disputes about the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306p-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide joinder of employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

306Q Dealing with disputes by arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306q
note: Employer must pay employee a certain rate of pay.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.99
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306q-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306q-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306q-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306Q Dealing with disputes by arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to pay employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306R Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306r
has part: 306R(1) Application fees
has part: 306R(2) Application fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101

306R(1) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306r-ss-1
part of: 306R Application fees
note: Must provide application fee with regulations
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306R(1) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306R(2) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306r-ss-2
part of: 306R Application fees
note: Application fee regulation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.101
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306R(2) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires payment of application fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306S Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306s
has part: 306S(1) Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
has part: 306S(2) Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102

306S(1) Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306s-ss-1
part of: 306S Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
note: Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306s-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306s-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 306S(1) Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making of regulated labour hire arrangement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306S(2) Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306s-ss-2
part of: 306S Preventing making of regulated labour hire arrangement
note: Definition of scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306s-ss-2-norm

306SA Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306sa
has part: 306SA(1) Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
has part: 306SA(2) Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102

306SA(1) Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306sa-ss-1
part of: 306SA Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
note: Avoiding application of regulated labour hire is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 306SA(1) Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306SA(2) Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306sa-ss-2
part of: 306SA Avoidance of application of regulated labour hire
note: Definition of scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.102
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306sa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines the term 'scheme'
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306T Short-term arrangements—engaging other employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306t
note: Employer must pay regulated employee at a rate determined under or in accordance with this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.103
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306t-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306t-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306t-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 306T Short-term arrangements—engaging other employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits employer from not paying regulated employee at a rate determined under or in accordance with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306U Short-term arrangements—entering into other labour hire
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306u
note: Regulated host covered by a regulated labour hire arrangement contravenes this section if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306u-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306u-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306u-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 306U Short-term arrangements—entering into other labour hire
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Regulated host is prohibited from contravening the section.
premise text: Regulated host covered by a regulated labour hire arrangement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306V Engaging independent contractors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306v
note: Employer must not dismiss employee and engage independent contractor to avoid paying a worker.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.104
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306v-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306v-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306v-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 306V Engaging independent contractors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the employer from dismissing an employee and engaging an independent contractor.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306W Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306w
has part: 306W(1) Guidelines
has part: 306W(2) Guidelines
has part: 306W(3) Guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106

306W(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306w-ss-1
part of: 306W Guidelines
note: The FWC may make written guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306W(1) Guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to provide guidelines
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306W(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306w-ss-2
part of: 306W Guidelines
note: Legislative instruments are not guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306W(2) Guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Guidelines are not legislative instruments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306W(3) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-306w-ss-3
part of: 306W Guidelines
note: Ensure guidelines are in force by November 2024 and at all times thereafter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.106
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 306W(3) Guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure guidelines are in force
premise text: (3) The FWC must ensure that guidelines under subsection (1) are in force:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Guidelines must be in force from November 2024 onwards
premise text: (3) The FWC must ensure that guidelines under subsection (1) are in force:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-306w-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Guidelines must be in force from November 2024 onwards
premise text: (3) The FWC must ensure that guidelines under subsection (1) are in force:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

307 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-307
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-307-norm

308 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-308
note: Defines employee and employer terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.107
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-308-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-308-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-308-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 308 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-308-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

309 Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-309
note: Balancing protection of employees' terms and conditions with employers' interests in running enterprises efficiently.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.108
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-309-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-309-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-309-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 309 Object of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-309-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Duty to balance competing interests.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

310 Application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-310
note: Transfer of rights and obligations under enterprise agreements, modern awards, and other instruments upon business transfer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-310-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-310-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-310-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 310 Application of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-310-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to provide for the transfer of rights and obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

311 When does a transfer of business occur
type: Concept
realized by: sec-311
has part: 311(1) When does a transfer of business occur
has part: 311(2) When does a transfer of business occur
has part: 311(3) When does a transfer of business occur
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109

311(1) When does a transfer of business occur
type: Concept
realized by: sec-311-ss-1
part of: 311 When does a transfer of business occur
note: Transfer of business occurs under specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 311(1) When does a transfer of business occur
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Definition of transfer of business
premise text: (1) There is a transfer of business...
conclusion text: ...the work the employee performed for the old employer;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

311(2) When does a transfer of business occur
type: Concept
realized by: sec-311-ss-2
part of: 311 When does a transfer of business occur
note: Definition of transferring employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 311(2) When does a transfer of business occur
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has-duty
logic summary: Duty to satisfy requirements
premise text: Requirements in paragraphs (1)(a), (b) and (c)
conclusion text: Satisfying Requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

311(3) When does a transfer of business occur
type: Concept
realized by: sec-311-ss-3
part of: 311 When does a transfer of business occur
note: Connection between old and new employer requires arrangement between Chapter 2 terms and conditions of employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.109
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 311(3) When does a transfer of business occur
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-311-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires an arrangement between Chapter 2 terms and conditions of employment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

312 Instruments that may transfer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-312
has part: 312(1) Instruments that may transfer
has part: 312(2) Instruments that may transfer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111

312(1) Instruments that may transfer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-312-ss-1
part of: 312 Instruments that may transfer
note: List of transferable instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-312-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-312-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 312(1) Instruments that may transfer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

312(2) Instruments that may transfer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-312-ss-2
part of: 312 Instruments that may transfer
note: Named employers that may transfer under modern awards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-312-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-312-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 312(2) Instruments that may transfer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

313 Transferring employees and new employer covered by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-313
note: Transferable instrument coverage after employment change
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.111
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-313-norm

314 New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-314
has part: 314(1) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
has part: 314(2) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
has part: 314(3) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112

314(1) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-314-ss-1
part of: 314 New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
note: Transferable instrument covers new employer and non-transferring employee in relation to that work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 314(1) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
logic summary: Transferable instrument obligation
premise text: (a) a transferable instrument covers the new employer because of paragraph 313(1)(a); and (b) after the transferable instrument starts to cover the new employer, the new employer employs a non-transferring employee; and (c) the non-transferring employee performs the transferring work; and (d) at the time the non-transferring employee is employed, no other enterprise agreement or modern award covers the new employer and the non-transferring employee in relation to that work;
conclusion text: (1) If: ... then the transferable instrument covers the new employer and the non-transferring employee in relation to that work.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Transferable instrument starts during employment
premise text: (b) after the transferable instrument starts to cover the new employer, the new employer employs a non-transferring employee; and (c) the non-transferring employee performs the transferring work;
conclusion text: (1) If: ... then the transferable instrument covers the new employer and the non-transferring employee in relation to that work.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Transferable instrument starts during employment
premise text: (b) after the transferable instrument starts to cover the new employer, the new employer employs a non-transferring employee; and (c) the non-transferring employee performs the transferring work;
conclusion text: (1) If: ... then the transferable instrument covers the new employer and the non-transferring employee in relation to that work.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

314(2) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-314-ss-2
part of: 314 New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
note: Defines non-transferring employee in relation to business transfer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 314(2) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

314(3) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-314-ss-3
part of: 314 New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
note: Subject to FWC order under subsection 319(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.112
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 314(3) New non-transferring employees of new employer may be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-314-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Subjunctive
logic summary: Depends on FWC order
premise text: FWC order under subsection 319(1)
conclusion text: This section has effect subject to such order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

315 Organisations covered by transferable instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-315
has part: 315(1) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
has part: 315(2) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
has part: 315(3) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113

315(1) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-315-ss-1
part of: 315 Organisations covered by transferable instrument
note: Named employer award covers new employer if certain conditions met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 315(1) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If A, then B.
premise text: (a) a named employer award covers the new employer because of paragraph 313(1)(a); and (b) the named employer award covered an employer organisation in relation to the old employer immediately before the termination of a transferring employee’s employment with the old employer;
conclusion text: then the named employer award covers the employer organisation in relation to the new employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

315(2) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-315-ss-2
part of: 315 Organisations covered by transferable instrument
note: Named employer award covers employee organisation in relation to transferring employee and non-transferring employees performing same work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 315(2) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Named employer award covers employee organisation in relation to transferring employee and non-transferring employees performing same work.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Termination of transferring employee's employment with old employer
conclusion text: Named employer award covers employee organisation immediately before termination
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

315(3) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
type: Concept
realized by: sec-315-ss-3
part of: 315 Organisations covered by transferable instrument
note: Organisations covered by transferable instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.113
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-315-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 315(3) Organisations covered by transferable instrument
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

316 Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-316
has part: 316(1) Transferring employees who are high income employees
has part: 316(2) Transferring employees who are high income employees
has part: 316(3) Transferring employees who are high income employees
has part: 316(4) Transferring employees who are high income employees
has part: 316(5) Transferring employees who are high income employees
has part: 316(6) Transferring employees who are high income employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114

316(1) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-316-ss-1
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees
note: Guarantee of annual earnings for a guaranteed period to a transferring employee applies if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 316(1) Transferring employees who are high income employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If the old employer gave a guarantee, then it must provide for the transferring employee.
premise text: (a) The old employer had given a guarantee of annual earnings for a guaranteed period to a transferring employee; and
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) the old employer had given a guarantee of annual earnings for a guaranteed period to a transferring employee; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: The obligation applies to the transferring employee.
premise text: (b) The transferring employee was a high income employee immediately before the termination of the transferring employee’s employment with the old employer; and
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (b) The transferring employee was a high income employee immediately before the termination of the transferring employee’s employment with the old employer; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: The obligation applies to the new employer.
premise text: (c) Some of the guaranteed period occurs after the time (the transfer time) the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer; and
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (c) some of the guaranteed period occurs after the time (the transfer time) the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: The obligation applies to the enterprise agreement.
premise text: (d) an enterprise agreement does not apply to the transferring employee in relation to the transferring work at the transfer time.
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (d) an enterprise agreement does not apply to the transferring employee in relation to the transferring work at the transfer time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

316(2) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-316-ss-2
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees
note: Guarantee of annual earnings has effect after transfer as if given to the transferring employee by the new employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 316(2) Transferring employees who are high income employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: The state guarantees annual earnings.
premise text: (2) The guarantee of annual earnings...
conclusion text: The new employer is obligated to pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: The transfer implies that the new employer is obligated to pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
premise text: (2) The guarantee...
conclusion text: If the transfer occurs, then the new employer must pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The guarantee applies during the transfer period.
premise text: (2) The guarantee...
conclusion text: The guarantee of annual earnings has effect after the transfer time as if it had been given to the transferring employee by the new employer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: The guarantee diffuses to the new employer.
premise text: (2) The guarantee...
conclusion text: The new employer is obligated to pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: entails
logic summary: The guarantee entails that the new employer must pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
premise text: (2) The guarantee...
conclusion text: If the transfer occurs, then the new employer must pay the transferring employee's guaranteed annual earnings.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

316(3) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-316-ss-3
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees
note: New employer not required to comply with guarantee of annual earnings before transfer time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-3-norm

316(4) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-316-ss-4
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees
note: New employer is not required to pay more than the annual rate of the guarantee of annual earnings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Excluding higher rates from the new employer's obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

316(5) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-316-ss-5
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees
note: Guarantee of annual earnings must be varied if non-monetary benefits cannot be provided.
description: Amount of money equivalent to agreed benefits
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 316(5) Transferring employees who are high income employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee must be varied
premise text: Non-monetary benefits cannot be provided
conclusion text: Guarantee of annual earnings is varied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

316(6) Transferring employees who are high income employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-316-ss-6
part of: 316 Transferring employees who are high income employees
note: Old employer's obligations regarding guarantee of annual earnings unaffected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.114
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 316(6) Transferring employees who are high income employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-316-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues existing obligation
premise text: Old employer's obligations arose before transfer time
conclusion text: Old employer's obligations unaffected
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

317 FWC may make orders in relation to a transfer of business
type: Concept
realized by: sec-317
note: FWC may make orders in relation to a transfer of business
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-317-norm

318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-318
has part: 318(1) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 318(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 318(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 318(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116

318(1) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-318-ss-1
part of: 318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
note: Application for order regarding transfer of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 318(1) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Employer has obligation to make order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

318(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-318-ss-2
part of: 318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
note: The FWC may make an order only on application by certain parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 318(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

318(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-318-ss-3
part of: 318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
note: Consider views of new employer, employees, and public interest when deciding whether to make an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 318(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

318(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-318-ss-4
part of: 318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
note: Order must not come into operation before transferring employee becomes employed or order is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.116
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 318(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on operation before specified conditions are met.
premise text: (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-318-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval between specified conditions.
premise text: (a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;
conclusion text: (b) the day on which the order is made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

319 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-319
has part: 319(1) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 319(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 319(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
has part: 319(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118

319(1) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-319-ss-1
part of: 319 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
note: The FWC may not make a transferable instrument that covers a non-transferring employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of making a transferable instrument that covers a non-transferring employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

319(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-319-ss-2
part of: 319 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
note: The FWC may make an order only on application by certain parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 319(2) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

319(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-319-ss-3
part of: 319 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
note: Consider views of new employer and employees when deciding whether to make an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 319(3) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

319(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-319-ss-4
part of: 319 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
note: Order must not come into operation before a non-transferring employee starts to perform transferring work.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.118
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-ltl-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 319(4) Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on operation before specified condition is met.
premise text: (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular non-transferring employee...
conclusion text: ...before the later of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Order is mandatory when conditions are met.
premise text: (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular non-transferring employee...
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between order and specified condition.
premise text: (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular non-transferring employee...
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-319-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between order and specified condition.
premise text: (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular non-transferring employee...
conclusion text: ...the later of the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

320 Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-320
has part: 320(1) Variation of transferable instruments
has part: 320(2) Variation of transferable instruments
has part: 320(3) Variation of transferable instruments
has part: 320(4) Variation of transferable instruments
has part: 320(5) Variation of transferable instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120

320(1) Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-320-ss-1
part of: 320 Variation of transferable instruments
note: Power to vary transferable instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission to vary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

320(2) Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-320-ss-2
part of: 320 Variation of transferable instruments
note: Variation of transferable instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 320(2) Variation of transferable instruments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

320(3) Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-320-ss-3
part of: 320 Variation of transferable instruments
note: Application requirements for variation of transferable instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 320(3) Variation of transferable instruments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires application by a person or employee organisation
premise text: The FWC may make the variation only on application by...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

320(4) Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-320-ss-4
part of: 320 Variation of transferable instruments
note: Consider views of new employer and employees when deciding to make variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-4-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 320(4) Variation of transferable instruments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

320(5) Variation of transferable instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-320-ss-5
part of: 320 Variation of transferable instruments
note: Variation of transferable instruments must not come into operation before certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.120
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 320(5) Variation of transferable instruments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on premature variation
premise text: (5) A variation of a transferable instrument under subsection (2)
conclusion text: must not come into operation before the later of...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Condition for variation to take effect
premise text: (a) the time when the transferable instrument starts to cover the new employer
conclusion text: must come into operation on or after...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-320-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Condition for variation to take effect
premise text: (b) the day on which the variation is made
conclusion text: must come into operation on or after...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

321 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-321
note: Employer must pay certain amounts to national system employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.122
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-321-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-321-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-321-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 321 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-321-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer must pay certain amounts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

322 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-322
note: Defines employee and employer terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.123
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-322-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-322-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-322-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 322 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-322-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

323 Method and frequency of payment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-323
has part: 323(1) Method and frequency of payment
has part: 323(2) Method and frequency of payment
has part: 323(3) Method and frequency of payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124

323(1) Method and frequency of payment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-323-ss-1
part of: 323 Method and frequency of payment
note: Employer must pay employee amounts payable in relation to work performance.
description: Amounts payable to the employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 323(1) Method and frequency of payment
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must pay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Payment must be made within a certain timeframe
premise text: (c) at least monthly.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

323(2) Method and frequency of payment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-323-ss-2
part of: 323 Method and frequency of payment
note: Methods of payment for employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Methods of payment for employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

323(3) Method and frequency of payment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-323-ss-3
part of: 323 Method and frequency of payment
note: Employer must pay money by specified method.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.124
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 323(3) Method and frequency of payment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-323-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay by specified method.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

324 Permitted deductions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-324
has part: 324(1) Permitted deductions
has part: 324(1A) Permitted deductions
has part: 324(2) Permitted deductions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.125

324(1) Permitted deductions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-324-ss-1
part of: 324 Permitted deductions
note: Employer may deduct amount from employee's pay if authorized in writing or by agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.125
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 324(1) Permitted deductions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to deduct amount from employee's pay.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

324(1A) Permitted deductions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-324-ss-1a
part of: 324 Permitted deductions
note: Deduction for employer benefit is prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.125
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits deduction for employer benefit
premise text: (1A) However, an employer must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

324(2) Permitted deductions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-324-ss-2
part of: 324 Permitted deductions
note: Specify amount of deduction for single deduction
description: Amount of deduction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.125
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-324-ss-2-norm

325 Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
type: Concept
realized by: sec-325
has part: 325(1) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
has part: 325(1A) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
has part: 325(2) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126

325(1) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
type: Concept
realized by: sec-325-ss-1
part of: 325 Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
note: Employer cannot require employee to spend or pay amount of their money.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 325(1) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits employer from requiring employee to spend or pay amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits payment for benefit of employer or related party.
premise text: (b) for a payment—the payment is directly or indirectly for the benefit of the employer or a party related to the employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Requires temporal interval between requirement and payment.
premise text: (a) the requirement is unreasonable in the circumstances; and (b) for a payment—the payment is directly or indirectly for the benefit of the employer...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Requires recurring trace between employee and employer.
premise text: (a) the requirement is unreasonable in the circumstances; and (b) for a payment—the payment is directly or indirectly for the benefit of the employer...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits indirect requirement.
premise text: (1) An employer must not directly or indirectly require an employee to spend, or pay to the employer or another person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

325(1A) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
type: Concept
realized by: sec-325-ss-1a
part of: 325 Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
note: Employer cannot require employee to spend or pay an amount of their money under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-ltl-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 325(1A) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits direct or indirect spending or payment.
premise text: (1A) An employer (the prospective employer) must not...
conclusion text: ...an amount of the prospective employee’s money if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits indirect spending or payment.
premise text: (c) the payment is directly or indirectly for the benefit of the prospective employer or a party related to the prospective employer.
conclusion text: ...an amount of the prospective employee’s money if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for requirement.
premise text: (1A) An employer (the prospective employer) must not...
conclusion text: ...an amount of the prospective employee’s money if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-1a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for requirement.
premise text: (1A) An employer (the prospective employer) must not...
conclusion text: ...an amount of the prospective employee’s money if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

325(2) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
type: Concept
realized by: sec-325-ss-2
part of: 325 Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
note: Circumstances in which a requirement is or is not reasonable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.126
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-325-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 325(2) Unreasonable requirements to spend or pay amount
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

326 Certain terms have no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-326
has part: 326(1) Certain terms have no effect
has part: 326(2) Certain terms have no effect
has part: 326(3) Certain terms have no effect
has part: 326(4) Certain terms have no effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127

326(1) Certain terms have no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-326-ss-1
part of: 326 Certain terms have no effect
note: Employer may not deduct an amount from employee's pay if it benefits employer or related party and is unreasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 326(1) Certain terms have no effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits deduction for employer benefit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits unreasonable deduction
premise text: (b) unreasonable in the circumstances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

326(2) Certain terms have no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-326-ss-2
part of: 326 Certain terms have no effect
note: Regulations may prescribe circumstances for a deduction to be reasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 326(2) Certain terms have no effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mayPrescribe
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

326(3) Certain terms have no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-326-ss-3
part of: 326 Certain terms have no effect
note: Employer requirements that contravene subsection 325(1) are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-ltl-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 326(3) Certain terms have no effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits employer requirements that contravene subsection 325(1)
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that the term: (a) permits, or has the effect of permitting, an employer to make a requirement that would contravene subsection 325(1); or
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Traces the temporal relationship between terms and prohibited employer requirements
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that the term: (a) permits, or has the effect of permitting, an employer to make a requirement that would contravene subsection 325(1); or
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits employee requirements that contravene subsection 325(1)
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that the term: (b) directly or indirectly requires an employee to spend or pay an amount, if the requirement would contravene subsection 325(1) if it had been made by an employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Traces the temporal relationship between employee requirements and prohibited employer requirements
premise text: (3) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that the term: (b) directly or indirectly requires an employee to spend or pay an amount, if the requirement would contravene subsection 325(1) if it had been made by an employer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

326(4) Certain terms have no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-326-ss-4
part of: 326 Certain terms have no effect
note: Deduction of amount from employee's payment is prohibited for minors without parental consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.127
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-shacl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of deduction
premise text: (4) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for deduction prohibition
premise text: (4) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for deduction prohibition
premise text: (4) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for deduction prohibition
premise text: (4) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-326-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation for deduction prohibition
premise text: (4) A term of a modern award, an enterprise agreement or a contract of employment has no effect to the extent that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

327 Things given or provided, and amounts required to be spent or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-327
note: Employer must not give or provide something contrary to paragraph 323(1)(b) and subsection 323(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 327 Things given or provided, and amounts required to be spent or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of giving or providing something
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

327A Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-327a
has part: 327A(1) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
has part: 327A(2) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
has part: 327A(3) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128

327A(1) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-327a-ss-1
part of: 327A Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
note: Employer must pay required amounts to employees on time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 327A(1) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay required amounts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

327A(2) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-327a-ss-2
part of: 327A Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
note: Failing to pay certain amounts as required is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 327A(2) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits failing to pay certain amounts as required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on employers to pay certain amounts as required.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), an amount is covered by this subsection if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the payment and the required amounts.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), an amount is covered by this subsection if:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits failure to pay certain amounts as required.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b), an amount is covered by this subsection if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

327A(3) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
type: Concept
realized by: sec-327a-ss-3
part of: 327A Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
note: Failing to pay certain amounts as required is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.128
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 327A(3) Offence—failing to pay certain amounts as required
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits failing to pay certain amounts as required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

327B The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-327b
has part: 327B(1) The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
has part: 327B(2) The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131

327B(1) The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-327b-ss-1
part of: 327B The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
note: The Minister may declare a Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

327B(2) The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-327b-ss-2
part of: 327B The Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code
note: Cannot refer conduct to DPP or AFP for possible offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.131
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Fair Work Ombudsman
conclusion text: refer conduct to DPP or AFP
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

327C Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-327c
has part: 327C(1) Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
has part: 327C(2) Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132

327C(1) Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-327c-ss-1
part of: 327C Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
note: Only the Director of Public Prosecutions or Australian Federal Police can commence proceedings for certain offences against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits commencement of proceedings by anyone other than the Director of Public Prosecutions or Australian Federal Police.
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against subsection 327A(1); may be commenced only by the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts the commencement of proceedings for certain offences against this Act to the Director of Public Prosecutions or Australian Federal Police.
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against subsection 327A(1); may be commenced only by the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Specify
logic summary: Specifies the agents that can commence proceedings for certain offences against this Act.
premise text: (1) Proceedings for an offence against subsection 327A(1); may be commenced only by the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Specify
logic summary: Specifies the agents that can commence proceedings for certain offences against this Act.
premise text: (b) a related offence provision, to the extent that the related offence provision relates to an offence against subsection 327A(1); may be commenced only by the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Australian Federal Police.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

327C(2) Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-327c-ss-2
part of: 327C Commencing proceedings for certain offences against this Act
note: No proceedings for certain offences against this Act may be commenced after 6 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.132
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-327c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No proceedings for certain offences against this Act may be commenced after 6 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

328 Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-328
has part: 328(1) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
has part: 328(2) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.133

328(1) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-328-ss-1
part of: 328 Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
note: Employer must comply with guarantee during certain periods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.133
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 328(1) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to comply with the guarantee
premise text: The employer gave a guarantee of annual earnings to the employee
conclusion text: The employer must comply with the guarantee during certain periods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Guarantee applies during specific periods
premise text: The employee is entitled to receive a certain amount of money for a specific period
conclusion text: The guarantee applies during the period specified in the promise
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: Employer's compliance with guarantee is justified by the circumstances
premise text: The employer is required to reduce the employee's earnings under certain circumstances
conclusion text: However, during certain periods, the employer must comply with the guarantee
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
logic summary: Guarantee spreads to other employees covered by the modern award
premise text: The employee is covered by a modern award that is in operation
conclusion text: The guarantee applies to all employees covered by the modern award during certain periods
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must
logic summary: Employer's compliance with guarantee is supported by AI analysis
premise text: The employer has given a guarantee of annual earnings to the employee
conclusion text: The guarantee must be complied with during certain periods based on AI analysis
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

328(2) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
type: Concept
realized by: sec-328-ss-2
part of: 328 Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
note: Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.133
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 328(2) Employer obligations in relation to guarantee of annual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-328-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to provide a guarantee of annual earnings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

329 High income employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-329
has part: 329(1) High income employee
has part: 329(2) High income employee
has part: 329(3) High income employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.134

329(1) High income employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-329-ss-1
part of: 329 High income employee
note: Definition of high income employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.134
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 329(1) High income employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

329(2) High income employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-329-ss-2
part of: 329 High income employee
note: Guarantee of annual earnings for high-income employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.134
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 329(2) High income employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employer has obligation to provide guarantee of annual earnings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

329(3) High income employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-329-ss-3
part of: 329 High income employee
note: Employee does not have a guarantee of annual earnings if employer revokes with agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.134
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-329-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 329(3) High income employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

330 Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-330
has part: 330(1) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
has part: 330(2) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
has part: 330(3) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.135

330(1) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-330-ss-1
part of: 330 Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
note: Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
description: Annual earnings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.135
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer's obligation to provide annual earnings
premise text: The employer undertakes to pay the employee an amount of earnings
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to receive annual earnings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Undertaking and employee's employment start within 14 days
premise text: The undertaking and employee's agreement are given before the start of the period
conclusion text: The periods overlap
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Employer's obligation implies employee's right to receive annual earnings
premise text: The employer undertakes to pay the employee an amount of earnings
conclusion text: The employee is entitled to receive annual earnings
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffersFrom
logic summary: Guarantee does not apply to enterprise agreement
premise text: An enterprise agreement does not apply to the employee's employment at the start of the period
conclusion text: The guarantee is distinct from the enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Guarantee is a modern award requirement
premise text: The employee is covered by a modern award that is in operation
conclusion text: The guarantee is recognized as a modern award requirement
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

330(2) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-330-ss-2
part of: 330 Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
note: Exemption from guarantee period for certain employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.135
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Indicates conditions under which the undertaking may be given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

330(3) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-330-ss-3
part of: 330 Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
note: Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.135
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-330-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 330(3) Guarantee of annual earnings and annual rate of guarantee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

331 Guaranteed period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-331
note: Defines the guaranteed period for a guarantee of annual earnings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-331-norm

332 Earnings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-332
has part: 332(1) Earnings
has part: 332(2) Earnings
has part: 332(3) Earnings
has part: 332(4) Earnings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136

332(1) Earnings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-332-ss-1
part of: 332 Earnings
note: Employee earnings definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 332(1) Earnings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines employee earnings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

332(2) Earnings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-332-ss-2
part of: 332 Earnings
note: Employee earnings do not include certain payments and reimbursements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 332(2) Earnings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of specific types of payments from employee earnings.
premise text: (2) However, an employee’s earnings do not include the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

332(3) Earnings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-332-ss-3
part of: 332 Earnings
note: Employee entitlement to non-monetary benefits
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 332(3) Earnings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: entails
logic summary: Employee has a right to non-monetary benefits
premise text: Employee is entitled to performance-based benefits
conclusion text: Employee has a right to non-monetary benefits
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Benefits are granted during employment
premise text: Employment is a temporal interval
conclusion text: Benefits are granted during employment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

332(4) Earnings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-332-ss-4
part of: 332 Earnings
note: Employer must contribute to superannuation fund under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.136
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 332(4) Earnings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-332-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must contribute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333 High income threshold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333
has part: 333(1) High income threshold
has part: 333(2) High income threshold
has part: 333(3) High income threshold
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137

333(1) High income threshold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333-ss-1
part of: 333 High income threshold
note: Prescribes high income threshold amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333(1) High income threshold
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333(2) High income threshold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333-ss-2
part of: 333 High income threshold
note: No effect on high income threshold if reducing its amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Negative Obligation
logic summary: No effect on high income threshold
premise text: (2) A regulation made for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent that it would have the effect of reducing the amount of the high income threshold.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Negative
logic summary: No effect on high income threshold
premise text: (2) A regulation made for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent that it would have the effect of reducing the amount of the high income threshold.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: No effect on high income threshold
premise text: (2) A regulation made for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent that it would have the effect of reducing the amount of the high income threshold.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: No Diffusion
logic summary: No effect on high income threshold
premise text: (2) A regulation made for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent that it would have the effect of reducing the amount of the high income threshold.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: No CogAI
logic summary: No effect on high income threshold
premise text: (2) A regulation made for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent that it would have the effect of reducing the amount of the high income threshold.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333(3) High income threshold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333-ss-3
part of: 333 High income threshold
note: If regulations specify a particular matter or state of affairs, the amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than it was on the last occasion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.137
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333(3) High income threshold
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Regulations specify a particular matter or state of affairs.
conclusion text: The amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than it was on the last occasion.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
premise text: Change in matter or state of affairs occurs before change in amount of high income threshold.
conclusion text: The amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than it was on the last occasion.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison
premise text: Change in matter or state of affairs occurs before change in amount of high income threshold.
conclusion text: The amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than it was on the last occasion.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ≤
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison with inequality
premise text: Change in matter or state of affairs occurs before change in amount of high income threshold.
conclusion text: The amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than or equal to the amount of high income threshold on the last occasion.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ≤
logic summary: Temporal interval comparison with inequality
premise text: Change in matter or state of affairs occurs before change in amount of high income threshold.
conclusion text: The amount of high income threshold worked out in that manner would be less than or equal to the amount of high income threshold on the last occasion.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

333A Prospective employees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333a
note: Employer's guarantee of annual earnings obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.138
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333A Prospective employees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
premise text: Employer gives undertaking
conclusion text: Employee entitled to earnings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333B Employees not subject to pay secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333b
has part: 333B(1) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
has part: 333B(2) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
has part: 333B(3) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.139

333B(1) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333b-ss-1
part of: 333B Employees not subject to pay secrecy
note: Disclosure of employee remuneration and employment terms is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.139
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of disclosure requirements
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333B(2) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333b-ss-2
part of: 333B Employees not subject to pay secrecy
note: Employees can ask other employees about their remuneration and employment terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.139
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Can
logic summary: Permission to ask
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333B(3) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333b-ss-3
part of: 333B Employees not subject to pay secrecy
note: Workplace rights are not prevented by termination of employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.139
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333B(3) Employees not subject to pay secrecy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to respect workplace rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333C Pay secrecy terms to have no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333c
note: Term of employment contract has no effect if inconsistent with employee pay secrecy rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333c-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If term is inconsistent, then it has no effect
premise text: Term = A
conclusion text: A implies ¬A
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333D Prohibition on pay secrecy terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333d
note: Employer prohibited from including pay secrecy terms in employment contracts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.140
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 333D Prohibition on pay secrecy terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits employer from entering into contracts with pay secrecy terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies as a prohibition on pay secrecy terms.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333E Limitations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333e
has part: 333E(1) Limitations
has part: 333E(2) Limitations
has part: 333E(3) Limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141

333E(1) Limitations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333e-ss-1
part of: 333E Limitations
note: Entering into a contract of employment with an employee that includes a term providing for termination at the end of an identifiable period is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 333E(1) Limitations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits entering into a contract of employment with an employee that includes a term providing for termination at the end of an identifiable period.
premise text: (a) the person enters into a contract of employment with an employee; and (b) the contract includes a term that provides the contract will terminate at the end of an identifiable period
conclusion text: The person contravenes this subsection if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Identifies
logic summary: Identifies the conditions under which a contract is prohibited.
premise text: (c) the employee is not a casual employee of the employer for whom the period referred to in paragraph (b) is identified by reference to the completion of the shift of work to which the contract relates; and (d) subsection (2), (3) or (4) applies
conclusion text: and (c) the employee is not a casual employee of the employer for whom the period referred to in paragraph (b) is identified by reference to the completion of the shift of work to which the contract relates; and (d) subsection (2), (3) or (4) applies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333E(2) Limitations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333e-ss-2
part of: 333E Limitations
note: Renewable contracts apply if period is greater than 2 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-2-norm

333E(3) Limitations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333e-ss-3
part of: 333E Limitations
note: Contract extension limit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.141
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333E(3) Limitations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Condition for application
premise text: (sum of identifiable period and any other period for which contract may be extended or renewed) > 2 years
conclusion text: This subsection applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

333F Exceptions to limitations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333f
note: Exceptions to limitations for contracts of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.143
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333F Exceptions to limitations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excepts
logic summary: Exemptions from general rule
premise text: (1) Subsection 333E(1)
conclusion text: Subsection 333E(1) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is a task involving specialised skills
logic summary: Distinct and identifiable task
premise text: (a) the employee is engaged under the contract to perform only a distinct and identifiable task
conclusion text: The task is distinct and identifiable
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during a peak demand period
logic summary: Peak demand period
premise text: (c) the employee is engaged under the contract to undertake essential work during a peak demand period
conclusion text: The work is undertaken during a peak demand period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excepts
logic summary: Exemptions from general rule
premise text: (d) the employee is engaged under the contract to undertake work during emergency circumstances or during a temporary absence of another employee
conclusion text: The work is undertaken during emergency circumstances or a temporary absence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is funded in whole or in part by government funding
logic summary: Government funding
premise text: (f) the contract relates to a position for the performance of work that is funded in whole or in part by government funding
conclusion text: The work is funded by government funding
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333f-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excepts
logic summary: Exemptions from general rule
premise text: (g) the contract relates to a governance position that has a time limit under the governing rules of a corporation or association of persons
conclusion text: The contract is for a governance position with a time limit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333G Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333g
has part: 333G(1) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
has part: 333G(2) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.144

333G(1) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333g-ss-1
part of: 333G Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
note: Entering a prohibited fixed term contract is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.144
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 333G(1) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits entering a prohibited fixed term contract.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333G(2) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333g-ss-2
part of: 333G Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
note: Imposes obligation on Commonwealth, States, and Territories regarding prohibited fixed term contracts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.144
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333G(2) Effect of entering prohibited fixed term contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333H Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333h
has part: 333H(1) Anti-avoidance
has part: 333H(2) Anti-avoidance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145

333H(1) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333h-ss-1
part of: 333H Anti-avoidance
note: Prohibition on avoiding rights or prohibitions under the Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 333H(1) Anti-avoidance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits actions to avoid rights or prohibitions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies actions as prohibited
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333H(2) Anti-avoidance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333h-ss-2
part of: 333H Anti-avoidance
note: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.145
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333H(2) Anti-avoidance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333J Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333j
has part: 333J(1) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
has part: 333J(2) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146

333J(1) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333j-ss-1
part of: 333J Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
note: The Fair Work Ombudsman must prepare and publish a Fixed Term Contract Information Statement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333J(1) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333J(2) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333j-ss-2
part of: 333J Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
note: Must include information about Subdivision A and section 333L.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333J(2) Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333K Giving new employees the Fixed Term Contract Information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333k
note: Employee must provide Fixed Term Contract Information Statement before or as soon as the contract is entered into.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333K Giving new employees the Fixed Term Contract Information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide Fixed Term Contract Information Statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333k-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Subclass of civil remedy provision (Part 4-1)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333L Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333l
has part: 333L(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 333L(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 333L(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 333L(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
has part: 333L(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146

333L(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333l-ss-1
part of: 333L Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: Applicable to disputes between employer and employee about the operation of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333L(1) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applicableTo
logic summary: Applicable to disputes between employer and employee.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a dispute between an employer and employee about the operation of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applicable to disputes about the operation of this Division.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a dispute between an employer and employee about the operation of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: relevantTo
logic summary: Relevant to disputes between employer and employee.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a dispute between an employer and employee about the operation of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Applicable during disputes between employer and employee.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a dispute between an employer and employee about the operation of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: relevantTo
logic summary: Relevant to disputes between employer and employee.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a dispute between an employer and employee about the operation of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333L(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333l-ss-2
part of: 333L Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: Parties must attempt to resolve disputes at the workplace level.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333L(2) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to attempt resolution
premise text: Parties are required to resolve disputes.
conclusion text: Attempt to resolve dispute at the workplace level.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution attempt
premise text: The parties' discussions must occur within a specific time frame.
conclusion text: The dispute resolution attempt occurs within the specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution attempt
premise text: The parties' discussions must occur within a specific time frame.
conclusion text: The dispute resolution attempt occurs within the specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to resolve disputes
premise text: Parties are required to resolve disputes.
conclusion text: Resolve dispute at the workplace level.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333L(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333l-ss-3
part of: 333L Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: Party must refer dispute to FWC if discussions at workplace level do not resolve it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333L(3) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to refer dispute to FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333L(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333l-ss-4
part of: 333L Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: FWC must deal with disputes referred under subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333L(4) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333L(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333l-ss-5
part of: 333L Disputes about the operation of this Division
note: Employer or employee may appoint a person or industrial association to provide support or representation for dispute resolution purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.146
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333L(5) Disputes about the operation of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333l-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May appoint a person or industrial association to provide support or representation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333M Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333m
has part: 333M(1) Employee right to disconnect
has part: 333M(2) Employee right to disconnect
has part: 333M(3) Employee right to disconnect
has part: 333M(4) Employee right to disconnect
has part: 333M(5) Employee right to disconnect
has part: 333M(6) Employee right to disconnect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148

333M(1) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333m-ss-1
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect
note: Employee has right to disconnect from work outside working hours.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 333M(1) Employee right to disconnect
held by: Agent
scope note: held by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Right exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333M(2) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333m-ss-2
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect
note: Employee right to disconnect outside working hours
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 333M(2) Employee right to disconnect
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Employee has a right
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333M(3) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333m-ss-3
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect
note: Employee right to disconnect guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 333M(3) Employee right to disconnect
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a descriptive clause
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a right
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333M(4) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333m-ss-4
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect
note: Employee right to disconnect is a workplace right within the meaning of Part 3-1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 333M(4) Employee right to disconnect
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToDisconnect
logic summary: Employee has right to disconnect
premise text: Section 333N of the Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: Employee has workplace right within Part 3-1
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibitsAdverseAction
logic summary: Employer cannot take adverse action against employee for exercising workplace right
premise text: Part 3-1 general protections provisions
conclusion text: Section 333M(4) prohibits adverse action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Exercise of workplace right implies employee has right to disconnect
premise text: Section 333N defines a workplace right
conclusion text: Employee exercise of workplace right implies right to disconnect
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: duringWorkHours
logic summary: Right to disconnect applies during work hours
premise text: Section 333N defines a workplace right
conclusion text: Employee has right to disconnect during work hours
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

333M(5) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333m-ss-5
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect
note: Employee must respond to required contact under law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333M(5) Employee right to disconnect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide response
premise text: Contact is required under law
conclusion text: Employee must respond
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333M(6) Employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333m-ss-6
part of: 333M Employee right to disconnect
note: Employee right to disconnect prevails over company rights if more favorable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.148
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 333M(6) Employee right to disconnect
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Right prevails over obligation
premise text: Employee right to disconnect is a right
conclusion text: Company rights are overridden by employee right
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333m-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Enterprise agreement includes more favorable right to disconnect term
premise text: Enterprise agreement contains right to disconnect term
conclusion text: Employee right to disconnect is included in enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333N Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333n
has part: 333N(1) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
has part: 333N(2) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149

333N(1) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333n-ss-1
part of: 333N Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
note: Employer and employee must resolve dispute about employee's refusal to monitor contact.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333N(1) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Employer and employee have an obligation to resolve the dispute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333N(2) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333n-ss-2
part of: 333N Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
note: Employer's reasonable belief about employee refusal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.149
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333N(2) Disputes about the employee right to disconnect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Believes
logic summary: Employer's belief is a duty
premise text: Reasonable belief
conclusion text: Duty to act reasonably
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

333P Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333p
has part: 333P(1) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
has part: 333P(2) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
has part: 333P(3) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.150

333P(1) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333p-ss-1
part of: 333P Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
note: FWC may make an order to stop refusing contact or taking certain actions if there is a risk of disciplinary action or continued requirement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.150
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333P(1) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to make an order
premise text: FWC has the power to make orders under this section.
conclusion text: The FWC must make an order if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Definition of employee right to disconnect
premise text: This section defines the employee right to disconnect.
conclusion text: The employee right to disconnect is a specific type of order that can be made under this section.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_NOT
logic summary: Prohibition on disciplinary action or continued requirement
premise text: The employer cannot take disciplinary action or continue to require the employee to monitor contact if the employee has refused.
conclusion text: The employer must not take disciplinary action or continue to require the employee to monitor contact if the employee has refused.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>
logic summary: Conditional order based on risk of disciplinary action or continued requirement
premise text: The FWC may make an order if there is a risk that the employer will take disciplinary action or continue to require the employee to monitor contact.
conclusion text: If there is a risk that the employer will take disciplinary action or continue to require the employee to monitor contact, then the FWC must make an order.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Definition of employee right to disconnect (again)
premise text: This section defines the employee right to disconnect again.
conclusion text: The employee right to disconnect is a specific type of order that can be made under this section.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to stop refusing contact or taking certain actions
premise text: The FWC must make an order if the employee has unreasonably refused to monitor contact.
conclusion text: The FWC must stop the employee from refusing contact or taking certain actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333P(2) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333p-ss-2
part of: 333P Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
note: FWC may make order to prevent employee from refusing contact or taking certain actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.150
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333P(2) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: FWC may make order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333P(3) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333p-ss-3
part of: 333P Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
note: The FWC must deal with an application within 14 days and as soon as reasonably practicable after starting to deal with it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.150
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333P(3) Orders to stop refusing contact or to stop taking certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must deal with the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333p-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
logic summary: Deal with the application within 14 days and as soon as reasonably practicable after starting to deal with it.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333Q Contravening an order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333q
note: Must not contravene a term of an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333q-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333q-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333q-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333Q Contravening an order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on contravention
premise text: Order term
conclusion text: Contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333R Actions under work health and safety laws permitted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333r
note: Removes prohibition on proceeding under WHS laws for same conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.152
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-argumentation-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows proceeding under WHS laws
premise text: Section 115 prohibition removed
conclusion text: Proceeding allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Includes application for order under section 333P
premise text: Application for order under section 333P made
conclusion text: Order under section 333P included
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Section 115 prohibition overlaps with application for order under section 333P
premise text: Section 115 prohibition applied
conclusion text: Application for order under section 333P overlaps
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333r-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Removal of prohibition implies allowance of proceeding
premise text: Prohibition removed
conclusion text: Proceeding allowed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333S This Subdivision is not to prejudice Australia’s defence,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333s
note: No action can be taken that would prejudice Australia's defence, national security, or covert/ international operations of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on prejudicial actions
premise text: No action can be taken...
conclusion text: ...would prejudice Australia's defence, national security...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with prohibited actions
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (b) Australia’s national security;
conclusion text: ...or the refraining from taking the action, would be, or could reasonably be expected to be...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relation with prohibited actions
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (b) Australia’s national security;
conclusion text: ...or the refraining from taking the action, would be, or could reasonably be expected to be...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for prohibited actions
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (b) Australia’s national security;
conclusion text: ...or the refraining from taking the action, would be, or could reasonably be expected to be...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333s-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes prohibited actions
premise text: (a) Australia’s defence; or (b) Australia’s national security;
conclusion text: ...or the refraining from taking the action, would be, or could reasonably be expected to be...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333T Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333t
has part: 333T(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
has part: 333T(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153

333T(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333t-ss-1
part of: 333T Declarations by the Director-General of Security
note: Director-General may declare exemptions from certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

333T(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333t-ss-2
part of: 333T Declarations by the Director-General of Security
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.153
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333T(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333U Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333u
has part: 333U(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
has part: 333U(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154

333U(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333u-ss-1
part of: 333U Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
note: Permits Director-General to declare exemptions from Subdivision provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Allows the Director-General to make declarations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333U(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333u-ss-2
part of: 333U Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333U(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333V Dealing with disputes in other ways
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333v
note: FWC must deal with disputes under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333V Dealing with disputes in other ways
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333v-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classification of FWC's action as a dispute resolution mechanism
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333W Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333w
has part: 333W(1) Guidelines
has part: 333W(2) Guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154

333W(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333w-ss-1
part of: 333W Guidelines
note: The FWC must make written guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333W(1) Guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide guidelines
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333W(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333w-ss-2
part of: 333W Guidelines
note: Guidelines made under subsection (1) are not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.154
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333w-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333W(2) Guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

333X Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333x
has part: 333X(1) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
has part: 333X(2) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
has part: 333X(3) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155

333X(1) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333x-ss-1
part of: 333X Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
note: Employer must allow employee to take paid parental leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333X(1) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Employer has a duty to allow employee to take paid parental leave
premise text: Section applies if...
conclusion text: Employee must be allowed to take paid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: RelatesTo
logic summary: Temporal relation between child's birth and employee's entitlement to leave
premise text: Child must be born alive for employee to be entitled to leave
conclusion text: Employee's entitlement to leave is related to the child's birth
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
logic summary: Employer's obligation implies a right in employee
premise text: Section preserves if...
conclusion text: Employee has a right to take paid parental leave
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Obligation spreads from employer to employee
premise text: Employer must allow employee to take leave
conclusion text: Employee is affected by employer's obligation
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

333X(2) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333x-ss-2
part of: 333X Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
note: Employer cannot refuse to allow employee to take leave or cancel part of leave without request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 333X(2) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Employer must not refuse to allow employee to take leave or cancel part of leave.
conclusion text: No refusal or cancellation allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333X(3) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-333x-ss-3
part of: 333X Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
note: Employer may refuse or cancel paid parental leave under employment terms and conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.155
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-333x-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 333X(3) Employer-funded paid parental leave—preserved if child is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

334 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-334
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.157
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-334-norm

335 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-335
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.158
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-335-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-335-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-335-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

336 Objects of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-336
has part: 336(1) Objects of this Part
has part: 336(2) Objects of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.158

336(1) Objects of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-336-ss-1
part of: 336 Objects of this Part
note: Objects of this Part are to protect workplace rights and freedom of association.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.158
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 336(1) Objects of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Protects workplace rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

336(2) Objects of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-336-ss-2
part of: 336 Objects of this Part
note: Protection for employees, employers, and organisations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.158
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 336(2) Objects of this Part
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-336-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Employee protection right
premise text: Employee is a person
conclusion text: State provides protection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

337 Application of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-337
note: This Part applies only to the extent provided by this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-337-norm

338 Action to which this Part applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-338
has part: 338(1) Action to which this Part applies
has part: 338(2) Action to which this Part applies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159

338(1) Action to which this Part applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-338-ss-1
part of: 338 Action to which this Part applies
note: Action taken by a constitutionally-covered entity or with intent to affect its activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 338(1) Action to which this Part applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Action taken by a constitutionally-covered entity
premise text: (1) This Part applies to the following action:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

338(2) Action to which this Part applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-338-ss-2
part of: 338 Action to which this Part applies
note: Entities covered by this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.159
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 338(2) Action to which this Part applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isA
logic summary: Classification of entities
premise text: Chapter 3 is a rights and responsibilities part
conclusion text: This Part applies to Chapter 3
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isCoveredBy
logic summary: Entity coverage
premise text: Chapter 3 is covered by this Part
conclusion text: This Part applies to Chapter 3
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

338A Meaning of independent contractor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-338a
note: A regulated worker must be an individual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-338a-logic-descriptionlogic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 338A Meaning of independent contractor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-338a-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Classification of a regulated worker
premise text: A regulated worker must be an individual
conclusion text: An individual is a regulated worker
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

339 Additional effect of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-339
note: Additional effect of this Part also has the effect it would have if any one or more of the following applied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.160
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 339 Additional effect of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to any one or more of the listed conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-339-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies during the period of time when any one or more of the listed conditions apply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

340 Protection
type: Concept
realized by: sec-340
has part: 340(1) Protection
has part: 340(2) Protection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162

340(1) Protection
type: Concept
realized by: sec-340-ss-1
part of: 340 Protection
note: Prohibition on taking adverse action against another person due to workplace rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 340(1) Protection
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on taking adverse action.
premise text: (1) A person must not take adverse action...
conclusion text: ...must not take adverse action against another person:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

340(2) Protection
type: Concept
realized by: sec-340-ss-2
part of: 340 Protection
note: Protection from taking adverse action against another person due to exercising a workplace right.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 340(2) Protection
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of taking adverse action
premise text: Exercise of workplace right
conclusion text: Protection from adverse action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-340-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of protection as a civil remedy provision
premise text: Part 4-1
conclusion text: Civil remedy provision
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

341 Meaning of workplace right
type: Concept
realized by: sec-341
has part: 341(1) Meaning of workplace right
has part: 341(2) Meaning of workplace right
has part: 341(3) Meaning of workplace right
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162

341(1) Meaning of workplace right
type: Concept
realized by: sec-341-ss-1
part of: 341 Meaning of workplace right
note: A person has a workplace right if they meet certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 341(1) Meaning of workplace right
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a right.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

341(2) Meaning of workplace right
type: Concept
realized by: sec-341-ss-2
part of: 341 Meaning of workplace right
note: Defines workplace processes and proceedings under a workplace law or instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 341(2) Meaning of workplace right
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines the scope of workplace processes and proceedings.
premise text: (2) Each of the following is a process or proceedings under a workplace law or workplace instrument:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

341(3) Meaning of workplace right
type: Concept
realized by: sec-341-ss-3
part of: 341 Meaning of workplace right
note: Prospective employee has workplace rights as if employed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.162
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-341-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Right
premise text: Employment
conclusion text: Prospective employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

342 Meaning of adverse action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-342
note: Employer must not take adverse action against employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.164
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 342 Meaning of adverse action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits employer from taking adverse action.
premise text: Employer must not take adverse action.
conclusion text: Employee has right to protection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-342-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for adverse action.
premise text: Adverse action occurs when...
conclusion text: Temporal interval for adverse action is defined.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

343 Coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sec-343
has part: 343(1) Coercion
has part: 343(2) Coercion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168

343(1) Coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sec-343-ss-1
part of: 343 Coercion
note: Coercion of another person to exercise or not exercise a workplace right is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 343(1) Coercion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of coercion
premise text: (1) A person must not organise or take, or threaten to organise or take...
conclusion text: Coercion is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of coercion on workplace rights
premise text: (a) exercise or not exercise, or propose to exercise or not exercise, a workplace right;
conclusion text: Coercion implies exercising or not exercising a workplace right.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of coercion by threat
premise text: (b) exercise, or propose to exercise, a workplace right in a particular way.
conclusion text: Coercion by threat is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

343(2) Coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sec-343-ss-2
part of: 343 Coercion
note: Exempts protected industrial action from coercion prohibition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-343-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Allows protected industrial action
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to protected industrial action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

344 Undue influence or pressure
type: Concept
realized by: sec-344
note: An employer must not exert undue influence or pressure on an employee in relation to certain decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.168
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of undue influence or pressure
premise text: Employer must not exert undue influence or pressure on employee
conclusion text: No undue influence or pressure allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of undue influence or pressure in relation to employee decisions
premise text: Employer must not exert undue influence or pressure on employee in relation to certain decisions
conclusion text: No undue influence or pressure allowed in relation to employee decisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring prohibition of undue influence or pressure
premise text: Undue influence or pressure is a recurring issue that must be prohibited
conclusion text: Undue influence or pressure is a recurring issue that must be prohibited
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-344-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of undue influence or pressure in relation to employee rights
premise text: Employer must not exert undue influence or pressure on employee in relation to certain rights
conclusion text: No undue influence or pressure allowed in relation to employee rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

345 Misrepresentations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-345
has part: 345(1) Misrepresentations
has part: 345(2) Misrepresentations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169

345(1) Misrepresentations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-345-ss-1
part of: 345 Misrepresentations
note: Making false or misleading representations about workplace rights is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 345(1) Misrepresentations
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false or misleading representations.
premise text: A person must not knowingly or recklessly make a false or misleading representation about: (a) the workplace rights of another person; or (b) the exercise, or the effect of the exercise, of a workplace right by another person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

345(2) Misrepresentations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-345-ss-2
part of: 345 Misrepresentations
note: No reliance expected on misrepresentation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.169
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-345-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 345(2) Misrepresentations
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

346 Protection
type: Concept
realized by: sec-346
note: Taking adverse action against another person due to their industrial activity is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.170
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-ltl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 346 Protection
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits taking adverse action against another person due to their industrial activity.
premise text: The other person engages in industrial activity within the meaning of paragraph 347(a) or (b).
conclusion text: Taking adverse action is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits taking adverse action against another person due to their industrial activity.
premise text: The other person does not engage in industrial activity within the meaning of paragraphs 347(c) to (g).
conclusion text: Taking adverse action is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits taking adverse action against another person due to their industrial activity.
premise text: The other person is or was an officer or member of an industrial association.
conclusion text: Taking adverse action is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the prohibition.
premise text: The other person engages, or has at any time engaged or proposed to engage, in industrial activity within the meaning of paragraph 347(a) or (b).
conclusion text: The temporal interval starts from the engagement in industrial activity.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-346-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the prohibition.
premise text: The other person does not engage, or has at any time not engaged or proposed to not engage, in industrial activity within the meaning of paragraphs 347(c) to (g).
conclusion text: The temporal interval ends from the non-engagement in industrial activity.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

347 Meaning of engages in industrial activity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-347
note: Engages in industrial activity if meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.170
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-347-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-347-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-347-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 347 Meaning of engages in industrial activity
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-347-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If person becomes or does not become an officer, they engage in industrial activity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

348 Coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sec-348
note: Coercion of industrial activity is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.171
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-348-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-348-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-348-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 348 Coercion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-348-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits coercion.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

349 Misrepresentations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-349
note: Making false or misleading representations about another person's industrial activity obligations is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.171
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-diffusion-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 349 Misrepresentations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations
premise text: State imposes obligation on individuals to not make false or misleading representations
conclusion text: Individuals must not knowingly or recklessly make false or misleading representations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations about disclosure obligations
premise text: State imposes obligation on individuals to disclose certain information
conclusion text: Individuals must not knowingly or recklessly make false or misleading representations about their disclosure obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between representation and industrial activity obligation
premise text: State defines temporal scope of representation prohibition
conclusion text: Representations must not be made within the defined temporal scope
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of false or misleading representations
premise text: State imposes obligation on individuals to not make recurring false or misleading representations
conclusion text: Individuals must not knowingly or recklessly make recurring false or misleading representations
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-349-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread of information
logic summary: Spread of false or misleading information
premise text: State imposes obligation on individuals to prevent spread of false or misleading information
conclusion text: Individuals must not knowingly or recklessly make false or misleading representations that can be spread by others
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350 Inducements—membership action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350
has part: 350(1) Inducements—membership action
has part: 350(2) Inducements—membership action
has part: 350(2A) Inducements—membership action
has part: 350(3) Inducements—membership action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172

350(1) Inducements—membership action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350-ss-1
part of: 350 Inducements—membership action
note: Employer cannot induce employee to take membership action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 350(1) Inducements—membership action
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing membership action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350(2) Inducements—membership action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350-ss-2
part of: 350 Inducements—membership action
note: Cannot induce independent contractor to take membership action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing membership action
premise text: Contract for services with independent contractor
conclusion text: Cannot induce independent contractor to take membership action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during the term of the contract
logic summary: Temporal relationship
premise text: Person who has entered into a contract for services must not induce independent contractor to take membership action
conclusion text: During the term of the contract, person who has entered into a contract for services must not induce independent contractor to take membership action
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Person who has entered into a contract for services with an independent contractor
conclusion text: Must not induce independent contractor to take membership action
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350(2A) Inducements—membership action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350-ss-2a
part of: 350 Inducements—membership action
note: Regulated businesses cannot induce regulated contractors to take membership action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing membership action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350(3) Inducements—membership action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350-ss-3
part of: 350 Inducements—membership action
note: Membership action requires becoming, not becoming, remaining or ceasing to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 350(3) Inducements—membership action
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Membership action is a taking
premise text: (3) A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
conclusion text: A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Membership action occurs during becoming, remaining, or ceasing to be an officer or member of an industrial association
premise text: (3) A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
conclusion text: A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Membership action occurs during becoming, remaining, or ceasing to be an officer or member of an industrial association
premise text: (3) A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
conclusion text: A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Membership action is true if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association
premise text: (3) A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
conclusion text: A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Membership action is true if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association
premise text: (3) A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
conclusion text: A person takes membership action if the person becomes, does not become, remains or ceases to be an officer or member of an industrial association.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350A Protection for workplace delegates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350a
has part: 350A(1) Protection for workplace delegates
has part: 350A(2) Protection for workplace delegates
has part: 350A(3) Protection for workplace delegates
has part: 350A(4) Protection for workplace delegates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172

350A(1) Protection for workplace delegates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350a-ss-1
part of: 350A Protection for workplace delegates
note: Employer must not unreasonably fail or refuse to deal with the workplace delegate, make false representations, or hinder exercise of rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on employer actions
premise text: Employer must not...
conclusion text: ...must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350A(2) Protection for workplace delegates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350a-ss-2
part of: 350A Protection for workplace delegates
note: Employees must comply with workplace delegate instructions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 350A(2) Protection for workplace delegates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide compliance
premise text: Workplace delegate instructions
conclusion text: Compliance required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350A(3) Protection for workplace delegates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350a-ss-3
part of: 350A Protection for workplace delegates
note: Employer bears burden of proving conduct is reasonable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has obligation to prove reasonableness
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350A(4) Protection for workplace delegates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350a-ss-4
part of: 350A Protection for workplace delegates
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for conduct required by law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.172
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Exempts subsection (1) from its application
premise text: (4) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct required by or under a law of the Commonwealth or a State or a Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Permits subsection (1) to be applied in certain circumstances
premise text: (4) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct required by or under a law of the Commonwealth or a State or a Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350a-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excludes
logic summary: Excludes subsection (1) from its application for conduct not required by law
premise text: (4) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct required by or under a law of the Commonwealth or a State or a Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350b
has part: 350B(1) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
has part: 350B(2) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
has part: 350B(3) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
has part: 350B(4) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
has part: 350B(5) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173

350B(1) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350b-ss-1
part of: 350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
note: Regulated business must not unreasonably fail or refuse to deal with the workplace delegate, make false representations, or hinder exercise of rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulated business must not unreasonably fail or refuse to deal with the workplace delegate.
premise text: associated regulated business
conclusion text: workplace delegate who is a regulated worker
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350B(2) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350b-ss-2
part of: 350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
note: Clarifies scope of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 350B(2) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

350B(3) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350b-ss-3
part of: 350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
note: Burden of proof lies on associated regulated business
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prove conduct is unreasonable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350B(4) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350b-ss-4
part of: 350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
note: Exempts conduct required by law from regulation under the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts conduct required by law from regulation.
premise text: (4) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct required by or under a law of the Commonwealth or a State or a Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350B(5) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350b-ss-5
part of: 350B Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
note: The associated regulated business for a workplace delegate who is a regulated worker is the regulated business that engaged the workplace delegate under a services contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.173
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 350B(5) Protection for workplace delegates—regulated workers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the regulated business for a workplace delegate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350C Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350c
has part: 350C(1) Workplace delegates and their rights
has part: 350C(2) Workplace delegates and their rights
has part: 350C(3) Workplace delegates and their rights
has part: 350C(4) Workplace delegates and their rights
has part: 350C(5) Workplace delegates and their rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174

350C(1) Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350c-ss-1
part of: 350C Workplace delegates and their rights
note: Definition of a workplace delegate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 350C(1) Workplace delegates and their rights
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

350C(2) Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350c-ss-2
part of: 350C Workplace delegates and their rights
note: Workplace delegate has right to represent industrial interests in disputes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 350C(2) Workplace delegates and their rights
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Expresses a right.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350C(3) Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350c-ss-3
part of: 350C Workplace delegates and their rights
note: Workplace delegate has right to reasonable access and communication with employees and regulated workers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-3-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 350C(3) Workplace delegates and their rights
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Right exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350C(4) Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350c-ss-4
part of: 350C Workplace delegates and their rights
note: Employer must comply with workplace delegate's rights term in the fair work instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to comply with workplace delegate's rights term.
premise text: The employer or regulated business has complied with the delegates' rights term in the fair work instrument.
conclusion text: The employer must afford the workplace delegate the rights mentioned in subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Employer's compliance with fair work instrument overlaps with workplace delegate's rights.
premise text: The employer or regulated business has complied with the delegates' rights term in the fair work instrument.
conclusion text: The employer must afford the workplace delegate the rights mentioned in subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Employer's compliance with fair work instrument is a recurring obligation.
premise text: The employer or regulated business has complied with the delegates' rights term in the fair work instrument.
conclusion text: The employer must afford the workplace delegate the rights mentioned in subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Employer is permitted to comply with workplace delegate's rights term.
premise text: The employer or regulated business has complied with the delegates' rights term in the fair work instrument.
conclusion text: The employer must afford the workplace delegate the rights mentioned in subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Employer's compliance with fair work instrument implies that they must afford workplace delegate the rights.
premise text: The employer or regulated business has complied with the delegates' rights term in the fair work instrument.
conclusion text: The employer must afford the workplace delegate the rights mentioned in subsection (3).
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

350C(5) Workplace delegates and their rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-350c-ss-5
part of: 350C Workplace delegates and their rights
note: Employer must consider size and nature of enterprise, resources, and facilities when determining what is reasonable for purposes of subsection (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.174
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 350C(5) Workplace delegates and their rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-350c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to consider...
premise text: subsection (3)
conclusion text: ...what is reasonable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

351 Discrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-351
has part: 351(1) Discrimination
has part: 351(2) Discrimination
has part: 351(3) Discrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176

351(1) Discrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-351-ss-1
part of: 351 Discrimination
note: Employer cannot take adverse action against an employee due to certain characteristics.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 351(1) Discrimination
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of adverse action based on protected characteristics.
premise text: Employer must not take adverse action.
conclusion text: Due to certain characteristics, employer cannot take adverse action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

351(2) Discrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-351-ss-2
part of: 351 Discrimination
note: Exemptions from anti-discrimination law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 351(2) Discrimination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

351(3) Discrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-351-ss-3
part of: 351 Discrimination
note: List of anti-discrimination laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.176
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 351(3) Discrimination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-351-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: Listing of anti-discrimination laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

352 Temporary absence—illness or injury
type: Concept
realized by: sec-352
note: Cannot dismiss employee due to temporary illness or injury
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-352-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-352-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-352-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of dismissal
premise text: Employer must not dismiss employee
conclusion text: Employee has right to remain employed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

353 Bargaining services fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-353
has part: 353(1) Bargaining services fees
has part: 353(2) Bargaining services fees
has part: 353(3) Bargaining services fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177

353(1) Bargaining services fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-353-ss-1
part of: 353 Bargaining services fees
note: No demanding or purporting to demand payment of a bargaining services fee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

353(2) Bargaining services fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-353-ss-2
part of: 353 Bargaining services fees
note: Payable fee for provision of bargaining services
description: Membership fees are excluded
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Payable fee for provision of bargaining services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

353(3) Bargaining services fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-353-ss-3
part of: 353 Bargaining services fees
note: Bargaining services fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.177
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-353-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 353(3) Bargaining services fees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

354 Coverage by particular instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-354
has part: 354(1) Coverage by particular instruments
has part: 354(2) Coverage by particular instruments
has part: 354(3) Coverage by particular instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178

354(1) Coverage by particular instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-354-ss-1
part of: 354 Coverage by particular instruments
note: Discrimination against an employer based on certain factors is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 354(1) Coverage by particular instruments
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of discrimination
premise text: (1) A person must not discriminate...
conclusion text: ...is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of workplace instruments
premise text: (i) provisions of the National Employment Standards;
conclusion text: ...or a particular type of workplace instrument...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

354(2) Coverage by particular instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-354-ss-2
part of: 354 Coverage by particular instruments
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for protected industrial action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-2-norm

354(3) Coverage by particular instruments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-354-ss-3
part of: 354 Coverage by particular instruments
note: Discrimination against a regulated business is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.178
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 354(3) Coverage by particular instruments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of discrimination
premise text: (3) A person must not discriminate...
conclusion text: ...against a regulated business
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of workplace instruments
premise text: (a) regulated workers in relation to the regulated business are covered, or not covered, by a particular type of workplace instrument...
conclusion text: ...by a particular kind of workplace instrument within a type of workplace instrument.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Overlap between regulated workers and workplace instruments
premise text: (a) regulated workers in relation to the regulated business are covered, or not covered, by a particular type of workplace instrument...
conclusion text: ...by a particular kind of workplace instrument within a type of workplace instrument.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of regulated workers and workplace instruments
premise text: (a) regulated workers in relation to the regulated business are covered, or not covered, by a particular type of workplace instrument...
conclusion text: ...by a particular kind of workplace instrument within a type of workplace instrument.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of regulated workers and workplace instruments
premise text: (a) regulated workers in relation to the regulated business are covered, or not covered, by a particular type of workplace instrument...
conclusion text: ...by a particular kind of workplace instrument within a type of workplace instrument.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-354-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of regulated workers and workplace instruments
premise text: (a) regulated workers in relation to the regulated business are covered, or not covered, by a particular type of workplace instrument...
conclusion text: ...by a particular kind of workplace instrument within a type of workplace instrument.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

355 Coercion—allocation of duties etc. to particular person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-355
note: Coercion is prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-355-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-355-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-355-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits coercion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

356 Objectionable terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-356
note: Terms with no effect due to being objectionable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.179
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-356-norm

357 Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-357
has part: 357(1) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
has part: 357(2) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
has part: 357(3) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180

357(1) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-357-ss-1
part of: 357 Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
note: Employer cannot misrepresent employment as independent contracting.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 357(1) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits employer's action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

357(2) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-357-ss-2
part of: 357 Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
note: Employer's reasonable belief is a defense to misrepresentation of independent contracting.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 357(2) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: Employer's belief is an exception to the obligation.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the employer reasonably believed...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OVERLAPS
logic summary: Employer's reasonable belief overlaps with the obligation.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the employer reasonably believed...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

357(3) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-357-ss-3
part of: 357 Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
note: Employer must consider size and nature of enterprise when determining reasonableness of belief
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 357(3) Misrepresenting employment as independent contracting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-357-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to consider size and nature of enterprise
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

358 Dismissing to engage as independent contractor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-358
note: Employer cannot dismiss or threaten dismissal of an employee to engage as independent contractor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.180
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-358-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-358-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-358-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 358 Dismissing to engage as independent contractor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-358-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on dismissing an employee to engage as independent contractor.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

359 Misrepresentation to engage as independent contractor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-359
note: Employer must not make false statements to persuade an individual to enter into a contract as an independent contractor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 359 Misrepresentation to engage as independent contractor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements to persuade an individual to enter into a contract.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

359B Dismissing to engage as casual employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-359b
note: Employer cannot dismiss or threaten dismissal of an employee to engage them as a casual employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 359B Dismissing to engage as casual employee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of dismissal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

359C Misrepresentation to engage as casual employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-359c
note: Employer must not make false statements to persuade or influence an individual to enter into a contract for casual employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.181
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false statements to influence an individual's employment decision.
premise text: Employer knows the statement is false.
conclusion text: Employer must not make the statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Traces the employer's statement as a causal factor in the individual's employment decision.
premise text: Individual is persuaded or influenced by the statement.
conclusion text: Employer's statement contributes to the individual's employment decision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Obliges the employer to refrain from making false statements.
premise text: Employer has a duty to provide accurate information.
conclusion text: Employer must not make false statements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe
logic summary: Requires the employer to believe the statement is true before making it.
premise text: Employer knows the statement is false.
conclusion text: Employer must not make the statement if they know it is false.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-359c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Requires the employer to recognize the potential for misleading statements.
premise text: Employer has access to information about the individual's employment decision.
conclusion text: Employer must be aware of the potential for false statements.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

360 Multiple reasons for action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-360
note: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 360 Multiple reasons for action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The reasons for the action include that reason.
conclusion text: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between actions and reasons
premise text: The action occurs during the period of taking action for a particular reason.
conclusion text: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: if-then
logic summary: Inference from premises to conclusion
premise text: The reasons for the action are included in the list of reasons.
conclusion text: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
logic summary: Spread of information or influence
premise text: The reasons for the action are communicated to others.
conclusion text: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-360-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if-then
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: The system processes the list of reasons and determines the action.
conclusion text: A person takes action for a particular reason if the reasons include that reason.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

361 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-361
has part: 361(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
has part: 361(2) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182

361(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-361-ss-1
part of: 361 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
note: Presumption of action being taken for a particular reason or intent unless proven otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 361(1) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Presumption of action being taken for a particular reason or intent.
premise text: (1) If: (a) in an application in relation to a contravention of this Part, it is alleged that a person took, or is taking, action for a particular reason or with a particular intent; and
conclusion text: it is presumed that the action was, or is being, taken for that reason or with that intent, unless the person proves otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval application.
premise text: (b) taking that action for that reason or with that intent would constitute a contravention of this Part;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal interval application.
premise text: (b) taking that action for that reason or with that intent would constitute a contravention of this Part;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Application to diffusion.
premise text: (b) taking that action for that reason or with that intent would constitute a contravention of this Part;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Application to cognitive agents.
premise text: (b) taking that action for that reason or with that intent would constitute a contravention of this Part;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

361(2) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
type: Concept
realized by: sec-361-ss-2
part of: 361 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
note: Presumption of action unless proved otherwise
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 361(2) Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-361-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Presumption of action
premise text: None
conclusion text: Unless proved otherwise
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

362 Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-362
has part: 362(1) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
has part: 362(2) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182

362(1) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-362-ss-1
part of: 362 Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
note: Coercion of action contravenes a provision of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 362(1) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Coercion is prohibited
premise text: (a) for a particular reason (the first person’s reason), a person advises, encourages or incites, or takes any action with intent to coerce...
conclusion text: the first person is taken to have contravened the provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Coercion is prohibited
premise text: (b) the action, if taken by the second person for the first person’s reason, would contravene a provision of this Part;
conclusion text: the first person is taken to have contravened the provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Action overlaps with a provision of this Part
premise text: (b) the action, if taken by the second person for the first person’s reason, would contravene a provision of this Part;
conclusion text: the first person is taken to have contravened the provision.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Action until a provision of this Part
premise text: (b) the action, if taken by the second person for the first person’s reason, would contravene a provision of this Part;
conclusion text: the first person is taken to have contravened the provision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Action diffuses a prohibition of this Part
premise text: (a) for a particular reason (the first person’s reason), a person advises, encourages or incites, or takes any action with intent to coerce...
conclusion text: the first person is taken to have contravened the provision.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

362(2) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-362-ss-2
part of: 362 Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
note: No limitation on section 550
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-362-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 362(2) Advising, encouraging, inciting or coercing action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

363 Actions of industrial associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-363
has part: 363(1) Actions of industrial associations
has part: 363(2) Actions of industrial associations
has part: 363(3) Actions of industrial associations
has part: 363(4) Actions of industrial associations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182

363(1) Actions of industrial associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-363-ss-1
part of: 363 Actions of industrial associations
note: Action of an industrial association is defined as certain actions taken by its members or agents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 363(1) Actions of industrial associations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Action of an industrial association is defined.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

363(2) Actions of industrial associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-363-ss-2
part of: 363 Actions of industrial associations
note: Prevents actions by industrial association members without reasonable steps taken. Employees must comply with liabilities of bodies corporate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-deontic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 363(2) Actions of industrial associations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Prevents actions
premise text: (a) the committee of management of the industrial association; or (b) a person authorised by the committee; or (c) an officer of the industrial association;
conclusion text: has taken all reasonable steps to prevent the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap for reasonable steps
premise text: (a) the committee of management of the industrial association; or (b) a person authorised by the committee; or (c) an officer of the industrial association;
conclusion text: has taken all reasonable steps to prevent the action.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines temporal condition for reasonable steps
premise text: (a) the committee of management of the industrial association; or (b) a person authorised by the committee; or (c) an officer of the industrial association;
conclusion text: has taken all reasonable steps to prevent the action.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines diffusion of obligation
premise text: (a) the committee of management of the industrial association; or (b) a person authorised by the committee; or (c) an officer of the industrial association;
conclusion text: has taken all reasonable steps to prevent the action.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Defines cognitive agent for obligation
premise text: (a) the committee of management of the industrial association; or (b) a person authorised by the committee; or (c) an officer of the industrial association;
conclusion text: has taken all reasonable steps to prevent the action.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

363(3) Actions of industrial associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-363-ss-3
part of: 363 Actions of industrial associations
note: Establishing state of mind of industrial association
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 363(3) Actions of industrial associations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

363(4) Actions of industrial associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-363-ss-4
part of: 363 Actions of industrial associations
note: Actions of industrial associations have effect despite subsections 793(1) and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.182
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-4-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-363-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 363(4) Actions of industrial associations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

364 Unincorporated industrial associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-364
has part: 364(1) Unincorporated industrial associations
has part: 364(2) Unincorporated industrial associations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184

364(1) Unincorporated industrial associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-364-ss-1
part of: 364 Unincorporated industrial associations
note: Liability for contraventions by unincorporated industrial associations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 364(1) Unincorporated industrial associations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes references to persons and unincorporated industrial associations
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, a reference to a person includes a reference to an unincorporated industrial association.
conclusion text: Liability for contraventions by unincorporated industrial associations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes references to persons and unincorporated industrial associations
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Part, a reference to a person includes a reference to an unincorporated industrial association.
conclusion text: Liability for contraventions by unincorporated industrial associations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

364(2) Unincorporated industrial associations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-364-ss-2
part of: 364 Unincorporated industrial associations
note: Each member, officer or agent of the industrial association who took part in the relevant action is also liable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.184
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 364(2) Unincorporated industrial associations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
logic summary: Each member, officer or agent of the industrial association is also liable.
premise text: The state imposes liability on members, officers and agents.
conclusion text: Each member, officer or agent who took part in the relevant action is also liable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The excerpt specifies the temporal overlap between the relevant action and the liability.
premise text: The state imposes liability on members, officers and agents who took part in the relevant action.
conclusion text: The liability overlaps with the temporal interval of the relevant action.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: The excerpt specifies a recurring pattern of liability for members, officers and agents.
premise text: The state imposes liability on members, officers and agents who took part in the relevant action.
conclusion text: There is a recurring pattern of liability for members, officers and agents.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeGraph
logic summary: The excerpt represents a knowledge graph of individuals subject to liability.
premise text: The state defines a class of individuals subject to liability.
conclusion text: The excerpt represents the knowledge graph of individuals subject to liability.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-364-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: The excerpt validates the structure of the class of individuals subject to liability.
premise text: The state defines a class of individuals subject to liability.
conclusion text: The excerpt validates the structure of the class of individuals subject to liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

365 Application for the FWC to deal with a dismissal dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-365
note: Application for FWC to deal with dismissal dispute
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-365-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-365-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 365 Application for the FWC to deal with a dismissal dispute
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

366 Time for application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-366
has part: 366(1) Time for application
has part: 366(2) Time for application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185

366(1) Time for application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-366-ss-1
part of: 366 Time for application
note: Application must be made within a specified time period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 366(1) Time for application
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be made within the specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

366(2) Time for application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-366-ss-2
part of: 366 Time for application
note: Allow further period for application under exceptional circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-366-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to FWC
premise text: (2) The FWC may allow a further period...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

367 Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-367
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
description: fee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.185
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-367-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-367-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-367-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 367 Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-367-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

368 Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-368
has part: 368(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 368(2) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 368(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
has part: 368(4) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186

368(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-368-ss-1
part of: 368 Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
note: FWC must deal with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 368(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

368(2) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-368-ss-2
part of: 368 Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
note: Conferences must be conducted in private.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conferences from being public.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

368(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-368-ss-3
part of: 368 Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
note: FWC must issue certificate if dispute resolution attempts are unsuccessful
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 368(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

368(4) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-368-ss-4
part of: 368 Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
note: Application for orders in relation to a contravention of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.186
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-4-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-368-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 368(4) Dealing with a dismissal dispute (other than by arbitration)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

369 Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-369
has part: 369(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
has part: 369(2) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
has part: 369(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187

369(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-369-ss-1
part of: 369 Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
note: Notification of FWC arbitration is required within 14 days after certificate issuance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 369(1) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification is mandatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

369(2) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-369-ss-2
part of: 369 Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
note: FWC may deal with dismissal dispute by arbitration, including making orders for reinstatement or compensation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 369(2) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: FWC may deal with dismissal dispute by arbitration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

369(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-369-ss-3
part of: 369 Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
note: Must not contravene a term of the order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.187
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 369(3) Dealing with a dismissal dispute by arbitration
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-369-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

370 Taking a dismissal dispute to court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-370
note: No general protections court application allowed unless FWC certificate issued or interim injunction applied for.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 370 Taking a dismissal dispute to court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: No general protections court application allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-370-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of applications based on FWC certificate and interim injunction.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

372 Application for the FWC to deal with a non-dismissal dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-372
note: Application for FWC to deal with non-dismissal dispute
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.188
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 372 Application for the FWC to deal with a non-dismissal dispute
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution
premise text: If: (a) a person alleges a contravention of this Part; (b) the person is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365 for the FWC to deal with the dispute;
conclusion text: During the period when a person alleges a contravention of this Part and is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission for dispute resolution
premise text: the person may apply to the FWC under this section for the FWC to deal with the dispute.
conclusion text: The person may apply to the FWC under this section for the FWC to deal with the dispute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of eligibility for dispute resolution
premise text: (a) a person alleges a contravention of this Part; and (b) the person is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365 for the FWC to deal with the dispute;
conclusion text: If a person alleges a contravention of this Part and is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365, then the person may apply to the FWC under this section for the FWC to deal with the dispute.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval for dispute resolution
premise text: (a) a person alleges a contravention of this Part; and (b) the person is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365 for the FWC to deal with the dispute;
conclusion text: Until the period when a person alleges a contravention of this Part and is not entitled to apply to the FWC under section 365
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-372-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Obligation for dispute resolution
premise text: the person may apply to the FWC under this section for the FWC to deal with the dispute.
conclusion text: The person must apply to the FWC under this section for the FWC to deal with the dispute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

373 Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-373
has part: 373(1) Application fees
has part: 373(2) Application fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189

373(1) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-373-ss-1
part of: 373 Application fees
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
description: Fee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 373(1) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

373(2) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-373-ss-2
part of: 373 Application fees
note: Application fee regulation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 373(2) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-373-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires payment of application fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

374 Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-374
has part: 374(1) Conferences
has part: 374(2) Conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189

374(1) Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-374-ss-1
part of: 374 Conferences
note: The FWC must conduct a conference to deal with the dispute if an application is made under section 372 and the parties agree to participate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 374(1) Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must conduct a conference.
premise text: An application is made under section 372.
conclusion text: The FWC must conduct a conference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The parties to the dispute must agree to participate in a conference.
premise text: An application is made under section 372 and the parties agree to participate.
conclusion text: The parties to the dispute must agree to participate in a conference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC may deal with a dispute by mediation or conciliation, or by making a recommendation or expressing an opinion.
premise text: Section 372 defines the FWC's obligations.
conclusion text: The FWC may deal with a dispute by mediation or conciliation, or by making a recommendation or expressing an opinion.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must conduct a conference if an application is made under section 372 and the parties agree to participate.
premise text: Section 372 defines the FWC's obligations.
conclusion text: The FWC must conduct a conference if an application is made under section 372 and the parties agree to participate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

374(2) Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-374-ss-2
part of: 374 Conferences
note: The FWC must conduct a conference in private.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 374(2) Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-374-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

375 Advice on general protections court application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-375
note: Must advise parties on general protections court application prospects
description: Advice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.189
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to advise parties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

375A Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-375a
has part: 375A(1) Appeal rights
has part: 375A(2) Appeal rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190

375A(1) Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-375a-ss-1
part of: 375A Appeal rights
note: FWC cannot grant permission to appeal from a decision made by the FWC under subsection 369(2) unless it is in the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of granting permission to appeal
premise text: FWC must not grant permission
conclusion text: unless it is in the public interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between FWC's decision-making power and public interest
premise text: FWC must consider the public interest
conclusion text: before granting permission to appeal
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

375A(2) Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-375a-ss-2
part of: 375A Appeal rights
note: Appeal rights limited to questions of fact
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 375A(2) Appeal rights
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Limits appeal rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

375B Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-375b
has part: 375B(1) Costs orders against parties
has part: 375B(2) Costs orders against parties
has part: 375B(3) Costs orders against parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190

375B(1) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-375b-ss-1
part of: 375B Costs orders against parties
note: The FWC may order costs against a party to a dispute if they caused the other party's costs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 375B(1) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
premise text: The FWC may make an order for costs...
conclusion text: A party must pay costs incurred by the other party.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between parties' actions
premise text: (a) an application for the FWC to deal with...
conclusion text: The first party's action (application) is before the second party's action (costs incurred).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between parties' actions
premise text: (a) an application for the FWC to deal with...
conclusion text: The first party's action (application) is before the second party's action (costs incurred).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: causes
logic summary: First party's actions cause costs for the other party
premise text: (b) the FWC is satisfied that...
conclusion text: The first party's action (unreasonable act or omission) causes the second party's cost.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: causes
logic summary: First party's actions cause costs for the other party
premise text: (b) the FWC is satisfied that...
conclusion text: The first party's action (unreasonable act or omission) causes the second party's cost.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

375B(2) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-375b-ss-2
part of: 375B Costs orders against parties
note: The FWC may make an order only if the other party applies for it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 375B(2) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS
logic summary: Knows the other party applied
premise text: The FWC knows the other party applied.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Contains a temporal interval
premise text: The order is made at some point in time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

375B(3) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-375b-ss-3
part of: 375B Costs orders against parties
note: The FWC's power to order costs under section 611 is not limited by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 375B(3) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-375b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: The FWC's power to order costs under section 611 is not limited by this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

376 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-376
has part: 376(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 376(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 376(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 376(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190

376(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-376-ss-1
part of: 376 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
note: Application of costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 376(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation on the state to apply costs orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

376(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-376-ss-2
part of: 376 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
note: Order for costs against a representative if they caused costs to be incurred due to unreasonable conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 376(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
premise text: Representative caused costs to be incurred
conclusion text: Order for costs against representative
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

376(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-376-ss-3
part of: 376 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
note: FWC may only make costs order if other party applies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 376(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Other party must apply
conclusion text: FWC may order costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

376(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-376-ss-4
part of: 376 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
note: Limitation on FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.190
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 376(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-376-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Limits FWC's power to order costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

377 Applications for costs orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-377
note: Application for costs order must be made within 14 days after dispute resolution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-377-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-377-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-377-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 377 Applications for costs orders
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-377-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within 14 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

377A Schedule of costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-377a
note: A schedule of costs may be prescribed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.191
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-377a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-377a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-377a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 377A Schedule of costs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-377a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prescribe a schedule of costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

378 Contravening costs orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-378
note: Must not contravene a term of the order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.192
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-378-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-378-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-378-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 378 Contravening costs orders
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-378-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

379 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-379
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-379-norm

380 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-380
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 380 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-380-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies the excerpt as a definition.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

381 Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-381
note: Establishes a framework for dealing with unfair dismissal balancing business and employee needs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.193
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-381-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-381-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-381-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 381 Object of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-381-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

382 When a person is protected from unfair dismissal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-382
note: Protection from unfair dismissal under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 382 When a person is protected from unfair dismissal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
logic summary: Annual rate of earnings threshold
premise text: The sum of the person's annual rate of earnings and other amounts is less than the high income threshold.
conclusion text: The person is protected from unfair dismissal if their annual rate of earnings meets the threshold.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Modern award coverage
premise text: A modern award covers the person.
conclusion text: The person is protected from unfair dismissal if a modern award applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Enterprise agreement applicability
premise text: An enterprise agreement applies to the person in relation to the employment.
conclusion text: The person is protected from unfair dismissal if an enterprise agreement applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-382-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: High income threshold
premise text: The sum of the person's annual rate of earnings and other amounts is less than the high income threshold.
conclusion text: The person is protected from unfair dismissal if their annual rate of earnings meets the threshold.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

383 Meaning of minimum employment period
type: Concept
realized by: sec-383
note: Minimum employment period for dismissal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-383-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-383-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-383-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Employer has obligation to provide minimum employment period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

384 Period of employment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-384
has part: 384(1) Period of employment
has part: 384(2) Period of employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195

384(1) Period of employment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-384-ss-1
part of: 384 Period of employment
note: Defines an employee's period of employment with an employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 384(1) Period of employment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a term
premise text: (1) An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that time as an employee.
conclusion text: An employee's period of employment is defined.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Requires a temporal relation
premise text: (1) An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that time as an employee.
conclusion text: A temporal relation between 'period of employment' and 'continuous service' is required.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Requires a trace
premise text: (1) An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that time as an employee.
conclusion text: A trace between 'period of employment' and 'continuous service' is required.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Requires a diffusion relation
premise text: (1) An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that time as an employee.
conclusion text: A diffusion relation between 'period of employment' and 'continuous service' is required.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Requires a cognitive agent
premise text: (1) An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that time as an employee.
conclusion text: A cognitive agent is required to understand 'period of employment' and 'continuous service'.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

384(2) Period of employment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-384-ss-2
part of: 384 Period of employment
note: Employee rights and responsibilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.195
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-384-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 384(2) Period of employment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

385 What is an unfair dismissal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-385
note: A person has been unfairly dismissed if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-385-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-385-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-385-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 385 What is an unfair dismissal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-385-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If the dismissal meets all conditions, it is unfair.
premise text: The person has been dismissed.
conclusion text: The dismissal is unfair.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

386 Meaning of dismissed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-386
has part: 386(1) Meaning of dismissed
has part: 386(2) Meaning of dismissed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197

386(1) Meaning of dismissed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-386-ss-1
part of: 386 Meaning of dismissed
note: A person has been dismissed if their employment was terminated or they resigned due to employer conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 386(1) Meaning of dismissed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasBeenDismissed
logic summary: Employment termination or resignation due to employer conduct.
premise text: (1) A person has been dismissed if: (a) the person’s employment with his or her employer has been terminated on the employer’s initiative; or (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.
conclusion text: (1) A person has been dismissed if: (a) the person’s employment with his or her employer has been terminated on the employer’s initiative; or (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Employment termination occurs during the employment.
premise text: (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.
conclusion text: (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Employment termination occurs during the employment.
premise text: (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.
conclusion text: (b) the person has resigned from his or her employment, but was forced to do so because of conduct, or a course of conduct, engaged in by his or her employer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

386(2) Meaning of dismissed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-386-ss-2
part of: 386 Meaning of dismissed
note: A person has not been dismissed if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.197
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-386-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 386(2) Meaning of dismissed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

387 Criteria for considering harshness etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-387
note: Criteria for considering harshness etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.198
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-387-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-387-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 387 Criteria for considering harshness etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

388 The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-388
has part: 388(1) The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
has part: 388(2) The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199

388(1) The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-388-ss-1
part of: 388 The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
note: The Minister may declare a Small Business Fair Dismissal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

388(2) The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-388-ss-2
part of: 388 The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
note: Employer must comply with Small Business Fair Dismissal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 388(2) The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-388-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Employer must comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

389 Meaning of genuine redundancy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-389
has part: 389(1) Meaning of genuine redundancy
has part: 389(2) Meaning of genuine redundancy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199

389(1) Meaning of genuine redundancy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-389-ss-1
part of: 389 Meaning of genuine redundancy
note: Employer must consult about redundancy before dismissing an employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 389(1) Meaning of genuine redundancy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to consult about redundancy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

389(2) Meaning of genuine redundancy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-389-ss-2
part of: 389 Meaning of genuine redundancy
note: Employer must redeploy dismissed employee within the enterprise or associated entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.199
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 389(2) Meaning of genuine redundancy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-389-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to redeploy dismissed employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390 When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-390
has part: 390(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
has part: 390(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
has part: 390(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200

390(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-390-ss-1
part of: 390 When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
note: The FWC may order reinstatement or compensation for unfair dismissal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 390(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-390-ss-2
part of: 390 When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
note: The FWC may make an order for unfair dismissal only if an application under section 394 has been made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 390(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-390-ss-3
part of: 390 When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
note: FWC must consider payment of compensation before ordering reinstatement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 390(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair dismissal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-390-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider payment of compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-391
has part: 391(1) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
has part: 391(1A) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
has part: 391(2) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
has part: 391(3) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
has part: 391(4) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200

391(1) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-391-ss-1
part of: 391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.
note: Employer must reinstate employee under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 391(1) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to reinstate employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

391(1A) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-391-ss-1a
part of: 391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.
note: Employer must appoint employee to equivalent position or another with no less favourable terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 391(1A) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must appoint employee to equivalent position or another with no less favourable terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

391(2) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-391-ss-2
part of: 391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.
note: Order to restore lost pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to restore lost pay
premise text: (2) If the FWC makes an order...
conclusion text: the FWC MUST make any order that the FWC considers appropriate...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to maintain employment continuity
premise text: (2) If the FWC makes an order under subsection (1)...
conclusion text: the FWC MUST also make any order that the FWC considers appropriate...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for employment continuity
premise text: (a) the continuity of the person’s employment;
conclusion text: ...the period of the person’s continuous service with the employer, or...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for continuous service
premise text: (b) the period of the person’s continuous service with the employer,
conclusion text: ...the associated entity.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

391(3) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-391-ss-3
part of: 391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.
note: Employer must pay remuneration lost due to dismissal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 391(3) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must pay remuneration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

391(4) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-391-ss-4
part of: 391 Remedy—reinstatement etc.
note: Consider remuneration earned by person during period between dismissal and reinstatement order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.200
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-4-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-391-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 391(4) Remedy—reinstatement etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

392 Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-392
has part: 392(1) Remedy—compensation
has part: 392(2) Remedy—compensation
has part: 392(3) Remedy—compensation
has part: 392(4) Remedy—compensation
has part: 392(5) Remedy—compensation
has part: 392(6) Remedy—compensation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202

392(1) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-392-ss-1
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation
note: Employer must pay compensation to employee upon dismissal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to pay compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

392(2) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-392-ss-2
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation
note: Determine compensation amount considering various circumstances.
description: Remuneration earned by the person from employment or other work during the period between dismissal and making of the order for compensation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 392(2) Remedy—compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to consider various circumstances.
premise text: (2) In determining an amount for the purposes of an order under subsection (1),
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

392(3) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-392-ss-3
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation
note: The FWC must reduce the amount of compensation by an appropriate amount on account of misconduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 392(3) Remedy—compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The FWC has an obligation to reduce the amount of compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

392(4) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-392-ss-4
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation
note: No compensation for emotional harm
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

392(5) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-392-ss-5
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation
note: Maximum compensation amount
description: Amount of compensation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 392(5) Remedy—compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Upper bound
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

392(6) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-392-ss-6
part of: 392 Remedy—compensation
note: Employee is entitled to compensation for a certain period of employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.202
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 392(6) Remedy—compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-392-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Employee has an obligation to receive compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

393 Monetary orders may be in instalments
type: Concept
realized by: sec-393
note: Employer may pay amount in instalments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.203
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-393-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-393-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 393 Monetary orders may be in instalments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

394 Application for unfair dismissal remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-394
note: Application for unfair dismissal remedy is allowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 394 Application for unfair dismissal remedy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Existence of application
conclusion text: A person who has been dismissed may apply to the FWC for an order under Division 4 granting a remedy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-394-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Existence of application fee section
conclusion text: For application fees, see section 395.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

395 Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-395
has part: 395(1) Application fees
has part: 395(2) Application fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204

395(1) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-395-ss-1
part of: 395 Application fees
note: Application fee must be paid with application to FWC under this Division.
description: Fee prescribed by regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 395(1) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application fee must be paid
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

395(2) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-395-ss-2
part of: 395 Application fees
note: Application fee regulation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.204
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 395(2) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-395-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Regulates application fees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

396 Initial matters to be considered before merits
type: Concept
realized by: sec-396
note: Consideration of application matters before merits
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-396-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-396-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-396-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 396 Initial matters to be considered before merits
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-396-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within period
premise text: subsection 394(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

397 Matters involving contested facts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-397
note: Conduct conference or hold hearing on disputed facts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-397-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-397-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-397-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct conference or hold hearing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

398 Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-398
has part: 398(1) Conferences
has part: 398(2) Conferences
has part: 398(3) Conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205

398(1) Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-398-ss-1
part of: 398 Conferences
note: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part if the FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 398(1) Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: CogAI's inference
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

398(2) Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-398-ss-2
part of: 398 Conferences
note: The FWC must conduct a private conference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 398(2) Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

398(3) Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-398-ss-3
part of: 398 Conferences
note: Consider circumstances of parties in considering application and informing self.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.205
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 398(3) Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-398-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consideration obligation
premise text: (a) considering the application
conclusion text: (b) informing itself in relation to the application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

399 Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-399
has part: 399(1) Hearings
has part: 399(2) Hearings
has part: 399(3) Hearings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206

399(1) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-399-ss-1
part of: 399 Hearings
note: No hearing unless FWC considers it appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: FWC must not hold a hearing
conclusion text: Hearing is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

399(2) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-399-ss-2
part of: 399 Hearings
note: FWC may decide not to hold hearing in relation to parts of matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to decide not to hold hearing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

399(3) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-399-ss-3
part of: 399 Hearings
note: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

399A Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-399a
has part: 399A(1) Dismissing applications
has part: 399A(2) Dismissing applications
has part: 399A(3) Dismissing applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206

399A(1) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-399a-ss-1
part of: 399A Dismissing applications
note: Dismissal of applications for orders under Division 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: FWC may not dismiss applications
premise text: Section 399A(1)
conclusion text: No dismissal allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

399A(2) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-399a-ss-2
part of: 399A Dismissing applications
note: Employer may apply for power to dismiss applications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 399A(2) Dismissing applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Employer has the right to apply for power.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

399A(3) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-399a-ss-3
part of: 399A Dismissing applications
note: The FWC may dismiss an application at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.206
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 399A(3) Dismissing applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC has the power to dismiss an application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-399a-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: →
logic summary: If the FWC may dismiss an application, it must do so.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400 Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-400
has part: 400(1) Appeal rights
has part: 400(2) Appeal rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207

400(1) Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-400-ss-1
part of: 400 Appeal rights
note: FWC cannot grant permission to appeal from a decision unless in the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of granting permission to appeal
premise text: FWC must not grant permission
conclusion text: unless in the public interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Conditional relationship between granting permission and public interest
premise text: FWC must not grant permission to appeal unless in the public interest
conclusion text: to appeal from a decision made by the FWC under this Part
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: FWC's obligation to consider public interest when granting permission to appeal
premise text: FWC must not grant permission unless in the public interest
conclusion text: to appeal from a decision made by the FWC under this Part
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: FWC's permission to grant permission to appeal is conditional on public interest
premise text: FWC must not grant permission unless in the public interest
conclusion text: to appeal from a decision made by the FWC under this Part
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400(2) Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-400-ss-2
part of: 400 Appeal rights
note: Appeal rights limited to questions of fact
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 400(2) Appeal rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Limits appeal rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400A Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-400a
has part: 400A(1) Costs orders against parties
has part: 400A(2) Costs orders against parties
has part: 400A(3) Costs orders against parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207

400A(1) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-400a-ss-1
part of: 400A Costs orders against parties
note: Order for costs against a party to a matter arising under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 400A(1) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400A(2) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-400a-ss-2
part of: 400A Costs orders against parties
note: The FWC may make an order only if the other party applies for it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 400A(2) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Might
logic summary: The FWC may make an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: The other party must know about the application.
premise text: The other party applies for it in accordance with section 402.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The order is made until the other party withdraws the application.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: If the other party applies, then the FWC may make an order.
premise text: The other party applies for it in accordance with section 402.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: The order is made during the application period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400A(3) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-400a-ss-3
part of: 400A Costs orders against parties
note: Limits FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 400A(3) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-400a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

401 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-401
note: Applicable if an application for unfair dismissal remedy has been made under section 394.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.207
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 401 Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Application for unfair dismissal remedy has been made under section 394.
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-401-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to section 394
premise text: Section 394 has been applied for
conclusion text: This section applies during the application period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

402 Applications for costs orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-402
note: Application for costs order must be made within 14 days after FWC determines matter or matter is discontinued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-402-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-402-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-402-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 402 Applications for costs orders
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-402-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within 14 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

403 Schedule of costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-403
has part: 403(1) Schedule of costs
has part: 403(2) Schedule of costs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208

403(1) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-403-ss-1
part of: 403 Schedule of costs
note: A schedule of costs may be prescribed in relation to items of expenditure likely to be incurred.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-403-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-403-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 403(1) Schedule of costs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

403(2) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-403-ss-2
part of: 403 Schedule of costs
note: Limitation on awarding costs in relation to items in the schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.208
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-403-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-403-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-403-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits exceeding costs in relation to items in the schedule
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

404 Security for costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-404
note: Security for costs may be provided by procedural rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-404-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-404-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-404-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 404 Security for costs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-404-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide security for costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

405 Contravening orders under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-405
note: Must not contravene a term of an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.209
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-405-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-405-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-405-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 405 Contravening orders under this Part
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-405-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

406 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-406
note: Industrial action must be organised or engaged in by certain persons after the nominal expiry date of an enterprise agreement or workplace determination has passed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.210
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-406-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-406-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-406-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 406 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-406-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be organised or engaged in by certain persons after the nominal expiry date of an enterprise agreement or workplace determination has passed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

407 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-407
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.211
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-407-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-407-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 407 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

408 Protected industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-408
note: Industrial action is protected under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-408-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-408-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-408-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 408 Protected industrial action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-408-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isProtected
logic summary: Industrial action is protected.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

409 Employee claim action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-409
has part: 409(1) Employee claim action
has part: 409(2) Employee claim action
has part: 409(3) Employee claim action
has part: 409(4) Employee claim action
has part: 409(5) Employee claim action
has part: 409(6) Employee claim action
has part: 409(6A) Employee claim action
has part: 409(7) Employee claim action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212

409(1) Employee claim action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-409-ss-1
part of: 409 Employee claim action
note: Employee claim action for a proposed enterprise agreement is industrial action that meets certain requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 409(1) Employee claim action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires meeting common requirements and additional requirements.
premise text: (a) is organised or engaged in for the purpose of supporting or advancing claims...
conclusion text: ...meets the common requirements set out in Subdivision B;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Occurs during the period of the protected action ballot.
premise text: (ii) an employee who is included in a group or groups of employees specified in a protected action ballot order for the industrial action;
conclusion text: ...by: (ii) an employee who is included in a group or groups of employees specified in a protected action ballot order...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Occurs everywhere that the protected action ballot is necessary.
premise text: Protected action ballot is necessary
conclusion text: ...for the industrial action;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

409(2) Employee claim action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-409-ss-2
part of: 409 Employee claim action
note: Industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 409(2) Employee claim action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action without protected action ballot.
premise text: (2) The industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot (see Division 8 of this Part).
conclusion text: Unlawful terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for protected action ballot.
premise text: (2) The industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot (see Division 8 of this Part).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for protected action ballot.
premise text: (2) The industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot (see Division 8 of this Part).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses protected action ballot to industrial action.
premise text: (2) The industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot (see Division 8 of this Part).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Applies reasoning to protected action ballot.
premise text: (2) The industrial action must be authorised by a protected action ballot (see Division 8 of this Part).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

409(3) Employee claim action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-409-ss-3
part of: 409 Employee claim action
note: Industrial action must not be in support of or to advance claims to include unlawful terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 409(3) Employee claim action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action in support of or to advance unlawful claims.
premise text: (3) The industrial action must not be in support of, or to advance, claims to include unlawful terms in the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Industrial action implies a prohibition on supporting or advancing unlawful claims.
premise text: (3) The industrial action must not be in support of, or to advance, claims to include unlawful terms in the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

409(4) Employee claim action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-409-ss-4
part of: 409 Employee claim action
note: Bargaining representative must not engage in pattern bargaining.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 409(4) Employee claim action
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of engaging in pattern bargaining.
premise text: (4) A bargaining representative...
conclusion text: ...must not be engaging in pattern bargaining...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

409(5) Employee claim action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-409-ss-5
part of: 409 Employee claim action
note: No relation to demarcation dispute or FWC order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 409(5) Employee claim action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

409(6) Employee claim action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-409-ss-6
part of: 409 Employee claim action
note: Must meet notice requirements of section 430 if section 429 applies in relation to industrial action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 409(6) Employee claim action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

409(6A) Employee claim action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-409-ss-6a
part of: 409 Employee claim action
note: Cannot have contravened any order made under section 448A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot have contravened any order made under section 448A
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

409(7) Employee claim action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-409-ss-7
part of: 409 Employee claim action
note: Bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement must comply with Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.212
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: COVERS
logic summary: The bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement covers Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: COVERS
logic summary: The bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement covers Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS A TYPE OF
logic summary: The bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is a type of Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-409-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS A TYPE OF
logic summary: The bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is a type of Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

410 Employee response action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-410
has part: 410(1) Employee response action
has part: 410(2) Employee response action
has part: 410(3) Employee response action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214

410(1) Employee response action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-410-ss-1
part of: 410 Employee response action
note: Industrial action must not relate to a demarcation dispute etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action related to demarcation disputes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

410(2) Employee response action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-410-ss-2
part of: 410 Employee response action
note: No relation to demarcation dispute or FWC order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

410(3) Employee response action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-410-ss-3
part of: 410 Employee response action
note: Employee organization's officer is a bargaining representative.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.214
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 410(3) Employee response action
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Employee organization
conclusion text: Officer
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-410-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Reference to a bargaining representative includes an officer
premise text: (3) If an employee organization is a bargaining representative...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

411 Employer response action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-411
has part: 411(1) Employer response action
has part: 411(2) Employer response action
has part: 411(3) Employer response action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215

411(1) Employer response action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-411-ss-1
part of: 411 Employer response action
note: Employer must respond to proposed enterprise agreement with industrial action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to respond.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS A
logic summary: Industrial action is a response to employee action.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

411(2) Employer response action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-411-ss-2
part of: 411 Employer response action
note: Employer must respond to industrial action authorized by a protected action ballot.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 411(2) Employer response action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must respond.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for response.
conclusion text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

411(3) Employer response action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-411-ss-3
part of: 411 Employer response action
note: Employer cannot have contravened a mediation and conciliation conference order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 411(3) Employer response action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-411-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening a mediation and conciliation conference order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

412 Pattern bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-412
note: Pattern bargaining requires being a bargaining representative for 2 or more proposed enterprise agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.215
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-412-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-412-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-412-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Pattern bargaining requires a condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-413
has part: 413(1) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
has part: 413(2) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
has part: 413(3) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
has part: 413(4) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
has part: 413(5) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217

413(1) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-413-ss-1
part of: 413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
note: Common requirements for industrial action to be protected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 413(1) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

413(2) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-413-ss-2
part of: 413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
note: Industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
conclusion text: The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between industrial action and proposed enterprise agreements
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
conclusion text: The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between industrial action and proposed enterprise agreements
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
conclusion text: The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between industrial action and proposed enterprise agreements
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
conclusion text: The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between industrial action and proposed enterprise agreements
premise text: (2) The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
conclusion text: The industrial action must not relate to a proposed enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement or a cooperative workplace agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

413(3) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-413-ss-3
part of: 413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
note: Only persons genuinely trying to reach an agreement are allowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 413(3) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Only persons genuinely trying to reach an agreement are allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The person organising or engaging in the industrial action must have a genuine attempt to reach an agreement.
premise text: Person organising or engaging in the industrial action
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The person organising or engaging in the industrial action must continue to genuinely try to reach an agreement until it is successful.
premise text: Person organising or engaging in the industrial action
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: The person organising or engaging in the industrial action must be a bargaining representative for the agreement.
premise text: Person organising or engaging in the industrial action
conclusion text: Bargaining representative for the agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

413(4) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-413-ss-4
part of: 413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
note: Compliance with orders is required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 413(4) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

413(5) Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-413-ss-5
part of: 413 Common requirements that apply for industrial action to be
note: Must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and relate to industrial action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.217
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must-not
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening orders
premise text: The following persons must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and that relate to industrial action
conclusion text: No contravention is allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between persons and orders
premise text: The following persons must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and that relate to industrial action
conclusion text: Persons are related to orders during a certain time period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between persons and orders
premise text: The following persons must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and that relate to industrial action
conclusion text: Persons are related to orders during a certain time period
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must-not
logic summary: Spread of obligations among persons
premise text: The following persons must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and that relate to industrial action
conclusion text: Obligations are spread among persons
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-413-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must-not
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application of obligations
premise text: The following persons must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and that relate to industrial action
conclusion text: Obligations are applied by artificial intelligence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

414 Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-414
has part: 414(1) Notice requirements for industrial action
has part: 414(2) Notice requirements for industrial action
has part: 414(3) Notice requirements for industrial action
has part: 414(4) Notice requirements for industrial action
has part: 414(5) Notice requirements for industrial action
has part: 414(6) Notice requirements for industrial action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218

414(1) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-414-ss-1
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action
note: Employer must receive written notice before engaging in employee claim action for a proposed enterprise agreement.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 414(1) Notice requirements for industrial action
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

414(2) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-414-ss-2
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action
note: Minimum notice period for industrial action
description: Notice period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 414(2) Notice requirements for industrial action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Minimum notice period for industrial action
conclusion text: Notice period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
conclusion text: 120 hours
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

414(3) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-414-ss-3
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action
note: No notice can be given until after the results of the protected action ballot have been declared.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: No notice can be given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

414(4) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-414-ss-4
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action
note: Employer must respond to written notice of employee response action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 414(4) Notice requirements for industrial action
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must respond.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

414(5) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-414-ss-5
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action
note: Employer must give written notice to bargaining representatives and employees before engaging in employer response action.
description: Notice of action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 414(5) Notice requirements for industrial action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

414(6) Notice requirements for industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-414-ss-6
part of: 414 Notice requirements for industrial action
note: Notice must specify nature of action and start date.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.218
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 414(6) Notice requirements for industrial action
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-414-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

415 Immunity provision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-415
has part: 415(1) Immunity provision
has part: 415(2) Immunity provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220

415(1) Immunity provision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-415-ss-1
part of: 415 Immunity provision
note: No action lies under any law in relation to protected industrial action unless it involves personal injury, wilful or reckless destruction of property, or unlawful taking, keeping, or use of property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action unless it involves specified conditions.
premise text: (1) No action lies under any law (whether written or unwritten) in relation to any industrial action that is protected industrial action...
conclusion text: ...unless the industrial action has involved or is likely to involve: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Identifies temporal intervals involved in protected industrial action.
premise text: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
conclusion text: ...unless the industrial action has involved or is likely to involve: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Identifies recurring protected industrial action.
premise text: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
conclusion text: ...unless the industrial action has involved or is likely to involve: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Spreads protected industrial action to related conditions.
premise text: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
conclusion text: ...unless the industrial action has involved or is likely to involve: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Identifies protected industrial action using AI.
premise text: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
conclusion text: ...unless the industrial action has involved or is likely to involve: (a) personal injury; or (b) wilful or reckless destruction of, or damage to, property; or (c) the unlawful taking, keeping or use of property.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

415(2) Immunity provision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-415-ss-2
part of: 415 Immunity provision
note: No defamation action can be brought in relation to industrial action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No defamation action can be brought.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Defamation can be brought in other contexts.
premise text: (2) However, subsection (1) does not prevent an action for defamation being brought in relation to anything that occurred in the course of industrial action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-415-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Subsection (1) imposes a duty to prevent defamation during industrial action.
premise text: (2) However, subsection (1) does not prevent an action for defamation being brought in relation to anything that occurred in the course of industrial action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

416 Employer response action—employer may refuse to make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-416
note: Employer may refuse to make payments to employees in relation to the period of action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-416-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-416-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 416 Employer response action—employer may refuse to make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

416A Employer response action does not affect continuity of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-416a
note: Employer response action does not affect continuity of employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.220
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-416a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-416a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-416a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer has an obligation to not affect continuity of employment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

417 Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-417
has part: 417(1) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
has part: 417(2) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
has part: 417(2A) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221

417(1) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-417-ss-1
part of: 417 Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
note: Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before certain events occur.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 417(1) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

417(2) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-417-ss-2
part of: 417 Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
note: Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 417(2) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (2) The persons are:
conclusion text: must not be organised or engaged in before
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) The persons are:
conclusion text: before
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

417(2A) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
type: Concept
realized by: sec-417-ss-2a
part of: 417 Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
note: Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before a variation starts to operate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.221
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-dialectical-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 417(2A) Industrial action must not be organised or engaged in before
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action before a variation starts to operate.
premise text: (2A) If the person is an employer or employee covered by an enterprise agreement...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that industrial action before a variation starts to operate is prohibited.
premise text: (2A) If the person is an employer or employee covered by an enterprise agreement...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-dialectical-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Dialectical
operator: Negate
logic summary: Negates the possibility of industrial action before a variation starts to operate.
premise text: (2A) If the person is an employer or employee covered by an enterprise agreement...
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAt
logic summary: States that industrial action before a variation starts to operate starts at the start of the variation.
premise text: (2A) If the person is an employer or employee covered by an enterprise agreement...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-417-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise
logic summary: Recognises industrial action before a variation starts to operate as prohibited.
premise text: (2A) If the person is an employer or employee covered by an enterprise agreement...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

418 FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-418
has part: 418(1) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
has part: 418(2) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
has part: 418(3) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
has part: 418(4) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223

418(1) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-418-ss-1
part of: 418 FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
note: FWC must order that industrial action by employees or employers stop.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 418(1) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action by one or more employees or employers...
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with protected industrial action periods
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action by one or more employees or employers...
conclusion text: ...the stop period specified in the order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Eventually stops industrial action
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action by one or more employees or employers...
conclusion text: ...the stop period specified in the order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses protection of industrial action
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action by one or more employees or employers...
conclusion text: ...the stop period specified in the order.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes unprotected industrial action
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action by one or more employees or employers...
conclusion text: ...the stop period specified in the order.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

418(2) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-418-ss-2
part of: 418 FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
note: FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 418(2) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

418(3) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-418-ss-3
part of: 418 FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
note: FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 418(3) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

418(4) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-418-ss-4
part of: 418 FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
note: FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.223
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 418(4) FWC must order that industrial action by employees or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-418-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

419 FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
type: Concept
realized by: sec-419
has part: 419(1) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
has part: 419(2) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
has part: 419(3) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224

419(1) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
type: Concept
realized by: sec-419-ss-1
part of: 419 FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
note: FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system stop.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 419(1) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action by non-national system employees or employers.
premise text: (1) If it appears to the FWC that industrial action...
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with business operations.
premise text: (a) is: (i) happening; or (ii) threatened, impending or probable; or (iii) being organised;
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Eventually leads to business disruption.
premise text: (b) will, or would, be likely to have the effect of causing substantial loss or damage...
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads to business operations.
premise text: (a) is: (i) happening; or (ii) threatened, impending or probable; or (iii) being organised;
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes threat to business.
premise text: (b) will, or would, be likely to have the effect of causing substantial loss or damage...
conclusion text: ...the FWC must make an order that the industrial action stop...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

419(2) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
type: Concept
realized by: sec-419-ss-2
part of: 419 FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
note: FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 419(2) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

419(3) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
type: Concept
realized by: sec-419-ss-3
part of: 419 FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
note: FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.224
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 419(3) FWC must order that industrial action by non-national system
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to order industrial action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-419-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC's obligation and industrial action
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

420 Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-420
has part: 420(1) Interim orders etc.
has part: 420(2) Interim orders etc.
has part: 420(3) Interim orders etc.
has part: 420(4) Interim orders etc.
has part: 420(5) Interim orders etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225

420(1) Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-420-ss-1
part of: 420 Interim orders etc.
note: Determine an application for an order within 2 days after the application is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 420(1) Interim orders etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Duty to determine an application within a specified timeframe.
premise text: (1) As far as practicable, the FWC must determine an application for an order under section 418 or 419 within 2 days after the application is made.
conclusion text: The FWC must determine an application for an order within 2 days after the application is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Application must be determined within a specified timeframe.
premise text: (1) As far as practicable, the FWC must determine an application for an order under section 418 or 419 within 2 days after the application is made.
conclusion text: The application must be determined within 2 days after the application is made.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Duty to make a decision on an application.
premise text: (1) As far as practicable, the FWC must determine an application for an order under section 418 or 419 within 2 days after the application is made.
conclusion text: The FWC must make a decision on an application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Duty to take action on an application.
premise text: (1) As far as practicable, the FWC must determine an application for an order under section 418 or 419 within 2 days after the application is made.
conclusion text: The FWC must take action on an application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

420(2) Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-420-ss-2
part of: 420 Interim orders etc.
note: Interim order must stop industrial action from occurring.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 420(2) Interim orders etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

420(3) Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-420-ss-3
part of: 420 Interim orders etc.
note: FWC cannot make interim order if it would be contrary to public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making interim order
premise text: FWC must not make interim order
conclusion text: it would be contrary to public interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: not
logic summary: Not making interim order is permissible if it would be contrary to public interest
premise text: FWC must not make interim order
conclusion text: it would be contrary to public interest
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Interim order cannot be made during period when it would be contrary to public interest
premise text: FWC must not make interim order
conclusion text: it would be contrary to public interest
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Interim order cannot be made if it would be contrary to public interest
premise text: FWC must not make interim order
conclusion text: it would be contrary to public interest
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: FWC must consider implications of making interim order on public interest
premise text: FWC must not make interim order
conclusion text: it would be contrary to public interest
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

420(4) Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-420-ss-4
part of: 420 Interim orders etc.
note: The FWC does not have to specify the particular industrial action in making an interim order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-4-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 420(4) Interim orders etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

420(5) Interim orders etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-420-ss-5
part of: 420 Interim orders etc.
note: An interim order continues in operation until the application is determined.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 420(5) Interim orders etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-420-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Continuation of interim order
premise text: (5) An interim order continues in operation until the application is determined.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

421 Contravening an order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-421
has part: 421(1) Contravening an order etc.
has part: 421(2) Contravening an order etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225

421(1) Contravening an order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-421-ss-1
part of: 421 Contravening an order etc.
note: Must not contravene a term of the order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 421(1) Contravening an order etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

421(2) Contravening an order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-421-ss-2
part of: 421 Contravening an order etc.
note: Exemption from complying with an order under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.225
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 421(2) Contravening an order etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-421-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
premise text: (2) However, a person is not required to comply with an order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

422 Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-422
has part: 422(1) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
has part: 422(2) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.227

422(1) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-422-ss-1
part of: 422 Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
note: Granting of injunction against industrial action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.227
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 422(1) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of industrial action
premise text: (1) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
conclusion text: may grant an injunction on such terms as the court considers appropriate if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of application
premise text: (1) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
conclusion text: may grant an injunction on such terms as the court considers appropriate if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of industrial action
premise text: (a) a person has applied for the injunction; and (b) the requirement set out in subsection (2) is met.
conclusion text: if: (a) a person has applied for the injunction; and (b) the requirement set out in subsection (2) is met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
logic summary: Spread of information about industrial action
premise text: (a) a person has applied for the injunction; and (b) the requirement set out in subsection (2) is met.
conclusion text: if: (a) a person has applied for the injunction; and (b) the requirement set out in subsection (2) is met.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of industrial action
premise text: (1) The Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
conclusion text: may grant an injunction on such terms as the court considers appropriate if...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

422(2) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
type: Concept
realized by: sec-422-ss-2
part of: 422 Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
note: Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining representative is engaging in pattern bargaining.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.227
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 422(2) Injunction against industrial action if a bargaining
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action if a bargaining representative is engaging in pattern bargaining.
premise text: (2) The court is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is engaging in pattern bargaining...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action if a bargaining representative is engaging in pattern bargaining.
premise text: (2) The court is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is engaging in pattern bargaining...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action during a period when a bargaining representative is engaging in pattern bargaining.
premise text: (2) The court is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is engaging in pattern bargaining...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-422-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits industrial action if a bargaining representative is engaging in pattern bargaining.
premise text: (2) The court is satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement is engaging in pattern bargaining...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-423
has part: 423(1) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(2) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(3) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(4) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(5) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(6) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 423(7) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228

423(1) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-423-ss-1
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 423(1) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

423(2) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-423-ss-2
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: FWC must be satisfied that protected industrial action is causing significant economic harm to the employer or employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 423(2) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: FWC must be satisfied...
conclusion text: FWC MUST BE SATISFIED...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

423(3) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-423-ss-3
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: FWC must be satisfied that protected industrial action is causing significant economic harm to employees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 423(3) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: FWC must be satisfied...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

423(4) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-423-ss-4
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: Factors relevant to working out whether protected industrial action is causing or threatening to cause significant economic harm.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-4-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 423(4) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

423(5) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-423-ss-5
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: FWC must be satisfied that harm is imminent before suspending or terminating protected industrial action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 423(5) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

423(6) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-423-ss-6
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: FWC must be satisfied that protected industrial action has been engaged in for a protracted period of time and the dispute will not be resolved in the reasonably foreseeable future.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 423(6) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to suspend or terminate protected industrial action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

423(7) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-423-ss-7
part of: 423 FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.228
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 423(7) FWC may suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-423-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-424
has part: 424(1) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 424(2) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 424(3) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 424(4) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
has part: 424(5) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230

424(1) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-424-ss-1
part of: 424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 424(1) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits FWC from failing to suspend or terminate protected industrial action.
premise text: (1) The FWC must make an order suspending or terminating protected industrial action for a proposed enterprise agreement that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

424(2) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-424-ss-2
part of: 424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 424(2) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of suspension or termination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

424(3) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-424-ss-3
part of: 424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: FWC must determine application within 5 days after it is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 424(3) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to determine application within 5 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

424(4) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-424-ss-4
part of: 424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: FWC must make an interim order suspending protected industrial action if unable to determine application within period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 424(4) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to suspend protected industrial action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Interim order must be in effect until application is determined
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

424(5) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-424-ss-5
part of: 424 FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
note: FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.230
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-5-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-424-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 424(5) FWC must suspend or terminate protected industrial action—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

425 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—cooling off
type: Concept
realized by: sec-425
note: FWC must suspend protected industrial action—cooling off
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.231
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-425-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-425-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-425-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 425 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—cooling off
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-425-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide suspension order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-426
has part: 426(1) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
has part: 426(2) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
has part: 426(3) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
has part: 426(4) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
has part: 426(5) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
has part: 426(6) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232

426(1) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-426-ss-1
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
note: FWC must suspend protected industrial action for a proposed enterprise agreement if certain requirements are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 426(1) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to suspend protected industrial action
premise text: The FWC must make an order suspending protected industrial action
conclusion text: if the requirements set out in this section are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

426(2) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-426-ss-2
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
note: FWC must be satisfied that protected industrial action is adversely affecting the employer or employees covered by the agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 426(2) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to suspend protected industrial action
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is adversely affecting the employer or employees covered by the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

426(3) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-426-ss-3
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
note: FWC must suspend protected industrial action if it threatens harm to anyone other than a bargaining representative or an employee covered by the agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 426(3) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to suspend protected industrial action
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is threatening to cause significant harm
conclusion text: FWC must suspend protected industrial action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC's obligation and the protected industrial action
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is threatening to cause significant harm
conclusion text: The protected industrial action occurs after FWC's obligation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC's obligation and the protected industrial action
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is threatening to cause significant harm
conclusion text: The protected industrial action occurs before or at the same time as FWC's obligation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
logic summary: Conditional relationship between FWC's obligation and the protected industrial action
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is threatening to cause significant harm
conclusion text: If the protected industrial action threatens harm, then FWC must suspend it
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_NOT
logic summary: Prohibition on suspending protected industrial action if it does not threaten harm
premise text: FWC must be satisfied that the protected industrial action is threatening to cause significant harm
conclusion text: It is not required that FWC suspend the protected industrial action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

426(4) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-426-ss-4
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
note: FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 426(4) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide suspension
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the FWC may take into account...
conclusion text: Requirement—suspension is appropriate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for suspension
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the FWC may take into account...
conclusion text: The period during which the protected industrial action is suspended
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for suspension
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the FWC may take into account...
conclusion text: The period during which the protected industrial action is suspended
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for suspension
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the FWC may take into account...
conclusion text: The period during which the protected industrial action is suspended
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for suspension
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the FWC may take into account...
conclusion text: The period during which the protected industrial action is suspended
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

426(5) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-426-ss-5
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
note: FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-5-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 426(5) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

426(6) FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-426-ss-6
part of: 426 FWC must suspend protected industrial action—significant
note: FWC may make order on application by certain parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.232
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-426-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

427 FWC must specify the period of suspension
type: Concept
realized by: sec-427
has part: 427(1) FWC must specify the period of suspension
has part: 427(2) FWC must specify the period of suspension
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233

427(1) FWC must specify the period of suspension
type: Concept
realized by: sec-427-ss-1
part of: 427 FWC must specify the period of suspension
note: FWC must specify suspension period for protected industrial action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 427(1) FWC must specify the period of suspension
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide suspension period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

427(2) FWC must specify the period of suspension
type: Concept
realized by: sec-427-ss-2
part of: 427 FWC must specify the period of suspension
note: FWC must specify the period of suspension for protected industrial action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.233
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 427(2) FWC must specify the period of suspension
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-427-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a specified period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

428 Extension of a period of suspension
type: Concept
realized by: sec-428
has part: 428(1) Extension of a period of suspension
has part: 428(2) Extension of a period of suspension
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234

428(1) Extension of a period of suspension
type: Concept
realized by: sec-428-ss-1
part of: 428 Extension of a period of suspension
note: Extension of a period of suspension for a proposed enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-428-ss-1-norm

428(2) Extension of a period of suspension
type: Concept
realized by: sec-428-ss-2
part of: 428 Extension of a period of suspension
note: FWC must specify period of extension in order
description: period of extension
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-428-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-428-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-428-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC must specify period of extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

429 Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-429
has part: 429(1) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
has part: 429(2) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
has part: 429(3) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
has part: 429(4) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234

429(1) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-429-ss-1
part of: 429 Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
note: No further protected action ballot required for employee claim action during suspension period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits further protected action ballot for employee claim action during suspension period.
premise text: (a) an order suspending the employee claim action has been made; and (b) a protected action ballot authorised the employee claim action: ...
conclusion text: ...which had not ended before the beginning of the suspension period;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies temporal interval during which further protected action ballot is not required.
premise text: (c) the suspension period (including any extension under section 428) ends, or the order is revoked before the end of that period.
conclusion text: suspension period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Specifies temporal interval until which further protected action ballot is not required.
premise text: (c) the suspension period (including any extension under section 428) ends, or the order is revoked before the end of that period.
conclusion text: end of suspension period
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits taking further protected action ballot during specified temporal interval.
premise text: (i) some or all of which had not been taken before the beginning of the period (the suspension period) of suspension specified in the order; or (ii) which had not ended before the beginning of the suspension period; or (iii) beyond the suspension period;
conclusion text: ...which had not ended before the beginning of the suspension period;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits taking further protected action ballot during specified temporal interval.
premise text: (i) some or all of which had not been taken before the beginning of the period (the suspension period) of suspension specified in the order; or (ii) which had not ended before the beginning of the suspension period; or (iii) beyond the suspension period;
conclusion text: ...beyond the suspension period;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

429(2) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-429-ss-2
part of: 429 Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
note: Allow employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to engage in employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

429(3) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-429-ss-3
part of: 429 Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
note: Employee claim action must be engaged in without considering suspension period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 429(3) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

429(4) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-429-ss-4
part of: 429 Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
note: No employee claim action different in type or duration from authorized by protected action ballot.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.234
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 429(4) Employee claim action without a further protected action ballot
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-429-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits employee claim actions different in type or duration from authorized by protected action ballot.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

430 Notice of employee claim action engaged in after a period of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-430
note: Employer must receive written notice before engaging in employee claim action.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.235
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-430-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-430-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-430-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 430 Notice of employee claim action engaged in after a period of
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-430-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

431 Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-431
has part: 431(1) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
has part: 431(2) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
has part: 431(3) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237

431(1) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-431-ss-1
part of: 431 Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
note: Terminating protected industrial action for a proposed enterprise agreement if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 431(1) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits protected industrial action for a proposed enterprise agreement.
premise text: (a) the industrial action is being engaged in, or is threatened, impending or probable; and (b) the industrial action is threatening, or would threaten: ...
conclusion text: ...the Minister may make a declaration terminating protected industrial action...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Determines if industrial action overlaps with certain conditions.
premise text: (a) the industrial action is being engaged in, or is threatened, impending or probable; and (b) the industrial action is threatening, or would threaten: ...
conclusion text: ...the Minister is satisfied that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Determines if industrial action will eventually meet certain conditions.
premise text: (a) the industrial action is being engaged in, or is threatened, impending or probable; and (b) the industrial action is threatening, or would threaten: ...
conclusion text: ...the Minister may make a declaration terminating protected industrial action...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses information about protected industrial action.
premise text: (a) the industrial action is being engaged in, or is threatened, impending or probable; and (b) the industrial action is threatening, or would threaten: ...
conclusion text: ...the Minister may make a declaration terminating protected industrial action...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes protected industrial action.
premise text: (a) the industrial action is being engaged in, or is threatened, impending or probable; and (b) the industrial action is threatening, or would threaten: ...
conclusion text: ...the Minister may make a declaration terminating protected industrial action...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

431(2) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-431-ss-2
part of: 431 Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
note: Declaration comes into operation on the day it is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-2-norm

431(3) Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-431-ss-3
part of: 431 Ministerial declaration terminating industrial action
note: A declaration under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-431-ss-3-norm

432 Informing people of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-432
has part: 432(1) Informing people of declaration
has part: 432(2) Informing people of declaration
has part: 432(3) Informing people of declaration
has part: 432(4) Informing people of declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237

432(1) Informing people of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-432-ss-1
part of: 432 Informing people of declaration
note: Declaration under subsection 431(1) triggers this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-1-norm

432(2) Informing people of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-432-ss-2
part of: 432 Informing people of declaration
note: Publish declaration in Gazette
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 432(2) Informing people of declaration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

432(3) Informing people of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-432-ss-3
part of: 432 Informing people of declaration
note: Informing FWC of declaration making
description: Declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

432(4) Informing people of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-432-ss-4
part of: 432 Informing people of declaration
note: Informing bargaining representatives of declaration and its effect
description: (a) of the making of the declaration; (b) of the effect of Part 2-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.237
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
premise text: (4) The Minister must...
conclusion text: ...take all reasonable steps...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-432-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for informing is immediate
premise text: (4) The Minister must...
conclusion text: ...as soon as practicable...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

433 Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
type: Concept
realized by: sec-433
has part: 433(1) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
has part: 433(2) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
has part: 433(3) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238

433(1) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
type: Concept
realized by: sec-433-ss-1
part of: 433 Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
note: Minister's directions to specified persons regarding actions under a proposed enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires Minister's directions to be followed
premise text: Minister gives directions
conclusion text: specified persons must take or refrain from taking actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

433(2) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
type: Concept
realized by: sec-433-ss-2
part of: 433 Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
note: Minister's obligation to give directions for removing or reducing threat
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister's obligation to give directions
premise text: The Minister may only give directions
conclusion text: that are reasonably directed to removing or reducing the threat
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Minister's permission to give directions
premise text: The Minister may only give directions
conclusion text: that are reasonably directed to removing or reducing the threat
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

433(3) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
type: Concept
realized by: sec-433-ss-3
part of: 433 Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
note: A direction under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-433-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 433(3) Ministerial directions to remove or reduce threat
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

434 Contravening a Ministerial direction
type: Concept
realized by: sec-434
note: Must not contravene a ministerial direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.238
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-434-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-434-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-434-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 434 Contravening a Ministerial direction
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-434-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits contravening a ministerial direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

435 Guide to this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-435
note: Establishes process for employees to choose protected industrial action through a secret ballot.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.239
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 435 Guide to this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishes process for employees to choose protected industrial action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-435-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies the process as a guide to this Division.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

436 Object of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-436
note: Employees must engage in protected industrial action if they wish to determine whether a bargaining representative can establish a fair process.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.239
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-436-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-436-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-436-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 436 Object of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-436-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employees must engage in protected industrial action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

437 Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-437
has part: 437(1) Application for a protected action ballot order
has part: 437(2) Application for a protected action ballot order
has part: 437(2A) Application for a protected action ballot order
has part: 437(3) Application for a protected action ballot order
has part: 437(5) Application for a protected action ballot order
has part: 437(6) Application for a protected action ballot order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240

437(1) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-437-ss-1
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order
note: Application for a protected action ballot order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 437(1) Application for a protected action ballot order
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Legal obligation to apply for a protected action ballot order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval of application
premise text: (1) A bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement, or 2 or more such bargaining representatives (acting jointly), may apply to the FWC for an order (a protected action ballot order)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of application for a protected action ballot order
premise text: (1) A bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement, or 2 or more such bargaining representatives (acting jointly), may apply to the FWC for an order (a protected action ballot order)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of information about application for a protected action ballot order
premise text: (1) A bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement, or 2 or more such bargaining representatives (acting jointly), may apply to the FWC for an order (a protected action ballot order)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of application for a protected action ballot order by the FWC
premise text: (1) A bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement, or 2 or more such bargaining representatives (acting jointly), may apply to the FWC for an order (a protected action ballot order)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

437(2) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-437-ss-2
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for specific types of agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-2-norm

437(2A) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-437-ss-2a
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order
note: Notification time must be specified in application for protected industrial action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 437(2A) Application for a protected action ballot order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

437(3) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-437-ss-3
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order
note: Application requirements for a protected action ballot order
description: The application must specify the group or groups of employees, questions to be put to the employees, and the name of the person or entity that wishes to be the protected action ballot agent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 437(3) Application for a protected action ballot order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must specify requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

437(5) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-437-ss-5
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order
note: Employees must be specified in a protected action ballot order application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 437(5) Application for a protected action ballot order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Employee specification
premise text: (a) will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement; and (b) either: (i) are represented by a bargaining representative who is an applicant for the protected action ballot order; or (ii) are bargaining representatives for themselves but are members of an employee organisation that is an applicant for the protected action ballot order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

437(6) Application for a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-437-ss-6
part of: 437 Application for a protected action ballot order
note: Application must be accompanied by prescribed documents and information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.240
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 437(6) Application for a protected action ballot order
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide required documents and information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

437A Application for a protected action ballot order—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-437a
has part: 437A(1) Application for a protected action ballot order—
has part: 437A(2) Application for a protected action ballot order—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241

437A(1) Application for a protected action ballot order—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-437a-ss-1
part of: 437A Application for a protected action ballot order—
note: Application for a protected action ballot order is required if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 437A(1) Application for a protected action ballot order—
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditions must be met for an application to be made
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: Application can only be made if conditions are met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

437A(2) Application for a protected action ballot order—
type: Concept
realized by: sec-437a-ss-2
part of: 437A Application for a protected action ballot order—
note: Application for a protected action ballot order has effect as if it were multiple applications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.241
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 437A(2) Application for a protected action ballot order—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-437a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Application for a protected action ballot order has effect as if it were multiple applications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

438 Restriction on when application may be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-438
has part: 438(1) Restriction on when application may be made
has part: 438(2) Restriction on when application may be made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242

438(1) Restriction on when application may be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-438-ss-1
part of: 438 Restriction on when application may be made
note: Prohibition on making an application before a certain time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 438(1) Restriction on when application may be made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Restricts when an application can be made
premise text: (1) If one or more enterprise agreements cover the employees...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

438(2) Restriction on when application may be made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-438-ss-2
part of: 438 Restriction on when application may be made
note: Making an application for a protected action ballot order is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-438-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making an application for a protected action ballot order.
premise text: (2) To avoid doubt, making an application for a protected action ballot order does not constitute organising industrial action.
conclusion text: Organising industrial action is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

439 Joint applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-439
note: Rules for joint applications in protected action ballots
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.242
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-439-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-439-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 439 Joint applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

440 Notice of application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-440
note: Applicant must notify employer and specified entity of application within 24 hours.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-440-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-440-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-440-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 440 Notice of application
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-440-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice to employer and entity within 24 hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

441 Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-441
has part: 441(1) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
has part: 441(2) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243

441(1) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-441-ss-1
part of: 441 Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
note: Determine an application for a protected action ballot order within 2 working days after it is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 441(1) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must determine an application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

441(2) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
type: Concept
realized by: sec-441-ss-2
part of: 441 Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
note: Application must comply with section 440 before FWC can determine it
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 441(2) Application to be determined within 2 days after it is made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-441-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Application must comply with section 440
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

442 Dealing with multiple applications together
type: Concept
realized by: sec-442
note: FWC may deal with multiple applications for a protected action ballot order at the same time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-442-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-442-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 442 Dealing with multiple applications together
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

443 When the FWC must make a protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-443
note: FWC must make protected action ballot order for proposed enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.243
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-443-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-443-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-443-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 443 When the FWC must make a protected action ballot order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-443-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make protected action ballot order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

444 Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-444
has part: 444(1) Ballot agent and independent advisor
has part: 444(1A) Ballot agent and independent advisor
has part: 444(1B) Ballot agent and independent advisor
has part: 444(1C) Ballot agent and independent advisor
has part: 444(1D) Ballot agent and independent advisor
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245

444(1) Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-444-ss-1
part of: 444 Ballot agent and independent advisor
note: Protected action ballot agent obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 444(1) Ballot agent and independent advisor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to make a protected action ballot order
premise text: (1) This section applies if the FWC must make a protected action ballot order under subsection 443(1).
conclusion text: Protected action ballot agent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between protected actions and ballot orders
premise text: (1) This section applies if the FWC must make a protected action ballot order under subsection 443(1).
conclusion text: Protected action ballot agent
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of protected actions on ballot orders
premise text: (1) This section applies if the FWC must make a protected action ballot order under subsection 443(1).
conclusion text: Protected action ballot agent
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of obligations to ballot agents
premise text: (1) This section applies if the FWC must make a protected action ballot order under subsection 443(1).
conclusion text: Protected action ballot agent
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of ballot agents and independent advisors by AI
premise text: (1) This section applies if the FWC must make a protected action ballot order under subsection 443(1).
conclusion text: Ballot agent and independent advisor
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

444(1A) Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-444-ss-1a
part of: 444 Ballot agent and independent advisor
note: Designate protected action ballot agent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 444(1A) Ballot agent and independent advisor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must designate a protected action ballot agent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

444(1B) Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-444-ss-1b
part of: 444 Ballot agent and independent advisor
note: Specify protected action ballot agent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 444(1B) Ballot agent and independent advisor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be specified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

444(1C) Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-444-ss-1c
part of: 444 Ballot agent and independent advisor
note: Must be an eligible protected action ballot agent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1c-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 444(1C) Ballot agent and independent advisor
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST BE
logic summary: Obligation to be an eligible protected action ballot agent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

444(1D) Ballot agent and independent advisor
type: Concept
realized by: sec-444-ss-1d
part of: 444 Ballot agent and independent advisor
note: Exceptions to subsection (1C) for a person conducting the ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.245
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-444-ss-1d-norm

445 Notice of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-445
note: Must provide notice of protected action ballot order to applicants, employer, and protected action ballot agent.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-445-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-445-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-445-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide notice of protected action ballot order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

446 Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-446
has part: 446(1) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
has part: 446(2) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246

446(1) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-446-ss-1
part of: 446 Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
note: Protected action ballot order requires a protected action ballot to be held in relation to industrial action by employees of the same employer or employees at the same workplace.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 446(1) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires a protected action ballot to be held
premise text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During industrial action by employees of the same employer or employees at the same workplace
premise text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During industrial action by employees of the same employer or employees at the same workplace
premise text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc. Chapter 3 Industrial action Part 3-3 Protected action ballots Division 8 Section 447 Fair Work Act 2009 Compilation date: 02/04/2026
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

446(2) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-446-ss-2
part of: 446 Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
note: The FWC may require protected action ballots to be held at the same time under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.246
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 446(2) Protected action ballot order may require 2 or more protected
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires protected action ballots to be held at the same time.
premise text: (a) that the level of disruption of the employer’s enterprise, or at the workplace, could be reduced if the ballots were held at the same time;
conclusion text: (b) that requiring the ballots to be held at the same time will not unreasonably delay either ballot.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The protected action ballots are held during a specific time period.
premise text: (2) The FWC may make, or vary, the protected action ballot orders so as to require the protected action ballots to be held at the same time;
conclusion text: if the FWC is satisfied: (a) that the level of disruption of the employer’s enterprise, or at the workplace, could be reduced if the ballots were held at the same time; and (b) that requiring the ballots to be held at the same time will not unreasonably delay either ballot.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The protected action ballots are held during a specific time period.
premise text: (2) The FWC may make, or vary, the protected action ballot orders so as to require the protected action ballots to be held at the same time;
conclusion text: if the FWC is satisfied: (a) that the level of disruption of the employer’s enterprise, or at the workplace, could be reduced if the ballots were held at the same time; and (b) that requiring the ballots to be held at the same time will not unreasonably delay either ballot.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: The protected action ballots are held during a specific time period.
premise text: (2) The FWC may make, or vary, the protected action ballot orders so as to require the protected action ballots to be held at the same time;
conclusion text: if the FWC is satisfied: (a) that the level of disruption of the employer’s enterprise, or at the workplace, could be reduced if the ballots were held at the same time; and (b) that requiring the ballots to be held at the same time will not unreasonably delay either ballot.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-446-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: The protected action ballots are held during a specific time period.
premise text: (2) The FWC may make, or vary, the protected action ballot orders so as to require the protected action ballots to be held at the same time;
conclusion text: if the FWC is satisfied: (a) that the level of disruption of the employer’s enterprise, or at the workplace, could be reduced if the ballots were held at the same time; and (b) that requiring the ballots to be held at the same time will not unreasonably delay either ballot.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

447 Variation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-447
has part: 447(1) Variation of protected action ballot order
has part: 447(2) Variation of protected action ballot order
has part: 447(3) Variation of protected action ballot order
has part: 447(4) Variation of protected action ballot order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247

447(1) Variation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-447-ss-1
part of: 447 Variation of protected action ballot order
note: An applicant may apply to vary the protected action ballot order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 447(1) Variation of protected action ballot order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Applicant has permission to apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

447(2) Variation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-447-ss-2
part of: 447 Variation of protected action ballot order
note: Variation of protected action ballot order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to vary the protected action ballot order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

447(3) Variation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-447-ss-3
part of: 447 Variation of protected action ballot order
note: Application can be made before or after voting closes with FWC consent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Can
logic summary: Permission to apply before or after voting closes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

447(4) Variation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-447-ss-4
part of: 447 Variation of protected action ballot order
note: FWC may vary protected action ballot order on application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.247
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 447(4) Variation of protected action ballot order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-447-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

448 Revocation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-448
has part: 448(1) Revocation of protected action ballot order
has part: 448(2) Revocation of protected action ballot order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248

448(1) Revocation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-448-ss-1
part of: 448 Revocation of protected action ballot order
note: Duty to revoke protected action ballot order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 448(1) Revocation of protected action ballot order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to revoke
conclusion text: The applicant must revoke the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

448(2) Revocation of protected action ballot order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-448-ss-2
part of: 448 Revocation of protected action ballot order
note: FWC must revoke protected action ballot order upon application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 448(2) Revocation of protected action ballot order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

448A FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-448a
has part: 448A(1) FWC must conduct conferences
has part: 448A(2) FWC must conduct conferences
has part: 448A(3) FWC must conduct conferences
has part: 448A(4) FWC must conduct conferences
has part: 448A(5) FWC must conduct conferences
has part: 448A(6) FWC must conduct conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248

448A(1) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-448a-ss-1
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences
note: FWC must attend a conference with bargaining representatives for an agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 448A(1) FWC must conduct conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to attend a conference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Conference details specified
premise text: (a) at a specified time or times during a specified period; and (b) at a specified place, or by specified means;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for conference attendance
premise text: (1) If the FWC has made a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement, the FWC must make an order directing the bargaining representatives for the agreement to attend a conference:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: should
logic summary: Reasoning for attending a conference
premise text: (a) at a specified time or times during a specified period; and (b) at a specified place, or by specified means;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
logic summary: Diffusion of information about conference attendance
premise text: (1) If the FWC has made a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement, the FWC must make an order directing the bargaining representatives for the agreement to attend a conference:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for conference attendance
premise text: (1) If the FWC has made a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement, the FWC must make an order directing the bargaining representatives for the agreement to attend a conference:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

448A(2) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-448a-ss-2
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences
note: Conferences must be conducted by the FWC within a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 448A(2) FWC must conduct conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct conferences
premise text: (2) The specified period must end on or before...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

448A(3) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-448a-ss-3
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences
note: FWC must conduct conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 448A(3) FWC must conduct conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct conferences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

448A(4) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-448a-ss-4
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences
note: The conference must be conducted in private.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must conduct the conference in private.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

448A(5) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-448a-ss-5
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences
note: FWC must conduct conferences and may mediate or conciliate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 448A(5) FWC must conduct conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct conferences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

448A(6) FWC must conduct conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-448a-ss-6
part of: 448A FWC must conduct conferences
note: FWC must conduct conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.248
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-448a-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between sections
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

449 Conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-449
has part: 449(1) Conduct of protected action ballot
has part: 449(2) Conduct of protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249

449(1) Conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-449-ss-1
part of: 449 Conduct of protected action ballot
note: Must be conducted by a specified person or entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 449(1) Conduct of protected action ballot
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct the ballot by a specified person or entity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

449(2) Conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-449-ss-2
part of: 449 Conduct of protected action ballot
note: Must conduct protected action ballot expeditiously and in accordance with certain procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must conduct protected action ballot expeditiously.
premise text: (2) The protected action ballot agent...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-449-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Must conduct within certain timeframe.
premise text: (b) the timetable for the ballot;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

450 Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-450
has part: 450(1) Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
has part: 450(2) Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249

450(1) Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-450-ss-1
part of: 450 Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
note: This section applies if the protected action ballot agent is not the Australian Electoral Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The protected action ballot agent is not the Australian Electoral Commission.
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

450(2) Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-450-ss-2
part of: 450 Directions for conduct of protected action ballot
note: FWC must provide written directions to protected action ballot agents on specific matters.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.249
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-450-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

451 Timetable for protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-451
has part: 451(1) Timetable for protected action ballot
has part: 451(2) Timetable for protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250

451(1) Timetable for protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-451-ss-1
part of: 451 Timetable for protected action ballot
note: Must comply with section if FWC directs or Australian Electoral Commission is the agent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with directions given by FWC
premise text: If this section does not apply, the protected action ballot agent must comply with directions given by the FWC in relation to the matters dealt with by this section (see section 450).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

451(2) Timetable for protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-451-ss-2
part of: 451 Timetable for protected action ballot
note: Develop a timetable for the conduct of the protected action ballot and determine the voting method.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.250
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-451-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must develop a timetable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

452 Compilation of roll of voters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-452
has part: 452(1) Compilation of roll of voters
has part: 452(2) Compilation of roll of voters
has part: 452(3) Compilation of roll of voters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251

452(1) Compilation of roll of voters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-452-ss-1
part of: 452 Compilation of roll of voters
note: Must comply with section if FWC directs or Australian Electoral Commission is the protected action ballot agent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with directions given by FWC if section does not apply
premise text: If this section does not apply, the protected action ballot agent must comply with directions given by the FWC in relation to the matters dealt with by this section (see section 450).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with section if FWC directs
premise text: (b) the FWC has directed the protected action ballot agent to comply with this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with section if Australian Electoral Commission is protected action ballot agent
premise text: (a) the protected action ballot agent is the Australian Electoral Commission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

452(2) Compilation of roll of voters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-452-ss-2
part of: 452 Compilation of roll of voters
note: Must compile roll of voters after receiving protected action ballot order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to compile roll of voters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

452(3) Compilation of roll of voters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-452-ss-3
part of: 452 Compilation of roll of voters
note: Employer must provide names and other information to ballot agent for compiling roll of voters.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 452(3) Compilation of roll of voters
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-452-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

453 Who is eligible to be included on the roll of voters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-453
note: Eligibility for voter roll based on proposed enterprise agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.251
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Employee has right to be included on voter roll if covered by proposed enterprise agreement
premise text: Employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement
conclusion text: Employee is eligible to be included on the roll of voters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Eligibility for voter roll based on proposed enterprise agreement is during the period when employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement
premise text: Employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Eligibility for voter roll based on proposed enterprise agreement is everywhere in the context of employee rights
premise text: Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ifAndOnlyIf
logic summary: Eligibility for voter roll based on proposed enterprise agreement is if and only if employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement
premise text: Employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-453-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Employee has right to be included on voter roll if covered by proposed enterprise agreement
premise text: Employee will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

454 Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-454
has part: 454(1) Variation of roll of voters
has part: 454(2) Variation of roll of voters
has part: 454(3) Variation of roll of voters
has part: 454(4) Variation of roll of voters
has part: 454(5) Variation of roll of voters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252

454(1) Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-454-ss-1
part of: 454 Variation of roll of voters
note: Protected action ballot agent must comply with subsections (2) to (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 454(1) Variation of roll of voters
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with subsections (2) to (4)
premise text: (a) the protected action ballot agent is the Australian Electoral Commission; or (b) the FWC has directed the protected action ballot agent to comply with those subsections.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

454(2) Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-454-ss-2
part of: 454 Variation of roll of voters
note: Employee must be included on the roll of voters if requested by applicant, employee, or employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 454(2) Variation of roll of voters
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide employee's name on the roll of voters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

454(3) Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-454-ss-3
part of: 454 Variation of roll of voters
note: Must remove employee's name from roll of voters under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 454(3) Variation of roll of voters
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory action.
premise text: Protected action ballot agent must remove employee's name from roll of voters.
conclusion text: The protected action ballot agent must remove the employee's name from the roll of voters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

454(4) Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-454-ss-4
part of: 454 Variation of roll of voters
note: Must remove person's name from roll of voters under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

454(5) Variation of roll of voters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-454-ss-5
part of: 454 Variation of roll of voters
note: The Commission must include an employee's name on the roll of voters if eligible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.252
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 454(5) Variation of roll of voters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-454-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must include an employee's name on the roll of voters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

455 Protected action ballot papers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-455
has part: 455(1) Protected action ballot papers
has part: 455(2) Protected action ballot papers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254

455(1) Protected action ballot papers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-455-ss-1
part of: 455 Protected action ballot papers
note: Ballot paper must be in prescribed form and include required information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 455(1) Protected action ballot papers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide specific information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

455(2) Protected action ballot papers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-455-ss-2
part of: 455 Protected action ballot papers
note: Definition of ballot paper
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Ballot paper is a subclass of voting method
conclusion text: Ballot paper is a subclass of voting method
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-455-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Ballot papers are used during elections
conclusion text: Ballot papers are used during elections
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

456 Who may vote in protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-456
note: Employee must be on voter roll to vote in protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-456-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-456-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-456-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 456 Who may vote in protected action ballot
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-456-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Employee must be on voter roll to vote
premise text: Employee votes in protected action ballot
conclusion text: Employee is on voter roll
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

457 Results of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-457
has part: 457(1) Results of protected action ballot
has part: 457(2) Results of protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254

457(1) Results of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-457-ss-1
part of: 457 Results of protected action ballot
note: Declare and inform results of protected action ballot
description: declaration, information to persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must declare and inform results
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

457(2) Results of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-457-ss-2
part of: 457 Results of protected action ballot
note: Publish results of protected action ballot as soon as practicable.
description: Results of protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.254
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 457(2) Results of protected action ballot
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish results
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-457-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: PUBLISH
logic summary: Publish on website or other means
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

458 Report about conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-458
has part: 458(1) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
has part: 458(2) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
has part: 458(3) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255

458(1) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-458-ss-1
part of: 458 Report about conduct of protected action ballot
note: Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 458(1) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
premise text: (a) the protected action ballot agent is the Australian Electoral Commission; and (b) the Commission: ...
conclusion text: ...the Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commission must give the written report to the FWC.
premise text: (b) the Commission: ...
conclusion text: ...the Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The report must be prepared after the protected action ballot is conducted.
premise text: (b) the Commission: ...
conclusion text: ...the Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: The report must be given to the FWC after the protected action ballot is conducted.
premise text: (b) the Commission: ...
conclusion text: ...the Commission must prepare a written report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to the FWC.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Commission may be cited in other laws.
premise text: This section may be cited as [Section 458(1)] of this Act.
conclusion text: ...this section may be cited as [Section 458(1)] of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

458(2) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-458-ss-2
part of: 458 Report about conduct of protected action ballot
note: Must prepare a report about the conduct of the ballot and give it to FWC if complaints or irregularities are received.
description: Report about the conduct of the ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a report
conclusion text: Must provide a report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

458(3) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-458-ss-3
part of: 458 Report about conduct of protected action ballot
note: Report about conduct of protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.255
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 458(3) Report about conduct of protected action ballot
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-458-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must report
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: protected action ballot agent must report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-459
has part: 459(1) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
has part: 459(2) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
has part: 459(3) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256

459(1) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-459-ss-1
part of: 459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
note: Industrial action is authorized by a protected action ballot if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 459(1) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Authorization obligation
premise text: (a) the action was the subject of the ballot; and (b) at least 50% of the employees on the roll of voters for the ballot voted in the ballot.
conclusion text: The action is authorized if the conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with declaration period
premise text: (d) the action commences: (i) during the 30-day period starting on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot; or (ii) if the FWC has extended that period under subsection (3)—during the extended period.
conclusion text: The action must occur within a specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship with declaration period
premise text: (d) the action commences: (i) during the 30-day period starting on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot; or (ii) if the FWC has extended that period under subsection (3)—during the extended period.
conclusion text: The action occurs until a specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Spread of authorization to employees
premise text: (a) the action was the subject of the ballot; and (b) at least 50% of the employees on the roll of voters for the ballot voted in the ballot.
conclusion text: The authorization spreads to a significant portion of employees.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Relationship between action and ballot outcome
premise text: (c) more than 50% of the valid votes were votes approving the action; and (d) the action commences: (i) during the 30-day period starting on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot; or (ii) if the FWC has extended that period under subsection (3)—during the extended period.
conclusion text: The action is approved by a majority of votes if it occurs within the specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

459(2) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-459-ss-2
part of: 459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
note: Industrial action is authorised under specific circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 459(2) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorizes
logic summary: Authorizes industrial action under specified conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

459(3) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-459-ss-3
part of: 459 Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
note: Extension of time limit for protected action ballot order application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.256
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 459(3) Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-459-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (3) The FWC may extend...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

460 Immunity for persons who act in good faith on protected action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-460
note: Immunity for persons who act in good faith on protected action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.257
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-460-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-460-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 460 Immunity for persons who act in good faith on protected action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

461 Validity of protected action ballot etc. not affected by technical
type: Concept
realized by: sec-461
note: Validity of protected action ballot etc. not affected by technical breaches
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.258
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-461-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-461-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-461-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemptions
logic summary: Exemptions from breach do not affect validity
premise text: A technical breach of a provision does not affect the validity of...
conclusion text: ...the conduct of a protected action ballot.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

462 Interferences etc. with protected action ballot
type: Concept
realized by: sec-462
note: Interfering with protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.259
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-462-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-462-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-462-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 462 Interferences etc. with protected action ballot
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-462-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits interfering with protected action ballot
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

463 Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-463
has part: 463(1) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
has part: 463(2) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
has part: 463(3) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261

463(1) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-463-ss-1
part of: 463 Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
note: Prohibition on contravening protected action ballot order terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 463(1) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person must not contravene...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

463(2) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-463-ss-2
part of: 463 Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
note: No contravening a protected action ballot order or agent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 463(2) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: No contravening.
premise text: (2) A person must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

463(3) Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-463-ss-3
part of: 463 Contravening a protected action ballot order etc.
note: Prohibition on making an order under Division 2 of Part 4-1 in relation to a contravention by the Australian Electoral Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on actions
premise text: (3) However, an order cannot be made under Division 2 of Part 4-1 in relation to a contravention (or alleged contravention) of subsection (1) or (2) by the Australian Electoral Commission.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-463-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on actions
premise text: (3) However, an order cannot be made under Division 2 of Part 4-1 in relation to a contravention (or alleged contravention) of subsection (1) or (2) by the Australian Electoral Commission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

464 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-464
has part: 464(1) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
has part: 464(2) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
has part: 464(3) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261

464(1) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-464-ss-1
part of: 464 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
note: The Australian Electoral Commission is responsible for the costs of a protected action ballot.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The Australian Electoral Commission has an obligation to cover the costs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

464(2) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-464-ss-2
part of: 464 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
note: Commonwealth liable for costs of protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 464(2) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
logic summary: Commonwealth is liable for costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

464(3) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
type: Concept
realized by: sec-464-ss-3
part of: 464 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by the Australian
note: Commonwealth not liable for costs incurred by Australian Electoral Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.261
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-464-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commonwealth obligation to pay costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-465
has part: 465(1) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
has part: 465(2) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
has part: 465(3) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
has part: 465(4) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
has part: 465(5) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262

465(1) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-465-ss-1
part of: 465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
note: This section applies if the protected action ballot agent is not the Australian Electoral Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The protected action ballot agent is not the Australian Electoral Commission.
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval of applicability
premise text: This section applies if...
conclusion text: The protected action ballot agent is not the Australian Electoral Commission.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

465(2) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-465-ss-2
part of: 465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
note: Liability for costs of conducting a protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: liability
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

465(3) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-465-ss-3
part of: 465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
note: Jointly and severally liable for costs of protected action ballot
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Joint liability for costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

465(4) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-465-ss-4
part of: 465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
note: Protected action ballot agent must pay costs to applicants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 465(4) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must provide costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

465(5) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
type: Concept
realized by: sec-465-ss-5
part of: 465 Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
note: Exempts costs of legal challenges from protected action ballot costs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 465(5) Costs of protected action ballot conducted by protected action
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-465-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXEMPT
logic summary: Exempts costs of legal challenges
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

466 Costs of legal challenges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-466
has part: 466(1) Costs of legal challenges
has part: 466(2) Costs of legal challenges
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262

466(1) Costs of legal challenges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-466-ss-1
part of: 466 Costs of legal challenges
note: Who is liable for costs incurred in relation to legal challenges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 466(1) Costs of legal challenges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: liability
logic summary: Liability for costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

466(2) Costs of legal challenges
type: Concept
realized by: sec-466-ss-2
part of: 466 Costs of legal challenges
note: A person who is liable for costs may be indemnified by another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.262
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 466(2) Costs of legal challenges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-466-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability for costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

467 Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-467
has part: 467(1) Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
has part: 467(2) Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263

467(1) Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-467-ss-1
part of: 467 Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
note: Disclose employee information about employees on roll of voters not to be disclosed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 467(1) Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: None
conclusion text: Disclose employee information about employees on roll of voters not to be disclosed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

467(2) Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-467-ss-2
part of: 467 Information about employees on roll of voters not to be
note: Disclosure of employee information is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.263
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose employee information.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure conditions.
premise text: (b) the disclosure is required or authorised by or under a law; or
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure requirements.
premise text: (c) the employee has consented, in writing, to the disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-467-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose employee information under certain conditions.
premise text: Note 1:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

468 Records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-468
has part: 468(1) Records
has part: 468(2) Records
has part: 468(3) Records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264

468(1) Records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-468-ss-1
part of: 468 Records
note: Protected action ballot agent must keep certain records.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 468(1) Records
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

468(2) Records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-468-ss-2
part of: 468 Records
note: Must keep ballot material for one year after the day on which the protected action ballot closed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 468(2) Records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must keep ballot material for one year after the day on which the protected action ballot closed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

468(3) Records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-468-ss-3
part of: 468 Records
note: Comply with regulations for keeping ballot material.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 468(3) Records
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

468A Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-468a
has part: 468A(1) Eligible protected action ballot agents
has part: 468A(2) Eligible protected action ballot agents
has part: 468A(3) Eligible protected action ballot agents
has part: 468A(4) Eligible protected action ballot agents
has part: 468A(5) Eligible protected action ballot agents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264

468A(1) Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-468a-ss-1
part of: 468A Eligible protected action ballot agents
note: Eligible protected action ballot agents must be approved by the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 468A(1) Eligible protected action ballot agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be approved
premise text: (1) Each of the following is an eligible protected action ballot agent:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

468A(2) Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-468a-ss-2
part of: 468A Eligible protected action ballot agents
note: Approval of eligible protected action ballot agents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Granting permission to FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

468A(3) Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-468a-ss-3
part of: 468A Eligible protected action ballot agents
note: Conditions for a person to be an eligible protected action ballot agent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 468A(3) Eligible protected action ballot agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Classifies the key as prescribing regulations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

468A(4) Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-468a-ss-4
part of: 468A Eligible protected action ballot agents
note: The FWC must re-evaluate the eligibility of protected action ballot agents every 3 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 468A(4) Eligible protected action ballot agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to re-evaluate eligibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

468A(5) Eligible protected action ballot agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-468a-ss-5
part of: 468A Eligible protected action ballot agents
note: FWC must take action if eligible protected action ballot agent no longer meets requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.264
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 468A(5) Eligible protected action ballot agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-468a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

469 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-469
note: Regulations for protected action ballots
description: procedures, form and content of ballot paper, qualifications and duties of scrutineers, preparation of reports, records to be kept
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.265
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 469 Regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Regulations for protected action ballots
conclusion text: procedures, form and content of ballot paper, qualifications and duties of scrutineers, preparation of reports, records to be kept
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-469-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between regulations and protected action ballots
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-470
has part: 470(1) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 470(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 470(3) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 470(4) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 470(5) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266

470(1) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-470-ss-1
part of: 470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
note: Employer must not make payment to employee in relation to industrial action
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 470(1) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of payment
premise text: Employer must not make payment
conclusion text: Payment is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

470(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-470-ss-2
part of: 470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
note: Payments not made for certain periods of partial work bans.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 470(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

470(3) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-470-ss-3
part of: 470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
note: Partial work ban is not a failure or refusal to attend for work, perform work at all, or overtime ban.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 470(3) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a prohibition
premise text: (3) A partial work ban is industrial action that is not...
conclusion text: it is not an overtime ban
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

470(4) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-470-ss-4
part of: 470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
note: Payment of overtime ban is exempt if employer requests and employee refuses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-ltl-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Payment of overtime ban is exempt if employer requests and employee refuses.
premise text: Employer requested overtime work
conclusion text: Payment not applicable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Overtime ban includes periods of overtime to which the ban applies.
premise text: Overtime ban is defined as a period of overtime
conclusion text: Periods of overtime are included in the ban
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Payment of overtime ban is exempt if employer requests and employee refuses.
premise text: Overtime work overlaps with periods of overtime to which the ban applies
conclusion text: Payment not applicable during overlapping periods
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Payment of overtime ban is exempt if employer requests and employee refuses.
premise text: Overtime work is recurring
conclusion text: Payment not applicable during recurring periods
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

470(5) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-470-ss-5
part of: 470 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
note: Total duration of industrial action includes overtime ban period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.266
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 470(5) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-470-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Obligation includes overtime ban period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Payments relating to partial work bans
type: Concept
realized by: sec-471
has part: 471(1) Payments relating to partial work bans
has part: 471(2) Payments relating to partial work bans
has part: 471(3) Payments relating to partial work bans
has part: 471(4) Payments relating to partial work bans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267

471(1) Payments relating to partial work bans
type: Concept
realized by: sec-471-ss-1
part of: 471 Payments relating to partial work bans
note: Employee's payments reduced due to partial work ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(1) Payments relating to partial work bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to reduce payments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Payments relating to partial work bans
type: Concept
realized by: sec-471-ss-2
part of: 471 Payments relating to partial work bans
note: Employee payments reduced by proportion specified in notice or order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(2) Payments relating to partial work bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to reduce employee payments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(3) Payments relating to partial work bans
type: Concept
realized by: sec-471-ss-3
part of: 471 Payments relating to partial work bans
note: Employer must provide notice of non-payment
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(4) Payments relating to partial work bans
type: Concept
realized by: sec-471-ss-4
part of: 471 Payments relating to partial work bans
note: Employee must engage in protected industrial action on a day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.267
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(4) Payments relating to partial work bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-471-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

472 Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
type: Concept
realized by: sec-472
has part: 472(1) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
has part: 472(2) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269

472(1) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
type: Concept
realized by: sec-472-ss-1
part of: 472 Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
note: The FWC may make an order varying the proportion by which an employee’s payments are reduced.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-472-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-472-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 472(1) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

472(2) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
type: Concept
realized by: sec-472-ss-2
part of: 472 Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
note: FWC may make order only if person applies under subsection (4).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.269
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-472-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-472-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 472(2) Orders by the FWC relating to certain partial work bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

473 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-473
has part: 473(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
has part: 473(2) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270

473(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-473-ss-1
part of: 473 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
note: An employee must not accept a payment from an employer if the employer would contravene section 470 by making the payment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 473(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits accepting payments from employers that would contravene section 470.
premise text: Section 470 prohibits certain employer actions.
conclusion text: An employee must not accept such a payment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits asking employers to make payments that would contravene section 470.
premise text: Section 470 prohibits certain employer actions.
conclusion text: An employee must not ask the employer to make such a payment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits acts of coercion or misrepresentations relating to payments that would contravene section 470.
premise text: Section 348 and 349 prohibit certain actions.
conclusion text: An employee must not engage in such behavior.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

473(2) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-473-ss-2
part of: 473 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
note: An employer must not make a payment to an employee if it would contravene section 470.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.270
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-473-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of making payments to employees if it would contravene section 470.
premise text: Section 470 prohibits such payments.
conclusion text: Employer must not make payment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-474
has part: 474(1) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 474(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
has part: 474(2A) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271

474(1) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-474-ss-1
part of: 474 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
note: Employer cannot make payment to employee if industrial action exceeds 4 hours.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of payment
premise text: Industrial action exceeds 4 hours
conclusion text: Employer cannot make payment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-474-ss-2
part of: 474 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
note: Employer must request or require employee to work overtime, and employee must refuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(2) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Employer's request or requirement is a necessary condition for employee's refusal.
premise text: Employer requested or required the employee to work overtime.
conclusion text: Employee refused to work overtime.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Employee's refusal is a consequence of their obligations under a modern award, enterprise agreement, or contract of employment.
premise text: The employee refused to work the period of overtime.
conclusion text: The refusal was a contravention of the employee’s obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Employee's refusal is a subclass of their obligations under a modern award, enterprise agreement, or contract of employment.
premise text: The employee refused to work overtime.
conclusion text: The refusal was a contravention of the employee’s obligations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Overtime ban and section 474(2) apply during the same period.
premise text: The industrial action includes an overtime ban.
conclusion text: Section 474(2) does not apply to a period of overtime to which the ban applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Overtime ban and section 474(2) do not overlap in time.
premise text: The industrial action is, or includes, an overtime ban.
conclusion text: Section 474(2) does not apply to a period of overtime to which the ban applies.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Employee's refusal is allowed under certain circumstances.
premise text: An employee can refuse to work additional hours if they are unreasonable.
conclusion text: The employee refused to work overtime.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(2A) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-474-ss-2a
part of: 474 Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
note: Total duration of industrial action includes overtime ban period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.271
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2a-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-474-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(2A) Payments not to be made relating to certain periods of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

475 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-475
has part: 475(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
has part: 475(2) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272

475(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-475-ss-1
part of: 475 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
note: An employee must not accept a payment from an employer if the employer would contravene section 474 by making the payment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 475(1) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

475(2) Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-475-ss-2
part of: 475 Accepting or seeking payments relating to periods of industrial
note: Employers must not make payments to employees if it would contravene section 474.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.272
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-475-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of making payments to employees if it would contravene section 474.
premise text: Section 474
conclusion text: Payment to employee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

476 Other responses to industrial action unaffected
type: Concept
realized by: sec-476
note: Employer's right to respond to industrial action without payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.273
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer's obligation to respond to industrial action
premise text: This Division does not affect any right of the employer...
conclusion text: Employer has an obligation to do anything in response to industrial action that does not involve payments to the employee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Industrial action overlaps with Chapter 3
premise text: If an employee engaged, or engages, in industrial action against an employer...
conclusion text: Industrial action and Chapter 3 overlap
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Employer's response implies a right to do something
premise text: This Division does not affect any right of the employer...
conclusion text: Employer's response implies an obligation to do something
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Industrial action diffuses to Chapter 3
premise text: If an employee engaged, or engages, in industrial action against an employer...
conclusion text: Industrial action diffuses to Chapter 3
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-476-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes the employer's obligation
premise text: This Division does not affect any right of the employer...
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes the employer's obligation to do something
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

477 Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-477
has part: 477(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
has part: 477(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274

477(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-477-ss-1
part of: 477 Applications by bargaining representatives
note: Applications by bargaining representatives
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-477-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-477-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 477(1) Applications by bargaining representatives
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

477(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
type: Concept
realized by: sec-477-ss-2
part of: 477 Applications by bargaining representatives
note: Application by bargaining representative on behalf of others
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.274
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-477-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-477-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 477(2) Applications by bargaining representatives
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

478 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-478
note: Permit holders must comply with requirements when exercising rights under Division 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-478-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-478-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-478-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 478 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-478-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Permit holders must comply with requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

479 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-479
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.275
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-479-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-479-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-479-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 479 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-479-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

480 Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-480
note: Right of entry for officials of organisations to investigate suspected contraventions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.276
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-480-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-480-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-480-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-480-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Right of entry for officials of organisations
premise text: Organisations have the right to investigate suspected contraventions
conclusion text: Employees, Employers, Occupiers of premises must provide access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-480-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Right of entry during work hours
premise text: Section 481: Fair Work Act 2009
conclusion text: Right of entry during work hours
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

481 Entry to investigate suspected contravention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-481
has part: 481(1) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
has part: 481(2) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
has part: 481(3) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277

481(1) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-481-ss-1
part of: 481 Entry to investigate suspected contravention
note: Permit holder may enter premises for investigation of suspected contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 481(1) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Can
logic summary: Permit holder has the right to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

481(2) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-481-ss-2
part of: 481 Entry to investigate suspected contravention
note: The fair work instrument must apply or have applied to the member.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 481(2) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST APPLY
logic summary: The fair work instrument must apply or have applied to the member.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

481(3) Entry to investigate suspected contravention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-481-ss-3
part of: 481 Entry to investigate suspected contravention
note: Must reasonably suspect contravention has occurred or is occurring.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.277
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must reasonably suspect contravention has occurred or is occurring.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-481-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Must believe suspicion is reasonable.
premise text: Suspicion is reasonable.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-482
has part: 482(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
has part: 482(1A) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
has part: 482(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
has part: 482(2A) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
has part: 482(3) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278

482(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-482-ss-1
part of: 482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises
note: Permit holder's rights while on premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 482(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has right to inspect and interview
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

482(1A) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-482-ss-1a
part of: 482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises
note: Occupier or affected employer not required to allow inspection of records or documents that contravene a law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 482(1A) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of inspection of records or documents that contravene a law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

482(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-482-ss-2
part of: 482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises
note: Definition of affected employer for entry onto premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 482(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval for entry onto premises
premise text: The suspected contravention relates to, or affects, the member
conclusion text: Entry onto premises is permitted
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

482(2A) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-482-ss-2a
part of: 482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises
note: Cannot contravene requirement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-shacl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening the requirement
premise text: (2A) A non-member record or document is a record or document that...
conclusion text: Occupier and affected employer must not contravene requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for the requirement
premise text: (2A) A non-member record or document is a record or document that...
conclusion text: The requirement applies from now until the end of the permit holder's organisation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for the requirement
premise text: (2A) A non-member record or document is a record or document that...
conclusion text: The requirement recurs every time a non-member record or document is created or updated
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for the requirement
premise text: (2A) A non-member record or document is a record or document that...
conclusion text: The requirement can be represented as a knowledge rule: if (record or document is a non-member record or document) then (occupier and affected employer must not contravene requirement)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-2a-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Definition
logic summary: Schema definition for the requirement
premise text: (2A) A non-member record or document is a record or document that...
conclusion text: The schema for the requirement can be defined as: Record or Document: non-member record or document
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

482(3) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-482-ss-3
part of: 482 Rights that may be exercised while on premises
note: Occupier or affected employer must not contravene a requirement under paragraph (1)(c).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.278
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-482-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 482(3) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

483 Later access to record or document
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483
has part: 483(1) Later access to record or document
has part: 483(1A) Later access to record or document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279

483(1) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483-ss-1
part of: 483 Later access to record or document
note: Require affected employer to produce or provide access to relevant record or document
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the affected employer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483(1A) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483-ss-1a
part of: 483 Later access to record or document
note: Employer not required to produce or provide access to record or document if it would contravene a law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.279
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits production or provision of record or document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483AA Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483aa
has part: 483AA(1) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
has part: 483AA(2) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
has part: 483AA(3) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
has part: 483AA(4) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280

483AA(1) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483aa-ss-1
part of: 483AA Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
note: Permit holder may apply for order allowing inspection of non-member records.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 483AA(1) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permit holder may apply for order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483AA(2) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483aa-ss-2
part of: 483AA Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
note: FWC must have regard to conditions before making an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 483AA(2) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

483AA(3) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483aa-ss-3
part of: 483AA Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
note: This subdivision has effect accordingly if the FWC makes the order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 483AA(3) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The FWC makes the order.
conclusion text: This subdivision has effect accordingly.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483AA(4) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483aa-ss-4
part of: 483AA Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
note: Application for an order under this section must set out the reason for the application.
description: Reason for application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.280
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 483AA(4) Application to the FWC for access to non-member records
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Application requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483A Entry to investigate suspected contravention relating to TCF
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483a
note: Permit holder may enter premises and exercise a right to investigate suspected contravention of TCF award worker's industrial interests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.281
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483a-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 483A Entry to investigate suspected contravention relating to TCF
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Permit holder has a right to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483B Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483b
has part: 483B(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
has part: 483B(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283

483B(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483b-ss-1
part of: 483B Rights that may be exercised while on premises
note: Permit holder has right to inspect and interview on premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 483B(1) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Permit holder has right to inspect and interview.
premise text: The permit holder is entitled to exercise this right.
conclusion text: The permit holder may inspect and interview.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Permit holder has right to inspect and interview everywhere on premises.
premise text: The permit holder is entitled to exercise this right.
conclusion text: The permit holder may inspect and interview.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo
logic summary: Permit holder has permission to inspect and interview.
premise text: The occupier or affected employer must allow inspection and interviewing.
conclusion text: The permit holder may inspect and interview.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Permit holder has right to interview on premises.
premise text: The permit holder is entitled to exercise this right.
conclusion text: The permit holder may interview.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483B(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483b-ss-2
part of: 483B Rights that may be exercised while on premises
note: No inspection or copying of records allowed if it contravenes a law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.283
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 483B(2) Rights that may be exercised while on premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of inspection or copying
premise text: Contravenes a law
conclusion text: No inspection or copying allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483C Later access to record or document
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483c
has part: 483C(1) Later access to record or document
has part: 483C(2) Later access to record or document
has part: 483C(3) Later access to record or document
has part: 483C(4) Later access to record or document
has part: 483C(5) Later access to record or document
has part: 483C(6) Later access to record or document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284

483C(1) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483c-ss-1
part of: 483C Later access to record or document
note: Permit holder can request access to records or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Can
logic summary: Permit holder has the right to request access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

483C(2) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483c-ss-2
part of: 483C Later access to record or document
note: No obligation to produce or provide access to a record or document if it would contravene a law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 483C(2) Later access to record or document
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of production or provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483C(3) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483c-ss-3
part of: 483C Later access to record or document
note: Must not be earlier than 14 days after notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 483C(3) Later access to record or document
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Must not be earlier than specified day.
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAt
logic summary: Day or days specified in the notice starts at 14 days after the notice is given.
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: The day or days specified in the notice starts at 14 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: The day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Until
logic summary: Day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: The day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Until
logic summary: Day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: The day or days specified in the notice until 14 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483C(4) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483c-ss-4
part of: 483C Later access to record or document
note: Cannot contravene requirement after notice is given
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention
premise text: Notice is given
conclusion text: Cannot contravene requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention by occupier and affected employer
premise text: Occupier and affected employer are specified
conclusion text: Cannot contravene requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of prohibition on contravention
premise text: Notice is given
conclusion text: Cannot contravene requirement
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483C(5) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483c-ss-5
part of: 483C Later access to record or document
note: Occupier or affected employer must not contravene a requirement under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 483C(5) Later access to record or document
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483C(6) Later access to record or document
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483c-ss-6
part of: 483C Later access to record or document
note: Permit holder's right to inspect and make copies of records or documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.284
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Permit holder has right to inspect and make copies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483D Entry onto other premises to access records and documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483d
note: Permit holder has right to enter other premises for records and documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.285
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483d-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483d-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483d-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 483D Entry onto other premises to access records and documents
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has right
logic summary: Right to access records and documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483E Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483e
has part: 483E(1) Later access to record or document—other premises
has part: 483E(2) Later access to record or document—other premises
has part: 483E(3) Later access to record or document—other premises
has part: 483E(4) Later access to record or document—other premises
has part: 483E(5) Later access to record or document—other premises
has part: 483E(6) Later access to record or document—other premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286

483E(1) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483e-ss-1
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises
note: Require occupier to produce or provide access to a record or document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 483E(1) Later access to record or document—other premises
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483E(2) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483e-ss-2
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises
note: Occupier not required to produce or provide access to a record or document if it would contravene a law of the Commonwealth or a State or Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 483E(2) Later access to record or document—other premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483E(3) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483e-ss-3
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises
note: Must not be earlier than 14 days after notice is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 483E(3) Later access to record or document—other premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Must not be earlier than specified days.
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: The specified days must not be earlier than 14 days after notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Meets
logic summary: Must meet a temporal interval of at least 14 days.
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: The specified days meets a temporal interval of at least 14 days.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Must meet an until condition of at least 14 days.
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: The specified days meets an until condition of at least 14 days.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Until
logic summary: Must meet a diffusion condition of at least 14 days.
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: The specified days meets a diffusion condition of at least 14 days.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Until
logic summary: Must meet a cogAI condition of at least 14 days.
premise text: (3) The day or days specified in the notice must not be earlier than 14 days after the notice is given.
conclusion text: The specified days meets a cogAI condition of at least 14 days.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483E(4) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483e-ss-4
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises
note: Must not contravene requirement after notice is given
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention
premise text: (4) The notice may be given:
conclusion text: Occupier must not contravene requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice and contravention
premise text: (b) within 5 days after the entry.
conclusion text: The notice may be given: (a) while the permit holder is on the other premises; or (b) within 5 days after the entry.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of contravention on permit holder
premise text: (a) while the permit holder is on the other premises; or (b) within 5 days after the entry.
conclusion text: The notice may be given: (a) while the permit holder is on the other premises; or (b) within 5 days after the entry.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagated prohibition of contravention
premise text: (4) The notice may be given:
conclusion text: Occupier must not contravene requirement
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483E(5) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483e-ss-5
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises
note: Occupier must not contravene a requirement under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-5-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 483E(5) Later access to record or document—other premises
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

483E(6) Later access to record or document—other premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-483e-ss-6
part of: 483E Later access to record or document—other premises
note: Permit holder may inspect and make copies of record or document at other premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.286
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 483E(6) Later access to record or document—other premises
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-483e-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Permit holder has permission to inspect and copy record or document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

484 Entry to hold discussions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-484
note: Permit holder may enter premises for discussions with employees or TCF award workers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.287
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-484-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-484-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-484-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

486 Permit holder must not contravene this Subdivision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-486
note: Permit holder must not contravene this Subdivision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-486-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-486-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-486-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of contravening
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-487
has part: 487(1) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
has part: 487(2) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
has part: 487(3) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
has part: 487(4) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
has part: 487(5) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288

487(1) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-487-ss-1
part of: 487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
note: Give entry notice before entering premises
description: entry notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must give entry notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

487(2) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-487-ss-2
part of: 487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
note: An entry notice must comply with section 518.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 487(2) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

487(3) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-487-ss-3
part of: 487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
note: Entry notice must be given within a specified time frame.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 487(3) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide entry notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

487(4) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-487-ss-4
part of: 487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
note: Provide exemption certificate upon entry
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide exemption certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

487(5) Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
type: Concept
realized by: sec-487-ss-5
part of: 487 Giving entry notice or exemption certificate
note: Give entry notice upon entering premises under Subdivision AA
description: entry notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.288
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-487-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide entry notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

488 Contravening entry permit conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-488
note: Permit holder must not contravene entry permit conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-488-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-488-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-488-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 488 Contravening entry permit conditions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-488-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

489 Producing authority documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-489
note: Produce authority documents upon request or before making certain requirements.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.289
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-489-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-489-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-489-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must produce authority documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

490 When right may be exercised
type: Concept
realized by: sec-490
has part: 490(1) When right may be exercised
has part: 490(2) When right may be exercised
has part: 490(3) When right may be exercised
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290

490(1) When right may be exercised
type: Concept
realized by: sec-490-ss-1
part of: 490 When right may be exercised
note: Exercise right during working hours.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 490(1) When right may be exercised
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Right to exercise during working hours.
premise text: (1) The permit holder may exercise a right under Subdivision A, AA or B only during working hours.
conclusion text: The permit holder can exercise the right during working hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Exercise right within specified time interval.
premise text: (1) The permit holder may exercise a right under Subdivision A, AA or B only during working hours.
conclusion text: The exercise of the right occurs during the permitted time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Exercise right within specified time interval.
premise text: (1) The permit holder may exercise a right under Subdivision A, AA or B only during working hours.
conclusion text: The exercise of the right is part of the permitted activity.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Exercise right within specified time interval.
premise text: (1) The permit holder may exercise a right under Subdivision A, AA or B only during working hours.
conclusion text: The exercise of the right is part of the permitted activity.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Exercise right within specified time interval.
premise text: (1) The permit holder may exercise a right under Subdivision A, AA or B only during working hours.
conclusion text: The exercise of the right is part of the permitted activity.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

490(2) When right may be exercised
type: Concept
realized by: sec-490-ss-2
part of: 490 When right may be exercised
note: Permit holder may hold discussions during mealtimes or breaks.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 490(2) When right may be exercised
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permit holder may hold discussions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

490(3) When right may be exercised
type: Concept
realized by: sec-490-ss-3
part of: 490 When right may be exercised
note: Permit holder may enter premises under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 490(3) When right may be exercised
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-490-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

491 Occupational health and safety requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-491
note: Comply with reasonable requests for occupational health and safety requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-491-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-491-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-491-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory compliance with requests.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

492 Location of interviews and discussions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-492
has part: 492(1) Location of interviews and discussions
has part: 492(2) Location of interviews and discussions
has part: 492(3) Location of interviews and discussions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290

492(1) Location of interviews and discussions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-492-ss-1
part of: 492 Location of interviews and discussions
note: Conduct interviews or hold discussions in agreed premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to conduct interviews or hold discussions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

492(2) Location of interviews and discussions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-492-ss-2
part of: 492 Location of interviews and discussions
note: Permit holder and occupier must agree on interview location.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 492(2) Location of interviews and discussions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide agreement
premise text: Permit holder and occupier cannot agree on interview location.
conclusion text: Obligation to agree
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

492(3) Location of interviews and discussions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-492-ss-3
part of: 492 Location of interviews and discussions
note: Permit holder may conduct interviews or discussions in certain rooms or areas.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.290
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 492(3) Location of interviews and discussions
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permit holder may conduct interviews or discussions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Rooms or areas where one or more persons take meal or breaks overlap with permitted rooms or areas.
premise text: (b) that is provided by the occupier for the purpose of taking meal or other breaks.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MayNot
logic summary: Permit holder may not be subject to an order if rights under this section are misused.
premise text: Note 1: The permit holder may be subject to an order by the FWC under section 508 if rights under this section are misused.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MayNot
logic summary: Permit holder must not intentionally hinder or obstruct others exercising rights under this section.
premise text: Note 2: A person must not intentionally hinder or obstruct a permit holder exercising rights under this section, or otherwise act in an improper manner (see section 502).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

492A Route to location of interview and discussions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-492a
has part: 492A(1) Route to location of interview and discussions
has part: 492A(2) Route to location of interview and discussions
has part: 492A(3) Route to location of interview and discussions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291

492A(1) Route to location of interview and discussions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-492a-ss-1
part of: 492A Route to location of interview and discussions
note: Comply with reasonable requests from premises occupier
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with requests
premise text: Section 492(1)
conclusion text: The permit holder must comply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

492A(2) Route to location of interview and discussions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-492a-ss-2
part of: 492A Route to location of interview and discussions
note: Request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable due to route choice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 492A(2) Route to location of interview and discussions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide reasonable route for interview and discussions.
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable only because the route is not that which the permit holder would have chosen.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Route choice does not affect temporal overlap of request and interview.
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable only because the route is not that which the permit holder would have chosen.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
logic summary: Request and interview may trace to same location.
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable only because the route is not that which the permit holder would have chosen.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Request and interview may diffuse to same location.
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable only because the route is not that which the permit holder would have chosen.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Request and interview may be recognized as related.
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) is not unreasonable only because the route is not that which the permit holder would have chosen.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

492A(3) Route to location of interview and discussions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-492a-ss-3
part of: 492A Route to location of interview and discussions
note: Prescribes circumstances for a request under subsection (1) to be reasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 492A(3) Route to location of interview and discussions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-492a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Prescribes circumstances for a request under subsection (1) to be reasonable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

493 Residential premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-493
note: Restriction on entering residential premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.291
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-493-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-493-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-493-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of entry into residential premises
premise text: Chapter 3
conclusion text: sec-493
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-494
has part: 494(1) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
has part: 494(2) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
has part: 494(3) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
has part: 494(4) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
has part: 494(5) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292

494(1) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-494-ss-1
part of: 494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
note: Official must not exercise State or Territory OHS right unless permit holder.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 494(1) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Official must not exercise State or Territory OHS right.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

494(2) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-494-ss-2
part of: 494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
note: Right to enter premises requires permit holder
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: State or Territory OHS law has right to enter premises
premise text: (2) A right to enter premises, or to inspect or otherwise access an employee record of an employee that is on premises...
conclusion text: The State or Territory OHS law has the right to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligationTo
logic summary: State or Territory has obligation to permit holder to exercise right
premise text: (2) A right to enter premises, or to inspect or otherwise access an employee record of an employee that is on premises...
conclusion text: The State or Territory has the obligation to permit holder to exercise the right.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Permit holder has right to enter premises
premise text: (2) A right to enter premises, or to inspect or otherwise access an employee record of an employee that is on premises...
conclusion text: The permit holder has the right to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligationTo
logic summary: Permit holder has obligation to exercise right
premise text: (2) A right to enter premises, or to inspect or otherwise access an employee record of an employee that is on premises...
conclusion text: The permit holder has the obligation to exercise the right.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo
logic summary: Permit holder has permission to enter premises
premise text: (2) A right to enter premises, or to inspect or otherwise access an employee record of an employee that is on premises...
conclusion text: The permit holder has the permission to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

494(3) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-494-ss-3
part of: 494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
note: Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide permit
premise text: Official must exercise State or Territory
conclusion text: Official must be permit holder
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for permit holder exercise
premise text: Official must exercise State or Territory
conclusion text: Temporal interval for permit holder exercise
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

494(4) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-494-ss-4
part of: 494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
note: Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 494(4) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Official must be permit holder
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

494(5) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-494-ss-5
part of: 494 Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
note: Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.292
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 494(5) Official must be permit holder to exercise State or Territory
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-494-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be a permit holder
premise text: (5) However, sections 499 to 504 do apply in relation to the official:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

495 Giving notice of entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-495
has part: 495(1) Giving notice of entry
has part: 495(2) Giving notice of entry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294

495(1) Giving notice of entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-495-ss-1
part of: 495 Giving notice of entry
note: Exercise of State or Territory OHS right to inspect employee record requires notice and waiting period.
description: written notice setting out intention and reasons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Exercise of State or Territory OHS right to inspect employee record without notice and waiting period is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

495(2) Giving notice of entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-495-ss-2
part of: 495 Giving notice of entry
note: A person is an affected employer if one or more of their employees perform work on the premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.294
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 495(2) Giving notice of entry
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-495-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of affected employer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

496 Contravening entry permit conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-496
note: Must not contravene a condition imposed on entry permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.295
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-496-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-496-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-496-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of contravention
premise text: State or Territory OHS right
conclusion text: permit holder must not contravene a condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

497 Producing entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-497
note: Must produce entry permit upon request for inspection
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.295
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-497-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-497-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-497-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exercise of State or Territory OHS right without permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

498 When right may be exercised
type: Concept
realized by: sec-498
note: Exercise of State or Territory OHS right during working hours.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.295
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-498-norm

499 Occupational health and safety requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-499
note: Must comply with requests for occupational health and safety requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.295
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-499-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-499-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-499-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits exercise of State or Territory OHS right without compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

500 Permit holder must not hinder or obstruct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-500
note: Must not hinder or obstruct others
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-500-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-500-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-500-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 500 Permit holder must not hinder or obstruct
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-500-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

501 Person must not refuse or delay entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-501
note: Refusal or delay of entry onto premises by a permit holder is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-501-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-501-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-501-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 501 Person must not refuse or delay entry
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-501-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal or delay
premise text: This section is a civil remedy provision (see Part 4-1).
conclusion text: A person must not refuse or unduly delay entry onto premises by a permit holder who is entitled to enter the premises in accordance with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

502 Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-502
has part: 502(1) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
has part: 502(2) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
has part: 502(3) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296

502(1) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-502-ss-1
part of: 502 Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
note: Hinder or obstruct permit holder
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 502(1) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

502(2) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-502-ss-2
part of: 502 Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
note: Failure to agree on a place does not constitute conduct referred to in subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 502(2) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

502(3) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-502-ss-3
part of: 502 Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
note: Hinder or obstruct permit holder
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.296
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 502(3) Person must not hinder or obstruct permit holder etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-502-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: State
conclusion text: Hinder or obstruct permit holder
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

503 Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-503
has part: 503(1) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
has part: 503(2) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297

503(1) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-503-ss-1
part of: 503 Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
note: Taking action with the intention of giving a false impression that something is authorized by this Part is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 503(1) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of action with the intention of giving a false impression.
premise text: This subsection is a civil remedy provision (see Part 4-1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

503(2) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-503-ss-2
part of: 503 Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
note: No obligation if reasonably believed authorized
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 503(2) Misrepresentations about things authorised by this Part
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excemption
logic summary: Excemption from obligation
premise text: Reasonable belief of authorization
conclusion text: No obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-503-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Belief of authorization
premise text: Reasonable belief of authorization
conclusion text: Authorization believed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

504 Unauthorised use or disclosure of information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-504
note: Prohibition on using or disclosing information without investigation purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.297
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-504-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-504-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-504-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 504 Unauthorised use or disclosure of information or documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-504-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on unauthorized use
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

505 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-505
has part: 505(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
has part: 505(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299

505(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-505-ss-1
part of: 505 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 505(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: FWC may deal with a dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

505(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-505-ss-2
part of: 505 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
note: FWC may impose conditions on an entry permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.299
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 505(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Imposes obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

505A FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-505a
has part: 505A(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
has part: 505A(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
has part: 505A(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
has part: 505A(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301

505A(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-505a-ss-1
part of: 505A FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold discussions or TCF award workers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 505A(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May deal with a dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

505A(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-505a-ss-2
part of: 505A FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 505A(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

505A(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-505a-ss-3
part of: 505A FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 505A(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May impose conditions on an entry permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

505A(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
type: Concept
realized by: sec-505a-ss-4
part of: 505A FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
note: FWC must be satisfied that frequency of entry is correct before making an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.301
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 505A(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about frequency of entry to hold
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must satisfy condition
premise text: FWC is satisfied that the frequency of entry by the permit...
conclusion text: FWC may only make an order under subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that the frequency of entry is correct before making an order.
premise text: (4) However
conclusion text: FWC may only make an order under subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that the frequency of entry is correct before making an order.
premise text: (4) However
conclusion text: FWC may only make an order under subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that the frequency of entry by the permit is correct.
premise text: the FWC is satisfied that the frequency of entry by the permit...
conclusion text: FWC may only make an order under subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-505a-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that the frequency of entry is correct before making an order.
premise text: (4) However, the FWC may only make an order under subsection (3)
conclusion text: the FWC is satisfied that the frequency of entry by the permit...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

506 Contravening order made to deal with dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-506
note: Prohibition on contravening an order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-506-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-506-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-506-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 506 Contravening order made to deal with dispute
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-506-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids action
premise text: Order made under subsection 505(2) or subsection 505A(3)
conclusion text: Contravening the order is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

507 FWC may take action against permit holder
type: Concept
realized by: sec-507
has part: 507(1) FWC may take action against permit holder
has part: 507(2) FWC may take action against permit holder
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302

507(1) FWC may take action against permit holder
type: Concept
realized by: sec-507-ss-1
part of: 507 FWC may take action against permit holder
note: Revocation of entry permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 507(1) FWC may take action against permit holder
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

507(2) FWC may take action against permit holder
type: Concept
realized by: sec-507-ss-2
part of: 507 FWC may take action against permit holder
note: FWC must consider permit qualification matters when taking action against a permit holder.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.302
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 507(2) FWC may take action against permit holder
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider permit qualification matters
premise text: FWC must take action under subsection (1)
conclusion text: considering permit qualification matters is a condition of taking action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: FWC's action is within a timeframe that considers permit qualification matters
premise text: In deciding whether to take action under subsection (1), the FWC must take into account the permit qualification matters.
conclusion text: the timeframe for FWC's action includes considering permit qualification matters
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: FWC's action is part of a recurring process that considers permit qualification matters
premise text: In deciding whether to take action under subsection (1), the FWC must take into account the permit qualification matters.
conclusion text: the process for FWC's action includes considering permit qualification matters
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-507-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC has a duty to consider permit qualification matters when taking action against a permit holder
premise text: The FWC must take into account the permit qualification matters.
conclusion text: considering permit qualification matters is a condition of FWC's action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

508 FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
type: Concept
realized by: sec-508
has part: 508(1) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
has part: 508(2) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
has part: 508(3) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303

508(1) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
type: Concept
realized by: sec-508-ss-1
part of: 508 FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
note: Restrict rights exercisable under this Part if misuse detected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 508(1) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Restrict rights
premise text: Misuse detected
conclusion text: Rights restricted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

508(2) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
type: Concept
realized by: sec-508-ss-2
part of: 508 FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
note: Restrictions on entry permits and exemption certificates for an organisation suspected of misuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 508(2) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the organisation as a suspect of misuse.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

508(3) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
type: Concept
realized by: sec-508-ss-3
part of: 508 FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
note: FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.303
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-508-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 508(3) FWC may restrict rights if organisation or official has misused
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

509 Contravening order made for misuse of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-509
note: Prohibition on contravening a term of an order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-509-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-509-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-509-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 509 Contravening order made for misuse of rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-509-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a term of an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

510 When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
type: Concept
realized by: sec-510
has part: 510(1) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
has part: 510(2) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
has part: 510(3) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304

510(1) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
type: Concept
realized by: sec-510-ss-1
part of: 510 When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
note: FWC must revoke or suspend entry permits under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 510(1) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of revocation or suspension
premise text: FWC must impose conditions
conclusion text: Revocation or suspension is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: FWC must revoke or suspend permits within a certain timeframe
premise text: Permit holder was ordered to pay a pecuniary penalty under this Act
conclusion text: Revocation or suspension is required within 30 days of payment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: FWC must revoke or suspend permits based on court decisions
premise text: Court cancelled or suspended a right of entry for industrial purposes
conclusion text: Revocation or suspension is implied by court decision
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Inference
logic summary: FWC must revoke or suspend permits based on information commissioner findings
premise text: Information Commissioner found substantiated a complaint relating to action taken by the permit holder
conclusion text: Revocation or suspension is inferred from Information Commissioner's finding
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of revocation or suspension based on permit holder's conduct
premise text: Permit holder was found to have contravened subsection 503(1)
conclusion text: Revocation or suspension is prohibited based on permit holder's conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

510(2) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
type: Concept
realized by: sec-510-ss-2
part of: 510 When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
note: FWC is not required to suspend or revoke an entry permit under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 510(2) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to suspend or revoke
premise text: FWC must impose conditions
conclusion text: No obligation to suspend or revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Suspension or revocation does not overlap with entry permit
premise text: FWC must impose conditions on permits
conclusion text: Suspension or revocation is separate from entry permit
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Suspension or revocation occurs until harsh/unreasonable circumstances are met
premise text: FWC must impose conditions on permits
conclusion text: Suspension or revocation is conditional on circumstances
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Harsh/unreasonable circumstances diffuse to suspension or revocation
premise text: FWC must impose conditions on permits
conclusion text: Suspension or revocation is affected by circumstances
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: FWC has permission to suspend or revoke under certain circumstances
premise text: FWC must impose conditions on permits
conclusion text: FWC has discretion to suspend or revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

510(3) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
type: Concept
realized by: sec-510-ss-3
part of: 510 When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
note: FWC must consider previous circumstances when taking action under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.304
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 510(3) When the FWC must impose conditions on, revoke or suspend
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Consideration
logic summary: FWC must consider previous circumstances when taking action under subsection (1)
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to a circumstance referred to in a paragraph of that subsection if the FWC took the circumstance into account when taking action under that subsection on a previous occasion.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-510-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: FWC took the circumstance into account on a previous occasion
premise text: The FWC took action under subsection (1) on a previous occasion
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

511 General rules for suspending entry permits
type: Concept
realized by: sec-511
note: Suspension of entry permit must be for a specified period and does not prevent revocation or imposition of conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.306
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-511-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-511-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-511-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-511-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: The suspension must be for a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-511-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Incompatibility
logic summary: The suspension does not prevent revocation or imposition of conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

512 FWC may issue entry permits
type: Concept
realized by: sec-512
note: FWC may issue entry permits to officials of organisations that meet certain criteria.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-512-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-512-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 512 FWC may issue entry permits
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

513 Considering application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-513
note: Official must consider permit qualification matters when deciding fitness and propriety.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.307
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-513-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-513-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-513-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 513 Considering application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-513-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Official must consider permit qualification matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

514 When the FWC must not issue permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-514
note: FWC must not issue permit under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-514-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-514-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-514-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 514 When the FWC must not issue permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-514-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

515 Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-515
has part: 515(1) Conditions on entry permit
has part: 515(2) Conditions on entry permit
has part: 515(3) Conditions on entry permit
has part: 515(4) Conditions on entry permit
has part: 515(5) Conditions on entry permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308

515(1) Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-515-ss-1
part of: 515 Conditions on entry permit
note: FWC may impose conditions on an entry permit when issued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 515(1) Conditions on entry permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Imposes obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

515(2) Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-515-ss-2
part of: 515 Conditions on entry permit
note: Consider permit qualification matters when imposing conditions on entry permits.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: should
logic summary: Obligation to consider permit qualification matters.
premise text: FWC must take into account...
conclusion text: impose conditions under subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

515(3) Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-515-ss-3
part of: 515 Conditions on entry permit
note: Record conditions on entry permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 515(3) Conditions on entry permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to record conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

515(4) Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-515-ss-4
part of: 515 Conditions on entry permit
note: Permit ceases to be in force until condition is recorded.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits issuing a permit with conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

515(5) Conditions on entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-515-ss-5
part of: 515 Conditions on entry permit
note: Avoid contravening an FWC order due to permit conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.308
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-515-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

516 Expiry of entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-516
has part: 516(1) Expiry of entry permit
has part: 516(2) Expiry of entry permit
has part: 516(3) Expiry of entry permit
has part: 516(4) Expiry of entry permit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309

516(1) Expiry of entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-516-ss-1
part of: 516 Expiry of entry permit
note: Permit expires after 3 years or when holder ceases to be official.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 516(1) Expiry of entry permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits holding permit after specified period.
premise text: (1) Unless it is revoked, an entry permit expires...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

516(2) Expiry of entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-516-ss-2
part of: 516 Expiry of entry permit
note: FWC may extend old permit period under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 516(2) Expiry of entry permit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permit extension is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

516(3) Expiry of entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-516-ss-3
part of: 516 Expiry of entry permit
note: The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotExceed
logic summary: Prohibition on exceeding the period specified by FWC.
premise text: (3) The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary for it to determine the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: OverlapsWith
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the period specified and the FWC's consideration period.
premise text: (3) The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary for it to determine the application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Temporal interval contained within the FWC's consideration period.
premise text: (3) The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary for it to determine the application.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustBeLessThanOrEqual
logic summary: Restriction on the length of the period specified.
premise text: (3) The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary for it to determine the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IsAnObligation
logic summary: Classification of section as an obligation.
premise text: (3) The period specified must not be longer than the FWC considers necessary for it to determine the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

516(4) Expiry of entry permit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-516-ss-4
part of: 516 Expiry of entry permit
note: FWC cannot extend period under subsection (2) if requested information is provided
description: copies of records or documents, or other information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.309
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-516-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on extending period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

517 Return of entry permits to the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-517
has part: 517(1) Return of entry permits to the FWC
has part: 517(2) Return of entry permits to the FWC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310

517(1) Return of entry permits to the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-517-ss-1
part of: 517 Return of entry permits to the FWC
note: Return entry permit to FWC within 7 days of revocation, suspension, or expiration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

517(2) Return of entry permits to the FWC
type: Concept
realized by: sec-517-ss-2
part of: 517 Return of entry permits to the FWC
note: Return of entry permits after suspension period ends
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 517(2) Return of entry permits to the FWC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-517-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return entry permit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

518 Entry notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-518
has part: 518(1) Entry notice requirements
has part: 518(2) Entry notice requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310

518(1) Entry notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-518-ss-1
part of: 518 Entry notice requirements
note: Entry notice must specify premises, day of entry, and organisation.
description: entry notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 518(1) Entry notice requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide entry notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

518(2) Entry notice requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sec-518-ss-2
part of: 518 Entry notice requirements
note: Entry notice requirements for certain types of entries under sections 481, 483A, or 483D.
description: Particulars of suspected contraventions or contraventions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.310
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 518(2) Entry notice requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide particulars of suspected contraventions or contraventions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-518-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Entry notice requirements apply between the permit holder's organisation and the affected parties
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

519 Exemption certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-519
has part: 519(1) Exemption certificates
has part: 519(2) Exemption certificates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312

519(1) Exemption certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-519-ss-1
part of: 519 Exemption certificates
note: Issue exemption certificate to organisation upon application and reasonable belief of hindering investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 519(1) Exemption certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Issue exemption certificate upon application and reasonable belief.
premise text: The FWC must issue a certificate (an exemption certificate) to an organisation for an entry under section 481.
conclusion text: The organisation has the right to expect the FWC to issue a certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Exemption certificates are issued within a reasonable timeframe after application.
premise text: The FWC must issue the certificate (an exemption certificate) within a reasonable timeframe after receiving the application.
conclusion text: The timeframe for issuing the exemption certificate is reasonable.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Exemption certificates are issued in response to repeated applications.
premise text: The organisation has applied multiple times and the FWC must issue a certificate (an exemption certificate) upon each application.
conclusion text: The exemption certificate is recurring.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Exemption certificates are not mandatory but may be issued at discretion.
premise text: The FWC has the discretion to issue a certificate (an exemption certificate) upon application and reasonable belief.
conclusion text: The organisation is not required to have an exemption certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

519(2) Exemption certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-519-ss-2
part of: 519 Exemption certificates
note: Exemption certificate requirements
description: Particulars of suspected contravention, organisation name, permit holder names (if applicable)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.312
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 519(2) Exemption certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-519-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Exemption certificate specifications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

520 Affected member certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-520
has part: 520(1) Affected member certificates
has part: 520(2) Affected member certificates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313

520(1) Affected member certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-520-ss-1
part of: 520 Affected member certificates
note: Issue affected member certificate on application by organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 520(1) Affected member certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Issuing certificate is an obligation
premise text: (1) The FWC must, on application by an organisation...
conclusion text: Issue affected member certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between FWC's satisfaction and issuing certificate
premise text: (1) The FWC must, on application by an organisation...
conclusion text: Satisfied that a member performs work on premises
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of FWC's satisfaction on issuing certificate
premise text: (a) a member of the organisation performs work on particular premises...
conclusion text: Issue affected member certificate
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of obligation to issue certificate
premise text: (1) The FWC must, on application by an organisation...
conclusion text: Issue affected member certificate
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

520(2) Affected member certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sec-520-ss-2
part of: 520 Affected member certificates
note: Affected member certificate must state certain information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.313
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 520(2) Affected member certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-520-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide specific information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

521 Regulations dealing with instruments under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521
note: Regulations dealing with instruments under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.314
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521-norm

521A Meaning of accommodation arrangement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521a
has part: 521A(1) Meaning of accommodation arrangement
has part: 521A(2) Meaning of accommodation arrangement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315

521A(1) Meaning of accommodation arrangement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521a-ss-1
part of: 521A Meaning of accommodation arrangement
note: Occupier must provide accommodation arrangement under certain conditions.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 521A(1) Meaning of accommodation arrangement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide accommodation arrangement
premise text: (1) If an occupier of premises enters into an arrangement with an organisation...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

521A(2) Meaning of accommodation arrangement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521a-ss-2
part of: 521A Meaning of accommodation arrangement
note: Occupier must provide accommodation arrangement if permit holder is assisted to exercise rights.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 521A(2) Meaning of accommodation arrangement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Occupier has an obligation to provide accommodation arrangement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permit holders are permitted to enter into accommodation arrangements with occupiers.
premise text: (2) If an occupier enters into an arrangement with a permit holder...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Occupiers have an obligation to provide accommodation arrangements if they enter into agreements with permit holders.
premise text: (2) If an occupier enters into an arrangement with a permit holder...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

521B Meaning of transport arrangement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521b
has part: 521B(1) Meaning of transport arrangement
has part: 521B(2) Meaning of transport arrangement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315

521B(1) Meaning of transport arrangement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521b-ss-1
part of: 521B Meaning of transport arrangement
note: Transport arrangement required for permit holder assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 521B(1) Meaning of transport arrangement
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires transport arrangement
premise text: (1) If an occupier of premises enters into an arrangement with an organisation...
conclusion text: the arrangement is a transport arrangement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Transport arrangement relates to permit holder assistance during arrangement
premise text: (a) an occupier of premises enters into an arrangement with an organisation;
conclusion text: the transport arrangement is related to the permit holder's exercise of rights.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Transport arrangement implies permit holder assistance
premise text: (b) under the terms of the arrangement, a permit holder is provided with transport for the purpose of assisting him or her to exercise rights under this Part;
conclusion text: the arrangement is a transport arrangement.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Transport arrangement diffuses assistance to permit holder
premise text: (b) under the terms of the arrangement, a permit holder is provided with transport for the purpose of assisting him or her to exercise rights under this Part;
conclusion text: the arrangement provides transport assistance.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Transport arrangement recognized as providing assistance
premise text: (b) under the terms of the arrangement, a permit holder is provided with transport for the purpose of assisting him or her to exercise rights under this Part;
conclusion text: the arrangement provides transport assistance.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

521B(2) Meaning of transport arrangement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521b-ss-2
part of: 521B Meaning of transport arrangement
note: Occupier of premises must enter into an arrangement with a permit holder.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.315
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 521B(2) Meaning of transport arrangement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide an arrangement
premise text: (2) If:...
conclusion text: an occupier of premises must enter into an arrangement with a permit holder.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

521C Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521c
has part: 521C(1) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
has part: 521C(2) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
has part: 521C(3) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
has part: 521C(4) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316

521C(1) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521c-ss-1
part of: 521C Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
note: Occupier must provide accommodation to permit holder exercising rights.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 521C(1) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide accommodation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

521C(2) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521c-ss-2
part of: 521C Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
note: Must provide accommodation if requested by permit holder within reasonable period and unable to enter into arrangement by consent.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

521C(3) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521c-ss-3
part of: 521C Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
note: Occupier must not charge excessive fee for accommodation under arrangement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of excessive fee charging
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

521C(4) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521c-ss-4
part of: 521C Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
note: Permit holder's conduct in accommodation under arrangement is considered exercise of rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.316
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 521C(4) Accommodation arrangements for remote areas
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on permit holder
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

521D Transport arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521d
has part: 521D(1) Transport arrangements for remote areas
has part: 521D(2) Transport arrangements for remote areas
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317

521D(1) Transport arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521d-ss-1
part of: 521D Transport arrangements for remote areas
note: Occupier must provide transport for permit holder in remote areas.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 521D(1) Transport arrangements for remote areas
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide transport
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

521D(2) Transport arrangements for remote areas
type: Concept
realized by: sec-521d-ss-2
part of: 521D Transport arrangements for remote areas
note: Transport arrangements for remote areas must be provided if requested by the permit holder.
description: transport to the premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.317
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The occupier must provide transport if requested.
conclusion text: transport to the premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-521d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for transport provision
premise text: the permit holder requests transport
conclusion text: transport to the premises
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

522 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-522
note: Employer may stand down employee without pay in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-522-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-522-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 522 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

523 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-523
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.319
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-523-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-523-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 523 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

524 Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-524
has part: 524(1) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
has part: 524(2) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
has part: 524(3) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320

524(1) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-524-ss-1
part of: 524 Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
note: Employer may stand down employees under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 524(1) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

524(2) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-524-ss-2
part of: 524 Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
note: Employer may stand down employees under certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 524(2) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to stand down employees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

524(3) Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-524-ss-3
part of: 524 Employer may stand down employees in certain circumstances
note: Employer not required to make payments during stand down period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.320
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-524-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Employer's obligation to make payments
premise text: Employer stands down employee
conclusion text: No payment required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

525 Employee not stood down during a period of authorised leave or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-525
note: An employee is not taken to be stood down under subsection 524(1) during a period when the employee is taking authorised leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.321
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 525 Employee not stood down during a period of authorised leave or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If an employee takes authorised leave, they are not stood down.
premise text: Employee is taking paid or unpaid leave that is authorised by the employer.
conclusion text: Employee is not stood down under subsection 524(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The employee's absence overlaps with the period during which they would otherwise be stood down.
premise text: Employee is taking paid or unpaid leave that is authorised by the employer.
conclusion text: The employee's absence overlaps with the period during which they would otherwise be stood down.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The employee's absence repeats the pattern of taking authorised leave.
premise text: Employee is taking paid or unpaid leave that is authorised by the employer.
conclusion text: The employee's absence repeats the pattern of taking authorised leave.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The employee's absence diffuses to other employees who are also taking authorised leave.
premise text: Employee is taking paid or unpaid leave that is authorised by the employer.
conclusion text: Other employees who are also taking authorised leave diffuse to the employee's absence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-525-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognises
logic summary: The system recognises the employee's absence as authorised leave.
premise text: Employee is taking paid or unpaid leave that is authorised by the employer.
conclusion text: The system recognises the employee's absence as authorised leave.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

526 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-526
has part: 526(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
has part: 526(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
has part: 526(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
has part: 526(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322

526(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-526-ss-1
part of: 526 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
note: The FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 526(1) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May deal with a dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

526(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-526-ss-2
part of: 526 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part through arbitration, mediation, conciliation, or making a recommendation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 526(2) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission for FWC to deal with disputes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

526(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-526-ss-3
part of: 526 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
note: FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part on application by certain parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 526(3) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: FWC may deal with a dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

526(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-526-ss-4
part of: 526 FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
note: FWC must consider fairness in dispute resolution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 526(4) FWC may deal with a dispute about the operation of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-526-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider fairness.
premise text: FWC must deal with the dispute.
conclusion text: Consider fairness between parties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527 Contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527
note: Prohibits contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about the operation of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.322
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 527 Contravening an FWC order dealing with a dispute about the
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527A Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527a
note: Sexual harassment is prohibited in certain situations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 527A Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sexual harassment.
premise text: The other person is a worker in a business or undertaking...
conclusion text: Sexual harassment is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Harassment occurs during the same time period as the other person's employment.
premise text: The harassment occurs in connection with the other person being a person of the relevant kind.
conclusion text: Harassment overlaps with the other person's employment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for sexual harassment to employees or agents.
premise text: Persons may be liable for acts contravening this Part that are performed by their employees or agents.
conclusion text: Responsibility for sexual harassment is diffused to employees or agents.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
logic summary: Implicates the need for a stop order in cases of alleged contravention.
premise text: Applications may be made to the FWC to deal with a dispute about an alleged contravention of this Part...
conclusion text: A stop order is implied in cases of alleged contravention.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the need for a court hearing in cases where a dispute has not been resolved by the FWC.
premise text: In most cases, a dispute about an alleged contravention of this Part will be dealt with by a court only if the dispute has not been resolved by the FWC.
conclusion text: A court hearing is recognized in cases where a dispute has not been resolved.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527B Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527b
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527B Meaning of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527C Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527c
note: Object of this Part is to give effect, or further effect, to Chapter 3 Rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.323
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527c-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527C Object of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

18 December 1979 ([1983] ATS 9); and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-18-norm

16 December 1966 ([1976] ATS 5); and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
note: Obligation to comply with ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with ILO Convention (No. 111)
premise text: (c) the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, done at Geneva on
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between employment and occupation
premise text: (c) the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, done at Geneva on
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of employment and occupation on discrimination
premise text: (c) the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, done at Geneva on
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of employment and occupation to discrimination
premise text: (c) the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, done at Geneva on
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognition
logic summary: Cognitive aspect of employment and occupation
premise text: (c) the ILO Convention (No. 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, done at Geneva on
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 June 1958 ([1974] ATS 12); and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Prohibits sexual harassment of workers, persons seeking to become workers and persons conducting businesses or undertakings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 June 1958 ([1974] ATS 12); and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527CA Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527ca
has part: 527CA(1) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
has part: 527CA(2) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
has part: 527CA(3) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
has part: 527CA(4) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324

527CA(1) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527ca-ss-1
part of: 527CA Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
note: No exclusion of concurrent State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: No exclusion
premise text: (1) This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory that is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Concurrent laws overlap in time
premise text: (1) This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory that is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: Concurrent laws have recurring traces
premise text: (1) This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory that is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Concurrent laws diffuse through time
premise text: (1) This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory that is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Concurrent laws are cognizable by CogAI
premise text: (1) This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory that is capable of operating concurrently with this Part.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527CA(2) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527ca-ss-2
part of: 527CA Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
note: Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-2-norm

527CA(3) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527ca-ss-3
part of: 527CA Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
note: Allowing concurrent operation of State and Territory laws to prevent sexual harassment or deal with disputes related to it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Granting permission for concurrent operation of laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527CA(4) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527ca-ss-4
part of: 527CA Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
note: Section 26 has effect subject to this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.324
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527ca-ss-4-norm

527D Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527d
has part: 527D(1) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
has part: 527D(2) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
has part: 527D(3) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
has part: 527D(4) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326

527D(1) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527d-ss-1
part of: 527D Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
note: Prohibits sexual harassment in connection with work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 527D(1) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527D(2) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527d-ss-2
part of: 527D Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
note: Prohibits sexual harassment in connection with work
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 527D(2) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal scope of worker definition
premise text: When a person is a worker in a business or undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527D(3) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527d-ss-3
part of: 527D Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
note: A person carrying out work for a business or undertaking is considered a worker in that business or undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527D(3) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of a worker's status
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527D(4) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527d-ss-4
part of: 527D Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
note: Defines meaning of terms for Work Health and Safety Act 2011 in this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.326
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-4-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527D(4) Prohibiting sexual harassment in connection with work
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

527E Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527e
has part: 527E(1) Vicarious liability etc.
has part: 527E(2) Vicarious liability etc.
has part: 527E(2A) Vicarious liability etc.
has part: 527E(2B) Vicarious liability etc.
has part: 527E(3) Vicarious liability etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327

527E(1) Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527e-ss-1
part of: 527E Vicarious liability etc.
note: Principal liable for employee's actions under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527E(1) Vicarious liability etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Vicarious liability
premise text: Employee's actions are subject to the principal's liability.
conclusion text: Principal is liable for employee's actions under certain circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between employee's actions and the Act's application
premise text: Employee's actions occur during their employment or duties as an agent.
conclusion text: The Act applies to the principal if they had also done the act during the same temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Inference of liability from employee's actions
premise text: Employee's actions are subject to the Act's application.
conclusion text: The principal is liable for the employee's actions under certain circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Spread of liability from employee to principal
premise text: Employee's actions are subject to the Act's application.
conclusion text: The principal is liable for the employee's actions under certain circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Artificial intelligence inference of liability
premise text: Employee's actions are subject to the Act's application.
conclusion text: The principal is liable for the employee's actions under certain circumstances.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527E(2) Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527e-ss-2
part of: 527E Vicarious liability etc.
note: Principal must take reasonable steps to prevent employee/agent from contravening subsection 527D(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527E(2) Vicarious liability etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prevent contravention
premise text: Principal must take reasonable steps
conclusion text: Employee/agent cannot contravene subsection 527D(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for reasonable steps
premise text: Principal took all reasonable steps to prevent employee/agent from doing acts that would contravene subsection 527D(1)
conclusion text: Reasonable steps occurred within a specific temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: inference
logic summary: Inference of obligation based on principal's actions
premise text: Principal must take reasonable steps to prevent employee/agent from contravening subsection 527D(1)
conclusion text: Obligation to prevent contravention exists
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation through principal's actions
premise text: Principal took all reasonable steps to prevent employee/agent from doing acts that would contravene subsection 527D(1)
conclusion text: Obligation diffuses through principal's actions
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive action
logic summary: Cognitive action of principal in preventing employee/agent from contravening subsection 527D(1)
premise text: Principal must take reasonable steps to prevent employee/agent from doing acts that would contravene subsection 527D(1)
conclusion text: Principal's cognitive action prevents contravention
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

527E(2A) Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527e-ss-2a
part of: 527E Vicarious liability etc.
note: Commonwealth liable for act done by defence member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527E(2A) Vicarious liability etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
logic summary: State liability for Commonwealth action
premise text: (2A) If a person does an act that contravenes subsection 527D(1)
conclusion text: This Act applies in relation to the Commonwealth...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of liability on Commonwealth action
premise text: (2A) If a person does an act that contravenes subsection 527D(1)
conclusion text: This Act applies in relation to the Commonwealth...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527E(2B) Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527e-ss-2b
part of: 527E Vicarious liability etc.
note: The Commonwealth must take reasonable steps to prevent the person from doing acts that would contravene subsection 527D(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to take reasonable steps
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527E(3) Vicarious liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527e-ss-3
part of: 527E Vicarious liability etc.
note: No vicarious liability for certain subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.327
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527E(3) Vicarious liability etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

527F Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527f
has part: 527F(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
has part: 527F(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
has part: 527F(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
has part: 527F(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328

527F(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527f-ss-1
part of: 527F Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
note: A person may apply for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment dispute.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527F(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May apply for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment dispute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The FWC may allow an application to be amended if, for example, the applicant wishes the FWC to deal with the dispute in a way not initially applied for.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: If the FWC has dealt with the dispute as mentioned in paragraph (b) and is satisfied that all reasonable attempts to resolve the dispute...
premise text: The FWC has dealt with the dispute as mentioned in paragraph (b).
conclusion text: ...the applicant may make a sexual harassment court application.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527F(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527f-ss-2
part of: 527F Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
note: List of persons entitled to deal with sexual harassment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527F(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

527F(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527f-ss-3
part of: 527F Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
note: Cannot apply for a stop sexual harassment order if the aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 527F(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on applying for a stop sexual harassment order
premise text: aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment
conclusion text: Cannot apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion based on temporal relationship between defence membership and alleged harassment
premise text: aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment
conclusion text: Excluded from applying for stop sexual harassment order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace based on defence membership and alleged harassment
premise text: aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment
conclusion text: Cannot apply for stop sexual harassment order
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of individuals who cannot apply for a stop sexual harassment order
premise text: aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment
conclusion text: Defence member
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of individuals who cannot apply for a stop sexual harassment order
premise text: aggrieved person was a defence member at the time of alleged harassment
conclusion text: Valid exclusion
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527F(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527f-ss-4
part of: 527F Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
note: Industrial associations may represent aggrieved persons for applications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.328
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 527F(4) Application for the FWC to deal with a sexual harassment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Industrial associations may represent aggrieved persons for applications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

527G Time for application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527g
note: Dismissal of applications under section 527F after a certain time period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.329
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527g-norm

527H Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527h
has part: 527H(1) Application fees
has part: 527H(2) Application fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330

527H(1) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527h-ss-1
part of: 527H Application fees
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
description: Fee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527H(1) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527H(2) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527h-ss-2
part of: 527H Application fees
note: Application fee regulation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527H(2) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Regulates fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

527J Stop sexual harassment orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527j
has part: 527J(1) Stop sexual harassment orders
has part: 527J(2) Stop sexual harassment orders
has part: 527J(3) Stop sexual harassment orders
has part: 527J(4) Stop sexual harassment orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330

527J(1) Stop sexual harassment orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527j-ss-1
part of: 527J Stop sexual harassment orders
note: The FWC may make an order to prevent sexual harassment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527J(1) Stop sexual harassment orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Has part: prevent sexual harassment
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527J(2) Stop sexual harassment orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527j-ss-2
part of: 527J Stop sexual harassment orders
note: FWC must deal with stop sexual harassment order applications within 14 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527J(2) Stop sexual harassment orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to deal with applications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527J(3) Stop sexual harassment orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527j-ss-3
part of: 527J Stop sexual harassment orders
note: FWC must consider certain outcomes and procedures when issuing a stop sexual harassment order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527J(3) Stop sexual harassment orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Mandatory consideration of outcomes and procedures
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527J(4) Stop sexual harassment orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527j-ss-4
part of: 527J Stop sexual harassment orders
note: Application for stop sexual harassment order may be dismissed if it relates to Australia's defence, national security, covert operation, or international operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.330
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Application for stop sexual harassment order may be dismissed if it relates to Australia's defence, national security, covert operation, or international operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527K Contravening a stop sexual harassment order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527k
note: Prohibition on contravening a stop sexual harassment order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527k-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527k-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527k-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 527K Contravening a stop sexual harassment order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening a stop sexual harassment order
premise text: A person to whom a stop sexual harassment order applies
conclusion text: must not contravene a term of the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527L Actions under work health and safety laws permitted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527l
note: Removes prohibition on proceeding under WHS laws for same conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527l-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527l-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527l-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows proceeding under WHS laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527l-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Includes corresponding provisions of WHS laws
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527M This Subdivision is not to prejudice Australia’s defence,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527m
note: Prejudicial action to Australia's defence, national security, or covert/ international operations of the Australian Federal Police.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.332
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits taking or refraining from taking action that would be prejudicial to specified interests.
premise text: Nothing in this Subdivision requires or permits a person to take, or to refrain from taking, any action...
conclusion text: Action is prohibited if it would be prejudicial to specified interests.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlapsWith
logic summary: Identifies temporal intervals where action would be prejudicial.
premise text: ...or could reasonably be expected to be, prejudicial to:
conclusion text: Action overlaps with specified temporal intervals if it would be prejudicial.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
logic summary: Describes conditions under which action is prohibited.
premise text: ...or the taking of the action, or the refraining from taking the action...
conclusion text: Action occurs before specified conditions if it would be prejudicial.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
logic summary: Describes how action affects specified interests.
premise text: ...or could reasonably be expected to be, prejudicial to:
conclusion text: Action diffuses into specified interests if it would be prejudicial.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527m-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Describes how system recognizes action as potentially prejudicial.
premise text: ...or could reasonably be expected to be, prejudicial to:
conclusion text: System recognizes action as potentially prejudicial if it relates to specified interests.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527N Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527n
has part: 527N(1) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
has part: 527N(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333

527N(1) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527n-ss-1
part of: 527N Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
note: The Chief of the Defence Force may declare exemptions from certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-n3logic-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Describes the time period during which exemptions are allowed
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a specified activity.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
logic summary: Describes the mechanism through which exemptions are communicated
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a specified activity.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: By
logic summary: Describes the method used to make exemptions
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a specified activity.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-1-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: For
logic summary: Describes the purpose for which exemptions are made
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Chief of the Defence Force may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a specified activity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

527N(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527n-ss-2
part of: 527N Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527N(2) Declarations by the Chief of the Defence Force
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
premise text: (2) A declaration under subsection (1)
conclusion text: has effect according to its terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

527P Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527p
has part: 527P(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
has part: 527P(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333

527P(1) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527p-ss-1
part of: 527P Declarations by the Director-General of Security
note: Director-General may declare exemptions from Subdivision provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

527P(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527p-ss-2
part of: 527P Declarations by the Director-General of Security
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527P(2) Declarations by the Director-General of Security
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval from the Minister
premise text: (2) A declaration under subsection (1)
conclusion text: has effect according to its terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Declaration has effect during the period of approval
premise text: (2) A declaration under subsection (1)
conclusion text: has effect according to its terms.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

527Q Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527q
has part: 527Q(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
has part: 527Q(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333

527Q(1) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527q-ss-1
part of: 527Q Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
note: Permits Director-General to declare exemptions from certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope of the exemption.
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Director-General of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a person carrying out work for the Director-General.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal scope of the exemption.
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Director-General of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a person carrying out work for the Director-General.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: may
logic summary: Describes the mechanism by which the exemption is granted.
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Director-General of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a person carrying out work for the Director-General.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: may
logic summary: Describes the mechanism by which the exemption is granted.
premise text: (1) Without limiting section 527M, the Director-General of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service may, by legislative instrument, declare that all or specified provisions of this Subdivision do not apply in relation to a person carrying out work for the Director-General.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527Q(2) Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527q-ss-2
part of: 527Q Declarations by the Director-General of ASIS
note: Approval required for declaration under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.333
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires approval from Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527R Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527r
has part: 527R(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
has part: 527R(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
has part: 527R(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334

527R(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527r-ss-1
part of: 527R Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
note: FWC must deal with a dispute (other than by arbitration) if an application is made under section 527F and does not consist solely of an application for a stop sexual harassment order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527R(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to deal with a dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527R(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527r-ss-2
part of: 527R Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
note: Private conferences for dealing with sexual harassment disputes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527R(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be conducted in private
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527R(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527r-ss-3
part of: 527R Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
note: FWC must issue certificate if dispute resolution attempts are unsuccessful
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527R(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute (other than by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527S Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527s
has part: 527S(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
has part: 527S(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
has part: 527S(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334

527S(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527s-ss-1
part of: 527S Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
note: Notification of FWC for arbitration of sexual harassment dispute
description: Notification within 60 days after certificate issue or application made during/after those 60 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527S(1) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify FWC for arbitration of sexual harassment dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527S(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527s-ss-2
part of: 527S Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
note: The FWC must remove a party from the dispute and notify them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527S(2) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must remove a party from the dispute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527S(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527s-ss-3
part of: 527S Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
note: FWC may make orders to redress loss or damage suffered by an aggrieved person in relation to a dispute.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.334
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527S(3) Dealing with a sexual harassment dispute by arbitration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC must make orders to redress loss or damage suffered by an aggrieved person in relation to a dispute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527s-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The FWC's actions occur between the dispute and redressing loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527T Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527t
has part: 527T(1) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
has part: 527T(2) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
has part: 527T(3) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336

527T(1) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527t-ss-1
part of: 527T Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
note: No court application allowed unless FWC has issued a certificate or interim injunction is applied for.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 527T(1) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: No court application allowed unless FWC has issued a certificate or interim injunction is applied for.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the FWC's role in certifying disputes
premise text: The FWC has issued a certificate under paragraph 527R(3)(a)
conclusion text: A court application is prohibited unless this condition is met
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Specifies the time frame for making a court application
premise text: The sexual harassment court application must be made within a period specified in subsection (3)
conclusion text: A court application is prohibited unless this condition is met
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Allows for interim injunction applications
premise text: The sexual harassment court application includes an application for an interim injunction
conclusion text: A court application is permitted if it includes this condition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527T(2) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527t-ss-2
part of: 527T Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
note: A sexual harassment court application is an application to a court under Division 2 of Part 4-1 for orders in relation to a contravention of Division 2 of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527T(2) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the employer to prevent sexual harassment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

527T(3) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
type: Concept
realized by: sec-527t-ss-3
part of: 527T Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
note: Specify periods for taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.336
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 527T(3) Limitation on taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Specify periods for taking a sexual harassment dispute to court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-527t-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Specify temporal intervals
premise text: The provision mentions specific periods
conclusion text: Temporal intervals are specified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

528 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-528
note: National system employer obligations regarding employee dismissals and records.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-528-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-528-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-528-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 528 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-528-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must notify CEO of proposed dismissals.
premise text: Section 528(1)
conclusion text: Notification is mandatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

529 Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-529
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.338
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 529 Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: employee means a national system employee
conclusion text: employer means a national system employer
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-529-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: organisation etc.
conclusion text: rights and responsibilities of employees, employers, organisations etc.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-530
has part: 530(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
has part: 530(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
has part: 530(3) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
has part: 530(4) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
has part: 530(5) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340

530(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-530-ss-1
part of: 530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals.
description: Written notice about the proposed dismissals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 530(1) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

530(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-530-ss-2
part of: 530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 530(2) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Dismissals must occur after notice is given.
premise text: (2) The notice must be in the form (if any) prescribed by the regulations and set out:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

530(3) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-530-ss-3
part of: 530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

530(4) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-530-ss-4
part of: 530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
note: Employer must notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Employer has a duty to notify Centrelink.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

530(5) Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
type: Concept
realized by: sec-530-ss-5
part of: 530 Employer to notify Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals
note: Employer must not dismiss employees except as permitted by the order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.340
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-530-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dismissal of employees without permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

531 FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
type: Concept
realized by: sec-531
has part: 531(1) FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
has part: 531(2) FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341

531(1) FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
type: Concept
realized by: sec-531-ss-1
part of: 531 FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
note: Employer must notify registered employee associations before dismissing 15 or more employees.
description: Notification of relevant registered employee associations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 531(1) FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must comply with notification requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

531(2) FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
type: Concept
realized by: sec-531-ss-2
part of: 531 FWC may make orders where failure to notify or consult
note: Employer must notify registered employee association of proposed dismissals and reasons.
description: Notice of proposed dismissals and reasons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.341
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-531-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must comply with subsection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

532 Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-532
has part: 532(1) Orders that the FWC may make
has part: 532(2) Orders that the FWC may make
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342

532(1) Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-532-ss-1
part of: 532 Orders that the FWC may make
note: The FWC may make orders to put employees in the same position as if the employer had complied with subsections 531(2) and (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 532(1) Orders that the FWC may make
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may make orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

532(2) Orders that the FWC may make
type: Concept
realized by: sec-532-ss-2
part of: 532 Orders that the FWC may make
note: FWC cannot make orders for certain things
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.342
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-532-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot impose duty on FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

533 Application for an FWC order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-533
note: Application for an FWC order is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-533-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-533-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-533-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 533 Application for an FWC order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-533-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application is mandatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

534 Limits on scope of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sec-534
note: Exemptions from application of Division 534
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.343
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-534-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-534-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 534 Limits on scope of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-535
has part: 535(1) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
has part: 535(2) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
has part: 535(3) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
has part: 535(4) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
has part: 535(5) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345

535(1) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-535-ss-1
part of: 535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records
note: Employer must keep employee records for 7 years.
description: employee records of the kind prescribed by the regulations in relation to each of its employees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 535(1) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must keep employee records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

535(2) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-535-ss-2
part of: 535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records
note: Employer must provide employee records in prescribed form and include required information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 535(2) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer must provide employee records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

535(3) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-535-ss-3
part of: 535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records
note: Employer must comply with regulations regarding employee records inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

535(4) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-535-ss-4
part of: 535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records
note: Employer must not make or keep false records.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of making false records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

535(5) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
type: Concept
realized by: sec-535-ss-5
part of: 535 Employer obligations in relation to employee records
note: Employer obligations in relation to employee records do not apply if the record is not false or misleading in a material particular.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-5-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-535-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 535(5) Employer obligations in relation to employee records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536 Employer obligations in relation to pay slips
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536
note: Employer must provide pay slip within one working day of paying an employee.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.345
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Employer has a duty to provide pay slip.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536AA Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536aa
has part: 536AA(1) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
has part: 536AA(2) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
has part: 536AA(3) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347

536AA(1) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536aa-ss-1
part of: 536AA Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
note: Employer cannot advertise employment at a rate of pay that contravenes the Act or a fair work instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of advertising employment at a rate of pay that contravenes the Act or a fair work instrument.
premise text: (1) An employer must not advertise...
conclusion text: ...contravene either of the following...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for advertising employment rates.
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: ...if the advertised employment occurred:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536AA(2) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536aa-ss-2
part of: 536AA Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
note: Employer must specify rate of pay in advertising
description: (c) or (d)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536AA(2) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Employer obligation
premise text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536AA(3) Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536aa-ss-3
part of: 536AA Employer obligations in relation to advertising rates of pay
note: Employer has a reasonable excuse to exempt from subsections (1) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.347
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excuse
logic summary: Employer's excuse
premise text: Reasonable excuse
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536A Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536a
note: Corrupting benefits provided to or in relation to organisations are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536A Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits corrupting benefits.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536B Meanings of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536b
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536b-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536b-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536B Meanings of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536C Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536c
has part: 536C(1) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
has part: 536C(2) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
has part: 536C(3) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348

536C(1) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536c-ss-1
part of: 536C Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
note: No exclusion of concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No exclusion
premise text: This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory
conclusion text: The law is still in effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Concurrent laws overlap with this Part
premise text: This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory
conclusion text: The law is still in effect
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Concurrent laws repeat with this Part
premise text: This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory
conclusion text: The law is still in effect
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Concurrent laws diffuse with this Part
premise text: This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory
conclusion text: The law is still in effect
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
logic summary: Concurrent laws incorporate this Part
premise text: This Part does not exclude or limit the operation of a law of a State or Territory
conclusion text: The law is still in effect
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536C(2) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536c-ss-2
part of: 536C Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
note: Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-2-norm

536C(3) Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536c-ss-3
part of: 536C Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws
note: States and Territories may not provide different penalties or fault elements for the same offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.348
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: States and Territories must not provide different penalties or fault elements.
premise text: State/Territory law differs from Commonwealth law.
conclusion text: No difference in penalties or fault elements allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: States and Territories must not provide different defences or exceptions for the same offence.
premise text: State/Territory law differs from Commonwealth law.
conclusion text: No difference in defences or exceptions allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: States and Territories' laws may overlap with the Commonwealth's laws for the same offence.
premise text: State/Territory law differs from Commonwealth law.
conclusion text: Laws may overlap.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Consistency
logic summary: States and Territories' laws must be consistent with the Commonwealth's laws for the same offence.
premise text: State/Territory law differs from Commonwealth law.
conclusion text: Laws must be consistent.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536c-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validity
logic summary: States and Territories' laws are valid if they do not differ from the Commonwealth's laws for the same offence.
premise text: State/Territory law differs from Commonwealth law.
conclusion text: Laws are valid.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536CA Dishonesty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ca
has part: 536CA(1) Dishonesty
has part: 536CA(2) Dishonesty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349

536CA(1) Dishonesty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ca-ss-1
part of: 536CA Dishonesty
note: Definition of dishonesty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536CA(1) Dishonesty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with normative force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536CA(2) Dishonesty
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ca-ss-2
part of: 536CA Dishonesty
note: Determination of dishonesty is a matter for the trier of fact.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.349
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ca-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536CA(2) Dishonesty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536D Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536d
has part: 536D(1) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
has part: 536D(2) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
has part: 536D(3) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350

536D(1) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536d-ss-1
part of: 536D Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
note: Receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536D(1) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536D(2) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536d-ss-2
part of: 536D Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
note: Requesting, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536D(2) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits requesting, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536D(3) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536d-ss-3
part of: 536D Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
note: Defendant's intention does not need to be in relation to a particular registered organisations officer or employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.350
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536D(3) Giving, receiving or soliciting a corrupting benefit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536E Meaning of registered organisations officer or employee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536e
note: Defines who is considered a registered organisations officer or employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.352
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-ltl-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 536E Meaning of registered organisations officer or employee
held by: LegalPerson
scope note: held by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Establishes the identity of the subject.
premise text: Each of the following is a registered organisations officer or employee:
conclusion text: an officer (within the meaning of the Registered Organisations Act) of an organisation or branch of an organisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Establishes the identity of the subject.
premise text: Each of the following is a registered organisations officer or employee:
conclusion text: an employee of an organisation or branch of an organisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Defines the temporal relationship between the subject and the organisation.
premise text: Each of the following is a registered organisations officer or employee:
conclusion text: an officer (within the meaning of the Registered Organisations Act) of an organisation or branch of an organisation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536e-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occurs-before
logic summary: Establishes the temporal relationship between the subject and the organisation.
premise text: Each of the following is a registered organisations officer or employee:
conclusion text: an employee of an organisation or branch of an organisation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536F Giving a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536f
has part: 536F(1) Giving a cash or in kind payment
has part: 536F(3) Giving a cash or in kind payment
has part: 536F(4) Giving a cash or in kind payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354

536F(1) Giving a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536f-ss-1
part of: 536F Giving a cash or in kind payment
note: Providing cash or in-kind payment to an employee organisation or prohibited beneficiary is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536F(1) Giving a cash or in kind payment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person (the defendant) commits an offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536F(3) Giving a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536f-ss-3
part of: 536F Giving a cash or in kind payment
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) of section 536F
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536F(3) Giving a cash or in kind payment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536F(4) Giving a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536f-ss-4
part of: 536F Giving a cash or in kind payment
note: Definition of a cash or in kind payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.354
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536f-ss-4-norm

536G Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536g
has part: 536G(1) Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
has part: 536G(2) Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.356

536G(1) Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536g-ss-1
part of: 536G Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
note: Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment from an employee organisation's employer is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.356
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536g-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536g-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536G(1) Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536G(2) Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536g-ss-2
part of: 536G Receiving or soliciting a cash or in kind payment
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain payments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.356
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536g-ss-2-norm

536H Implied freedom of political communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536h
has part: 536H(1) Implied freedom of political communication
has part: 536H(2) Implied freedom of political communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.357

536H(1) Implied freedom of political communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536h-ss-1
part of: 536H Implied freedom of political communication
note: Implies that the Division does not apply to any extent that infringes on implied freedom of political communication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.357
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536H(1) Implied freedom of political communication
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to the extent (if any) that it would infringe any constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.
conclusion text: The Division does not apply to any extent that infringes on implied freedom of political communication.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Describes a temporal interval relationship.
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to the extent (if any) that it would infringe any constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.
conclusion text: The Division's applicability is limited by its potential infringement on implied freedom of political communication within a certain scope.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: within
logic summary: Describes an ordered temporal interval relationship.
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to the extent (if any) that it would infringe any constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.
conclusion text: The Division's applicability is limited by its potential infringement on implied freedom of political communication within a certain scope.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: within
logic summary: Describes the spread of information or influence.
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to the extent (if any) that it would infringe any constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.
conclusion text: The Division's applicability is limited by its potential infringement on implied freedom of political communication within a certain scope.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: within
logic summary: Describes the processing of knowledge or information.
premise text: (1) This Division does not apply to the extent (if any) that it would infringe any constitutional doctrine of implied freedom of political communication.
conclusion text: The Division's applicability is limited by its potential infringement on implied freedom of political communication within a certain scope.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536H(2) Implied freedom of political communication
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536h-ss-2
part of: 536H Implied freedom of political communication
note: No limitation on section 15A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.357
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes limitation on section 15A
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536J Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536j
note: Guide to this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536j-norm

536JA Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ja
note: Defines employee and employer terms for the Fair Work Act 2009.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.358
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ja-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ja-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JA Meaning of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536JB Contravening a minimum standards order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jb
note: Prohibition on contravening a minimum standards order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jb-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jb-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jb-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JB Contravening a minimum standards order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids contravention of a minimum standards order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JC The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jc
has part: 536JC(1) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
has part: 536JC(2) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359

536JC(1) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jc-ss-1
part of: 536JC The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
note: A minimum standards order does not impose obligations on a person, unless the order applies to the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jc-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JC(1) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536JC(2) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jc-ss-2
part of: 536JC The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
note: A minimum standards order does not give a person an entitlement unless the order applies to the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jc-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JC(2) The significance of a minimum standards order applying to a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536JD When a minimum standards order applies to a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jd
note: A minimum standards order applies to a regulated worker if it covers and is in operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.359
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jd-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jd-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jd-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JD When a minimum standards order applies to a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jd-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: A minimum standards order applies to a regulated worker if it covers and is in operation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JE When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536je
has part: 536JE(1) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
has part: 536JE(2) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
has part: 536JE(3) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.361

536JE(1) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536je-ss-1
part of: 536JE When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
note: A minimum standards order covers a regulated worker or business if expressed to do so.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.361
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JE(1) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JE(2) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536je-ss-2
part of: 536JE When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
note: A minimum standards order covers a regulated worker or business if it provides or has the effect of covering them under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.361
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JE(2) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
logic summary: Implies obligation
premise text: The order provides or has the effect of covering the worker or business.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to cover the worker or business.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
premise text: The order covers the worker or business if it provides or has the effect of covering them under certain conditions.
conclusion text: The coverage is during the provision or effect of the order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
premise text: The order covers the worker or business if it provides or has the effect of covering them under certain conditions.
conclusion text: The coverage is until the provision or effect of the order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Describes conditional relationship
premise text: The order covers the worker or business if it provides or has the effect of covering them under certain conditions.
conclusion text: There is a diffusion from the provision or effect of the order to the coverage.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes implication relationship
premise text: The order provides or has the effect of covering the worker or business.
conclusion text: There is an implication from the provision or effect of the order to the coverage.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JE(3) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536je-ss-3
part of: 536JE When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
note: Minimum standards order does not cover a regulated worker if any of Chapter 3A Minimum standards for regulated workers applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.361
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JE(3) When a minimum standards order covers a regulated worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Minimum standards order does not cover a regulated worker if any of Chapter 3A Minimum standards for regulated workers applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536je-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jf
has part: 536JF(1) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(2) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(2A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(3) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(3A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(4) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(5) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(6) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(6A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
has part: 536JF(7) When a minimum standards order is in operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362

536JF(1) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-1
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
note: Minimum standards order comes into operation on specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-1-norm

536JF(2) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-2
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
note: Minimum standards order must not be made before specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JF(2) When a minimum standards order is in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on making minimum standards order before specified day.
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards order is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAt
logic summary: Minimum standards order starts at specified day.
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards order is made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Minimum standards order implies a specific day for its commencement.
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards order is made.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Minimum standards order propagates to all relevant parties on specified day.
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards order is made.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Minimum standards order inference engine infers a specific day for its commencement.
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards order is made.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JF(2A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-2a
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
note: Specifies a day for an employee-like worker minimum standards order that allows sufficient time for consultation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Specifies a temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JF(3) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-3
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
note: Minimum standards order commencement delay
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JF(3A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-3a
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
note: Specify a day not earlier than 6 months after the relevant notice of intent for the order was published, if circumstances urgently require it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JF(3A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify a day not earlier than 6 months after the relevant notice of intent for the order was published.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JF(4) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-4
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
note: Conditional commencement of a minimum standards order determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-4-norm

536JF(5) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-5
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
note: Minimum standards orders operate until revoked
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Minimum standards orders operate until revoked
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JF(6) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-6
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
note: Minimum standards order continues in operation until revoked.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-6-norm

536JF(6A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-6a
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
note: Relevant notice of intent for employee-like worker minimum standards order must be published at the same time as the draft.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-6a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-6a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JF(6A) When a minimum standards order is in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish notice of intent at the same time as draft
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JF(7) When a minimum standards order is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jf-ss-7
part of: 536JF When a minimum standards order is in operation
note: Relevant notice of intent must be published at the same time as the draft order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.362
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-7-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JF(7) When a minimum standards order is in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jf-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice of intent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JG When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jg
has part: 536JG(1) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
has part: 536JG(2) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363

536JG(1) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jg-ss-1
part of: 536JG When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
note: Guidelines cover regulated workers or businesses if they explicitly state so.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JG(1) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Expressed coverage
premise text: (1) Minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if the guidelines are expressed to cover the regulated worker or the regulated business.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal coverage
premise text: (1) Minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if the guidelines are expressed to cover the regulated worker or the regulated business.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal coverage
premise text: (1) Minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if the guidelines are expressed to cover the regulated worker or the regulated business.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Information coverage
premise text: (1) Minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if the guidelines are expressed to cover the regulated worker or the regulated business.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Artificial intelligence coverage
premise text: (1) Minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if the guidelines are expressed to cover the regulated worker or the regulated business.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536JG(2) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jg-ss-2
part of: 536JG When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
note: Guidelines cover regulated workers or businesses under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.363
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JG(2) When minimum standards guidelines cover a regulated
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
logic summary: Regulated worker or business must meet guidelines.
premise text: (2) Minimum standards guidelines also cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the guidelines cover the regulated worker or the regulated business:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision of this Act.
premise text: (2) Minimum standards guidelines also cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the guidelines cover the regulated worker or the regulated business:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision of this Act.
premise text: (2) Minimum standards guidelines also cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the guidelines cover the regulated worker or the regulated business:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision of this Act.
premise text: (2) Minimum standards guidelines also cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the guidelines cover the regulated worker or the regulated business:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jg-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Guidelines apply during the provision of this Act.
premise text: (2) Minimum standards guidelines also cover a regulated worker or a regulated business if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the guidelines cover the regulated worker or the regulated business:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jh
has part: 536JH(1) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
has part: 536JH(2) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
has part: 536JH(3) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
has part: 536JH(4) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
has part: 536JH(5) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364

536JH(1) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jh-ss-1
part of: 536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
note: Minimum standards guidelines come into operation on the specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-1-norm

536JH(2) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jh-ss-2
part of: 536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
note: Minimum standards guidelines must not be earlier than the day they are made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JH(2) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition on early implementation
premise text: (2) The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the minimum standards guidelines are made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JH(3) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jh-ss-3
part of: 536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
note: Determination takes effect on specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Determination takes effect during specified day
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JH(4) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jh-ss-4
part of: 536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
note: Minimum standards guidelines cannot be earlier than the day of determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JH(4) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: The specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the determination is made.
conclusion text: Minimum standards guidelines cannot be earlier than the day of determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JH(5) When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jh-ss-5
part of: 536JH When minimum standards guidelines are in operation
note: Minimum standards guidelines continue in operation until revoked.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.364
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jh-ss-5-norm

536JJ Contravening a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jj
note: Prohibition on contravening a collective agreement term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jj-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jj-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jj-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JJ Contravening a collective agreement
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jj-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JK The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jk
has part: 536JK(1) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
has part: 536JK(2) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365

536JK(1) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jk-ss-1
part of: 536JK The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
note: A collective agreement imposes obligations on a person unless the agreement applies to the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JK(1) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If A, then B.
premise text: (A) Collective agreement does not impose obligations on a person, and a person does not contravene a term of a collective agreement, unless the agreement applies to the person.
conclusion text: (B) A collective agreement imposes obligations on a person unless the agreement applies to the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: A and B overlap if there exists a time interval I such that A starts before I ends and I ends after B starts.
premise text: (1) Collective agreement does not impose obligations on a person, and a person does not contravene a term of a collective agreement, unless the agreement applies to the person.
conclusion text: (2) The agreement applies to the person if and only if the person is subject to the agreement during some time interval I.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: A holds until B if A starts before B ends.
premise text: (1) Collective agreement does not impose obligations on a person, and a person does not contravene a term of a collective agreement, unless the agreement applies to the person.
conclusion text: (2) The agreement imposes obligations on a person only during some time interval I.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: A diffuses B if every instance of A is an instance of B.
premise text: (1) Collective agreement does not impose obligations on a person, and a person does not contravene a term of a collective agreement, unless the agreement applies to the person.
conclusion text: (2) The agreement applies to all persons if and only if every person is subject to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IsA
logic summary: A is a subclass of B if A is an instance of B.
premise text: (1) Collective agreement does not impose obligations on a person, and a person does not contravene a term of a collective agreement, unless the agreement applies to the person.
conclusion text: (2) The agreement is a rule that governs the behavior of persons if and only if every person is subject to the agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JK(2) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jk-ss-2
part of: 536JK The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
note: Entitlement requires application to the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JK(2) The significance of a collective agreement applying to a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires application for entitlement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JL When a collective agreement applies to a person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jl
note: A collective agreement applies to a regulated worker if it covers and is in operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.365
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jl-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jl-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jl-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JL When a collective agreement applies to a person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jl-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: and
logic summary: Multiple conditions for applicability
premise text: (a) The collective agreement covers the regulated worker; (b) The collective agreement is in operation; (c) No other provision of this Act provides, or has the effect, that the collective agreement does not apply to the regulated worker.
conclusion text: The collective agreement applies to the regulated worker if it meets all conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JM When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jm
has part: 536JM(1) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
has part: 536JM(2) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
has part: 536JM(3) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
has part: 536JM(4) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366

536JM(1) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jm-ss-1
part of: 536JM When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
note: A collective agreement covers a regulated worker, business or organisation if the agreement is expressed to cover.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JM(1) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JM(2) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jm-ss-2
part of: 536JM When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
note: A collective agreement covers a regulated worker, business or organisation if it provides or has the effect that it covers them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JM(2) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Provision of Act implies coverage
premise text: Provision of Act
conclusion text: Coverage of regulated worker, business or organisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JM(3) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jm-ss-3
part of: 536JM When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
note: A collective agreement does not cover a regulated worker, business or organisation if any of the following provides, or has the effect, that the agreement does not cover.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JM(3) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JM(4) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jm-ss-4
part of: 536JM When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
note: Collective agreement no longer covers regulated worker, business or organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.366
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JM(4) When a collective agreement covers a regulated worker, a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits collective agreement coverage
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: a collective agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover regulated worker, a regulated business or an organisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Exclude
logic summary: Excludes collective agreement coverage during cessation period
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: a collective agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover regulated worker, a regulated business or an organisation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recur
logic summary: Recurring exclusion of collective agreement coverage during cessation period
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: a collective agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover regulated worker, a regulated business or an organisation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagate
logic summary: Diffuses exclusion of collective agreement coverage during cessation period
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: a collective agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover regulated worker, a regulated business or an organisation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jm-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analyzes exclusion of collective agreement coverage during cessation period
premise text: (4) Despite subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: a collective agreement that has ceased to operate does not cover regulated worker, a regulated business or an organisation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JN When a collective agreement is in operation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jn
note: Collective agreement comes into operation on registration day or specified later day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.367
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JN When a collective agreement is in operation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Collective agreement comes into operation on registration day or specified later day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jn-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JP Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jp
note: Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws from affecting regulated workers, businesses, or parties to services contracts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.369
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JP Exclusion of certain State and Territory laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes certain laws from affecting regulated entities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jp-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassHierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class/type/subclass hierarchies.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JQ What are workplace relations matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jq
has part: 536JQ(1) What are workplace relations matters
has part: 536JQ(2) What are workplace relations matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371

536JQ(1) What are workplace relations matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jq-ss-1
part of: 536JQ What are workplace relations matters
note: Defines workplace relations matters for the purposes of this Chapter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jq-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jq-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JQ(1) What are workplace relations matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536JQ(2) What are workplace relations matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jq-ss-2
part of: 536JQ What are workplace relations matters
note: Exclusion of certain matters from workplace relations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.371
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jq-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JQ(2) What are workplace relations matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536JR What is an unfairness ground
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jr
has part: 536JR(1) What is an unfairness ground
has part: 536JR(2) What is an unfairness ground
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372

536JR(1) What is an unfairness ground
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jr-ss-1
part of: 536JR What is an unfairness ground
note: Unfairness grounds in relation to a services contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JR(1) What is an unfairness ground
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Grounds for unfairness
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JR(2) What is an unfairness ground
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jr-ss-2
part of: 536JR What is an unfairness ground
note: Grounds specified in subsection (1) are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.372
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Excluding certain grounds from unfairness grounds
premise text: Subsection (1) specifies grounds for unfairness
conclusion text: These grounds are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between grounds and non-workplace relations matters
premise text: Subsection (1) specifies grounds for unfairness
conclusion text: These grounds are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: contains
logic summary: Temporal containment of non-workplace relations matters within grounds
premise text: Subsection (1) specifies grounds for unfairness
conclusion text: These grounds are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of non-workplace relations matters through grounds
premise text: Subsection (1) specifies grounds for unfairness
conclusion text: These grounds are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jr-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of non-workplace relations matters through grounds
premise text: Subsection (1) specifies grounds for unfairness
conclusion text: These grounds are not unfairness grounds to the extent that they relate to matters not covered by workplace relations.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536JS Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536js
has part: 536JS(1) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
has part: 536JS(1A) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
has part: 536JS(2) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
has part: 536JS(3) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373

536JS(1) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536js-ss-1
part of: 536JS Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
note: Minimum standards order prevails over State law to extent of inconsistency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >!
logic summary: Overriding power
premise text: Minimum standards order
conclusion text: State law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JS(1A) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536js-ss-1a
part of: 536JS Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
note: Chapter applies to the exclusion of other laws affecting employee-like worker rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JS(1A) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Chapter applies to the exclusion of other laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JS(2) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536js-ss-2
part of: 536JS Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
note: Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and Territory laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Term applies to specified State or Territory law
premise text: (a) a law of a State or Territory specified in regulations...
conclusion text: ...to the extent that the law is so specified;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JS(3) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536js-ss-3
part of: 536JS Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
note: Reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument made pursuant to a law of a State or Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.373
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JS(3) Interaction of minimum standards orders with State and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Reference to a regulation, rule or other instrument made pursuant to a law of a State or Territory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Explicit class/type/subclass hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536js-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JT Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jt
has part: 536JT(1) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
has part: 536JT(2) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
has part: 536JT(3) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
has part: 536JT(4) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374

536JT(1) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jt-ss-1
part of: 536JT Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
note: Authorises collective agreements under specific circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows collective agreements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536JT(2) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jt-ss-2
part of: 536JT Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
note: Authorisation of conduct for making collective agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JT(2) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Specify and authorise conduct
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection 51(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JT(3) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jt-ss-3
part of: 536JT Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
note: Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Specify conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JT(4) Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jt-ss-4
part of: 536JT Authorisation of conduct for the purposes of the Competition
note: Conduct is not specified in or specifically authorised by this Act if it satisfies certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.374
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Indicates permission to engage in conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536JV Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jv
note: Sets minimum standards for regulated workers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jv-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jv-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JV Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536JW Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jw
note: Defines employee and employer terms for minimum standards regulation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.376
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jw-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jw-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jw-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JW Meaning of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines key terms with ordinary meanings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536JX The minimum standards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jx
note: The FWC must take into account the need for minimum standards for regulated workers.
description: clear and simple standards, fair and relevant standards, standards that recognize the perspectives of regulated workers, etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.377
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jx-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jx-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jx-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jx-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must take into account...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jx-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: The standards must be clear and simple.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JY Minimum standards orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jy
has part: 536JY(1) Minimum standards orders
has part: 536JY(2) Minimum standards orders
has part: 536JY(3) Minimum standards orders
has part: 536JY(4) Minimum standards orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379

536JY(1) Minimum standards orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jy-ss-1
part of: 536JY Minimum standards orders
note: FWC may make minimum standards orders for employee-like workers and regulated road transport contractors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JY(1) Minimum standards orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JY(2) Minimum standards orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jy-ss-2
part of: 536JY Minimum standards orders
note: Minimum standards order for employee-like workers is an obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JY(2) Minimum standards orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of minimum standards order
conclusion text: employee-like worker minimum standards order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JY(3) Minimum standards orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jy-ss-3
part of: 536JY Minimum standards orders
note: A minimum standards order for regulated road transport contractors is a road transport minimum standards order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JY(3) Minimum standards orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the type of obligation.
conclusion text: road transport minimum standards order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JY(4) Minimum standards orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jy-ss-4
part of: 536JY Minimum standards orders
note: FWC may make minimum standards order on its own initiative or on application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JY(4) Minimum standards orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jy-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to make minimum standards order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536JZ Applications for minimum standards orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536jz
note: Organisations may apply for minimum standards orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.379
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 536JZ Applications for minimum standards orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Organisations may apply for minimum standards orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536jz-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536K Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536k
has part: 536K(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
has part: 536K(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
has part: 536K(3) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
has part: 536K(4) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380

536K(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536k-ss-1
part of: 536K Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
note: Publish notice of intent and draft proposed order before making employee-like worker minimum standards order. FWC must take into account certain matters when making a decision on employee-like worker minimum standards orders.
description: Notice of intent, draft order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536K(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish notice and draft before making order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536K(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536k-ss-2
part of: 536K Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
note: Publish notice and draft order on website and other means. Consider persons included in class of employee-like workers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536K(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: PUBLISH
logic summary: Publishing requirement
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a decision
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536K(3) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536k-ss-3
part of: 536K Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
note: FWC must decide to refuse to consider an application if not satisfied about employee-like workers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536K(3) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to decide
conclusion text: FWC must decide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classification of FWC's decision-making process
premise text: FWC is responsible for making decisions
conclusion text: Decision-making process is about employee-like workers
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536K(4) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536k-ss-4
part of: 536K Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
note: FWC must engage with parties and follow consultation process before making or varying employee-like worker minimum standards order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.380
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536K(4) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536k-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to engage with parties and follow consultation process.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KA Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ka
has part: 536KA(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
has part: 536KA(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384

536KA(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ka-ss-1
part of: 536KA Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
note: FWC must take into account certain matters when making a road transport minimum standards order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KA(1) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider certain matters
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport minimum standards order...
conclusion text: ...the FWC must take into account these matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation between consideration and action
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport minimum standards order...
conclusion text: ...the FWC must take into account these matters.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Inference from consideration to action
premise text: (a) an application is made for a road transport minimum standards order...
conclusion text: ...the FWC must take into account these matters.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Spread of consideration to other orders
premise text: (b) the FWC is considering making or varying a minimum standards order...
conclusion text: ...the FWC must take into account these matters.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Classification of AI systems in relation to consideration
premise text: (b) the FWC is considering making or varying a minimum standards order...
conclusion text: ...the FWC must take into account these matters.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KA(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ka-ss-2
part of: 536KA Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
note: FWC must consult parties and Road Transport Advisory Group before making or varying road transport minimum standards orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.384
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KA(2) Particular matters FWC must take into account in making a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult parties and Road Transport Advisory Group.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: FWC must have regard to commercial realities of the road transport industry.
premise text: (d) must have regard to the commercial realities of the road transport industry; and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC must be satisfied that making or varying the road transport minimum standards order will not unduly affect the viability and competitiveness of owner drivers or other similar persons.
premise text: (e) must be satisfied that making or varying the road transport minimum standards order will not unduly affect the viability and competitiveness of owner drivers or other similar persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: FWC must consult parties to be covered.
premise text: (a) must not make or vary the road transport minimum standards order unless there has been genuine engagement with the parties to be covered; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KB FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kb
has part: 536KB(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
has part: 536KB(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385

536KB(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kb-ss-1
part of: 536KB FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
note: Publish a notice of intent and a draft of the proposed road transport minimum standards order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KB(1) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish a notice of intent and a draft.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KB(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kb-ss-2
part of: 536KB FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
note: FWC must publish notice and draft on website and other means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KB(2) FWC to prepare and publish a draft of a road transport
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kb-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Subject: FWC
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KC Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kc
has part: 536KC(1) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
has part: 536KC(2) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
has part: 536KC(3) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385

536KC(1) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kc-ss-1
part of: 536KC Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
note: Ensure affected entities have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KC(1) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure affected entities have a reasonable opportunity to make written submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KC(2) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kc-ss-2
part of: 536KC Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
note: The FWC must publish submissions made to the FWC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KC(2) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KC(3) Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kc-ss-3
part of: 536KC Affected persons and bodies to have a reasonable
note: The FWC may decide not to publish confidential or commercially sensitive information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.385
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withhold information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classifies information as confidential or commercially sensitive
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KD Hearings in relation to draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kd
note: The FWC may hold a hearing in relation to a draft order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kd-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kd-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KD Hearings in relation to draft order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536KE Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ke
has part: 536KE(1) Finalising draft order
has part: 536KE(2) Finalising draft order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386

536KE(1) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ke-ss-1
part of: 536KE Finalising draft order
note: The FWC may make changes to a draft order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-1-norm

536KE(2) Finalising draft order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ke-ss-2
part of: 536KE Finalising draft order
note: If changes are significant, FWC must decide not to make order and publish revised draft.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.386
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ke-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: 12-month period of consultation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KF Decision not to make order based on the draft
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kf
note: Publish notice of decision on website and other means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kf-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kf-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kf-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kf-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kf-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Subdivision E—Decisions on minimum standards orders
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KG Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kg
has part: 536KG(1) Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
has part: 536KG(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387

536KG(1) Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kg-ss-1
part of: 536KG Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
note: Decision on application for minimum standards order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Decision to refuse or make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KG(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kg-ss-2
part of: 536KG Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
note: Refusal of application based on prioritisation direction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.387
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KG(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Prioritisation direction
conclusion text: Refusal of application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kh
has part: 536KH(1) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
has part: 536KH(2) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
has part: 536KH(3) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
has part: 536KH(4) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
has part: 536KH(5) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388

536KH(1) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kh-ss-1
part of: 536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
note: Employee-like worker minimum standards order must include specific terms.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KH(1) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide specified terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KH(2) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kh-ss-2
part of: 536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
note: Employee-like worker minimum standards order must cover specified digital labour platform operators and employee-like workers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KH(2) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: covers
logic summary: Class hierarchy application
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KH(3) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kh-ss-3
part of: 536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
note: Specify digital labour platform operators responsible for employee-like worker entitlements.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KH(3) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify digital labour platform operators
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KH(4) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kh-ss-4
part of: 536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
note: Digital labour platform operators and employee-like workers must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or classes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requirement
logic summary: A requirement exists for digital labour platform operators and employee-like workers to be specified.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KH(5) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kh-ss-5
part of: 536KH Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
note: Class description must include industry or sector reference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.388
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KH(5) Terms that must be included in an employee-like worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kh-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must include
logic summary: Class description requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KJ Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kj
has part: 536KJ(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
has part: 536KJ(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
has part: 536KJ(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
has part: 536KJ(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389

536KJ(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kj-ss-1
part of: 536KJ Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
note: Must include terms in road transport minimum standards order
description: (a) the work in the road transport industry covered by the road transport minimum standards order; (b) the regulated road transport contractors covered by the road transport minimum standards order; (c) the road transport businesses covered by the road transport minimum standards order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KJ(1) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must include terms
premise text: (a) the work in the road transport industry covered by the road transport minimum standards order; (b) the regulated road transport contractors covered by the road transport minimum standards order; (c) the road transport businesses covered by the road transport minimum standards order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: COVERS
logic summary: Covers work in road transport industry
premise text: (a) the work in the road transport industry covered by the road transport minimum standards order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: COVERS
logic summary: Covers regulated road transport contractors
premise text: (b) the regulated road transport contractors covered by the road transport minimum standards order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must include terms
premise text: (c) the road transport businesses covered by the road transport minimum standards order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KJ(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kj-ss-2
part of: 536KJ Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
note: Must include specified road transport businesses and contractors in a minimum standards order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KJ(2) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KJ(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kj-ss-3
part of: 536KJ Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
note: Road transport businesses must be specified by inclusion in a specified class or classes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KJ(3) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be specified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KJ(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kj-ss-4
part of: 536KJ Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
note: Class description may be by reference to industry or sector
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.389
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-4-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kj-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KJ(4) Terms that must be included in a road transport minimum
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536KK Term about settling disputes must be included in a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kk
note: A minimum standards order must include a term that provides a procedure for settling disputes about any matters arising under the order.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kk-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kk-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kk-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KK Term about settling disputes must be included in a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a procedure for settling disputes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KL Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kl
has part: 536KL(1) Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
has part: 536KL(2) Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390

536KL(1) Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kl-ss-1
part of: 536KL Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
note: Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KL(1) Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes terms about payment terms, deductions, etc.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlapsWith
logic summary: Overlaps with record-keeping in relation to matters covered by the Act
premise text: (d) record-keeping in relation to matters covered by or required by this Act, or by an order or instrument made under this Act, being matters that concern regulated workers or regulated businesses;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursDuring
logic summary: Occurs during the implementation of minimum standards orders
premise text: (1) A minimum standards order may include terms about any of the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KL(2) Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kl-ss-2
part of: 536KL Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
note: No limitation on terms in minimum standards order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kl-ss-2-norm

536KM Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536km
has part: 536KM(1) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
has part: 536KM(3) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390

536KM(1) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536km-ss-1
part of: 536KM Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
note: Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards order Terms about penalty rates, payment for time before or between engagements, and minimum engagement periods must not be included in an employee-like worker minimum standards order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KM(1) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of certain terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal exclusion
logic summary: Temporal exclusion for certain matters
premise text: (f) a matter prescribed by the regulations, or belonging to a class of matter prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Excluded matters are excluded from the scope of the minimum standards order
premise text: (a) overtime rates; (b) rostering arrangements; (c) matters that are primarily of a commercial nature that do not affect the terms and conditions of engagement of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order; (d) a term that would change the form of the engagement or the status of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order including, but not limited to, a term that deems a regulated worker to be an employee; (e) a matter relating to work health and safety that is otherwise comprehensively dealt with by a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Excluded matters are diffused throughout the minimum standards order
premise text: (a) overtime rates; (b) rostering arrangements; (c) matters that are primarily of a commercial nature that do not affect the terms and conditions of engagement of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order; (d) a term that would change the form of the engagement or the status of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order including, but not limited to, a term that deems a regulated worker to be an employee; (e) a matter relating to work health and safety that is otherwise comprehensively dealt with by a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classification
logic summary: Excluded matters are classified as such
premise text: (a) overtime rates; (b) rostering arrangements; (c) matters that are primarily of a commercial nature that do not affect the terms and conditions of engagement of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order; (d) a term that would change the form of the engagement or the status of regulated workers covered by the minimum standards order including, but not limited to, a term that deems a regulated worker to be an employee; (e) a matter relating to work health and safety that is otherwise comprehensively dealt with by a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbidden
logic summary: Prohibition of specific terms
premise text: The state prohibits the inclusion of these terms.
conclusion text: These terms must not be included.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KM(3) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536km-ss-3
part of: 536KM Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
note: Regulations may specify matters not covered by Commonwealth, State or Territory laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.390
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KM(3) Terms that must not be included in a minimum standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536km-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies
logic summary: Regulations may specify matters not covered by laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536KN Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kn
has part: 536KN(1) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
has part: 536KN(2) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392

536KN(1) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kn-ss-1
part of: 536KN Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
note: Cannot include certain matters in a road transport minimum standards order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KN(1) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits including certain matters in a road transport minimum standards order.
premise text: (1) In addition to the matters in section 536KM, a road transport minimum standards order must not include terms about any of the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes certain matters from being included in a road transport minimum standards order due to temporal overlap.
premise text: (b) a matter prescribed by the regulations, or belonging to a class of matter prescribed by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes certain matters from being included in a road transport minimum standards order due to temporal overlap.
premise text: (b) a matter prescribed by the regulations, or belonging to a class of matter prescribed by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes certain matters from being included in a road transport minimum standards order due to temporal overlap.
premise text: (b) a matter prescribed by the regulations, or belonging to a class of matter prescribed by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classifies certain matters as prohibited in a road transport minimum standards order using artificial intelligence.
premise text: (a) a matter relating to road transport that is otherwise comprehensively dealt with: (i) by the Heavy Vehicle National Law as set out in the Schedule to the Heavy Vehicle National Law Act 2012 (Qld); or (ii) by another law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KN(2) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kn-ss-2
part of: 536KN Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
note: Regulations may specify matters dealt with comprehensively by the Heavy Vehicle National Law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.392
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KN(2) Further terms that must not be included in a road transport
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Heavy Vehicle National Law Act 2012 (Qld)
conclusion text: Schedule to the Heavy Vehicle National Law Act 2012 (Qld)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Heavy Vehicle National Law Act 2012 (Qld)
conclusion text: Schedule to the Heavy Vehicle National Law Act 2012 (Qld)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kn-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibition on including certain matters in regulations
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b):
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536KO Achieving the minimum standards objective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ko
note: Terms that may be included in a minimum standards order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ko-norm

536KP Applications to vary or revoke minimum standards orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kp
note: Organisations and businesses can apply for a determination to vary or revoke minimum standards orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kp-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kp-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kp-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KP Applications to vary or revoke minimum standards orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows the FWC to vary or revoke minimum standards orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KQ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards orders if
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kq
note: FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards orders if consistent with the minimum standards objective.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.393
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kq-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kq-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KQ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards orders if
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536KR Minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kr
has part: 536KR(1) Minimum standards guidelines
has part: 536KR(2) Minimum standards guidelines
has part: 536KR(3) Minimum standards guidelines
has part: 536KR(4) Minimum standards guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419

536KR(1) Minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kr-ss-1
part of: 536KR Minimum standards guidelines
note: The FWC may make minimum standards guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KR(1) Minimum standards guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536KR(2) Minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kr-ss-2
part of: 536KR Minimum standards guidelines
note: Minimum standards guidelines for employee-like workers are employee-like worker guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KR(2) Minimum standards guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide minimum standards guidelines
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KR(3) Minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kr-ss-3
part of: 536KR Minimum standards guidelines
note: Minimum standards guidelines for regulated road transport contractors are road transport guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KR(3) Minimum standards guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide minimum standards guidelines
premise text: (3) Minimum standards guidelines for regulated road transport contractors are road transport guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KR(4) Minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kr-ss-4
part of: 536KR Minimum standards guidelines
note: FWC may make minimum standards guidelines under this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kr-ss-4-norm

536KS Applications for minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ks
note: Organisations and businesses may apply for minimum standards guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.419
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-descriptionlogic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Organisations and businesses may apply for minimum standards guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ks-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isA
logic summary: Classification
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KT Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kt
has part: 536KT(1) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
has part: 536KT(2) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
has part: 536KT(3) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420

536KT(1) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kt-ss-1
part of: 536KT Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
note: This section applies to a decision to make or vary employee-like worker guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KT(1) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The section applies to a decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KT(2) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kt-ss-2
part of: 536KT Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
note: Consider persons included in class of employee-like workers before making a decision under section 536KU.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KT(2) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider persons included in class of employee-like workers
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...
conclusion text: The FWC MUST consider whether, on the whole, the persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Consider persons included in class of employee-like workers is a requirement for decision-making under section 536KU
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...
conclusion text: The persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consideration of persons included in class of employee-like workers
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...
conclusion text: The FWC considers whether, on the whole, the persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Recurring consideration of persons included in class of employee-like workers
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...
conclusion text: The FWC considers whether, on the whole, the persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Diffusion of consideration to persons included in class of employee-like workers
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...
conclusion text: The FWC considers whether, on the whole, the persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
logic summary: Recognition of persons included in class of employee-like workers
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under section 536KU, the FWC must...
conclusion text: The FWC recognizes whether, on the whole, the persons included (or purportedly included) in the class of employee-like workers to be covered by the minimum standards guidelines, or the guidelines as proposed to be varied, are employee-like workers.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KT(3) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kt-ss-3
part of: 536KT Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
note: FWC must decide to refuse or not consider the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KT(3) Initial matter to be considered for employee-like worker
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must decide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kt-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Class of employee-like workers
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KU Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ku
has part: 536KU(1) Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
has part: 536KU(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420

536KU(1) Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ku-ss-1
part of: 536KU Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
note: The FWC may decide to refuse, make, or not make minimum standards guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The FWC may decide to refuse, make, or not make minimum standards guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: The FWC may decide to refuse, make, or not make minimum standards guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KU(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ku-ss-2
part of: 536KU Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
note: Refusal of application based on prioritisation direction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.420
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KU(2) Decisions on applications for minimum standards guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ku-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Prioritisation direction
conclusion text: Refusal of application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KV Minimum standards guidelines not to be made if a minimum
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kv
note: No minimum standards guidelines can be made for regulated workers and businesses under the same matters as an existing order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KV Minimum standards guidelines not to be made if a minimum
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kv-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During the operation of an existing order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KW Terms that must be included in minimum standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kw
note: Minimum standards guidelines must include specific terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kw-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kw-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kw-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KW Terms that must be included in minimum standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KX Terms that may be included in minimum standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kx
note: Terms that may be included in minimum standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.421
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kx-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kx-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kx-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the type of obligation or prohibition
premise text: None
conclusion text: Obligation/Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KY Terms that must not be included in minimum standards
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ky
note: Terms that must not be included in minimum standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ky-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ky-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KY Terms that must not be included in minimum standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kz
has part: 536KZ(1) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
has part: 536KZ(2) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
has part: 536KZ(3) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
has part: 536KZ(4) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
has part: 536KZ(5) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
has part: 536KZ(6) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422

536KZ(1) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-1
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
note: FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if consistent with certain objectives.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KZ(1) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Allowance of variation or revocation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC's decision and objectives
premise text: (1) The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking minimum standards guidelines if the FWC is satisfied that making the determination is consistent with:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between FWC's decision and objectives
premise text: (1) The FWC may make a determination varying or revoking minimum standards guidelines if the FWC is satisfied that making the determination is consistent with:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Propagation of FWC's decision to related objectives
premise text: (b) if the President considers that the determination might relate to the road transport industry—the road transport objective.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Use of artificial intelligence in FWC's decision-making process
premise text: (b) if the President considers that the determination might relate to the road transport industry—the road transport objective.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536KZ(2) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-2
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
note: FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KZ(2) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Allowance of variation in minimum standards guidelines
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536KZ(3) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-3
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
note: FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if necessary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KZ(3) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536KZ(4) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-4
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
note: FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KZ(4) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to vary or revoke guidelines
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KZ(5) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-5
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
note: FWC must revoke minimum standards guidelines upon operation of minimum standards order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-5-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KZ(5) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to revoke guidelines
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536KZ(6) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536kz-ss-6
part of: 536KZ FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
note: FWC must vary minimum standards guidelines if a new order is made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.422
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-6-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536KZ(6) FWC may vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines if
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536kz-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to vary guidelines
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536L Applications to vary or revoke minimum standards guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536l
note: Organisations and businesses may apply for a determination varying or revoking minimum standards guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.423
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536l-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536l-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536l-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for a determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LB Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lb
note: Guides this Part about unfair deactivation and termination of services contracts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lb-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LB Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536LC Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lc
has part: 536LC(1) Object of this Part
has part: 536LC(2) Object of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424

536LC(1) Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lc-ss-1
part of: 536LC Object of this Part
note: Establishes a framework for dealing with unfair deactivation and termination of regulated workers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LC(1) Object of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishes a framework for dealing with unfair deactivation and termination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LC(2) Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lc-ss-2
part of: 536LC Object of this Part
note: Ensure a fair go all round for regulated businesses and workers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.424
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LC(2) Object of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Ensure a fair go all round
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LD When a person is protected from unfair deactivation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ld
note: Protection from unfair deactivation for employees-like workers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-alleninterval-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LD When a person is protected from unfair deactivation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Protection from unfair deactivation for employees-like workers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Employee-like worker
conclusion text: Protected from unfair deactivation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ld-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Regular work period
premise text: 6 months of regular work
conclusion text: Eligible for protection
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LE When a person is protected from unfair termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536le
note: Protection from unfair termination for regulated road transport contractors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.426
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LE When a person is protected from unfair termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: The person has been performing work in the road transport industry under a services contract for at least 6 months.
conclusion text: The period of service is at least 6 months.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536le-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Duty
premise text: A person is protected from unfair termination at a time if...
conclusion text: There is an obligation to protect the person from unfair termination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LF What is an unfair deactivation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lf
note: A person has been unfairly deactivated if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LF What is an unfair deactivation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The FWC must have reason to believe
premise text: the person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform
conclusion text: the FWC is satisfied that the person has been unfairly deactivated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must-not
logic summary: The FWC must not have reason to believe the person has been unfairly deactivated
premise text: the FWC is satisfied that the person has been unfairly deactivated
conclusion text: the deactivation was unfair
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must-have
logic summary: The FWC must have reason to believe the person has been unfairly deactivated
premise text: the person has been unfairly deactivated
conclusion text: the FWC is satisfied that the person has been unfairly deactivated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lf-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must-have
logic summary: The FWC must have reason to believe the deactivation was unfair
premise text: the deactivation was not consistent with the Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code
conclusion text: the deactivation was unfair
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LG Meaning of deactivated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lg
note: A person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-ltl-5
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-deontic-6

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the person as deactivated based on conditions
premise text: The person performed digital platform work through or by means of the digital labour platform.
conclusion text: The person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the digital labour platform operator as responsible for modifying, suspending, or terminating access
premise text: The digital labour platform operator modified, suspended, or terminated the person’s access to the digital labour platform.
conclusion text: The person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the person as unable to perform work due to significant alteration of ability
premise text: The person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract, or the ability of the person to do so is so significantly altered that in effect the person is no longer able to perform such work.
conclusion text: The person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Describes the temporal interval during which the person was deactivated
premise text: A person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform if: (a) the person performed digital platform work through or by means of the digital labour platform; and (b) the digital labour platform operator modified, suspended, or terminated the person’s access to the digital labour platform; and (c) the person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract, or the ability of the person to do so is so significantly altered that in effect the person is no longer able to perform such work.
conclusion text: The period during which the person was deactivated
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the conditions and the consequence of being deactivated
premise text: A person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform if: (a) the person performed digital platform work through or by means of the digital labour platform; and (b) the digital labour platform operator modified, suspended, or terminated the person’s access to the digital labour platform; and (c) the person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract, or the ability of the person to do so is so significantly altered that in effect the person is no longer able to perform such work.
conclusion text: The conditions imply that the person was deactivated
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lg-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the obligation as a duty of the digital labour platform operator
premise text: A person has been deactivated from a digital labour platform if: (a) the person performed digital platform work through or by means of the digital labour platform; and (b) the digital labour platform operator modified, suspended, or terminated the person’s access to the digital labour platform; and (c) the person is no longer able to perform work under an existing or prospective services contract, or the ability of the person to do so is so significantly altered that in effect the person is no longer able to perform such work.
conclusion text: The digital labour platform operator has a duty to deactivate the person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LH Criteria for considering whether a deactivation was unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lh
note: Criteria for considering whether a deactivation was unfair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.427
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lh-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lh-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LH Criteria for considering whether a deactivation was unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536LJ Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lj
has part: 536LJ(1) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
has part: 536LJ(2) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
has part: 536LJ(2A) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
has part: 536LJ(2B) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429

536LJ(1) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lj-ss-1
part of: 536LJ Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
note: Minister must make Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make code
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LJ(2) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lj-ss-2
part of: 536LJ Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
note: Minister must deal with specified matters in the Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LJ(2) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must deal with specified matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LJ(2A) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lj-ss-2a
part of: 536LJ Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
note: Public consultation requirement before code development
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct public consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LJ(2B) Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lj-ss-2b
part of: 536LJ Minister to make a Digital Labour Platform Deactivation
note: Variation or revocation of Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.429
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lj-ss-2b-norm

536LK What is an unfair termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lk
note: Termination is unfair if it does not comply with the Road Transport Industry Termination Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lk-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lk-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LK What is an unfair termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536LL Meaning of terminated
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ll
note: Terminated person performed work as a regulated road transport contractor under a services contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.430
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ll-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ll-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LL Meaning of terminated
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536LM Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lm
has part: 536LM(1) Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
has part: 536LM(2) Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431

536LM(1) Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lm-ss-1
part of: 536LM Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
note: Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LM(1) Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536LM(2) Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lm-ss-2
part of: 536LM Criteria for considering whether a termination was unfair
note: Termination due to serious misconduct is not considered unfair.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits termination due to serious misconduct.
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1) and any other provision of this Part, a termination that occurs because of serious misconduct of the person who was deactivated is not unfair.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for consideration of termination fairness.
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1) and any other provision of this Part, a termination that occurs because of serious misconduct of the person who was deactivated is not unfair.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines termination condition for unfairness consideration.
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1) and any other provision of this Part, a termination that occurs because of serious misconduct of the person who was deactivated is not unfair.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Applies to termination fairness consideration.
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1) and any other provision of this Part, a termination that occurs because of serious misconduct of the person who was deactivated is not unfair.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lm-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: AppliesTo
logic summary: Defines termination fairness consideration.
premise text: (2) Despite subsection (1) and any other provision of this Part, a termination that occurs because of serious misconduct of the person who was deactivated is not unfair.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536LN Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ln
has part: 536LN(1) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
has part: 536LN(2) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
has part: 536LN(3) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431

536LN(1) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ln-ss-1
part of: 536LN Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
note: Minister has permission to make a code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Expresses permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LN(2) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ln-ss-2
part of: 536LN Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
note: Matters that must be dealt with in the Road Transport Industry Termination Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-2-norm

536LN(3) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ln-ss-3
part of: 536LN Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
note: Regulated road transport business must meet minimum standards for workers before termination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.431
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LN(3) Minister to make Road Transport Industry Termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ln-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated road transport business must meet minimum standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LP When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lp
has part: 536LP(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
has part: 536LP(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
has part: 536LP(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433

536LP(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lp-ss-1
part of: 536LP When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
note: The FWC may order a person's reactivation if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LP(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LP(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lp-ss-2
part of: 536LP When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
note: The FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation if an application under section 536LU is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LP(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may order remedy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LP(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lp-ss-3
part of: 536LP When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
note: FWC cannot order payment of compensation to the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LP(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair deactivation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on ordering compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LQ Remedy—reactivation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lq
note: Digital labour platform operator must restore person to previous position after reactivation order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.433
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lq-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lq-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lq-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Digital labour platform operator must restore person to previous position
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LR When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lr
has part: 536LR(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
has part: 536LR(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
has part: 536LR(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435

536LR(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lr-ss-1
part of: 536LR When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
note: FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LR(1) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to provide remedy
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LR(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lr-ss-2
part of: 536LR When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
note: The FWC may order remedy for unfair termination if an application under section 536LU is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LR(2) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may order remedy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LR(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lr-ss-3
part of: 536LR When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
note: FWC must consider payment of compensation before ordering it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LR(3) When the FWC may order remedy for unfair termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider payment of compensation.
premise text: FWC must not order the payment of compensation to the person unless...
conclusion text: FWC must consider payment of compensation before ordering it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536LS Remedy—new contract, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ls
has part: 536LS(1) Remedy—new contract, etc.
has part: 536LS(2) Remedy—new contract, etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435

536LS(1) Remedy—new contract, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ls-ss-1
part of: 536LS Remedy—new contract, etc.
note: Road transport business must enter into a new contract in the same terms as the services contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LS(1) Remedy—new contract, etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to enter into a new contract
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LS(2) Remedy—new contract, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ls-ss-2
part of: 536LS Remedy—new contract, etc.
note: If road transport business is no longer a road transport business, an associated entity must be a road transport business.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.435
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LS(2) Remedy—new contract, etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ls-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (a) the road transport business at the time of the termination is no longer a road transport business;
conclusion text: (b) an associated entity of the road transport business is a road transport business;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LT Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lt
has part: 536LT(1) Remedy—compensation
has part: 536LT(2) Remedy—compensation
has part: 536LT(3) Remedy—compensation
has part: 536LT(4) Remedy—compensation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436

536LT(1) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lt-ss-1
part of: 536LT Remedy—compensation
note: Compensation order must pay compensation to a person in lieu of entering into a new services contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LT(1) Remedy—compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LT(2) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lt-ss-2
part of: 536LT Remedy—compensation
note: FWC must consider various circumstances when determining compensation amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LT(2) Remedy—compensation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consider circumstances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LT(3) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lt-ss-3
part of: 536LT Remedy—compensation
note: Reduce compensation amount by an appropriate amount on account of misconduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
conclusion text: FWC must reduce compensation amount.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between FWC's satisfaction and reduction
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536LT(4) Remedy—compensation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lt-ss-4
part of: 536LT Remedy—compensation
note: No compensation for emotional harm
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.436
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lt-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibits compensation for emotional harm
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LU Application for unfair deactivation or unfair termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lu
note: Application for unfair deactivation or unfair termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.439
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lu-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lu-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lu-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightTo
logic summary: Right to apply for remedy
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LV Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lv
has part: 536LV(1) Application fees
has part: 536LV(2) Application fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440

536LV(1) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lv-ss-1
part of: 536LV Application fees
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
description: Fee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LV(1) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay the fee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LV(2) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lv-ss-2
part of: 536LV Application fees
note: Application fee regulation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LV(2) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires payment of application fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LW Initial matters to be considered before merits
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lw
note: Consideration of specific matters before merits consideration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lw-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lw-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lw-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LW Initial matters to be considered before merits
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustConsider
logic summary: Matters to be considered before merits consideration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LX Matters involving contested facts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lx
note: Must conduct a conference or hold a hearing if facts are in dispute.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.440
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LX Matters involving contested facts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct a conference or hold a hearing.
premise text: The FWC must...
conclusion text: ...if, and to the extent that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for conducting a conference or holding a hearing.
premise text: The FWC must conduct a conference or hold a hearing in relation...
conclusion text: ...if, and to the extent that...,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for conducting a conference or holding a hearing.
premise text: The FWC must conduct a conference or hold a hearing in relation...
conclusion text: ...if, and to the extent that...,
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
logic summary: Conditional obligation to conduct a conference or hold a hearing.
premise text: The FWC must conduct a conference or hold a hearing in relation...
conclusion text: ...if, and to the extent that...,
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lx-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classification of the provision as an obligation.
premise text: The FWC must conduct a conference or hold a hearing in relation...
conclusion text: ...if, and to the extent that...,
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LY Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ly
has part: 536LY(1) Conferences
has part: 536LY(2) Conferences
has part: 536LY(3) Conferences
has part: 536LY(4) Conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441

536LY(1) Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ly-ss-1
part of: 536LY Conferences
note: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part if the FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LY(1) Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: the FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: This section applies...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: This section applies...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a matter arising under this Part if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LY(2) Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ly-ss-2
part of: 536LY Conferences
note: The FWC must conduct a private conference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LY(2) Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LY(3) Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ly-ss-3
part of: 536LY Conferences
note: Consider circumstances of parties to matter when considering application and informing self.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LY(3) Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider circumstances of parties to matter.
premise text: (3) The FWC must take into account any difference in the circumstances of the parties to the matter.
conclusion text: in: considering the application; and informing itself in relation to the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider temporal intervals of circumstances of parties to matter.
premise text: (3) The FWC must take into account any difference in the circumstances of the parties to the matter.
conclusion text: in: considering the application; and informing itself in relation to the application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider temporal intervals of circumstances of parties to matter.
premise text: (3) The FWC must take into account any difference in the circumstances of the parties to the matter.
conclusion text: in: considering the application; and informing itself in relation to the application.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider diffusion of circumstances of parties to matter.
premise text: (3) The FWC must take into account any difference in the circumstances of the parties to the matter.
conclusion text: in: considering the application; and informing itself in relation to the application.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
logic summary: Classify circumstances of parties to matter using CogAI.
premise text: (3) The FWC must take into account any difference in the circumstances of the parties to the matter.
conclusion text: in: considering the application; and informing itself in relation to the application.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LY(4) Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ly-ss-4
part of: 536LY Conferences
note: FWC must consider parties' wishes when processing applications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536LY(4) Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory consideration of parties' wishes.
premise text: (4) The FWC must take into account the wishes of the parties to the matter...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: FWC's actions are contained within consideration of parties' wishes.
premise text: (4) The FWC must take into account the wishes of the parties to the matter...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Parties' wishes imply FWC's actions.
premise text: (4) The FWC must take into account the wishes of the parties to the matter...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: FWC's consideration of parties' wishes spreads to other actions.
premise text: (4) The FWC must take into account the wishes of the parties to the matter...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ly-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: FWC's AI system requires consideration of parties' wishes.
premise text: (4) The FWC must take into account the wishes of the parties to the matter...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LZ Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lz
has part: 536LZ(1) Hearings
has part: 536LZ(2) Hearings
has part: 536LZ(3) Hearings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441

536LZ(1) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lz-ss-1
part of: 536LZ Hearings
note: No hearing unless FWC considers it appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: FWC must hold a hearing
conclusion text: FWC must not hold a hearing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LZ(2) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lz-ss-2
part of: 536LZ Hearings
note: FWC may decide not to hold a hearing in relation to parts of the matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to decide not to hold a hearing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536LZ(3) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536lz-ss-3
part of: 536LZ Hearings
note: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.441
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536lz-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536M Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536m
has part: 536M(1) Dismissing applications
has part: 536M(2) Dismissing applications
has part: 536M(3) Dismissing applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442

536M(1) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536m-ss-1
part of: 536M Dismissing applications
note: Dismissal of applications for orders under Division 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: FWC may not dismiss applications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536M(2) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536m-ss-2
part of: 536M Dismissing applications
note: FWC may exercise its power on application by a regulated business.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: FWC may exercise its power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536M(3) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536m-ss-3
part of: 536M Dismissing applications
note: The FWC may dismiss an application at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536M(3) Dismissing applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC has the power to dismiss an application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536m-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: →
logic summary: If the FWC may dismiss an application, it must do so.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MA Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ma
has part: 536MA(1) Appeal rights
has part: 536MA(2) Appeal rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442

536MA(1) Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ma-ss-1
part of: 536MA Appeal rights
note: FWC cannot grant permission to appeal from a decision unless in the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of granting permission to appeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MA(2) Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ma-ss-2
part of: 536MA Appeal rights
note: Appeal rights limited to questions of fact
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MA(2) Appeal rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ma-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Limits appeal rights
premise text: (2) Despite subsection 604(1), an appeal...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MB Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mb
has part: 536MB(1) Costs orders against parties
has part: 536MB(2) Costs orders against parties
has part: 536MB(3) Costs orders against parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442

536MB(1) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mb-ss-1
part of: 536MB Costs orders against parties
note: Order for costs against a party to a matter arising under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MB(1) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MB(2) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mb-ss-2
part of: 536MB Costs orders against parties
note: The FWC may make an order only if the other party applies for it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MB(2) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: onlyIf
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The FWC may make an order.
conclusion text: Only if the other party applies for it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MB(3) Costs orders against parties
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mb-ss-3
part of: 536MB Costs orders against parties
note: No limitation on FWC's power to order costs under section 611.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.442
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-3-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MB(3) Costs orders against parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536MC Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mc
has part: 536MC(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 536MC(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 536MC(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
has part: 536MC(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443

536MC(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mc-ss-1
part of: 536MC Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
note: Duty to seek permission before engaging a representative
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MC(1) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to seek permission
premise text: (a) an application for an unfair deactivation or unfair termination remedy has been made under section 536LU; and (b) a person who is a party to the matter has engaged a lawyer or paid agent (the representative) to represent the person in the matter;
conclusion text: The person must seek permission before engaging a representative.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MC(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mc-ss-2
part of: 536MC Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
note: FWC may order costs against a representative for causing costs to be incurred by the other party.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MC(2) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MC(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mc-ss-3
part of: 536MC Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
note: FWC must obtain consent from other party before making costs order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MC(3) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must obtain consent
premise text: Section 536MD
conclusion text: Order under section 536MC(3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MC(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mc-ss-4
part of: 536MC Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
note: Limitation on FWC's power to order costs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.443
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MC(4) Costs orders against lawyers and paid agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Limits FWC's power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536MD Applications for costs orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536md
note: Application for costs order must be made within 14 days after FWC determines matter or matter is discontinued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.444
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536md-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536md-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536md-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MD Applications for costs orders
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536md-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within specified timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536ME Schedule of costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536me
has part: 536ME(1) Schedule of costs
has part: 536ME(2) Schedule of costs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.444

536ME(1) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536me-ss-1
part of: 536ME Schedule of costs
note: Prescribing schedule of costs for certain expenditures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.444
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting permission to prescribe schedule of costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536ME(2) Schedule of costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536me-ss-2
part of: 536ME Schedule of costs
note: Must not award costs in relation to an item at a rate or of an amount exceeding the rate or amount appearing in the schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.444
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536me-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits awarding costs exceeding the rate or amount in the schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MF Security for costs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mf
note: Security for costs may be provided
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.444
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mf-norm

536MG Contravening orders under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mg
note: Must not contravene a term of an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.445
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mg-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mg-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mg-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MG Contravening orders under this Part
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mg-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on contravening orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MH Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mh
note: Defines collective agreements and their scope.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mh-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mh-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MH Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536MJ Object of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mj
note: Object of this Part is to provide a simple, flexible and fair framework that enables collective agreements to be made by consent for employee-like workers; regulated road transport contractors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.446
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mj-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mj-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MJ Object of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536MK Making a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mk
has part: 536MK(1) Making a collective agreement
has part: 536MK(2) Making a collective agreement
has part: 536MK(3) Making a collective agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447

536MK(1) Making a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mk-ss-1
part of: 536MK Making a collective agreement
note: Regulated business must make a collective agreement with an organisation representing industrial interests of workers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MK(1) Making a collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated business must make a collective agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MK(2) Making a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mk-ss-2
part of: 536MK Making a collective agreement
note: Collective agreement may be made between a digital labour platform operator and an organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the entities involved in the collective agreement.
premise text: A digital labour platform operator and an organisation are parties to a collective agreement.
conclusion text: The entities are classified as such.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536MK(3) Making a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mk-ss-3
part of: 536MK Making a collective agreement
note: A collective agreement may be made between a road transport business and an organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of one or more regulated road transport contractors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.447
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MK(3) Making a collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536ML Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ml
has part: 536ML(1) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
has part: 536ML(2) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448

536ML(1) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ml-ss-1
part of: 536ML Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
note: Entities must give a notice under this section for a proposed collective agreement.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536ML(1) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entities must give a notice under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536ML(2) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ml-ss-2
part of: 536ML Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
note: A consultation notice for a proposed collective agreement must specify certain matters.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.448
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536ML(2) Notice of consultation period for a proposed collective
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ml-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of regulated workers and businesses
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MM Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mm
has part: 536MM(1) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
has part: 536MM(2) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
has part: 536MM(3) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449

536MM(1) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mm-ss-1
part of: 536MM Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
note: Consultation notice must be given to FWC and/or relevant organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Consultation notice must be given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MM(2) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mm-ss-2
part of: 536MM Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
note: Notify FWC and negotiating entities of consultation notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MM(2) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: The notifying entity must notify FWC and negotiating entities.
conclusion text: The consultation notice is given to the entity to which it is directed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MM(3) Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mm-ss-3
part of: 536MM Consultation notice to be given to FWC, etc.
note: Publish consultation notice on FWC's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mm-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
conclusion text: FWC must publish consultation notice on FWC's website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MN Notice to be given to regulated workers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mn
note: Must provide notice under Chapter 3A minimum standards for regulated workers
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.449
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mn-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mn-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mn-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MN Notice to be given to regulated workers
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MP Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mp
has part: 536MP(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
has part: 536MP(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
has part: 536MP(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451

536MP(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mp-ss-1
part of: 536MP Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
note: Neither party can apply to the FWC for dispute resolution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MP(1) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on applying to the FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MP(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mp-ss-2
part of: 536MP Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
note: FWC must deal with a dispute (other than by arbitration)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MP(2) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must deal with the dispute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MP(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mp-ss-3
part of: 536MP Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
note: FWC may dismiss an application if no reasonable prospects of collective agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MP(3) Application for the FWC to deal with a dispute
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: FWC can dismiss an application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MQ Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mq
has part: 536MQ(1) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
has part: 536MQ(2) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
has part: 536MQ(3) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451

536MQ(1) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mq-ss-1
part of: 536MQ Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
note: Request to sign an agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-1-norm

536MQ(2) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mq-ss-2
part of: 536MQ Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
note: Request must not be made earlier than 30 days after notice was given to employee-like worker or regulated road transport contractor.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on making request earlier than specified period.
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) must not be made...
conclusion text: ...must not be made earlier than 30 days after the last day...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Request timing overlaps with notice period.
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) must not...
conclusion text: ...must not be made earlier than 30 days after the last day...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Request timing overlaps with notice period.
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) must not...
conclusion text: ...must not be made earlier than 30 days after the last day...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustBeMadeAfter
logic summary: Request timing is dependent on notice period.
premise text: (2) A request under subsection (1) must not...
conclusion text: ...must be made after the last day on which a notice was given...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536MQ(3) Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mq-ss-3
part of: 536MQ Negotiating entity may request that other negotiating entity
note: Both negotiating parties must sign the agreement for a collective agreement to be made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.451
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Both parties must sign the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for collective agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536MR Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mr
has part: 536MR(1) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
has part: 536MR(2) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
has part: 536MR(3) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
has part: 536MR(4) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452

536MR(1) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mr-ss-1
part of: 536MR Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
note: Application for registration of collective agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MR(1) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536MR(2) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mr-ss-2
part of: 536MR Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
note: Application must be accompanied by a signed copy of the collective agreement identifying regulated business, organisation, and class of workers.
description: signed copy of the collective agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MR(2) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be provided
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
logic summary: Collective agreement identifies regulated business, organisation, and class of workers
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MR(3) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mr-ss-3
part of: 536MR Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
note: Application must be accompanied by a declaration signed by the regulated business and the organisation covered by the collective agreement.
description: declaration, explanation, notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MR(3) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Declaration must be signed by the regulated business and the organisation covered by the collective agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The declaration must state that the regulated business and the organisation explained the terms of the agreement and their effect to the regulated workers covered by the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MR(4) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mr-ss-4
part of: 536MR Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
note: Application must be accompanied by required declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.452
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MR(4) Application to the FWC to register a collective agreement
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mr-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide required declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MS FWC must register collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ms
has part: 536MS(1) FWC must register collective agreement
has part: 536MS(2) FWC must register collective agreement
has part: 536MS(3) FWC must register collective agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453

536MS(1) FWC must register collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ms-ss-1
part of: 536MS FWC must register collective agreement
note: FWC must register collective agreement if requirements are met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MS(1) FWC must register collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MS(2) FWC must register collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ms-ss-2
part of: 536MS FWC must register collective agreement
note: The FWC must register a collective agreement that includes a procedure for settling disputes.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MS(2) FWC must register collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The FWC must register a collective agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: The collective agreement includes a procedure for settling disputes.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MS(3) FWC must register collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ms-ss-3
part of: 536MS FWC must register collective agreement
note: FWC must register collective agreement with specified terms.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.453
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MS(3) FWC must register collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to register collective agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ms-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Collective agreement must include specified terms
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MT Application for variation of a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mt
has part: 536MT(1) Application for variation of a collective agreement
has part: 536MT(2) Application for variation of a collective agreement
has part: 536MT(3) Application for variation of a collective agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455

536MT(1) Application for variation of a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mt-ss-1
part of: 536MT Application for variation of a collective agreement
note: Application for variation of a collective agreement is allowed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MT(1) Application for variation of a collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Application for variation of a collective agreement is allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MT(2) Application for variation of a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mt-ss-2
part of: 536MT Application for variation of a collective agreement
note: Must provide signed copy of collective agreement with specified information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MT(2) Application for variation of a collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
logic summary: Identify regulated business, organisation, and class of workers
premise text: (a) the regulated business covered by the collective agreement;
conclusion text: (b) the organisation covered by the collective agreement;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IDENTITY
logic summary: Identify class of regulated workers
premise text: (c) the class of regulated workers covered by the collective agreement as proposed to be varied.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MT(3) Application for variation of a collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mt-ss-3
part of: 536MT Application for variation of a collective agreement
note: Application must be accompanied by a declaration signed by the regulated business and organisation.
description: Declaration with explanation of terms and effect on workers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.455
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mt-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Declaration must be signed by regulated business and organisation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MU FWC must vary collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mu
has part: 536MU(1) FWC must vary collective agreement
has part: 536MU(1A) FWC must vary collective agreement
has part: 536MU(2) FWC must vary collective agreement
has part: 536MU(3) FWC must vary collective agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456

536MU(1) FWC must vary collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mu-ss-1
part of: 536MU FWC must vary collective agreement
note: FWC must register a varied collective agreement if requirements are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MU(1) FWC must vary collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to register a varied collective agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MU(1A) FWC must vary collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mu-ss-1a
part of: 536MU FWC must vary collective agreement
note: FWC must consider public interest when varying collective agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1a-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MU(1A) FWC must vary collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider public interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MU(2) FWC must vary collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mu-ss-2
part of: 536MU FWC must vary collective agreement
note: FWC must publish a copy of the collective agreement as varied and the declaration referred to in subsection 536MT(3) on the FWC’s website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MU(2) FWC must vary collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MU(3) FWC must vary collective agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mu-ss-3
part of: 536MU FWC must vary collective agreement
note: The FWC must vary collective agreements upon registration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.456
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MU(3) FWC must vary collective agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mu-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to vary collective agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MV FWC must be notified of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mv
has part: 536MV(1) FWC must be notified of termination
has part: 536MV(2) FWC must be notified of termination
has part: 536MV(3) FWC must be notified of termination
has part: 536MV(4) FWC must be notified of termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457

536MV(1) FWC must be notified of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mv-ss-1
part of: 536MV FWC must be notified of termination
note: Notify FWC of termination before agreement end.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MV(1) FWC must be notified of termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MV(2) FWC must be notified of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mv-ss-2
part of: 536MV FWC must be notified of termination
note: Notify FWC of termination with consent
description: Declaration that must accompany application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify FWC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MV(3) FWC must be notified of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mv-ss-3
part of: 536MV FWC must be notified of termination
note: Regulated business must notify organisation of termination and specify date of effect.
description: Notice with declaration signed by regulated business and organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulated business must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MV(4) FWC must be notified of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mv-ss-4
part of: 536MV FWC must be notified of termination
note: FWC must be notified of termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-4-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MV(4) FWC must be notified of termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mv-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MW FWC must register termination notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mw
has part: 536MW(1) FWC must register termination notice
has part: 536MW(2) FWC must register termination notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457

536MW(1) FWC must register termination notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mw-ss-1
part of: 536MW FWC must register termination notice
note: FWC must register termination notice on its website.
description: Notice of collective agreement termination and date of effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MW(1) FWC must register termination notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to register notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MW(2) FWC must register termination notice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mw-ss-2
part of: 536MW FWC must register termination notice
note: The collective agreement ceases to operate on the specified date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.457
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MW(2) FWC must register termination notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Implies cessation of operation
premise text: (2) The collective agreement ceases to operate...
conclusion text: The collective agreement ceases to operate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: on
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the termination notice and the cessation of operation
premise text: (2) The collective agreement ceases to operate...
conclusion text: The termination notice occurs on the specified date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: on
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the termination notice and the cessation of operation
premise text: (2) The collective agreement ceases to operate...
conclusion text: The termination notice occurs on the specified date.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: on
logic summary: Describes the propagation of the cessation of operation
premise text: (2) The collective agreement ceases to operate...
conclusion text: The cessation of operation is propagated on the specified date.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mw-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: on
logic summary: Describes the cognitive relationship between the termination notice and the cessation of operation
premise text: (2) The collective agreement ceases to operate...
conclusion text: The termination notice is related to the cessation of operation on the specified date.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536MX Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mx
has part: 536MX(1) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
has part: 536MX(2) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
has part: 536MX(3) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458

536MX(1) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mx-ss-1
part of: 536MX Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
note: A term of a collective agreement has no effect to the extent that it is not about a matter mentioned in subsection 536MK(2) or (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MX(1) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536MX(2) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mx-ss-2
part of: 536MX Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
note: Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect to the extent they do not affect the terms and conditions of engagement of regulated workers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-2-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MX(2) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536MX(3) Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mx-ss-3
part of: 536MX Terms of a collective agreement that are of no effect
note: Inclusion of a term with no effect does not prevent the agreement from being valid.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.458
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Inclusion of a term with no effect does not prevent the agreement from being valid.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mx-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of a collective agreement
premise text: A collective agreement is defined as an agreement that includes certain terms.
conclusion text: The inclusion of a term with no effect does not affect the validity of the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536MY Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536my
note: Framework for dealing with unfair contract terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.459
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536my-norm

536MZ Meaning of employee and employer
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536mz
note: Defines employee and employer terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.459
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mz-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mz-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mz-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536MZ Meaning of employee and employer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536mz-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Establishes ordinary meanings for employee and employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536N Object of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536n
has part: 536N(1) Object of Part
has part: 536N(2) Object of Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.460

536N(1) Object of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536n-ss-1
part of: 536N Object of Part
note: Establishes a framework for dealing with unfair contract terms of services contracts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.460
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536N(1) Object of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishes a framework for dealing with unfair contract terms.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536N(2) Object of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536n-ss-2
part of: 536N Object of Part
note: Ensure a fair go all round for principals and independent contractors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.460
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536N(2) Object of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Ensure a fair go all round
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NA When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536na
has part: 536NA(1) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
has part: 536NA(2) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
has part: 536NA(3) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461

536NA(1) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536na-ss-1
part of: 536NA When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
note: FWC may make an order under this Part in relation to a services contract if the FWC is satisfied that the services contract includes one or more unfair contract terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NA(1) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536NA(2) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536na-ss-2
part of: 536NA When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
note: The FWC may make an order only if a person has made an application under section 536ND.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NA(2) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: The FWC can make an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NA(3) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536na-ss-3
part of: 536NA When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
note: FWC must consider fairness when making an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NA(3) When the FWC may make an order in relation to an unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider fairness
premise text: FWC must take into account fairness
conclusion text: when making an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536na-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Definition of fairness
premise text: fairness between the parties concerned
conclusion text: in deciding whether to make an order
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NB Matters to be considered in deciding whether a term of a
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nb
note: Guidelines for determining unfair contract terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.461
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nb-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nb-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NB Matters to be considered in deciding whether a term of a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536NC Remedy—order to set aside etc. contract
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nc
note: The FWC may make an order under this section setting aside or amending a services contract related to workplace relations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.462
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nc-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nc-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nc-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NC Remedy—order to set aside etc. contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May make an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536ND Application for unfair contract term remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nd
has part: 536ND(1) Application for unfair contract term remedy
has part: 536ND(2) Application for unfair contract term remedy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463

536ND(1) Application for unfair contract term remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nd-ss-1
part of: 536ND Application for unfair contract term remedy
note: Application for unfair contract term remedy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-1-norm

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536ND(1) Application for unfair contract term remedy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

536ND(2) Application for unfair contract term remedy
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nd-ss-2
part of: 536ND Application for unfair contract term remedy
note: Application for unfair contract term remedy is prohibited unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536ND(2) Application for unfair contract term remedy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of application for unfair contract term remedy
premise text: (2) An application must not be made in relation to a services contract
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NE Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ne
has part: 536NE(1) Application fees
has part: 536NE(2) Application fees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463

536NE(1) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ne-ss-1
part of: 536NE Application fees
note: Application must be accompanied by a prescribed fee.
description: Fee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NE(1) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay the fee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NE(2) Application fees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ne-ss-2
part of: 536NE Application fees
note: Application fee regulation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NE(2) Application fees
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ne-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires payment of application fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NF Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nf
has part: 536NF(1) Conferences
has part: 536NF(2) Conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463

536NF(1) Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nf-ss-1
part of: 536NF Conferences
note: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part if the FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NF(1) Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Artificial agent's obligation
premise text: The FWC conducts a conference in relation to the matter.
conclusion text: This section applies in relation to a matter arising under this Part.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536NF(2) Conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nf-ss-2
part of: 536NF Conferences
note: The FWC must conduct a private conference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.463
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NF(2) Conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nf-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NG Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ng
has part: 536NG(1) Hearings
has part: 536NG(2) Hearings
has part: 536NG(3) Hearings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464

536NG(1) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ng-ss-1
part of: 536NG Hearings
note: No hearing unless FWC considers it appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: FWC must hold a hearing
conclusion text: FWC must not hold a hearing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between hearing and matter
premise text: Hearing occurs during consideration by FWC
conclusion text: The matter arises during the period when the FWC considers it appropriate to hold a hearing
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Inference from condition to conclusion
premise text: If FWC considers it appropriate, then there is no need for a hearing
conclusion text: There is no need for a hearing if the FWC considers it appropriate
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
logic summary: Combination of conditions
premise text: The views of parties and consideration by FWC are necessary conditions
conclusion text: Both the views of parties and consideration by FWC are necessary for a hearing to be held
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: and
logic summary: Combination of conditions
premise text: The views of parties and consideration by FWC are necessary conditions
conclusion text: Both the views of parties and consideration by FWC are necessary for a hearing to be held
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NG(2) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ng-ss-2
part of: 536NG Hearings
note: FWC may decide not to hold a hearing in relation to parts of the matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to decide not to hold a hearing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NG(3) Hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536ng-ss-3
part of: 536NG Hearings
note: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536ng-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may decide to hold a hearing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

536NH Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nh
has part: 536NH(1) Dismissing applications
has part: 536NH(2) Dismissing applications
has part: 536NH(3) Dismissing applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464

536NH(1) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nh-ss-1
part of: 536NH Dismissing applications
note: Dismissal of applications for orders under Division 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: FWC may dismiss applications
premise text: Section 536NH(1)
conclusion text: Application dismissed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: FWC may dismiss applications based on failure to attend conferences or hearings
premise text: Section 536NH(1)(a)
conclusion text: Application dismissed due to failure to attend conference
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: FWC may dismiss applications for orders under Division 3
premise text: Section 536NH(2)
conclusion text: Application dismissed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NH(2) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nh-ss-2
part of: 536NH Dismissing applications
note: The FWC may exercise its power under subsection (1) on application by a party to the matter or an organisation entitled to represent the industrial interests of a party to the matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NH(2) Dismissing applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The FWC may exercise its power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NH(3) Dismissing applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nh-ss-3
part of: 536NH Dismissing applications
note: No limitation on FWC's power to dismiss applications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.464
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-3-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NH(3) Dismissing applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: None
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NJ Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nj
has part: 536NJ(1) Appeal rights
has part: 536NJ(2) Appeal rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465

536NJ(1) Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nj-ss-1
part of: 536NJ Appeal rights
note: FWC cannot grant permission to appeal from a decision unless in the public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-1-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of granting permission to appeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NJ(2) Appeal rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nj-ss-2
part of: 536NJ Appeal rights
note: Appeal rights limited to questions of fact
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-2-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NJ(2) Appeal rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Limits appeal rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536NK Contravening orders under this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-536nk
note: Prohibition on contravening orders under this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: fair-work-act-2009.pdf, p.465
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nk-norm
asserts: fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nk-logic-deontic-1

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nk-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 536NK Contravening orders under this Part
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

fair-work-act-2009-sec-536nk-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Mandatory prohibition
premise text: This section is a civil remedy provision (see Part 4-1)
conclusion text: A person must not contravene an order under this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed